HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-0220LARRAINE K. MORTON, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
vs. N0.2009 - .Z~'~IVa. TERM
DANIEL L. BRICKER,
Defendant
COMPLAINT IN CUSTODY
Petitioner, Larraine K. Morton, by and through her counsel, Grace E. D'Alo of
MidPenn Legal Services, states the following:
1. Petitioner, hereinafter referred to as the Mother, resides at 27 Mountain View
Terrace, Newville, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 17241.
2. The above-named Defendant currently resides at 409 Berkshire Rd, Upper Allen,
Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, 17055-5514.
3. Mother and Defendant are the natural parents of:
Dakota R. Morton, born June 14, 1997 (age 11).
4. Mother and Defendant were never married.
5. Mother is the natural mother of the following children, who are also living with
her at the address mentioned in paragraph 1:
a. Sky M. Morton, born on October 13, 2000 (age 8);
b. Faith L. Morton, born on October 06, 2003 (age 5);
c. Rose M. Gibbs, born on November 17, 2008 (age 2 months).
6. Dakota has lived since birth with Mother until January 4, 2009 and for the last
three years at the address mentioned in paragraph 1. Prior to that and since
January 2000 Mother was living at Boiling Springs Apartments in subsidized
housing.
?. On December 24, 2008 Dakota visited the Defendant.
8. Defendant agreed to return Dakota before school started on January 5, 2009.
9. On January 4, 2009, Defendant failed to return Dakota.
10. Defendant told Mother that he would not be bringing Dakota back and that he
would enroll him in the Mechanicsburg Middle School on January 5, 2009.
11. Dakota also told Mother that he was told that he would not be returning to her.
12. To the best of Mother's knowledge Dakota has not attended school since January
5, 2009.
13. Defendant is not acting in the Dakota's best interest fox reasons including, but not
limited to, the following:
a. Defendant has not allowed Mother to see or talk to Dakota on a regular
basis;
b. Defendant has failed to return Dakota as promised;
c. Dakota is a special needs-child and Mother is best able to take care of him;
d. Defendant has refused to provide Mother with information as to whether
Dakota is receiving the care and education that is necessary and
appropriate for him;
e. Defendant has traumatized Dakota by not allowing him to contact Mother
even though Mother has been his primary caretaker for his entire life;
f. During the summer of 2008 the Defendant did not even so much as call
Dakota.
g. Defendant is not paying child support, he is unemployed and Mother finds
it doubtful whether he will be able to financially support Dakota.
14. Mother is the parent who can best provide for Dakota for reasons including, but
not limited to, the following:
a. Mother is presently able to provide for Dakota by giving him a nurturing
and stable home environment and providing for his emotional, physical,
medical and educational needs;
b. Since the Dakota's birth, Mother is the person who has provided for his
daily needs and is the person most capable of caring for him;
c. Mother can best facilitate and maintain any contact between Dakota and
the Defendant.
d. Mother has been responsible for developing and monitoring Dakota's IEP.
15. Mother requests that the Court grant primary physical and legal custody of Dakota
to her and grant the Defendant supervised visitation with him.
16. Without this Court's intervention, Mother and Dakota aze at risk of irreparable
harm by being denied contact with each other.
17. Mother is not aware that Defendant has legal counsel and, therefore, cannot
attempt to contact her/him to obtain a concurrence for the relief requested.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the following:
a. Order the Defendant to immediately return Dakota to Mother in
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
b. Issue an order granting Lorraine K. Morton primary legal and physical
custody of Dakota.
c. Limit the custodial rights of Defendant to supervised visitation at a time
and place as ordered by this Court or agreed to by the parties;
d. Issue an order prohibiting the Defendant from removing Dakota from
Pennsylvania except as provided by this Court's custody order;
e. Any other relief this court deems just and proper.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
~~-~-~
G E. D'ALO
MID NN LEGAL SERVICES
401 E. LOUTHER STREET
CARLISLE, PA 17013
VERIFICATION
The above-named Plaintiff, Larraine K. Morton, verifies
that the statements made in the attached Petition for special
Relief and Complaint are true and correct. Plaintiff understands
that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties
of 18 Pa. C.S. §4904, relating to unsworn falsification to
authorities.
Date. ~~ w
/, /
Larraine K. Morton
t
P..
~-
r~
~~ :~ _., ,
,:
~
~` ,;
,.. -
' ~ , ~i;7
.s'~ f .~ ~..
.
~. ~ ~
< ~
~
~.
LARRAINE K. MORTON, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
vs. No. 2009- CIVIL TERM
DANIEL BRICKER, CA'°2~c~0
Defendant IN CUSTODY
PRAECIPE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
To the Prothonotary:
Kindly allow, Larraine K. Morton ,Plaintiff, to proceed in forma au eris.
I, Grace E. D'Alo, attorney for the party proceeding in forma au eris, certify that
I believe the party is unable to pay the costs and that I am providing free legal services to
the party.
1 Gr~\ )~
Gra e D' Alo
Jess a Diamondstone
ffrey Biringer
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MidPenn Legal Services
401 E. Louther Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-9400
r,
~7
~
~
d rr
'~ ry ~.,., l
;
~:
~ `' „ ,
~
;;.- =' ~ :;
~.
~~
.~ ~r
.:~; ¢
LARRAINE K. MORTON, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
Vs. No. 2009 - .z~CrvII. TERM
DANIEL L. BRICKER,
Defendant
PETITION FOR SPECIAL RELIEF
Petitioner, Larraine K. Morton, by and through her counsel, Grace E. D'Alo of
MidPenn Legal Services, states the following:
1. Petitioner, hereinafter referred to as the Mother, resides at 27 Mountain View
Terrace, Newville, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 17241.
2. The above-named Defendant currently resides at 409 Berkshire Rd, Upper Allen,
Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, 17055-5514.
3. Mother and Defendant are the natural parents of:
Dakota R. Morton, born June 14, 1997 (age 11).
4. Mother and Defendant were never married.
5. Mother is the natural mother of the following children, who are also living with
her at the address mentioned in paragraph 1:
a. Sky M. Morton, born on October 13, 2000 (age 8);
b. Faith L. Morton, born on October 06, 2003 (age 5};
c. Rose M. Gibbs, born on November 17, 2008 (age 2 months).
6. The attached Complaint in Custody outlines where Dakota has lived for the past 8
years and is herein incorporated by reference.
7. On December 24, 2008 Dakota visited the Defendant.
8. Defendant agreed to return Dakota before school started on January 5, 2009.
9. On January 4, 2009, Defendant failed to return Dakota.
10. Defendant told Mother that he would not be bringing Dakota back and that he
would enroll Dakota in the Mechanicsburg Middle School on January 5, 2009.
11. Dakota also told Mother that he was told that he would not be returning to her.
12. To the best of Mother's knowledge Dakota has not attended school since January
5, 2009.
13. Defendant is not acting in Dakota's best interest for reasons including, but not
limited to, the following:
a. Defendant has not allowed Mother to see or talk to Dakota on a regular
basis;
b. Defendant has failed to return Dakota as promised;
c. Dakota is a special needs-child and Mother is best able to take care of him;
d. The Defendant has refused to provide Mother with information as to
whether Dakota is receiving the care and education that is necessary and
appropriate for him;
e. Defendant has traumatized Dakota by not allowing him to contact Mother
even though Mother has been Dakota's primary caretaker for his entire
life;
f. During the summer of 2008 the Defendant did not even so much as call
Dakota.
g. Defendant is not paying child support, he is unemployed and Mother finds
it doubtful whether he will be able to financially support Dakota.
14. Mother is the parent who can best provide for Dakota for reasons including, but
not limited to, the following:
a. Mother is presently able to provide for Dakota by giving him a nurturing
and stable home environment and providing for his emotional, physical,
medical and educational needs;
b. Since the Dakota's birth, Mother is the person who has provided for his
daily needs and is the person most capable of caring for him;
c. Mother can best facilitate and maintain any contact between Dakota and
the Defendant.
d. Mother has been responsible for developing and monitoring Dakota's IEP.
15. Mother requests that the Court grant primary physical and legal custody of Dakota
to her and grant the Defendant supervised visitation with him.
16. Without this Court's intervention, Mother and Dakota are at risk of irreparable
harm by being denied contact with each other.
17. Mother is not aware that Defendant has legal counsel and, therefore, cannot
attempt to contact her/him to obtain a concurrence for the relief requested.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the following:
a. Order the Defendant to immediately return Dakota to Mother in
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
b. Issue an order granting Larraine K. Morton primary legal and physical
custody of Dakota.
c. Limit the custodial rights of Defendant to supervised visitation at a time
and place as ordered by this Court or agreed to by the parties;
d. Issue an order prohibiting the Defendant from removing Dakota from
Pennsylvania except as provided by this Court's custody order;
e. Any other relief this court deems just and proper.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
~-
CE E. D'ALO
D ENN LEGAL SERVICES
401 . LOUTHER STREET
CARLISLE, PA 17013
LARRAINE k. MORTON IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
vs. N0.2009 - CIVIL, TERM
DANIEL L BRICKER,
Defendant
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
h
AND NOW, this _ ~, ~ day of January, 2009, I, Grace D'Alo, hereby certify
that I served Daniel L. Bricker, with a copy of the foregoing Petition for Special Relief
and Complaint by first registered receipt and first class, United States Mail, postage pre-
paid, addressed as follows.
Daniel L. Bricker
409 Berkshire Rd
Upper Allen
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-5514
MIDPENN LEGAL SERVICES
ace E. D'Alo
East Louther Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717} 243-9400, ext. 2517
Attorney for Plaintiff
~~ ~
~'
"' ~, `fi-
~~ r
~
-~ _? `;
r ~~,;`
.
~4 ~ ~
•~
TANNER LAW OFFICES, LLC
1300 Market Street, Suite 10
Lemoyne, PA 17043
Phone (717) 731-81141 Fax (717) 731-8115
Attorney for Defendant
t t T ~, ~-
y j`~ k~ t 1 t L .- t~
!(~~~ '
1. i~ i . .._ ..
t y...
~.i
[[~~
" ~ . (.1 ~., ~J ~. C'y a ~ r
{J fi.; ~ r ±, ~ 'm, Opt 1..~j~ ~-+. i ~~ ~ t~`~~
~. ..;
LARRAINE K. MORTON, §
Plaintiff §
v. §
DANIEL L. BRICKER, §
Defendant §
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 09-0220 CIVIL TERM
PETITION OF DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE
The petition of Tabetha A. Tanner, Esquire, respectfully represents the following:
Defendant and Petitioner entered into a representation agreement with respect to the
above-captioned custody action on or about January 8, 2009.
2. Defendant agreed by signing the Representation Agreement that "if fees or costs are
owing, payment is due no later than thirty (30) days from the date the bill is presented ...
If such a payment is not timely paid [we] reserve the right to suspend services until
satisfactory arrangements are made or, if necessary, to end our services."
4. Throughout the course of representation, Petitioner sent Defendant regular monthly
statements reflecting the fees and costs owed for services rendered with regard to the
above-referenced matter.
In addition to the regular monthly statements, Petitioner sent Defendant a letter on August
26, 2010 requesting that the outstanding balance be paid prior to further representation,
and that if payment was not received on or before September 15, 2010, Petitioner would
file to withdraw from Defendant's case.
6. Despite a fee agreement requiring payment by Defendant for Petitioner's services on an
hourly basis and the submission of bills to the Defendant, Petitioner has not received any
payments from Defendant during the past ten (10) months.
7. The Defendant has failed to substantially fulfill his financial obligation to the Petitioner
regarding Petitioner's legal fees and Petitioner has been given reasonable warning that
Petitioner will withdraw unless said financial obligation is fulfilled. Good cause thus
exists pursuant to Rule 1.16(b)(5) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct for
Petitioner's withdrawal.
8. The continued representation of the Defendant without payment of petitioner's fees, or
the prospect of such payment, has resulted and will further result in an unreasonable
financial burden on Petitioner. Good cause thus exists pursuant to Rule 1.16(b)(6) ofthe
Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct for Petitioner's withdrawal.
WHEREFORE, petitioner requests that this Court grant Petitioner leave to withdraw her
appearance on behalf Defendant in this action.
Respectfully submitted,
~a~,~~. ~1 ~; U~~~~
Tabetha A. Tanner, Esquire
Supreme Court I.D. No. 91979
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in the foregoing Petition of Defendant's Counsel for
Leave to Withdraw Appearance are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and
belief. I understand that false statements made herein may subject to me to the penalties ofPa.C.S.
Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
y~~~. ~
Tabetha A. Tanner, Esquire
SEP 2 4 2010
t(
LARRAINE K. MORTON, § IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff § CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V. §
DANIEL L. BRICKER, § NO. 09-0220 CIVIL TERM
Defendant §
RULE
AND NOW, this 40?'71'da Y of 2010 upon consideration of the
foregoing Petition of Defendant's Counsel for Leave to Withdraw Appearance, the Court grants a rule
to show cause why the appearance of Tabetha A. Tanner, Esquire, on behalf of the Defendant, Daniel
L. Bricker, should not be allowed to be withdrawn.
Rule returnable $' 404? 'tom ?t le.
Cumberland County Courthouse, 1 Courthouse Square, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013.
All proceedings to stay meanwhile.
V
. T J Utz t
I"
Y
Try]
-i ? A