HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-7261RICHARD J. BIELICKI and
JANET E. BIELICKI
Petitioners
v.
v n
-rt
o
IN THE COURT OF COMMON *S6 =-T3
:OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, {?. m
Qv
PENNSYLVANIA
-n
:NO. 10- 702 ?o CIVIL T40 ';::?
CUMBERLAND COUNTY ASSESSMENT:
OFFICE e ;I
Respondent : TAX ASSESSMENT APPEAL
PETITION FOR REVIEW
AND NOW this 190' day of November, 2010, comes Petitioners Richard J.
Bielicki and Janet E. Bielicki, and Petitions that this Honorable Court pursuant to the
Fiscal Code to review the determination of the County Assessment Office as to the
appropriate value of certain real estate for taxing purposes based on the following:
Petition For Review (In the Nature of an Appeal)
Tax Parcel Number 01-21-0271-289
1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to the Fiscal Code 72 P.S.
Section 5020-518.1 and the Judicial Code 42 Pa. C.S. Section 933.
2. Petitioners are adult citizens currently residing at 2703 Logan Street, Camp
Hill, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17011.
3. At all times relevant to this Petition, Petitioners are owners of real estate
located at 2703 Logan Street, Camp Hill, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
4. The property in question is designated as Parcel Number 01-21-0271-289 by
the Cumberland County Assessment Office, and contains 0.26 acres and a
residence structure.
5. In 2010 the Assessment Office increased the value of the parcel in question,
4 9?"d0 pd &5k
gW asy 1-7
Parcel Number 01-21-0271-289, from $240,000 (as assessed by the ORDER of
the Court Of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 04-5250
CIVIL, dated the 4t' day of February, 2005) to $466,600.
6. Petitioners appealed this reassessment to the Cumberland County Board of
Assessment Appeals, arguing that: the ORDER of the Court Of Common Pleas of
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, issued the 4t' day of February, 2005, setting
the value of this property at $240,000, is apparently being ignored by the
Assessment Office. This may be in violation of that Court ORDER and the
Pennsylvania Constitution and Pennsylvania Statutes; this new tax assessment is
not the actual current value that this property could be sold for; no improvements
have been made to this property in the intervening years between the ORDER of
the Court and the 2010 reassessment; the housing market has been severely
depressed for the last two or three years and, in many cases, real estate values
actually declined since the last County wide reassessment in 2004; real estate sales
in Petitioners neighborhood have been poor, with two homes adjoining our
property having been advertised for sale for nearly three years. The owners,
having no success in selling, have resorted to renting these homes while still
attempting to sell. A comer property one block from ours was for sale for over
two years and the owners finally sold to their daughter because no other buyers
appeared; the Gross Living Area calculated by the Assessors Office is 3,512
square feet while the actual Living Area is much less, recently measured by
Petitioners at 2,525 square feet; the 2010 reassessment disregards, negates and
contradicts the equalizing effects to equal taxation among property owners
2
resulting from the costly County wide reassessment done during the year 2004;
the reassessment violates the Pennsylvania Constitution relating to equal taxation
among property owners.
7. On October 28, 2010, following a formal appeal hearing, the Cumberland
County Board of Assessment Appeals decreased the assessment of Parcel
Number 01-21-0271-289 from $466,600 to $380,000. This decreased value still
constitutes a $140,000, or 58%, increase in tax assessed value from February
2005 to January 2010. Since the real estate market is poor and shows no signs
of improving despite massive federal subsidies, and no improvements have
been made to Petitioners property in the intervening years, Petitioners believe
that the Board of Assessment Appeals has chosen to totally ignore the ORDER
of the Court issued the 4th day of February 2005 and, instead, use assessment
formulas and inappropriate comparables is assessing this property.
8. The average 2010 assessed value of all properties within a one block radius of
Petitioners property is $272,314. This is probably more reflective of the actual
current value of Petitioners property.
9. Petitioners appeal this determination as the tax assessed value is inappropriate
and unconstitutional.
WHEREFORE Petitioners pray this Honorable Court set a hearing date to hear
evidence as to why the assessed value imposed by the Cumberland County Assessment
Office is incorrect and prejudicial to Petitioners.
Respectfully Submitted
14414?zwz
'chard J. a cki
2703 Lo Street
Camp Hill, PA 17011
717-412-7530
I
RICHARD J. BIELICKI and IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
JANET E. BIELICKI, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioners
vs. 04-5250 CIVIL
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
ASSESSMENT OFFICE,
Respondent TAX ASSESSMENT APPEAL
ORDER
AND NOW, this - y day of February, 2005, afterTieaiing and consideration of the
testimony adduced, and following review of the exhibits, the appeal of the petitioners is
SUSTAINED to the extent that the value of the subject property is determined to be
$240,000.
Richard J. and Janet E. Bielicld
Petitioners
Stephen Tiley, Esquire
For Respondent
:rlm
BY THE COURT,
f
VERIFICATION
I, Richard J. Bielicki, hereby verify that the statements in the foregoing Petition
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
I understand that statements made herein are subject to the penalties of Title 18
Pa. S.C. Section 4904 relating to unworn statements to authorities.
November 19, 2010
R.i J. Bielicki
RICHARD J. BIELICKI and
JANET E. BIELICKI,
Petitioners
vs.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
ASSESSMENT BOARD,
Respondent
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 10-7261 CIVIL
IN RE: APPEAL FROM DETERMINATION OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSMENT
ORDER
AND NOW, this 36' day of November, 2010, hearing in the above-captioned
assessment appeal is set for Friday, April 15, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom Number 4,
Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, PA.
Richard J. Bielicki
Janet E. Bielicki
Petitioners
Stephen Tiley, Esquire
For Respondent
Arn
c
CS Q
?t
rn a
C:=)
CD
y
=41
N? -,r-
n -V. = o
a? a
o
o
-i a
BY THE COURT,
OF THE LPROTHONCOTARY
Stephen D. Tiley, Esquire 201 APR + 3 PM • Supreme Court I.D. No.32318
Attorney for Cumberland County
Board of Assessment Appeals
5 South Hanover Street CUMBERLAND COUNTY Tel: 717-243-5838
Carlisle. Pennsylvania 17013 PENNSYLVANIA Fax: 717-243-6441
RICHARD J. BIELICKI and IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
JANET E. BIELICKI OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioners
V. CIVIL ACTION - LAW
THE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT
APPEALS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY NO. 10-7261 Civil Term
Respondent REAL ESTATE TAX ASSESSMENT
APPEAL
Parcel No. 01-21-0271-289
PRAECIPE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Please enter my appearance on behalf of the Appellee, Cumberland County Board of
Assessment Appeals, in the above captioned matter.
Dated: ?.? 1r7Respectfully submitted,
Stephen D. Tiley, Esquire
Attorney for Cumberland County Board
of Assessment Appeals
5 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-5838
Supreme Court I.13132318
Stephen D. Tiley, Esquire Supreme Court No. 32318
Attorney for Appellant Cumberland County
Board of Assessment Appeals
5 South Hanover Street Tel: 717-243-5838
Carlisle Pennsylvania 17013 Fax.: 717-243-6441
RICHARD J. BIELICKI and IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
JANET E. BIELICKI OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
. PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioners
V. CIVIL ACTION - LAW
THE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT
APPEALS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY NO. 10-7261 Civil Term
Respondent REAL ESTATE TAX ASSESSMENT
APPEAL
Parcel No. 01-21-0271-289
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing Praecipe to
Enter Appearance by placing a true and correct copy of the same in the United States
mail, postage pre-paid, addressed to:
Matthew D. Coble, Esquire
Pa ID# 89603
Kathryn L. Mason, Esquire
Pa ID# 306779
ELLIOTT GREENLEAF & BALABAN
Attorney for Appellants
27 North Front Street
P.O. Box 1284
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1284
Tel. No. (717)-234-3282
J. Stephen Feinour, Esquire Elizabeth D. Snover, Esquire
Attorney for Camp Hill Borough Attorney for Camp Hill School District
NAUMAN SMITH SHISSLER & HALL, LLP JOHNSON DUFFIE STEWART & WEIDNER
18' Floor 301 Market Street
200 North Third Street P.O. Box 109
Harrisburg, PA 17101 Lemoyne, PA 17043-0109
Date: ?? -?dll
Stephen D. Tiley, Esquire
Assistant Cumb. Co. Solicitor
5 S. Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-5838
Attorney I.D.#32318
RICHARD J. BIELICKI and
JANET E. BIELICKI
Petitioners
V.
THE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT
APPEALS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY
Respondent
Parcel No. 01-21-0271-289
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 10-7261 Civil Term
REAL ESTATE TAX ASSESSMENT
APPEAL
ORDER
AND NOW, this J q' day of April, 2011, upon representation by Stephen
D. Tiley, Esquire, counsel for the Appellee, that the parties have agreed to a general
continuance pending settlement negotiations, the hearing scheduled for April 15, 2011
is cancelled and the matter is continued generally at the call of either party.
By The Court
?' '? 2, 1? C?
Kevin ess, P. J. c °
co
- a
cc: Matthew D. Coble, Esquire <
a.
Kathryn L. Mason, Esquire ,I zap
J. Stephen Feinour, Esquire CI
Elizabeth D. Snover, Esquire
Stephen D. Tiley, Esquire / A
RICHARD J. BIELICKI and
JANET E. BIELICKI
Petitioners
V.
THE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT
APPEALS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY
Respondent
Parcel No. 01-21-0271-289
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 10-7261 Civil Term c o
-va
REAL ESTATE TAX ASSES*
APPEAL 41
o
C") zz
ORDER °
--? car
` , 2011, up1bn --
AND NOW, this 2-Y day of Atvj
Q
CZ) C'3
Stipulation and Joint Motion for Agreed Order, it is Decreed and Ordered that the fair
market value of the property which is the subject of this appeal, as of the date of the
original Petition to the Cumberland County Board of Assessment Appeals, to wit: July
22, 2010, is $350,000. The within appeal is applicable to the year 2010 Cumberland
Countywide reassessment. The predetermined ratio applicable to the year 2010
Cumberland Countywide reassessment is 100% of year 2010 fair market value. The
common level ratio is not applicable to the year 2010 Countywide reassessment.
Therefore, the assessment for purposes of the year 2010 Countywide reassessment
shall be $350,000. This assessment shall be implemented beginning with year 2011
County and municipal taxes, and year 2011/12 School Real Estate Taxes, and shall
continue thereafter until revised in accordance with law.
By The Court
Kevin A.
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Richard J. Bielicki
V Stephen D. Tiley, Esquire J
J. Stephen Feinour, Esquire
?/ Richard W. Stewart, Esquire ax8