HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-0894LAW OFFICES
SNELBAKER.
BRENNEMAN
& SPARE
MARY W. TARK,
Plaintiff,
VS.
EVELYN KAREN ROGERS
SMITH,
Defendant.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
No: 02- ~C~// CIVIL TERM
CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILD
COMPLAINT FOR CUSTODY
AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff, MARY W. TARK, by her attorneys, Snelbaker,
Brenneman & Spare, P.C., and avers the following:
1. The Plaintiff is Mary W. Tark, an adult individual residing at 1390 Simpson Ferry
Road, New Cumberland, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17070.
2. The Defendant is Evelyn Karen Rogers Smith, an adult individual residing at 300
East 13th Street, Apartment 502, Woodbine, Georgia 31569.
3. Plaintiff seeks to confirm legal and physical custody of the following child:
Present Residence
malTle
TYLER WAYNE CHANCEY
1390 Simpson Ferry Road
New Cumberland, PA 17070
The child was bom in wedlock.
Age
12 years
(D.O.B.: 2/11/90)
The child is presently in the custody of Plaintiff at the residence listed in
Paragraph 1 above.
During the last five (5) years, the child resided with the following persons and at
LAW OffICES
SNEIBAKeR
BRENNEMAN
& SPARE
the following addresses:
(1)
Persons Addresses
Plaintiff and her husband, 1390 Simpson Ferry Road
Kyung J. Tark New Cumberland, PA
Dates.
1990 to present
currently resides with the following persons:
Name
Tyler Wayne Chancey
Kyung Tark
The mother of the child is the Defendant, Evelyn Karen Rogers Smith.
The father of the child is Ronald Wayne Chancey, who died as a result of an
automobile accident in Georgia on January 30, 2002.
The mother and father were divorced by Final Judgment and Decree dated May
27, 1992 in an action docketed in the Superior Court for the county of Pierce, State of Georgia in
Civil Action File No: 91 CV-165. A copy of said Final Decree and Judgment is attached hereto
as Exhibit "A". The final Decree provides, in pertinent part:
"Permalaent LEGAL custody of the minor child of the parties, namely;
TYLER WAYNE CHANCEY, born February 11, 1990, is hereby awarded
to the Pl~tintiff, RONALD WAYNE CHANCEY, subject to reasonable
visitation rights for the Defendant."
The relationship of Plaintiff to the child is that of paternal grandmother. She
Relationship
Grandson
Spouse
5. The relationship of Defendant to the child is that of mother. She currently resides
with unknown persons in Georgia.
6. Plaintiff has not participated as a witness in other litigation concerning the
-2-
LAW OFFICES
SNELBAKER.
BRENNEMAN
& SPARE
custody of the child in another court. Plaintiff has no information of a custody proceeding
concerning the child pending in a court of this Commonwealth. Plaintiff is not aware of any
other custody proceedings in any other jurisdiction, except for the Final Decree mentioned in
Paragraph 3 above.
Plaintiff does not know of a person not a party to the proceedings who has
physical custody of the child or claims to have custody or visitation rights with respect to the
child.
7. The best interest and permanent welfare of the child will be served by granting the
relief requested because Plaintiff has provided a stable and permanent home environment for the
child for more than ten (10) years. Both before and after the untimely death of the child's father,
Plaintiff has demonstrated that she is uniquely qualified, willing and able to properly care for the
child. The child has special needs which are being addressed by the Plaintiff, the West Shore
School District and other local providers of such services.
8. Each parent whose parental rights to the child have not been terminated and the
~erson who has physical custody of the child have been named as parties to this action. All other
~ersons, named below who are know to have or claim a right to custody or visitation of the child
rill be given notice of the pendency of this action and the right to intervene: None.
9. Plaintiff has genuine care and concem for the child.
10. Plaintiff's relationship with the child began with the consent of a parent.
11. Plaintiff'has assumed the role and responsibility of the child's parent by providing
-3-
LAW OFFICES
SNELBAKER.
BRENNEMAN
& SPARe
for the physical, emotional and social needs of the child for more than ten (10) years. Plaintiff
has assumed responsibility for the child because said child would be substantially at risk due to
parental abuse, neglect and other reasons.
Defendant is unable to properly care for the child. Defendant has had ver~ little
interaction with the child over the past ten (10) years.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests your Honorable Court to confirm and grant her sole
legal and physical custody of TYLER WAYNE CHANCEY.
Date: ~ ~/ 2002.
Respectfully submitted,
SNELBAKER, BRENNEMAN & SPARE, P.C.
By:
~'Phil(~ H~ire
Pa. Supreme Court I.D. No: 65200
44 West Main Street
P.O. Box 318
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-0318
(717) 697-8528
Attorneys for Plaintiff
-4-
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR ~IE COUITI~
OF PIERCE, STATE OF GEORGIA
RONALD WAYNE CHANCEY,
Plaintiff,
Vs.,
EVELYN KAREN CIIARCEY,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION, .
COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE
FINAI.~ JUDGHENTAND DECREE
The above and foregoing matter coming on to be heard at this
time, no issuable defense having been filed by the Defendant, and
more than forty-five (45) days having elapsed from the time the
complaint was served on the Defendant; and upon consideration of
this case upon evidence submitted as provided by law, it is the
Judgment of the Court that a total divorce be granted, that ks to
say a divorce a vinculo matrimonii to the parties, upon legal
principles.
And it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED and DECREED by the Court that
the marriage contract heretofore entered into between the parties
to this case, from and after this date, be and ,is set aside and
dissolved as fully and effectually as if no such contract had
ever been 'made or entered into and Plaintiff and Defendant,
fo£merly husband and wife, in the future shall be held and
considered as separate and distinct persons altogether un-
connected by any nuptial union or civil contract whatsoever, and
both shall have the right to remarry.
· Permanent LEGAL custody of the minor child of the parties,
namely; TI~.~R WAFNE CHANCE~, born February 11, 1990, is hereby
I. of,c,
EXHIBIT A
')f--
GEORGIA, PIERCE COUNTY.
Personally appeared RONALD WAYNE CHANCEY before the under-
signed officer duly authorized to administer oaths, who, after
being sworn deposes and on oath says:
On May 27, 1992, I was granted a divorce from my wife in
the Superior Court of Pierce County, Georgia. A copy of said
Final Judgment and Decree is attached to this affidavit.
Said Decree vested legal custody of my minor child, Tyler
Wayne Chancey, in myself. I hereby grant unto my mother, Mary
Tark, the right ~o assist in the rearing and supervision of said
minor child, including the right to seek medical attention for
th~ child, or anything else necessary or needful for the up-
bringing of said child.
Sworn to and subs!cribed
before me, this 27th day
of May, 1992.
NotaWy ~Pu51ic: ' J ~ '
Exhibit A
(P. 2 of 2)
LAW OFFICES
SNELBAKER,
BRENNEMAN
& SPARe
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in this Complaint are true and correct. I understand that
false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. § 4904 relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date:
February 20 ~002.
MARY W. TARK
PLAINTIFF
V.
EVELYN KAREN ROGERS SMITH
DEFENDANT
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
: 02-894 CIVIL ACTION LAW
:
: IN CUSTODY
AND NOW, Tuesday, February 26, 2002 , upon consideration of the attached Complaint,
it is hereby directed that parties and their respective counsel appear before Dawn S. Sunday, Esq. , the conciliator,
at 39 West Main Street, Mechaniesbur§, PA 17055 on Thursday, March 21, 2002 at 8:30 AM
for a Pre-Hearing Custody Conference. At such conference, an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or
if this cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the court, and to enter into a temporary
order. All children age five or older may also be present at the conference. Failure to appear at the conference may
provide grounds for entry of a temporary or permanent order.
The court hereby directs the parties to furnish any and all existing Protection from Abuse orders,
Special Relief orders, and Custody orders to the conciliator 48 hours prior to scheduled hearing.
FOR THE COURT,
By: /s/ Dawn S. Sunday. Esq.
Custody Conciliator
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law to comply with the Americans
with Disabilites Act of 1990. For information about accessible facilities and reasonable accommodations
available to disabled individuals having business before the court, please contact our office. All arrangements
must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business before the court. You must attend the
scheduled conference or hear/ng.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR ATTORNEY AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE AN ATTORNEY OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET
FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Cumberland County Bar Association
2 Liberty Avenue
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
Telephone (717) 249-3166
MARY W. TARK,
Plaintiff :
:
vs. : 02-894
:
EVELYN KAREN ROGERS SMITH, :
Defendant :
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION LAW
IN CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 2~ day of __~O~)~._ , 2002,
upon consideration of the attached Custody Conciliation Report, it is ordered and directed as follows:
I. The Paternal Grandmother, Mary W. Tark, shall have sole legal and primary physical
custody of Tyler Wayne Chancey, bom February 1 I, 1990.
2. The Mother, Evelyn Karen Rogers Smith, may have periods of supervised visitation with the
Child as arranged by agreement of the parties.
cc: Philip H. Spare, Esquire - Counsel for Paternal Grandmother
Evelyn K.Rogers Smith, Mother
MARY W. TARK,
Plaintiff
VS.
EVELYN KAREN ROGERS SMITH,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
02-894
CIVIL ACTION LAW
IN CUSTODY
CUSTODY CONCH,IATION SUMMARY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CUMBERLAND COUNTY RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 1915.3-8, the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following report:
1. The pertinent information concerning the Child who is the subject of this litigation is as
follows:
NAME
DATE OF BIRTH
CURRENTLY IN CUSTODY OF
Tyler Wayne Chancey
February 11, 1990
Plaintiff-Paternal Grandmother
2. A Conciliation Conference was held on March 21, 2002, which was attended by the Paternal
Grandmother, Mary W. Tark, and her counsel, Philip H. Spare, Esquire. The Mother, Evelyn Karen
Rogers Smith resides in Georgia and did not attend the Conference or contact the Conciliator. The
Paternal Grandmother's counsel served the Mother with notice by restricted certified mail accepted by
the Mother on March 6, 2002. The biological Father of the Child is deceased.
3. The Paternal Grandmother stated at the Conference that the Child, who is now 11 years old,
has resided with her for over 10 years. She indicated further that the Child has had contact with the
Mother 4 times in the last 10 years, with the most recent time being at the Father's funeral on February
2, 2002. The Grandmother spoke with the Mother by telephone prior to the Conference but indicated
that the Mother did not raise an objection to the Grandmother's request for custody during that
conversation. The Child is in the 6th grade at Lemoyne Middle School. According to the
Grandmother, the Child is doing well in school and is involved in many activities. The Child has
special needs resulting from a form of autism which require that he maintain a strict regular routine.
The Grandmother expressed concerns regarding the Mother's ability to provide proper care for the
Child and to ensure his safety and well-being.
Date
4. The Conciliator recommends an Order in the form as attached based upon representations
made by the Paternal Grandmother and the fact that the Mother did not attend the Conference or
contact the Conciliator.
Dawn S. Sunday, Esquire 0t
Custody Conciliator