HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-2662DONNA MOWRY,
Plaintiff
V.
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE FOR WRIT OF SUMMONS
To the Prothonotary:
Please issue a writ of summons in the above captioned action.
Writ of Summons shall be issued and forwarded to the Sheriff of Cumberland.
Date: April 27, 2009
To The Above Named Defendants:
Respectfully submitted,
Rominger & Associates
JW E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 241-6070
Supreme Court ID # 81924
WRIT OF SUMMONS
Matthew Coover
391 North Middleton Road
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
YOU ARE NOTIFIED THAT THE ABOVE-NAMED PLAINTIFF HAS
COMMENCED AN ACTION AGAINST YOU.
Date:
-:51 d 'z' e _0
_ o`
Prothonotary
By:4-w2a
Deputy
TH'
C APR P'j Qc3
t l '_? F..:'rte:°.;;,.'"•
Sheriffs Office of Cumberland County
R Thomas Kline ?wnt? of cumbp? Edward L Schorpp
Sheri t Solicitor
Ronny R Anderson ?W_ 's Jody S Smith
Chief Deputy OFr-xE 4F '"E S04gR1FF Civil Process Sergeant
SHERIFF'S RETURN OF SERVICE
04/30/2009 10:50 AM - Shawn Harrison, Deputy Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law, states that on April
30, 2009 at 1050 hours, he served a true copy of the within Writ of Summons upon the within named
defendant, to wit: Matthew Coover by making known unto Matthew Coover personally, at 391 North
Middleton Road, Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 17013, its contents and at the same time
handing to him personally the said true and correct copy of the same.
SHERIFF COST: $32.92
April 30, 2009
SO ANSWERS,
R THO S K SHERIFF
De y Shdrjfflf
2009-2662
Donna Mowery v Matthew Coover
N
rn _
ri
-
7
,
.e
?A ?
..
.
. C-0
"j
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DONNA MOWRY,
Plaintiff
No. 09-2662
V.
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE PURSUANT TO Pa.R.C.P. 1012
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly enter the appearance of Michael B. Scheib, Esquire of Griffith, Strickler, Lerman,
Solymos & Calkins, as attorney for the Defendant in the above-captioned matter and mark the docket
accordingly.
Dated: March , 2012
GRIFFITH, STRICKLER, LERMAN,
SOLYMOS & CALKINS
By: Ze
MICHAEL B. SC IB, ESQUIRE v
Attorney I.D. No. 63868
110 South Northern Way
York, Pennsylvania 17402
(T) 717-757-7602
(F) 717-757-3783
mscheib@gslsc.com
Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Coover
.y
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DONNA MOWRY, No. 09-2662
Plaintiff
v.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this _I „ day of March, 2012, I, Michael B. Scheib, Esquire, a member of the
firm of GRIFFITH, STRICKLER, LERMAN, SOLYMOS & CALKINS, hereby certify that I have
this date served a copy of Praecipe for Entry of Appearance, by United States Mail, addressed to the
party or attorney of record as follows:
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
Rominger & Associates
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(Attorney for Plaintiff)
GRIFFITH, STRICKLER, LERMAN,
SOLYMOS & CALKINS
By::T/I
MICHAEL B. SCHEIB, ESQUIRE "
Attorney I.D. No. 63868
110 South Northern Way
York, Pennsylvania 17402
(T) 717-757-7602
(F) 717-757-3783
mscheib@gslsc.com
Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Coover
c:a
te
r
-' . _..y ?-
?? ? . tea
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DONNA MOWRY,
Plaintiff
V.
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
No. 09-2662
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE
Please enter a Rule upon Donna Mowry, Plaintiff, to file a Complaint within twenty (20)
days from the date of the service of this Rule or suffer Judgment non-pros.
Date: March G 2012
GRIFFITH, STRICKLER, LERMAN,
SOLYMOS & CALKINS
By.
MICHAEL B. SCHEIB, ESQUI
Supreme Court I.D. No. 63868
110 South Northern Way
York, Pennsylvania 17402-3737
Phone (717) 757-7602
Fax (717) 757-3783
MscheibLg)gslsc.com
Attorney for Defendant
NOW, March Q 2012, RULE ISSUED AS ABOVE.
loxid 1>7&e l l
Prothonotary
J
BY:
Deputy
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DONNA MOWRY, No. 09-2662
Plaintiff
V. CIVIL ACTION - LAW
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this qt? day of March, 2012, I, Michael B. Scheib, Esquire, a member of
the firm of Griffith, Strickler, Lerman, Solymos & Calkins, hereby certify that I have this date
served a copy of the Praecipe for Rule to file a Complaint by United States Mail, postage
prepaid, addressed to the party or attorney of record as follows:
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
Rominger & Associates
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(Attorney for Plaintiff)
GRIFFITH, STRICKLER, LERMAN,
SOLYMOS & CALKINS
j
By: G?-
MICHAEL B. SCHEIB, ESQUIRE
Supreme Court I.D. No. 63868
110 South Northern Way
York, Pennsylvania 17402-3737
Attorney for Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DONNA MO WRY, No. 09-2662
Plaintiff
v. CIVIL ACTION - LAW? w 7
MATTHEW COOVER, `_
Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED;'- rv
co
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this 441 day of March, 2012, I, Michael B. Scheib, a member of the firm
of Griffith, Strickler, Lerman, Solymos & Calkins, hereby certify that I have this date served a
copy of the Interrogatories/Request for Production of Documents of Defendant Matthew Coover
to Plaintiff Donna Mowry; Set No. 1, by United States First-Class Mail, postage prepaid,
addressed as follows:
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
Rominger & Associates
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(Attorney for Plaintiff)
GRIFFITH, STRICKLER, LERMAN,
SOLYMOS & CALKINS
J/ ? 1 J_ YJ y /
By: / ?. C?' ???f1
MICHAEL B. SC EIB, ESQ. #PA 63868
110 South Northern Way
York, Pennsylvania 17402-3737
Phone (717) 757-7602
Fax (717) 757-3783
Mscheib &g),slsc.com
Attorney for Defendant Matthew Coover
DONNA MOWRY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant,
CIVIL ACTION - LAW ' ?.
NO: 2009 - 2662 -
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED '
?
`_ .
NOTICE -
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the
following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this complaint and notice are
served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the
court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you
fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be entered against you by the
court without further notice for any money claimed in the complaint or for any other claim or
relief requested by the plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to
you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW.
IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE A LAWYER, THIS OFFICE MAY BE ABLE
TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORAMTION ABOUT AGENCIES THAT MAY OFFER
LEGAL SERVICES TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS AT A REDUCED FEE OR NO FEE..
Cumberland County Bar Association
32 South Bedford Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Phone: (717) 249-3166
(800) 990-9108
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law to comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. For information about accessible facilities and
reasonable accommodations available to disabled individuals having business before the Court,
please contact our office. All arrangements must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing
or business before the Court. All arrangements must be made at least 72 hours prior to any
hearing or business before the court. You must attend the scheduled conference or hearing.
DONNA MOWRY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO: 2009 - 2662
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant,
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Donna Mowry, by and through her undersigned counsel, and avers in support of
her complaint as follows:
Plaintiff, Donna Mowry, is an adult individual residing at 41 Mill Street, Mt.
Holly Springs, Pennsylvania 17065.
2. Defendant, Matthew Coover, is an adult individual residing at 391 N. Middleton
Rd., Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013.
3. On May 27, 2007 at about 6:15 PM, Plaintiff was the driver of a vehicle traveling
East on the Harrisburg Pike near the intersection of Harrisburg Pike and South Middlesex Road
in Middlesex Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
4. Defendant, Matthew Coover, who was traveling North on South Middlesex Road
and was stopped at the traffic light at the intersection South Middlesex Road and Harrisburg
Pike; suddenly, unexpectedly, and failing to yield to oncoming traffic, proceeded into the
intersection of Harrisburg Pike and South Middlesex Road disobeying the red traffic signal.
5. Due to Mr. Coover's sudden encroachment into Plaintiff's lane of travel, Plaintiff
was unable to avoid striking the rear of the Mr. Coover's vehicle.
6. Plaintiff reported to her family physician complaining of neck pain and was
diagnosed with a cervical sprain and tinnitus.
7. The accident and resulting injuries to the Plaintiff, were solely caused by the
negligence of Defendant, Matthew Coover.
Count I: Negligence
8. Previous paragraphs are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth
herein.
9. The occurrence of the aforementioned incident and the resultant injuries to
Plaintiff, Donna Mowry, are the direct and proximate result of the negligence, carelessness,
and/or recklessness of Defendant, Matthew Coover, generally and more specifically as set forth
below:
a. In failing to be reasonably vigilant to observe the road and traffic
conditions then and there existing;
b. In failing to yield the right-of-way to oncoming traffic prior to entering an
intersection;
c. In failing to obey a red traffic signal in violation of 75 Pa. C.S.A.
§3112(a)(2)
d. In failing to wait until it is safe to move his vehicle from a stopped
position in violation of 75 Pa. C.S.A. §3333;
e. In failing to exercise reasonable care in the operation and control of his
vehicle, in violation of 75 Pa. C.S.A. § 3714;
f. In failing to be continuously alert, in failing to perceive any warning of
danger that was reasonably likely to exist, and in failing to have his
vehicle under such control that injury to persons or property could be
avoided;
g. In otherwise driving his vehicle upon the roadway in a manner
endangering persons and property and in a manner with careless disregard
to the rights and safety of others in violation or the Motor Vehicle Code of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
10. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of the Defendant, Plaintiff
Donna Mowry suffered injuries to her cervical spine and neck, as well as ongoing issues with
headaches caused by the same.
11. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's negligence, Plaintiff Donna
Mowry has suffered great physical pain, discomfort and mental anguish, and she will continue to
endure the same for an indefinite period of time in the future, to her great physical, emotional,
and financial detriment and loss.
12. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant's negligence, Plaintiff Donna
Mowry has suffered lost wages, and a loss of earning capacity as she has not returned to work
since her accident.
13. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant's negligence, Plaintiff Donna
Mowry has been compelled, in order to affect a cure for the aforesaid injuries, to spend money
for medicine and/or medical attention, and may be required to expend money for the same
purposes in the future, to her detriment and loss.
14. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant's negligence, Plaintiff Donna
Mowry has been, and probably will in the future be, hindered from attending to her daily duties,
to her great detriment, loss, humiliation, and embarrassment.
15. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant's negligence, Plaintiff Donna
Mowry has suffered a loss of life's pleasures, and will continue to endure the same in the future,
to her great detriment and loss.
16. Plaintiff Donna Mowry believes and, therefore, avers that her injuries are
permanent in nature.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Donna Mowry, seeks damages from Defendant, Matthew
Coover, in an amount in excess of the compulsory arbitration limits of Cumberland County,
exclusive of interest and costs.
3/a?/Ja
Date:
Respectfully submitted,
ROMINGER & ASSOCIATES
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 241-6070
Attorney for Plaintiff
VERIFICATION
I, Donna Mowry, verify that the statements in the foregoing document are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I understand that any false
statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. Section 4904, relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date: 3 -V-?R- /(;?
DONNA MOWRY,
V.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO: 2009 - 2662
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Karl E. Rominger, Esquire, attorney for Petitioner, do hereby certify that I this day served a copy
of the within Complaint by USPS First Class Mail, postage prepaid, at Carlisle, Pennsylvania, addressed as
follows:
Michael B. Scheib, Esquire
Griffith, Strickler, Lerman, Solymos & Calkins
110 S. Northern Way
York, PA 17402-3737
Attorney for Defendant Matthew Coover
Respectfully,
Rominger & Associates
Date: ID ?
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 241- 6070
Supreme Court ID #: 81924
Attorney for Donna Mowry
c?
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DONNA MOWRY,
Plaintiff
v.
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant
No. 09-2662
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
NOTICE TO PLEAD
To: Donna Mowry
c/o Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
You are hereby notified to file a written response to the enclosed Defendant's Answer
with New Matter within twenty (20) days from service hereof or a judgment may be entered
against you.
GRIFFITH, STRI
S
Dated: April 0 _, 2012 By:
MICHAEL B. SCHEIB, ESQUIRE
Attorney I.D. No. 63868
110 South Northern Way
York, Pennsylvania 17402
(T) 717-757-7602
(F) 717-757-3783
mscheib@gslsc.com
Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Coover
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DONNA MOWRY, No. 09-2662
Plaintiff
V. CIVIL ACTION - LAW
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
DEFENDANT'S ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER
COME NOW, Defendant, Matthew Coover, by and through his attorneys, Griffith,
Stickler, Lerman, Solymos & Calkins and Michael B. Scheib, Esquire, respond to the allegations
in Plaintiff's Complaint as follows:
1. Admitted upon information and belief.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted in part, denied in part. It is admitted that Defendant, Matthew Coover,
was traveling North on South Middlesex Road and was stopped at the traffic light at the
intersection South Middlesex Road and Harrisburg Pike. The remaining allegations are denied.
After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form
a belief as to the truth of the allegations set forth in paragraph 4 of Plaintiff's Complaint and
same are denied and strict proof thereof is demanded.
5. Admitted in part, denied in part. It is admitted that Defendant was struck by the
Plaintiff. The remaining allegations are denied. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations set
forth in paragraph 5 of Plaintiff's Complaint and same are denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded.
6. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations set forth in paragraph 6 of
Plaintiff's complaint and the same is denied and strict proof thereof is demanded.
7. Denied. This paragraph states a conclusion of law to which no response is
required. Furthermore, after reasonable investigation, answering Defendant is without
knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or veracity of the allegations
contained in paragraph 7 of Plaintiff's Complaint and same are denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded.
COUNTI
NEGLIGENCE
8. Paragraphs 1 through 7 of Defendant's Answer with New Matter are incorporated
herein as though fully set forth at length.
9. Denied. This paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is
required.
10. Denied. This paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is
required. Furthermore, after reasonable investigation answering Defendant is without knowledge
or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or accuracy of the allegations in
paragraph 10 of Plaintiff's Complaint and the same is denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded.
11. Denied. This paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is
2
required. Furthermore, after reasonable investigation answering Defendant is without knowledge
or information. sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or accuracy of the allegations in
paragraph 11 of Plaintiff's Complaint and the same is denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded.
12. Denied. This paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is
required. Furthermore, after reasonable investigation answering Defendant is without knowledge
or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or accuracy of the allegations in
paragraph 12 of Plaintiff's Complaint and the same is denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded.
13. Denied. This paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is
required. Furthermore, after reasonable investigation answering Defendant is without knowledge
or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or accuracy of the allegations in
paragraph 13 of Plaintiffs Complaint and the same is denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded.
14. Denied. This paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is
required. Furthermore, after reasonable investigation answering Defendant is without knowledge
or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or accuracy of the allegations in
paragraph 14 of Plaintiff's Complaint and the same is denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded.
15. Denied. This paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is
required. Furthermore, after reasonable investigation answering Defendant is without knowledge
3
or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or accuracy of the allegations in
paragraph 15 of Plaintiff's Complaint and the same is denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded.
16. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations set forth in paragraph 16
of Plaintiff's complaint and the same is denied and strict proof thereof is demanded.
WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests this Honorable Court to enter judgment
in his favor together with the costs of this lawsuit.
By way of further defense:
NEW MATTER
17. Paragraph 1 through 16 of Defendant's Answer with New Matter are incorporated
herein and as if fully set forth at length.
18. Plaintiff's injuries, if any, may be barred or limited by the Motor Vehicle
Financial Responsibility Law.
19. Plaintiff's injuries, if any, may be barred or limited by a limited tort selection.
20. Plaintiff's injuries, if any, were caused by the acts or omissions of a third party
over whom Defendant had no control.
21. Plaintiff's injuries, if any, were caused by events which either predated or
postdated the motor vehicle accident which is the subject of this lawsuit.
22. Plaintiff's damages were caused by her own conduct.
4
23. Plaintiffs recovery may be barred or limited by the amount of uninsured or
underinsured motorist's benefits, if any, to which Plaintiff may be entitled to recover.
24. Defendant is entitled to have the Court mold any verdict in Plaintiffs favor to
reflect the amount of uninsured or underinsured motorist's benefits, if any, which Plaintiff has
received.
WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests this Honorable Court to enter judgment
in his favor together with the costs of this lawsuit.
Dated: April _I ? , 2012
GRIFFITH, STRICKLER, LERMAN,
SOLYMOS & CALKINS
r,J f
By:
MIC EL B. S IB, tSQUW?E
Attorney I.D. No. 63868
110 South Northern Way
York, Pennsylvania 17402
(T) 717-757-7602
(F) 717-757-3783
mscheib@gslsc.com
Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Coover
5
VERIFICATION
I, Matthew Coover, hereby verify that the statements made in the foregoing Defendant's
Answer with New Matter are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge or
information and belief, as well as reports, records, conferences and other investigatory material
made available to me. To the extent that the foregoing contains averments which are
inconsistent in fact, I verify that my knowledge or information is sufficient to form a belief that
one or more of them is true, although I am currently unable, after reasonable investigation, to
ascertain which of the inconsistent averments are true.
To the extent that the foregoing contains legal conclusions or opinions, I hereby state that
my Verification is made upon the advice of counsel, upon whom I have relied in filing this
document.
This Verification is made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904 related to unsworn
falsifications to authorities.
/?
Date: April ?, 2012 (??
Matthew Coover
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DONNA MOWRY, No. 09-2662
Plaintiff :
V.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this day of April, 2012, I, Michael B. Scheib, Esquire, a member of
the firm of GRIFFITH, STRICKLER, LERMAN, SOLYMOS & CALKINS, hereby certify that I
have this date served a copy of Defendant's Answer with New Matter, by First Class Mail,
addressed to the party or attorney of record as follows:
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
Rominger & Associates
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(Attorney for Plaintiff)
By:
GRIFFITH, STRICKLER, LERMAN,
SOLYMOS & CAL1S
MICHAEL B. SCHEIB, ESQUII7
Attorney I.D. No. 63868 vv
110 South Northern Way
York, Pennsylvania 17402
(T) 717-757-7602
(F) 717-757-3783
mscheib@gslsc.com
Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Coover
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DONNA MOWRY, No. 09-2662
Plaintiff
V. CIVIL ACTION - LAW <
MATTHEW COOVER, ?•
Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED --
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this I ? day of 2012, I, Michael B. Schei6,_'E,&ire
a member of the firm of Griffith, Strickler, Lerman, Solymos & Calkins, hereby certify that I
have this date served a copy of the Interrogatories of Defendant Matthew Coover to Plaintiff
Donna Mowry, Set No. 2, by United States First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as
follows:
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
Rominger & Associates
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(Attorney for Plaintiff)
GRIFFITH, STRICKLER, LERMAN,
SOLYMOS & CALKIAS 11 .
By:
MICtIAEL B. SCHEIB, ESQUIRE
Attorney I.D. # PA. 63868
110 South Northern Way
York, PA 17402-3737
Phone (717) 757-7602
Fax (717) 757-3783
Mscheib(&gslsc.com.
Attorney for Defendant, Matthew Coover
DONNA MOWRY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V. CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO: 2009 - 2662
MATTHEW COOVER, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
N
Defendant, co :3C
Fn
Z -C ;T.
PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO NEW MATTER OF DEFENDANT
? c-
17. Admitted. = c
18. Denied. This paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is required.
19. Denied. By way of further answer, the Plaintiff was covered by the full tort election
under her motor vehicle policy.
20. Denied. Plaintiff knows of no third party who was responsible for the injuries sustained.
Strict proof of the same will be required at the time of trial.
21. Denied.
22. Denied.
23. Denied. This paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is required.
24. Denied. This paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is required.
Respectfully submitted,
ROMINGER & ASSOCIATES
Dated: d-
Lee Manarino, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 241-6070
Supreme Court ID # 312895
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DONNA MOWRY,
Plaintiff,
V.
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO: 2009 - 2662
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
VERIFICATION
LEE MANDARINO, ESQUIRE, states that he is the attorney for Plaintiff in this action;
that he makes this affidavit as attorney because he has sufficient knowledge or information and
belief, based upon his investigation of the matters averred or denied in the foregoing document;
and that this statement is made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Pa.C.S. §4904, relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date: May 7, 2012
Lee Mandarino, Esquire
Attorney for Plaintiff
DONNA MOWRY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant,
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO: 2009 - 2662
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Lee Mandarino, Esquire, attorney for Plaintiff, do hereby certify that I this day served a
copy of the Response to New Matter upon the following by depositing same in the United States
Mail, first class postage prepaid, at Carlisle, Pennsylvania, addressed as follows:
Michael B. Scheib, Esquire
Griffith, Strickler, Lerman, Solymos & Calkins
110 South Northern Way
York, Pennsylvania 17402
717-757-7602
Dated: May 7, 2012
Lee Mandarino, Esquire
Attorney for Plaintiff
f[�t
Pt G
CUtle 2 NdiA
2: E
p `NditdS r C Q J; y
dlA
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DONNA MOWRY,
Plaintiff
v.
MATTHEW COOVER,
Defendant
TO: Prothonotary
Date:
No. 09-2662
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE TO DISCONTINUE
Pursuant to Rule 229, please mark this matter settled, discontinued and ended.
, 2014 By:
DONNA MO R
41 Mill Stre
Mt. Holly Springs, PA 170:5