HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-06-09P:\FILPS\Climb\13086 Wdlowm\13084.3.pttl.wpd/
CrcetW: 980/04 0:06PM
Revvcd: 11/N09 11:41AM
MARTSON DEARDORFF WILLIAMS OTTO GILROY
MARTSON LAW OFFICES
Christopher E. Rice, Esquire
I.D. No. 90916
10 East High Street
Cazlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-3341
Attorneys for Petitioners
0
FALLER
!~; ~ O
o
m '
,
['~
~-~~
'= .
C ~ : +~
r
,~z~ „E
~ ~'?
~c; r:'
c~ a c)~
y ~ .. x=
^rp
.
IN ~~ : IN THE
ROBERT C. WALLOWER, ,
an alleged incapacitated person NO: ~ -
ORPHAN'S
AND NOW, come BETTY L. WALLOWER,
WEIHBRECHT, by and through their attorneys,
GILORY & FALLER, and move as follows:
1. Petitioner Betty L. Wallower is an adult
Crossing, Enola, Pennsylvania 17025, and is the mother of
2. Petitioner Lori L. Wallower and David We
individuals with an address of 12 Natures Crossing, Enola,
and brother-in-law of Respondent Robert C. Wallower.
3. Respondent, Robert C. Wallower, is an adult ii
T OF COMMON PLEAS OF
~ COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
~9 -~oy~
T DIVISION
I. WALLOWER, and DAVID
DEARDORFF WILLIAMS OTTO
with an address of 12 Natures
Robert C. Wallower.
wife and husband, are adult
17025, and aze the sister
d residing at 1239 Timber View
Drive, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 17 50, (herein, "Respondent").
4. Respondent is unmarried and does not have any children. Respondent's only
surviving parent is his mother, Petitioner Betty L. Wallower.
5. Respondent's date of birth is October 19, 1957,1 and he is currently 52 years of age.
6. Respondent is an incapacitated person as that term is defined under Chapter 55 ofthe
Pennsylvania Decedent's Estates and Fiduciaries Code, 20 P .C.S.A. § 5501 et seq.
7. Respondent is an adult whose ability to receiv and evaluate information effectively,
and communicate decisions in any way, is impaired to such significant extent that he is partially
or totally unable to manage his financial resources and meet es~ential requirements for his health and
safety.
8. Respondent's immediate family consists of the following:
a. Petitioner Betty L. Wallower, mother; ~
b. Petitioner Lori I. Wallower, sister; an~
c. Scott R. Wallower, brother. I
9. Petitioners are unaware of a written Will of R spondent.
10. Petitioners seek to have plenary guardians of a estate and of the person appointed
by this Court.
11. Respondent is in immediate need of guazdi~nship. He is acknowledged to be
incapacitated by the Petitioners based upon certain acts and om~ssions ofRespondent concerning his
health and safety, and by John M. Hume, M.D., J.D., after ~ recent evaluation. See letter dated
October 3Q 2009, signed by Dr. John M. Hume and attached ereto as Exhibit "A."
12. Consequently, the failure to make such appoin ent of the guazdians would result in
irreparable harm to Respondent and to his estate. Petitioners be ieve, and therefore aver, that without
plenary guardians of the estate and of the person, Respondent Twill be taken advantage of, depleted
of his assets and, most importantly, may cause harm to himself.
13. Upon information and belief, there is clear and cpnvincing evidence that Respondent
lacks the ability and mental capacity to manage his finances ~nd his person, and make decisions
concerning the same.
14. Petitioners aze requesting that plenary guazdian~be appointed. The specific azeas of
incapacity over which Petitioners have requested the guazdi s be assigned powers are for the
personal and financial affairs ofRespondent with emphasis on liis health care and maintenance, and
use of funds.
15. This Court has jurisdiction over the alleged incapacitated person pursuant to 20 Pa.
C.S.A. 712(4) and 20 Pa. C.S.A. 5511 et seq.
16. Respondent's net worth, to the best ofPetitiongrs' knowledge, is $55,000.00, and his
income, if any, is unknown.
17. Respondent recently quit his job and does nat have health insurance. Respondent
refuses to obtain Cobra even though Petitioner Betty
Without health insurance, Respondent maybe denied ~
18. Because of the alleged incapacitated
impairments, he lacks the capacity to make or communicate
financial affairs and daily life including the ability to
necessary decisions about his health and safety.
19. It is believed that the severity of
conditions necessitates that a plenary guardian of his estate
financial aspects of his life. More importantly, the incapa
manipulation by third parties and Petitioners believe he cot
20. It is believed that the severity of
conditions necessitates that a plenary guazdian of his person
aspects of his life, including basic Gaze and maintenance.
person has made recent decisions that caused harm to himse:
Hospital and the filing of this Petition.
2L No other court has ever assumed jurisdiction
capacity of the alleged incapacitated person.
22. No other guazdian has been appointed for the
23. Petitioners believe, and therefore aver, that an
necessary under these set of circumstances.
24. Petitioners request that if the Court
evaluation, it will exercise its discretion pursuant to 20
independent medical examination of Respondent.
25. Petitioners recommend that Petitioners Lori I.
has agreed to pay for the same.
medical services.
mental, physical, and psychiatric
decisions or to manage his
need for assistance and make
's mental, physical, and psychiatric
appointed to manage and handle all
tated person is subject to abuse and
be a victim of designing persons.
's mental, physical, and psychiatric
appointed to manage and handle all
vlore importantly, the incapacitated
esulting in admittance to Holy Spirit
any proceeding to determine the
or estate of the Respondent.
dent medical evaluation is not
a need for an independent medical
§ 5511(d) and order an
and David Weihbrecht, be
appointed as plenary guardians of the person and of the estate to act jointly and severally as the
proposed guardians do not have any interest adverse to the Respondent.
By:
to execute a Durable Power of
t will not agree to the same.
the following relief:
Ebert C. Wallower, the alleged
as this Court may direct, to show
an incapacitated person and plenary
~ointed;and
and David Weihbrecht as plenary
C. Wallower; and
and proper.
OFFICES
i!
26. Petitioners have attempted to convince
Attorney naming one of the Petitioners as agent, but Resp
WHEREFORE, Petitioners request that this Court
a. Issue a citation directed to Respondent,
incapacitated person, and to such other pers
cause why Respondent should not be adjudgf
guazdians of the person and of the estate be a
b. This Court appoint Petitioners Lori I. Wallo
guazdians of the Person and of the Estate of ]
c. Order any other relief this Court deems nece,
MARTSON
Dated: //-lx^O~
Christopher .Rice, Esquire
LD. No. 90 16
Ten East H'gh Street
Cazlisle, P 17013
(717)243-3 41
Attorneys fob Petitioners
i
.30HN B3. ~i1QL, B43D., J3-. ',
....BSS 9aA~ Street ',
-ii9~r~ar~ ~A 1709
/a -- 30 - c
~~ ,~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~ ~.
~~ ~~
~~~~~~~
ham,. U~~l~.~ ,~
~~~ ~
~~~~'~~~
~~ ~~
~~ ~~~
dud ~
:~~
,~~D
v~.ztl~re~ ox
The foregoittgPetition forAdjuflication
is based upon informmation which has been ~athcred by my coca
The language of the document is that of counsel and not my oa
the extent that it is based upon information rshich I have givep
to the best of mykaowledge, information and belief. To the ext.
is that of counsel, I have relied upon counsel in making this va
Phis statement and verificatior are made subject to the p
relating to unswom falsification to authorities, which provid
averments, I may be, sub}xt to crirnina] penalties.
ofplenaryGuardians
f in the preparation of the lawsuit.
I have read the document and to
zny counsel, it Is true aad correct
that the content of the document
atiaa of IS Pa. C.S. Scctioa 4904
that if T make knowingly false
'VERIFICATION
The foregoing petition forA.dj udication
is based upon information which has been gathered 6y my tour
The language of the document is that of covtuol and not my ov
the extent that it is based upon iaf'oaaatioa which I have gives
to the beat of my knowledge, information, and, bolief. To the ext
is that of covnso[, I have relied upon counsel in making this vo
This statemem and veniflc~atioa are made subject to the p
relating to mtsworn falsification to authorities, which provid
averments, I may be snbj ect to criminal penalties.
:?t ~'~
in the preparation of the lawsuit.
I have read the document and to
my counsel, it is true and correct
that the content of the document
ilties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904
that if I make knowingly false
Loti L.Wallower