HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-0393
JAMES L. GETTEL,
Plaintiff
v.
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 05- 393 Cu~
SCOTT B. PECK,
Defendant
: IN 1M' "lx:
NOTICE
YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the claims
set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this
Complaint and Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by
attorney and filing in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set
forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without
you and a judgment may be entered against you by the Court without further notice for
any money claimed in the Complaint of for any other claim or relief requested by the
Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Cumberland County Bar Association
2 Liberty Avenue
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 249-3166
'II
,
,
JAMES L. GETTEL,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 05-
: IN EQUITY
v.
SCOTT B. PECK,
Defendant
COMPLAINT
1. Plaintiff is James L. Gettel, an adult individual who resides at 113 Hershey
Road, No.6, Shippensburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 17257.
2. Defendant is Scott B. Peck, an adult individual who resides at 300
Thomey Grove Road, Shippensburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17257.
3. Plaintiff is the owner of real property located on Thomey Grove Road,
Southampton Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania with an assigned tax
parcel number of 39-15-0177-019. See Tax Map, Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
4. Defendant is the owner of real property located at 300 Thomey Grove
Road, Southampton Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, with an assigned
tax parcel number of 39-15-0177-020, which property adjoins the property owned by the
Plaintiff as described in Paragraph 3 above.
5. The current tax map and prior maps show Thomey Grove Road as
extending through both the Defendant's property and the Plaintiff's property.
6. Plaintiff's sole means of vehicular access to his property is by way of
Thomey Grove Road, a private road extending from Means Hollow Road through the
Defendant's property.
7. Plaintiff purchased this property from his grandmother pursuant to a deed
dated October 30, 2000 and recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds in and for
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, at Deed Book 233, Page 564.
8. Plaintiff's grandparents had purchased the property pursuant to a deed
dated May 10, 1963 and recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds in and for
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, at Deed Book "V", Volume 20, Page 795.
9. While he owned the property, Plaintiff's grandfather visited the property
using Thomey Grove Road at least annually to check postings and look for damage, cut
trees, etc.
10. Since purchasing the property in 2000, Plaintiff has visited the property
using Thomey Grove Road about monthly to inspect the property and to hike through
the woods.
11. While building a house on Defendant's property, Defendant dumped a
large quantity of earth on Thomey Grove Road. He later installed a locking gate across
it, thereby blocking the road and denying Plaintiff vehicular access to Plaintiff's property.
12. In a conversation between Plaintiff and Defendant early in 2004, prior to
the installation of the gate, Defendant promised Plaintiff that he would move the dirt and
restore Thomey Grove Road.
13. Plaintiff has contacted Defendant several times by telephone since
installation of the gate to request that it be removed or otherwise modified to allow
Plaintiff access to his property.
14. Defendant has refused Plaintiff's requests and has left the gate intact.
Plaintiff is still unable to drive a vehicle onto his property.
WHEREFORE, for all the above reasons, the Plaintiff, James L. Gettel,
respectfully requests that this honorable court declare that Plaintiff has a prescriptive
easement on that part of Thomey Grove Road extending across Defendant's property,
that Defendant restore Thomey Grove Road to provide Plaintiff with vehicular access to
his property, and that Defendant reimburse Plaintiff for all attorney's fees and costs of
suit.
1/;).1 /p~
Date I I
Respectfully Submitted
TURO LAW OFFICES
.~
s
"
~
~
:i
'1'1
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in the foregoing Complaint are true and correct.
I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18
Pa.C.S. ~4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
\b,J~
Date I ,
~'K P
- ~'
~CJ
y
0-"
0\
~'
-S{
e><")
----
~..
C/>
c::
f'._,>
(;~~,
r.:;) -'1
;,'J",!
C~ ~--:-J
".,. Ih
r-.,
r,,)
(;"1
l""l
\t?\)
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBELRAND COUNTY - PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES L. GETTLE
: No. 05-393 Civil
Plaintiff
: Civil Action - Law
vs
SCOTT B. PECK
Defendant
NOTICE TO PLEAD
You are hereby notified to file a written response to the enclosed Answer
with New Matter and Counterclaim within twenty (20) days from service hereof
or a judgment may be entered against you.
I~~
< H. Anthony Adams
Attorney for the Defendant
Supreme Court I.D. No. 25502
49 W. Orange Street
Suite 3
Shippensburg, PA 17257
(717)532- 3270
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBELRAND COUNIY - PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES L. GETTLE
: No. 05-393 Civil
Plaintiff
: Civil Action - Law
vs
SCOTT B. PECK
Defendant
ANSWER
Now come the Defendant, Scott B. Peck, by and through his attorney, H.
Anthony Adams, and set forth the following:
1.
Admitted
2.
Admitted
3.
Admitted
4.
Admitted
5.
Admitted
~
6.
Denied, the Plaintiff's actual access to his property in from another
location believed to be Gum Run Road.
7.
Admitted, however Defendant has no actual knowledge of the truth of the
matter averred.
8.
Admitted, however Defendant has no actual knowledge of the truth of the
matter averred.
9.
Denied, Thorny Grove Road until recent improvement was little more than
a logging trail usable only by ATV or horse.
10.
Denied, Plaintiff would on occasion use the road to a point near
defendant's land but would walk to the land of Defendant. Plaintiff most
frequently used the actual access road to the property.
11.
Admitted
12.
Admitted Defendant agreed to grant a license to the Plaintiff to cross his
land.
13.
Admitted, but never mentioned gate.
14.
Admitted, that Defendant will not allow access. Plaintiff can enter his
property by the alternate route.
New Matter
15.
The land owned by the Plaintiff and Defendant is unenclosed woodland
and no prescriptive rights can be obtained.
Wherefore, Defendant prays your Honorable Court enter judgment in his
favor and againt Plaintiff.
Respectfully submitted,
!\ ~.e--'> ~~
H. Anthony Adams, Esquire
Attorney for Defendant
49 W. Orange Street, Suite 3
Shippensburg, PA 17257
(717)-532-3270
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in this answer are true and correct. I
understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18
Pa. C.S. Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date: /1)1 j&s
~~-/3.-&-
SCOlT B. PECK
I"
. ..'
Ii
"
,
JAMES L. GETTEL,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 05-393
v.
SCOTT B. PECK,
Defendant
: Civil Action - Law
PRAECIPE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Please settle, withdraw and discontinue the above-captioned matter on behalf of
the Plaintiff.
Respectfully Submitted
TURO LAW OFFICES
3-/0-DS
Date
.~
J
I
I
II
'I'
I
JAMES L. GETTEL,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
: NO. 05-393
SCOTT B. PECK,
Defendant
: Civil Action - Law
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I served a true and correct copy of the Praecipe to Withdraw
upon H. Anthony Adams, Esquire, by depositing same in the United States Mail, first
class, postage pre-paid on the 10th day of March, 2005, from Carlisle, Pennsylvania,
addressed as follows:
H. Anthony Adams, Esquire
49 W. Orange Street, Suite 3
Shippensburg, PA 17257
TURO LAW OFFICES
-}-~
J
()
~...;,
i"i
(...;";
SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR
CASE NO: 2005-00393 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
GETTEL JAMES L
VS
PECK SCOTT B
SHANNON SHERTZER
Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law,
says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE
was served upon
PECK SCOTT B
the
DEFENDANT
, at 1755:00 HOURS, on the 4th day of February
2005
at 300 THORNEY GROVE ROAD
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257
by handing to
SCOTT PECK
a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE
together with
and at the same time directing His attention to the contents thereof.
Sheriff's Costs:
Docketing
Service
Affidavit
Surcharge
So Answers:
18.00
14.80
.00
10.00
.00
42.80
,?,''''''::'~i:;;;:::>,.",:,,: ..l~~~
R. Thomas Kline
Sworn and Subscribed to before
02/07/2005
JAMES ROBINSON
(' Ju' L r~/7
.... . " ',/ ,.,.,/
. '14'VL ". ,) V
IJ'~puty Sheri f
By:
;L
me this I - day of
j'-G~ dlTo; A.D.
('-Ai~ Q. h, C~/' ,".2/,4
rothonotary
'.
.'
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY - PENNSYL VANIA
James L. Gett~
Plaintiff
v.
: NO. 05-393 Civil
Civil Action - Law
Scott B. Peck,
Defendant
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
TO PROTHONOTARY:
Enter my appearance for the Plaintiff James L. Gettle i
John Broujos, Esquire
,
. ROU ros & GILROY, P.c.
At y LD. No. 06268
4 North Hanover Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
717/243-4574; 717/766-1690
FAX 7117/243-8227
June 6, 2005
TO PROTHONOTARY:
Withdraw my appearance as attorney for James L.Get~in the above-captioned case.
~>AAA .
J sM. Rob' son, Esquire
RO LAW FFICES
28 S. Pitt Street
Carlisle, P A 17013
245 9688
c: H. Anthony Adams, Esquire
Attorney for Defendant
49 W. Orange Street
Shippensburg, P A 17257
"
.'
"j
~
,....,
=
=
CJ1.
S
9.
--<
X-n
rnp
-.-ltr
:0<.;'
(~:~ C:-;
:'--"'""1".
- -:,
~;Z C')
"'~rn
0.
."-~\
~~D
'-<
N
-
--c
f';?
\D
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY - PENNSYL VANIA
James L. Gettfll
Plaintiff
: NO. 05-393 Civil
Civil Action - Law
v.
Scott B. Peck
Defendant
PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO NEW MATTER
Plaintiff through his attorney John H. Broujos, of Broujos & Gilroy, PC sets forth the
following Answer to New Matter.
15. Denied: the land is not unenclosed woodland. Denied that no prescriptive right
could be obtained. On the contrary a prescriptive right and other remedies are available
to Plaintiff.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays the Honorable Court to enter a judgment in Plaintiff's
favor and against the Defendant.
R
John . Broujos, Esquir
Atto J.D. No. 06268
4 N. Hanover Street
Carlisle, P A 17013
(717) 243-4574; (717) 766-1690
Fax: (717) 243-8227
. -
VERIFICATION
1 verifY that the statements made in this answer are true and correct. I understand that
false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904
relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
DATE:_ }';JI1e J 3-05
I_A_.~l ~.J
F" Gettue
. -
, .
(")
C.
",
:g
U'I
Lc
~:i::-~
N
-.l
r.c_,
o
"
:r-n
hl""-
. r.;:i
-,
2;~:
"n
r:';'
<:-'S
in
en
CO