The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-4890WHJIAM L. HUDSON 71 West Summit Street Alliance, Ohio 44601 SSN: 434-98-5868 DOB: 01-24-55 Employer: Sebring Presbyterian Church Plaintiff VSo CHRISTINA 1% HUDSON 14 East Oakwood Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013 SSN: 184-38-7293 DOB: 08-15-56 Employer:. Carlisle Area Schools Defendant } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } CASE NO. 1998-DR-1206 JUDGE STUCKI 0 q- qggo e', I AGREED JUDGEMENT ENTRY This matter came before the Court upon the Plaintiff's Complaint for divorce. The Court finds that the parties stipulate as follows: 1. The parties were married January 18, 1986 in Galton, Pennsylvania. 2, The parties separated on or about October 1, 1996 and have continuously lived separate and apart without cohabitation since that date, for a period in excess &one year. 3. A parent child relationship exists in accordance with Ohio Revised Code §3111.01 through §3111.19 with two children: MARY CLARE tlUDSON BORN: May 7, 1987 and CHARLES WILLIAM HUDSON BORN: July 29, 1988 4. The children have continuously been residents of the State of Pannsylvania since the date of the parties separation on or about October 1, 1996. 388 5. The parties have divided all personal property, furnishings, and bank accounts to their full satisfaction. 6. The parties have divided all marital debt to their full satisfaction. 7. Neither party makes any claim on any pension plan, IRA, Profit Sharing, 401K, or other qualified retirement accounts of the other party. 8. After consideration of the factors in Ohio Revised Code Section 3105.18 and 3105,171,amithar party makes any claim against the other for Spousal Support. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJ-lYDGED AND DECREED as follows: 1. Plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute and complete divorce from Defendant on the grounds of incompatibility and living separate and apart for a period in excess of one year without cohabitation. 2. That all issues relating to the children such as Parental Rights and Responsibilities, child support, and visitation are held for naught and not tO be decided by this Court due to the fact that the children have be residents of the State of Pennsylvania for a period in excess of six (6) months removing jurisdictiun over such mar~ers from this Court. Any action involving issues of the children such as parental rights and responsibilities~ child support, or visitation shall be taken up with the State of Pannsylvania or through an appropriate UFISA action. 3. Each party shall retain any and all household goods, furnishings, personal property, motor vehicles, or bank accounts presently held in his or her name or possession, free and clear of any claim of the other party. Each shall assume responsibility for any liens, debts, or other obligations on said items they retain and hold the other party harmless for same. 4. Each party shall assume responsibility for debts incurred in his or her name and any debts incurred by them since the date of separation and hold the other party harmless. 5. Neither party shall be responsible for'any payment of spousal support to the other. 6. Each party shall retain as his or her own separate property any qualified retirement accounts, including bat not limited to, IRA, pension fund, 401K fund or profit sharing fund, free and clear of any claim of the other party. Each party shall execute any " 389 documents necessary to fae'flitate this separation as required by the fund holder or plan administrator, 7. Neither Plainfuffnor Defendant from the date of this entry shall incur any debts or obligations upon the credit of the other and each shall indemnify and save the other absolutely harmless of any debts or obligations so charged or otherwise incurred. IT IS SO ORDERED Cost to deposit withany remainder to the Plaintiffhere'm DATE: APPROVED: 230 N. 15th Street Sebring, Ohio 44672 Phone: (330)938-2110 Defendant MAGISTRATE A TRUE ~p¥ PHIL~Gr?IAI(ASI$, CLERK · - --.-- ............. uep~y Date ~'~ ~- 390 Franco Psychological Associates 26 State Avenue Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 2434896 Fax (717) 243-5297 Licensed Psychologists Margery Andrews, M.Ed. LLnda ChaLk, Ph.D. John-Paul Checkett, Ph.D. Kathy Ellis, Ed.D. Kenneth France, Ph.D. Edward A. l:ranco, Ph.D. Loft Hog& M.S. Davis C. Tracy, Ph.D. Licensed Social Workers Susan McGraw, A.C.S.W, Nancy M. Small, A.C.S.W. February26,1999 Certified Professionols Kay Balczianas, M.S.N., RN Certified Psychiatric Nurse Jo Ann Cosle~ Ed.D. Certified School Psychologist Joan Larhn-Drake, Ph.D., R,N. Cea'tiffed Psychiatric Nurse Letter to the Court Re: Divorce Case No 1998DR01206 Rev. William Long Hudson and Christina Hudson Dear Judge: Our practice was consulted by Bill and Christina Hudson in September of 1998 around the time that they were making final plans regarding their divorce. Both Bill and Chris had two conjoint sessions with Dr. Davis Tracy, focused on coming to a firm conclusion regarding the divorce. Because it appea~ed that the relationship was not repairable, these two sessions primarily on gaining closure to their marriage. Both ,are informed and concerned parents regarding their two children Claire (age 11) and Charles (age 10). As you may be aware Chris and the children have been living in Pennsylvania for the past three years while Bill has commuted to see them on the weekends. While Chris is the pr/mary custodial parent, she has encouraged Bill to see the children as often as possible and has tried to assist in these visits by transporting the children part of the way to Ohio on the weekends when Bill is scheduled to be with the children. Chris has met on an ongoing basis with Dr. Edward Franco beginning on September 28, 1999. Initially, these sessions were primarily focused on Chris' fear and sadness about the marriage ending. More recently, however, she has improved emotionally and has done an excellent job of helping her two children maintain a close and supportive relationship with Bill. Given the length of time that the family has been separated and adapting to weekend visitation, it appears that the clfildren have accepted and adjusted to the arrangement. Based on the good communication that the couple has regarding the children's welfare and the well established v/sitation arrangement, it is our professional opinion that ../~"~the couple~.~ does,~_~ D/~'n°t require~p,/~attendance./~, at a parenting~: ~~semi~nar' ~ ~ ~- Davis Tracy, Ph.D Edward A. Franco, Ph.D. r 3 [} IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA L t-toOSo Plaintiff gs Defendant File No. IN DIVORCE NOTICE TO RESUME PRIOR SURNAME Notice is hereby given that the Plaintiff/defendant in the above matter, [select one by marking "x"] __ prior to the entry of a Final Decree in Divorce, or / after the entry of a Final Decree in Div~orce dated c~/~4 ~~ hereby elects to resume the prior surname of .~-_~ ~ ~ ~ ",and }ives this written notice avowing his/her intention pCpdas,~t; the, provisi,o.~F ~}4J.S. 7~4. Date: Cq/0 ~.~/~.~S~~fft/'~J(~~- gnature of na~eing resumed / COMMONWE*L*. Or PE SYLV ^ ) oF On the ,~)~_ day of& t~'L~ 200~,'before me, the Prothonotary or the notary public, personally appeared the above aff~ant known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within document and acknowledged that he / she executed the foregoing for the purpose therein contained. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand hereunto set my hand and official seal. NOTARIAL SEAL CLAUDIA A. BREWBAKER, NOTARY PUBLIC Carlisle Boro, Cuml~erland County My Commission Expires April 4r 2005 P~ud~onotary-or Notary Public