HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-05008
ANDREW R. BAKER,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
V.
PERFECT ORDER, INC.,
Civil Action No. Qd- SDD?
Civil Action- Law
Defendant §
H50 6"eos-U_Y--81?eL.
oU
tCS?9 ? PRAECIPE FOR WRIT OF SUMMONS
17655
TO The Prothonotary:
Please issue writ of summons in the above-captioned civil action.
Coy A. Starr, Esq.
Attorney ID Number 77956
4 South Market Street
Duncannon, PA 17020
834-6024
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
County of Cumberland
Andrew R. Baker
V&
Perfect Order, Inc.
1150 Lancaster Blvd.
Suite 100
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
Perfect Order, Inc.
You are hereby notified that
Andrew R. Baker
--------------------------------
Court of Common Pleas
2000-5008 Civil ............ 19
Civil-Action---Law
the Plaintiff ha s commenced an action in __ Civil Action - Law
against you which you are required to defend or a default judgment may be entered against you.
(SEAL)
Curtis -R.----- Long
------- ------------------------
Prothonotary
Date _.Suly-1Z,-2(1Q0------------- 19---- By ---I -De?P T- ------
uty
R
O
co
w g 9
rt ;C)
,N
G u
1 0 0 1 r 0 F-h
r
o
cn ;
o
U
CC ; r
rt E
d i
I O C
C
p i
I CA O
N
CCC
SSS w
p I IQ
CD N n
J I 1 J
V
0
1
Ul
O
rn
I Ln
I I
1
x
0
1
1
1
IN
°o
11
N
IOD
1r
IC
I ".
1~
1
1
I
I
i
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing document was this day served upon the
following by U.S. first class mail, postage prepaid:
Coy A. Starr, Esq.
4 South Market Street
Duncannon, PA 17020
9
Schaun D. Henry
July 24, 2000
ANDREW R. BAKER,
Plaintiff
V.
PERFECT ORDER, INC.
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 2000-5008 CIVIL
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
TO: Curtis R. Long, Prothonotary
Please enter our appearance in the above-captioned action on behalf of Defendant Perfect
Order, Inc.
McNEES, WALLACE & C
By
James P. DeAngelo
I.D. #62377
Schaun D. Henry
I.D. #80597
100 Pine Street
P. O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 232-8000
Attorneys for Defendant Perfect Order, Inc.
Dated: July 24, 2000
,.lq? _1
ANDREW R. BAKER,
Plaintiff
V,
PERFECT ORDER, INC.
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 2000-5008 CIVIL
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
PRAECIPE FOR RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT
TO: Curtis R. Long, Prothonotary
Please issue a Rule on Plaintiff Andrew R. Baker to file a Complaint in the above case
within twenty (20) days after service of the rule or suffer a judgment of non pros.
McNEES, WALLACE & NURICK
By
I
James P. DeAngelo
I.D. #
Schaun D. Henry
I.D. #
100 Pine Street
P. O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 232-8000
Dated: July 24, 2000
Attorneys for Defendant Perfect Order, Inc.
NOW, 0,4 qj, _ 2000, RULE ISSUED AS ABOVE.
Curtis R. Long, Proth otary
By ?m94 ? /L!
puty Prothonotary
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing document was this day served upon the
following by U.S. first class mail, postage prepaid:
Coy A. Starr, Esq.
4 South Market Street
Duncannon, PA 17020
I
y/? FJ
Schaun D. Henry
July 24, 2000
PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT
(Must be typewritten and submitted in duplicate)
TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY:
Please list the within matter for the next Argument Court.
CAPTION OF CASE
(entire caption must be stated in full)
ANDREW R. BAKER
(Plaintiff)
vs.
PERFECT ORDER, INC.
(Defendant)
No. 2000-5008 Civil x3&x
1. State matter to be argued (i.e., plaintiff's motion for new trial, defendant's
demn= to complaint, etc.):
Defendant's Preliminary Objections
2. Identify counsel who will argue case:
(a) for plaintiff: Coy A. Starr
Address: 4 South Market Street, Duncannon, PA 17020
(b) for defendant: Schaun D. Henry
Address: McNees, Wallace & Nurick
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
3. I will notify all parties in writing within two days that this case has
been listed for argiment.
4. Argument Court Date:
January 3, 2001
Dated: December , 2000 Attorney for Defendant
C; c
ca
TJ
r e-? `? c?a
-
J
,l
4
4
0 K
ANDREW R. BAKER,
Plaintiff
V.
PERFECT ORDER, INC.
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 2000-5008 CIVIL
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
Perfect Order, Inc., by and through its counsel, McNees, Wallace & Nurick, hereby
makes the following preliminary objections to Plaintiffs Complaint.
Preliminary Objection In The Nature Of A Demurrer
1. Plaintiff purports to state a claim for breach of contract in the sole count of
his Complaint.
2. Plaintiff incorporates averments in Paragraphs 1 through 31 in its prayer for
relief on what Plaintiff alleges was a two-year oral employment contract.
3. Plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted for breach of
contract because Plaintiff has failed to aver sufficient facts to overcome the presumption
of at-will employment.
WHEREFORE, Perfect Order, Inc. respectfully requests that the Court dismiss with
prejudice Plaintiff's claim for legal insufficiency.
McNEEL E
DAugust 29, 2000 By ``e?c??111
James P. DeAngelo
I.D. #62377
Schaun D. Henry
I.D. #80597
100 Pine Street
P. O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 232-8000
Attorneys for Defendant Perfect Order, Inc.
-2-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing document was this day served upon
the following by U.S. first class mail, postage prepaid:
Coy A. Starr, Esq.
4 South Market Street
Duncannon, PA 17020
Schaun D. Henry
Dated: August 29, 2000
SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR
CASE NO: 2000-05008 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
BAKER ANDREW R
VS
PERFECT ORDER INC
HAROLD WEARY
, Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of
Cumberland County, Pensylvania, who being duly sworn according to law,
says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS
PERFECT ORDER INC
was served upon
the
DEFENDANT , at 0015:39 HOURS, on the 20th day of July , 2000
at 1300 BENT CREEK BLVD
MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055 by handing to
AMY WELLER (ADMIN. ASST.)
a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with
and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof.
Sheriff's Costs:
Docketing 18.00
Service 5.58
Affidavit .00
Surcharge 10.00
.00
33.58
Sworn and Subscribed to before
me this IAt- day of
X .2 azro A.D.
P othonota.ry
So Answer?.s
R. Thomas Kline
07/21/2000
COY A. STARR
Deputy Sherif
ANDREW R. BAKER,
Plaintiff
vs.
PERFECT ORDER, INC.,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
00-5008 CIVIL
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN RE: DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
BEFORE HESS. OLER AND GUIDO, J.J.
ORDER
AND NOW, this Z 22r day of January, 2001, it appearing that the complaint fails to
set forth any allegations of an employment contract which was, in accordance with paragraph 30
of the complaint, "to begin on November 1, 1997," the preliminary objection of the defendant is
SUSTAINED. Plaintiff is herewith granted twenty (20) days within which to file an amended
complaint.
BY THE COURT,
Coy A. Starr, Esquire
For the Plaintiff
Schaun D. Henry, Esquire
For the Defendant
:rlm
I?,
o? R-
Cl1MBEFj,L.pkV:) C GUNTY
t?ENNSYi_VANA
ANDREW R. BAKER,
Plaintiff
V,
PERFECT ORDER, INC.
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2000-5008
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND NOW COMES Perfect Order, Inc., by and through its attorneys, McNees,
Wallace & Nurick, and answers the Amended Complaint as follows:
1 . Upon information and belief the averments of Paragraph 1 are admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Denied as stated. By way of further response, Defendant denies that any
cause of action actually arose in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania or elsewhere. To the
extent that Plaintiff alleges that the events occurred in Mechanicsburg, Cumberland
County, Pennsylvania, Defendant admits that venue would be proper
4. Denied. Plaintiff was hired in April 1996. His employment was at-will.
5. Denied. Defendant denies that any contract for employment, be it verbal or
written, was ever formed with Plaintiff. Plaintiff was at all times an employee at-will.
6. A consultant could earn more than $35,000 per year. All other averments
of Paragraph 6 are denied.
7. April 1, 1996 was Plaintiff's first day at work.
8. Defendant admits that it put Plaintiff to work in its PC manufacturing facility
in September of 1996. All other allegations of Paragraph 8 are denied.
9. Denied. While Plaintiff was provided with information regarding what was
expected of him in his job, there was no need to "finalize the terms of employment"
since Plaintiff was at all times an employee at-will.
10. Denied. No contract for employment was ever formed whether oral or
otherwise. Plaintiff was an employee at-will and no specified term of employment was
provided.
11. Denied. Plaintiff was assigned to work on the manufacturing facility project
in September 1996, and Plaintiff was responsible for hiring a part-time employee to
help with construction. That part-time employee is still employed by Perfect Order.
12. Denied as stated. By way of further response, Defendant admits that
Plaintiff alleges he was injured at the Cameron Street warehouse facility.
13. Denied as stated. The manufacturing facility was closed in October 1997.
14. Plaintiff's rate of pay was to be changed to $39,000 a year beginning
November 1, 1997. All other averments of Paragraph 14 are denied.
15. Denied as stated. When the manufacturing facility closed, instead of laying
Plaintiff off, as it had every right to do, Perfect Order assigned Plaintiff to other duties.
Plaintiff did not stop working for Perfect Order until July 15, 1998, when he was
discharged. Accordingly, Plaintiff was still employed by Perfect Order on November 1,
1997.
2
16. *Denied as stated. Plaintiff's duties were changed to accommodate the
needs of Perfect Order.
17. Denied. Plaintiff was an employee at-will.
16. *In March of 1998, Terry Johnson expressed that Plaintiff was doing a good
job and that he had plans for Plaintiff's future assignments.
18. Denied. Upon reasonable investigation, Defendant is without sufficient
information to admit or deny whether Plaintiff was "required to attend regular massage
therapy sessions." It is denied there were complaints about Plaintiff's therapy. There
were concerns about Plaintiff's attitude and his failure to do his job.
19. Denied. Upon reasonable investigation, Defendant is without sufficient
information to admit or deny the averments of Paragraph 19.
20. Defendant warned Plaintiff about his absences. The work environment did
not become unpleasant; however, Plaintiff's conduct and language were abrasive.
Defendant is without sufficient information to admit or deny averments regarding
Plaintiff's pain levels and the same are therefore denied.
21. Denied. The answer to this paragraph is incorporated by reference.
22. Denied. Plaintiff was informed that his work duties were not being
completed, and that he could not expect Crystal Griffin to complete his assignments
because she did not have availability to do so. After reasonable investigation,
* As per Complaint.
3
Defendant is without sufficient information to admit or deny the other averments of
Paragraph 22 and the same are therefore denied.
23. Plaintiff issued an abrasive e-mail and followed that e-mail up with another
apologizing for having sent the first e-mail. Upon reasonable investigation, Defendant
is without sufficient information to determine whether Plaintiff spoke to each
salesperson and apologized in person, whether the salespersons stated that "they
understood", or whether Plaintiff was suffering under intense stress and suffering pain
levels that were not manageable. All other averments of Paragraph 23 are denied.
24. Admitted.
25. Denied. Mr. Johnson advised Plaintiff that he wanted to discuss problems
related to Plaintiff's improper use of Company e-mail and other job performance issues.
Plaintiff was d',ischarged before the meeting could be scheduled.
26. Admitted.
27. Admitted.
28. Denied as stated. Defendant denies that Plaintiff responded by explaining
that workers' compensation would be better able to determine the validity of Plaintiff's
claim for compensation. In reality, when Plaintiff tried to submit to workers'
compensation a claim for an injury which did not occur at work and Defendant
resisted, plaintiff became extremely agitated and stormed out of the office, leaving
work without authorization.
29. Admitted.
4
30. Denied. Defendant does not have an employment contract with Plaintiff. As
an at-will employee, Plaintiff would have been discharged at any time, for any reason
or for no reason. Although Defendant was not required to satisfy any conditions
precedent to terminating Plaintiff's at-will employment, Plaintiff was advised on
numerous occasions that his job performance was not acceptable.
31. Denied. By way of further response, no employment contract ever existed;
therefore, Plaintiff could not have any time "remaining" on a non-existent contract for
employment.
32. Paragraph 32 is an introductory paragraph to which no responsive pleading
is required. To the extent a responsive pleading is required, the averments of
Paragraph 32 are denied.
33. Denied. There was no contract. Plaintiff was an at-will employee.
34. Paragraph 34 is a prayer for relief to which no responsive pleading is
required. To the extent that a responsive pleading is required, the averments of
Paragraph 34 are denied. Plaintiff should be denied any and all relief.
35. Plaintiff was an at-will employee.
NEW MATTER
36. Plaintiff has failed to set forth a claim on which relief may be granted
because he has failed to set forth each and every element of the employment contract.
5
37. Even if Plaintiff can set forth a claim for an oral employment contract, which
is denied, his term of employment is not absolute. Plaintiff was discharged for just
cause.
McNEES, WALLACE & NURICK
Dated: March 5, 2000 By
James P. DeAngelo
I.D. #62377
Schaun D. Henry
I.D. #80597
100 Pine Street
P. O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 232-8000
Attorneys for Defendant
6
ANDREW R. BAKER,
Plaintiff
V.
PERFECT ORDER, INC.
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2000-5008
: CIVIL ACTION -LAW
VERIFICATION OF ELLEN B. RUNDLE
The undersigned, Ellen B. Rundle, states that she is Fiscal Manager for Perfect
Order, Inc., the Respondent in this matter, that she is authorized to prepare this Verification
and that the matters stated in the foregoing Answer To Amended Complaint are true to the
best of her knowledge, information and belief. The foregoing is made subject to the
provisions of 18 Pa.C.S. §4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Dated: March ( , 2000
Ellen B. Rundle
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing document was this day served
upon the following by regular, first-class U.S. mail, postage prepaid:
Coy A. Starr, Esq.
4 South Market Street
Duncannon, PA 17020
Schaun D. Henry
Dated: March 5, 2001
. w .: _
u? }_
to t
ANDREW R. BAKER,
Plaintiff
vs.
PERFECT ORDER, INC.,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
00-5008 CIVIL
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN RE: REQUEST TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13'r day of August, 2001, a rule is issued on all parties to show
cause why the relief requested in the within motion ought not to be granted. This rule returnable
ten (10) days after service.
BY THE COURT,
v Irt
OF 7
PciV'h„4?'?.',llivlA rJ
i
c
0
ANDREW R. BAKER,
Plaintiff
V.
PERFECT ORDER, INC.,
Defendant
AUG 0 8 20?.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Civil Action No. 2000-5008
Civil Action- Law
ORDER
AND NOW, this day of , 2001, it is hereby
ORDERED and DIRECTED that Coy A. Starr, Esq., be granted his request to withdraw as
counsel of record for the Plaintiff in the above captioned matter.
FURTHER, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff have
days to notify this
Court of new counsel of record or otherwise indicate to the Court of its intention to proceed with
the above captioned matter.
BY THE COURT
J.
ANDREW R. BAKER, § IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
§ OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
Plaintiff § PENNSYLVANIA
V. §
§ Civil Action No. 2000-5008
PERFECT ORDER, INC., §
§ Civil Action- Law
Defendant §
REQUEST LEAVE OF COURT TO WITHDRAW APPEARENCE
COMES NOW, this 2"d day of August, 2001, the attorney for Plaintiff in the above
captioned matter, Coy A. Starr, Esq. of 211 Loshes Run Road, Duncannon, PA 17020
respectfully requests LEAVE OF COURT TO WITHDRAW APEARENCE; as follows:
Counsel for Plaintiff is closing down the Law Office Of Coy A. Starr, Esq and will be
voluntarily placed on INACTIVE STATUS with respect to the practice of law in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
2. On May 27, 2001, Plaintiff and counsel for Plaintiff prepared Plaintiff's Response to
Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories and at this time Plaintiff was notified by counsel
of record for Plaintiff of the decision to withdraw representation.
Plaintiff understood that a new attorney would be necessary and at that time received all
case related materials.
r %
WHEREFORE, Coy A. Starr, Esq., counsel for Plaintiff respectfully requests that this
Honorable Court grant leave to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff.
Respectfully submitted,
Dater 2-0(
By:
Coy A Starr, Esquire
Supreme Court I.D. No.: 77956
Law Office of Coy A. Starr
211 Loshes Run Road
Duncannon, PA 17020
(717) 834-3460
d- l
Z ?
? .YTI
ltd
N
MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
100 PINE STREET
P. O. BOX 1166
HARRISBURG, PA 17108-1166
TELEPHONE 17171 232-8000
Fn 1717)237-5300
http://www.mwn.com
SCHAUN D. HENRY
DIRECT DIAL: (717) 237-5346
E-MAIL ADDRESS: SHENRY@MWN.COM
August 20, 2001
The Honorable Kevin A. Hess
Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas
One Courthouse Square
Carlisle, PA 17013
RE: Baker v. Perfect Order
Civil Action 00-5008
Dear Judge Hess:
We are in receipt of your Rule to Show Cause dated August 13, 2001. Please be
advised that Perfect Order does not oppose the withdrawal of Attorney Coy Starr from
representation of Mr. Baker. We do ask however, that Mr. Starr and Mr. Baker give assurances
to the Court that this case will not be delayed by Mr. Starr's withdrawal. This matter has
dragged on fora period of almost two years. Baker's case has already been dismissed with
leave to amend after Defendant filed successful preliminary objections to the initial complaint.
Baker is now proceeding under an amended complaint. We ask that the Court not impose
additional hardship on our client by allowing undue delay in proceeding with this matter.
In the event that Baker obtains new counsel, we are specifically requesting that the
discovery period not be extended for any more than thirty (30) days. This should allow new
counsel sufficient time to become familiar with the case with Mr. Starr's and Mr. Baker's
assistance.
Respectfully submitted,
MCNEES WALLA NU. ICK LLC
By
?/
Schaun D. Henry
dip
c: Coy Starr, Esquire
Mr. Andrew R. Baker
COLUMBUS. OH HAZLETON, PA WASHINGTON, D.C.
ANDREW R. BAKER, § IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
§ OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
Plaintiff § PENNSYLVANIA
V. §
§ Civil Action No. 2000-5008
PERFECT ORDER, INC., §
§ Civil Action- Law
Defendant §
NOTICE
YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth
in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Amended
Complaint and Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and
filing in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you.
You are warned that, if you fail to do so, the case may proceed without you and a judgement may
be entered against you by the Courtwithout further notice for any money claimed in the
Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Petitioner. You may lose money or
property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA LEGAL SERVICES
213A North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
(717) 232-7536
ANDREW R. BAKER,
Plaintiff
V.
PERFECT ORDER, INC.,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Civil Action No. 2000-5008
Civil Action- Law
Defendant
AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff, Andrew Baker, by and through his attorney, Coy A.
Starr, Esq., to allege as follows:
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff, Andrew Baker is an individual RD # 4 Box 4677, Duncannon, Pennsylvania
17020.
2. Defendant, Perfect Order, Inc. is a corporation doing business under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with its principal place of business located at 1150
Lancaster Blvd, Ste 100, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055.
VENUE
3. Venue is appropriate for with this action because the causes of action arose with
Defendant in Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
BACKGROUND OF FACTS AND AGREEMENT TERMS
4. On or about March, 1996, Plaintiff was hired by Perfect Order, Inc. to be a consultant.
5. The contract of employment was an oral agreement whereby Plaintiff would be employed
by Perfect Order for one year at a rate of pay of a minimum $35,000.00 per year with
three weeks paid vacation.
6. The minimum pay of $35,000.00 per year was in essence a "draw" upon which the
consultant was to be paid a commission of forty-five percent (45%) of what was billed to
the customer and that amount was to be subtracted from the draw. In other words, the
consultant could earn more than the minimum $35,000.00 per year.
On April 1, 1996, Plaintiff began working for Defendant.
8. In September, 1996 Plaintiff was approached by John Gomery, Vice President of Perfect
Order, Inc., and he inquired as to whether Plaintiff was interested in creating and running
a PC manufacturing facility in an effort to gain a state contract as a hardware
provider/manufacturer.
9. Plaintiff was interested and met with Terry Johnson to finalize the terms of employment.
10. At this meeting in September, 1996, the terms of the employment were orally agreed that
Plaintiff s salary would remain the same and that the length of said contract was to be two
(2) years. This oral two year agreement was to become the standard contract for Perfect
Order, Inc.
11. In October 1996, Plaintiff began the groundwork for forming the manufacturing branch
by creating a procedure for manufacture; software for tracking stock, sales, and doing
reports; creating and maintaining contact with the two major parts distributors in the area;
and hiring a part time person to help with construction. This individual would later
become a full time consultant with Perfect Order and remains in their employ.
12. On September 10, 1997 while working in the manufacturing facility, Plaintiff was injured
trying to lift an 80+ pound boxed computer. Plaintiff completed all necessary paperwork
relating to filing a workman's compensation claim.
13. On or about October 31, 1997, this facility was closed.
14. Due to a negative income stream during Plaintiff s work at his new position and the
subsequent loss of pay due to the facility closure, Plaintiff s rate of pay was to be changed
to $39,000.00 per year beginning November 1, 1997.
15. On or about November 1, 1997, Plaintiff began working again as a consultant for Perfect
Order, Inc with the same rate of pay and benefits as he had previously received as a
consultant.
16. Due to Plaintiff s injuries, Plaintiff and Defendant agreed to allow Plaintiff to become an
an office employee performing inside sales and sales support tasks, as well as some
vendor relations, product ordering, and marketing and Plaintiff was to coordinate the sale
of the newly formed and financially failing training facility.
17. Plaintiff and Defendant agreed pursuant to prior dealings that the rate of pay for this
position would be the same as the previous position for a two (2) year period to begin on
January 6, 1998.
16.. At the end of March, 1998, Terry Johnson indicated to Plaintiff that "he was very pleased
with [Plaintiff s] work and that [Johnson] had big plans for Plaintiff during the next
year."
18. Because of Plaintiff s injuries, Plaintiff was required to attend regular massage therapy
sessions. Defendant's sales staff began to make complaints about these sessions.
19. As a result of said complaints, Plaintiff reduced his therapy sessions to one time per
week.
20. Despite the reduction in therapy sessions, the complaints about Plaintiff's availability
continued and the work environment became increasingly unpleasant. Plaintiff s pain
levels increased due to the reduction in treatment and the increase in stress.
21. The office environment became increasingly difficult and by the end of May, 1998
Plaintiff was regularly receiving unfriendly comments about Plaintiff s need to attend
therapy and doctors appointments from my fellow office workers, partners in the
company, and the sales staff.
22. In the beginning of June, 1998, Perfect Order's Human Relations Specialist Crystal
Griffin complained to Plaintiff that during the times Plaintiff was out the sales staff
requested that she perform Plaintiff s duties and that she could not handle the increase in
workload. In response to her complaint, Plaintiff issued a friendly email asking the sales
staff to cease those requests and to place work requests on Plaintiff s therapy day prior to
3 P.M.
23. Within a couple of days, Ms. Griffin complained that the sales staff was continuing with
their requests. Frustrated, under intense stress, and suffering pain levels that were no
longer manageable, Plaintiff lost his temper and issued an abrasive email demanding that
the sales staff respect my previous request to not burden Ms. Griffin with my work.
Within the hour following said email, Plaintiff issued a follow up email apologizing for
the abrasive nature of the second email. Additionally, Plaintiff spoke to each sales person
and apologized in person. Without exception they all stated that they understood the
stress levels and that they were not adversely affected by the email.
24. The next day Ms. Griffin and Terry Johnson stated that they wished to conduct meeting in
response to the abrasive email.
25. Prior to the appointed time in a casual meeting in the hallway Plaintiff asked Mr. Johnson
about the nature of that meeting. He told Plaintiff that pursuant to company policy as set
forth in the company's employee handbook the manner in which to deal with minor
problems was to meet with the employers and in all likelihood would result in a verbal
reprimand. Johnson reaffirmed at that time that he was pleased with Plaintiff s
performance and noted the progress made with the training facility. A difficult work
request came up and Mr. Johnson asked Plaintiff to handle that request instead of having
the informal meeting. The informal meeting was never rescheduled.
26. The following day, Ms. Griffin and Plaintiff had a meeting in the morning. No mention
was made about the email but she asked that Plaintiff assume some additional
responsibilities in order to reduce her workload. Plaintiff accepted those responsibilities.
27. On June 30, 1998, Plaintiff requested a weeks vacation to begin July 1, 1998 until
Monday, July 6, 1998.
28. On or about July 13, 1998, Plaintiff met with Ms. Griffin with respect to Plaintiff's
request regarding a workman's compensation claim he wished the company to file on his
behalf. She stated that she felt Plaintiff was asking the company to perform a fraudulent
act by filing the request for Workman's Compensation. Plaintiff responded by explaining
that Workman's Compensation would be better able to determine the validity of
Plaintiff s claim for compensation. At that time she restated that she refused to file the
claim on Plaintiff s behalf because she felt it was illegal but did state that Plaintiff could
file said request on his own behalf.
29. On Wednesday July 15, 1998 Plaintiff was discharged.
30. Prior to discharge, Plaintiff never had a meeting with his employers pursuant to the
company's employment contract.
31. At the time of discharge, Plaintiff had approximately one and one-half (1 ''/2) years
remaining on the two year oral employment contract agreed to begin on November 1,
1997.
CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
BREACH OF CONTRACT
32. The facts and statements of paragraphs 1 through 31, above, are here incorporated by
reference.
33. Defendant breached an oral, two year employment contract entered into on January 6,
1998 by discharging Plaintiff without cause as provided by the procedures set forth in the
Defendant's employee handbook.
34. Plaintiff suffered damages to include but not limited to an amount in excess of one and
one half year's worth of salary and benefits as a result of Defendant company's breach of
said agreement.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment against Defendant and in favor of Plaintiff for
the remaining amount of salary due pursuant to said contract, plus costs and interests and any
other relief this Court may deem just and proper.
Date:
Respectfully submitted,
By:
O/
Coy A Starr, Esquire
Supreme Court I.D. No.: 77956
Law Office of Coy A. Starr
211 Loshes Run Road
Duncannon, PA 17020
(717) 834-3460
VERIFICATION
I, Andrew R. Baker, verify that the statements made in this Amended Complaint are true
and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I understand that false
statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. § 4904, relating to unsworn
falsification to authorities.
A
Date ndrew R. Baker
ANDREW R. BAKER, § IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
§ OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
Plaintiff § PENNSYLVANIA
v. §
§ Civil Action No. 2000-5008
PERFECT ORDER, INC., §
§ Civil Action- Law
Defendant §
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this day of 12`h day of February, 2001, I hereby verify that I have caused true
and correct copy of the Complaint in the above captioned matter to be placed in the U. S Mail,
First Class postage prepaid and addressed as follows:
Schaun D. Henry
McNees, Wallace & Nurick
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-5300
Date: 2 l Z o
By.
Coy A Starr, Esquire
Supreme Court I.D. No.: 77956
Law Office of Coy A. Starr
211 Loshes Run Road
Duncannon, PA 17020
(717) 834-3460
C_.
S c c
:,
Co
ANDREW R. BAKER,
Plaintiff
V.
PERFECT ORDER, INC.,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Civil Action No. 2000-5008
Civil Action- Law
Defendant
NOTICE
YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth
in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and
Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing
with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned
that, if you fail to do so, the case may proceed without you and a judgement may be entered
against you by the Court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for
any other claim or relief requested by the Petitioner. You may lose money or property or other
rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA LEGAL SERVICES
213A North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
(717) 232-7536
ANDREW R. BAKER, § IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
§ OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
Plaintiff § PENNSYLVANIA
V. §
§ Civil Action No. 2000-5008
PERFECT ORDER, INC., §
§ Civil Action- Law
Defendant §
COMPLAINT
AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff, Andrew Baker, by and through his attorney, Coy A.
Starr, Esq., to allege as follows:
PARTIES
Plaintiff, Andrew Baker is an individual RD # 4 Box 4677, Duncannon, Pennsylvania
17020.
2. Defendant, Perfect Order, Inc. is a corporation doing business under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with its principal place of business located at 1150
Lancaster Blvd, Ste 100, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055.
VENUE
3. Venue is appropriate for with this action because the causes of action arose with
Defendant in Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
BACKGROUND OF FACTS AND AGREEMENT TERMS
4. On or about March, 1996, Plaintiff was hired by Perfect Order, Inc. to be a consultant.
The contract of employment was an oral agreement whereby Plaintiff would be employed
by Perfect Order for one year at a rate of pay of a minimum $35,000.00 per year with
three weeks paid vacation.
6. The minimum pay of $35,000.00 per year was in essence a "draw" upon which the
consultant was to be paid a commission of forty-five percent (45%) of what was billed to
the customer and that amount was to be subtracted from the draw. In other words, the
consultant could earn more than the minimum $35,000.00 per year.
On April 1, 1996, Plaintiff began working for Defendant.
8. In September, 1996 Plaintiff was approached by John Gomery, Vice President of Perfect
Order, Inc., and he inquired as to whether Plaintiff was interested in creating and running
a PC manufacturing facility in an effort to gain a state contract as a hardware
provider/manufacturer.
Plaintiff was interested and met with Terry Johnson to finalize the terms of employment.
10. The terms of the employment were orally agreed that Plaintiff s salary would remain the
same and that the length of said contract was to be two (2) years. This oral two year
agreement was to become the standard contract for Perfect Order, Inc.
11. In October 1996, Plaintiff began the groundwork for forming the manufacturing branch
by creating a procedure for manufacture; software for tracking stock, sales, and doing
reports; creating and maintaining contact with the two major parts distributors in the area;
and hiring a part time person to help with construction. This individual would later
become a full time consultant with Perfect Order and remains in their employ.
12. Due to a negative income stream during Plaintiff s work at this new position, Plaintiff s
rate of pay was to be changed to $39,000.00 per year beginning November 1, 1997.
13. On September 10, 1997 while working in the manufacturing facility, Plaintiff was injured
trying to lift an 80+ pound boxed computer. Plaintiff completed all necessary paperwork
relating to filing a workman's compensation claim.
14. On November 1, 1997, Plaintiff began working again as a consultant for Perfect Order,
Inc.
15. Due to Plaintiffs injuries, Plaintiff and Defendant agreed to allow Plaintiff to become an
an office employee performing inside sales and sales support tasks, as well as some
vendor relations, product ordering, and marketing and Plaintiff was to coordinate the sale
of the newly formed and financially failing training facility. Plaintiff began at this
position on January 6, 1998.
16.. At the end of March, 1998, Terry Johnson indicated to Plaintiff that "he was very pleased
with [Plaintiff s] work and that [Johnson] had big plans for Plaintiff during the next
year."
17. Because of Plaintiffs injuries, Plaintiff was required to attend regular massage therapy
sessions. Defendant's sales staff began to make complaints about these sessions.
18. As a result of said complaints, Plaintiff reduced his therapy sessions to one time per
week.
19. Despite the reduction in therapy sessions, the complaints about Plaintiff's availability
continued and the work environment became increasingly unpleasant. Plaintiff's pain
levels increased due to the reduction in treatment and the increase in stress.
20. The office environment became increasingly difficult and by the end of May, 1998
Plaintiff was regularly receiving unfriendly comments about Plaintiff s need to attend
therapy and doctors appointments from my fellow office workers, partners in the
company, and the sales staff.
21. In the beginning of June, 1998, Perfect Order's Human Relations Specialist Crystal
Griffin complained to Plaintiff that during the times Plaintiff was out the sales staff
requested that she perform Plaintiff s duties and that she could not handle the increase in
workload. In response to her complaint, Plaintiff issued a friendly email asking the sales
staff to cease those requests and to place work requests on Plaintiff's therapy day prior to
3 p.m.
22. Within a couple of days, Ms. Griffin complained that the sales staff was continuing with
their requests. Frustrated, under intense stress, and suffering pain levels that were no
longer manageable, Plaintiff lost his temper and issued an abrasive email demanding that
the sales staff respect my previous request to not burden Ms. Griffin with my work.
Within the hour following said email, Plaintiff issued a follow up email apologizing for
the abrasive nature of the second email. Additionally, Plaintiff spoke to each sales person
and apologized in person. Without exception they all stated that they understood the
stress levels and that they were not adversely affected by the email.
23. The next day Ms. Griffin and Terry Johnson stated that they wished to conduct meeting in
response to the abrasive email.
24. Prior to the appointed time in a casual meeting in the hallway Plaintiff asked Mr. Johnson
about the nature of that meeting. He told Plaintiff that pursuant to company policy as set
forth in the company's employee handbook the manner in which to deal with minor
problems was to meet with the employers and in all likelihood would result in a verbal
reprimand. Johnson reaffirmed at that time that he was pleased with Plaintiff s
performance and noted the progress made with the training facility. A difficult work
request came up and Mr. Johnson asked Plaintiff to handle that request instead of having
the informal meeting. The informal meeting was never rescheduled.
25. The following day, Ms. Griffin and Plaintiff had a meeting in the morning. No mention
was made about the email but she asked that Plaintiff assume some additional
responsibilities in order to reduce her workload. Plaintiff accepted those responsibilities.
26. On June 30, 1998, Plaintiff requested a weeks vacation to begin July 1, 1998 until
Monday, July 6, 1998.
27. On or about July 13, 1998, Plaintiff met with Ms. Griffin with respect to Plaintiff s
request regarding a workman's compensation claim he wished the company to file on his
behalf. She stated that she felt Plaintiff was asking the company to perform a fraudulent
act by filing the request for Workman's Compensation. Plaintiff responded by explaining
that Workman's Compensation would be better able to determine the validity of
Plaintiff's claim for compensation. At that time she restated that she refused to file the
claim on Plaintiff's behalf because she felt it was illegal but did state that Plaintiff could
file said request on his own behalf.
28. On Wednesday July 15, 1998 Plaintiff was discharged.
29. Prior to discharge, Plaintiff never had a meeting with his employers pursuant to the
company's employment contract.
30. At the time of discharge, Plaintiff had approximately one and one-half (1 %) years
remaining on the two year oral employment contract agreed to begin on November 1,
1997.
CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
BREACH OF CONTRACT
31. The facts and statements of paragraphs 1 through 31, above, are here incorporated by
reference.
32. Defendant breached an oral, two year employment contract entered into on November
1997 by discharging Plaintiff without cause as provided by the procedures set forth in the
Defendant's employee handbook.
33. Plaintiff suffered damages in an amount in excess of one and one half year's worth of
salary as a result of Defendant company's breach of said agreement.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment against Defendant and in favor of Plaintiff
for the remaining amount of salary due pursuant to said contract, plus costs and interests and any
other relief this Court may deem just and proper.
Respectfully submitted,
Date:
By:
Coy A tarr, Esquire
Supreme, Court I.D. No.: 77956
Law Office of Coy A. Starr
4 South Market Street
Duncannon, PA 17020
(717) 834-6024
VERIFICATION
I, Andrew R. Baker, verify that the statements made in this Complaint are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I understand that false statements herein are
made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. § 4904, relating to unworn falsification to
authorities.
"' 'Date I Andrv-R. Baker
ANDREW R. BAKER, § IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
§ OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
Plaintiff § PENNSYLVANIA
V. §
§ Civil Action No. 2000-5008
PERFECT ORDER, INC., §
§ Civil Action- Law
Defendant §
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this day of 14' day of August, 2000, I hereby verify that I have caused true
and correct copy of the Complaint in the above captioned matter to be placed in the U. S Mail,
First Class postage prepaid and addressed as follows:
James P. DeAngelo, Esq.
McNees, Wallace & Nurick
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
Attorney for Defendant
Date: //'-1 t C?
By:
Coy A Starr, Esquire
Supreme Court I.D. No.: 77956
Law Office of Coy A. Starr
4 South Market Street
Duncannon, PA 17020
(717) 834-6024
0,
ANDREW R. BAKER, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
PERFECT ORDER, INC.,
Defendant
NO. 2000-5008
ORDER
AND NOW, this 191" day of 04Pd-&&- , 2002, the above-captioned
matter, Civil Action No. 2000-5008, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
OF T,N9Y
02` .: 19
cul A I TY
o
l 9V6?! !?? y4`!:i?9llR+p ns:n- A"-i!p-ie@8f?:!'Ai?f llY.?,£?FN4FeS: MR!,??PZ91i?1. '!'
ANDREW R. BAKER, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
NO. 2000-5008
PERFECT ORDER, INC.,
Defendant
MOTION TO ACCEPT PRAECIPE TO DISCONTINUE SUIT
AND NOW comes the Defendant, Perfect Order, Inc., by its attorneys McNees
Wallace & Nurick LLC, and respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter an
order directing the Prothonotary to accept for filing the Plaintiffs Praecipe to Discontinue
Suit and to mark this action as ended, discontinued and settled. In support of said
Motion, the Defendant represents the following:
1. On January 30, 2002, Plaintiff filed a "Praecipe to Discontinue Suit,"
attached as Exhibit A, with the Prothonotary.
2. The Prothonotary rejected the Praecipe on the grounds that the Praecipe
must be filed by Plaintiffs attorney.
3. At the start of the suit, Plaintiff was represented by Coy A. Starr, Esq.
4. On August 2, 2001, Mr. Starr requested leave of the Court to withdraw
appearance. Mr. Starr was voluntarily placed on inactive status with respect to the
practice of law and has since closed his law office. Since the discontinuance of his
legal practice, neither Plaintiff nor Defendant have been able to locate Mr. Starr.
5. On December 17, 2001, Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a Settlement
Agreement and General Release, attached as Exhibit B, settling the dispute between
the parties.
6. In light of the limited resources of the judicial system and the fact that this
suit has lingered for over ten months since execution of the Settlement Agreement,
Defendant respectfully asks the Court to accept Plaintiffs Praecipe to Discontinue Suit
to bring this matter to a close.
McNEES, WALLACE & N RICK
By
James P. DeAngelo
I.D. No. 62377
Schaun D. Henry
I. D. No. 80597
100 Pine Street
P. O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 232-8000
Attorneys for Defendant Perfect Order, Inc.
Dated: October 23, 2002
ANDREW R. BAKER,
Plaintiff
V.
PERFECT ORDER, INC.,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 2000-5008
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
PRAECIPE TO DISCONTINUE SUIT
TO: Prothonotary
Mark this action as ended, discontinued and settled.
Date: 1'3°J0 2 ,-
Andrew R. Baker, Plaintiff
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE
THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE ("Agreement") is
entered into this t`L day of lbctaAppy- , 2001, by and between PERFECT
ORDER, INC. ("Company"), and ANDREW R. BAKER ("Baker")
WHEREAS, Baker was formerly employed by the Company; and
WHEREAS, differences have arisen between the parties concerning Baker's termination
from his employment; and
WHEREAS, both parties desire to reach an amicable settlement of these differences.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and
intending to be legally bound, the Company and Baker agree as follows:
1. Purpose: It is expressly understood that this Agreement is entered into for the
purpose of avoiding further litigation between Baker and the Company of the claims arising out
of the aforesaid employment relationship.
2. Consideration: The undersigned, Andrew R. Baker, expressly acknowledges
and confirms that the only considerations for him signing this Settlement Agreement and
General Release are the neutral letter of reference and the other terms and provisions stated
herein; that no other promise or agreement of any kind, save for these set forth in this Agreement
has been made to him by any person or entity whatsoever to cause him to sign this document;
and that he fully understands the meaning and intent of this instrument.
3. Other Benefits: Any other benefits accumulated by or provided to Baker as an
employee of the Company which have not already ceased will cease as of the date of this
Agreement.
4. Liahili : Nothing contained herein shall be construed as an admission by the
Company of any liability of any kind to Baker, all such liability being waived.
5. Confidentiality: Baker and the Company agree that the terns and fact of
settlement shall be confidential. Baker and the Company further agree not to disclose any
information concerning this settlement to any agency or person, including but not limited to past,
present and future employees of the Company, except where such disclosure is required by law.
6. Disparaging Remarks: Neither Baker nor the Company shall make any
disparaging references about each other orally, in writing, electronically, or in any other manner.
At all times the references to and comments about each other shall be free of negative inference.
In response to any inquiries regarding Baker's employment with the Company, the Company
agrees that it shall merely disclose Baker's dates of employment, his position, and his rate of
pay. In addition, the Company agrees that it will provide Baker with a letter of reference
indicating his job duties and that he performed those duties to the satisfaction of the Company
(attached as Exhibit 1).
7. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and be
governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
8. Release: In consideration of the terms of this Agreement, Baker agrees for
himself, his heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to forever release and
discharge the Company and its successors and assigns, officers, agents, contractors, consultants
and employees, past and present, collectively or individually, from any and all claims, demands,
causes of actions, losses and expenses of every nature whatsoever, known or unknown, arising
out of or in connection with his employment by the Company or the termination thereof,
including, but not limited to, breach of contract (express or implied), intentional infliction of
emotional harm, wrongful discharge or other tort, the Age Discrimination In Employment Act of
1967 (29 U.S.C. §621 gt seg.), or any other federal, state or municipal statute or ordinance
relating to employment, labor relations or wages. The Company agrees for itself, its successors
and assigns, officers, agents, contractors, consultants and employees, past and present,
collectively or individually to forever release, hold harmless and discharge Baker for himself, his
heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns from any and all claims, demands, causes
of actions, losses and expenses of every nature whatsoever, known or unknown, arising out of or
in connection with Baker's employment by the Company or the termination thereof, including,
but not limited to, breach of contract (express or implied), intentional infliction of emotional
harm, wrongful discharge or other tort, the Age Discrimination In Employment Act of 1967 (29
U.S.C. §621 et Mg.), or any other federal, state or municipal statute or ordinance relating to
employment, labor relations or wages, or any cause of action. The Company releases Baker
from all claims arising from his employment up to and including the time of signing of this
Agreement.
9. Covenant Not To Sue: Baker agrees that in addition to discontinuing,
withdrawing and ending his charges before the Court of Common Pleas for Cumberland County,
Civil Action No. 2000-5008, he will not bring any other action, suit or administrative
proceeding or request contesting the validity of this Agreement or attempting to negate, modify
or reform it, nor will he sue the Company and/or its officers, agents, contractors, consultants or
employees, past or present, individually or collectively, for any reason arising out of his
employment or the termination thereof. In the event that Baker breaches this covenant, Baker
shall pay the Company all of its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in each and every such
action, suit or other proceeding, including any and all appeals or petitions therefrom in the event
the same is ultimately concluded in the Company's favor. In the event that the Company
breaches this covenant, the Company shall pay Baker all of his actual attorneys' fees and costs
incurred in each and every such action, suit or other proceeding, including any and all appeals or
petitions therefrom in the event the same is ultimately concluded in the Baker's favor. The
Company also agrees that it shall not sue Baker due to any cause of action arising from his
employment up to the time of the signing of this Agreement.
10. Other Agreements: This Agreement cannot be amended or modified, except in
writing signed by Baker and an agent of the Company specifically authorized to sign on behalf
of the Company in this matter.
11. Severability: In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held to
be void, voidable or unenforceable, the remaining portions hereof shall remain in full force and
effect.
12. Acknowledgement: Baker represents to the Company as follows:
(a) He has had at least twenty-one (21) days to review all of the
provisions of this Agreement with his attorney, and fully understands it
and the choices with respect to the advisability of making the settlement
and release provided herein.
(b) He acknowledges that the entered into this Agreement by his free will
and choice without any compulsion, duress or undue influence from
anyone.
(c) He acknowledges that he has had independent legal counsel who has
advised him regarding his rights and the advisability of entering into this
Agreement.
(d) He acknowledges that he has been advised by his attorney of his/her
right to revoke this Agreement during the seven (7) day period following
execution hereof.
13. Number of Copies/Pages: This document has been intentionally made four (4)
pages. Baker and the Company agree that there will only be two (2) fully executed originals,
one (1) for Baker and one (1) for the Company. Any additional copies needed can be made from
the originals.
14. Authorized Agent: The Company hereby nominates
, (Name and Title), as their authorized Agent to sign this
Agreement. The Company hereby warrants that the authorized Agent has the authority to sign
on behalf of the Company, intending on this Agreement to be legally binding.
w
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Baker has hereunto set his hand and the Company has
caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized agent, all as of the date first above
written.
EXECUTED the day and year first above written.
Witness
f
M
Pe ct Ordei, Inc.
Witness
Witness
Ma-
Witness
Nr??-
drew Baker
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on this date a true and correct copy of the
foregoing document was served by first-class mail, postage prepaid, upon Plaintiff.
Andrew R. Baker
2033 Linglestown Road
Harrisburg, PA 17110-9484
Schaun D. Henry
Dated: October 23, 2002
{A388662:}
v.
ANDREW R. BAKER,
Plaintiff
VS.
PERFECT ORDER, INC.,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
00-5008 CIVIL
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN RE: REQUEST TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE
ORDER
AND NOW, this 2-14 day of October, 2002, the request of Coy A. Star, Esquire, to
withdraw as counsel of record for the plaintiff in the above captioned matter is GRANTED.
BY THE COURT,
Kevi A. Hess, J.
Andrew R. Baker
Plaintiff
Schaun D. Henry, Esquire 0
For the Defendant
:rlm
Fil
r _.
oz, OCT 28 "r' 4: t?"