Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-08-12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Tuesday, May 15, 2012 Carlisle, Pennsylvania (The following proceedings were held at 9:40 a.m,.:;l THE COURT: From our previous informal discussion, I understand that there's an agreement t.o resolve the issues that are before us. MR. KUTULAKIS: Yes, Your Honor. MR. REYNOSA: That is correct, Your Honor. THE COURT: Do you want to begin, Attorney Reynosa or Attorney Kutulakis? MR. KUTULAKIS: I can try to take a crack at this, Your Honor_ The parties have agreed to the following: That I will assume a payment to an engineer surveyor to reconfigure a property boundary line between the subject. parcels. Mr. Reynosa and I have developed a proposed exhibit for the Court which we've captioned as Exhibit A. The property line, while it's a fiction at this point in spirit, as it relates to this exhibit will begin at a point that we've numbered as No. 1 on this Exhibit A to a point that we've numbered as point No. 2, from point 2 to point 3 which will close the subject property which we currently -- I currently own. In addition to the fees associated with ghat, which we understand to be somewhere between 1,000 and 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 $1,500, I will -- I will assume the responsibility of paying that sum. Additionally, we will pay a fee of $7,500 to Mr. Reynosa for his fees associated with this case to date broken down into payments as follows: A payment of $4,500 payable today with 3 equal installments of $1,000 beginning on the date that Mr. Diffenbaugh completes his engineering as described in good faith in Exhibit A. Thereafter, 2 remaining payments of $1,000 will be made 30 days apart with the ability to make total payment prior to that if we choose to do so. I presume you won't object to that. MR. REYNOSA: No. MR. KUTULAKIS: Additionally, Mr. Reynosa will be drafting praecipes to discontinue both actions that are currently before this Honorable Court as well as a general release to be executed by both parties. The general scope of the release will indicate that the parties will mutually release one another for all current known or unknown causes of action but will not bar any ability to enforce future property disputes between current or future land owners. The spirit of that release is not to .relate to anything that's transpired to date at all. It's to protect the prospective landowners in the future, their 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 rights to enforce their own property rights. We do not have those releases to present to the Court today. I don't hold any reservations that Mr. Reynosa's pen won't get that done in an accurate action appropriately. Also, we agreed that as long, as I get a draft, we will do our very best to have the general release executed within 15 days of today's date, Your Honor. MR. REYNOSA: And the future claims that Mr. Kutulakis suggests or potential future claims I believe relate to issues such as if a new landowner or current landowner encroaches upon Mr. Kutulakis's land for some reason or tries to build a house too close to his property, not for any claims that may have been known or unknown during the course of this lawsuit; is that correct? MR. KUTULAKIS: Right. And it's mutual. So likewise if I were to sell my property, if whoever purchases it would encroach on the then landowner, they would have rights that the other landowner would have. MR. REYNOSA: And we'll reference both parcels of land 411 Barnstable as well as 505 as well by parcel numbers in the release. THE COURT: Say that again. MR. REYNOSA: We'll incorporate both parcels of land, 411 and 505 Barnstable Road in the general release. We can submit this Exhibit A to the Court, or we can 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 incorporate it into our general release. Whatever the Court wishes. It's our general drawing that Mr. Diffenbaugh will refer to in doing his additional work related to the subdivision of the land. THE COURT: Maybe we could do both. We can make a copy for the Court, and you could use that for your purposes. Just a thought. MR. REYNOSA: Very well. We can do that. I believe that covers all the issues. THE COURT: And to confirm, obviously, I'm relying on your representations but your client is i:n agreement with this, Attorney Reynosa? MR. REYNOSA: She is in agreement with this. Is that correct, Miss Kutulakis? MRS. KUTULAKIS: Yes. THE COURT: Do you need anything further in the way of an order other than an order approving settlement? And by that I mean do you need any kind of order that regurgitates the terms that you just placed of record or shall we ask for transcript or leave just leave the record as it is and rely on that as the terms of the agreement? MR. REYNOSA: If I may speak to my client? If we could just have an order just, I guess, reciting the general terms and with a deadline that hopes that in good 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 faith the parties try to complete or have an agreement completed within 15 days of today's date, something to that effect? MR. KUTULAKIS: I don't have any objection, Your Honor. MR. REYNOSA: And if the Court wishes to have the transcript transcribed for that purpose to do the agreement, I wouldn't have a problem with that so we can get a court order. THE COURT: That's probably better since inadvertently, although I am sure you would bring it to my attention, inadvertently I would change something in my dictated order I think it would be better to get a transcript and then I'll enter an order incorporating those terms if that's satisfactory with you and with your client as well. MR. REYNOSA: Sure. So long as we have an order incorporating the terms, that's fine. THE COURT: All right. That's what we'll do then. For today's purposes, this 15th of May, 2012, we approve the settlement and it is ordered that the settlement and the terms of that settlement placed of record by counsel are approved and incorporated into this order of court with the Court to prepare a written order to be distributed to counsel. We request the reporter to prepare a transcript 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 for incorporation in our formal order. Thank you. Is that satisfactory? MR. KUTULAKIS: Yes, Your Honor. MR. REYNOSA: Thank you. THE COURT: Let me just say that it is always better to reach agreement than to be compelled to go through the litigation, and I am very happy that you reached an agreement. It seems reasonable to me and a very reasonable settlement of the issues so you can put this all behind you. MR. KUTULAKIS: Your Honor, I feel compelled on the record, I know I did this in chambers too but formally to apologize to the Court for delaying bringing this to fruition and forcing the Court to come from out of county. I want to make sure I did that formally on the record. THE COURT: No apology necessary. (The proceedings concluded at 9:49 a.m.) 7 f4 I hereby certify that the proceedings are contained fully and accurately in the notes taken by me on the above cause and that this is a correct transcript of same. ;~ r ~L~, / ~, "~' ~.mdy L. ~ortez~, RPR Official Court Reporter The foregoing record of the proceedings on the hearing of the within matter is hereby approved and directed to be filed. ~R% d`/ Z-v~Z Date CERTIFICATION ~- Eugene Fike, II, r. J. 8