HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-2977SHERIFF'S OFFICE OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY
Ronny R Anderson
Sheriff
Jody S Smith
Chief Deputy
Richard W Stewart
Solicitor
?????SS+ 4I? Luull?pr?-?
FILED-OFFICE
OF THE PROTHONOTARY
2011 MAR 22 PM 3' 20
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
PE14NSYLVANIA
MTGLQ Investors, LP I
vs.
Cynthia J.C. Sabatini (et al.)
Case Number
2011-2977
SHERIFF'S RETURN OF SERVICE
03/18/2011 08:19 PM - Michael Barrick, Deputy Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law, states that on March
18, 2011 at 2019 hours, he served a true copy of the within Complaint in Mortgage Foreclosure, upon the
within named defendant, to wit: Robert J. Sabatini Jr., by making known unto Cynthia Sabatini, Wife of
Defendant at 5 Juniper Drive, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17055 its contents and
at the same time handing to her personally the said true and correct copy of the same.
MICHAE BARRI K, EPUTY
03/18/2011
08:19 PM - Michael Barrick, Deputy Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law, states that on March
18, 2011 at 2019 hours, he served a true copy of the within Complaint in Mortgage Foreclosure, upon the
within named defendant, to wit: Cynthia J.C. Sabatini, by making known unto herself personally, at 5
Juniper Drive, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17055 its contents and at the same
time handing to her personally the said true and correct copy of the same.
SHERIFF COST: $54.00
March 21, 2011
,c.: CounrySUiEA Sner?;i, i?e?eo.=.e't. ?.?;;.
MICHAEL BARRIC EPUTY
SO ANSWERS,
RON R ANDERSON, SHERIFF
By: Robert J. Sabatini, Jr.
Cynthia J.C. Sabatini
5 Juniper Drive
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
(717) 766-0756
MTGLQ Investors, L.P.
CARE OF 4828 Loop Central Drive
Houston, TX 77801
Plaintiff
V.
CYNTHIA J.C. SABATINI
5 JUNIPER DRIVE
MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055
ROBERT J. SABATINI, JR.
5 JUNIPER DRIVE
MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055
Defendant(s)
DATE OF RESPONSE: April 11, 2011
FILED-OFFICE
OF THE PROTHONOTARAY
2011 APR 13 PM 1: ,32
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA;
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CIVIL DIVISION
CUMBERLAND County
NO. 11-2977 Civil
DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IN
MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE
1. Admitted in part and Denied in part. Defendant admits that Plaintiff is the corporation
designated as such in the caption on the first page of the Complaint. Denied in part
because it would require a legal conclusion.
2. Admitted.
3. Documents speak for themselves.
4. Documents speak for themselves.
5. Denied. This is a legal conclusion.
6. Denied. This is a legal conclusion.
7. Documents speak for themselves.
WHEREFORE, Respondents respectfully request this Honorable Court to compel Plaintiff's to
provide required responses.
By:
Robert J. atini, Jr.
Defendant
By: -?thia U v?
Cy C . Sa tini
Defendant