HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-0227RUTH A. KENNEDY,
Plaintiff
V.
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Docket No.: 2012-227 - Civil
In Equity
NOTICE TO PLEAD `
TO: Ruth A. Kennedy , r
c/o Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire r<Q- -',
200 North Hanover Street t- --n
?. °-;
P..
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013 _
You are hereby notified to file a written response to the enclosed within twenty (20) days
from service hereof or a judgment may be entered against you.
Respectfully Submitted,
Rominger & Associates
Date: P? ru
Karl . Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 241-6070
Supreme Court ID# 81924
Attorney for Defendant
RUTH A. KENNEDY,
Plaintiff
V.
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Docket No.: 2012-227 - Civil
In Equity
DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO COMPLAINT IN PARTITION
AND NOW, comes Samuel Eugene Kennedy, by and through his counsel, Karl E.
Rominger, Esquire, and in support of his Answer, avers as follows:
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
5. Admitted by way of further answers subject to various offsets.
6. Admitted.
7. Admitted that the Defendant has sole and exclusive use of the property since June 1997.
Strict proof of any reasonable rental value is demanded at trial with proof from conpetent
witnesses.
8. Denied. By way of further answer each side is entitled to 50 percent of equity adjusted
for costs and contributions as more fully laid out in the new matter.
9. Denied. By way of further answers conclusion of law requires no answer. If an answer
is required offsets have to be contemplated.
WHEREFORE defendant requests this Honorable Court partition the property with
appropriate credits and debits for each party.
NEW MATTER
10. Previous paragraphs are incorporated by reference.
11. Defendant installed a swimming pool on the property and deck the approximate value
and costs was $15,000.00.
12. Defendant put a new furnace into the property the cost of which is approximately
$5,000.00.
13. Defendant has paid all of the mortgage payments including principal and interest.
14. Defendant has paid all of the property taxes including but not limited to county and
school.
15. Defendant has borne the cost of insuring the property during this time.
16. Defendant has made miscellaneous but numerous and sundry improvements to the
property, worked to maintain the property, and invested heavily in its maintenance and
care.
WHEREFORE defendant requests this Court grant partition and in so doing divide the
proceeds of the sale with appropriate credits including reimbursements for the amounts spent as
described above.
Date: f?(U0.f
Respectfully Submitted,
Rominger & Associates
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 241-6070
Supreme Court ID# 81924
Attorney for Defendant
RUTH A. KENNEDY,
Plaintiff
V.
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Docket No.: 2012-227 - Civil
In Equity
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Karl E. Rominger, Esquire, certify that I this day served a copy of the within
Defendants Answer to Complaint in Partition, upon the following, by depositing the same in the
United States Mail, postage pre-paid, via first class mail, addressed as follows:
Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire
200 North Hanover Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
Respectfully Submitted,
Rominger & Associates
Date: Qo(?fl?
Karl FzRominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
(717) 241-6070
Supreme Court ID# 81924
Attorney for Defendant
RUTH A. KENNEDY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs. CIVIL ACTION - LAW c-)
c
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY, NO. 2012-227 CIVIL TERM rnca N
-n
M__
Defendant IN EQUITY z? ca -urn
t<A N Obi
MOTION FOR HEARING -n
=a zā ,ca
?
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, by and through her counsel, Bradley L
Ciff'
Esquire, and the law firm of Griffie & Associates, and moves the Court as follows:
1. The instant action was initiated with the filing of a Complaint in Partition on
January 19, 2012.
2. After appropriate service upon Defendant, Defendant filed an Answer and New
Matter on February 9, 2012.
3. Plaintiff has filed her Reply to Defendant's New Matter and no further pleadings
are pending.
4. The parties have agreed to use the services of one selected appraiser for purposes
of appraising the real estate at issue and for purposes of providing a rental value
for the property at issue, and have filed a Stipulation in this regard, a copy of said
Stipulation being attached hereto and incorporate herein by reference as Exhibit
«A"
5. With the pleadings being closed and the parties having agreed upon an expert for
purposes of an appraisal and determination of rental value, the case is rape to be
heard.
6. A copy of this Motion has been provided to opposing counsel, Karl E. Rominger,
Esquire, and he concurs.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests your Honorable Court to schedule a hearing in the
above captioned matter to determine the value of the real estate, the rental value of the
real estate and the various claims and credits of the parties in this partition action.
Respectfully submitted,
B riff e, Esquire
ttorney for Plaintiff
Supreme Court ID No. 34349
200 North Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-5551
(800) 347-5552
I verify that the statements made in the foregoing document are true and correct. I
understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.
Section 4904, relating to unworn falsification to authorities.
DATE: ?- (?-
RUTH A. KENNEDY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs. CIVIL ACTION -LAW
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY, NO. 2012-227 CIVIL TERM
Defendant INEQUITY
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
sf
I, Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire hereby certify that I did, the 2L day of February,
2012, cause a copy of Plaintiff's Motion for Hearing to be served upon the Defendant,
Samuel Eugene Kennedy, by serving his attorney of record by first class mail, postage
prepaid, at the following address:
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
DATE: 1t )-
RUTH A. KENNEDY,
Plaintiff
VS.
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 2012-227 CIVIL TERM
IN EQUITY
STIPULATION
AND NOW, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, STIPULATE AND
AGREE as follows:
1. A partition action has been initiated to the above docketed case, having been filed
on January 19, 2012.
2. In order to facilitate negotiations and discussions regarding this case, and in an
effort to resolve the matter without litigation, the parties shall use the services of
Larry E. Foote, with Diversified Appraisals, to appraise the real estate at issue
located at 215 West Pine Street, Mt. Holly Springs, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
3. The parties shall be jointly responsible, on an equal basis, for all fees incuw:red by
Diversified Appraisals in preparing a present day appraisal of the property and in
setting forth the estimated rental value of the property for the period from June
1997 to February 2012.
4. Upon completion of the present day appraisal of the property, the parties shall
agree, for all purposes associated with this litigation, that the present day
appraisal is the accurate and correct value of the property at present.
5. Upon receipt of the estimated rental value of the property for the period'. from
June 1997 to present (February 2012), the parties shall abide by the estimated
Exhibit "A"
rental value of the property as prepared by Diversified Appraisals for future
negotiation and litigation purposes.
6. Neither party shall use the services of additional appraisers to provide separate,
different or new appraisals of the real estate, nor separate, different or new rental
values of the property for the time period indicated through any portions of this
litigation, it being the intention of the parties that they are preserving their limited
resources by agreeing to use Diversified Appraisals as their common or joint
appraiser and shall abide by the present day value appraisal and rental value as so
determined by Diversified Appraisals without dispute
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound and to
legally bind their heirs, executors and assigns, have hereunto set forth their hand and seal
the day and year hereinafter written.
WITNESSETH:
Ruth A.
xommger, hsquire
RUTH A. KENNEDY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
VS. CIVIL ACTION -LAW C")
-uz ;z
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY, NO. 2012-227 CIVIL TERM rn "?
x"n
rn_
Defendant INEQUITY z= w -of-
_< N p C.
PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S NEW MATTER <a z-n
x
10. Plaintiffs averment set forth in paragraph 1 through 9 of her Co
are +
-< o
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in their full text.
11. Denied. Plaintiff is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a
belief as to the truth of the averments set forth in paragraph 11 and they are,
therefore, denied, with specific proof thereof being demanded at trial.
12. Denied. Plaintiff is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a
belief as to the truth of the averments set forth in paragraph 12 and they are,
therefore, denied, with specific proof thereof being demanded at trial.
13. Denied. Plaintiff is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a
belief as to the truth of the averments set forth in paragraph 13 and they are,
therefore, denied, with specific proof thereof being demanded at trial.
14. Denied. Plaintiff is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a
belief as to the truth of the averments set forth in paragraph 14 and they are,
therefore, denied, with specific proof thereof being demanded at trial.
15. Denied. Plaintiff is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a
belief as to the truth of the averments set forth in paragraph 15 and they are,
therefore, denied, with specific proof thereof being demanded at trial.
16. Denied. Plaintiff is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a
belief as to the truth of the averments set forth in paragraph 16 and they are,
therefore, denied, with specific proof thereof being demanded at trial.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests your Honorable Court to dismiss Defendant's New
Matter unless specific proof of the claims therein are provided to the Court.
Respectfully submitted,
cJn" e, tsquire
for Pla
niff
r?on
Court ID No. 34349
200 North Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-5551
(800) 347-5552
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in the foregoing document are true and correct. I
understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section
4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities.
DATE: 7- - / L- - ") 'Ili
RUT A. KENNEDY
RUTH A. KENNEDY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY, NO. 2012-227 CIVIL TERM
Defendant INEQUITY
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1, Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire hereby certify that I did, the ,/ `+ day of February,
2012, cause a copy of Plaintiff's Reply to New Matter to be served upon the Defendant,
Samuel Eugene Kennedy, by serving his attorney of record by first class mail, postage
prepaid, at the following address:
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
DATE:
ffi , squire
ey for Plaintiff
RUTH A. KENNEDY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
VS CIVIL ACTION -LAW
.
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY, NO. 2012-227 CIVIL TERM
Defendant IN EQUITY zrn rn rnF=
r-
?.. rn
STIPULATION r- M o,
t
h
i °
a
STIPULA
bound
to be le
all
tendin
i C) r
ere
o,
es
AND NOW, the part ,
y
g
g
n
AGREE as follows:
1. A partition action has been initiated to the above docketed case, having been filed
on January 19, 2012.
2. In order to facilitate negotiations and discussions regarding this case, and in an
effort to resolve the matter without litigation, the parties shall use the services of
Larry E. Foote, with Diversified Appraisals, to appraise the real estate at issue
located at 215 West Pine Street, Mt. Holly Springs, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
3. The parties shall be jointly responsible, on an equal basis, for all fees incurred by
Diversified Appraisals in preparing a present day appraisal of the property and in
setting forth the estimated rental value of the property for the period from June
1997 to February 2012.
4. Upon completion of the present day appraisal of the property, the parties shall
agree, for all purposes associated with this litigation, that the present day
appraisal is the accurate and correct value of the property at present.
5. Upon receipt of the estimated rental value of the property for the period from
June 1997 to present (February 2012), the parties shall abide by the estimated
?w
rental value of the property as prepared by Diversified Appraisals for future
negotiation and litigation purposes.
6. Neither party shall use the services of additional appraisers to provide separate,
different or new appraisals of the real estate, nor separate, different or new rental
values of the property for the time period indicated through any portions of this
litigation, it being the intention of the parties that they are preserving their limited
resources by agreeing to use Diversified Appraisals as their common or joint
appraiser and shall abide by the present day value appraisal and rental value as so
determined by Diversified Appraisals without dispute.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound and to
legally bind their heirs, executors and assigns, have hereunto set forth their hand and seal
the day and year hereinafter written.
WITNESSETH:
a
. Rominger, Esquire
RUTH A. KENNEDY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs. : CIVIL ACTION -LAW
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY, NO. 2012-227 CIVIL TERM
Defendant INEQUITY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this (0 day of M?'e- t 2012, upon
presentation and consideration of the within Motion for Hearing, and in consideration of
the fact that the pleadings have been closed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND
DIRECTED that a hearing is hereby scheduled on this matter for , the Sp't"A-
?j0 ? o'clock It .m., in Courtroom No. F) of
day of , 2012, at ?,
the Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
BY THE COURT,
Cc Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire
Attorney for Plaintiff
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
Attorney for Defendant
Thomis A. Placey J,
Common Pleas Judgqm
rn=
=rte
?. A'
.
cn? r
%
i ?r
Dom;
_ ;.
`J M
w D
=? na
RUTH A. KENNEDY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENN SYLVANIA
VS. CIVIL ACTION - LAW
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY, NO. 2012-227 CIVIL TERM
Defendant IN EQUITY '' C°;»
Prior Judge: Thomas A. Placey -'
PETITION FOR CONTINUANCE
AND NOW, comes Petitioner, Ruth A. Kennedy, by and through her counsel of
record, Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire and the law firm of Griffie & Associates, and petitions
the Court as follows:
1. Your Petitioner is Ruth A. Kennedy, the above named Plaintiff, currently residing
at 136 East Louther Street, Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
2. Your Respondent is Samuel Eugene Kennedy, the above named Defendant,
currently residing at 215 West Pine Street, Mt. Holly Springs, Pennsylvania, and
who is represented in these proceedings by Karl E. Rominger, Esquire of 155
South Hanover Street, Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
3. Based upon the filing of a Complaint in Partition and Answer filed thereto, a
hearing is scheduled in this matter for Wednesday, May 30, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. in
Courtroom No. 6 of the Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
4. Upon agreement of the parties, the property at issue has been appraised and the
parties have accepted the appraisal provided by the mutually selected real estate
appraiser.
5. The real estate appraiser indicated to the parties that he did not feel he had the
expertise to provide a rental value for the property at issue for the 15 year period
at issue in this matter.
6. Petitioner has secured the name of an expert for purposes of providing a rental
value of the property for the 15 year period at issue in these proceedings, but
Respondent has not yet concurred in the use of that expert.
7. It is essential that the Court have available for decision, and that the parties have
available for negotiations, the rental value of the property from the time Petitioner
moved from the property to present.
8. Even under circumstances where Respondent would concur in the use of the
expert proposed by Petitioner, there will not be sufficient time for that expert to
secure all of the necessary information to provide a statement as to the rental
value of the property prior to the scheduled hearing.
9. The case will not be in a position to be tried on May 30, 2012 as scheduled.
10. Having the information relative to the rental value available will be of benefit to
the parties in their attempts to negotiate a resolution of this matter prior to trial
and no negotiations can take place until the rental value is secured.
11. Petitioner, with the concurrence of Respondent, requests your Honorable Court to
reschedule this matter to a new date.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests your Honorable Court to continue the hearing
presently scheduled for May 30, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. to a later date.
Respectfully submitted,
I N - , 4-U&\
AN-
Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire
Attorney for Petitioner
Supreme Court ID No. 34349
200 North Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-5551
(800) 347-5552
I verify that the statements made in the foregoing document are true and correct. I
understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.
Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
DATE: i z
Rut A. Kennedy
RUTH A. KENNEDY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs. : CIVIL ACTION -LAW
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY, NO. 2012-227 CIVIL TERM
Defendant INEQUITY
Prior Judge: Thomas A. Placey
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire hereby certify that I did, the lam` 'day of May, 2012,
cause a copy of the within Petition for Continuance to be served upon the Defendant,
Samuel Eugene Kennedy, by serving his attorney of record by first class mail, postage
prepaid, at the following address:
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
DATE: c b-'4 4
Bradley L. Griffie, squire
Attorney for Plaintiff
RUTH A. KENNEDY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs. : CIVIL ACTION -LAW
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY, NO. 2012-227 CIVIL TERM
Defendant INEQUITY
Prior Judge: Thomas A. Placey
ORDER OF COURT
1,14
AND NOW, this 24 day of 2012, upon presentation
and consideration of the within Petition for Continuance, the hearing currently scheduled
nWD
for May 30, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. is hereby continued to , the h day of
2012, at o'clock, Em., in Courtroom No. 6 of the
Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
BY THE COURT,
Thomas A. Pl ey, Judge
Cc: Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire
Attorney for Plaintiff
? Karl E. Rominger, Esquire rn c
Attorney for Defendant
?p,C s a. led < ? - .
r
0
RUTH A. KENNEDY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs. : CIVIL ACTION -LAW
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY, NO. 2012-227 CIVIL TERM
Defendant INEQUITY
Prior Judge: Thomas A. Placey
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this -day of Ull1E , 2012, upon presentation
and consideration of the within Petition for Continuance, the hearing currently scheduled
for July 2, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. is hereby continued to , the 4A day of
&?CzaaqfL , 2012, at 0 o'clock, A .m., in Courtroom No. 6 of the
Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
BY THE COURT,
Thomas A. Placey, Judge
Cc" Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire
/Attorney for Plaintiff
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
?
Attorney for Defendant L C c
(20 1 yes :r;v
r ? trite
- po
_<)> W L
CD
C)
c:, I
~J
RUTH A. KENNEDY, 1N THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff :CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs. :CIVIL ACTION -LAW
SAMUEL EUGENE KENNEDY, NO.2012-227 CIVIL TERM
Defendant 1N EQUITY
:Prior Judge: Thomas A. Placey
ORDER OF COURT
~~ of August, 2012, upon presentation and consideration
AND NOW, this
of the within Petition, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DIRECTED that the hearing
scheduled for September 6, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom Number 6 of the Cumberland
County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, is continued generally.
~~ '
Thomas A. Pl ey, Judge
c ~ ~
~~ N
~ ."'~
~
~'
Cc~Bradley L. Crriffie, Esquire .
,~
Attorney for Plaintiff w =ā ~--~
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire ~,~~ ~ z ~'
Attorney for Defendant ~ _
~:'
-.~
~ w
crj
~"~
`-~'~@s rya-~l~d ~r~aq~a
~~~