HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-5853CUMBERLAND COUNTY AGING & IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
COMMUNITY SERVICES, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner
VS
NO
.
.
CIVIL ACTION -LAW - "'-
w
ca C_
MURIEL LENHOFF, En
ii
n
Respondent OLDER ADULTS PROTECTIVE`'
SERVICES ACT ?? U1
PETITION FOR INVOLUNTARY INTERVENTION
-,.
BY EMERGENCY COURT ORDERo , .
AND NOW, the Petitioner, Cumberland County Aging & Community Services,
by its Solicitor, Anthony L. DeLuca, Esquire, pursuant to the provisions of the Older
Adults Protective Services Act, 35 P. S. Sec. 10225.101 et se_ 1c ., and respectfully
represents as follows:
The Petitioner, Cumberland County Aging & Community Services, with its office
located at 1100 Claremont Road, Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, is the local
provider of protective services for older adults in Cumberland County.
2.
The Respondent, Muriel Lenhoff, an older adult, age 79, address currently
unknown, was operating a motor vehicle on the evening of July 21, 2011 that was
blocking traffic in a cattle shoot in the right lane of traffic on the turnpike near Carlisle,
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
3.
At present, the Petitioner is not aware of any relatives of the Respondent.
4.
On or about July 21, 2011 at approximately 10:30 P.M., the Pennsylvania State
Police were notified of a car blocking traffic on one of the lanes of the turnpike.
5.
Trooper Holliday, assigned to the turnpike at the Newville Barracks, conducted
the initial investigation attempting to obtain identifying information about Muriel
Lenhoff through interview and also checking with law enforcement sources.
6.
The Respondent either would not or was not able to provide him with any
verifiable information regarding her residence.
7.
She informed Trooper Holliday that she had left a long term care home in
Michigan to go to Ohio by way of Philadelphia and was unable to answer basic questions
concerning contacts of people as well as members of her family.
8.
Further investigation by the Pennsylvania State Police developed the following
information:
a. That her cell phone had no contacts in it;
b. That two addresses were found one being a post office box in Huron, Ohio
and th other a post office box in Beechwood, Ohio;
C. That her driver's license was from the state of Michigan and that the
address on the license was the address of her place of employment
approximately ten (10) years ago;
d. That the person contacted at her former place of employment reported
receiving other calls requesting information about her but that person was
unable to provide any information; and
e. That her car which contained two (2) maltese dogs was towed to a local
garage.
9.
Investigation by the protective service worker for Petitioner reflected the
following:
a. That there was a car repair ticket from a Ford Dealership in Sandusky, Ohio
and, when the dealership was contacted, the person remembered Muriel
Lenhoff being there about four (4) months ago, said she was quite eccentric
and thought she was staying at a nearby hotel;
b. That the two (2) maltese dogs had microchip implants that identified a post
office box in Cambridge, Maryland. The veterinarian was contacted, said it
was a very old chip and no one there knew anything about Muriel Lenhoff;
c. That the office of aging in Sandusky, Ohio was contacted regarding Muriel
Lenhoff and that office was not familiar with her; and
d. That no financial information is known.
10.
Muriel Lenhoff was subsequently taken by Trooper Holliday to the Emergency
Room of Carlisle Regional Medical Center for evaluation but she refused to consent to
any testing and stayed in the emergency room throughout the day on Friday, July 22,
2011 without being admitted as a patient.
11.
While at Carlisle Regional Medical Center a mental capacity assessment was
conducted by Michael A. Torres, M.D., a copy of which is attached hereto, marked as
Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference, which assessment is as follows:
a. That she was very confused and confabulates extensively;
b. That she exhibits delusional thinking patterns;
C. That she is incongruent with issues presented to her;
d. That she exhibits disorganized thinking;
e. That her concentration is impaired; and
12.
Petitioner was advised by officials at Carlisle Regional Medical Center on Friday,
July 22, 2011, that, without her consent to be tested, there was no medical basis to either
keep her in the emergency room or admit her to the hospital and, therefore, she would
have to leave the facility.
13.
If compelled to leave the hospital without protective services, the Petitioner
believes and, therefore, avers that Muriel Lenhoff would be at imminent risk of death or
serious physical harm which caused Petitioner to request an Involuntary Intervention by
Emergency Court Order.
14.
The facts in this case were presented to Magisterial District Judge Charles A.
Clement, Jr. on the evening of Friday, July 22, 2011 and an Order was issued directing
that Muriel Lenhoff receive appropriate medical and psychological evaluations and
treatment at Carlisle Regional Medical Center and, upon release, be transported and
admitted to Claremont Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in Carlisle, Pennsylvania,
pending a Hearing before the Court of Common Pleas. A copy of said Order is attached
hereto, marked as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference.
15.
Petitioner believes and, therefore, avers that the least restrictive involuntary
protective services required in this case, after any required treatment at Carlisle Regional
Medical Center, is the immediate removal and transportation of Muriel Lenhoff from
Carlisle Regional Medical Center to the Claremont Nursing and Rehibilitation Center,
Carlisle, Pennsylvania where she can receive appropriate care, pending a Hearing in this
matter.
16.
The proposed services would remedy the situation and condition which present an
imminent risk of death or serious physical harm to Muriel Lenhoff.
17.
The proposed services are not over broad in extent or duration because Muriel
Lenhoff is unable to care for herself due to her mental impairment and would be placed at
imminent risk of death or serious physical harm by no action being taken to protect her.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter an
Emergency Order pursuant to the Older Adults Protective Services Act providing relief,
including but not limited to directing the Respondent, Muriel Lenhoff, to be removed
from Carlisle Regional Medical Center, if not already renmoved, and transported and
admitted to Claremont Nursing and Rehabilitation Center for appropriate care and that
the Court schedule a hearing to be held not more than 72 hours from the signing of this
Order.
Respectfully submitted
DATED: _ ?c ,
Anth ny L. De ca
P.O. Box 358
113 Front Street
Boiling Springs, PA 17007
Attorney for Petitioner
VERIFICATION
I hereby verify that the facts and information set forth in the foregoing Petition for
Involuntary Intervention by Emergency Court Order are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge, information, and belief. I understand that any false statements contained
herein are subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn
falsification to authorities.
Dated: v? S1S O tl ?? ??
Janet Paull
Reference No:
Mental Capacity Assessment
NB The Mental Capacity Act's first principle is that a person must be assumed to have capacity to make a
decision or act for themselves unless it is established that they lack capacity in relation to those matters.
1. Individual's Details
Name:
Address:
Date of Birth:
Location at Time of Assessment:
2. Decision Requiring Test of Mental Capacity (Provide details)
z c S (j-
e z.e?
NB: Before deciding that someone lacks capacity to make a particular decision, it is important to
take all practical and appropriate steps to enable them to make that decision themselves
3. Two-Stage Test of Mental Capacity (See Code of Practice Chapter Four)
a. Does the person have an impairment of the mind or brain, or is there some sort of
disturbance affecting the way their mind or brain works? (It doesn't matter whether the
impairment or disturbance is temporary or permanent.) Provide evidence.
NB: If a person does not have such an impairment or disturbance of the mind or brain, they will
not lack capacity under the Act.
-
r ? v,- v?'??? Ccti ' p
??'? - ? l$r'Z`f?t...c `Z. 2 cd' ?( ( / .? c..{ /LC11,LC C?a'7?<LC.j''? c?? ? ???-LG'?L?.c? ,.?}L°i? , [: ?. ??Q ?_ i_r a Lvs t?.
Does that impairment or disturbance mean that the person is unable to make the decision
in question at the time it needs to be made?
Can the person:
(a) understand the information relevant to the decision? Yes ? No
(b) retain that information? Yes ? No
(c) use or weigh that information as part of the process of making the decision? Yes ? No [
(d) communicate his/her decision (whether by talking or any other means)? Yes 5 No ?
Provide evidence in respect of the person's ability in relation to each of these fni jr Plpmpntc of tho +o,+.
` ??< ?2•a•t? ?C•?.t?l.M-e.i'k,?i2?? li?;.(.`wi.i? ? ?.,"?. ?L/ G ' ? Lc,?,i.,J ? '? CZ atu-?? - j?p? ??.
le <
!?-??-G y- C/r'". C•.?`??f-:.i.- s -4-,_'C.-I ?Li1 `J
ii a person cannot ao one or more of these four things, they are unable to make the decision.
4. Outcome of Mental Capacity Test
On the balance of probabilities, there is a reasonable belief that:
Or The person has capacity to make this particular decision at this time F-1
The person does not have capacity to make this particular decision at this time A
Details of Assessor
Assessor; f?te.?,t^"L 1???
Signature: x:61
Designation: EXHIBIT "A"
Date:
Time: I L(3''"? .?
Cardiff and Vale Mental Capacity Act Partnership Mental Capacity Assessment Form Version One 30/04/08
?"-?'arnberland "'o ,. CS 71796e5529
V'? V I\ I, V I V V„ I V L I\ I? I l l\ L.
ow>zaffil of
h??l
CHARLES A. CLEMENT, JR.
Magisterial District Judge
District Court 09-1-01
LOWER ALLEN TOWNSHIP
NEW CUMBERLAND BOROUGH
SHIREMANSTOWN BOROUGH
MR
ORDER
Docket No:
Case Piled,
Having found clear and convincing evidence that it is naossaary to provide emergency relief to protect the respondent above,
in accordance with 35 P. 1 225.307 f ?h1ereby order th t the fq No wing rotective s rvicerD rovided-
? Or:GE?P- ?Sy C(npLd a?,ift C•WE??e.*t?
A br?tit??? 7A0??1???c? L??i(r C? A.,?'`? ul,"o?lJ At 19^jj e A- NS a
r^ lVVDASGN-9 4 1
?Q.rv7'8G 111 i 4h-opi Gw? -A A? ?,?°
Appointed legal counsel to represent the respond nt at the protective services review hearin _ o ?
e.iF-X @e?-e
t?oL? o m,AA ,ue-V
This order shall not exc ed 72 ours from time the order is issued. /a(,?•75
Order is issued on; f L
Date Magisterial District Judge ql .
This order is valid only for the period of time specified above.
Please contact the court of common pleas of this county for important information of further proceedings in connection with
the order.
MOM 35111.
Olde Towne Commons
400 Bridge Street, Suilc #r
Now Cumhrrland, PA 17070
OFFICE (717) 774-5989
PAX (717) 774.6684
EXHIBIT "B"
Petitioner
-336 P0002?0002 F-185
ADUSe OT Lne r=iaeriy 1,elnion
?N?'r- ? ?UdWuceNlt? ? Y??C?
Lt\
Respondent: -,k?el LQ,u? !`t-
Printed 07l2PJ2011 B-09-37PM
S
CUMBERLAND COUNTY AGING &
COMMUNITY SERVICES,
Petitioner
VS.
MURIEL LENHOFF,
Respondent
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. //-- SBS3
CIVIL ACTION -LAW
OLDER ADULTS PROTECTIVE
SERVICES ACT
ORDER
AND NOW, to wit, this a5_61day of , 2011, it is ORDERED and
DECREED that the within Petition be heard on the day of , 2011, at
'LG,
dti 30 P M o'clock, in Courtroom No. 5 at the Cumberland County Courthouse,
Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
na shall be appointed to represent the older
adult, Muriel Lenhoff, at this hearing.
BY THE COURT:
vJane E. Moos,
Ah+hony L. beLuca k
J.
00pies Mud
??
7/
p/
Qs
C_
r
CUMBERLAND COUNTY AGING & IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
COMMUNITY SERVICES, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner
v.
11-5853 CIVIL TERM
MURIEL LENHOFF, OLDER ADULTS PROTECTIVE
Respondent SERVICES ACT
IN RE: INTERIM ORDER
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2011, following a
hearing on the Petition for Involuntary Intervention filed by the
Cumberland County Aging and Community Services Office we find that
Muriel Lenhoff is a care dependent individual and is in need of
protective services as defined by the Older Adult Protective
Services Act.
Should she be discharged from the Carlisle Regional
Medical Center, it is directed that she be transported to the
Claremont Nursing and Rehabilitation Center where they are directed
to provide for her care and treatment pending further order of
Court.
The record shall remain open for a period of ten days.
By the Court,
Albert H. Mas and, J.
Anthony L. DeLuca, Esquire
For the Petitioner - Cp?1vE'a
Jane E. Adams, Esquire
For the Respondent
pcb
co
Gj
-' t ?` c?
CUMBERLA COUNTY AGING &
COMMUNITY SERVICES,
MOVING PARTY
vs.
MURIEL LENHOFF,
RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 11-5853
OLDER ADULTS PROTECTIVE
SERVICES ACT
C
cnt?
MOTION TO EXTEND ORDER OF COURT
r?
c,
C)
AND NOW COMES THE MOVING PARTY, Cumberland County Aging &
Community Services, in and for Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, who represents and
moves as follows:
I.
The Moving Party is Cumberland County Aging & Community Services, in and
for Cumberland County, with its office located at 1100 Claremont Road, Carlisle,
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
2.
On July 25, 2011, a Petition for Involuntary Intervention by Emergency Court
Order was filed by the Moving Party and, on July 28, 2011, a hearing on said Petition
was held.
3.
At the conclusion of the hearing on July 28, 2011, an Order of Court was entered
wherein Muriel Lenhoff was found to be a care dependent individual and in need of
protective services as defined by the Older Adult Protective Services Act. Said Order
stated that the record shall remain open for a period of ten (10) days. A copy of the Order
of Court is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by reference.
r7)°
--f e?
4.
At the time of the hearing on July 28, 2011, there was little identifying
information regarding where Muriel Lenhoff resided and, since that hearing, a little
progress has been made in her identification and the state where she may be a resident
but not enough to allow her to be discharged from Claremont Nursing and Rehabilitation
Center without placing her at risk of death or serious bodily harm.
5.
Additional time is needed to continue the investigation identifying Muriel Lenhoff
and attempting to determine what state she resides in.
6.
The moving party, Cumberland County Aging & Community Services, believes
and, therefore, avers that the Order of Court of July 28, 2011 should be extended for an
additional ten (10) days to allow the moving party additional time to continue the
investigation to determine what state Muriel Lenhoff is a resident.
7.
Jane E. Adams, Esquire, Counsel for Muriel Lenhoff, concurs in the Motion to
Extend the Order of Court dated July 28, 2011.
WHEREFORE, Moving Party prays that this Honorable Court:
1. Extend the Order of Court, dated July 28, 2011, for an additional ten (10)
days; and
2. Direct Claremont Nursing and Rehabilitation Center to continue to
provide for the care and medical treatment of Muriel Lenhoff pending further Order of
Court.
Respectfully Submitted,
thony L. De 7,Esquire
113 Front Street
P.O. Box 358
Boiling Springs, PA 17007
(717) 258-6844
Attorney for Moving Party
CUMBERLAND COUNTY AGING & IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
COMMUNITY SERVICES, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner
v' 11-5853 CIVIL TERM
MURIEL LENHOFF, OLDER ADULTS PROTECTIVE
Respondent SERVICES ACT
IN RE: INTERIM ORDER
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2011, following a
hearing on the Petition for Involuntary Intervention filed by the
Cumberland County Aging and Community Services Office we find that
Muriel Lenhoff is a care dependent individual and is in need of
protective services as defined by the Older Adult Protective
Services Act.
Should she be discharged from the Carlisle Regional
Medical Center, it is directed that she be transported to the
Claremont Nursing and Rehabilitation Center where they are directed
to provide for her care and treatment pending further order of
Court.
The record shall remain open for a period of ten days.
By the Court,
Anthony L. DeLuca, Esquire
For the Petitioner
Jane E. Adams, Esquire
For the Respondent
pcb
s
Albert H. Mas'land, J.
TRUE COPY FROM RECORD
in Testimony whereof, I here unto set my hand
and th?of said urt at Carlisle, Pa.
This day of , 20
thonotary
EXHIBIT "A"
CUMBERLA COUNTY AGING & IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
COMMUNITY SERVICES, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
MOVING PARTY
VS. NO. 11-5853 , .}
OLDER ADULTS PROTECTIVE
MURIEL LENHOFF, SERVICES ACT,,
RESPONDENT ] ==
C
[
''
-< .
-- -acl
ORDER OF COURT -3
,
f6'A e
AND NOW, this day of August, 2011, upon review of the Motion to ,
Extend Oorder of Court, the Court orders the following:
1. The Order of Court dated July 28, 2011 is extended for an additional ten
(10) days; and
2. Claremont Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is directed to continue to
provide for the care and medical treatment of Muriel Lenhoff pending
further Order of Court.
BY THE COURT,
Albert H. Maslan ,
JAnthony L. DeLuca, Esquire
For the Moving Party
Jane E. Adams, Esquire
For the Respondent
(Ar 8,
5
1.
The Petitioner is the Cumberland County Aging & Community Services, in and
CUMBERLAND COUNTY AGING &
COMMUNITY SERVICES,
Petitioner
vs.
MURI EL LENHOFF,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 11-5853
OLDER ADULTS PROTECTIVE
SERVICES ACT
Respondent
ro?
r-nW
=rn
?
to ?,
PETITION TO RELEASE AND TRANSPORT -??
!Z c:)
Tv rs
= C;p
AND NOW COMES THE PETITIONER, the Cumberland County Aging & -<<
Community Services, in and for Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, by its solicitor,
Anthony L. DeLuca, Esquire, who represents and avers as follows:
for Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, with its office located at 1100 Claremont Road,
Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
2.
On July 25, 2011, Petitioner filed a Petition for Involuntary Intervention by
Emergency Court Order and, after a Hearing on July 28, 2011, an Order of Court was
•c
co
-v
N
C?
entered wherein Muriel Lenhoff was found to be a care dependent individual and in need
of protective services. Said Order stated that the record shall remain open for a period of
ten (10) days.
3.
c?
mr
rn
C3
C-
c?
T?
;U
The Order of Court dated July 28, 2011 was extended for an additional ten (10)
Days on August 11, 2011.
4.
Subsequently, Muriel Lenhoff exhibited psychological issues that required mental
health intervention and she was transported to Chambersburg hospital for treatment.
5.
Upon her release from Chambersburg Hospital, she returned to Claremont
Nursing
and Rehabilitation Center where she is currently.
6.
Since the initial Hearing, contacts were established in the State of Ohio and,
within the past few days, Petitioner has been advised that an appropriate facility in
Beachwood, Ohio will accept Muriel Lenhoff for the purpose of placement in that state.
7.
On November 7, 2011, Jane E. Adams, Esquire was advised that an agency in the
State of Ohio would accept Muriel Lenhoff for the purpose of placement in that state and
she concurs that she should be released from Claremont Nursing and Rehabilitation
Center and transported to Ohio for placement there.
8.
Petitioner is agreeable to transporting Muriel Lenhoff to Ohio and requests
authorization for her release from Claremont Nursing and Rehabilitation
Center for the purpose of transporting her in her vehicle to the State of Ohio
where she will be placed at Menorah Park Center for Senior Living which is located in
Beachwood, Ohio.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that this Honorable Court
enter an Order directing the Respondent, Muriel Lenhoff, to be released from Claremont
Nursing and Rehabilitation Center and transported in her motor vehicle to Menorah Park
Center for Senior Living in Beachwood, Ohio and that this action be terminated in the
Office of the Prothonotary, in and for Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
Respectfully submitted
DATED: 44
Anthony L. Luca
P.O. Box 358
113 Front Street
Boiling Springs, PA 17007
Attorney for Petitioner
VERIFICATION
I hereby verify that the facts and information set forth in the foregoing PETITION
TO RELEASE AND TRANSPORT are true and correct to the best of my knowledge,
information, and belief. I understand that any false statements contained herein are.
subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to
authorities.
Dated: NW<ZWAJA-r -71 2-611 C--i M-4j L iu.?x-(i
Janet Paull
CUMBERLAND COUNTY AGING &
COMMUNITY SERVICES,
Petitioner
vs.
MURIEL LENHOFF,
Respondent
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 11-5853
OLDER ADULTS PROTECTIVE
SERVICES ACT
ORDER OF COURT
41A
AND NOW, this day of November, 2011, upon review of the Petition to
Release and Transport, it is hereby Ordered that:
1. That the Respondent, Muriel Lenhoff, shall be released from Claremont
Nursing and Rehabilitation Center to Petitioner's authorized
representatives;
2. That Petitioner's authorized representatives shall transport Muriel Lenhoff
in her motor vehicle to Menorah Park Center for Senior Living in
Beachwood, Ohio; and
3. That this Action be terminated in the Office of the Prothonotary, in and for
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
BY THE COURT,
Albert H. Masland, J.
Cj p -n
Anthony L. DeLuca, Esquire C "i
??or @ S ?`?rG4 -O3 ??rt
For the Petitioner ! (l
e- 'Orn
Jane E. Adams, Esquire 00 °o
For the Respondent d l co -0 Q
zo o?
-.4
Cumberland County Aging & Community Services 5;c= 3>
?c :0
AUTHORITY TO PAY COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL Q' NOV 14 2011
1. COURT
2. VOUCHER
? District Justice It Common Pleas O Appellate ? Other N-0 13800
3. FOR J., C.P., APPELLATE) 4. AT ITY/STA ) 5. BUDGET CODE
/
`/ S) G
6. IN THE CASE OF 7. CHARGE/OFFENSE (PURDON CITATION) 8. O PETTY OFFENSE
FELONY ? MISDEMEANOR
9. PROCEEDINGS (Describe briefly) 11. PERSON REPRESENTED 12. CIVIL DOCKET NO.
? 1 ? Defendant - Adult
2 O Defendant - Juvenile
Y? i ' S? / ?
//-/??-y1i•`?, 4 ? Appelleppelleant 13,,,•L DOCKET NO.
5 ? Habeas Petitioner
6 C3 Material Witness
?
,
,
10. PERSON REPRESENTED (Full N e) 7 ? Parolee Charged With Violation
8 ? Probationer Charged With Violation
14. APPEALS DOCKET NO.
9 110 Other
i n a c.,-4r, j1le-4
U L"
16. NAME OF A ORNEY/PAYEE AND
A
l D
pp
ate MAILING ADDRESS
L) C4 C Jane Adams, Esq.
17 W. South St.
NAfv:OF
?LDNN PLEAS JUDGE ASSIGNED TO CASE C
li
l
P
7
3
..
ar
A 1
01
e,
s
O
' p? 17.T PHQNNE 0$ 18? CIALSECURITY NO ORtEEIINNO
Q?
S 11 a
CLAIM FOR SERVICES OR EXPENSES
LA
19. - SERVICE
--J HOURS DATES AM01dNTS D
a.lir4a men';C;d/ol'.»
iply rahti?per hou 'tire total
b. Prellmina arl s to ofi[ain "In oprt-/ com-
BtlOn
ter Ito tbe[-
c- Moth an?}leQu6s?s .
_
d Bail Hearings - _ -?
Q e. Sentence Hearings r _!
0
z
1. Trial
1. Trial
r ri
__q
-
g. Revocation Hearings C
Tt
h. Juvenile Hearings
C:
I. Appeals Court 19A. TOTAL IN COURT COMP.
I. Other (Specify on additional sheets)
TOTAL HOURS =
X $55 PER HOUR - $
20. a. Interviews and conferences Multiply rate per hour times total
b. Obtaining and reviewing records hours. Enter total "Out of Court"
LL
l'- compensation below
O ?
c. Legal research and brief writing .
O 0 d. Investigative and other work (Specify on additional sheets) 20A. TOTAL OUT OF COURT
COMP.
TOTAL HOURS = X $45 PER HOUR = $
21. ITEMIZATION OF REIMBURSABLE EXP ENSES AMT. PER ITEM
Milage $. per mile x
W
2
~O
21 A. TOTAL ITEMIZED EXP.
F
-
i
- _$
22. CERTIFICATION OF ATTORNEY/PAYEE 23. GRAND TOTAL CLAIMED
Has compensation and/or reimbursement for work in this ease previously been applied for? ? YES 10 NO = $
If yes, were you paid? ? YES i'*NO If yes
by whom were
ou
aid? How much?
,
y
p
Has the person represented paid any mon , or to your k ge anyone else, in connection with the matter for 24• DEDUCT. PRIOR PYMTS.
which you were appointed to provide re esentatio O YE. If yes, give details on additional shoe s a $
I swear or affirm the truth or correctness 25: NET AIM NT C
of the above statements fgnature of Aftomey/Payee Date r
= $
//
l
ll
26.At PROW r,
rtru
1
Signature of
: : 7 27. AMT. APPROVED
AVMENt
/
Judge , (]ale: /r' `k!/ -
??? (r
a $ /?
te
f
Copy 1 - Mail to Court Administrator at completion of service
JANE ADAMS
ATTORNEY AT LAW
17 W. South St..
Carlisle, Pa. 17013
(717) 245-8508
BILL for: LENHOFF
RE: Muriel Lenhoff
Dates: 27 July 2011 to 11 November 2011
BILLING INFORMATION:
Hourly Rate: 45.00
DATE DESCRIPTION
----------------------- HOURS
27
Jul
11 -----------------------------
Reviewed petition. ------------
0.20
27 Jul 11 Call from Anthony Deluca. 0.20
28 Jul 11 Attended hearing regarding Muriel Lenhoff. 1.67
28 Jul 11 Went to Carlisle Hospital; visited Muriel Lenhoff. 0.60
22 Aug 11 Called Tony Deluca regarding update; called Sharon. 0.10
25 Aug 11 Call from Tony Deluca. 0.10
26 Aug 11 Attended conference with Judge Masland to discuss 0.40
options regarding Muriel Lenhoff.
30 Aug 11 Called Claremont caseworker. 0.10
2 Sep 11 Called Solicitor for Office of Aging in Ohio; had 0.20
long discussion about procedure and jurisdiction and
options for Muriel Lenhoff.
6 Sep 11 Call from Tony Deluca. 0.10
6 Sep 11 Conference call with Ohio attorney and Tony Deluca. 0.40
9 Sep 11 Call from Kelli Perk in Ohio about sending Muriel 0.10
Lenhoff back.
Totals for this Period: 4.17
Amount of Disbursements: $ 0.00
Current Balance: $ 187.65
Balance Forwarded from previous bill: $ 0.00
Amount Due Now: $ 187.65 %/