HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-25-12IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE:
EDITH S. RIFE TRUST ORPHANS' COURT DIVISION
"'- 3
• ~ _'
n_
NO. 21-11-0325 `:~o
NO. 21-10-1006 _~.~ ~ =-~
NO. 21-83-0773 ` ~ z -~ ~'
-~~,~ to
-, ; .
PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE ~ =~ ` '
~~
M..~
AND NOW COME Petitioners, Steven A. Maxwell, Barry Maxwell, Douglas :Maxwell,
and Sherri Maxwell, remainder beneficiaries of the Edith S. Rife Revocable Trust, by and
through their attorney, Law Offices of Craig A. Diehl, and respectfully represent as follows:
1. On or about March 15, 2011, a Rule to Show Cause was directed to Fred H.
Junkins, Executor of the Estate of Charles J. Rife, deceased, to show what cause, if any, he may
have as to why he should not be required to file an accounting of the administration of the Edith
S. Rife Trust from the date of death of Edith S. Rife.
Ivry
~ ,. ~..'
~~~ ;~
--G,
2. On or about June 17, 2011, a Decree was entered ordering Fred H. Junkins,
Executor of the Estate of Charles J. Rife, deceased, to file an accounting of the administration of
the Edith S. Rife Trust by Charles J. Rife from the date of death of Edith S. Rife within thirty
(30) days of June 17, 2011.
3. The Decree dated June 17, 2011, further directed that the beneficiaries of the
Edith S. Rife Trust shall file objections, if any, to the accounting filed by the Executor within
forty-five (45) days of service of the same.
4. To the best knowledge of Petitioners, no accounting of the administration of the
Edith S. Rife Trust was ever prepared and served on any of Petitioners.
~~
5. On or about October 31, 2011, a Rule to Show Cause was directed to Fred H.
Junkins, Executor of the Estate of Charles J. Rife, deceased, to show what cause, if any, he may
have that the Court should not issue a Declaration that Charles J. Rife breached his fiduciary
duty as Trustee of the Edith S. Rife Trust, and reserving the question of damages for further
consideration by the Court.
6. On or about November 21, 2011, Fred H. Junkins, Executor of the Estate of
Charles J. Rife, filed preliminary objections to the Rule to Show Cause dated October 31, 2011.
7. On or about December 9, 2011, John Maxwell, a remainder beneficiary of the
Edith S. Rife Revocable Trust, filed a preliminary objection to the preliminary objection of Fred
H. Jenkins, Executor.
8. Upon consideration of the preliminary objections filed by both parties, briefing
and argument by the parties, this Honorable Court sustained John Maxwell's preliminary
objection and dismissed the Executor's preliminary objections.
9. Based upon the aforesaid chronology, Petitioners have been unable to ascertain
whether their legal interests as a remainder beneficiary of the Edith S. Rife Trust have been
unjustly or adversely affected or whether they have incurred damages due to various breaches of
fiduciary duty committed by decedent, Charles J. Rife, as Trustee of the Edith S. Rife Trust,
since no accounting has ever been provided in direct violation of prior Court Orders.
10. Petitioners' due process rights have been adversely affected since there has been
no accounting filed to review and the time period of forty-five (45) days as directed in a prior
Court Order has never commenced.
11. Petitioners desire to file a late claim in the Estate of Charles J. Rife since prior
Court Orders were not complied with.
12. It is the belief of Petitioners that no prejudice shall result from the allowance of a
late claim since Fred H. Junkins, Executor of the Estate of Charles J. Rife has filed pleadings, a
brief, and engaged in oral argument before this Court advocating that Petitioners are
indispensable parties.
13. Additionally, as recently as March 19, 2012, an Answer with New Matter was
filed to the Motion of John W. Maxwell for a Rule to Show Cause. Accordingly, this Petition for
Rule to Show Cause is timely and shall not significantly delay the current proceedings.
WHEREFORE, Petitioners respectfully request this Honorable court to issue a Rule,
directed to Fred H. Junkins, Executor of the Estate of Charles J. Rife, to show what cause, if any,
that he may have that:
1. A late filed claim by Petitioners should not be allowed in the Estate of
Charles J. Rife, and
2. the Court should not grant such other relief as it may direct.
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF CRAIG A. DIEHL
Date: / ~^ By:
Craig A iehl, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 52801
3464 Trindle Road
Camp Hill, PA 17011
Tel: (717)763-7613
Fax: (717)763-8293
Attorney for Steven A. Maxwell, Barry Maxwell,
Douglas Maxwell and Sherri Maxwell
VERIFICATION
I, CRAIG A. DIEHL, ESQUIRE, Attorney for Petitioners, Steven A. Maxwell, Barry
Maxwell, Douglas Maxwell, and Sherri Maxwell, who is authorized to make this Verification on
Petitioners' behalf, verify that the information contained in the foregoing document is true and
correct to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. I understand that false statements
herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to
authorities.
Date: L 1 ~~,II,G
CRAIG .DIEHL, ESQUIRE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, the / ~' ~ day of April, 2012, the undersigned hereby certifies that a
true and correct copy of the foregoing Petition for Rule to Show Cause was served upon the
opposing parties by way of United States first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
Murrell R. Walters, III, Esquire
54 East Main Street
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
Attorney for Fred H. Junkins
Wayne F. Shade, Esquire
53 W. Pomfret Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Co-counsel for Fred H. Junkins
James D. Cameron, Esquire
1325 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17102
Attorney for John W. Maxwell
David A. Fitzsimmons, Esquire
Martson Law Office
10 East High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Co-counsel for John W. Maxwell
D bra A. Fike, Legal Secretary