HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-6321SHERIFF'S OFFICE OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY
Ronny R Anderson
Sheriff at ?fiur7b t { . ?I Fy . ICE
Jody S Smith
Chief Deputy $ s;
Richard W Stewart 10 0 CUi 12 10 8'43
Solicitor`
Advantage Assets II, Inc.
Case Number
vs.
Charles M. Kelley 2010-6321
SHERIFF'S RETURN OF SERVICE
10/07/2010 08:05 PM - Amanda Cobaugh, Deputy Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law, states that on
October 7, 2010 at 2005 hours, she served a true copy of the within Complaint and Notice, upon the within
named defendant, to wit: Charles M. Kelley, by making known unto himself personally, at 510 Woodcrest
Drive, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17050 its contents and at the same time
handing to him personally the said true and correct copy of the same.
AMANDA COBAUGH, DEPQIY
SHERIFF COST: $37.00
October 08, 2010
SO ANSWERS, f
RON R ANDERSON, SHERIFF
(C) CounfySuile Sheriff. Telecsoft.. loc
ADVANTA~E ASSETS, II, INC.,
Plaintiff
I
v.
CHARLES ILIA. KELLEY,
Defendant
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
No: 10-6321- CIVIL TERM
Civil Action -Law
NOTICE TO PLEAD ~,
,~ ~
To: Advantage Assets, II, Inc. ~ ~-~,
c/o Frederic I. Weinberg, Esquire ~='~ `~' ~ ~ "
Gordon & Weinberg, P.C. u?~ rv ~;~ .
1001 E. Hector Street, Suite 220 ~~ `~ ~°
Conshohocken
PA 19428 mac-, -°
~" ~~
, a ~ r-s
`~=
-~
~ r.a
~7 ~'
;,~
You rare hereby notified to plead to the enclosed Preliminary Objections with in
twenty (20) days from the date of service hereof or a default judgment may be entered
against you..
Date: 1~ ~,1t2-' l b
Respectfulyy/Submitted,
ICAichael J. Pykosh, Esquire
I.D. # 5 851
2132 Market Street
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011
Attorney for Defendant, Charles M. Kelley
,~
Michael J. Pyko~3h, Esquire
ID # 58851
Dethlefs-Pykos)# Law Group, LLC
2132 Market Stp~et
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011
Telephone - (719) 975-9446
Fax - (717) 975'-2309
ADVANTA E ASSETS, II, INC.,
Plaintiff
v.
for Defendant
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
No: 10-6321- CIVIL TERM
CHARLES M. KELLEY, Civil Action -Law
Defendant
DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
ANQ'NOW, comes the Defendant, Charles M. Kelley, by and through his
attorneys D~thlefs-Pykosh Law Group, LLC, by Michael J. Pykosh, Esquire, who files
his Prelimini~ry Objections to the Plaintiff's Complaint, and avers as follows:
1. Plaintiff filed suit against Defendant alleging that Defendant owes money to
Plaintii~ arising out of an account issued by Citibank, N.A. of which Plaintiff Claims
to be tie Original Creditor. Comp. ¶ 1.
2. The complaint was filed on October 5, 2010.
First Pre~~iminary Objection- Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(2)- Failure to conform to rule of
court (~ailure to state whether agreements is oral or written, state its terms,
nd/or attach written contract upon which the claim is based)
3. The omplaint avers the existence of some type of contract between the parties,
referre to as the "account."
4. Pu~~uant to Pa. R.C.P. 1019(h), where a claim asserted is based upon an
agre~ment, the pleading must state whether the agreement is oral or written.
5. The Complaint does not indicate whether the agreement is oral or written.
6. Purl~uant to Pa. R.C.P. 1019(1), if the agreement is written, it must be attached to
the pleading or, if not, the pleader must explain its absence and set forth the
substi~nce of the agreement. More specifically, Plaintiff has failed to attach the
original Loan/Credit Agreement signed and dated, including both original and
amer>~taed terms and conditions applicable to the credit card agreement. Asset
Acceptance, LLC v Margaret Madden Order dated March 18, 2009, No. 2912 of
2008 ~D (Fayette County 2009) citing Atlantic Credit & Finance, Inc. v Guiliana,
829 ~,2d 340 (Pa. Super. 2003). Plaintiff has also failed to attach "other periodic
mailings detailing changes to the terms of the contract Remit Corporation v Miller,
5 Pa. ~&C 5th 43, 45 (Centre Cty., 2008)
7. The Plaintiff has failed to describe the terms of the agreement, nor has it
attach'~d a copy of a written agreement or explained its absence.
Second ~I~reliminary Objection- Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(2)- Failure to conform to rule
of court (Improper Verification)
8. Pa. F.C.P. 1024 required that every Complaint be verified by a Party, unless the
party i~ without sufficient knowledge or information with which to verify, or,
that the party is outside the jurisdiction of the court and its verification
obtained within the time allowed for pleading. Pa. R.C.P. 1024(c)(1) and
(2)
9. The ~omplaint is verified by Leonard Pryzansky CEO, as agent for Plaintiff,
the facts in an attached Affidavit not the facts in the Complaint. The
verifiC~ation only identifies Mr. Pryzansky as an agent of the Plaintiff yet he signs as
CEO;
Third Pj~eliminary Objection- Pa.R.C.P. No. 1028(a)(2)-Failure to conform to rule
of court (failure to attach written assignments of debt)
10. Thy, Plaintiff is not the original creditor, but rather assignee of the original
creditor. Comp. ¶ 1. Since the Plaintiff s right to maintain an action as an assignee
is pr~kficted upon written assignment or agency agreement, that writing must be
attached to the Complaint, pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1019(1).
11. By wiling to attach a copy of the assignment of the debt to the Plaintiff, the
Complaint does not comply with an express rule of court, in violation of Pa. R.C.P.
1028~a)(2). See Remit Corporation v Miller 5 Pa. D&C 5th 43 and Capital One
Bank v. Clevenstine, 7 Pa. D&C 5th 153
Fourth Preliminary Objection- Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(5) Plaintiff is stranger to
Defendant
12. Pa. R.C.P. 2002(a) required that an action be brought by the real party in
interest.
13. By Mailing to attach a copy of the necessary writing by which the Plaintiff would
becorlre the assignee of the account and thus the real party in interest or an
agency agreement, the Plaintiff has failed to conform with the requirements of the
aforesaid rule.
14. Plaintiff has not shown standing or capacity to sue Defendant.
15. Sin I e this matter was not brought by the real party in interest it must be
dismi sed.
'Fifth Preliminary Objection- Pa. R.C.P. No. 1028(a)(4)- Demurrer
17. Th ' Plaintiff has failed to allege facts sufficient to maintain a cause of action for
Breach cif Contract.
Sixth Preliminary Objection- Pa. R.C.P. No. 1028(a)(3)
18. The' Complaint contains only a general assertion of the amount the Plaintiff
claims is'~owed by the Defendant. It provided no detail as to the date(s) on which the
debts weit'e incurred, the amounts incurred on each date, the dates or amounts of
payment, nor dates of accrual and amounts of interest charges and other fees.
19. Pa. ~~t.C.P. No. 1019 and Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(3) require that the above detail be
included ~n a Complaint of this type.
20. By r~bt including the requisite detail of the account,
to an express rule of Court.
the Complaint fails to conform
WH~REFORE, the Defendant respectfully requests that his Preliminary
Objections be sustained, and that Plaintiffs Complaint be dismissed with prejudice.
~~
Date: 0 -I
Ret~ju~ly~ubmitted,
Michael J. Py-Tcosh, Esquire
I.D. # 58851
2132 Market Street
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011
(717)975-9446
ADVANTAGE ASSETS, 11, INC.,
Plaintiff
v.
No: 10-6321- CIVIL TERM
CHARLESI M. KELLEY, Civil Action -Law
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Defendant, Charles M. Kelley's,
Preliminarry Objections to Plaintiff s Complaint, was hereby served by depositing the
same withih the custody of the United States Postal Service, First Glass, postage
prepaid, adj~ressed as follows:
Advantage Assets, II, Inc.
clo Frederic I. Weinberg, Esquire
', Gordon & Weinberg, P.C.
1001 E. Hector Street, Suite 220
Conshohocken, PA 19428
Date: ~0 -";~~ -( 0
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Respectfully S~~nitted,
Michael J. Pykosh, Esquire
I.D. # 58851
2132 Market Street
Camp Hitl, Pennsylvania 17011
Attorney for Defendant
VERIFICATION
I, Charles M. Kelley, hereby verify that the statements of fact made in the
foregoing documents are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge,
information and belief. 1 understand that any false statements therein are subject to the
criminal penalties contained in 18 Pa C. S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn
falsification to authorities.
Date: lU ~'' l $1 ~d
Charles M. Kelley '
sas
MOM
MIIIIMM
MMM
MOWER
The Law Offices of Frederic I Weinberg
& Associates, P.C.
BY: Frederic I. Weinberg, Esquire
'Identification No.: 41360
Joel M. Flink, Esquire
Identification No.: 41200
1001 E. Hector Street, Ste 220
Conshohocken, PA 19428
484/351-05.00
.FILL
HE PRO f'ONQ
C#i Stp 15 i i1 1:49
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
ADVANTAGE ASSETS II, INC. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
vs. DOCKET NO. : 10-6321
CHARLES M KELLEY
PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW COMPLAINT
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly withdraw the above -captioned action, without
prejudice..
The Law Offices of rederic I. Weinberg
& Associates, P
BY:
Frederi. I. W-inberg, Esquire
Joel M. Flin , Esquire
Attorney .r Plaintiff
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
I. FREDERIC I. WEINBERG, ESQUIRE, hereby certify that I, on
the date below, served a copy of the Praecipe to Withdraw
Complaint to Pa.R.C.P. 1028(c)(1), via First Class Mail, postage
pre -paid, to all other parties or their counsel of record.
Dated
FREDERILI—WEINBERG, ESQUIRE