HomeMy WebLinkAbout13-0579IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
CUMULUS BROADCASTING, LLC,
Plaintiff,
VS.
BRANDSTAND GROUP, INC. and
KARIN GOULD, as Guarantor,
Defendants.
c
~ ~ '":J
~r. ,
~' C i
c~ 3 ~:; C-;
~
~-~ sv - {._ .
-~:'
.~
~;_r
COMPLAINT IN CIVIL ACTION ~'='- c~:~
FILED ON BEHALF OF
Plaintiff
COUNSEL OF RECORD OF THIS
PARTY:
SHAWN P. MCCLURE, ESQUIRE
PAID #205951
JENNIFER L. TIS, ESQUIRE
PAID #203751
RAYMOND P. WENDOLOWSKI, JR., ESQUIRE
PAID #311415
Bernstein-Burkley, P.C.
Firm #718
Suite 2200 Gulf Tower
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
412-456-8100
BERNSTEIN FILE NO.00077215
~ I o3.75 Pp -~`~
~f X7393
~ a8~~9
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
CUMULUS BROADCASTING, LLC,
Plaintiff, No.
vs.
BRANDSTAND GROUP, INC. and
KARIN GOULD, as Guarantor,
Defendants.
NOTICE AND COMPLAINT
NOTICE TO DEFEND
You have been sued in Court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the following
pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and Notice are served upon you,
by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the Court your
defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case
may proceed without you and a Judgment may be entered against you by the Court, without further
notice, for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff.
You may lose money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE A LAWYER, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW. THIS OFFICE
CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT HIRING A LAWYER.
IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE A LAWYER, THIS OFFICE MAY BE ABLE TO
PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT AGENCIES THAT MAY OFFER LEGAL
SERVICES TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS AT A REDUCED FEE OR NO FEE.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
2 LIBERTY AVENUE
CARLISLE, PA 17013
717-249-3166
800-990-9108
2
00077215
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Cumulus Broadcasting, LLC ("Plaintiff'), is a limited liability company with
offices in Cincinnati, Ohio.
2. Defendant, Brandstand Group, Inc. ("Defendant"), is a corporation having offices and place
of business at 2913 Glenwood Road, Camp Hill, Cumberland, Pennsylvania 17011.
3. Defendant, Karin Gould ("Defendant-Guarantor"), is an adult individual receiving mail or
conducting business at 2913 Glenwood Road, Camp Hill, Cumberland, Pennsylvania 17011.
COUNT I -AGAINST DEFENDANT. BRANDSTAND GROUP. INC.
FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT
4. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference thereto each and every of the preceding paragraphs
of this Complaint as if the same were more fully set forth herein.
5. To induce the extension of credit, Defendant executed and delivered to Plaintiff an
Application for Credit ("Agreement"), a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit
"1," and made a part hereof.
6. At the special instance and request of Defendant, Plaintiff provided to Defendant advertising
services, as are more specifically described on Plaintiffs Invoices which are identified on Plaintiff s
Statement of Account. A true and correct copy of Plaintiff's Statement of Account is attached hereto,
marked Exhibit " 2," and made a part hereof.
7. Plaintiff avers that Defendant received duplicates or copies of said invoices in the regular
course of Plaintiff's business.
8. Defendant received and accepted the aforementioned advertising services.
9. The prices charged by Plaintiff were the fair, reasonable, and market prices that prevailed at
the times of the transactions.
00077215
10. The prices charged by Plaintiff were the prices that Defendant agreed to pay.
11. Plaintiff avers that as of November 5, 2012, a balance of $4,000.50 remains due and owing
to Plaintiff as a result of the Defendant's failure to pay for the aforementioned advertising services.
12. Plaintiff avers that the Agreement between the parties provides for interest at the rate of
eighteen percent (18%) per annum as damages on the liquidated balance.
13. Plaintiff avers that interest at the aforesaid rate amounts to $84.83 from November 5, 2012
through December 18, 2012.
14. Plaintiff avers that the Agreement between the parties provides that Defendant will pay
Plaintiffs collection costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees).
15. Plaintiff avers that such reasonable collection costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees)
will amount to $1,332.17.
16. Although repeatedly requested to do so by Plaintiff, Defendant has willfully failed and
refused to pay the aforesaid balance, interest, attorneys' fees, or any part thereof to Plaintiff.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands Judgment against Defendant, Brandstand Group, Inc., in Count I
of this Complaint in the amount of $5,417.50, with continuing interest on the principal balance at the rate of
eighteen percent (18%), and costs.
COUNT II -AGAINST DEFENDANT, KARIN GOULD. AS GUARANTOR
17. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference thereto each and every of the preceding paragraphs
of this Complaint as if the same were more fully set forth herein.
18. As a further inducement for the extension of credit, Defendant-Guarantor executed and
delivered to Plaintiff a guaranty of payment, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto, marked
Exhibit "1," and made a part hereof.
4
00077215
19. Plaintiff avers that all conditions precedent to the Defendant-Guarantor's duty of
performance under said guaranty have occurred.
20. Plaintiff has been damaged as aforesaid in Count I in the amount of $5,417.50.
21. Although repeatedly requested to do so by Plaintiff, Defendant has willfully failed and
refused to pay the aforesaid balance, interest, attorneys' fees, or any part thereof to Plaintiff.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands Judgment against Defendant, Karin Gould, as Guarantor, in
Count II of this Complaint in the amount of $5,417.50, with continuing interest on the principal balance at
the rate of eighteen percent (18%), and costs.
BERNSTE -BURKLEY, P.C.
BY:
Shawn .McClure, Esquire
PAID #205951
Attorney for Plaintiff
707 Grant Street
Suite 2200 -Gulf Tower
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
412-456-8100
BERNSTEIN FILE NO.00077215
5
00077215
CUMULUS BROADCASTING LLC
la1E;S MaII+iES
CLIENT INFORMATION SWEET AND CREDIT APPLICATION
Legal Name: ~ /, ~-n ~d -~~ ~ c~. ~ t'0 /r~ •]- ~ ~ _
Trade Name: ..5tt rye.
Check one: ~ Corporation o Partnership
o Limited Liability Company o Sole Proprietorship
a Government _ Q Non-Profit
Address: ~~~ .y ~ Y
City /State / Zi.p:
~~r~
Phone: 717 °' f 12.-- ~ ~i 3 ~ Fax: T 1 `1 ~ Z4 f `~ ' 431,x? ~i
Email: ~-e'~~ c~ ~~,"~ ~ al 1:~+~ Website: Iii wwv . ~ir ~..,, ~I,j-1-A„ ~ c~+,7.~ a , [,,c~ -»
Fed Tax ID or SS: ,~ ~ ` i?~-~lrf 17 S~ State of Incorporation:
Number of years in business: ~ ~ Number of Employees:
Name of company principal(s) responsible for business transactions:
-,
Nansel Title Addrean Cl'tyrStetd7.ip 'rel.
f/- r s PY ~-=t •fi~+~ S~ - C!.Yl ~ i ~ mil" _ ,~6•_ t..{_
Name Title Asldtna Cig9SlstOdZip 'rel.
Trade References: Jdentify four (4) entities previously extending credit (list media references first).
UPI I , l ~T ~ t,~t.•-e > •-~ , r
~'. ,
Namd(:smtacf _ CitydStatdZip } Tel Flu E-mail
~.-'.1,7Xn.if i cwt- ~ a•1 1 :`F~da ~-nC. 1~-~~c,4~.~.(:,a~ _fi'~.i iT1 y.-~~ °.i'y.3 ~7/ 7 !' " y~.yr„~rf-3 - Gr~1i
. NamdCmtact !~r[llSteWZip Tel Faz L•-mail
3. »?tic~l . ;?'l. kr. tit+J~o/E-.t ~~L/~-11:.,,.,43 LL 4+~•a-t'7 3 7~c`~° -,:~„#'.s • aj f_3 ,= •'/~~Y, . ~~3 i , j'4; s•,
~ N ttsx ~'7~ CilylStatdZip Tel Fez ~ [i~nail
~~7_+~i+.s't..J~t~/f~ l~/.1sn11't.l~i lJt~'vr,:...~Z 43c')"l1" ls.3t; ~' ~Q,~~n~/~/4l ~® ~~
~Fa'fN~wm~ytrct ~ ~!~'. ~C}t' ~ISns~/!try ral ~ ~~_ r/"t V FB~ I OO E-mtnl
Bank Reference
Bank Name: ~`~~k. ~.r-~; _ }~ •'•..+, ~-, Branch: ~ ~. ~:{ ,-.r L'.~;`,.f-,l~
Bank Contact: .(=,-t C ~r7 c.•-r~~•,, Telephone: 1i! i - ~.%fi ~,:~~'+='~=%
AccountNo.: ~ .~ .~:s?.5^Il S~
I hereby certify that the information contained herein is complete and accur~e. This information bas been famished with the
understanding that it will be used by Glumulus from time to time to determine the amount and conditions of the credit to be extended.
Furthermore, l hereby authorize the financial institutions listed in this credit application to release necessary information to Cumulus
in order to verify the information contained herein.
Guarantee: The undersigned, inconsideration ofthe Applicant herein receiving credit, does hereby unconditionally, jointly and
severally, guarantee payment of any and all bills or obligations incurred by Applicant.
!have reviewed Cumulus's Standard Terms and Conditiats attached hereto as may be made?fled by Cwnetlus from time to
time. / ltereby acknowledge and agree that such Standard Terms and Cond,+tions shall apply to aU my adveHisingpurchase orders
with Cumulrrx
AUTHORIZED SIGNA7'IfRE: ~ "'---- DATE: ~' ~ ` J ~..-.
J
PR1N1' NAME: CJ r' , » . ~ ~ u' ~ Ci -. TI7`L:E• ~.~; ' ~r ~+ ~/ -~ /"`
Rev. 3/.l E
v. ~ O` 7 ~ W ~ o' O {j O u x .- .. ~ b ~ V ~ yi 7 _
CCuy N ua y~ 00 C '~•}}jQppjii C
$~~ ~ •~~~~pO $a t~~fi~$K~n~~ ~ 7 ~~yl~U T~Q yC7~ y~Q ~L ~~~ ~~ •~ ~ ~°C _
° ~n Vl . ~ $ t~ '~ ~. u~ ~ .~ ~ .3 QQQ T b . .~ ~ G0~ ~ ~ ~ a~ > n r~ ~ ~ ~. `~ ~ ~ 'a0 ~ .G ~ P, C S w
~~ ~ ~~y~ <~'v~a.'`3.9~$ .3 .9 T a~°~ =Q ~yi:7n3 ~.'~ -~ .C ;" ~ $ ~ y.~t~ 8
3 ~ ~ C L ~ M O w ~ $ ~ ~ T ~ ~.g ~ ~ p ~ ~ j >. .T 7 O~ y ~j ~ .a ~ ~ ~ G Q a •a G _C ~ n
!S ~ . ~ ~ 3 ~ 'A ~~1 ~ ~O ._ < Lu E 7 a ~ ~ "S - «G `li i . ~ c ~ ~t T ~ ~ 'R ~ '3 ~i
~ .~ ~a7 b o7P~ .`C ~i ~.5 `Zf ..at ~~ .9 ~~, ~ .5' !t o~
5 ~ .. ~
~~ .~
~ ~ ~ -~.
o~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ b
.~ b ~ ~ ~ ~
T ~ ~. ~ .~
~bs - ~
.~ ~ T a
5 ~r ~~ T ~ b ~ ~ ~. any '~ a 8 ~ b~ ,~
$~Qg N p yp~j' yp p {Y~ u
T -. .~ ~ ~
S ~ ~ ~ .~.s ~ ~N ~ ~ gT ~ T ~ Se~ O Q 9 ~j' i~. ~ y 3 ~ O R b ~ ~ . .!7
b ~ ~ ~~ . ~ ~, 3~ ~3 ~~ ~~ ~ ~
T~~
sr bb - ~ < b
i w ~ ~ T PG
~ ~ ~ ~+~ ~ $ g ~~ ~ ~~ b
~ ~ ~ .. b ~ ~
~ ~
.. ~ s ~ e ~b .a~ b b
.:pL.a.CCP.b~$'~~•~3 c3~ Qr3g.ri~~.e.8~ 3 ~~'l4iS.~ .4 .i~ w •~.:
dec 06 ~ 2012 3:91 PM HP Fax
page 2
CUSTOM R STATEMENT
Cumul s -Des Moines
November 1, 42 • December 6, 2012
Remit To: Cumulus -Des Manes
~pnCy; Grandstand Caroup PO 8oz 645108
PO Box 868 Cincinnati pH 45264b109
Camp HNI, PA 17001-0888 615-331-8200
Amount Duac 14„000.50
AdtR#81 S Aycy#814 Amount Paid:
Advertlser: Happy Jogs Pizza Plese roturn ttie upper porl(on of ststernsM wllh
Y~ Gaymsnt
05f27/12 NW7021SiT K6G0-FM ~ 2,888.50 2,808.60
Oti/27H 2 INV1021t153 KHKI-FM 2,227.00 5,125.60
11/05!12 PMT KG7G0-FM INV 1021817 -1,12b.00 3860 4.000.50
0.001 0.001 O.o~1 0.00' OAO
Terms: Dua Upon Roceipt
Page 1 V 4.1
Advt#815 Agcylf894
Data Printed 1 2/612 01 2
~H~B~T a
VERIFICATI(}N
The undersigned does hereby verify subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. ~ 4904, rr~iatin~ to
unsworn falsification to authorities, and under penalty of perjury, that he/she is US S ('~• _ G~ og
`~ •- ,4
,Plaintiff herein, that halshe is duly authorized to make this Verification and that the
rDQ • ~
facts set forth in t e foregoing COMPL~~INT sue tn-e and. correct to the best of his/her knowledge,
information and. belief.
-,
.,-~
~.
(,Sign in Blue lnk)
C007721~
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
CUMULUS BROADCASTING, LLC,
Plaintiff', No. 13-579 Civil Term
V�.
BRANDSTAND GROUP, INC. and
KARIN GOULD, as Guarantor,
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO NEW
MATTER
FILED ON BEHALF OF:
Plaintiff
COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR
THIS PARTY:
SHAWN P. MCCLURE, ESQUIRE
PA ID#205951
JENNIFER L. TIS, ESQUIRE
PA ID#203751
RAYMOND P WENDOLOWSKI JR., ESQ
PA ID #311415
Bernstein-Burkley, P.C.
Firm#718
Suite 2200 Gulf Tower
Pittsburgh, PA 152)19
412-456-8100
BERNSTEIN FILE NO. C0077215
IN THE, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
CUMULUS BROADCASTING, LLC,
Plaintiff, No. 13-579 Civil Term
v>.
BRANDSTAND GROUP, INC. and
KARIN GOULD. as Guarantor,
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO NEW MATTER
AND NOW comes Plaintiff, Cumulus Broadcasting, LLC, by and through counsel,
Bernstein-Burkley, P.C., and files the following Reply to New Matter, averring in support thereof
the following:
1. Paragraph 1 of Defendant's New Matter refers to a document which speaks for
itself. and to the extent Defendant's allegations in Paragraph l in any way attempt to
mischaracterize that document, Paragraph 1 is specifically denied.
2. Paragraph 2 of Defendant's New Matter states a conclusion of law to which no
response is required. To the extent that said allegation is in any way deemed to be an allegation
Of fact. said allegation is specifically denied, and strict proof thereof is demanded at the trial
hereof.
3. Paragraph 3 of Defendant's New Matter states a conclusion of law to which no
response is required. To the extent that said allegation is in any way deemed to be an allegation
of fact.. said allegation is specifically denied, and strict proof thereof is demanded at the trial
hereof.
4. Paragraph 4 of Defendant's New Matter states a conclusion of law to which no
response is required. To the extent that said allegation is in any way deemed to be an allegation
of fact, said allegation is specifically denied, and strict proof thereof is demanded at the trial
hereof.
Paragraph 5 of Defendant's New Matter states a conclusion of law to which no
response is required. To the extent that said allegation is in any way deemed to be an allegation
of fact, said allegation is specifically denied, and strict proof thereof is demanded at the trial
hereof'.
6. Paragraph 6 of Defendant's New Matter states a conclusion of law to which no
response is required. To the extent that said allegation is in any way deemed to be an allegation
of fact, said allegation is specifically denied, and strict proof thereof is demanded at the trial
hereof.
7, Paragraph 7 of Defendant's New Matter states a conclusion of law to which no
response is required. To the extent that said allegation is in any way deemed to be an allegation
of fact. said allegation is specifically denied, and strict proof thereof is demanded at the trial
hereof.
& Paragraph 8 of Defendant's New Matter states a conclusion of law to which no
response is required. To the extent that said allegation is in any way deemed to be an allegation
of fact, said allegation is specifically denied, and strict proof thereof is demanded at the trial
hereof
9. Paragraph 9 of Defendant's New Matter states a conclusion of law to which no
response is required. To the extent that said allegation is in any way deemed to be an allegation
Of fact. said allegation is specifically denied, and strict proof thereof is demanded at the trial
hereof.
10. Paragraph 10 of Defendant's New Matter states a conclusion of law to which no
response is required. To the extent that said allegation is in any way deemed to be an allegation
of fact, said allegation is specifically denied, and strict proof thereof is demanded at the trial
hereof.
I 1. Paragraph 11 of Defendant's New Matter states a conclusion of law to which no
response is required. To the extent that said allegation is in any way deemed to be an allegation
of fact, said allegation is specifically denied, and strict proof thereof is demanded at the trial
hereof. By way of further reply, all services requested were requested by an authorized party on
behalf of Defendants.
12. Paragraph 12 of Defendant's New Matter states a conclusion of law to which no
response is required. To the extent that said allegation is in any way deemed to be an allegation
of fact. said allegation is specifically denied, and strict proof thereof is demanded at the trial
hereof. By way of further reply, all products and services requested were properly provided as
averred in Plaintiff's Complaint.
13. Paragraph 13 of Defendant's New Matter states a conclusion of law to which no
response is required. To the extent that said allegation is in any way deemed to be an allegation
of fact. said allegation is specifically denied, and strict proof thereof is demanded at the trial
hereof.
WHEREFORE. Plaintiff demands Judgment against Defendant, Brandstand Group, Inc. and
Karin Gould,in the amount of$5,41.7.50, with continuing interest on the principal balance at the
rate of eighteen percent {"18%), and costs.
BERNSTEIN-BURKLEY, P.C.
By: VC'
Raymon P. Wendolowski Jr., Esquire
PA ID#311415
Attorney for Plaintiff
707 Grant Street
Suite 2200 - Gulf Tower
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
412-456-8100
BERNSTEIN FILE NO. 00077215
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
CUMULUS BROADCASTING, LLC,
Plaintiff, No. 13-579 Civil Term
VS.
BRANDSTAND GROUP, INC. and
KARIN GOULD, as Guarantor,
Defendants.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1, Raymond P. Wendolowski Jr., Esquire hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the
foregoing REPLY TO NEW MATTER was served on the Defendant's attorney. by regular U. S.
Mail. postage prepaid, this day or—&—tc-h—,
2013, addressed as follows:
Christopher S. Lucas
Law Offices of Christopher S. Lucas
2917 Glenwood Road
Camp Hill, PA 17011
'At
Raymond P. Wendolowski Jr., Esq.
PA ID#311415
Attorney for Plaintiff
707 Grant Street
Suite 2200 - Gulf Tower
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
412-456-8100
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
CUMULUS BROADCASTING, LLC, r
Plaintiff,
No. 13-579 Civil Term 'co
rn
= - ,
vs.
r-
x
BRANDSTAND GROUP, INC. and
KARIN GOULD, as Guarantor,
Defendants.
PRAECIPE TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE
FILED ON BEHALF OF
Plaintiff
COUNSEL OF RECORD OF
THIS PARTY:
SHAWN P. MCCLURE, ESQUIRE
PA ID #205951
JENNIFER L. TIS, ESQUIRE
PA ID#203751
RAYMOND P. WENDOLOWSKI, JR., ESQUIRE
PA ID #311415
Bernstein-Burkley, P.C.
Firm#718
Suite 2200 Gulf Tower
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
412-456-8100
BERNSTEIN FILE NO. C0077215
Y
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
CUMULUS BROADCASTING, LLC,
Plaintiff, No. 13-579 Civil Term
vs.
BRANDSTAND GROUP, INC. and
KARIN GOULD, as Guarantor,
Defendants.
PRAECIPE TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, by counsel, Bernstein-Burkley, P.C., and Raymond P.
Wendolowski, Jr., Esquire, and moves this honorable Court to enter an Order, dismissing the
above-captioned matter with prejudice.
Respectfully submitted,
By:
vV j
Y
Raymon P. Wendolowski, Jr., Esquir
PA ID #311415
Attorney for Plaintiff
Suite 2200 Gulf Tower
707 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
412-456-8100
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
CUMULUS BROADCASTING, LLC,
Plaintiff, No. 13-579 Civil Term
VS.
BRANDSTAND GROUP, INC. and
KARIN GOULD, as Guarantor,
Defendants.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1,Raymond P. Wendolowski, Jr., Esquire, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of
the foregoing PRAECIPE TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE was served on the Defendants by
regular U.S. Mail,postage prepaid, this /7 day of April, 2012, address as follows:
Brandstand Group, Inc.
c/o Christopher S. Lucas, Esquire
Law Offices of Christopher S. Lucas
2917 Glenwood Road
Camp Hill, PA 17011
Karin Gould
c/o Christopher S. Lucas, Esquire
Law Offices of Christopher S. Lucas
2917 Glenwood Road
Camp Hill, PA 17011
vV \
i
Raymond P. Wendolowski, Jr., Esqu re
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
CUMULUS BROADCASTING, LLC,
Plaintiff, No. 13-579 Civil Term
vs.
BRANDSTAND GROUP, INC. and
KARIN GOULD, as Guarantor,
Defendants.
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, to wit, this day of , 2013, upon Praecipe of
Plaintiff, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that this matter is dismissed with
prejudice.
BY THE COURT:
J.