HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-35072123777
THIS IS AN ARBITRATION MATTER. ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES
r HEARING REQUIRED.
GORDON & WEINBERG, P.C.
'BY: FREDERIC I. WEINBERG, ESQUIRE
Identification No.. 41360 -"
,?' t -
JOEL M. FLINK, ESQUIRE
Identification No.: 41200
1001 E. Hector Street, Ste 220 -<=
Conshohocken, PA 19428
484/351-0500
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS "a
125 S. West Street CUMBERLAND COUNTY
Wilmington, DE 19801
VS. DOCKET NO. : /a-,3-130'7 0,1vi 7a-^
RENATHA HAMILTON
915 INDIANA AVE
LEMOYNE PA 17043-1407
NOTICE
YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND AGAINST THE CLAIMS SET FORTH
IN THE FOLLOWING PAGES, YOU MUST TAKE ACTION WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS AFTER THIS
COMPLAINT AND NOTICE ARE SERVED, BY ENTERING A WRITTEN APPEARANCE PERSONALLY OR BY
ATTORNEY AND FILING IN WRITING WITH THE COURT YOUR DEFENSES OR OBJECTIONS TO THE CLAIMS
SET FORTH AGAINST YOU. YOU ARE WARNED THAT IF YOU FAIL TO DO SO THE CASE MAY PROCEED
WITHOUT YOU AND A JUDGEMENT MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST YOU BY THE COURT WITHOUT FURTHER
NOTICE FOR ANY MONEY CLAIMED IN THE COMPLAINT OR FOR ANY OTHER CLAIM OR RELIEF REQUESTED
BY THE PLAINTIFF. YOU MAY LOSE MONEY OR PROPERTY OR OTHER RIGHTS IMPORTANT TO YOU.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER
OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE
YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
32 S. BEDFORD STREET
CARLISLE, PA 17013
(717) 249-3166
S
103.75 po AT7Y
0'w l `j61o/
l?? d 7 (a/!o5
COMPLAINT IN CIVIL-ACTION
1. At all times relevant hereto, the defendant(s) was the holder
of a credit card, which at the request of the defendant(s) was issued to
the defendant(s) by the plaintiff under the terms of which the plaintiff
agreed to extend to defendant(s)the use of plaintiff's credit facilities.
2. Defendant(s) accepted and used the aforesaid credit card so
issued and by so doing agreed to perform the terms and conditions
prescribed by the plaintiff for the use of said credit card.
3. The defendant (s) received and accepted goods and merchandise
and/or accepted services or cash advances through the use of the credit
card issued by the Plaintiff. A true and correct copy of the statements
or Affidavit of Account, if available, is attached hereto made part
hereof and marked as Exhibit "A".
4. All the credits to which the defendant(s)is entitled have been
applied and there remains a balance due as of 5/18/12 in the amount of
$2,849.74.
5. Plaintiff has made demand upon the defendant(s)for payment of
the balance due but the defendant(s)has failed and refused and still
refuses to pay the same or any part thereof.
6. Defendant's last payment on account was made on 2/7/2011.
WHEREFORE, plaintiff claims of the defendant (s) the sum of $2,849.74
plus applicable costs, interest and attorney's fees.
GORDON & WEINBERG, P.C.
f?
BY:
FREDERIC I. E BERG, ESQUIRE
JOEL M. FLIN , ESQUIRE
Attorney for Plaintiff
P01A
RENATHA HAMILTON
4695965002526867
State of Delaware
County of New Castle
2123777
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE
AFFIDAVIT
I, / :Che/g 64ax j? being duly served sworn according to law, depose
and say that:
1. I am the authorized representative of the Plaintiff herein and I have
custody and control of the files relating to this account;
2. Plaintiff's files are maintained in the usual and ordinary course of
business;
3. This action is based on a claim for breach of contract and that
damages are sought as a direct result of said breach;
4. There is now due and owing from defendant to plaintiff, the amount of
$2,849.74 less credits in the amount of $.00 totaling $2,849.74 as of April 6,
2012.
5. If called upon, affiant can testify at trial as to the facts
pertaining to this matter.
The above facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge,
information and belief.
f
AFFIANT:
Sworn to and Subscribed
before me this ?C day
of , 2 2
i
Notary Public
P120
1Z: •C` .?
SHERIFF'S OFFICE OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY P =.=
Ronny RAnderson
Sheriff
?a Ali ? u+?brr ?
# .^
^ y
Jody S Smith ??w
l?
's Gnr.' CO
Chief Deputy , - --
Richard W Stewart
Solicitor OFFICE,: - ,E c?Eala? {
Barclays Bank Delaware Case Number
vs.
2012-3507
Renatha Hamilton
SHERIFF'S RETURN OF SERVICE
06/11/2012 06:32 PM - Shawn Gutshall, Deputy Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law, states that on June
11, 2012 at 1832 hours, he served a true copy of the within Complaint and Notice, upon the within named
defendant, to wit: Renatha Hamilton, by making known unto herself personally, at 915 Indiana Avenue,
Lemoyne, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17043 its contents and at the same time handing to her
personally the said true and correct copy of the same.
TSHA , EPUTY
SHERIFF COST: $44.00
June 12, 2012
SO ANSWERS,
RON R ANDERSON, SHERIFF
(cj GountySutte Sheriff. Tele.osoft. Ina
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
€0
'Hot
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION P -
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE, f; RL)' ND COUNT
- r???S1'Li?,?NIA
Plaintiff(s) Docket No.: 12-3507-Civil Term
v.
RENATHA HAMILTON,
Defendant(s) PRAECIPE FOR APPEARANCE
Filed on Behalf of Defendant
Counsel:
The J. Murphy Firm
The Grant Building, 33?d Floor
310 Grant Street, #3309
Pittsburgh, PA. 15219
(412)521-2000
Joseph P. Murphy, Esquire
Pa. Supreme Court I.D. 83120
+?161N
•- \ 1 Y
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE,
Plaintiff(s) Docket No.: 12-3507-Civil Term
V.
RENATHA HAMILTON,
Defendant(s)
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly accept my appearance on behalf of The Defendant.
RespeofGl ly,
Joseph P
$3120
Th/I.phy Firm
TBuilding, 33rd Floor
3Street, #3309
Pi , PA. 15219
# i
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE,
Plaintiff(s)
V.
RENATHA HAMILTON,
Defendant(s)
Docket No.: 12-3507-Civil TermrrI "
J
-
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO
COMPLAINT
Filed on Behalf of Defendant
Counsel:
The J. Murphy Firm
The Grant Building, 33rd Floor
310 Grant Street, #3309
Pittsburgh, PA. 15219
(412)521-2000
Joseph P. Murphy, Esquire
Pa. Supreme Court I.D. 83120
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE,
Plaintiff(s) Docket No.: 12-3507-Civil Term
V.
RENATHA HAMILTON,
Defendant(s)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Joseph P. Murphy, counsel for the Defendant in the above captioned
matter, do solemnly swear that the foregoing
- -C APPEARANCE
.ICJ PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO COMPLAINT
'12 rMOTION/REQUEST/PRAECIPIE FOR ARGUMENT
were delivered by First Class, U.S. Mail, Postage Pre-Paid to the Below:
Joel Flink, Esq.
Gordon and Weinberg, P.C.
1001 E. Hector Street, Suite 220
Conshohocken, Pa 19428
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE,
Plaintiff(s) Docket No.: 12-3507-Civil Term
V.
RENATHA HAMILTON,
Defendant(s)
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO COMPLAINT
Now comes the Defendant, by and through counsel, the J. Murphy
Firm, and Joseph P. Murphy, Esquire and bring(s) and file(s) the within
Preliminary Objections to Complaint, averring in support thereof as follows:
OBJECTIONS TO CONTRACT CLAIMS
1. The Complaint references a credit agreement or contract.
2. No averment is made as to whether said agreement is oral, or
written.
3. The foregoing amounts to a violation of Pa. R.C.P. §1019(h), as
amended, which requires that, "When any claim or defense is
based upon an agreement, the pleading shall state specifically if the
agreement is oral or written."
4. Accordingly, the Complaint is the proper subject of preliminary
objections pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(2) for violation of rule of
court 1019(h).
5. Although the Complaint references a credit agreement or contract,
no copy of the agreement or contract is attached thereto.
6. The foregoing amounts to a violation of PA. R.C.P. §1019(1).
7. Accordingly, the Complaint is the proper subject of preliminary
objections pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. §1028(a)(2) for failure to conform
to Rule of Court 1019(i).
OBJECTIONS DIRECTED TOWARD LACK OF SPECIFICITY
8. These objections arise under Rule 1028(a)(3) and Rule 1019(f)
9. Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(3) provides for the filing of preliminary
objections where the complaint is insufficiently specific.
10. Rule 1028(a)(3) is commonly understood to require that the
complaint be sufficiently specific as to allow the Defendant to
formulate an answer, admitting or denying the averments in the
complaint.
11. As set forth in the attached brief, the complaint in this case is not
so sufficiently specific.
12. Pa. R.C.P. 1019 requires, inter alia, that facts be pled and that
items of special damage be pled with specificity.
13. In the context of a credit case, the facts and items of special
damage, which are to be pled, include the dates and amounts of
charges, fees, fines, interest, and the like.
14. In the context of a credit case, the requirements of 1019 are
normally met by attaching copies of an un-interrupted chain of
statements, starting with a zero balance and ending with a
statement showing the amount sought in the complaint.
15. It is respectfully submitted that the neither the Complaint, nor the
documents attached thereto, sufficiently or specifically plead the
facts and items of special damage underlying the case.
16. This renders the Complaint the proper subject of preliminary
objections, pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(2), for failure to
conform to Rule of Court 1019, and the proper subject of
preliminary objections, pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1028(a)(3) for
insufficient specificity.
OBJECTIONS TO VERIFICATION
17. The Complaint is verified by counsel.
18. A verification by counsel can be appropriate only if same complies
with Pa. R.C.P. 1024(c).
19. Said verification does not comply with Pa. R.C.P. §1024(c).
20. Accordingly, the Complaint is the proper subject of preliminary
objections, pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(2) for failure to comply
with Rule 1024(c).
WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully prays that the Complaint filed by
the Plaintiff be dismissed with prejudice, or, in the alternative that the
complaint be stricken, and the Plaintiff be required to plead over in accord
CA IA
PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT
(Must be typewritten and submitted in triplicate)
E' a fa _
16!, h .
E?
125
TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY: (List the within matter for the next
Argument Court.)
CAPTION OF CASE
(entire caption must be stated in full)
VS.
?Ac1M t ` T
No./ Z -2'5T76 0 /Term
1. State matter to be argued (i.e., plaintiff's motion for new trial, defendant's demurrer to
complaint,
/2e , T6 ecj r w?
2. Identify all counsel who will argue cases:
(a) for plaintiffs:
J'1C7 I- ^ (Name and Address)
(b) for defendants:
w-v L" 31 a Gfc/v,? s k 33a?
/ (Name and Address)
3. 1 will notify all parties in writing within two days that this case has been listed for
argument.
4. Argument Court Date:
Signature
?513G
Z I '
Date: ttorney for
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Two copies of all briefs must be filed with the COURT ADMINISTRATOR
(not the Prothonotary) before argument.
2. The moving party shall file and serve their brief 12 days prior to argument.
3. The responding party shall file their brief 5 days prior to argument.
4. If argument is continued new briefs must be filed with the COURT
ADMINISTRATOR (not the Prothonotary) after the case Is rellsted.
aro+ * 1 $Ia?
C? ? 9s3
C
rn CD =m
-0;m
2123777 cnr" _ :.:=
�p CD I
___4 C-)
GORDON & WEINBERG, P.C. =--t.4
0
CJs
BY: FREDERIC I . WEINBERG, ESQUIREp " ' tm,
Identification No. : 41360 -j>JL_ f`
JOEL M. FLINK, ESQUIRE
Identification No. : 41200 CO
1001 E. Hector Street, Ste 220
Conshohocken, PA 19428
484/351-0500
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
VS . DOCKET NO. : 12-3507 CIVIL
TERM
RENATHA HAMILTON
PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW COMPLAINT
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly withdraw the above-captioned action, without
prejudice.
GORDON & WEINBERG, P.C.
BY
FREDERIC W NBERG, ESQUIRE
JOEL M. F INK, ESQUIRE
Attorn for Plaintiff
P006
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
I, JOEL M. FLINK, ESQUIRE, hereby certify that I, on the
date below, served a copy of the Praecipe to Withdraw Complaint
to Pa.R.C. P. 1028 (c) (1 ) , via First Class Mail, postage pre-paid,
to all other parties or their counsel of record.
JOEL F IN , ESQUIRE
Dated — 3
r r
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE,
Plaintiff(s)
Docket No.: 2012-3507
V.
RENATHA HAMILTON, ; -a
PRAECIPE TO DISMISS WITH-;jw fr,
PREJUDICE =� -"
Defendant(s) > t,, C.)
<C:)
e
Filed on Behalf of:
DEFENDANT C:) N
�- cn ^;
Counsel for this Party:
Joseph Murphy
83120
THE J. MURPHY FIRM
310 GRANT STREET, #3309
PITTSBURGH, PA 15219
(412)521-2000
t"IJA
f f
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE,
Plaintiff(s)
Docket No.: 2012-3507
V.
RENATHA HAMILTON
Defendant(s)
Certificate of Service
I do solemnly swear that a true and correct copy of the within Praecipe
to Dismiss With Prejudice was delivered to the below party or counsel
therefore as follows:
Joel Flink, Esq.
Gordon & Weinberg
1001 E Hector Street Suite 220
Conshohocken, PA 19428
[X] Via First Class U.S. Mail, Postage [ ] Via Facsimile:
Pre-Paid
[ ] Via Certified U.S. Mail, Postage [ ] Via Express Mail
Pre-Paid Carrier:
Article N-uf6ber
[ ] Via Certified U.S. Mail, Po A ge [ Other Method as follows:
Pre-Paid, Return Receipt Requested.
Joseph Mur�hy
May 8th, 0 3
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE,
Plaintiff(s)
Docket No.: 2012-3507
V.
RENATHA HAMILTON
Defendant(s)
PRAECIPE TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
To the Department of Court Records:
Kindly mark the above-captioned matter Dismissed with Prejudice for
failure to comply with order of court dated January 3rd, 2013
a copy of which is attached hereto.
The Day's Count is as Follows:
January 3rd -- January 31St 28 Days
February 1St - February 28th 28 Days
March 1s' - March 31St 31 Days
April 1St - April 30th 30 Days
May 1St - May 8th 08 Days
r
TOTAL: 125 Days
Respectfully Submitted,
Joseph Murph
May 8th, 2013
(Counsel for DEFENDANT)
IN THE COURT 0 COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE,
Plaintif (s) Docket No.-..;12 3,507-Civil Term
V.
RENATHA HAMILTON,
Defendant(s) .
ORDER .
On this 3 day of �, 20 �3 , it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is stricken. Plaintiff may file anhended
complaint within 120 days If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint
within the time set forth a ove, the Prothonotary, upon Praecipe of the
Defendant, shall dismiss t is case with prejudice.
BY THE COURT;
151 '114 avy 4
}
COHSE T 0 T NTRY OF THE ABQV'� Q ER:
' �7o
J eph P. M rop rq � r n
C.if D'
Jo IiYSk, sq. 2---