HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-6565F40
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
Plaintiff(s) & Address(es)
Erie Insurance Group a/s/o Jeffrey
Walker
100 Erie Insurance Place
Erie, PA 16530-1104
VS.
Defendant(s) & Address(es)
Crane Plumbing
41 Cairns Road
Mansfield, Ohio 44904,
and John Does (1-100)
Case No. //- D 5- J 5- Civil Term
Civil Action Jury Trial Demanded
..,
C
-'q3
rnw
• ZI'+'1
W 1-
• ?D
Z
PRAECIPE FOR WRIT OF SUMMONS
TO THE PROTHONOTARY/CLERK OF SAID COURT:
Issue summons in the above case
Writ of Summons shall be issued and forwarded
Date : August 19, 2011
Print Name: Christopher A. Gomez/
Address: 501 Office Center Dr., Ste. 300
Fort Washington, PA 19034
Telephone #: 215-283-1177
Supreme Court ID Number: 82899
• • • • •
WRIT OF SUMMONS
TO: Crane Plumbing, 41 Cairns Road, Mansfield, Ohio 44904
HA OMMENCED AN
YOU''ARI? NOTIFIED THAT THE ABOVE-NAMED PLA4Prothono;taryty/C
ACTION, AGAINST YOU.
rk, Civi
l Division
Dater
by
Deputy
Z9
ss
CC
N
Ev
z
to
0
-n
•-i
rnn?
-'0m
CQO
• Q
o--n
?M
D
0
X 92 oaW R6
C? l'fs?f
91??6 3532
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT A. STUTMAN, P.C.
By: Christine G. Benedum
Attorney I.D. No.: 204940
500 Office Center Drive, Suite 301
Fort Washington, PA 19034
Phone: 215-283-1177
Fax: 215-283-1188
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP A/S/O
JEFFREY WALKER
Plaintiff,
VS.
CRANE PLUMBING
and JOHN DOES (1-100),
Defendants.
No. 11-6565
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that effective immediately the mailing address for counsel for
Plaintiff, Erie Insurance Group a/s/o Jeffrey Walker, in this matter is as follows:
Law Offices of Robert A. Stutman, P.C.
500 Office Center Drive
Suite 301
Fort Washington, PA 19034
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT A. STUTMAN, P.C.
Dated: January 18, 2012 By ?iyt
Christine Grecus Benedum
Attorney I.D. No. 204940
500 Office Center Drive, Suite 301
Fort Washington, PA 19034
Tel: (215) 283-1177
Fax: 215) 283-1188
Email: benedumcLa)stutmanlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
! PROTHONdTAR
Attorney for Plaintiff
2012 JAN 20 AM 11: 16
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CIVIL ACTION
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, CHRISTINE GRECUS BENEDUM, HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 18th day of
January, 2012, a true and correct copy of Plaintiff's Notice of Change of Address was served by
first-class mail on the following:
Crane Plumbing
41 Cairns Road
Mansfield, Ohio 44904
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT A. STUTMAN, P.C.
By P
Christine Grecus Benedum
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP
a/s/o JEFFREY WALKER and
ANNE WALKER, h/w
100 Erie Insurance Place
Erie, PA 16530-1104
V.
Plaintiff,
COMPLAINT
CASE NO.; 11-6565 -CIVIL TERM
CRANE PLUMBING, LLC
41 Cairns Road
Mansfield, OH 44904
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Erie Insurance Group, as subrogee of Jeffrey Walker and Arne Walker, h/w, by
and through the undersigned counsel, hereby brings this civil action against Defendant, Crane
Plumbing, LLC, and upon information and belief, complains against Defendant as follows:
THE PARTIES
1. Plaintiff, Erie Insurance Group (hereinafter "Erie"), is a corporation duly
organized and existing under the laws of the state of Pennsylvania with its principal place of
business located at 100 Erie Place, Erie Pennsylvania 16530, and at all times relevant hereto was
authorized to issue insurance policies in the State of Pennsylvania.
2. At all times relevant hereto, Erie's insureds, Jeffrey Walker and Anne Walker,
owned and occupied a residential home located at 5149 South Deerfield Avenue,
Mechanicsburg, PA 17050-3496 (hereinafter, the "Property").
2
3. Prior to August 28, 2009, Erie issued a policy of insurance to Jeffrey Walker and
Anne Walker; said policy covering the Property, including its structure and contents, and
insuring against other losses was, in effect on August 28, 2009.
4. Defendant Crane Plumbing, LLC (hereinafter "Crane) is a limited liability
company duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and holding itself
out as having a principal place of business located at 41 Cairns Road, Mansfield, OH 44904.
5. Upon information and belief, at all times relevant hereto the Defendant was
engaged in the business of, inter alia, designing, manufacturing, marketing, selling and/or
distributing products, including water supply lines for sinks.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
6. Jurisdiction properly lies in this Court pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 5301 because
Defendant regularly conducts business within this State.
7. Venue in this action properly lies in Cumberland County pursuant to Pa. R.C. P.
No. 2179 (a) as Defendant regularly conducts business in Cumberland County, PA and the
transaction or occurrence giving rise to the cause of action arose in Cumberland County, PA.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
8. At all times relevant hereto, Erie's insureds, Jeffrey Walker and Anne Walker,
owned and occupied the Property.
9. Prior to August 28, 2009, the Defendant designed, manufactured, marketed, sold,
and/or distributed the water supply line which was connected to the powder room sink on the
first floor of the Property (hereinafter "the water supply line").
3
10. On or about August 28, 2009, a water leak occurred within the Property and
originated at the water supply line.
11. The water leak was caused by the failure of the water supply line.
12. The liner and the metal braiding of the water supply line failed and resulted in the
subject water leak.
13. The water supply line and/or its component parts, including the liner and metal
braiding, were designed, manufactured, marketed, sold, and/or distributed by the Defendant.
14. The water leak resulted in significant damage to the Property and personal
property of Erie's insureds, Jeffrey Walker and Anne Walker.
15. As a result of the water loss and resultant damage, Erie has made payments to its
insureds in an amount not in excess of $50,000.00 in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the insurance policy.
16. As a result of the payments made to its insureds for the subject water loss, Erie is
legally, equitably and contractually subrogated to the rights of its insureds to the extent of its
payments.
COUNT I - NEGLIGENCE
ERIE v. DEFENDANT
17. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all of the allegations contained in the preceding
paragraphs as though fully set forth herein at length.
18. The Defendant is a corporations or business entity that designs, assembles,
manufactures, markets, distributes, sells and places into the stream of commerce products
throughout the United States, including the water supply line that caused the water loss in this
case.
4
19. The Defendant designed, manufactured, assembled, tested, distributed, marketed,
sold and placed into the stream of commerce the water supply line that caused the water leak at
the Property.
20. On or about August 28, 2009, the water supply line failed, causing a water leak
and damaging real and personal property and other damages as previously pled.
21. The Defendant owed a duty to consumers, including Erie's insureds, to exercise
reasonable care in the design and manufacture of water supply lines.
22. The subject water leak and resulting damages sustained by Plaintiffs insureds
were caused by the negligence, breach of duty of care, carelessness, negligent acts and/or
omissions of the Defendant, its agents, servants, and/or employees, acting within the course and
scope of their employment and agency, in:
a) designing, manufacturing, selling, marketing, distributing, supplying,
and/or assembling the water supply line in a defective and unreasonably
dangerous condition that was unsafe for its intended use;
b) designing, manufacturing, selling, distributing, supplying, and/or
assembling the water supply line with insufficient liner and metal
braiding, thereby causing a defective and unreasonably dangerous
condition that was unsafe for its intended use;
C) failing to properly and adequately design, manufacture, assemble, inspect
and/or test the sufficiency of the water supply line which connected the
sink to the water source;
d) failing to properly and adequately design, manufacture, assemble, inspect
and/or test the adequacy of the strength and/or thickness of the lining and
the braiding of the water supply line connected to the sink;
e) failing to properly and adequately design, manufacture, and/or assemble
the water supply line in conformity with industry standards;
f) failing to adequately appreciate the risks of the defect of the water supply
line;
g) failing to adequately warn of the risks of the defect of the water supply
line;
5
h) failing to place into the stream of commerce a water supply line that is
merchantable and fit for its intended purpose; and
i) failing to use due care under the circumstances.
23. As a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid negligence, breach of duty of
care, carelessness, negligent acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the subject water leak
occurred and Plaintiff, Erie, paid its insureds a sum not in excess of $50,000.00, representing the
fair and reasonable value of the damage to the Property and personal property of its insureds.
24. By virtue of the aforesaid payment and pursuant to the terms of the aforesaid
insurance policy, Erie is legally, equitably and contractually subrogated to the rights of its
insured to the extent of such payments.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Erie, demands judgment in its favor and against Defendant in
an amount not in excess of $50,000.00 and in the alternative on Count I of the Complaint for
compensatory damages, together with interest, costs of suit, counsel fees, and such other and
further relief as this Honorable Court deems just and proper under the circumstances.
COUNT II - FAILURE TO WARN
ERIE v. DEFENDANT
25. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all of the allegations contained in the preceding
paragraphs as though fully set forth herein at length.
26. The Defendant owed a duty to consumers, including Erie's insureds, to exercise
reasonable care in issuing warnings regarding the defective and dangerous nature of its water
supply line.
27. The Defendant knew or reasonably should have known that their water supply
line was defective and dangerous and/or was likely to be dangerous when used in a reasonably
foreseeable manner.
6
28. The Defendant knew or reasonably should have known that Erie and its insureds
would not realize that the water supply line was defective and posed a danger of causing
substantial property damage.
29. The Defendant failed to adequately warn of the danger or instruct Erie or its
insureds on the safe use of its product.
30. A reasonable designer, manufacturer, distributor, assembler, or seller under the
same or similar circumstances would have warned of the danger and instructed on the safe use of
the product, including but not limited to, providing detailed installation instructions together with
warnings to frequently inspect the water supply line.
31. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's failure to warn the plaintiff or its
insureds regarding the defective and dangerous nature of its water supply line, the subject water
leak occurred and Plaintiff, Erie, paid its insureds a sum not in excess of $50,000.00,
representing the fair and reasonable value of the damage to the Property and personal property of
its insureds.
32. By virtue of the aforesaid payment and pursuant to the terms of the aforesaid
insurance policy, Erie is legally, equitably and contractually subrogated to the rights of its
insureds to the extent of such payments.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Erie, demands judgment in its favor and against Defendant in
an amount not in excess of $50,000.00 and in the alternative on Count II of the Complaint for
compensatory damages, together with interest, costs of suit, counsel fees, and such other and
further relief as this Honorable Court deems just and proper under the circumstances.
7
COUNT III - STRICT PRODUCTS LIABILITY
ERIE v. DEFENDANT
33. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all of the allegations contained in the preceding
paragraphs as though they were fully set forth herein at length.
34. The cause of the water leak was due to a failure of the water supply line and/or its
component parts, which were defectively designed, manufactured, assembled, tested, marketed,
distributed, sold and placed into the stream of commerce by the Defendant.
35. As a direct and proximate result of the product defect or defects referenced above,
the subject water leak occurred, and Plaintiff, Erie, paid its insureds a sum not in excess of
$50,000.00, representing the fair and reasonable value of the damage to the Property and
personal property of its insureds.
36. By virtue of the aforesaid payment and pursuant to the terms of the aforesaid
insurance policy, Erie is legally, equitably and contractually subrogated to the rights of its
insureds to the extent of such payments.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Erie, demands judgment in its favor and against Defendant in
an amount not in excess of $50,000.00 and in the alternative on Count III of the Complaint for
compensatory damages, together with interest, costs of suit, counsel fees, and such other and
further relief as this Honorable Court deems just and proper under the circumstances.
COUNT IV-BREACH OF WARRANTY
ERIE v. DEFENDANT
37. Plaintiff incorporates, by reference, the preceding paragraphs as though they were
fully set forth herein at length.
38. In designing, manufacturing, marketing, selling, distributing, supplying, and/or
assembling the subject water supply line, the Defendant made certain express and implied
8
warranties that the water supply line was of good and merchantable quality and was reasonably
safe and fit for its intended use.
39. The Defendant breached the express and implied warranties, or other
representations that accompanied the sale and distribution of water supply line into the stream of
commerce.
40. As a direct, proximate and consequential result of the breach or breaches, the
subject water leak occurred, and Plaintiff, Erie, paid its insureds a sum not in excess of
$50,000.00, representing the fair and reasonable value of the damage to the Property and
personal property of its insureds.
41. By virtue of the aforesaid payment and pursuant to the terms of the aforesaid
insurance policy, Erie is legally, equitably, and contractually subrogated to the rights of its
insureds to the extent of such payments.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Erie, demands judgment in its favor and against Defendant in
an amount not in excess of $50,000.00 and in the alternative on Count IV of the Complaint for
compensatory damages, together with interest, costs of suit, counsel fees, and such other and
further relief as this Honorable Court deems just and proper under the circumstances.
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT A.
STUTMAN, P.C.
By: f e G. Ebert, Esquire
500 Office Center Drive, Suite 301
Fort Washington, PA 19034
(215) 283-1177 - Fax: (215) 283-1188
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Erie Insurance Group, a/s/o Jeffrey Walker
9
VERIFICATION
I, Stefanie G. Ebert, Esquire attorney for Plaintiff, hereby state that I am familiar with the
facts of this case and am authorized to file this Verification on their behalf.
I verify that I prepared the foregoing Complaint based on information furnished to me by
the Plaintiff. I further verify that the facts set forth in the foregoing Complaint are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
I understand that false statements made herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.
C.S. § 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date: %? l oZ. STE FIE G. EBERT, ESQUIRE
FILED-OFFiC._
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS mar=F ?'PQTHON rAP'?
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION 2012 JU-0 PM s 5?
CUMBERLAND CO NTY
PENNSYLVANi
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP
a/s/o JEFFREY WALKER and
ANNE WALKER, h/w
Plaintiff,
V.
CRANE PLUMBING, LLC
Defendant.
COMPLAINT
CASE NO.; 11-6565 - CIVIL TERM
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
PRAECIPE TO ATTACH
OFFICE OF THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly attach the enclosed duly executed Verifications of the Plaintiff to Plaintiff s
Complaint in the above-captioned matter.
Dated: July 24, 2012
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT A.
STUTMAN, P.C.
By: Stefanie Ctffiert, Esquire
500 Office Center Drive, Suite 301
Fort Washington, PA 19034
(215) 283-1177 - Fax: (215) 283-1188
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Erie Insurance Group, a/s/o Jeffrey W
VERIFICATION
I, Francis Guillemette, having read the attached Complaint, verify the said Complaint is
based on information furnished to counsel, which information has been gathered by counsel in
the course of this lawsuit. The language of the document is that of counsel and not of signer.
Signer verifies that he has read the Complaint and that it is true and correct to the best of signer's
knowledge, information and belief.
I understand that false statements made herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.
C.S. § 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Dated: ;2- :__,
` AME
1-,F 0 TA i 4 Y RESPONSE TO THE ENCLOSED NEW MATTER WIOTHIN TW NRTIY (20)
DAYS FROM SERVICE HEREOF OR A JUDGMENT MAY BE
Z 1; ! ENTERED AGAINST YOU.
UMBERLAND COU14TY /s/ Mark D. Villanueva
PENNSYLVANIA By: Mark D. Villanueva
Defendant American Standard Brands ("American Standard"), improperly
pled as "Crane Plumbing, LLC"
TO THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED TO
FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE ENCLOSED NEW MATTER
WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS FROM SERVICE HEREOF OR A
JUDGMENT MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST YOU.
/s/ Mark D. Villanueva
By: Mark D. Villanueva
Defendant American Standard Brands ("American Standard"), improperly
pled as "Crane Plumbing, LLC"
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
-----------t---------------------------------------------------x
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP
a/s/o JEFFREY WALKER and ANNE WALKER, h/w
100 Erie Insurance Place
Erie, PA 16530-1104,
-agalnst-
CRANE PLUMBING, LLC
41 Cairns Road
Mansfield, OH 44904,
Plaintiff.
Plaintiff,
Defendant/Third Party
---------------------------------------------------------------x
---------------------------------------------------------------
AS AMERICA, INC. d/b/a AMERICAN
STANDARD BRANDS
1 Centennial Avenue
Piscataway, NJ 08855,
Plaintiff,
Defendant/Third Party
-against-
INTERNATIONAL IMPORTS AND
CASE NO.: 11-6565 -CIVIL TERM
ANSWER AND NEW MATTER OF
DEFENDANT/THIRD PARTY
PLAINTIFF AMERICAN
STANDARD BRANDS
ME1 1378621'??5v.2
DISTRIBUTION, INC.
5701 Pine, Island Road
Tamarac, Florida 33321,
Third Party Defendant.
----------- ---------------------------------------------------x
NOTICE TO DEFEND
Y'pu have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the
following pages you must take action within twenty (20) days of this third-party complaint and
notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing
with the court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned
that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be entered against
you by the court without further notice for any money claimed in the complaint or for any other
claim or relief requested by the third-party plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other
rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW.
THIS OFFICE CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT HIRING A LAWYER.
IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE A LAWYER THIS OFFICE MAY BE ABLE
TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT AGENCIES THAT MAY OFFER
LEGAL ASSISTANCE TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS AT A REDUCED FEE OR NO FEE.
Cumberland County Bar Association
32 South Bedford Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania
717-249-3166
ME] 13786215v.2
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
----x
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP
a/s/o JEFFREY WALKER and ANNE WALKER, h/w
100 Erie Insurance Place CASE NO.: 11-6565 -CIVIL TERM
Erie, PA 16530-1104,
ANSWER AND NEW MATTER OF
Plaintiff, DEFENDANT/THIRD PARTY
.-against- PLAINTIFF AMERICAN
STANDARD BRANDS
CRANE PLUMBING, LLC
41 Cairns Road
Mansfield, OH 44904,
Plaintiff.
Defendant/Third Party
---------------------------------------------------------------x
---------------------------------------------------------------x
AS AMERICA, INC. d/b/a AMERICAN
STANDARD BRANDS
1 Centennial Avenue
Piscataway, NJ 08855,
Plaintiff,
-against-
Defendant/Third Party
INTERNATIONAL IMPORTS AND
DISTRIBUTION, INC.
5701 Pine Island Road
Tamarac,' Florida 33321,
Third Party Defendant.
---------------------------------------------------------------x
Defendant AS America, Inc. d/b/a American Standard Brands ("American Standard"),
improperly pled as "Crane Plumbing, LLC", by and through its attorneys McCarter & English,
LLP, as and for its Answer to the Complaint of Plaintiff Erie Insurance Group ("Erie") a/s/o
Jeffrey Walker and Anne Walker, states as follows:
ME1 13786215v.2
THE PARTIES
1. After reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 1 of the
Complaint.
2. After reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 2 of the
Complaint.
3. After reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 3 of the
Complaint.
4. Defendant American Standard denies the allegations of Paragraph 4 of the Complaint.
5. After reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 5 of the
Complaint.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
6. Defendant American Standard admits that it conducts business within the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania. The remaining allegations of Paragraph 6 constitute legal conclusions to which
American Standard need not respond. To the extent any portion of the remaining allegations of
Paragraph 6 does not constitute a legal conclusion and requires a response, American Standard
denies the allegations.
7. Defendant American Standard admits only that it conducts business in Cumberland
County, Pennsylvania. After reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without
knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining factual
allegations in Paragraph 7 of the Complaint. The remaining allegations of Paragraph 7 constitute
legal conclusions to which American Standard need not respond. To the extent any portion of
the remaining allegations of Paragraph 7 does not constitute a legal conclusion and requires a
response,! American Standard denies the allegations.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
8. After reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 8 of the
Complaint.
9. After reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 9 of the
Complaint.
ME I 13786215v.2
10. After reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 10 of the
Complaint.
11. After reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 1 l of the
Complaint.
12. Auer reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 12 of the
Complaint.
13. Ater reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 13 of the
Complaint.
14. Auer reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 14 of the
Complaint.
15. Ater reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 15 of the
Complaint.
16. After reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the factual allegations in Paragraph 16 of
the Complaint. The remaining allegations of Paragraph 16 constitute legal conclusions to which
American Standard need not respond. To the extent any portion of the remaining allegations of
Paragraph 16 does not constitute a legal conclusion and requires a response, American Standard
denies the allegations.
COUNT I - NEGLIGENCE
17. Defendant American Standard repeats and incorporates by reference its answers to each
and every allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 16 of the Complaint as though fully set
forth at length herein.
18. Defendant American Standard admits only that it markets and distributes products
throughout the United States. The remaining allegations of Paragraph 18 constitute legal
conclusions to which American Standard need not respond. To the extent any portion of the
remaining allegations of Paragraph 18 does not constitute a legal conclusion and requires a
response,'', American -Standard denies the allegations.
19. Auer reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 19 of the
Complaint.
ME1 1378621'5v.2
20. Auer reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 20 of the
Complaint.
21. The allegations of Paragraph 21 constitute legal conclusions to which American Standard
:need not 'respond. To the extent any portion of Paragraph 21 of the Complaint does not
constitute a legal conclusion and requires a response, American Standard denies the allegations.
22. The allegations of Paragraph 22 and subparts (a) through (i) constitute legal conclusions
to which American Standard need not respond. To the extent any portion of Paragraph 22 and its
subparts Of the Complaint does not constitute a legal conclusion and requires a response,
American Standard denies the allegations.
23. After reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the factual allegations in Paragraph 23 of
the Complaint. The remaining allegations of Paragraph 23 constitute legal conclusions to which
American Standard need not respond. To the extent any portion of the remaining allegations of
Paragraph 23 does riot constitute a legal conclusion and requires a response, American Standard
denies the allegations.
24. The allegations of Paragraph 24 constitute legal conclusions to which American Standard
need not respond. To the extent any portion of Paragraph 24 of the Complaint does not
constitute a legal conclusion and requires a response, American Standard denies the allegations.
WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, American Standard demands judgment on Count I of
the Complaint in its favor and against the Plaintiff, together with other such relief as the Court
may deem appropriate.
COUNT II - FAILURE TO WARN
25. Defendant American Standard repeats and incorporates by reference its answers to each
and every allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 24 of the Complaint as though fully set
forth at length herein.
26. The allegations of Paragraph 26 constitute legal conclusions to which American Standard
need not respond. To the extent any portion of Paragraph 26 of the Complaint does not
constitute a legal conclusion and requires a response, American Standard denies the allegations.
27. Defendant American Standard denies the allegations in Paragraph 27 of the Complaint.
28. Defendant American Standard denies the allegations in Paragraph 28 of the Complaint.
29. Defendant American Standard denies the allegations in Paragraph 29 of the Complaint.
30. Defendant American Standard denies the allegations in Paragraph 30 of the Complaint.
31. Defendant American Standard denies the allegations in Paragraph 31 of the Complaint.
ME1 1378621'5v.2
32. The allegations of Paragraph 32 constitute legal conclusions to which American Standard
need not respond. To the extent any portion of the allegations of Paragraph 32 does not
constitute a legal conclusion and requires a response, American Standard denies the allegations.
WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, American Standard demands judgment on Count II of
the Complaint in its favor and against the Plaintiff, together with other such relief as the Court
may deem appropriate.
COUNT III - STRICT PRODUCTS LIABILITY
33. Defendant American Standard repeats and incorporates by reference its answers to each
and ever}: allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 32 of the Complaint as though fully set
forth at length herein.
34. Defendant American Standard denies the allegations in Paragraph 34 of the Complaint.
35. Defendant American Standard denies the allegations in Paragraph 35 of the Complaint.
36. The allegations of Paragraph 36 constitute legal conclusions to which American Standard
need not respond. To the extent any portion of the allegations of Paragraph 36 does not
constitute a legal conclusion and requires a response, American Standard denies the allegations.
WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, American Standard demands judgment on Count III of
the Complaint in its favor and against the Plaintiff, together with other such relief as the Court
may deem appropriate.
COUNT IV - BREACH OF WARRANTY
37. Defendant American Standard repeats and incorporates by reference its answers to each
and ever} allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 36 of the Complaint as though fully set
forth at length herein.
38. After reasonable investigation, Defendant American Standard is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 38 of the
Complaint.
39. Defendant American Standard denies the allegations in Paragraph 39 of the Complaint.
40. Deefendant American Standard denies the allegations in Paragraph 40 of the Complaint.
41. The allegations of Paragraph 41 constitute legal conclusions to which American Standard
need not respond. To the extent any portion of the allegations of Paragraph 41 does not
constitute a legal conclusion and requires a response, American Standard denies the allegations.
WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, American Standard demands judgment on Count IV
of the Complaint in its favor and against the Plaintiff, together with other such relief as the Court
may deem appropriate.
ME1 13786215v.2
NEW MATTER IN THE FORM OF AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
42. American Standard repeats, repleads and incorporates by reference all foregoing
paragraphs as if fully set forth.
43. The Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
44. Airy injuries and/or damages sustained by Plaintiff, as alleged in the Complaint, were
caused in! whole or in part by the negligence and/or culpable conduct of Plaintiff and/or other
third parties and not as a result of any negligence and/or culpable conduct on the part of
American Standard.
45. Without admitting liability, American Standard alleges that if it bears any responsibility
for the damages complained of, it is absolved from any resulting liability by virtue of the
superseding/intervening actions of others.
46. The damages allegedly sustained by Plaintiff were caused, in whole or in part, by the
negligencje or other culpable conduct of one or more persons or instrumentalities over which
American Standard had no control.
47. The product was subject to abuse, alteration, change, improper installation or operation
by persons not in the employ or control of American Standard, which proximately caused the
injuries complained of by Plaintiff in the Complaint. Such change in condition bars the action as
against American Standard.
48. No acts or omissions of American Standard proximately caused any damages
49. This Defendant never made any implied warranties regarding any of the products referred
to in the Complaint.
50. The incident and injuries complained of were caused by unauthorized, unintended and
improper !use of the product complained of, and as a result of failure to exercise reasonable and
ordinary care, caution and vigilance.
51. American Standard owes no duty to Plaintiff.
52. American Standard breached no duty to Plaintiff.
53. American Standard cannot confirm that it designed, manufactured, distributed and/or sold
the product at issue in this action until such time as it has an opportunity to conduct a product
inspection. American Standard reserves its right to assert that it did not it design, manufacture,
distribute', and/or sell the product at issue in this action.
54. Plaintiff's claims may be barred by the statute of limitations.
55. Plaintiff has failed to mitigate Plaintiff's damages.
ME I 13786215v.2
56. Any and all claims against American Standard are barred due to spoliation and/or
destruction of evidence.
57. American Standard properly disclaimed any and all implied warranties regarding any of
the products referred to in the Complaint.
58. Plaintiff's claims may be barred by its filing in an improper venue.
WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, American Standard demands judgment on the
Plaintiff $ Complaint in its favor and against the Plaintiff, together with other such relief as the
Court may deem appropriate.
NEW MATTER IN THE FORM OF A THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT
Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff American Standard, by and through its attorneys McCarter &
English, LLP, avers as follows:
1. Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff American Standard is a Delaware corporation with
headquarter offices in New Jersey and organized and existing under the laws of New Jersey.
2. Third-Party Defendant International Imports and Distribution, Inc. ("International") is a
foreign corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of Florida.
3. Third-Party Defendant International contracts or contracted to supply goods and services
in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
4. Third-Party Defendant International regularly conducts or conducted business in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or derives substantial revenue from goods used or consumed or
services rendered in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
5. American Standard has been sued by Plaintiff Erie Insurance Group a/s/o Jeffrey Walker
and Anne Walker. A copy of the original Complaint is attached as Exhibit A.
6. Third-Party Defendant International, its agents, servants, and/or employees were engaged
in the bus ' iness of designing, manufacturing, marketing, selling, and/or distributing the supply
line at issue in Plaintiff's Complaint.
7. American Standard has denied liability to the Plaintiff, but asserts that if held liable to
Plaintiff American Standard is entitled to indemnification and/or contribution for International's
negligence contributing to the loss alleged in the Plaintiff's Complaint.
ME 1 1378621',5v.2
WHEREFORE, to the extent Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff is found liable for any
amount of damages to the Plaintiff, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff is entitled to indemnity and
contribution from Third-Party Defendant for any and all such amounts, plus costs and expenses
associated and incurred as a result of defending this claim. -?" ltl??
By: GL?l
Dated: August 21, 2012 Mark D. Villanueva, Esq.
Attorney ID No. 89892
McCarter & English, LLP
BNY Mellon Center, Suite 700
1735 Market St.
Philadelphia, PA 19103
mvi l lanueva@mccarter. com
(215) 979-3800
(215) 979-3899 (fax)
Attorneys for Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff
American Standard Brands
ME1 13786215v.2
VERIFICATION
I, 'Brian Osias, attorney for AS America, Inc. d/b/a American Standard Brands, am duly
authorized to verify that the statements in the foregoing Answer and New Matter are true and
correct to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. The undersigned understands that
the statements made herein are subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 4904 relating
to unswom falsification to authorities.
Dated:
4Z,
ME1 13786215x.2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I Mark D. Villanueva hereby certify that on this 21S` day of August 2012, a true and
correct copy of Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff's Answer, New Matter and Third Party
Complaint was served by email and federal express on the following counsel of record:
Stefanie Ebert
Law Offices of Robert A. Stutman, P.C.
500 Office Center Dr., Suite 301
Fort Washington, PA 19034
7#VV1 &P-,
Mark D. Villanueva
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
------------------------------------------------------------ x
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP
a/s/o JEFFREY WALKER and ANNE WALKER, h/w
100 Erie Insurance Place CASE No.: 11-6565 -CIVIL TERM
Erie, PA 16530-1104,
PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO
Plaintiff, NEW MATTER OF
DEFENDANT/THIRD PARTY
-against- PLAINTIFF AMERICAN
STANDARD BRANDS
CRANE PLUMBING, LLC
41 Cairns Road
Mansfield, OH 44904,
.fir. N ..
Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff. ? rn n
------------------------------------------------------------x - ;
r "=
AS AMERICA, INC. d/b/a AMERICAN < c?
STANDARD BRANDS =C)
" C7
1 Centennial Avenue
Piscataway, NJ 00885 - us
Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff,
-against-
INTERNATIONAL IMPORTS AND
DISTRIBUTION, INC.
5701 Pine Island Road
Tamarac, Florida 33321,
Third Party Defendant.
x
Plaintiff, Erie Insurance Group (`Brie") a/s/o Jeffrey Walker and Anne Walker, by and
through its attorneys, Law Offices of Robert A. Stutman, P.C., as and for its Answer to the New
Matter of Defendant AS America, Inc. d/b/a American Standard Brands ("American Standard"),
pled as "Crane Plumbing, LLC," states as follows:
PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO NEW MATTER IN THE FORM OF AFFIRMATIVE
42 - 58. The allegations of Paragraph's 42 - 58 constitute legal conclusions to which Plaintiff,
Erie, need not respond. To the extent any portion of Paragraphs 42 - 58 of the New Matter does
not constitute a legal conclusion and requires a response, Plaintiff, Erie, denies the allegations.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Erie, demands judgment in its favor and against Defendant
on Defendant American Standard's New Matter, together with other such relief as the Court may
deem appropriate.
PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO NEW MATTER IN THE FORM OF A THIRD-PARTY
COMPLAINT
1 - 7. After reasonable investigation, Plaintiff, Erie, is without knowledge or information
sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation in Paragraphs 1 -7 of the New Matter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Erie, demands judgment in its favor and against Defendant on
Defendant American Standard's New Matter, together with other such relief as the Court may
deem appropriate.
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT A.
STUTMAN, P.C.
".is &X4,
Dated: Q I? IZ. By: StefarU G. Ebert, Esquire
500 Office Center Drive, Suite 301
Fort Washington, PA 19034
(215) 283-1177 - Fax: (215) 283-1188
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Erie Insurance Group, als/o Jeffrey Walker
and Anne Walker
VERIFICATION
I, Stefanie G. Ebert, Esquire attorney for Plaintiff, hereby state that I am familiar with the
facts of this case and am authorized to file this Verification on their behalf.
I verify that I prepared the foregoing Reply to New 'Matter based on information
furnished to me by the Plaintiff. I further verify that the facts set forth in the foregoing
Complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
I understand that false statements made herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.
C.S. § 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date: STEFANI . EBERT, ESQUIRE
I, Stefanie G. Ebert, Esq., hereby certify that on this 4th day of September, 2012, a true and
correct copy of Reply to New Matter of Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff AS America,
Inc. d/b/a American Standard Brands Pled as Crane Plumbing, LLC. was served by
first class mail on the following:
Mark Villanueva, Esq.
MCCARTER & ENGLISH
BNY Mellon Center
1735 Market St., Ste 700
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
Counsel for Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff AS America, Inc. d/b/a American Standard Brands
("American Standard'), pled as "Crane Plumbing, LLC,
INTERNATIONAL IMPORTS AND
DISTRIBUTION, INC.
5701 Pine Island Road
Tamarac, Florida 33321,
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT
A. STUTMAN, P.C.
r
By: Stef G. Ebert, Esquire
500 O Center Drive, Suite 301
Fort Washington, PA 19034
(215) 283-1187- Fax: (215) 283-1188
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Erie Insurance Group, als/o Jeffrey Walker
and Anne Walker
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION .-
- , _, ..
,.~; - .
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP a/s/o CASE NUMBER: 1 I -6565 - 4
JEFFREY WALKER and ANNE - `"
WALKER, h/w, ISSUE N[1MBER: ~:~ ~-, ~~~'
- ~~ ;_
_....~
Plaintiff _._
-_~
PLEADING:
v.
CRANE PLUMBING, LLC,
Plaintiff
Defendant/Third Party
AS AMERICA, INC. d/b/a AMERICAN
STANDARD BRANDS,
Plaintiff
v.
Defendant/Third Party
INTERNATIONAL IMPORTS AND
DIS7~'RIBUTION, INC.,
PRAECIPE FOR APPEARAN('I~,
CODE AND CLASSIFICATION:
FILED ON BEHALF OF:
INTERNA"I'IONAL IMPORTS AN L)
DISTRIBUTION, INC., Third Party
Defendant.
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
E. RALPH GODFREY, ESQU[RE
Third Party Defendant Pa. ID# 77052
CIPRIANI & WERNER, P.C.
1011 Mumma Road, Suite 20l
Lemoyne, PA 17043
(7 i 7) y /J-~60(i
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP a/s/o JEFFREY ) CASF, NO: 11-6565
WALKER and ANNE WALKER, h,'w, )
Plaintiff 1
JURY "TRIAL DEMANDED
v.
CRANE PLUMBING, LLC,
Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff
x
x
AS AMERICA, INC. d/b/a AMERICAN
STANDARD BRANDS,
Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff
v.
INTERNA'CIONAL IMPORTS AND
DISTRIBUTION, INC.,
"third Party Defendant
x
PRAECIPE FOR APPEARANCE
TO: PRO"I'HONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUN"TY:
Kindiy enier my appearance on behalr of the Third Party Defendant, INTi:INf~TIONAL
IMPORTS AND DISTRIBUTION, INC., in the above-captioned matter.
Respectfully submitted,
CIP.&`WERNER, P.C.
~~~ - / 7 ~ ~ Z /~ BY:
~:'12ALPH GODFREY~SQU
Attorney No. 77052
1011 Mumma Road
Suite 201
Lemoyne, PA 17043
Tele: 717-975-9600
Fax: 717-975-3846
Counsel for the 'third Party Defendant,
INTER~1ATInNAL IMP(>R_TS '~1I)
DISTRIBUTION, INC.,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
That counsel for the Third Party Defendant, INTERNATIONAL IMPORTS AND
DISTRIBUTION, INC., hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of its PRAF_,CIPE FOR
APPEARANCE has been served on all counsel of record, by first class mail, postage pre-paid,
according to the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, on the ~ --~~- ~_. day of
~C ~~ ~--~- , 2012.
Stefanie Ebert, Esquire
Law Offices of Robert A. Stutman, P.C.
500 Office Center Drive, Suite 301
Fort Washington, PA 19034
Mark D. Villanueva, Esquire
McCarter & English, LLP
BNY Mellon Center, Suite 700
1735 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
BY:
CIPRIANI & WERNER, P.C.
E. PuALPiI SOD ~ , ESQUIRI~
Counsel for the Thi Party Defend
INTERNATIONAL I ~ D
DISTRIBUTION, INC.
t.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP CASE No.: 11-6565 -CIVIL TERM
a/s/o JEFFREY WALKER and ANNE
WALKER. h/w
Plaintiff,
v.
CRANE PLUMBING, LLC ~ ~ "
Defendant/Third Part~~ Plaintiff, ~- ~ _ -
i ; __
AS AMERICA, INC. d/b/a AMERICAN
STANDARD BRANDS (PLED AS CRANE
PLUMBING, LLC)
Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff,
ti~.
INTERNATIONAL IMPORTS AND
DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Third Party Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
To the Prothonotary:
Kindly Enter r,~y Appearance as counsel for the Plaintiff, Erie Insurance Group
als/o Jeffrey Walker and Anne Walker in the captioned matter.
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT
A. STUTMAN, P.C`.
~, _
ourtn y E. Dolaway, Esquir
500 Office Center Drive, Suite 301
Fort Washington, PA 19034
(215) 283-1187- Fax: (215) 283-I 18i~
Attorneys for Plaintiff •Erie Insurance Groin, a/s/o
Jeffrey Walker and Anne Walker
R ~ ,_
CEKTIFICATE OF SERVICE
L Cris Fiore, Paralegal, hereby certify that on this 26`" day of October, 2012, a true
and correct copy of Reply to New ~l~lutte~• of Defendant/Third Party Pl~int~ffA S'
America, Inc. dib/a American Standard Brands Pled as Crane Plumbir~,~>. 1:1,('. was
served by Iirst class mail on the following:
Mark Villanueva, Esq.
MCCAR'TER & ENGLISH
BNY Mellon Center
1735 Market St.. Ste 700
Philadelphia. Pennsylvania 19103
C'our~scl fir Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff AS America, Inc. dih,~u American Standard 13r~ands
~".American Standard"), pled as "C~°ane Plun~abing, LLC',
E. Ralph Godfrey, Esq.
CIPRIANI & WERNER
101 l Mumma Rd., Ste. 201
Lemoyne, PA 17043-~ 1145
Counsel fo,~° Additional Defendant American
Standard Brands & ~~nter-national Imports and Dislrihution, Inc
_ ~.G~_.
Cris Fiore, Paralegal