HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-30-07
..
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
INRE:
ESTATE OF FRANK F. DAVENPORT, JR.
FRANK F. DAVENPORT, III
Petitioner
WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., TRUSTEE
UNDER THE RESIDUARY "TRUST B"
FIBIO SUZANNE B. DAVENPORT
AND ISSUE
\.>--
ORPHANS'.COURT DIVISION
No.
ANSWER TO PETITION FOR CITATION TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY AN INVENTORY AND
ACCOUNTING SHOULD NOT BE FILED BY
RESPONDENT W ACHOVIA BANK, N.A.
Filed on behalf of Wachovia Bank, National
Association
Counsel of Record for this Party:
William Campbell Ries, Esquire
Pa. I.D. No. 19919
TUCKER ARENSBERG, P.C.
Firm No. 287
1500 One PPG Place
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
412-566-1212
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
ORPHANS' COURT DIVISION
IN RE:
ESTATE OF FRANK F. DAVENPORT, JR. No.
FRANK F. DAVENPORT, III
Petitioner
W ACHOVIA BANK, N.A., TRUSTEE
UNDER THE RESIDUARY "TRUST B"
FIB/O SUZANNE B. DAVENPORT
AND ISSUE
Respondent
ANSWER TO PETITION TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY AN INVENTORY AND ACCOUNTING SHOULD NOT
BE FILED BY RESPONDENT WACHOVIA BANK, N.A. WHILE
ACTING TRUSTEE OF "TRUST B" AS CREATED UNDER THE ESTATE
OF FRANK F. DAVENPORT, JR. FIB/O SUZANNE B. DAVENPORT AND ISSUE
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:
NOW COMES WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("Respondent") and files
the within Answer to the Petition to Show Cause Why an Inventory and Accounting should not
be filed, as follows:
1. Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
the truth or falsity of the averments of Paragraph 1 of the Petition and the same are therefore
denied, except Respondent admits that Petitioner is an adult and is the son of Frank Freeman
Davenport, Jr.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. The averments of Paragraph 4 are denied. It is denied that Respondent has an
office in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. It is denied that Respondent serves as the sole trustee for
Trust B. On the contrary, Respondent serves as co-trustee for Trust B with Decedent's wife,
Suzanne B. Davenport.
5. Admitted.
6. The averments of paragraph 6 are specifically denied. On the contrary, the Will
names H. Marshall Davenport, III, Central Trust Company of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and
Suzanne B. Davenport as co-trustees. Respondent is the successor to Central Trust Company
of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania after a series of mergers and acquisitions, but Respondent and
Suzanne B. Davenport are currently the co-trustees.
7. It is admitted that the Will creates a residuary share called "Trust B" (funded
October 17,1969), and that the Decedent's spouse, Suzanne B. Davenport, and her children
are beneficiaries under the Trust. Said Trust "B" is created by Items IIIB of the Will not Article II.
8. The averments of Paragraph 8 of the Petition states a conclusion of law to which
no response or pleading is required. To the extent a response is required, said averment is
denied.
9. The averments of Paragraph 9 of the Petition states a conclusion of law to which
no response or pleading is required.
10. The averments of Paragraph 10 of the Petition states a conclusion of law to
which no response or pleading is required.
11. The averments of Paragraph 11 are specifically denied. On the contrary,
Respondent has always administered the Trust in a prudent manner and in accordance with the
terms of the governing instrument and the Probate, Estates and Fiduciary Code. The
Decedent's wife, Suzanne B. Davenport, serves as co-trustee with Respondent.
-2-
12. The averments of Paragraph 12 are specifically denied. On the contrary,
Respondent is willing to file an Accounting and has prepared an Accounting with respect to the
administration of the Trust.
13. The averments of Paragraph 13 are specifically denied. On the contrary,
Respondent has always acted and continues to act in a prudent manner and has prepared and
is willing to file an accounting with respect to the administration of the Trust. Suzanne B.
Davenport is co-trustee with Respondent.
14. The averments of Paragraph 14 are specifically denied. On the contrary, the
Prudent Investor Rule was not adopted in Pennsylvania until 1999, Respondent has at all times
since the Adoption of the Rule adhered to the Prudent Investor Rule in administering the Trust.
Suzanne B. Davenport, the co-trustee approved the recommendations of Respondent.
15. Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
the truth or falsity of the averment in Paragraph 15 of the Petition, and the same is therefore
denied. The co-trustee, Suzanne B. Davenport, never approved any distributions to Petitioner
since Respondent has been successor co-trustee.
16. Denied. Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a
belief as to the truth or falsity of the averment in Paragraph 16 of the Petition, and the same is
therefore denied. On the contrary, the Respondent has always administered the trust in a
prudent manner.
17. WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that the relief requested by
petition be denied and his Petition be dismissed. Respondent has prepared an Accounting of
the co-trustees' administration of the Trust through February 28,2007 and will file the same
without the need of a Court Order. The beneficiaries of the Trust will be severely jeopardized if
the Respondent is not permitted to dispose of any assets of the Trust because in order to carry
out its duties as a fiduciary in a prudent manner, the Trustee must be able to continue to
-3-
purchase and sell the assets of the Trust as it deems prudent under the circumstances. In
addition, the production of Respondent's entire file and copies of all documents in its possession
relating to the Decedent's estate not limited to all prior tax returns (including those filed by the
Respondent after the death of the Decedent) any and all records of all brokerage accounts,
deeds and mortgage associated therewith and other ancillary financial information without
limitation intended, is overly burdensome and vexatious. Respondent will make the records of
the Trust which are not privileged available to the Petitioner at reasonable times and Petitioner
may copy documents at its own expense.
NEW MATTER
18. Respondent currently serves as Co-Trustee with the Decedent's wife, Suzanne
B. Davenport, who has served as Co-Trustee since the inception of the Trust. All decisions
involving the administration require the approval of both trustees.
19. As Co-Trustee with Respondent, Suzanne B. Davenport shares the fiduciary
responsibility for the prudent administration of the Trust with Respondent and would be jointly
liable for all decisions involving the trust.
20. As Co-Trustee with Respondent, Suzanne B. Davenport refused to grant
distributions requested by Petitioner. The discretionary refusal to grant distributions to
Petitioner were carefully considered by Suzanne B. Davenport and her personal counsel, and
were refused.
21. Suzanne B. Davenport, through her agent, the Petitioner in these proceedings,
has attempted to resign as Co-Trustee. As of the date of this Answer, to the knowledge of the
Respondent, she has not yet been permitted to resign by consent of the beneficiaries.
-4-
22. As a result of Suzanne B. Davenport's serving and continuing to serve as Co-
Trustee, Respondent and Suzanne B. Davenport share fiduciary responsibility for the
administration of the Trust.
23. Respondent has at all times, it has properly exercised its fiduciary duty owed to
the Trust and beneficiaries of the Trust, and that is has acted in accordance with applicable law.
WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests this Honorable Court to dismiss the
citation and to deny the Petitioner's Petition for Citation
Dale: ~ ~ tJ ,2007
Respectfully submitted,
B
BF:298326-2017579-131522
-5-
84-38-97 15:92 WACHOVIA
I '
ID=7172913583
P82/82
V~~~FICATION
I, Diane Goad, A ~istant Vice President of Waohovia Bank, N.A." state that the facts
contained in the foregoillg Answer to Petition for Citation are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge. information. md belief. This Verification Is made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.
C.S. f 4904 relating to L nswom falsification to authorities.
r;;Jp~Y/&~
, m: Diane Goad
Title: Assistant Vice President,
Wachovia Bank, N.A.
'1- 30
-" 2007
Date:
BI":29832&-101757&-131522
I ,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
On this ..?Q~~ of AI t. {<L ,2007, I hereby certify that a true and correct
copy of the foregoing Answer to Petition for Citation to Show Cause Why an Inventory and
Accounting Should not be Filed by Respondent Wachovia Bank, N.A. was served upon all
counsel of record via first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
Neil W. Yahn, Esquire
James Smith Dietterick & Connelly, LLP
Post Office Box 650
Hershey, PA 17033
By:
William Campbell Ries, Esq.
BF:298326-1 017579-131522