HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-17-09 (2) N
Jeffrey R. Boswel{, Esquire
~~ ~
~ -'-g
-,. ,
Supreme Court LD. #25444 . _~
' ' t/)
t~ i,
BOSWELL, TINTNER & PICCOLA ' ~
n ~ ~
315 North Front Street "
"_? ~ r
~-~ _ °
=
'
i
P. O. Box 741 -
'' ~`' ~ -.J r
-;
~__..
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108-0741
~ J - -
t
,, f
Phone (717-236-9377) ~'~ "~ '
r
Fax(717-236-9316)
_~r
~'
~-
E-mail (iboswell(a~btpalaw.com) .
~7
-~ ~-
'ro Q ..
f~tD
IN RE: : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
ESTATE OF LINWOOD B. :CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PHILLIPS, JR.
NO. 21-06-0122
ORPHANS' COURT DIVISION
CLAIMANT'S ANSWER AND OBJECTIONS TO PETITION FOR CITATION TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY CLAIM OF HARVEY SHAPIRO SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
AND NOW, comes Harvey H. Shapiro (referred to herein as "Claimant"), by his
counsel, Jeffrey R. Boswell, Esquire, Boswell, Tintner & Piccola, and makes this
Claimant's Answer and Objections to the Petition for Citation to Show Cause Why Claim
of Harvey Shapiro Should Not Be Dismissed, as set forth, as follows:
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
5. Admitted.
6. Admitted. By further answer, Claimant alleges that he was deprived of his
personal property that he last saw on the Estate's real property, not only in the marital
home, but also on the grounds and in the garages and, therefore, in the custody of the
Estate's Executor, Robert G. Frey.
7. Denied. Whereas Claimant believes Alice R. Phillips has personally vacated
the Estate's real property, Claimant believes, and therefore alleges, that some or all of
the Claimant's personal property remains on the Estate's real property, and, thus,
Claimant demands proof of the allegation at a hearing on this matter.
8. Denied. Claimant alleges Robert G. Frey, Executor of the Estate of Linwood
B. Phillips, Jr., had knowledge of the Claimant's physical presence of himself and his
personal property at the marital home and garages and surrounding grounds of the
Estate's real property, and, therefore, demands proof of this allegation at a hearing on
this matter.
OBJECTIONS
9. Claimant incorporates the answers contained in paragraph 1 through 8
without restating same.
10. Claimant last saw his personal property on the Estate's real property in the
marital home, the garages, and the grounds, as delineated on the list contained in
Claimant's letter to Robert G. Frey, the Executor, dated October 23, 2008, which is
attached to the Petition as Exhibit "A."
11. Robert G. Frey, the Executor, had control of the Estate's real property at 93
Encks Mill Road, Carlisle, where Claimant's property lay, in the marital home of the
decedent, the multi-car stone garage building, and the small garage, and on the
grounds surrounding these buildings.
12. The Claimant had numerous conversations with Robert G. Frey, the
Executor, concerning Claimant's personal property and his recovery of that personal
property.
13. Robert G. Frey, the Executor, encouraged the Claimant to file a claim
against the Estate with regard to Claimant's personal property.
14. Claimant made written confirmation of his claim by sending a letter to Robert
G. Frey, the Executor, which October 23, 2008, letter is attached to the Petition as
Exhibit "A."
15. Claimant has recovered his antique display table referenced on page 1 of
the October 23, 2008, letter to Robert G. Frey, the Executor.
16. Robert G. Frey, the Executor, was aware of the presence of specific items of
personal property, including, but not limited to, the pool table in a dismantled condition,
in the marital house.
17. Robert G. Frey, the Executor, personally viewed Claimant's personal
property, as he acknowledged same in a discussion with Claimant after walking through
the marital house and the surrounding grounds with decedent's daughter, Linda Stull.
18. Claimant moved his personal property to the Estate's property, including the
marital home, the large garage, the small garage, and the surrounding grounds, in
March, 2008, and, thereafter, Claimant informed Robert G. Frey, the Executor, of the
presence of Claimant's personal property on the Estate's real property.
19. After being informed of the presence of Claimant's personal property on the
Estate's real property, Robert G. Frey, the Executor, had an obligation to protect
Claimant's personal property from theft, waste, mischief, and damage.
20. Robert G. Frey, the Executor, never objected to the presence of Claimant's
personal property on the Estate's real property.
21. Robert G. Frey, the Executor, was aware of claims made by Alice R. Phillips,
the decedent's surviving spouse, against the Estate and, thus, should have, but did not
take actions to protect Claimant's personal property from Alice R. Phillips' actions to
control, to damage, and to deprive Claimant of his personal property, even though
Robert G. Frey, the Executor, had notice of risks posed to Claimant's personal property
by decedent's surviving spouse.
22. Claimant alleges that the replacement value of the personal property as to
which he has been deprived by the Executor's actions or non-actions, does not exceed
$100,000.00.
23. Robert G. Frey, the Executor, failed to provide access to the Estate's real
property for the Claimant to regain possession and to remove his personal property
from the Estate's real property.
WHEREFORE, the Claimant prays that the Court order Robert G. Frey, the
Executor, and the Estate of Linwood B. Phillips, Jr., to return Claimant's personal
property or to pay the Claimant the replacement cost, a sum not to exceed $100,000.00.
Respectfully submitted,
BOSWELL, TINTNER & PICCOLA
By: ~.,
J R. Boswell, Esquire
I.D. No. 25444
315 N. Front Street
P. O. Box 741
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0741
(717) 236-9377
Attorneys for Harvey H. Shapiro
Date: September 17, 2009
VERIFICATION
I, Jeffrey R. Boswell, Esquire, being duly sworn according to law, deposes and
says that he is the attorney for the Claimant, Harvey H. Shapiro, that said Claimant
cannot make the verification to the foregoing Claimant's Answer and Objections to
Petition for Citation to Show Cause Why Claim of Harvey Shapiro Should Not Be
Dismissed due to time constraints, and that the facts set forth in the foregoing Answer
are true and correct upon representations made by the Claimant based on Claimaint's
personal knowledge, information and belief. I understand that false statements herein
are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904 relating to unsworn falsification
to authorities.
Jeffrey R. oswell, Esquire
Dated: September 17, 2009
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I do hereby certify that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing
Claimant's Answer and Objections for Citation to Show Cause Why Claim of Harvey
Shapiro Should Not Be Dismissed by placing the same in the United States Mail, first
class, postage prepaid, at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, addressed as follows:
George B. Faller, Jr., Esquire
Martson Deardorff Williams Otto Gilroy & Faller
Martson Law Offices
10 East High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorneys for the Executor and the Estate of Linwood 8. Phillips, Jr.
Hubert X. Gilroy, Esquire
Martson Deardorff Williams Otto Gilroy & Faller
Martson Law Offices
10 East High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorney for Linda Stull
Neil W. Yahn, Esquire
James Smith Dietterick & Connelly, LLP
P. O. Box 650
Hershey, PA 17036
Attorneys for Alice R. Phillips
Robert G. Frey, Esquire
5 S. Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013-3307
Executor of the Estate of Linwood 8. Phillips, Jr.
By:
Jeffre .Boswell, Esquire
Dated: September 17, 2009