The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-5144Mn T h? Cou4 o-?' CCMrron P4EaZ ojp CeLrA. c3 r (Lro Cc?wr(?, nsr?uc?nit? Clwl Dw?stor? C?rld I arnar Rc,z?qq)r v. 1 fl• 'PcAon, E.., Braonl, -T. ?06kc?vtc? 3. (Ylurr. ID. C-? rr } 3 And?f?? shwcns, R. marsh, t- Knit y, L+ ???-ndexrl? i C?t>> l T Rm 7fu.cc? %CV&A IDLrnc?n8c-8 To THE `I07-HO tN(0-' Pei Y O V S PST D Cs:)uRT I-,)ndtnsw, G, C,ummons Glyc. lfu - c-rt(4 Poc EaJ) O-P +-*- c Lv?vn}? ncsmt? to 4t C.c-tOn o-P- Wes C MI tXe Dn CWn ?r and 4-h£, S0.rv1Y, ?1,??l r? c C?rnbz?lox?c? Coc Hit s?ruree. c-on zrch d`z Yk?t lS LI+ X6610 (-/Ls-burn rd, 17041-tnf4 . 10-3-014 N: Lo?ANoooj bean PQ&k&Y G?vr? rAlf-viad SL c-c-w'cr Rov-1tr' r-P3(o37 iplr-lf+IQQS, camp 4 AN,P, tzco (.Air i4 DF sury1mcLgF ?© OE?EN?IENTS? S P?rd? R (??1n?r,, p.k?lcl?rs, D. E. Brannt , ?. t?olokovtOh, 3. Murray, D- Cx?rr??l,, P•v,drr??, Z. rvlbOlaF,, ?. How=vVt. V-,C , R. 5-?w 's, R. Mox5h,1- f: L,`' z4C?'urelli, ENC,4 Nt4b EVE1{Y©N£. OF YoU, P%P E 146AE,.$Y N,JrsFSEL> Ttip.TT{?E AC?VE- NAMED P1?SNT=F?? StAN PRt?N3LEy 1nZpAUL_ R07TUR 0,'6 COMMENCED ACTI:©N /NGNmk43T- 0 F You. WAz t -xNC?ToN, c.AmAR F=-AC-4 NNU Ev?RyD??le 1 DN-z'ED_ a tPRo'n}ON urA-R Y D?.?uT Y Al r, PF?I1 UG r ?? Gu.w?l??rta? ?oc?n4y,Yrlitsy??ar? ? CC)YWMOn ?I c T? Thy Go , astir 4on, ma c Ra7-? ? C i u r l Te Pun - Q. j . 6?-c? 'vk o ???s ?Vl?,?.?sp 1 O t?rIX?O -L-??OC r'Yla 1 ?.?.1 E C' Roz:??? ?1? ?s vuc}k?o?n ask?v?? ihd ? ??• 1n su?? ?? Gt11 d Lccn1Cc?' -f?, f rock + Fjr rno4ron VCL\'v c hid 1r)?r? an ? ? 1?y IO/3IDY S?bmA?A 4 VOL ' LislournF-4 "J??klpat7001 L4ryW r? r CP3&37 E ij l,.,E t ( I_, 0 iu - I AF-kda k\ e'}Y e 1 41 &E-Ck q, cKrya AVrL, +hj- ac_ too oc Pr-14 a bp??l + lh?n?. i k l? u? z am h 1?, 1 f+o re?rFSs Sc..O?? at a?,rm z ??Z, no ar8 4cj- my Pry,30n 0-c?'J,? ti 5 o.+ a n 4m- WancI.,ggzr-- m y a #zac d accCau? !?4a4errwr+ ?h ;5cVpoC+ d-htjs,. PAGE 1 INMATE ACCOUNTS SYSTEM 09-20-2004 E-B-1006 MONTHLY ACCOUNT STATEMENT 943 CAM • INMATE NAME NUMBER LAST FIRST MI OLD BALANCE CG4129 PRESSLEY SHAWN -9.38 BATCH DATE # MO DY YEAR TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION BALANCE AFTER AMOUNT TRANSACTION 2673 08-25-2004 14 MISCELLANEOUS MEDICAL SERVICE REFUND 4.00 -5.38 2674 08-26-2004 . 38 INSIDE PURCHASES XEROX / RG -1.30 -6.68 2775 09-08-2004 14 MISCELLANEOUS REFUND MEDICAL SERVICE 2.00 -4.68 2823 09-16-2004 38 INSIDE PURCHASES LIBRARY / VENDACARD -.30 -4.98 NEW BALANCE AS OF THIS STATEMENT -------------------> -4.98 VI?, ?. try ? r.?,-.. - ?.1 7: ?? -_? ?? ?ai =? /i12?t//cL 11!'/Ic SGri?/G.L c. V ?cC LCe_CL [G??cs'-1??L /c ci?1L?? _ 1Ix , j.c.criusc.a/-'yn uIct/ ', ??? l"(li?t(? Fcc a?rnY f?c2?`n/// or !?'GrG d ,bex? Fr ??ZCS,? yo_Y'.cc AIL- ) C?-SSGSzl_ / / / C .6 <d/.llc.rlC G , cJ G C tx? !<!/? p r le cc acs?ct .? ? ? Cchu,s?T i ;y s c??pl? ??r, _ Xt;~+,1 I1 PAGE 1 INMATE ACCOUNTS SYSTEM 09-20-2004 F.-B-1004 MONTHLY ACCOUNT STATEMENT 942 CAM INMATE NAME NUMBER LAST FIRST MI OLD BALANCE CU4596 WASH INGTON MICHAEL -33.23 BATCH DATE # MO DY YEAR TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION TRANSACTION BALANCE AFTER AMOUNT TRANSACTION 2823 09-09-2004 38 INSIDE PURCHASES XEROX COPIES OX'D RG -1.00 -34.23 2819 09-09-2004 37 POSTAGE POSTAGE DONE 9/9 -.83 -35.06 NEW BALANCE AS OF THIS STATEMENT ------- ------------> -35.06 A-4 a4.,, ,=? 04 C wL ue.., ?O ASS eS-i5 ?*-s?G, -?e,'? cct 'QC?Sn< VQ)I3Voy SEAN PRESSLEY, MICHAEL WASHINGTON, AND LAMAR ROZIER, PLAINTIFFS V. J. BEARD, R. BITNER, D. KELCHNER, D. PATTON, E. BRANNIGAN, J. POLOKOVICH, J. MURRAY, D. GARRETT, J. ANDRADE, Z. MOSLAK, D. HOFFMAN, M. KAZOR, : R. STEVENS, R. MARSH, LT. KELLY, LT. ZACCURELLI, R. SOUTHERS, DEFENDANTS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 04-5144 CIVIL. TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this day of January, 2005, the petition of the within plaintiffs to proceed in forma pauperis, IS GRANTED. The praecipe for a writ of summons may be filed without payment of the filing fee and the Sheriff shall serve the writ. Sean Pressley, CG 4129, Pro se SCI-Camp Hill 2500 Lisburne Road Camp Hill, PA 17001 Michael Washington, CU 5814, Pro se 2500 Lisburne Road Camp Hill, PA 17001 Xmar Rozier, CP 3637, Pro se 2500 Lisburne Road Camp Hill, PA 17001 By ther Court, Edgar B. Bayley, J. ?.S Sheriff :sal ?. __ w i,., Commonwealth of Pennsylvania County of Cumberland WRIT OF SUMMONS Court of Common Pleas Sean Pressley, Michael Washington, and Lamar Rozier Plaintiff Vs. No. 04-5144 In CivilAction-Law J. Beard, R. Bitner, D. Kelchner, D. Patton, E. Brannigan, J. Polokovich, J. Murray, D. Garrett, J. Andrade, Z. Moslak, D. Hoffman, M. Kazor, R. Stevens, R. Marsh, Lt. Kelly, Lt. Zaccurelli, R. Southers, Defendant To J. Beard, R. Bitner, D. Kelchner, D. Patton, E. Brannigan, J. Polokovich, J. Murray, D. Garrett, J. Andrade, Z. Moslak, D. Hoffman, M. Kazor, R. Stevens, R. Marsh, Lt. Kelly, Lt. Zaccurelli, R. Southers, You are hereby notified that Sean Pressley, Michael Washington, and Lamar Rozier the Plaintiff(s) has / have commenced an action in Civil Action-Law against you which you are required to defend or a default judgment may be entered against you. (SEAL) CURTIS R. LONG Date January 20, 2005 Attorney: Name: Sean Pressley, CG 4129 Michael Washington, CU 5814 Lamar Rozier, CP 3637 Address: SCI-Camp Hill, 2500 Lisburne Road Camp Hill, PA 17011 Attorney for: Pro Se =n 'The C?rnrnor? -?1tct?s c.cc,%.4 G- G«mv-)F 1c. c?c=n k? ' nn avant Gv?l Dw,stpn ?G fl ??c ;s\ I e? CA. C6??cd ek _ rvbt.on Fos Cc>m?lo?n-1 ???SCs?l9?S ac-Cr&nu' V u\-,z CI©©1- CC-1 Ond . ?? 1?a. cu??? c?U'?1 3Era? ?i 1 ,mod rn?cLa??1 40n mcxqu j?oc an ov6?x (3%t-6k +o conJLOAC + c..®rnPlc?irl?-. C.c?xnoN?l G (7 ni-o?c? 4 /q /05 IN; It ? ?t r-, ELF is ,t Y, It ki tj Zf t? St (9-'61 11?) 4101) LEZ PZ d !hS 7ja°8eQ 'A spooM dj (LL61 ' OD aozroW 'ID "dnS) 9E PZ'S'.l'N S6£ 'Zo£ PZ'astW r6 'A ladooo t(6pawa? ,1o uour'apmuoa laqun,( jot papuewaa IG)gruopnlpsuoaun ;o 8mpmq 01 se pawagle) (tL(l1 'J!D PZ) ££C PZ A 104 Payrpow TA 'N"a S;) t6S 'ddnS'3 1L£' `wlo0ley?t 'A waga UL61 rA'Q'M) 491 'ddnS' I Stt 'ornl4 "A >jaZ -aep '(suolleaggnd It8a1 Euiwaauoo) (9L61) ZZE PZ'P3'1 Lh'8111 "1:)'S 96'L16 "s "n tZt'vrivH 'A apcaPuV 'wou qns PatuaP uaa '(5-161 ate 419) E££ 'ZZE PZ'd 919 'i'ons/ `n 'Zn{O '(8-161 'JIDP OF.1-6Z['SII PZ'd U9 '1Aa7'A gs13I0A1 jo aossa;oad 'aalpa1 q atlsaq arj!]3 put loglnr. 3olTian 9utpnloul Swadxa fataalll lraanas jo fuowllsal agT palussaad s3311utrld slut -araq asagT 2ut1na 'SL6I `ZI lagwaaaH put 'L aagwaaaQ `9I lagwanoN uo panutluoa lip. -taT aqT put' 'lutrldwoa papuawr aql paiams -us slutpua2a4 'lanoo a2pnf-aaagl e ao; paau ail 2ugsiAgo sngl 'jagaa:aMpaunfut aoj lsanbaa atagl maapgTtm'oslr Rally s elna „fluo saagstlgnd„ aup isaluoa of pumut Tou pup Sail 7rgT paluatpw. fag,I, 'saanp -aooad malAa.l rtpaw sql uo vtar;pr atagl moapgltm s3;qultld 'luawpuawr still ul -utr2r lag lutrldwoa atagl puawr op panow sl9quwld 'SL6I `91 aag0P0 uo 'aanamoH 'SL6I 'LZ psn2nV uo 'ltnbalp puoDaS; aqT 1o3 slraddV 20 lanop saltlS palw,q 'a2pnp 3atgj 'urw,lnrg 'H 2u1AaI algraouoH aql 9q palaurdwt sum T.moo o2pnf-aaagq r'awtl Trip Jr. uogar stgl ut luaw2pnf 9aoluarl3ap fldwts utgT aaow 1g2nos s,l3qu1t1d aoutS 'sawr,L 2umf2uofj put '9a2uy d;2 2ursrg :raq;urd Karlff `PIaoM ?PVG 'eur]r7 PpPruf2 :alna „Slug saagsgqnd„ aql aapun papnlaxa 9lpa2allt aaam saadudsmau 9utmollo; aid, 'Itroadg 2q.8rupryf put up 1q_?rg 'dr2uy dr2 2ursrff '1a2uallsgq olt3Fng :papnlaxa uaaq antq of pa2alle aaam slratpouad 2ut.emollo2 aql jo sansst arlnagatd '1@uo q 'S dq!gd fq paltpa 31radg slaglurd h'nslff aq,L Put ''(aag laagog 9q wig '..zagaaj 3o Inog PaXtN aq,L 'umoag ds'g 'H 9q IaIQ aaffAJ a!G "af 'fglaS laagnH 9q wood aq,L 'farad aq,L 'um .arr a2aoan So aF7 .flq• ut poolg 'wur.AOtr) -v !"IS 9q XIn,L Xoslff `2¢gaa3 song o.u.,. sautlaptn2 oql aapun papnlaxa s>ooq ally 'sautiaptn2 ail aapun papnlaxa 9lgrt3gsnf -un uaaq pry pla) fagl vlTlm asogl 2uowr aaam gmgm slratpouad aaglo pull sllooq aqp palstl s3Jtlwrld 'lutrldwoa aqp of xtpuad EIS "salewui of 01gelNAe Irualrw S41PV3J- aql si, tmsaj 6lgisslwadwi aina , riluo s,jagsggnd„ r gans imp papnjauoa alms anrg s11noD •x -LLZ-9LZ m lduasurll Iru1 aag 'Z ON aup -apw!) of pappr sum asrjgd stgl Imp ploaas aq1 w, suoilraipm 'aanamo11 'aar 013111 SL61 'o£ aunp palrp Iraauap riauworv lurlslssv ail ;o 1!Arpi;lr aql w paplAoad Z ON augapmo To uop -ipuaa 341 u11ou'ZL61 `o£ RrW Pa4rp'9 -ON up -along lruL9uo agl ut aeadde lou swop „slsaialui luqun'd of Iraddr, pmM, asragd aq1 'aajol w dliuasaad s1 'g0igm Z ON auijaping To 8wpiom Irnlae agl of se uoilsanb awos suirwal: aaagl •Z -du ur, ul 'sa.mpaaoad put saagarad laubcl -n;gsuoa 3o uotldopr 2utlaaatp aapao ur put saanpaaoad' put salogod luasaad slurpuej -ap TO guawaaao7u0 lsutr2r 3atlaa aAIlaun.lui luaurwaad pup. 6arutwgaw pg2nos gag2 put 'slua,wpuawr gquaalano3 put 'glutu 'glg2ta 'Isat3 ail palslot,i eaatlasad put samlod bqq Trgl juaul2pnf 9aolrarloap lg2nos s3jq -ulsld 'lsalnau: 41jualot;3ns sum quill Spun 2udlrw-uomaap r aoI aptAoad of papr; put 'papnloxa uaaq prq swap mujaaa gum, suotT -surldxa 61rnbapr aptAoad of slutat3do suotT -aaaaoa aambaa of palm 'swall palsaluoa 3q 6gtpyssiwpr agl ploddns of salrwut ao7 fltunlaoddo alrnbapu ur aptAoad of paltt', 9agTyp.gl ut juaiatjap 2llruotlnltlsuoa @aam 09'oN'Ullaling angralswlwpV ut glaol laS saanpaaoad aql irgl pa2allr, s33tputsld 'lso< leat2o)ouad ptlrA gut 01 aa2urp luasaa('. put argla r alnpgsuoa ptnom slstaalrw yon pray put antoaaa of s;,ltlutsld 2utmollr lrq: 2wmogs Sur lnogltm suotlmilgnd snotar: pray pus antaaaa oil 19211 ail luasaadw fay' gatgm ssula aql put s331lutrld paiuap put sluspuajap T.rgl pa2a(pr s33tlulrld 'uor -sagddr lruognlgsuoa put lualstsuoa s ]' ,fltltgtssod fur 2utpnl3aad pus '9aolrultup -sup put lruolltaat `juajslsuoaul `farallgx an lull,, suotltoggnd jo uotsnlaxa pup. f11u uo suolsmap 2uq;twaad 'aor.2 nail uo proa: -aano pus anbUA gloq 2wag ss 9 g2noau, Z 'soN sautjaping pa2uallrga s3Jtputrld ,a1rudoad -dr paaaptsuoa aq oT st xas jo laafgns .algrldaaar you aas 'puawaloxa glum uotirdnoaoaad tulnlruun ao 'fptlstl -saq 'wstprs 'wstgaosrw 'rtltgdoaoau 2ulAlonul Sias Tat dap 91arala gotgm 1o 'anp3A Irtaos 2utwaapaa lnogltm 911@1 (BL6U sos'ddns'd ash sc alts (IHVM 'A Nosx3vf ?u c ° ?\? ?,. Me_vo ymn& nl C L + n a l oz V-Aab r1 Fc>? k r? cure ID, ?+k ©p T?ngS,,-,& ey? S t? a c w,1 r? hkzs atAlon -c-MA," t 1 , o,XNA t-o,~ r q-,c kk-rCVmf,, V pVc ? Sind, Vb?un -rcn1 ,,?s?-l?,d ?, V,A rvtann c rvi? t,ln, aC,'hay'1 S'kt?c: 1'?r,SOr',?.?t's [,i9'?m 4-k, gP ? a 3( C>c dfacaor ana kn r ?>nc,?nU? (c????' t? dot ya u.s,c. ??c , c 83 a1\?en ,?a?:h? p®? 4t ornn ihx e????rnm?rf r tfrJr c>F?r,?vanc s, ,?M? ??n t ?Y?Lf?JYA CP, 3?EDd), d?1, vice c ?n?? c,?nc s?r?cx cS 1n?rJ? , `??Sr? ?-??,? ?n???'?? d??:la?cc; o? ?n??,1k1n cs?.? tr??rn?lc.?tci?? ??--c?fx??a.? 4? \ t ,c `n?C F SS1k X45, or A dnvs e5? '?rcx iar d?&? c +'n d, el,nourj, cxdw?+n,s?rtz?iv? a d P?.r?od?c? t?cW? ?n?c?r4ri s tYt Viplc? ?k, $-1-4,, and I L A +k cw\&'cnA 4-S a? +i"c, U S . CchnU? , cr1. Si?'t?vvtvnk 0 TvIF , Ram On t0--LA-©' I Thy Plca,n?' s Wv\?- ?? u?rr?rvta and w.c3hcsc? S roc ,n?crrviG Pc x tS w, , 1?? 0- IV') 4,, J° ac are +h sd .10-1 c cnx +? d scc E y? i l?v de, dirt cc3rv lr h?r C onb?r,n9 1-1?,4. ?n?-lu?? vvte?-,e?n. fYv-? 0. }r? c S'LL, Luck?+ v. (31r s?_.,rk?n Ick-Cflm I??n-d1'?Lr rs r u,r?d -1a ,4. Fire h? tics s?? ( r rtvvtc, ?tn? j, $5C? pl-3-d8t I, ?I? Cry. Cmn, lOA6 20 30q). _S a?tc,c?cd h? yVlc, >l ? rnP. l? 5h?n o?? C'..Wwna qr_,ut, c ? anc? ,shc??n °? usi; c?r? unc o?? PDc- 41j, Q0 tn? mesons, 47,_?, CotA4 rskocdJ ?? r?-? +h? dl q 10,5 `??Bnx? C itnpAIIIP 17,001 sunatnq ! Ja)rt w pasinaa uaaq srg a8rnxur[ sigy 'aint wswtgaaw aqj It aaam ssaao3d anp 3o squaw autnbai aqj Sjsilts lou,pjnom;, Z 'oN utla -Ing an1ltalsTunupV ut gl3oj las saanpaooad ayl IVgj Papnauoa PEq Plat3suryjj a9Pnr .Z ON utgattng ant ra st -utwPV 9utpuawt 'iL61 'L aaquiaadaS. pajup suotjEln2w '3o las mau, t p'ansst saatnaaS ItpO jaa33oD'30 luawwrdaQ a4j `(TL6I' 7,'N :Q'S) IV6'ddnS,A o££'sfgo'A a3;'soS ut plat3 i -suuX a2pnr-3o.aap3o aqj o1 8mppodsag 1 •aa13•to" s,aauotsstwwoD t aqj put 'juapualutaadnS aqa 'aall!wwoo j matrcai aqj Xq suopor aqj aoj sl!wtl awes utul3a0; pa4sttgrjsa Z -ON ucjapng jaa3ja ut aq of sum juapualuttadnS aqj Jo uotstaap fatutwila3d aqj 'wilalul aqj. uj •pagavaa sum u'otst8ap trut3 d aao3a9 juapuajuuadnS aql 11jtm aa3uoa.plnom put, aagjanj 0jr91jsan -ut uayj plnom a0ijjo s31uotss1wwoD a4j, 'saatnaaS Iruo1g33aao0 30 aauotsstwwoO aqj of uotstaap sty' put laodaa s,aajltwwoa agl p.tEmao; ol,polaanp sum u.mj ut oym 6ltltaE3 juuldnS -aql 91 suotltpuaw e4j 30 49apui, -wooa3 sl!'gaodaa.ol uagj, sum aalltwwoo matnaa stgy 'atgEjdeaauun se pa.'?ugr.ga uaaq prq g0tym suotlroggnd aqj aappuoo of Alipat3 Iruotj0a33oa goua 3o juapualut -3adnS aqj Xq pagsilgrjsa aq of sum aalltw -woo matnaa t jugj pa13f0ads wpapng aqy 'suo$eam aagjo pule samsoid -XD 'swaraju 3o aanjnjnuttu ao asn aql 3atdap jou plnogs uotlEOggnd aqy 'L Iau -uosaad uosud _ao saaat33o yuawaaao3 -ua mt( spjtmoj aouatpagostp ao pail -q altaui lot plnogs uotlrapgnd a4L '9 t 'djtntj3V alqupuaw -w0a r sE lonpuw qan$ Ariliod ao Al t• -uoglnr trjt9wuaae.o3 lsuts. t uoylaq -aa 3o dgOatuE 'aouatotn 'ssaussatmr[ ajEaonPt jou plnogs umironond a IZ '. (St'OVZ § mE`I Ituad aaS) 'ajrls styj 3o ao sajrjS palwn aql 3o luawuaano? 3o waoJ 8utlstx0 aqj 3o moigliano jt3101A ayl ajraonpE jou plnogs uotlrattgnd aqj; •V -riatj gVAN pawaouoa upapnq r ui 5I[wadsa 'paanouun oR jou plnogs trg7 JoAaa ur „'sop -ewwnsuoa„ sprat Z ON upatne trutFuo aqy ,t 'uu91jo luuoijru Jo Pajo 'U012 -qaa 'aata siagl-3o asnuaaq suosaad spatMOI Pa.ijrq ajtaut a0 [its] ?J!II!^ 'awtjap lou ptnoys uotltattgnd aqj, '£ '(00 9£Z § mr?j lruad aaS) 'sialirw guns 2ulluasaadaa ao "2wquasap ut aopuuo 3o sltwil ,Satwolsno aqj puo9aq of ao'wsgoosew ao'ujstpts;'[ots].uatjaaa -axa'xas'6jtpnu ut lsa3alut ptg3ow 3o lnjawtgs'juaynad of fIluuutwopa3d luaddr, jou plnogs` uotjraggnd aqy 'Z 'saltjS Paltafl aqj w 8wttuw auln2aa 3oj algrgdaaae i. aq plnogs'slttaaltw ag1 'tt3aua8 °I. 't :salrwut aoj"aanltialll 3o ? 1!t!qujdaa -013 agl Suwaa,xo8 saupaptn3 uaAas 114303 ,as ueyl Z .oN wjaling an11r3jstutwpV wE3? -oad atjnadtaayj u 3o uotluaado ag+.aajap g0tgm put 'salrwut 3aylo put jjr.js gjoq ao3 uognitlsui aqj jo ,llamas put Swivs aqj ualra3gl yotgm salrwut 3o sdnoa8 Sg 3otnugaq ao 3olnugaq tEnptntput...01 prat, '6rw luvaltw 8utpraa ultl.[an 3a I [uotq -dwnsuo0] aqj luyj Bans ain sapnltilt. Irtoostjur put 9j!I!grlsut Ituotjowa asogm salrww awos 'aanamoq 'air aaagj, :ostnoad 2w -molloJ aqj pauttjuoa utjaling aqj `aanamoq saadsdsmau put 'sawz¢8ew 'gooq 3o a8ut3 6ptm a sluap -110dsaa3oa paztaoyjnr wo33 anta0a3 04 30 of aquasgns of pamollr aq Ilrgs saltutut '6j8uipio3DV 'asn jrnptntput ajtnud ao wr32o3d iagl!a ao3 slutaaltui pajulai put aanjtaaltl of salrwut 6q ssaaar molls of saatnaaS Ituotl -0aa3o? 30 luaw43EdaQ 3111 30 8attod agjsem" It jtgl pal-CIS utjaling stgy .Z ON utjaling amltalstutwpV pansst saatnaaS Ituotlaa33oD 3o luoutlitda(l a4j 'IL61 '6Z I!adV u0 'saanoa]oad puv prn•°,-!d pa.?vallttja aqj 3o suotstnaa ttcluujsgns of pal sjanoa iagjo . q suotstaap put 'janoo stgj ql!m Silutjaaw It3anas 'satlaud a4j 2uOwE suotjr1408au papuajxg - •slur2p!I aluwut as oad 3o aagwnu r dq patt3 aaam suotlov pa juja3'palt; sure, uotjouIudt.Btao a4j 3ajJV 11'I ? #IIF? lKawnadas wills 3 nP 05S I I I 1 p .? T?F? rernt?16v1 ?"U'L C-Cu C? ?, lO?r'and C?>u ?t??vlsY? tm, Sri ???st? e? a? ?r•_??aro?-s?n ??,? ??.?nn?,c?- ? 'acs -Cr?rn??r?,r,?- 17ti?r1??-?rU ? n t?SYc ?'zx,i, d?c ?. ur r ?,??r?a1 ,cam Pis\ o (l?£.a'o lOt"V) S -isrs L and cc?rrcc N b u?on vn 1?not?1fd?",?nearvvt and bpii- l? t,) ©n to-ss:-c33 -?- ?.?, ?tsn?2ccr? ? ?Cr-Ccarr?L?Lt ar?Cj C?,?Mwis}I? {? ?, vYV?d VJ1hi e 11 i S G vxvw s.AO" Vv1o???rr.?kb© l? <Y> NYI • a> tang,' c? 4?vin crsnc?ti?in? t?9i?L? sv) H?i? 3MU e?oS? G. ckl ?t v?e?acgn? ow?? ac ?u ?roM +rLti4 L?Uin C(?nd??;?v) t-h? o2?f ?-L? ?cvr1-rnextE- ?rrzs.{?v?S, ? ???.?v c?c,\? ?\?5 cc?or?E; dsE;?- }o-?n?:?, ?r?c??vic?va?s inEx..k?? •?n ?c?k L4) Co In w??d.coJ,dzrtlal,cnxt?wvix? bti ?rn4 ?c>cs? toyw c?.?t avl? 4?.s?r2s-??? •??nadss?.c?L/•sn?:?c.???, c1a?cr?b??u?& ? ? ?? vsdz?ncg??cY? sacs t tu<<? wl??r??+??, t`?rssonzss axe o ?ucds u\Cr\ ct. J? ?, u?x kcal l aLo s , av,a lnara c1? . (?) -Ln ad J?sv , Lac 'r`ng 4c? sr? g avv? ?r?urds w't*in 4? l V,A i? t? rFA fXIb ??Ltitc?lO?l?. ?? grsd a b?e ?c?Cs in 4yc, S W\Ll . ,na?4c.?p c.?.\?, C.?FSarz? lei e?ca? Qe?vr,?oc no > r cox sr?hou5°z CVha LA VV\4A iS 5c VtLnt ash Q ? , eo??ut 'anon I?r?l ll? YlsoruAJ rl,J is and m? ""?co '?1•, d-l<,?; ?p?yv??Lc,,\?? c? s??rv?ss??pQn_ ? un;i--- 11??!u E?vui]? C?'1G?? ?? \ ?rnmW'1?P1.?? ?cndOvw?sor? vvt n}?,(? a ce ?or/1, Pmc tic or CA,5?, b ron. or as ,vre?sAov o? %Zz vJ& unctko i u?tio?na? i2? T wa,5 neE- +?? no?+c.4, c1s P1c?m? irvlt? °? ?wll,L a cl?anc?,? b? ?-{ .?? ? >?k c?-?u?ra1£,-4'e,•c' ?n4Li , -r, ee r7cv-hxti A o m\\ bn ,My nor a- 3%ac? b?sn ncxxF2pm&?r? i?,.ct??s>?&?4ncr?odc?f?S 1wr b d?`cr?,?>nc,?so? b`?S?snF.? cznb snr?cuti ?? r?. sy?T- Ct?11?E? -4-v?©??f?vn des A Wbd-LF -5s?z vl `r??9?c1fY1C_? ?fn5 mf,, cLr?d +s nc?, ?n \Otl &c R? cat ? 1s?vncs,S.ko%obz&n&,.,5 Grab a?` rww;s - +5? elz -Lu? c ?1n? tG ncanbcr c i sue 'snvoA?irns,A ,bl? c?2 ,c?txs?S 5? c WVI"-) wha (b? \) Z- t ? A- b b?V r? doxovvcv? d-1 fr Y cti? ?ndevrd s u?Er -lP?V`3cVl Cl(MvOluf? iv) M)1 A AtD O'c*& ? 4vo c?4w.- txj t it ?rnroly ?>n? CL) rr r lcnli?t, u - dot ?1ci?vr?i Pr l b? P.d?;i ?c,nc ll 4rf -CCA-A la M is ct Al d? P L? 3k+ h Go P?c? csF??a Lt-CS3 4- i:3arm YobLSsb`g, -?o AT:) 60 horn OLKC ?vt -m ?r 4\t, cic,sr n5 ?z? v sl ujd dren4-4??)as"n44Fs r?tokon err c ? r\ ©5 ca?s?r? ?j- -pAkA-4ffo c l? t Po. 60K i?d cam-P %0111- ooo'-o?? Z 90OZ `61 XJMuef TOTOG snT .alels ueiiopx gpui-g LIZZ-SL6 QIL) :'ONxnd 1717b0-I£L QIL) :'ON ouoild iiOLi dd `liiH duztD aeizQ Xatlfl SS suoiloouoD jo luaualirdaQ eiueel isuuad 8bl8bdd 'ON 'Q'I Sauzolly lasunoa luslsissy uei.zoCI .M puours t-d uei.aoa •M puo v-d /s :Xg losunoo lezauog jo ooli30 `pallnugns ,?lTn3loadsaZl -sluzpua3aQ aul of luoua2pnf Aimauzns lu-eB `omVewalp gill ui io `ooipnfold glim possiiusip aq luinlduaoD SJJPui-eld gill legl lsonbaz SlInpoodsaa sluepuajaQ oqj `aHoaa jUM _ ZA/ / /'+G ?c?iv?syl o.i/ ?..L L°C2.S ?ourd O/- G?GSn?t'r.??/scC? f oq si?ly ricer/ l 214&1,'d Al ??.? / /%<,/i/a 1t//?/'??r°?ri?G ?C; ? ?y?/G?::iPw Gc /id r/^ 'rcLJ u GGr?besL vj- JCr?i.t<y? LhrzL GIfC 1'a?li. w,A[?: r? Crue Gchr[:? /^!-rc/???2t JJ 1). ,[D,v 9-? s - O z, ^G' GC.«s ?i'?,v/Jl/-?i^G CL Lyym/ s L'? _ C?iYt`o i/,//?•[<llCctiiwa,`G Uf:.. ??. ??c [t [.'S Idds L: v///Ft r, Co//.:r?%/1'i G.?J !<.??ic'?i.?`?tnn ,S I!!?i /?o i c. 4: // eJ/ .5': f.[vi`/ice'/4/.ily?a .?C?/4: fy/.»'CC.??,/j.c.?l i-C ri'o sn 1/y e Li u.•.v? Ccn<?rE%oN LL\/.[I Gk G{'f1'L d/' I?G /JCOisI t/H e.ur?C?/- C1/[i /I'f?C I/G.NS D.) ZI)C U C- !L kd S C?Gf/ C.?/C?L6 ?L10SC /I(Cz/v%C//4lclx aG SG /.'l ??E. /'ov S cricuS w?/+.refl?`.r ¢tid yct[.c /rrcc,'?ccC?/;Uaale? //,PGr c'?C'C CrclJC c` "I -r ycos/ice 57?. /1 ?u?? Li ?/No_rO?c'YG ??a?jYL/ia?Cf/GC /-l'C"//u4c3 ??c IJLd(.•?C<J/?r?Y C. ?/ii f: pf /.S ri Fi t'/'S 4NL?' GrUI[/?ls L/IC/"c'i? l'rCJr ii?H/1. CcSSG/% G'CS'/'tii?f?,pU3 C, ?<c??a/ass ?ac?a?ifc/? J / p G} ZNQdC?c<? G /-<`i'c ,Sa?c?? ?ctS?llFCe? ?s?c ?!'isc?crs s,?.?? ?"Cl?cr?? ? . Gdi L`?iN Lhe ti{e+f %LC LAi-C L`?It'¢Gvt? f/ ?? UU/" ?7'G`'C./'L.S +S '?"'C.tLiNely S?o?CF?, I U3 tl <i/(1 <7 /' ?fs?cvyc c? ?,.? <i ?irc. CYO O? II^/.)c,/r/C/^S IePC Yoli/E/NG?? ?/C /1. cGG Iyer!"//?Q.r?/ ?''h/////u''<.-?e:•? ?Ge//lam/-/LC.i^.y?7 LC//cl«k.k? IGN?/lif JCJ•cN/C: .S4//fJ? CS /G/' G,(--?<F,KC??JN/OC<3 C? ?'//?/e L/5,udo/,lcf/'c,? o???i?,fo?-,zl??e.Y ???/c 4?ovc r<uc=dvs-?`z?4?,'uti?? 12111 W&/sJ«¢//?i??Hks?lec/.a?°?,r??l?cci,rz? Go h?he4r?x? c/?/-/vppooi•LI<f//? 1?a Ca. ??tu:1i/es?_.6' c%r h'-rE! ?e.&:t/?.•?c/? CG N'GI/O'?YQ/1tnl^l/r?/y /?J/k L?h4 c<rL! /? J /r 13?t/Si'uce6e;??ha??ec?JL?H/er7eii/??e?ucY?eciuc?ler?ecr?,-1<cc? ??r,acKicYPcu.ews ?iSc/ri Ml lt?cct ?u 1-(l ?Jili/sive/SS ctiN ?fcur¢?e Was dG Hi CCU e/0/0 0 r ,/I L Lc Ki Ly L C CIe??LC.?%e",l/C.SJCS/ 1//cGC/%pp r?C.ec? ??- i L°bi ?GF/ctC d.J a-/a.?f stisC e.Y?GV'?C )A[?'?u%f?CCSJ ?iQSflE3.S?'?Ge.vCl •=?=rciti%:>:`.?tf??`aN. // IS)!. ?/7cre??s c/e?ya ?arfe nec/.,r?er a.C/3?uCS i:vve/v.%v/s/vlu/L//%b!'C ',derer:?lr-/{LS Yr/as?o%L/c??J<:`/' to ?zes !'c es?f Y/`i4.c-ye C/e ,??. d.'rca?rre? ?', ?eU „ciI^e6 /?y'e- G?cl,?6//Cit/:?tl' Qr'sco?cr?' 2!e e?rZ'cr/vtr-tire cu?r?r? i%iE?c/, cC ua/?- ct.crc ?J erd-o./v?1/ <i?uo l?rr,:? . ;v cvhe? 4 cz?s /. rzs. J )L? ?dd? 'su4v1??/ l)rc - Z?/ ?a (YL°r?!'C r4ctS/??acCi FiG Go/n///l4i?`s???cJ??cl"c?hcC4use. o? ?fiG UG/S GGVrrS2/r/i'a6/ a`/Iwo 5r?r3 iLiis ?r?>??Jv33.??e aeCe ??. 11lore r' C?e- !e-/Ja UG d L4-zea'L HC4 ro.?./s .fhC cc". yslZU4(!'? G?'?,c?? Gke ?lcc.rl??if?S lie-tioII L`o!?-tOIG%'it f °?ia cc c,<.: ?/ X, Kg ?aN /' C', R 0, 1- a e T 7"h4 Corw?vscn?5 C,tx.?x?- Gwnn\e??Tlc.,ra?c\, Ca Qny?lvu.vy, Gtv?\ ?.??sto? .xl ?W?Zs CA- C v_ -s. aOX-a ?k OA . CY.r ?A&J- s CR 3z s,\2\U, \c vn?? s Mod tbc? ?o t ?t Ce?vv?J?cuw? Dc\74?`? ck, cdl?LA cy?- 4q, w???npcrv?uxvt \ c.,na U?L?Yr..0?5 ;v? :3v?n?r c. S??v a?,-1, blow w On D,-6?-Os tq\\C? ,tN -\. V-OrY cnl 83? b k O ie - p?- C-7i-n" cnk, r SA OIL .50 -I n r6., 70 l3cx 518 Cc?uT% \,Vc, gc)O1-©vig t ?C3 ? ?dCa U C \,11,Pc,- ?7W1-021?C? L-2 -,7 -05 ;: _? ?_ {-, . ?, _ ,. 4- if IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA SEAN PRESSLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, No.-06-5144 V. CIVIL ACTION JEFFREY A. BEARD, Ph.D., et al., Defendants. PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Please enter my appearance of behalf of the Defendants J. Beard, R. Bimer, D. Patton, E. Brannigan, J. Palakovich, J. Murray, D. Garrett, D. Kelchner, J. Andrade, Z. Moslak, D. Hoffman, M. Kazor, R. Stevens, R. Marsh, Lt. Kelly, Lt, Zaccarelli, and R. Southers. Respectfully submitted, O?Ftpe of General Counsel, By: Dated: February t8, 2005 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 717-731-0444 PA Attorney I.D. No. 52802 ON IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA SEAN PRESSLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 05-5144 V. CIVIL ACTION JEFFREY A. BEARD, Ph.D., et al., Defendants. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Praecipe for Entry of Appearance was served upon the person(s) indicated below: Service by first-class mail addressed as follows: Shawn Pressley, CG-4129 Michael Washington, CU-5814 SCI-Camp Hill SCI-Camp Hill P.O. Box 8837 P.O. Box 8837 Camp Hill, PA 17001-8837 Camp Hill, PA 17001-8837 Lamar Rozier, CP-3637 SCI-Camp Hill P.O. Box 8837 Camp Hill, PA 17001-8837 Dated: February 18, 2005 GVLA I C'.O'L_ ? CI J4 A?Conrad Clerk Typist II Pennsylvania Department of Corrections 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 (717) 731-0444 SEAN PRESSLEY, MICHAEL WASHINGTON, AND LAMAR ROZIER, PLAINTIFFS V. J. BEARD, R. BITNER, D. KELCHNER, D. PATTON, E. BRANNIGAN, J. POLOKOVICH, J. MURRAY, D. GARRETT, J. ANDRADE, Z. MOSLAK, D. HOFFMAN, M. KAZOR, : R. STEVENS, R. MARSH, LT. KELLY, LT. ZACCURELLI, R. SOUTHERS, DEFENDANTS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 04-5144 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this z day of February, 2005, the motion for pre-complaint discovery, IS DENIED. By the Court, Edgar B. Bayley, J. can Pressley, CG 4129, Pro se SCI-Camp Hill P.O. Box 200 Camp Hill, PA 17001 ., ichael Washington, CU 5814, Pro se i ` SCI-Camp Hill a p? c t cxI P.O. Box 200 Camp Hill, PA 17001 >Kchael A. Farnan, Esquire Office of General Counsel nn? 2520 Lisburn Road da -? ?C J P.O. Box 598 Camp Hill, PA 17001-0598 :sal ??4 LO ;6 WN hZ 914 CLTT: V T W? I C V RT'TTRT\T - T\T()7 F(ITTNTT) SHERIFF'S RETURN - NOT FOUND CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONTWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL R. Thomas Kline Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law, says, that he made a diligent search and inquiry for the within named DEFENDANT POLOKOVICH J but was unable to locate Him in his bailiwick. He therefore returns the WRIT OF SUMMONS , NOT FOUND , as to the within named DEFENDANT , POLOKOVICH J 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 DEFENDANT IS RETIRED. Sheriff's Costs: So answers: - Docketing 6.00 -•_ --? Service .00 Not Found 5.00 R. Thomas Kline Surcharge 10.00 Sheriff of Cumberland (ounty .00 21.00 00/00/0000 Sworn and subscribed to before me this day of Ut7a A. D. Pr onotary ' SHERIFF'S RETURN - NOT FOUND CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONTWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL R. Thomas Kline Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law, says, that he made a diligent search and inquiry for the within named DEFENDANT GARRETT D but was unable to locate Him in his bailiwick. He therefore returns the WRIT OF SUMMONS the within named DEFENDANT GARRETT D 55 UTLEY DRIVE NOT FOUND , as to CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 DEFENDANT IS RETIRED. Sheriff's Costs: So answeU-; Docketing 6.00 Service .00 Not Found 5.00 R. Thomas Kline Surcharge 10.00 Sheriff of Cumberland County .00 21.00 00/00/0000 Sworn and subscribed to before me this .1911 ? day of 3c-0,? A.D. ll ? Pr th no atat ry w J?. SHERIFF'S RETURN - NOT FOUND CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONTWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL R. Thomas Kline ,Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law, says, that he made a diligent search and inquiry for the within named DEFENDANT MOSLAK Z unable to locate Him in his bailiwick WRIT OF SUMMONS but was He therefore returns the the within named DEFENDANT , MOSLAK Z 2500 LISBURN ROAD NOT FOUND , as to CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 DEFENDANT IS AN OUTSIDE VENDOR AND IS NOT EMPLOYED AT SCI CAMP HILL. Sheriff's Costs: So answers: Docketing 6.00 -° Service . 00?'? Not Found 5.00 R. Thomas Kline Surcharge 10.00 Sheriff of Cumberland County 00/00/0000 Sworn and subscribed to before me this ,-ct day of? 07 L't? A. D . C1444 Pr WE onotary SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL BRIAN BARRICK Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon QL'ADM .7 - the DEFENDANT , at 1125:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of January , 2005 at 55 UTLEY DRIVE CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 by handing to KRISTINA LEBO, CLERK II, ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge So Answers: 18.00 f"41 11-91 11.10 r .00 10.00 R. Thomas Kline .00 39.10 00/00/0000 Sworn and Subscribed to before m_.e/ this -Z A%,et- day of o oy s- A. D. Prothonotary' By : <? `A?&?ile Deputy Sheriff SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL BRIAN BARRICK , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon BITNER R the DEFENDANT , at 1125:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of January , 2005 at 55 UTLEY DRIVE CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 by handing to KRISTINA LEBO, CLERK II, ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 6.00 Service .00 Affidavit .00 Surcharge 10.00 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this o24-Lo day of ?Ba A.D. I Prothonotary So Answers: R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 By: C Deputy Sheriff SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL BRIAN BARRICK , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon KELCHNER D the DEFENDANT at 1245:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of January 2005 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 by handing to LOUISE PERKINS, SECRETARY TO SUPERINTENDENT a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge So Answers: ?? d a 6.00 11.10 ` .00 ., 10.00 R. Thomas Kline .00 27.10 00/00/0000 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this day of e?i???? ?cDS° A.D. ?n ?'2u1t1? ?? othonotary By. ? `Z?? Deputy Sheriff SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL BRIAN BARRICK , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon PATTON D the DEFENDANT , at 1245:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of January , 2005 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 by handing to LOUISE PERKINS, SECRETARY TO SUPERINTENDENT a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 6.00 Service .00 Affidavit .00 Surcharge 10.00 .00 16.00 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this day of 3ov.S? A.D. Prothonotary So Answers: R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 By: nI 44), Deputy Sheriff SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL BRIAN BARRICK Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon BRANNIGAN E the DEFENDANT , at 1245:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of January , 2005 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 by handing to LOUISE PERKINS, SECRETARY TO SUPERINTENDENT a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge So Answers: 6.00 .00 00 10.00 R. Thomas Kline .00 16.00 00/00/0000 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this day of A.D. x V, By: Q 4 6 Deputy Sheriff P, ' Prothonotary / ' SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL BRIAN BARRICK , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon ANDRADE J the DEFENDANT , at 1125:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of January , 2005 at 55 UTLEY DRIVE CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 KRISTINA LEBO, CLERK II by handing to ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 6.00 Service .00 Affidavit .00 Surcharge 10.00 .00 16.00 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this o7 day of :7A. D. T-1 Prothonotai`y So Answers: R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 By: Deputy Sheriff SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL BRIAN BARRICK , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon HOFFMAN D the DEFENDANT at 1245:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of January , 2005 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 by handing to LOUISE PERKINS, SECRETARY TO SUPERINTENDENT a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 6.00 Service .00 Affidavit .00 Surcharge 10.00 .00 16.00 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this o2,n-4 day of 7 uµ, -2- oy A.D. flu , . (? 1 . ^`?1A D -I,' So Answers: R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 By: l? a Deputy Sheriff Prothonotary' SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL BRIAN BARRICK Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon KAZOR M the DEFENDANT , at 1125:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of January , 2005 at 55 UTLEY DRIVE CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 KRISTINA LEBO, CLERK II by handing to ADULT IN CHARGE a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 6.00 Service .00 Affidavit .00 Surcharge 10.00 nn Sworn and Subscribed to before me this day of 2v p? A.D. LL, 0, )"40-P,.i 41J?- r thonotary So Answers: R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 By . ?f 4 l Aj `Deputy Sheriff SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL BRIAN BARRICK , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon STEVENS R the DEFENDANT , at 1245:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of January , 2005 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 LOUISE PERKINS, SECRETARY TO by handing to SUPERINTENDENT a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 6.00 Service .00 Affidavit .00 Surcharge 10.00 .00 16.00 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this _ day of J t?u...?.,W ) A. D. Prothonotary So Answers : R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 By: GG?? ??Deputy Sheriff SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL BRIAN BARRICK , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon MARSH R DEFENDANT the , at 1245:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of January , 2005 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 LOUISE PERKINS, SECRETARY TO by handing to SUPERINTENDENT a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 6.00 Service .00 Affidavit .00 Surcharge 10.00 .00 16.00 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this -21,,A day of -2trt? A. D. [Prothonotary So Answers: R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 By: 4;? i Deputy Sheriff SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL BRIAN BARRICK Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon KELLY LT DEFENDANT the , at 1245:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of January , 2005 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 by handing to LOUISE PERKINS, SECRETARY TO SUPERINTENDENT a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 6.00 Service .00 Affidavit .00 Surcharge 10.00 .00 16.00 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this day of -?2 A. D. i eA,rzi F othonotary So Answers: A s+. ? t f '??d° n? ? rtr? .''e, f R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 By: Deputy Sheriff SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL BRIAN BARRICK , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon ZACCURELLI LT the DEFENDANT at 1245:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of January , 2005 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 by handing to LOUISE PERKINS, SECRETARY TO SUPERINTENDENT a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 6.00 Service .00 Affidavit .00 Surcharge 10.00 .00 16.00 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this U7? day of oZa5? A.D. So Answers: R. T1 R. Thomas Kline 00/00/0000 By : ?j Deputy Sheriff Prothonotary ' SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR CASE NO: 2004-05144 P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND PRESSLEY SEAN ET AL VS BEARD J ET AL BARIN BARRICK , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within WRIT OF SUMMONS was served upon SOUTHERS R the DEFENDANT , at 1245:00 HOURS, on the 26th day of January , 2005 at 2500 LISBURN ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 by handing to LOUISE PERKINS, SECRETARY TO SUPERINTENDENT a true and attested copy of WRIT OF SUMMONS together with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge So Answers: 6.00 .00 .x .00 10.00 R. Thomas Kline .00 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this -rnt2 ap day of ?? tit7 s A.D. Prothonotary 00/00/0000 ? By: Deputy Sheriff n 4. Cdr -Ir (-)f CUvrr,?cr lam,WIS O? cumb?stctr8 r t ,nnajl?-x n?cAv, WnkAcj- To 11, JiA you hove., bEfh 5utj in Cau4. c.4j4b 46 dew doss 4hL Glc?,r?')S ??+ do h rn +hb ?Ilow?r, Ls, LlzW /MXOo f? az /V/41,7 bu rr C?a) s a ? 4+s Pen /k 6- la?j OVJ no?,a(f wL)E4 by En-6 c ?n? ck wry n cfem oocL pa6onc& or 61 oA( 7 y o/ld -fir/a? r/? c xj-?n) wjk ?kL cour+ c?6ur dt,4?6n,5,?s o) ab EC-7ons 4-r) *E-(:)cmws 5E4 -6+h OLT(C 4 to - VOLt afe, w!rnf j ? e-r y"a 6LCso 4ke- cc.6? why prcy-E?j u1r d yoae,d oJu? b? 6<17745r4d a ln,s+ ?jou b y e ccu, 4 vt--& Ata f4hf no-k6 c Hof cry ,yzrc r?li? F r? u s 6 m rr?f -1J'76 C_OMPIO r>? hoc ayy o*cr- cla//Yl or b? tit, Rc, I A 4's, you "'y /asp rno/? of bra r 1,* o? o` k,-r 44 Of-L it r?4on•?--v tru You of d -a 4-L 4('s evx- ?O `. Our aA(-nv? a -orrE YCU Jo rlo- V)u „ ov) ?{ n o? C?nr ca rd one, c?u Ev or 4fJEfhont. k-MA OLX? U-*ES F, LJOu Celn 5J IT, VA). Comrrnniu?.f?h ©-? t??r??sy??n?a DTjL( M6)4 C -? (Of fu-- lcx-L, 04(?cL c?k- thy, Ct--m?-k cckjasd a550 b66.4rn rj. Pa BOX s1;? Waal -o s90 -7>7-73? -efoyyy Cu btc\C n8 (10L,r4c?` vznsc.?l Y-?;a Sg.cn i?c&s'sl?r ??1??a?1 ?ash??}c? cx-,nd l-cwar Ro rtir. v. ?. ?cc?,r R. P;?kn?,r, D. Ktlt?,rrtc, l7. ?atbnr E. Bronn??,ut?, S• 1?IoFbvK.li, 5. YVevc?`' D•C cr??rrS. kvi&taf- 7z Ma51c.?',, D.1.1c?rv?n, M.t4czbr,?i,. n? cua., t io. oq-514iy C"iv\1 kcmor1 5?c? 1t'1Cx? ?n?n? lay 'rn?s ?5 cavil c'?c?,1-s ac.?idn brov?4?+ ?cosuarr?-+o }4?? C;,,;r R?{rfs f??+o? /87ll 49 U.S.C. SEC. 1983 b? SEan ?rt?i?, rrt?chc.? t, os6T4z)n and Later Roz filr, A ? pci5ontf's wV), ; al- ra11 r?,\? s ?imfs he rt.-1o coa5 rncaruxJa:1 CZ4- 41 S+r? ccoc rL4conal Tnesl i?ul<con a 1 C?rr??l ?; ? ? (tGmpNiv 16a.lid In Cumlor?r'1ooj Co ? ? nns?it niq, odlr? .o sa as lc<c?m r/ unle r 1'r7 fie- o 4.5 ors SGi::ncfs {h?,1otk?n? rron'ry darrrofECIaraor arraf r6 unclrv? r`li?.? ?5 ,4o c.?l C.?QirnS.`7?'??cS anion albs ?f fh? r?larirh"?.s hw? ?? r c?.hous?d it pc?,;1;uU s c ion braJ c ??n "Aaj&{gn d, uns?rn, and unGOrro?r? l?rz loor(cr t? vJri*6o .s4-*-4unzn-k jr) ???ik ccunz?. ryl scondu ,. / o+4x6 rz fo4S. -rhF- PlaiAA(s orc by Su 6t? 4,T-) Gl n'+ v ??sev?iOC? it #-6c i?cioon 6rvrrnm&rrl--whso earpre! -{o +ht cord;- ions +kt+ ind,Qi&AjS sxeu% , as paC? ©?- -W ,uckt ?r?son ;?.no albn end +ht, 4N r, C Lk9m&.11j?\s \? k\nt, t?nr?sglorAnk'c., Jr OEjea4mu - o(- Cor c tx- ions ("a f. "chi, \U;?? ? s cxr-C. * LA.O-, +h? si?ni? rn1-and CA4 CoA "Alp of ?aY?} t cm Styr ia(1 u A-h'o 4t, 5F-&6%a\ iYk?r m -Unit- C"Smu"? urvlcr Co4A1A1 ns +hUU UUcrt,ccu6one ut)LA3& D as a fL15L A o-C disciQl?nory And c?8Y ;nis44ut !- "i p`?s 4F YJ lack -?Y, fuk iwvAS o? Vcoc.E8ural Am- prcxsss in vro,(xFr 04 fh, 8+h L, IN+h ?rn?na?n?r?s }o -kV)t, U S. Con.s??Aeon . SLA-cl tic. kon Coin! l?c,5 Sur,?;G?iOY1 Out ?E, 1?lGina-i s cxo,lms under q,.q tea,("s. G31. a? Stan?Qbb\ , l Micbc*A watwr7l-on, o`r) it-Iarmr /?,pzl£r'C??t??Ce?nl®,1 d? off, rY,:?t?r??\'Zfr? Ca?-;zfx1S (?? -?n4.. Uv,i? °j??.s J?.r?Irx? ?4.?.c'rYhYleuCt.. 3) stu-.c"1 Ztr?K ak cAk Akmer,.s i--cAwvnk ?o finks o4icn was 4a, ClarnnniIilSiof')F-R C-?- Arnz, Kern :1 is 6uf ?in his i na;vid and c3?cc..wJ, cann???,s u) DEr r?d?n? 9-0\0;sok W\?? al- akI k\ftt,s ?4\s,?/xI k? -tlr",?1s o6ion X6 4& Gh;k.Fq- ?EGCirc? `t?cGM?n4 C MNL ?xGrw?nf,S ?J• ?f? l?3 ?S(.tcq in AiS /iIJIALOJ Qn8 0,4%UoJ, C c?rn?c?c ; 5) vx , o. nC3d 66)nu a? cAl +iiv, rilwar* +o 4;s cxR&n a-r.6 %,Suft:fIft}"f Er+ ok- Car~,PNkil• At, iS 3LAE. in Ws inSvl8LJ o n A oWc'%8 Gom?C-L 4i,s (o)14Acw- - David -t,-4on of cd / ¢-i rn65 rs-JcvEnl 4o -j is ctc bbn CA-e,3 CA t 6 LAS k 4r.n t, 4- Ofr Ck-?cJi-z. A SErVir-. C D K5 Uu? +n His inji*id vucaQ Gorn?oc? 7) Drd?r,? Ec,n? Bronn?n Goal/fimES r?ln? Fh?s anon rc,GS ?h? D&,-tp& A- inn %6o ovv&) a? cal Al mz ctawwA- NT?) krrils aJon vuw) +h?, 3uffiyni:.)4 o Genkrolrz 5?rv,c&s L` ?`?o? S?cvS`? N?..s his wlaiviAUC3 q) lDtk wavnV Idon rf) Cray c,?ca! +ivwFs r?1 ?s? 1-kr, tir,;s cc?on wlis 4- , s ,n oC- F,-?,IAl me ??k C'D o? May)., cxLA In Inks irt?ividuj 60okx Ict) CzrrAr ccJr oAk AnmS rt.: ww - k6 -kVi-,,. oJa6f) or AS 0 MCJL C o-? uy;- tyx", ,c3C'Mo ov")J,, is 3w-8 i6 h,sindivadczwpoc:,+Y- 1 1.) D?fi r T--o++hn ko8tcdAt, ci4- at I -hrrrr s rt ww4- 4o ++;s a64cv7 s o A6vrI, ?Olxincr ?`rL`J(ccl?1l11?C"? ?! Caenf gli. /R, /1s 3uzd it? hts ;ndivtdt4aJ COMf cA . Ia) DL nd ? zacY• rnos\a? cx4 Ca\\ ??w1t, i`ra?UiX1? ?o n?5 (aL?ioh 05 an CKt (YlinLC ak C?a?nQ??r\?• ?i. ?S Sr..??d ?ri?ni5 ?!n?wic?vc?I C?`n?? r3> O??~cr>?vn? C d ?n ak all-k-iwtfs r?14?aex,? ?o F1 ,s OJ4c)v u-r sc"C' +yw'+mW- ana c i i.?ion vhanc c ("Ct s?t~ir oh rYlaprll)O'- compkl • rh is sUw in his ;nai?;d?a co? ?y? t dtJn? M.?& c?, KG '?- 01\ 4-i MtS Q,\"xrd O }?li,5 OC idn u.45 fhl, 0SI QM Vllox?a ?r C.k Co'Y'A i% \. i S &A? ire \ni5 krc;\JI' v.c'A comyu'%- 15> ?x?? R. S4E n? a? self ?irr?u5 r??ft 4o4hi6 oc)im wo6 c, Unit-/yJGn?y CL Cr..mfwM, ?? ?5 .su its ?1i5 ind?u?c1 1 Corn . U Ib)1 kin &4 RM\Olp-fv maesh 4 G ?vn-s CO u? -lz, ? ?s ar}it? urtsca 0/71 ? N1a is c'- camf M • N? is Sub in his W vi?Lj Coeq)a' . 17) iOLj?)&-YNt V*A1 01Oi\ -tire ft 4Aj - A'o Wks cJlon u- s0 t c} At, is sk-, in WIS inAivi&'O cprr??c icy. Z"U rtj (, 0- cd1-hrnL5 t-jLvy - kD v s OcRon a? 1 i11. u? •s ?t <<zd ;n his;nd?u ? com(xx6 .A. kG) t d?n? ?„Gk soup .rs ?? all his r?lg vtof {z? 7 h s czc va a xr? a Gx?nst C"k cc'?QwA ;nhiS•trOWkdukoA com?(;?- &LIL a ao•) On !o-I 1-03 ? ?? cxYAS ?-IYAr??4?X ?fOr!! -?' *k Rt LA G? &J: 1 . ("(?( ?z Y-) ) -b 44" f. (Q- VIh CA CA- CkA:rN rn c_tprta?'lEAJ rxa4 tLv raoh twr?+l?n) t ?,E, u sk-,;:Jll p(oaA c A 3?ktnin tiht a?V1U, G her moc o?,Pt?s luni lcx h?arc? C?nr.r ni h/s Octu ,ML4 in A14 WU/ a r u- 4o Pr;-?s-5-4 iwa, 4zr-s or rr) C'e(Dac-lli-? bn A-o *h - o(- a fa-?ordu concern AL Acc sr''00 1?;r 3uc.h pLa-mr-}- aa? etccwsr, mt 'Rmc,,-?\j ac e W4 in A?)t,SMU LOi4) OLA-?nO& j D Pl?n?r? h Cki?skx??C"cx'') scYx ior?s Ins UxR e1rar-A in can ciga c-0A ird+"v a s iYl G?(. ?k. u5 ok,-o l'?rowvrt ray (*s Z uj,44i W& 3NLA t ram a3? ©n -,a3 -oil wh; I s+i l ? X- ?? u s rn Y. -?cEasS\ LA i 5su a v?n??rr??? r?oc? ("YY???^r?uc.?-"??(?IoU?3791c Cu:?s?+v?tr,Em cam- U?,?-k 'n o?y> 4??rU 1i XUY?dvc t \r?`iti\n (V1c..SS\ WGfni rtt u?S?s ?oC 1 1 GsS%,skr,ou, crud w n?Ltsazs "s-CA ? n c.- \Aar,kIA-V-N.n?car Suc?,4;n?;n 4-,?YIA o„u?l b? 1 u?cyc) an irn?rzCrvi?ss?b\?, ?1?rc ccl,, ownc4io7 hirn 60 lyc 0?5? (fin - -13-o?fnrJ?tr.:?t&Sk•j su6vr,,r?i?; c? -hmd? C??sA O - 4k-'S ?M1SLOTYI A. , +0 > vl? %CO- CAtx! t? .Vli.)? C.10"Lmi KctzQ4', Y 4, or,, Ct dcc.nni`?` n o. 8t6510n Gn A?nt, G**cc,\ ?? non kh? &6t \On 0?- a(o) lYlr.r?r \ Submi?A. +imfl + su?rio&?" x+ F',?Ic l?r?r ayr air. &CtMint,r rfc Bch cam- 44E- dEds±on off- Exzv xr NY AV-68f a-1) 0n 3-b-oq M . RL'tof4i a-46/L on o(- )4L-,4.(As LL?,s 1,65L4U? rrt? r??c? Pita: t?07 au-osshr Ern o4- JkL-?-e, ?ion c-4- c c;nl-r<tban8 or)8 r n? an U<t?f 6'• a3? R 1n4.rvr,n c ?.?.5 ?? \o?oc?., ?xGrnin? Ar??tc.?C. n? wh?e,h firr?c, vNr ?r,?:s`',l t Jcx?. £ u ?uG?Coc-rur??` C?0UAro=X C, La(9?fJ K? , ?EntE?3? '?`??t?? Gzz>tA fK.k Car A C f ? v i'c? FS u ?G 00/7k4- Iririor ?in?,r k+rn u?l??? (cc?szc4 ctp,nar, arm t.rrr;i? ?k,Lz. Ez?r rO GrG 30) On Mr. PftS,slf? (,-x.•b rzt? ?YMC CC *A31-f;ZOV ccu?any Y 31? A Y?s?r?, c,?.??s h?,ld b?.'??.. s.?-rn???? P?1a51a1? off- o.rn?., r?tit. t?cr.?5?1 u d?n0i r inks hoc c??s?? -o ? wj4-f)&%SES,OrJ 4oprssen--do?um +? rc? tons c on a bloc45E k Bch ??nd,n \n?rr1 i am y '5arnc-bormn Him -Ea 30 da.1 Dc,- 3a) 1(Y1t . ?cs ? ?ubmi C? vk"r C? O? ?XGt11tY1EX r1n0?k 5 d?c,s?vn o- ??CC, c?rnPc? 0(- ?clon, 5t? b, and arannir 4-o &4f?. kEtchmx ark ??k?e ? off- w1n? ,sus??r?? k??. d?..?s? ©?- ?rnin?s mobl?k. 33) Can L4-30-014 Mr.?(&-A Lk 5-b lbSUEA Cm-)?" REj?ofv("Ok1? ')#A&DMR7 CAk 1&'30 PM CAU - X7S? rs?or Z ? Vt65,. 0/73 Gp ffDLx A 61 uril aMa ?s . csh c,8ul6% ? me 'pct kal, c 4oEaf N v_?0W c \O r- \-)6A ,rna horn ?m Dc,, s?4-?.?.s ka as ? kV- rGk?v?, ? C"? Rc.,"? sous. St s 34) ae jox?, 4c 3 ern -khJ 5arnf.,do.? o PRC C.anvwtJ 0+ Mr. fm Cc.tl c..ons?s?,n?? ? un?k-???.c VYlursh, c'.ounse.for Sou-lh?.f?S,G+r?" ?? Kau Gk c t1?K }? I ?m? l?iu? r?l?ccr? r))/ ?1 on A{ Wi?? c ?rovidrn/? Gh? -?C, cj or,,_?j`?`? Eoc ?.;t dzub?on CC A+v?n h?n? Gn owtArvn, tc?t, 1ntcc?, c &sk c?,??m c?< air . 3S5)ff1c.'lr law, k6yn'*tA a. Virylt.. \c,VptAc)f, 1hc'r'KGs 8-citmo-14Tj 3UZAr-kl t3 h ?'df c +s?or?, C,(7d Gh?{ f;um,rer bdn.<-r uJho c?m?ndt d -4,t, dw-Ab?on -oc 3?,) ©n 7-a4s-oy` /Ylr. ?r?0? u?.s i?Su? D?FG?t.6 #?+co.3??? uJr?f?rr ?Gcxaa??cr ,.,r-,uW c(s Cana a co64? \0-1 LAV) I Niter ??x IY AIC4h OJVIL ih? him kl? a t' c?r? CCl?klr L,t/1464 Grey ?oA'i Fu 3y 1? jj . 37) ??s u wo5 ?? ?J2?Ct G Lc?mpr?. Osc?,1411y, ar /rlurSt7- Rl? P??`-t r° cxaf t?.1`,?'?1nr? ;'??,c?c ct , ?Scav* "Er S, rno Sc?kSO? 1 ?t?? o4- uJ1l?c?? ?cp4rtr? v?.cyhc?k,l?..a?n? ?n?-„rnrx,. 38? urr;? ?Y'Gtr?rtr CYl?ssl7 r.?dv?? in1c.???1.?1? }-1??-1??.. u.?.cld b?.??cc.? orb 6)4n -?.tfpa(+ ?) Mc. P;?ss ?ubrn? U kh mt. G?yI o? ESL rh s d scan ka Supj KtAc )Y Lk j and C,1ry+F ?xruM?n (?r? r?? ?scl? c? u ah.c1? sw?kun 4 h??Rc s ptS:xSkOCi. 'C)KV c ((\e ?c ? ?ece?eU tY,??W O hts NC, 0ae 44)?- uxts 0 ?o?a\`1czv?<Sn M?xc? , C-r cc? 4?orn an? , 117 1rck?r?lA , 91) On SCE rttac L? .2003 co mr, Ro-v LX- Lkr s E PC?n?_c?sS ? tryrn ?1n?, (Z1?t 1? A-0 4't' 3MU a.A! C cAo&Y?\%U yak rns. Rcm\,tx t; xt-?, ?r r) -Xi Y? eicc £1 twt) L v- ?W,?A kW+ h? LA s bu 5c ,d (i? cx ?rnc vl?r, ct L1nt? ,c r r.?r we E r,?ss or vc??v?c r n VVr/?+?1} ?Vr'u )-w'A- oc c cc'?,cr -?'L c orc4.rnln ) 4)1, d4 CANon V? V Uf.+? 1 p.? l?r?.l? ?LI a t N3) f)l(.V-07-etX P?rcev try VV ,. S1YAU (-oA) ou .'OAir'', tom' k?ri1 ?i nn-' U xt?> ocd-,.? \Y') Of) Ovzc? wkk4) eY?. ,veavr l ?? c ctS., AtC, 'iq) on :A& kn,a003 CA f - •P-az-lfx wGS FIC':AIxA on ? r ?s. ?Yl '?.•-ib.-C)y tY?r• ?r"L..??'(, i..;?G-?, `?t.,iCx.`,tiS? k"i0'?Y1 ?'.. ?^ i?";[., t'?•(''E.f?+?? LI-W?-Oq r6r. Razacr wlis P6"X? in 4h, A14U on A,C, c,'ndzc (? n 5 -tr ?s ?l t?^r Roz,;;P ??X?S 1 5 ?g4 C???` s #pt ?'t'$ o u• c.rr , btl c rk CAffl'('%jfC? ,1? tl???,iYd+Js'? pYC?iVl4?U6cf?; ?iC;l7?Jwca ?r?VY ?r ?€ (. X)LtO k. p 0) 6In,;, LN) N. V- tVs\nc , , c,-- Y Jr-\. 3t. ,M c , «k t"?c c?z-?? rs LF?I? crarv r ,SFO c(- t;k7z.t;?Ca,r?{+ ,?ndlao???rr<r; U4-4,A,Ck ?rn? z PI'C. car,?-jv-ILA4-8' nAy- '?C -ltx ?Y' F?eC s} .4uS c-v(??ouf??r?v?t?r? ?,.r? rare, ?Yrr r?ra?CYJr 4-(O y7) (or RozlLC Subn-717TC a 411-al y C'puj 0- -' 4? - Pfi6s, J6crsior7 /r-" .S?af K?e1?e?n.f' Gr,d C? iewr?if?s._r {?nc; da c? vhf a}a7u >?%: RCS aU) C)n 7-/,J -C,Y/ /YJf. AO`LfFY WG?S + Cars 43m 44,nk?? k9u 04 rn?J} r l? r? My Pcztcv c?x,s nc - ?ui-n !?Jr fir, rtJh? hi., t?4,as h?-rr ?j r oc , IV) or vP?Z a???,; {o \OE, ?-rEr'rj r ?xctn?n? mad ? ?'Y"? ,? GS>G pr t4-?vr r ary,vG xre. t-n/-' lky? b r 4, or r 0rXDike conUr7I r,?cJ 44-) ? 61zc' '3 (Do for 5? . 5 ? On $--l-A H -O°1 Mr Rczrs r wfib /6'3u?j a41?? a,,18 ck?/O- vcd 6r, r:l? d or, Ac. s??us ?J?k??v:?>'- t.:rov?d?? ?,,?-• o. ?.?:???? k:?<??? ?:s- suLh. a?yTC ;Ck? 531 ?? 1-?C,???rn?.n'c?? wh,c,k, ?m? ?+'lr. Roz+?x" e?..?r:?.s ?re?-,r?u? er; AEG J •ca4us wrf?- r?? 5q) mc. R•c-zrvr f, IL'A C._ Gi „_' ?a??r7oincX C? -i-r ztae_? e 0 - . a t? ?? A n t?? A' Al- t?FZG - 551 IkA- . c L ti i? M??f zt?r'S r?e7?,C r?eJ? t =?. f ?hfs?-ks'??G h/3 A-G ?J???{i.?'{1??.,??1`" f"l'L lJ._ti?f.?} r_-f?1 )??•:Lk'.f? l?i?!C?L? `S" l.a TCixLiiC. [N/iB ?'?QL,j?' v? t?I i CAC"h? k'c11(; iG?IG'C G' <? t (- i fJ,,'j151 k?l,t1t" 117?1L?UCaI?S. -lo 4) L C•rv. r It t? _?l: 5 7 ) 1 Yl ?J4?; ;? '?`lf'`Y` G; - L ' 7c?r ??$Y 1 ` t Z1 ??!_ Y CG?r 't t4 G v f:??r Cw •Y 1 f 1 C• i Awslor ?? _u?2.'??';. (,?k.?,Y?c?'?Z':f? ?-?CIU`? t;' ?;?.S?(? idJl7?7 ra.?$?t','.?,;/K 3 `C, •?-ti'1!'f.. ; ? '4 ?e uX `> Ytcau:?c C? yr°1 ??h GYtAw) \Nn ,nrs?v, i?5 !r'? L C :S?rJ ?uS . ^.rY .t)/ %CCF? CF?1?7:YiU X77 55)00 1 S+r,AuS lJ?t?.1 ?fJViC?tt?)IY1^rtl)it?, C?)^U ?rec.(?(, tfta)Y?RY1r 1i1`?s foG.} on CA ffkolvlw "1t ? t i- -G? YYI+'• U ?cv?t+ ?rJf> C.? ?eLS tSJUE C( r1-NSwr7C Uu{ C-kcocv m1t. N'f4A l c?.A 6l -, {'C) j? r r e. blG.rtik ? iocxn nr? Suc?rl/ k?rv?,ru? V,RrYI ?+.AM-L,?\ b-,O ,A 1-000 at 1rr? Er;?9 _ tel.) YY1f "6kirr, On vbrn, Cc1 Cx --tr7">Jc, G FIi oy- A-rdr;xdvS cart R?Sto`') +J o r \\?lJ!'vt?i?t??cj cam- 1'?i'-cZOY, ??Trt?flfar?? /Jfc.+^r1??jfxr`14L1tJ,??UJfl?fz?'r)? -?'{?z,,C.ltClulOl7? (ct?.1f. (_1 kt?b irv:?1 o"V??11a??Z, jv)t. ,?i,SRor 4u; kv,f:t irJ t1Jt??!`,Uv il1C kl+!?-jnyl fclv1 AtA wi orLl CewjljL-j 1u:xX} 1',?` A_C)vy, :56. (uH•?C)n (?-ry ?)?1 C/7r 1,t1?o{, nt??+t?n r ?)??1 /J?SUF ?)'l,scCin uc? ?lo9i'i'zf G hb;cttrY? bLFoC?eC?m rlf C(losla, ((1f lt1CS?fltrx+k7r7 cc;SY???; c r, G?f>?JLiY Fclr ??U Cdr c t th7? r? F?atdEnc? , icx?S a ,r?9? Liao J- h Ptr Ylk U.?t?r' On A OY`, ?utC?"',, c?rlp G?rlt1 n?l? (/3,rY1 ?u/a?1 ??zd v?..Yj!) G /?Ptri%9rS?3/?? S?k?llc?C?rd. 105.) nl f wc,,urtr?q-f l Sl1k?r'Y1t' CA ?-Jm dt? nfffak +0 C? ??(CC, Cc??'i5r? Imo/ C? ? tt r ` +YY,,tF-b1AK?L'CS ??'-r'Yluf'), rc,???l,pr)? I:fGn(?l?fJ uJ{%v /?S:SU'EC+ G G?it?l:.`,lO? ?.St.'J?v?i'i/?? C 1 ?i; ?`tL1SlC9f? C}?c mc.,s\a.. G W M ( 1",,Ar,tr).?oo ? iA?x; cdVp9-, a -k-j 3(, fl. K41chr € ? c ?rl ? G? l r?. ? 6e2&jrkr {?t?vl?t kra? U? t.?+hRt.?', St..t???nck;1 ?'>`, c??1c?• VI) CUr) Fs- y'._,?? !?fir' (.r? `17rrxf ? / ?SUI L c? # 1+?37F 5 Gu fl?U/ k?? f A41tr' Crv c c:,P ro?? c? 1?? YYl?rs? arc ?`? ,?r? h rn the , . u???s ? r on GEC. ?? , w,44)x x.t4-(fivir7 F/rr any 4'ft,:6 r? kx,- 4?jf ?SUCt?. tnc, w?.5 he fd b? lore r' rra?ErS n'l??r?h, KcJI?, i'??z/?-? a w1i y rr ? / Tlmv --bid Con-h?iu? mf. tA-r1?h;rt7~?r:?'l on Ac. -?? uJ/t1?u W l'rcvlcirra CzrR? ?c?ua.P ?SuPPo6? ?,?t suC.??. 6Q. Atr) 6,Wta? C4, ??L C ?c.tStU? rvlis C.cuzk 6y 14-oor) o ;o J,5. P:v 70.} od) o? yyif csJ?. htrr???,rt? RL?nti?c?5 0? h{S ?° . ?lacsr,? ? E? cc.??s Cc4jnuL8 C krc1 S c5 > ?c 1/ ??cxtf c2 f (Ql? C?c' r'/ S i t? r i?{ ! <I' i tt:?rl?r )il!C?}r C (Y ? ; { lCt w h F) / (?t, ; S? ? q ? J ? ?c c ?:cs/ i its izi-r? T)Thy cv(L,5uka?ccA- A-li-) in -kAn , SyYu art ro rvC 7a?`c1'?. ;?`r,\?l??k'?"> V`lc\S?fi?L.YI ?`Ly?'1'"W' ?,`?°CCti?(\"iC_C?SS 'T'Y"\u-} :.lr.-?.?U?(? K%?2..C)?1?i•.lQ1rA?, 1 ?t y> TY;{. t,;'y?, ?Y.?r'Y1S CSC ?G?( ic. i lS .t T `! '?7 h?St 1`(?C,\V\c,\L?.Ca.?? ??t.C?`,?;±CbS . CSC" ?k?`?, UCV?t.? ?} t f ` + J ]?j) t-UtnvaS ..r/.C`t> ?v„a.'ri V.J1k6r- `7_X?C=t.J C,7,Js ISf.SF:iL`15ss C?Wit ..J t'-I7t?i t £x7 tc? t c?vrm%,r,?CfJyyz = ? d? ikr r? 74) GV_s ('? L.?) ?:? t (/ (ln (J Lx Y C f 41 3\jef .kt I I(.i E.ni L. ?q J _? 1 t C)r ff `Q 8???`f1?? ?s•_?r.x_s<< i1r' s?r..?s1Y:;?j? t..._?s! k? tJF?_.?j? ties„,,?Fs frc,.Y) Yl re-, -tal AI.SW/ ? t`! c, /f /q ! U.. IY?eY ,, ? •. \ C. ...r 4,--)Corl(I(.(.?sxrC?,try,lurr--k,4r&tt?ctjj ,ar,lvi?L. {!?{r} (is :go ?r) bbr)Lftr '}-{'rat. 117 •Y? ' 1 ?C7('. -O,AQ, C?'..fY_. =%r%x >u?G? ? acY??.ssu ?t itl+oMear?c?r,z?? rr??(??c C1 S. Cc-?<s??ct?iOY?P ?Kj1f- in ??J1n?c?,1G?ri=S' r?r ?k 14au.1-}ar { F??I?ac?? r'-I u Cc cassck?rC1 ?.cEV?n? s4u.ry- sinMpA?d?C•-rcdu!n c'c.r ,LAW) t'writt Ayw-,vi V "'l? °'? 1.? ?`•'?'?_ 1.-C'7Y? iT?ITV UY )• i ?'•s ? i??.rn ??r?r,1 €.n??? k?ti.4?{c?r??,S=.L,'?cc.,.,.x;?.?r-c? du?.`rrc?.?S. con?Onbn WYPV?i(Ji (K?E,fk ,5u'y4 C: v 4-(-) in 4EML( ^- ?il.f-/1t M1J ?! /,Il? uIf / Oi GCur''?t( Cy a(,r b? 1Tk?9 .1, ?._r)(Ir t!?S i?YV 4 S(1 n± f 1 t? , AV,'r_. U 5. r rl,li i c A ( t 'rnunc.??:?t1 ?K ?rt(y L\ .c?? ? Y ??'CCU ??idxa: ?rrrr 4 C>'r, sian c 9z,, ?lcir?a,ll c.+x?s? ? rn?L1 ?irx ss' Ir ('op,L r.+ 4t-3ryl(j of • ! X?;.?fK%x`%? Tfi i*.T, 'r,'1C?.?Y1'ati:?? ? (f1:S_=vCt?,?? CG G.?i 1 t `C?•?t?r.Y?C.. ?` ?.?t,;_I f ?i f I'11,? C?x; :xc"k ?.. kr, 4A ? 1 i ' ( C w „ 'yr "i Sr' t l -l aMGGi G l.l.....? ..t t?, tQ! ; 5 \ p v 1 q C -G c?? C cC < t?c\4 ; a ?_? ?f S r? I?r' i ' _S \w L; Ai)ay J-t*, (or,. J Y ?j r'•5 ?Y{{ avl?t`G'/'iiL a-7 - 05 I r" , Zn 71rr4 Ce ,4- 0?- Covrirrto6'J 0-!?- 1 9 M1 \ S Ck_( C.t eS ,? x?r x.eoc) 4t., y^lc,el r k ? C.)f'o ?rs?7-{ rj kxl d'?6f,ol1,,; YACAk(l(r- V?I?,iC,Y`r.?? ? r C:.04 Yw d i ? ?? o > c' <.?. ? ' ? ` ; ,: ? " -? - „ (? .l -. ,;?? SEAN PRESSLEY, MICHAEL WASHINGTON, AND LAMAR ROZIER, PLAINTIFFS V. J. BEARD, R. BITNER, D. KELCHNER, D. PATTON, E. BRANNIGAN, J. POLOKOVICH, J. MURRAY, D. GARRETT, J. ANDRADE, Z. MOSLAK, D. HOFFMAN, M. KAZOR, : R. STEVENS, R. MARSH, LT. KELLY, LT. ZACCURELLI, R. SOUTHERS, DEFENDANTS AND NOW, this z T discoverv, IS DENIED. EDGAR E.BAYLEY JUDGE I COURTHOUSE SQUARE CARLISLE, PENNSYLVANIA 17013-3387 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 04-5144 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT day of February, 2005, the motion for pre-complaint MAR 15.0 5 ) Ci f : 0 ,3 Michael Washington, LU-5814 0 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA SEAN PRESSLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 04-5144 V. CIVIL ACTION JEFFREY A. BEARD, Ph.D., et al., Defendants. DEFENDANTS' PRELIMNARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT AND NOW, come Defendants, by and through their counsel, and Preliminarily Object to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, and in support thereof aver: CLAIMS 1. Plaintiffs, Sean Pressley ("Pressley"), Michael Washington ("Washington"), and Lamar Rozier ("Rozier") are inmates in the custody of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections ("DOC") who at all times relevant hereto have been incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill ("SCI-Camp Hill"). 2. Defendants are employees of the DOC. 3. Plaintiffs' claims are based on the fact of their confinement in the Special Management Unit ("SMU"), and fall within three (3) broad categories: (1) when they were transferred to and while they have been confined in the SMU they have been denied the procedural due process they allege they are guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment; (2) conditions in the SMU violate the Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment; (3) conditions in the SMU violate the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 4. Plaintiffs ask the court for declaratory relief, an order releasing them to the general prison population, expungement of their records, compensatory damages punitive damages and costs. FACTS 5. Pressley was transferred from the Restricted Housing Unit ("RHU") at the State Correctional Institution at Greene to the SMU at SCI-Camp Hill on June 11, 2003 (Complaint, ¶ 20) 6. Pressley was not given written notice nor a hearing before being placed in the SMU ($ 21) 7. On January 23, 2004, Pressley was issued a misconduct alleging he destroyed, altered, tampered with or damaged property, and lied to an employee. As a result of this misconduct he was sentenced to sixty (60) days Disciplinary Custody ("DC") time. (¶¶ 23, 24) 1) 8. On March 6, 2004, Pressley was issued a misconduct alleging he was found with contraband and refused an order. As a result of this misconduct he was sentenced to fifteen (15) days DC time. (¶¶ 27, 28) 9. On April 30, 2004, Pressley was moved form DC status to Administrative Custody ("AC") status. (¶ 33) 10. Pressley has exhausted all of the available administrative remedies to appeal his confinement in the SMU. 11. Rozier was transferred from the RHU to the SMU at SCI-Camp Hill on January 22, 2003. (¶ 41) 12. Rozier was not given written notice or a hearing before being placed in the SMU. 13. Rozier has exhausted all of the available administrative remedies to appeal his confinement in the SMU. 14. Washington was transferred from the RHU at the State Correctional Institution at Frackville to the SMU at SCI-Camp Hill on September 18, 2002. (¶56) 15. Washington was not given written notice or a hearing before being placed in the SMU. (¶ 57) 16. On November 2, 2003, Washington was issued a misconduct. As a result of this misconduct he was sentenced to thirty (30) days in DC. 3 17. On June 14, 2004, Washington was issued another misconduct. 18. On August 4, 2004, Washington was issued another misconduct. (¶67) 19. Washington has exhausted all of the available administrative remedies to appeal his confinement in the SMU. 20. Plaintiffs allege that they have been denied health care that would be available to them if they were not confined in the SMU. (¶ 72) 21. Plaintiffs allege that they are confined in an atmosphere of excessive violence whereby officers and prisoners alike assault each other and mentally abuse each other. (¶ 73) 22. Plaintiffs allege they are not provided with the same calorie diet as inmates not confined in the SMU. (¶74) 23. Plaintiffs allege they are exposed to other inmates' infectious diseases within the unit. (¶ 75) 24. Plaintiffs allege they are denied confidential communications as to their health care needs. (¶ 77) 25. Plaintiffs allege their access to legal matters and assistance is severely restricted. (¶ 78) 26. Plaintiffs allege they are prevented from attending to their overall hygienic needs. (¶ 79) a 27. Plaintiffs allege these conditions create an atypical and significant hardship in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life. (¶ 80) 28. Plaintiff alleges these conditions are the result of racially motivated bias and result from Defendant Jeffrey A. Beard's failure to properly train and supervise the staff. DEMURRER I EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS 29. "The DOC's maximum security housing is divided into three (3) different leveled units: (1) Restricted Housing Unit; (2) Special Management Unit; (3) the Long Term Segregation Unit (LTSU). LTSU is the most restrictive; specifically it is an area of maximum security housing coupled with extremely limited programming and privileges designed for high risk inmates." Islet' v. Beard, 814 A.2d 168, 169 fn. 2 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004) 30. "One of the reasons for transfer of a prisoner to the LTSU is a failure to satisfy the requirements of the somewhat less restrictive disciplinary custody units, the SMU and/or the RHU." Rivera v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 837 A.2d 525 (Pa. Super. 2003) 31. Conditions in the LTSU do not violate the Eighth Amendment. Rivera A.2d at 534 5 32. If the harsher and more restrictive conditions of the LTSU do not violate the Eighth Amendment, the less harsh conditions of the SMU cannot, by definition, violate the Eighth Amendment. WHEREFORE, Respondent moves the court to dismiss all of Plaintiffs' claims based on the Eighth Amendment. DEMURRER II DUE PROCESS CLAIMS 33. "The Courts of this Commonwealth and the Federal courts have consistently held that prison officials have the authority to determine where a prisoner should be housed and that the Due Process Clause imposes few restrictions on the use of that authority." Singleton v. Lavan, 834 A.2d 672, 675 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2003) 34. "[L]iberty interests which are protected by the Due Process Clause ...will be generally limited to freedom from restraint which, while not exceeding the sentence in such an unexpected manner as to give rise to protection by the Due Process Clause of its own force nonetheless imposes atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life. Wilder v. Department of Corrections, 673 A.2d 30, 32 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996) citing Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995) 6 35. "Unlike the criminal trial and appeals process where a defendant is accorded the full spectrum of rights and protections guaranteed by the state and federal constitutions, and which is necessarily within the ambit of the judiciary, the procedures for pursuing inmate grievances and misconduct appeals are a matter of internal prison administration and the `full panoply of rights due a defendant in a criminal prosecution is not necessary in a prison disciplinary proceeding...' unless `an innate can identify a personal or property interest ...not limited by Department regulations and which has not been affected by a final decision of the department' the decision is not an adjudication subject to the court's review." Bronson v. Central Office Review Committee, 554 Pa. 317, 321, 323, 721 A.2d, 357, 358-359 (1998) (internal citations omitted) WHEREFORE, Respondents move the court to dismiss all of Plaintiff's claims based on alleged violations of the Due Process Clause. DEMURRER III DUE PROCESS CLAUSE 36. Plaintiffs' claims against all Defendants with the exception of Jeffrey A. Beard are based on an alleged denial of due process as a result of these Defendants' participation in proceedings which resulted in disciplinary action against the Plaintiffs. 7 37. "[T]he failure of a prison official to act favorably upon an inmate's grievance is not itself a constitutional violation." Flanaaon v. Shively, aff'd 980 F.2d 722 (3d Cir. 1992) cert. denied 510 U.S. 829, 114 S.Ct. 95, 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993) 38. Further, an inmate does not have a viable constitutional claim based solely on a prison official's failure to adhere to a regulation, directive, or policy statement. Elkin v. Fauver, 969 F.2d 48 (3d Cir. 1992) cert. denied 506 U.S. 977 113 S.Ct. 473 121 L.Ed.2d 379 (1992) WHEREFORE, Defendants move the court to dismiss all claims against all Defendants based on an alleged violation of Plaintiffs' rights to Due Process. DEMURRER IV FAILURE TO TRAIN AND SUPERVISE 39. Plaintiffs allege their constitutional rights have been violated by Defendant Jeffrey A. Beard's failure to train and supervise employees under his direction. 40. "[W]hen supervisorial liability is alleged ...a plaintiff is required to demonstrate a causal link between the misconduct complaint of and the actions of the supervisory officials in order to state a cause of action under §1983 against those official, conclusory allegations of failure to supervise and control, absent more, are insufficient to state a claim under §1983. "A plaintiff must be able to show that a...supervisor had some 8 specific knowledge of the unconstitutional conduct and acquiesced in this conduct by failing to train and supervise "adequately." Heinla v. Commonwealth, 153 Pa. Cmwlth. 599, 610, 621 A.2d 1212, 1217-18, (1993) 41. Respondent Superior does not state a viable claim under 42 U.S.C.S. §1983. Polk Count v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325, 102 S.Ct. 445, 453, 70 L.Ed.2d 509, 521 (1981) The Plaintiff must prove the individual was "personally involved" in the alleged violation Goode v. Rizzo, 423 U.S. 362, 96 S.Ct. 598, 46 L.Ed.2d 5614, (1976); Hampton v. Holmesburg Prison Officials, 546 F.2d 1077, 1082 (3d Cir. 1976) The general responsibility for supervising the operations of a prison is insufficient to establish the personal involvement required to support liability against a warden in a §1983 case. Keeper v. King, 130 F.3d 1309, 1314 (8`h Cir. 1997) 42. A supervisor is liable for the actions of a subordinate under § 1983 only if he is a "moving force" behind the subordinate's constitutional violations. Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1118 (3d Cir. 1989) (citing City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 389) 43. Plaintiffs have failed to allege any facts to support of failure to train or supervise in their complaint. 9 WHEREFORE, Defendant Jeffrey A. Beard moves the court to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims based on an alleged failure to train or supervise. DEMURRER V ACCESS TO COURTS 44. "[T]he fundamental constitutional right of access to the courts requires prison authorities to assist inmates in the preparation and filing of meaningful legal papers by providing prisoners with adequate law libraries of adequate assistance from persons trained in the law." Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 828, 97 S.Ct. 1491, 52 L.Ed.2d 52 (1977) 45. In order to establish a claim that he has been denied access to the courts, an inmate must demonstrate an actual injury, that is, the he has actually been denied access to a court in a specific instance. Kershner v. Mazurlciewicz, 670 F.2d 440, 444-445 (3d, Cir. 1982); Johnson v. Lehman, 148 Pa. Cmwlth. 98, 609 A.2d 880 (1992) 46. Plaintiffs have failed to allege any specific instance wherein any them has been denied access to the courts. WHEREFORE, Defendants move the court to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims based on an alleged denial of access to the courts. DEMURRER VI EQUAL PROTECTION CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT to 47. "In order to state an equal protection claim for unequal or discriminatory treatment, a person must allege that he has not been treated the same as similarly situated persons and that the disparate treatment is based on an unjustifiable standard, such as race." Miles v. Wiser, 847 A.2d 237, 242 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004) 48. Inmates in different custody levels are not similarly situated. Isley, supra. at A.2d 172, fn. 10. WHEREFORE, Defendants move the court to dismiss all of Plaintiffs' claims based on an alleged violation of their right to equal protection by reason of their confinement in the SMU. DEMURRER VII EQUAL PROTECTION RACIAL BIAS 49. To bring a successful claim based on an allegation of a violation of a plaintiffs' right to equal protection because racial discrimination, the plaintiff must show that: (1) defendants intentionally discriminated on the basis of race; (2) plaintiff suffered a legally cognizable injury; and (3) defendants were personally involved in the alleged violation. Simpson v. Flom, 80 F.Supp.2d 477, 479, (ED Pa. 2000) 11 50. Plaintiffs have failed to allege any facts which would support a claim based on alleged racial discrimination. WHEREFORE, Defendants move the court to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims based on allegations of racial bias. Respectfully submitted, Office of General Counsel, By: Dated: April 14, 2005 12 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 717-731-0444 PA Attorney I.D. No. 52802 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA SEAN PRESSLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 05-5144 V. CIVIL ACTION JEFFREY A. BEARD, Ph.D., et al., Defendants. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's for Complaint was served upon the person(s) indicated below: Service by first-class mail addressed as follows: Shawn Pressley, CG-4129 Michael Washington, CU-4596 SCI-Camp Hill SCI-Camp Hill P.O. Box 8837 P.O. Box 8837 Camp Hill, PA 17001-8837 Camp Hill, PA 17001-8837 Lamar Rozier, CP-3637 SCI-Camp Hill P.O. Box 8837 Camp Hill, PA 17001-8837 Dated: April 14, 2005 J A. onrad Clerk Typist 2 Pennsylvania Department of Corrections 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 (717) 731-0444 rJ t/ =54 (l ?; r C` ' .J r i .1 4v`t_tiY? ?t`r?1? v. n T11?.`U'.fr r Cj?- Ccmrrlcn J ,3A . Cr?_ Na.e:?l-mil y?F ?-? i ??tw?tnary Cbon__- , Lv? ?F? To l -)c rt? tPrL IY'AInosu? bc -tef' ?i ?sayc?{ ib ?,?1 vv1?d Wc?h?rr?+oh Grid l cma? Rnzt?c St vr, ?ollow? ?c rWUC cO-sl in rL. Pcx? ?p (,?? nd?n ?ctYVlnvn o?j?uha+?? ?a ?r e?rwPla, ?- Yti v'f-U t?, ?? c,? I m nca?f? e ,c ? r» -d-hz. v?c?-v rp, o? a It? -Mur fa- al l 3Alt ?cac 4)ala?LOZAl-??dtA,. , &rvc T-Lwr?1(? walllf,WMIdEstjcts+ruL, F_occi? c?t}f. suci? r r ? in z?rnc s as trn b?d?r) %M sucl?n Ems.?'t?llon ( 1, ?}. A. ?. rubrn 01 t (05C A 895 113-7 Via. Sir. ss ig9y . ?)wJ,m,ncry oln x4ion Jhoulcl su`lkotrl l y) cc, ?z c1?t s ?Y,d rr?, m dcc d ? H,? c?15 1?s sS YO 4 Plc,An-1-r )' ark 1? l t?ls? ct?r?V Ac ?, bkrs\-) o rt?hk r?\t??. UJt?cn?-r V. zazL C; G81 Aad 13311 134/5 lac,-57Vj 578 (P-,, Irf/ ). Thy u.ll n. o? o- Fro c5, c_oYVtpla 4 oc & W1 Ac, a tu Skr? tiny n?c,rd n td,oat a??li?d Pifcd?n aft;--J b ct.t rnEysand aP s Q? n L;hould r?-bk,A%WVttst,? Jus-k--b6d--LU2 - 16 rna{- cG 3&4EA. uJill,amsy. cS??c? 7?,'1. dad IOQb,1Cct5 C?: c.mwlt? ?LX;t). 4 I,, kmmArof -1 hz, d2Gvnd? Cis wro.? bY..caw,?. 'C'm i on (ln,? rua VYnpc? r ?r?ok??av rami na c ruXr vtl 6?cx?.,ty, 6t, ?1-u.... W14 r? ck ?rtcr?S '?, \?s SU G?nd k4,? c?xndons ©? ?TS[? wG \? s? kc v?ok, Vaneh ndvn?,?l z e? slnotxl? ?lle?? k1l: ""C ?CCS Chu 'c zsa,cJr\??, \rot?l?`? ??-uS o-? ?h?. 3rv?u ecc?:tnne?.Th,s ar??? rs ? drn a P4-.c,?1 !`?ownkS. Ftr?,/ Nn? ??c?ndn??srC?c? Ybl t A?)t M c?w> V)3mti.?1-I-61W C')r-nuC v n p? '?ccrcn end art v ?l?s rc?kh? r c °? nt d` b \?vtrn cgn() `6r) A ?t 3rnu w,?Jr ? rd ko 4)-c- 8u)m, c, nnu klnc?.? k r?1 cold b, ava?l?bl? +o cstd? crV 1? ?, ?rnu.ih? ?Fx o? ru, '??-rn?r,a? ?c a.,n ?n?, s?t'tc? v?J?c?.4 r?.s? ??'? ? `???k? ?!-h?, B1-l? a vv ?. \?? c?w? Nza L4 -S-Q'7 c-7,!3c,4---)-85OQ76). 0-I C&C ah +t ? u arc con ,n?c? ttn ctxn a ?? z r xc-? ova., Vdffnc,r. onA ar?. Vuk stn 4800P r nc kF- c hoc o x aA{,, wlntcln vy s bELY-) Vko -co voolct-A4 1h?, ? ?n rnf:? (N--zW y. V?&S f 7y8 P-jAMk -d c,vr.,g8q) VA, -RUCA ,\u C> Cacn , 4VI wti, ac 4ro?tdF w,k?, a\ c?Jar?c ??k i4?n r Fcss c stc o?- We 2?tMtA roc & ( to A rJ uj -j j - l n,55 a/ltirc% g15o s b? ht? vw\ {\,?g'?1? arn?ndm£n-?. ?vA v. rAc Ccwg4r ?lo(? F3d 72q (-7-H,) Gtc. dZ01) an8 C:eAtC v fmtfl??, L.W060C6) C rc, r TE S q,29 !(U78GSf?? G/r/5?t1). Ack4?hUr?(L (AGAM -OA(A acs zxPosf d ? In cktous dzs inativt s ostY rt?lrs iv ct?r cxt? nn llb? cvti,c l? dY,6 also barn l)W +r,- 75 olc? Y BiA? am4lndms?n , kt?lt v. tMck?n 1?3 sc?21(i4g3). ?I ?n\t 1,?c?k>£s ccr r,S -1Vy t` ar4 tc?c t cups rxr £1r Q C? c?tenS tv? N,? 4? ct c;l cNl-\ .c Vhwotf °uvb ?s? u?h?ch ha also b??r> cond?vnn b-z vicke kAot, amtrkSm4,A v. t_s t v, 834 F S t 177 C ?. (?RZ. i4ef 3), T4ti? 1 F l - d4 c1 n ?5 a n+ ?s 1b j W- u k ?s ?c?d ?o rx Ir?ui in, ?-h c 4-L c"Av, torv, oL -k6 Smu a J }h Fxl4 a? +1?? rrt?; campIwSoY' ,4 ?t??, 1ccV?Art dcaPrmin?r? ,?, Ff. ?ti ond £?4 am?rxlmfrl R v. l ysj U.S. 337 101 scfr a (rqg?). Taus fht , 00.5 o-?-flee 1-7'sc/ oir ?rr?l?r?n? '.a11?%,^??,C??,?-??. ????d'?1?? acs ??.wt(??a,?, ??>>?C?Q,'k -I? 1?'csn??,??,;? F?'?-h ams?rr?r?- Gt?. C- 'EY1C?k Q, UaM?;m 1,5 \0 Avr4i. ns C>rr a '?-Zp 11 1??Y uA- C <KJ Ab,S 1 V\C" s, (? can Ont, mwb? 515 U ; (17,?i`? Sc+ ta?r3 V?pv:,-d,, Wv,t,,n.. Sca - ; Vl`I -kcJ 0vx/?]1,.?(???'TV'? ZAT RTts: - ?E'J(?? {J?:t? R`(?17C `t ? '?Cs1(a'?i?_ !6??'? c r,?Zr bG£ . l(h?r tin c - ? CLJJF.- Xkl C C' ?c w, r2lak?cn c,ra?nar? thr_.4rr) uF i zn aye w}\^£.c?- AAror, c cla;rns 3l)clxld 6L (I Chi ?a ;YY16.1 Cc'I- ,KctAvw.wvn O4,nuA-ton, -trj P'cur+FFs F_?ulr . Dui, ?rc?c £ G1ocs.?? CADGE c Y xlc? ? a u+,d?s ?n? ???4rcx c1cu I {,? t?lcyr<1ti?fs ?n? ??{ ?o? ?tc?c ?ncr? +h (YCC,?4s? f1?(,s t,?\",OLn-v,n?.r??.?h?,Rlcanh.? `? u?mn F is aI?C o c?nd?,n a Pd ?? ?r c?c ?? <?,rn s,l ron ?oY1 crFg '71lul CLt? ??C9 to Ong t?CCYL ?Ct?tcc?? lieul kit suPr?rn? U-U,4 an c yalC? (1!1 9y ??y?,3 9'7?/) °v ? Inele)nnjrj? qIS06 ? ` ? of d?? ar?f ?n&k kl? an c,?'f c luny Ec cc?\? c ?? r,? &? and Fmr 5En4- C c u m2nva -v i d-,Xi CE, k +r nCEL , rn r- tcd d? ?Iam rmk-zzr, nd cc t,r,? a4d mfn4- k?? bch(nd ?ci bean e.?Cdan ?r n? c Arln P -nsh a%ry?vA- f,m?os d Thy, d?nc,? o? N is PM06 b`?.-?kl)ud? ncl?r??S 1,n ,ate Plcan?s IS v f?r? 3c ?4 L?roc C C ust- D v 244x4?oc?, AVM 64 n?-, Pry. (rAWarLj nbyAons Eo n ?I??vtk,GCs e7?a?P000 WS ?, cams ?s?.,ld b? bY?n,?• E. Fc,,lur? ty TXr,.an ?nc? S?E,??sC)? -IA.Av e n?: d? dz,,?s cl ?m e `l Rla?n C?? 1r,e.?? \ ail can ed-tin r?lanlyl?s la,n{ u?` °rkl tic Fralur? }n ?n and Su?f?U, c cf?rm me confru,n P c o r S{- rl- , b e l fa( 1¢? `f-126 pk2ir) ( XS ,,2 rE aDl?r?c w,dF; sPt rCd cansi?d,xhorx ?cl? COr2S ouc h a i?rii r urn hh ?» as (c^?1EE, °k? 1aM C,xMI`i?lfX?1€? d??,d ?cd bt ct p&? cc?n ,?IG'(15 cad elf ?`?'`? aeon Ec c urn ?hixv>, {?ddt tibna?lb k i wola?,cns ark aPwAQ6 6?- x d, a w{ 11. ,? 4?? tv rznc? drew?n YxE ?-(Ovn C's A- Cr,nflcr - h? `a,d {{x? l I???s aS Q\4c:d, ?ti`z. A l ,vkSuC?co,w1? ?o <)t? Car 1?1?,1,+? 0. a6?S-\- d???Wl?- f3?'?rd . czc??rnsd- ?s ?.ndtn F ('r-af sl ?l 1e d its F ? 4 "Co ?, Cs?vr?S R.o l vc `Tl,? 1?lain?y ? aunt OAX a dtifrnal oj?- ctc?-izS cAWm. Y) Avc, ?h N,?d? nd-ten t` wn, C I obj?L6-cs w k-l-V? cc? 430 c? c ,Y? s,?l ?, b? c54 n,s? as Pro ?kanS Avvcl Race w1,?:,??,rY, Cayotl,? 17661-6200- ff -. f -n5 PNcmw? jc W?rA fir, c?nAc cCc ® 1 Gb tc tuna cv r1 loq- )o tnbott uc.(? b? ?, ?? G\a rwcal n s 1-0,S 5s wtc??xn 1C)rWct: V76? I '6n ?o?sti ?''?ny.?? , ` 2CO p r l (? 17CO I 3 r) N c? <-<> (_) ?? ? ?. --i f' ' G? _ ?.7 -? ?a i,? -_. ?.< :._ a-? it -`? -, V7 G? SEAN PRESSLEY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PLAINTIFF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. J. BEARD, ET AL, DEFENDANTS 04-5144 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this "2 6 day of September, 2005, IT IS ORDERED that the outstanding preliminary objections shall be heard by this court without oral argument. Defendant shall file a brief in chambers not later than thirty-five (35) days from this date. Plaintiff shall file a response brief not later than thirty-five (35) days thereafter. The preliminary objections shall be decided without oral argument. By the Court, Edgar B. Bayley, J. ,,,can Pressley, CG 4129, Pro se SCI-Camp Hill P.O. Box 200 Camp Hill, PA 17001 'Aichael J. McGovern, Esquire 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 For Defendants :sal >-- cc; N 1? r H r ._ ii C7 CL .l CY , ' O ?p ?. 60 LL C> c? _) CJ N SEAN PRESSLEY, ET AL, PLAINTIFFS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. J. BEARD, ET AL, DEFENDANTS 04-5144 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTION OF DEFENDANTS TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this - r?Vo day of December, 2005, the preliminary objections of defendants to plaintiffs' complaint, ARE GRANTED. Plaintiffs are given 120 days to file a legally cognizable amended complaint. Sean Pressley, CG 4129, Pro se SCI-Camp Hill P.O. Box 200 Camp Hill, PA 17001 By the Court, / i Edgar B. Bayley, J. Jamal Washington, CU-5811, Pro se SCI-Fayette 50 Overlook Drive LaBelle, PA 15450-1050 r?? m?a e Lamar Rozier, CP-3637, Pro se SCI-Camp Hill P.O. Box 8837 Camp Hill, PA 17001-8837 Michael J. McGovern, Esquire 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 For Defendants :sal 1 II. L7 r_. •-,?'^ LL.' ?-? tz; 0 c =n ?? C ours U? kwon o C? Mta?? l a v?d CCU-'), - an l4 v 5. 1..1 X91 ? Pc,?on f?lo. C?'? - 51 `r`/ s c S wed ek CA. &,A rv, 4 Y,n j nr? ANO NOW, covv? r?l?;n?'s Sin !?«?, M?cl? Wb* n ion, anc? L?rr c t ozt?r cc? ?csa ? ?,d 5ulorni' t??. (-ol lowi n SEA? rnt n? ?lumc. ?16,144, 5 r, c 1 d?rn?nd? +h?r? ou rx 8Ollar'-?' (!3wo.oo) Ck a1? G?c??MS rC?l? 1Y1 his C?G?iC?n 5 l c(?C?rl ??is Uni?-Gt? ri?f t?t??AS(?.X101r1C? 1-ll.?.???UYI Cc? l?Gc+M(?i?1?'? (,vAOU wrl'#,-cn oo--l ce,orCorao ku"V6, -tk- uhlcu??uP .¦?? ?r ??«s us vr'rcr?i^?u r? N vin 'I in ??-3VML f, +?? un/ ?c ?( t?roc urn S use ?o ©tA-Z.rr\ikv,t, n7i5c??r,d?k r oc- i??su _c? wl? (F con?,r? 4ext.,, and --ht, inhurnan?. Gor)dik'tons mr. `fir-mil UaA.S sUb3 Lf? ?O -k- U'nin vJcAior? of Ar??nc?vY, xr?s ? n? ?S CA- +k' U v)*J-c6 Cont>k- "On. a? lct:tY 141 mlcha-c1 6,Jo?k'ivl +oo JumcnJ6 +k4 4wWwi collars 0130, aoo.oo) cA?.t L p?- cffl ClC"V -' rcL15f-8 In ac4 on b cTon hl? cw lr?? Sul l LOrv ro i4-v Lm4- 4c 4+^ -. bp2? 6J Mo v?u»'Ic cir; ?- c<:?- WCi4Ln nuk cz. or an oFFoc-?u n*, 1.0 bL 6. 8, 4t, unlatA. i?cac?dt?r t..,o b vvl?/{wKr?in kIrA 1r) 4-L, U Mkt- urlawu Nrcx?r?ur ULSt8 +0 rL fX)v4s (''bUZd WkIlL., Gov) -?V'lt -)crL, Orn8 { Lr rv ??urnc?h? condk* -*Oos (Y)(-. (.(Ja51?ir n ujo.> Sc?loj?c;4 k? 1?z.r?sn In VIDIAoY7 O4 AVk, WtJ 3Y'AU4?,, ?y aY,? $ of- WH , Uv't ) SV? CoYkS-\4u C)o . 3) Plairl? ikk -, (..OLMQ.r t?zlLr d??,r?S Six -?cx?v?d c3oll?tS C4 (00, COO. on) -(-rarn A-V* d?? e Inc n?5 oc ? r?1 s?. c?( cal CicciY?? r C4,,ksu? in -i+is ackhon La?) c. tt on 616 uvolo, " COYVN, fYlf +o cacA (YvA?) LVY104 av't-- af- 4 -, wr c.?Vl?c,??.}?ic? r'rA??c._?c?ur]? U"wt? +U vY?a? ?in Inirvt IYl +?? AMU, z. (.,t n'CU-.?Jtt.CX ?CX:c_Ol1d`c.5 C'l?Y? ? ?E..? z.? ? I1???. ?N?1 ?, ?-C?Yl ? lJ?C7? r~;or+s kssUcc iA?dnc?, mr. 0? kYwt nd1-pf,?-A-5 Cof\-3 -i ioo ujkL CCD41Yl?SA 4.Y ? , &V'O +k, 1'n hu.YYIom- ;?OZ;Lr c ?x?J ?u Jac +0 +kft in in vol iti anj o? +?x C. rJEf S6,kl? y? Eocf, o( +?,?. f?fc?in? ?1 Fs, r11r, ter l , Yvl? v ?hkv .ion, cA v)? rat;cr?rvcrd I-I?c?? +h?d??Ys r?cc? o? N??c cAnlc?,,_? C rxvx kk v?tY ?- o ? NQvo ?rv? ?? LQ,ni? GVI? CC7r1?,n?YV??..nt ???S?1Yl 1?1 udQYm C +CO AYOwnc,vv w+ o-? UriA-,A S C ov???i ? ?. 5,) caj a 4c. Or, we ?Y1(- . l c ?A,Sh? n?iY?'1, oy-)j I`Vlr.%,zi?? d1wc?? ?4?d Eh? dLl?v??SC?ur. rz?c?5 ?" ?Gt'1 ??i?? `L-V`c,Y ?11c.SC..01'?l,,tC`.?' ?C? i 0) U v, - zd bt Each M U 4I?ti ?to,v ? s, vAr NL Ir , vYir. ? oz-*m CA 0.8 W c "'Sklo) r-\, de-wo r,8 +63z- occ V -I cL., U p,- (-Yv,ayn Cws r c? inns a `aYV? L&6) o? ? r ? which, c ar r ?s ions ?c? cis W ou?? Lh?o ?? orn Ec& o-? Pici-I i4 , rY1r. Nr l , YY?r. oziE_r, Ord M(. ty-) 8trnay-)? 4J ?ns? aiu io 4J A Grp ?c%? s?c? ?o c? Ins, w!? ire wk-J) 4T-) ?-),i vLL ct c` ?x?n?? t o gut s ?av?d?. Cc -. ? NE Nanocabt?. 5;?.d?E., ?.. i-` ??? r?? C ca- ?. iii.,: --.. "? `L? ' _ i?. ? _?' ':J r} (`?Y l._1 • 0 vcx?lcu PA ic>`na2? WC4?n? cu* C?, LanMC?.c? ? VS etor(3i P, Oj?MRI -0, `won, E. bvamiRn t T qgc) \0s 1), 5. YYlucf' D - C70S &I S. 'N wnc?rc?', Z. ? (1er?lctk,`& \\Amwn, Y\A Ya7-Dr, R. t-+.k?1??, ??: too 1,n Hof ?1- 3?Sr C3ucK?, - Caxnt, Doe, So 6Acrs Cax No. py-Slgq Caw` kc, n uc? ?c? 17. 2.rVlte?c?d 1 i phis a wv? r? ors Coc,on b?©((1?? 10 1?1SS? C?,;?l R? N 0-? 1471, ya U. ?3.c. sur.+on ?RS3? u?ho 0rv? n uv?l?-?4 '.n ?A& CAj4;!5 0113 I lam s Gc?io P?wca9 duv Pc©c i n cv r?c? • +4 w` in Alf" S ,a? m4 U.y -C"Srnu"?, a6 -In Gp?dt ?? u?i?n?h? aJN4U, i n viotcJripr) ck- -E Ind, I `f km r)?w-4 --o 4xu LA ilA-cA 34 aA,?Ez C©r 6?t? epr,1 37 +Pa. CoJ& 3 G icn q3. I I/ ?x Abom r 1 -1-nmc,Di?G(??ihb, Qnc? ?G-P?DYti?o2 ?rwyrv4m:?UE, Lxn i t Cone a on •- t?? cu rr?e S` CA- d?.rf ?S ? cam` C?a?rvl.s. ,q) ?.S Af l ?' lC ?"??n ??Ting, cexuc?- ?a? J?rl?pec,?ioYl ©v? -??`?I.cvr??st 1 CVA?VIA3 l tnc??t' `ra Pa_ C. L R31. bash; -A-on, a? La.nnam Rerzvuli-5 C' tplc.??rr4 al \L n4 rcjj M C:A ,m x s 5? ax-Evvt?x?{. 4F, is if) indivic?uaR as n? i s Nom; C6( -k& • E?axvLin C' CV ?fR ?rLVC "? p ? ? C?r? r,? vn? .INS 4(? v1LS 1(1pL191aLJl Q? ©?hLC,?Y ?C Cc?n?,?lti\1: n hLs ??a??1 od 'iua? cor??a c??,?S in 1ri?5 ?? iY-)& i" CO C- Eu4 rs ?,na p?L?1 C' ALA cW Wom L 17 ? rvYl? ohY1 o ? -d) v-z^ ? 44v, -Pbr?Mf-sc 0 p? S?r?LC ? c xvL?J u1? • ?? ?S ?u m Wks qI 17aPmndc4 -:Sou iS 1-4?ocwkt c D uc t v "(y1 'un V11S to) t-) in&Touri =T ln?s ind???u? C.o a?,L a?r1 CO c Y k l ?I ?S c, Exaxvimt-c C& ?L4) 15 G1cs?? ca?iQr? C'cla? i-q ? Qk fJEpEn vw"ail kcZor s a ?o crn Cl d ?' ass pan Go ckc ? N& ?s Su ?n 6s i4wi Auj ccm 4Cc?x.? ly1, ?b)11D?gnd? wlafsh "s CL- al i - Aflnf? c ?'? 1?- ?: ?? ire ?n?S inc?,i?si c-caQ Cp ?,.??`?? ??s ?nd???,?,( cam,-?.??? caryleWlt 7-c a On-? C& ?v ks ,M VII k nA?VGAu l co cj?l a "AA- V)ar z-)b ;sa co Si don o+ cc? ao? ? '- ,d Ylb U-M 1,6 a -1?{ a P ? ??> I DU X ? > >S ac Vocdv??C lam Cax*y Kit1. ?d?'?s sum in ?iS ind?v?dc,?,? co?c?r:?, CPO) D CL ?t YV1sc X' (?Xawl i v1fS? RvtiJ. iS,3ufj rr) ???^ 612(pl1JJud Co?? ? (93? ???-?, k Cdr Acph c CI kIE-cd is cL Courl?5 or ???,u? ?5 ?l lYl?S ?n????c?? Comet Y C40 S 3UZ4? %n WIS Vndt\) taU-9 CO? a7)l??d? ??s?sa Lc? istY? CArn5 ?h aq • X) 31 17i-MAMk 3C4rW :506n t s a,-- 6? -orfxyk?s? O cows )W - kE, t S 3LAi a tin ? bY)XV Aukaj CfxA, a ` P > ri? Sh?on ??5 ?s `1V,, G1?ti?,- C,ooXit D? ,a ?Sojob tbb'ts C?- OA- m U-96S -Gd??? ?? Gwrr?rt?? un?Snov.?n. ?1?.? ?s ?? j ??" ?1? u??p5 ?ba?w?i t5 C?rr?nki; unknown. crr, out ?n 4A- r in \j'u Q -T? &ax. eyrs ?r 1a ,arc ?, ,on ' n? o-+ c?,l,t ftAz.\)?-4 -tlrc:s 4o -1??? acAioo. 0 33.) QYt G-11:03 rAr. ?ftzssl c,,scs 4irmsPv ? -9-v-ovvi kh.E, I0us'?,19 Un i(tiqu") C-- Scz--G & -b h? CZATkJkv& svtiu g?? vVtt?.`?r ` wckn) no-E o,,?vtX) c ?rti sn Inc icy, Nn? Ins c har c?und ns` iQ ?1 ar?wt? h e n -11b wu, 0r 3511 my-vv , W0,5 noA- tn ou ti?? I? n (.l?l?lc? -b co nkc,.?4- C'VCif fXV kArA-. Rau c Or 3C.- Cott:?eujnsV?*L? A-o +nt, morL ?riic6VL 37 ?wcu ??- CAP ??\\ . or OL b ?? $ c oy-&? toa?on. ?B1 rnf. Rozi?r W&5 v14 100X) CL vtt,ao Wn WWC ) -?o co"-64 ? is n 4 - SNA o 0. wr :r1 t ior?a?F? jKnAlt5 op %4,ko Cupf)04 C)-y 4)t, -3mu PrVM 4 J?o ?hc,? , s- o j-v& o.? ? u K--gK>r1 (;`Po k ?rl'`? t Cr?vn ??'. Mo. P?cU cv n4 ru?wt, c0., wen?.?s • gc?1, `???'on on Y-?$-Dy and subs?u?n?1 jrzNu-vn-T-A j -A-., Smu b n 7-l2 -Dq. U ?J yIIIYIAc.Rc-z:vuc w? no? c??? us?? n nok ? A-VIA k?, • 0 ua?l y3? was UA&v( ?s?d ior? +o 10? . rF?v ?v? --o ktt? Mv. Rcz:vi-v cAja?s no-- cyk?9zan c? ?n c? 4n c? c 4-o COQ- hks ?n ?d 4,& A?,?,n fDA= fJo0v 0?- M Q%n&t 60 0?- 3LAf Pof-66 h,s rtAu,``m npA-c `? ??Mu -?o 7R ?ro? ?1d1U c,?sc? na-I- ?, ??t?to? ?rorv?, OA48-02 ?'?rt f'. Wa56it °n c,asY1row1 "Gnu PAU a? SC.?-Frockv??t?, ?b v +rv?or? r ?r ??? ?VV?U m,c UJCL&6 ?'> errs V4- .`dun Ljvr kn 44 Yl?-, wckl? L.unc?tc ?ns?? n c Ylao ?n vn 4-it, q,5) W -?Vk?? O-V-" 4vi, ?v?c ?r s 0-?- -?? t n 3ut)00 - ok-? 3Y)Au V ac?. U Yll1? (:L 51?i -ion was no ' o a ?nF? ? t o t?l?tc? y1> ?TI?? D?? d? n ?v S?J?AJU t©1 °?t?xti? DG-P?DYV18C?1 ?.nv?,?? ?FSC;??1tn? an? I !?G-F?pYV1I$_©2 Auvti5 l t,?' o??tvE? 1CAAL?oc?CcAsc ?S ?£G . v ?U.Slv1 t1 ? s 1?.9b-<-?in d Y1Cx?- o-0oC???;t?Y - sad huffy 1M.U/ of cJC?azEs for kvj • ?1Cc k, air\ nYtAk (,jkEt, b?ncuo?ori GL s&rious hr A ko s nc? j44t ,v,T? GL n a? CrO ? ?s r(1_ !mod ?Va„AL,q,I w0cu5VOd cku) s uR) 37 Pa. CoA& ,3U??on U tl ZPm6vc tz N Govt vt t`?coc u.c?S ?cJO6t?Y1? r %Y-WAZ? SkSC:#\ y b, (Ai I t n? C bit urn V???u?p©`v?? •-'ham D?pw-kyyw- - w"t 4 cu n w ? t "ti W 1Af uj 6c? O ? Sic : ? ob ?r St?nnS hoc ?n oc cSi n 't n wuaR, i n +1r" P Ru M cj- iYl ac.cor??, CLOD wtA c?Y1C,? ?Ls 0? ?G? ? ail `tnnnc? c? ?? so> ??? d? ?tJo??sh u?s? G Cke ol?c t?c?v4din .nt???? ar,d an iC?ns ??sct? ? dot' ?YVIU ?? vVl tic t?S 7 ?I IIon I • 1?n?w? cov\&Ml +?L - ?o Avt, uji, kot,?+ anyy .?rocx.?wc?Q ? U 5?? ?c?? try- o? yavvla YO,?? IndVUL inca,n ? • n + t n? av)`? abCx?? T5 af& tin sa> Un14 t` AU Q? iLJ,5 CDrawti m t -ko 4c,- ?YVttc 54., ?wlu ?rnakzs n ? b1, ?c r tpacolE ,. T h? t?la4+n? ? 'S avz, r r ©n& rum,r& CEnAtr bQ? wr,A'zn YY1Cc7? \ 10.yS ?-n?2 - wktc, ('Z vu 1lvvA\ UYt`t?& ?vtc??v uctYS ?m ? 0? ? to wko a u??41n rs a"Lc?l? (.AvNV,1-,& t'r&%J;duaL Inou.sz-? *\n t'??lU ? s arm j?c vn Wow manic, %3 wfPli z,?, C I©A?on, s?,:?? uril?kG ;nd?U??u?9s Ir,ouS? 'ti???? ?? t?1??v??,?s T CSI) YYI??M J?3??, VT ?G? AAr ?1VYk? 57-'?c? ?n 11tiv? p 1\ It adt?a? b» -?nZ, ?s ?f?E7 LYE Q, gbn ?? ®CGt--j(Janv C IS. 9 59-) Zv?iv?duc ? InoukS2? ?n 3VVlU c2L-wb cx, \ ? r mtr& w??ln?n CZA ra ?n?c k?r? ' -h can mdvold cx9 ?OusuJ \n ? ?wtu to h?? C?WI Int. {s '4viv 3Plt,"L6, 6a-AcAx9-Q, an6 ai - ' u4ty CSC-C)4. V foD??? nd???dua4S V)ou.3-kn --n&,_.3YYIU arm ?v 6e6 k ,,) +VIZ, 80ci L o? c ot% , ?A- 5 'v 4U IndivtduAe 1 -q l?ou?^S a 5 0, Uj?? n al l W 3 W IA n 4F, anv? znd? j;s tin ?)Mu ate %rmAkfA kc) corwtrw, Fu9iH? e? r sons ujt+Wr) 1- 6v 116 ua 4??,s. 131 .T??i.s?d?w9? ?nexcs `?n ??? ?Y?U GLrv ?n? aCC (04)z v?c??u??w?s ??ous tiny. ?vwU arm ©?1` • ©uc c?uc?o? FfcC?S? S c? a ?? i Yl Ong. vvon l?vrln?? 0? t?,,, , QCC S ?p ? and ?? acfp-? ? t c3.?is?n? ?i rc?ian ©r C.l?r?s. `V?S? S ?pr ?hc3??9?bS ?lkS ?Yl 'Y? ?YL?I,? C c. ?C? b???wd ?ao - iOn, do G.?VV\ont> an? AAI?U'%?-tSonO ?r1 ? ?dw?d s tin 4? toP Z?n?tiVidu to Inoue '?n Alv?b 3mu aQ, cow fuhA -Fo ! cA ups }fir ??? ?1 ?,c s -fir Ceti (AMC ??A?) ?c? afv-A c E-Y) Scuff FtX50M 1 cj??- n ? ;3MU , 6 U? such in s-Ia,k, 6sczS nn(? _f )o n U u 0 3mu acs ©u?;n dvnt AT An,- b? ?? Mt?" cC A CMn vn ,I?r ham, oc- \,waa ©nk-o CD,?USs CkY)a 1%3on-'S &a ?c? ?ax?C ?? irn 4-? b 76?1 z.Y,bw?dvc9zs V- ? 7\n A?A& '??mA GL?? 11111 ??{xwL6 I ? a\^nto? oJ,\ ?r?v?r?nrr??-a? or ??sor?? t+, ?d cal, lnun?l c.©n?-ac?-- n 73??+son Oc?? d??r?caxc? in'?arv?r.?Q a-nd •?rvv? 4C P?cahv ra.?sz-d `m 4-6 ?rvlu fuJ??c,v? rt?lc?5 O©??rJ ?C ?5on?r5 SPirt aYl? Grp !a in ? a-k?em for ab??? ?4? rv1c. ???\ bin c1? kt, `63 -?VF 75.) ?? ?`I?rr-+4? , bou'nn Co4mzl? n s 0. t?1 ?r G?bau i q ccw, 3 0?- eJ" ?? Vcu?-) s mn 76• vV??? ion Cabe?,?-?- 5 c? 6,5 I? cc"?? " + n S coon ?v 4xt" ks? y o? c?ktc) kC Claws ?m R \a • -?71`-rh?o?tons o-?- ? d???s as dtSCrt?'tn ?a ; ?h5 ?$i - 7(? t rl Y1p-? ?rovtc?v N:?n-tvl ?G? aqla G.,\ntwcv? -A(-xl.tlr Utt?M?1? VIOI&Q ?s 0!?- Sstuncr?wt&vl • 7R) (31, 39) T V\,, C,C-?Ons cp CL-5 in ?? ?hS?1-?(0 ???n tn?o-?- Pre?i?; Zco?'AArt ?Y?AU w i44A gYV1,UI &rntSS CU'1?curall ??? t?cubo?i `?r?? 14 kkA PvyMltyldM -b un ?- ?o?ts?; ton . ntcc? f2? t?c©csc ?,cn? leaf, In SMU WsmnAuLl i ?h? t??rr-fin irtc.??o??:? `t'aro r?lns?1-78 0? C-OW41 and b 5? t?l ? wuf, com ko -? Z,,V\A t i Oc wEcv ?l vn L4, ioi 'CAA c ant - Pip 01-TvlM&Arc W ? ? 1 Gr' A,vl tOla tpY? r oo"s T4nW1( ?? ?ntsc o?d ? ? ; wl?ic b? a S wt? ?ub?s can ; V '? , orn sc©?? ai, mss, ?,cav c w+ vftzstmi, ?n,mw r\AE-vwbu, ©,c LOAM. i? t Av?, tnd *dua9 kv?ou?\ ? off' 4k, tnGid w is oNo ?aci1? rot and 54 i? jj ice, s ntionv,, is ?n?? Ao ? cxkb\?isti u?1+ pr ivy ? P G tnv s byrvi? cwnabl? U S5 0 1q. u ? d i 1 ;; +1?? 801 EVcrn des 44 arc Vwv y? aJ? ?d?n,+1,inc?v?iin?c s??1&rvw? ??i vwuSco?nd?.?A k-P rwaK,Ga CAJ(\kkEn 3 uxnn?ar osc ?WO sw Qt, ©V- oj?v?j noc, W E, Ao an env , gnL « ? a. Vwscp?Us-? c , +6t i,5 UP M TAA?' COMAA koo? 6 ©\n WTU, Cak tib?s: O z vm',c?,""3 ? r ? d? r`hon ? ?? c??€ ?ns?; eur,d or C3? ?- ? ? ?v,s ok- Q-( -? Wu-t ?Yl3'3?g tp? -b ?uPPor-? -? I-+1? d2F,ts?? Bs.) Dn ?,-t a -03 wIb onio2, c Ar, omu16? f4 Y'K s A-ew V40. was ice- ??ta a ss 1niYY1 luc ??o 4'ti? c.© w -?©rrrt" ?L?? -for ?, Pr?r?c? o? ?nc???Vdva9s c?-???t b-n on ?c tc? its c? r ? ?-G? s!M (,l. V 1s ?r1tW1 UL? c?Ct4C1G?0 n1? 3©?? ??- -o c? SRC, ?s C1a35 _, p?v??okottcr?n, an? D O? Ylb ?rr t.?lk r?S SIO? LA in k(_ sly) ?1 ? d ??n 'Ce?dl (1f ?1 ' ?a?s a. M PI* v?ct?9? vYlr.QIY? C9 go)lQn 1-ea3-014 u91M?c? CY) 'r ???? rvu5con?uck?P???Z?i6 G1r?ysSw?? h? ? n U qa. : pr dLS`?? C?? C , ?cww? ?Al) m xwu ion r? ,texts' 4o q t*kvn ar6 NAr 4*", ?UonVc-'')8?'n can ?n lamed Inc>-?? ti 1n ? w? ? p (0© (?&-u q3)1 fYW s Yyo 0-AAuv, a pEa? o-?AA?ts kcz?z.zx', cnc CDP rA3? a izs\,tn a.5 DLr ? CJ q? P?nc?ca as a N\Zk' 0- 3 • ? 1 Af. Pc-? L)J\TY 1."s J?,cYV\ c inks LfOO Ck- b Yak on kvv-.? 3aarnIE, 'l Yl emu to ?'- ?1'W1 l an? awicAlbnl' k1ro +C) an y ;7 nc Ak\A ', ?`tt-'*'?-? ? ?af?f' GIC?.u? ? ?I ?1 i Y£1' ? n ? Q ? Q. 1®rdt?c OfI6 %:53 0 ?a?i ??? ? ???uc?.s rc9i? i?r?r? 'CAWF,4 Ain 4tt, !ntCj&va--- ih y?u? ?o??, r 4?rin ? _ on +Vv--, 3c?4Jn 4,b wvlU in ?-iY\A'rY? Wwv1 G{uuC?Cun8 C1riG roYliYip} +?M? j? I :M% orb-1?,?5 d soon cal; vIAf P 4 a ?? ?1 o-g s .'y "AA to O C P?CDWJ? So\W1 DOF-, . -I pinG1???? ?x1urn?vl s inn wa bj- Tc? ,acA gush °1 dec, idn +nt OmAnt, azs 0. " 01(? CoLkf5z-- to40n 1-11-06 wM& C)n Phan > Ins ?wtl t i ?l to i ME,-:z co5? PAIP-Pt 1 St? AWA 4C+M, ?? err t?1 t ?-oc 41t, L?ncic en n ton, c etc m nor c F?vt&-ocam, an8 Cwt &nm 4 tot=,1., ?? h,, , ?cawuvwr W?Ic? dvnL? wt?-pt?t 1 on 4A% 1 n V kim ccnd Wrc'onin k ;m 4-C) fs Dc. 41, u.AJIa p in R U4,s, ttri ?' +Mc.PrP st`? "tALA a ??„ia?pej lop ?? urn ? ?o a ERG Covw Pt ? X06) ?? y, 'fxCZxw,??c vV?o??c? d??s?,ew? as a.rrla' o? ????.>?? (Ybzt?6? as cl vVAC? cas,-E,. -) On 3 - as-05 wvab on Phi tau ? 3vnu, tyl vwi U 0?; ?? ?n S ?orv?n 1 ma cc>t)r-) i ?n+rh -fib qS d Dcd ? c p D,ta XL s pec-? < <a11 WI r. ? - ?5Lkm Cc. ? Q -?n 4A? tat (o-?s-?? ?? on W o?? ?wut ?Ab? C?c?sw?? ?rrn??ss??n of- . Co,d ax?a k an twoo J?ac'v\n ?s b {mod n ` CrtO -Eo ?ti c ??w?a?nc? a dcc.,?ian . I TmR Q c? C c? 4 \Ai e>q 7s©n n 71 S, aYK? q boo C us 0.,cvaAv&-G C>? ?- . Ujwd? fly) ?Ul n pus n `z ? •J\L7+n Gacrv? `Mos?c, ors a w5 4 Cam. e?v \? s 5m JYIc? c i?su I?'lasc?ru?d 4-ViQa4,r-n'iy an U-A I IBS 1Ylr. StA?rw? a U"-a5 4)rm a6vt I lam, P t-ncz, op V-84%n WA P-fmroj E • i j W va s ?ocv?n r c ? 66-oE? u f.on a 1666tie:? bctin on 3CLMV kn A^? In V,,?rw L;I1 Cknd c?ion?n Cr?v?n 3d s ?SG-? Gxid? &Jt i ?isL 4No-$ CLWo eon c??tbnc?, Em ?dm Iao)J Mf. Ruas qua mk d a isct? A-o a VqL covvpr&-.A ©-- S6n Do ult, ? i , arY4,12 r,, lw is,a. dujs ton c Pho?d ?` 4tu ?c??s?on e??xr? ??Yb??k, as ??.? o? ,w) 4-ton su4cinE? +W-= ?u?z??an ck- zyam jLr cz a w? c?u iaa On Z-a1-ost mt).Vr?t =O-YL?S r 36 MULOrl`?`?138 m?w?, c1? ?U& C1C1( r?, WW1 0? i ?Y1t c c ?_t1? an SWAPIk t? U??tvl?ss ?xwc, ?a41 U3 "I nu-? CA- w?&Aa9s wifti R-rm Vna Q .? E An ivic, &YA- 'in c?caltiw? ?? Ir?.c?rih , ?,rr,?,wiy??,???/l??.c,? c??0?v? de?i? turr- oil, a ? ohs vvV?sc?v?c?uC, 4b ? P)?, cz vt a ohs, Toe?# t 3 i V `4 i ? 15 CO. o t?tZ?a AU?b-?Of) k"OO VYL i n ?-c?urVl ?Su??-cun? ?v?4S?O'n p? E??YU??LF-?'' la?l,a,n ?,-?a-ps tMr?. Pry I W -, on Ph?,?k\.c u?a? vA\SCp,u>v'?1?(o3C? ?tVt ??vvt ???1(a n? .n9 ? L/ v cUnc? ?? on VA -?o ©d s c?+ww? u 17 as A3tas1? rv??, s bw ? w owza?'S jQ,5 CA- WD4t-C o n -ak-bs ¦ t ?? an P ?v ???.R • Is Vv??r1c? ?Gl? fo-7g t'Ys Gk t55? ??wt -n iL? v? t 3q. 1?35. W??C?SS ?ocwt cc??s SGT , ?n vw1 O yytk ' c? 4 ®rx? ccnc? C, - notlz ae61z5 fl cub • ?31 ? ?? tp - aS?pS ??? pn ?a?vf, WI. ?• ???? u1A? ?o 01o an oc? . l rx ? ? , gA ,t n _ on CALY?td Vv\M A-o tis d zs 1 U-t &Cylct ;LX;"S, iS ? ?-c?its.t510? w ?'Nlo??{ Ct Q, Yw o F c€ux-a& , C ?i O - an 0 CAW cxc? ,C/0 8, lye.' ?Lc.-Pr?ss? ?-Ooru?` iv.!?A''u??/ c,c9?s t? ? C?3 J ? W1.S barst? ?Gsrl?i? +t ®n Sant(,,. 4?, ;z5Y\A U Gn 9in&"qy, 1n.iM Yv-JP q ? C? S ?'?'Y`M.`v{' wu?C??•e'?' ? c? Fes' `?Cd t't c?h ???5 ?i?t9 SL©1n . C-C)U)?zsL 4'11o Y\/1,c. tAC?2\llcw" iy,) Avm Iy-7>Ion 3-aN-05 t'v1c.Roz_?' W t?? vvltsC?? ( Curt Evw abu3't?U 4 tNB Vvln. R? ?t ?lotn a vu c vl-I?)-3 ??V\A aZ5K Q(4 IkAll MO. ?&VtG UJO,?) At.)n:Llu?- A-'Y.,U G*Jn6ft =o-,s I ?laK V4 t?cc w? ujkv, , a cr i?na4? o-? ?s61, ,n 3 - WW , ©,n P6 s vvif. RUZ-"IF f tAY? &5t t vw+scmndu??Afo?I !D4 a?? ??nn of ' +?Wtaiul Can , u ?v? a I att cunc? nt C ?g 151.) mc. 9- ztv 1\AzA aa.-?mtl ?c, '4w a 15'J'o nn ask ? jkz:w ?v ?t ?YIC ? 1YlC L?itC ??tlckS Cc?i J RCL rts • ? ?nou?l??? ? ?, tinc?? tin ?? PAO35 a4? t vim- Free cil-vn aTO-VO 04-_ i53? ry1 r. ?z1 log! ?, Gov ionouxu? Av??t-, -\vix QKZr)AUc?s O-f) '-somd" ?8cl* hc;, -nwu «Y?d ?n r ? -? z -?5 t,?l?l?, on Ph??-?? v?l c Rez??' ? l?s?u uc ---#*775517 ? vc?C?O? ? cn ax, R?C? t?6?':trnc. Rc,?,ti?' sub?vw? c?.?rv?? c,???n?s -?'oc'?rv? ? c?sk??? fit' ? ?c?n?? c? ?? c:??ducJ? ??-N? F? Kno?,O tr MGcc??n? try ????? • 15?? ? ?? VL?x'EV? , LKfunti??' tz+p?? GclWC'C??t?. d?'lt? rV1c?. Rcrz_t?? ???? cwt ? t? ?cutu?-r IdInc n c(-1nYc 6n onAb w-*u In 5au hvnn ? t d DC? ? ? ? as' ? t w?? -WY i e??? cN c3itc? ? ?crs 157) Mr, k-z It s?bv\?kAz.C? c? ?rng.,Du C'Cd 40 Comfl?\45L6 042 ?m so C06 is?u2? a ?vo? ?uuon?'R dsio?n e ?Xa wti? V?Ao ??t a wlCti C C dcucC . • ISB ?Ylr. Ruz•cc --t&rna _V'NM c ?fl ',gin -?-{,?,rn ?h?? ?n?d?G??io? ?w? wlo?1,?.? e? a, ?s9? On (? - a -03 ( on 0)4,5 4t OO YVl n OaSS i 4-o 0 jc,?a? ??u? v??scot'x? tom`-#?1???a?a i use wZD end - o 01o ow) Of E?JL6wct 61az a1 V ©m "n t, O AA,4,'tn AAAb 3nM 'IA v WA u1 a P6 ass c?Fl???OY? YKC tmnn' w6 i%5w Q81"s -on 61X? ??a? ww4? t?c?CC?? CAS c?rv?? ?b31j Y?t,?c, ll9a??? ? ? ? rn ? ?-%??@ a? Pis c? ?'? ? mv3con&?zk# s f?;??! nfm tack o?- w" in +ujr n 3uAajnt8 d-I -jmston A? v v '? c"-s Cf--c??4- fps'- G4???? ??' ???c', and ? ?; ??c?1?'1?.?'? '-?.` ? 1 ?P rg 7 • Ij ?,y.?.w?,?V??:S '?C G®vv??ta?n,c.? f.???-h ?a?-? ?a??? v? ac ,?a -4)c , u?I 3-7 Va codes 310 Cb? Cs?. Pl _am N --0,- 7q IG(o in r- gvl9?n o ti x r ?v??s vAu?? walk s ? ?,r ?rocfa?wraQ ?c,?,P-?' ?ru 1£?, ? n ?? ? mss cam H 4-h °N1 j Y. c?C CU1?M ,( ?c?1?pv(1CSvc aVet IIv o ? its ECK?aNwvK ?CcQ?i '??X,1?' ?.??f1 5 v.9ig-'?'?+-?l ? SV?, V?bV?C? ? r S ari6 ProcE?ukJ d u& PTm?? co? 6q T?r?? cwt k-YWb t[?? ezC,4;on c SWU,tv?ol P?aantis r ?'??? • 1-70. ??6,vrt?S QY,6 C?UZ, ?,?OC.F?-S 0? 60 wn on rcA-Ptr)Vk(n lm'il rtl4As an 'o a ? E?' C -VA8MCJ- 1 xctn i ?9loWt(? 3`7 Pit- C:QAL 93. ID Caun-Ir air, 0 171, b7a,' C k Tv*. vk:v ??nCpr?ot mfhs4-7R-/70 P! c P?r? h- af)8 an (-t 3Q-©u LA?of) U, ccf olo r P 1 D c A?Yvtu 113) des U-t? CLU {fta b COJ dtAC - ka'S 17q)l rw, ©WAX d? ? vfoy-A&-., vyv).Vr?ss1 ?A om shi an C,?4ian on 1??? P?- v?E? !75>+ M 'YvckLA 3 6ufS a aU?7in? 4. c)A4N&r i ti SRC C?v,? GL rytr.P"?\ ?? c \ car c®w?r?Ld UVI4 anc? L- R??S? cv ca ve ?l1r.Pc?1 ©n tic, 34C&Is IAN^G 1 ?' ©C ran p `J(lt off- h?a. i? %)IPAf P ? Pgc, OZ o_ w cd? ok-) c c)"C: ? (1btC?? ?v?u° KA-vit"r w?r rnmr, t8 lie Rg? Cn -7- 23-Oq Wlr. R7-'-? CA-22,:5 i,:56UEA (057b3O C4, Oy or ?soe 46r,:T cu-k? e \C) w P? b?1?a , A V n? - ?s slim c c?ion ®n ??s V?F-UZS3*k a Ir- P?- ???? ?1n® c?v?nv? ?t, Pr?l ern t? ????s C? cenaU8- on h?5 • i ?vr j C,??1??n b'n Yl1s uw --- ^?6n a r6 nevp-c P ?n ?k coask C t?5) Uwi NaKuvs, wo-,r.:?h on +6& PPG awr convLyi CR- zackion on ?i+s Fa- ? aja 41M oc oE, IBt? .?. P11?`rnn Q-A?'I ALI P c e 0__WV OA ok C-0 LkK 10 t(V1 r. P IA? O.5 t 5311 D?c?- 6v1a? 3 Eu? cy? w S IBq)'. r c? o crdd?-l?c,t.P pk? - , hn?jc o..,od 0)66- Exa.m.? r4? 3 C"5 0? vW - OR- c oLycD t?s) an ?(-.?.8-6?( YVI?.?ioz??.c c?? ? c?? t?la? ih ??- C? V1 5 -lo--O VYt?? '{?pzlt?'f U (? ? c5 (,? O?'?l. G ?l? 17338 COWS\1 wo YkCL+V\L UZCA6 b 31 t C.e?nbnu? bYll? ?, 5?-ate,: - ? 1_ r?7 O'?14?(' ck? Yk 'Qrov? 6,Yc ®Zk?JC Wr on j S ?,?ov.9ti OtYI ac y-) O`n VI's ?Of+ IWO ? PRc, CA- ? conv c?- vvlr. 9,mt'CY'S C.Fdl ce)lllp a;8 c alp ? n mv. q, - Tr Qy, !Rov i VIYO c?? ?U4- e)n Frus r ?r? :a" -? ©r- c n • t$g?!, IMF. Roz?vc s ?? a?5 etc ?kS W u1? to n sus nod h? PPc> d on a? ? ? ? c?ccrs? . IR©?' d? $-may-Dy my, Pcz cc Was 113 ' ka317U37 aj-Avr?d O C? £ 10 ?,?viti? C Wyv C -?nd , uc+-Or? 6 ( F?k4 mac ?r?v"?d i Zz. 3 Ali? ?? t ?ha wtiu tm r. R®zti an kc. ©r WtD- V,\XV\N © po?uwn? o Y.?"rt?c OA ow& =,r ?w i? ?h sus-?.?n? ??PR? d?s?or7 Q? C?- L VVdke, ? OrR CJ0LAI '.!5F, • 193?`VV1?c, R??vc' •c?-=?,?? cu???r?a9 ?Ins?S ??L o-?- c.?I?icJ? c?ns`dv;??n PSG tgy'T,?RC?'s : u,??cvLVVnF vti?f?s Prov?c? rnr. • OZi? S t v I AA-) CUn bbl ?t tiS PcL! ?- c ro '?t n I?'s?• 'Wlr• R©Zl rX' ??YLU, ?6'V?lk? ( e???5 ? ? .??nf??Z:un? Chi?? CSCC-wrlivtps(' ?`tY lam' ???'1 © C.t? ?uG?1 ! ?1 ?t') c?uS?-a? ?'? ? 't'?'l,? t ? On G2 jc.c? 8-12-x3 LL?, k t,K ckl-?z ocy ! an c)4Ets- 41 M ? b? rywtj %'%f) k-, iV? . CLn WrAUC? on V?S RC4?- ramp 4? • ?9g? Pc PRA UJDZ C.On\9 C©vwp??5 O? Sohn 33? ;,34 ax? 3s ovo C Onl%nuzd on U-9*)?CAJ(-? UDndu?k (ov) VIiS Vajc- c.XXA,crc tni w? G?YI © c`?ur`u ?????? - fJ ?c Ow 2e0)©n S-q-oq MV. 5 1 n c.?r? sum c? ??3763s c?.u'H.?or? u??or ?F?s, eoqAUC? an 1??s ?? t v kAA? • e - i? ? c Stiwu flat ?n?2n?. goa) P? PRA cAX,(? comp-r? cad o? Lfvly? V! &3. arq. • CbYIc? ?(Vh.l,?a5? '?oY) i?? ?C ??c?t? I S ?c?4 `? C? Y Gaff v ?1J5 v` C C l9 l rylp. Ujoz ?? sulor a-`w' EGQ -I-lus o?vs c ?c? b ?nPQs . wa s b Ccu nA? GvvvrtL ? aw<? a?P MOKjn cUnd ntOK t aj?vi?AA wlYkIL6nw? n Cy?- ern Cef)(? c.ILc - oq 5 ', ?iGL? Y1c???4?1 Stidy ?t b?_n_ rn acxs. t,?n?k ?.c mmbi) an AAAb KG`s con o vltb c can ok- ????c?s a j 0 CEO ?(;ti ' \Dti V fi- A. 2p IM?C, wash ir, ? o6 t o? `? ? LVbnil } o?c, fro -. o6 tat anc C1 - gxaku;WW-K' e L?PK dc's Y)o ?--6 o? h v cis b ? k ?),DC bc? ?bn?Boa ???ivlc? Pew a? ??? , b?G min ??n?vv?u P ?m c?nd ?_ a vA? Pottc pc--Ats o2 v4fAtt CScc.?? C?r?i Pa. Cif, q3. l l . ae?? f Plan ? s cS wu? VoAA4 tin can 4\c'? • 5c)-Vmvm ram 6aG P"OY) bualc3?, i a uriv? e)r c?vn , vt uc) oOns *w-) V)Q,4;Yvti , ac dFnuA j+?. Svv?t PRA, v© s ?o n?? ?n P?, ? CS q 3, a) P(I(tw d© A-o V:ccn viu A r QSk to emu- 4o AU cfi8 m a?3?' t?RC ntvLv a3v' ? A-??la%4ov c4.n V? ©r ?? cV ?c --o k ?s?, ? W?,U, ?u.?' iv1 c?.r c?'7?rv?uv?2andc ?` ot? for ?€a-OL- a.15) n - 4 ?V vA- w 5 l? 9 C`? u?C AIo rtc-?UE-, 0- v??r'? • a? k: 7?1 D(15`c?O6 C ul t0 E,f c ?V L1/1" `cxU13 AA(li?a.` C V?R'?e&o r ? co ne , "'? 3fo • s. c? ?cc.??+nt???> Hof c?rrnPl?nc?? w??, Dz h ? -V w, ?C ~Prt?VV1$o2 A?S?vu???skrati?? Pc?? ? PnY)b* o .s ? 8uq-, Pte . (' ,la?vvtS -mac R ?? ? ZxU-PQ:)(,Zlz EW60digA ty) f?c l?P • ?v?n?-v??,rv?rr?- Rio-d?t?. U.??.? 5 cams-?-?,?-ion - . vtd,tmo Pro I nom oval ?v e?a?crarr ?Plao-XrMl cz ???x? v?o1a?? ? a,?-? 4b1? Dc,-?Drvl?7?2 Ar?,?uvt?? ?v C s CLnc? 2, Pc . ! C.??, Q3. Lt . ? pup-k m Vrcx?Lk_u?Q a4aZ?, ?lc?ri?%? wnC,E??t?-?5 ?a,-ca J5# 17! -d6! d cc M-? EX ? wc??? 5L&L Pa??Mp 6S ? ' h M-7) bC ? U-Vofl jvn v4r? fscwoc- -?Oc "-vt,*W WE, WL?n 6? ,3 c?nc 3L*uMArMdt>r? kO s3 c-- 4*.Mv?-W Wl?(cri tS 6©o? c k5 Cam' . Wccii`c? or? =? . yr T4vt. C OLM,5t ©CX av)c U nl? - Mw)OL NY-1 ?Y)Aiv? 'i?(n oc ?? V"-K-C, OV%Y) ?? gv?Ul bay uP©n c? js'-`PP°r? CpAn? 4 crtaycs ctxl k"k?c, ? EKyl- bk4tJl-s 1 C1P6 aao ?o Y\adur , 4)?, z5wu t, - ? v va`nk?4 c. A-o c ow?wrc--, CAW-V)CLM- ? ?? h !A- I • tr? aYl? , -uoi-? an Czu c? C - ,c?a$cor? b ?? ,n, c":26p h c,1? ?Wtctv?o? r Lk. aa3o ?'rh? Plow s P ioa'? r??ri u? nc?? ?? o n wnw?n,???9 vv?uflnv?' u?? o? s??? Qom, •n as ?uP?cv scA1??d Peso v??R s ?_s. end ?-1n? Pr?vut?l ©- rcy- ''?hs?a?a-a?3 ?n din ?? -??n?.? 1 bex?? ?v> - t? ?ndv xA- `O A-\i u ???d?a 1?5 co?i?-lion. ? an ou ns? ?vv? ?c..??5. • ?v?4 n P? c ?c? c?,v?4W5 Vtio? 37 ?oLCDA?- 4 3. G? aa7) lamp Mo. Pr?l ? uzqa? cler'?Wcx? in (9a011 on Q -dl?-q8 W6k, ?o 10 46 0,4u C - zscm•- 1 Cti5 Q ?e??r ??©1c? oqaq)1wl 3-02 to wt- ,w) P. U. A Scz-Grunt, E i'YI?. Pre p ` ox bxokv 8u?47-3 r c--cvw9 u?. &3? JI Qn ?? c?Lroc 3-5-??! YVI Pr ?? ? vvu ?c? ct Fc:or?w . 4 M ?ickcst,0,? 3 p on 5-9-04 o+ wl f. Prr?t 5 A,,, tuna Ak --I? b? \gi??c ?+ u+ A7o Acr-? Pbr ti usn? a ?nWP • • • ??d ???-&?sc.Xppl 'tp c?tt ``h11?`.R` ( Wt?'c?? ?(`-?A??nCI?A?(9U:?' Pct ' cx A Lr ?n a35?? um? S .vc ern ? Dr. - on rvt(.P(Es l z p n 4 -a3-oq ? got Wye: 03ro) Cjr)un? t'g 3OA1,C r n _??oY- % vcvvnkc 5 d Kwr. - P t©Fc?w?&? ? ?L? P? 6i S W7) e1 s-cjaAi-bn 'c ?M .6 Sr'??? C:) ,c cf, A38 ©C'. ay-) J Cov ens ?`:A ^? l vwivl?s?Y oC G'c4cO CtLo Prove vAf Proms C'o A-? 0, ?rrLT? \f?l5 •,? c-OR ?, ?wtu ??e?tk such - Yb Q ?u S Qax ? 5 wal vto r bt IM JEJ eAfEq. n c d ?o O sic a)-N8 44 A-)ho3b • aLo- al4i D?s?x- -Fh? A ?kv +r?c %VCA? ,#.. ? ,v o,8 Ov,?J- cfx,wzsiL- mc.RcrLv?s stl u? ?Lkc l C? ? b R,s? v?AOu.? Cis v? ti? ar WAY) C" c5YET 6?ss. Ova 3-aa-py Dr. Mf.?z Lf L'n OCCUS4 ? cis P ?, hoc '?? ?? t n P3 rAv. Rorz?-(' uxcz , ??-41-A A-o b c n 1??` P Pin 3,?, Ok- 04, A- ?,`?`P• ?1,c. Ra`zttit' w?d.? ???c'aQ '? -b fir. Sr?.?tncs.-?, 4,?. nc? i n n? 44 34)bo c0-0,'?-oy nn?.u in s Q d 9 ?S? &1 ?- ass ?o ? ?? • Vs gof Vu" -o ?4-6L"?Z AW M-Li wGuc-? i P4 wc, ur?-?\ g ?-3-Qy r?su??=c? 4r? 1?'?vw b?cvt???l??--a-o Un 7-a-Cq Rik Via t5a.? t Ld 4n CY) mxd 5?4w& an6 ooam Wwo moo rin c PaAn VAC, L?-?,Zg"Y,40n - t 2 ?Ac. u Ax s dons c? ?p r? cmu-fn ti n r. 0a acs 653??nv C?c??tQYIS ©? c?? F`?l O-s Qt?C??? tin (IC h? aa? -asa "??n dv?'?' aWX? and aSN? ac Q?,? o c nc?? s Cc c?tx?`r,w '+n • rtic?.S viol °?, is?sun? I A-0 -1v?t', SWI, d d V- t j Pax ? tom. d?? dam, Proms o? tom. ! (3) : Pfock?w CS \o k dT:?Mwtkn?- Cy?Th?, c.?rv?rri??x?? e? ?.P1.&?s -k? ?SYv1U ?c Jo A-f) an a?-, ;cei ael? ??V*W- Rc 4 a can kn???? ?(, -N?Ptc.?nkr??a? r??ra? o?a?l '? to °I?,O?G ?ht?wkln. 4\9-,,d 3 c"-rL-k - J cm n x. G. k +*, Plci s " 0 CWbj 5"JVWv S VMO?At vW In c+c cad ?? ?.SCvr?? vt ? n af-?, vvQ? JvVb dd x1aQ i ?F 4? RaG.S YQU?, t ?-?? unsc,-xyc'nsi?,caavl? ?o GAS 1,30 O(o t ? . ell. Q. x ?L, Poc L7©01- o zoo viovk CPO- S V? i 0 535 , 4 'v t 2 1 hJ ?'co p '?'1 ?; _ . S ' ' (S {?????? ? c •. ?'?ti) ?,?? ?. ). K. ) Y ` fZ1 i ~? ^G IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA SEAN PRESSLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 04-5144 v. JEFFREY A. BEARD, Ph.D., et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NOTICE TO PLEAD TO: Plaintiffs, SHAWN PRESSLEY, LAMAR ROZIER, and MICHAEL WASHINGTON You are hereby notified to file a written response to the enclosed Defendants' to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days from service hereof or default judgment may be entered against you. Respectfully submitted, Office of General Counsel, i By: icha . McGovern Assistdftl Counsel Department of Corrections 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 717-731-0444 PA Attorney I.D. No. 52802 Dated: May 19, 2006 f , IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA SEAN PRESSLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 04-5144 V. CIVIL ACTION JEFFREY A. BEARD, Ph.D., et al., Defendants. DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT AND NOW, come Defendants, by and through their counsel, and preliminarily object to Plaintiffs' amended complaint, and in support thereof aver: PARTIES 1. Plaintiffs, Sean Pressley ("Pressley"), Michael Washington ("Washington"), and Lamar Rozier ("Rozier") are inmates in the custody of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections ("DOC") who at all times relevant hereto have been incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill ("SCI- Camp Hill") 2. Plaintiffs have named twenty-seven current or former DOC employees and thirty-nine Jane and John Does as Defendants. f ? PROCEDURAL HISTORY 3. Plaintiffs filed their original complaint on or about march 27, 2005. 4. On April 18, 2005, Defendants filed preliminary objections to Plaintiffs' complaint. 5. On December 30, 2005, the Court issued an order granting Defendants' preliminary objections and granting Plaintiffs 120 days to file a legally cognizable amended complaint. 6. On April 30, 2006, Plaintiffs filed their amended complaint. CLAIMS 7. Plaintiffs' claims are based on the fact of their transfer to and confinement in the Special Management Unit ("SMU") at SCI-Camp Hill. SMU's are "special units within designated Department of Corrections facilities designed to safely and humanely handle an inmate whose behavior presents a serious threat to the safety and security of the facility, staff, other inmates or him/herself." (See DC-ADM 802, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", § IV M). Pressley has been confined in the SMU for a combined total of three years. Rozier has been confined in the SMU for a combined total of three years. Washington has been confined in the SMU for a combined total of four years. Their complaints fall within several broad categories: (1) that when they were transferred to and while they have been confined in the SMU they have been denied the procedural due process they allege 2 they are guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment and 37 Pa. Code 93.11(b) and further allege that conditions in the SMU violate the Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment; (2) the inmate misconduct appeals process in the SMU violates the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause and 37 Pa. Code 93.10; (3) their Fourteenth Amendment rights to Due Process, DOC policy DC-ADM 802, and 37 Pa. Code 93.11 were violated by reason of their confinement in Administrative Custody ("AC"); (4) in retaliation for their complaints regarding the SW and litigation they initiated they were denied their Fourteenth Amendment rights to Due Process and Equal Protection in their periodic reviews for advancement out of the SW and their rights as guaranteed by DOC policies DC-ADM 801, DC-ADM 802 (attached hereto as Exhibit "B"), and 6.51 (attached hereto as Exhibit "C") were violated; and (5) they have been denied adequate dental treatment in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and in retaliation for exercising their First Amendment rights to file grievances. 8. Plaintiffs ask the court for declaratory relief, an order releasing them to the general prison population, expungement of their records, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and costs. 3 FACTS AS ALLEGED Count One 9. In paragraphs 33 through 76 of their amended complaint, Plaintiffs allege that they were not given written notice that they were being considered for transfer to the SMU or the reasons for their possible transfer. Further, they were not provided with a hearing to contest their placement in the SMU or any written rationale for their placement in the SMU. 10. Plaintiffs allege that of the approximately 40,000 inmates in the custody of the DOC, approximately 75 are housed in the SMU. 11. Plaintiff's allege that inmates are committed to the SW for an indefinite period of time and that the policies governing the SMU make them ineligible for parole, limit the amount of written materials they may keep in their cell, prevent them from purchasing personal hygiene products, limit their correspondence with society, require them to eat their meals in their cells, require them to submit to strip searches every time they leave their cells, limit their calorie intake, subject them to a count light in their cells which remains on at all times, prohibit them from conversing with other inmates in the SMU, deny them access to rehabilitative and educational programs, limit their right to exercise, limit their access to legal materials and legal assistance, prohibit contact visitation, render them ineligible for mental health treatment, force them to discuss their health at 4 their cell doors where other inmates can listen, and deny them medical and dental treatment (¶¶ 51 through 69). 12. Plaintiffs allege: there is an atmosphere of excessive violence in the SMU; inmates frequently heave bodily waste on corrections officers and other inmates; inmates in the SW are deprived of almost all environmental and sensory stimuli; and prison officials ignore inmates' complaints, which creates a state of hopelessness. 13. Plaintiffs allege that the failure to provide them with written notice and a hearing wherein they can challenge the decision to confine them in the SMU violates the Fourteenth Amendment. 14. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Secretary Beard's failure to establish written policies and procedures, pursuant to 37 Pa. Code 93.11(b), providing notice and an opportunity to be heard to inmates before their confinement in the SMU, and other Defendants' failure to provide them with written notice and a hearing pursuant to 37 Pa. Code 93.1 l(b) violate their rights. Count Two 15. In paragraphs 85 through 163 of their amended complaint, Plaintiffs allege that while they were confined in the SW Pressley was issued fourteen misconducts, Rozier was issued three misconducts, and Washington was issued one misconduct. Plaintiffs further allege that at their misconduct hearings they 5 e were uniformly denied the opportunity to call witnesses on their behalf, denied the opportunity to present documentary evidence, and denied legal assistance. Rozier also alleges that on two occasions he was not allowed to attend his misconduct hearings. 16. Plaintiffs allege that each of them was found guilty at all of their misconduct hearings and that sanctions were imposed on them. 17. Plaintiffs further allege that they either appealed these decisions through the proper channel or were denied the opportunity to appeal these decisions, and in every case, their appeal was denied. 18. Plaintiffs allege they were denied the opportunity to call witnesses on their behalf, to present documentary evidence, and to have legal assistance by reason of Defendants Secretary Beard, Superintendent Kelchner, and Chief Hearing Examiner Bitner's failure to properly train and supervise the hearing examiners. 19. Plaintiffs allege the appeals of their misconduct hearings were denied in an arbitrary and summary manner by reason of Secretary Beard, Superintendent Kelchner, and Chief Hearing Examiner Bitner's failure to properly train and supervise the Program Review Committees ("PRC"). PRC is "A committee consisting of three staff members who conduct Administrative and Disciplinary Custody Hearings, periodic reviews, make decisions regarding continued 6 R ? confinement in a Security Level 5 Housing Unit, and hear all first level appeals of misconducts." (Exhibit "A," § IV H). 20. Plaintiffs further allege they were found guilty of some of the charged misconducts by reason of Secretary Beard's failure to establish policies and procedures in accordance with 37 Pa. Code 93.10. 21. Plaintiffs allege that the procedures used in their misconduct hearings and subsequent appeals violated the Due process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and 37 Pa. Code 93.10. Count Three 22. In paragraphs 171 through 206 of their amended complaint, Plaintiffs allege numerous instances where they were placed or continued in AC in violation of DOC policies. AC is "A status of confinement for non-disciplinary reasons that provides closer supervision, control, and protection than is provided for in general population." (Exhibit "A," § IV A). 23. Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the Program Review Committees ("PRCIs") convened to determine their placement did not follow DOC procedure; that they were placed in or continued in AC in violation of 37 Pa. Code 93.11(b); and that the process was handled in an arbitrary, summary, and biased fashion by reason of Secretary Beard, Superintendent Kelchner, and Chief Hearing Examiner Bitner's failure to train or supervise PRC members. 7 l Count Four 24. In paragraphs 210 through 223 of their amended complaint, Plaintiffs allege that while confined in the SMU, pursuant to DOC policy they were supposed to be provided with a periodic review every thirty days. 25. At these periodic reviews, the PRC is required to determine by vote whether the inmate will be advanced in the SMU program, denied advancement, have their disciplinary custody time reduced, or be returned to the institutions general population. 26. Plaintiffs allege that at each of their periodic reviews the same statement was read to them, informing them they would remain in the SMU and they were never. advised of the reasons their confinement in the SMU was being continued. 27. Plaintiffs allege that for inmates to be eligible for advancement in the SMU program or to have their disciplinary custody time reduced, the inmate must receive a recommendation from the unit manager and the counselor, and then receive a majority of the votes from the unit office concurring with the recommendation. 28. Plaintiffs allege these procedures violated their due process rights as set forth in the Fourteenth Amendment and violated DOC policy and 37 Pa. Code 93.10 and 93.11(b). 8 29. Plaintiffs allege that their periodic reviews to assess their progress in the SMU program were not conducted on an impartial basis and violated the Due process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and were in retaliation for their litigation. 30. Plaintiffs further allege that Secretary Beard, Superintendent Kelchner, and Chief Hearing Examiner Bitner are liable for these violations by reason of their failure to train and supervise their subordinates. Count Five 31. In paragraphs 227 through 252 of their amended complaint, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants Dr. Salancy and Corrections Health Care Administrator Law were deliberately indifferent to their serious medical needs in violation of their Eighth Amendment rights to be free from cruel and unusual punishment and denied and or delayed dental treatment in retaliation for their filing grievances in violation of their First Amendment rights. DEMURRER I Eip,hth Amendment Claims Based on Conditions of Confinement in the SMU 32. "The DOC's maximum security housing is divided into three (3) different leveled units: (1) Restricted Housing Unit; (2) Special Management Unit; (3) the Long Term Segregation Unit ("LTSU"). LTSU is the most restrictive; specifically it is an area of maximum security housing coupled with extremely 9 w . limited programming and privileges designed for high risk inmates." Isley v. Beard, 814 A.2d 168,169 fn. 2 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2004). 33. "One of the reasons for transfer of a prisoner to the LTSU is a failure to satisfy the requirements of the somewhat less restrictive disciplinary custody units, the SMU and/or the RHU." Rivera v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 837 A.2d 525 (Pa.Super. 2003). 34. Conditions in the LTSU do not violate the Eighth Amendment. Rivera, 837 A.2d at 534. 35. If the harsher and more restrictive conditions of the LTSU do not violate the Eighth Amendment, the less harsh conditions of the SMU cannot, by definition, violate the Eighth Amendment. WHEREFORE, Respondent moves the court to dismiss all of Plaintiffs' claims based on alleged violations of their Eighth Amendment rights by reason of their confinement in the SMU. DEMURRER II Due Process Claims Based on Plaintiffs' Confinement in the SMU. Misconduct Appeals Confinement in AC and Periodic Reviews 36. "The Courts of this Commonwealth and the Federal courts have consistently held that prison officials have the authority to determine where a prisoner should be housed and that the Due Process Clause imposes few 10 restrictions on the use of that authority." Singleton v. Lavan, 834 A.2d 672, 675 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2003). 37. "[L]iberty interests which are protected by the Due Process Clause ... will be generally limited to freedom from restraint which, while not exceeding the sentence in such an unexpected manner as to give rise to protection by the Due Process Clause of its own force nonetheless imposes atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life. Wilder v. Department of Corrections, 673 A.2d 30, 32 (Pa.Cmwlth. 1996) citing Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995). 38. "Unlike the criminal trial and appeals process where a defendant is accorded the full spectrum of rights and protections guaranteed by the state and federal constitutions, and which is necessarily within the ambit of the judiciary, the procedures for pursuing inmate grievances and misconduct appeals are a matter of internal prison administration and the `full panoply of rights due a defendant in a criminal prosecution is not necessary in a prison disciplinary proceeding...' unless ,an inmate can identify a personal or property interest ... not limited by Department regulations and which has not been affected by a final decision of the department' the decision is not an adjudication subject to the court's review." Bronson v. Central Office Review Committee, 554 Pa. 317, 321, 323, 721 A.2d, 357, 358-359 (1998) (internal citations omitted). 11 WHEREFORE, Respondents move the court to dismiss all of Plaintiff's claims based on alleged violations of the Due Process Clause by reason of their confinement in the SMU, misconduct appeals, confinement in AC, and periodic reviews. DEMURRER III Due Process Clause 39. Plaintiffs' claims against all Defendants named in counts one through four of their amended complaint with the exception of Secretary Beard, Superintendent Kelchner, and Chief Hearing Examiner Bitner, are based on an alleged denial of due process as a result of these Defendants' participation in proceedings which resulted in disciplinary action against the Plaintiffs. 40. "[T]he failure of a prison official to act favorably upon an inmate's grievance is not itself a constitutional violation." Flanagon v. Shively, affd, 980 F.2d 722 (3d Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 829, 114 S.Ct. 95, 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993). 41. Further, an inmate does not have a viable constitutional claim based solely on a prison official's failure to adhere to a regulation, directive, or policy statement. Elkin v. Fauver, 969 F.2d 48 (3d Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 977 113 S.Ct. 473 121 L.Ed.2d 379 (1992). 12 WHEREFORE, Defendants move the court to dismiss all claims against all Defendants based on an alleged violation of Plaintiffs' rights to Due Process by reason of their failure to act favorably on Plaintiffs' grievances. DEMURRER IV Failure to Train and Supervise 42. Plaintiffs allege their constitutional rights have been violated by Secretary Beard's, Superintendent Kelchner's, and Chief Hearing Examiner Bitner's failure to train and supervise employees under his direction. 43. "[W]hen supervisorial liability is alleged ... a plaintiff is required to demonstrate a causal link between the misconduct complaint of and the actions of the supervisory officials in order to state a cause of action under § 1983 against those official, conclusory allegations of failure to supervise and control, absent more, are insufficient to state a claim under § 1983." "A plaintiff must be able to show that a ... supervisor had some specific knowledge of the unconstitutional conduct and acquiesced in this conduct by failing to train and supervise `adequately."' Heinley v. Commonwealth, 153 Pa.Cmwlth. 599, 610, 621 A.2d 1212, 1217-18, (1993). 44. Respondent superior does not state a viable claim under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983. Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325, 102 S.Ct. 445, 453, 70 L.Ed.2d 509, 521 (1981). The Plaintiff must prove the individual was "personally involved" in the alleged violation. Goode v. Rizzo, 423 U.S. 362, 96 S.Ct. 598, 13 46 L.Ed.2d 5614, (1976); Hampton v. Holmesburg Prison Officials, 546 F.2d 1077, 1082 (3d Cir. 1976). The general responsibility for supervising the operations of a prison is insufficient to establish the personal involvement required to support liability against a warden in a § 1983 case. Keeper v. King, 130 F.3d 1309, 1314 (8`' Cir. 1997). 45. A supervisor is liable for the actions of a subordinate under § 1983 only if he is a "moving force" behind the subordinate's constitutional violations. Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1118 (3d Cir. 1989) citing City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 389 (1989). 46. Plaintiffs have failed to allege any facts to support of failure to train or supervise in their complaint. WHEREFORE, Secretary Beard, Superintendent Kelchner, and Chief Hearing Examiner Bitner move the court to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims based on their alleged failure to train or supervise subordinate employees. DEMURRER V Access to Courts 47. "[T]he fundamental constitutional right of access to the courts requires prison authorities to assist inmates in the preparation and filing of meaningful legal papers by providing prisoners with adequate law libraries of adequate assistance from persons trained in the law." Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 828, 97 S.Ct. 1491, 52 L.Ed.2d 52 (1977). 14 48. In order to establish a claim that he has been denied access to the courts, an inmate must demonstrate an actual injury, that is, the he has actually been denied access to a court in a specific instance. Kershner v. Mazurkiewicz, 670 F.2d 440, 444-445 (3d Cir. 1982); Johnson v. Lehman, 148 Pa.Cmwlth. 98, 609 A.2d 880 (1992). 49. Plaintiffs have failed to allege any specific instance wherein any them has been denied access to the courts. WHEREFORE, Defendants move the court to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims based on an alleged denial of access to the courts. DEMURRER VI Equal Protection - Conditions of Confinement 50. "In order to state an equal protection claim for unequal or discriminatory treatment, a person must allege that he has not been treated the same as similarly situated persons and that the disparate treatment is based on an unjustifiable standard, such as race." Miles v. Wiser, 847 A.2d 237, 242 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2004). 51. Inmates in different custody levels are not similarly situated. Isley, supra. 814 A.2d at 172, fn. 10. WHEREFORE, Defendants move the court to dismiss all of Plaintiffs' claims based on an alleged violation of their right to equal protection by reason of their confinement in the SMU. 15 DEMURRER VII Claims Based on 37 Pa. Code 93.11 (b) 52. 37 Pa. Code 93.11(b) (attached hereto as Exhibit "D") specifically addresses issues of confinement in a Restricted Housing Unit ("RHU"). 53. An RHU is defined as "An area or group of cells for an inmate assigned to DC or AC status." (Exhibit "A," § IV J). 54. Plaintiffs' claims are based on their confinement in an SMU, not an RHU. WHEREFORE, Defendants move the court to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims based on allegations Defendants' alleged violations of 37 Pa. Code 93.1 l(b). DEMURRER VIII Claims Based on DOC Policies 55. An inmate does not have a viable § 1983 claim based solely on a prison official's failure to adhere to a regulation, directive, or policy statement. Elkin v. Fauver, 969 F.2d 48, 52 (3d Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 977, 113 S.Ct. 473, 121 L.Ed.2d 379 (1992). 56. Further, when a DOC policy contains specific language that it does "not create rights in any person nor should it be interpreted or applied in such a manner as to abridge the rights of an individual" that policy does not create any enforceable rights in a Pennsylvania prison inmate. dones/Seymour v. Lefebvre, 781 F.Supp. 355, 359 (E.D.Pa. 1991), aj'd, 961 F.2d 1567 (3d Cir. 1992); see also 16 Williams v. Kyler, 680 F.Supp. 172 (M.D.Pa. 1986), aff'd, 845 F.2d 1019 (3d Cir. 1988). 57. DC-ADM 801 and 802 both contain the disclaimer which the court in Jones/Seymour specifically found did not create any rights in inmates. WHEREFORE, Defendants move the court to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims based on any rights Plaintiffs allege have been conferred on them by DOC policy. Respectfully submitted, Office of General Counsel, By: 6ZLAVA4 Michae J McGovern AssistanCounsel Attorney Identification No. PA52802 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 (717) 731-0444 Dated: May 19, 2006 17 Exhibit A AUTHORITY The Authority of the Secretary of Corrections to direct the operation of the Department of Corrections is established by Sections 201, 206, 506, and 901-B of the Administrative Code of 1929, 71 P.S. §§61, 66, 186, and 310-1, Act of April 9, 1929, P.L. 177, No. 175, as amended. II. PURPOSE This document establishes policy and procedure for the operation of housing units used to confine inmates in Administrative Custody status. 111. APPLICABILITY This policy is applicable to each facility operating a housing unit used to confine an inmate in Administrative Custody status. IV. DEFINITIONS A. Administrative Custody (AC) A status of confinement for non-disciplinary reasons that provides closer supervision, control, and protection than is provided for in general population. B. Department The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. DGADM 802, Administrative Custodv Procedures Page 2 C. Disciplinary Custody (DC) The maximum restrictive status of confinement to which an inmate found guilty of a Class I misconduct may be committed. D. Facility Manager The Superintendent of a State Correctional Facility, State Regional Correctional Facility, Commander of a Motivational Boot Camp, Regional Director of a Community Corrections Center, and/or the Director of the Training Academy. E. General Population A status of confinement for an inmate who is not in Administrative or Disciplinary Custody or other type of special housing. F. Long Term Segregation Unit (LTSU) A housing unit or group of cells designated to house an inmate classified as a Custody Level 5H. G. Pre-Hearing Confinement A temporary administrative status of confinement in the inmate's general population cell or in a Security Level 5 Housing Unit, pending the outcome of a misconduct hearing. H. Program Review Committee (PRC) A committee consisting of three staff members who conduct Administrative and Disciplinary Custody Hearings, periodic reviews, make decisions regarding continued confinement in a Security Level 5 Housing Unit, and hear all first level appeals of misconducts. The committee shall consist of a Deputy Superintendent (who shall serve as the chairperson), a Commissioned Officer, and one staff member from the following classifications, Corrections Classification and Program Manager (CCPM), Unit Manager, School Principal, Alcohol and Other Drugs Treatment Specialist Supervisor or Inmate Records Officer Supervisor. The Facility Manager may designate other staff as committee members; however, if such designations are made, they must be in writing and the Facility Manager must maintain a list of all designees. Whenever a PRC is convened, at least one member of the committee must be a staff member who is not directly involved in the administration of the Security Level 5 Housing Unit in which the inmate is currently housed. 1. Protective Custody (PC) A category of Administrative Custody used for an inmate requiring protection from other inmates or for reasons not caused by his/her own behavior. DC-ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures Page 3 J. Restricted Housing Unit (RHU) An area or group of cells for an inmate assigned to DC or AC status. K. Restricted Release List A list of inmates, identified by the Office of the Secretary, who are restricted from release from AC status without the prior approval of the respective Regional Deputy Secretary. This list is updated and distributed to all facilities on a quarterly basis by the Regional Deputy Secretaries. L. Security Level 5 Housing A housing unit, area, or group of cells designated as an RHU, SMU, Capital Case Unit, and/or LTSU. M. Special Management Unit (SMU) Special units within designated Department of Corrections facilities designed to safely and humanely handle an inmate whose behavior presents a serious threat to the safety and security of the facility, staff, other inmates or him/herself. N. Special Needs Unit (SNU) A housing unit established to provide a safe and secure setting and specialized treatment services for an inmate identified as being unable to function in a general population-housing unit. An inmate in this category may include someone diagnosed as mentally ill, emotionally unstable, mentally retarded, and physically or developmentally challenged. Placement does not require the mental health commitment process. 0. Unit Management Team The individuals assigned to operate a housing unit with the responsibilities for security, risk management, conducting informal resolutions of misconducts, and program delivery. P. Unit Manager The individual who is responsible for the supervision of all members of the Unit Management Team and the delivery of security and program services. V. POLICY It is the policy of the Department to place any inmate in AC status whose presence in general population would constitute a threat to life, property, himself/herself, staff, other inmates, the public, or the secure or orderly running of the facility.' '4-4249 DC-ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures Page 4 VI. PROCEDURES A. Placement in AC Status 1. Any general population inmate may be assigned AC status and placed in a Security Level 5 Housing Unit by order of the Shift Commander for the following reason(s):2 a. the inmate is in danger by/from some person(s) in the facility and cannot be protected by alternate measures 3 b. placement in general population would endanger the inmate's safety or welfare when it is not possible to protect him/her by other means ;4 c. the inmate is a danger to himself/herself or others;5 d. the inmate is suspected of being or is the instigator of a disturbance; e. the inmate would pose an escape risk in a less secure status; f. the inmate has been charged with, or is under investigation for a violation of facility rules and there is a need for increased control pending disposition of charges or completion of the investigation; g. the inmate has requested and been granted self-confinement; h. the inmate is being held temporarily for another authority and is not classified for the general population of the holding facility; i. no records and/or essential information are available to determine the inmate's custody level or housing needs; and/or j. the inmate has completed a DC sanction but one or more of the above reasons exist. 2. The following factors shall be considered by the PRC when reviewing an inmate for AC status placement as self-confinement: a. that verifiable and documented justification exists for placement; b. that the inmate is an obvious target for other inmates, consistent with the definition of Protective Custody (see Section IV. I.); and c. that staff have made every effort (documented) to keep the inmate safely housed in general population. z 4-4404 s 4-4281 ° 4-4281 5 4-4250, 4-4281 DC-ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures Page 5 3. An inmate who has completed a DC sanction imposed in accordance with Depart- ment policy DC-ADM 801, "Inmate Discipline" may be placed in AC status by order of the PRC for any of the reasons identified in section VI. A. 2, however, a hearing shall be held as described in Section VI. B. 4. Whenever practical, written notice of the reasons for AC placement is given to the inmate prior to placement, but in all cases within 24 hours after placement. The written notice shall be prepared on the misconduct form DC-141, Part 1 by indicating "Other."6 5. If the inmate has a mental illness, the PRC should explore the feasibility of placing him/her into a Special Needs Unit as an alternative, as long as the inmate's safety is not jeopardized. If the inmate's safety cannot be reasonably assured in any status other than AC, then the case should be referred and appropriate mental health services must be provided while the inmate remains in AC status. 6. When an inmate is placed in AC status the Facility Manager/designee shall review the placement within 72 hours. 7 7. The Facility Manager may request that an inmate be placed on the Restricted Release List when he/she poses a threat to the secure operation of the facility and where a transfer to another facility or jurisdiction would not alleviate the security concern. The Regional Deputy Secretary must approve placing the inmate in this status. B. Administrative Hearing An Administrative Hearing shall be conducted as follows: 1. The hearing shall be conducted by the PRC. 2. The reason(s) for the inmate's AC confinement must be explained to the inmate. 3. When the inmate is in AC status as pre-hearing confinement on a misconduct charge, an Administrative Hearing will not be held, provided a hearing on the misconduct charge is held within seven workdays, excluding weekends and State holidays, and the misconduct charge is disposed of at that hearing. An inmate request for a continuance of the disciplinary hearing is an automatic waiver of the hearing on the reason(s) for pre-hearing confinement. In all other cases, except as noted in Section B.4. below. The hearing shall be scheduled within seven workdays, excluding weekends and State holidays, after AC placement. 4. Confinement in AC status for investigative purposes shall not exceed 15-calendar days. The Facility Manager may approve one 15-calendar day continuation of confinement, if the investigation has not been completed. The reason for the continuation shall be documented and a copy provided to the inmate. Following the 30-calendar day period, if the inmate remains in AC status, he/she must be charged e 4-4404 7 4-4250 DC--ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures Page 6 with a misconduct and a hearing held within seven workdays, excluding weekends and State holidays. If the investigation indicates that a security concern, as outlined in Section VI. A. 1. exists, but the evidence is not sufficient for a misconduct, the inmate may be scheduled for a hearing to determine if further AC placement is necessary, upon expiration of the 30-calendar days. 5. The rationale for the AC placement shall be read and explained to the inmate. 6. The inmate shall be permitted to respond to the rationale for AC placement. The inmate may tell his/her version orally or submit it in writing. A PRC committee member shall write a summary of any relevant oral statement by the inmate. 7. The PRC's decision shall be based on some evidence as to whether there is a valid security reason to confine the inmate in AC as defined in Section VI. A. 2. The evidence may include counselor's reports, Psychiatric/Psychological information, staff recommendations, and/or investigative reports. 8. A written summary of the hearing shall be prepared on the DC-141 Part 3. It shall include the reason(s) relied upon by the PRC to reach its decision. A copy of the written summary shall be given to the inmate. The inmate may submit a concise summary of the hearing, which shall be made a permanent part of the file. 9. If, in the opinion of the PRC, the inmate is physically or mentally unable to attend or participate, the hearing shall be postponed until the inmate is able to attend and participate. The decision to postpone a hearing shall be documented on the DC-141 Part 3 and shall be made close to the time the hearing would have been held. There is no appeal from the decision to postpone the hearing. If the inmate is able to attend and refuses, the hearing will be held in absentia. If the inmate becomes disruptive in the hearing or refuses to follow instructions, he/she shall be removed and the hearing conducted without the inmate being present. C. Waiver 1. An inmate may voluntarily waive the hearing described in Section VI. B. at any time prior to the hearing's completion. The inmate may also waive the written notice requirements and any time limitations relating to the hearing or the service of notice. 2. All waivers shall be in writing and shall be signed and dated by the inmate. 3. When an inmate requests self-confinement in AC status, such request shall be deemed a waiver of all procedures described in this directive except periodic PRC review. Only written notice of the reason for the AC placement is necessary. 4. An inmate's refusal to attend a hearing shall be deemed a waiver of the proceeding. The refusal shall be documented on the DC-141, Part 3. The inmate may not appeal the results of a hearing he/she refused to attend. DC-ADM 802, Administrative Custodv Procedures Page T_ D. Appeals 1. An inmate may appeal the decision of the PRC concerning his/her initial confinement in AC to the Facility Manager within two days of the completion of the hearing. The appeal must be in writing. The decision of the Facility Manager will be forwarded to the inmate within 10 days of the receipt of the appeal. 2. An inmate may appeal the initial decision of the Facility Manager to continue him/her in AC confinement to the Office of the Chief Hearing Examiner. The appeal must be addressed as follows: Chief Hearing Examiner Department of Corrections 1451 N. Market Street Elizabethtown, PA 17022 Failure to properly address the appeal will delay the process. 3. The Office of the Chief Hearing Examiner will review the record of the hearing and all other relevant documents and rule on the appeal within two workdays after its receipt. 4. In every case where the action of the PRC or the Facility Manager is reversed, the Office of the Chief Hearing Examiner will prepare a letter to the inmate and a memorandum to the Facility Manager. These will be forwarded to the appropriate Regional Deputy Secretary for review and signature. 5. If the PRC decides to continue the inmate in AC following the 90-day review, the inmate may appeal his/her continuation as outlined in Section VI. D. 1 through 4. 6. The inmate's right to appeal terminates when he/she is released from AC. E. Periodic Reviews 1. The PRC shall review the status of each inmate in AC status every seven days for the first two months.8 2. Each inmate in AC status shall be seen weekly by his/her counselor 3. The Unit Management Team shall review the status of every inmate in AC after 30 days and every 30 days thereafter.9 4. The counselor's weekly interviews and the Unit Management Team's monthly reviews are documented in the DC-14, Cumulative Adjustment Record. 5. The PRC will interview every inmate in AC status every 90 days unless the Unit Management Team recommends an earlier review. The PRC's decision to continue N-4253 9 4-4253 DC-ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures Page the inmate in AC status or release him/her to population is documented on a DC- 141- Part 4, with a copy provided to the inmate. 6. The inmate may refuse to attend any interview. If the inmate refuses to attend an interview, his/her refusal will be documented on the DC-141- Part 4, and a review of the inmate's status conducted in absentia. 7. A qualified psychologist or psychiatrist shall personally interview and conduct an assessment on any inmate remaining in AC status for more than 30 calendar days. If the inmate's confinement continues for an extended period, a mental health assessment will be completed at least every 90 calendar days.10 F. AC Housing Status" AC is a status of confinement that provides the highest level of security and control. An inmate confined in this status shall not have the privileges available in lower security level housing. The following conditions apply to an inmate in AC status: a. All tobacco products are prohibited. b. There are no radio, television, or telephone calls (except emergency or legal telephone calls) in accordance with Department policies DC-ADM 818, "Automated Inmate Telephone System," and 6.5.1, "Administration of Security Level 5 Housing Units." c. Personal property, commissary, written materials, and prescribed medication are permitted in accordance with Department policy 6.5.1. d. All visits are non-contact in accordance with Department policies DC-ADM 812, "Inmate Visiting" and 6.51. e. Any combination of personal property that will fit into one standard-size records- center box may be maintained in the cell. Personal property includes: (1) written materials in accordance with DC-ADM 803, "Inmate Mail and Incoming Publications;" (2) one newspaper (one-for-one exchanges are permitted for newly received editions); and 12 (3) 10 magazines (one-for-one exchanges are permitted for newly received publications).13 f. An inmate shall be permitted to exchange legal materials from his/her cell with stored legal materials once every 30 days. The PRC may authorize more 10 4-4256 4-4249 12 4-4269 " 4-4269 DC-ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures Page 9 frequent exchanges based upon a demonstrated need for additional exchanges for active litigation. Such exchanges, however, may not exceed one per week. g. When an inmate is scheduled for transfer to another facility, his/her property shall be handled in accordance with DC-ADM 815, "Personal Property, Basic/State Issued Items and Commissary/Outside Purchases." h. An inmate shall be provided access to the facility law library in accordance with Department policy DC-ADM 007, "Access to Provided Legal Services." i. Leisure reading material may be requested from the library on a weekly basis. j. A jumpsuit, footwear, and basic issue toilet articles shall be provided. Two sets of personal undergarments are permitted. No other personal apparel is permitted. Outerwear will be provided as needed. k. Exercise shall be offered one hour per day, five days per week. 14 1. The opportunity to shower and shave shall be offered three times per week. 2. The PRC or Security Level 5 Unit Management Team may approve additional privileges based on individual need, safety and security and the behavioral progress of the inmate. 3. Additional privileges may include: a. an increase in visiting privileges; b. a radio; c. a television; d. an increase in telephone calls; e. increased commissary; f. access to educational books and materials; and/or g. a work assignment; h. any other general population privileges except freedom to move about the facility and freedom to engage in programs with the general population; and i. at the PRC's discretion, an inmate in longterm AC status maybe eligible for the General Labor Pool (GLP) compensation. (1) The inmate must be indigent in accordance with Department policy DC-ADM 803. 14 4-4270 DC-ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures Pace 10 (2) The inmate must not be housed in the Long Term Segregation Unit (LTSU) or Special Management Unit (SMU). Compensation for an inmate housed in the LTSU or SMU is in accordance with Department policy 6.5.1. (3) The inmate must comply with the GLP requirements in accordance with Department policy DC-ADM 816, "Inmate Compensation." He/She must maintain an acceptable level of personal hygiene, the cleanliness of his/her living quarters and accept work assignments within the housing unit. The inmate must follow all rules, participate in recommended programs, and be willing to accept any employment or school assignment offered. (4) The GLP compensation rate for an AC status inmate shall be $.50. An inmate who is receiving the GLP compensation rate of $32 as of the implementation date of this policy will continue to receive that rate. However, should he/she lose GLP status due to a misconduct or Unit Team action, he/she will receive the $.50 compensation rate if/when the PRC reinstates the him/her to GLP status. 4. Any additional privilege(s), if permitted, may also be revoked by the PRC or Security Level 5 Unit Management Team based on a change in individual need, safety and security, or inappropriate behavior of the inmate. G. Program Considerations' 5 An inmate housed in AC status should be provided access to programs and services that include, but are not limited to: 1. educational services; 2. commissary (in accordance with Department policy DC-ADM 815 and a commissary list approved by the PRC); 3. library services; 4. casework, counseling, and diagnostic and classification services; 5. religious guidance in accordance with Department policy DC-ADM 819, "Religious Activities;" and 6. recreation. H. Release from AC Status The Unit Management Team may recommend that PRC release an inmate from AC status. 16 16 4-4273 t6 4-4254 DC-ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures Page 11 2. With the exception of an inmate on the Restricted Release List, the Facility Manager or the PRC may release an inmate from AC status to general population at any time." 3. Certain factors shall be evaluated in making a decision to continue or release an inmate from AC status :18 a. length of time in RHU; b. number, type, and frequency of misconducts; c. continued public or facility risk; d. safety of the inmate, other inmates, and staff; e. the inmate's behavior while in AC status, including sanitation, personal hygiene/grooming, response to authority and other inmates, and to verbal and written orders; and f. recommendation of the unit and treatment staff. 4. Inmates identified on the Restricted Release List may not be released without the approval of the Secretary/designee. a. The PRC may make a recommendation to the Facility Manager if it is believed that an inmate on the Restricted Release List could be safely released to the general population. b. The Facility Manager must provide rationale for recommending the release of the inmate to the Regional Deputy Secretary. c. If the Regional Deputy Secretary disapproves the release of the inmate, the Facility Manager will be advised and the recommendation will not be forwarded to the Secretary/designee. d. If the Regional Deputy Secretary approves the release, he/she will forward the recommendation to the Secretary/designee. e. The Secretary/designee will make the final decision whether or not to release an inmate on the Restricted Release List to general population. 5. The PRC or the Facility Manager may release an inmate from PC to general population at any time when the rationale used for placing the inmate in PC status is no longer valid. The PRC or the Facility Manager shall document the reasons for the release of the inmate from PC on a DC-141, Part 4. ' 4-4254 1e 4-4254 DC-ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures Pane 12 6. If the inmate's release from AC status involves a transfer from the facility, the following procedures are to be followed: a. The Facility Manager shall make such a recommendation to the Director, Bureau of Inmate Services (BIS) via a transfer request. The transfer rationale should include a recommendation regarding which facility, or other jurisdiction, would be best suited to house the inmate. The rationale should also include programming needs as well as continuing security concerns. b. The transfer committee will review the referral and provide a recommendation to the respective Regional Deputy Secretary. c. The Regional Deputy Secretary shall make the final decision regarding the release of the inmate from AC status for protection and, if approved, shall decide the facility to which the inmate will be transferred. VII. SUSPENSION DURING EMERGENCY In an emergency or extended disruption of normal facility operations, the Secretary/ designee may suspend any provision or section of this policy for a specified period. VIII. RIGHTS UNDER THIS POLICY This policy does not create rights in any person nor should it be interpreted or applied in such a manner as to abridge the rights of any individual. This policy should be interpreted to have sufficient flexibility to be consistent with law and to permit the accomplishment of the purpose of the policies of the Department. IX. RELEASE OF INFORMATION AND DISSEMINATION OF POLICY A. Release of Information 1. Policy This policy document is public information and may be released upon request. 2. Procedures Manual, (if applicable) The procedures manual for this policy is not Public information and shall not be released in its entirety or in part, without the prior approval of the Secretary/ designee. This manual or parts thereof may be released to any Department employee on an as needed basis. B. Distribution of Policy 1. General Distribution The Department's policy and procedures manual (when applicable) shall be distributed to the members of the Central Office Executive Staff, all Facility Managers, and Community Corrections Regional Directors on a routine basis. DC -ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures Page 13 Distribution to other individuals and/or agencies is subject to the approval of the Secretary/designee. 2. Distribution to Staff It is the responsibility of those individuals receiving policies and procedures, as indicated in the "General Distribution" section above, to ensure that each employee expected or required to perform the necessary procedures/duties is issued a copy of the policy and procedures. X. SUPERSEDED POLICY AND CROSS REFERENCES A. Superseded Policy 1. Department Policy a. DC-ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures, issued June 29, 1992, by former Secretary Joseph D. Lehman. b. DC-ADM 802-1, Administrative Custody Procedures, issued December 29, 1992, by former Executive Deputy Secretary Lawrence J. Reid. c. DC-ADM 802-2, Administrative Custody Procedures, issued August 16, 1995, by former Executive Deputy Secretary Raymond E. Clymer, Jr. d. DC-ADM 802-3, Administrative Custody Procedures, issued November 27, 1995, by former Secretary Martin F. Horn. e. DC-ADM 802-4, Administrative Custody Procedures, issued March 23, 1998, by former Secretary Martin F. Horn. f. DC-ADM 802-5, Administrative Custody Procedures, issued June 22, 1998, by former Secretary Martin F. Horn. g. DC-ADM 802-6, Administrative Custody Procedures, issued August 12, 1998, by former Secretary Martin F. Horn. h. DC-ADM 802-7, Administrative Custody Procedures, issued August 27, 1998, by former Secretary Martin F. Horn. i. DC-ADM 802-8, Administrative Custody Procedures, issued September 1, 1999, by former Secretary Martin F. Horn. j. DC-ADM 802-9, Administrative Custody Procedures, issued April 17, 2000, by former Secretary Martin F. Horn. k. DC-ADM 802-10, Administrative Custody Procedures, issued October 4, 2001, by Secretary Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D. 1. 6.5.11, Protective Custody, issued September 2, 1993, by former Secretary Joseph D. Lehman. m. 6.5.11-1, Protective Custody, issued May 1, 1995, by former Executive Deputy Secretary Raymond E. Clymer, Jr. n. 6.5.13, Thirty (30) Day Reviews, issued November 27, 1995, by former Secretary Martin F. Horn. o. 6.5.13-1 Thirty (30) Day Reviews, issued August 27, 1998, by former Secretary Martin F. Horn. p. 6.5.13-2 Thirty (30) Day Reviews, issued September 1, 1999, by former Secretary Martin F. Horn. DC-ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures Pape 14 2. Facility Policy This document supersedes all facility policy and procedure on this subject. B. Cross Reference(s) 1. Administrative Manuals a. DC-ADM 007, Access to Provided Legal Services b. DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline c. DC-ADM 803, Inmate Mail and Incoming Publications d. DC-ADM 812, Inmate Visiting e. DC-ADM 815, Personal Property, Basic/State Issued Items and Commissary/Outside Purchases f. DC-ADM 816, Inmate Compensation g. DC-ADM 818, Automated Inmate Telephone System h. DC-ADM 819, Religious Activities i. 6.5.1, Administration of Security Level 5 Housing Units j. 6.5.8, Capital Case Administration 2. ACA Cross Reference a. Administration of Correctional Agencies: None b. Adult Correctional Institutions: 4-4249, 4-4250, 4-4253, 4-4254, 4-4256, 4-4269, 4-4270, 4-4273, 4-4281, 4-4404 c. Adult Community Residential Services: None d. Adult Correctional Boot Camp Programs: None e. Correctional Training Academies: None x hibit B AUTHORITY The Authority of the Secretary of Corrections to direct the operation of the Department of Corrections is established by Sections 201, 206, 506, and 901-B of the Administrative Code of 1929, 71 P.S. §§61, 66, 186, and 310-1, Act of April 9, 1929, P.L. 177, No. 175, as amended. II. PURPOSE This policy establishes procedures for addressing inmate violations of Department of Corrections rules and policy.' III. APPLICABILITY This policy is applicable to every inmate and staff member in all facilities under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections.2 IV. DEFINITIONS A. Administrative Custody (AC) A status of confinement for non-disciplinary reasons, which provides closer supervision, control, and protection than is provided in general population. 144229 2 4-ACRS-3A-02 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Paae 2 B. Calendar Days Any number of consecutive days, including weekends and holidays. C. Center Director The person responsible for all areas of operation of a Community Corrections Center (CCC). D. Chief Hearing Examiner An employee of the Department's Office of Chief Counsel who conducts final reviews of inmate misconduct appeals. E. Community Corrections Hearing Committee The persons designated by the Center Director to conduct misconduct hearings at a CCC. The committee shall be impartial and shall consist of at least one, but no more than three, staff members. 2. The committee shall perform the functions performed by Hearing Examiners as outlined in this policy. F. Department The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. G. Director of the Bureau of Community Corrections (BCC) The person responsible for the overall direction of the Bureau of Community Corrections. H. Disciplinary Custody (DC) The maximum restrictive status of confinement to which an inmate guilty of a Class I misconduct may be committed. An inmate shall be placed in disciplinary custody status for a period no longer than 90 days per misconduct charge. 1. Hearing Examiner An employee of the Department's Office of Chief Counsel who conducts inmate misconduct hearings and who serves as an impartial party in the inmate disciplinary process for rule violations and misconducts. The Hearing Examiner reviews evidence, determines relevance of witnesses, interviews witnesses, determines guilt or innocence, and imposes sanctions consistent with this policy.3 3 4-4240 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Page 3 J. Mental Health Cases An inmate who has a mental health stability score of "C" or "D" or, in the opinion of mental health staff, may be suffering from a serious mental illness. K. Mental Health Unit (MHU) A housing area or group of cells designated for an inmate confined in a facility-based mental health unit licensed by the Pennsylvania Department of Welfare, Office of Mental Health. L. Misconduct Any violation or alleged violation of Department rules, regulations or policies as outlined in Section VI. of this policy. M. Pre-Hearing Confinement A temporary administrative confinement in the inmate's general population cell or RHU pending the outcome of a misconduct hearing. N. Program Review Committee (PRC) A committee consisting of three staff members that conduct Administrative and Disciplinary Custody Hearings, periodic reviews, make decisions regarding continued confinement in the Restricted Housing Unit (RHU) and/or Special Management Unit (SMU) and hear all first level appeals of misconducts. The committee shall consist of one staff member from each of the following classifications: Deputy Superintendent (who shall serve as the chairperson), Corrections Classification and Program Manager (CCPM), Unit Manager, School Principal, Drug and Alcohol Treatment Specialist (DATS) Supervisor or Inmate Records Office Supervisor, and a Commissioned Officer. The Facility Manager may designate other staff as committee members, however, if such designations are made, they must be in writing and the Facility Manager must maintain a list of all designees. Whenever a PRC is convened, at least one member of the committee must be a staff member who is not directly involved in the administration of the RHU/SMU in which the inmate is currently housed. 0. Restricted Housing Unit (RHU) An area or group of cells for an inmate assigned to administrative or disciplinary custody status. P. Special Management Unit (SMU) A special unit within designated Department facilities designed to safely and humanely handle an inmate whose behavior presents a serious threat to the safety and security of the facility, staff, other inmates or himself/herself. 0. Unit Management Team DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Page 4 The individuals assigned to operate a housing unit with the responsibility for security, risk management, and program delivery. The Unit Management Team may act as the Hearing Examiner and decide Class 2 misconducts in those facilities where the Secretary has specifically approved their use in this manner. ' R. Videoconference A conference carried via television. S. Working Days The normal work days of the Department, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. V. POLICY It is the policy of the Department to operate a disciplinary process that provides clear notice of prohibited behavior, outlines a fundamentally fair hearing process, and establishes consistent sanctions for violations of Department rules and regulations 4 It i5 also the policy of the Department that information concerning an inmate's criminal acts shall be forwarded to appropriate court or law enforcement officials for consideration for prosecution.5 VI. PROCEDURES Every inmate under the jurisdiction of the Department is expected to follow Department rules and regulations. In the event that an inmate violates Department rules and regu- lations, the violation shall be reported and disposed of either by an informal or formal process. The informal resolution process shall be used for those violations that are considered less serious in nature, while the formal resolution process shall be used for violations of a more serious nature. Attachment A provides a list of prohibited behavior that may result in the commencement of disciplinary procedures. As explained in Section VI. D. of this policy, only Class I charges #35 through #46 and Class II charges are subject to informal resolution by the Unit Management Team. Class I charges #1 through #34 must be disposed of formally by the Hearing Examiner. (See Attachment A for a list of misconduct charges.)6 A. Misconduct/Rule Violation Reports Every rule violation is to be reported via a DC-141, Misconduct Report, Part I (Attachment B). An inmate charged with any of the listed violations will receive a copy of the report .7 1. The misconduct report is to be used to give notice to the inmate of the rule violation(s) with which he/she has been charged and report the facts upon which the 44-4226, 44281, 1-ABC-3C-01. 4-ACRS-3A-01, 4-ACRS-3A-02 e 4-4227, 4-4232,4-4249, 1-ABC-3C-04 6 4-ACRS-3A-03, 4-ACRS-3A-04 7 4-ACRS-6C-02 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Pane 5 charges are based. The report will be used as evidence against the inmate during the misconduct or informal resolution hearing.8 2. The misconduct report shall be written by either the charging staff member or contract personnel who has personal knowledge of the rule violation or by a staff member at the direction of a person who has personal knowledge of the misconduct. 3. The misconduct report will be written and submitted to the Shift Commander or Officer-in-Charge as appropriate, before the tour of duty concludes the same day/shift that the charging staff member or contract personnel have knowledge of the violation. If not, the report must include a justification for the delay. 4. Prior to service of the misconduct report on the inmate, the report shall be investi- gated as required, reviewed and approved by the Shift Commander. The Shift Commander, as an alternative to approving the misconduct, may refer the matter for informal resolution under Section VI. D. of this policy. The Shift Commander will also enter all pertinent information regarding the misconduct into the Department misconduct tracking system .9 B. Service of Misconduct Report The inmate shall be personally served with the misconduct report the same day the report is written.10 If the misconduct report is not served the same day the report is written, the Shift Commander/designee must determine why the report was not served and supply justification on the DC-141, Part I. 2. Someone other than the charging staff member will serve the misconduct report. At CCCs the charging staff member may serve the misconduct report. 3. The staff member who serves the misconduct report shall record the date and time of service on the misconduct report immediately prior to giving the inmate a copy of the misconduct report. 4. The DC-141, Part II(A), Inmate Request for Representation and Witnesses form and the DC-141, Part II(C), Hearing Supplement, Inmate Version, and Witness Statement form shall be delivered to the charged inmate with the misconduct report. The inmate must fill out the DC-141, Part II(A) and submit it to the block officer or CCC staff member no later than 9:00 a.m. the next day. The block officer shall sign the DC-141, Part II(A), give a copy to the inmate, and forward the form to the Hearing Examiner. The inmate should bring the DC-141, Part II(C) to the hearing. C. Pre-Hearing Confinement 84-4232, 4-4233, 1-ABC-3C-04, 4-ACRS-6C-01 94-ACRS-6C-02 104-4236, 1-ABC-3C-06, 4-ACRS-6C-03 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Disclpllne Pane 6 Pre-hearing confinement is not to be routine but used only upon approval of the Shift Commander. The Shift Commander will assess the incident and make the determination for pre-hearing confinement. When an alleged rule violation is reported, an appropriate investigation is begun within 24 hours of the time the violation is reported unless there are exceptional circumstances for delaying the investigation." The Facility Manager/ designee will review the placement of the inmate within 72 hours of placement in pre-hearing confinement. 12 D. Informal Resolution of Rule Violations 1. The rule violation charges eligible for informal resolution are :13 a. all Class I charges #35 through #46; and b. all Class 11 charges. 2. The Shift Commander will review all eligible misconduct reports for informal resolution. The staff member issuing the DC-141 Part I may recommend informal resolution for eligible charges, but the Shift Commander, who will base his/her choice on the relative seriousness of the misconduct and the inmate's previous misconduct history, shall make the decision. The Shift Commander must justify the reason why an eligible charge was not referred for informal resolution under the immediate action section of the DC-141. Every misconduct selected for informal resolution will be logged on the informal resolution log and forwarded to the Unit Management Team for disposition. A misconduct that is recommended for informal resolution is to be entered into the automated misconduct tracking system. The DC- 141s selected for a hearing will be forwarded to the Hearing Examiner after being logged into the automated misconduct tracking system. 3. The Unit Manager/designee, and at least one other member of the Unit Management Team will meet with the inmate for disposition of the charges within seven working days. The reporting staff member is encouraged, but not required, to attend the meeting. 14 No assistance or witnesses are permitted at these meetings. The inmate will not submit a DC-141 Part II(c), but will be permitted to give his/her version of the events at the meeting. 4. The Unit Manager/designee may take one of the following actions and note the action taken on the Informal Resolution Action Form (Attachment C): a. no action; b. reprimand and warning; c. refer back to the Hearing Examiner for a formal misconduct hearing if additional information indicates the situation is more serious than the Shift Commander " 4-4234 124-4235, 4-ACRS-6C-03 13 4-4230, 1-ABC-3C-05 14 4-4230, 1-ABC-3C-05 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline n--- 7 thought. In this case, the DC-141 will be returned to the Shift Commander, logged into the automated misconduct tracking system, and forwarded to the Hearing Examiner for a hearing. The 24 hour to seven day hearing time limit starts when the Shift Commander receives the DC-141 back from the Unit Management Team; d. up to seven days cell restriction as described in Section NIL J. (4) (b) of this policy; e. up to seven days loss of specified privileges (telephone, yard, day room, etc.); f. one week loss of commissary; g. assignment of additional work duties for which the inmate shall not be compensated; assess restitution for damaged/destroyed state items/property, with the inmate's assess agreement for payment. If the inmate refuses to agree to make restitution, the matter is to be referred to the Hearing Examiner for formal resolution; and the copy of the form designated for the inmate is given to him/her at the conclusion of the meeting. All other copies of the form are to be disseminated as indicated on the form. 5. Upon the completion of the informal resolution meeting, the Unit Manager is to forward a copy of the completed Informal Resolution Action Form (Attachment C) to the staff member responsible for maintaining the data in the automated misconduct tracking system. 6. The inmate may appeal the informal resolution, in accordance with Section L. of this policy, only in those cases that the sanction is disproportionate to the offense. 7. If the inmate refuses to attend the informal resolution meeting, the Unit Manager will return the DC-141, Part I to the Shift Commander to be logged into the automated misconduct tracking system, and forwarded to the Hearing Examiner for a hearing.15 The 24-hour to seven day hearing time limit starts when the Shift Commander receives the DC-141 back from the Unit Management Team. 8. For the purpose of effect on parole, pre-release, and PACT, informal resolutions are not considered as misconducts, but should be reflected on applicable block and work reports. E. Misconduct Hearing 15 44230, 1-ABC-3C-05 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Paae 8 1. A Hearing Examiner shall conduct the misconduct hearing. 16 2. The misconduct hearing shall be scheduled no less than 24 hours or no more than seven working days, excluding weekends and state holidays, after notice of the charge is served. The inmate shall be informed of the time of the hearing 24 hours in advance of the misconduct hearing." 3. The inmate will be present during the misconduct hearing unless the inmate waives that right in writing or refuses to attend.18 4. If the charged inmate becomes disruptive at the hearing or refuses to follow the instructions given by the Hearing Examiner, he/she will be removed and the hearing conducted without the inmate being present.19 5. Inmate Assistance a. An inmate charged with a rule violation may request assistance at a misconduct hearing. The inmate shall be permitted assistance at the hearing from a staff member or an inmate in the same population status. The assistant must be willing to serve. In cases when it is apparent that an inmate is not capable of collecting and presenting evidence effectively on his/her own behalf, as determined by the Hearing Examiner, assistance shall be appointed.20 b. The inmate shall be permitted to meet with the assistant for an appropriate period of time before the hearing. 6. Inmate Version - At the hearing, the charge(s) shall be read to the inmate. The Hearing Examiner shall request the inmate's plea to each individual charge. The inmate may submit a written version or may orally present his/her version that shall be summarized as part of the hearing record.21 7. Witnesses The Hearing Examiner may approve the presence of any staff member or witness, only if the staff member or witness has knowledge of the incident, is present on facility grounds, and only if the testimony is needed to establish the guilt or innocence of the inmate. 22 164-ACRS-6C-03 174-4236, 4-4238, 1-ABC-3C-06, 1-ABC-3C-07, 4-ACRS-6C-02 164-4241 19 4-4241 204-4243, 1-ABC-3C-11, 4-ACRS-3A-03, 4-ACRS-3A-04 21 4-4242, 1-ABC-3C-09 22 4-4242, 1-ABC-3C-09 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Paae 9 a. Up to three relevant witnesses, who have been properly requested per Section E. 7. a. above, shall be permitted. One of the three witnesses may be the staff member who witnessed the misconduct violation, or the charging staff member.23 (1) The inmate must state on the DC-141, Part II(A) why the witness is relevant to the hearing. The witness must be a staff member, official volunteer, contract employee, or an inmate, unless the hearing is conducted at a CCC, where civilian witnesses may be permitted. If the Hearing Examiner denies the reque24ted witness, the reasons for denying such a request shall be stated in writing. (2) If the inmate properly requests a witness who is not available a the time of the hearing, the inmate may elect to either waive the seven working days hearing requirement or to have the witness execute a written statement under oath which shall be presented in lieu of live testimony (or subject to the penalties for unsworn falsification to authorities). If the inmate elects to have the witness present, the hearing shall be rescheduled at the earliest time after the witness is available. (3) If an inmate witness or assistant becomes disruptive at the hearing or refuses to follow the instructions given by the Hearing Examiner, he/she shall be removed and the hearing conducted without the witness or assistant being present. The Hearing Examiner may question any witness. The charged inmate shall be permitted a reasonable opportunity to pose relevant questions to any adverse witness. The Hearing Examiner shall control the extent of questioning. c. The Hearing Examiner shall make determinations of credibility. d. All testimony shall be under oath. e. If the inmate elects to plead guilty or waive his/her right to a hearing, no witnesses shall be required. 8. When a misconduct charge is based upon information supplied by a confidential informant, the following procedure shall be followed: a. An in-camera hearing (without the charged inmate present) shall be conducted to determine the reliability of the informant 25 The informant must be established as reliable by a preponderance of evidence showing: (1) how, where, and when the informant was in a position to observe the violation or gain personal knowledge of the violation; 234-4242, 1-ABC-3C-09 24 4-4242, 1-ABC-3C-09 25 4-4241 Page DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline 10 ails (2) what other witnesses have corroborated the informant's statement and how; or (3) how and when the informant gave reliable information in the past. b. The information provided by the informant, but not the identity of the informant, shall be disclosed to the charged inmate during the hearing. The charged inmate shall have the opportunity to respond to the facts presented in the informant's statement. c. In cases where the information provided by the informant could itself reveal the identity of the informant, the Hearing Examiner may withhold identifying information from the charged inmate 26 9. Videoconference equipment may be used to conduct misconduct hearings in accordance with Department policy 1.1.10, "Videoconferences." F. Waivers27 1. An inmate may voluntarily waive the hearing process outlined in this policy at any time prior to the hearing's completion. The inmate may also waive any witness requests or time limitations relating to the hearing or notice of service.28 2. Every waiver shall be in writing and shall be signed by the charged inmate. G. Inmate Refusal to Attend the Hearing29 An inmate who refuses to attend a hearing shall be asked to sign a waiver advising that he/she has a right to a hearing but may waive that right. 2. If the inmate refuses to attend the hearing or sign a waiver, two staff members who witness the refusal shall sign the waiver form. The hearing shall be conducted without the charged inmate present. The Hearing Examiner shall determine guilt or innocence, and a sanction shall be imposed if the inmate is found guilty. 3. The inmate may not appeal the results of a hearing he/she refused to attend. H. Inmate Unable to Attend 30 If the inmate is physically or mentally unable to participate in a hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall postpone the hearing until the inmate is able to participate. The decision to postpone a hearing under this section shall be in writing and shall be made at the time the hearing would have been held. 284-4241 274-4237, 1-ABC-3C-08 28 4-4230, 1-ABC-3C-05 2e 4-4237 3°4-4239, 1-ABC-3C-10 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Page 11 1. Disposition of Charges As soon as possible after hearing all evidence, but no later than seven calendar days thereafter, the Hearing Examiner shall determine based upon the evidence obtained in the hearing process, including staff reports, the statements of the inmate charged, and the evidence derived from witnesses and documents, whether the inmate is guilty of the misconduct charge based on preponderance of evidence that the inmate committed the misconduct.31 2. After the Hearing Examiner reaches the decision, the inmate shall be called before the Hearing Examiner to hear the decision. If the inmate is found not guilty, that fact shall be recorded in writing. The inmate shall be given a copy. No rationale for the decision is required. All record of the misconduct shall be removed from the inmate's facility file and retained in a separate facility file until the inmate is released or transferred.32 4. If the inmate is found guilty, a written summary of the hearing shall be prepared that shall include the facts relied upon by the Hearing Examiner to reach the decision, and the reasons for the decision. The summary shall also include findings of fact concerning the testimony of each witness presented. A copy of the written summary shall be given to the inmate.33 The inmate shall be advised that he/she has up to 15 calendar days to submit a written appeal to the PRC.34 5. In misconducts involving financial loss or cost because of the inmate's behavior, the Hearing Examiner may impose costs against the inmate in accordance with the Section VI. O. of this policy. 6. The Hearing Examiner may dismiss any misconduct charge without prejudice, to permit recharge without determination of guilt or innocence. 7. If the inmate is found guilty of a drug-related misconduct, the Hearing Examiner shall submit a Drug-Related Misconduct Form in accordance with Department policy 6.3.12, "Drug Interdiction" to the Intelligence Captain. This form shall also include a copy of the DC-141, Part II(B). A copy of the Drug-Related Misconduct Form shall be given to the inmate. This form shall serve as notification to the inmate that any inmate who is found guilty of a misconduct for dealing, using (including by urinalysis), or possessing controlled substances, will be prohibited from having contact visits for the period specified below. This time period and the special security precautions shall commence on the date of the misconduct hearing, upon a finding of guilt. 1st offense - 180 days 2nd offense - 360 days 3rd offense - indefinitely 314-4244, 1-ABC-3C-12, 4-ACRS-6C-03 32 4-4246 334-4245, 1-ABC-3C-13.4-ACRS-6C-03 34 4-4248, 1-ABC-3C-14 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Page 12 8. If the inmate's contact visits are prohibited indefinitely because of drug related misconducts, he/she will have to wait three years and complete Alcohol and Other Drugs (AOD) treatment before he/she can write to the Facility Manager/designee asking to have contact visits reinstated. J. Misconduct Sanctions 1. The Hearing Examiner shall impose misconduct sanctions.3e 2. An inmate found guilty of a Class I misconduct (charges #1 through and including #34 is to be removed from his/her job assignment.36 3. An inmate who is found guilty of a misconduct for #39 (refusing to work, attend school or attend mandatory programs or encouraging others to do the same) for a second time, including any informal resolution, will, in addition to any other penalty imposed, not be allowed the privilege of telephone or television until he/she returns to work, school, or the mandatory program. After a period of 90 days, upon application by the inmate, PRC may terminate this restriction if the inmate's failure to return to the assignment is no fault of his/her own.37 4. In addition to being removed from his/her job assignment, one or more of the following sanctions may also be imposed for a Class I misconduct:38 a. assignment to disciplinary custody status for a period not to exceed 90 days per misconduct charge ;39 cell restriction for a period not to exceed 30 days per misconduct charge. Cell restriction is total confinement to general population cell, dorm area or cubicle, except for meals, showers, one formal religious service per week, commissary, law library and one one-hour specified daily exercise period. Participation in programs, school, and work are suspended; c. loss of privileges for a prescribed period. Privileges lost must be specifically identified and shall, where possible, be related to the misconduct violation. Privileges include television, radio, telephone, and commissary for up to 30 days, visiting suspension or restriction for up to 60 days '40 yard and blockout; d. assessment of costs as a result of the inmate's behavior in accordance with Section VI. 0. of this policy; e. reprimand, warning, counseling; 3s 44226, 4-4252, 1-ABC-3C-01 " 4-4226. 1-ABC-3C-01 37 4-4226, 1-ABC-3C-01 3e 4-4226, 1-ABC-3C-01 39 4-4252 4' 44267 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Page 13 f. final disposition of confiscated contraband; g. revocation of pre-release status and/or outside program codes; and/or h. limitation of commissary privileges to ten dollars a week for up to one year following a finding of guilt for a misconduct involving gambling. 5. The Hearing Examiner may reduce the classification of any Class I misconduct (except Class I charges #1 through #15) to a Class II misconduct. 6. Inmates found guilty of Class II misconduct charges are subject to one or more of the above sanctions except placement in disciplinary status and loss of pre-release status. 7. Time given for misconduct charges #1 through #14 shall be served in its entirety. An exception to an inmate serving the entire sanction for misconduct charges #1 through #14 may be allowed for an inmate on the Mental Health Roster if a recommendation to reduce the sanction is made by the facility's Mental Health Staff. For other mis- conducts, the PRC may consider a release to general population upon completion of half of the sanction imposed. The Facility Manager or PRC may change an inmate from DC to AC status only upon expiration of the DC sanction and only if the proper notice and hearing procedures are provided as outlined in Department policy DC- ADM 802, "Administrative Custody Procedures." 8. At any time, the Facility Manager/designee may reduce the disciplinary sanction imposed on any inmate other than those with misconduct charges #1 through #14, except as noted in Section VI. J. 7. above, based on the security needs of the facility. The reduction of the sanction must be done in accordance with Department policy 6.5.1, "Administration of Security Level 5 Housing Units." 9. An inmate with multiple misconduct sanctions whose disciplinary custody time exceeds one year may be released to general population by approval of PRC and the Facility Manager after completion of one year of misconduct free behavior as long as the reduction of time does not involve charges #1 through #14, except as noted in Section VI. J. 7. above. 10. The PRC or the Facility Manager has the discretion to reduce disciplinary sanctions for mental health cases in accordance with Department policy 6.5.1. 11. The disciplinary sanctions imposed by the Hearing Examiner may be suspended in accordance with Department policy 6.5.1. K. Review of Misconduct Proceedings41 1. After the misconduct hearing has been concluded, the hearing record shall be forwarded to the Facility Manager/designee for review. This review shall ensure that 0 4-ACRS-3A-01, 4-ACRS-3A-02 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Page 14 the hearing was conducted in accordance with stated procedures and that the action taken conformed to facility regulations.42 2. A record of the proceedings shall be included in the DC-15, Inmate Record as a permanent record of the proceedings as L. Appeals 1. First Level df Appeal - PRC a. An inmate who has been found guilty of a misconduct charge(s) or an informal resolution may appeal to the PRC for initial review within 15 calendar days of the hearing. The three valid bases for an appeal to the PRC are: (1) the procedures employed were contrary to law, Department directives, or regulations; (2) the punishment is disproportionate to the offense; and/or (3) the findings of fact were insufficient to support the decision. b. No appeals from a finding of 'not guilty' are permitted. c. Every appeal shall be in writing. Only one appeal to the PRC shall be permitted in the case of each misconduct report. d. An inmate may seek the assistance of a staff member or an inmate in the same population status in the preparation of an appeal. The inmate appellant must sign the appeal. e. The appeal shall include a brief statement of the facts relevant to the appeal. The text must be legible and presented in a courteous manner. The inmate may state any claims concerning alleged violations of Department directives, regulations or other law. The PRC shall address each issue raised by the inmate, and may, at its discretion, consider any other matter relevant to the issues raised. The PRC is not required to address issues not raised or improperly raised by the appellant. g. The PRC shall have the authority to: (1) reject any appeal that does not conform to Section L. 1. a. through L. 1. f. above; (2) uphold the Hearing Examiner's or Unit Management Team's decision; 42 4-4247 434-4240, 4-4245, 1-ABC-3C-13 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Page 15 (3) uphold the finding of guilt, but modify the punishment; (4) vacate the decision and remand back to the Hearing Examiner for a rehearing; (5) vacate the decision and charge to permit recharge and rehearing; or (6) dismiss the charge and prohibit recharge. h. The PRC may not impose a greater punishment than has been designated by the Hearing Examiner. The PRC shall provide a brief written statement to the inmate of the reasons for its decision within seven working days of receipt of an appeal44 2. Second Level of Appeal - Facility Manager a. The inmate may appeal the decision of the PRC to the Facility Manager/designee within seven calendar days of receipt of the written PRC decision 45 The appeal shall include a brief statement of the facts relevant to the appeal. The text must be legible and presented in a courteous manner. The inmate may state any claims concerning alleged violations of Department directives, regulations or other law. The Facility Manager/designee shall address all issues raised by the inmate and may consider any other matter relevant to the issues raised. The Facility Manager/designee is not required to address issues not raised or improperly raised by the appellant. c. The Facility Manager/designee may make any decision permitted to the PRC. The decision of the Facility Manager/designee shall be in writing and shall be forwarded to the inmate within seven working days of receipt of the appeal .46 Any day that the Facility Manager/designee is absent from the facility shall not be included in the seven working days. In the event of annual leave or an extended absence by the Facility Manager/designee, a designee who was not on the PRC that heard the inmate's first level of appeal shall respond to the second level of appeal in place of the Facility Manager. 3. Final Appeal - Office of Chief Counsel It is the intent of the Department to provide every inmate with a complete and timely review of all appeals properly raised to final review. The following steps have been established to ensure timeliness at final review while continuing to provide a thorough impartial review of the issues. a. Every final appeal of a misconduct shall be addressed to the Chief Hearing Examiner at the following address: °° 4-4248, 1-ABC-3C-14 "4-4248, 1-ABC-3C-14 4e 4-4248, 1-ABC-3C-14 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Page 16 Chief Hearing Examiner 1451 N. Market Street Elizabethtown, PA 17022 The inmate may appeal the decision of the Facility Manager/designee within seven calendar days of the receipt of the Facility Manager's/designee's decision. Appeals that are addressed to the Secretary, Chief Counsel, or to other Central Office Staff, are delivered to these individuals first, and then referred to the Chief Hearing Examiner. Improperly addressed appeals may cause a delay in the response at final appeal. b. An inmate appealing for final review of his/her misconduct is responsible for providing the Chief Hearing Examiner with a brief statement relative to issues and any available paperwork or documentation relevant to the appeal. A proper appeal for final review should include photocopies of the Misconduct Report, Hearing Examiner's Report, the Inmate Version and Witness forms, Appeal to PRC, PRC Response, Appeal to the Facility Manager, and the Facility Manager's/designee's response. c. The Chief Hearing Examiner shall review and respond to every misconduct appeal to final review within seven working days of receipt of all necessary records for review. The Chief Hearing Examiner shall review the misconduct, the hearing report, and all appeals arising from either, and the issue raised to final appeal. d. Upon completion of final review, the Chief Hearing Examiner shall respond directly to the inmate in all cases where the position taken by the facility is upheld. e. In every case where the action of the Hearing Examiner, PRC or the Facility Manager/designee is reversed or amended, or where a matter is remanded, the Chief Hearing Examiner shall prepare a letter to the inmate and a memorandum to the Facility Manager/designee. The Chief Hearing Examiner shall forward the letter and memorandum to the appropriate Regional Deputy Secretary for review and signature. M. Disciplinary Custody Status Inmates47 A DC status inmate is housed in a separate cell from a general population and an AC status inmate. 2. An inmate in DC status is prohibited from using, purchasing, or possessing any tobacco products while confined in the RHU. 3. An inmate in DC status shall not have the privileges of radios, televisions, telephone calls, personal property or commissary (except toilet articles, legal/correspondence materials, and prescribed medications). " 4-4249 DC-ADM 801. Inmate Discipline Page 17 4. Visits are limited to one non-contact visit per month, which may be limited to weekdays only, with immediate family. Legal and religious advisor visits shall be permitted, in accordance with Department policy DC-ADM 812, "Inmate Visiting Privileges." In case of a verified emergency, the Unit Manager or a Commissioned Officer may approve a telephone call. Every approved emergency telephone call must be logged in the RHU Log Book and in the inmate's DC-17X, Adjustment Record for Administrative and Disciplinary Custody Inmates. 5. A DC status inmate shall be permitted to maintain in his/her cell any combination of personal property from the following list that will fit into one standard sized records- center box: a. written materials in accordance with DC-ADM 803, "Inmate Mail and Incoming Publications;" b. one newspaper (one-for-one exchanges permitted for newly received editions); and 48 c. 10 magazines (one-for-one exchanges permitted for newly received publications).49 Additionally, each facility will establish procedures to permit an inmate to exchange legal materials from his/her cell with stored legal materials once every 30 days. The PRC may authorize more frequent exchanges based upon a demonstrated need that the inmate requires additional exchanges for active litigation. Such legal material exchanges, however, may not exceed one per week. 6. An inmate shall be provided access to the facility law library by requesting legal materials in accordance with Department policy DC-ADM 007, "Access to Provided Legal Services." Other library books may be requested on a weekly basis. 7. An inmate in DC status shall be provided with an orange RHU jumpsuit and slip on canvas footwear. Basic issue toilet articles shall be provided on request. Three pair of personal undergarments are permitted. No other personal property is permitted. Outerwear for exercise shall be provided as needed. 8. A DC status inmate will receive one hour of exercise per day, five days per week, 50 and will be permitted a minimum of three showers and three shaves per week. 9. The PRC shall interview every AC and DC case every 90 days unless recommended for earlier review by the inmate's Unit Management Team. The counselor must see every inmate weekly. Each inmate's Unit Management Team reviews his/her case monthly. The counselor's weekly interview and the Unit Management's monthly review are to be documented in the DC-14. Any recommendation by the Unit Management Team for early release is to be forwarded to the PRC. 4' 4-4269 49 4-4269 50 4-4270 DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Page 18 N. Community Corrections 1. Procedures a. The Center Director can review for informal resolution and meet with the inmate for disposition of the charges using the same range of sanctions as in Section VI. D. 4. b. A Hearing Committee shall hear misconduct hearings held at a CCC. c. If a CCC inmate is placed in pre-hearing confinement, the misconduct report shall be served within 48 hours of the inmate's placement in pre-hearing confinement. d. If a CCC inmate is returned to a facility under pre-hearing confinement, a Hearing Examiner shall conduct the hearing at the facility. e. Misconduct reports shall be processed and hearings conducted as outlined in Section E. of this policy. 2. Appeals a. If the inmate has been permanently returned to a facility, appeals may be filed in accordance with Section L. of this policy. An inmate remaining at a CCC may appeal misconduct hearing results to the Director, Bureau of Community Corrections, P.O. Box 598, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17001-0598. 0. Assessment of Cost for Inmate Misconduct 1. When the Cost is Known at the Time of the Misconduct Hearing a. The Department shall develop a list setting forth the actual financial loss or cost, of replacing standard items furnished to or used by an inmate. The list may include, but not necessarily be limited to, items such as bedding, food trays, and articles of clothing. The list may be updated as deemed necessary by the Department. Any such update may add or delete items from the list and may increase or decrease the financial loss or cost of items reflected on the Cost of Replacing Commonly Damaged Items form (Attachment D). A copy of this list, and any revisions to the list, shall be made available to each inmate. b. The Misconduct Report must include a statement describing the item and the actual amount of the reimbursement that may be ordered as part of the sanction. A copy of the Misconduct Report shall be provided to the facility Business Manager. Upon service of the Misconduct Report, the facility may temporarily delay processing some or all expenditures from the inmate's account if the facility believes the inmate is attempting to circumvent the potential assessment. DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipiine Page 19 c. When a Hearing Examiner orders that an inmate reimburse the Department for a financial loss or cost, and the item is specified on Attachment D, the Hearing Examiner may order the reimbursement as part of the misconduct hearing decision without conducting a further proceeding. If a financial loss or cost is to be assessed as part of the misconduct hearing decision, the inmate witnesses permitted to testify during the misconduct hearing may include otherwise permissible witnesses whose testimony is relevant to the determination of the financial loss or cost. Notice of any misconduct hearing decision ordering an inmate to reimburse the Department shall be given to the facility Business Manager. Upon receipt of a decision imposing an assessment against an inmate, the Business Office can take up to 50% of the inmate's current account balance and 50% in subsequent months until the debt is satisfied. However, funds shall not be deducted from the inmate's account until such time as any appeal resulting from the misconduct decision is finally resolved or the time for the filing of an appeal has passed without an appeal being filed. If an appeal is filed, the facility Business Manager/designee may delay or temporarily suspend processing expenditures from the inmate's account pending disposition of the appeal. 2. When the Cost is Not Known at the Time of the Misconduct Hearing a. When, as the result of a misconduct hearing, a Hearing Examiner orders that an inmate pay for a financial loss or cost resulting from a violation of written rules governing inmate behavior, and the item is not set forth on Attachment D, notice of such order shall be given to the facility Business Manager. The facility may temporarily delay processing some or all expenditures from the inmate's account if the facility believes the inmate is attempting to circumvent the potential assessment. b. The Business Manager, in consultation with appropriate Department staff or others, shall determine the amount of the financial loss or cost resulting from the violation of written rules governing inmate behavior, including the amount of investigative or administrative costs. c. A Department employee shall deliver a Notice of Assessment for Misconduct (Attachment E) to the inmate. In accordance with Department policy DC-ADM 820, "Co-Payment for Medical Services" if the assessment is based upon costs incurred to provide medical treatment to an inmate whose injury was caused by another inmate's assaultive conduct, the assaultive inmate shall be required to pay a fee equivalent to two- thirds of the total cost of medical services provided to the injured inmate. e. An inmate who wishes to challenge the amount of the financial loss or cost set forth in the Notice of Assessment for Misconduct must request a hearing within five working days after receipt of the Notice of Assessment for Misconduct. A hearing request is made by signing the Notice of Assessment for Misconduct in DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline Page 20 the space indicated and submitting it to the Hearing Examiner in the same manner as designated for a request slip. 3. Cost Assessment Hearing a. The Assessment Hearing is an opportunity to present testimony and evidence regarding the amount of the financial loss or cost. The Assessment Hearing is not an opportunity to contest the inmate's guilt or innocence for the underlying misconduct charge. b. A Hearing Examiner shall conduct the Assessment Hearing. 4. Inmate Assistance The inmate may be permitted assistance at the Assessment Hearing in accordance with Section VI. E. 5. of this policy. 5. Order of Testimony/Burden of Proof a. The Department shall bear the burden of establishing some evidence to prove the amount of the assessment. The Department shall proceed first. The Department may present a written statement in lieu of live testimony. The witness subject to the penalties for unsworn falsification must make any such written statement to authorities under 18 Pa. C.S.A. §4904. b. The Hearing Examiner may require the presence of any staff member or other person on the grounds of the facility at which the hearing is being conducted. c. The inmate may request witnesses at the Assessment Hearing in accordance with Section VI. E. 7. of this policy. d. All live testimony shall be made under oath. An inmate who fails to appear for his/her Assessment Hearing shall be deemed to have waived the request for a hearing unless such failure to appear is for reasons beyond the inmate's control. If the inmate waives the request for a hearing, the assessment shall be upheld. 6. Disposition The Hearing Examiner shall determine the amount of financial loss or costs, if any, resulting from the violation of written rules governing inmate behavior. b. The Hearing Examiner shall prepare a written summary of the Assessment Hearing, including the amount of the assessment, if any, the facts relied upon in reaching the decision, and the reasons for the decision. A copy shall be forwarded to the facility's Business Manager and to the inmate. DC-ADM 801, inmate Disclpllne Page 21 c. Upon receipt of a decision imposing an assessment against an inmate, the facility's Business Manager may deny the inmate permission to spend funds in his/her account in an amount equal to the lesser of the amount of the assessment or 50% of the funds in the inmate's account on the day the decision is received. Funds shall not be deducted from the inmate's account until such time as any appeal resulting from the misconduct decision is finally resolved or the time for the filing of an appeal has passed without an appeal being filed. If an appeal is filed, the facility may delay or temporarily suspend processing expenditures from the inmate's account pending disposition of the appeal. 7. Appeals a. Every appeal from an Assessment Hearing shall be handled in accordance with Section VI. L. of this policy except that there are only two valid bases for Assessment Hearing appeals: (1) the hearing procedures were inconsistent with the policy; and (2) the findings of fact were insufficient to support the decision. b. Every appeal shall be in writing. Only one appeal may be submitted for any assessment. c. Pending disposition of an appeal, the facility Business Manager may deny the inmate permission to spend funds in his/her account in an amount equal to the lesser of the amount of the assessment or 50% of the funds in the inmate's account on the day the original decision was received. d. The inmate shall be provided with a written response to any appeal that is filed properly. VII. SUSPENSION DURING EMERGENCY In an emergency or extended disruption of normal facility operations, the Secretary/ designee may suspend any provision or section of this policy for a specified period. VIII. RIGHTS UNDER THIS POLICY This policy does not create rights in any person nor should it be interpreted or applied in such a manner as to abridge the rights of any individual. This policy shall be interpreted to have sufficient flexibility to be consistent with law and to permit the accomplishment of the purposes of the policies of the Department. DC-ADM 801, Inmate Dlsclpline Page 22 IX. RELEASE OF INFORMATION AND DISSEMINATION OF POLICY A. Release of Information 1. Policy This policy document is public information and may be released upon request. 2. Procedures Manual (if applicable) The procedures manual for this policy is not public information and shall not be released in its entirety or in part, without the prior approval of the Secretary/designee. This manual of parts thereof may be released to any Department employee on an as needed basis. B. Distribution of Policy 1. General Distribution The Department's policy and procedures manuals (when applicable) shall be distributed to the members of the Central Office Executive Staff, all Facility Managers, and Community Corrections Regional Directors on a routine basis. Distribution to other individuals and/or agencies is subject to the approval of the Secretary/designee. 2. Distribution to Staff It is the responsibility of those individuals receiving policies and procedures as indicated in the "General Distribution" section above, to ensure that each employee expected or required to perform the necessary procedures/duties is issued a copy of the policy and procedures. X. SUPERSEDED POLICY AND CROSS REFERENCE A. Superseded Policy 1. Department Policy a. DC-ADM 801, issued March 8, 2000 by former Secretary Martin F. Horn b. DC-ADM 801-1, issued April 17, 2000, by former Secretary Martin F. Horn c. DC-ADM 801-2, issued November 1, 2000, by former Secretary Martin F. Horn d. DC-ADM 801-3, issued October 4, 2001, by former Secretary Martin F. Horn e. DC-ADM 801-4, issued December 2, 2003 by Secretary Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D. 2. Facility Policy and Procedures This document superseded all local facility policy and procedures on this subject. I DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline 00 23 B. Cross References 1. Administrative Manual Cross Reference(s) a. DC-ADM 007, Access to Provided Legal Services b. DC-ADM 201, Use of Force c. DC-ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures d. DC-ADM 803, Inmate Mail and Incoming Publications e. DC-ADM 804, Inmate Grievance System f. DC-ADM 812, Inmate Visiting Privileges g. DC-ADM 820, Co-payment for Medical Services h. 1.1.10, Videoconferences i. 6.3.12, Drug Interdiction j. 6.5.1, Administration of Level 5 Housing Units k. 11.2.1, Reception and Classification 2. ACA Standards a. Administration of Correctional Agencies: None b. Adult Correctional institutions: 4-4226, 4-4227, 4-4229, 4-4230, 4-4232, 4-4233, 4-4234, 4-4235, 4-4236, 4-4237, 4-4238, 4-4239, 4-4240, 4-4241, 4-4242, 4- 4243, 4-4244, 4-4245, 4-4246, 4-4247, 4-4248, 4-4249, 4-4252, 4-4267, 4-4269, 4-4270, 4-4281 c. Adult Community Residential Services: 4-ACRS-3A-01, 4-ACRS-3A-02, 4- ACRS-3A-03, 4-ACRS-3A-04, 4-ACRS-6C-01, 4-ACRS-6C-02, 4-ACRS-6C-03 d. Adult Correctional Boot Camp Programs: 1-ABC-3C-07, 1-ABC-3C-08, 1-ABC- 3C-09, 1-ABC-3C-10, 1-ABC-3C-11, 1-ABC-3C-12, 1-ABC-3C-13, 1-ABC-3C-14 e. Correctional Training Academies: None x hibit C AUTHORITY The authority of the Secretary of Corrections to direct the operation of the Department of Corrections is established by Sections 201, 206, 506, and 901-B of the Administrative Code of 1929, 71 P.S. § 61, 66, 186, and 301-1, Act of April 9, 1929, P.L. 177, No. 175, as amended. II. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to establish policy and procedures for the Administration of Security Level 5 Housing Units. III. APPLICABILITY This policy is applicable to all facilities within the Department of Corrections that operate a Security Level 5 (1-5) Housing Units (Restricted Housing Unit [RHU], Special Management Unit [SMU], and Long Term Segregation Unit [LTSU]). IV. DEFINITIONS A. Administrative Custody (AC) A housing status to which an inmate is assigned for non-disciplinary reasons but requires closer supervision and control than is generally available in general population.' 4-4249 6.5. 1, Administration of Security Level 5 Housing Units Page 2 B. Custody Level 5 (CL 5) A classification level to which an inmate is assigned who has demonstrated, through a pattern of escapes or attempted escapes, maladjustive or assaultive behavior, or through a need for protection that he/she requires a high degree of structure. C. Custody Level 5H (CL 51-1) A custody level assigned to an inmate who fails to complete the SMU program or who may be deemed of having serious behavioral problems and a high potential for repeating that behavior. An inmate with this classification is not viewed as a viable candidate for release to general population, due to the following: 1. he/she is a serious escape risk; 2. he/she has demonstrated assaultive behavior with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury; 3. he/she has inflicted injury to staff and/or inmates; 4. he/she has engaged in a facility disturbance(s); 5. he/she has been, or is in the possession of, weapons and/or implements of escape; 6. he/she has a recorded history of: a. having or exerting negative influence in facility activities; b. being a member of a Security Threat Group (STG) or other unauthorized organization(s) as outlined in Department policy 6.3.1, "Facility Security;" and/or c. being a sexual predator. D. Disciplinary Custody (DC) A housing status to which an inmate is assigned, via sanction imposed by a Hearing Examiner, upon being found guilty of a Class I misconduct.2 E. General Population A housing status to which the majority of inmates are assigned who are not housed within a Restricted Housing Unit, Special Management Unit, Capital Case Unit, Mental Health Unit, Long Term Segregation Unit, Medical Infirmary, or Diagnostic Unit of a particular facility. 2 4-4249 6.5. 1, Administration of Security Level 5 Housing Units Page 3 F. Long Term Segregation Unit (LTSU) A housing unit or group of cells designated to house inmates classified as Custody Level 5H. G. Restricted Housing Unit (RHU) A housing unit or group of cells designated to house inmates assigned to AC/DC status.3 H. Security Level 5, Maximum Maximum security housing consisting of single or double occupancy cells with a secure control booth that has remote electronic locking capabilities. 1. Special Management Unit (SMU) A housing unit or group of cells designated to house inmates who are, or have been, disruptive or violent. All other pertinent definitions are contained in the procedures manual for this policy. V. POLICY It is the policy of the Department to maintain Security Level 5 Housing Units in order to maintain the secure and orderly operation of the facility and to provide for the safety of the public, staff, and other inmates. A Security Level 5 Housing Unit is generally a Restricted Housing Unit (RHU), a Special Management Unit (SMU), or a Long Term Segregation Unit (LTSU).° VI. PROCEDURES 1. Upon reception to an L5 unit, each inmate shall be provided with a copy of the unit's inmate handbook within one hour after reception or as soon thereafter as possible. The handbook shall be readily available in both English and Spanish. If other languages are required, copies shall be obtained and issued on an as needed basis. a. The inmate is required to sign for a numbered copy of the handbook and it will remain the property of the unit. b. Each unit handbook shall contain the unit's rules and regulations and information pertaining to: (1) daily and special routines; (2) rules and regulations; a 4-4249 4 4-4249 6.5. 1, Administration of Security Level 5 Housing Units Page 4 (3) management phases and progression (SMU and LTSU only); (4) guidelines for disciplinary time reductions; (5) types and frequency of inspections; and (6) general and miscellaneous information. c. The Deputy Superintendent for Facilities Manage ment(DSFM)/Deputy Superintendent for Internal Security (DSIS) and Major-of-the-Guard shall review/revise the handbook at least annually. d. The inmate shall return the unit handbook when he/she is released. 2. All operational procedures are contained in the procedures manual for this policy. 3. All pertinent terms are contained in the glossary section of the procedures manual for this policy. VII. SUSPENSION DURING AN EMERGENCY In an emergency or extended disruption of normal facility operation, the Secretary/ designee may suspend any provision or section of this policy for a specific period. VIII. RIGHTS UNDER THIS POLICY This policy does not create rights in any person nor should it be interpreted or applied in such a manner as to abridge the rights of any individual. This policy should be interpreted to have sufficient flexibility so as to be consistent with law and to permit the accomplish- ment of the purpose of the policies of the Department. IX. RELEASE OF INFORMATION AND DISSEMINATION OF POLICY A. Release of Information 1. Policy This policy document is public information and may be released upon request. 2. Procedures Manual (if applicable) The procedures manual for this policy is not public information and shall not be released in its entirety or in part, without the prior approval of the Secretary/ designee. This manual or parts thereof, may be released to any Department employee on an as needed basis. 6.5. 1, Administration of Security Level 5 Housing Units Page 5 B. Distribution of Policy 1. General Distribution The Department's policy and procedures manuals (when applicable) shall be distributed to the members of the Central Office Executive Staff, all Facility Managers, and Community Corrections Regional Directors on a routine basis. Distribution to other individuals and/or agencies is subject to the approval of the Secretary/designee. 2. Distribution to Staff It is the responsibility of those individuals receiving policies and procedures, as indicated in the "General Distribution" section above, to ensure that each employee expected or required to perform the necessary procedures/duties is issued a copy of the policy and procedures. X. SUPERSEDED POLICY AND CROSS REFERENCE A. Superseded Policy 1. Department Policy 6.5.1, Administration of Security Level 5 Housing Units, issued February 26, 2003, by Secretary Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D. 2. Facility Policy and Procedures This document supersedes all facility policy and procedures on this subject. B. Cross Reference(s) 1. Administrative Manuals a. DC-ADM 007, Access to Provided Legal Services b. DC-ADM 201, Use of Force c. DC-ADM 203, Searches of Inmates and Cells d. DC-ADM 610, Food Service e. DC-ADM 801, Inmate Discipline f. DC-ADM 802, Administrative Custody Procedures g. DC-ADM 803, Inmate Mail and Incoming Publications h. DC-ADM 807, Inmate Hygiene and Grooming i. DC-ADM 815, Personal Property, Basic/State Issued Items and Commissary/Outside Purchases j. DC-ADM 818, Automated Inmate Telephone System k. DC-ADM 819, Religious Activities 1. 5.1.1, Staff Development and Training m. 6.3.1, Facility Security n. 6.3.12, Drug Interdiction 6.5. 1, Administration of Security Level 5 Housing Units Page 6 o. 6.7.1, Emergency Preparedness p. 11.2.1, Reception and Classification q. 13.1.1, Management and Administration of Health Care r. 13.2.1, Access to Health Care s. 13.8.1, Access to Mental Health Care t. 15.1.1, Safety C. ACA Standards 1. Administration of Correctional Agencies: N/A 2. Adult Correctional Institutions: 4-4131, 4-4134, 4-4155, 4-4249, 4-4257, 4-4258, 4- 4259, 4-4560, 4-4261, 4-4262, 4-4263, 4-4264, 4-4265, 4-4267, 4-4268, 4-4269, 4- 4270, 4-4271, 4-4272 3. Adult Community Residential Services: N/A 4. Adult Correctional Boot Camp Programs: N/A 5. Correctional Training Academies: N/A EXhlbit D § 93.11. Housing. (a) An inmate does not have a right to be housed in a particular facility or in a particular area within a facility. (b) Confinement in a restricted housing unit (RHU), other than under procedures established for inmate discipline, will not be done for punitive purposes. The Department will maintain written procedures which describe the reasons for housing an inmate in the RHU and require due process in accordance and with established principles of law for an inmate who is housed in the RHU. Inmates confined in the RHU will be reviewed periodically by facility staff. Authority The provisions of this § 93.11 amended under section 506 of The Administrative Code of 1929 (71 P. S. § 186). Source The provisions of this § 93.11 adopted October 22, 1971, effective October 23, 1971, 1 Pa.B. 2017; amended March 9, 1973, effective March 10, 1973, 3 Pa.B. 447; amended February 17, 1984, effective February 18, 1984,14 Pa.B. 534; amended December 21, 2001, effective December 22, 2001, 31 Pa.B. 6932. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (257004) to (257005). Notes of Decisions Administrative Confinement In this civil rights action, plaintiff, inmate, did not allege denial of due process in connection with assignment to administrative confinement. In fact, the inmate indicated that a hearing was held where the inmate's rationale for returning to the general prisoner population was expressed. Plaintiffs assertion that a favorable response to the appeals was not received failed to support that there was denial of an opportunity for appellate review. Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to be satisfied with the decision of prison officials, made pursuant to applicable prison regulations, where the inmate must retain in administrative confinement for the inmate's own protection. Oden v. Caison, 892 F. Supp. 111 (E. D. Pa. 1995). Authority The Department of Corrections could not delegate authority to the State Police to make promises on an inmate housing assignment. The State Police were not authorized agents of the Department of Corrections. Fay v. Ryan, 818 F.Supp. 882 (1993). General Comment New prison restraint policy, which mandated behind-the-back handcuffing for all out-of-cell movements of all death-sentenced inmates, did not violate regulation, where the regulation does not address the use of restraints. Commonwealth v. Price, 705 A.2d 933 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998). An inmate does not have a right under the U. S. Constitution of Pennsylvania State laws or regulations to any specific custody status. Oden v. Caison, 892 F. Supp. 111 (E. D. 1995). IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA SEAN PRESSLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, V. JEFFREY A. BEARD, Ph.D., et al., Defendants. No. 04-5144 CIVIL ACTION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint was served upon the person(s) indicated below: Service by first-class mail Addressed as follows: Shawn Pressley, CG-4129 Michael Washington, CU-4596 Lamar Rozier, CP-3637 SCI-Camp Hill P.O. Box 200 Camp Hill, PA 17001 Stacy M. Jarv(j U Clerical Supervisor 2 Pennsylvania Department of Corrections 55 Utley Drive Camp Hill, PA 17011 (717) 731-0444 Dated: May 19, 2006 r°? ? -n ,.. ?„ . ?..2 iv ,:?` ? c.:a tcr ? ?.:. ' w i- r? j <: ?, ?a bC Gc.Arn6fT68 .C? P?n???fuct.nick. 5tan_.PrbzsSlE?-2e3?nll.__ _vS- No-oy-siyy r?sr?t?°? ?a- Ru.V? l53L ?a.. ?Q. . P. flt? f?la?rr?s i? -Fora. Pr?limi??r c?ioo ?riZon _ (a) ?? Plcunl-?f?'s ?'?.c?n Pr?I , [Yl,c:?a? 0-4 ? a?roi%? Ca??on? Cam.,. .. C 6)?f sad cor??nef?•ace?._b? -? ?_ aS pow- l? cncr?s(? d??_ and 12c4 oP024F-d ;d? 7 - 9-07 __ ?.pa?ri - ??,r? Pr}??29 30l mo rai, Raid F?tclsuill?,? ?u 1793 2 -En Thb Cnlr+ O-P 60MI"On PIWL DC- CcAm6fland C<x??, (Innsviuan-a-, T, Szczn B15, ly, d?.l?? undue _ DF Oncl Cor(R& 64"S?8 CAP ? Prz5oncj J L. )1__rr? _:n ` 7 _ f/?,_ rQn d ryai& + co als rn?ud ?0 - 3 - wa an in -V, ;ncafuf".d A+ C??,.) Lf)V"f-jy- gn-7b:,r anIJ Mf4wv I 14- A;S Plc?AAfs i!? 6 ac?-Eran jDr Vr.?.? oj-dcx- - Cr4dl 40'_Cpr_f??Or?° i..c,?E? m co-_ptairr?i? 1n ?k cr'SU? {' ?F fir. c/a?rn? e... At, ai?znlvx?-Lr- '?. ??k5 man Ta6cu- r -x?? 40 rn awrovir? cxcr_?oxr?S?r?d?nc:?. Tru?car_r?vi- s COOC4 u/?h,;??on alto ?uytif alp ?rorn _ _ . ??r?n?ar?ar?' .Pd /S?Jch?r ? Go rr??oad c??h . u>ii?, m? 1, 12 ?crscu?O-Foccr c/a?rris Y`?f.?f?c?? 'b 1?'Ic Lc.?zshr,??ooS rz;?ue? cpprou?tarn_ r,:- - L8 h tf4o cam Exki b4- Q 7??n Junb CA--, a00b n'1r. L.tkash?rrJ-?fon ?;c,?s fraVIAxrd PAIJ 40--3c?r- B,)?'n flame ?na? rnorrf? S ?u?rn??l ?_r? ? +o Lbrr.PJ 15Jcyza^ `E0 coAn??€,? Cvrre? "r. u?sh„??n d;sp??, h<<s rya ca?rovf.A- k- ArL? .?T-?r?.n? t??r. (mss ??_ a?1 't- -',?. ,.tt?i_? tYJr. GtJ?r?-?ra ?s u9E Gr,?_ Go-?n? e 5.??r3 y-9 D''/ T uwr?. mr. ?.k. aski }???uS __ Gc2 ?C?4f 'lc?• _ I Drr "V-)7-0-7 .Z ?C?4 on YVIr. _BfA 17-)Dn V-?-07 qykkr +6-614t? of- --o7 mr.- wA5kLj -a IA law. vKc GncrZ0-io05- {-mil; L7?-?Q?t 8?3 W AL 4iie,.o 4o rrek&o .v`?l??pt?n c?F .Policc?__rs5 a?? f?x? OAS ext?tk F• 20.E Ed?d J. k?m u? ? ?(° -1161.1??-11-0- Oil A?- 1/uk54a- d1,44 S-46 a:??/?rr?? -/-o rEU?ECv den _.c?x?,?! of _ _car -r? r? =1?.?- _ 4ruL and Ja,? On y-z7 D7 ?zn CYI, _ .u? c?)?rk- E! c?rLd c??e oq o+6 s-6 oz 6,kkl-,? J- o ?Scy n?: 14- azw J .. k tam.a lfss ?-?.? 5 cc?rkr`? cd'a,y? a-Rl?r r?s???- o?_°!-t?, r?ri??. Armand c?r? -t?_aa?o.?1??1. ? c? &57-. O?2-9 lqgFf-l ..or !?.s?Qr?Ed ?_ 'c?? yr er??r?n?n? -Cs _ ?o Wi s. Cpff??lx?F-nc& and 1vaj' ? M l Gtr -?Or' c?EY? S? p O c;2-7,) .?al or ?cur cdlc?r? 2?a? _.. i __ _ .._ _ __. ._ ..._j_ . __...._ _ _. , __.._ __ _ __ ?. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA State Correctional Institution-Camp Hill Date: March 16, 2005 Subject: Request to Correspond with Co-Plaintiffs To: Sean Pressley, CG-4129 E-Block From: Ian W. Tag irt Corrections Superintendent Assistant I have discussed this issue with the Superintendent and Mr. Marsh. Based ony this discussion an arrangement has ? n reached that shall allow you and inmates Washington, Michael, CU and Rozier, Lamar, CP-3637, to have continued access to the courts as these inmates are co-plaintiffs. When it is necessary for these inmates to sign documents in your possession that is connected with your civil action you will need to submit a request slip to Mr. Chambers. In your request you will need to be specific in terms of what you are asking inmate. Washington or Rozier to sign and when you need to have it submitted-to the Court. Upon receipt Mr_ Chambers shall have an officer collect the documents from you and deliver them to the designated inmate. Prior to delivery, the documents shall be searched in accordance with DC-ADM-803 and the handling of legal or privileged correspondence. if there is any contraband in the documents or there. is extra documents not outlined. in the request slip the extra items shad be considered contraband and dealt with appropriately. Once the documents have been inspected the documents shall be carried to inmate Washington or RozWs cell where these inmates shall be provided the opportunity to review them and sign the documents. Once completed the documents shall be inspected again and returned to you. As with many procedures in the SMU, this process shall be limited to one exchange every two weeks, unless documented and vedfed deadlines have been imposed by the court require otherwise. This is the procedure that shall be put in place. In the event you or inmates Washington or Rozier change programming levels to the point where you are both at the same level, this procedure will be canceled as you will both be able to use the mini-law library to accommodate your legal work. EX HzRT-r A, Sean Pressley, CC-4129, E-Block-Request to Correspond Page 2 However, only one of you shall be permitted to bring paperwork as the SMU procedures prohibit the both of you from bringing legal material to the mini-law lib -nary when one of you is participating as an assistant. 1WT Cc: Superintendent Kelchner Deputies Majors Mr. Marsh Mr. Chambers DC-15 File` 46 Our mission is to protect the public by confining persons committed to our custody in safe, secure facilities, and to provide opportunities for inmates to acquire the skills and values necessary to become productive law-abiding citizens; while respecting the rights of the victims. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections State Correctional Institution At Camp Hill, Pa. 17001-8837 August.3, 2005 Subject: Correspondence Between SMU Inmates WASHINGTON, Michael CU-4596 PRESSLEY, Shawn CG4129 To: Superintendent SCI-Camp Hill From: &-4A4-L- Counselor II SCI-Camp. Hill ?liVi-L? 4Y tU- AU6 - 42006 Referred Inmate Michael Washington, CU-4596 has requested.correspondenc a privileges with inmate Shawn Pressley, CG- 4129. Both inmates are currently housed in the Special Management Unit (SMU) at SCI-Camp Hill. Current policy at SCt-Camp HUI is to approve correspondence between inmates only when, they are related, alt1mgh-special circtunstarmes will be considered on an irxiWual basis. Inmate Washington and Pressley's special circumstance is that they are co-plaintiffs in: Washington, Pressley, Rozier Plaintiffs V. J. Beard, et al. Defendants Case no. 04-5144 A check of the PACER by Mr. Taggart revealed that inmates Washington and Pressley are in fact co-plaintiffs in the above listed case. Please Indicate your decision in the space below and return this form to me. Should you deny this request, you may wish to make additional comments at the bottom of this form. Any problems or questions should be addressed to me or nit- Manager Marsh. ( Approved () Denied WQ Relationship verified by our records. Special Comments: Date Superintendent or Designee Cc: DC-15 I DC-14 Ex 6 FT - 6. INM=U T TO STAFF MEMBER Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections INSTRUCTIONS Complete items number 1-8. If you follow instructions in preparing your request, it can be responded to more promptly and intelligently. 1. To: (Name and Title of Officer) - 7 2. Date: - - ocn 3. By: (Print I e Name and Number) 4. Counselor's Name 61 AA -'eQ 0 Ir nim lure 5. Unit Manager's Name 6. Work Assignment 7. Housing Assignment - cy! 8. Subject: State your request completely but briefly. Give details. T © - 1? C 0? x 66,:5f *-Q3 C6, 4e rAA-k 9. R jjn?: (This Section for Staff Response OnI -- ?r To DC-14 CAR only O Tp DC-14 CAR and DC-15 IRS Cam' Staff Member Name 2A `? lt./ 9""4 !kA H / t'` k? d _ Date / o? Print Revised July 2000 17 R 0 (f) Staff Member Name L-L? 3 L? / l %-!: Date -3-1q-07 Print Sign --C) Revised July 2000 EX t Te)y T DC-ADU SW„ inmate GdOYN ae System DC-804 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Part 2 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS P.O. BOX 598 CAMP HILL, PA 17001 OFFICIAL INMATE GRIEVANCE INITIAL REVIEW RESPONSE GRIEVANCE NO. 184753 TO: (lenute Name & DC No.) FACUM HOUSING LOCATION GRIEVANCE DATE Pressley, Shawn CG-4129 Mahan ? HA 1038 14117107 The fa WAV is a mmmy of my *WNW raoffa9 W wbwwm In your grievance, you complain that Mr. Beck, CCII, did not process paperwork allowing you to correspond with inmate Washington CU-4596. You state that you wrote Mr. Beds a request slip on 4007 and he did not respond. I spoke to Mr. Beds regarding your complaint. He reported that he responded to you in person during his weekly rounds in the RHU. Therefore, a written follow-up was not necessary. He advised you that your request to correspond with Mr. Washington was reviewed with Administrative staff and since the request centered around a civil matter and not a criminal matter, Correspondence would not be granted. I find that Mr. Beds did respond to you in a timely matter and therefore this grievance is denied. cc. Deputy Temperine Major Derfler Mr. Marlin Mr. Vuksta Mr. Beds DC-15 DC-14 Print Name dad TMN of Grievance Oftw SIGNATURE OF GREVANCE OFRCER DATE Michael J. Vuksta, UM y L X H !:'6- f::?- LT ' DC-ADM 803, Inmate Mail and Incoming Publications Policy Page 5 V. POLICY It is the policy of the Department to provide an inmate access to communication with members of society through the established public mail system,2 to inspect mail, determine the types of publications allowed, and to review publications intended for inmates.3 Restrictions shall be related directly to facility order and security, public safety, and obscenity laws and statutes a VL PROCEDURESs A. Mail Privileges 1. An inmate shall be permitted to correspond with the public, his/her attorney, and public officials s 2. There shall be no limit to the number of correspondents to whom an inmate may send or from whom an inmate may receive mail.' 3. An inmate may not: a. correspond with another inmate, former inmate, parolee, probationer, co- defendant, or victimjs) of the inmate's criminal acts except with the written approval of the Facility Manager. The Office of the Victim Advocate will provide verification that an individual is a victim of the inmate's criminal acts, at the request of the Facility Manager; b. transfer or receive through any means whatsoever, negotiable instruments, money, or items of monetary value to or from any other inmate, a former inmate, parolee, probationer, co-defendant, or victim(s) of the inmate's criminal acts or his/her immediate family without prior written approval of the Facility Manager/ designee; c. correspond with a current or former employee, current or former volunteer, or current or former contract employee except with the written approval of the Facility Manager/designee.; d. send or receive correspondence containing threatening or obscene materials, as well as correspondence containing criminal solicitations or furthering a criminal plan or misconduct offense.; e. use the facility address to fraudulently identify himself/herself as an employee, agent or representative of the facility, For example: 2 4-4492 31-ABC-5D-04, 1-ABC-5D-07 s g Cx 4 4-4487,4-4488.,4-4490, 1-ABC-5D-02 4-ACRS-6A-07 4-4266, 4-4275,4-4487, 4-4492 I DC-804 Part 1 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS P. O. BOX 598 CAMP HILL, PA 17001-0598 GRIEVANCE NUMBER OFFICIAL INMATE GRIEVANCE TO: FACILITY GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR FACILITY: DATE: FROM: (INMATE NAME & NUMBER) SIGNATURE of INMATE: WORK ASSIGNMENT: HOUSING ASSIGNMENT: • ?, es INSTRUCTIONS: _ r 1. Refer to the DC-ADM 804 for procedures on the inmate grievance s stem y . 2. State your grievance in Block A in a brief and understandable manner , 3. List in Block B any actions you may have taken to resolve this matter. Be sure to include the identity of staff members you have contacted. A. Provide a brief, clear statement of our grievance. Additional paper may be used, maximum two pages (one DC-804 form and one one- id d 8 1 " 11 " s e . x page). State all relief that you are seeking. x P. J s 4 tt r ? z 2 ^`. s -si f n q m - J ^ LL S 2 J Y 5 e B. List actions taken and staff you have c6n6cted, before subr sitting this grievance. ?P Your grievance has been received and will be processed in accordance with DC-ADM 804. Signature of Facility Grievance Coordinator Date WHITE - Facility Grievance Coordinator Copy CANARY - File Copy PINK - Action Roturn Copy GOLDENROD - Inmate Copy Revised April 2001b T EA__ Ex t DC-804 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Part 3 Department of Corrections April 27, 2007 SCI-Mahanov DATE: Y SUBJECT: Grievance Rejection Form FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY TO. • CG4129 Pressley, Sean GRIEVANCE NUMBER 185902 H/A f18 TE. 91fartin Edward R. Martin, CSA FROM: Facility Grievance Coordinator The attached grievance is being returned to you because you have failed to comply with the provision(s) of DC- ADM 804, Inmate Grievance System: 1. Grievances related to the following issues shall be handled according to procedures specified in the policies listed and shall not be reviewed by the Facility Grievance Coordinator a. DC-ADM 801-Inmate Disciplinary and Restricted Housing Unit Procedures b. DC ADM 802-Administrative Custody Procedures c. other policies not applicable to DC-ADM 804. 2. The grievance does not indicate that you were personally affected by a Department or facility action or policy. 3. Group grievances are prohibited. 4. The grievance was not signed and/or dated with your commitment name and number. 5. Grievances must be legible, understandable, and presented in a courteous manner. 6. The grievance exceeded the two (2) page limit. Description needs to be brief. 7. X Grievances based upon different events shall be presented separately. 8. The grievance was not submitted within fifteen (15) working days after the events upon which claims are based. 9. You are currently under grievance restriction. You are limited to one grievance each 15 working days. You filed grievance # on 10. Grievance involves matter(s) that occurred at another facility and should be directed by the inmate to the appropriate facility. 11. The issue(s) presented on the attached grievance has been reviewed and addressed previously in grievance no. dated Note: This grievance is rejected. Admittedly, you present an issue that is two-fold. cc: DC-15 File E? DC-ADAM 804, Inmate Grievance System Attachment C r) 2, s? P 4o uP(,t .1%? Tbf WY- VV'j 4o c C?f-x, S?Av CE)- Zn Thv CocAY?,- cad- r_orvt?titon P6zoz Op GGCrn66Tlay?8 , p?nsylua.ri« vs. U win P1 1 -1 H Ps A--V- V _. T??is .ice a Gwl_ V,7-s ?fio?a t.?_I_ .YVlc?aY? ?A.i ?XY1c+er' RaZ(E3?`'IQ?l17`CD L. ?'t.G. l9tar-), ?O G3?c?.l.? 1?kCJ?aS' !!fl??.? P.S7?PXY., ..Thy Ploy s aft.), 10. ac.?n??_Y?.alx! 1.?? _ Aa- CD -/L _,,?rnu to Y?olaabn a-P,F6?1??i rnr?_,? _Gls, ?itks?'c?toY1, 3ZPa<Coa??_?PEG•9311 ,??4L?1180I Tnt?1?? Proc.£.e?.u?.s -Thy F1cun-?-i?? ?r?r_ a? -f - du_ ire utola?rA? o? -1?. B n?Yv?x? -Eo_-E-4? ?. cAr?i-?or?. Thv Pia.??s Ost, .kin 8-Ecjaza?on?, . ta,2?? +11e? d,nd s 441Ld prd?nai NO UAnnj 400- 07, r ,CSciE4 T_.a nag-o. ?'r?C? oc+ 4 S li 1 WAN zc'-C?+kjc Mr. 6 13 +rW)64" rr6nuz 4.E-)aUA?0 r-ca rev kn - rr vlr)6 m -?-0 -NAb non- Ir -?A 6.38 C?rk. jq -Clf:,Qo oc,,2-an- k4i6n York 97?7- a I e 9-90 /::?? /871 /gl-9z 4e In' A,?AP,4 co 110- .n 6 5.2_0 F 751 .d??ncl s c ??? A_> Play -vCf-?s tarn?Pd -. ?om?lci?n-?- ?;??s _ _ ? ?_gfov? u?ul?l e?r?e?l? _4L &44s ar-J.cL+ 4?6_ ?j es '9'fta+ AX - P6r?i -s cc41.5u and 4ow. ?!o?- oral; cA- acaa on 4& I .M of 80mW-3EL or oN?er cdijj? aj 1. 71Y --- ?o-V,FaV-.IAA7 Pa, l ?123? (,i_?1? Iro.rrn ?1' ? ? E? u?r?rim 1?_fa2r4ra _.sl??(? a, pla?n?t;? .su.?'?rs can 1_n?? ?f_rc?r?r?r1E.l? ? .c.cncbrl?,. ??ri ?zsk? v. ccJar?rn {ls??g? ,?D?r oF_._ I? c? 1st- E?n? ,nos vvE fir fir ms .fix' ?e?n a? __ .. m?w,irnal_ p?mo? o? ?rnv can?ti ?rrabl?; inkI'y h Bfa$ F?r? (c91 73 63c? Gvc-?4?4?•T?, ac,?tdYS G?a?rv1,? ?n 5 r?'I?I-ron c.?nr?- b? r???F.? C. l lnM Tn iA-A ? NA-4-1(Yk c -? Js cis ?bl?ci?s + f??,rmi?- ?'or tnn? ?a cor?c? o-tvu. TV, ac?r8anc&- 4? 6S.9c?i olocky U?? f..C.?.?lo'?4?C IYl WfsS[1L? Tl!uS G2GTIar? ?- li.?OtdiS? ?G1id ??1?1!•_?'ltcS C?f;?'Y101??5?5 T__ _ ka- man -P - IF _.`?5?/FxS,?a.Lfb,1.25?E.d.i?•14Zg??/r1e_?.?_.??! t?.??£mE- . _ adrnani?Fcrx?;con Vi c. c?ec?onc?9 is ?n CLCYIa?Lhc 0?- jtxe,-? l?Ie ,S?'trr?tacF?-. _??2 ?? . ?iD, ?5a7 CD.1?L•m, r9F??? ?,.? d ? Y. M. cimP . J079/1s340 ?C. lox_ 07 1975 C4C COn44uJt6nLiS 4acp(i.Smon Ok- li:),?C, Ir??x25t-?. -v?c .??J-W6c v-rY)"v;L,-A3-9F.F,3J W-7,02563? , 11, V2o0?), JLzd s4- l?s? on?_?t? his scud Aai.__ (' ?z v. lea, ,i.?k, y?5 Fzc? N73, '?76 C54 Cir. f9-z3)- TherrE. 15 Qt5 pkutc?,?nT?x?? pF' G1vt?' ? ?bEfi?} U4T?LnI-?.t? 51? -1? F?11. S?4 nr CIO-" +0, JUL, On 'on"rLAY ?bdu0-,4kbo,r- ?? q F,3J cal- 3 10 rCYi,4J'I/.//LGl71.Sf?Y) U•.U•.k37 4-1m s? =114P71 1171,YA C its uo _.IIYal1,f ._&SS?B???_r?lYd?£1_Gt-l..Q?*?1.@CI?_CF?}?110 QC?'£'? 11 63A CIr. 2-OD). x-k- y 2- lb F.acl ? 72`. 'a ? 40- I {1YilakTlJJ(IFX' QrS !T'''lS ?-O LG ? ?`I?fSLfif?iGL ..-tic' ctnc? I?ar? ?a-n lo?_ P?????r?,. ? e?r?r? ?o ?rr?s?r,c? qn c? P C` 14 e? car -.,r c c? 74-7;1_1 V) s m4ion. Rcr_ A- PrJ_imivxlh___.. _ o d- Qn. _7 1.9 : _07 _ Fill ED-OFFICE OF THE: ?T IO €-JON0 IARY ?l t I0 SEP 28 A'M 11: 481 Case No. V ?7 PE11"HS)Y V 1'11 Statement of Intention to Proceed To the Court: P?CtI intends to proceed with the above captioned matter. Print Name Sign Name Date: Zlo l Attorney for Explanatory Comment The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has promulgated new Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 governing the termination of inactive cases and amended Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. Two aspects of the recommendation merit comment. 1. Rule of civil Procedure New Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 has been promulgated to govern the termination of inactive cases within the scope of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The termination of these cases for inactivity was previously governed by Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and local rules promulgated pursuant to it. New Rule 230.2 is tailored to the needs of civil actions. It provides a complete procedure and a uniform statewide practice, preempting local rules. This rule was promulgated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shop v. Eagle, 551 Pa. 360,710 A.2d 1104 (1998) in which the court held that "prejudice to the defendant as a result of delay in prosecution is required before a case may be dismissed pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901." Rule of Judicial Administration 1901(b) has been amended to accommodate the new rule of civil procedure. The general policy of the prompt disposition of matters set forth in subdivision (a) of that rule continues to be applicable. 11 Inactive Cases The purpose of Rule 230.2 is to eliminate inactive cases from the judicial system. The process is initiated by the court. After giving notice of intent to terminate an action for inactivity, the course of the procedure is with the parties. If the parties do not wish to pursue the case, they will take no action and "the Prothonotary shall enter an order as of course terminating the matter with prejudice for failure to prosecute." If a party wishes to pursue the matter, he or she will file a notice of intention to proceed and the action shall continue. a. Where the action has been terminated If the action is terminated when a party believes that it should not have been terminated, that party may proceed under Rule230(d) for relief from the order of termination. An example of such an occurrence might be the termination of a viable action when the aggrieved party did not receive the notice of intent to terminate and thus did not timely file the notice of intention to proceed. The timing of the filing of the petition to reinstate the action is important. If the petition is filed within thirty days of the entry of the order of termination on the docket, subdivision (d)(2) provides that the court must grant the petition and reinstate the action. If the petition is filed later than the thirty-day period, subdivision (d)(3) requires that the plaintiff must make a showing to the court that the petition was promptly filed and that there is a reasonable explanation or legitimate excuse both for the failure to file the notice of intention to proceed prior to the entry of the order of termination on the docket and for the failure to file the petition within the thirty-day period under subdivision (d)(2). B. Where the action has not been terminated An action which has not been terminated but which continues upon the filing of a notice of intention to proceed may have been the subject of inordinate delay. In such an instance, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedy of a common law non pros which exits independently of termination under Rule 230.2. vs Case No. ()Li -51 Statement of Intention to Proceed �. CO -fir To the Court: c cc':� 7",-R �'Zep C intends to proceed with the above captionyedaiatter: Print Name St o v Qf" Ssi, Sign Name PtQLUj,� Date: V 0-k Attorney for Explanatory Comment The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has promulgated new Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 governing the termination of inactive cases and amended Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. Two aspects of the recommendation merit comment. I.Rule of civil Procedure New Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 has been promulgated to govern the termination of inactive cases within the scope of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The termination of these cases for inactivity was previously governed by Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and local rules promulgated pursuant to it. New Rule 230.2 is tailored to the needs of civil actions. It provides a complete procedure and a uniform statewide practice, preempting local rules. This rule was promulgated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shop v.Eagle, 551 Pa. 360,710 A.2d 1104 (1998) in which the court held that "prejudice to the defendant as a result of delay in prosecution is required before a case may be dismissed pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901." Rule of Judicial Administration 1901(b) has been amended to accommodate the new rule of civil procedure. The general policy of the prompt disposition of matters set forth in subdivision(a)of that rule continues to be applicable. II Inactive Cases The purpose of Rule 230.2 is to eliminate inactive cases from the judicial system. The process is initiated by the court. After giving notice of intent to terminate an action for inactivity,the course of the procedure is with the parties. If the parties do not wish to pursue the case, they will take no action and"the Prothonotary shall enter an order as of course terminating the matter with prejudice for failure to prosecute." If a party wishes to pursue the matter,he or she will file a notice of intention to proceed and the action shall continue. a. Where the action has been terminated If the action is terminated when a party believes that it should not have been terminated, that party may proceed under Rule230(d)for relief from the order of termination. An example of such an occurrence might be the termination of a viable action when the aggrieved party did not receive the notice of intent to terminate and thus did not timely file the notice of intention to proceed. The timing of the filing of the petition to reinstate the action is important. If the petition is filed within thirty days of the entry of the order of termination on the docket,subdivision(d)(2)provides that the court must grant the petition and reinstate the action. If the petition is filed later than the thirty-day period,subdivision(d)(3)requires that the plaintiff must make a showing to the court that the petition was promptly filed and that there is a reasonable explanation or legitimate excuse both for the failure to file the notice of intention to proceed prior to the entry of the order of termination on the docket and for the failure to file the petition within the thirty-day period under subdivision(d)(2). B. Where the action has not been terminated An action which has not been terminated but which continues upon the filing of a notice of intention to proceed may have been the subject of inordinate delay. In such an instance, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedy of a common law non pros which exits independently of termination under Rule 230.2.