Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-4392IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW JOHN W. GUILLIAMS No. D7' ill/ T1t-M VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING APPEAL FROM THE SUSPENSION OF OPERATING PRIVILEGES TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: AND NOW comes Petitioner, John W. Guilliams, by and through his attorney, Heather N. Orisko, Esquire of the Law Office of Darrell C. Dethlefs, and respectfully avers as follows: 1. Petitioner, John W. Guilliams, resides at 401 E. Portland Street, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055. 2. Petitioner's Pennsylvania Operator's Number is 14706729. 3. Penn DOT Proposes by Notice dated June 12, 2009 to suspend Petitioner's driving privileges for a period of one (1) year pursuant to Section 1547of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Code, effective July 17, 2009 at 12:01 AM. Please see attached document, OFFICIAL NOTICE OF THE SUSPENSION, dated June 12, 2009, attached hereto and incorporated herein and Exhibit A. 4. The withdrawal and suspension of Petitioner's operating privileges is unlawful, in that Petitioner's record with Penn DOT does not warrant suspension and Petitioner did not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently refuse a chemical test on May 23, '2009. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that this Honorable Court allow him to take an appeal from the suspension of his operating privileges. Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF DARREL'.L C. DETHLEFS Date: 0710//0 9 Heather N. Orisko, Esquire r Attorney ID# 91067 2132 Market Street Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011 (717) 975-9446 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW JOHN W. GUILLIAMS No. VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Heather N. Orisko, Esquire, of the Law Office of Darrell C. Dethlefs, hereby certify that on this date, a copy of the forgoing APPEAL FROM THE SUSPENSION OF OPERATING PRIVILEGES was served via First Class United States Postal Service Mail, Certified with Return Receipt Requested, to the following parties: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Office of Chief Counsel Third Floor, Riverfront Office Center Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17104-2516 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF DARRELL C. DETHLEFS Date: '97/007 Heather N. Orisko, Es uire Attorney ID# 91067 2132 Market Street Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011 (717) 975-9446 Exhibit A. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bureau of Driver Licensing Mail Date: JUNE 12, 2009 JOHN W GUILLIAMS WID # 091566691208712 001 401 E PORTLAND ST PROCESSING DATE 06/05/2009 DRIVER LICENSE # 14706729 MECHANICSBURG PA 17055 DATE OF BIRTH 08/18/1947 Dear MR. GUILLIAMS: This is an Official Notice of the Suspension of your Driving Privilege as authorized by Section 1547B1I of the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code. As a result of your violation of Section 1547 of the Vehicle Code, CHEMICAL TEST REFUSAL, on 05/23/2009: ¦ Your driving privilege is SUSPENDED for a period of 1 YEAR(S) effective 07/17/2009 at 12:01 a.m. COMPLYING WITH THIS SUSPENSION You must return all current Pennsylvania driver's licenses, learner's permits, temporary driver's licenses (camera cards) in your possession on or before 07/17/2009. You may surrender these items before, 07/17/2009, for earlier credit; however, you may not drive after these items are surrendered. YOU MAY NOT RETAIN YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES. However, you may apply for and obtain a photo identification card at any Driver License Center for a cost of $12.00. You must present two (2) forms of proper identification (e.g., birth certificate, valid U.S. passport, marriage certificate, etc.) in order to obtain your photo identification card. You will not receive credit toward serving any suspension until we receive your license(s). Complete the following steps to acknowledge this suspension. 1. Return all current Pennsylvania driver's licenses, learner's permits and/or camera cards to PennDOT. If you do not have any of these items, send a sworn notarized letter stating you are aware of the suspension of your driving privilege. You must specify in your letter why you are unable to return your driver's license. Remember: You may not retain your driver's license for identification purposes. Please send these items to: 091566691208712 S 1" wo AA0.11 11! ?` +oe-lp gtavi A Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bureau of Driver Licensing P.O. Box 68693 Harrisburg, PA 17106-8693 2. Upon receipt, review and acceptance of your Pennsylvania driver's license(s), learner's permit(s), and/or a sworn notarized letter, PennDOT will send you a receipt confirming the date that credit began. If you do not receive a receipt from us within 3 weeks, please contact our office. Otherwise, you will not be given credit toward serving this suspension. PennDOT phone numbers are listed at the end of this letter. 3. If you do not return all current driver license products, we must refer this matter to the Pennsylvania State Police for prosecution under SECTION 1571(a)(4) of the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code. PAYING THE RESTORATION FEE You must pay a restoration fee to PennDOT to be restored from a suspension/revocation of your driving privilege. To pay your restoration fee, complete the following steps: 1. Return the enclosed Application for Restoration. The amount due is listed on the application. 2. Write your driver's license number (listed on the first page) on the check or money order to ensure proper credit. 3. Follow the payment and mailing instructions on the back of the application. Please note: Paying the restoration fee DOES NOT satisfy the requirement to acknowledge your suspension/revocation. If you have not acknowledged your suspension/revocation, please follow the instructions listed under "Complying with this Suspension/Revocation". 091566691208712 APPEAL You have the right to appeal this action to the Court of Common Pleas (Civil Division) within 30 days of the mail date, JUNE 12, 2009, of this letter. If you file an appeal in the County Court, the Court will give you a time-stamped certified copy of the appeal. In order for your appeal to be valid, you must send this time-stamped certified copy of the appeal by certified mail to: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Office of Chief Counsel Third Floor, Riverfront Office Center Harrisburg, PA 17104-2516 Remember, this is an OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SUSPENSION. You must return all current Pennsylvania driver license products to PennDOT by 07/17/2009. Sincerely, Janet L. Dolan, Director Bureau of Driver Licensing INFORMATION 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. IN STATE 1-800-932-4600 TDD IN STATE 1-800-228-0676 OUT-OF-STATE 717-412-5300 TOO OUT-OF-STATE 717-412-5380 WEB SITE ADDRESS www.dmv.state.pa.us PILED-(Y- ' OF TFEF PRP" 7P,.?\,"' APY 2009 JUL - i AN 10: 3 3 #11/1 0 AJ/ Z171/3N JUL 062009h IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW ?y JOHN W. GUILLIAMS No. dj-t1,2jd em zlrm vs. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING ORDER AND NOW, this day of , 2009, upon presentation of the within Petition, and upon Motion of Heather N. Orisko, Esquire of the Law Office of Darrell C. Dethlefs, attorney for Petitioner, the Court orders and decrees that the Petitioner is allowed an appeal from the Order of the Secretary of Transportation, suspending his operating privileges for a period of one (1) year, commencing July 17, 2009. The appeal acts as a supersedeas pending this appeal; and that all proceedings are stayed. A hearing is scheduled for ?&&x '/ , 2009, at 07: 30 o'clock ? M, , in Courtroom No. 21 of the Cumberland County Courthouse located at 1 Courthouse Square, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013. CJF Tp t r! (Y??f?ll 209.lUL -a Pri 1. 12 n 't .VI s =i 021 S JOHN W. GUILLIAMS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING 09-4392 CIVIL TERM IN RE: APPEAL FROM SUSPENSION OF DRIVING PRIVILEGE ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this ~ day of October, 2009, the appeal of John Guilliams from the suspension of his operating privilege for a refusal to allow testing of his blood following his arrest for driving under the influence, IS DENIED. By the Court, r „_. / Edgar B. Bayley, J. ' Heather N. Onsko, Esquire 2131 Market Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 For Petitioner ~ Philip M. Bricknell, Esquire For the Department of Transportation sal II , t ES ,m,~ ~ l~c~ `~~ JOHN W. GUILLIAMS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF : DRIVER LICENSING 09-4392 CIVIL TERM IN RE: APPEAL FROM SUSPENSION OF DRIVING PRIVILEGE OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT Bayley, J., October 13, 2009:-- PennDOT suspended the driving privilege of John W. Guilliams for one year for failure to submit to a test of his blood following his arrest for driving under the influence. Guilliams filed this appeal upon which a hearing was conducted on October 7, 2009. We find the following facts. On May 23, 2009, Patrolman Andrew Bassler, of the Silver Spring Township Police Department, arrested John Guilliams for driving under the influence. Bassler took Guilliams to the Holy Spirit Hospital for a test of his blood to determine his blood alcohol content. Bassler read the Implied Consent warnings to Guilliams from Form DL 26, after which Guilliams signed the form and said he would undertake a test. An experienced phlebotomist injected a needle into Guilliams' arm. Guilliams would not hold still and disregarded instructions to hold his fist tight. For about thirty to forty seconds the phlebotomist repositioned the needle in the arm but was unable to inject it into a vein from which blood could be drawn. The needle was withdrawn and the 09-4392 CIVIL TERM phlebotomist said she would try again. Guilliams said he had already given a test and would not allow the phlebotomist to "stick him again." Another experienced phlebotomist said she would perform the procedure but petitioner was adamant in his refusal to allow another attempt to draw his blood.' After approximately four or five minutes of trying to convince petitioner to allow another attempt to draw blood Patrolman Bassler deemed a refusal. At the hearing, petitioner testified that it hurt when the attempt was made to draw is blood but he did not tell that to either of the phlebotomists or the police officer. He testified that "I never refused a blood test." In Winebarger v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 655 A.2d 1093 (Pa. Commw. 1995), Winebarger was arrested for driving under the influence and was taken for a blood test. After unsuccessful attempts to strike a vein to draw blood from each of his arms he refused to allow any further attempt. A police officer deemed a refusal which was upheld by the trial court and affirmed by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. The Commonwealth Court stated that the issue was whether as a matter of law "that consent to one stick" into each arm should be sufficient, rendering any subsequent refusal meaningless for compliance purposes. The Commonwealth Court declined to do so, stating that they would not quantify how many attempts at drawing blood will be deemed proper consent, preferring instead to continue to analyze the facts of each case independently. The The medical protocol at Holy Spirit Hospital allows four attempts to inject a needle into a vein to draw blood. If blood is still not obtained there must be a delay of twenty hours before a further attempt can be made. -2- 09-4392 CIVIL TERM Court noted that once the Commonwealth has shown that a motorist has refused to submit to testing the burden shifts to the motorist to provide by competent medical evidence that he was physically unable to take the test. In the case sub judice, Guilliams refused any effort to draw his blood after one attempt had been made. He offered no medical evidence that he was physically unable to provide blood. As he testified, he made the decision, following the one failed effort, that he never refused a blood test. He is wrong. There was a deemed refusal. Accordingly, the following order is entered. ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this ~ day of October, 2009, the appeal of John Guilliams from the suspension of his operating privilege for a refusal to allow testing of his blood following his arrest for driving under the influence, IS DENIED. Heather N. Orisko, Esquire 2131 Market Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 For Petitioner Philip M. Bricknell, Esquire For the Department of Transportation :sal -3- ~~~ .~~,~ ;~,~,,~.,_.,~P,~~~~l~~;Y 2~~~ QCT 13 ~ +~ 3~ 3~3