HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-4167
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
:CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
; NO. 04-41(,1 Ciu~L t-~
JAMES E, ALLEN, III,
vs,
KRlSTIE NEIBEL,
Defendant
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: CUSTODY
COMPLAINT FOR CUSTODY
AND NOW, this day of August, 2004, comes the Plaintiff, JAMES E. ALLEN, III, by
his attorney Michael D. Rentschler, Esquire, who files the within Complaint in Custody, and
respectfully avers the following:
1. Your Plaintiff is James E. Allen, III, an adult individual who currently resides at 2502 Live
Oak, Dallas, Texas 75204.
2. The Defendant is Kristie Niebel, an adult individual who currently resides at 29 N, 23rd
Street, Camp Hill, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17011.
3. The Plaintiff and Defendant are the natural parents of one minor child, namely, Makoa J.
Allen, hereinafter referred to as "Child" who was born on September 2, 2002, in Kuwai,
Hawaii.
4. The Child has lived with the following persons at the following addresses at the following
times:
a. From birth to June 2003, in Hawaii, with Defendant and Defendant's roommate;
b. From June 2003 to March 2004, at 2110 Mayfred Lane, Camp Hill, Cumberland
County, PA, with Defendant and Defendant's parents, Doug and Yolanda NeibeI;
c, From April 2004 to Present, at 29 N. 23rd Street, Camp Hill, Cumberland County,
P A, with Defendant.
5. Plaintiff believes that it is in the Child's best interest that he is granted joint legal custody
and partial physical custody with Child for the following reasons:
a, Although Plaintiff resides in Texas, he has maintained contact with the Child, has
visited with the Child, has financially supported the Child and desires to continue a
more meaningful relationship with the Child with defined times for partial physical
custody; and
b. Plaintiff is the loving natural father of the Child and there is no rational basis for
denying him joint legal custody and partial physical custody of the Child.
6. The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County has jurisdiction in this case since
Defendant and Child have resided in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania in excess of the
statutorily prescribed length of time.
7. There have not been any actions for custody of the minor Child in Pennsylvania or elsewhere,
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that this Honorable Court award Plaintiffwith
joint legal custody and partial physical custody.
Respectfully submitted,
~/?-
~ . -
'/'~ -~
;?--~:.;;?-.:? ,
Michael D. Rentsc
28 N. 32nd Street
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011
Supreme Court ID # 45836
Attorney for Plaintiff
~
/~~
er, Esquire
VERIFICATION
I, James E. Allen, Ill., Plaintiff herein, do hereby swear and affirm that the statements contained
in this Complaint for Custody are true and correct. I understand that any false statement may be
prosecuted under Pa CSA Section 4904 which relates to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date: _1 / 'B I tJ 'I
~~f.lJA~
JY:S E. ALLEN, III ~
-cq
p ~ B
t ~ Lr,
'i; V1 \Y
.c: '& ~
~ pc.
-c:.
--.J :n
i=-
~
g
JAMES E. ALLEN, III
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA
V.
04-4167 CIVIL ACTION LAW
KRISTIE NElBEL
DEFENDANT
IN CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW,
Thursday, September 02, 2004
, upon consideration of the attached Complaint,
it is hereby directed that parties and their respective counsel appear before Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq.
at 4th Floor, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle on Thursday, October 07, 2004
, the conciliator,
at 9:30 AM
for a Pre-Hearing Custody Conference. At such conference, an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or
if this cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the court, and to enter into a temporary
order. All children age five or older may also be present at the conference'. Failure to appear at the conference may
provide grounds for entry of a temporary or permanent order.
The court hereby directs the parties to furnish any and all exislting Protection from Abuse orders,
Special Relief orders, and Custody orders to the conciliator 48 hours Ilrior to scheduled hearing.
FOR THE COURT.
By: /s/
Hubert X. Gill-oy, Esq.
Custody Conciliator
mhc
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law to comply with the
Americans with Disabilites Act of 1990. For information about accessible facilities and reasonable
accommodations available to disabled individuals having business before the court, please contact our office.
All arrangements must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business before the court. You must
attend the scheduled conference or hearing.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR ATTORNEY AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE AN ATTORNEY OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET
FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Cumberland County Bar Association
32 South Bedford Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
Telephone (717) 249-3166
'?f?A ~ ~ ~~ ~ AC;ZC"p
-~ 7t ~.z..y ~u: 4(/1 C'-p
~
~ p; ~-':m ~ -~ /7(l.~'6
VIN'vi\lASNN3d
I I Nnrn r",.',r'H:'::;1Ai,n"
AI.. . \.-."'- \oJ;' I........f'i V
2lJ :1; ~Id z- d3S ~OOZ
AUV10NOHlOtld 3Hl :JO
:Dl:1:Io-G31L:l
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA
v
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
KRISTIE NEIBEL,
Defendant
NO. 04-4167
IN CUSTODY
COURT ORDER
AND NOW, this 22, 11 day of February, 2005, upon consideration of the attached
Custody Conciliation report, it is ordered and directed as follows:
1. A hearing is scheduled in Court Room No. ~ of the Cumberland County Court
House on the 2M day of ~ ,2005 at 0-1-. m. At this hearing, the
Father shall be the moving party and shall proceed initially with testimony. Counsel
for the parties shall file with the Court and opposing counsel a memorandum setting
forth the history of custody in this case, the issues currently before the Court, a list of
witnesses who will be called to testify on behalf of each party and a summary of the
anticipated testimony of each witness. This memorandum shall be filed at least ten
days prior to the mentioned hearing date.
2. In the event Father makes plans to come to the Cumberland County area during any
time frame prior to the hearing in question, legal counsel for the Father may contact
the Conciliator for a conference call with legal counsel for the Mother in an effort to
work out a period of visitation for the Father at that time. The Conciliator may file a
supplemental report with the Court scheduling Father's periods of visitation. If
during that time Mother desires to have any type of evaluation accomplished of the
Father, Father shall cooperate in the evaluation conditional upon the Mother paying
all the costs of the evaluation. The evaluation would need to be scheduled consistent
-
.
with any period of time Father schedules for a visit in Cumberland County. Results
of the evaluation would be shared with both parties.
BY THE COURT,
'/{I i--?
J dge
CC~bara SumpIe-Sullivan, Esquire ~ I .. f") ')
:::R::;:re ~ ~~_
~ ,Jb3/tJ5' ;iU ~
0;). - ~ -06
.
ry
FES 1 'l2005 .J
lJ;\'
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
...
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
v
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
KRISTIE NEIBEL,
Defendant
NO. 04-4167
IN CUSTODY
CONCILIATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY CIVIL RULE OF
PROCEDURE 1915.3-8(b), the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following
report:
1. The pertinent information pertaining to the child who is the subject of this litigation
is as follows:
Makoa J. Allen, born September 02, 2002.
2. A Conciliation Conference was held on Febrnary 10, 2005, with the following
individuals in attendance:
Present were the Father, James E. Allen, III, with his counsel, Michael D.
Rentschler, Esquire, and the Mother, Kristie Neibel, with her counsel Barbara
Sumple-Sullivan, Esquire.
3. There appears to be a history in this case where the parties can't agree on a number
of issues. Father has had limited contact with the minor child and Father is currently
living in Texas. Mother is suggesting Father needs to have a custody evaluation and
that the Father also needs to go through a periodic visitation situation prior to any
type of more expanded visitation, especially before the Father would take the child
back to Texas. The Father feels the Mother is basically being unreasonable with
respect to the request for an evaluation and the Father desires to institute a specific
period of custody with the child as soon as possible. The parties are unable to reach
an agreement and the Conciliator believes a hearing is required. The Conciliator
recommends an Order in the form as attached.
;:2-lLr 0,)
DATE
GJ
'*
,\7
.
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PlEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 04-4167 CIVIL TERM
KRIESTIE NIEBEL,
Defendant
IN CUSTODY
IN RE:
AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, upon
consideration of Plaintiff's Complaint for Custody in the
above-captioned matter with respect to the parties' child,
Makoa J. Allen (date of birth September 2, 2002), and pursuant to
an agreement of the parties in open court and dictated by their
respective counsel, Michael D. Rentschler, Esquire, and Barbara
Sumple-Sullivan, Esquire, it is ordered and directed as follows:
The parties shall share legal custody of their
minor child, Makoa J. Allen. Primary physical custody of the
minor child shall be with the Mother.
Father shall have periods
of visitation and partial custody with the child as follows:
A. During the month of June, from June 18th,
2005, to June 25th, 2005, when Father shall travel to
Pennsylvania to be with the minor child. During this period
Father shall be given expanded rights of unsupervised contact and
overnight visits as deemed appropriate by both parties,
B. August 12th, 2005, through August 17th, 2005,
Father shall travel to pennsylvania and visit with his son here,
again, with the phase in of expanded rights of unsupervised
contact, and overnight visitation shall occur as can be agreed to
by the parties.
C. From October 7th, 2005, through Octoner 9th,
2005, Mother shall take the child to Texas for periods of
N
f.;; ..:s
~~~i ~:~ ~
y'c, .;~: .~
(..,)i:,::
f'~..LL
Li-\U~
-:d l:J
C1- "'J:
;.-
tJ.-
o
~:C
<"">
\
::--:
'''~::.-;
".-
,-0
C',
"'.;-
,.....
----
;..
.
visitation with Father. Mother shall actually stay at Father's
residence during that time period to facilitate the transition
between the households.
D. December 26th, 2005, through December 31st,
2005, Mother shall, again, travel to Texas and stay in Father's
household to allow for a transition period for Makoa.
E. From March 11th, 2006, to March 18th, 2006,
Father shall visit with the child here in Pennsylvania, again
with the expansion of overnights, and contact will be by the
agreement of the parties.
F. April 13th, 2006, through April 17th, 2006,
Mother shall again travel to Texas and stay in Father's residence
at that point to allow for transition for the child.
G. From May 25th, 2006, to June 2nd, 2006,
Mother shall initially take the child to Texas, spend some time
with the child there, and return and allow Father a reasonable
number of days during that visit to be alone with the child in
Texas.
It's the intention of the parties to vary the
extent of supervised contact based on how the child is
progressing with the attachment, and both parties agree to use
their best faith efforts to work with that to facilitate a good
relationship with the child.
The parties agree that Father shall pay the full
airfare for Makoa on the trips to Texas. The costs of airfare
for each of the parties' visits either to Pennsylvania or to
Texas shall be their own individual costs.
The parties also agree that they shall split the
fee of Dr. Shienvold equally for his assistance in formulating
this agreement.
.
.
It is the intention of the parties that this
matter will be reviewed after the first week of vacation for next
summer, which is the May 25th, 2006, to June 2nd, 2006, vacation
break, either through conciliation or upon petition for further
hearing.
By the Court,
~chael D. Rentschler, Esquire
28 North 32nd Street
Camp Hill, PA 17011
For the Plaintiff
~rbara Sumple-Sullivan, Esquire
549 Bridge Street
New Cumberland, PA 17070
For the Defendant
:mae
\
'-v.
Barbara Sumple-Sullivan, Esquire
Supreme Court #32317
549 Bridge Street
New Cumberland, PAl 7070
(717) 774-1445
JAMES E ALLEN, III,
Respondent
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA
v.
CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
KRISTI C. NIEBEL,
Petitioner
: NO. 04-4167
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF CUSTODY ORDER
I. Petitioner is Defendant, Kristi C. Niebel, an adult individual residing at 29 N. 23rd Street,
Camp HilI, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17011.
2. Respondent is Plaintiff, James E. Allen, III, an adult individual residing at 1409 North Zang
Boulevard, #634, Da\1as Texas 75203.
3. Petitioner seeks to amend the current Custody Order regarding the fo\1owing child:
NAME
ADDRESS
DOB
Makoa J. Allen
29 N. 23rd Street
Camp Hill, PA
September 2, 2002
The child is currently in the primary custody of Petitioner who resides at 29 N. 23rd Street,
Camp Hi\1, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17011.
During the last five years, the child has resided with the following persons and at the following
addresses:
PERSONS
ADDRESSES
DATES
Petitioner and child
1970 Hana Lima Street
Lihue, Hawaii
9/2/2002-6/2003
Petitioner, child and
Petitioner's parents,
Yolanda and Doug Niebel
2110 Mayfred Lane
Camp Hill, P A
6/2003-2/1/2004
Petitioner and child
29 N. 23rd Street
Camp Hill, PA
2/1/2004-Present
(petitioner's Mother resided temporarily with her due to her job.)
The Mother of the child is Petitioner, Kristi Niebel, who is currently residing 29 N. 23rd Street,
Camp Hill, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. She is single.
The Father of the child is Respondent, James E. Allen, III, who is currently residing at 1409
North Zang Boulevard, #634, Dallas, Texas 75203. He is married.
4. The relationship of the Petitioner to the child is that of Mother. The Petitioner currently
resides with the child.
5. The relationship of the Respondent to the child is that of Father. The Respondent
2
currently resides with his wife, Leslie Allen and his infant son.
6. Petitioner and Respondent had previously participated in a custody proceeding in this Court.
A copy of the Custody Order dated May 2, 2005, is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
incorporated herein by reference.
7. Petitioner has no information of a custody proceeding concerning the child pending in a Court
of this Commonwealth.
8. Petitioner does not know of a person not a party to the proceedings who has physical custody
of the child or claims to have custody or visitation rights with respect to the child.
9. The best interest and permanent welfare of the child will be served by granting the relief
requested because Respondent has failed to follow the current custody order. The Order was
entered by the parties' agreement to comport with the recommendations of Arnold T.
Shienvold, Ph.D to create a schedule which would allow for the establishment of some
bonding between the child and his Father. Father and child had very limited contact.
Pursuant to the last Order, the child was to have short visits with Respondent in an
environment where the child feels safe and comfortable before he was to be taken to Father's
environment. These short visits required Respondent to come to Pennsylvania and were to
help the Respondent and child form a relationship with each other. Respondent has failed to
visit the child for the periods ofJune 18, 2005 through June 25,2005 and August 12, 200S
through August 17, 2005 as set forth in the current custody order. No bonding in a familiar
3
location has occurred. While the next period of visitation is anticipated to occur in Texas, the
child is not ready for such a visit in light of Father's prior failures under the Order.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the visitation scheduled further be
modified.
Respectfulktted,
. 0
Dated: August Z~05
(
Barbara Sumple-Sullivan, Esquire
Attorney for Petitioner
549 Bridge Street
New Cumberland, P A 17070-1931
(717) 774-1445
Supreme Court I.D No. 32317
4
v
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION. - LAW
NO. 04-4167 CIVIL TERM .
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
KRIESTIE NIEBEL,
Defendant
IN CUSTODY
IN RE:
AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, upon
consideration of Plaintiff's Complaint for Custody in the
above-captioned matter with respect to the parties' child,
Makoa J. Allen (date of birth September 2, 2002), and pursuant to
an agreement of the parties in open court and dictated by their
respective counsel, Michael D. Rentschler, Esquire, and Barbara
Sumple-Sullivan, Esquire, it is ordered and directed as follows:
The parties shall share legal custody of their
minor child, Makoa J. Allen. Primary physical.custody of the
minor child shall be with the Mother. Father shall have periods
of visitation and partial custody with the child as follows:
A. During the month of June, from June 18th,
2005, to June 25th, 2005, when Father shall travel to
Pennsylvania to be with the minor child. During this period
Father shall be given expanded rights of unsupervised contact and
overnight visits as deemed appropriate by both parties.
B. August 12th, 2005, through August 17th, 2005,
Father shall travel to Pennsylvania and visit with his son here,
again, with the phase in of expanded rights of unsupervised
contact, and overnight visitation shall occur as can be agreed to
by the parties.
C. From October 7th, 2005, through October 9th,
2005, Mother shall take the child to Texas for periods of
visitation with Father. Mother shall actually stay at Father's
residence during that time period to facilitate the transition
between the households.
D. December 26th, 2005, through December 31st,
2005, Mother shall, again, travel to Texas and stay in Father's
household to allow for a transition period for Makoa.
E. From March 11th, 2006, to March 18th, 2006,
Father shall visit with the child here in Pennsylvania, again
with the expansion of overnights, and contact will be by the
agreement of the parties.
F. April 13th, 2006, through April 17th, 2006,
Mother shall again travel to Texas and stay in Father's residence
at that point to allow for transition for the child.
G. From May 25th, 2006, to June 2nd, 2006,
Mother shall initially take the child to Texas, spend some time
with the child there, and return and allow Father a reasonable
number of days during that visit to be alone with the child in
Texas.
It's the intention of the parties to vary the
extent of supervised contact based on how ~he child is
progressing with the attachment, and both parties agree to use
their best faith efforts to work with that to facilitate a good
relationship with the child.
The parties agree that Father shall pay the full
airfare for Makoa on the trips to Texas. The costs of airfare
for each of the parties' visits either to Pennsylvania or to
Texas shall be their own individual costs.
The parties also agree that they shall split the
fee of Dr. Shienvold equally for his assistance in formulating
this agreement.
It is the intention of the parties that this
matter will be reviewed after the first week of vacation for next
summer, which is the May 25th, 2006, to June 2nd, 2006, vacation
break, either through conciliation or upon petition for further
hearing.
By the Court,
Michael D. Rentschler, Esquire
28 North 32nd Street
Camp Hill, PA 17011
For the Plaintiff
~ar.. ara Sumple-Sullivan,
Bridge Street
New Cumberland, PA 17070
For the Defendant
Esquire
:mae
Barbara Sumple-SuJlivan, Esquire
Supreme Court #32317
549 Bridge Street
New Cumberland, PA 17070
(717) 774-1445
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
v.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
KRISTI C. NIEBEL,
Defendant
NO. 04-4167
VERIFICA TION
I, KRISTI C. NIEBEL, hereby certifY that the facts set forth in the foregoing
PETITION TO MODIFY CUSTODY ORDER are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge, information and belief. I understand that any false statements made herein are
subject to penalties of 18 Pa. C.SA g4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
DATED: ~,200
Barbara Swnple-Sullivan, Esquire
Supreme Court #32317
549 Bridge Street
New Cwnberland, PA 17070
(717) 77 4-] 445
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
KRISTI C. NIEBEL,
Defendant
NO. 04-4167
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Barbara Sumple-Sullivan, Esquire, do hereby certifY that on this date, I served a true and
correct copy of the PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF CUSTODY ORDER, in the above-
captioned matter upon the following individual, by United States first-class mail, postage prepaid,
addressed as follows:
Michael D. Rentschler, P.C.
28 N. 32nd Street
Camp Hill, P A 170Jr/
DATE: August 2(, 200S
t/
"'--.
Barbara Sumple-SulJivan, Esquire
549 Bridge Street
New Cumberland, PA 17070-193 I
(717) 774-1445
0 ~
~ ~
tt ....., ~
P C--:)
C::I
8 en ......
li ;r~ X-"
(-.:": rl1r==:
- G'~l FS
..c:. -0 f'.)
I...-J 0'
f- -0
.r
~ ..
.) U'~
, -.'
..
JAMES E. ALLEN, III
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
04-4167 CIVIL ACTION LAW
KRIST! C. NIEBEL
DEFENDANT
IN CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW,
Tuesday, August 30, 2005
, upon consideration of the attached Complaint,
it is hereby directed that parties and their respective counsel appear before Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq.
at 4th Floor, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle on Thursday. September 08, 2005
, the conciliator,
at 10:30 AM
for a Pre-Hearing Custody Conference. At such conference, an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or
if this cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the court, and to enter into a temporary
order. All children age five or older may also be present at the conference. Failure to appear at the conference may
provide grounds for entry of a temporary or permanent order.
The court hereby directs the parties to furnish any and all existinl: Protection from Abuse orders,
Special Relief orders, and Custody orders to the conciliator 48 hours prior to scheduled hearinl!.
FOR THE COURT.
By: Isl
Hubert X Gilrov. Esq.
Custody Conciliator
y
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is requin:d by law to comply with the Americans
with Disabilites Act of 1990. For information about accessible facilities and reasonable accommodations
available to disabled individuals having business before the court, please contact our office. All arrangements
must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business before the court. You must attend the scheduled
conference or hearing.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR ATTORNEY AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HA VE AN ATTORNEY OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET
FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Cumberland County Bar Association
32 South Bedford Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 170]3
Telephone (717) 249-3166
-~~;#~ ~~ Y.J'~$
~~~ ~~,z;A>W"
~':><> [J-('~iv-? ~4~ 5O-w.g
"'\lI0i.,I:"C.i...l
\;/"'\J .7i 1\,"'\1 'I! < .~'''''
"'.'''''' """"n'"
liNn,.,">.:"" J
^-i.. '1.,
3'1 :S [lid 08 5fW sonz
ABV1Vi()HJCca ~~Hl :10
:JJij~o-G:3 1:1
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURr OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAN[) COUNTPENNSYLVANIA
V
KRIESTIE NIEBEL,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION. LAW
CIVIL ACTION INO. 04-4167 Civil Tenn
IN CUSTODY
MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF
AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2005, comes Michael D. Rentschler,
Esquire, attorney for Plaintiff herein, who files the within Motion by respectfully
averring as follows:
1. The undersigned counsel represents Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter. The
case is scheduled for a conciliation conference wittl Hubert Gilroy, Esquire, on
October 14, 2005. The conciliation conference results from a Motion to Modify
Custody filed by Defendant's counsel, Barbara Sumple-Sullivan, Esquire.
Procedurally, the case had progressed through an initial conciliation and then listed
for trial. On the date of the trial, Plaintiff and Defendant settled the case and a
custody Order was entered by Judge Oler. The Miotion to Modify was filed by
Defendant's counsel to modify that Order.
2. The child is Makoa J. Allen who was born on September 2, 2002, in Kuwai,
Hawaii. Plaintiff is the natural Father of the child ,and Defendant is the natural
Mother of the Child. The Child was born out of wedlock and the parties have never
been married to each other. Father lives in Dallas, Texas. Mother lives in Camp
Hill, Pennsylvania. Mother has majority physical custody and joint legal custody of
the child.
3. The undersigned counsel provided the Plaintiff with advance notice of the hearing
and also that an additional retainer would need to be p:~id as well as the remaining
balance owed for previous work, Plaintiff informed tine undersigned counsel via
email on October 5, 2005, which was opened on October 6, that he had no money
to pay any of the fees. Since the Plaintiff is not able to pay the undersigned counsel
to represent him, it is requested that the undersigned counsel be permitted to
withdraw from this case and be excused from participating in the conciliation
conference. A true and correct, although redacted, copy of the email from Plaintiff
to the undersigned counsel is incorporated herein, madle a part hereof and attached
as Exhibit "A",
4. The undersigned counsel has spoken with Conci'liator Gilroy's office and has
informed him of the fact that he was going to withdraw. The Plaintiff may participate
in the conciliation by telephone and the Plaintiff's telephone number has been given
to the conciliator. Consequently, Plaintiff will be able to participate in the
conciliation hearing, although without counsel.
5. On October 6, 2005, the undersigned counsel spl)ke with Defendant's counsel
and Defendant's counsel does not object to this Motion to withdraw.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that this Honorable Court grant the within
Motion and permit the undersigned counsel to withdraw and to excuse him from the
Conciliation hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~
Michael D. Rentschler, Esquire
28 North 32 nd Street
Camp Hill, PA 17011
Attorney for Plaintiff
Supreme Court 10 45836
(717) 975-91129
H :,~L' (", ~
RIl: custody conciliation healing
Date -';0/512005626'59 PM Eastern Standard TimE'
~~m:t'
18.
.::iE->r,'! from the mtcrnet
D~,~.:!f ;..4ihc,~,
1 din $ony to !ntofnl you that f dD not have any money!
_" I appreciate all you've done to this point My plan
is to accept your O1Olio;'1 of removal, participate in the hearing
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Michael D. Rentschler, Esquire, do hereby certifY that, on the date stated below, I
served a copy of the foregoing Document upon the following by first class mail, postage
prepaid and addressed to:
James E. Allen, III
1409 North Zang Blvd, # 634
Dallas, TX 75203
Barbara Sumple-SuIlivan, Esquire
549 Bridge Street
New Cumberland, P A 17070-1931
Hebert Gilroy, Esquire
4 N. Hanover Street
Carlisle, P A 17013
Date: /#/)~:5-
/ /
~~~
-Michael D. Ren er, Esquire
28 N. 32"d Street
Camp HiiII, PA 1701l
(717) 975-9129
Supreme Court ID # 45836
(")
c
.-:>
=
c:;)
cJ"'
co
C>
-<
.
-.
c
r;;;.
::2
o
-n
-\
:t::n
role
-a~
:n.~t'
:~i~~
:;
:.<:
"'"
::r:;
'-?
s;-
cr:J
V
KRIESTIE NIEBEL,
Defendant
o
RECEIVED OCT 07 200y
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTPENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-4167 Civil Te""
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
IN CUSTODY
ORDER
AND NOW, this
q {-l
day of
OL.r
, 2005,
upon consideration of Michael D. Rentschler, Esquire's Motion to Withdraw as
Counsel for Plaintiff, and noting the concurrence with that Motion on behalf of
Plaintiff James E. Allen, III and Defendant's counsel, Barbara Sumple-Sullivan, and
it appearing that accommodations are made to Plaintiff to participate at the
conciliation conference via telephone, said Motion is hereby GRANTED. Michael D.
Rentschler, Esquire may withdraw from this case and he is excused from attending
the conciliation conference scheduled on October 14,2005 at 8:30 am.
Honorable Wesley Oler, Judge
Distribution:
~rbara Sumple-Sullivan, Esquire
~rt Gilroy, Esquire
~es E. Allen, III
~ael D. Rentschler, Esquire
Court Administrator's Office
~
sP
\t;\~
c<; .s'S\
,-'
< 0\\\\0
\0\':'. 'l' ,"
-) \ . :J
~) . ....
CIJ
r,
.~,-J
f
~
RECEIVU} r- "~' ~~~') ~
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v
: NO. 04-4167
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
KRISTI C. NIEBEL,
Defendant
IN CUSTODY
COURT ORDER
AND NOW, this \ 1 tL day of October, 2005, upon consideration of the attached
Custody Conciliation Report, it is ordered and directed as follows:
1. Father's periods of temporary physical custody with the minor child in this case as
set forth in the May 2, 2005 Order shall be suspended pending Father's further
petition to this Court to have the case again scheduled for a conference with the
Custody Conciliator.
BY THE COURT,
?L
., Judge
Cc: ~ichael D. Rentschler, Esquire ~
v&rbara Sumple-Sullivan, Esquire
~r. James E. Allen, III
f
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA
v
: NO. 04-4167
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
KRISTI C. NIEBEL,
Defendant
IN CUSTODY
Prior Judge: The Honorable J. Wesley Oler, Jr.
CONCILIATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH TIIE CUMBERLAND COUNTY CIVIL RULE OF
PROCEDURE 1915.3-8(b), the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following
report:
1. The pertinent information pertaining to the child who is the subject of this litigation
is as follows:
Makoa J. Allen, born September 2, 2002
2. A Conciliation Conference was held on October 14, 2005, with the following
individuals in attendance:
The Mother, Kristi C. Niebel, with her counsel, Barbara Sumple-Sullivan,
Esquire
The Father, James E. Allen, III, did not appear. Legal counsel for the Father
had contacted the Conciliator's office to indicate that he would be attending
the Conciliation Conference and that Father would attend "via telephone".
Neither Father nor anyone else ever contacted the Conciliator again. Mother
had no information with respect to Father wanting to attend via telephone,
nor did Mother's counsel. There was no contact attempted by Father on the
day of the Conciliation with the Conciliator or otherwise.
f
3. This case has a history where Father had not seen the child for a long period of time.
Father initiated an action earlier in 2005 to start having custody with his minor child.
Father resides in Texas. The parties worked out an agreement before the Court in
May of 2005 that specified Father would have certain time with the minor child in
June, July, August and October. In fact, the October visitation included Mother
taking the child down to Texas to visit the Father. The reality of the situation is that
the Father has not fulfilled the terms of the Order and has not seen the child since
April. Understandably, with those circumstances existing in the case, the Mother did
not take the child to Texas for the scheduled October 7th visit. More importantly, the
Father did not contact Mother to pay for a plane ticket for the child for that trip.
4. Based upon the above, the Conciliator recommends an Order in the fonn as
attached.
Date: ( (J -- L ~--- () ~
'I
RECEIVED \1.f,;;J :; L; </
,
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v
NO. 04-4167
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
KRISTI C. NIEBEL,
Defendant
IN CUSTODY
COURT ORDER
AND NOW, this ls th day of March, 2006, upon consideration of the attached
Custody Conciliation Report, it is ordered and directed as follows:
1. A hearing is scheduled in Courtroom No.1 of the Cumberland County Courthouse on
the :? ~ day of m~?; , 2006, at /: 70 , ~. m. At
this hearing the Father, ames E. Allen, III, shall be the movmg party and shall
proceed initially with testimony. Counsel for the parties, or the parties themselves if
they are unrepresented, shall file with the Court and the opposing pati)o a
Memorandum setting forth the history of custody in this case, the issues currently
before the Court, a list of witnesses who will be called to testify on behalf of each party,
and a summary of anticipated testimony of each witness. This Memorandum shall be
filed at least five days prior to the mentioned hearing date.
2. Pending said hearing no Order will be entered granting Father specific periods of
temporary custody with the minor child. However, in the event Father comes from
Texas to central Pennsylvania prior to the hearing or at the time of the hearing,
Mother shall make arrangements to have Father enjoy periods of temporary custody
with the minor child at said times in Penns)'lvania,
BY THE COURT,
Cc; ~rbara Sumple-SuIlivan, Esquire
J'dr, James E. Allen, III -{
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA
v
: NO. 04-4167
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
KRISTI C. NIEBEL,
Defendant
IN CUSTODY
Prior Judge: The Honorable J. Wesley OIer, Jr.,
CONCILIATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY CIVIL RULE OF
PROCEDURE 1915.3-8(b), the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following
report:
1. The pertinent infonnation pertaining to the child who is the subject of this litigation
is as follows:
Makoa J. Allen, born Septemher 2,2002
2. A Conciliation Conference was held on February 28, 2006 via telephone conference
between the Father, James E. Allen, III, who is unrepresented by counsel, and the
Mother, Kristi C. Niebel, and her counsel, Barbara Sumple-SuIlivan, Esquire.
3. There is an October 19, 2005 Order which suspended Father's periods of temporary
custody. That Order was entered as a result of Father failing to appear at a prior
Conciliation Conference.
4. This case has a history where the Father has not seen the child for a long period of
time. He initiated an action in early 2005 to start having custody. Father resides in
Texas. The parties worked out an agreement before the Court in May of 2005 that
specifies that the Father would have certain time with the minor child. Mother
suggests Father did not fulftIl the tenns of that agreement. A Conciliation
Conference was scheduled last October and Father did not appear, which resulted in
the Order tenninating Father's contact with the child provided under the prior
agreed-upon Order.
. .
S. Father now is asserting that he wants to have time with the minor child and that he is
willing to come to Pennsylvania to do so. He also wants the Court to order the
Mother to take the child to Texas. Mother is unwilling to agree at this time primarily
because she believes Father has not fulfilled the spirit of the prior agreement reached
between the parties and Father has not been consistent in attempting to have contact
with his child.
6. The parties are unable to reach an agreement and a hearing is required. The
Conciliator recommends an Order in the fonn as attached.
Date: March;< , 2006
< ~
.'
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA
v.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
KRISTI C. NEIBEL,
Defendant
NO. 04-4167 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2006, upon consideration of the custody
conciliation report dated February 16, 2005, with respect to the parties' child,
Makoa J. Allen, and following a hearing held on May 8, 2006, it is ordered and
directed as follows:
1. Legal custody of the child shall be in Defendant, the
mother;
2. Primary physical custody of the child shall be III
Defendant, the mother;
3. Visitation or partial physical custody of the child shall
be in Plaintiff, the father, at the following times and places:
a. Visitation: At the residence of Defendant,
the mother, on July 2, 2006, July 3, 2006, July 4,
2006, September 2, 2006, September 3, 2006,
November 24, 2006, and November 25, 2006, for
a period of four hours each day, the hours to be
mutually agreed upon by the parties and, in the
absence of such agreement, to be determined by
Defendant, the mother;
b. Partial Custody: At the residence of
Plaintiff, the father, from December 27, 2006, at
6:00 p.m. until December 30, 2006, at 9:00 a.m.;
provided, that Defendant, the mother, shall have
'IIil\!\;I !\1,\,SNN3d
Al,NnW n~N1H3m~ro
12:\ Wd 6-AVW900Z
AW10NOHlOlld 3Hi ::10
3Ol.:lD--031l:l
, .
.
the right to stay with the child during this period
of Plaintiffs partial custody; provided, further,
that the expense of transportation for the child for
this period of partial custody shall be borne by
Plaintiff, the father;
4. In the event that either party fails to comply with, or to
exercise, his or her custodial rights hereunder, the court will
entertain a petition for modification of this order on that
ground;
5. Defendant, the mother, shall permit reasonable
telephone contact between Plaintiff, the father, and the child, at
Plaintiffs expense;
6. A hearing to establish a custody schedule for the 2007
year will be held on Thursday, January 4,2007, at 9:30 a.m., in
Courtroom No.1, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle,
Pennsylvania; Plaintiff, the father, may participate by
telephone if he wishes in this hearing because of his out-of-
state residence in Texas;
7. Nothing herein is intended to preclude the parties from
deviating from the custodial terms of this order by mutual
agreement.
'-"'mes E. Allen, III
4332 Riverside Drive
Dallas, TX 75241
Defendant, Pro Se
\
^
. ..
.
~bara Sumple Sullivan, Esq.
549 Bridge Street
New Cumberland, P A 17070
Attorney for Defendant
fl".-'~
JAMES E. ALLEN, III,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
KRISTI C. NEIBEL,
Defendant
NO. 04-4167 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2007, upon
consideration of the issue of custody with respect to the parties'
child, Makoa J. Allen, and pursuant to an agreement of the parties
reached in open court, it is ordered and directed as follows:
1. All the terms of the prior order dated May 9,
2006, are confirmed, except as specifically modified by this order.
2. Father shall have partial physical custody of the
minor child as follows:
a. March 2007: Father shall travel to
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, during his school spring break to visit
the child beginning March 10, 2007, through March 13, 2007.
b. July 2007: Mother shall travel to Dallas,
Texas, to allow the child to visit from June 30, 2007, through July
3, 2007.
c. November 2007: Mother shall travel to Texas
with the child to visit father beginning Thanksgiving Day, November
22, 2007, through November 25, 2007.
d. December 2007: Father shall travel to
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, to visit the child beginning December 26,
2007, through December 29, 2007.
e. Such other times as the parties can mutually
agree, especially to accommodate trips of father to Pennsylvania.
In regards to periods of partial custody of
father, the parties agree that the periods of overnight shall be
extended for the child as the child can tolerate.
VINV/\lASNN3d
.1 i ~ !"I""',,-\ "\J'T :-W-;:A'n'"
^-.U\l /\,.}',,-' .'"" .:""'.i~JY ~r v
8 f :Z Wd g- NVr LOOZ
AtN10NGHlOcd 3Hl :10
38!:!::lo-cB1l:I
~ , , .
By the Court,
~mes E. Allen, III, Plaintiff<
(Telephonically)
4332 Riverside Drive
Dallax, TX 75241
cP<-=
01
vr~rbara Sumple Sullivan, Esquire
549 Bridge Street
New Cumberland, PA 17070
For the Defendant
pcb