Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-5885 ,utv,5, ; i uJuN1Y PEN??Yf VWLL ROY M. SINGER, JR.,and PATRICIA A. SINGER Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA HARRY J. ARNOLD and DONNA L. ARNOLD and ROBERT HARPSTER . NO. I o - 588s 0,iyi I -kp 2?hl Defendant : Civil Term NOTICE TO DEFEND YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND AGAINST THE CLAIMS SET FORTH IN THE FOLLOWING PAGES, YOU MUST TAKE ACTION WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS AFTER THIS COMPLAINT AND NOTICE ARE SERVED, BY ENTERING A WRITTEN APPEARANCE PERSONALLY OR BY AN ATTORNEY AND FILLING IN WRITING WITH THE COURT YOUR DEFENSES OR OBJECTIONS TO THE CLAIMS SET FORTH AGAINST YOU. YOU ARE WARNED THAT IF YOU FAIL TO DO SO THE CASE MAY PROCEED WITHOUT YOU AND A JUDGEMENT MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST YOU BY THE COURT WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR ANY MONEY CLAIMED IN THE COMPLAINT OR FOR ANY OTHER CLAIM OR RELIEF REQUESTED BY THE PLAINTIFF. YOU MAY LOSE MONEY OR PEOPERTY OR OTHER RIGHTS RAPORTANT TO YOU. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO THE TELEPHONE OR THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 32 SOUTH BEDFORD STREET CARLISLE, PA 17013 1-800-990-9108 717-249-3166 .j4a.oo Po ATN a1f c qaq 0 oN8197 Robert Radebach, Esquire 912 North River Road Halifax, PA 17032 717-896-2666 robradebachatty@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiffs IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ROY M. SINGER, JR and PATRICIA A. SINGER, his wife Plaintiffs HARRY J. ARNOLD and DONNA L. ARNOLD, his wife, and ROBERT HARPSTER, Defendants CIVIL ACTION - LAW : NO. COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiffs Roy M. Singer, Jr. And Patricia A. Singer, his wife are adult individuals residing at 402 Brick Church Road, East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 2. Defendants Harry J. Arnold and Donna L. Arnold, his wife are adult individuals residing at 406 Brick Church Road, East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 3. Defendant Robert Harpster is an adult individual residing at 404 Brick Church Road, East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 4. Plaintiffs Roy M. Singer, Jr. And Patricia A. Singer, his wife are the owners of one tract of land situate in East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, described in Cumberland County Deed Book Y-24, Page 154, as follows: All THAT CERTAIN tract or parcel of land with improvements thereon erected situate in East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, bounded and described in accordance with a plan Of survey by Gerrit J. Betz, dated November 13, 19721 as follows, to wit: BEGINNING at a point on the Westerly line of Brick Church Road which point is 154.42 feet North of the Northwesterly corner of Dauphin Street and Brick Church Road and at Northerly line of a ten (10) feet wide unopened public alley; thence along same South 85 degrees 20 minuted West 150 feet to a point on the Easterly line of a 10 feet unopened public alley; thence along same North 4 degrees 40 minutes West 50 feet to a point; thence North 85 decrees 20 minutes East 150 feet to a point on the Westerly line of Brick Church Road aforesaid; thence along same South 4 degrees 40 minutes East 50 feet to a point the place of BEGINNING. HAVING thereon erected a two and one-half (2'/Z) story frame dwelling numbered 402 Brick Church Road. 5. Defendants Harry J. Arnold and Donna L. Arnold, his wife are the owners of one tract of land situate in East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, described in Cumberland County Deed Book 276, Page 2664, as follows: ALL THAT CERTAIN lot or piece of ground situate in East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, bounded and described in accordance with a survey by Michael C. D'Angelo, registered Surveyor, dated June 13, 1975, as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Brick Church Road (50 feet wide) at the Northeast corner of Lot No. 15 on the hereinafter mentioned plan; said point being measured along said road in a Northwardly direction 269.0 feet from the centerline of Dauphin Street; thence extending from said beginning point along the Northerly said of Lot No. 15 North 82 degrees 15 minutes West 150.0 feet to a pin on the Easterly side of a 10 foot alley; thence extending along said alley, North 8 degrees 22 minutes East 45.0 feet to a found stake a corner of lot No. 13; thence extending along side lot South 82 degrees 15 minutes East 150.0 feet to a found pin on the Westerly side of Brick Church Road; thence extending along said road, South 8 degrees 22 minutes West 45.0 feet to the point and place of BEGINNING. BEING Lot No. 14, Block A on Plan of Lots of Enola Terrace, recorded in Plan Book 1, Page 3. BEING known and numbered as 406 Brick Church Road. 6. Defendant Robert Harpster is the owner of two tracts of land situate in East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, described in Cumberland County Deed Book 199, Page 535, as follows: Parcel 1 ALL THAT CERTAIN lot of land situate in East Pennsboro Township, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a pin on the East side of Carlisle Avenue and the southern line of the land formerly of Jacob R. and Elsie M. Bender; thence East along the land formerly of the aforesaid Jacob R. and Elsie M. Bender eighty-two and eight tenths (82.8) feet, more or less, to a pin on an unnamed alley; thence southwardly along the West side of the alley last mentioned, ninety-five and eight tenths (95.8) feet more or less, to the North side of another unnamed alley; thence westwardly along the North side of the alley last mentioned, fifty-four and three tenths (54.3) feet, more or less, to the East side of Carlisle Avenue; thence nouhwardly along the East side of Carlisle Avenue, ninety-six (96) feet, more or less, to a point, the place of BEGINNING. Parcel 2 ALL THAT CERTAIN lot of ground situate in East Pennsboro Township, County of Cumberland and State of Pennsylvania, bounded and described as follows, to wit: On the North by Lot No. 14, Block A; On the West by an alley; On the South by Lot No. 16, Block A; and On the East by State Street. CONTAINING fifty feet in front on State Street and extending back an even width of one hundred and fifty feet (150) to the aforesaid alley; BEING Lot No, 15, Block A, according to plan of lots laid out and adopted by Arthur R. Rupley, called Enola Terrace, said plan being recorded in the Recorder's Office in and for Cumberland County, at Carlisle, Pennsylvania, in Plan Book 1, Page 3. HAVING thereon erected a frame dwelling house No. 404 Brick Church Road, Enola, 7. Plaintiffs aver that there is an alley approximately ten feet (10') in width leading west from Brick Church Road along lands of William C. Rheem, Jr., known as 408 Brick Church Road, which then bends to the south along the lands of Defendants Arnold, which has been constituted as an alley for many years and has been used by the partes to this action without objection, obstruction or interference except at the lands of Arnolds. The Rheem property is described as follows: ALL THAT CERTAIN tract of land with the improvements thereon erected situate in East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, more particularly bounded and described as follows, to wit: BEGINNING at a point at the Southwest corner of Brick Church Road (formerly called State Street) and a ten-foot wide alley; thence Southwardly along the west line of Brick Church Road 66 feet, more or less, to a point at line of lands now or late of Edgar L. Weller and wife; thence along said Weller lands, North 82 degrees 15 minutes West, 150 feet to the East line of another ten-foot wide alley; thence by the latter alley, North 5 degrees 45 minutes East, 17.7 feet to the Southern side of the ten-foot wide alley first mentioned; thence by the Southern side of said alley, North 78 degrees 12 minutes East, 157 feet, more or less, to the Place of BEGINNING. 8. Plaintiffs aver that each of the tracts of the parties hereto which have frontage on Brick Church Road abut a ten foot wide unnamed alley on the west of said lots, which provides access to the western end of each such lot. 9. The said alley was laid out on the plan of Enola Terrace by A. R. Rupley, and recorded in Cumberland County Plan Book 1, Page 3, and is shown on Block "A" of the said Plan. 10. Plaintiffs aver that ever since Defendants Arnold acquired ownership of Lot No. 14, Block A, of Enola Terrace, they have claimed ownership of the bed of the aforesaid alley and have hindered, blocked and wrongfully excluded the Plaintiffs from their clear right to the use of the said alley, by parking vehicles and trailers thereon and have now blocked the said alley by erection of a small concrete block wall so that the Plaintiffs are unable to access the rear of their property and the garage erected at the west end of their lot. 11. Plaintiffs aver that they sought assistance from East Pennsboro Township to regain use of the said alley, but were unable to obtain any relief from what has developed into a substantial conflict which has the potential for serious bodily harm and property damage. 12. On June 20, 2010, Plaintiffs were loading a truck parked on the alley in question adjacent to the north side of Arnold property for purposes of loading items of personal property, when Harry Arnold demanded that Plaintiffs move the truck, and when Plaintiffs failed to move the truck, Defendant Harry Arnold towed the vehicle off the alley and caused substantial damages to the four wheel drive hubs and the transmission of the Plaintiffs' vehicle, the costs of repair for said damages being $1701.30, and required Plaintiffs to have the vehicle towed to a garage for an additional expense of $130.00 13. Plaintiffs aver that the vehicle used to tow their truck was owned by Defendant Harpster, who permitted Harry Arnold to use said truck to tow the vehicle of Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs aver that Defendant Harpster is also liable for the damages to the truck of the Plaintiffs, by permitting Harry Arnold to use it to tow and damage the Plaintiffs' truck. 14. Plaintiffs aver that neither Defendants Arnold nor Defendant Harpster have acquired sufficient ownership rights in the said alley to exclude Plaintiffs from their lawful right to use the said alley either by conveyance or adverse possession, so that their actions on June 20, 2010, constitute an actionable trespass entitling the Plaintiffs to damages. 15. Plaintiffs further aver that they are entitled to an Order from this Honorable Court declaring that the Plaintiffs have the right to use the aforesaid alley free and clear of any objection, obstruction and enjoining the said Defendants from interfering with the Plaintiffs use of the said alley. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand Judgment against the Defendants in the amount of $1831.30, together with interest and costs from June 20, 2010, and further that this Honorable Court enter an Order declaring that the Plaintiffs have the free right of passage over and upon the alley abutting the lands of Defendants in common with the said Defendants, and further enjoining the said Defendants from obstructing, blocking or interfering with the Plaintiffs lawful use of the said alley, and such other relief as the Court deems proper...... and Pla Robert G. Radebach, Esquire 912 North River Road Halifax, PA 17032 717-896-2666 I.D. 19255 Attorney for Plaintiffs We verify that the statements made in this Complaint are true and correct. We understand thatfalse statements herein are made subjectto the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. §4904 relating to unswom falsification to authorities. Dated:September 11, 2010 P4, C ROY SINGER or ft.-4-it ROY M. SINGER, JR. and : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PATRICIA A. SINGER, :CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiff NO. 10-5885 Civil Term v. c-~ c ~ °n HARRY 3. ARNOLD and DONNA -'° ~ rn o ~.., ~ ~-n ;..- L. ARNOLD and ROBERT ~ ~ ~' -"' -° {'~ HARPSTER, ~ ~ ~ ° c.~ Defendants ~c d x• o n ~c~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ p ~rTt ~ ANSWER ~ AND NOW come the defendants, by and through their attorney, James H. Turner, Esquire, and makes the following Answer: 1. Admitted. 2. Admitted. 3. Admitted. 4. Admitted. 5. Admitted. 6. Admitted. 7. Admitted and denied. The alley in question has been never developed nor dedicated to the public. It has been obstructed by plaintiff when plaintiff constructed a carport on his property. Plaintiff has further obstructed it by the accumulation of trash and debris. 8. Denied. Access to the western end of plaintiff s lot is by an alley running along the southern side of plaintiff's property which has been obstructed by plaintiff. 9. Admitted. 10. Denied. Plaintiff has access to the rear of his property by means of the alley which plaintiff has obstructed. 11. Denied. Defendant is unaware of any efforts by plaintiff to contact East Pennsboro Township nor does the situation have the potential for serious bodily harm or property damage. 12. Denied. Plaintiff was obstructing the alleyway for two days but was not loading any property into the truck nor was he in its vicinity. Defendant Harry Arnold repeatedly requested plaintiff to remove the truck which was obstructing the alleyway as did an East Pennsboro Township police officer, which requests plaintiff refused. Defendant Harry Arnold did tow the truck a short distance so the alleyway would be clear to vehicular access after advising plaintiff of his intention to do so on three occasions. Defendants are unaware of any damages to plaintiff s vehicle. 13. Denied. Defendant Harry Arnold obtained permission to use the truck but did not inform defendant Harpster of his purpose for using the truck. 14. Denied. Plaintiff was trespassing on the alleyway on June 20, 2010 by obstructing it for no purpose and by refusing to remove the obstruction. 15. Denied. By obstructing the alleyway on the south side of the property, plaintiff has forfeited any rights to the remainder of the alleyway. WHEREFORE, plaintiff requests your Honorable Court to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff. Jars H. Turner, Esquire TURNER AND O' CONNELL 4701 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 717/232-4551 Attorney for defendant Verification I verify that the statements made in the foregoing are true and correct. I understand that false statements are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Date: ~~f ~/D ~c-T~ ~~l C.L~~ Certificate of Service I, 3ames H. Turner, hereby certify that I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing by depositing same in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Robert Radebach, Esquire 912 North River Road Halifax,PA 17032 Date: 10/15/10 es H. Turner Robert Radebach, Esquire 912 North River Road Halifax, PA 17032 717-896-2666 robradebachatty@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiffs }s _ pp t tu1U i;=?;" ! u itz "{j PM I' IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ROY M. SINGER, JR. and PATRICIA A. SINGER, Plaintiffs : CIVIL ACTION - LAW V. HARRY J. ARNOLD, DONNA L. ARNOLD, and ROBERT HARPSTER, Defendants NO. 10-5885 -CIVIL PLAINTIFFS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES DIRECTED TO DEFENDANTS To: Harry J. Arnold, Donna L. Arnold, and Robert Harpster, Defendants c/o James Turner, Esquire Turner and O'Connell 4701 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Pursuant to Rule 4005 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, you have been served the within Interrogatories by the Plaintiffs aforementioned, and are required to answer same, in writing and under oath, within thirty (30) days of the date of service hereof. INSTRUCTIONS 1. These Interrogatories are considered to be continuing and, therefore, should be modified or supplemented as you obtain further or additional information up to the time of trial of this case. 2. The answers to these Interrogatories shall reflect the cumulative knowledge of all representatives, agents and employees of the party to whom they are addressed. 3. Where exact information cannot be furnished, estimated information is to be supplied. Where an estimate is to be used, it should be identified as such and accompanied by an explanation as to the basis on which the estimate is made and the reason the exact information cannot be furnished. 4. Where knowledge, information or documents in the possession of a party are requested, such request includes knowledge, information or documents in the possession of the party's agents, representatives or attorneys. 5. If any document was, but no longer is in your possession or subject to your control, state what disposition has been made of it. DEFINITIONS 1. "Document" or "documents" includes, without limitation, writings and printed matter of every kind and description, photographs and drawings, notes and records of oral communication, and recordings (tapes, discs or other) of oral communication. In all cases where originals are not available, "documents" also means copies of original documents and copies of non-identical copies. 2. "Identify" as applied to person means to state the following: (a) full name; (b) title, if any; (c) present home address; (d) present business address; and (e) person, if any, for whom the person identified was acting at the time to which the interrogatory relates. 3. "Identify" as applied to any writing means to state the following: (a) its date; (b) identity of its author(s); (c) identity of its sender(s); (d) identity of person(s), to whom it is addressed; (e) identity of recipient; (f) format; (g) title; (h) number of pages; (1) complete summary of contents; and 0) identity of person(s) known or believed to have possession, custody or access to the writing. 4. "Identify" as applied to an oral statement, conversation or conference means to (a) identify the person making each statement, the person to whom each statement was made, and all other persons present at the time of each statement; (b) state the date of such statement, conversation or conference; (c) state the place where such statement, conversation or conference was held; (d) if by telephone, identify the person receiving the telephone call, the person making the call, and the places where the persons participating in the call were located; and (e) state in detail the substance of each statement, conversation or conference. 5. "Person" means any individual, firm, association, partnership, corporation, or trustee and also, where relevant, the person representing or acting for such "person". 6. "Explain" or "state" means to set forth every fact relevant to the answer to the Interrogatory and to set forth each such fact fully and unambiguously. INTERROGATORIES 1. Personal Information (for each Defendant). State: (a) Your full name; (b) Each other name, if any, which you have used or by which you have been known; (c) The name of your spouse at the time of the incident period set forth in your Complaint and the date and place of your marriage to such spouse; (d) The address of your present residence and the address of each other residence which you have had during the past five years; (e) Your present occupation and the name and address of your employer; (f) Date of your birth; (g) Your Social Security number; (h) Your military service and positions held, if any; and (1) The schools you have attended and the degrees or certificates awarded, if any. ANSWER: Factual basis for claims and defenses. State with particularity the factual basis for each claim you are asserting in the case. ANSWER: 3. Witnesses. (a) Identify each person who: (1) Was a witness to the incident through sight or hearing and/or (2) Has knowledge of facts concerning the happening of the incident or conditions or circumstances at the scene of the incident prior to, at the time of, or after the incident. (b) With respect to each person so identified, state that person's exact location and activity at the time of the incident. ANSWER: 4. Statements. If you know of anyone that has given any statement (as defined by the Rules of Civil Procedure) concerning this action or its subject matter, state: (a) The identity of each such person; (b) When, where, by whom, and to whom each statement was made, and whether it was reduced to writing or otherwise recorded; and (c) The identity of any person who has custody of any such statement was reduced to writing or otherwise recorded. ANSWER: 5. Reports of incident. Identify documents (except reports of experts subject to Pa. R.C.P. No. 4003.5) which describe the incident or the cause thereof. ANSWER: 6. Demonstrative evidence. If you know of the existence of any photographs, motion pictures, video recordings, maps, diagrams, or models relevant to the incident, state: (a) The nature or type of such item; (b) The date when such item was made; (c) The identity of the person that prepared or made each item; and (d) The subject that each item represents or portrays. ANSWER: 7. Trial preparation material. If you, or someone not an expert subject to Pa. R.C.P. No. 4003.5, conducted any investigations of the incident, identify: (a) The identity of any document(s) (except reports of experts subject to Pa. R.C.P. 4003.5) regarding any survey or investigative reports, setting forth the author and date of such document(s). ANSWER: 8. Trial witnesses. Identify each person you intend to call as a non-expert witness at the trial of this case, and for each person identified state your relationship with the witness and the substance of the facts to which the witness is expected to testify. ANSWER: 9. Expert Witnesses. Identify each expert you intend to call as a witness at the trial of this matter, and for each expert state: (a) The subject matter about which the expert is expected to testify; and (b) The substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify and a summery of the grounds for each opinion. (You may file as your answer to this interrogatory the report of the expert of have the interrogatory answered by your expert.) ANSWER: 10. Trial Exhibits. Identify all exhibits that you intend to use at the trial of this matter and state whether they will be used during the liability or damages portions of the trial. ANSWER: 11. Books, Magazines, etc. If you intend to use any book, magazine, or other such writing at trail, state: (a) The name of the writing; (b) The author of the writing; (c) The publisher of the writing; (d) The date of publication of the writing; and (e) The identity of the custodian of the writing. ANSWER: 12. For each Defendant, state: (a) The period and amount of time they have resided at their current residence; (b) The prior owners of their residence, if known; (c) The current address of any of the prior owners, if known; and (d) The period and amount of time the prior owners resided at their residence. ANSWER: 13. If you intend to use any admission(s) of a party at trial, identify such admission(s). ANSWER: Date: Halifax, PA 17032 (717) 896-2666 I.D.# 19255 Attorney for Plaintiffs 912 North River Road Robert Radebach, Esquire 912 North River Road Halifax, PA 17032 717-896-2666 robradebachatty@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiffs IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ROY M. SINGER, JR. and PATRICIA A. SINGER, Plaintiffs : CIVIL ACTION - LAW V. HARRY J. ARNOLD, DONNA L. ARNOLD, and : ROBERT HARPSTER, :NO. 10-5885 -CIVIL Defendants : CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND NOW, June 6, 2011, I, Robert G. Radebach, Esquire, Attorney for Plaintiffs, hereby certify that I served a copy of Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories Directed to Defendants in the above-captioned matter upon James H. Turner, Esquire, Attorney for Defendants, on June 6, 2011, by depositing the same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid in the post office at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, addressed as follows: James Turner, Esquire Turner and O'Connell 4701 North Front Stree Harrisburg, PA 1711 , Robert G. Radebach, 912 North River Road Halifax, PA 17032 (717) 896-2666 I.D.# 19255 Attorney for Plaintiffs CA PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR TRIAL (Must be typewritten and submitted in triplicate) TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY Please list the following case: ? for JURY trial at the next term of civil court. X? for trial without a jury. CAPTION OF CASE (entire caption must be stated in full) ROY M. SINGER and PATRICIA A. SINGER Xrn a1. ^LL, i7 --" ----y--- '- (check one) X1 Civil Action - Law ? Appeal from arbitration (other) (Plaintiff) vs. The trial list will be called on HARRY J. ARNOLD and DONNA L. ARNOLD Trials commence on ROBERT HARPSTER (Defendant) Pretrials will be held on vs. (Briefs are due S days before pretrials No. 10-5885 CIVIL Term Indicate the attorney who will try case for the party who files this praecipe: ROBERT G. RADEBACH, Esquire ?- --) Indicate trial counsel for other parties if known: / James Turner, Esquire / I This case is ready for trial. Date: May 10, 2012 -14.,15. DO PO ATry e# l3lo/ //3/01 Pl# a 7sOys Signed: _-Lt,W r(? f!Y Print Name: ROBERT G. RADEBACH Attorney for: Plaintiffs ROY M. SINGER, AND PATRICIA A. SINGER, Plaintiffs V. HARRY J. ARNOLD, DONNA L. ARNOLD, and ROBERT HARPSTER, Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CIVIL ACTION - LAW CIVIL TERM NO: 2010-5885 IN RE: NON-JURY TRIAL ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 30th day of May 2012, the case having been assigned to this Court for the scheduling of the Non-Jury Trial, it t is hereby Ordered and Directed that the Non-Jury Trial will be held on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom No. Six of the Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. By the Court, Thomas A. lacey C.P.J. Distribution List: /Robert Radebach, Esq. 912 North River Road ' ` Halifax, PA 17032 % -` w =1= ' Attorney for Plaintiffs ° r° James Turner, Esq. 4701 North Front Street ` Harrisburg, PA 17110 Attorney for Defendants ? Court Administration ,?j?G ROY M. SINGER, JR. and PATRICIA A. SINGER, Plaintiffs v. HARRY J. ARNOLD, DONNA L. ARNOLD and ROBERT HARPSTER, Defendants ~,,,~w~r IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLE OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRI NO: 2010-5885 CIVIL TERM IN RE: NON-JURY TRIAL VERDICT AND NOW, this 31st day of August 2012, following a non jury trial held 15 August 2012, the court makes the following findings of fact in advance of its verdict: 1. Plaintiffs' property contains two ten-foot wide, unopened public alleys along the left side of the property and the rear of the property when facing the property Brick Church Road; 2. Defendants' properties share the rearward, unopened alley with Plaintiff; 3. Defendant Harry J. Arnold has erected a small block wall, parked vehicles, and stored materials that block the ingress and egress of the rearward, unopened public alley for Plaintiffs and Defendant Harpster; 4. Defendant Donna L. Arnold is a titled co-owner of the property, but has taken nc personal action toward blocking the alley; 5. Defendant Robert Harpster owns a property adjoining both the Plaintiffs' and th other Defendants' properties; 6. Defendant Harpster additionally owns property on the other side of this unopene alley and has access to his property without the use of this alley. So, he is litera ly and figuratively in the middle of this dispute; ~ - 7. Defendant Robert Harpster has made no effort to block the ingress or egress the rearward, unopened public alley; 8. The truck, allegedly damaged as claimed in this action, is not owned by any pa to this action. ORDER OF COURT In applying the law to the above findings of fact: 1. The action against Defendant Robert Harpster is DISMISSED; 2. Plaintiffs have the right to use the rearward alley, free and clear of any obstruction, in their quiet and peaceful ingress and egress to their property; 3. Defendants Harry J. and Donna L. Arnold are ENJOINED from interfering with Plaintiffs' quiet and peaceful use of the rearward, unopened public allley; 4. Judgment on the claim for intentional damage to the truck of a non-party is in favor of Defendants Harry J. and Donna L. Arnold. By the Court, Thoma A Placey C.P.J. ~ Robert Radebach, Esq. 912 North River Road Halifax, PA 17032 ,, a For Plaintiffs ~ c~ "y / James Turner, Esq. `~`' ~' 4701 North Front Street .~. x,, -~ Harrisburg, PA 17110 ~""~ _ For Defendants `~ `•~' ~" -a ~p~ -P S y,~Q~ I.Pd ~t~31~/~ ~~