HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-2162 ?< a
} i
"
:.. C
_C?
. tv
ANGINO & ROVNER. P.C.
Michael E. Kosik, Esquire
Attorney IDO : 36513
4503 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708
(717) 238-6791
FAX (717) 238-5610
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
E-mail: mkosik!a angino-rovner.com
DOROTHY HAMILTON IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNA.
V. CIVIL ACTION - LAW _
NO. /0 1- c2g001 (2ivi l 10V
DAVID DRAKE,
Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
NOTICE TO DEFEND
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the
following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and Notice are
served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the
Court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you
fail to do so the case may proceed without you and judgment may be entered against you by the
Court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief
requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE
SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Cumberland County Bar Association O
2 Liberty Avenue s
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 249-3166Ip3.7S (??
??87aa3
Rfa '73 y5jr
495857
NOTICIA
Le han demandado a usted en la corte. Si asted quiere defenderse de estas demandas
expuestas en las paginas sugnuientes, usted tiene viente (20) dias de plazo al partir de la fecha de la
demanda y la notificacion. Usted debe presenter una apariencia escrita o en persona o por abogado
y archivar en la corte en forma escrita sus defensas o sus objeciones a las demandas en contra de su
persona. Sea avisado que si usted no se defiende, la corte tomara medidas y puede entrar una Orden
contra usted sin previo aviso o notificacion y por cualquier queja o alivio que es pedido en la
peticion de demanda. Usted puede perder dinero o sus propiedades o otros derechos importantes
para usted.
LLEVE ESTA DEMANDA A UN ABOGADO IMMEDIATEMENTE. SI NO TIENE
ABOGADO O SI NO TIENE EL DINERO SUFICIENTE DE PAGAR. TAL SERVICIO, VAYA
EN PERSONA O LLAME POR TELEPFONO A LA OFICINA CUYA DIRECCION SE
ENCUENTRA ESCRITA ABAJO PARA AVERIGUAR DONDE SE PUEDE CONSEQUIR
ASISTENCIA LEGAL.
Cumberland County Bar Association
2 Liberty Avenue
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 249-3166
49585?
ANG[NO & ROVNER, P.C.
Michael E. Kosik, Esquire
Attorney ID# : 36513
4503 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 171 10-1708
(717)238-6791
FAX (717) 238-5610
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
E-mail: mkosik(q_)angino-rovner.com
DOROTHY HAMILTON
Plaintiff,
V.
DAVID DRAKE,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNA.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT
1. Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton is an adult individual and citizen of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, who resides at 25 Weatherburn Road, Enola, Cumberland
County, Pennsylvania 17025.
2. Defendant David Drake is an adult individual and citizen of the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, who resides at 5865 Wertzville Road, Enola, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania 17025.
3. The facts and occurrences hereinafter related took place on April 16, 2010, on
Wertzville Road (Pa. Route 944) at Carol Lane in East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland
County, Pennsylvania.
495957
4. At that time and place, Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton was operating a 2003 Saturn
which was stopped on Wertzville Road waiting for traffic to clear to turn left into her
development.
5. At that time and place, Defendant David Drake was operating a 1991 Chevrolet
S 10 pick-up truck directly behind Plaintiff's vehicle.
6. At that time and place, Defendant David Drake operated his vehicle without paying
attention to traffic and, suddenly and without warning, violently slammed into the rear of the
Plaintiffs stopped vehicle.
7. The foregoing accident and all of the injuries and damages set forth hereinafter
sustained by Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton are the direct and proximate result of the negligent,
careless and reckless manner in which Defendant David Drake operated his vehicle as follows:
(a) failure to have his vehicle under such control as to be able to stop within
the assured clear distance ahead;
(b) failure to keep alert and maintain a proper watch for the presence of other
motor vehicles on the highway;
(c) failure to travel at a safe speed;
(d) failure to apply his brakes in sufficient time to avoid striking the rear of
Plaintiffs car.
(e) failure to drive his vehicle with due regard for the highway and traffic
conditions which were existing and of which he was or should have been
aware;
(f) driving his vehicle upon the highway in a manner endangering persons
and property and in a reckless manner with careless disregard to the rights
and safety of others and in violation of the Motor Vehicle Code of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
49587
CLAIM I
DOROTHY HAMILTON V. DAVID DRAKE
8. Paragraphs 1 through 7 of Plaintiff's Complaint are incorporated herein by
reference.
9. Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton sustained painful and severe injuries which include
but are not limited to severe head pain, neck pain, and low back pain as well as general shock to
her nervous system.
10. By reason of the aforesaid injuries, Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton was forced to
incur liability for medical treatment, medications, hospitalizations and similar miscellaneous
expenses in an effort to restore herself to health, and claim is made therefor.
11. Because of the nature of her injuries, Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton has been advised
and, therefore, avers that she may be forced to incur similar expenses in the future, and claim is
made therefor.
12. As a result of the aforementioned injuries, Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton has
undergone and in the future will undergo great physical and mental suffering, great
inconvenience in carrying out her daily activities, loss of life's pleasures and enjoyment, and
claim is made therefor.
13. Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton continues to be plagued by persistent pain and
limitations and, therefore, avers that her injuries may be of a permanent nature, causing residual
problems for the remainder of her lifetime and claim is made therefor.
14. As a result of the aforesaid injuries, Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton has sustained
uncompensated work loss, and claim is made therefor.
495857
15, As a result of the aforementioned injuries, Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton may sustain
work loss, loss of opportunity and a permanent diminution of her earning power and capacity,
and claim is made therefor.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton demands judgment against Defendant David
Drake in an amount in excess of Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars exclusive of interest and
costs and in excess of any jurisdictional amount requiring compulsory arbitration.
CLAIM II
DOROTHY HAMILTON V. DAVID DRAKE
16. Paragraphs 1 through 15 of Plaintiff's Complaint are incorporated herein by
reference.
17. Before the subject motor vehicle accident, Defendant David Drake consumed
alcoholic beverages, or other drugs, which caused him to become intoxicated and impaired.
18. Defendant David Drake while impaired and under the influence of drugs and/or
alcohol drove his vehicle at an excessive rate of speed.
19. After consuming alcoholic beverages, or other drugs, Defendant David Drake knew
or should have known that he was severely intoxicated and unable to safely operate a motor vehicle.
20. Defendant David Drake knew or should have known that his operation of a motor
vehicle while intoxicated constituted outrageous conduct and a reckless indifference to the rights of
others on the highway.
21. Defendant David Drake's failure to travel at a safe rate of speed and collision on the
roadway displayed willful, negligent and reckless indifference towards the rights of others on the
roadway.
22. Defendant's conduct constitutes wanton and willful negligence, is outrageous and
entitles Plaintiff David Drake to an award of punitive damages.
495857
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton demands judgment against Defendant David
Drake in an amount in excess of Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars exclusive of interest and
costs and in excess of any jurisdictional amount requiring compulsory arbitration.
ANGM0,,&'"VN,Iz'R. P. C.
IGlichael E. Kosik, Esquire
I.D. No. 36513
4503 N. Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 238-6791
Counsel for Plaintiff
495857
VERIFICATION
I, DOROTHY HAMILTON, do swear and affirm that the facts set forth in the foregoing
COMPLAINT are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I
understand that this verification is made subject to the penalties of the Rules of Civil Procedure
relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
WI
DOROTHY HAMILTON
Dated: Aar z o 1 Z-
203648
SHERIFF'S OFFICE OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY
Ronny R Anderson
Sheriff
Jody S Smith
Chief Deputy
Richard W Stewart
Solicitor
0 0,1N' ai ? ttn:r,,?p7ft?
4: iLE.C- UMCE
PP,CTHQNOTAP Y
.a '
THE'
2012 APR 20 AM 8= 45
CUMI RLAND COUNT'S
PENNSYLVANIA
Dorothy Hamilton
vs.
David Toby Drake
Case Number
2012-2162
SHERIFF'S RETURN OF SERVICE
04/13/2012 05:33 PM - Ryan Burgett, Deputy Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law, states that on April 13,
2012 at 1733 hours, he served a true copy of the within Complaint and Notice, upon the within named
defendant, to wit: David Toby Drake, by making known unto himself personally, at 5865 Wertzville Road,
Enola, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17025 its contents and at the same time handing to him
personally the said true and correct copy of the same.
RYAN BURGETT, DEP
SHERIFF COST: $43.45
April 18, 2012
SO ANSWERS,
RON ~ R ANDERSON, SHERIFF
a
MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER
COLEMAN & GOGGIN
By: Brigid Q. Alford, Esquire
ID# 38590
By: Allison L. Krupp; Esquire
ID# 30'701.3
4200 Crurns Mill Road, Suite B
Harrisburg, PA 171 I
7l 7-651-3710
Attornevs for Defendant David Drake
DOROTHY FIAM[LTON
Plaintiff,
E~,= ~ .~.
Q~~ 2~ ~H ~~ Z~
~~
IN THE COURT OF COMMON E-'LEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION
v
NO. 12-2162 CIVIL TERM
DAViD DRAKE
Defendant
JURI! TRIAL DEN[ANDED
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
TO 7~HE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly enter the appearance of Brigid Q. Alford, Esquire, Allison L. Krupp, Esquire and
Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin on behalf of Defendant David Drake in the
above-captioned malaer.
Date: 10/19/2012
MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER
COLEMAN & GOGGIN
s/
Brigi Q. Iford, Esqui e
PA. LD. 38590 '
4200 Crurns Mill Road; Suite B
Harrisburg, PA 171 I2
P: (717) 651-3710
F: (7I 7) 651-9630
baalford~)mdwc~:.com
a
MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER
COLEMAN & GOGGIN
. ~ "
s/'~
Allison L. Krupp, Esqui
PA. I.D. 307013
4200 Crums Mill Road, ,Suite B
Harrisburg, PA 17112
P: (717) 651-3510
F: (717) 651-9630
alkrup~la`~,rridwc~.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that, this 19`" day of October, 2012, I have served a true and. correct copy
of the foregoing document upon the following individual, by first class mail, postage repaid, and
addressed as follows:
ANGINO & ROVNE,R, P.C.
Michael E. Kosik, Esquire
4503 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708
Attorney.; or Plainii~f Dorothy Hamilton
Date: 10/ 19/2012
~~
~.._ ._
S.~ L
Brig d Q. lford, squ' e
s/_ _
Allison L. Krupp, Esquire
~ ~ ~ a I f ~,. f:.
~ .--
r:
: '
~ ~ `a E
. i
a .
: t i •.~
,-~~ir r~~ r ~~;-~ r, ,~.~, ,
a~ A l ,.. Y t ~1 i f'`t
ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C.
Michael E. Kosik, Esquire
Attorney ID# : 36513
4503 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708
(717)238-6791
FAX (717) 238-5610
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
E-rr~ail: mkosik@angino-rovner.com
DOROTHY HAMILTON
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID DRAKE,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNA.
CIVIL ACTION -LAW
NO. 12-2162
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S NEW MATTER
AND NOW come the Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton, by and through her attorneys, Angino
& Rovner, P.C., and hereby replies to the New Matter of Defendant as follows:
23. Denied. This averment is a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is
required. To the extent that a response may be deemed proper, it is specifically denied that Plaintiff
Dorothy Hamilton's Complaint fails to state a cause of action on which relief can be granted. To
the contrary, Plaintiffls Complaint sets forth a cause of action for negligence in the operation of a.
X12613
motor vehicle and gross, reckless, and outrageous conduct in operating a motor vehicle while
extremely intoxicated resulting in the rear end accident and Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton's injuries.
24. Denied. This averment is a conclusory statement unsupported by any factual
averments, and therefore, no further response is required. To the extent that a further response may
be deemed proper, it is specifically denied that Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton's injuries and damages
were caused by the acts or omissions or any unidentified person other than Defendant Drake and
over whom Defendant Drake had no right of control. To the contrary, Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton's
injuries were caused by the negligent, reckless, and outrageous conduct of the Defendant who
operated a motor vehicle while extremely intoxicated causing him to strike the rear of Plaintiff
Dorothy Hamilton's car at a high rate of speed causing her injuries and damages.
2.5. Denied. This averment is a mixed conclusion of fact and law to which no
responsive pleading is required. To the extent that a further response may be deemed proper, it is
specifically denied that Plaintiff s injuries and damages were in whole or in part the result of a pre-
existing condition and were not caused or exacerbated by the Defendant's negligent, reckless, and
outrageous conduct. To the contrary, it is averred that all of the injuries and damages set forth in
Plaintiff s Complaint are the direct, factual cause of Defendant's negligent, reckless, and outrageous
conduct in operating a motor vehicle while extremely intoxicated resulting in the rear end accident
and Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton's vehicle.
26. Denied. This averment is a conclusory statement unsupported by any factual
statements, and therefore, no further response is required. To the extent that a further response may
be deemed proper, it is specifically denied that Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton's injuries and damages
were caused by any act, event, or condition other than the motor vehicle accident resulting from
512613
Defendant Drake's negligent, reckless, and outrageous conduct when he struck Plaintiff Dorothy
Hamilton in the rear at a high rate of speed as set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint.
27. Denied. This averment is a mixed conclusion of fact and law to which no
responsive pleading is required. To the extent that a further response may be deemed proper, it is
specifically denied that Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton's claims or damages are barred in whole or in
part by her alleged failure to mitigate her damages. To the contrary, at all times, Plaintiff Dorothy
Hamilton followed the advice of her treating physicians and did everything she could to minimize
the effects of the injuries on her activities of daily living.
28. Denied. This averment is a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is
required. To the extent that a further response may be deemed proper, it is specifically denied the
Defendant Drake's conduct in negligently, recklessly, and outrageously operating a motor vel-iicle
while extremely intoxicated and strike Dorothy Hamilton's car from the rear at a high rate of speed
was not the factual cause of her injuries and damages as set forth in Plaintiffs Complaint. To the
contrary, Defendant Drake's negligent, reckless, and outrageous conduct was the factual cause of all
of Plaintiff s injuries and damages.
29. Denied. This averment is a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is
required. Ta the extent that a further response may be deemed proper, it is specifically denied that
Plaintiffs claims are barred or limited by the application of the Pemisylvania Motor Vehicle
Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S.A. §1701 et. seg
30. Denied. This averment is a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is
required. To the extent that a further response may be deemed proper, it is specifically denied that
Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton selected limited tort on her automobile insurance policy. To the
contrary, Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton had a full tort policy as reflected on her enclosed declaration
512613
page attached hereto as Exhibit A. Furthermore, Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton's tort selection is
irrelevant since Defendant Drake was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol as set
forth in 75 Pa.C.S.A. §1705(d)(i).
31. Denied. This averment is a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is
required. To the extent that a further response may be deemed proper, it is specifically denied
Plaintiffs cause of action is barred or otherv~~ise limited by the doctrine of superseding or
intervening cause. By way of further response, Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton maintains that doctrines
of superseding or intervening cause are inapplicable to her cause of action against Defendant Drake
where her vehicle was struck in the rear at a high rate of speed by the Defendant who was extremely
intoxicated resulting in her injuries and damages.
32. Denied. This averment is a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is
required. To the extent that a further response may be deemed proper, it is specifically denied that
Plaintiff claim is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Plaintiffs cause of action is based
upon a motor vehicle accident which occurred on April 16, 2010 as set forth in Plaintiff s
Complaint. Plaintiff s Complaint was filed in Cumberland County on Apri15, 2012 before the two-
year anniversary of the accident, and the two year statute of limitations as set forth in 42 Pa.C.S.A.
X5524. Plaintiff s Complaint was served by the sheriff of Cumberland County on April 13, 2012
within the time period permitted under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure.
33. Denied. This averment is a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is
required. 'I'o the extent that a further response may be deemed proper, it is specifically denied that
the Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton's claim is barred or otherwise limited by doctrines of waiver and~or
estoppel. By way of further response, Plaintiff Dorothy Hamilton maintains that the doctrines of
waiver and/or estoppel are inapplicable to her claim.
512613
34. Denied. This averment is a conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is
required. To the extent that a response may be deemed proper, it is specifically denied that Plaintiff
Dorothy Hamilton. was negligent in any manner upon the cause of action stated in her Complaint,
and therefore, it is denied the doctrine of comparative negligence is in any way applicable to
Plaintiff's cause of action. As previously stated, the accident resulting in Plaintiff's injuries and
damages as set forth in her Complaint was a rear end accident which occurred when she was
stopped waiting for approaching traffic. Defendant Drake was extremely intoxicated and travelling
at a high rate of speed and failed to observe her stopped vehicle, striking the rear of her vehicle
pushing it down the highway and causing her physical injuries and damages. Plaintiff Dorothy
Hamilton maintains that there are no facts which would give rise to negligence on her part.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully request that this Honorable Court dismiss Defendant's
New Matter and enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
51?.613
I.D. No. 36513
4503 N. Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717} 238-6791
Counsel for Plaintiff
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANLA:
COUNTY OF DAUPHIN
SS.
AFFIDAVIT
I, MICHAEL E. KOSIK, ESQUIRE, being duly sworn according to law, deposes and states
that I am counsel for Plaintiff, that I am authorized to make this Affidavit on behalf of said Plaintiff,
and the facts set forth in the foregoing Reply to New Matter, are true and correc~he best of my
knowledge, information, and belief.
F,. Kosik
Sworn to and subscribed
`~-
I~efore rime this ~ day
of I~0`! ~~, 2012.
e
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
COMMONW4RAL'rli Otr' PENNSYLVANIA
NOTARIAL SEAL
ANGELA DAWN HORCHLER, Notary Public
Susquehanna Twp;, Dauphin County
My Commission Expires March 18, 2013
512613
This CONTINUATION Page, Wlth P~'»r Jacket Form 8 5 3 7 And Forms
And Endorsements Listed Below CO~:TINUES your PERSONAL AUTO POLICY
INSURER: PROPERiY ~ CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD ~rFOrtv
4040 VINCENNES CIRCLE, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46268
DECLARATIONS
POLICY NO. 55 PHJ526189
Named Insured -and TON, JAMES AND- DOR THY
Melling Address -r 339 WOODBRIDGE DR
ETTERS,PA 17319
,..
Policy Period 12:01 A.M. Standard Time
at the Address of the Named Insured --CFROM 0 5 - i 6 - 0 9 TO 0 5 -16 - i 0 TERM: 1 YEAR
BILLING ID NUMBER: X
Producer Name: Code: 349992
rrTSmn~t~R SERVICE: 1-800-423-6789 CLAIM SERVICE: 1-877-805-9918
TOTAL POLICY PREMIUM: $ 1392.00
0 0. s r p on o or a um r as err.
1 03 FONT GRAND AM SE1 1G2NF52E23M597700 C672DJ 013
2 03 STRN L300 iG8JW54R63Y5272i2 C364DJ 013
COVERAGE IS PROVIDED ONLY WHERE A PREMIUM IS SHOWN FOR THE AUTO AND COVERAGE.
YOUR POLICY AFFORDS COLLISION COVERAGE TO A VEHICLE YOU MAY RENT ON A SHORT
TERM BASIS BECAUSE YOU HAVE PURCHASED COLLISION COVERAGE ON AT LEAST ONE OF THE
VEHICLES DESCRIBED 1N YOUR POLICY. THE BROADEST AMOUNT OF COLLISION COVERAGE
AND THE LOWEST DEDUCTIBLE THAT APPLIES TO ANY OF YOUR VEHICLES APPLIES TO THE
ONE YOU RENT.
THE COLLISION COVERAGE THAT APPLIES TO RENTAL VEHICLES IS SUBJECT TO ALL TERMS
APPLYING TO COLLISION COVERAGE IN YOUR POLICY INCLUDING EXCLUSIONS.
COVERAGES AND LIMITS OF LIABILITY
PREMIUMS BY AUTO
1 2
A. LIABILITY
BODILY INJURY EACH PERSON $
EACH ACCIDENT $
PROPERTY DAMAGE EACH ACCIDENT $
C. UNINSURED MOTORISTS: STACKED
BODILY INJURY EACH PERSON $
EACH ACCIDENT $
UNDERINSURED MOTORISTS: STACKED
BODILY INJURY EACH PERSON $
EACH ACCIDENT $
100, 000
300,000 $ 172.00 150.00
100,000 $ 90.00 72.00
i00,ODfl
300,000 $ 49.00 49.00
ioo,ooo
300,000 $ 35.00 35.00
CC+UNTERSIGNED SY ~- AUTHORIZED AGENT
--CONTINUED ON PAGE 2----
000000
FORM A-+IS00-0 (Ed. 2104} AV _ (~
~. ~~ ~"` .
DEC~,ARATIONS (CONTINUED) POLICY NO. 55 PHJ526189
~~ NAMED INSURED: HAMILTON, JAMES AND DOROTHY
D. DAMAGE TO YOUR AUTO AUTO AUTO
OTHER THAN COLLISION 1 2
ACV LESS DEDUCTIBLE $FULL FULL
COLLISION
ACV LESS DEDUCTIBLE $ 500 500
TOWING & LABOR COSTS
EACH DiSABLEMEN'T $ 50 50
1 2
ACV = ACTUAL CASH VALUE
$ 59.00 27.00
$ 209.00 120.00
$ 6.00 6.00
FIRST PARTY BENEFITS: $ 152.00 143.00
ADDED MEDICAL EXPENSE BENEFIT UP TO $ 50,000
ADDED WORK LOSS BENEFIT UP TO $50,000 SUBJECT TO
A MAXIMUM OF $2,500 PER .MONTH
ADDED FUNERAL EXPENSE BENEFIT UP TO $2,500
EXTRAORDINARY MEDICAL BENEFITS $100,000 $ 9.00 9.00
---------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL PREMIUM EACH AUTO $ 781.00 611.00
---------------------------------
-------------------
ACCT NO. X TOTAL POLICY PREMIUM $ 1,392.00
LOSS PAYEE/ADDITIONAL INSURED
AUTO PA STATE EMPLOYEE AUTO G M A C
P1 PO BOX 67012 P2 P O BOX 674
HARRISBURG PA 171067012 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55440
FORMS AND ENDORSEMENTS NOW MADE PART OF THIS POLICY:
A-504fl-1 LIFETIME CONTINUATION AGREEMENT
A-5260-1 WAIVER OF COLLISION DEDUCTIBLE
A-5261-0 SUPPLEMENTAL DEATH BENEFIT ENDORSEMENT
A-5719-0 COVERAGE FOR DAMAGE TO YOUR AUTO EXCLUSION ENDORSEMENT
A-5579-2 LIMITED MEXICO COVERAGE
A-5897-0 PERSONAL AUTO INSURANCE PROGRAM SPECIAL EXTENSIONS OF COVERAGE
A-5701-5 PENNSYLVANIA SURCHARGE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
A-5995-0 ENHANCED VALUE ENDORSEMENT - DIMINISHING COLLISION DEDUCTIBLE
A-5904-4 AMENDMENT OF POLICY PROVISIONS - PENNSYLVANIA
A-6075-0 ENHANCED COV PERM INSTALL AUDIO VISUAL DATA REC TRANS EQUIP
THE AUTOS DESCRIBED IN THIS POLICY ARE PRINCIPALLY GARAGED AT THE ADDRESS SHOWN
ON PAGE 1
RATING INFORMATION:
STACKED UM/UDM
FULL TORT APPLIES
FORiYI A-~8Q0-@ (Ed. 2104) AV
DECLARATIONS (CONTINUED) POLICY NO. 55 FHJ526189
NAMED INSURED: HAMILTON, JAMES AND DOROTHY
* PLEASE NOTE
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE ENCLOSED FOR YOUR REVIEW:
PLIMH-2071 ACCOUNT CREDIT
CAF-1863-3 NOTICE OF TORT OPTIONS
DRA-1014-2 PENNSYLVANIA SURCHARGE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
DRA-769-0 ANTI-FRAUD NOTICE
DRA-900-3 NOTICE TO POLICYHOLDER
Because a vehicle is equipped with an air bag safety feature your
policy premium has been reduced.
Because a vehicle is protected by an anti-theft device, we were able to
give you an additional credit.
You have insured more than one vehicle on your policy and have received a
multi-car premium reduction.
Call us toil-free at 1-800-423-6789 if you have any questions or changes to
your policy.
if you're ever in an accident ... report it right away! Put the resources,
reputation and resolve of The Hartford to work for you immediately!
Call 1-877-805-9918.
DRIVER INFORMATION
NO. NAME DOB MS SEX OCC LIC # DT LIC
1 HAMILTO~I,JAMES R 040743 M M RETIRED 11947986 PA 040759
2 HAMILTON,DOROTHY L 032546 M F ACCOUNTANT 18988938 PA 032562
04-09-12 04-09-12 04-09-12
FORM A-4~0-0 {Ed. ?109} AV
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Michelle M. Milojevich, an employee of the law firm of Angino & Rovner, P.C., do
hereby certify that I am this day serving a true and correct copy of PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO
DEFENDANT'S NEW MATTER upon all coursel of record via postage prepaid first class United
States mail addressed as follows:
Brigid Q. Alford, Esquire
Marshall, Uennehey, Warner, Coleman
& Coggin
420 Crums Mill Road, Suite B
Harrisburg, PA 17112
Dated: ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~'
,. , ~ ~ r ' ~~..
Michelle M. Milojevich
512613
OF THE PROTHONOW`tY
201'3 APR 29 PM 313
CUMBMAND COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
ANGINO&ROVNER,P.C.
Michael E.Kosik,Esquire
Attorney ID# : 36513
4503 North Front Street
Harrisburg,PA 17110-1708
(717)238-6791
FAX(717)238-5610
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
E-mail: mkosik @angino-rovner.com
DOROTHY HAMILTON IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNA.
V. CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 12-2162
DAVID DRAKE,
Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Please mark the above-captioned action as settled, satisfied, and discontinued.
A ER,P,C..
ichael squire
I.D.No. 36513
4503 N. Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 238-6791
Counsel for Plaintiff
524194
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Michelle M. Milojevich, an employee of the law firm of Angino & Rovner, P.C., do
hereby certify that I am this day serving a true and correct copy of PRAECIPE upon all counsel of
record via postage prepaid first class United States mail addressed as follows:
Allison L. Krupp,Esquire
Marshall,Dennehey, Warner,Coleman
& Goggin
4200 Crums Mill Road, Suite B
Harrisburg, PA 17112
r
Michelle M. Milojevich
Dated: 4/26/13
524194