HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-0153COMMON%VEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA / i//~0~'
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOTICE OF APPEAL
FROM
DISTRICT JUSTICE JUDGMENT
COMMON PLEAS No. O4~" ~
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Notice is given that the appe#ant has filed in the above Court of Common Pleas an appeal from the judgment rendered by the District Justice on the
date and in the case mentioned belo~
Robin Lynne Clemins
Gayle A. Elder
Central Penn, Box 5 ~e PA 17093
12/13/01 Scott j. Sprucebank ~ Robin Lynne Clemins
CVLT19. ~ 0000302-01 ~R~ ~ //~~
This block will be signed ONLY when this notation is required under R£ . -I! apioe ~/ant was C/AIMANT (see Pa. R.C.P.J.P. No.
1008B.
This Notice of Appeal, when received by the District Justice, will operate as a lO01( 6 ) in action before District Justice, heMUST
SUPERSEDEA$ to the judgment for possesdon in this case FILE. A COMPLAINT witltin twenty (20) clays after
fl#rig Dis NOTICE. o! APPEAL.
Signature of Prothonotary or Deputy
PRAEClPE TO ENTER RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT AND RULE TO FILE
(This section of form to be used ONLY when appel/ant was DEFENDANT (see Pa. R.C.P.J.P. No. 1001(7) in action before D/strict Justice.
IF NOT USED, detach from copy of notice of appeal to be served upon appellee).
PRAECIPE: To Prothonotary
Enter rule upon Scott J. Sp~'u~ , appellee(s), to file a complaint in this appeal
~ appellee(s)
RULE: To Scott j, Sprucebank , omallee($).
Nerne of appellees)
(1) You are notified that a role is hereby entered upon you to file a complaint in this appeal within tw~ty (20) days after the date of
service of Ifils rule upon you by personal service or by certified or registered mail
(2) If you do not file a complaint within this time, a JUDG/~NT OF NON PROS WILL BE ENTERED AGAINST YOU.
(3) The date of service of this role if service was by mail is the date of maili~ ~ ~ //~
,.
COURT FILE TO BE FILED WITH PROTHONOTARY
PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF APPEAL AND RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT
(This proof of service MUST BE FILED WI THIN TEN (10) DA YS AFTER filing the notice of appeal, Check applicable boxes)
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF ; ss
AFFIDAVIT: I hereby swear or affirm that I served
[] a copy of the Notice of Appeal, Common Pleas No,
(date of service) ,
receipt attached hereto, and upon the appellee, (name)
__ , 19 [] by personal service [] by (certified) (registered) mail, sender's receipt attached hereto.
[] and further that I served the Rule to File a Complaint accompanying the above Notice of Appeal upon the appellee(s) to whom
the Rule was addressed on 19 , [] by personal service [~] by (certified) (registered)
mail. sender's receipt attached hereto,
SWORN (AFFIRMED) AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME
THIS DAY OF __ 19
Signature of affiant
, upon the District Justice designated therein on
[] by personal service [] by (certified) (registered) mail, sender's
, oFi
Title of official
My commi~,sion expires on ._
C
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
'COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND
Mag. Dist. NO.:
09-3-05
DJ Name: Hon.
~Y~E A. ET.hER
AOclress: 507 N. YORK ST.
M~CHANICSBuKG, PA
(717) 766-4=575
17055
ROBINL. CLEN~NS
BOX 5,GALE HALL
COLLEGE HILL ROAD
SUMmit. DALE, PA 17093
NOTICE OF JUDGMENT/TRANSCRIPT
CIVIL CASE
P~INTIFF: NAME and ADDRESS
~PRUC~'R~J~TK, SCOTT J. ~
436 SIOUX DRIVE
MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055
VS.
DEFENDANT: NAME a~ ADDRESS
FCLE~I~'NS, ROBIN LYNNE ~
BOX S,GALE HALL
COLLEGE HILL ROAD
~UMMERDALE, PA 17093 U
DocketNo.: CV-0000302-01
DateFiled: 10/16/01
THIS IS TO NOTIFY YOU THAT:
Judgment:
~-~ Judgment was entered for: (Name)
~] Judgment was entered against: (Name)
in the amount of $ I: 1 ~;q _ 1 ~
~ Defendants are jointly and severally liable.
FOR PT~AINTIFF
on: (Date of Judgment)
(Date & Time)
--] Damages will be assessed on:
-'"[This case dismissed without prejudice.
~ Amount of Judgment Subject to
AttachmentJAct 5 of 1996 $
[--~ Levy is stayed for days or [---] generally stayed.
Amount of Judgment $ 1,13a--90
Judgment Costs $ 34.25
Interest on Judgment $ . O0
Attorney Fees $ . O0
Total $ 1,169.15
Post Judgment Credits $.
Post Judgment Costs $.
:ertified Judgment Total $
['--~ Objection to levy has been filed and hearing will be held: ~-"¢~ ~'~
Place
Date: :
~ ~ ~ : ~:u II
Time: ~ c --"
ANY PAR~ HAS THE RIGHT TO APPEAL WITHIN 30 DAYS A~ER THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT BY ~NG~O~E
OF APPEAL WITH THE PROTHONOTARY/CLERK OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CIVIL DIVISION. YOU
MUST INCLUDE A COPY OF THIS NOTICE OF JUDGMENT/TRANSCRIPT FORM WITH YOUR NOTICE OF APPEAL.
: Date ~,d' ~(~"~ d~-' -'~ , District Justice
I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the record of the proceedings containing'the judgment.
Date , District Justice
My commission expires first Monday of Januaq,
AOPC 315-99
2006 SEAL
PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF APPEAL AND RULE TO
(This proof of service MUST BE FILED WITHIN TEN (10) DA YS AFTER firing the notice of a
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF CL]l[t~oe~la.P.c] ; ss
AFFIDAVIT: I hereby swear or affirm that I served
; appT~able--~s)
..%
[] a copy of the Notice of Appeal, Common Pleas No. 02-1.53 Ci'¢J.] , upon the District Justice designated therein on
(date of service) ,.3'a_n_t~_ 14 ~ '~002 . , [] by personal service [] by (certified) (registered) moil, sender's
receipt attached hereto, and upon the appellee, (name) _ Scoa. t: J, Sp['-uce]Da_,-3]( , on
~ , ~ [] by personal service [] by (certified) (registered) mail, sender's receipt attached hereto.
~[] and further that I served the Rule to File a Complaint accompanying the above Notice of Appeal upon the appellee(s) to whom
the Rule was addressed on ~'~:~n_t~_t-~ 1 4 ~
mail, sender's receipt attached hereto,
SWORN,,,(AF~/~MED)AND~ SUBS,~RIBED BEFORE ME
THIS /'~ _ DAY OF .~-~/ ,
, ~ 200,2[] by personal service J~ by (certified) (registered)
~¢~0,~ 7~ Signature of affiant
SCOTT $. SPRUCEBANK,
Plaintiff
VS.
ROBIN LYNNE CLEMENS,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 02-153 CIVIL
DISTRICT IUSTICE ACTION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this 23'~ day of January, 2002, comes Marylou Matas, Esquire,
Attorney for Defendant, and states that she mailed a Notice of Appeal and Praecipe to
Enter Rule to File Complaint and Rule to File to the PlaintS, Scott J. Sprucebank, at his
address of 436 Sioux Drive, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, by certified mail, restricted
delivery, return receipt requested. A copy of said receipt is attached hereto indicating
service was made on January 16, 2002.
Sworn and subscribed _~
to before me this ~ ~
day of ,2002.
N6'~ARY t~LIC
Attorney for Plaintiff
GRIFFIE & ASSOCIATES
200 North Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-5551
Dkect Query - Intranet Page 1 of 1
This item was delivered on 01/16/2002 at 10:45.
Signature:
Address:
Item Number;
Inquire on multiple items.
I Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
itan 4 If Restrictecl Delivery is desired.
· Print your name and address on the reverse
~ an that we can return the card to you.
~ Attach this ca~to tho back of the mail lacs
, or off the fmnt~f space permits. P '
1. Article A to:
'-' t
A. Received by (P/ease Print B. Date of ~lvety
[] Agent
PS Form 38 Domestic Return Receipt
http://pts.usps.gov/netdat~WWWl~b~_z~z.uzv~rm~
1/22/02
SCOTT J. SPRUCEBANK
Plaintiff
Vs.
ROBYN LYNNE CLEMENS
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY
: PENNSYLVANIA
: DOCKET #02-153
: CIVIL ACTION
: COMPULSORY ARBITRATION
NOTICE
YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the
claims set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20)
days after this Complaint and Notice are served, by entering a written
appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the Court your
defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if
you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be
entered against you by the Court without further notice for any money claimed in
the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You may
lose money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAVVYER AT ONCE. IF
YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR
TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU
CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
MidPenn Legal Services
717.243.9400
8 Irvine Row, Carlisle, PA 17013
139690
8
SCOTT J. SPRUCEBANK
Plaintiff
Vs.
ROBYN LYNNE CLEMENS
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY
: PENNSYLVANIA
: DOCKET #02-153
: CIVIL ACTION
: COMPULSORY ARBITRATION
AND NOW comes the Plaintiff, Scott J. Sprucebank, by and through his
attorney, the offices of Shumaker Williams, P.C. and respectfully files this
Complaint pursuant to an Appeal from a District Justice Judgment and in support
thereof states as follows:
Plaintiff is an adult individual who resides at 436 Sioux Drive,
Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17050.
Defendant is an adult individual who resides at Central
Pennsylvania College, Box 5, Gale hall, College Hill Road,
Summerdale, Pennsylvania 17093.
The Defendant requested monetary assistance from the Plaintiff to
pumhase various items of personalty and assured the Plaintiff that
she would reimburse him for the charges made to the account.
139690
1
The Defendant was provided the use of the PlaintifFs credit card
pursuant to the aforesaid request.
Plaintiff provided the aforesaid use of the credit card based upon
the request of the Defendant and the assurance by the Defendant
that the purchases made thereon would be reimbursed or repaid by
Defendant.
During the period from April 2000 to June 2000, the Defendant
made the following charges to the Plaintiffs credit card account:
a. 6-10-00 Reference #866 - SEARS $69.79
b. 6-10-00 Reference #153 - SEARS 68.88
c. 6-10-00 Reference #764 - BU Shoe Dept 176.93
d. 6-10-00 Reference #609 - TJ Max 908.70
e. 6-10-00 Reference #599 - TJ Max 330.70
f. 6-10-00 Reference #661 - TJ Max 79.44
g, 6-16-00 Reference #474 - Holiday Hair 11.13
h. 6-16-00 Reference #552 - Ashoka Boutique 55.11
i. 6-23-00 Reference #650 - Garrisons 25.00
j. 6-24-00 Reference #791 - Marshalls 33.74
k. 6-24-00 Reference #462 - BonTon 317.96
I. 6-24-00 Reference #082 - BonTon 38.49
m. 6-24-00 Reference #568 - TJ Max 100.94
n. 6-29-00 Reference 975 - Hecht's 52.99
o. 4-14-00 Reference 016 - Boscov's 109.12
139690
2
p. 4-14-00 Reference 024 - Boscov's 104.90
q. 5-22-00 Reference 335 - Boscov's 101.70
r. 5-22-00 Reference 343 - Boscov's 19.07
s. 5-22-00 Reference 350 - Boscov's 123.32
t. 5-22-00 Reference 368 - Boscov's 90.05
$2,806.96
After repeated demands for payment by Plaintiff, Defendant has
failed and refused to provide reimbursement or payment pursuant
to her premise.
Plaintiff filed a District Justice Civil Action with District Justice Gayle
Elder against Defendant, and paid $68.50 for filing fees and service
costs.
The District Justice found in favor of the Plaintiff in the amount of
$1,169.15 inclusive of costs.
10.
Defendant appealed from the District Justice Judgment on
September 11, 2001, which was served on the Plaintiff on or about
January 14, 2002.
139690
3
COUNT I
BREACH OF CONTRACT
11. Paragraphs 1 through 10 are reavered and realleged as if set out in
full herein.
12. Defendant made a promise to repay Plaintiff for charges made on
Plaintiff's credit card account.
13. After repeated demands by Plaintiff to the Defendant, Defendant
has failed and refused to pay the charges set forth above.
14. Defendant's actions are a Breach of her Agreement to pay the
Plaintiff.
15. Based upon the Breach by the Defendant, the Plaintiff has suffered
damages in the amount of $2,806.96 as set forth in paragraph 6
which is incorporated herein, and the filing fees for the Distdct
Justice in the amount of $68.50.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff requests that this Honorable court enter
Judgment in his favor and against the Defendant in the amount of
$2,806.96 together with the filing fee for the District Justice motion of
$68.50 together with any additional relief that this court deems
appropriate. Said amount is less than the amount requiring compulsory
arbitration pursuant to Local Rule of Court.
139690
4
COUNT II
QUANTUM MERIUT
16. Paragraphs 1 through 15 are reaverred and realleged as if set out
in full herein.
17. Defendant purchased vadous items of personalty from the period of
April 2000 to June 2000 on Plaintiffs credit card.
18. Defendant has been unjustly enriched and benefited since she has
obtained title to various items of personalty totaling $2,806.96
without payment for the same.
19. Defendant should be required to reimburse Plaintiff for her unjust
enrichment based upon the use of Plaintiffs credit card.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff requests that this Honorable court enter
Judgment in his favor and grant the Defendant in the amount of $2,806.96
together with the filing fee for the Distdct Justice motion of $68.50 together
with any additional relief that this court deems appropriate. Said amount
is less than the amount requiring Compulsory Arbitration pursuant to Local
Rule of Court.
Attorney ID#55895
SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C.
P O Box 88
Harrisburg, PA 17108
717.763.1121
139690
5
VERIFICATION
I, Scott J. Sprucebank, individually, verify that the statements made in the
foregoing pleading are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I
understand that any false statements made herein are subject to the penalties of
18 Pa. C.So § 4904 relating to unsworn falsification of authorities.
Scott J. Sprucebank
139690
7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this i Z. day of February, 2002, I Anthony J. Foschi, Esquire,
of the law firm of SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C., hereby certify that this day I
served a true and correct copy of the foregoing, upon the person stated below by
depositing same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, first class mail, on
the date set forth:
Marylou Matas, Esquire
GRIFFIE & ASSOCIATES
Attorney for Robyn Lynne Clemens
200 North Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
717.243.5551
Anthony J. Foschi, Esquire
P O Box 88
Harrisburg, PA 17108
717.763.1121
Attorney for Plaintiff
139690
6
SCOTT J. SPRUCEBANK,
Plaintiff
ROBYN LYNNE CLEMENS,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: NO. 02-153 CIVIL TERM
: COMPULSORY ARBITRATION
NOTICE TO PLEAD
You are hereby notified to file a written response to the within Answer and New Matter
within twenty days (20) days from service hereof or a judgment may be entered against you.
SCOTT J. SPRUCEBANK,
Plaintiff
ROBYN LYNNE CLEMENS,
Defendant
: 1N THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: NO. 02-153 CIVIL TERM
: COMPULSORY ARBITRATION
ANSWER
AND NOW, comes the Defendant, Robyn Lynne Clemens, by and through her attorney,
Marylou Matas, Esquire, and the office of Griffie & Associates, and files this Answer:
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
Denied. It is specifically denied that Defendant requested moneta~ assistance from
Plaintiff to purchase various items of personalty. It is specifically denied that Defendant
assured Plaintiffthat she would reimburse him for the charges made to the account.
Admitted in part and denied in part. It is admitted that Defendant was provided the use
of Plaintiff's credit card. It is specifically denied that use of Plaintiff's credit card was
pursuant to Defendant's request.
Denied. It is specifically denied that Plaintiff provided the use of the credit card based
upon Defendant's request. It is specifically denied that Plaintiff provided the use of the
credit card based upon Defendant's assurance that the purchases made thereon would be
reimbursed or repaid by Defendant.
Denied. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without specific knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in this paragraph.
Specific proof is demanded at trial.
Admitted in part and denied in part. It is admitted that Defendant has failed and refused
to provide reimbursement to Plaintiff after his recent repeated demands for payment. It is
specifically denied that Defendant promised to provide reimbursement to Plaintiff.
Admitted. It is averred, however, that the proceedings before the District Justice are
irrelevant to the instant de novo proceedings.
Admitted. It is averred, however, that the proceedings before the District Justice are
irrelevant to the instant de novo proceedings.
10.
Admitted in part and denied in part. It is admitted that Defendant appealed from the
District Justice Judgment. It is specifically denied that Defendant appealed from the
District Justice Judgment on September 11, 2001. Rather, it is averred that Defendant
appealed from the District Justice Judgment on January 11, 2002. It is admitted that the
Plaintiff was served with a notice of appeal on or about January 14, 2002. It is averred,
however, that the proceedings before the District Justice are irrelevant to the instant de
novo proceedings.
BREACH OF CONTRACT
11.
Defendant's answers to Plaintiffs Paragraphs 1 through 10 are incorporated herein by
reference as if set forth in their full text.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Denied. It is specifically denied that Defendant made a promise to repay Plaintiff for
charges made on Plaintiff's credit card account.
Admitted in part and denied in part. It is admitted that since Defendant .sought a
Protection from Abuse action against Plaintiff he has demanded reimbursement for costs
associated with the use of the credit card. It is denied that the demands were repeated as
no demands were made prior to the Protection from Abuse litigation.
Denied. It is specifically denied that Defendant's actions are a breach of her Agreement
to pay Plaintiff, as no such agreement existed.
Denied. It is specifically denied that Defendant committed a breach. It is specifically
denied that Plaintiff has suffered damages in the mounts as stated. It is specifically
denied under any circumstances that Plaintiff's entitled to reimbursement of District
Justice fees.
WHEREFORE, Defendant requests this Honorable Court to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint.
QUANTUM MERIUT
Defendant's answers to Plaintiff's Paragraphs 1 through 15 are incorporated herein by
reference as if set foah in their full text.
Admitted.
Denied. It is specifically denied that Defendant has been unjustly enriched and benefited
by obtaining title to various items of personalty totaling $2,806.96 without payment for
the same, as such items were gifts from Plaintiff.
19. Denied. It is specifically denied that Defendant should be required to reimburse Plaintiff.
It is specifically denied that Defendant has been unjustly enriched based upon the use of
Plaintiffs credit card.
WHEREFORE, Defendant requests this Honorable Court to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint.
NEW MATTER AND COUNTERCLAIM
FOR EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
20. Defendant's answer to Plaintiffs Paragraph 1 through 19 are incorporated herein by
reference as if set forth in their full text.
21. Defendant's marriage to her husband ended in February 2000.
22. Plaintiffs marriage ended in April 2000, after his wife lef~ the residence.
23. Plaintiff and Defendant began dating in April 2000.
24. Plaintiff and Defendant continued dating until January 2001.
25. During the course of their relationship, Plaintiff was aware of Defendant's financial
situation and her limited available income.
26. During the course of their relationship, Defendant lost approximately fifty pounds.
27. Plaintiff often made fun of Defendant's appearance because her clothing did not fit
properly.
28. Plaintiff knew that Defendant did not have any means to purchase luxury items, including
clothing, for herself.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
Plaintiff insisted that Defendant take and use his credit card to purchase items of
personalty for herself.
At no time prior to Defendant seeking a Protection from Abuse Action did Plaintiff make
a request for reimbursement for any purchases Defendant might make while using his
credit card.
Defendant never made any promises to reimburse Plaintiff for any purchases she might
make while using his credit card.
Plaintiff insisted that Defendant spend at least five thousand dollars on his credit card.
Plaintiff became incensed when Defendant did not spend five thousand dollars on his
credit card.
During the course of their relationship, Plaintiff purchased many items of personalty for
Defendant, including a cellular telephone, jewelry and clothing.
During the course of their relationship, Plaintiff purchased various services for Defendant,
including a real estate appraisal of her former marital residence and lawn maintenance for
her residence.
During the course of their relationship, Plaintiff took Defendant on several vacation trips,
to several restaurants and frequently sent her flowers.
Plaintiff purchased and gave all of the aforesaid items and services as git~s for Defendant,
without expectation of repayment.
38.
39.
40
Defendant accepted all of the aforesaid items from Plaintiff as gifts from him, without
expectation of reimbursement.
During the course of their relationship, Defendant purchased some small gift items for
Plaintiff.
.Defendant gave those items to Plaintiff without the expectation of repayment.
41. Plaintiff accepted those items as gifts, without the expectation of reimbursement.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
Plaintiff repeatedly asked Defendant to move into his residence in the months of October,
November and December of 2000.
Defendant did move into Plaintiff's residence in mid to late December 2000.
Defendant moved out of Plaintiff's residence in mid January 2001.
In February 2001, Plaintiff began to exhibit behaviors that Defendant considered to be
stalking and harassment.
Plaintiff continued this behavior despite Defendant's repeated requests for him to stop.
On or about June 2001, Defendant threatened to file a Protection From Abuse action
against Plaintiff.
On or about July 3, 2001, Defendant's employer sent a no-trespass notice by written
correspondence to Plaintiff stating that Plaintiff was forbidden to enter any and all
property of the Central Pennsylvania College, where Defendant was employed and
resided, and all areas surrounding the townhouses and apartments of the college.
49. The no-trespass notice referenced in paragraph 48 was sent to Plaintiff due to his continual
harassment of Defendant.
50. Plaintiff did not stop his harassing behavior.
51. Defendant contacted Cumberland Valley Domestic Violence Services and filed a
Protection From Abuse action against Plaintiff on or about September 21, 2001.
52. A temporary Protection From Abuse Order was entered against Plaintiff on or about
September 21, 2001.
53. Prior to the hearing for the final Order, Plaintiff requested that the Ordered time restriction
be reduced fi.om eighteen months to six months.
54. Defendant refused to reduce the length of the Order at that time.
55. A final Protection From Abuse Order was entered against Plaintiff on or about February
25, 2002.
56. Plaintiff filed a District Justice Action on or about October 16, 2001, demanding payment
for gifts given during the relationship.
57. After their relationship ended, Plaintiffrepeatedly sent letters to Defendant acknowledging
that he was happy to have given her his credit card, among other things, and glad he could
provide things for her that she needed.
58. Defendant believes that Plaintiff's demand for payment now is an attempt to continue his
ongoing harassment of her.
59.
Defendant has suffered emotional distress as a result of Plaintiff's ongoing harassment of
her.
60.
Defendant sought the assistance of counseling and other victim services as a result of
Plaintiff's ongoing harassment of her.
61.
Defendant has suffered out of pocket losses, including lost wages and attorney's fees as a
result of Plaintiff's ongoing harassment of her.
WHEREFORE, Defendant requests your Honorable Court to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint
and award appropriate damages to Defendant for emotional distress.
Respectfully submitted,
aryl~/l,a~as, Esquire
Attorney foL~efendant
GRIFFIE & ASSOCIATES
200 North Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-5551
(800) 347-5552
DATE:
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in the foregoing document are true and correct. I
understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904,
relating to unswom falsifications to authorities.
ROBI~q L. CLEMENS
SCOTT J. SPRUCEBANK
Plaintiff
VS.
ROBYN LYNNE CLEMENS
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY
: PENNSYLVANIA
: DOCKET #02-153
: CIVIL ACTION
: COMPULSORY ARBITRATION
NOTICE TO PLEAD
You are hereby notified to file a written response to the within Preliminary
Objections within twenty (20) days from service hereof or a judgment may be
entered against you.
:140893
SCOTT J. SPRUCEBANK
Plaintiff
VS.
ROBYN LYNNE CLEMENS
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
DOCKET #02-153
: CIVIL ACTION
: COMPULSORY ARBITRATION
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
Comes now The Plaintiff by and through his attorney, the office of Shumaker
Williams, P.C., and respectfully files these Preliminary Objections to Defendant's
New Matter and Counter Claim and in furtherance thereof states as follows:
1. Plaintiff filed a Complaint on February 12, 2002 pursuant to an appeal from a
District Justice judgment.
2. On March 7, 2002, Defendant filed an Answer and New Matter to Plaintiff's
Complaint and served the same on Plaintiff's Counsel by certified mail on
March 11, 2002, signed for on March 13, 2002 by Plaintiff's Counsel.
:140893
Demurrer to Defendant's Counterclaim
3. Defendant's Counterclaim is based upon the theory of "Emotional Distress."
4. Pennsylvania Law has adopted the Restatementof Torts 2d ~46, "Intentional
Infliction of Emotional Distress."
5. In order to sustain a case of action, one must allege facts of extreme and
outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly which causes severe
Emotional Distress to another.
6. Nowhere in Defendant's Counterclaim are there averments of extreme and
outrageous conduct which would sustain her cause of action.
WHEREFORE, Defendant's Counterclaim should be dismissed for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1028
(a)(4)
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS PURSUANT TO
Pa. R.C.P. 1028(2)
7. Pa. R.C.P. 1019(f) requires that Averments of Special Damages shall be
specifically stated.
8. Defendant's Answer, New Matter, and Counterclaim states in Paragraph 61
that Defendant has suffered ",..out of pocket losses, lost wages and attorneys
fees...".
:140893
9. Defendant does not plead with any specificity the special damages suffered
as required by Pa. R.C.P. 1019(0 and 1021(a). Further, attorney fees are
not collectable as a matter of course in this action.
10. Defendant in paragraphs 21,22, 27, 28, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,
40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 through 58 includes scandalous and
impertinent matters and should be stricken pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1028(2).
11. Defendant in her Counterclaim refers to various writings, but fails to attach
the same to her Answer, New Matter and Counterclaim.
12. Pa. R.C.P. 10190) requires that when a claim or defense is based upon a
writing, the Pleader shall attach a copy of the writing to the pleading.
WHEREFORE, Defendant's Counterclaim should be dismissed for failure to
state a claim as a matter of law and in the alternate, Defendant's New Matter and
Counterclaim should be stricken for inclusion of scandalous or impertinent matters
and for failure to follow Rules of Court.
Respec~~
SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C.
P O Box 88
Harrisburg, PA 17108
:140893
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this ~"~ day of March, 2002, I Anthony J. Foschi, Esquire, of
the law firm of SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C., hereby certify that this day I served a
true and correct copy of the foregoing, upon the person stated below by depositing
same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, first class mail, on the date set
forth:
Maryiou Matas, Esquire
GRIFFIE & ASSOCIATES
Attorney for Robyn Lynne Clemens
200 North Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
717.243.5551
SHUMA~
By: ~,/ . _ .~-- ........
Anthony J. Foschi, Esquire #55895
P O Box 88
Harrisburg, PA 17108
717.763.1121
Attorney for Plaintiff
:140893
SCOTT J. SPRUCEBANK
Plaintiff
Vs.
ROBYN LYNNE CLEMENS
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY
: PENNSYLVANIA
DOCKET # 02-153
: CIVIL ACTION
COMPULSORY ARBITRATION
PRAECIPE TO SETTLE, DISCONTINUE AND END
To: Prothonotary:
Please mark the above-captioned matter as Settled, Discontinued
and Ended.
Respectfully,
Anthony J. Foschi
P O Box 88
Harrisburg, PA 17108
717.763.1121
I.D.#55895
GRIFFIE & ASSOCIATES
By:
200 North Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
I.D.# 84'1 Iq
143062
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this 22~day of May, 2002, I Anthony J. Foschi, Esquire, of
the law firm of SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.O., hereby certify that this day I served
a true and correct copy of the foregoing, upon the person stated below by
depositing same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, first class mail, on
the date set forth:
Marylou Matas, Esquire
GRIFFIE & ASSOCIATES
Attorney for Robyn Lynne Clemens
200 North Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
717.243.5551
SHUMA~AMS, P.C.,
By: ~'
Anthony J. Foschi, Esquire
P 0 Box 88
Harrisburg, PA 17108
717.763.1121
Attorney for Plaintiff
143062
2