Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-4227F'~E=~-G~j=^~ it rtn~ /'~~+.,V '-.'~~~ 2C~~ ~"~~-; 2~ F'9 {~ r., s} ~ ~- ~,,, ,,. . -.,.~r, -~F,i~~. ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire Attorney ID# : 91895 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 (717)238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff E-mail: dchristopher@angino-rovner.com DONNIE N. SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased, Plaintiff v. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA NO. 10 - yaa7 ~ivil ~'Pa"1r CIVIL ACTION -LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NOTICE TO DEFEND You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and judgment may be entered against you by the Court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. Cumberland County Bar Association 32 South Bedford Street, Carlisle, PA ^ Telephone number- 717- 249-3166 5 ~qa •00 P A ArN ~~ga39B 424268 AVISO LISTED HA SIDO DEMANDADO/A EN CORTE. Si usted desea defenderse de las demandas que se persentan mas adelante en las siguientes paginas, debe tomar accion dentro de los proximos veinte (20) dias despues de la notificacion de esta Demanda y Aviso radicando personalmente o por medio de un abogado una comparecencia escrita y radicando en la Corte por escrito sus defensas de, y objecciones a , las demandas presentadas aqui en contra suya. Se le advierte de que si usted falla de tomar accion como se describe anteriormente, el caso puede proceder sin usted y un fallo por cualquier suma de dinero reclamada en la demanda o cualquier otra reclamacion o remedio solicitado por el demandante puede ser dictado en contra suya por la Corte sin mas aviso adicional. Used puede perder dinero o propiedad u otros derechos importantes para used. LISTED DEBE LLEVAR ESTE DOCUMENTO A SU ABOGADO INMEDIATAMENTE. SI USED NO TIENE UN ABOGADO, LLAME O VAYA A LA SIGUIENTE OFICINA. ESTA OFICINA PUEDE PROVEERLE INFORMACION A CERCA DE COMO CONSEGUIR UN ABOGADO. SI USED NO PUEDE PAGAR POR LOS SERVICIOS DE UN ABOGADO, ES POSIBLE QUE ESTA OFICINA LE PUEDA PROVEER INFORMACION SOBRE AGENCIAS QUE OFREZCAN SERVICIOS LEGALES SIN CARGO O BAJO COSTO A PERSONAS QUE CUALIFICAN. Cumberland County Bar Association 32 South Bedford Street Carlisle, PA Telephone number- 717- 249-3166 424268 ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire Attorney ID# : 91895 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 (717)238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) E-mail: dchristopher@angino-rovner.com llUNNlr: N. SHUMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA NO. v. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER, Defendants CIVIL ACTION -LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiff Donnie N. Shomper is an adult individual and a citizen of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania who resides at 860 Walnut Street, Apartment SA, Lemoyne, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 2. Plaintiff Donnie N. Shomper is the Administrator of the Estate of Lee Ann Shomper, Deceased, by Letters of Administration duly issued by the Register of Wills, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. A Short Certificate is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3. Plaintiff Donnie N. Shomper brings this action under the Wrongful Death and Survival Act for the death of his wife, Lee Ann Shomper, who died on October 29, 2008. 4. Decedent, Lee Ann Shomper, married Plaintiff, Donnie N. Shomper, on July 7, 2001. 5. Defendant Brooke R. Rhodes is an adult individual and citizen of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania who resides at 623 Hilltop Drive, New Cumberland, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 17070. 424268 6. Defendant David E. Salter is an adult individual and citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia who resides at 7822 Roundabout Way, Springfield, Fairfax County, VA 22153. 7. At the time of the events hereinafter related, Defendants Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter owned the apartment building located at 210 Third Street, New Cumberland, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 17070. 8. On or around August 2008, Plaintiff Donnie N. Shomper visited the subject apartment building to look at an apartment to rent. Defendant Rhodes showed Mr. Shomper the apartment. 9. At that time, Mr. Shomper noticed that the handrail in the stairwell leading to the third floor was loose. 10. At that time, Mr. Shomper told Mr. Rhodes that Lee Ann Shomper had difficulty walking and that the handrail needed to be fixed as a condition of he and his wife agreeing to move in to the property. 11. Defendant Rhodes promised to fix the loose handrail in the immediate future. 12. Defendant Rhodes did not repair the handrail. 13. There was a second staircase leading to the third floor apartments; however, the handrail for that staircase was in even worse shape, and the staircase was missing large sections of handrail. 14. The facts and occurrences hereinafter related took place on or about September 10, 2008, at approximately 12:30 p.m. at 210 Third Street, New Cumberland, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 17070. 424268 2 15. Decedent Lee Ann Shomper went out of her apartment into the third-floor stairwell to go down the stairs. 16. At that time, Mr. Shomper was in the apartment. 17. As she attempted to go down the stairs, Lee Ann Shomper grabbed the handrail. It pulled out of the wall, causing her to lose her balance, fall, and tumble down two flights of stairs. 18. Mr. Shomper heard his wife go tumbling down the two flights of stairs and ran out to see if she was okay. 19. Mr. Shomper found the wooden handrail pulled out of the wall. 20. The wooden handrail failed because it was not securely fastened to the stairwell wall. 21. The aforementioned condition of the stairwell and handrail represented a condition which existed for a significant period of time before Decedent Lee Ann Shomper's fall. 22. Plaintiff Donnie N. Shomper notified the landlord in August 2008 that the handrail at issue was loose and in disrepair. 23. Based on the width of the stairwell, Defendants Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter knew, or should have known, that the stairwell was required to have two handrails. 24. Defendants Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter had actual notice of the defective and unsafe condition of the handrail in the third floor stairwell and had promised to fix it. 424268 3 25. Defendants Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter were under a duty to properly maintain the stairwell and to follow through on Mr. Rhodes's promise to Mr. Shomper to repair the handrail. 26. Immediately following her fall, Mrs. Shomper was complaining of a sore wrist, but believed that she was able to go to the bank. 27. While at the bank, Mrs. Shomper was involved in a very minor traffic accident and was taken to the Holy Spirit Hospital by EMS due to her prior wrist injury. 28. Mrs. Shomper was diagnosed with and treated for a fractured right wrist. 29. Then, on October 29, 2008, Mr. Shomper found his wife unresponsive. 30. He immediately called for an ambulance who rushed her to the hospital where she died as a result of multiple pulmonary emboli. 31. Mrs. Shomper's wrist injury and death were direct and proximate results of the Defendants' failure to properly repair the handrail of which they had actual or constructive notice. COUNTI DONNIE N. SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased v. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER NEGLIGENCE 32. All prior paragraphs of this Complaint are incorporated herein by reference. 33. The aforementioned fall and all injuries and damages as set forth hereinafter sustained by Decedent Lee Ann Shomper are the direct and proximate result of the negligent and careless conduct of Defendants Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter as follows: a) failure to properly maintain the handrail in the third floor stairwell; b) failure to properly inspect the handrail in the third floor stairwell to ensure that it was securely fastened to the stairwell and that it would not fail under normal use; 424268 [~ c) failure to properly secure the handrail to the stairwell; d) failure to properly attach the handrail to the wall so that it would not come out of the wall during foreseeable use; e) failure to provide handrails on both sides of a wide stairwell; and, f) failure to follow through on the promise to repair the loose handrail. 34. As a direct and proximate result of the aforementioned conduct of Defendants Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter, Decedent Lee Ann Shomper sustained painful and severe injuries, which include, but are not limited to, a fractured right wrist, bruising, loss of mobility, and an increased risk of developing the pulmonary emboli from which she died on October 29, 2008. CLAIM I -SURVIVAL ACTION DONNIE N. SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased v. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER 35. All prior paragraphs of this Complaint are incorporated herein by reference. 36. Plaintiff, Donnie N. Shomper, brings this action on behalf of the Estate of Lee Ann Shomper, under and by virtue of the Act of 1976, July 9, P.L. 586, No. 42, ~2, Pa.C.S.A. §8302. 37. Defendants are liable to the Estate of Lee Ann Shomper for damages as set forth herein. 38. Plaintiff, Donnie N. Shomper, Administrator of the Estate of Lee Ann Shomper, hereby makes claims on behalf of the Estate for all the damages suffered by his wife and her estate, including the pain and suffering Lee Ann Shomper underwent prior to death, her loss of earnings and earning power, and for all other damages sustained by the Estate as stated below. 39. By reason of the aforesaid injuries sustained by Decedent Lee Ann Shomper, she was forced to incur liability for medical treatment and medications, she required assistance with 424268 5 activities of daily living, and similar miscellaneous expenses in an effort to restore herself to health, and claim is made therefor. 40. By reason of the aforesaid injuries sustained by Decedent Lee Ann Shomper, she suffered pain, suffering, difficulty with her day-to-day activities, and loss of life's pleasures and enjoyment, and claims are made therefor. 41. By reason of the aforesaid injuries sustained by Decedent Lee Ann Shomper, she suffered embarrassment, frustration, and humiliation, and claims are made therefor. 42. By reason of her injuries and death, Mrs. Shomper suffered a permanent diminution of her earning power and potential, and a claim is made therefor. 43. Decedent, Lee Ann Shomper, did not bring an action for these injuries during her lifetime. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Donnie N. Shomper, Administrator of the Estate of Lee Ann Shomper, demands judgment against Defendants Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter in an amount in excess of Fifty Thousand ($50,000) Dollars, exclusive of interest and costs and in excess of any jurisdictional amount requiring compulsory arbitration. CLAIM II -WRONGFUL DEATH DONNIE N. SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased v. BROOKE R RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER 44. All prior paragraphs of this Complaint are incorporated herein by reference. 45. Plaintiff, Donnie N. Shomper, Administrator of the Estate of Lee Ann Shomper, brings this action for the wrongful death of Lee Ann Shomper on behalf of all persons entitled to recover, therefore, under and by virtue of the Act of 1976, July 9, P.I. 589, No. 142 §2, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §8301. 424268 6 46. The following are the names of all persons entitled by law to recover damages for such wrongful death and their relationship to the decedent: Name: Relationship: Address: Donnie N. Shomper Husband Lemoyne, PA 47. As a result of the death of the Decedent, Lee Ann Shomper, Mr. Shomper has suffered a pecuniary loss and has been, and in the future will be, deprived of the Decedent's companionship, contribution, support, comfort, services and so on, and claims are made therefor. 48. As a direct and proximate result of the death of Decedent, Lee Ann Shomper, Plaintiff, Donnie N. Shomper, has incurred funeral, burial, and related expenses, as well as expenses for performing the duties of the Executor of the Decedent's estate, and claims are made therefor. 49. Plaintiff, Donnie N. Shomper, has lost the future maintenance and support of his wife, and claims are made therefor. 50. Plaintiff, Donnie N. Shomper, has lost the ability to maintain or sustain a familial relationship with his wife, and claims are made therefor. S 1. Plaintiff, Donnie N. Shomper, surviving spouse, has suffered the loss of the society, comfort, and consortium of his wife, and claims are made therefor. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Donnie N. Shomper, Administrator of the Estate of Lee Ann Shomper, demands judgment against Defendants Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter in an 424268 '] amount in excess of Fifty Thousand ($50,000) Dollars, exclusive of interest and costs and in excess of any jurisdictional amount requiring compulsory arbitration. Date: ~~'~ /~ ~l Respectfully submitted, ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. ~. r ; . -_..._..__ .. ~,/~_._...1 ~~ ,~,.-_...._,.-.-~...-..._.._ Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire PA LD. No. 91895 4503 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 238-6791 dchri stopher@angino-ro vner. com Counsel for Plaintiff 424268 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND estate of LEE ANN SHnMPFR _ ~rirsr, rvvadie, ~astJ in said county, deceased, SHORT CERTIFICATE I, GLENDA EARNER STRASBAUGH Register for the Probate of Wills and Granting Letters of Administration in and for CUMBERLAND County, do hereby certify that on the 3rd day of December, Two Thousand and Eight Letters of ADMINISTRATION in common form were granted by the Register of said County, on the late of NEW CUMBERLAND BOROUGH to DONNIE N SHOMPER (First, Midd/e, Lastl and that same has not since been revoked. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said office at CARLISLE, PENNSYLVANIA, this 3rd day of December Two Thousand and Eight. File No. PA File No. Date of Death S.S. ## 2008- 01197 21- 08- 1197 10/29/2008 NOT VALID WITHOUT ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND IMPRESSED SEAL VERIFICATION I, Donnie N. Shomper, Plaintiff hereby verify that the facts set forth in the foregoing Complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I understand that any false statements therein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. §4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. WITNESS: ~ ~ _v., DONNIE N. SHOMPER Date: 3 ~~ 441380 SHERIFF'IS OFFICE OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY Ronny R Anderson Sheriff Jody SSmith Chief Deputy Richard W Stewart Solicitor E ~_ .r ~_ o~ of 4ru1h ~, r~~ ~~~.. f :~ ,.-r~~ a ~, ~. , ~' ~ nin br ~~~ ~{- ~' r ~ 20`~ ~+~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~' ~Z ~ ~~~'~~~ rtes ~. F -.,~ s~~Rlr~ C~~~v"~ ~;_'~~'( Donnie N. Shomper vs. Case Number David E. Salter (et al.) 2010-4227 HERIFF'S RETURN OF SERVICE 06/25/2010 On this date Ronny R, nderson, Sheriff mailed the within Complaint and Notice by certified mail, return receipt requested to Da id E. Salter, 7822 Roundabout Way, Springfield, VA 22153. 06/29/2010 06:00 PM -Shawn Harr on, Deputy Sheriff, who being duty sworn according to law, states that on June 29, 2010 at 1755 hours, he served a true copy of the within Complaint and Notice, u the within named defendant, to wit: Brook R. Rhodes, by making known unto Maggie Salter, Wife o de ndant at 623 Hilltop Drive, New Cum erland, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 1707 it ont nts nd at the same time handing to her pe onally the said true and correct copy of the sa S WN HARRISON, DEPUTY 07/15/2010 Ronny R. Anderson, Sh riff, who being duly sworn according to law, states that he served the within Complaint and Notice u on the within named defendant, David E. Salter, in the following manner: On June 25, 2010 the Sheri mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested a true and correct copy of the within Complaint and N tice to the defendant's last known address of 7822 Roundabout Way, Springfield, VA 22153. The certifie mail return receipt card was received by the Cumberland County Sheriffs Office signed by an adult in ch rge. SHERIFF COST: $71.50 SO ANSWERS, July 15, 2010 RON R ANDERSON, SHERIFF (c) CountySuite Sheriff. Teleosoft. Inc a ~ o . o . ..- .-. ti m ~ ~ ~ ~ Postage $ ~ O O Certlfled Fee O (~ Receipt Fee nt Required) Postmark p Re ~ (Endo ~ Delivery Fee ment Required) Here O Total ostage &'Fees ..0 O ~ ~'' ~t Dayi~._ t. tio.: ~+,.-_ ..~r~l-t.t:]C-----------2111Q 4 - 227 -------_ . _ _ .__"~•_-7822 Roundabout Wa -------•-...--- Y ` S ~~-ri - ----- ------------ - field VA 22153 --- w 6 ml4 ~2• 3. Ado comPkte _ is dashed. Mre return ~ AttacFt this card t th card tom reverse "ig ~' ^ Agent ~' o e tx on the fitirtt if . ecelvr9d ~~ mail~lece, d!' ( Mrnej C. Date of Delivery ~' a'~ed to: D• ~ `deNuery ad3ees dMibrent from item 1 T ^ Yes Davf'd E. Salt r H YES. erKer deNvery ,..;..~ c 7 ^ No • 7822` Roundabo t Way ~ .. Springfield, A 22153 C t, ~ . 3. Servb~ ~ ^ CertiAsd MaR ~ F.>q~ Mvl 2 010 - 4 2 2 7 r~r Merr;handi o ^ lnsurod 1 D c o D se 2 Artlde Number 4. ~eehlcraed IExba-Fee) ^ Yes r>~~ ' 70D6 0810 GOOD 7882 0007 ~ ~+' 38 1'1. RAM D°r"e°r k Retum Recei t p ~ozses~o2-M-,s,o , LAW OFFICES WILLIAM J. FERREN ASSOCIATES BY: James H. Rohlfing, squire Attorney I.D. No.: 59094 BY: James P. Bradley, E quire Attorney I.D. No. 20424 1500 Market Street -Suit 2920 29rn Floor -West Tower Philadelphia, PA 19102 (267) 675-3019 (267) 675-3037 Attorneys for Defendant , Brooke R. Rhodes and D id E. Salter DONNIE N. SHOMPER, Administrator of The Estate of Lee Ann Sh miler, Deceased v. BROOKE R. RHODES DAVID E. SALTER r 201Q.~~~ 1 ~ ~~'~~i ~~ COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY NO.: 10-4227 RANCE/JURY TP TO THE PROTHONOT Y: Kindly enter our pearances on behalf of Defendants, Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter, with regard to the ve-captioned matter. A jury of twelve (1 )persons is hereby demanded. WILI~AM J. FERREN & ASSOCIATES BY: J S H. ROHLFING, ESQU$(E'' J S P. BRADLEY, ESQUIRE Attorneys for Defendants, Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter DATED: July 15, 2010 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, JAMES H. E. Salter, hereby certify class mail upon the G, ESQUIRE, on behalf of Defendants, Brooke R. Rhodes and David the foregoing Entry of Appearance was served via United States first counsel:: Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire Angino & Rovner, P.C. 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 WILLIAM J. FERREN & ASSOCIATES BY: DATED: July 15, 2010 LAW OFFICES TO: PLAINTIFF YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED TO ANSWER THE ENCLOSED NEW MATTER AND COUNTERCLAIM WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF SERVICE HEREOF. /s/ James H. Rohlfmy- Esquire JAMES II. ROMFING, ESQUIRE WILLIAM J. FERREN & ASSOCIATES BY: James H. Rohlfmg, Esquire Attorney I.D. No.: 59094 BY: James P. Bradley, Esquire 204240 10 N Attomay o- 1500 Market Street - Suite 2920 29TH Floor - West Tower f Philadelphia, PA 19102 (267) 675-3019 (267) 675-3037 - ;ti Attorneys for Defendants, Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter DONNIE N. SHOWER, Administrator of : The Estate of Lee Ann Shomper, Deceased : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY V. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER NO.: 10-4227 DEFENDANTS, BROOKE IL RHODES AND DAVID E. SALTER'S, ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH NEW MATTER AND COUNTERCLAIM Defendants, Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter, hereby answer Plaintiff's Complaint and aver New Matter and Counterclaim as follows: Admitted. 2. Admitted. 3. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 4. This paragraph does not provide enough information to admit or deny the allegations alleged therein. 5. Admitted. 6. Admitted. 7. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 8. Denied. By way of further answer, Answering Defendants at all times acted reasonably. Strict proof to the contrary is demanded at the time of trial. 9. Denied. By way of further answer, Answering Defendants at all times acted reasonably. Strict proof to the contrary is demanded at the time of trial. 10. Denied. By way of further answer, Answering Defendants at all times acted reasonably. Strict proof to the contrary is demanded at the time of trial. 11. Denied. 12. Denied. 13. Denied. 14. Denied. 15. This paragraph does not provide enough information to admit or deny the allegations alleged therein. 16. This paragraph does not provide enough information to admit or deny the allegations alleged therein. 2 17. This paragraph does not provide enough information to admit or deny the allegations alleged therein. 18. This paragraph does not provide enough information to admit or deny the allegations alleged therein. 19. This paragraph does not provide enough information to admit or deny the allegations alleged therein. 20. This paragraph does not provide enough information to admit or deny the allegations alleged therein. 21. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 22. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 23. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 24. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 25. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 26. This paragraph does not provide enough information to admit or deny the allegations alleged therein. 27. This paragraph does not provide enough information to admit or deny the allegations alleged therein. 3 28. This paragraph does not provide enough information to admit or deny the allegations alleged therein. 29. This paragraph does not provide enough information to admit or deny the allegations alleged therein. 30. This paragraph does not provide enough information to admit or deny the allegations alleged therein. 31. This paragraph does not provide enough information to admit or deny the allegations alleged therein. WHEREFORE, Answering Defendants, Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter, demand that judgment be entered in their favor and against the Plaintiff together with an award of attorney's fees and costs incurred in defense of this matter. COUNTI DONNLE N. SHOWER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOM PER. Deceased v. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER NEGLIGENCE 32. Answering Defendants hereby incorporate by reference their responses to paragraphs 1 through 31 above as though same were fully set forth at length herein. 33. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 34. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. WHEREFORE, Answering Defendants, Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter, demand that judgment be entered in their favor and against the Plaintiff together with an award of attorney's fees and costs incurred in defense of this matter. 4 CLAIM I - SURVIVAL ACTION DONNIE N SHOWER., Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER. Deceased v. BROOKE IL RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER 35. Answering Defendants hereby incorporate by reference their responses to paragraphs 1 through 34 above as though same were fully set forth at length herein. 36. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 37. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 38. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 39. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 40. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 41. Denied: This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 42. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 43. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. WHEREFORE, Answering Defendants, Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter, demand that judgment be entered in their favor and against the Plaintiff together with an award of attorney's fees and costs incurred in defense of this matter. CLAIM H - WRONGFUL DEATH DONNIE N. SHOWER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPEX Deceased v. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER 44. Answering Defendants hereby incorporate by reference their responses to paragraphs 1 through 43 above as though same were fully set forth at length herein. 45. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 46. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 47. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 48. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 49. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 50. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 51. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. 6 WHEREFORE, Answering Defendants, Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter, demand that judgment be entered in their favor and against the Plaintiff together with an award of attorney's fees and costs incurred in defense of this matter. NEW MATTER 52. Answering Defendants hereby incorporate by reference all of their preceding responses to all of Plaintiffs allegations in this Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint as though same were fully set forth at length herein. 53. Plaintiff's claims are barred in whole or in part by the provisions of the Pennsylvania Comparative Negligence Act. 54. Plaintiff's claims are barred in whole or in part by the applicable Statute of Limitations. 55. Plaintiff's claims are barred in whole or in part by the Doctrine of Assumption of Risk and/or Comparative Negligence. 56. Plaintiffs Complaint fails to state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted against the Answering Defendants. 57. The Answering Defendants specifically deny any negligence, carelessness and/or failure in any duties allegedly owed to the Plaintiff on their part. 58. Answering Defendants specifically deny that any dangerous, hazardous, and/or unsafe conditions existed on the property in question and that Answering Defendants had or should have had actual or constructive notice of any alleged dangers, hazards, and/or unsafe conditions, the existence of same being herein denied. 59. If the Plaintiff sustained any damages as alleged in the Complaint, these facts being specifically denied by the Answering Defendants, then those damages were caused by the 7 acts or omission of persons other than the Answering Defendants over whom/which the Answering Defendants had neither control nor right to control. WHEREFORE, Answering Defendants Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter respectfully request that judgment be entered in their favor and against Plaintiff along with attorney's fees and other costs that the Court deems just and proper. COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST PLAINTIFF, DONNIE N SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased 60. Answering Defendants hereby incorporate by reference their answers to paragraphs 1 through 59 above as though the same were fully set forth at length herein. 61. Should Plaintiff's losses be proven, liability therefore is that of Plaintiff Donnie Shomper due to his negligence, carelessness, recklessness, etc. as set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint which is incorporated herein by reference and re-alleged against Plaintiff Donnie Shomper, any liability on the part of Answering Defendants being hereby expressly denied for the reasons set forth above and being otherwise negligent, careless and reckless under the circumstances as will be further established by discovery to be produced in the future. 62. Answering Defendants hereby assert that Plaintiff Donnie Shomper is alone liable to himself or liable over to Answering Defendants or jointly or severally liable or liable to Answering Defendants directly. WHEREFORE, should judgment be entered against Defendants, Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter, liability for which is strictly denied, then Answering Defendants, Brooke R. 8 Rhodes and David E. Salter, hereby demand that judgment be further entered against Plaintiff Donnie Shomper, by way of contribution and/or full indemnity. BY: P. BRADLEY, ESQUIRE Attorneys for Defendants, Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter DATED: August 11, 2010 9 WILLIAM J. FERREN & ASSOCIATES VERIFICATION I, JAMES H. ROHLFING, ESQUIRE, hereby verify that the statements made in the foregoing Answer with New Matter and Counterclaim are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I further verify that I am authorized to take this Verification on behalf of Defendants, Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter, in the capacity of Defendants' attorney, and also for the reason that Defendants' Verifications cannot be obtained within the required pleading period. It is intended that Defendants' personal Verifications will be substituted . subsequently. I understand that false statements herein made are subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. §4904 relating to unworn falsification to authorities. ? Lzlw 9? J S H.. ROHLFING, DATED: August 11, 2010 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, JAMES H. ROHLFING, ESQUIRE, on behalf of Defendants, Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter, hereby certify that the foregoing Answer with New Matter and Counterclaim was served via United States first class mail upon the following counsel:: Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire Angino & Rovner, P.C. 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 WILLIAM J. FERREN & ASSOCIATES BY: IZ9 /? 6a?? ?"S H. ROHLFING, ESQtKE DATED: August 11, 2010 ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire Attorney 1D# : 91895 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 (717) 238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff E-mail: dchristopher?aangino-rovner.com T ARY ?Q AUUU 25 AN 10: 17 AtVtq DONNIE N. SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased, Plaintiff V. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA NO. 10-4227- Civil Term CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' NEW MATTER AND COUNTERCLAIM New Matter 51 This paragraph contains no averments of fact that can be admitted or denied. To the extent that this paragraph is deemed to contain averments of fact, they are specifically denied. 53. Denied. At all times relevant hereto, Plaintiff and his decedent conducted themselves as reasonable and prudent persons under the circumstances. 54. Denied. Plaintiff filed this action well within the applicable two-year statute of limitations. 447793 ORIGINAL 55. Denied. At all times relevant hereto, Plaintiff and his decedent conducted themselves as reasonable and prudent persons under the circumstances. It is specifically denied that Plaintiff or his decedent assumed the risk of injury. By way of further answer, Mr. and Mrs. Shomper relied on the assurance by Mr. Rhodes that he would repair the stairway when they moved into the apartment. When the Defendants chose not to repair the stairway, the Plaintiffs were forced to live in an apartment without safe stairway access through no choice or fault of their own. 56. Denied. This paragraph is denied as a conclusion of law and contains no averments of fact that can be admitted or denied. To the extent that this paragraph is deemed to contain averments of fact, they are specifically denied. 57. Denied. This paragraph contains no averments of fact that can be admitted or denied. To the extent that this paragraph is deemed to contain averments of fact, they are specifically denied. By way of further answer, Plaintiff incorporates the allegations set forth in the Complaint as if stated herein. 58. Denied, A dangerous condition did exist, and Defendants had actual and constructive notice of the defective and dangerous condition of the stairwell in question. By way of further answer, Plaintiff incorporates the allegations set forth in the Complaint as if stated herein. 59. Denied. Regardless of whether they hired contractors to perform work for them, the Defendants remained responsible for the condition of their rental property. It is admitted that the Plaintiff sustained damages alleged in the Complaint. Defendants are responsible for all of Plaintiff s injuries. 447793 2 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against the Defendants in an amount in excess of $50,000, exclusive of interest and costs and in excess of any jurisdictional amount requiring compulsory arbitration. Counterclaim 60. This paragraph contains no averments of fact which can be admitted or denied. To the extent that this paragraph is deemed to contain averments of fact, they are specifically denied. 61. Denied. At all times relevant hereto, Plaintiff Donnie Shomper conducted himself as a reasonable and prudent person under the circumstances and was not responsible in any way for the injuries suffered by his wife. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations set forth in his Complaint as if stated herein. 62. Denied. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference his answer to paragraph no. 61. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Donnie Shomper demands judgment in his favor and against the Defendants, along with attorney's fees and other costs that the Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, Date: '/ -'VI 6) ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Daryl >. Christopher, Esquire PA I.D. No. 91895 4503 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 238-6791 dchristopher@angino-rovner.com Counsel for Plaintiff 447793 3 AFFIDAVIT 1, Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire, counsel for the Plaintiff, state that Plaintiff's foregoing Response to Defendants' New Matter and Counterclaim contains no new facts that must be verified. Date: c Respectfully submitted, ANGINO & ROVER, P.C. 5 Daryl E. hristopher, Esquire PA I.D. No. 91895 4503 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 238-6791 dchristopher@angino-rovner.com Counsel for Plaintiff 447793 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Mary T. Geraets, an employee of the law firm of Angino & Rovner, P.C., do hereby certify that I am this day serving a true and correct copy of the PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' NEW MATTER AND COUNTERCLAIM upon all counsel of record via postage prepaid first class United States mail addressed as follows: James H. Rohlfing, Esquire William J. Ferren & Associates 1500 Market St., Suite 2920 29th Floor, West Tower Philadelphia, PA 19102-2100 Attorney for Defendants Ma T. raets Dated: 447793 . S U ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire Attorney ID# : 91895 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 {717) 238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff E-mail: dchristopher@angino-rovner.com DONNIE N. ,SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of SEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA NO. 10-4227- Civil Term v BROOKE R. RHODES and ]DAVID E. SALTER, Defendants CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO RULE 4009.21 Plaintiff intends to serve a subpoena identical to the one that is attached to this notice. You have twenty (20) days from the date listed below in which to file of record and serve upon the undersigned an objection to the subpoena. If no objection is made the subpoena may be served. Respectfully submitted, Date: I Y / 454160 ANGINO ROVNER, P.C. Daryl . Chri er, Esquire PA I.D. No. 91895 4503 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 238-6791 dchristopher@angino-rovner.com Counsel for Plaintiff ORIGINAL COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND Donnie N. Shomper, Administrator of The Estate of Lee Ann Shomper, deceased Plaintiff/s versus :No. 10-4227-Civil Term Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter Defendant/s SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS OR THINGS FOR DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO RULE 4009.22 To: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the County of Cumberland 114 North Hanover St., Suite 104 Carlisle, PA 17013 Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to produce the following documents or things: Any and all documents relating in any way to inspections performed of 210 Third Street, New Cumberland, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania; applications for Section 8 status of said property; approval, denial, or revocation of Section 8 status of said property; and any and all documents reflecting violation of any building or property maintenance codes or standards of said property. You may limit your response to documents relating to January 1, 2005, to present. Please produce to Daryl Christopher, Esquire, at Angino & Rovner, P.C., 4503 N. Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110. You may deliver or mail legible copies of the documents or produce things requested by this subpoena, together with the certificate of compliance, to the party making this request at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sought. If you fail to produce the documents or things required by this subpoena within twenty (20) days after service, the parry serving this subpoena may seek a court order compelling you to comply with it. THIS SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE FOLLOWING PERSON: Name: Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire Address: 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Telephone: (717) 2:38-6791 Supreme Court ID #: 91895 Attorney for: Plaintiff Date: Seal of the Court BY THE COURT: Prothonotary/Clerk, Civil Division Deputy 454159 Return of Service: On the day of served (name of person served) by: (Describe method of Service) with the foregoing subpoena I verify that the statements in the Return of Service are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S:A. Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Date: (Signature) 454159 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1, Mary T. Geraets, an employee of the law firms of Angino & Rovner, P.C., do hereby certify that I am this day serving a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA upon all counsel of record via postage prepaid first class United States mail addressed as follows: James H. Rohlfing, Esquire William J. Ferren & Associates 1500 Market St., Suite 2920 29'h Floor, West Tower Philadelphia, PA 19102-2100 Attorney for Defendants A Mary T. Ger ets " Dated: 454160 FILED-OFFICE OF THE PROTHONOTARY ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire Attorney ID# : 91895 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 (717) 238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff E-mail: dchristopher@angino-rovner.com 2010 NOV 22 AM 11: S9 CUMBERLAND COUNTY PEI°INISYLVA IA DONNIE N. SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased, Plaintiff V. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA NO. 10-4227- Civil Term CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND NOW COMES Plaintiff, Donnie Shomper, by and through his attorneys, Angino & Rovner, P.C., and respectfully moves this Honorable Court to compel Defendants to provide full and complete answers to Plaintiffs Request for Production of Documents and Interrogatories and in support thereof avers: 1. This lawsuit was initiated by Complaint filed on or around June 23, 2010. 2. Both Defendants were served no later than July 19, 2010. 3. Defense counsel entered his appearance on or around July 19, 2010, and sent initial discovery requests to the Plaintiff on the same date. 452551 4. Defendants filed their Answer with New Matter on or around August 13, 2010. 5. Plaintiff filed his Reply to New Matter and Counterclaim on or around August 23, 2010. 6. Plaintiff provided full and complete answers to Defendants' Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents on August 25, 2010. 7. Plaintiff sent out his first set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to the Defendants on August 23, 2010. 8. Defendants had not responded or objected by October 1, 2010, so Plaintiff's counsel sent a letter requesting responses within the next two weeks. A copy of Plaintiff's counsel's letter is attached as Exhibit A. 9. Defendants still have not provided responses to the Plaintiff's initial discovery requests. 10. All of the discovery sought by Plaintiff through his Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents is relevant to the present action. 11. Pa.R.C.P. 4019 provides that upon motion of a party, the Court can make an appropriate Order and sanction when a party fails to properly answer interrogatories or request for production of documents. 12. Plaintiff requests that Defendants be Ordered to provide full and complete responses to Plaintiff's requests within 20 days or be given an appropriate sanction by the Court. 13. Plaintiff is represented by Daryl Christopher, Esquire, of Angino & Rovner, P.C., 4503 N. Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110; phone - 717-238-6791. 452551 2 14. Defendants are represented by James H. Rohlfing, Esquire, of William J. Ferren & Associates, 1500 Market St., Suite 2920, 29th Floor, West Tower, Philadelphia, PA 19102-2100; phone - 267-675-3019. 15. Plaintiff s counsel sought concurrence of defense counsel on October 21, 2010, by emailing Attorney Rolfing a copy of Plaintiff s Motion. 16. Defense counsel did not respond and therefore, Plaintiff assumes he does not concur in this Motion. 17. No other Judge has ruled upon any other issue in the same or related matter on this case. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter an Order compelling Defendants to provide Plaintiff with answers to his Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents. Respectfully submitted, ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. aryl istopher, Esquire PA I.D. No. 91895 4503 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 238-6791 dchristopher@angino-rovner.com Counsel for Plaintiff Date: V 452551 3 CERTIFICATE OF CONCURRENCE/NON-CONCURRENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 208.2(d) On October 21, 2010, I contacted defense counsel seeking concurrence with Plaintiff s Motion To Compel Discovery. Defense counsel never responded and therefore, Plaintiff assume he does not concur in the Motion. Date: Respectfully submitted, ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Daryf E. Christopher, Esquire PA I.D. No. 91895 4503 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 238-6791 dchristopher@angino-rovner.com Counsel for Plaintiff 452551 Arangino-rovner 4503 NORTH FRONT STREET HARRISBURG, PA 17110.1799 717/238-6791 FAX 717/238.5610 W W W.ANGINO•ROVNER.COM F,MAIL. DCHRISTOPHER@ANGINO-ROVNER.COM October 1, 2010 James H. Rohlfing, Esquire William J. Ferren & Associates 1500 Market St., Suite 2920 29th Floor, West Tower Philadelphia, PA 19102-2100 RE: Shomper v. Rhodes, et al., Cumb. Co. No. 10-4227 Civil Term Dear Mr. Rohlfing: RICHARD C. ANGINO NEIL J. ROVNER DAVID L. LUTZ MICHAEL E. Kosm RICHARD A.SADLOCK LISA A B. WOODBURN DARYL E. CHRISTOPHER Your clients' responses to my initial discovery requests are overdue. Please provide full and complete answers and responsive documents within the next two weeks. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Daryl E. Christopher DEC/ 450924 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Mary T. Geraets, an employee of the law firm of Angino & Rovner, P.C., do hereby certify that I am this day serving a true and correct copy of the PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY upon all counsel of record via postage prepaid first class United States mail addressed as follows: James H. Rohlfing, Esquire William J. Ferren & Associates 1500 Market St., Suite 2920 29th Floor, West Tower Philadelphia, PA 19102-2100 Attorney for Defendants T. eraets Dated: 452551 S NOV23?yv DONNIE N. SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased, Plaintiff V. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA NO. 10-4227- Civil Term c3 c a x CIVIL ACTION - LAW =? . -m r <> x- ? C) r = --Icy JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 3> a z ? DC N C)rn ORDER .., a -< cn -, AND NOW, this ;Y ?' day of Mtleom fto?- , 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall provide full and complete Answers to Plaintiffs Requests for Production of Documents and Interrogatories within 20 days of the date of this Order. 119%4- na'4 .r?.,a .r. If Defendants fail to comply with this Order y they shall b&jweo4xfed-fl1Ly111- putting ur-ml evidence at trial. BY THE COURT: Distribution: Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire, Angino & Rovner, P.C., 4503 N. Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110, Counsel for Plaintiff James H. Rohlfmg, Esquire, of William J. Ferren & Associates, 1500 Market St., Suite 2920, 29"' Floor, West Tower, Philadelphia, PA 19102-2100, Counsel for Defendants Cop; e5 rya.. lead l 1 /a V110 flo 452551 t;"I0 Qrr, -g 4M II : "UMBERLAN 0 0Jtg4Ty PENNS )'LMNHA ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire Attorney ID# : 91895 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 (717) 238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff E-mail: dchristopher@angino-rovner.com DONNIE N. SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA NO. 10-4227- Civil Term V. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER, Defendants CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CERTIFICATE PREREQUISITE TO SERVICE OF A SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO RULE 4009.22 TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the County of Cumberland As a prerequisite to service of a subpoena for documents and things pursuant to Rule 4009.22, Plaintiff certifies that: (1) a notice of intent to serve the subpoena with a copy of the subpoena attached thereto was mailed or delivered to each party at least twenty days prior to the date on which the subpoena is sought to be served; (2) a copy of the notice of intent, including the proposed subpoena, is attached to this certificate; (3) no objection to the subpoena has been received; and 456321 (4) the subpoena which will be served is identical to the subpoena which is attached to the notice of intent to serve the subpoena. Date: 1.117110 Respectfully submitted, ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. ?4a2ryl E. Christopher, Esquire PA I.D. No. 91895 4503 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 238-6791 dchristopher@angino-rovner.com Counsel for Plaintiff 456321 ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire Attorney ID# : 91895 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 (717) 238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff E-mail: dchristopher@angino-rovner.com DONNIE N. SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA NO. 10-4227- Civil Term V. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER, Defendants CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO RULE 4009.21 Plaintiff intends to serve a subpoena identical to the one that is attached to this notice. You have twenty (20) days from the dale listed below in which to file of record and serve upon the undersigned an objection to the subpoena. If no objection is made the subpoena may be served. Respectfully submitted, ANGINO R VNER, P.C. Daryl . Chn er, Esquire PA I.D. No. 91895 4503 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 238-6791 dchristopher@angino-rovner.com Date: Counsel for Plaintiff 454160 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND Donnie N. Shomper, Administrator of The Estate of Lee Ann Shomper, deceased Plaintiffs versus : No. 10-4227-Civil Term Brooke R. Rhodes and David E. Salter Defendant/s SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS OR THINGS FOR DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO RULE 4009.22 To: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the County of Cumberland 114 North Hanover St., Suite 104 Carlisle, PA 17013 Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to produce the following documents or things: Any and all documents relating in any way to inspections performed of 210 Third Street, New Cumberland, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania; applications for Section 8 status of said property; approval, denial, or revocation of Section 8 status of said property; and any and all documents reflecting violation of any building or property maintenance codes or standards of said property. You may limit your response to documents relating to January 1, 2005, to present. Please produce to Daryl Christopher, Esquire, at Angino & Rovner, P.C., 4503 N. Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110. You may deliver or mail legible copies of the documents or produce things requested by this subpoena, together with the certificate of compliance, to the party making this request at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sought. If you fail to produce the documents or things required by this subpoena within twenty (20) days after service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court order compelling you to comply with it. THIS SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE FOLLOWING PERSON: Name: Address Telephone: Supreme Court ID #: Attorney for: Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 238-6791 91895 Plaintiff BY THE COURT: Date: Seal of the Court Prothonotary/Clerk, Civil Division Deputy 454159 Return of Service: On the day of served (name of person served) by: (Describe method of Service) with the foregoing subpoena I verify that the statements in the Return of Service are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. Section 4904 relating to unworn falsification to authorities. Date: (Signature) 454159 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Mary T. Geraets, an employee of the law firm of Angino & Rovner, P.C., do hereby certify that I am this day serving a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA upon all counsel of record via postage prepaid first class United States mail addressed as follows: James H. Rohlfing, Esquire William J. Ferren & Associates 1500 Market St., Suite 2920 29?' Floor, West Tower Philadelphia, PA 19102-2100 Attorney for Defendants taw ? ,?• .. Mary T. G ®r ets Dated: 1)-q-\D 454160 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Mary T. Geraets, an employee of the law firm of Angino & Rovner, P.C., do hereby certify that I am this day serving a true and correct copy of the CERTIFICATE PREREQUISITE TO SERVICE OF A SUBPOENA upon all counsel of record via postage prepaid first class United States mail addressed as follows: James H. Rohlfing, Esquire William J. Ferren & Associates 1500 Market St., Suite 2920 29th Floor, West Tower Philadelphia, PA 19102-2100 Attorney for Defendants Mary T. eraets Dated: l -a' '-? ' 1 V 456321 _1C_ i. h ."ft_ '€ta? ?iuDTAi ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire Attorney ID# : 91895 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 (717) 238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff E-mail: dchristopher@angino-rovner.com _2 PM 3.46 ,f+ 3ERLAND COL14TY '?.-ONSl'LVANIA DONNIE N. SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased, Plaintiff V. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA NO. 10-4227- Civil Term CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF WRONGFUL DEATH AND SURVIVAL SETTLEMENT AND PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEEDS AND NOW COMES Donnie N. Shomper, Administrator of the Estate of Lee Ann Shomper, Deceased, by and through his attorneys, Angino & Rovner, P.C., and hereby Petitions this Honorable Court pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 2206 for an Order approving the proposed settlement and approving the proposed distribution of proceeds. 1. On October 10, 2008, Petitioner's decedent, Lee Ann Shomper, was injured when she fell down a flight of stairs at her apartment located at 210 Third Street, New Cumberland, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. Mrs. Shomper died on October 29, 2008, as a result of a pulmonary embolism. 460632 2. Plaintiff believes and averred in his Complaint that his wife's fall down the steps caused or contributed to her death. 3. On December 3, 2008, Plaintiff Donnie Shomper applied for and was granted Letters of Administration by the Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas in Estate No. 2008-01197. 4. At the time of her death, Mrs. Shomper left behind only one heir and only one wrongful death beneficiary, her husband, Donnie Shomper. 5. The crux of Plaintiff's case against the Defendants is that the handrail of the stairwell was loose and caused or contributed to Mrs. Shomper's fall. 6. Were it to proceed to trial, the present case would involve difficult questions regarding the mechanics of Mrs. Shomper's un-witnessed fall and whether the fall was related to her death. 7. Plaintiff/Petitioner and his counsel believe that settling the present case in exchange for $250,000.00 is in the Plaintiff's best interest as an Estate beneficiary, as a wrongful death beneficiary, and as the Administrator of his wife's Estate. 8. Attached as Exhibit A is a copy of the proposed settlement and release. 9. The settled claims include two separate causes of action: a survival action asserted under 42 Pa.C.S.A. §8302, and a wrongful death action asserted under 42 Pa.C.S.A. §8301. 10. At the time of her death, Mrs. Shomper was married to her husband, the Plaintiff/Petitioner Donnie Shomper, and had no children or surviving parents. 11. Under Pennsylvania law, Mr. Shomper is the sole wrongful death beneficiary and the sole beneficiary of his wife's Estate. 460632 2 12. Plaintiff/Petitioner engaged the services of the law firm of Angino & Rovner, P.C., to prosecute a personal injury claim on behalf of his wife's Estate and on behalf of him as the wrongful death beneficiary. A copy of the Power of Attorney & Fee Agreement is attached as Exhibit B. 13. Pursuant to the Power of Attorney & Fee Agreement, Angino & Rovner is entitled to 35% of the gross settlement. 14. Pursuant to the Power of Attorney & Fee Agreement, Angino & Rovner is also entitled to recover its out-of-pocket expenses associated with the present case. The costs chargeable to Mr. Shomper are $3,616.21. Attached as Exhibit C is a list of the expenses being charged by Angino & Rovner, P.C. 15. Plaintiff/Petitioner proposes a distribution of the settlement proceeds as follows: a. Counsel fees - $87,383.79 ($87,500 less a fee concession of $116.21); b. Reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses - $3,626.12; C. 80% of the balance, or $127,200, to the Wrongful Death Action; d. 20% of the balance, or $31,800, to the Survival Action. 16. Prior to filing the subject Petition, Plaintiff/Petitioner contacted the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue regarding the proposed distribution between wrongful death and survival actions and received the Department's consent. Attached as Exhibit D is a letter from the Department of Revenue consenting to the proposed distribution. 17. A proposed Distribution Sheet showing the final distribution of this settlement is attached as Exhibit E. 460632 3 WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff/Petitioner respectfully requests that this Court issue an Order approving the proposed settlement and distributing funds as described in paragraph 15 above. Date: Respectfully submitted, ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Daryl 'Christopher, Esquire PA I.D. No. 91895 4503 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 238-6791 dchristopher@angino-rovner.com Counsel for Plaintiff(s) 460632 4 VERIFICATION I, Donnie Shomper, Plaintiff, hereby verify that the facts set forth in the foregoing Petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I understand that any false statements therein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. §4904, relating to unworn falsification to authorities. WITNESS: Donnie Shomper, Administrator of the Estate of Lee Ann Shomper Date: •? ?? 460632 O?pt/r READ IT CAREFULLY KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Donnie N. Shomper, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Lee Ann Shomper, deceased, intending to be legally bound hereby, for the full and sole consideration of the sum of Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00), to paid me at the time of the signing, sealing and delivery of this Release, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, have release, discharged, and acquitted by these presents, do for myself, my heirs, executors, administrators, acquit and forever discharge, Brooke R. Rhodes, David E. Salter, Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America and any and all other persons, firms and corporations (hereinafter Releasees), each and all of them from any and all claims, rights, demands, damages, actions or causes of action of whatsoever kind and nature which 1, individually, jointly or separately, now have, ever had, or may at any time hereafter have arising out of or in any way connected with any and all known and unknown, foreseen and unforeseen, physical or psychological injuries and the expenses and the consequences thereof or any other loss or damage sustained by Lee Ann Shomper, or me, Donnie N. Shomper, individually and as the administrator of the estate of Lee Ann Shomper, deceased, as a result of or in any way connected with an incident which occurred on or about October 10, 2008, on the premises located at 210 Third Street, New Cumberland, PA 17070, or the death of Lee A. Shomper, who was pronounced dead on arrival at Harrisburg Hospital on or about October 29, 2008, including but not limited to the injuries, losses or damages claimed or which could have been claimed in the suit pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Docket No. 10-4227, which case shall be marked satisfied and/or settled, discontinued and ended with prejudice. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, that, T acknowledge and assume all risks, chance or hazard that the said injury or damage may be or become permanent, progressive, greater, or more extensive than is now known, anticipated or expected. No promise or inducement which is not herein expressed has been made to me and in executing this Release, 1 do not rely upon any statement or representation made by any person, firm or corporation, hereby released, or any agent, physician, doctor or any other person representing them or any of them, concerning the nature, extent or duration of said damages or the legal liability therefore. FURTHERMORE, 1, Donnie N. Shomper, individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Lee Ann Shomper, deceased, intending to be legally bound hereby, do expressly stipulate and agree in consideration of the aforementioned payment of Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) to indemnify and hold forever harmless Releasees and their parent, subsidiary, affiliated and inter-related companies and their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, successors and assigns, and each or any of them, against any lien or loss from any other claims, including Worker's Compensation liens or any other lien for wages or medical bills, demands, or actions which may hereafter or at any time be made or brought against each or any of them to enforce any claim for personal injuries, wages, medical bills, or any other damages sustained by me arising out of or in any way connection with the incidents of October 10, 2008 and October 29, 2008, by or on behalf of me, my heirs, executors, administrators, J' next-of-kin, successors, or assigns, or each or any of them, or any claimant deriving their claim from or through me. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT this settlement is the compromise of a doubtful and disputed claim and that payment made is not to be construed as an admission of liability on the part of the Releasees and Releasees deny any liability for the personal injuries or any other loss or damage sustained by me and the settlement and this Release and any payment shall never be treated as evidence of liability nor as an admission of liability or responsibility by Releasees at any time or in any manner whatsoever. I certify that I have made this compromise settlement after consultation with, and advice from my attorney, Daryl E. Christopher who has explained to me the nature and extent of my legal rights and the effect of this Release. FURTHERMORE, the undersigned hereby declare that the terms of this settlement and release have been completed read and are fully understood and accepted for purpose of making a full and final compromise, adjustment and settlement of any and all claims against Releasees or against any other person, firm, corporation, or entity disputed or otherwise, on the account of the injuries and damages above stated and for the express purpose of precluding forever any further or additional claims for personal injuries, damages or losses sustained by me against any person, firm, corporation, or entity arising out of the aforesaid incidents of October 10, 2008 and October 29, 2008. The undersigned further declares that this Release contains the entire agreement between the undersigned and Releasees and declare that no promise, inducement, or agreement not herein expressed has been made to the undersigned, and that the terms of the Release are contractual and not a mere recital. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending to be legally bound hereby, I hereunto set my hand and seal this day of , 2011. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of the below-described witness. WITNESS PRINT NAME ADDRESS Donnie N. Shomper, Adminstrator of Estate of Lee Ann Shomper, Deceased Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of , 2011. NOTARY PUBLIC ??N?B?T POWER. OF ATTORNEY AND FEE AGREEMENT -BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, I (WE)ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I (WE) HAVE ENGAGED THE LAW FIRM OF ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. (HEREIN-AFTER A &R),-TO REPRESENT ME (US) UNDERTHE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS: A & R may on my (our) behalf secure medical, -work and other similar records, conduct an investigation, negotiate, and if necessary start suit against anyone responsible for my (our) injures and- losses with respect to +_ _ ?0^SftI Ja,4, A }$4l } with foil-power and -authority to appear on behalf ofthe undersigned in any Court of record or in any administrative or other proceeding, to do and perform all and every act -and thing whatsoever that may be requisite and necessary to be done in connection with the above claim as fully as the undersigned might or could do if personally present; hereby ratifying ar--id confirming all that- said attorneys shall lawfully do or cause to be done therein by virtue of this power of attorney. 2. I (we) understand that so long- as the -case is handled by an A & R attorney, I (we) will not be responsible for any-fees and/or expenses unless a recovery or benefit is obtained. 3. If my (our) case is handled to a successful completion by an A & R attorney, I (we) agree to pay A & R all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses without the payment of interest, plus a fee for time expended as follows: A & R ME (US) a. SETTLEMENT PRIOR TO STARTING SUIT 30% 70% b. SETTLEMENT FOLLOWING SUIT BUT PRIOR TO PRETRIAL CONFERENCE OR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS FOR ARBITRATION 35% 65% c. SETTLEMENT AT OR AFTER A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE OR SETTLEMENT AFTER THE APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS FOR ARBITRATION; SETTLEMENT OR VERDICT AT TRIAL OR .ARBITRATION; SETTLEMENT AFTER TRIAL, ARBITRATION, OR APPEALS. 40% 60% d: IF NO- ULT COVERY OR NON- TARY RI C ANGIO 750); J. OVNER ($450); IA 40 UR NOT TO.E GEED 40% O AL R F AL ENE e. OTHER CASES 4. Once ar -attorney fee is established based upon work performed to achieve a--settlement or verdict, any additional settlements. will be at the same percentage or possibly higher if additional work is performed to achieve the settlement or verdict. 5. If my (our) case was forwarded/referred to A&R-by another attorney-or-law firm, A&R may pay a portion of its fee to forwarding counsel. You will not pay a larger fee because of the fee splitting arrangement. 6. If for any reason I (we) take my (our) case to another attorney or law firm including a former A & R attorney or- handle it myself (ourselves), I (we) recognize that A & R has, in good faith, expended money and time for my (our), benefit and I (we) therefore agree to pay, or have my (our) new attorney pay, immediately, upon severing the A & R attorney/client relationship, all the out-of-pocket expenses incurred on-my (our) case plus interest at the-rate of 6% per annum from the data o€ each expenditure. In addition, when the case-is successfully concluded, I (we)-agree to pay or to direct my (our) new attorney to pay as a fee 20%--of the gross recovery to A & R. .7.. In the event that any settlement is made on a structured or deferred payment basis, A & R shall be entitled to receive their percentage based on the present value of the structured settlement, if paid as a lump sum at the time of settlement. If by settlement or operation of law, benefits are to be paid periodically in the future, the attorneys' fee due to Angino & Rovner, P.C., on such benefits will be calculated by taking the present value of such future payments at the time of the award based upon the then existing federal funds discount rate and will be paid in a lump sum to the attorneys at the time of settlement or verdict. I (we) agree not to settle or discuss settlement of my (our) case without the written consent of A & R. 362178 (revised 10/09) 1 ? ? 1 ?' PLEASE COMPLETE PERSONAL INFORMATION BELOW Receiving Support from Dept of Welfare or Public Assistance (Including Cash Yes (circle one) Receivin Medicare7Medicaid Yes circle one Medicare # Under child support order? Yes circle one Are you in arrears es with child support? Yes- CS V_ (circle one Are you currently in ban.1-ruptcy? Yes (circle one) Tnjured'sName ,rnn, ' c If Married, Spouse's-Name- Injured's Social Security Number 2 U V _ tI _ S.7.Sl a If Married, Spouse's S,orial SecurityNumber Injured's Date of Birth If Married, Spouse's Date of Birth Address Street 117, City, State, Zip C z-, e- 4 ti 7 ? 7 d E-Mail Address Telephone Home 7 / 7 7 Work Cellular F V 2 L G BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, THIS ? DAY OF 1.9 -f C ^ /5 e ` , 20-1/I (WE) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I -(WE) HAVE READ, UNDERSTOOD, AND RECEIVED A COPY OF SAME AND AGREE WITH iT=RMS AND CONDITIONS. WITNESS(ES): CLIENT(S): (SEAL) (SEAL) I recognize that in order to investigate my claim, Angino & Rovner, P.C., will obtain my medical records and other personal medical information. I understand Angino & Rovner may disclose my medical information to experts, insurance carriers, defendants, other attorneys and/or other individuals necessary to pursue my case. I have been informed that I have the right to privacy in my medical records under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1320,-et seq. If this Act would be deemed to apply to disclosures made by Angino & Rovner, I hereby waive any rights I may-have under the aforementioned Act and hereby hold Angino & Rovner, P.C., harmless for any actions which may be affected by HIPAA or the regulations thereunder. 1:7 "0' (Client's initials) I understand-that Angino & Rovner will retain my file for a period of five years after the conclusion of my case. I further- acknowledge that Angino-i Rovner will destroy my file at the end of the five year period. Exceptions to-this ipolicy may include cases involving minors, annuities/structured settlements, and worker's compensation cases settled by partial compromise and release. I have no expectation that my file will be retained permanently. /2 XI'S (Client's Initials) I (We) acknowledge pursuant to Act 109 of 2006, which became law on July 7, 2006, that a statutory lien has been created by the Pennsylvania Legislature which requires me (us) to provide information concerning any Orders or Agreements to pay child support and any arrearages that may be due at the time of settlement or verdict. I (we) also recognize that the law requires the law firm of Angino and Rovner, P.C. to verify with the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare whether there are any arrearages in my (our) support obligation at the time of settlement. I (we) understand that the law requires my attorney pay the amount of the arrearages to the Pennsylvania State Disbursement Unit prior to distribution to me of the net proceeds of any settlement or award to me in any case where the net proceeds to client exceed $5000.00. I acknowledge that if there are child support arrearages owed at the time of settlement or verdict that it is statutory lien which Angino and Rovner, P.C. must confirm and honor. )9 Xis (Client's Initials) 362178 (revised 10/08) C1 J • Angino & Rovner, P.C. ** CASE/ACCOUNTING REGISTER ** FILE NUMBER ............: 08197 PREPARED: 2/03/2011 PAGE: 1 CLIENT.: ............... : SHOMPER, ESTATE OF LEE ANN DATE IN OFFICE.........: 12/10/2008 TYPE OF CASE...........: S&F DEFENDANT(S)...........: BROOKE RHOADS ATTORNEY IN CHARGE.....: DEC FORWARDER ..............: REFERRAL ...............: SPECIAL NOTE(S)........: W-9 ---------- -------------------------------------- *** -------------- FILE EXPENSES --------- *** -------------- ------------ --- DESCRIPTION DATE QUANTITY UNIT/PRICE AMOUNT PERSON FAX CHARGES (PER PAGE) 2/19/2010 4.00 1.00 4.00 FAX CHARGES (PER PAGE) 1/11/2011 6.00 1.00 --- 6.00 --------- EXPENSE TYPE TOTAL: FAX CHARGES (PER PAGE) 10.00 INVESTIGATION TIME EXPENSE 8/20/2009 .50 70.00 35.00 MAS INVESTIGATION TIME EXPENSE 9/17/2009 .75 70.00 52.50 MAS INVESTIGATION TIME EXPENSE 1/21/2010 .50 70.00 35.00 MAS INVESTIGATION TIME EXPENSE 1/27/2010 .75 70.00 52.50 MAS INVESTIGATION TIME EXPENSE 6/01/2010 .75 70.00 52.50 MAS INVESTIGATION TIME EXPENSE 9/30/2010 1.50 70.00 105.00 MAS INVESTIGATION TIME EXPENSE 1/04/2011 .50 70.00 35.00 MAS INVESTIGATION TIME EXPENSE 1/31/2011 .25 70.00 --- 17.50 --------- MAS EXPENSE TYPE TOTAL: INVESTIGATION TIME EXPENSE 385.00 DIGITAL C.D. 8/20/2009 6.00 DIGITAL C.D. 1/04/2011 -- 6.00 --------- EXPENSE TYPE TOTAL: INVESTIGATION EXPENSE - 12.00 * LANG DISTANCE 2/02/2011 5.00 - - - EXPENSE TYPE TOTAL: LONG DISTANCE --- -- ---- 5.00 MILEAGE 1/27/2010 -- 9.50 --------- EXPENSE TYPE TOTAL: MILEAGE - 9.50 COLOR COPIES 8/20/2009 28.00 .50 14.00 blk;b(l C Angino & Rovner, P.C. ** CASE/ACCOUNTING REGISTER ** PREPARED: 2/03/2011 FILE NUMBER ............: 08197 CLIENT .......... .......: SHOMPER, ESTATE OF LEE ANN ------------------------------------------ COLOR COPIES ADDL ------------------ 8/28/2009 - - - -- 31. -- 00 -------------- .25 ------------- - -- 7.75 COLOR COPIES 8/25/2010 67. 00 .25 16.75 PHOTOCOPIES 2/02/2011 1,639. 00 .25 409.75 PHOTOCOPIES 2/02/2011 200. 00 .25 - 50.00 ----------- EXPENSE TYPE TOTAL: PHOTOCOPIES 498.25 POSTAGE 9/10/2009 .44 POSTAGE 8/09/2010 .44 POSTAGE 10/14/2010 .44 POSTAGE 11/24/2010 2. 00 .44 .88 POSTAGE 1/04/2011 5.20 POSTAGE 1/04/2011 6.70 POSTAGE 1/21/2011 1.39 POSTAGE 2/02/2011 60.33 POSTAGE 2/02/2011 .44 EXPENSE TYPE TOTAL: POSTAGE 76.26 SUB-TOTAL 996.01 ** ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** CHECK EXPENSES *** DESCRIPTION DATE CHECK# AMOUNT HEALTHPORT 12/30/2008 77888 38.56 STAR-MED LLC 1/07/2009 77930 53.81 WEST SHORE EMERGENCY 1/07/2009 77931 37.92 DAUPHIN COUNTY TREASURER 1/12/2009 77959 150.00 DAUPHIN COUNTY TREASURER 1/29/2009 78096 50.00 ISIDORE MIHALAKIS, M.D. 3/18/2009 78475 1,050.00 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 8/27/2009 79966 39.00 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 8/27/2009 79967 156.00 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 9/16/2009 80154 57.00 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 9/16/2009 80155 228.00 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 9/30/2009 79966 39.00- INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 9/30/2009 79967 156.00- LOWER ALLEN TOWNSHIP POLICE 1/27/2010 81237 15.00 STAR-MED LLC 1/28/2010 81257 34.00 STAR-MED LLC 2/17/2010 81402 49.41 CONRAD M. SIEGEL, INC. 2/17/2010 81404 250.00 PROTH OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY 6/23/2010 82398 92.00 SHERIFF OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY 6/23/2010 82399 100.00 BOROUGH OF NEW CUMBERLAND 10/20/2010 83306 15.00 BOROUGH OF NEW CUMBERLAND 10/28/2010 83347 15.00 PROTH OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY 12/01/2010 83529 3.00 JAMES C. DRUECKER, PE 2/02/2011 84012 385.00 SUB-TOTAL - 2,623.70 ** ------ - ------------ ------------------------------------- ------------- TOTAL EXPENSES -------------------- - --- 3,619.71 *** ----------------- xxxxx RECEIPTS x xxxx PAGE: 2 Angino & Rovner, P.C. ** CASE/ACCOUNTING REGISTER ** PREPARED: 2/03/2011 FILE NUMBER ............: 08197 PAGE: 3 CLIENT .................: SHOMPER, ESTATE OF LEE ANN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SHER. OF CUMB. CO. RTN. 7/30/2010 28.50 ------------ RECEIPTS TOTAL 28.50 *** ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * OUTSTANDING INVOICES * CUSTOMER NAME INV# INV DATE $BILLED $PAID $DUE OUTSTANDING INVOICE TOTAL .00 *** ------------ TOTAL... 3,591.21- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** END OF FILE ** 0•t ,511'21+ X11 ?aX 2 5.00} ?X??iT y } pennsylvania DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 1A - I" February 16, 2011 Daryl Christopher, Esquire Angino & Rovner, PC 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Re: Estate of Lee Ann Shomper File Number 2108-1197 Court of Common Pleas Cumberland County Dear Mr. Christopher: The Department of. Revenue has received.the Petition. for, Approval of Settlement Claim to be filed on behalf of the above4eferenced Estate in regard to a- wrongful death and survival action. It has been forwarded to this Bureau for the Commonwealth's approval of the allocation of the proceeds paid.to settle the actions. Pursuant to the Petition, the'44-yeariold decedent died.as a result of injuries received in a fall.. Decedent is survived by her husband. Please be advised that, based upon these facts and for inheritance tax purposes only, this Department has no objection to the proposed allocation of the net proceeds of this action, $127,200.00 to the wrongful death claim and $ 31,800.00 to the survival claim. Proceeds of a survival action are an asset included in the decedent's estate and are subject to the imposition of Pennsylvania inheritance tax. 42 Pa.C.S.A. §8302; 72 P.S. §9106, 9107. Costs and fees must be deducted in the same percentages as the proceeds are allocated. In re Estate of Me an, 669 A.2d 1059 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1995). I trust that this letter is a sufficient representation of the Department's position on this matter. As the Department has no objections to the Petition, an attorney from the Department of Revenue will not be attending any hearing regarding it. Please contact me if you or the Court has any questions or requires anything additional from this Bureau. Sin rely, annon E. Baker Trust Valuation Specialist '. Inheritance Tax Division 1 A ` , t u i i ,i3Ci ;U; TOW ?J!s f7 j) [ -,i 1701 Bureau of Individual Taxes PO Box 280601 1 Harrisburg, PA 17128 1 717.783.5824 1 shabaker@state.pa.us C ?????T anglno-rovner 4503 NORTH FRONT STREET RICHARD C. ANGINO HARRISBURG, PA 17110-1799 NEIL J. ROVNER PHONE: (717) 238-6791 DAVID L. LUTZ FAX: (717) 238-5610 MICHAEL E. KOSIK RICHARD A.SADLOCK www.angino-rovner.com LISA M. B. WOODBURN E-mail: dchristopher@angino-rovner.com DARYL E. CHRISTOPHER DONNIE M. SHOWER, ADMINISTRATOR of the ESTATE of LEE ANN SHOWER, DECEASED and DONNIE M. SHOMPER, Individually v. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER DISTRIBUTION SHEET TOTAL AMOUNT OF SETTLEMENT $250,000.00 DEDUCTIONS: Attorney's Fee (35%) $87,500.00 Balance $162,500.00 Reimbursement of expenses paid by attorneys to others for records, experts, etc. $3,616.21 Balance $158,883.79 PLUS: FEE CONCESSION 116.21 BALANCE TO CLIENT PLUS ANY INTEREST EARNED WHILE HELD IN BANK ESCROW $159,000.00 FINAL DIVISION: Attorney's Fee $87,383.79 Client's Balance $159,000.00 Reimbursement of Expenses $3,616.21 This settlement/verdict may be taxable. We recommend that you consult your accountant or tax attorney for the calculation of your tax liability and any deductions to which you may be entitled. WARRANTY AND NOW, this day of , 2011, I acknowledge that I have read, understood, approved and obtained a copy of this Distribution Sheet. I further acknowledge that the above balance constitutes my total reimbursement for medical expenses, wage losses, pain and suffering and any other losses sustained or claims resulting from our accident. I warrant that if there are any outstanding medical bills, child support arrearages or claims other than as set forth above, they will be my responsibility; I further warrant that I will pay any outstanding Blue Cross, Blue Shield, Public Assistance, Medicare/Medicaid, medical subrogation liens or any other liens and expenses not noted above. WITNESS DONNIE M. SHOMPER 461114 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Mary T. Geraets, an employee of the law firm of Angino & Rovner, P.C., do hereby certify that I am this day serving a true and correct copy of the PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF WRONGFUL DEATH AND SURVIVAL SETTLEMENT AND PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEEDS upon all counsel of record via postage prepaid first class United States mail addressed as follows: James H. Rohlfing, Esquire William J. Ferren & Associates 1500 Market St., Suite 2920 290' Floor, West Tower Philadelphia, PA 19102-2100 Attorney for Defendants Miry It Geraets Dated: 3-)-h 460632 r• ?J ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire Attorney ID# : 91895 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 (717) 238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff E-mail: dchristopher@angino-rovner.com DONNIE N. SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased, Plaintiff V. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA NO. 10-4227- Civil Term CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER AND NOW, this day of R (R1/'0 , 2011, upon consideration of the Petition for Approval of Wrongful Death and Survival Settlement and Proposed Distribution, the Petition is hereby granted. Plaintiff/Petitioner is authorized to settle his case in exchange for $250,000.00 by signing the Release attached to this Petition. The proceeds are to be distributed as follows: Angino & Rovner, P.C. - attorney's fees - $87,383.79; 2. Angino & Rovner, P.C. - out-of-pocket expenses - $3,616.21; s 460632 3. 80% of the balance, or $127,200, to the Wrongful Death Action; 4. 20% of the balance, or $31,800, to the Survival Action. BY THE COURT: Distribution: ?Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire, Angino & Rovner, P.C., 4503 N. Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110; Counsel for Plaintiff ? James H. Rohlfing, Esquire, William J. Ferren & Associates, 1500 Market St., Suite 2920, 29`" Floor, West Tower, Philadelphia, PA 19102-2100; Counsel for Defendants C"Pie-% P&Id -511111 DYE 460632 C 1Ir re??T{?4l'0TAR 2911 MAC, 22 A14 i f : 02 CUMBERLAND COUNTY RE0SYLVANIA ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Daryl E. Christopher, Esquire Attorney ID# : 91895 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 (717) 238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff E-mail: dchristopher@angino-rovner.com DONNIE N. SHOMPER, Administrator of the Estate of LEE ANN SHOMPER, Deceased, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA NO. 10-4227- Civil Term V. BROOKE R. RHODES and DAVID E. SALTER, Defendants CIVIL ACTION - LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PRAECIPE To the Prothonotary of Cumberland County: Please mark the above-captioned action settled, satisfied, and discontinued. Respectfully submitted, ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Date: V.X10 443332 Daryl . Christopher, Esquire PA I.D. No. 91895 4503 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 238-6791 dchristopher@angino-rovner.com Counsel for Plaintiff ORIGINAL a i CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Mary T. Geraets, an employee of the law firm of Angino & Rovner, P.C., do hereby certify that I am this day serving a true and correct copy of the PRAECIPE upon all counsel of record via postage prepaid first class United States mail addressed as follows: James H. Rohlfing, Esquire William J. Ferren & Associates 1500 Market St., Suite 2920 29'' Floor, West Tower Philadelphia, PA 19102-2100 Attorney for Defendants ?7' . -1 Dated: -1 Mary T. 443332