HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-5551
ORIGINAL
vs.
) IN THE COURT OF COMMOM PLEAS OF
)
) CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
)
) CNIL ACTION - F AMIL Y DNISION
~ NO: 04 - r~S'( (},"uL~~
)
AMY SHANK,
Plaintiff
CHARLES R. LAPINSKY, III,
Defendant
COMPLAINT FOR CUSTODY
1. The Plaintiff is Amy J. Shank, an adult individual, currently residing at 136 East
Washington Street, Elizabethtown, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania 17022,
2. The Defendant is Charles R. Lapinsky, III, an adult individual, currently residing at
823 Acri Drive, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17050,
3. Plaintiff seeks primary physical custody of the following children:
Name
Present Residence
Age
Shane R. Lapinsky
823 Acri Drive
Mechanicsburg, P A 17050
13 years old
(d.o,b, 10/14/91)
The child was born during the marriage.
The child is presently in the custody of Charles R. Lapinsky, III.
4. Since June of 1997, the parties have been operating under an Order of Court whereby
Mother and Father share legal custody with Father having primary physical custody and Mother
having substantial periods of partial custody. Attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "A" is a
true and correct copy of said Order.
5, The relationship of Plaintiff to the child is that of Mother. The Plaintiff currently
resides with the following persons:
Name
Jeff Shank
Misti J. Kautz
Breana M. Kautz
Relationship
Husband
daughter
daughter
6, The relationship of Defendant to the child is that of Father, The Defendant currently
resides with the following persons:
Name Relationship
Beth Bodenheimer-Lapinsky wife
Tessa Stein step-daughter
7. Plaintiff has participated as a party or witness or in any other capacity or litigation
concerning the child in Dauphin County Court docketed to 1963-S-1996, Charles R. Lapinsky v.
Amy J. Zinoble n/k/a Amy J. Shank,
8. Plaintiffhas information of any custody proceeding concerning this child as indicated
above,
9, Plaintiff does not know of any other person not a party to these proceedings who has
physical custody of the child or who claims to have custody or visitation rights with respect to
the children.
10. The best interest and permanent welfare of the child will be served by granting the
relief requested because:
a. The child has indicated a strong desire to live with his mother.
b, Mother believes the child's best interest and permanent welfare will be served by
Mother obtaining primary physical custody of her son,
c. Mother has concerns about the child's emotional state and well-being due to the
family dynamics in Father's home.
11. Each parent whose parental rights to the child has not been terminated and the person
who has physical custody of the children has been named as a party to this action,
12. All other persons named below who are known to have a claim or right to custody or
visitation of the child will be given notice of the pending of this action and the right to intervene,
Name
Address
Basis of Claim
None.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Amy J. Shank requests this Honorable Court grant her primary
physical custody of the parties' child, Shane R. Lapinsky,
Respectfully submitted,
GINGRICH, SMITH, KLINGENSMITH & DOLAN
By:
.{~~Lt~
J e Murphy, Esquire - l r;--
Att rney for Plaintiff U
2 S. Market St., P. 0, Box 267
lizabethtown, PA 17022
Attorney I.D, #80838
ORIGINAL
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in this Complaint for Custody are true and correct. I
understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa, C.S, Section
4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities,
Date: 1~P,t/ot
t+n_nJlYln(
Amy J. JhlkJA t.. 1
Oct-~9-2004 11:45am From-DC PROTHONOTARY
+
T-660 P.002/004 F-325
'r' '='"~
, .
v.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO . , 963 S 1 996
CHARLES R. LAPINSKY,
Plaintiff
AMY J. ZINOBLE,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN CUSTODY
AND NOW,
ORDER OF COURT
thi~aY of ~ e..-.
, 1997,
the parties having reached further agreement with regard to the
best interests of the subject minor child, Shane Robert Lapinsky,
born October 10, 1991, it is hereby ORDERED AND DECREED as
follows:
1. The parties shall have shared legal custody of the
subject minor child. They shall consult with each other relative
to all important decisions concerning the subject minor child,
including such matters as health, education, and religion.
2. Plaintiff Charles R. Lapinsky, Jr., shall have
primary physical custody of the subject minor child.
3. Defendant Amy J. Zinoble shall have partial
periods of physicaJ. custody, for purposes of visitation, as per
the following schedule:
A. During the school year, Mother shall be entitled
to alternating weekends from Friday after school, until
. the beginning of school Monday morning. During the
school year, Mother will also be entitled to
alternating Fridays, to coincide ~ith her non-
visitational weekend, from after school until 11:00
a.m. Saturday morning.
B. During the summer months, Mother shall have
visitation every Wednesday from 5:00 p.m. until Friday
EXHIBIT
j "A"
.Oct-~9-2004 11:45am From-DC PROTHONOTARY
+
T-660 P.OOS/004 F-S25
,,- ...,
- . -
at 5:00 p.m. Likewise, she shall also be entitled to
alternating weekends from Friday at 5:00 p.m. until
Monday morning at 8:30 a.m.
C. The parties shall share the holidays equally, with
the exact details to be agreed upon between them.
D. The parties shall equally divide all vacation
periods from school, other than summer vacation, in as
equal a manner as possible, with the exact details to
be agreed upon between them.
E. Mother shall be entitled to additional periods of
visitation, likewise the parties may make modifications
to this agreement any time, based upon the agreement
and consent of both parties.
4. In the event the parties should be unable to reach
agreement regarding the custody and visitation arrangement, then
each agrees to first utilize the mediation process, prior to
initiating any type of litigation.
5. During any period of custody or visitation the
parties to this order shall not possess or use any controlled
substance, neither shall they consume alcoholic beverages to the
point of intoxication. The parties shall likewise assure, to the
extent possible, that other household members and/or house guests
oomply with this prohibition.
J.
~
""
-
()
"1
o
r::J(.J
tt'k
~ ~
~ s ~
..fL :r>
~J:-
w
-...
cY
o
c
~ ~ l~~;;
~~"~. L>~'~
i
,....,
=
c;:>
..r-
Z
C:)
....:::
I
W
-U
=-=
~
:;J
fi;::D
,
-urn
~15?
-_je}
"T~ -r-
t5 :d
":, C)
orl1
--I
',]>
..0
.<
':Y
(;.)
VI
AMY J. SHANK
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
04-5551 CIVIL ACTION LAW
CHARLES R. LAPINSKY, III
DEFENDANT
IN CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW,
Tuesday, November 16,2004
, upon consideration of the attached Complaint,
it is hereby directed that parties and their respective counsel appear before Melissa P. Greevy, Esq. , the conciliator,
at 301 Market Street, Lemoyne, PA 17043 on Friday, December 03, 2004 at 10:00 AM
for a Pre-Hearing Custody Conference, At such conference, an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or
if this cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the court, and to enter into a temporary
order, All children age five or older may also be present at the conference. Failure to appear at the conference may
provide grounds for entry of a temporary or permanent order.
The court hereby directs the parties to furnish any and all existing Protection from Abuse orders,
Special Relief orders, and Custody orders to the conciliator 48 hours prior to scheduled hearinl!;.
FOR THE COURT.
By: /s/
Melissa P. Greevv. Esq.
Custody Conciliator
mhc
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law to comply with the Americans
with Disabilites Act of 1990. For information about accessible facilities and reasonable accommodations
available to disabled individuals having business before the court, please contact our office, All arrangements
must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business before tht: court. You must attend the
scheduled conference or hearing,
YOU SHOULD TAKE TillS PAPER TO YOUR A TTORNEY AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE AN ATTORNEY OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET
FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP,
Cumberland County Bar Association
32 South Bedford Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
Telephone (717) 249-3166
~ fr -? r~ ~ .Ie/-IIed
-w >;Z ~. ~/JcJ'He.l;
~ jp .:e~ -~.J:"9 .40.:h-e.jl
'iftNVi\1}Si'.4N3d
. ^~. '-'--"'r''''';.;
t 11\1"......'.' ""c ',- ,', "', I
fill;..; ;1\..),.} ~___~.- :'._"---:;~.) - ~I
28 : 11 U'1 f-J2 AON ~GOZ
l'u'..NJ.' ONOH10tld 3Hl :10
f\ < ^--1!"T1 '-1
3:)!:l:Il.,ru;:J Ii-
AMY], SHANK,
Plaintiff
vs,
) IN THE COURT OF COMMOM PLEAS OF
)
) CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
)
) CNIL ACTION - FAMILY DNISION
)
) NO,: 04-5551
)
CHARLES R. LAPINSKY, III,
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this day served a copy of the Custody Complaint and
Scheduling upon the person(s) and in the manner indicated below, which service satisfies the
requirement ofPa, R.C,P, 440:
Service by Facsimile and Certified First-Class Mail. Return Receipt Requested on
December 1,2004 addressed to:
Charles Lapinsky, III
823 Acri Drive
Mechanicsburg, P A 17050
I
SMITH, KLINGENSMITH & DOLAN
(")
~:~~~
'i:
;.2
<
.....
-~
t~::1
C':::>
.,#-:.-
o
-q
--I
..,..
ii'ip:
-r~rn
-;1 C)
;_..:: ,.L)
-r' -r',
<~~:1
,t;-,..
J;;
~<
C:,
f'l1
CJ
I
-.J
[.1
r...)
I _~ ____ _
. Complete items 1, 2, and 3, Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
. Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you,
. Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Charles Lapinsky,
823 Acri Drive
Mechanicsburg, PA
2. Article Number
(rransfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, August 2001
D. Is delivery address different from item 1?
If YES, enter delivery address below:
III
17050
3. Service Type
XX Certified Mail
D Registered
D Insured Mail
D Express Mail
D Return Receipt for Merchandise
DC.a.D.
&. CM+.'~n~ DmlimIT1 _. [U ~~ -.
7003 1680 0002 2752 8588
Domestic Return Receipt
102595-02-M-1540
U,S. Postal Service".
CERTIFIED MAIL, RECEIPT
(Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided)
. .. . . . .. . .
I OFFICIAL :USE I
Postage $ .60
Cerllfled Fee 2.30
Retum Reclept Fee Postmark
(Endorsement Required) 1. 75 Here
Restricted Delivery Fee 3.50
(Endorsement ReqUIred)
Total Postage & Feee $ 8.15
cO
cO
LT)
cO
ru
LT)
I"-
ru
ru
CJ
CJ
CJ
CJ
cO
.J]
r-'l
/TI
g _____~ ___ ~rl~_s ~?insky, III
I"- ~, A;it:li/O.; "8'23" ~rt -nnVe----m------------------------------
or PO Box No.
ciiY.-SiSi9:ZiP+4--Meefia.nies-btif-;-PA-----lt&50----------------
PS Form 3800. June 2002 See Reverse for Instructions
-:-~ 1\',
r,
.,1
()
~;
r--.;)
c::.)
<::7":)
.L-
a
rTl
(""J
I
--I
()
-1'1
::;:I
i'ilp
- rn
~SCJ
('~ r)
,'; ~:_~
;:..~\ n--j
"'TI
T'. )
~ ",: 1
--,
~
DEe 1 3 2004Y
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NIO. 04-5551 CIVIL TERM
AMY J. SHANK,
v.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
CHARLES R. LAPINSKY, III,
IN CUSTODY
Defendant
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this ~ day of December, 21004, upon consideration of the
attached Custody Conciliation Summary Report, it is hereby ordered and directed as
follows:
1. Leaal Custody. The parties, Amy J. Shank Bind Charles R. Lapinsky, III, shall
have shared legal custody of the minor child, Shane Robert Lapinsky, born October 14,
1991. Each parent shall have an equal right, to be exercislsd jointly with the other parent, to
make all major non-emergency decisions affecting the child's general well-being including,
but not limited to, all decisions regarding his health, educa1tion and religion. Pursuant to the
terms of 23 Pa. C. S. 95309, each parent shall be entitlE~d to all records and information
pertaining to the child including, but not limited to, medical, dental, religious or school
records, the residence address of the child and of the other parent. To the extent one
parent has possession of any such records or information, that parent shall be required to
share the same, or copies thereof, with the other parent within such reasonable time as to
make the records and information of reasonable use to the other parent. Pursuant to the
parties' rights of shared legal custody, the parties will coop1erate with signing the appropriate
release of information forms necessary in order to allow thE~ parents to speak with the child's
psychotherapist.
2. Physical Custody. Father shall have primary physical custody subject to
Mother's rights of partial custody which shall be arranged as follows:
A. On alternating weekends from Friday after school until Sunday at
5:00 p.m.
B. The Summer school recess.
C. Other additional periods of partial custody based on mutual
agreement and consent of the parties.
D. The parties shall share the holiday:s equally, with the exact
details to be agreed upon between them.
NO. 04-5551 CIVIL TERM
E. The parties shall equally divide all vacl:ltion periods from school,
other than Summer vacation, in as equal a manneir as possible, with these
details to be agreed upon between them.
3. The Custody Conciliation Conference shall reconvene on July 25, 2005 at
8:30 a.m. at the office of the Custody Conciliator, Melissa Peel Greevy, Esquire, 1901
State Street, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011. In the eVf:tnt the parties agree that they
do not need this additional Conciliation Conference, they shall each provide the
Conciliator written notice seven (7) days prior to the Cont c
BYTHE~d
((~/
, V\-
-----.
J.
Dist:
JoAnne Murphy, Esquire, PO Box 267, Elizabethtown, PA 17022 I\~ ~~ /1_... /L .1 /,;J.~ 1 {,"o'i
Charles R, Lapinsky, III, 823 Acri Drive, Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 -,-~ /r~
C}-
I .' '.
"~:"f"
,,1:
01 ::; /.' J
" ::J ("..., ...,
.: I ,I "i7 h ,~., J
. . ", '. 'il!Jr.
<::'/", -
5'jt; :J::7g~~~~li ~::
'-~,.. , -.
";':';'l~)
y
DEe 1 3 2004
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 04-5551 CIVIL TERM
AMY J. SHANK,
v.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
CHARLES R. LAPINSKY, III,
IN CUSTODY
Defendant
CUSTODY CONCILIATION SUMMARY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CUMBERLAND COUNTY RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
1915.3-8, the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following report:
1. The pertinent information concerning the child who is the subject of this
litigation is as follows:
NAME
DATE OF BIRTH
CURRENTLY IN THE CUSTODY OF
Shane Robert Lapinsky October 14, 1991
Falther
2, A Custody Conciliation Conference was held on December 3, 2004 following
Mother's filing of a Complaint for Custody on November 3, 2004. Present for the conference
were: the Mother, Amy J. Shank, and her counsel JoAnne Murphy, Esquire; the Father,
Charles R. Lapinsky, III, attended pro se.
I:J- /
De -e I ()<f
l jMt.
Melissa Peel Greevy, Esquire
Custody Conciliator
r as attached.
&~
3.
The parties reached an agreement in the form
!
:240702
Plaintiff
RECEIVED AUG 23 Z005f
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO, 04-5551 CIVIL TERM
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN CUSTODY
AMY J, SHANK,
v.
CHARLES R. LAPINSKY, III,
Defendant
CUSTODY CONCILIATION SUMMARY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CUMBERLAND COUNTY RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
1915,3-8, the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following report:
1. The pertinent information concerning the child who is the subject of this
litigation is as follows:
NAME
DATE OF BIRTH
CURRENTLY IN THE CUSTODY OF
Shane Robert Lapinsky October 14, 1991
Father
2. The parties' second Custody Conciliation Conference was held on August 5,
2005 as agreed at the December 3, 2004 conference. Present for the Conference were:
the Mother, Amy J, Shank, who attended pro se, and the Father, Charles R. Lapinski, III,
attended pro se.
3. The parties have clearly been working diligently to have consistent
expectations of the child with regard to grades and following rules. They are also making a
serious effort to be consistent with regard to the kind of music that he brings into the home.
Both are concerned about the lyrics of the rap CD's which he likes to listen to because they
find the language offensive for a number of reasons, Both report that the relationship with
the step-mother has improved. Both intend to follow through with school expectations this
fall. Father also anticipates a return to working with Mike Dunlevy at the Philhaven office in
Harrisburg. After some discussion, the parties agreed to leave the December 15, 2004
Custody Order in place, It was noted that there had been a previous Order issued in
Dauphin County, Pennsylvania to Docket No. 1963-S-199€i. It is the parties' mutual
NO. 04-5551 CIVIL TERM
agreement that the proper venue for this custody matter shall be retained in Cumberland
County, Pennsylvania and that Dauphin County Court should have no further jurisdiction in
this matter. ~
~{2& \..~.l ~
te Melissa Pee reevy, Esquire
Custody Conciliator
Disl. ,;(my J, Shank, 534 Indian Rock Circle, Elizabethtown, PA 17022
"...eharles R. Lapinski, III, 823 Acri Drive, Mechanicsburg, PA 17050
./Dauphin County Court Administrator, Dauphin County Courthouse, Front & Market Streets, Harrisburg, PA 17101
:256398
\/;!\,t/ r:l, l,,:~,; '-.j ~'J .:::(]
A1Nr(i:-", .-:! ,~:~;:~iV'~nJ
98 :8 Hd 82 5fW SOUZ
AtlV10i,UjJDdd 3Hl :10
38:,HO--a3ll:J