Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-6520d Robert S. Mirin, Esquire Attorney ID 25301 Law Offices of Robert S. Mirin 2515 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Phone(717)909-9900 Fax(717)561-1616 Susquehanna@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff JOHN A. SCHEIDLER PLAINTIFF V. : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INCORPORATED AND CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS COMPLAINT NOTICE YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be entered against you by the Court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW. THIS OFFICE CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT HIRING A LAWYER. IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE A LAWYER, THIS OFFICE MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT AGENCIES THAT MAY OFFER LEGAL SERVICES TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS AT A REDUCED FEE OR NO FEE. CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 32 SOUTH BEDFORD STREET CARLISLE, PA 17013 (717) 249-3166 AVISO USTED HA SIDO DEMANDADO/A EN CORTE. Si usted desea defenderse de las demandas que se presentan mas adelante en las siguientes paginas, debe tomar acci6n dentro de los pr6ximos veinte (20) dias despues de la notificaci6n de esta Demanda y Aviso radicando personalmente o por medio de un abogado una comparecencia escrita y radicando en la Corte por escrito sus defensas de, y objecciones a, las demandas presentadas aqui en contra suya. Se le advierte de que si usted falla de tomar acci6n como se describe anteriormente, el caso puede proceder sin usted y un fallo por cualquier suma de dinero reclamada en la demanda o cualquier otra reclamaci6n o remedio solicitado por el demandante puede ser dictado en contra suya por la Corte sin mas aviso adicional. Usted puede perder dinero o propiedad u otros derechos importantes para usted. USTED DEBE LLEVAR ESTE DOCUMENTO A SU ABOGADO INMEDIATAMENTE. SI USTED NO TIENE UN ABOGADO, LLAME O VAYA A LA SIGUIENTE OFICINA. ESTA OFICINA PUEDE PROVEERLE INFORMACION A CERCA DE COMO CONSEGUIR UN ABOGADO. SI USTED NO PUEDE PAGAR POR LOS SERVICIOS DE UN ABOGADO, ES POSIBLE QUE ESTA OFICINA LE PUEDA PROVEER INFORMACION SOBRE AGENCIAS QUE OFREZCAN SERVICIOS LEGALES SIN CARGO O BAJO COSTO A PERSONAS QUE CUALIFICAN. CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 32 SOUTH BEDFORD STREET CARLISLE, PA 17013 (717) 249-3166 2 COMPLAINT AND NOW COMES, Plaintiff, John A. Scheidler, by and through counsel Robert S. Mirin, Esquire and the Law Offices of Robert S. Mirin, and herewith files the following Complaint and in support thereof, avers as follows: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff, John A. Scheidler, at all times material to this Complaint, resided at 118 Abolition Street, Apartment 2, Enola, Pennsylvania 17025. 2. Defendant is West Shore Auto Service Incorporated, a Pennsylvania corporation, with an address of 104 North Front Street, Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania 17043, where it is engaged in the business of repairing automobiles and its principal/owner is n/b/n Connie M. (Dodson) Williams. BACKGROUND 3. During the early spring of 2007, West Shore Auto Service Incorporation and its principal, n/b/n Connie M. (Dodson) Williams, engaged the services of Plaintiff Scheidler to work as an automotive and repair technician at West Shore Auto Service Incorporated in Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania. 4. Plaintiff Scheidler's job duties involved the repair of automobiles for said entity. 5. `Plaintiff Scheidler's principle duties involved effectuating repairs of vehicles brought to the facility for that purpose. 6. a.) On or about April 4, 2007, a local television station and the Patriot- News reported charges that were ultimately dismissed. 3 b.) The television station and Patriot-News report alleged that Plaintiff was charged with simple assault and harassment in a case involving Plaintiff Scheidler and his son. 7. Shortly thereafter, the reported charges in question were dismissed and a Cumberland County Children and Youth's investigation concluded that the allegations made by the police department, based upon a report received, were unfounded. 8. The initial report and charges were referenced on a local television station and carried on the front page of the Patriot-News (Exhibit A). 9. a.) On the day following the television and newspaper reportage, the employer (Ms" Dodson-Williams) questioned Plaintiff Scheidler concerning the allegations, which Scheidler explained did not involve punching or hitting of the child, but involved normal issues of parental discipline. b.) She directed that Mr. Scheidler stay out of the front shop area and perform his work in the rear of the shop. 10. Shortly thereafter, the employer pretextually evaluated Plaintiff's work performance and, because of the reported incident in the newspaper, terminated his employment. 11. At the time Plaintiff was initially employed by Defendant West Short Auto Services Incorporated, he had been solicited by Defendant away from employment as an established automotive technician at another local automobile dealership. 12. The employer's decision to terminate Plaintiff Scheidler was based upon the transient publicity surrounding the unfounded charges of simple assault and harassment. 4 13. The issues presented by that brief incident between Defendant and Plaintiff Scheidler had no relationship to the job duties or nature of John Scheidler's employment. 14. Notwithstanding that fact, and in contravention of the public Pennsylvania policy as expressed in the Criminal Record Information History Act, Title 18, Pa. C.S.A. §9121, 9125, 9143 and 9181 et seq., governing and forbidding the use of criminal record information history unrelated to Plaintiffs job duties, the employer terminated Plaintiff Scheidler's employment. 15. Said termination was unjust, contrary to Pennsylvania policy and violated Pennsylvania's public policy. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff seeks damages for loss of income and employment, as well as damages under the Criminal Record Information History Act, lost pay, attorney's fees, and exemplary damages to the extent that said damages are deemed appropriate under Pennsylvania Law. Dated: g Robert S. Mirin, Esquire PA ID#25305 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT S. MIRIN 2515 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 717-909-9900 Fax 717-561-1616 susquehanna(a?comcast net VERIFICATION I, Plaintiff John A. Scheidler, hereby verify that the statements contained in this Complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904, relating to unworn falsification to authorities. :3 ab Date ohn A. Scheidler 6 A l x., t . •, :.. ,• , .P 113- N, N S Y L was i not abused ;fa#her says denies punching;. >•soii, IL for crying wrestling practi cc- JEW L BLELWN %PwAct-News pn;ca?se o Jahn A. Scheidlel what sum pia considere d A n, d hit was just disciplining his don - Zhb ?isahBnt diwioua.• said ScheLdl- not er, 38, of the 100 block of Abolition 1 Street in Bast peaaabpso., who is free on $lSW.. bail acv ad 1: "Ihe police woyldn't lis#eim tome:-• It'd a..case that brings W6 sharp togas w}>$t the law conaaders • rea- acne t"r. 14 ctat ggd:'that aft?q he cried on the matdiicfaga'wre?stling practice on $uadap? his father struck him in the In hint in the chest and made W the street. 'Yes; I sjapped ]iim lint dfda't .punch him tfie chest,^ Scheidler said _ "lllls is yesteiday. -I 4fn i6u8.- was wrong for slapping him, The P*e . but it wasn't wouWn't child abuse.- '. Scheidler, even-Osten who •.=dax his =• me:" . bail cortsiitions can have no contact with his Johefl sou a+itliont permis- sion from Cumberland Coun Children and Youth •Smvkx.s, .. the boy was Vmnving a hissy fit" ouut t?} Y• r ? my? i f•.•. ?'...i?. •:rf.•'•k• ;S''W:<<7.,•t'vt C i}t,'1' ..N uP aggainst' s tough kid,- Said.. marks on bill • 1 *We left, and I told him, ' thought he should I Frsed said 'wj6n pal ding for the rest ` eats i0id cM.. ra disagree on „ the sea- what ?- $O Schddler aal . 1 also cars Ara tp btoedftter >i in nn sc thahtool, he,diSgl't,do evidence tbd* ' one he • otlier I t Play football in,xhe orthe: Hg said that he ', toy y41on't' h°? a' iot . of 1 pjW lj- th»y aa'» E;a d said. the car on the way. fio i Mart and suggested that his there is a Bad fine bo- son gbt out of the car and runes aadsbuse ^ .to work ofi•h1a fiv on, JERRYi. ' 25Er8424 I Police, who responded at or E7xIj ?BtT ft WEDlES AprN ?l 2007 50 eenft -..T' v v C ?, f, SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2008-06520 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND SCHEIDLER JOHN A VS WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE ET AL NOAH CLINE , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INCORPORATED the DEFENDANT , at 0014:05 HOURS, on the 5th day of November-, 2008 at 104 N FRONT STREET WORMLEYSBURG, PA 17043 by handing to CONNIE M. WILLIAMS BUSINESS OWNER a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge Postage h JI-7/br 9, So Answers: 18.00 16.00 OPP' .00 ?e -__ 10.00 _ R. Thomas Kline 42 44.42 11/06/2008 ROBERT MIRIN Sworn and Subscibed to before me this of By : day Deputy Sheriff A. D. s _"3 CASE NO: 2008-06520 P SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND SCHEIDLER JOHN A VS E WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE ET AL NOAH CLINE , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE was served upon TATTT.T.TaMC f r)MTTP.. M TX)n.gC)M the DEFENDANT , at 0014:05 HOURS, on the 5th day of November-, 2008 at 104 N FRONT STREET WORMLEYSBURG, PA 17043 by handing to CONNIE M. WILLIAMS DEFENDANT a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge So Answers: 6.00 .00 .00 10.00 R. Thomas Klin .00 16.00 11/06/2008 ROBERT MIRIN Sworn and Subscibed to before me this of By: day Deputy Sheriff A. D. 0 JOHN A. SCHEIDLER, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. No. 08-6520 Civil WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INCORPORATED and CONNIE M (DODSON) WILLIAMS, Defendants DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO COMPLAINT AND NOW, come West Shore Auto Service and Connie M. Williams, Defendants in the above- captioned matter, by their counsel, John M. Kerr, Esquire, pursuant to Rule 1028(a)(4) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure , and files the within Preliminary Objections, the nature of which are as follows: 1. In the Complaint, Plaintiff, a former employee of West Shore Auto Service, Inc., a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, alleges that he was terminated from his position as an automotive and repair technician as a result of certain adverse publicity on a local television station involving criminal charges which had been filed against him (Complaint, 11116-8 & 12). 2 Plaintiff alleges that this termination was in contravention of the public policy expressed at 18 Pa. C.S.§§9121, et. seq. (Complaint, ¶14). I. PRELIMINARY OBJECTION IN THE NATURE OF A DEMURRER (West Shore Auto Service, Inc.) 3 Plaintiff, John A. Scheidler, was an employee of the corporation, West Shore Auto Service, Inc. 4 Plaintiff does not allege that prior to employment, West Shore Auto Service, Inc. conducted a check of Plaintiff's criminal record history. L 5 Plaintiff does not allege that subsequent to becoming employed, West Shore Auto Service, Inc. conducted a check of Plaintiff's criminal record history. 6 Plaintiff does allege that he was terminated after it was revealed in the news media that he had been arrested as a result of an altercation with his son. 7 Plaintiff was an at-will employee and, pursuant to the common law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, could be terminated for any reason not contravening statute or public policy. 8 Terminating an employee because of attendant publicity to his arrest for crimes involving striking his son is not contrary to any policy exception adopted by the courts of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. WHEREFORE, it is requested that the Court grant Defendants' Demurrer and dismiss the Complaint for failing to state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted. II. PREMININARY OBJECTION IN THE NATURE OF A DEMURRER (Connie Williams) 9 Plaintiff has named Connie M. (Dodson) Williams as a party defendant in the captioned matter. 10 Plaintiff John A. Scheidler was an employee of West Shore Auto Service, Inc. (see ¶3 of Complaint). 11 It is not alleged that Plaintiff was an employee of Defendant Connie Williams. 12 It is alleged that "the employer pretextually evaluated Plaintiff's work performance and, because of the reported incident in the newspaper, terminated his employment" (Complaint, 1110) (emphasis added). The employer was not Connie Williams; instead, by the averments in Plaintiff's Complaint, the employer was West Shore Auto Service, Inc. (Complaint, ¶3). 13 As a result, Defendant Connie Williams is not liable on the facts as alleged, and Plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action on which relief may be granted as to her. WHEREFORE, it is requested that that the Court grant Defendants' Demurrer and dismiss the Complaint for failing to state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted. Respectfully submitted, -?4 M. I John M. Kerr, Esquire I.D. #26414 Law Office of John M. Kerr 5020 Ritter Road Suite 109 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 (717) 766-4008 Dated: November 25, 2008 t JOHN A. SCHEIDLER, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. No. 08-6520 Civil WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INCORPORATED and CONNIE M (DODSON) WILLIAMS, Defendants CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby states that he has served a copy of the foregoing, "Defendants' Preliminary Objections To Complaint," on the below-named individual in the manner indicated: First Class Mail. Postage Prepaid Robert S. Mirin, Esquire Law Offices of Robert S. Mirin 2515 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 J hn M. Kerr, Esquire I.D. #26414 Law Office of John M. Kerr 5020 Ritter Road Suite 109 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 (717) 766-4008 Dated: November 25, 2008 {' "". 4 I': J _.? l ? Y i,, .` tlf t ....:.- ? i .: ? `S S PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT (Must be typewritten and submitted in duplicate) TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY: (List the within matter for the next Argument Court.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CAPTION OF CASE (entire caption must be stated in full) John A. Scheidler, Plaintiff vs. West Shore Auto Service Incorporated and Connie M. (dodson) Williams, Defendants No. 08-6520 , Civil Term 1. State matter to be argued (i.e., plaintiff's motion for new trial, defendant's demurrer to complaint, etc.): nt-f-ndants' Preliminary Objections To Complaint 2. Identify all counsel who will argue cases: (a) for plaintiffs: Robert S. Mirin, Esquire 2515 N. Front St, Harrisburg, PA 17110 (Name and Address) (b) for defendants: John M. Kerr, Esquire 5020 Ritter Rd, Suite 109 (Name and Address) Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 3. 1 will notify all parties in writing within two days that this case has been listed for argument. X 4. Argument Court Date: February 4,2009 Sign re -oH/V /I. Kirk Print your name Defendants Attorney for Date: November 25, 2008 INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Two copies of all briefs must be filed with the COURT ADMINISTRATOR (not the Prothonotary) before argument. 2. The moving party shall file and serve their brief 12 days prior to argument. 3. The responding party shall file their brief 5 days prior to argument. 4. If argument is continued new briefs must be filed with the COURT ADMINISTRATOR (not the Prothonotary) after the case Is relisted. 1, "L JOHN A. SCHEIDLER IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PLAINTIFF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. No.: 08-6520 CIVIL WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INCORPORATED AND CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' PRELIMIARY OBJECTIONS TO COMPLAINT AND NOW COMES Plaintiff John A. Scheidler, by and through counsel Robert S. Mirin, Esquire and the Law Offices of Robert S. Mirin, and files the following Response to Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Complaint, and in support thereof, avers as follows: 1. Admitted. 2. Admitted. 3. Admitted. 4. Admitted. 5. Denied. Plaintiff alleges that employer (West Shore Auto, Inc.) advised Plaintiff that it was aware of the criminal charges against him. 6. Admitted. 7. Admitted. 8. Denied. The termination of Plaintiff is contrary to the Criminal Record Information History Act, Title 18, Pa. C.S.A. §9121, 9125, 9143 and 9181 et seq. 9. Admitted. Connie M. (Dodson) Williams'stated that she was the owner of v West Shore Auto, Inc., the managing agent and the policymaker. f ,O. 10. Admitted. 11. Denied. Connie Williams was owner of and managing agent for West Shore Auto, Inc. 12. Denied. See answer to #11 above. 13. Denied. Plaintiff's information and belief is that Connie Williams is the principal/owner of West Shore Auto, Inc., a closely held Pennsylvania corporation and Plaintiff s supervisor. WHEREFORE, it is requested that the Court deny Defendants' Demurrer and their Preliminary Objections should be dismissed. Respectfully submitted, /ate Robert S. Mirin, Esquire Attorney ID#25305 Law Offices of Robert S. Mirin 2515 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Phone (717) 909-9900 Fax (717) 561-1616 suquehanna@comcast.net J ??: ? t2? .?°? ?.r .?-- ? _?.ii!! Cry '' .C"J ' r' _` :t'?' ?"ti C."? ?- C k . JOHN A. SCHEIDLER V. WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INC., and CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 2008 - 6520 CIVIL TERM IN RE: DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS BEFORE HESS, OLER, GUIDO, JJ. ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 26TH day of MARCH, 2009, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion the Preliminary Objections of West Shore Auto Service, Inc., are DENIED. The Preliminary Objections of Defendant Connie (Dodson) Williams are GRANTED. By the , Edward E. Guido, J. Robert S. Mirin, Esquire 11- John M. Kerr, Esquire :sld Cor ?--s rya t LL -' 1 0- N tz? act , JOHN A. SCHEIDLER V. WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INC., and CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : NO. 2008 - 6520 CIVIL TERM IN RE: DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS BEFORE HESS OLER, GUIDO, JJ. OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT Currently before us are Defendants' Preliminary Objections in the nature of a demurrer. The standard to be applied in deciding such objections is well settled: (A)II material facts set forth in the complaint as well as inferences reasonably deducible there from are admitted as true !for the purposes of review. The question presented by the demurrer is whether on the facts averred, the law says with certainty that no recovery is possible. DeMary v. Latrobe, Printing & Publishing Co., 762 A.2d 758 at 761 (Pa.Super. 2000). Applying that standard to the case at bar we are constrained to deny the demurrer as to defendant West shore Auto Service, Incorporated. However, the demurrer of Connie M. (Dodson) Williams will be granted. The well pleaded facts and reasonable inferences may be summarized as follows. The plaintiff was working as an auto repair technician for defendant West Shore Service, Incorporated. Local news media reported that plaintiff was charged with simple assault and harassment as a result of an incident with his son. The accusations involved normal parental discipline and were unrelated to plaintiff's suitability for his job. The charges NO. 2008 - 6520 CIVIL TERM were dismissed. Nevertheless the defendant West Shore discharged the plaintiff "based upon the transient publicity surrounding the unfounded charges..."' It has long been the law in this Commonwealth that, absent contractual restraints, an employer may terminate an employee for any reason. See Henry v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Co., 139 Pa. 289 21 A. 157 (1891). For almost a century there were no exceptions to the general rule. In 1974 our Supreme Court first recognized the possibility of a wrongful discharge claim where the employee's termination violated it "clear mandate of public policy." Geary v. United States Steel Corporation, 456Pa.171, 319 A.2d 174 at 180 (1974). In McLaughlin v. Gastro Specialists, Inc. 561 Pa. 307, 750 A.2d 283 (2000) the Pennsylvania Supreme Court conducted a comprehensive review of the law regarding wrongful discharge. As it stated: (A)s a general proposition, the presumption of all non-contractual employment relations is that it is at-will and that this presumption is an extremely strong one. An employee will be entitled to bring a cause of action for a termination of that relationship only in the most limited of circumstances where the termination implicates a clear mandate of public policy in this Commonwealth. 750 A.2d at 287. The McLaughlin Court went on to hold that "public policy" is determined "by examining the precedent within Pennsylvania, looking to our own constitution, court decisions and statutes promulgated by our legislature." 750 A.2d at 288. The public policy exceptions recognized thus far in this commonwealth fall into three categories. "(A)n employer (1) cannot require an employee to commit a crime, (2) cannot prevent an employee from complying with a statutorily imposed duty, and (3) 1 Complaint, paragraph 12. 2 NO. 2008 - 6520 CIVIL TERM cannot discharge an employee when specifically prohibited from doing so by statute." Spierling v. First American Home Health Services, Inc. 737 A.2d 1250, 1252 (Pa.Super. 1999). Plaintiff contends that his discharge is actionable because it violates the public policy of this Commonwealth as articulated in Criminal Record Information History Act, (18 Pa. C.S.A. § 9101 et seq). We agree. The Superior Court faced very much the same issue in Cisco v. United Parcel Services, Inc. 328 Pa. Super.300, 476 A.2d 1340 (1984). The plaintiff in Cisco was discharged after he was arrested for theft and trespass. He was eventually acquitted of the charges by a jury. He then brought an action for wrongful discharge arguing that it was against public policy to allow someone to "be arbitrarily discharged from his source of livelihood merely because of an accusation." Cisco, 476 A.2d at 1343. The Superior Court went on to state: Section (b) of the Criminal History Record Information Act, 18 Pa. C.S.A. § 9125, lends support to his contention. (b) Use of information. - Felony and misdemeanor convictions may be considered by the employer only to the extent to which they relate to the applicant's suitability for employment in the position for which he has applied. The 1982 amendment to this section substituted "Felony" for "Arrests." While a perusal of legislative history of this change proved unhelpful, it may reasonably be surmised that any experience with the criminal justice system which falls short of a conviction is not a fair consideration by an employer considering hiring an individual with that experience. Indeed, even convictions for felonies and misdemeanors may be considered only insofar as they relate to an applicant's suitability for the job. We may assume that this principle is an expression of public policy. 476 A.2d at 1343. 3 NO. 2008 - 6520 CIVIL TERM While the Cisco court went on to affirm the lower court's granting of the demurrer, it did so for reasons that do not appear in the instant case. It based its decision on the fact that the charges involved "an arrest arising from appellant's performance of his extant duties." 476 A.2d at 1344. As the Cisco court stated: We have concluded that a plausible and legitimate reason for appellant's discharge existed in that his employer was protecting its reputation by discharging an employee who was accused of theft and trespass in connection with his employment, even though a jury ultimately acquitted him. (emphasis added) 476 A.2d at 1344. In the instant case, while such a plausible and legitimate reason may exist, it is not obvious, as it was in Cisco. Therefore, the demurrer will be denied as to defendant West shore Auto Services, Incorporated. The plaintiff also seeks to impose liability on Defendant Williams as the "principal/owner" of defendant West Shore Auto Service, Incorporated. However, he makes no allegations whatsoever which would justify piercing the corporate veil. Therefore, we will grant the demurrer of defendant Williams. See Lumax Ihdustires, Inc. v. Aultman, 543 Pa. 38, 669 A.2d 893, (1995). 4 NO. 2008 - 6520 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 26TH day of MARCH, 2009, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion the Preliminary Objections of West Shore Auto Service, Inc. are DENIED. The Preliminary Objections of Defendant Connie (Dodson) Williams are GRANTED. By the Court, /s/ Edward E. Guido Edward E. Guido, J. Robert S. Mirin, Esquire John M. Kerr, Esquire :sld 5 C\j T f 1? Y cx? ? CV ?w 0-- C!n U 00 JOHN A. SCHEIDLER, Plaintiff V. WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INCORPORATED and CONNIE M (DODSON) WILLIAMS, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA No. 08-6520 Civil ANSWER AND NEW MATTER TO COMPLAINT FILED ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE. INC. AND NOW, come West Shore Auto Service, Inc., Defendant in the above-captioned matter, by its counsel, John M. Kerr, Esquire, and files the within Answer and New Matter, the nature of which is as follows: PARTIES 1. ADMITTED. 2. ADMITTED in part and DENIED in part. It is admitted that West Shore Auto Service, Inc. (hereinafter, "West Shore Auto") is the remaining Defendant and that it has a business address at 104 North Front Street in Wormleysburg. Inasmuch as Connie Williams has been dismissed as a party defendant, the remainder of the allegation is denied as irrelevant. BACKGROUND 3. ADMITTED in part and DENIED in part. It is admitted that West Shore Auto hired Plaintiff LMOfEmd hn M. err 5020 Mift Road SWIe 108 MedwnkabuM PA 17055 PHom: 717.766.4006 Fnx: 717.788.4066 John A. Scheidler (hereinafter, "Scheidler") on or about March 5, 2007. it is denied that Connie Williams in any way engaged the services of Scheidler. The hiring decision was made by the corporate entity. It is admitted that he was hired as a technician. 4. ADMITTED. Byway of further answer, he was to trouble-shoot and diagnose problems; make necessary repairs; and to comply with rules and regulations of the workplace. 5. Defendant West Shore Auto incorporates by reference its answer to to paragraph 4 above, as if fully set forth in its entirety. 6. a) DENIED. After reasonable investigation, Defendant West Shore Auto is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation found at paragraph 6a) of Plaintiff's Complaint and, accordingly, denies the same. Strict proof is demanded at time of trial. By way of further answer, West Shore Auto is uncertain of the precise date when the referenced publicity occurred. Moreover, the Complaint fails to identify the nature of the charges. b) DENIED as stated. Defendant West Shore Auto is unsure just what Plaintiff means by the phrase that the media outlets "alleged that Plaintiff was charged...." 7. DENIED. After reasonable investigation, Defendant West Shore Auto lacks sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the averments found at paragraph 7 of Plaintiff's Complaint and, accordingly, deny the same. Strict proof is demanded at time of trial. By way of further answer, West Shore Auto was not privy to any report of Children and Youth Services of Cumberland County on Scheidler, nor on any outcome of a Children and Youth investigation, nor is it aware of the outcome of any charges filed by police against Plaintiff Scheidler. 8. DENIED. Defendant West Shore Auto does not know what Plaintiff means by "[t]he Lw- OM of dJ$OOO hn M.en• solo Rlttu Road suite 109 MedlaNcsburg, PA 17055 F iam: 717.788.4008 FAx: 717.788.4088 initial report and charges..."; therefore, it cannot form an answer as to the veracity of the averment at paragraph 8 of Plaintiff's Complaint and, accordingly, denies the same. Instantly, Defendant does not know what report Plaintiff is referencing, i.e., whether it is the media report or the police report or something else. 9. a) DENIED. First, Connie Williams did not question Scheidler concerning what was contained in any media report. West Shore Auto's sole concern was the employee's ability to perform the responsibilities of his position. In fact, Ms. Williams had the following colloquy with Scheidler: Williams: "John, I saw you on TV. The picture didn't do you justice. You are more handsome than that." Scheidler: "OK, I'll leave now." Williams: "There is no reason to feel that you have to leave." Moreover, Scheidler did not make the comments attributed to him at paragraph 9a) of the Complaint. On the Monday preceding the publicity, Scheidler had his mother telephone the employer to tell them that her son would not be coming to work that day based upon personal issues. On Monday evening, Scheidler appeared at the work place himself and informed the employer that he had been in jail. b) DENIED. Ms. Williams never told Scheidler that as a result of the publicity, he should stay out of the front shop area and perform his work in the rear of the shop. Rather, most of the major work at West Shore Auto is performed on the back bays because management does not want any type of messy job visible to the public which sees only the bays in the front area. 10. DENIED. The decision that the Plaintiffs employment was moving in the direction of termination was made before any publicity occurred. Moreover, it was not pretextual at all, but driven because Scheidler could not perform his responsibilities within the time constraints and efficiency needed at an auto service business, as more fully outlined infra. at Defendant's New Matter below. 11. DENIED. Plaintiff Scheidler responded to an advertisement on West Shore's Board in tawOtand hn M.hen 5020 RftW R..d Su1tE 108 MEdW*Mbta$. PA 17055 F icm: 717.788.4008 FAx: 717.766.4088 the front of its location, indicating, "Help Wanted." Without any prompting from West Shore Auto, Scheidler dropped his resume off at the business. He was recommended by the MAC Tool Distributor servicing the Company, who knew him when he had worked at L.B. Smith Ford. Scheidler had worked for a Toyota Dealership, where he was very unhappy. Plaintiff Scheidler sought out West Shore Auto - not the other way around. 12. DENIED. Defendant West Shore Auto incorporates by reference its answer to paragraph 10 of the Complaint, as if fully set forth in its entirety. 13. DENIED. There was no incident between West Shore Auto and Plaintiff Scheidler, as more fully set forth in the answer to paragraph 9a) above, which is incorporated by reference, as if fully set forth in its entirety. 14. DENIED. The allegation contained at paragraph 14 of Plaintiffs Complaint represents a conclusion of law, to which no response is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. WHEREFORE, it is requested that judgment be entered on behalf of Defendant, West Shore Auto Service, Inc., and against Plaintiff, John Scheidler, and that the Complaint be dismissed in its entirety. NEW MATTER M.err A 5020 MM Road Suite 108 Med=9Cabtug. PA 17055 PHow: 717.766.4008 FAx: 717.766.4066 15. Defendant West Shore Auto's answers to paragraphs 1-14 of the Complaint are incorporated by reference, as if fully set forth in their entirety. 16. Plaintiff John A. Scheidler was hired by Defendant West Shore Auto, in part, on the representation by MAC Tool Distributor, Gary Keusi, that he was an efficient technician. 17. From the beginning of his employment, Scheidler was very slow and had to be coaxed along. For example, an oil change, which should only require 20-25 minutes, took Scheidler forty-five (45) minutes to complete. 18. In one case, when swapping out a used engine, which books out at sixteen (16) hours, Scheidler required forty (40) hours and the job still was not complete. After his termination, the job required four (4) additional hours for the Manager to complete himself. 19. On March 15, 2007, Scheidler misdiagnosed a 1998 Saturn. He said that the problem was a wiper motor but, in fact, it proved to be a wiper switch. 20. On March 30, 2007, Scheidler misdiagnosed a 2004 Pontiac Sedan involving a front wheel bearing when he replaced the wrong side bearing. 21. On April 12, 2007, when working on a 1997 Ford Truck, Scheidler replaced a water pump. Three (3) days later, the truck came back with the same overheating problem. 22. During the course of his brief employment, Scheidler decided to replace his tool box with a new one and had spoken to the MAC Tool Distributor about obtaining a new one. 23. Prior to any publicity concerning Scheidler's legal difficulties, West Shore Auto manager, Tim Long, told the MAC Tool Distributor to hold off on the tool box, telling him, "I don't think he's [Scheidler] going to make it here." Gary Keusi commented, "John has changed a lot since LB Smith Ford." 24. In addition, Scheidler either refused or was reluctant to complete time sheets, feeling that doing so was "beneath him." 25. Moreover, Scheidler had difficulty taking direction from the Manager of West Shore Auto Service, Tim Long, saying that he should not have to take orders from someone younger than himself. 26. At his Unemployment Hearing, Plaintiff Scheidler did not maintain that he had been I..Oeaea t1n M.Nerr 5020 RNW Road state 109 MedWdCSbLN9, PA 17055 PHom: 717.766.4008 FAX: 717.766.4066 terminated as a result of the charges filed against him and the attendant publicity; instead, he told the Referee that it was because West Shore Auto wanted to hire Tim Long's brother, who would not be driving a truck anymore. 27. The employer, West Shore Auto Service, Inc., made every attempt to accommodate Scheidler and his personal issues, allowing him to take leave. When Scheidler told Tim Long, "I have all these things on my mind," Long responded by saying, "you can go home and think about it." WHEREFORE, it is requested that judgment be entered in favor of Defendant, West Shore Auto Service, Inc., and against Plaintiff, John Scheidler, and that the Complaint be dismissed in its entirety. Respectfully submitted, John M. Kerr, Esquire I. D. #26414 Law Office of John M. Kerr 5020 Ritter Road Suite 109 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 (717) 766-4008 Dated: April 27, 2009 0 Z M. err Y 5020 Ed" Pow sultC 108 Medwksbua PA 17055 Now 717.766.4008 FAx: 717.766.4066 VERIFICATION The undersigned hereby states that he is on-site Manager for West Shore Auto Service, Inc. and, as such, is authorized to execute this Verification and that any factual statements contained in the foregoing Answer and New Matter are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief. He understand that any false statements are subject to the penalties prescribed at 18 Pa. C.S. §4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that he has served a copy of the foregoing, "Answer and New Matter To Complaint Filed On Behalf of Defendant, West Shore Auto Service, Inc." on the below-named individual in the manner indicated: First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid Robert S. Mirin, Esquire Law Offices of Robert S. Mirin 2515 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 a ... Wl. YAW John M. Kerr, Esquire Law Office of John M. Kerr 5020 Ritter Road Suite 109 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 (717) 766-4008 Dated: April 27, 2009 F M. err 5020 itter Road see log Mecdltlrlksb<ng, PA 17055 PHOM: 717.788.4008 FAx: 717.788.4088 FILES-- -f-i o-?E ?j OF THE 2009 APR 27 l 8: 17 LL?tr _ ?'?'r r ci r: I. JOHN A. SCHEIDLER, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INCORPORATED and CONNIE M (DODSON) WILLIAMS, Defendants No. 08-6520 Civil PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: John M. Kerr, Esquire, attorney for Defendant in the above-captioned action, 9 l.wo?d 0 M.e1T 5020 Potter Road Sutle 109 Medianlcsburg, PA 17055 Prone: 717.766.4008 FAx: 717.766.4066 respectfully represents that: 1. The above-captioned action is at issue. 2. The claim of the Plaintiff is in an undetermined amount. There has been no Counterclaim filed. The following attorneys are interested in the case as counsel or otherwise disqualified to sit as arbitrators: None WHEREFORE, Your Petitioner prays your Honorable Court to appoint three (3) arbitrators to whom the case shall be submitted. Respectfully submitted, 1. John M. Kerr, Esquire I.D. #26414 Law Office of John M. Kerr 5020 Ritter Road Suite 109 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 (717) 766-4008 Dated: October 30, 2009 Lw O?¢d otul M.?err 5020 Ritter Road Suite 108 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 PHoNe: 717.766.4008 FAx: 717.788.4066 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that he has served a copy of the foregoing, "Petition For Appointment of Arbitrators," on the below-named individual in the manner indicated: First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid Robert S. Mirin, Esquire Law Offices of Robert S. Mirin 2515 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Counsel of Record for Plaintiff, John A. Scheidler John A. Scheidler 118 Abolition Street Apartment 2 Enola, PA 17025 (believed to be proceeding pro se) g4 W. 4jw John M. Kerr, Esquire Law Office of John M. Kerr 5020 Ritter Road Suite 109 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 (717) 766-4008 Lw Of6¢ d 10 M.eff 5020 Potter Road suite 109 Mechardesbtug. PA 17055 PHONE: 717.766.4008 FAx: 717.766.4066 Dated: October 30, 2009 RLEE,--,?; F! V,E -GAF THE r, ,NARY 2H9 OCT 30 ill;,f 1, * 09 JOHN A. SCHEIDLER, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PLAINTIFF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INCORPORATED and CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS, DEFENDANTS 08-6520 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this b day of November, 2009, the petition of defendant, West Shore Auto Service Incorporated, for the appointment of a Board of Arbitrators, IS DENIED. There is nothing in the pleadings that limits plaintiff's claim to the arbitration limits. Robert S. Mirin, Esquire For Plaintiff ?hn M. Kerr, Esquire For West Shore Auto Service Incorporated :sal //!J U I DQ OF THE p" 2009 NOV 16 Pii I : 6 PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR TRIAL (Must be typewritten and submitted in triplicate) TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY Please list the following case: ? for JURY trial at the next term of civil court. ?X for trial without a jury. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CAPTION OF CASE (entire caption must be stated in full) (check one) ?X Civil Action - Law JOHN A. SCHEIDLER, ? Appeal from arbitration (other) (Plaintiff) VS. WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INCORPORATED and CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS, (Defendant) vs. 01/05/10 The trial list will be called on and 02/01/10 Trials commence on Pretrials will be held on 01/13/10 (Briefs are due S davs before pretrials `,No. 08-6520 CIVIL Term Indicate the attorney who will try case for the party who files this praecipe: JOHN M. KERR, ESQUIRE Indicate trial counsel for other parties if known: ROBERT S. MIRIN, ESQ. This case is ready for trial. Signed: JOHN M. KERR Print Name: Date: NOVEMBER 18, 2009 WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE ` Attorney for: CA OF A 4PROK&MY 211191 V 18 AM 11: 31 CUM8EH u "OUNTY gi ? clto- # /S"9 V k /-?- ? -3 -3 70? JOHN A. SCHEIDLER, PLAINTIFF IN COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE, INC., AND CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS, DEFENDANTS NO. 08-6520 CIVIL IN RE: NON-JURY TRIAL ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2009, the non-jury trial in the above referenced case has been assigned to this Court. Prior to setting an actual trial date IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DIRECTED that the parties in this case file a pre-trial memorandum with the Court on or before January 8, 2010, in the following format: 1. A concise statement of factual issues to be decided at trial. 11. A list of witnesses the party intends to call at trial along with a concise statement of their anticipated testimony. III. A list of all exhibits each party anticipates presenting at trial. IV. A statement of any legal issues each party anticipates being raised at trial along with copies of any cases which may be relevant to resolution of the stated issue. V. An estimate of the anticipated time needed for the party to present its case. Upon receipt and review of these memorandums, the Court will set a trial date for this case. By the Court, M. L. Ebert, Jr., J. Robert S. Mirin, Esquire, Attorney for Plaintiff _t /hn M. Kerr, Esquire, Attorney for Defendant t bas f, FlLED-oFIc;E OF THE PR07 !ONOTMY 2009 NOV 19 PM 3: 58 CUPS::. 3? t vINfY r EiNN'S #LVAN A 0I Robert S. Minn, Esquire Attorney ID 25301 Law Offices of Robert S. Mirin 2515 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Phone(717)909-9900 Fax (717) 561-1616 S usquehanna@coincast.net Attorney for Plaintiff JOHN A. SCHEIDLER PLAINTIFF V. WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INCORPORATED AND CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS ALEQ-- &1't vE _ { THE PC H, IRf?Y 2010 JAN 12 PM 3: 04 CUMI'Ll- IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA No.:08-6520 Civil Judge Ebert MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND NOW COMES, Robert. S. Mirin, Esquire, and respectfully requests this honorable court to kindly withdraw the appearance of Robert S. Mirin, Esquire on behalf of the Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter, and avers as follows: 1. Counsel and Plaintiff have irreconcilable differences. 2. Mr. John Scheidler will be proceeding pro-se. WHEREFORE, counsel respectfully request that counsel's appearance on behalf of Plaintiff be withdrawn. Date: Robert S. Mirin; EsquVe Attorney I.D. No. 25305 The Law Offices of Robert S. Mirin 2515 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 909-9900 (717) 561-1616 fax susquehanna@comcast.net U Robert S. Minn, Esquire Attorney ID 25301 Law Offices of Robert S. Mmn 2515 N. Front Street llarrisburg, PA 17110 Phone (717) 909-9900 Fax (717) 561-1616 Susquehanna@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff JOHN A. SCHEIDLER PLAINTIFF V. WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INCORPORATED AND CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA No. -08-6520 Civil Judge Ebert CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Dayasha Pina, paralegal for the Law Offices of Robert S. Mirin hereby certify that on this, the 1 Ith day of January, 2010, I served the attached Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, upon the following individual in the manner described in the Rules of Civil Procedure. John M. Kerr, Esquire The Law Offices of John M. Kerr 5020 Ritter Road Mechanicsburg, Pa 17055 John Scheidler 118 Abolition Street Apt 2 Enola, Pa 17025 Date: 1-11-2010 The LaWOffides of Robert S. Mirin 2515 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 909-9900 (717) 561-1616 fax suNuehanna@comeast.net JOHN A. SCHEIDLER, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PLAINTIFF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE, INCORPORATED AND CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS, DEFENDANTS NO. 08-6520 CIVIL ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 20th day of January, 2010, upon consideration of the Petition to Withdraw as Counsel filed by the Petitioner, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DIRECTED that: 1. A Rule is issued upon the Parties to show cause why the Petitioner should not be granted permission to withdraw as counsel of record; 2. The Parties will file an answer on or before February 10, 2010; 3. If no answer to the Rule to Show cause is filed by the required date, the relief requested by Petitioner shall be granted upon the Court's receipt of a Motion requesting Rule be made Absolute. If the Parties file an answer to this Rule to Show Cause, the Court will determine if further Order or hearing is necessary. 4. The Prothonotary is directed to forward said Answer to this Court. By the Court, Robert S. Mirin Esquire Petitioner ? John M. Kerr, Esquire Attorney for Defendants John Scheidler 118 Abolition Street, Apt. 2 Enola, PA 17025 bas r mil, i?a r f w Ak1j M. L. Ebert , Jr., J o C: ? -.•^J c T7 v.o w u < JOHN A. SCHEIDLER, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PLAINTIFF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE, INCORPORATED AND CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS, DEFENDANTS NO. 08-6520 CIVIL AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2010, the case having been assigned to this Court for the scheduling of the Non-Jury Trial, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DIRECTED that the Non-Jury Trial will be held on Wednesday, July 21, 2010, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom No. 2 of the Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. By the Court, -i John M. Kerr Esquire Attorney for Defendant ?A. Scheidler, Plaintiff 118 Abolition Street, Apt. 2 Enola, PA 17025 /FZobert S. Mirin, Esquire bas p ?s LC 3/a J?v M. L. Ebert, Jr., J. ? a n rT1 01 JOHN A. SCHEIDLER : IN THE C URT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PLAINTIFF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. No.: 08-6520 CIVIL WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INCORPORATED AND CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS DEFENDANTS n ' -? M C-0 AND NOW COMES Robert S. Mirin, Honorable Court to make the MOTION TO For the following facts: 1. Petitioner filed for a motion to be 2. Parties had until February 10, 2010 to 3. No Answers to the Rule to show cause 4. Pursuant to Cumberland County Local a rule to show cause an order shall be i Pa.R.C.P. 206.5governing the requiren scheduling of depositions and the mare ire, respectfully requests this EST RULE BE MADE ABSOLUTE. from case. an answer to said order. filed. 206.4(C) 2 upon a grant of in accordance with for an answer the in which argument will be schedule. 5. Counsel respectfully request that the cou discharging him from the case. Wherefore, counsel respectfully request MOTION MADE ABSOLUTE enter a Rule Absolute REQUEST RULE BE O Date: 3 p?3 Respectfully submitted, Robert S. Mifin, Esquire Attorney I.D. No. 2530 The aw Offices of Robert S. Mirin 251 North Front Street Harrisburg, RA 17110 (717 909-9900 (717 561-1616 fax susQ ehannaOcomcastnet JOHN A. SCHEIDLER : IN THE CURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PLAINTIFF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. No.: 08-6520 CIVIL WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE INCORPORATED AND CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS DEFENDANTS I, Medina Long, Paralegal Intern, of The Law on the day of , 2010 I served a Motion To Request Rule Be Made Absolute, upon John M. Kerr, Esquire Attorney for Defendants 5020 Ritter Road, Suite 109 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 John Scheidler 118 Abolition Street, Apt .2 Enola, PA 17025 mal of Robert S. Mirin, hereby certify and correct copy of the foregoing following individuals: JOHN A. SCHEIDLER, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PLAINTIFF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE, INCORPORATED AND CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS, DEFENDANTS NO. 08-6520 CIVIL ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2010, upon consideration of Robert S. Mirin, Esquire's Petition to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff John A. Scheidler, and no party having filed an Answer to the Rule to Show Cause dated January 20, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DIRECTED that the Petition is GRANTED. Robert S. Mirin, Esquire, appearance as counsel for Plaintiff John A. Scheidler is withdrawn. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND DIRECTED that the Non-Jury Trial of this matter will be held on July 21, 2010, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom No. 2 of the Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania as previously scheduled. By the Court, M. L. Ebert, Jr., J. ,,?Robert S. Mirin, Esquire Petitioner 1,__`J'0hn M. Kerr, Esquire Attorney for Defendants /d" r Scheidler 118 Abolition Street, Apt. 2 Enola, PA 17025 bas (2a jet f S rv&t LSIC-C AJ VJ n? c. ?_ t JOHN A. SCHEIDLER, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. No. 08-6520 Civil WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE (JUDGE EBERT) n N ° ' INCORPORATED and CONNIE M. -T2 F q T] (DODSON) WILLIAMS, : - r-- i; Defendants PRAECIPE TO DISCONTINUE TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Kindly discontinue with prejudice the above-captioned action and mark the docket, "Discontinued With Prejudice." Respectfully submitted, c ohn A. Scheidler ?? arc +? ?? ??y appearing pro se 118 Abolition Street Apt. #2 Enola, PA 17025 Dated: July 20, 2010 i,??? ch*k dJMi?iM lk1,NNh o , DtiheA rJ #MJfIL b WX" lttr? INY M1i? MilliiN1110? 11y CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby states that he has served a copy of the foregoing, "Praecipe To Discontinue", on the below-named individual in the manner indicated: First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid John M. Kerr, Esquire Law Office of John M. Kerr 5020 Ritter Road Suite 109 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 0 John A. Scheidler Dated: July 20, 2010 JOHN A. SCHEIDLER, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PLAINTIFF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. WEST SHORE AUTO SERVICE, INCORPORATED AND CONNIE M. (DODSON) WILLIAMS, DEFENDANTS NO. 08-6520 CIVIL ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 200' day of July, 2010, the Court being in receipt of the Praecipe to Discontinue the above-captioned matter just filed by the Plaintiff, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DIRECTED that the Non-Jury Trial previously scheduled for July 21, 2010, is CANCELLED. John M. Kerr, Esquire 5020 Ritter Road Mechanicsburg, PA 17110 John A. Scheidler, Plaintiff 118 Abolition Street, Apt. 2 Enola, PA 17025 _,?obert S. Mirin, Esquire 2515 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Court Administrator -DNS bas IW/v 12Dpt F.? rw?t LL 1 7?ac f fv rt By the Court,