HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-4752t
F" f (l ^..q._
rLC
1 9 C 3t46
IJ Il {t <Llfi J ? a;
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT MCCOY,
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
CIVIL DIVISION
NO.: 10-`75A
G? ii -rerix
COMPLAINT IN CIVIL ACTION
Filed on behalf of Plaintiff:
Robert McCoy
COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR THIS PARTY:
Robert A. Rapkin, Esquire
Identification No. 61628
KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C.
210 Grant Street, Suite 202
Pittsburgh PA 15219
(412) 566-1001
WRIT WAIVED
O
ga.oo Q a Arr`f
?aa-sr 8
e? a4sY?/
Vs.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
ROBERT MCCOY,
Plaintiff,
VS.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
Defendant.
NOTICE TO DEFEND
No.:
YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the following pages,
you must take action within TWENTY (20) days after this complaint and notice are served, by entering a written
appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the court your defenses or objections to the claims set
forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be
entered against you by the court without further notice for any money claimed in the complaint or for any other
claim or relief requested by the plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A
LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW
TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Lawyer Referral Service
4th Floor, Cumberland County Courthouse
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 240-6200
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
ROBERT MCCOY,
Plaintiff,
VS.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
Defendant.
No.:
COMPLAINT
1. Plaintiff, Robert McCoy, is an adult individual citizen and legal resident of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 141 Horseshoe Road, Carlise, PA 17015.
2. Defendant, Ford Motor Company, is a corporation qualified to do and regularly
conduct business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, with its address and principal place of
business located at 300 Renaissance Center, P.O. Box 43301, Detroit, MI 48243, and can be
served at c/o CT Corporation System, 116 Pine Street, Suite 320, Harrisburg, PA 17101.
BACKGROUND
3. On or about May 15, 2010, Plaintiff purchased a new 2010 Ford F-150,
manufactured and warranted by Defendant, bearing the Vehicle Identification Number
1FTFXIEVXAFB55847.
4. The vehicle was purchased in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and is
registered in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
2
5. The contract price of the vehicle, including registration charges, document fees,
sales tax, finance and bank charges, but excluding other collateral charges not specified, yet
defined by the Lemon Law, totaled more than $30,000.00. Plaintiff is not in possession of
Purchase Agreement, however, same may be obtained from Defendant's authorized dealership.
6. In consideration for the purchase of said vehicle, Defendant issued to Plaintiff
several warranties, guarantees, affirmations or undertakings with respect to the material or
workmanship of the vehicle and/or remedial action in the event the vehicle fails to meet the
promised specifications.
7. The above-referenced warranties, guarantees, affirmations or undertakings
are/were part of the basis of the bargain between Defendant and Plaintiff.
8. The parties' bargain includes an express 3-year / 36,000 mile warranty, as well as
other guarantees, affirmations and undertakings as stated in Defendant's warranty materials and
owner's manual.
9. However, as a result of the ineffective repair attempts made by Defendant through
its authorized dealer(s), the vehicle is rendered substantially impaired, unable to be utilized for
its intended purposes, and is worthless to Plaintiff.
During the first 12 months and/or 12,000 miles, Plaintiff complained on at least three (3)
occasions about defects and or non-conformities to the following vehicle components: Frame of
the Truck, Drive Shaft, Rear Axle and Tire Sticks Out Further Then Other Tires . True and
correct copies of all invoices in Plaintiff possession are attached hereto, made a part hereof, and
marked Exhibit "A".
3
COUNTI
PENNSYLVANIA AUTOMOBILE LEMON LAW
11. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all facts and allegations set forth in this Complaint
by reference as if fully set forth at length herein.
12. Plaintiff is a "Purchaser" as defined by 73 P.S. § 1952.
13. Defendant is a "Manufacturer" as defined by 73 P.S. §1952.
14. McGuire's Ford is and/or was at the time of sale a Motor Vehicle Dealer in the
business of buying, selling, and/or exchanging vehicles as defined by 73 P.S. §1952.
15. On or about May 15, 2010, Plaintiff took possession of the above mentioned
vehicle and experienced nonconformities as defined by 73 P.S § 1951 et SeMc ., which substantially
impair the use, value and/or safety of the vehicle.
16. The nonconformities described violate the express written warranties issued to
Plaintiff by Defendant.
17. Section 1955 of the Pennsylvania Automobile Lemon Law provides:
18. If a manufacturer fails to repair or correct a nonconformity after a reasonable
number of attempts, the manufacturer shall, at the option of the purchaser, replace the motor
vehicle... or accept return of the vehicle from the purchaser, and refund to the purchaser the full
purchase price, including all collateral charges, less a reasonable allowance for the purchasers
use of the vehicle, not exceeding $.10 per mile driven or 10% of the purchase price of the
vehicle, whichever is less.
19.
20. Section 1956 of the Pennsylvania Automobile Lemon Law provides a
presumption of a reasonable number of repair attempts if:
4
21. (1) The same nonconformity has been subject to repair three times by the
manufacturer, its agents or authorized dealers and the nonconformity still exists; or
22.
23. (2) The vehicle is out-of-service by reason of any nonconformity for a
cumulative total of thirty or more calendar days.
24.
25. Plaintiff has satisfied the above definition as the vehicle has been subject to repair
more than three (3) times for the same nonconformity, and the nonconformity remained
uncorrected.
26. In addition, the above vehicle has or will be out-of-service by reason of the
nonconformities complained of for a cumulative total of thirty (30) or more calendar days.
Plaintiff has delivered the nonconforming vehicle to an authorized service
and repair facility of the Defendant on numerous occasions as outlined
below.
After a reasonable number of attempts, Defendant was unable to repair the
nonconformities.
Plaintiff avers the vehicle has been subject to additional repair attempts for
defects and conditions for which Defendant's warranty dealer did not
provide or maintain itemized statements as required by 73 P.S. § 1957.
Plaintiff avers that such itemized statements, which were not provided as required by 73 P.S. § 1957 also include
technicians' notes of diagnostic procedures and repairs, and Defendant's Technical Service Bulletins relating to this
vehicle.
27. Plaintiff avers the vehicle has been subject to additional repair attempts for
defects and conditions for which Defendant's warranty dealer did not provide the notification
required by 73 P.S. § 1957.
Plaintiff has and will continue to suffer damages due to Defendant's failure
to comply with the provisions of 73 P.S. §§ 1954 (repair obligations), 1955
(manufacturer's duty for refund or replacement), and 1957 (itemized statements
required).
5
Pursuant to 73 P.S. § 1958, Plaintiff seeks relief for losses due to the vehicle's
nonconformities, including the award of reasonable attorneys' fees and all court
costs.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully demands judgment against Defendant
in an amount equal to the price of the subject vehicle, plus all collateral charges,
attorneys' fees, and court costs.
COUNT II
MAGNUSON-MOSS (FTC) WARRANTY IMPROVEMENT ACT
28. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all facts and allegations set forth in this Complaint
by reference as if fully set forth at length herein.
29. Plaintiff has or may have resorted to Defendant's informal dispute settlement
procedure, to the extent said procedure complies with 16 CFR 703.
30. Plaintiff avers that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has determined that no
automobile manufacturer complies with 16 CFR 703. See, Fed. Reg. 15636, Vol. 62, No. 63
(Apr. 2, 1997).
31. Plaintiff is a "Consumer" as defined by 15 U.S.C. §2301(3).
32. Defendant is a "supplier", "warrantor", and a "service contractor" as defined by 15
U.S.C. § 2301 (4),(5) and (8).
33. The subject vehicle is a "consumer product" as defined by 15 U.S.C. § 2301(1).
34. By the terms of its written warranties, affirmations, promises, or service contracts,
Defendant agreed to perform effective repairs at no charge for parts and/or labor.
35. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Improvement Act requires Defendant to be bound
by all warranties implied by state law. Said warranties are imposed on all transactions in the state
in which the vehicle was delivered.
6
36. Defendant has made attempts on several occasions to comply with the terms of its
express warranties; however, such repair attempts have been ineffective.
37. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Improvement Act, 15 U.S.C. §2310(d)(2)
provides:
If a consumer finally prevails on an action brought under paragraph (1) of this subsection, he may be
allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the amount of aggregate amount of
costs and expenses (including attorney fees based upon actual time expended), determined by the court to
have been reasonably incurred by the Plaintiff for, or in connection with the commencement and
prosecution of such action, unless the court, in its discretion shall determine that such an award of
attorney's fees would be inappropriate.
38. Plaintiff has afforded Defendant a reasonable number of opportunities to conform
the vehicle to the aforementioned express warranties, implied warranties and contracts.
39. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's failure to comply with the express
written warranties, Plaintiff has suffered damages and, in accordance with 15 U.S.C.
§2310(d)(1), Plaintiff is entitled to bring suit for such damages and other legal and equitable
relief.
40. Defendant's failure is a breach of Defendant's contractual and statutory
obligations constituting a violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Improvement Act,
including but not limited to: breach of express warranties; breach of implied warranty of
merchantability; breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose; breach of
contract; and constitutes an Unfair Trade Practice.
41. Plaintiff avers that Defendant's warranty was not provided to Plaintiff until after
the vehicle was delivered, making any and all limitations, disclaimers and/or alternative dispute
provisions ineffective for a failure of consideration.
7
42. Plaintiff avers Defendant's Dispute Resolution Program was not in compliance
with 16 CFR 703 for the model year of the subject vehicle.
43. Plaintiff avers that Defendant's warranty did not require Plaintiff to first resort to
a Dispute Resolution Program before filing suit.
44. Plaintiff avers that upon successfully prevailing upon the Magnuson-Moss claim
herein, all attorney fees are recoverable and are demanded against Defendant.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully demands judgment against Defendant in an amount
equal to the price of the subject vehicle, plus all collateral charges, incidental and consequential
damages, reasonable attorneys' fees, and all court costs.
COUNT III
PENNSYLVANIA UNFAIR TRADE
PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW
45. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all facts and allegations set forth in this Complaint
by reference as if fully set forth at length herein.
46. Plaintiff is a "Person" as defined by 73 P.S. §201-2(2).
47. Defendant is a "Person" as defined by 73 P.S. §201-2(2).
48. Section 201-9.2(a) of the Act authorizes a private cause of action for any person
"who purchases or leases goods or services primarily for personal, family or household
purposes."
49. Section 1961 of the Pennsylvania Automobile Lemon Law, provides that a
violation of its provisions shall automatically constitute a violation of the Pennsylvania Unfair
Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act, 73 P. S. 201-1 et seg.
8
50. In addition, the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection
Act, 73 P.S. §201-2(4), defines "unfair or deceptive acts or practices" to include the following
conduct:
(vii). Representing that goods or services are of a particular standard, quality or grade,
or that goods are of a particular style or model, if they are of another;
(xiv). Failing to comply with the terms of any written guarantee or warranty given to
the buyer at, prior to, or after a contract for the purchase of goods or services is
made;
(xv). Knowingly misrepresenting that services, replacements or repairs are needed if
they are not needed;
(xvi). Making repairs, improvements or replacements on tangible, real or personal
property of a nature or quality inferior to or below the standard of that agreed to
in writing;
(xvii). Engaging in any other fraudulent or deceptive conduct which creates a
likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding.
51. Plaintiff avers Defendant has violated these, as well as other provisions, of 73 P.S.
§201-2 et seq.
52. Section 201-3.1 of the Act provides that the Automotive Industry Trade Practice
rules and regulations adopted by the Attorney General for the enforcement of this Act shall
constitute additional violations of the Act.
53. Defendant's conduct surrounding the sale and servicing of the subject vehicle falls
within the aforementioned definitions of "unfair or deceptive acts or practices."
54. The Act also authorizes the Court, in its discretion, to award up to three (3) times
the actual damages sustained for violations.
9
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully demands judgment against Defendant in an
amount not in excess of , together with all collateral charges, attorneys' fees, all court costs and
treble damages.
By:
KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C.
Robert A. Rapkin, Es ire
Attorney for Plainti
210 Grant Street, ite 202
Pittsburgh PA 15219
(412) 566-1001
10
I
VERIFICATION
I, Robert A. Rapkin, being duly sworn according to law, depose and say that I am the
attorney for the Plaintiff, in this action and that the facts set forth in the foregoing Complaint are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I understand that any false
statements made herein are subject to the Penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. §4904, relating to unsworn
falsifications to authorities.
ROBERT A. RAPKII
Attorney for Plaintiff
12
CUSTOMER #: 2497992
RO$F;RT MCCOY
141 HORSESHOE. RI1
CARLISLE-, PA 17015
HCME:717-245-7992 CONT:'717-249-7992
270833 6. trick Lane
*TIMQICE* MAGUIRE'S FORD
OF H,ERSHEY
100 It. Thlattedown Drive
PAGE 1 Palmyra, Pik 17678
(717} 838-77W Quick Lane Direct
'??s '? -zYY;4?Y- t,c 'ss}:,.ew.w. {a?-S ]}?p}g, 7.. }}??22.q?.?q f y?$f5[q? a? (??rxr $ a.??ggF t>?, J?,.
.tt_1 ?,: L _t 'Fn R:i.'R'q ? R3Y3 - ? ., R?AirM.., r. ....:?iM J:M.:•iM'C:tto}x: .?..?.:'Ffk?"f•. MO. 'Sy s'.{## ": N }•13.`? n:?,?•..?r`:3Si
::,:< ...
:.<s...,..... ., x1ax ls F 3 r ;... .} ' s i 3""Sa<: ;.,
><:, 3# {# ;,• ' . 'rs.. 'lJrn aIFY. , ' } BRIM
•....4.ffi..J);. ?? ??5?. ? f<, ,. € i. I::?;?,
f..,
.....
:! .r, ,:.4`Ekk+,i,..<«r. e'- •>' ::&:!: C ..'" ,.,y? . J. ?: - 'iS•D"y" 'f r
.. ..,::.::?:::...c.,,,,.$:.!::'i.::t.°Eii:>.+u r. -, :,a , ............ :.a.?:;...:.. L:.:. ..hy't??•?iora.) .. t:? a ^.,"?e:`?.sit-c?f:?,h%a-''F-','x,.u,:i7c(g?.):e?Y%::...,.
.. . ,,, t 1>":kF•,7s.,,i,sw,E`£,? -;''X^'s3 ".' _<,I;,:wr::a •z 'zzs
a, ffl: 52i??, £7: :(k 'i a.??'?;ats:':=,:a?F;y:E; a
sr:+. K fsi':'.••611'h 2 ? ?.Y? c s'.«`'><` ''>z ,2: LpM?.t,b_.,.,,. k s_.,.a??;'•t2F
.?): 'r3i??¢?u23$3?#C. .;)...d •s .t'xxie x-^) s"t 's 'r •xs •t
raa,tt:?'::;:::z•?sn::.:s:;•^:;.?•
.v,_,,..,..•.?......
3':iti:::..'??.'•'.fi'.t :............... xY iS?ia2:uo,•:Y .s:t .?e. `''srs? . '? '. .
0 •'s'?:f:4f%:2UvY.t„ .;. ?. f . 'u'r. ..>.. ?i3 mild No.
....:...,...-._„ .. .,... •,.?: w? ,.,,,,-.,,.... rr? F . ..rfP'?...y,.ix.}yy?b ?2 q`,S.,,L:??: ktr2 b '.f. 3G, >r?''.: •,y.<?!.?.
.rF,:..n....,. •......., .. n. .. .. .}6..1 t!':S? ?;f. ... :::,>':w 'i?r:3n'v.?f: r k•'.??.k : .?l.•
,
?+u :Y.',ft•)+. ..,y?-„5.d: HE f}}}? ,?aweq > }•.a}J>::+.u!-,:,rs:? r r.?F2 r
( `n p, f { .f:.:{:.f,..
::?'?tk'-%:=}%:'::.i .. :...a:<t ••5?J •-1: 4.- ::;:a1. MEANS 2-11000% - F:a ..
. ......... •YA.){F e`J'J.• ' S : r: IY':<>:>ri-;x>:-.>.•...
tt ?:•2J?:•iF•
.$'s?f?2ats.4@x?k+w?,..:r?:.sgx
g f- 3 b ?as2tia•I?<?w)<??. fr s ? s2se3taav' ? ); ia.:, .. .. .,.
,: ,..?:> : . ,...,.. ?. a..,tG.v»J:'i.?o`it1.:, a. ? E .. # '...?•xxs .:::`xi?,,,• .as•; .. - .. a t???a?>`+:'? F ?2.2?•?x?>; .? .. _< .
's:;r sy :?#s$ n;s?#' cs.`i4:f##g %s? ";:teee;:,x•;{: ,aype:y':'' A:
:M010 .. ?'n01.,rA^ S?.•
... .......>. '?,i,.., '...?;:;e •G•? :2 ? $ i,,e>. ?; .u. i" e.9 F:i4t2:f•J}sx•:
........}::::,:....:i:Y<iMttva:::.p;::.tOS:.uO,- , M.?Ski2. •„}y:`: Y ?3ai:'.'de: ?'` {; • :F::n'":A... .
,;.:;:);>:" ?`..?,•=:^a. ,.i;t3? .. " ........................ ? ,._„,..,., ., .:.,-,.?.....h,.".,:H:.,,.?>s... ,rest}:'s)...t>F......?.....as.:
s'nt:£et.sis',••s,'la:.ss?rX.x<S`::3y "":; -$'>s'2i •a3r6?(;3A•3•f f[*,s;•"ysJ:<ov.J:v •e?r 3• axsacwxc<a:- :,a»c?x:
INS
iw
f
-.J?,t,:.:fCU.,.• i fis: '•:;??.,y v'.;'3»:•x••;«-.w??,... e?yt:?sS •x .o :. n:<•'y--• t".isss ?:;s;%"' •:Sd ' :t,e .? •vx,.x: •t ^
.............:::.... .....:.....: :::>; ''•#. ,s}. .J;Isiw. '•`F fsr.:J ;x,. ?Y .,3'. •'°.`?1r }2:2 k3.L,'QiV Fi.'?'?`.,r.•?;3
....:,.v s•..t%aiue$ d!. •w:' ?. ?'
..., .. »,:?£.»•.., w3 :1? as ? 1:.3.4 •'A.?•.?n°:;,.. yi?••f, a?
s y 3.' {et. 3}Sfi}c2 itxt ,b.1g .y, ...
:. i,.:. . ?tTfz «.:. Tt iw . ?x 8> Of6? s #i: s ?}_3g u
y'
ON BEHALF OF SERVICING DEALER, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE STATEMENT F ;
INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREON IS ACCURATE UNLESS OTHERWISE
SHOWN. SERVICES DESCRIBED WERE PERFORMED AT NO CHARGE TO The factory warranty oormlitut" alt
of 'h warrJnUa with respect ro
I. sale of we ?em
Ut
TM
LABOR AMOUNT 351.95
OWNER, THERE WAS NO INDICATION FROM THE APPEARANCE OF THE
VEHICLE OR OTHERWISE
THAT ANY PAR .
eme.
Seger hereby e? e6dydlsekit»saE
d PARTS AMOUNT 0.00
,
T REPAIRED OR REPLACED
UNDER THIS CLAIM HAD BEEN CONNECTED IN ANY WAY WITH ANY werma
as ehher expree3 of
Implied, Induz eery imp2w
GAS, OIL, LUKE
•`"
d•OO
ACCIDENT, NEGLIGENCE OR MISUSE. RECORDS SUPPORTING THIS
CLAIM ARE AVAILABLE FOR (1) YEAR FROM THE DATE O 'f merchan-sLy or
Tsuteae for n particular purpose, SUBLETAMOUNT
d.dd
F PAYMENT
NOTIFICATION AT THE SERVICING DEALER FOR INSPECTION BY
MANUFACTURER'S Serer neither assumes nor
authorizes any other ppnon to NASC• CHARGES
0:00
REPRESENTATIVE. assume for it any Ilahelty in
em2no0on Vdth the sale of tr" TOTAL CHARGES 351 95
ttemmarns. LESS 0 100
(SIGNED) DEALER, GENERAL MANAGER OR AUTHORIZED PERSON IDATQ
CUSTOMER SIG A RE SALES TAX 0
-
•
PLEASE PAY •,t; s
:s
?. s
THIS AMOUNT 7•r• : •: , t. r Gi
SERVICE FILE COPY PLAINTI S
EXH
r}r.:kM::Y--^•.5c+:ayJmx',:E{>•r.? •:r or' . r .Z . r ):2' ..yw, t r. :+r.;?.,?...:.
,?(? ? *' S:}" 2:'"?.>•'+.?r?i??.-",'. '? '?i?(g-,FrZp?,?:,`{sJ° ?ti ? ,?.?j?{?<'sa:? •':;i'^?
....,.......r:?tY;'ati,::ar'dat'f??.:AS:Y!dK-?CdAS??:"s?Se??%,?JY'W?'.aR?>• ..?..^T:}C-r::::3^.'+:n"?'?>?'-3A2?2.7,s.$sf"t.Y?#?ti:A'??,??'?`?k•?':'Y.??tiafr{?!i•:3:R}h?R:?,'t
=08 2 WHEEL THRUST ANGLE ALIGNMENT
t iyi).'• ;iKy:s%v„?::. L't%G:A2^A?f ' xprr ?, .y . .- y ............:t••;:.;:: • • t..;t;:.,r:: ::rn.;e}::av.
.,'.:'>.;:?:i i:.:';:{;b>f53:. •:? }? ?Zbli'3?: .::: , ?. .,.. ?" ,:.. .....4y:..-..... .?'?. :.. .r_. n : '??a?ysaxam--?£R.e?..': .'?...i??::..'??x .•s..a?•,r.,?'?.s?.?. ii?r:!`s,??,,:!?:;:r/.•t?.>,???'.?..?.'+??E=:?i",•
PARTS•
.Od LA90R: 351 5 OTHER: 0.00 TOTALy
..r
,.......,,.....: ...s.{ss:. i9R : :.,, :u• :.s?`rs.?x ..' e s : ra.w: csa :. LINE A: 351.95
§?'?:y:•r:2y?,x:
0
ai
0
A
u.
w
ti
m
0
F-
0
a
ui
x
r
z
w
w
W
3
m
L7
a
w -
N
5r
v) c•
r co
C', Lo
0 R h
P: IK ?
N??M
0 0 ?i QO µ7
Uri Hpxoa
Uo Gu(+r-?a
31 4 }d
e?
x
t>1
C
a
G
w
?S
s=
g$?
Hg
°r
e
3 6
Y?
K
? a C
T"
g?S
Ir r M?
` ?t I
+ ?r r
JE
v I
d
3
? ? Nr I
10 ?
F ?
of U'
N r
-j
O !
x?
CD
w
(?f? i 1r N
r r
dI f
I ? I
LL N
•0 0
j ?tr r
? ( IJ
r N 01
G
M m
w
?i
t?
: x
xa
o.
Or
I c
i co
o Lo
rQ ~ C.
oQ I
op
?? I >C M
OoWaoW
U r-? H O ]G OD
Uo£uh No'
?i N ri tV ?. Lo
H
H -1 H
Q? *i O U 0)
3 H .
UpC3N0
0
+r
0
w
ai
LL
v
t?0
q
P,
tD
Y
L
V
5
o
zi
i?
2n
is
s?
a=
ed
°L
g?a
tlo
s?^
x
9 -,
o ee?
&nte 611/10 4:37 PM
Ford Truck, SUV & Rear Wheel Drive Van : F100/F150 : 4X4: 2000-10 : except SW Raptor
Front : Left
Actual Before Specified Range
1.01 0.6°
2.8!'4.8"
0.00° 0.20°
Cross Comber
Cross Caster
Cross SAI
Total Too
Cross Turn Diff.
Camber
Caster
Toe
SAL
Included Angle
Turning. Angie DUE
Front
Front : Right
Actual Before S ecMed Range
0 to 11.2° 0.4° ?
3.20 5.20
0.01* _ 0XV 0.20°
-,4ctuai --Before S eclfied Ran e
-0.6° -0.6°1.0°
-1.2° 0.4°
0.03° 0.00* 0.400
Rear : Left
F Actual .Before ifted Range- -1
-02 Camber
1 00.020 _.._? Tae
Rear
Cross Camber
Total Toe
Thrust Angle
Rear : Right
Actual Before S ecified Ran e
Actual Before S ecifled Ronne
-0.3°
r
-0.120
0.08° -0.509
0.50° The steering wheel is currently level.
MAGUIRE'S
193718
CUSTOMER #: 249799 2 FORD
?
WORKORDER
ROBERT L MCCOY SOUTH MAIN STREET
141 HORSESHOE RD PAGE 1 ,P.O. Box 39
CARLISLE, PA 17015 DUNCANNON, PA 17020
737-2772 & 834-3111
OME:717-249-7992
H
CONT:717-249- 9
SERVICE ADVISOR: 2443
STEVE SMILEY
BUS: CELL.-.
:
PICKU 1FTFXIEVXAFB55847
P
10 FORD F150
U6 RED CM , ..:...
,i
i
4
:
? ?
- ??•
•
:
S.:L!NJFn.:.:.:..
,;.. <.:-f
:'.':':::1V'A!l:S:C:
:
?L
... .. :..
u
CASH
**
15MAY10 D WAITER
::...... OPTIONS: **
STK:DO138 DLR• 16E532
ENG:5.4 Liter
B
PI
...........:.
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE 8
AUTHORIZED BY X
DATE TIME BY
REVISED
ESTIMATE (1)
TERMS: STRICTLY CASH UNLESS ARRANGEMENTS MADE REVISED :
^I hereby authorize the repair work hereinafter set forth to.be done along with the necessary ESTIMATE (2)
material and agree that you are not responsible for Im or damage to vehicle or articles left in
vehicle In ease of fire, theft or any other cause beyond your control or for any delays caused by REVISED
unavailability of parts or delays in parts shipments by the -polar or transporter. I hereby gram ESTIMATE 13}
you snw/or your employees permission to operate the vehicle herein described on streets :1HERE BY ACK L GE THAT I NOTIFI & GAVE ORAL APPROVE
highways or elsewhere for the purpose of testing and/or inspection. M express mechanic's lien is IM
hereby acknowledged on above vehicle to secure the emount of repairs thereto ' HE A
SI GNED atorsesssaun?ee
TECHNICIAN COPY
«..
cs .... ::
...::..::.:..::.:.... r.....::,..::,y..:: :.: ..:.:...
1FTFXIEVXAFB55847
Page 3 of 4
PACKAGES
SOME 2009-2010 F-150 VEHICLES ARE AVAILABLE WITH EITHER TRAILER TOW OR M
TRAILER TOW PACKAGES. UNDERSTANDING HOW TO IDENTIFY THE DIFFERENCE IN THESE
OPTION PACKAGES MAY BE REQUIRED WHEN ORDERING SOME SERVICE PARTS FOR THE
VEHICLE. VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH MAX TRAILER TOW PACKAGE ARE FACTORY EQUIPPED
WITH MANUAL TELESCOPING TRAILER TOW MIRRORS. THESE MIRRORS MAX TRAILER TOWLE
AS A STAND-ALONE REGULAR PRODUCTION OPTION. IN ADDITION,
SAFETY CHAIN BRACKET IS WELDED TO THE RECEIVER IN THREE LOCATIONS - BOTH SIDES
AND BOTTOM. THE STANDARD TRAILER TOW SAFETY CHAIN BRACKET IS WELDED IN TWO
RECEIVER. APPROPRIATE ORDERING
LOCATIONS ALONG THE SIDES OF THE GUIDES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THESE OPTION PACKAGES
EFFECTIVE DATE: 0711112009
20838 2009-2010 F-150 - INSTRUMENT CLUSTER 1 DISPLAY BACKLIGHTING OPERATION -
VEHICLES WITH AUTOLAMPS ONLY
2009-2010 F-150 EQUIPPED WITH AUTOLAMPS ONLY. INTERIOR BACKLIGHTING WILL BEHAVE
DIFFERENTLY THAN VEHICLES WITH CONVENTIONAL HEADLAMP CONTROLS. WHEN
PARKLAMPS OR HEADLAMPS ARE MANUALLY TURNED ON IN DAYTIME AND/OR DAWN/DUSK
CONDITIONS, INSTRUMENT CLUSTER BACKLIGHTING WILL NOT ILLUMINATE AND THE INFO
DISPLAYS IN THE INSTRUMENT CLUSTER. AND CENTERSTACK WILL REMAIN BRIGHT TO
PREVENT SUNLOAD WASHOUT. ALL INFO DISPLAYS AND BACKLIGHTING WILL NOT DIM IF
THE DIMMER SWITCH IS ADJUSTED. IN ADDITION, SOME CUSTOMERS MAY BE CONCERNED
THAT INSTRUMENT CLUSTER ILLUMINATION AND INFO DISPLAYS FLICKER DURING
DAYLIGHT CONDITIONS WITH PARK LAMPS/HEADLAMPS MANUALLY ON, AS THE VEHICLE
ENTERS AND EXITS LOWER AMBIENT LIGHT REPAIRS AGAINST THIS S NORMAN CONDITIONGESANb SHADED
AREAS. DO NOT ATTEMPT
EFFECTIVE DATE: 0611812009
THERE ARE NO TSBS FOR SYMPTOM ENTERED
201100 - ELECTRICAL INTERIOR LIGHTING
SPECIAL SERVICE MESSAGES
21371 2009-2010 MULTIPLE VEHICLE LINES BUILT BEFORE 512812010 - CAN NOT SHIFT OUT
CONTROL OF PARK AND SOME OR ALL SJB FUNCTIONS INOPERATIVE
MESSAGE EXT DISPLAYED UNDER APR OR CODE
EFFECTIVE DATE: 0610812010
20838 2009-2010 F-150 -INSTRUMENT CLUSTER/ DISPLAY BACKLIGHTING OPERATION -
VEHICLES W1TH AUTOLAMPS ONLY
MESSAGE TEXT DISPLAYED UNDER A PRIOR CODE
EFFECTIVE DATE: 0611812009
THERE ARE NO TSBS FOR SYMPTOM ENTERED
201000 - ELECTRICAL LIGHTING SYSTEMS
SPECIAL SERVICE MESSAGES
21371 2009-2010 MULTIPLE VEHICLE LINES BUILT BEFORE 5/2812010 -CANNOT SHIFT OUT
OF PARK AND SOME OR ALL SJB CONTROL FUNCTIONS INOPERATIVE
MESSAGE TEXT DISPLAYED UNDER A PRIOR CODE
EFFECTIVE DATE: 0610812010
http://www.vrep. fordtechservice.dealerconnection.com/vdirs/oasis/oareq. asp?backto=www... 6/17/2010
3 Aar` !g
SERVICE ADVIS R 491
g.? CX rte. A r
R. 0.
6USTOMER 497
R.O.#
LIC.# V KEY TAG
1
' Bob McCoy
141 Horseshoe Road
Carlisle PA 17015
06/24/10 10 FORD F150' IFTFXlEVXAFB55847 27563 1640
•::r., ,. Jo- i:.a:'yv• rx : ..x•.. :Jr'a .y .,.?..•..
06/24/10 52 00:00 YZD8634 74.00 00 06/24/10
Mpj?
-oZ' M
223977 717-249-7992 RED 2
T317B ?:lI.S1;EltilBl° ? ?
===sue esssasz+txnt?rt?earm??_r as 1zEPIkTC LTI7E Oq1 ma=-==k?stzusxs?'rr?-- --_
CcrsTbrllrR S RE BE 18 C3FF CENTER TO THE. RIG14T
IEASLTRED FROM FRAAIB TO QLi TS D pF TA RE 17 MFA$.URES HE Ste: A$ NEW 4X4 TR'=JC
LOT. 88D.:, L A'Y ]5?E 017'V ' A DT T t1 .. 8 T . HU:; CHA&GE
Bili Code:- C
t7DB Repai>_ Typez G
t1I7B :S?L? 13Q?3t : ;5 .
y
ON BEHALF' OF SERVICING DEALER, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE STATEMKNT OF DISCLAIMER
INFORMATION CONTAINED HERON IS ACCURATE UNLESS
OTHERWISE SHOWN. SERVICES DESCRIBED WERE PERFORMED AT THE FACTORY WARRANTY CONSTITUTES ALL E'
OF THE WARRANTIES WITH RESPBCf TO THE ;
NO CHARGE TO OWNER. THERE WAS NO INDICATION FROM THE SALE OF THIS ITEM/fTEMS. THE SELLER HERBBY ,
APPEARANCE OF THE VEHICLE OR OTHERWISE, THAT ANY PART EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
`
?
>
REPAIRED OR REPLACED UNDER THIS CLAIM HAD BEEN EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. INCLUDING ANY
.
•-
CONNECTED IN ANY WAY WITH ANY ACCIDENT, NEGLIGENCE OR IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR r
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE SELLER
MISUSE. RECORDS SUPPORTING THIS CLAIM ARE AVAILABLE FOR NEITHER ASSUMES NOR AUTHORIZES ANY
(1) YEAR FROM THE DATE OF PAYMENT NOTIFICATION AT THE OTHER PERSON TO ASSUME FOR IT ANY
Big
SERVICING DEALER FOR INSPECTION BY MANUFACTURER'S LIABILITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE OF
ITS l1'EMAT'EMS
REPRESENTATIVE. i
,
(SIGNED) DEALER. GENERAL MANAGER OR AUTHORIZED PERSON (DATE)
.. ,
CUSTOMER SIGNATURE •' ¢ r'• ",
.
a?.
CUSTOMER #: 14 5 9 2
ROBERT MCCOY
141 HORSESHOE RD
CARLISLE, PA 17015
HOME:717-249-7992 CONT:N/A
132116
*INVOICE*
DUPLICATE 1
PAGE 1
BOB RUTH FORD, INC.
P.O. BOX 446 • 700 NORTH US ROUTE 15
DILLSBURG, PA. 17019
(7171'432-9614
(7171 766-2003
n.. ;
L..:: J..J.
>> }J <
>
n.. ;
:,:.r......:.::...:..:... .
:.. :... •:i:LJ i;•.'it•:, .. .. ..:.:.v.: ..ter..
.:.G:• 5:..:. ... ,n .r:.:'.urn i.!v:.
:' ..:J' ::r}.......:.: ..:: v: iiv:KJ.. _} n:....m:::....:. .::. :•,C;::: i:::.: G:J•Y:i ?':: '??:???
': -:.: '•':.: n:: JJJ:;: vn•:... ••t.w:n; }:: L•:d:t:vv ?':i{.L:::Lit?%:; •
:J
-::.. . :.. GJ ...... ..... ..:..::.:::.:::.:•
. J. :iii •::::i':: •.:::.
... ,J.. n..: r..:.: . n.
.,: ..:. };.ii,.+::Li:is':i:'yilSJli?:i::;:ii%;:>i:[L%; ;•i
_ .y ._ L ..
JJ J
'AL
ON BEHALF OF SERVICING DEALER, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE LIMITED WARRANTY
INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREON IS ACCURATE UNLESS OTHERWISE
SHOWN
SERVICES DESCRIBED WERE P LABOR AMOUNT 0.00
.
ERFORMED AT NO CHARGE TO Service/Parts are.warranted
OWNER. THERE WAS NO INDICATION FROM THE APPEARANCE OF THE
12,000 miles or 12 months, PARTS AMOUNT 0.00
VEHICLE OR OTHERWISE, THAT ANY PART REPAIRED OR REPLACED whichever comes first
This OIL
GAS
LUBE 0
00
UNDER THIS CLAIM HAD BEEN CONNECTED IN ANY WAY WITH ANY . ,
, .
ACCIDENT, NEGLIGENCE OR MISUSE. RECORDS SUPPORTING THIS warranty does not exclude or
modifying any other warranty SUBLET AMOUNT 0.00
CLAIM ARE AVAILABLE FOR (1) YEAR FROM THE DATE OF PAYMENT
NOTIFICATION AT THE SERVICING DEALER FOR INSPECTION BY prescribed by law. Labor
char
r
b
d
ili MISC. CHARGES 0.00
MANUFACTURER
'S REPRESENTATIVE. ges a
e
ase
on preva
ng
hourly labor rates - TOTAL CHARGES
0.00
times motor manual
ested tim
s
h
l
d LESS INSURANCE 0.00
ugg
e sc
e
u
e. SALES TAX
0.00
(SIGNED) DEALER, GENERAL MANAGER OR AUTHORIZED PERSON (DATE) CUSTOMER SIGNATURE
PLEASE PAY
THIS AMOUNT
30
FILE COPY
h
V
M 6320 Carlisle Pike
Mechanicsburg, Pa. 17050
Ph
one (717) 7664733
MECHANICSBUMY
www mecafferty.com LASOR
COLOR, brUUK NO
RARE u0EN9E lW.
?IM
E'WE
ROBERT MCCOY
RIR? NERY DATE DELIVERY Ni1LE8
._. .. .. YEARlwN110:/M
141 HORSESHOE ROAD :.... ;..... < '.,....._..,.
KI-EtI50:.SER-1, .5
CARLISLE, PA 17015 VEw CLE *Lawo. M eau' DeniEeNO. PROOU DATE
T F 4 0. F. T. E. NO. P O. NO ... .... ... R. Q4ffi
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES
ti. ,.. ?.. r , The only warranties, . if any, applying to
the part(s) and/or service are those
F_ 1? § offered by the manufacturer. The selling
[J
1 z' dealer hereby expressly disclaims all
I R 0 VERIFIED .RIGHT=^sfiDE ^ 4?. warranties, either expressed or implied,
OllT: F. R ... i
T FRpIf FI:ANE TF#AN'€fFT. SIDE
ND LbQSEIiINs•:;'f FIRE' I+? including any implied warranties of
Y r;NOtfiNG Tt{friXLE EF7 I°; 1kiIL(?L merchantability or fdness for a particular
THAT,;TI C .. FS,._.: ,.tT'A f?i ti purpose, and
rites an neither assumes or autho-
BE SHFFTED TQ EtIER D I N'12ECHECK A NT -
y other person to assume for it
any liability in connection with the sale of
JOBS 1 TOTALS•...'. .._.• ...,
this part(s) and/or service. Buyer shall not
JOB# 1 JOURNAL PREFIX FTCS JOB# 1 TOTAL 0 00 be entitled to recover from the selling
dealer any consequential damages,
COMMENTS= . `. .. - . • ... damages to property, damages for loss
WAIT of use, loss of time, loss of profits or
TOTALS - .............. income, or any other incidental damages.
* NEXT
* nai?
*xxr*x>?A*,tA . ?.r .4 W . ;, TAI JOR.... 0.00
* [ ]CASH [ 7 CH ( CIS NO.` 3 * ? ' w• Tl'01 Q$?B ET... 0.00
?.s; T.€?1 .G. . 0.00
?O
* [ I VISA [ I [sDIS IfASTER VEI? TWA" V ? ?i? f } T (CHG. 0.00
* 1UTAI - 939 DISC 0.00
* [ I AMER PRESS C.-1 --- s............ _i T- At TAX...... 0.00
****'e********
s!y*****i xs '`.-, TOT1'LziNV0ICE $ O.QO
-7
THANK YOU r6k -Yom BU INESS]"f'
0
h
Sw A?-rte 6 'l k YM? F
3 utFh i-+ 3 [ rye j+ 9?,=?i.'.
St
CtlMB? ?tSYLV???
P
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Robert McCoy,
Plaintiff.
Vs.
Ford Motor Company,
Defendant.
CIVIL DIVISION
NO.: 10-4752
PROOF OF SERVICE
Filed on behalf of Plaintiff:
Robert McCoy
COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR THIS PARTY:
Robert A. Rapkin, Esquire
Identification No. 61628
KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C.
30 East Butler Pike
Ambler, PA 19002
(215) 540-8888
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Robert McCoy,
V.
Ford Motor Company,
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
No.: 10-4752
PROOF OF SERVICE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Service of the complaint regarding the above captioned matter was made to Ford Motor
Company, c/o CT Corporation System, 116 Pine Street Harrisburg, PA 17101, on 07/23/2010, via
U.S. First Class Mail, Certified /Return Receipt Requested. A representative of Defendant signed
the return receipt on 07/28/2010, a copy of which is attached.
KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C.
n
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
?'?? 3Zo
PA / "1 Io /
A. Signature
,t-,? ? ? Agent
?' / `` ?'"' - ? Addressee
B. Received by (Printed Name)
1 -7 C. Date of Del"Z-1
-z ? D. Is delivery address different from item 1 ? u re!
If YES, enter delivery address below: 11 No
3. Service Type
,Certified Mail ? Express Mail
?tegistered A"eturn Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
2. Article Number
(transfer from service laben
PS Form 3811, February 2004
7010 0783 3000 0471 3321
Domestic Return Receipt
CIVIL DIVISION
102595-02-M-1540
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT MCCOY,
Plaintiff,
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
Defendant.
CIVIL DIVISION
CASE NO. 10-4752
~ ~
~~ ~ `~'
c2n~.
~' N v
c~;,
r
Z C)
~~ -o
~
W F7
~ «,
-~-
c
o
ANSWER AND NEW MATTER
AND NOW, comes defendant, Ford Motor Company, by its attorneys, Dobis,
Russell & Peterson, P.C., and files the within Answer and New Matter as follows:
ANSWER
1. Admitted.
2. Ford denies the accuracy of the address for its principle place of business,
but admits the balance of the allegations contained in this paragraph.
BACKGROUND
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
5. Ford denies that this is an accurate statement regarding the purchase price
of the subject vehicle.
6. Ford denies that this is an accurate statement regarding the limited warranty
applicable to the subject vehicle.
7. Ford denies that this is an'accurate statement regarding the limited warranty
applicable to the subject vehicle.
8. Ford denies that this is an accurate statement regarding the limited warranty
applicable to the subject vehicle.
9. Ford specifically denies the allegations contained within this averment.
10. Ford specifically denies the allegations contained within this averment.
AS TO COUNT I
11. Ford repeats and reiterates its answers to the allegations of paragraphs 1 - 10 with
full force and effect as though more fully set forth.
12. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is
required.
13. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is
required.
14. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is
required.
15. Ford denies the existence of any defects or non-conformities that
substantially impair the use, value or safety of the subject vehicle.
16. Ford denies the existence of any defects or non-conformities that
substantially impair the use, value or safety of the subject vehicle.
17. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is
required.
18. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is
required.
19. Not applicable.
20. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is
required.
21. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is
required.
22. Not applicable.
23. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is
required.
24. Not applicable.
25. Ford denies the existence of any defects or non-conformities that
substantially impair the use, value or safety of the subject vehicle.
26. Ford specifically denies the allegations contained within this averment.
27. Ford specifically denies the allegations contained within this averment.
AS TO COUNT II
28. Ford repeats and reiterates its answers to the allegations of paragraphs 1 - 27 with
full force and effect as though more fully set forth.
29. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
30. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
31. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
32. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
33. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
34. Ford denies that this is an accurate statement regarding the limited warranty
applicable to the subject vehicle.
35. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
36. Ford specifically denies the allegations contained within this averment.
37. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
38. Ford specifically denies the allegations contained within this averment.
39. Ford specifically denies the allegations contained within this averment.
40. Ford specifically denies the allegations contained within this averment.
41. Ford specifically denies th@ allegations contained within this averment.
42. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
43. Ford specifically denies the allegations contained within this averment.
44. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
AS TO COUNT III
45. Ford repeats and reiterates its answers to the allegations of paragraphs 1 - 44 with
full force and effect as though more fully set forth.
46. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
47. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
48. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
49. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
50. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
51. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
52. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
53. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
54. This averment constitutes a conclusion of law, to which no response is required.
NEW MATTER
55. The subject vehicle does not have anon-conformity, defect or condition which
substantially impairs its use, value or safety.
56. Plaintiff failed to permit defendant a reasonable number of attempts to repair the
alleged non-conformity, defect, or condition, or otherwise failed to give defendant a reasonable
opportunity to cure the defect.
WHEREFORE, this defendant requests this Honorable Court to enter judgment in its favor.
DESIGNATION OF TRIAL COUNSEL
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that PAUL K. RUSSELL, ESQ., is hereby designated as
trial counsel.
CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL
I certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am aware that if any
of the foregoing statements made by me are willfully false, I am subject to punishment.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that a copy of the within document has been filed with the
Prothonotary's Office in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, PA, Civil
Action and that a copy of the same was served upon all interested attorneys within the
period of time allowed in accordance with the Rules of the Court.
DOBIS, RUSSELL & PETERSON, P.C.
Attorneys for defendant,
Ford Motor Company
BY:
PAUL K. RUSSELL, Q.
I.D. #70882
213 Yates Avenue
Woodlyn, Pennsylvania 19094
(610) 689-8698
DATED: August 30, 2010
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I, Paul K. Russell, Esq., do hereby certify that service of a true and correct copy of
the within defendant's, Ford Motor Company, Answer with New Matter to Plaintiffs
Complaint was made on this 30th day of August, 2010, to the below listed counsel by
United States mail, postage prepaid.
Robert Rapkin, Esq.
KIMMEL & SILVERMAN
30 East Butler Pike
Ambler, PA 19002
L%=~
PAUL K. RUSS
Robert A. Rapkin, Esquire
Identification No. 61628
KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C.
30 East Butler Pike
Ambler, PA 19002
(2151540-8888
ROBERT MCCOY
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
ATTORNEYS FOR
PLAINTIFF
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Cumberland County
NO. 10-4752
PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO NEW MATTER OF
DEFENDANT, FORD MOTOR COMPANY
55. Denied. The allegations of this paragraph constitute a conclusion of fact and/or
law to which no responsive pleading is required. However and to the extent there are any
allegations contained herein, such allegations are specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
56. Denied. The allegations of this paragraph constitute a conclusion of fact and/or
law to which no responsive pleading is required. However and to the extent there are any
allegations contained herein, such allegations are specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at the time of trial.
n ~~
C ~` -n
"~ i~
..
~~
~; ~,
~"~. t -~
~,.
~ ~'~``
w
cn
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully demands judgment ag~inst~Defendant in an amount
equal to the contract price of the subject vehicle, plus all collateral ch~ges and attorney fees.
SILVERMAN, P.C.
By:
Rob~rt A ~,Rapkin, Esquire
Identificati n No. 61628
Attorney foPlaintiff
30 East Butle~ Pike
Ambler, Penns'Xlvania 19002
(215) 540-8888 `~~
VERIFICATION
Robert A. Rapkin, Esquire, states that he/she is the attorney for the Plaintiff herein; that
he/she is acquainted with the facts set forth in the foregoing Answer t~l ew Matter; and that
same are true to the best of his/her knowledge, information and belikf. his statement is being
,<
made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904 relat~iig ~unsworn falsification to
authorities.
By:
Robert A. Ra in, Esquire
Identification o. 61628
Attorney for Pl 'tiff
30 East Butler Pi 1
Ambler, Pennsylvar~,a 19002
(215) 540-8888
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Robert A. Rapkin, Esquire, counsel for Plaintiff, do hereby certify that I served all
parties with true and correct copies of the foregoing Answer to New Matter, by placing same in
the United States Mail, First Class, Postage Paid addressed as follows:
Paul K. Russell, Esq.
Dobis, Russell & Peterson P.C.
326 South Livingston Avenue
Livingston, NJ 07039
KIMMELI& SI~VERMAN, P.C.
By:
lrt pkin, Esquire
Identifi do No. 61628
Attorne for aintiff
30 Eas Butler 'ke
Ambl , Pennsyl is 19002
(215) 40-8888
Date: 2nd day of September 2010
W
r
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Robert McCoy
Plaintiff
NO. 10-4752
20
VS.
M CO
3*
Ford Motor Company
RULE 1312-1
Defendant{ 3y
The Petition for Appointment of Arbitrators shall be substantially it
Following form: =C)
e-
---I
FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS -`
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:
r_-3
c
w
Robert A. Rapkin , counsel for the plaintiff/defendant in the above
action (or actions), respectfully represents that:
1. The above-captioned action (or actions) is (are) at issue.
2. The claim of plaintiff in the action is $ Within Arbitration Limits
a S
C:) C")
C") ?6f
The counterclaim of the defendant in the action is
The following attorneys are interested in the case(s) as counsel or are otherwise disqualified to sit
as arbitrators:
00,Q"15$-3
WHEREFORE, your petitioner prays your Honorable Court to appoint three (3) arbitrators to aSt,?US
whom the case shall be submitted.
Respectfully submitted,
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, /?/} XJ , 20 , in consideration of t? oregoing
petition, Esq. /and
Esq., and Esq., are appointed arbitrators in the above
captioned ac on (or actions) as prayed f0 v
r
R6,4 A . k0apk;„, ,
Pawl eussell, s?
By the Court,
0 !f '/
GFVWOO
Kevin A. ss, P.J.
Copes pAet l ed 7/a / /
R4 L
ROBERT MCCOY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF??
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVAA °-
rncu
r-n
CIVIL ACTION - LAW ? ;:o
-za
;;0
--
?a r
vs.
NO. 10-4752 CIVIL n
CD
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Q
Defendant °
ORDER
AND NOW, this 47' day of April, 2011, the appointment of a Board of
Arbitrators in the above-captioned case is VACATED. Ron Turo, Esquire, Chairman, shall be
paid the sum of $50.00.
BY THE COURT,
Kevin A/ Hess, P. J.
? Ron Turo, Esquire
Court Administrator
:rlm wples pla. ?j d ill a7/I 1
0-
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Cumberland County, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
Robert McCoy
Plaintiff,
vs.
NO.: 10-4752
Ford Motor Company,
Defendant.
PRAECIPE TO SETTLE, DISCONTINUE AND END
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly mark the above-captioned matter as settled and discontinued.
Respectfully submitted,
c.: a
z, `":.f
--Yi
__
v C:) Q
n
c?
Robert A. Rapkin quire
KIMMEL & SIL
RMAN, P.C.
A0
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the within Praecipe to Settle,
Discontinue, and End was served on April 26, 2011, via U.S. Mail and facsimile, receipt
confirmed, to:
Paul K. Russell
Dobis, Russell & Peterson P.C.
326 South Livingston Avenue
Livingston, NJ 07039
973-740-2474
obert A. Rapki Esquire
KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C.