HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-12-09
n ~~
~-, -,.,
n
.~ __ , ._ .
Jeffrey R. Boswell, Esquire p
~ -~,.~ ~ ~
:
Supreme Court LD. #25444 !•-' ~~" n _
"'~ - `
BOSWELL, TINTNER & PICCOLA ~ ~. ~ }
E
315 North Front Street =. - r,~3 ~ _
N
- --
P. O. Box 741 =-? ~~~
--~ `- - -
-
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108-0741 ,
"%G ~ ~
~ ~.
- -
Phone (717-236-9377) r
j C _
~ - -_'
Fax (717-236-9316) -i
~ - q ~ __ ~
E-mail (iboswell(a~btpalaw.com) ~ CI1
iT
IN RE: ESTATE OF : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
SARAH McCREA CHAPMAN JONES :CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
LATE OF LOWER MIFFLIN TWP., :ORPHANS' COURT DIVISION
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA.,
DECEASED. : NO. 2009-00329 (21-09-0329)
OBJECTION IN THE FORM OF AN ANSWER TO
PETITION TO TERMINATE TRUST
AND NOW, come Henry L. Chapman, Karen E. Chapman, and Katharine
Chapman Michalka, Contingent Beneficiaries of the Testamentary Trust of Sarah
McCrea Chapman Jones (referred to herein as "Contingent Beneficiaries"), by and
through their attorneys, Jeffrey R. Boswell, Esquire, and Boswell, Tintner & Piccola, and
hereby file this Objection in the Form of an Answer to the Petition to Terminate Trust
filed by Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (referred to herein as "M&T"), as
follows:
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
5. Admitted in part, and denied in part. Contingent Beneficiaries admit that
Decedent's Last Will and Testament provided for the establishment of numerous trusts,
but deny all trusts were established as provided for, having no specific information
concerning their establishment and, thus, Contingent Beneficiaries demand information
about the establishment of any and all trusts and demand production of all financial
details, bank statements, investment activities, reports, and annual tax returns
concerning the administration of the trusts. Further, Contingent Beneficiaries demand
M&T execute IRS Form 2848 to authorize release of all tax returns filed during the time
period of all trusts pertinent to Alfred McCrea Chapman, the father of the Contingent
Beneficiaries.
6. Admitted.
7. Admitted.
8. Admitted.
9. Admitted.
10. Admitted.
11. Denied. Contingent Beneficiaries are without information in order to form a
belief as to this averment, and Respondents demand proof as to this averment.
12. Denied. Contingent Beneficiaries are without information in order to form a
belief as to this averment, and Respondents demand proof as to this averment.
13. Denied. Alfred McCrea Chapman (herein referred to as "Beneficiary")
could benefit from the value or income that could be generated by the Chapman Lodge
property, including the adjacent land, with any income to be used for his present care.
14. Admitted in part, and denied in part. Contingent Beneficiaries admit that
Alfred McCrea Chapman suffers from chronic serious mental illness. However,
Contingent Beneficiaries aver that Alfred McCrea Chapman could benefit from the value
and income that could be generated by the Chapman Lodge property, including the
adjacent land, with proper management of these resources to produce income for the
Beneficiary's present care.
15. Admitted in part, and denied in part. Contingent Beneficiaries admit that a
letter dated July 26, 1988, exists concerning the Beneficiary's desires on or about July
26, 1988. However, Contingent Beneficiaries aver that the July 26, 1988, letter does
not address Beneficiary's present desire or the benefit that he could gain from income
that could be generated with proper management of the Chapman Lodge property,
including the adjacent land.
16. Admitted in part, and denied in part. Contingent Beneficiaries admit that if
it is proven that the Beneficiary has no need for the subject property, his children as
Contingent Beneficiaries become joint life tenants in Chapman Lodge and its adjacent
land. Contingent Beneficiaries aver that the children are adults and are available and
able to use the Chapman Lodge property, including its adjacent land, as life tenants for
proper purposes.
17. Admitted.
18. Admitted.
19. Admitted in part, and denied in part. Contingent Beneficiaries admit that
Katharine Chapman Michalka executed a statement on February 23, 2007, which was
attached to M&T's Petition as Exhibit "D." However, Contingent Beneficiaries aver that
the Trustees have not made full disclosure as to the costs and details pertinent to the
maintenance of Chapman Lodge property and the adjacent land, and, thus, deny the
averment as stated. The Contingent Beneficiaries demand proof of all maintenance
costs and all details of administration of the subject property, including the source and
use of all income, all records, accounts, bank statements, and tax returns.
20. Admitted.
21. Admitted in part, and denied in part. Contingent Beneficiaries admit that
Co-trustee M&T has expressed its desire to terminate the trust and to make immediate
distribution to St. John's Episcopal Church in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. However,
Contingent Beneficiaries deny that distribution is warranted or appropriate, as the
Trustees have not made full disclosure of all details of the trust administration to
Contingent Beneficiaries. Furthermore, M&T's request for relief is contrary to the
express directives of the Testamentary Trust.
22. Denied. The Petitioner states a conclusion of law to which no response is
necessary. However, to the extent that a response is necessary, Contingent
Beneficiaries aver that distribution of the trusts' assets to St. John's Episcopal Church is
contrary to the Testamentary Trust's express directives and purposes, including benefit
to the Beneficiary and, thereafter, the Contingent Beneficiaries (as life tenants), from the
use of Chapman Lodge property and the adjacent land.
NEW MATTER
23. Contingent Beneficiaries incorporate the answers set forth in paragraphs 1
through 22 in this New Matter without the necessity to restate same.
24. Neither Co-trustee Manufacturers & Traders Trust Company, nor Co-trustee
John McCrea, III, has provided an accounting as to the details of the administration of
this trust and, therefore, Contingent Beneficiaries demand a full accounting.
25. In her Last Will and Testament and her First Codicil, Sarah McCrea
Chapman Jones created other trusts for the benefit of the Beneficiary, which other trusts
are critical to the Beneficiary's present care. The Contingent Beneficiaries demand the
production of financial details as to these other trusts created for the benefit of the
Beneficiary, including all present principal and expenses, as well as sources of all
income, all records, accounts, bank statements, and tax returns.
26. M&T's Petition to Terminate Trust fails to cite Alfred McCrea Chapman, the
lifetime Beneficiary, who is an indispensible party to this action.
WHEREFORE, the Contingent Beneficiaries respectfully request this Honorable
Court not to permit the immediate distribution of the Chapman Lodge and its adjacent
property to St. John's Episcopal Church in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, and to order that the
Co-trustees immediately provide a full accounting of all principal, income, and expenses
pertinent to the trust property and the administration of this trust from its establishment
to the present date, to all interested parties, including the Beneficiary and the
Contingent Beneficiaries.
BOSWELL, TINTNER & PICCOLA
By:
Je r y R. Boswell, Esquire
I.D. No. 25444
315 N. Front Street
P. O. Box 741
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0741
(717) 236-9377
Attorneys for Henry L. Chapman,
Karen E. Chapman, and Katharine
Chapman
DATED: May 8, 2009
VERIFICATION
I, Henry L. Chapman, Contingent Beneficiary of the Testamentary Trust of Sarah
McCrea Chapman Jones, hereby verify that the facts contained in the foregoing
Objection in the Form of an Answer to Petition to Terminate Trust are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. I understand that false
statements herein are subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. §4904 relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
Henry L. Chapma
DATE: May ~ , 2009
VERIFICATION
I, Jeffrey R. Boswell, Esquire, being duly sworn according to law, deposes and
says that he is the attorney for the Contingent Beneficiaries of the Testamentary Trust
of Sarah McCrea Chapman Jones, Katharine Chapman Michalka and Karen
E.Chapman, that said Contingent Beneficiaries cannot make the verification to the
foregoing Objection in the Form of an Answer to Petition to Terminate Trust due to time
constraints, and that the facts set forth in the foregoing Objection in the Form of an
Answer are true and correct upon his knowledge, information, and belief. I understand
that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904
relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Jeff .Boswell, Esquire
Dated: May 8, 2009
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I do hereby certify that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing
Objection in the Form of an Answer to Petition to Terminate Trust by placing same in
the United States Mail, first class, postage prepaid, at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,
addressed as follows:
No V. Otto, III, Esquire
Seth T. Mosebey, Esquire
10 East High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorneys for Manufacturers and Traders
Trust Company
By:
Dated: May 12, 2009