Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-0935 ROBERT L. BEAR Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. o)~- r,JJ~ CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR Defendant IN DIVORCE NOTICE TO DEFEND AND CLAIM RIGHTS YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the following pages, you must take prompt action. You are warned that if you fail to do so, the case may proceed without you and a decree of divorce or armulment may be entered against you by the Court. A judgment may also be entered against you for any other claim or relief requested in these papers by the Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you, including custody or visitation of your children. When the ground for divorce is indignities or irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, you may request marriage counseling. A list of marriage counselors is available in the Office of the Prothonotary, Cumberland County Courthouse, One Courthouse Square, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013. IF YOU DO NOT FILE A CLAIM FOR ALIMONY, DIVISION OF PROPERTY, LA WYERS'S FEES OR EXPENSES BEFORE A DIVORCE OR ANNULMENT IS GRANTED, YOU MAY LOSE THE RIGHT TO CLAIM ANY OF THEM. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. Cumberland County Bar Association 32 South Bedford St. Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 249-3166 OR (800) 990-9108 ROBERT L. BEAR Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. GALE G. BEAR Defendant CIVIL ACTION - LAW IN DIVORCE COMPLAINT I. Plaintiff is Robert L. Bear, who currently resides at 201 Potato Road, Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 2. Defendant is Gale G. Bear, who currently resides at 1166 Rhoda Boulevard Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 3. The Plaintiff and Defendant have been bona fide residents in the Commonwealth for at least six (6) months immediately previous to the filing of this Complaint. 4. The Plaintiff and Defendant were married on December 14, 1958. COUNT I - DIVORCE 5. Paragraphs I through 4 ofthis Complaint are incorporated herein by reference as though set forth in full. 6. There have been no prior actions of divorce or for annulment between the parties. 7. Divorce is sought pursuant to the provisions of the Divorce Code, S S 330 I (a)(2), 3301(a)(6), and 3301(d), in that: a. The Defendant committed adultery. b. The Defendant offered such indignities to the Plaintiff as to render Plaintiffs condition intolerable and life burdensome. c. Plaintiff and Defendant have lived separate and apart since June II, 1972, and continue to do so. 8. Plaintiff has been advised that counseling is available and that Plaintiff may have the right to request that the court require the parties ~to participate in such counseling. 9. Plaintiff requests that the court require the parties to participate in counseling, pursuant to 9s330I(a), 3301(d) and 3302 of the Divorce Code. 10. The Plaintiff in this action is not a member of the Armed forces. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff requests the Court to enter a decree of Divorce. COUNT 11- EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION II. Paragraphs I through 10 of this Complaint are incorporated herein by reference as though set forth in full. 12. Plaintiff and Defendant have acquired property, both real and personal, during their marriage, which property is "marital property". 13. Plaintiff and Defendant may have owned, prior to marriage, property which has increased in value during the marriage and/or which has been exchanged for other property, which has increased in value during the marriage, all of which property is "marital property". 14. Plaintiff and Defendant have been unable to agree as to an equitable division of said property prior to the filing of this Complaint. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff requests this Honorable Court to equitably divide all marital property. Respectfully submitted, ~~J~ ;J,00 r -RJJ:c LL/ Robert L. Bear, pro se 201 Potato Road Carlisle, PAl 70 13 VERIFICATION I, Robert L. Bear, verify that the statements made in this petition are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to t1Je penalties of 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. S 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. ,f;~ LLv Robert L. Bear ~ ~ (\ ~ ~ \-, - .::t:: ~ ~ 4 ~ <> ....... J c U 0\ ~t\ ~ , ~ '" r;'\ (') ,-no ~~ -' ~~:, -i~:\?";(~ ',:'\ C _,.1 \".J ROBERT L. BEAR Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA v. GALE G. BEAR Defendant CIVIL ACTION - LAW 05- '135 c,'v,! IN DIVORCE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Robert L. Bear, hereby certify that a copy of the Complaint for Divorce, directed to Defendant, was served upon Defendant at Defendant's residence, 1166 Rhoda Boulevard, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 this JA1:day of J1 KI\.Cf' ,2005, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, and certified mail, return receipt requested, pursuant to Pa. C.R.P. 1930.4(c). 12 ~~ Ilu-J Robert L. Bear, pro se 201 Potato Road Carlisle, P A 17013 r--" -,"" .--\ ~....1. . . ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant : NO. 05-935 : IN DIVORCE NOTICE TO PLEAD You are hereby notified to file a written response to the within Counterclaim within twenty days (20) days from service hereof or a judgment may be entered against you. ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant : NO. 05-935 : IN DIVORCE ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM I. Admitted. 2. Admitted. 3. Admitted. 4. Admitted. 5. Admitted. 6. Admitted. 7. Admitted in part. Denied in part. a. Denied. It is denied that Defendant committed adultery. b. Denied. It is denied that Defendant offered any indignities whatsoever to Plaintiff or acted in any way to cause Plaintiff s condition to be intolerable or life burdensome. c. Admitted. 8. Admitted. 9. Denied. It is denied that counseling is appropriate in this case. It is further averred that the parties have been separated for nearly thirty-three (33) years, that the Plaintiff has been repeatedly found guilty of criminal violations for harassment and other matters directed toward the Defendant and that the Plaintiff s request for counseling is solely based upon a desire to further harass Defendant. 10. Admitted. WHEREFORE, Defendant requests your Honorable Court to enter a Decree. EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION II. Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's paragraphs I through 10 of this Complaint are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in their full text. 12. Admitted in part. Denied in part. It is admitted that Plaintiff and Defendant acquired real and personal property during their marriage. It is averred, however, that over the past thirty-three (33) years of their separation they have mutually agreed to dispose of all marital property in a marmer that was acceptable and agreed upon by both parties and, as such, no marital property exists. 13. Admitted in part. Denied in part. It is admitted that Plaintiff and Defendant owned property prior to their marriage which may have increased in value or which may have been exchanged for other property. It is denied, however, that any such property exists now. It is averred, rather, that during the parties' thirty-three (33) years of separation they have mutually agreed upon the distribution of all of their marital property and all marital property has been distributed accordingly; as such, no marital property exists. 14. Denied. It is denied that Plaintiff and Defendant have been unable to agree to an equitable division of their property prior to filing the Complaint. It is averred, rather, that, in fact, Plaintiff and Defendant have over their thirty-three (33) years of separation appropriately distributed all of their marital property to their mutual . . satisfaction and agreement and no such marital property exists at this time for purposes of distribution. WHEREFORE, Defendant requests your Honorable Court to dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint. COUNTERCLAIM ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES AND NOW, comes Defendant, Gale G. Bear, and files the following Counterclaim to Plaintiff's Complaint. 15. Defendant's Answers to pmagraph I through 14 of Plaintiffs Complaint are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in their full text. 16. By mutual agreement, sometimes at the request of Defendant, sometimes at the request of Plaintiff, the parties disposed of all of their marital property over the past thirty-three (33) years during their separation. 17. The distribution of marital property that the parties agreed upon was done by their mumal agreement and include a distribution to fmnily members and to third party purchasers for value. 18. At each time of distribution of the property neither party made any claim against the other for additional benefit or entitlement to said property. 19. The only reason that the issue of equitable distribution has been raised in this matter by Plaintiff is to create additional confrontation and cost for Defendant, as Plaintiff represents himself pro se and presumably will have limited costs associated with pursuing this matter. 20. Defendant does not have the necessary background to pursue this matter pro se and must retain counsel. . . 21. Defendant has retained Bradley 1. Griffie, Esquire and the law firm of Griffie & Associates to represent her in this matter at an hourly rate of $250.00 per hour, which rate will be charged for all services rendered in these proceedings. 22. Plaintiff has no attorney's fees associated with this matter and has raised issues which now must be addressed through these pleadings and other proceedings, which are groundless and have no basis in law or fact. 23. Plaintiff is better able to bear the cost of Defendant's attorney's fees in this case. WHEREFORE, Defendant requests your Honorable Court to enter an Order requiring Plaintiff to pay Defendant's attorney's fees, costs and expenses associated with these proceedings. Respectfully submitted, ~,.- . 0 ) D e . Grif., , Esquire ey for Defendant GRIFFIE & ASSOCIATES 200 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-5551 (800) 347-5552 <' VERIFICATION I verify that the statements made in the foregoing document are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities. DATE:) / 16J Do( 1 -1~.J&~ 'GaleG.Be~,Defendant ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant : NO. 05-935 : IN DIVORCE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Tl( I, Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire, hereby certify that I did, the ~ day of March, 2005, cause a copy of Defendant's Answer and Counterclaim to be served upon Plaintiff by certified mail, restricted delivery at the following addresses: Robert L. Bear 201 Potato Road Carlisle, P A 17013 - DATE: 3 II b) 0 ~ Ie, Esquire ad, or Defendant GRIFFIE & ASSOCIATES 200 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717)243-5551 (800)347-5552 " J- 7J r ''::l \;t:- 'ct":: \..) ,'. ~" :.;'< " <'""-1 _\ , ,~ "J- :;,,, ,:--, ,. , >M -------- ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs. CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant : NO. 05-935 : IN DIVORCE NOTICE If you wish to deny any of the statements set forth in the attached affidavit, you must file a counter-affidavit within twenty days after this Affidavit has been served on you or the statements will be admitted. AFFIDAVIT UNDER 113301(d) OF THE DIVORCE CODE I. The parties to this action separated since June II, 1972 and have continued to live separate and apart since that time. 2. The marriage is irretrievable broken. 3. I understand that I may lose rights concerning alimony, division of property, lawyer's fees or expenses if I do not claim them before a divorce is granted. I verify that the stah:ments made in the foregoing document are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities. DATE: 3//0 J 0 ) {JciitJ. ~.i GALE G. BEAR, Plaintiff ROBERT L. BEAR, : IN THE COURT OF COMMO PLEAS OF Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, P NNSYL VANIA vs. : CNIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, : NO. 05-935 Defendant : IN DNORCE Request for change of venue due to the divine judgment of "the Suprem Judge of the world" (The Declaration ofIndependence) upon the Cumberland County Co rt and its "falsely so called" (1 Timothy 6:20) "Honorable Judges of said court." "Do you know what 1 suggest? If you would take that (tape recorder) ho e and bury it on your farm,!lnd ifYQu would repent, you would have your wife back." (Refi rmed Mennonite Bishop Earl M. Basinger propositioning me on behalf of Menno Simons (1496- 561) and all Reformed Mennonites, April15, 1973.) "The Supreme Judge of the world" judges from his Supreme Law Book: "Thus wer they defiled by their own works, and went awhoring with their own inventions." (Psalm 106:39) And he was withdrawn from them about a stone's cast and kneeled down, and pray , saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done. nd there appeared an angel unto him from heaven, strengthening him. And being in an agony he prayed ore earnestly: and his sweat was as if it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground. (St. Luke 22: 1-44) Then saith Pilate unto him, Speakest thou not unto me? Knowest thou not that I ha e power to crucify thee, and have power to release thee? Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at II against me, except it were given thee from above -. (St. John 19:10, II) But they cried, saying, Crucify him, crucify him. (St. John 23:21) Reformed Mennonite shunning "wife" Gale Gross Bear had "power - given thee fro above" soon after my excommunication June 11, 1972 to boldly boast, "What can you do? 1 have th whole church behind me." Reformed Mennonites said, in effect "Crucify him, crucify him" as a hu band, a father to six young and helpless children and as a meaningful human being, as Gale Gross Bear "we t awhoring." The Cumberland County Court and its "falsely so called" "Honorable Judges of sai court" also had "power - given thee from above" to judge ever since June 23, 1976; Reformed Mennon' es who fulfill an American Heritage definition of whores: "To offer oneself or another for sexual hire" a e merely practicing Mennonite "fully warranted -love and concern." "The Supreme Judge of the world" commands in the Supreme Law Book: Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which t y ought not, for filthy lucre's sake. (Titus I: II) Why was it any more "in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" (1 Corinth ans 5:4) for Menno Simons and his Reformed Mennonite "evil men and seducers" (2 T othy 3:13) to demand their Mennonite price of "repent" before they would "Give me m wife - that 1 may go in unto her"; (Genesis 29:21) than it was "fully warranted -love and co cern" to demand dollars in the name of prostitution before "I may go in unto her?" After 450 years of Mennonites subverting "whole houses," the "mouths" of Gale Gr ss Bear, all Mennonites, Amish, their supporting cast of characters and the Cumberland County Curt, are "stopped"! Not one, "not only in this worid, but also in that which is to come, (Ephesians 1:21) can' take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God" (Ephesians 6: 17) and d fend 450 years of Menno Simons and his "evil men and seducers" (2 Timothy 3:13) who "went awhoring" in the name of Christ. God looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any th did seek God. Everyone of them is gone back: They are altogether become filthy; there is none that d eth good, no, not one (Psalm 53:2, 3) Will there be "none that doeth good, no, not one" who will obey "the gospel of God" Romans I: I) commanding all: "Provide things honest in the sight of all men;" (Romans 12: 17) then p blicly call for and end 450 years of Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness by Mennonites w 0 "went awhoring" and seduced wives of their victims to go "awhoring" with them? Will any publicly confess they have no "power - given thee from above" to defend 45 years of Mennonites who "went awhoring"? Will any publicly confess, all they have is "power - iven thee from above" to "flee" from facing the terrible truth and prove; "God in not a man, that he sh uld lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? Or hath he spok n, and shall he not make it good? (Numbers 23:19) One thousand shall flee at the rebuke of one. (Isaiah 30: 17) Is it possible? All who march under the banner of Mennonitism as being the same as marching under the banner of Christ, also their supporting friends, will not any be honest enough to pub icly confess the terrible truth, but will "flee" from this truth? "The Supreme Judge of the world" judges: "Verily I say unto you That the publicans and harlots go into the kingdom of God before you. (St. Matthew 21 :31) Will "harlots" who only sell sex for money "go into the kingdom of God before you" ennonites and Amish stop Menno Simons and his "evil men and seducers" (2 Timothy 3:13) selling "ma ried" sex in the name of Christ for the Mennonite demanded price of "falsely so called" (1 Timothy 6:20) Mennonite "repent"? Nothing is so good for an ignorant man as silence; and if he was sensible of this he wo Idn't be ignorant. (Saadi) True to Saadi's words, by their silence don't Mennonites and Amish prove they aren' ignorant of how Menno Simons and his "evil men and seducers" "went awhoring" for 450 years and sed ced Mennonite "wives" to go "awhoring" with them? "Judge says he won't reconsider Bear decision" was the headline in the Carli Ie, PA Sentinel of February 18, 1989, containing a news story that ended with the following: "Lastly Bear alleged the court has displayed a 'long history of bias' toward him whic affected the outcome of the case. "(Judge Kevin) Hess said such allegations are easy to make and are a comfortable, al hough 'puerile' - childish - explanation for an unfavorable result." "Hess says he is very careful to avoid 'even an appearance of bias' and that such aile ations are 'happily very infrequent.'" If that is a true statement of Judge Kevin Hess, why then does lawyer David A. Ody I st in his investigative report, report lawyer, at the time, Kevin Hess being the very first to help c ver up the Cumberland County Court and State Police crime oflying me into the mental hospital a d their additional cover up crime to this day? Can't I truthfully say to every Cumberland County judge who may grant this divorc , as I turned and faced Judge J. Wesley Oler and said: "Judge Oler, you are part of the criminal conspiracy of covering up how I was lied in 0 the mental hospital. - I say that the Cumberland County Court has - is guilty - of the crime of lyin me into the mental hospital, attempting to have me declared criminally insane. One ofthe lies was t at I held up a school bus with a loaded gun." This I stated in the witness chair June 6, 2000. The court tr nscript was certified by Judge Oler. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ordered in 1975 the Cumberland County Court must hear my case with the following as part of the Supreme Court's Opinion to the Cumberland County ourt: "In our opinion, the complaint in Counts I and II, raises the 'shunning' practice of a pellee church and the conduct of the individuals may be an excessive interference of marriage and the fam ly relationship, alienation of affections, and tortuous interference with a business relationship which th courts of this commonwealth may have authority to regulate, even in light of the 'establishment' and free exercise' clause of the First Amendment." The Associated Press revealed on April 26, 1976 how the Cumberland County Court 'convinced against its will is of the same opinion still," when it reported the following almost two months B FORE the court's "fully warranted -love and concern" Opinion of June 23, 1976. This was contrary to t e Canons of Judicial Conduct. "But on Monday, Weidner said Bear's problems were his own fault. '''Well, the church's case is even stronger now, and maybe that's why they wanted it ent back,' the judge said. "He said he felt 'the higher court thought Bear's lawsuit should be thrown out, becau e, my God, he brought this all on himself,' Weidner replied. "The judge made the comments during an interview following Monday's court sessio ,but had made similar remarks in open court." The University of Pennsylvania Law Review contains an article written by Justin K. iller entitled, Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't. Religious Shunning and the Free Exercise CIa se, published in November, 1988, Mr. Miller states, Page 285, Volume 137: "Bear v. Reformed Mennonite Church "The Reformed Mennonite Church, as one of its fundamental principles, teaches that n excommunicated member should be shunned. The shunning includes a total boycott of t e individuals by their families. Bishop Daniel Musser of the Reformed Mennonite Church spoke of the p actice this way:" "All company necessary to admonish, or to minister to their necessities, should be fre Iy given; but eating social meals, or keeping social company, or having commercial intercourse, the Word of ild forbids, and when it is demanded, must be denied under all circumstances. - And thou shalt stone hi with stones, that he die. (Deut. XIII) Surely, this command disturbed the sacred family relation much mo e seriously than the gospel command. Besides, the espousals (sic) of Christ are above the espousals (sic) man. The duties of wedlock must ever yield to our duties to God. To be faithful to God, is the first duty 0 man; and consequences can never enter into consideration." Justin Miller states, Page 282, regarding another shunning case which also is fully ap licable to mine. "The religious group could argue that its religious belief, which required shunning, w uld be burdened by state action. - This distinction, however, lacks substance. If the court is a state actor hen it upholds the church member's tort claim, then it is a state actor when it upholds the religious group's free exercise defense." Judge Kevin Hess boasted "he is very careful to avoid 'even the appearance of bias'" n judging fellow Cumberland County Court judges, President Judge Dale F. Shughart, and Judge Clinto R. Weidner, didn't continue their "long history of bias" by refusing to reconsider Weidner's Opinion I argued before both in open court. This was just before Judge Weidner resigned, I believe, as of July 1, 1976. Both judges upheld Weidner's Opinion that Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness is' ully warranted- love and concern." After April 26, 1976, Judge Weidner was asked to disqualify himself quite some time rior to his final decision, yet it appears to have been clocked in by the court on the day of Judge Weidne 's final decision and Judge Weidner "overruled and dismissed" it, I believe, the last day he was in office, n June 30, 1976! Only if Cumberland County Court judges believe the rules of judicial conduct "shoul be thrown out" as Judge Weidner was so biased he believed the State Supreme Court "thought Bears laws it should be thrown out," Judge Clinton R. Weidner should have disqualified himself because of his ery evident and petty prejudice. The definition of petty I intend here is "of contemptible narrow mind 0 views; A petty outlook. " Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 2. A judge should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all his acti ities. A. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should conduct himself at all tim in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. B. A judge should not allow his family, social, or other relationships to influence his judi ial conduct or judgment. He should not lend the prestige of his office to advance the private interest f others, nor should he conveyor knowingly permit others to convey the impression that they are in a speci I position to influence him. He should not testify voluntarily as a character witness. Commentary Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judge . A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. He must expect to be the subject of con tant public scrutiny. He must therefore accept restrictions on his conduct that might be viewed as burdensome by t e ordinary citizen and should do so freely and willingly. Don't all become "a state actor" who uphold it is "fully warranted -love nd concern" for Reformed Mennonites to demand the price of "repent," for married sex, prove how "contemptible" their "narrow mind" is in its "views"? Surely all can't be too "feebleminded" to know, if Cumberland County Curt judges would be "a state actor" in every Cumberland County marriage, judging it fully warranted - love and concern" for Bishop Glenn M. Gross to play with the minds of all wives to play their bodies against their husbands," the most stupid Cumberland County j dges know there would be "blood in the streets." The Cumberland County Court Opinion of June 23, 1976 states on page two: "In any vent, given the circumstances of the case, enforcement of the requested injunction would have been imp ssible, its effect nugatory." Don't all highly educated lawyers agree with Lawyer Daniel Webster when they see h w Judge Weidner's Opinion disagrees with Reformed Mennonite Bishop Glenn M. Gross' 1975 C mberland County Court testimony, Pages 150-151? "Falsehoods not only disagree with truths, but usually quarrel among themselves." Lawyer for cult, William B. Ball: Speaking now as a member and a bishop of the Refo med Mennonite church, Reverend Gross, if this court were to grant the order sought by the Plaintiff to is ue an injunction to stop the church, its bishops, ministers, deacons, and aU members from teaching, pract cing and enforcing the doctrine of avoidance, what would be the result? Bishop Gross: Well, we read that every soul be subject unto the higher powers where here is no power but God, the powers that be are ordained of God and we should submit to them as the sc iptures teach, rendering to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, but to God the things that are God's, a d if it would mean that we would have to discontinue the practice of our religious faith and teaching, it wou d be denying us our religious liberty to practice as we so desire, because we would have to feel that it wo Id have to be God's will and accept it. "Comfort the feebleminded" who can't know or because "they willingly are ignorant, , (2 Peter 3:5) how Bishop Gross' "good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts ofthe simple," (Romans 16:18) according to "the Supreme Judge ofthe world." Reformed Mennonite Bishop Glenn M. Gross actually said "It would mean that we w uld have to discontinue the practice of our religious faith' to 'hath his privy member cut off' (Deuter nomy 23: I) from 'the wife of his bosom'" (Deuteronomy 28:54) until he returns to Mennonitism. Cumberland County Court Deposition of Reformed Mennonite Bishop Earl M. Basinge , October 20, 1975, Page 8. Bishop Basinger: In this case, it is an uproar. It is not willingly. They could have live together. They could have raised their children. She would have had to avoid and have no company wi h him. That would have been her duty. To "in this case," end my "uproar" against the "lying tongue" of Reformed MenDoni es and the "lying tongue" of the Cumberland County Court, Cumberlaud County President Judge Dale F Shughart and, at the time, District Attorney Edgar B. Bayley had me lied into a mental hospital. Lawyer David A. Ody attempted to discover why I was taken into custody by the Sta Police and taken to Holy Spirit Community Mental Health Center on December 5, 1977. The following a e excerpts from his report. I started my search for information with a phone call to the Pennsylvania State Police at th Carlisle barracks. The trooper who answered the phone gave me what seemed to be a spontaneous response to y question. I asked him who had called the State Police to complain of Bear taking his daughter and what the exa t nature of the complaint was that the police received. I also asked the trooper if the logbook would reflect ow the matter was brought to the attention of the State Police. The trooper told me that he thought this case was one of Judge Shughart's and that he beli ved the matter was handled with an assignment slip and would therefore not show up on the logbook. An "assi ment slip" was described as a piece of paper which is handed to the police officer who performed the job not d on the paper. I waited on the phone while the trooper checked with someone else at the barracks whom e thought might know more about the incident. When he returned to the phone he told me, "Oh boy, you real created a monster here." I asked him what he meant by this remark and he told me that he didn't know anything about the incident involving Bear's arrest and admission to Holy Spirit Hospital. On December 27, 1977 I called the CumberlandlPerry Mental Health (CPMH) office in Ca lisle. Michael Chambers who identified himself as director spoke to me because he alleged that Carolyn Su y, Bear's caseworker, was not in. Mr. Chambers told me he couldn't answer any of my questions exce to advise me that Bear had been taken to the Holy Spirit Hospital with a warrant under emergency mental healt procedures provided for by the Emergency Mental Health Procedures Act. He could not release any info ation or records to me until he spoke with his attorney, Kevin Hess. On December 27, 1977 I also called the Holy Spirit Hospital and spoke to Mrs. Holmes w 0 is in charge of mental health records. Mrs. Homes advised me that I could review Bear's records but that I c uldn't receive a copy ofthe records without a court order or subpoena. On December 28, 1977 Bear and I went to the Holy Spirit Hospital to review their records hich related to Bear's three-day confinement. We found that the records were not available because they co d not be located in the Hospital. After waiting sometime, Dr. Borelli arrived at the facility but in spite of his hel , the records could not be located. I was allowed to review a very few papers which were in a file relating to Bea . These included a psychological report which indicated Bear was normal. A copy of this document was given t me. I gave it to Bear for his use. There was a social history in this file. The history stated that Bear took his aughter off a school bus with a loaded gun. The history indicated that Bear denied reports of taking his daughter 0 fthe bus with a loaded gun. The report was prepared by a social worker at the facility named Ted. I later spoke to him d he explained to me that he got the report of the bus and loaded gun from the State Police who had told the sto to the hospital staff. The story was general knowledge among the staff according to this social worker. He ever saw the story in writing. We had to leave the hospital without reviewing the entire file because it could not be locat d. Mrs. Holmes advised me that she would attempt to locate the file so I might review the records at a later ti e. On December 29, 1977 Bear and I went to the office ofCPMH on Hanover Street in Carli e. I presented them with a letter requesting certain information be made available to me. I attached an authorizati n from Bear. We were able to speak with Carolyn Sukay who was the caseworker assigned to Bear's case. Mis Sukay didn't have much to say that was helpful or informative. With respect to the CPMH records which we as ed to review, Miss Sukay said there was only authorization, chronological notes and a copy of the discharge sum ary. (a) Bear was taken into custody by the State Police and taken to Holy Spirit Hospital u er the emergency mental health procedures available when there is immediate danger to someone's Iifi . A warrant to allow this was issued by CPMH. (b) The State Police were the complaining party asking for the warrant to involuntarily mmit Bear to Holy Spirit Hospital. (c) The State Police wanted to know of Bear's diagnosis and discharge plans. (d) Bear was not admitted to Holy Sprit under emergency procedures because the paper were not completed properly, (This varies with the hospital records which indicate that Bear was not ad itted on an involuntary basis because an examination at the time he was brought to the hospital revealed that there was no mental health emergency which would necessitate involuntary admission.) (e) On either 12/8 or 12/9 Sgt. Mixell of the State Police called CPMH for information bout Bear's evaluation. Sukay called the Holy Spirit Hospital and they said to have the Police c I Dr. Borelli. Sukay then called the State Police and spoke to a policeman named Cletus because Sgt. Mi ell was not there. Cletus said he would have the District Attorney call Dr. Borelli. (f) On either 12/8 or 12/9 Judge Shughart called CPMH to get information relating to Sukay notes that she didn't tell Shughart anything. Two hours after leaving the CPMH offices, Robert Goril called to advise me that their atto ey told them they didn't have to release the information requested by my letter because emergency procedures ere not completed and Bear was not admitted involuntarily. On December 31, 1977 I visited Holy Spirit Hospital for a review of the medical records. he records were apparently complete except for the discharge summary, which Dr. Borelli had not yet comple ed. The records revealed the following information: (a) The warrant for Bear's arrest and involuntary commitment to the hospital was issued y CPMH pursuant to an affidavit signed by Sgt. Mixell. The affidavit was dated 12/5/77. (b) The affidavit stated that Bear threatened to kill his children and commit suicide. It fur her stated that a noose was seen in Bear's barn and that he kept weapons on the premises. (c) There were two references in the file to Judge Shughart wanting Bear admitted for eVlluation. (d) Dr. Borelli examined Bear at 6:45 p.m. on 12/5/77 approximately 45 minutes after Be r was brought to Holy Spirit. Dr. Borelli certified that Robert Bear was not in need of emergency com itment. (e) Bear signed a voluntary admission authorization which included a statement that he w s aware of his rights and understood that he could leave the facility at any time after giving them a written equest to leave. (f) There is a reference in the file to Bear authorzing the release of evaluation results to L avid Ody and Judge Shughart. It is possible for Bear to review this record personally ifhe will make a written application to the Holy Spirit Hospital. A treatment team will sit down with Bear when he reviews the records. The discharge summary of Dr., Borelli has still not been provided to me although the Hos ital agreed to send it to me when it is complete. Mrs. Holmes indicated to me that these summaries are often not c mpleted and made part of a record for many months after a patient is discharged. I received a request from Dr. Borelli to call him through Robert Bear shortly after Bear wa discharged from the hospital. I called Dr. Borelli and he informed me that there was nothing wrong with Bear and that he would be willing to testify to that effect. There are a number of questions which remain unanswered concerning the matter of Bear' commitment and arrest. I have contacted the State Police at the Carlisle barracks, but they have not answered t e questions I have. I would like to know where Sgt. Mixell got his directions in the matter of Bear's arrest and co nmitment and I would like to find out exactly how the entire matter was brought to the attention of the State P Jlice. With the exception of Mrs. Holmes at the Holy Spirit Hospital, everyone involved with th~ matter had been reluctant to talk, unwilling to give any information or evasive in their answers to me. Theyal seem to be uncomfortable with my questions about these events even though the questions are not difficu t or unusual. Perhaps Judge Shughart would tell you why he wanted you evaluated as indicated in the re ords at Holy Spirit Hospital. He may even tell you what steps he took to see that you were evaluated if any. Ifh has done nothing wrong he should have nothing to hide. (End of Report) Our Mental Health laws state: (c) Notification of Rights at Emergency Examination - Upon arrival at the facility, the p rson shall be informed of the reasons for emergency examination and of his right to communicate mmediately with others. We needed to wait until David Ody read the hospital records on December 31, 1977 before we learned of the reasons for the attempted emergency examination. Sgt. Grant Mixell told me that D strict Attorney Bayley and Judge Shughart ordered me to be taken into custody. If I had know I was ct arged with all their false charges and had been told that I was free to leave without being arrested and that h.is part of the law applied, I would have asked them to take me home. Instead the state police posed as fri nds and I trusted them. "If it is determined that the person is severely mentally disabled and in need of em rgency treatment, treatment shall be begun immediately. If the physician does not so find, or if at any ti ae it appears there is no longer a need for immediate treatment, the person shall be discharged and returned to such place as he may reasonably direct." I never threatened to kill myself. I never threatened to kill our children. I did not ev n own a gun. I sold my one rifle several months before December 5, 1977 and had no other weapons. I lid not have a hanging noose in the barn. In happier times our children swung on a rope with a loop i it and it was seventeen (17) inches from the floor. 1 was not even near a school bus when I brought my twelve ear old daughter home after she said, "You bastard!" Unfortunately, Mennonite damned husbands and fathers during more than 450 year being forced to endure Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness have made those charges b ought against me quite believable. Our eight year old daughter said to me, her Reformed Mennonite "Grandma Bear sa d, 'Your daddy may take his life.'" A kind Bear relative came to the farm and reminded me, "Bobby, if they would find you hanging in your barn you would solve the Mennonites' problem." Ammon Monroe Aurand, Jr. states in his book Little Known Facts About the Amish a d the Mennonites of an Ohio Amish husband and father going amuck and killing his wife and all is children. A more liberal Mennonite Minister from East Peoria, Illinois, in 1980 told me the same thing happened in Illinois when an excommunicated Amish husband and father could stand no more. Asking Mennonite historians to admit or deny Mennonitism has driven an estimated ,000 to 5,000 Mennonite damned and shunned husbands and fathers to suicide during 450 years is as llopeless as asking Cumberland County Judges to confess their crime of lying me into the mental hospital a nd/or their cover up crime. This was the summary of my Psychological Evaluation one day after I was lied into the m ntal hospital, taken December, 6, 1977. PHYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION: Robert Baer An intellectual profile such as this is counter-indicative of emotional disturbance. Mr. Baer is capable of thinking in abstract terms, but has enough practical orientation not J lose sight of the concreteness of issues. There is no evidence of psychotic process in this man. His thinking is clear and his flow 0 ideas is quite relevant to the issue. The question of paranoia was raised. Rorschach responses and T AT stories yielded no evi ence of this disorder beyond a slight tendency to be somewhat suspicious and defensive. This was not seen in clin cal proportions and may well be real when one considers the situation in which this man finds himself. Based on these test results, there is no reason why this man cannot function quite adequate y in the community. His ability to relate to others is good. His cooperative nature and sensitivity toward the wellb ing of other people are positive factors in his adjustment to a difficult situation. In summary then, Mr. Baer's psychological profile is well within normal limits. There is n apparent need for ongoing treatment at this time. Thomas . Hanshaw Psychol gist TLH:bw I was discharged from Holy Spirit December 9, 1977. I was first told to go to the bus ness office. A Mrs. MessersmiU presented me with a bill for $521.60. I said, "I didn't bring myself here. I idn't come here because there was anything wrong. I will go to prison before I pay that." Mrs. Messers niU asked me if I was the Bear who had been in the newspapers. I said, "I am sorry to say I am." She sai. Holy Spirit didn't want any publicity and I was free to go. I went home and the State Police never arrested me for the crimes they charged agai st me December 5, 1977. But Holy Spirit began to send me statements demanding their $521.60. I talked t Lawyer David A. Ody. The result was his investigative report. I sent it around, Holy Spirit no longer sen me statements demanding payment. I may be nothing, nothing but persistent. Years later Holy Spirit ~ave me a copy of their document proving Cumberland County picked taxpayers' pockets of $521.60 May 5, 1978 in order to cover up the Court-State Police cover up crime. All my efforts to uncover who criminal y authorized payment of that $521.60 ended with all who had to know, also being guilty of covering u) Court and State Police crimes. Judge J. Wesley Oler, Jr., reminded every reader of his April 1, 2003 Opinion and st tes essentially the same again on page 8, when the Cumberland County Court and State Police at Carlisle ie and commit crimes on behalf of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. On a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal case, the evidence is to be iewed "in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth" and "all reasonable references in the Commonwealth' favor" are to be entertained. Thus Judge Oler on pages 4 and 8 belatedly explained why he "in a criminal case" agl inst the Cumberland County Court and State Police at Carlisle "viewed (it) in the light most favo able to the Commonwealth" in the following, "falsely so called" (I Timothy 6:20) "light" on page 3. The document proceeds to discuss the purported injustice of a mental health commitment p oceeding in 1977, a prosecution in which Defendant was apparently accused of holding up a school bus with a loa( ed gun, and a Mennonite shunning experience to which he was subjected and which apparently occurred in 1972. "Comfort the feebleminded" (I Thessalonians 5: 14) who can read lawyer David A Ody s investigative report, of which the Cumberland County Court and State Police at Carlisle have never d nied one word, yet believe the "purported" ("present the appearance, often false") injustice of a mental health ommitment proceeding in 1977." Plus being "apparently accused of holding up a school bus with a II aded gun." With such deceitful words doesn't Judge J. Wesley Oler, Jr.; prove he is guilty as I sh ed? "Judge Oler, you are part of the criminal conspiracy of covering up how I was lied int the mental hospital. - I say that the Cumberland County Court has - is guilty - of the crime of Iyin me into the mental hospital, attempting to have me declared criminally insane. One of the lies was tl at I held up a school bus with a loaded gun." This I stated in the witness chair June 6, 2000. The court tra script was certified by Judge Oler. Half a fact is a whole falsehood. He who gives the truth a false coloring by his false m nner of telling it, is the worst of liars. (E.L. Magoon) Didn't even Reformed Mennonite Senior Bishop Glenn M. Gross prove Judge Oler," he worst of liars" by refusing to delete one word of my death sentence December 29, 1977, before witnesses and my tape recorder at the Carlisle State Police barracks? "All human ties, including those of marriage and the family, must give w y under the ban of the church." "Crush before God, terrify, humble, pulverize with the lash of the ban until they become as ravening, biting dogs or unclean, filthy swine - a dunghill of I man." "A Mennonite shunning experience to which he was subjected and which apparently occurred in 1972;" in Judge Dler's "false manner oftelling it," Judge Dler I eglected to state my "Mennonite shunning experience," as Bishop Gross didn't deny; began une 11, 1972 and continues until this day because of the Cumberland County Court's JUI e 23,1976 Gross lie that my "Mennonite shunning experience" is "fully warranted -love and concern" until I mercifully die! Lawyer David A. Ody on December 29, 1977, reminded Cumberland/Perry Mental Haith and Mental Retardation case worker Carolyn Sukay in my presence; the law provides a penalty of u to one year in prison for anyone who gives false information in order to lie a sane citizen into a mental ospital and that includes all who help cover up such a crime. Not one to whom I have sent lawyer David A. Ody's investigative report of how the C mberland County Court and State Police at Carlisle committed their crime of lying me into Holy Spirit Me lItal Health Center on December 5, 1977, and committed their additional cover up crime ever since, includiu g the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, has accused me offabricating one word of Ody's report. Are there any worshipers of "the god oftbis world" (2 Corinthians 4:4) Cumberland County Court who are too "feebleminded" (I Thessalonians 5:14) to know, ifthere would be "EQUAL JUST CE UNDER LAW" in Cumberland County; all guilty of lying me into the mental hospital and/or the. additional cover up crimes, would face somewhat or altogether what confessed criminal First Deputy Att rney General of Pennsylvania Richard Guida said he faced on May 31, 1991, just before being put in pri on? "Your Honor, aliI can say is, I am unemployed and unemployable. The media has h rmed me. The system has harmed me. It would have been less expensive and more humane if they had .ust taken me out back and shot me." Are there any worshippers of "the god of this world" Cumberland County Court wh( are too "feebleminded" to know, had the Court's and State Police's crimes succeeded in having De locked up with the criminally insane, perhaps for life, "It would have been less expensive and more hurr ane if they had just taken me out back and shot me?" Deposition of Reformed Mennonite Bishop Earl M. Basinger, October 20,1975 Page I I and 12 "You know the word of the Lord is very sharp and He says that he that hateth his br ther is a murderer. That deserves the severest punishment that can be brought upon this man and that is se aration from the church. That is the severest punishment that we can apply. We apply it in love in the h pe that they will see themselves. Murderers can be forgiven, thieves, thieves. Jesus said all manner of sir shall be forgiven. Even if you speak against him it can be forgiven if we repent. That is the secret of the w ole matter if we repent. " The Supreme Judge of the world" judges: "These things doth the Lord hate; Yea, - a e an abomination to him: a proud look, a lying tongue; and hands that shed innocent blood, an heart that eviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, a false witness that speaketh lies. Proverbs Chapter 6) Menninger Foundation Senior Psychoanalyst and Rear Admiral in the Navy Medical Corps Reserve, Psychiatrist and M.D., Howard M. Voth, wrote to Bishops Glenn M. Gross and Earl M. Basinger, June 23, 1980, the following: I am convinced the time has come for you to permit the Robert Bear family to reunite. Err otional disturbances of one kind or another will almost surely develop in the Bear children if the family is not soo reunited. In fact, I think it is entirely probable that such disturbances are already present. It seems to me that sufficient punishment has been dealt to Robert Bear for behavior you onsider wrong. That is your right. However, bear in mind that you are also punishing his wife and children by sep rating the father from his wife and children. I am sure you appreciate better than most how important fathers re to the home. Though Robert Bear has suffered mightily, his children have paid the highest cost of all. To damage the image of the father to his children is extremely harmful. Furthermore, and equally serious, the absence of the father from the home deprives them of a vital maturational stimulus. Dr. Voth wrote the following to Gale Gross Bear, June 26, 1980: I have great admiration for much of what the Mennonites believe in, but on one issue I bel eve the church is in error. This has to do with breaking up families. Perhaps many years ago such practices were ecessary for disciplinary purposes, but there are better ways to resolve differences than such a harsh and e treme measure. As a psychiatrist of thirty years' experience, I can tell you without any reservation that yo r children will not develop as well as they would if they were living in a family. Put very simply, your children mQ you and your husband are all paying a very high price by letting your family get split up. Emotional distur ances of some kind are nearly always the result of the broken home. These disturbances may not now be in evid( nce, but they will surface someday. Isn't Dr. Harold M. Voth's prophecy proven true by how "emotional disturbances' ill our children torment them because for years it was intended I should not live long enough to discove their mother's adultery? I don't deny, like "the Supreme Judge of the world," 1 "hate" the "lying tongue" and the "proud look" of all of the Reformed Mennonite cult and Cumberland County Court whose crimes and li s "shed (the) innocent blood" of our six children's very important formative childhood years. "The Supreme Judge of the world" judges: For they have sown the wind, and they st all reap the whirlwind. (Hosea 8:7) Though hand join in hand, the wicked shall not be unpunished -. (Hosea 8:7) Yes, I hate the "proud look" of Gale Gross Bear, Reformed Mennonites and the CUll berland County Courthouse crowd who believe "the Supreme Judge of the world" has "a lying tongue" ust as they have. They believe, "the wicked shall- be unpunished" for the premeditated murder of this II arriage and family in cold blood. If I believed "the Supreme Judge of the world" lied like Gale Gross Bear, Reformed Iennonites and the Cumberland County Courthouse crowd, I believe, I would have made certain some had not remained "unpunished" long years ago, if all the price I would pay is be mercifully put to death v II lethal injection. But before I could be legally executed I would be able to prove what I list here "the wic ed" have done. "People came to me and said, 'Don't get involved in this case, it's cursed.' Maybe I should have listened." Thus quoted noted defense Lawyer William C. Costopoulos n his book Principal . Suspect of then Assistant Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Merle "Skip" Ebert, now C mberland County District Attorney. Yes, this case is "cursed" by "the Supreme Judge ofthe world." And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! For ye lade men with burdens grievous t be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers. (St. Luke 11:46) "Do you believe there is anyone in the Cumberland County Courthouse' ho doesn't know the court lied in my case?" I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed (Galatians 2: II) and asked First Assistant District Attorney Jaime M. Keath g that question December 19, 2000. In a rare moment of honesty in my case Jaime Keating confessed, "There may be a few." In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give t em repentance to the acknowledging of the truth; And that they may recover themselves out of the snare 0 the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will. (2 Timothy 2:25,26) True to "the Supreme Judge of the world," God gave Jaime Keating a partial birth 0 the truth of the Cumberland County Court's crimes and lies, but "the devil" aborted the truth before Ja me Keating could "Provide things honest in the sight of all men." (Romans 12: 17) Otherwise wouldn't Jain e Keating have glorified God for causing him to have such an immaculate conception of the truth and fo having "power - given thee from above" (St. John 19: II) to show all, the ugly as sin big bastard baby, the :umberland County Court conceived with its crimes and lies? Woe unto you, lawyers! For ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered no in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered. (St. John 11 :52) Can any deny, truth is "the key of knowledge" to "the Supreme Judge of the world"? Had the "lawyers" who are Jaime Keating's superiors offered him $50,000 per year salary increase and his praise "proclaimed upon the housetops," CSt. Luke 12:3) Jaime Keating wouldn't have swallowed the truth 0 his cult's and court's lies and crimes as some ignorant children pick the filth from their noses and swa ow it. "Specifically, the defendant stated that he would cut Mr. Gross in half with a machin gun." From Page 8 of Chief Deputy Jaime M. Keating's rebuttal brief against my appeal to the Superior ( ourt of Pennsylvania. "He explained to me that someone had told him that he could bring a machine gun w h an extra clip and that he could cut my boss in half with it." Thus did witness Lester Shearer testify June 5,2002 against me, according to the trial transcript, Page 20. Half a fact is a whole falsehood. He who gives the truth a false coloring by his false manner of telling it, is the worst of liars. (E.L. Magoon) Reformed Mennonite Senior Bishop Glenn M. Gross' lackey, Lester Shearer, willingl" was "the worst of liars," allowing Jaime Keating to reveal his "whole falsehood". Now only the utterly ignorant and those who "willingly are ignorant" (2 Peter 3:5) ca 't know the divine judgment of Jesus Christ judges Jaime Keating as Christ judged the devil, "He is a liar, .nd the father of it." (St. John 8:44) All guilty trusted Jaime Keating the jackal, "an accomplice or lackey who aids in the commission of base or disreputable acts," to "let us do evil that good may come" (Romans 3:8) when Keatin~ came before the Superior Court. All know the "good" they pray to "the god of this world" (2 Corinthian 4:4) is that they can continue to get away with their Cumberland County Court "evil" crimes and lies. I can take Jaime Keating to the retired soldier who put a loaded curved clip in his au omatic rifle, unexpectedly thrust it into my hands and swearing said, "Use this on that - Mennonite I ishop brother-in- law of yours." I will ask that man in front of Jaime Keating, if he would ever have put t at loaded gun in my hands had he any doubt I wouldn't and couldn't cut Reformed Mennonite Bishop G enn M. Gross "in haW' with that army automatic rifle. But there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. (Galatians I :7) The Cumberland County Court has so perverted "the gospel of Christ" until all the praise, p omotions and jobs go to those who cover up the truth of the court's crimes and lies. Truth is not only violated by falsehood; it may be equally outraged by silence. (Amiel) The Cumberland County Court has so perverted "the gospel of Christ" that the court only gives jobs to those who violate truth with their falsehoods and/or equally outrage truth by their sham ful silence. For positive proof, I am applying for the job of cleaning the men's rest rooms in the c urthouse or even more menial employment. Would the judges of the Cumberland County Court allow me to have a job even if the judges needed to clean up after they dirtied? Nothing can seem foul to those that win. (Shakespeare) Patriot-News reporter Matt Miller reported in the June II, 2003 edition: "Oler asked Bear whether he had also appealed his case to the state Supreme Court." "Bear said he had not. But when he began to elaborate, Oler cut him off and continued with the hearing." The Cumberland County Court and District Justices have always "cut off" the truth here state. I will present just a few examples, "to prove this, let the facts be presented to a candid world." (The Declaration of Independence) Cumberland County Court Testimony, December 12, 1975, pages I7-18: Lawyer for Reformed Mennonites William Musser: Is there any question in your mind, rIr. Bear, that your wife in her dealings with you, was, in her mind, being completely faithful to God and her religious beliefs? Bear: As mentioned in the writings, right before the publicity came out, yes, there is a question and I'll explain. Right before the publicity came out I came home from Delaware for a night an I went to bed and she came and got in bed with me and I thought in good faith, she said to me "I'll get in b d with you if you don't tell." And I said I won't. I thought our marriage was no one's business, and I tho ght we were going to resume our marriage, and she also said that you don't bother me tonight. Almost a y ar I had a wife like that and I promised that I wouldn't. Morning came and she said, ... well, and I started 0 bother her and she said you promised, and I said it's morning, and she allowed it. (But not coitus) And then before I was going home to Delaware she talked of maybe resuming our marriage and I said, Well, th n what you have done for almost a year is wrong. She said no, that isn't wrong, and then I said what you are doing, what you did is wrong. No, that wasn't wrong. I said then what you're thinking of doing must be wrong. She said no that wasn't wrong either. Then... The Court interrupting: Wait a minute, when are you going to answer the question? Bear: Pardon me? The Court: Have you answered the question? Bear: Yes, I said that I didn't believe she was sincere, and then, pardon me, your Ron r, I explained. The Court: All right. Anything else, Mr. Musser? Mr. Musser: That's all. Judge Weidner also "cut off' my testimony because all testimony telling how Reform d Mennonites blessed shunning "wife" Gale Gross Bear sexually teasing with her naked body didn't fi the court's final "fully warranted -love and concern" lie. Reformed Mennonites were told while they bl ssed her naked sexual teasing just as I tell the court of its crimes and lies. Cumberland County Court Deposition of Reformed Mennonite Bishop Earl M. Basinge , October 20, 1975, Page 8. Bishop Basinger: In this case, it is an uproar, it is not willingly. They could have live together. They could have raised their children. She would have had to avoid and have no company wi h him. That would have been her duty. Soon after Reformed Mennonites excommunicated me June 11, 1972 they were told wanted the most documented account ever written of what Mennonites do when a husband and father is xcommunicated. "If you aren't too ashamed to do it, I'll try not to be too ashamed to tell." Reformed Ml nnonites weren't and I wasn't. II That first summer shunning "wife" Gale Gross Bear came out of her garden with a sp ck of mud splashed up under one eye. I said, "Gale, you have a speck of mud under your eye." She ried to wipe it off and missed. 1 reached out my hand and said, "I'll get it for you." She replied, "Don't y u touch me!" "She would have had to avoid and have no company with him. That would have been When doing her "duty" of, "Don't you touch me," didn't cause me to come crawling b ck to Mennonitism like a beaten servile dog in order to "touch" Gale Gross Bear again, ALL FORMED MENNONITES were not "faithful to (their) religious beliefs". Reformed Menno ites blessed Gale Gross Bear having "company" with me by welcoming all but "his it was" (Ezekiel 16:15) uite a number of times by using her naked, teasing body, hoping her naked body english would end my "u roar". I could have truthfully testified in court Gale Gross Bear's most torrid time of three ( ) separate times in sixteen (16) hours from the afternoon of April 5 until the morning of June 6, 1973 when ale Gross Bear welcomed all but "the physical union of male and female sexual organs". "I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed" (Galatians 2: II) and told R formed Mennonite Bishop Joseph W. Byers, who married us December 14, 1958, in stark naked etail what Reformed Mennonites blessed. Had Bishop Byers denied one word I would have told hi in more stark naked detail! Then I said, "You know that isn't right." Bishop Byers helplessly shrugge his shoulders and lamely lamented as all do who go along with "amorality by consensus" in order to get alo g. "What can one do?" A friend traveling in Thailand at the time sent me the following World News headline and' s accompanying news story. A man who delivered a load of fertilizer to the farm years later said he never thou ht while serving as a soldier in South Korea he would meet the husband he read about being accused of rape by hi Mennonite shunning wife. (_ ... ~ .. ._ . L BANGKOK POST WI':U't:s H". Ut:(:t;~IHt.'R ~. I JOO hll'll/l HII'! ~ )1 .! ll'\.n1fl1.1 Yt.n. ..a:.... .. Cumberland County, PA 1979 Criminal Court Testimony, Page 32 Bear: Did you never sexually tease after I was excommunicated: Gale Gross Bear: No, (Page 34) - Judge Harold E. Sheely: Did he ever rape you? Gale Gross Bear: In my min , 1 would say yes, I don't know what the definition under the circumstances would be. As I see it, 1 would s y yes. (Page 36) - Judge Harold E. Sheely: You are talking now of sexual intercourse? Gale oss Bear: Yes. (Page 38) - Bear: Then you mean it occurred sometime between June the 11th of 1972 nd 1974 when you left home, is that right? Gale Gross Bear: That's correct. Bear: And you don't know whe ? Gale Gross Bear: 1 can't remember. Bear: But it happened? Gale Gross Bear: Yes. Bear: Well, were you c othed or were you naked? Gale Gross Bear: 1 really can't remember those details. Bear: Did it happen in t e times that 1 was in your bed or when you were in my bed? District Attorney Michael Eakin objected and Judge Sheely upheld his objection although udge Sheely earlier had stated: "You will have to tell us what you meant by it." Reformed Mennonite Gale Bear, at the time, inadvertently forced Judge Harold E. Seely and District Attorney J. Michael Eakin to either allow me to expose and exploit her court perjury cr mes or be accomplices to her crimes by attempting to hide them from my jurors, which they failed to do. Gale Bear also forced all Reformed Mennonites to bless her crimes or excommunicate her for her bvious court crimes and expose Reformed Mennonites publicly as being less than the "pure church" they bo st to be. When I went to court on the morning of December 2,1979, I faced a ma imum often years in the penitentiary, plus $22,500 in fines. I WORLD NEWS BANGKOK THIAlAND History tells of a woman hailing her husband into Old Baily Court in London many y ars ago. The woman was so obnoxious that the judge asked the husband, "How long have you been m rried to this woman?" "Fifteen years, Your Honor." The judge said, "Fifteen years married to that oman is punishment enough. Case Dismissed." Strongly against the desires of Judge Sheely and District Attorney Eakin, my jurors n ust have judged being married to a Mennonite shunning wife who hated me enough to attempt to lie me i to the penitentiary was punishment enough for all my real and trumped up charges. A multimillionaire invited me to a delicious steak supper prepared by his wife. While I was enjoying the meal the lady said, "If I would have testified like your wife in court, I would ne ed to confess I lied." I asked, "Why would you?" She replied, "Because I couldn't live with m "self." State Policeman Kirk Perkins was finally able to get Bishop Glenn M. Gross to confes before witnesses and my tape recorder, December 29, 1997, "I do not, and never did believe that" I "forc~ II rape, sexual intercourse" upon his, at the time, supposedly "wise virgin" Reformed Mennonite shunn ng sister. I975 Cumberland County Court testimony, Page I23: Question: If Gale Bear did not follow the marital avoidance, would you instruct her as to how she should conduct herself? Bishop Gross: Yes, I believe there would be, as with any other of the teachings of Jesu Christ, if we felt a believer was not following consistently with the spirit and word of the Lord, they would e given admonition and instruction in the word. From December 2,1979 until December 29,1997,18 years and 27 days, Bishop Gross didn't confess he "felt," he said, "I do not, and never did believe that," his Reformed Mennonite sister's Ii s and crimes of perjury. Bishop Gross surely knew her lies and crimes are not "following consistently w th the spirit and word of the Lord." Yet, when did he give his professed "saint" sister "admonition and i struction in the word" to confess her lies and crimes to the Cumberland County Court and to me, then i struct her to ask God to forgive her? Didn't Reformed Mennonites bless Gale Bear's crimes and lies for all those years bec use they knew her court "rape" lie hurt me very much and therefore her court criminal misconduct was pa t of my "severest punishment," as Bishop Basinger testified? "And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection ofDiv ne Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor. "Signed by order and in behalf of the Congress." (The end of the Declaration of Indepe dence) After the signing of The Declaration ofIndependence, history tells of Benjamin Fran lin saying to those who also signed it; "We must all hang together, or assuredly we will hang separately." Less formally, but just as determinedly, don't the 1,000,000 worldwide Mennonites a d Amish, or however many there are, also "mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, am our sacred honor;" they will all hang together and be "ashamed" of Christ and his following "word "? For whosoever will save his life shall lose it; but whosoever shall lose his life for my s ke and the gospel's, the same shall save it. For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, aI d lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? Whosoever therefore shall be asham d of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ash a ned, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels. (St. Mark 8:35-38) Where can Mennonites and Amish be found who aren't "ashamed" of (Christ) and h s "words," Christ's following "words"? Jesus Christ said: "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye wil do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in h' m. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: For he is a liar, and the father of it. (St. John 8:4~) "In the year 1558 both Menno and Dirk Philips published strong tracts on the quest! ~n. In Menno's tract entitled Instruction on Excommunication the strict position on shunning which den anded that all human ties, including those of marriage and the family, must give way under the ban of the church, was clearly taught." (Page 28) "And if this be heresy and diabolical seduction, as the preach rs loudly assert, then must the Son of God, Christ Jesus, and all the prophets, apostles, and lofty witness s of God, have been manifest heretics, all! And then the whole Scripture, which teaches naught but moral II provement, and . everywhere points us to Christ, must have been naught but deceit and falsehood!" (Pages 527-28) "Not a single Scripture is falsified or broken by us. Not a single gloss is made. To not one absu dity are we driven. It is the plain Scripture and its foundation which we present to the reader, as you may fe I with your hands and see with your eyes." (Page 886) "For how can there ever be a greater love for God a d how can there be a more praiseworthy profession than that one should be willing and ready not only to gi' e up his temporal goods, ease, honor, and prosperity, but also shun his dearest friend upou earth, while in ull health, out of sincere regard for Christ, in obedience to His eternal and holy truth?" (Page 973) "Till t ey again observe the truth and cease from their error and return to the right way, (i.e. the Mennonite way) or until they become as ravening, biting dogs or unclean, filthy swine." (Page 986) "Crush before Go , terrify, humble, pulverize," (Page 989) "with the lash of the ban." (Page 990) "It is evidenced in that you, a dunghill of a man, ashes, and a vapor -." (Page 1019, The Complete Writings of Menna Simons) How many Mennonites and Amish aren't "ashamed" of Christ's and his "words" tell ng how Menno Simons was "a murderer" of Jesus Christ's sacred marriage and family command? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God h th joined together, let not man put asunder. (St. Matthew 19:6) How many Mennonites and Amish aren't "ashamed" of Jesus Christ and his "words' to confess of Menno Simons; "for he is a liar; and the father of' God-judged Mennonite "doctrines oj devils"? (1 Timothy 4:1) How many Mennonites and Amish aren't "ashamed" to obey "the gospel of Christ" (,omans 1:16) and have it "proclaimed from the housetops" (St. Luke 12:3) how Mennonites have murderee marriages and families for 450 years by obeying Menno Simons' "lying tongue"? And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake. (St. Luke 21: 17) How many Me nonites and Amish are willing to be "hated of all Men(nonites) for my name's sake," for calling for and end ng 450 years of Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness "in the name of our Lord Jesus Ch ist"? (1 Corinthians 5:4) How many Mennonites and Amish are willing to not be "ashamed - for (Christ's) sal e and the gospel's"? Would such not publicly confess the truth; for 450 years Menno Simons and his "evil men and seducers" murdering marriages and families can't be defended with one word of "the Sl ord of the Spirit, which is the word of God"? (Ephesians 6: 17) Likewise, don't all ofthe Cumberland County Courthouse crowd and all ofthe Cum erland County Bar Association; informally also "mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and ur sacred honor" none will publicly protest the Cumberland County Court's crimes and lies, proven by n e "facts (now) submitted to a candid world"? ./ ~ frliL i{ 2. ,J.b ~cerely Submitted, / (~Y,~~ RObert L:;ear ... .1 VERIFICATION I verify mat the statements made in the forgoing document are true and correct I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 19 PA C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities. DATE:~ Robert L. Bear, Plai tiff \:~: <:' ~ i~ ~ :;:0 I cJ" :>'" :;J:. :::1 -<- Q. 1,;1- ....Q~.,., _,)0 '(:'b -:.:;~ .-,-, ~,~ -1:, (j~Q 0'" _A ".'" 2. '-R o (J' - . . Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLE S OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNS LV ANIA ROBERT L. BEAR, vs. CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, : NO. 05-935 CIVIL TERM : IN DIVORCE Defendant AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE AND NOW, this .9'i/fJ.- day of March, 2005, comes Bradley L. Grif e, Esquire, counsel of record for Defendant, Gale G. Bear, and states that an Answer and Co terclaim to the Complaint in Divorce, an Affidavit Under Section 3301(d) of the Divorce ode and a Counter Affidavit Under 3301(d) of the Divorce Code was sent to Plaintiff, Robert L Bear, at his address of 20 I Potato Road, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, by certified mail, restricted del very, return receipt requested. A copy of said receipt is attached hereto indicating service March 19,2005. ,r'r ~.-"'-- ~ :::>' <'r'~--' ~~:,:::.-;~~ ./'" " .' ( ~: ,.' . e, E~qtllre '~-' me "or Def~dant GRIFFIE & ASSOCIATES 200 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-5551 (800) 347-5552 Sworn and subscribed to before me this d'i '.J> day of IN fi.M..J.. , 2005 )b.' iIn ,14' / , jtic ~,., / y!c1 M C'~ NOTARY BLIC KOT ARIAL SEAL ROBIN! GOSHORN, NOTARY pUBliC Jf~~~,~~,~~'Ji~~~~~:~~ ~U~~1 made on . . lr lr '" lr '" r'l CJ r'l Postage $ .(00 I 2,2:>0; , ". ,'.; '-.. --<-' '"'// ..., ~ / ~~> . ( <1?_?'ff[f, 1 'l&' I, " '........."_........" Certifi&:1Fee R&turr'1 Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) l~ I :5. )0 $ %./ L...~n B:>.~.1:<?n~n :"'?Pl II 0 I lr CJ CJ CJ CJ r'l U"J ru Total Postage & Fees Sent To f7,,~ r:Tn. "Stret{"Ap0:fu;f,., n orP080~N~~_ _~J_ o "City,'State,'ZJP.+-4 ~ &-\, COMPI f ~E THIS SECT(Of\! ON DELIVERY . Complete items 1, 2, end 3. Also complete A. ~atu"l 0' :J Agent , " 'F ttem 4 II Restricted Delivery Is desired. x1~jJJ ''-. t:J~ . Print your name and address on the reverse :J Addressee so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by (Printed Name) I\~ l;~ry . Attach this card to the back of the mailplece. or on the lrontll space permits. D. Is delivery oddnlss different fit>m _ I? tJ Yes 1. Article Addressed to: L.~ If YES, enter delivery address below: PNo ~~ 7-0i ~ \<d. i (be- \\&9- \?A 3. ~ce ljIpe ! Cortl11od MslI [J Express Mall I \\0\ b D sglstored ~aturn Receipt fo Msrohandlse D InSured Moll [J C.O.D. 4. R$Stricted OaUvery? (Extra Fee) ~.. 2. Mcle Number 7001 2510 0009 1018 9899 (Tiansfer from service lebeQ PS Form 3811, AUl/USI2oo1 Domestic Return Aecelpt P259S..Q2.M-154 I .. . . ~'--~ ."./ '-J> \ \ " } ) r~ <-, l::-l <::::..:J. t.;...., ;.4t ~. '... :/,) :---.' 'D ::..,~ ..~:? .--1 . ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Ys. : CNIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant : NO. 05-935 : IN DNORCE NOTICE TO PLEAD You are hereby notified to file a written response to the within Counterclaim within twenty days (20) days from service hereof or a judgment may be entered against you. : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA : CNIL ACTION - LAW : NO. 05-935 : IN DIVORCE COMPLAINT a. The Defendant committed adultery. \ ANSWER OF DEFENDANT GALE GROS~ BEAR a. Denied. It is denied that Defendant committed adultery. I My Answer ' A lying tongue hateth those that are afflicted by it. (Proverbs 26:28) And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand. (St. Mark 3: 5) All human ties, including those of marriage and the family, must give way u der the ban of the church. (Page 28, The Complete Writings of Menna Simons) The "lying tongue" of Men no Simons (1496-1561) and his Reformed Menno ite "evil men and seducers" (2 Timothy 3:13) seducing Gale Gross Bear, against my will, was the original ca se ofthis marriage and family being "divided against itself," beginning June 11, 1972. Cumberland County judges, also "evil men and seducers," gave our marriag and family, "divided against itself," a big, bad boost to their destruction with their "lying tongue" ev r since June 23, 1976, seducing Gale Gross Bear to believe what she and Reformed Mennonites did w s "pure" - "fully warranted - love and concern." Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion n the son of her womb? (Isaiah 49: 15) "A son of her womb" told me time after time Gale Gross Bear is guilty of ad Itery. 1 confess that was so against my will I refused to believe until a daughter "wept bitterly" (St. Luke 22 62) because she was too honest to deny her mother's adultery. To murder character is as truly a crime as to murder the body; the tongue 0 the slanderer is brother to the dagger of the assassin. (Tryon Edwards) I refused to believe Gale Gross Bear would be of those mothers, fortunately ~ w, who are "lovers of their own selves" (2 Timothy 3:2) so much they would murder the characters of their hildren in their futile attempt to cover up how they plunged their "lying tongue" dagger into the hear of their own once trusted character. When I realized Reformed Mennonite "evil men and seducers," especially he Bishop Brother Glenn M. Gross, were playing with her mind preparing her to play her body against me a d shun me, I pled with her. "Don't cause me to turn the effort I have used to provide for you until now, agai st you." Gale Gross Bear boldly boasted, "What can you do? I have the whole church behind me." Almo t 33 years later we are coming to the final result of her "rebellion" against Christ's sacred marriage an family command. Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. (St. Matthew 19:6) "The Supreme Judge of the world" (The Declaration of Independence) judges: 'For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. (I Samuel 15:23) At the high water mark of her "rebellion" and Gross "stubbornness" Gale B r did have the whole Reformed Mennonite cult and Cumberland County Court behind her teasing m with her naked behind and falsely judging such "indignities" are "pure" "fully warranted -love and concer " A virtuous woman is a crown to her husband: but she that maketh ashamed i as rottenness in his bones. (Proverbs 12:4) During these past almost 33 years 1 have often thought being married to shun ing Gale Gross Bear is not unlike a Siamese twin yet attached to his dead twin. Not only did Gale Gross Bear make me "ashamed," but she also made out chi dren too "ashamed" of her adultery for years for any to tell. Plaintiff's Complaint b. The Defendant offered such indignities to the Plaintiff as to rendeu Plaintiffs condition , intolerable and life burdensome. ' ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff vs. GALE G. BEAR, Defendant Answer of Defendant Gale Gross Bear b. Denied. It is denied that Defendant offered any indignities whatsoever to Plaintiff or acted in any way to cause Plaintiffs condition to be intolerable or life burdensome. My Answer Gale Gross Bear's answer glorifies herself as "a virtuous woman," whose "price is far above rubies" and I am so far beneath her I never realized the true worth of the "virtuous woman" I found. Who can find a virtuous woman? For her price is far above rubies. The hedrt of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil. She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life. (Proverbs 3:10-12) I Thanks to State Policeman Kirk Perkins setting up the meeting, December 2 , 1997, Reformed Mennonite Senior Bishop Glenn M. Gross before witnesses and my tape recorder adamant y refused to repudiate one word of the Reformed Mennonite death sentence imposed upon me ever since J ne 11, 1972. Reformed Mennonite Gale Gross Bear willingly became the servile spearhead of the folIo ing God-judged Mennonite "doctrines of devils," (I Timothy 4: I) Mennonite "damnable heresies," (2 Peter 2 I) "cruel and inhuman punishments. " "All human ties, including those of marriage and the family, mus give way under the ban ofthe church. Crush before God, terrify, humble, pulverize with th lash ofthe ban until they return to the right way, in other words the Mennonite way, or un il they become as ravening, biting dogs or unclean, filthy swine, a dunghill of a man." For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect. For the preaching of the cross is to them hat perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. (I Corinthians 1:17, 18) Any who believe, as I did, Mennonite marriage and family murdering madn ss was not "the cross of Christ" but the lying cross of Menno Simons and "foolishness," are judged by eformed Mennonites, as those "that perish." But Mennonites who believe and obey Menno Simons' "cro s of Christ" shunning are of "us which are saved" and Menno Simons' "cross of Christ" - "is the power of od." That must be the reason, even when Gale Gross Bear said, "You servant of S tan!" To me, she didn't offer "any indignities" because all she said and did, even her naked sexual teasi g, always welcoming all but coitus, is "the power of God." How else to explain her denial of forcing "indign'ties" upon me? "It is said to be one of the cruelest punishments known to anthropologists" w ote Professor of Lebanon Valley College, Paul A. W. Wallace, in one of his historical books, Pennsylvania eed of a Nation. What is "said to be one of the cruelest punishments known to ant ropologists," Reformed Mennonite shunning "wife" Gale Gross Bear was hell-bent to force pon me ever after June 11, 1972. Page] 7 of] 975 Deposition of Reformed Mennonite Bishop Glenn M. Gross. Question: 1 thought the avoidance applied to every aspect of life except for n cessities. This would also apply to sexual relations between a husband and a wife, is that correct? Bishop Gross: Well, I would say that my own conviction would be when it sa s not to eat and turn around and follow through with something like that would not seem very consistent. I ust admit we have no gospel grounds to say this, but we feel it would be implied in the scriptures. You under tand we have no rules, regulations and codes to live by. We accept the New Testament, which is the gui ebook for believers. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; a d by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts ofthe simple. (Romans 16: 18) Bishop Glenn M. Gross' "good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of he simple" who can't know, all Bishop Gross said was this "foolishness"; "I must admit we have no scriptur I grounds, - but - we accept the New Testament which is the guide book for believers." Bishop Gross offered a premium to all married Reformed Mennonites before and after 1975 for all who deliberately pretended they are too simple to know Bishop Gross' "foolishness" ade no sense. Bishop Glenn M. Gross offers the premium to "serve - their own belly" up a ainst their just as "simple" Mennonite wife's belly in bed if they don't tell Bishop Gross he is "a double min ed man - unstable in all his ways." (James I :8) There is no way, "not only in this world, but also in that whi is to come" (Ephesians 1:21) Bishop Gross' words can be defended by "the sword of the Spirit, which is the world of God." . (Ephesians 6: 17) According to Mennonite historians, Menno Simons wrote the following on January 23, 1560, and died a year later on January 31, 1561. "My second reply is that none under heaven can practice his faith while living with his apostate consort. To begin with he would be transgressing all the explicit commallldments of the Holy Ghost concerning the ban and shunning. And besides, he would not seek the re entance of his consort in such a manner as the Scripture teaches. And third he keeps company wi one who should, according to the commandments of the Word, be shunned by all pious pe sons, I will leave to the consideration of all of you ifthis can be called practicing the faith." (Page 1007, The Complete Writings of Menna Simons) "How many Jonestowns must there be? I am here to protest against child m lesters. For as surely as there are those who lure children with lollipops in order to rape their bodies, so too do those lure children with candy-coated lies in order to rape their minds." (Rabbi Maurice Davis state this in 1979 before a group of United States Senators.) Brethren, be not children in understanding: howbeit in malice be ye children but in understanding be men. (I Corinthians 14:20) And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise f you: whose judgment now of a long time Iingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not. (2 Peter 2:3) How could any be but "children iu understanding" who can be seduced to be ieve they will be "set on fire of hell" (James 3:6) unless they allow Menno Simons and his "evil men and sedu ers" (2 Timothy 3: 13) to "merchandise" their bodies to their Mennonite damned husbands for the Menn nite demanded price of "repent"? Then why can't such "children in understanding" have their minds raped as t is easy to rape a child's body, when continuously fed such "candy-coated lies" as "none under heaven ca practice his faith while living with his apostate consort," and Mennonite wife prostitution is "fully warr nted - love and concern"? Only "lovers of their own selves" (2 Timothy 3:2) would rape the bodies of ch' dren or rape the minds of "children in understanding" Mennonite and Amish wives. Gale Gross Bear was sexually mature enough to give birth to six children. B t she was such a child "in understanding" she allowed Menno Simons, Reformed Mennonites and the Cu berland County Court's "fully warranted - love and concern" lie to gang rape her marriage and family t death for almost 33 years! Gale Gross Bear is yet such a child "in understanding" she imagines she is "a vi tuous woman" whose "price is far above rubies." Five years ago I was very surprised to have two near neighbor girls, not yet i their teens, tell me they didn't want to grow up. How much Gale Gross Bear could have spared all concerned had she told all, she wanted to grow up enough physically to enjoy sexual intercourse and be mentally mature enough to be quite capable in many ways, but didn't want to grow up enough morally to be "a virtuous woman." For of all sad words of tongue or pen the saddest are these: "It might have be n!" (Whittier) "It might have been!" Ours was the first marriage and family ever Mennonit gang raped to death by Menno Simons and his "evil men and seducers." (2 Timothy 3:13) Then all Men onites and Amish would have been as "fearful" (Revelation 21: 8) to rape another marriage and family to eath with Menno Simons' "lying tongue" as Mennonites and Amish are "fearful" to call for and end 450 ye rs of Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness. Gale Gross Bear's Answer and Counterclaim ends with: 9. Denied. It is denied that counseling is appropriate in this case. It is further ave ed that the parties have been separated for nearly thirty-three (33) years, that the Plaintiff has been repeatedly foun guilty of criminal violations for harassment and other matters directed toward the Defendant and that Plaintiff's re uest for counseling is solely based upon a desire to further harass Defendant. Wherefore, Defendant requests your Honorable Court to enter a Decree. My Answer Wouldn't the judges of the Cumberland County Court do to even Jesus Christ, "who did no sin"; (I Peter 2:22) much as the court did to a sinner such as I am, had Christ commanded Reformed Mennonites not to make "merchandise" of Gale Gross Bear's naked body? Then Christ had done to Gale Gross Bear and Reformed Mennonites as Christ did in the temple? And the Jew's Passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem, and found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: And when he had made a scourge ("a whip") of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the c~angers' money, and overthrew the tables; and said unto them that sold doves, take these things hence; make not my F ther's house an house of merchandise. And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine hous hath eaten me up. (St. John 2:13-17) I Furthermore, I may have been "repeatedly found guilty," but it wouldn't ha e been by any who did judge me guilty if there had there been "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW" and all gu'lty of inflicting their crimes and lies upon me had been found guilty, needed to step down and step into priso with me. Cumberland County, PA 1979 Criminal Court Testimony, Page 32 Bear: Did you never sexually tease after I was excommunicated? Gale Gross Bear: No, Robert, I did not. (Page 34) - Judge Harold E. Sheely: Did he ever rape you? Gale Gross Bear: In my mind, I would say yes, I don't know what the definition under the circumstances would be. As I see it, I would say yes. (Page 36) - Judge Harold E. Sheely: You are talking now of sexual intercourse? Gale Gross Bear: Yes. (Page 38) - Bear: Then you mean it occurred sometime between th . sburg man was sentenced to one to June the 11 of 1972 and 1974 when you left home, is that right? in state prison Tuesday foc lying Gale Gross Bear: That's correct. Bear: And you don't know when? is ability to work at a Cumberland Gale Gross Bear: I can't remember. Bear: But it happened? Count)' child support hcarinc.. ' ? Don d Woods Sr~ 3S. wu coovlClCd last . Gale Gross Bear: Yes. Bear: Well, were you clothed or were you naked. week b a Cumberland Count)' jury of com; Gale Gross Bear: I really can't rememher those details. mining perjury al a chil4 sup?'?" hemng on Bear: Did it happen in the times that I was in your bed or July 2 . 1998. AIlhe lime 1lc.;'iia1'li\ing in' . Wonnl ysburJ. when you were m my bed? District Attorney Michael Eakin objected and Judge Sheely upheld his objection although Judge Sheely earlier had stated: "You will have to tell us what you meant by it." Then saith Pilate unto him, Speaketh thou not unto me? Knowest thou not th t I have power to crucify thee, and have power to release thee? Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no po er at all against me, except it were given thee from above; therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the reater sin. (St. John 19:10, 11) As Christ said to Pilate, Gale Gross Bear, Judge Harold E. Sheely and Distric Attorney J. Michael Eakin had "no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above" to do evil to me, yes, even a fIlthy sinner such as I am. All "power - given from above" was "power" to force all th ee and all who support them to pretend they are too "feebleminded" to know Gale Gross Bear blatantly lied and the Cumberland County Court completely covered up her lies because her lies served the court's orrupt purposes. For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: For the weapo s of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strongholds; Casting do imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into ca tivity every thought to the obedience of Christ. (2 Corinthians 10:3-5) I The Cumberland County Court joined Gale Gross Bear and Reformed Menn nites when the court "exalteth itself against the knowledge of God" and the court judged Mennonite arriage and family murdering madness is "fully warranted -love and concern." For the word of God is quick, and powerful, sharper than any two edged swo d, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and ofthe joints and marrow. And is a disce ner ofthe thoughts and intents of the heart. Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight but all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do. (Hebrews 4: 12, 13) , ~. .~r s'ent t' prison Just so are Gale Gross Bear's lies, Reformed Mennonite cult and Cumberland County Court crimes and lies "naked and opened unto" God, just as Gale Gross Bear's shunning body was "naked and opened" unto God every time she welcomed all but "the physical union of male and female sel'ual organs." Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God. (James 4:4) For had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. (I Corinthians 2:8) Had Gale Gross Bear known it, she wouldn't have crucified the Lord of glo 's sacred marriage and family command ever since June 11, 1972 due to her "friendship of the world," ennonite marriage and family murdering madness and become "enmity with God." Had Gale Gross B ar known it, she wouldn't have become "a friend of the 'fully warranted -love and concern' world" of th Cumberland County Court to become, as "the Supreme Judge of the world" judges, "the enemy of God." Under the title of Equitable Distribution Gale Gross Bear states in part: 13. Admitted in part. Denied in part. It is admitted that Plaintiff and Defendant wned property prior to their marriage which may have increased in value or which may have been exchanged for other property. It is denied, however, that any such property exists now. It is averred, rather, that during the part es' thirty-three (33) years of separation they have mutually agreed upon the distribution of all of their marital pro erty and all marital property has been distributed accordingly; as such, no marital property exists. My Answer 13. Denied. Gale Gross Bear brought no "marital property" to our "marria e" December 14, 1958. I lived alone for almost five (5) years to get set up to be taken down by Gale Gros Bear and Reformed Mennonites. At the time of our "marriage," I owned a one hundred (100) acre f rm and all the necessary equipment to operate a farm efficiently. I would have been out of debt except I urchased a piece of farm equipment to be even more efficient. Gale Gross Bear's Counterclaim Attorney's fees, Costs and Expenses, states i part: 21. Defendant has retained Bradly L. Griffie, Esquire and the Law Firm of Griffi and Associates to represent her in this matter at an hourly rate of $250.00 per hour, which rate will be charged fo all services rendered in these proceedings. 23. Plaintiff is better able to bear the cost of Defendant's attorney's fees in this c e. WHEREFORE, Defendant requests your Honorable Court to enter an Order requirin Plaintiff to pay Defendant's attorney's fees, costs and expenses associated with these proceedings. My Answer Days after our "marriage" December 14, 1958, I made it possible for Gale Gr ss Bear to sign checks and spend money as she saw fit. I never knew her to violate that trust until the fall 0 1972, after my Mennonite excommunication and her shunning of me. A friend and neighbor warned me," ou better watch her with the money." I yet trusted her, until she tried to clean our bank account out befo e a $5,000 check for seed potatoes for the next year had cleared. Fortunately she was just a little too late. She told me what was left wasn't worth while. After that attempt at theft by deception to embarrass me fi ancially and lose my good credit rating, so essential in business, Gale Gross Bear was no longer trusted wit access to what had been, until then, our checking account. Only until it occurs can anyone realize what it is like to have a Mennonite lyi g spy in the house. Farming is said to be one of the most dangerous occupations and after almost being killed a few times it no longer seems frightening. I have often thought I would prefer to die ten (10) times rath r to endure those first ten (10) years again. As with the Cumberland County Court's crimes and lies, so al 0 is it with Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness. No creditable witness is intended to s rvive, tell and be believed. I know I am believed, as "the Supreme Judge of the world" explains. For my thoughts are not your thoughts neither are my ways your ways, saith he Lord. For as the heavens are higher "than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and y thoughts than your thoughts. (Isaiah 55:8, 9) For everyone that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest is deeds should be reproved. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be ma e manifest, that they are wrought in God. (St. John 3:20, 21) In English law, man's ways are presumed innocent until proven guilty and if the many of cult and court gang up on the one and prevent him from proving them guilty, eureka, all are "innocent", but the one is guilty as the devil! Gale Gross Bear is quite skillful in playiug the many against the one. During November, 1972 I went to visit my Reformed Mennonite father. Our father and my Reformed Mennonite brother Francis came outside to meet me. Francis said, "You tried to rape Gale!" I said I didn't and could prove it. They refused to hear my rebuttal and prove my innocence by hearing Gale Gross Bear's vers on and mine with both present, as Gale Gross Bear was present in my supposedly "shunned" bed whe the alleged attempted "rape" occurred. Gale Gross Bear would have needed to deny in the presence of my father an brother something she tested during the first year of our "marriage." Once in a playful mood in bed she said 1 couldn't force her. Gale Gross Bea was so pleasantly startled how quickly "his it was," (Ezekiel 16: 15) she never challenged me in that way a ain. Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the Leopard his spots? Then may ye Iso do good, that are accustomed to do evil. (Jeremiah 13:23) Same "skin," same "spots," in Gale Gross Bear's answers as I have been for ed to deal with for almost thirty-three (33) years! In the fall of 1972 Gale Gross Bear also believed I was' better able to bear the cost" of Gale Gross Bear cleaning out our jointly held bank account and destroy my redit. Now Gale Gross Bear asserts, "Plaintiff is better able to bear the cost of Defendant's attorney's fees;- hen for all Gale Gross Bear knows, my checking account may be in 2005 just as small as it was in the fall of 972 when she tried to clean me out. H is true, we have mutually divided the part of our married property I used or years. But Gale Gross Bear failed to mention the marital property she has used for years. Gale Gross ear seems to be playing the game of, "What is ours is half mine, but what is mine is all mine!" Gale Gross Bear has already received half the value of our one marital prop rty listed under my name at the Cumberland County Court. But Gale Gross bear hasn't been gracious eno gh to divide with me even the value of one of the properties listed under her name. "Plaintiff and Defendant have over their thirty-three (33) year separation appropri tely distributed all of their marital property to their mutual satisfaction and agreement and no such marital prop rty exists at this time for purposes of distribution." Only when Gale Gross Bear divides equally the value of all property listed u der her name, as I have for her, will her statement before the court not be false. Before I pay Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire $250.00 per hour for helping Gale G oss Bear lie against me once more in court I plan to sit out what is left of my life in prison rather than cough p Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire's blood money! Try me. You won't like me. Surely, Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire should have his hand on the Cumberland ounty Court's pulse enough to know Gale Gross Bear's interests must be protected at what ever cost in order not to offend Gale Gross Bear. Suppose the Cumberland County Court offended Gale Gross Bear and she c anged her "skin" and her "spots" because she finally believes "the Supreme Judge of the world," plus at si ty-seven (67) years Gale Gross Bear realizes she is no longer "a spring chicken" and her days are drawin nearer when: But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou sh It be condemned. (St. Matthew 12:36,37) Then Gale Gross Bear would confess, here and now for the past almost thirty three (33) years, Menno Simons, the Reformed Mennonite cult and Cumberland County Court caused h r "sinning," just as Cicero stated. "The greatest incitement to guilt is the hope of sinning with impunity." Unless Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire is too "greedy of filthy lucre" (1 Timothy 3: ) to think honestly, wouldn't he have told Gale Gross Bear, to in effect, answer my Complaint as no being worthy of the dignity ofa reply? That is, by "a virtuous woman" of whom "the heart of her hnsband an) safely trust (to) do him good and not evil all the days of her life?" Would not Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire have advised Gale Gross Bear to put her full trust in the Cumberland County Court not wanting her to unload here and now, before 'the day of judgment" how both cult and court corrupted "a virtuous woman" 1 once could "safely trust"? Late cousin and lawyer Richard H. Wagner, said to me thirty (30) years ago, "They should have known never to get in a 'piss'(ing) (Isaiah 36: 12) contest with a skunk." Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the Leopard his spots? Then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil. (Jeremiah 13:26) Doesn't the Supreme Judge of the world" command me until I die: "Where~ re rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith"? (Titus 1:13) For if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all hings. (I John 3:20) In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure ill give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth; And that they may recover themselves out ofth snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will. (2 Timothy 2:25,26) How many cult and court and other hearts don't "condemn" them in not wa ting "God peradventure (to give Gale Gross Bear) repentance to the acknowledging of the truth"? Then ho could 1 not forgive Gale Gross Bear if God forgave her of her sins and she finally acknowledged this tru Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefor God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. (St. Matthew 19:6) How many hearts, including Gale Gross Bear's "condemn" them in not want ng to see us rapidly walking arm in loving arm toward the sunset of life, after both being chastised by "the S preme Judge ofthe world," proving we both may not be quite the "bastards" many believe we are? Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin. And ye have forgott n the exhortation that speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of he Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him. For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourge h every son whom he receiveth. Ifye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what on is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, th n are ye bastards, and not sons. (Hebrews l2:4-8) Explanation For those who believe I have turned this into a bitter divorce dispute by bein seduced to believe by the devil Gale Gross Bear is not a "fully warranted love and concern" - "virtuous w man" - her price is far above rubies (whom) the heart of her husband doth safely trust." (Proverbs 3:10, II) During the first year of our "marriage" December 14, 1958, Gale Bear becam Gross stubborn. She was deteq~lined she would have her way in what I believed was dead wrong. She wo ldn't talk, kiss, embrace or be be~ded for a whole week. Then her facial expression became visibly more me low and she surrendered in bed. Gale Gross Bear said then ~, f'I always wanted a husband who coul put me in my place." Th . d' 'ty' '/I...CSI:k) (i-I.., 't b'l'ty f . d d (D') ere IS no Ispan m marnage 1 e unsUl a I I 0 mm an purpose. Ie ens The wise are instructed by reason; ordinary minds, by experience; the stupid y necessity; and brutes by instinct. (Cicero) I always wanted a wife who tried to know her place, as I tried to know mine, nd we would try to stay in our places. I also wanted a wife who could be instructed by reason and not instr cted by her sexual instincts to "put me in my place." In the battle for business, it seemed Gale Gross Bear had a husband she alwa s wanted. Even in pre 1970 dollars, when I wanted to spend $10,000 of our money, Gale Gross Bear sometim s didn't want me to explain the boring details to her. Only when this Mennonite cult trouble began did Gale Gross Bear complain to me. "I always wanted a husband w~'l: is respected by everyone as you are when I go t the bank." I always wanted to believe: "A poor man,.oetter than a liar." (Proverbs 19:22) .' And all the devils besought him, saying, Send us into the swine that we may e ter into them. And forth with Jesus gave the leave, and the unclean spirits went out and entered into the sine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea, (they were about two thousand;) and choked in the sea. (St. Mark 5: 12, 13) "What can you do? I have the whole church behind me," boldly boasted Gale Gross Bear soou after my excommunication June 11, 1972. I don't doubt, had I said, "Come to my Reformed Mennonite brother Franci$'s hog farm and see," and had I "power - given from above" to do to all of Francis's hogs with Mennonite "doctrines of devils" (I Timothy 4: I) in them as Christ could have, Gale Gross Bear would never have dared tempt me to this day! I don't question, Gale Gross Bear would have finally realized she had "a hus and who could put me in my place," had I "power - given from above," as Christ had been given. I believe, had our six children all seen what "power - given from above" I h d to put Mennonite "doctrines of devils" into all their uncle Francis's swine; they would ever reme ber the spirit of Mennonite "doctrines of devils," coming out of their mother and all Reformed Mennonites, right into all Francis's hogs, causing them to all drown. Therefore, all who fault me, actually fault me because I am such a sinner I h ven't had "power - given from above" ever since June 11, 1972 to cause the spirit of Mennonite "doctrine of devils" (I Timothy 4:1) to enter into Reformed Mennonite Francis L. Bear's "swine". Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. (Isaiah I: I ) As "a state actor," Judge Clinton R. Weidner spoke for the Commonwealth f Pennsylvania when he publicly stated April 26, 1976: "My God, he brought this all on himself." Yes, I freely confess, because I had not "power - given from above" as Jesus hrist had, to do with Reformed Mennonite "doctrines of devils" and cause them to enter Francis L. ear's hogs, I brought this all on myself. And they that saw it told them how it befell to him that was possessed with t e devil, and also concerning the swine. And they began to pray him to depart out of their coasts. (St. Mark 5: 16, 17) It's all my fault! Only because I can't drive Mennonite "doctrines of devils" ut of Mennonites and into all Mennonite hogs, Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness wasn' stopped thirty (30) years ago. All Mennonites and Amish would "pray (that the following Mennonites 'doct ines of devils' (1 Timothy 4: I) depart out of their coasts." "In the year 1558 both Menno and Dirk Philips published strong tracts on th question. In Menno's tract entitled Instruction on Excommunication the strict position on shunning which d manded that all human ties, including those of marriage and the family, must give way under the ban of the hurch, was clearly taught." (Page 28) "And if this be heresy and diabolical seduction, as the preachers loudl assert, then must the Son of God, Christ Jesus, and all the prophets, apostles, and lofty witnesses of God, ave been manifest heretics, all! And then the whole Scripture, which teaches naught but moral improveme t, and everywhere points us to Christ, must have been naught but deceit and falsehood!" (Pages 527-28) "N t a single Scripture is falsified or broken by us. Not a single gloss is made. To not one absurdity are e driven. It is the plain Scripture and its foundation which we present to the reader, as you may feel wit your hands and see with your eyes." (Page 886) "For how can there ever be a greater love for God and h w can there be a more praiseworthy profession than that one should be willing and ready not only to gi e up his temporal goods, ease, honor, and prosperity, but also shun his dearest friend upon earth, while i full health, out of sincere regard for Christ, in obedience to His eternal and holy truth?" (Page 973) "Till hey again observe the truth and cease from their error and return to the right way, (i.e. the Mennonite way) r until they become as ravening, biting dogs or unclean, filthy swine." (Page 986) "Crush before God, errify, humble, pulverize," (Page 989) "with the lash of the ban." (Page 990) "It is evidenced in that you, a unghill of a man, ashes, and a vapor, dare to extol your office above that of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, and to put your doctrine ahead ofthat of the apostles." (Page 1019, The Complete Writings of Menna Simons) William Booth founded the Salvation Army, May, 1878, in London, England. "Then in the spring of 1885, seventeen year old Annie Swan turned up on the doorstep of Army Headquarters. Clad in a vivid scarlet dres' - symbol of the harlot's trade - she was incongruously clutching a Salvation rmy Songbook and demanding to see the general. Bramwell, as his father's dep ty, heard out her story. A village girl from Sussex, Annie had come to London to work as a domestic servant - and had walked into a cleverly laid trap. The service called not for cap and ribbons, but for the red silk dress, and the "hous ' was a brothel whose inmates were captive teen-aged girls." "In 1890, the Salvation Army had 13 homes housing over ree hundred girls in the United Kingdom alone, and a further 17 abroad, fore hadowing the mid-twentieth century total of 119 homes, caring for four thousa d girls a year." On August 20, 1912, William Booth died and "150,000 per ons filed past the old warrior's casket." "Unknown to most, royalty was there, too. Far to the rear of the hall sat Britain's Queen Mary, a staunch admirer of Booth. Beside her 0 the aisle was a shabby, but neatly dressed woman, who confessed her secret to the Queen. Once she had been a prostitute, and the Salvation Army had saved her. Years afterward at a meeting, General Booth heard her story and told h r gently: 'My girl, when you get to heaven, Mary Magdalene will give you one 0 the best places. ,,, "The woman had come early to claim an aisle seat, she sai , guessing that the casket would pass within feet of her. As it did, she had unobt sively placed three faded carnations on the lid, and they were the only flowers n the casket." "Queen Mary was deeply moved when the woman turned t her and said simply, in words which could stand as William Booth's epitaph:' e cared for the likes of us.'" "For how can there ever be a greater love for God and how can there be a m re praiseworthy profession than that one should be willing and ready not only to give up his temporal good, ease, honor, and prosperity, but also sbun his dearest friend upon earth, while in full health, out f sincere regard for Christ, in obedience to His eternal and holy truth?" (Page 973, The Complete Writings of enno Simons) Menno Simons knew, as Mennonites and Amish know to this day, with few e ceptions, Mennonite wives, not husbands, fall into Menno Simons' "cleverly laid trap;" Menno Simons asks all Mennonite married women, "How can there ever be a greater love for God - than - while in full hea th (sexually)" they are "ready and willing" to starve their Mennonite damned husband of sex until he p ys the demanded Mennonite price of "repent." For had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. (2 Co inthians 2:8) Although horrible, but true, probably girls and young women somewhere in he world will fall into "a cleverly laid trap" today and be forced into prostitution. Evil men and women ho have "made shipwreck" (I Timothy I: 19) the lives of young women by forcing them into a life of prostitut on, know what they are doing. But I am convinced Menno Simons and his "evil men and seducers" (2 Timot y 3: 13) outsmarted even themselves in that their "cleverly laid trap" for Mennonite wives "while in full h alth (sexually)" was so "cleverly laid" even they didn't know what they were doing. Even after almost 450 years of Mennonite wife prostitution would Bishop Ea peddled my shunning "wife" to me had he and his fellow Reformed Mennonites sprung the Mennonite "cleverly laid (prostitution) trap," kept hidden for more t Basinger have so brazenly own he had publicly an four centuries? '. "Do you know what I suggest? If you would take that (tape recorder) home and bury it on J your farm, and if you would repent, you would have your wife back." (Reformed Mennonite Bishop Earl M, Basinger propositioning me on behalf of Menno Simons (1496-1561) and all Reformed Mennonites, April 15, 1973.) Read The Complete Writings of Menno Simons and weep! For 450 years Menno Simons has taught Mennonites: "For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie." (Revelation 22: 15) , I am certain, Mennonites and Amish who glorify Menno Simons, were never aware of how Revelation 22:15 truly describes Menno Simons and his "evil men and seducers" (2 Timoth 3:13) who are so proud of their humility they dress in "plain clothes" "to be seen of men." (St. Matthew 23 5) Did Mennonites ever know, any more than Any Mennonite can "take the hel et of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit which is the word of God" (Ephesians 6: 17) and defend The omplete Writings of Menno Simons from how the Holy Bible justly judges them in Revelation 22:15? "Truth For Authority" Those words of Lucretia Mott are chiseled in stone on the State Capital step at Harrisburg. If it seems I have somewhat digressed, I take this liberty because I believe I ave "Truth For Authority." Truth like a bastard comes into the world never without ill-fame to him who gives her birth. (Milton) When I die, Gale Gross Bear, our six children, their spouses and our grandc i1dren may not say, "He cared for the likes of us." But just possibly this letter of warning can prevent ennonitism from making "shipwreck" (I Timothy I :14) of other marriages, families and lives and some ay say, "He cared for the likes of us." April I, 2005 " . VERIFICATION I verify that the statements made in the forgoing document are true a~d correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 19 P A.C,S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities. DATE:~ 10 ~ ear, Plaintiff () r",) ~:-A -\ r ." . , I ~ , C:! ROBERT L BEAR, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COM ON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNT, PENNSYLVANIA vs. : CNIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant : NO. 05-935 : IN DIVORCE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Robert L Bear, hereby certify that I did the //,f. day of April 2005, ca se a copy of Plaintiffs answer and Counterclaim to be served upon Defendand by certified mail, restrict d delivevy at tile following addresses: Gale G. Bear 1166 Rhoda Blvd, Mechanicsburg, P A 17055 DATE: ~ - i - 0 S -CJ~j/t . Robert L 201 Potato Carlisle, P tffz(/ ~ ~ ~ -;;f:) \ c5' ~, ~~~~:. Cf-:i- ..;;;.-\_.-- /.-" .."..-. {f~ ~;, ?:(~- T;.(" ,.-:;:.LJ "'<:'.;e ,- , S;;, -, _4 .4- f' ::::.r- -:;" ';S >of? o s:- q. ~:Q ~~ -oq t?~b_ 3"(\ _',_~ ;f", <;:}'(.'"1 t"f<' "" 1'<= 'Z CASE NO: 2005-00935 P SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA: COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND BEAR ROBERT L VS BEAR GALE G JASON VIORAL , Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says, the within COMPLAINT - DIVORCE BEAR GALE G DEFENDANT was served upon he at 1166 RHODA BLVD , at 2120:00 HOURS, on the 7th day of March , 2005 MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055 GALE BEAR by handing to a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT - DIVORCE togethe with and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents hereof, Sheriff's Costs: Docketing Service Affidavit Surcharge 18,00 5,18 ,00 10,00 ,00 33,18 Sworn and Subscribed to before day of A,D, i,-:, )~. Proth . ~----~,_H' U So Answers: R, Thomas Kline 03/08/2005 ROBERT L BEAR By: / L...,..--'~' '.0' ~/'''':// ' .,:I'.~'::~~ ..."j ,~ (. ~.~ Deputy Sheriff ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA v. CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G, BEAR, Defendant NO, 05-935 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 12th day of April, 2005, upon consideration of Plaintiff's request for change of venue, a Rule is hereby issued upon Defendant to show cause why the relief requested should not be granted. RULE RETURNABLE within 20 days of service. BY THE COURT, r~bert L. Bear , 201 Potato Road Carlisle, PA 17013-8991 Plaintiff, pro se l I cp.-L~i) LfY-~'QA- ~\ r8 QLJ- J~ -('--5 vBfadley L. Griffie, Esq. 200 N, Hanover Street Carlisle, P A 170 I 3 Attorney for Defendant :rc en :Ii ,,' \ \'. .\" cn>\7 v \.'OJ U ;.lv'".... ,;0 -'_.<~~~""'-"""~'~'" ROBERT 1. BEAR, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs, : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G, BEAR, Defendant : NO. 05-935 CIVIL TERM : IN DIVORCE ANSWER TO ORDER OF APRIL 12.2005 TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR A CHANGE OF VENUE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED AND NOW, comes Respondent, Gale G, Bear, by and through her counsel of record, Bradley 1. Griffie, Esquire, and the law firm of Griffie & Associates, and files the following Answer to Plaintiffs Request for a Change of Venue: I, Respondent, after a thorough review of the 14-page document filed by Petitioner, is unable to find any factual allegations relative to his request for a change of venue. 2, The allegations, statements, literary quotes, and other claims and phrases in the Petitioner's 14-page document do not set forth individual facts, do not set forth relevant facts, and otherwise do not set forth claims upon which the relief requested could be granted, 3, Petitioner's 14-page document, which apparently suggests a request on the Petitioner's part for a change of venue, fails to set forth any factual basis to which a response could be filed, to Petitioner's request. 4, The parties have resided for their entire lives in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 5, The parties had resided together when married in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania and have resided in Cumberland County since they separated since approximately 33 years ago, 6. All assets that were in existence at the time of the parties' separation has been distributed by mutual agreement and there are no issues of equitable distribution to address by the Court, 7, The standing Divorce Master in Cumberland County has never dealt with the issues related to divorce and equitable distribution which will be before the Divorce Master in these proceedings, 8. The prior proceedings in which the Petitioner was involved were not related to the pending divorce claims. 9. Petitioner is operating pro se in these proceedings and would not have any costs should the Court transfer venue. 10, Petitioner's position appears to be that he has received adverse decisions on unrelated matters before the Court in the past and, because of this, should have a change of venue on this matter. I J. Petitioner's position in this regard is without legal basis, fails to set forth a basis for a change of venue and would create undesirable precedence, 12, Respondent wishes to properly address all matters in this case and has retained legal counsel to do so such that she would incur additional expense should this matter he transferred for change of venue, 13, There is no basis in law or fact for a change of venue, WHEREFORE, Respondent requests your Honorable Court to dismiss the Petitioner's request for a change of venue, Respectfully submitted, ~ Date L. , Esquire tome or Defendant Griffie & Associates 200 North Hanover Street Carlisle, P A 17013 (717) 243-5551 (800) 347-5552 VERIFICATION I verify that the statements made in the foregoing document are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities. DATE: J/o' ..-,)'~' '6,,:-; / ~ ' ,-1 "./ "0:-<1<</ ,~./() ". Gale G. Bear, Defendant . ROBERT 1. BEAR, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA vs, : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G, BEAR, Defendant : NO, 05-935 CIVIL TERM : IN DIVORCE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Hannah Herman-Snyder, Esquire, hereby certifY that I did, the ~ay of April, 2005, cause a copy of Defendant's Answer to Petition for Change of Venue to be served upon Plaintiff by first-class mail, postage prepaid at the following addresses: Robert 1. Bear 20 I Potato Road Carlisle, P A 170 I3 DATE: LfLu'/d '( f . e, Esquire ey h eftndant GRI & ASSOCIATES 200 North Hanover Street Carlisle, P A 17013 (717)243-5551 (800)347-5552 ~~:~ "-> () '.:''':' ,:':",;'J "n Co" :;:1 ;; '.. ~o:: 1 ,,~ -,., f''' CJ - ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA v, CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G, BEAR, Defendant NO, 05-935 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2005, upon consideration of Plaintiffs request for change of venue, and of Defendant's Answer to Order of April 12, 2005, To Show Cause Why Plaintiffs Request for a Change of Venue Should Not Be Granted, Plaintiffs request for a change of venue is denied. BY THE COURT, Robert L. Bear ~O 1 Potato Road Carlisle, PA 17013-8991 Plaintiff, pro se Bradley L. Griffie, Esq, ~OO N. Hanover Street <(:arlisle, P A 17013 Attorney for Defendant :rc 2+1:8 uJ q... 1 '.:;J Hil)! d ,d ...l1J\)(J . ROBERT L. BEAR, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE Q, BEAR, : NO. 05-935 Defendant : IN DIVORCE Request that divorce proceedings be immediately stopped due to the Cumberland County Court denying me a change of venue. "Do you believe there is anyone in the Cumberland County Courthouse who doesn't know the court lied in my case?" I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed (Galatians 2: 11) and asked First Assistant District Attorney Jaime M. Keating that question December 19, 2000. In a rare moment of honesty in my case Jaime Keating confessed, "There may be a few." A lying tongue hateth those that are afflicted by it, (Proverbs 26:28) "All scripture is given by inspiration of God" (2 Timothy 3: 16) and judges all who cause me to be "afflicted by" the Cumberland County Court's "lying tongue hateth" me, Therefore I don't have a chance and want to stop this divorce while I am behind and before I get any more behind. I see by his papers, Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire, has proposed E. Robert Elicker, II, Esquire, as "Master" with respect to the following claims: "Distribution of Property and Counsel Fees," "Judge Oler, you are part of the criminal conspiracy of covering up how I was lied into the mental hospital. - I say that the Cumberland County Court has - is guilty - of the crime of lying me into the mental hospital, attempting to have me declared criminally insane, One of the lies was that I held up a school bus with a loaded gun." This I stated in the witness chair June 6, 2000. The court transcript was certified by Judge OleL In time we hate that which we often fear, (Shakespeare) Don't all involved hate me as much as they fear to publicly confess the Cumberland County Court's crimes and lies? A friend traveling in Thailand at the time sent me the following World News headline and its accompanying news story. A man who delivered a load of fertilizer to the farm years later said he never thought while serving as a soldier in South Korea he would meet the husband he read about being accused of rape by his Mennonite shunning wife, lDn1rh'~ -i\ll'!fi 11 4. i'\.l11flU )'t,f1. 10.&.. BANGKOK POST Wt.:J)''':SIJ..\l" f)U:t::\1Ht;K S. 'I WORLD NEWS BANGKOK. THIAlANO Cumberland County, PA 1979 Criminal Court Testimony, Page 32 Bear: Did you never sexually tease after I was excommunicated: Gale Gross Bear: No, Robert, I did not, (Page 34) - Judge Harold E. Sheely: Did he ever rape you? Gale Gross Bear: In my mind, I would say yes, I don't know what the definition under the circumstances would be, As I see it, I would say yes, (Page 36) - Judge Harold E. Sheely: You are talking now of sexual intercourse? Gale Gross Bear: Yes, (Page 38) - Bear: Then you mean it occurred sometime between June the 11th of 1972 and 1974 when you left home, is that right? Gale Gross Bear: That's correct, Bear: And you don't know when? Gale Gross Bear: I can't remember. Bear: But it happened? Gale Gross Bear: Yes. Bear: Well, were you clothed or were you naked? Gale Gross Bear: I really can't remember those details. Bear: Did it happen in the times that I was in your bed or when you were in my bed? District Attorney Michael Eakin objected and Judge Sheely upheld his objection although Judge Sheely earlier had stated: "You will have to tell us what you meant by it." . , Furthermore, why should I be forced to pay Gale Gross Bear's "counsel fees," helping her get away with her lie of denying she committed adultery against me, which none of our six children can deny the truth of the two who said she did commit adultery? That is, anymore than I had to pay the court costs for Gale Gross Bear and the Cumberland County Court uniting to help her get away with her Gross lie and perjury crime that I forced "rape, sexual intercourse" upon her? Wouldn't the Cumberland County Court ignore all her properties and sell my one property in order to pay Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire's $250 per hour "counsel fees" rather than publicly confess the Cumberland County Court's long standing crimes and lies? "Do you know what 1 suggest? If you would take that (tape recorder) home and bury it on your farm, and if you would repent, you would have your wife back." (Reformed Mennonite Bishop Earl M. Basinger propositioning me on behalf of Men no Simons (1496-1561) and all Reformed Mennonites, April15, 1973.) Thus were they defiled with their own works, and went awhoring with their own inventions. (Psalm 106:39) Menno Simons and all Reformed Mennonites "went awhoring" when they demanded their price of "repent" before they would "Give me my wife - that I may go in unto her," (Genesis 29:21) All completely fulfilled :an American Heritage Dictionary definition of whores: "To offer oneself or another for sexual hire." Why was it anymore "fully warranted - love and concern" for Reformed Mennonites to demand tIl1eir price of "repent" in the name of God before they would "Give me my wife - that 1 may go in unto her;" (Genesis 29:21) than had they demanded dollars in the name of God and prostitution before "I may go in unto her"? He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them, (St, John 12:40) Are not Christ's words proven true? Are not the hearts of Reformed Mennonites and those of the Cumberland County Court too "hardened" to confess the truth of their crimes and lies? Are the "eyes" of all not too "blinded" to see how they can publicly confess the truth of their crimes and lies and continue to lord over their victims? Nothing is so good for an igtlOrant man as silence; and if he was sensible of this he would not be ignorant. (Saadi) Don't all, by their abashed $i1ence in refusing to publicly and honestly answer my apt question, prove they are not ignorant of the cataclysmic consequences if all would be honest enough to publicly confess their crimes and lies? Mennonite Historians in The Complete Writings of Menno Simons are agreed, Menno Simons wrote the following November 12, 1556, "With great sadness of heart I inform my dear brethren that I receive one complaining letter after another, touching the relation of husband and wife in regard to he ban; so that I notice great sadness withy many - a matter that does not surprise me at all; for from the beginning of my service, yes, more than twenty years, I have been distressed with great fear concerning this matter to this very hour --, 4' , -- "In view of this, my heart was filled with sorrow on hearing that a certain length of time was given Swaanteje Rutgers in which to leave her husband, or that in case of her failure to leave him, she was to be delivered up to Satan and excommunicated, -- "My heart never shall consent to such indiscreet extremism or agree to such plan," (Pages 1048-49, The Complete Writings of Menno Simons) Mennonite historians have declared Mennonite wife Swaantje Rutgers was "short in stature," but she was far more woman than all who weakened to shun their Mennonite damned husbands and fulfill the Holy Bible description of them. How weak is thine heart, saith the Lord God, seeing thou doest the work of an imperious whorish woman, (Ezekiel 16:30) Selling my one property to pay the "counsel fees" of Gale Gross Bear would only reward her because she was too "weak" to:be a real woman in the similitude of Swaantje Rutgers and would reward her for taking her place with the hordes of "imperious whorish" Mennonite husband shunning women, How is it, during all of 450 years, Mennonites haven't seemed to hear, "how weak is thine heart, saith the Lord God" to Menno Simons for stating November 12, 1556; "My heart never shall consent to such indiscreet extremism or agree to such plans?" Yetjust 3 years, 2 months and 11 days later, January 23,1560, Menno Simons erected his Mennonite wall, not unlike the$oviet Union erecting its infamous Berlin Wall during "the Cold War," According to Mennonite historians, Menno Simons wrote the following on January 23, 1560, and died a year later on January 31, 1561. "My second reply is that none under heaven can practice his faith while living with his apostate consort, To begin with he would be transgressing all the explicit commandments of the Holy Spirit concerning the ban. and shunning, And besides, he would not seek the repentance of his consort in such a manner as the Scripture teaches, And third he keeps company with one who should, according to the commandments ofthe Word, be shunned by all pious persons, I will leave to the consideration of all of you if this can be called practicing the faith," (Page 1007, The Complete Writings of Menna Simons) But I say unto you, that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned, (St. Matthew 12:36,37) According to Jesus Chris's Words, Menno Simons "shall give account there of in the day of judgment" of how he said, "My heart never shall consent to such indiscreet extremism or agree to such plans," As far as I know, Mennonite historians don't tell whether Swaantje Rutgers lived 3 years more and was the first of MenrJio Simons' tens of thousands of victims of his "indiscreet plans," as Menno Simons confessed Mennonite leader Sylis stated the truth, "Understand then first of all, that I am blamed by Sylis of being an unstable weathercock because I have published as he says two tracts' which contradict each other, (Page 1002) "Second, I understand that $ylis has also said that I have published a book from which nothing but hatred, murder and blasphemy could come," (Page 1003, The Complete Writings of Menno Simons) Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. (St. Matthew 19:6) I . ,. Every Mennonite or Amish cult murdered marriage and family proves to this day, nothing has ever come of Menno Simons' "Indiscreet Extremism" enforced by his die-hard devotees for 450 years but "hatred, murder, and blasphemy" of Jesus Christ's sacred marriage and family commands, Thou hand join in hand, the wicked shall not be unpunished: but the seed of the righteous shall be delivered, (Proverbs 11 :21) I don't say I am of "the seed ofthe righteous." I just say, for the first time ever the Mennonite "hatred, murder, and blasphemy, indiscreet extremism hand join in hand" with the Cumberland County Court. All are hell-bent to prove God "a liar" (1 John 5:10) in that all of cult and court "shall- be unpunished" if cult and court "hand join in ~and" continues. I was so deceived by Menn\) Simons and his "evil men and seducers," (2 Timoth6y 3:13) I very unfortunately caused six children to be born into this "world of woe and sin" before I realized the Gross sin I was committing e~ery time I enjoyed "the natural use of the woman." (Romans 1:27) Just like borrowing moneyfrom a bank only as long as I paid the interest demanded, I was permitted to borrow "the nat~ral use of the woman" from Reformed Mennonites only as long as I paid the interest in MennoniJism demanded. I purchased a Cumberland' County Court "marriage license" in 1958, only to realize ever after June 23, 1976, the Gross frau-l perpetrated against me by the "evil men and seducers" (2 Tirnothy 3:13) of the Cumberland County Court. I didn't buy a Cumberland County Court "marriage license," I bought a Cumberll!-nd County Court "fully warranted -love and concern" license for Reformed Mennonites to loan \me "the natural use of the woman" only as long as I paid their evil interest in Mennonitism demanded. Please forgive me, I am notione of whom it can be said, "And in their mouth was found no guile," (Revelation 14:5) unless I confess "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" here and now, Gale Gross Bear aIild I were never married. The Cumberland County Court only sold me a license in 1958 for Reformed Mennonites to prostitute her body to me only as long as I paid the interest in Mennonitislm they demanded. How can it possibly be said of all Reformed Mennonites, the Cumberland County Court and their weak cast of supporting characters until they confess their lies and their court's crimes and lies; "And in their mouth was found no guile"? Sincerely submitted, -RJ.r -;( ~ Robert I. Bear May 19,2005 . . ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff v, GALEG. BEAR, Defendant : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : CIVIL ACTION - LAW : NO. 05-935 : IN DIVORCE ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this day of 2005, the request by Plaintiffto stop these "divorce" proceedings is granted, This court finally and grudgingly confesses the truth. A Cumberland County "marriage license" licensing Reformed Mennonites to loan "the natural use of the woman" (Romans 1:27) only as long as the interest in Mennonitism was paid is not "marriage," but pure prostitution, ifthere can be such an oxymoron, A "marriage" and "family" was impossible and therefore a "divorce" would be just as impossible. BY THE COURT, 1. Copy to Bradley L Griffie, Esquire Lawyer for Defendant . Every Mennonite or Amish cult murdered marriage and family proves to this day, nothing has ever come of Menno Simons' "Indiscreet Extremism" enforced by his die-hard devotees for 450 years but "hatred, murder, and blasphemy" of Jesus Christ's sacred marriage and family commands. Thou hand join in hand, the wicked shall not be unpunished: but the seed of the righteous shall be delivered, (Proverbs I 1:21) I don't say I am of "the seed ofthe righteous." I just say, for the first time ever the Mennonite "hatred, murder, and blasphemy, indiscreet extremism hand join in hand" with the Cumberland County Court. All are hell-bent to prove God "a liar" (1 John 5: 10) in that all of cult and court "shall- be unpunished" if cult and court "hand join in hand" continues. I was so deceived by Menno Simons and his "evil men and seducers," (2 Timoth6y 3:13) I very unfortunately caused six children to be born into this "world of woe and sin" before I realized the Gross sin I was committing every time I enjoyed "the natural use of the woman," (Romans 1:27) Just like borrowing money from a bank only as long as I paid the interest demanded, I was permitted to borrow "the natural use of the woman" from Reformed Mennonites only as long as I paid the interest in Mennonitism demanded. I purchased a Cumberland County Court "marriage license" in 1958, only to realize ever after June 23, 1976, the Gross fraud perpetrated against me by the "evil men and seducers" (2 Timothy 3:13) ofthe Cumberland County Court. I didn't buy a Cumberland County Court "marriage license." I bought a Cumberland County Court "fully warranted -love and concern" license for Reformed Mennonites to loan me "the natural use of the woman" only as long as I paid their evil interest in Mennonitism demanded, Please forgive me, I am not one of whom it can be said, "And in their mouth was found no guile," (Revelation 14:5) unless I confess "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" here and now, Gale Gross Bear and I were never married, The Cumberland County Court only sold me a license in 1958 for Reformed Mennonites to prostitute her body to me only as long as I paid the interest in Mennonitism they demanded, How can it possibly be said of all Reformed Mennonites, the Cumberland County Court and their weak cast of supporting characters until they confess their lies and their court's crimes and lies; "And in their mouth was found no guile"? Sincerely submitted, - RJ..fZ:, ~ Robert L Bear May 19,2005 ~ ~--:4 f:\ I..,~ r..': -, (', .-. ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEA OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA vs. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant : NO. 05-935 : IN DIVORCE PETITION TO BIFURCATE DIVORCE AND NOW, comes Petitioner, Gale G. Bear, by and through her counsel, Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire, and the law firm of Griffie & Associates, and petitions the Court as follows: I, Your Petitioner is the Defendant in the above-captioned action and an adult individual currently residing at 1166 Rhode Boulevard, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 2. Your Respondent is the Plaintiff in the above-captioned action and an adult individual currently residing at 201 Potato Road, Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 3, A Complaint in Divorce was filed by Plaintiff on February 22, 2005 4, An Answer and Counterclaim to the divorce action was filed on March 16, 2005. 5. A further responsive pleading was filed by the Respondent on April I, 2005. 6. Petitioner has filed an Affidavit Under Section 3301(d) of the Divorce Code to which no Counter-Affidavit has been filed, 7, In Respondent's Complaint for Divorce, he confirmed that the parties have been separated since June II, 1972, 8. Petitioner believes the parties have been separated since at least June II, 1972, 9, The parties have been separated for nearly thirty-three years and both parties have confirmed the separation has existed for this period of time. 10. During the nearly thirty-three year separation the parties have mutually disposed of aU of their assets that were in existence at the time of their separation. II, Respondent has alleged that there is equitable distribution to be addressed in these proceedings, 12. Due to the extended period of time that the parties have been separated, the confirmation from both parties that they wish to have a divorce thus allowing for a no-fault divorce, and the averment by the Petitioner that there are no assets to distribute, it is appropriate for the divorce proceedings to be bifurcated, 13. Petitioner has filed a Motion for Appointment of Master and a conference was held at which time Petitioner and her counsel appeared and the Respondent appeared pro se, 14, At the time of the Master's conference, the Respondent seemed to confirm to the Master and counsel for Petitioner that there are no marital assets at dispute in this case, 15. Despite this being the only additional claim that has been raised by the Respondent, Respondent indicated a refusal to execute an Affidavit of Consent that would allow for the parties to secure a divorce pursuant to Section 3301(c) of the Divorce Code, 16. Both parties have moved on with their lives over their extended separation and are entitled to have a divorce based upon their separation for in excess of two years. 17, Both parties have confirmed through their pleadings their desire to have a divorce. 18, As Respondent refused to participate fully in the Divorce Master's conference and, in fact, left the proceedings in an agitated state and with the suggestion that his cooperation would not be forthcoming in any respect with respect to these proceedings, it is believed that ongoing proceedings before the Divorce Master will be complicated, delayed, and otherwise fruitless for an extended period of time, 19, It is anticipated that if the Respondent has the opportunity to have any proceeding occur in front of the Court in a public Courtroorn, he will use that opportunity to create additional delay, secure additional publicity, and espouse his position regarding a multitude of irrelevant issues and factors that have no bearing whatsoever upon this case, 20. It is believed and, therefore, averred if the Court could conduct its hearing in the Divorce Master's Hearing Room, as has occurred with other proceedings in other divorces in the past, it would assist in resolving this matter with judicial economy and at the least expense to the parties. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests your Honorable Court to issue a Rule upon Respondent, Robert L. Bear, to show cause, if any he has, as to why the divorce action should not be bifurcated to allow the parties to be divorced and to allow for the resolution of the economic matters through agreement or the Master's proceeding, '6/3/6S , Date Respectfully submitted, ) )cl~itj 'l Brad y L. Griffie, squire Attorney for Defendant/Petitioner GRIFFIE & ASSOCIATES 200 North Hanover Street Carlisle, P A 17013 (717) 243-5551 (800) 347-5552 VERIFICATION I verifY that the statements made in the foregoing document are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa,C.S, Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities, DATE: Jah~ "'GALE G, BEAR ROBERT 1. BEAR, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEA OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G, BEAR, Defendant : NO. 05-935 : IN DIVORCE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE q'd I, Bradley 1. Griffie, Esquire, hereby certify that I did, the ~ day of April, 2005, cause a copy of Defendant's Petition to Bifurcate Divorce to be served upon Plaintiff by first-class mail, postage prepaid at the following addresses: Robert 1. Bear 20 I Potato Road Carlisle, PA 17013 DATE: 8/3/05 ~r~ ~~, iffie, squire lliccl c~~ Attorney for Defendant GRIFFIE & ASSOCIATES 200 North Hanover Street Carlisle, P A 17013 (717)243-5551 (800)347-5552 --- (? .~ ,...--') .~<;' \ -:.:,~ ,;0\ ,",-, c;::: - ROBERT L. BEAR Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v, No, 05-935 GALE G, BEAR Defendant CIVIL ACTION - LAW IN DIVORCE PRAECIPE TO DISCONTINUE To the Prothonotary: Kindly mark the above-captioned action settled, discontinued and ended for the following fully documented reasons. Thank you. Almost 20 years after Carlisle's last madam Bessie Jones was murdered in 1971, ending her family's 100 year blackmailing semi-public whorehouse dynasty reign over Cumberland County, the Carlisle Sentinel apparently thought it finally safe to teU the truth on its front page of February 24, 1990, This is the truth the Sentinel kept secret for a hundred years: "The best little whorehouse west of the Susquehanna or east of the Mississippi, serving the most prominent judges, generals, lawyers, chiefs of police, legislators, not to mention local prominent businessmen and even the not so prominent," according to Carlisle historian George Difenderfer. "Do you know what I suggest? If you would take that (tape recorder) home and bury it on your farm, and if you would repent, you would have your wife back." (Reformed Mennonite Bishop Earl M, Basinger propositioning me on behalf of Menno Simons (1496-1561) and all Reformed Mennonites, Apri115, 1973,) Thus were they defiled with their own works, and went awhoring with their own inventions. (psalm 106:39) Menno Simons and all Reformed Mennonites "went awhoring" when they demanded their price of "repent" before they would "Give me my wife - that I may go in unto her." (Genesis 29:21) All completely fulfilled an American Heritage Dictionary definition of whores: "To offer oneself or another for sexual hire." Were any who patronized Carlisle's "Best Little Whorehouse" deceived to believe. by paying to play with Carlisle's whores they also became married to them? Were any who Jlaid the interest in Mennonitism demanded for "the natural use ofthe woman" (Romans I :27) not deceived into believing they were "married?" Was not the Cumberland County Court gnilty of Gross fraud ever since the Court sold me a "marriage" license in 1958? Didn't the Court judge on June 23, 1976, and ever since it is ....ully warranted -love and concern" for Reformed Mennonite Senior Bishop Glenn M. Gross and his "evil mell and seducers" (2 Timothy 3:13) to loan me "the natural use of the woman" only as long as I paid the interest ilm Mennonitism demanded? Didn't Refonned Mennonites and the Jndges of the Cumberland County Court deceive Gale Ruth Gross and me into believing we were "married" and caused six innocent children to be born into this cult and court "world of woe and sin" when they mocked true marriage with their mock "marriage?" If Refonned Mennonites and the Cumberland County Court CJlII't publicly explain how Gale Ruth Gross was my wife when all I had was "the natural use of the woman" only as long as I paid the interest in Mennonitism demanded; how could any possibly explain why Gale Ruth Gross was any more my wife than the money I borrowed from the bank was mine "to have and to hold" afte:r I stopped paying the interest demanded? Until cult and court can come up with satisfactory answers, I intend to sign nothing that will give legitimacy to a "marriage" and "family" of six children that both the Reformed Mennonite cult and Cumberland County Court refused to give legitimacy to before God and man. How could Gale Gross Bear better prove the Cumberland County Court's "fully warranted -love and concern" lie than her adultery and sealing our six children to shameful silence for years and show how little "fully warranted -love and concern" GaJe Gross Bear truly had for tJ~is "marriage" and our six children? "Judge Oler, you are part of the criminaJ conspiracy of coverillig up how I was lied into the mental hospital, - I say that the Cumberland County Court has - is guilty - of the crime of lying me into the mental hospital, attempting to have me declared criminally insane. One of the lies was that I held up a school bus with a loaded gun," This I stated in the witness chair June 6, 2000. The court transcript was certified by Judge Oler. Code of Judicial Condlllct Canon 2. A judge should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all his activities, A. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should condUil::t himself at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. B. A judge should not allow his family, social, or other relationships to influence his judicial conduct or judgment. He should not lend the prestige of his office to advance the private interest of others; nor should he conveyor knowingly permit others to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence him. He should not testify voluntarily as a character witness. Commentary Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judges. A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. He must expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny. He must therefore accept restrictions on his conduct that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen and should do so freely and willingly. Historian Stanley Loomis Wrote of Madame Tison in his book The Fatal Friendship: - "But Madame Tison suffered another human weakness: buried decp in her nature, well out of her own sight, she had a conscience, Having won her way by denunciation, shl~ began to feel misgivings." - One day in the first week of July she burst into the prisoner's room and in front Il,ftwo guards, whose presence she ignored, she flung herself at Marie Antoinette's feet. 'Madame', she cried, 'I implore your majesty to forgive me!' Turgy, who was present at the scene, asserts these were exactly the words she used. 'I am a miserable, unhappy woman,' she continued, 'for I have caused your death and that, too. olrMadame Elizabeth. Forgive me, I beg you!'" - "Marie Antoinette raised the woman to her feet and tried to calm her. But Madame Tison was beyond human help. She began to scream and rave like a creature demented and then fell to the floor in convulsions. It took eight men to remove her. Two days later she was taken to the Hotel Dieu, where she was pronounced insane, " Isn't "public confidence in the judiciary" of Cumberland COUllity so "eroded" that none believe retiring President Judge George Hoffer or Judges Bayley, Hess, Oler, or Guid'B will discover they have conscience enough to confess the following irrefutable proof publicly? The Cumberland County Court Judges judged ever since June 23, 1976, that Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness is "fully warranted -love and concern." To cover up the Court's Gross lie President Judge Dale F. Shughart and at the time, District Attorney Edgar B. Bayley, had the State Police at Carlisle commit their joint crime of lying me into Holy Spirit Community Mental Health Center' on December 5, 1977. All guilty of their original crime and/or their additional cover up crime ever since have never had conscience enough to publicly confess their crime or crimes. "It has been a real pleasure to work with the present judges. I don't think the collegiality ('shared authority') among the five of us is surpassed by any judicial district in Pennsylvania." Thus did reporter Tiffany Pakkala quote retiring President Judge George Hoffer in the Sentinel Weekly of June 18,2005. How many swallowed retiring President Judge George Hoffer's words as some little "children in understanding" (I Corinthians 14 :20) pick the filth from their noses and swallow it? 'I 'his client on the stand and leading him through the . The story is told oflawyer Abraham Lmco ,n puttmg ciate who refu'~d to repay him. When the defendant tOt testimony that he had loan~ some mone! to a busmeHss as~od h had His lawyer asked if he had any proof and the the stand his lawyer asked If he had repllld the loan. e sal e . defendant drew out of his pocket his receipt of payment. d f: t fr ce with his client. "Did you know he held Abraham Lincoln turned and walked a few steps to stan ,~~e 0 ,I . this recei t?" "Yes Mr Lincoln but I thought he had forgotten It. , 'I Lfn~oln ~ed ~ went down the center aisle of the court to the door. Judge Treat called out, 'Mr. Lmco n where are you going? Don't you want to finish this case?", ' " Lincoln's face was pale as he replied, "Your Honor, I m gomg to wash my hands. , ' Aren't all with "shared authority" to just ignore the Cumberland County Court s cnm and lies guilty of greater fraud than Abraham Lincoln'.s client? Don't all,guilty dread more than death to finally testify the truth in court and publicly confess I have Irrefutable proof of Court's crimes and lies? , Didn't Judge Hoffer revel in his "real pleasure" of "shared :Iluthority" in carrying out and/or covennl Cnmberland County Court crimes and lies with all others like minded? Had Judge Hoffer been sincere would he not have said, "It has been a real pleasure" obeying the Cod Judicial Conduct? "It has been a real pleasure" for me to "avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all (my) activities." "It has been a real pleasure" p,romoting "public confidence in the integril and impartiality ofthejudiciary" by publicly confessing the Court's crimes and lies or publicly proving thell false. "It has been a real pleasure" to accept restrictions on (my) conduct that might be viewed as burdensol by the ordinary citizen and (I) do so freely and willingly." Hasn't it also been a "real pleasure" to Reformed Mennonites ever since June 23, 1976, to bave "sbar. authority" with the Judges of the Cumberland County Court in judging the following God-judged Mennonil "doctrines of devils" (I Timothy 4:1) are "fully warranted -love and concern." "All human ties, including those of marriage and the family, must give way under the ban oftbe cbur was clearly taught." (page 28) "And if this be heresy and diabolical seduction, as the preacbers loudly asser then must the Son of God, Christ Jesus, and aD the prophets. apostles, and lofty witnesses of God, have been manifest hereties, ail! And then the whole Scripture, which teal:hes naught but moral improvement, and everywhere points us to Christ, must have been naught but deceit and falsehood!" (Pages 527-28) "For bo\'l there ever be a greater love for God and how can there be a m6re praiseworthy confession than that one shl be willing and ready not only to give up his temporal goods, ease, honor, and prosperity, but also shnn his dearest friend upon earth, while in full health, out of sincere regard for Christ, in obedience to His eternall holy truth?" (page 973) "Till they again observe the truth and cease from their error and return to the rig way, (i.e. the Mennonite way) or until they become as ravening, biting dogs or unclean, filthy swine." (page "Crush before God, terrify, humble, pulverize." (page 989) "witb the lash of the ban," (page 990) ..It is evidenced in that you, a dunghill ofa man -." (page 1019, The Complete Writings of Men no Simons) Y e know nothing at aD, Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the pea and that the whole nation perish not. And this spake he not of himself: But being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation, (St. John 11:49-53) And when they had called the apostles, and beaten them, they commanded that they should not SPI the name of Jesus, and let them go. And they departed from the presence of the council, rejoicing that th, counted worthy to suffer shame for his name. (Acts 5:40-41) Surely, a sinner such as I, am not "worthy to suffer shame" by dying for Reformed Mennonites al Cumberland County Court, "that (their lies and crimes) perish not." Truth is not only violated by falsehood; it may be equally outraged by silence. (Arniel) Don't all who know Reformed Mennonites and tbe Cumberland County Court violate "the truth gospel" (Galatians 2:5) and/or the Code of JudiciAl Conduct," do as Christ commanded: "Counteth the c Luke 14:28) if he or she would no longer equally outrage truth by their shameful silence? Have not all counted the cost of ending Reformed Mennonite cult and Cumberland County COUI and lies a greater "cost," a greater "sin," than the sin offor'cing their God-judged "more bitter than de: (Ecclesiastes 7:26) existence upon the weak, helpless, and 16nely few? When all guilty of their crimes and lies "counteth the cost," don't they know if they would publicly tonfess and stop their crimes and lies the "cost" to them would be a certain "more bitter than death" existence for the many in order to end a "more bitter than death" existence they' foree upon their few victims? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh, What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder, They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away? He said unto them, Moses because ofthe hardness of your heads suffered you to put away your wives: But from the beginning it was not so. And I say unto you, Whosoever ;shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: And whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery, His disciples say unto him, If the case of a man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry, But he said unto them, all men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given. For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: And there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: And there he eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake, He that is able to receive it, let him receive it. (St. Matthew 19:6-12) He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: The word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day. (St. John 12:48) According to Jesus Christ's words, even those "to whom it is given" to have no desire whatever to be "one flesh" with any of the opposite sex ever since June 11, 1972, have any (rild-given right to condemn those who were married and were of "one flesh" since June 11, 1972, Even less God-given right do those have who had "a fe'al pleasure" enjoyed sex one or more times since June 11, 1972; to judge it "fully warranted-love and concern" for Reformed Mennonites to "defraud" (1 Corinthians 7:5) Gale Gross Beal'to "come together again (with her husband) that Satan tempt" (1 Corinthians 7:5) Gale Gross Bear to commit adultery. They say nnto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act. Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: But what sayest thou? Thiis they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not. So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her, And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground. And they which heard it being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: And Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst. When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine JICCUsers? Hath no man condemned thee? She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: Go., and sin no more. (St. John 8:4-11 ) Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus, (philippians 2: 15) If Reformed Mennonite Senior Bishop Glenn M. Gross, all his fellow Reformed Mennonite "evil men and (women) seducers" (2 Timothy 3:13) would let Christ's "mind be in you;" after they had "a real pleasure" in enjoying "the physical union of male and female sexual organs, leading to orgasm and the ejaculation of semen" into the vaginas of their women, once or more, ever since June 11,1972; would not all be "convicted by their own conscience?" Would not all say to Gale Gross Bear, "Neither do I condemn you;" because it was no more "given" unto Gale Gross Bear than to all Reformed Mennonites to abstain from sex who enjoyed the" real pleasure" of sex since June 11, 1972? If all of the Cumberland County Courthouse crowd who carried out the Court's crimes and lies would now "let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus," would not all also be "convicted by their own conscience" to confess the following publicly to Gale Gross Bear? "Neither do I condemn thee," from Cumberland County retiring President Judge George Hoffer, down to the lowliest "friend ofthe court" who had "a real pleasure" enjoying "the physical union of male and female sexual organs, leading to orgasm and ejaculation of semen" into the vaginas of their women once or more since June 11, 1972, because as with Gale Gross Bear, they also were not of those "to whom it is given" to abstain from sex ever since June 11, 1972. Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined 'together, let not man put asunder. (St. Matthew 19:6) In obeying Christ's command, "Jet not man put asunder," Amish shunned wife Emma King said of her shunning pain, "I don't think there's much in life worse than being sllunned by your family and friends and having your culture ripped from you. If they would kill us, it would be over with at least. This is just a slow death, It's torture, And that's what it's meant to be," In more orthodox Mennonite and Amish cults, every wife is given the choice to either "crush before God, terrify, humble, pulverize" their Mennonite damned husband with all the Mennonite mesmerized might of their minds, souls, and bodies; or all of their cult will be hell-bent to "crush before God, terrify, humble, pulverize" them because if all wives obey Christ it will destroy such cults. All shnnning wives who ohey Menno Simons and his "evil men and seducers" and refuse to obey Christ's command, "let not man put asunder," Saint Paul explains. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: For even their women did change the natural use into that which is against natnre, (Romans 1 :26) Then Saint Paul explains in the first five verses of the seventh (:hapter of I" Corinthians what is the "natural use" of marriage. It is good for a man not to toucb a woman, Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband. Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: And likewise also the wife unto the husband. The wife hath not power of h'~r own body, but the husband: And likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wifl~ >>efrand ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and Ilrayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency, (I Corinthians 7: 1-5) For 450 years Menno Simons and his "evil men and seducers" have seduced their women, by forcing them to face "a slow death, It's torture," to "change the natural use (lIftheir bodies) into that wbich is against nature," All shunning wives did "defraud" their Mennonite damned IliUsbands "tbat Satan tempt them" to "falsely so called" (I Timothy 6:20) Mennonite "repent," causing male .and female bodies to "come together again, that Satan tempt you not" to ever stray from Mennonitism agaiJ~. Ye adulterers and adulteresses know ye not that the friendship uf tbe world is enmity with God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend ofthe world is the enemy of God. (James 4:4) True to the Holy Bible, Gale Gross Bear was an adulteress, due to her "friendship" of those who seduced her to believe "it is a real pleasure" and would cause God "a real pleaslllre" for her" friendsbip" with the Reformed Mennonite cult and Cumberland County Court judging her shunning me is "fully warranted -love and concern," Gale Gross Bear was an adulteress due to ber "friendship" witIl "the god of this world" (2 Corinthians 4: 14) Reformed Mennonite cult and Cumberland County Court long Yl~rs before she committed adultery with a man or men, "The best little whorehouse west of the Susquehanna OJr east of the Mississippi, serving the most prominent judges, generals, lawyers, chiefs of police, legislators, not to mention local prominent businessmen and even the not so prominent," according to Carlisle historian George Difenderfer. Didn't all who knew of Carlisle's blukmailing whorehouse dynasty for more than a hundred years also know they would be suicide bombers if they would blow up the reputations of all who patronized Carlisle's whores and cause themselves a hated "more bitter than death" existence until they mercifully died? Didn't that prevent all who knew, including chnrehes and the Sentillel, from publicly blowing up Carlisle's "Best Little Whorehouse" and any wbo dared publicly call for its end? Isn't the Cumberland County Court hiding its crimes and lies bt:hind the same immunity, trusting all know, if any dare blow up publicly tbe Cumberland County Court's crimes and lies, any who dare do it will suffer a far more fearful fate tban a suicide bomber? Don't all know they would linger on suffering "a more bitter than death" existence? 1975 Cumberland County Court testimony, pages 150-151: Lawyer for cult, William B. Ball: Speaking now as a member and II bisbop of the Reformed Mennonite Church, Reverend Gross, if this court were to grant the order sought by the plaintiff to issue an injunction to stop the church, its bishops, ministers, deacons, and all members from teaching, practicing, and enforcing the i10ctrine of avoidance, what would be the result? Bishop Gross: Well, we read that every soul be subject unto the higher powers where there is no power but (of) God, the powers that be are ordained of God and we should submit to them as the scriptures teach, rendering to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, but to God the things that are God's, and if it would mean that we would have to discontinue the practice of our religious faith and teaching, it would be denying us our religious liberty to practice as we wOlllld so desire, because we would have to feel that it would be God's will and accept it. Jesus Christ said, "I am the good shepherd: The good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep. But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheefJ' are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and sCllttereth the sheep. The hireling fleeth, because he was a hireling, and careth not for the sheep." (St. John 10: 11-13) Reformed Mennonite Senior Bishop Glenn M. Gross and his Reformed Mennonite "evil men and seducers" seduced Gale Gross Bear to believe she would be "set on fire of hell" (James 3 :6) unless she would "crush before God, terrify, humble, pulverize" me with all the Mennonite mesmerized might of her mind, soul, and naked, teasing body. But like Christ said, when Bishop Gross "seeth the wolf coming," "the god ofthis world" (2 Corinthians 4:4) Cumberland County Court, didn't he "fleeth" from parroting what every boasted "true shepherd" Reformed Mennonite is instructed to parrot? "All company necessary to admonish, or to minister to their necessities, should be freely given; but eating social meals, or keeping social company, or having commercial intercourse, the Word of God forbids; and when it is demanded, must be denied under all circumstances.... And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die. (Deut. XIII) Surely, this command disturbed the sacred family relation much more seriously than the gospel command. Besides, the espousals of Christ are above the espousals of man. The duties of wedlock must ever yield to our duties to God., To be faithful to God, is the first duty of man; and consequences can never enter into consideration." (Pages 360-361, ReformedMennonite Church, by Reformed Mennonite Bishop Daniel Musser.) Had Bishop Gross not been "a hireling" Reformed Mennonites would have told the Cumberland County Court in 1975, "To be faithful to God, is the first duty of man; and consequences can never enter into consideration." Then Bishop Gross would have told the Court as he stated in his 1975, page 17, deposition, "I must admit we have no scriptural grounds to SflY this - avoidance - would also apply to sexual relations between a husband and a wife." But for Bishop Gross, being honest in Court would have cl'eated "consequences" he had to take "into consideration." First, he would have been defrocked as a bishop, then he would have been excommunicated and shunned by all Reformed Mennonites, including his "wife" Mary Ellen Fehrman Gross. Bishop Gross' Ashcombe Farm and Greenhouses business would have soon been a shambles as mine also soon was. "Comfort the feebleminded" (1 Thessalonians 5:14) who can't know, Bishop Gross ran so far from what all Reformed Mennonites profess to believe is as certain as Satan. Bishop Gross testified, if the Cumberland County Court would order Reformed Mennonites to no longer enforce their "doctrine of avoidance" all would "feel that it would be God's will and accf~pt it." "Comfort the feebleminded" who can't know what Bishop Gross actually said was all Reformed Mennonites would "feel it is God's will, and accept, it," that all Reformed Mennonites are "set on fire of hell" (James 3:6) if the Cumberland County Court had condemned Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness. He that believeth upon the Son of God hath the witness in himself: He that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son. (I John 5: 10) Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. (St. Matthew 19:6) Reformed Mennonite Senior Bishop Glenn M. Gross, you not only have "the 'witness" in yourself that you believed not "the Son of G()d's holy marriage and family command. Thus you have driven your very own sister to adultery. You are a "witness" to many how you have made God "a liar." Reformed Mennonite Senior Bishop Glenn M. Gross, why not change, be a "witness" to many how you were the first to sign and date what I have often presented to you Reformed Mennonites many times during more than 30 years? Two things have I required of thee; deny me them not befor,~ I die: Remove far from me vanity and lies: Give me neither poverty nor riches; feed me with food convenient for me: Lest I be fuU, and deny thee, and say, Who is the Lord? Or lest I be poor, and steal, and take th,~ name of my God in vain, (Proverbs 30:7-9) This family was neither rich nor poor before this calamity came upon it. Only a miracle of God will prevent my wife and children from being horribly scarred for the only chance in life they will ever have. The first order of business is that this family be reunited all quickly as possible. Then the token debt, as stated often before, of $100,000 until April 1, 1975, plus $10,000 per month and any part thereof until this token debt is paid in full, is the next order of business. But that was before Reformed Mennonites blessed my Mennonite mesmerized shunning "wife" lying like the devil in court in 1979 saying I forced "rape, sexual intercourse" upon her. I have stated many times that will cost Reformed Mennonites additionally the home farm returned free and clear of all encumbrances, which was lost in this lengthy struggle. It is necessary for Reformed Mennonites to reach into their' very deep pockets and cough up this token amount even if Reformed Mennonites feel it is like coughinl~ up blood. Only in this way can we establish the universal price for Mennonites and Amish-Mennoniltes murdering marriages and families. We, the undersigned Reformed Mennonite bishops say to every Reformed Mennonite regarding paying our token debt to the Robert Bear family as St, Paul said to the Corintbians: "Let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver." (2 Corinthians 9:7) Date Reformed Mennonite Senior Bishop Glenn M, Gross Date Reformed Mennonite Bishop Paul C. Fehrman Date Reformed Mennonite Bishop Robert Myers Date Reformed Mennonite Bishop Robert Beehler Date Reformed Mennonite Bishop Wilmer Schwenk Bishop Gross, why not be the first to sign and date my very mild Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness surrender terms and no longer prolong your misery and the misery of your victims? Never again must Reformed Mennonite Senior Bishop Glenn M. Gross and his "evil men and seducers" (2 Timothy 3:13) seduce another shunning wife to believe she will be "set on fire of hell" (James 3 :6) unless she is willing to "defraud" her Mennonite damned husband of her naked, teasing, body; "that Satan tempt" (1 Corinthians 7:5) him to "falsely so called" (1 Timothy 6:20) Mennonite "repent!" Heat not a furnace for your foe so hot that it do singe yourself. (Shakespeare) Reformed Mennonite Senior Bishop Glenn M. Gross, you heated :your very own sister's furnace so hot by denying her Mennonite "married sex" that she did "singe" herself and our six children with her adultery . How much more Gross Mennonite evil will you cause, Bishop Gross, before you are stopped? ._r:;JJ? ~v Robert L. Bear August 4, 2005 L!; 7.J1..- r'\ ,1; LL ~:_! -L. t-. '.L C) "-:--- Cr- -;;:J'""' 1- ,- ~_'J ('-..1 '-'- _T , (l') :,:'1 ~,r;:, C:::', C:--:-' ('," u ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND com.,fTY, PENNSYLVANIA v, CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G, BEAR, Defendant NO, 05-935 CIVIL TERM IN RE: DEFENDANT'S PETITION TO BIFURCATE DIVORCE BEFORE OLER, J, ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2005, upon consideration of Defendant's Petition To Bifurcate Divorce, and in accordance with 23 Pa, C,SA. !i 3323(c,l), a hearing on the issue of whether to bifurcate the divorce proceedings is set for Wednesday, November 23,2005, at 1:30 p,m, in Courtroom Number I in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County in Carlisle, Pennsylvania BY THE COURT, ~obert L. Bear 20 I Potato Road Carlisle, P A 17013-8991 ~:::~~:;m" E'q r R 200 N, Hanover Street V Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant \;'INV^lASNN3d JJ.Nnm CNl'Y38V'lnO E;O :Z Wd 6- SOV SOOZ Al:lV'lONOH.lOOd 3Hl .:10 ~1:1.~ "' vS. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : CIVIL ACTION - LAW ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff /Respondent GALE G, BEAR, : NO. 05-935 DefendantlPetitioner : IN DIVORCE PETITION FOR CONTINUANCE AND NOW, comes Petitioner, Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire, and the law firm of Griffie & Associates, and petitions the Court as follows: I. Your Petitioner herein is Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire, counsel of record for the above-named Petitioner. 2, A Petition for Bifurcation was filed by Petitioner, Gale G. Bear, in this matter, which caused a hearing to be scheduled for Wednesday, November 23, 2005, at I :30 porn, 3. Petitioner, Gale G, Bear, will be unavailable to attend the hearing on the date and time scheduled and has requested of her legal counsel that a new time and date be secured for the hearing. 4, With the hearing scheduled three months from the date of filing the within Petition, and in that Respondent is opposing the request for bifurcation, any rescheduling of the matter will not create allY hardship of any nature whatsoever for Respondent. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests your Honorable Court to enter an Order continuing this matter to a new date and time, Respectfully submitted, 1 squire ej Tor D endant RIFFlE & ASSOCIATES 200 North Hanover Street Carlisle, P A 17013 (717) 243-5551 (800) 347-5552 VERIFICATION I verify that the statements made in the foregoing doc:ument are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C,S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities, DATE: g):lOj I D t; / / ROBERT 1. BEAR, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant : NO, 05-935 : IN DIVORCE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Bradley 1. Griffie, Esquire, hereby certify that I did, the ~ay of August, 2005, cause a copy of Petitioner's Petition for Continuance to be served upon Plaintiff by first-class mail, postage prepaid at the following addresses: Robert 1. Bear 201 Potato Road Carlisle, P A 170 I3 DATE: >?)~OjI?J ') ffie, Esquire for Defendant FIE & ASSOCIATES 200 North Hanover Street Carlisle, P A 170 I3 (717)243-5551 (800)347-5552 ("-) t:. ,..., ,~ C::"-' Ul </> \,., -.U ...., ~~ --\ fF\~; \~j \ ,C:) f~1' ;:; :% (:::) r<; - ROBERT L. BEAR Plaintiff : IN mE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : : : v. . . No. 05-935 GALE G. BEAR Defendant CIVIL ACTION - LAW . . : IN DIVORCE PETITION FOR NO CONTINUANCE DUE TO THE FOLLOWING RIGHT REASONS 1. Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire's Petition for Continuance, "statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities" and signed by Lawyer Griffie, contain false statements. 2. It is patently false that rescheduling Defendant Gale Gross Bear's "Request for Bifurcation" - "Will not create any hardship of any nature whatsoever for Respondent." Gale Gross Bear and Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire are both yet hell-bent in their demand I pay Griffie's $250 per hour fee, even for Griffie's brainchild of demanding a continuance. If Gale Gross Bear can't lie with her lover Lawrence N. Bard and seduce him to lie for her in court before November 23, 2005, how much more time are she and Griffie demanding, a week, a month, a year more of lying with Bad Bard before he will lie for her in court? 3. The only property I yet own and where I reside will need to be sold before I pay one penny of all those $250 per hour hours for Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire helping Gale Gross Bear lie in order to come out ofthis smelling like "the rose of Sharon, and the lily ofthe valleys." (Song of Solomon 2:1) 4. Gale Gross Bear stated March 10, 2005, under the penalties of committing a crime, when she stated the following: 7, Admitted in part, Denied in part. a, Denied, It is denied that Defendant committed adulteIY, b, Denied, It is denied that Defendant offered any indignities whatsoever to Plaintiff, or acted in any way to cause Plaintiff's condition to be intolerable or life burdensome, Friends, yes, I have a few friends, tell me they plan to be in Cumberland County Courtroom #1, November 23, 2005, at 1:30 p.m., and plan to also get friends to come. All want to see whether Lawrence N .Bard, 104 Hillside Drive, Carlisle, PA will tell the truth in court as he confessed on August 11, 2005 to me in the back of his garage at his residence. Just in case any need a reminder, Bad Bard confessed to me his almost 19 year adulterous affair with Gale Gross Bear, which on August 11, 2005, Bad Bard confessed was yet ongoing. 5. Don't all Judges of Cumberland County hate me to the same degree all hate to publicly confess the Judges of Cumberland County lied when they have judged ever since June 23, 1976, the following God-judged Mennonite "doctrines of deviJs" (I Timothy 4: 1) are merely Mennonite "fully warranted - love and concern?" "All human ties, including those of marriage and the family, must give way under the ban of the church, was clearly taught." (Page 28) "And if this be heresy and diabolical seduction, as the preachers loudly assert, then must the Son of God, Christ Jesus, and all the prophets, apostles, and lofty witnesses of God, have been manifest heretics, all! And then the whole Scripture, which teaches naught but moral improvement, and everywhere points us to Christ, must have been naught but deceit and falsehood!" (Pages 527-28) "For how can there ever be a greater love for God and how can there be a more praiseworthy confession than that one should be willing and ready not only to give up his temporal goods, ease, honor, and prosperity, but also shun his dearest friend upon earth, while in full health, out of sincerl~ regard for Christ, in obedience to His eternal and holy truth?" (Page 973) "Till they again observe the truth and cease from their error and return to the right way, (i.e, the Mennonite way) or until they become as ravening, biting dogs or unclean, filthy swine." (Page 986) "Crush bdore God, terrify, humble, pulverize," (Page 989) "with the lash of the ban." (Page 990) "It is evidenced in that you, a dunghill of a man - ," (Page 1019, The Complete Writings of Menna Simons) 6. "Judge Oler, you are part of the criminal conspiracy of covering up how I was lied into the mental hospital. - I say that the Cumberland County Court has - is guilty - of the crime of lying me into the mental hospital, attempting to have me declared criminally insane. One ofthe lies was that I held up a school bus with a loaded gun." This I stated in the witness chair June 6,2000, The court transcript was certified by Judge Oler, "Comfort the feebleminded" (I Thessalonians 5:14) who have read the irrefutable documented evidence and can't know the Cumberland County Court criminally conspired with the State Police at Carlisle to lie me into Holy Spirit Community Mental Health Center on December 5, 1977. Truth is not only violated by falsehood; it may be equally outraged by silence. (AmieI) The law fully agrees with Amiel. It provides a penalty of up to one year in prison for all who lie a sane citizen into a mental hospital, plus up to a year in prison for all who equally outrage the law with their outrageous cover up crime of silence to this day. 7, "Comfort the feebleminded" who can't know, all ofthe Cumberland County Court hate me to the exact degree all guilty of their crimes and lies and/or their cover up crime hate to publicly confess their crimes and lies. 8. "Comfort the feebleminded" who wouldn't be "opposing the request of Bifurcation" before Cumberland County Court Judge J. Wesley Oler, Jr. who is as much a "part of the criminal conspiracy" in covering up how I was lied into the mental hospital, today, as he also was on June 6, 2000, 9. Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. (St. Matthew 19:6) 10. Blessed are ye, when men shall hate you, and when they shall separate you from their company, and shall reproach you, and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man's sake. Rejoice ye in that day, and leap for joy: For behold, your reward is great in heaven: For in the like manner did their fathers unto the prophets. (S1. Luke 6:22-23) Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! (Isaiah 5:20) Even Lawrence N. Bard agreed on August 11, 2005, had not Reformed Mennonites called "good evil," the preservation of this marriage and family against the Gross evils of Mennonitism ever since June 11, 1972, Gale Gross Bear would never have committed adultery against me even once with Bad Bard. Then ever since June 23, 1976, the judges ofthe Cumberland County Court "call evil good" by calling the "evil" of Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness "fully warranted -love and concern." Probation Officer David L. Myers once volunteered to me many years ago, except for what has been done to this marriage and family, he didn't believe I would ever have come before the Cumberland County Court. True to the Holy Bible, this "woe" that has come to Reformed Mennonites and the Cumberland County Court in needing to face their calling" evil good" is almost certainly what tempted Gale Gross Bear to carry out her almost 19 year adulterous affair with Lawrence N. Bard. 11. "Do you know what I suggest? If you would take that (tape recorder) home and bury it on your farm, and if you would repent, you would have your wife back." (Reformed Mennonite Bishop Earl M, Basinger propositioning me on behalf of Menno Simons (1496-1561) and all Reformed Mennonites, April 15, 1973.) Thus were they defiled with their own works, and went awhoring with their own inventions. (Psalm 106:39) True to the Holy Bible, Reformed Mennonites "went awhoring" "in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" (I Corinthians 5:4) when they demanded their price of "falsely so called" (I Timothy 6:20) "repent" before they would "Give me my wife - that I may go in unto her." (Genesis 29:21) Reformed Mennonites "went awhoring" by fully fulfilling an American Heritage Dictionary definition of whores: "To offer oneself or another for sexual hire," just as surely as had they demanded dollars in the name of God and prostitution before "I may go in unto her." And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: Whose judgment now ofa long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not. (2 Peter 2:3) Never before in the 450 year history of Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness by die-hard devotees of Menno Simons, has it ever been as positively proven how they "make merchandise" of "the natural use of the woman" (Romans I :27) by selling married sex for the Mennonite demanded price of "repent. " And the Jews' Passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem, and found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: And when he had made a scourge (a whip) ofsmall cords, he drove them all out ofthe temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out all the changers' money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise. And his disciples remembered that it was written: The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up. (St. Jolm2:13-17) If Jesus Christ would condescend to do to Reformed Mennonites at their church because they did a far worse "evil" than merchandising "oxen and sheep and doves," Reformed Mennonites "merchandise" married sex, wouldn't "the god ofthis world" (2 Corinthians 4:4) Cumberland County Court Judges call Christ's "good evil?" For even hereunto were ye called: Because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow in his steps: Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth. (I Peter 2:21-22) "All scripture is given by inspiration of God" (2 Timothy 3:15) and intended to inspire all to do our best in following Christ's "no sin" example. Then, if the end justified Christ's means in cleansing the temple, why are my quite modified means in trying to cleanse Mennonites from making "merchandise" oftheir women sexually, also not justified? Except by cult and court who "call evil good and good evil?" 12. Imagine that! I weakly follow a modified version of Christ's "example" in the temple in order to help stop Mennonites who "make merchandise" of their' women sexually and both cult and court call trying to obey Christ's "no sin, good example," "evil!" Sincerely submitted, "subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn fa~cation to ,authorities,." --1 <\ J-y~ -;( f3~jl/' Robert L. Bear September I, 2005 ....., c:;;::> ,..:.::> ,::-n (,., i -~- J -0 , N --co -""' ;:~ .',,'" :.< ROBERT L BEAR, Plaintiff v, GALE G, BEAR, Defendant IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 05-935 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 7'h day of September, 2005, upon consideration of Defendant's Petition for Continuance, a Rule is hereby issued upon Plaintiff to show cause why the relief requested should not be granted, RULE RETURNABLE within 10 days of service, ~ert L Bear 20 I Potato Road Carlisle, P A 17013-8991 Plaintiff, pro se ~dley L Griffie, Esq, 200 N. Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant BY THE COURT, J, e(~ .11 '!j c-- n""7 . U'U' jl ' '-I ftECEIVED SEP 072005 ROBERT 1. BEAR, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff/Respondent : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE Q, BEAR, : NO. 05-935 DefendantlPetitioner : IN DIVORCE ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this day of , 2005, upon presentation and consideration of the within Petition for Continuance, the hearing previously scheduled in this matter for Wednesday, November 23,2005, at 1:30 p,m. in Courtroom No, I of the Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, is continued to , the _ day of 200_, at o'clock _,m. in Courtroom No, of the Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. By the Court, J. Wesley Oler, Judge ROBERT 1. BEAR, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PlaintifflRespondent : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs, : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G, BEAR, : NO, 05-935 DefendantJPetitioner : IN DIVORCE PETITION FOR CONTINUANCE AND NOW, comes Petitioner, Bradley 1. Griffie, Esquire, and the law firm of Griffie & Associates, and petitions the Court as follows: I, Your Petitioner herein is Bradley 1. Griffie, Esquire, counsel of record for the above-named Petitioner, 2, A Petition for Bifurcation was filed by Petitioner, Gale G. Bear, in this matter, which caused a hearing to be scheduled for Wednesday, November 23, 2005, at 1:30 p,m, 3. Petitioner, Gale G. Bear, will be unavailable to attend the hearing on the date and time scheduled and has requested of her legal counsel that a new time and date be secured for the hearing. 4, With the hearing scheduled three months from the date of filing the within Petition, and in that Respondent is opposing the request for bifurcation, any rescheduling of the matter will not create any hardship of any nature whatsoever for Respondent. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests your Honorable Court to enter an Order continuing this matter to a new date and time. Respectfully submitted, fie squire e Jar De endant RIFFlE & ASSOCIATES 200 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-5551 (800) 347-5552 VERIFICATION I verify that the statements made in the foregoing document are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities. DATE: i'p.t/j,/ U::; ROBERT 1. BEAR, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant : NO. 05-935 : IN DIVORCE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Bradley 1. Griffie, Esquire, hereby certify that I did, the ~ay of August, 2005, cause a copy of Petitioner's Petition for Continuance to be served upon Plaintiff by first-class mail, postage prepaid at the following addresses: Robert 1. Bear 201 Potato Road Carlisle, PA 17013 DATE: ~&-CJI? <) ffie, Esquire lor Deftndant FIE & ASSOCIATES 200 North Hanover Street Carlisle, P A 17013 (717)243-5551 (800)347-5552 ~ (",:,) '.;5" G:/?, ~ " .',j - o -n --' -):'-n h\i;_:'. '\...' '- .- I:: C:? {oJ ';~ .- ~ ROBERT L BEAR Plaintiff v, GALE G, BEAR Defendant IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW : NO, 05-935 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2005, upon consideration of Defendant's Petition for Continuance, and of Plaintiff's "Answer to Rule Issued upon Plaintiff To Show Cause Why the Relief Requested by Defendant Gale Gross Bear Should Not Be Granted," Defendant's Petition is granted, and the hearing on Defendant's Petition for Bifurcation is rescheduled for Thursday, January 12, 2006, in Courtroom No, 1 at 1 :30 p,m, ~ert L, Bear 201 Potato Road Carlisle, Pa 17013-8991 Plaintiff, Pro Se ~radley L Griffie, Esquire 200 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 For the Defendant ') I I \'r~--~ "'.J,,"'; "'I J" 01 :i1 ~!d ~- no SuDZ ) LJ'f'( ".i' 'j',,' ("", ' :lULL ~o \0 ,.!-"" 1 '1"...1' ,..!.\.,;..../).....f .... 38iJ:K}{Bllj -- ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs, NO. 05-935 CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant IN DIVORCE PETITION TO OUASH A SUBPOENA Petitioner, Lawrence N. Bard, by his attorneys, Broujos & Gilroy, P.c., sets forth the following: 1. Petitioner is Lawrence N. Bard of 1166 Rhoda Boulevard, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 2. Petitioner has been served with a Subpoena to appear to testify at a hearing scheduled in the above captioned case on Thursday, January 12,2006 at 1:30 p,m, A copy of said Subpoena is attached hereto and marked "Exhibit A". 3, Petitioner has been advised that the hearing on Thursday, January 12, 2006 involves a Motion to Bifurcate filed by Defendant Gale G. Bear in which Defendant seeks to bifurcate the divorce proceedings in the above matter. 4. Plaintiff, Robert L, Bear, is the individual who has subpoenaed the Petitioner and has directed him to bring the following "The same honesty you evidenced August 11, 2005 when you confessed to an already and yet ongoing almost 19 year adulterous relationship with Gale Gross Bear." 5. Petitioner is 75 years old, not in the best of health, and views the Subpoena issued by Plaintiff in this matter as designed merely to harass and burden the Petitioner, 6. Petitioner has no information that he could testify on that would have any relevance to the Motion to Bifurcate filed by the Defendant in this case. 7. Petitioner will be inconvenienced and burdened by attendance at the January 12, 2006 hearing, especially when it is anticipated that Petitioner's testimony will not be deemed to be relevant. ~ 8. The undersigned counsel for Petitioner has contacted counsel for Defendant Gale G, Bear, and the Defendant's attorney concurs in the suggestion that Petitioner will not have any testimony relevant to the Motion to Bifurcate proceedings, and Defendant's attorney further suggests that he will be objecting at the hearing to any testimony presented by the Petitioner, WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests your Honorable Court to squash the Subpoena issued to him in this case. Respectfully submitted, ~ Date: December~2005 Hubert X. Gilroy, E uire Broujos & Gilroy, .c. Attorney for Pel' ioner COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYL VANIA COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND ROBERT L, BEAR Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA V, : NO, 05-935 GALE G. BEAR Defendant : CIVIL ACTION - LAW IN DIVORCE SUBPEONA TO ATTEND AND TESTIFY TO: Lawrence N. Bard 104 Hillside Drive, Carlisle, P A 17013 I. You are ordered by the court to come to Cumberland County Court House, Court Room I in Carlisle, P A 17013, on Thursday, January 12, 2006, at 1:30 p.m" to testify on behalf of Robert L. Bear in the above case, and to remain until excused. 2. And to bring with you the following: The same honesty you evidenced August II, 2005, when you confessed to an already and yet ongoing almost 19 year adulterous relationship with Gale Gross Bear. ]fyou fail to attend or to produce the documents or things required by this subpoena, you may be subject to the sanctions authorized by Rule 234.5 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, including but not limited to, costs, attorney fees and imprisonment. REQUESTED BY A PARTY/ATORNEY IN C9MPLIANCE WITH Pa.R.C.P.No. 234.2(a): Name: Robert L. Bear Address: 201 Potato Rd. Carlisle, PA 17013 Phone: 717-776-5980 BY THE COURT: Date: ():;t;{;n 1~.0t0S- Seal ofthe Court tle.w:t;,.J{ /!07'J; Prothonotary 0 ~Aw<<t1!~ Deputy Official Note: This form of subpoena shall be used whenever a subpoena is issuable, including hearings in connection with depositions and before arbitrators, masters, commissioners, etc. in compliance with Pa.R.C.P.No. 234.1. If a subpoena for records or things is desired, complete paragraph 2. EXHIBIT j A ~-." " CO} '. \' {":' <' .. ROBERT L. BEAR, PlaintitT IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA v, CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant NO. 05-935 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 2005, upon consideration Lawrence N. Bard's Petition To Quash a Subpoena, a hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, December 27, 2005, at 3:45 p.m., in Courtroom No, I, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, BY THE COURT, Robert L. Bear 20 I Potato Road Carlisle, P A 17013-8991 Plaintiff, pro se Bradley L. Griffie, Esq, 200 N, Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant 1).~(r-(J'5 ~ .~J.~ JJ> Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq, 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, P A 17013 Attorney for Petitioner :rc c. '"'II ( i Robert L. BeaT . 201 Potato Road Carlisle, PA 17013-8991 TO: F'irst Class Mail Q. ROBERT L, BEAR Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v, No, 05-9'35 GALE G, BEAR Defendant CIVIL ACTION - LAW IN DIVORCE Request that Judge J. Wesley Oler, Jr. disqualify himsE~lf to sit in judgment at the Subpoena Hearing he bas ordered for December 27, 2005 and the Bifurcation Hearing ordered for January 12, 2006. "Judge Oler, you are part ofthe criminal conspiracy of covering up how I was lied into the mental hospital. - I say that the Cumberland County Court has - is guilty - of the crime of lying me into the mental hospital, attempting to have me declared criminally insane. One of the lies was that I held up a school bus with a loaded gun," This I stated in the witness chair June 6,2000. The court transcript was certified by Judge OleL Surely, none need be smart as Satan to know, if they read LaWYf,r David A, Ody's investigative report of how I was lied into the mental hospital, had Judge J, Wesley Oler, Jr., confessed his crime or tried to lie out of it, he would have blown the Cumberland County Court, as we know it, ap:lrt, Ye shall know them by their fruits, (St. Matthew 7: 16) "The fool hath said in his heart, There is. no God" (psalm 14: I) who reminds even high and mighty Cumberland County Court Judges: "Behold, ye have sinned against thf' Lord: and be sure your sin will find you out," (Numbers 32:23) For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil, (Romans 13:3) Had the late President Judge Dale F, Shughart and at the time, ])istrict Attorney Edgar B. Bayley, ordered the State Police at Carlisle to shoot me on December 5,1977, tbeir "terror" and "evil" would have paled in comparison to the "terror" and "evil" had their "perfect crime" succeeded and I had been locked away with the criminally insane until I mercifully died. The builders of the mighty Titanic ocean liner, with its watertigbt compartments boasted, "Even God can't sink the Titanic," On its maiden voyage, plowing full steam ahead in the North Atlantic, the Titanic struck an iceberg and sank with a horrible loss of life. Now the Cumberland County Court, with Judge J, Wesley Oler, Jr., at the helm, in this case, is plowing full steam ahead into iceberg shunning wife Gale Gross Bear, ever sincf. June 11, 1972, becoming sexually "insatiable" (Ezekiel 16:20) and causing her to have an "almost 19 year" adulterous affair, as her illicit lover, Lawrence N, Bard confessed on August 11, 2005, On page 3 of his April 1, 2003 Opinion, Judge Oler stated: "The document proceeds to discuss the purported injustice of a mental health commitment proceeding in 1977, a prosecution in which Defendant was apparently accused of holding up a school bus with a loaded gun, and a Mennonite shunning experience to which he was subjected and which apparently occurred in 1972." Then Judge Oler explains on page 4 of his April 1, 2003 Opinion and states essentially the same again on page 8, why Judge Oler states halffacts and ends up with whole lies, "On a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal case, the evidence is to be viewed 'in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth' and 'all reasonable infereDi~es in the Commonwealth's favor' are to be entertained." Patriot-News reporter Matt Miller stated in the June II, 2003 edition: "Oler asked Bear whether he had also appealed his case to the state Supreme Court," "Bear said he had not. But when he began to elaborate, Oler cut him off and continued with the hearing." In the past, Judge J, Wesley Oler, Jr" has also "cut off" all my subpoenas to those who could prove beyond a question of a doubt those guilty of the "terror" and "evil" - "injustice of a mental health proceeding in 1977." Also in the past, Judge J, Wesley Oler, Jr., "cut off" all my subpoenas to Reformed Mennonites who could prove "a Mennonite shunning experience to which he was subjected and which apparently occurred in 1972," is intended to continue until I mercifully die. Refonned Mennonite witnesses also could have testified in court how the Cumberland County Court Judges have sanctioned ever since June 23, 1976 that Mennonite "terror" and "evil" is merely Mennonite "fully warranted - love and concern" for me, Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven, (St. Matthew 5:16) Mennonite historians adamantly refuse to admit or deny, Menno Simons and his "evil men and seducers" (2 Timothy 3:13) "let (their) light shine" upon probably not many more than 100,000 marriages and families during 450 years; and the following boasted Mennonite "light" probably didn't drive more than 5,000 Mennonite damned and shunned husbands and fathers to suicide because they couldn't stand this Mennonite boasted "light" a moment more. "All human ties, including those of marriage and the family, must give way under the ban of the church, was clearly taught," (page 28) "And if this be heresy and diabolical seduction, as the preachers loudly assert, then must the Son of God, Christ Jesus, and all the prophets, apostles, and lofty witnesses of God, have been manifest heretics, all! And then the whole Scripture, which teaches naught but moral improvement, and everywhere points us to Christ, must have been naught but deceit and falsehood!" (Pages 527-28) "For how can there ever be a greater love for God and how can there be a more praiseworthy confession than that one should be willing and ready not only to give up his temporal goods, ease, honor, and prosperity, but also shun his dearest friend upon earth, while in full health, out of sincere regard for Christ, in obedience to His eternal and holy truth?" (Page 973) "Till they again observe the truth and cease from their error and return to the right way, (i.e. the Mennonite way) or until they become as ravening, biting dogs or unclean, f'tIthy swine." (Page 986) "Crush before God, terrify, humble, pulverize," (page 989) "with the lash of the ban." (page 990) "It is evidenced in that you, a dunghill ofa man -." (page 1019, The Complete Writings of Men no Simons) Is it really absolutely necessary for one to graduate from high school, college and law school to know, it would not be "in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth" and "in the Commonwealtb's favor" for Judge J, Wesley Oler, Jr., to publicly confess his cover up crime and implicate many others in their" terror" and "evil?" Likewise have the Cumberland County Court Judges judged "evil good" ever since June 23, 1976 when they judged Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness is "fully warranted -love and concern," Any Judge who doesn't judge the "evil" of adultery "good," should now be able to realize Cumberland County Court Judges judged "evil good" and the Subpoena Hearing and the Bifurcation Hearing are both positive proof now of the court's "evil." Frenchman De Tocqueville came to the United States to study American democracy in the 1830's and left this for history: "In democracies, the tyrant public opinion no longer says: 'You shall think as I do or you shall die,' but he says, 'You are free to think differently from me and to retain your life, your property, and all that you possess; but you are henceforth a stranger among your own people. You may retain your civil rights, but they will be useless to you, for you will never be chosen by your fellow citizens if you solicit their votes; and they will affect to scorn you if you ask for their esteem. You will remain among men, but you will be deprived of the rights of mankind, Your fellow creatures will shun you like an impure being; and even those who believe in your innocence will abandon you, lest they should be shunned in their turn, Go in peace! I have given you your life, but it is an existence worse than death." (Frenchman De Tocqueville) Menno Simons and his. "evil men and seducers" punish their victims they damn and shun because, "all human ties, including those 01:. marriage and the family, must give way under the ban ofthe church," "In the Dutch Mennonite brotherhood about two thousand brethren and sisters were executed in the sixteenth century, one fourth of them being women and girls." (Mennonite Bishop and editor of The Complete Writings of Men no Simons, John C. Wenger, Page 928) Mennonites glory in having no history of even one victim of Mennonitism being executed by Mennonites. . But if Mennonites would be honest wouldn't they agree God-judged Mf,nnonite shunning is "more bitter than death" (Ecclesiastes 7:26) when they seduce Mennonite shunning wives to "crush before God, terrify, humble, pulverize" their Mennonite damned husbands with all the Mennonite mesmerized might oftheir mind, soul and body? If Mennonites obey God: "Provide things honest in the sight of all men," (Romans 12:] 7) wouldn't they publicly confess Menno Simons and his "evil men and seducers" should have said to every Mennonite damned and shunned husband and father for 450 years; "Go in peace! I hav,e given you your life, but it is an existence worse than death?" Shouldn't the Judges of the Cumberland County Court also honl~tly confess, their "fully warranted - love and concern" Opinion was the Court's veiled way of saying with Rl~formed Mennonites; "Go in peace! I have given you your life, but it is an existence worse than death?" But if Mennonites and Cumberland County Court Jud~:es would change horses in the middle of the stream of life and would say, "Go in peace! I hne given you your life and wife and children;" Mennonites and Cumberland County Court Jllldges surely must know they would give themselves what they freed their victims from, "alii existence worse than death." To explain the phenomenon of AI Capone and Chicago gangland crime in the 1930s, the llIinois Crime Survey stated: Political power in a denwcracy rests upon friendship, A man is YOlUr friend, not merely because he is kind to you, but because you can depend on him, because you know that he lI'i11 stick and that he will keep his word, Politics in the river wards, (of Chicago) and among common peol~le elsewhere as well, is a feudal relationship, The feudal system was one that was based not on law but upon personal loyalties, Politics tends, therefore, to become a feu dol system. Gangs, also, are organized on a feudal basis - that is, upon loyalties, upon friendships, and above all, upon dependability, This is one reason why IJoliticians and criminal gangs understand one another so well and so frequently enter into alliances with each other against the more remote common good, - Idealists are notoriously not good friends, No man who is mOrE' interested in abstractions like justice, humanity, and righteousness than be is in the more common immediate and personal relations oflife, is not likely to be a good mixer or a good politician, Doesn't any Mennonite know, if an "idealist," he faces ~'an existence worse than death" when he can't be trusted by fellow Mennonites to not publicly call for the end of Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness until he drops dead~1 Don't all of the Cumberland County Courthouse crowd and all "officer of the court" lawyers know, if an "idealist," he faces "an existence worse than death" if he publicly demands an end to the. Cumberland County Court crimes, lies and corruption until he drops dead? If any Mennonite or any of the Cumberland County Courthouse crowd would "provide things honest in the sight of all men," would he or she not publicly confess the politics of the Mennonite cult and Cumberland County Court are too much like politics in Chicago when gang lord AI Capone could boast, "I own the police?" The Code of Judicial Conduct demands of Jndge J, Wesley Oler, Jr" that he conduct himself at the Subpoena Hearing and Bifurcation Hearing thus: "A judge should not allow his family, social, or other relationship's to influence his judicial conduct or judgment. He should not lend the prestige of his office to advance the plrivate interest of others; nor should he conveyor knowingly permit others to convey the impression that they &Ire in a special position to influence him, He should not testify voluntarily as a character witness," I request that Judge J, Wesley Oler, Jr, disqualify himself from sitting in judgment at the Subpoena Hearing on December 27,2005 and the Bifurcation Heariug on January 12,2006 because he can't possibly meet the minimum requirements ofthe Code of Judicial Conduct, 1. "Judge Oler, you are part of the criminal conspiracy of covering up how I was lied into the mental hospital. - I say that the Cumberland County Court has - is l~ilty - of the crime of lying me into the mental hospital, attempting to have me declared criminally insane, One of the lies was that I held up a school bus with a loaded gun," This I stated in the witness chair June 6,2000. The court transcript was certified by Judge OleL By being party to the Cumberland County Court's cover up crime, Judge J, Wesley Oler, Jr" has proven he has allowed all guilty of their crime to influence him to be a fellow criminal. 2, How can Judge J, Wesley Oler, Jr, not be influenced to not want Lawrence N. Bard to prove Gale Gross Bear committed a crime when she stated before the court she did not commit adultery, just as Judge Oler will not want me to testifY in court about his irrefutable cover up crime? 3. Almost 20 years after Carlisle's last madam Bessie Jones was murdered in 1971, ending her family's 100 year blackmailing semi-public whorehouse dynasty reign over Cumberland County, the Carlisle Sentinel apparently thought it finally safe to tell the truth on its front page of February 24, 1990, This is the truth the Sentinel kept secret for a hundred years: "The best little whorehouse west of the Susquehanna or east of the Mississippi, serving the most prominent judges, generals, lawyers, chiefs of police, legislators, not to mention local prominent businessmen and even the not so prominent," according to 10cal historian George Difenderfer. When that camp follower of the Confederate Army decided to stay in Carlisle, she charmed tbe pants off enough prominent men to establish ber whorehouse dynasty, surly "social relationships" with Carlisle whores did "influence" those judges in their "Judicial conduct or judgment" if or wben their whores came before them in court. Then how can Judge J. Wesley Oler, Jr. not be influenced to not want Gale Gross Bear to confess all her lies, Reformed Mennonite lies and Cumberland County Court lies, leading her to request a Bifurcation Hearing, now ordered for January 12, 2oo6? Correction in my direction as commanded by "the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God." (Ephesians 6:17) As we therefore have opportunity, let us do good unto aU men, especially unto them who are of the household of faith. (Galatians 6: 1 0) Then how could I possibly pass up tbe "opportunity" to "do good" in pass up the opportunity to appear in court on December 27,2005 and prove bow Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire, lies for Gale Gross Bear and Hubert X, Gilroy, Esquire, lies for Lawrence N. Bard "for filthy lucre's sake?" (Titus 1:1 I) Historian Stanley Loomis wrote in his book The Fatal Friendship: "In many royal courts of an earlier century it had been the courtiers' privilege not merely to escort the bridal pair to the nuptial couch, but to remain in the room and witness the consummation of their union. Indeed, among the Gonzagas ofMantua it is recorded that at one such 'scene' a priest was called upon to insert his hand between the couple to verify full intromission. Such robust customs were no longer in vogue at the court of France at the time of Marie Antoinette's marriage, but their purpose, apart from entertaining the spectators, was practical. It was in this manner that the legitimacy of the future heir was symbolically verified." And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! For ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers. (St. Luke 11 :46) Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire and Hubert X, Gilroy, Esquire, bave no more "the divine right of (lawyer) kings" to defend Gale Gross Bear and Lawrence N, Bard wallowing in the "slime" (Genesis 11 :3) of their adultery than that priest had any "divine right" to put his hand between that copulating couple! Now ye are full, now ye are ricb, ye have reigned as kings without us. (1 Corinthians 4:8) Reformed Mennonites had no "divine right of kings" for every Reformed Mennonite forbidding hand to be between Gale Gross Bear's and my naked body, preventing any "intromission" beginning June 11, 1972, than she, becoming "insatiable" (Ezekiel 16:28) had any "divine right" to commit adultery for "almost 19 years," and counting, with Bad Bard, The Judges ofthe Cumberland County Court had no "divine right of (judge) kings" to judge ever since June 23, 1976 every Reformed Mennonite forbidding hand between Gale Gross Bear and me from being "one flesh" since June 11, 1972, is "fully warranted -love and concern." "Judge Oler, you are part of the criminal conspiracy of covering up how I was lied into the mental hospital. - I say that the Cumberland County Court has - is guilty - of the crime of lying me into the mental hospital, attempting to have me declared criminally insane, One of the lies was that I held up a school bus with .a loaded gun," This I stated in the witness chair June 6, 2000. The court tr~lnscript was certified by Judge OleL Nor did the Cumberland County Court have any more "divine night of kings" to order the State Police at Carlisle to lie me into Holy Spirit Community Mental Health Center on December 5, 1977 and carry out its additional cover up crime to this day, than Gale Gross Bear and Bad Bard have the "divine right" to commit adultery. "Do you know wbat I suggest? If you would take that (tape recorder) home and bury it on your farm, and if you would repent, you would have your wiff' back." (Reformed Mennonite Bishop Earl M, Basinger propositioning me on behalf of Menno Simons (1496-1561) and all Reformed Mennonites, April 15, 1973,) Dare to imagine how much earlier the American Colonies would lIIave rebelled against Great Britain if, instead of a tea tax and other taxes, King George ill would have taxed married sex with "Repent" and be a Mennonite, until every Colonial wife also committed adultery, Also, until aU were lied into a mental hospital, Yes, this is open rebellion against the Reformed Mennonite cult and Cumberland County Conrt, just as Saint Peter and Saint John rebelled with the following words: Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto JOu more than unto God, judge ye. (Acts 4:14) In his Petition to Quash A Subpoena Lawrence N, Bard stated in (tart: 1. Petitioner is Lawrence N, Bard of 1166 Rhoda Boulevard, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, (This is the same address as Gale Gross Bear.) 5, Petitioner is 75 years old, not in the best of health, and views tbe Subpoena issued by Plaintiff in this matter as designed merely to harass and burden the petitionelr, Judge Clinton R. Weidner stated in his "Finding of Facts" of his ;June 23,1976 Opinion: 59, Since his excommunication Plaintiff has (a) disrupted services of Defendant church; (b) hired a private detective to investigate the private life of Defendant (Bishop J, Henry Fisher,) aged 73 -, The detective's report of Bishop Fisher's womanizing over many years was so believable that was the first time ever, Reformed Mennonite watchers ever heard of a Bishop resigning, Invariably they are just relieved of their duties if they become too frail mentally and/or physically, Bishop Fisher faced the choice of resigning as Bishop or have the aUegations be proven of his alleged sexulll sins, Bishop J, Henry Fisher just proved how very true the Holy Bible is. For if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and Irnowetb aU things. (1 John 3:20) Reformed Mennonite Bishop J, Henry Fisher's heart condemned him so mucb that rather than try to prove bis innocence, be caused 19 Reformed Mennonites wbo didn't believe him, to supposedly be "set on fire of hell" (James 3:6) by all their fellow Refonned Mennonites and be excommunicated and shunned, Lawrence N, Bard's heart also condemns bim so much he doesn't want to try to prove his innocence in court of "an already and yet ongoing almost 19 year adulterous affair with Gale Gross Bear," Lawrence N, Bard doesn't want to confess in court, tbere is no longer a "yet ongoing almost 19 year adulterous affair with Gale Gross Bear," only because at "75 years old, not in the best of health;" "doth not even nature itself teach you," (I Corinthians 11:14) Lawrence N, Bard may no longer he able to perform "the very act" (St. John 8:4) of adultery? The worst thing an old man can be is a lover. (Otway) Likewise is it witb women as ancient Sarah "laughed within hersl~lf, saying, After I am waxed old, shall I have pleasure?" (Genesis 18: 12) In my doctor's waiting room I read how Phyllis Christen instructed the readers of the December/January 2000 AARP magazine Modern Maturity with her sexual instincts at 68, "I have been a widow for eight years and what I miss most in my life now is sex. I think about it every day and dream about it every night. Am I different from any other pe,rson who had to forfeit her sex life? I doubt it. I come from the age between never talking about it and free love. I was in the in-between group. Now I'm 68 and I miss sex more than anything. I miss the touch, the feel, and the warmth ofloving and sharing. I was 16 when I got married, knowing nothing about sex. What I learned, I learned from experience. To me, sex was sharing your complete self with someone you cared about. I will never stop wanting to have sex again and again. Don't tell me seniors don't want sex. Take it from me, no one ever forgets how wonderful sex can be." If Gale Gross Bear is a late bloomer and at 67 years sutTers as the AARP woman sutTered sexually, then Gale Gross Bear will know Jesus Christ doesn't lie, And with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again, (St. Matthew 7:2) Reformed Mennonite father-in-law Israel Gross' letter was a 1975 Cumberland County Court exhibit which stated in part, a month after my excommunication: "If two people can't be man and wife but are estranged and will not so much as touch one another, no social company, no eating together, etc" life would become almost unbearable together and in my opinion and belief far better to separate and not live together because it is no longer marriage but a living hell of torture. And too, Robert, the things that have occurred and are occurriug could cause you to be hospitalized, I would consider this well," Reformed Mennonites didn't mind Gale Gross Bear having me see her naked and in all stages of undress because that only intensified their "living hell of torture" before she and/or her bishop handlers allowed me to feel her naked body quite a number of times, always welcoming finger intercourse, but never sexual intercourse. Although the mandatory retirement age of a Cumberland County Court Judge is 70 years, it is as if all Cumberland Couuty Court Judges were never men enough, or too long ago forgot how a teaser wife and not a pleaser wife can cause them what Israel Gross called "a living hell of torture," Now, if Gale Gross Bear also thinks "of sex all the time" and 75 year old Bad Bard can't "satisfy" (Ezekiel 16:28) Gale Gross Bear any of the time, Bad Bard will cause her what her father called "a living hen of torture. " If Bad Bard's body is "as good as dead," (Hebrews 11:12) then hopefully Gale Gross Bear, like ancient Sarah, "laughed within herself saying, After I am waxed old sball I bave pleasure, my lord (Bad Bard) being old also," (Genesis 18: 12) 1 hope so because I wouldn't wish upon my worst enemy what Gale Gross Bear, Reformed Mennonites and the Cumberland County Court Judges have forced upon me for the past more than 33 God-judged "more bitter than death" (Ecclesiastes 7:26) years, Although unwortby in tbe least, I, like Saint Paul, have been "pressed out of measure, above strength, insomucb that we despaired even of life" (2 Corinthians 1 :8) and "in prisons more frequent." (2 Corinthians 11:23) Reformed Mennonites are now "pressed out of measure, above strength" to deny the truth of what they have done to this marriage and family, how they, like their lawyers, did "lade (all of this marriage and family) with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves lift them not with one of your fingers," Likewise did the Judges oftbe Cumberland County Court ever since June 23,1976, "lade (this marriage and family) with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves lift them not with one of your fingers;" because Judges are "pressed out of measure" in their guilt, to at this late date they seem "beyond strength" to lift "the burdens) otTwith one of your fingers," Sincerely submitted, -/(~ :;f ~ Robert L. Bear December 26, 2005 Lawyer David A, Ody attempted to discover why I was taken into custody by the State Police and taken to Holy Spirit Community Mental Health Center on December 5, 1977, Tbe following are excerpts from his report, I started my search for information with a phone call to the Pennsylvania State Police at the Carlisle barracks. The trooper who answered the phone gave me what seemed to be a spontaneous response to my question. I asked him who had called the State Police to complain of Bear taking his daughter and what the exact nature of the complaint was that the police received. I also asked the trooper if the logbook would reflect how the matter was brought to the attention of the State Police. The trooper told me that he thought this case was one of Judge Shughart's and that he believed the matter was handled with an assignment slip and would therefore not show up on the logbook. An "assignment slip" was described as a piece of paper which is handed 110 the police officer who performs the job noted on the paper. I waited on the phone while the trooper checked with someonl~ else at the barracks whom he thought might know more about the incident. When he returned to the phone he told me, "Oh boy, you really created a monster here." I asked him what he meant by this remark and he told me that he didn't know anything about the incident involving Bear's arrest and admission to Holy Spirit Hospital. On December 27, 1977 I called the Cumberland-Perry Mental Health (CPMH) office in Carlisle. Michael Chambers who identified himself as director spoke to me because he alleged that Carolyn Sukay, Bear's caseworker, was not in. Mr, Chambers told me he couldn't answer any of my questions except to advise me that Bear had been taken to the Holy Spirit Hospital with a warrant under emergency mental heaJth procedures provided for by the Emergency Mental Health Procedures Act. He could not release any information or records to me until he spoke with his attorney, Kevin Hess. On December 27, 1977 I also called the Holy Spirit Hospital and spoke to Mrs, Holmes who is in charge of mental health records. Mrs. Holmes advised me that I could review Bear's records but that I couldn't receive a copy of the records without a court order or subpo(:na, On December 28, 1977 Bear and I went to the Holy Spirit Hospital to review their records which related to Bear's three-day confinement. We found that the records were not available because they could not be located in the Hospital. After waiting sometime, Dr. Borelli arrived at the facility but in spite of his help, the records could not be located. I was allowed to review a very few papers which were in a file relating to Bear, These included a psychological report which indicated Bear was normal. A copy of this document was given to me, I gave it to Bear for his use. There was a social history in this file. The history stated that Bear took his daughter off a school bus with a loaded gun, The history indicates that Bear denied reports of taking his daughter off the bus with a loaded gun. The report was prepared by a social worker at the facility named Ted, I later spoke to him and he explained to me that he got the report of the bus and loaded gun from the State Police who had told the story to the hospital staff. The story was general knowledge among the staff according to this social worker. He never saw the story in writing, We had to leave the hospital without reviewing the entire file because it could not be located. Mrs, Holmes advised me that she would attempt to locate the file so Ji might review the records at a later time. On December 29,1977 Bear and I went to the office ofCPMI-I on Hanover Street in Carlisle. I presented them with a letter requesting certain information be made available to me, I attached an authorization from Bear. We were able to speak with Carolyn Sukay who was the caseworker assigned to Bear's case. Miss Sukay didn't have much to say that was helpful or informative. With respect to the CPMH records which we asked to review, Miss Sukay said there was only authorizations, chronological notes and a copy of the discharge summary. (a) Bear was taken into custody by the State Police and taken to Holy Spirit Hospital under the emergency mental health procedures available when there is immediate danger to someone's life. A warrant to allow this was issued by CPMH. (b) The State Police were the cornplaining party asking for the warrant to involuntarily comrnit Bear to Holy Spirit Hospital. (c) The State Police wanted to know of Bear' s diagnosis and discharge plans. (d) Bear was not adrnitted to Holy Spirit under emergency procedures because the papers were not completed properly, (This varies with the hospital records which indicate that Bear was not admitted on an involuntary basis because an examination at the time he was brought to the hospital revealed that there was no mental health emergency which would necessitate involuntary admission,) (e) On either 12/8 or 12/9 Sgt. Mixell of the State Police called CPMH for infonnation about Bear's evaluation. Sukay called the Holy Spirit Hospital and they said to have the Police call Dr. Borelli. Sukay then called the State Police and spoke to a policeman named Cletus because Sgt. Mixell was not there, Cletus said he would have the District Attorney call Dr. Borelli. (f) On either 12/8 or 12/9 Judge Shughart called CPMH to get infonnation relating to Bear's evaluation. Sukay notes that she didn't tell Shughart anything. Two hours after leaving the CPMH offices, Robert Goril called to advise me that their attorney told them they didn't have to release the infonnation requested by my letter because emergency procedures were not completed and Bear was not admitted involuntarily, On December 31, 1977 I visited Holy Spirit Hospital for a review of the medical records. The records were apparently complete except for the discharge summary, which Dr, Borelli had not yet completed, The records revealed the following infonnation: (a) The warrant for Bear's arrest and involuntary commitment to the hospital was issued by CPMH pursuant to an affidavit signed by Sgt. Mixell. The affidavit was dated 12/5/77, (b) The affidavit stated that Bear threatened to kill his children and commit suicide. It further stated that a noose was seen in Bear's barn and that he kept weapons on the premises. (c) There were two references in the file to Judge Shughart wanting Bear admitted for evaluation, (d) Dr. Borelli examined Bear at 6:45 p,m, on 12/5/77 approximately 45 minutes after Bear was brought to Holy Spirit. Dr. Borelli certified that Robert Bear was not in need of emergency commitment. (e) Bear signed a voluntary admission authorization which included a statement that he was aware of his rights and understood that he could leave the facility at any time after giving them a written request to leave, (f) There is a reference in the file to Bear authorizing the release of evaluation results to David Ody and Judge Shughart, It is possible for Bear to review this record personally if he will make a written application to the Holy Spirit Hospital. A treatment tearn will sit down with Bear when he reviews the records. The discharge summary of Dr. Borelli has still not been provided to me although the Hospital agreed to send it to me when it is complete. Mrs. Holmes indicated to me that these summaries are often not completed and made part of a record for many months after a patient is discharged. I received a request from Dr. Borelli to call him through Robert Bear shortly after Bear was discharged from the hospital. I called Dr. Borelli and he informed me that there was nothing wrong with Bear and that he would be willing to testilY to that effect. There are a number of questions which remain unanswered concerning the matter of Bear's commitment and arrest. I have contacted the State Police at the Carlisle barracks, but they have not answered the questions I have, I would like to know where Sgt, Mixdl got his directions in the matter of Bear's arrest and commitment and I would like to find out exactly how the entire matter was brought to the attention of the State Police, With the exception ofMrs, Holmes at the Holy Spirit Hospital, everyone involved with the matter has been reluctant to talk, unwilling to give any information or evasive in their answers to rne. They all seem to be uncomfortable with my questions about these events even though the questions are not difficult or unusual. Perhaps Judge Shughart would tell you why he wanted you evaluated as indicated in the records at Holy SpIrit Hospital. He may even tell you what steps he took to see that you were evaluated, if any. If he has done nothing wrong he should have nothing to hide," (End of Report) Our Mental Health laws state: (c) Notification of Rights at Emergency Examination - Upon arrival at the facility, the person shall be informed ofthe reasons for emergency examination and of his right to cornmunicate immediately with others. We needed to wait until David Ody read the hospital records on December 31,1977 before we learned ofthe reasons for the attempted emergency examination, Sgt. Grant Mixell told me . that District Attorney Bayley and Judge Shughart ordered me to be taken into custody. If I had known lwas charged with all their false charges and had been told that I was free to leave without being arrested and that this part of the law applied, I would havt: asked them to take me home, Instead, the state police posed as friends and I trusted them. "If it is determined that the person is severely rnentally disabled and in need of emergency treatment, treatment shall be begun immediately. If the physician does not so find, or if at any time it appears there is no longer a need for immediate treatment, the person shall be discharged and returned to such place as he may reasonably direct." On December 29,1977, Lawyer David Ody reminded CumberlandJPerry Mental Health and Mental Retardation worker Sukay in my presence that the l:~w provides a penalty of up to one year in prison for anyone who gives false information in order to have a citizen falsely committed to a mental hospital and that includes all who help cover up sucb falseness. I never threatened to kill myself, I never threatened to kill our children. I did not even own a gun, I sold my one rifle several months before December :5, 1977 and had no other weapons, I did not have a hanging noose in the barn, In happielr times our children swung on a rope with a loop in it and it was seventeen (17) inches from the floor. I was not even near a school bus when 1 brought my twelve year old daughter home after she said, "You bastard!" This was the summary of my Psychological Evaluation one day after I was lied into the mental hospital December 6, 1977. PSYCHOLOGICAL EV ALUA nON: Robert Baer An intellectual profile such as this is counter-indicative of emotional disturbance, Mr. Baer is capable of thinking in abstract terms, but has enough practical orientation not to lose sight of the concreteness of issues. There is no evidence of psychotic process in this man, His thinking is clear and his flow of ideas is quite relevant to the issue, The question of paranoia was raised, Rorschach responses and T AT stories yielded no evidence of this disorder beyond a slight tendency to be somewhat suspicious and defensive. This was not seen in clinical proportions and may well be real when one considers the situation in which this man fmds himself Based on these test results, there is no reason why this man cannot function quite adequately in the community. His ability to relate to others is good. His cooperative nature and sensitivity toward the wellbeing of other people are positive factors in his adjustment to a difficult situation. In summary then, Mr. Baer's psychological profile is well within normallimits. There is no apparent need for ongoing treatment at this time. Thomas L Hanshaw Psychologist TLH:bw 1 was discharged from Holy Spirit December 9, 1977. 1 was first told to go to the business office, A Mrs. Messersmitt presented me with a bill for $521.60. 1 said, "I didn't bring myself here. 1 didn't come here because there was anything wrong. I will go to prison before I pay that." Mrs. Messersmitt asked me if I was the Bear who had been in the newspapers, I said, "I am sorry to say 1 am." She said Holy Spirit didn't want any publicity and I was free to go. I went home and the State Police never arrested me for the crimes they charged against me December 5,1977. But Holy Spirit began to send me statements demanding their $521.60, 1 talked to Lawyer David A. Ody. The result was his investigative report. I sent it around, Holy Spirit no longer sent me statements demanding payment. I may be nothing, nothing but persistent. Years later Holy Spirit gave me a copy oftheir document proving Cumberland County picked taxpayers' pockets of $521.60 May 5, 1978 in order to cover up the court-Stiilte Police "in cahoots" crime. All my efforts to uncover who criminally authorized payment ofthalt $521.60 ended with all who had to know, also being "in cahoots." Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 2. A judge should avoid impropriety and the appearance o.{impropriety in all his activities. A. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should conduct himself at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, B. Ajudge should not allow his family, social, or other relationships to influence his judicial conduct or judgment. He should not lend the prestige of his office to advance the private interest of others; nor should he conveyor knowingly permit others to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence him, He shou~d not testifY voluntarily as a character witness, Commentary Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsiblf: or improper conduct by judges, A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety, He must expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny. He must therefore accept restrictions on his conduct that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen and should do so freely and willingly, "I withstood him to the face because he was to be blamed" (Galatians 2:10) and asked Assistant District Attorney Jaime Keating on December 19, 2lJiOO in the Cumberland County Courthouse, "Do you believe there is anyone in the Cumberland County Courthouse who doesn't know the Court lied in my case?" In a rare moment of h()nesty in my case, Jaime Keating confessed, "There may be a few." According to the Code of Judicial Conduct, all Judges of the Cumberland County Court violated their Code of Judicial Conduct because "there may b4e a few" Judges didn't "convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence him." Didn't Jaime Keating actually say, "There may be a few" who don't know "they are in a spedal position to influence" their boss Judges if they make public their Judges' crimes, lies and corruption? "Comfort the feebleminded" (l Thessalonians 5:14) who can't know Controller Alfred L. Whitcomb was not one of the "the few" who didn't know he was in double "hot water" had he dared tell of his Court's crimes, lies and corruption. 1. Had Controller Alfred L. Whitcomb told he knew wbo authorized picking taxpayers' pockets of $521.60, he would be admitting he helped to cover up the Cumberland County Court's crime. 2. Still rule those minds on earth at whose sage Milton's wormwood words were hurled: Truth like a bastard comes into the world never without ilf:-fame to him who gives her birth. (JElht1 ~fj1t.....) (Jj:;'\)r)".l f-j"'ilf) y) Had Controller Alfred L. Whitcomb dared tell the trutln on March 13, 1989, wouldn't Whitcomb have felt fortunate if the Cumberland County COUlrt criminals he uncovered had just called him a "bastard?" ., . ALFRED L WHITCOMB CONTROUEFI ,. JANICE B. WARICHER AOMINISTRATIve ASSISTANT '~.;.--:: ""('~,,-. ~~. '-~~~: .,o;~:rfg~~:~~~i aIDnirDllir nf aIwnh2rlana QIDUni~ Mr. Robert L, Bear R. D, #9 Box 325. Carlisle, Pa, 17013 Dear Mr. Bear, COURT HOUSE, CARUSLE, PA. 17013 March 13, 1989 , j ALFRED B, SHIPE CEPtITY CONTROLLER JAMES D, BOGAR soucrrOFl <- .J .~. .... ,~..' As we explained in our previous letter we are unable- to provide copies of invoices for the year 1978, To explain further, all Cumberland County's records are maintained for periods of time designated by the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Division of Archives authorized by the County Records Act of August 14, 1963. The Act sets guide- lines on the length of time County records must be maintained, In the case of Invoices, the records are required to be kept for a period of seven years. We have in our possession authorization from the State Archives Division to destroy invoices for the year 1978. Unlike hospitals we do not have a need to maintain certain financial records forever. Sincerely, ~/4!It/;;;J- A~ed L. Whitcomb Controller Encl. ALW: as i I . R. D. #9 Box 325 Carlisle, FA 17013 M.arch 15, 1989 . Controller Alfred L. Whitcomb Courthouse Carlisle, PA 17013 , Dear Mr . Whitcomb: , Please be patient. with this rigbth grade drcpout who is even IIXlre confused due to your latest letter received today. Your letter of March 1, 1989 states: "In accordance with subpeonea no. 2043 civil '88, and after extensive searching, we are unable :too locate the documents you have requested." Now your letter of Harch 13, 1989 statell in part.: "We have in our possession authorization from the State .Archives Division to destroy invoices for the year 1978." . __ My subpeonea to you requested a copy of the document s!undng who authorized payment of ury- voluntary cCllllll:i.tmentto Holy Spirit CollllllUIlity Mental Health Center, December 5, 1977 and was certaiDly not a request for a copy of an "invoice". . If the records for 1978 have been destroyed, as yeti stro:cgly iDter without saying so, w~ would you write, "After exten.sive searching we are unable to locate the ,documents JOu have requested."? Could you fault me for "read:ing betwee:n the lines" of yeur two letters and concluding that sil:lce it is impossible to carry 0111t an "extensive s.earch" of 1978 records destroyed without a trace, your latest letter is a smokescreen hiding the fact, that, although granted permission to destroy the 1978 records, you chose not to do so? Or your "extensive searching" letter is utterly false? After carefully paring all the fat from your two lett.ers this is all the gristly' meat left: "After extensive searching" of records destroyed :years ago "'we are unable to lc~atD "'h" d~~um""".- ~~. hs....;;::< -eque~ted" . "" -.. - ....... .-.......~ .-- .-. - . "0 what a tangled web we weave when we first practice to deceive." Sir Walter Scott How better could you bury this matter am put it to rest. than to send me a signed stat.ement according t.o t.he f01+owing: . I declare under the penalties of perjury that w 1978 a'l1thorlzed records have been destroyed on date. Alfred L. ilhit.cOlllb, Controller of Cumberland County, PeDIl5yl v,wa. Or do you not keep records. of when you destroy irreplace,able records? You' probably know that to support John Tower's recent nolllinat.ion for Secretary of Defense, former Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater said if w.wibo shacked up with women and- all who were drunken bad to leave gover=ent there wouldn't be anyone left in. ftas~n. . You also probably know that if all who helped lie. JDe intlJ the mental hospit.alandl or covered up their crime would confess here as they surely will confess in the here- after, there would not. be as IllllIlY left in the CumberlllIld County Courthouse. Do not your two confusing letters rightly lead one to be1.ieve t.hat you are well aW'are of the fact, that what I ~uested is the Culllberland CoUltIty Court's "smoking gun" Do we not both 1cD6w that ,lIIOre than a document has fallen t.hrough the cracks of t.he Cumberlam County Court? A "SlllOkinlr .run" bas [wen throul<:h '~he cracks of the CUlllberlar.d County Court. . '"\ Sincere~/, . ') -J.. '<' a-'l:..J DL..._ ~~ .. ~ert L. ilear Attorney David Ody wrote a letter dated February 7, 1978, containing the following explanation. "As you will recall, you asked me to call Dr, Borelli at his request to discuss your evaluation and whatever other matter Dr, Borelli had on his mind, I tried several times to get him on the phone without success, hut finally, I found him at one of his offices and explained who I was and that I was calling pursuant to his request that you have your attorney call. Dr. Borelli paused a moment and then seemed to remember you saying, "Oh yes!" The Doctor patiently explained to me that he had evaluated you and determined that you were an exhibitionist who would probably continue to expose yourself to women, but that you were not a potential rapist, He said that you would probably not hanD anyone but that you would continne to have difficulty exercising good judgment and that the problem would manifest itself in your exposing yourselfto women, I was shocked to hear this since you had told me soon after your discharge that Dr. Borelli told you that you were completely normal. Finally, I interrnpted Dr, Borelli's long explanation of your problems to interject that you had led me to believe that you were normal. Dr, Borelli said that you had misunderstood, He told you that you could be treated not that you were normal. The Doctor then began to explain the treatment and your problems again, Once again I interrupted to ask what the Doctor was intending to do on your bebalfwith the Judge. He seemed not to understand this question and explained how he hoped to help you by treating you and cautioned me that there was always the possibility that you would once again expose yourself to people. He was most insistent and apparently happy to teU me that you were not a threat to people around you other than your exhibitionism. I was, by this time thoroughly confused and shocked and did not know what to do. One question that I had intended to ask the Doctor previously was how he found out about your alleged loaded gun and taking your daughter off the school bus, I put this qnestion to the Doctor at the end of his lengthy explanation, He paused and there was the sound of paper rustling in the background. After a time he said, "I'm sorry, I had the wrong me, There is nothing wrong with Mr, Bear," That was the end of the conversation," Cumberland County, PA 1979 Criminal Court Testimony, Page 32 Bear: Did you never sexually tease after I was excommunicated? Gale Gross Bear: No Robert, I did not, (Page 34) - Judge Harold E. Sheely: Did he ever rape you? Gale Gross Bear: In my mind, I would say yes, I don't know what the definition under the circumstances would be. As I see it, I would say yes, (page 36) - Judge Harold E. Sheely: You are talking now of sexual intercourse? Gale Gross Bear: Yes, Page 38) - Bear: Then you mean it occnrred sometime between June the nth of 1972 and 1974 when you left home, is that right? Gale Gross Bear: That's correct. Bear: And you don't know when? Gale Gross Bear: I can't remember, Bear: But it happened? Gale Gross Bear: Yes, Bear: Well, were you clothed or were you naked? Gale Gross Bear: I really can't remember those details, Bear: Did it happen in the times that I was in your bed or when you were in my bed? District Attorney Michael Eakin objected and Judge Sheely upheld his objection although Judge Sheely earlier had stated: "You will have to tell us what you meant by it." All Cumberland County Court judges can't be that "feebleminded" (I Thessalonians 5:14) they do not know my Mennonite mesmerized shunning wife attempted to lie me into the penitentiary by testifying in court that I forced "rape, sexual intercourse" upon her. Nor can the Cumberland County Court be too "feebleminded" to know Judge Harold E, Sheely and District Attorney J, Michael Eakin knowingly helped Gale BeaT get away with her perjury crime right before their eyes, If Gale Gross Bear had been able to have a psychiatrist testify in court that I was fully capable of rape, I may have spent many long years in the penitentiary, but I was saved by my jurors who saw through the scam of cult and court. : ~- ~ , OALL' f1'. :!I"'UO~ PoM......-T...... COMMONWEALTK 01" PENNSYLV,o,NIA NINTH ..!UCICIAL DISTRICT CARLISLE, P.... '70'2 (7r7) .......IQa June 27, 1977 , . Mr. Robert L. Bear R.D. 9, Box 325 Carlisle, PA 17013 Dear Mr. Bear: .:~;....: The statements in your report of .June 21" 1977, regarding the involvement of my children in drugs ~LI1d the neces5ity for lIIe to "ease" them through . court because of bei.ng caught with -drugs is a complete and absolute unt:ruth. You asked that I make a denial and I have done so. Further, I' would appreciate receiving from you the 1:IaIIIeS and identUi- cation of those whom. you say gave you th:b information. Both of my children are professional peOJ:lle and such statements are either libelous or slande%~ous and I am en- titled to an explanation so that I may UL turn gi.ve it to them. . A prompt response giving me the names of the individuals who furnished you with t~ :Information wi.ll be:~ppreciated. YCI 1 tal DFS : bd In my open letter of June 21, 1977, I stated due to this cult and court destroyed marriage and family, I didn't want any of our six cbildren caugbt using drugs as Judge Sbugbart's son was caugbt and bow be was eased througb court. I never expected Judge Sbughart would become so hyper as to wriite the lying letter he did when I brougbt his and Judge Weidner's "fully warranted -love and concern" lies home to the first family of Cumberland County, I answered Judge Sbughart's letter publicly by declaring it was public knowledge his son was caught using drugs and I would not name those who told me. Without looking I found a mole in tbe Cumberland County Courthouse wbo later declared Judge Sbughart's letter was why he and District Attorney Edgar B. Bayley had tbe State Police at Carlisle lie me into tbe mental hospital six months later, That is after I again tried to draw Jludge Shughart out of his "stationary defense," . , b' <,,::.,.: 0, ra '.9,.". DETECTIVE AGENCY, INc. Lancaster (717) 299-5787 Harrisburg (717) 233-3609 York (717) 843.7563 Orginal Information Received Date Filed: February 21, 1975 Clients Name: Mr. Robert L. Bear R. D. #4, Box 556 Carlisle, Pennsylvania Telephone 249-3487 17103 Attorney: Mr. Richard vlagner 520 West Hanover Street Carlisle, Pe~~sylvania To Investigate: V~. Henry Fisher 35 Greensfield Road Lancaster, Pennsylvania Telephone 392-5050 Sr. Bishop in the Reformed Men- nonite Church " ,/., ~. ... - robe DETECTIVE AGENCY, INC, Lancaster (717) 299.5787 Harrisburg (717) 233.31509 York (717) 843.7563 The purpose of this investigation is to check into the b1;ckground and character of J. Henry Fisher, 35 Greenfield Road, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Mr. Fisher is a Bishop in the Reformed Mennonite Church. Probe was retained by our client Mr, Robert L. Bear on February 21, 1975. After talking with Mr, Bear and reading his book, it was decided . tha t our agency would do all it could to help ltJI', Bear get united with his wife and children. It is our opinion after talking at some length, on many occasions with Mr. Bear, that he is sincere, and his only motivation is being re- united with his wife (Gail) and children >nth whom he is deeply in love. This fact was made clear to our satisfaction after hours of meetings and questions with Mr. Bear. I would like to point out from a company standpoint: in an investi- --------. gation of this type, we, Probe, must be satisfied that our client to be, has a good, sound, justifiable reason for an investigation to commence. As stated earlier in this report the purpose of the investigation is to check into the background of one J. Henry Fisher. On much of the material and information gathered, no names will appear, as the informant or person being questioned asked that his name be withheld for various reasons. Such as: A, Have known Mr. Fisher for years as a friend, Invest. Report (Con'td) Page 2 . B. Have had and still have some kind of dealings with Mr. Fisher. C. Were afraid that somehow Mr, Fisher may be able to cause them to lose their job. After meetings with our client we decided to focus our investi- gation into the following areas. A. Reputation - as to what people thought about Mr. Fisher? B. Life Style - did Mr. Fisher live modestly or did he have one life style for the church and another life style that he preferred for himself? C, Autos - did he own antique au+.-os and/or other cars with many extras that far exceeded normal requirements for the auto to , serve its normal purpose? D. Business dealings - did }~. Fisher deal with individuals out- side the reformed church? And through investigation was it apparent that he did so and then made the necessary moves to hide these dealings from the church? E. Trips - did Hr. Fisher take many trips away from home? And if so how did he dress and act when away? F. Women did Mr. Fisher handle himself around women as the church and his position in the church demanded? Our main "thrust in this case was to answer the questions (A throu~~ F) and keep the cost as low as possible for our client as he was working with limited funds. . . ~ ~ . .. . Invest. Report (Con'td) Page 3 Our first inquiry about Mr. Fisher was made on February 21, 1975. An agent of Probe Detective Agency, Inc. contacted Subject A. With- out stating that he was working on any particular case. He asked ~ ject A what he knew about a J. Henry Fisher, who is a bishop in the Reformed Mennonite Church. Subject A sl1'.iled, laughed, and said, "that w:,oremonger." The agent held his surprised reaction and asked Subject A what he meant by that. The gentleman stated that lilr. Fisher was known to be quite a playboy when he .laS a<lsy on business trips. Es- pecially when he went to the Hotel Pierre located on 5th Avenue in lIew York City. The subject also stated that h.e had heard that Mr. Fisher at one time had a permanent suite at the Hotel Pierre. He stat- ed that at the time it was COlDl!lon Y.no'lledge B."!lon!; t:,e few who kne'tI Mr. Fisher 'Well. As the Agent did not want to deceive Subject A he then told him that he was checking i:nto Mr. Fisher's background. Subject A then asked that his name not be used in any report, whatsoever, he then gave our agent the names of several other individuals to question about Mr. Fisher. The next individual was questioned through one of the agency'.s contacts. For the purpose of this report we shall call her Subject B. Mrs. B not knowing that we already knew about the Hotel Pierre in New York City, verified the same story that Sub.iect A, gave us about the , ., , Invest. Report (Con'td) Page 4 Hotel. With one new twist, Subject B stated she knew, but would not reveal how, that Mr. Fisher had call girls with him when he stayed at the Hotel. Because we had two separate individuals that talked about the Hotel Pierre in New York City, without knowing that the other had knowledge of the same hotel. We decided to send an Agent to the Hotel Pierre in New York City to see if any evidence could be uncovered. Our Agent arrived at the Hotel Pierre in New York City on March 21, 1975. Our Agent rented a room and set about the task of investi- gating the information received. Records were checked back to the beginning of 1971, which is all the further the hotel keeps records, (four years). .mile there were several Fishers registered, their were no J. Henry Fisher or Henry J. Fisher ever registered during the four year period. After interviewing several hotel employees, our Agent spoke with an employee that had been there flD%' thirteen years. The employee explained to our Agent that it was very possible that Mr. Fisher did stay at the Hotel in the past. S~t, as otherschad, register- ed under another name to avoid detection, ....'hile our Agent was in New York, a Probe Agent then met with Sub- ject C. Subject C spoke freely after he was assurred his name would not be used in any manner, Subject C stated fue had been a ~riend of Mr. Fishers~for some years. And that he had no wish to hurt l1r, Fisher, . - . Invesi;, Report (Con' td) Page ;> but that he thought what the church was doing to Mr. Bear was ter- rible. Subject C stated that he knew of two womem that Mr. Fisher was very friendly with, but as both the women are, now married he did not want to reveal their names. Subject C when asked about the Hotel Pierre in New York City, stated, "Sure that's the Hotel Henry stayed at." Subject C also stated that Mr. Fisher was reported to act like a. big time out of town spender. And that Hr. Fisher usually freque'nted the Latin Quarter Night Club and the Copacabanna Night Club. Subject C stated that Mr. Fisher always gave out silver dollars to the night club waitresses and when they accepted them, Mr. Fisher would give them a pat or squeeze on the fannie. To verify Subject C' s story about the night. clubs, Subject A was asked about them. Subject A said, "sure I knew about those," and named the same night clubs that Subject C named. Since three different people, on three separate occasions, and unrelated to each other, reported basically the same story, and named the same places that Mr. Fisher allegedly frequented, may give some validity to the stories. For the purpose of this report the statements and investigation of the Hotel Pierre were all put together. In this way the reader could more easily understand that part of the report. . , bvest. Report (Con' td) Page 6 Another avenue of investigation was to be conducted on the fol- lowing people. A. Mr. and Mrs. B, Mr. and Mrs. C. Mr. and Mrs. ~ See page 6A for reasons of deletion After a lengthy interview with our client Mr, Bear. It was de- cided that one of our Agents should definitely interview all of the above. It was our belief and still is that the 6 could shed w~ch light on y~, Fisher's past reputation. Our client y~. Bear agreed to call the ~ and ask them if they would consent to an interview with a Probe Agent. The s told Va'. Bear that they would talk to an Agent. Several days later a Probe Agent called at his home at The date of the call was ~mrch 11, 1975. At that time the Agent spoke with . and attempted to set up an inter- view. Hr. stated at that time, "That he was speaking for the whole family including the 'S. And that they would no long- er be willing to say anything to anyone about Mr. Fisher, as they lived in Lancaster and were afraid of any repercussions." The Probe Agent could not change their minds, so an appointment was never made. It is also our belief that the family was very frightened at what might happen to them. Especially as one of them worked at New . ~ . PAGE 6A * These names must not be made public because Henry.'s deeds and power have blighted this family and they have suffered enough from Henry's unbridled passions and unbridled power to destroy the lives, peace of mind and happiness of others, Until a member of this family contacted me just after "Delivered Unto Satan" went on sale, I had only heard repeated reports of Henry's double life while in New York City. To learn anything about Henry in New York City seemed like looking for a needle in e. haystack. I never thought Henry would be so bold as to live his double life so close home in Lancaster County. After talking with seven members of this family, often one and two at a time, I realized Henry wasn't nearly as brilliant as I once thought him to be. If there was one in Lancaster County then there probably were others, "''hen I contacted Probe Detective Agency, Mr. LefE!ver assured me that Henry couldn't approach him and buy him off. Mr. LE!fever also said if Henry had lived an exemplary life he would also report to me that further investigation was futile, . .' Invest, Report (Con'td) Page 7 Holland Machine, and it is common knowledge that Mr. Fisher, because of his association with New Holland Machine, swings a lot of weight wi th them. It,~~ then decided to check into Mr. Fisher's ownership in New Holland Machine Inc., prior to the merger with Sperry Rand and after. Probe set about to find out how ~rr. Fisher was connected with New Holland Machine. Subject D, Subject E, Subject F, Subject C, and Subject A, were all contacted and asked about ~tr. Fisher's business dealings, Four of the individuals questioned k~ew Mr, Fisher to be heavily involved with New Holland r~chine, Inc. as a principal or stockholder. But, all stated that we might as well forget that avenue of approach as Mr, Fisher covers his tracks very well. Tney all knew that Mr. Fisher according to his own personal religiQus beliefs could not own stock, However, they all stated that there were many avenues of approach, that could be taken by Mr. Fisher, to hide any apparent stock ownership, This if often done by use of stock powers. Almost everyone we talked to concerning Mr. Fisher's stock ownership - all had the same opinion, "That Henry owned or controlled stock, but that he was careful. On an intelligence ~robe into New Holland Machine early in April our Agent spoke with an officer from the company. During questioning '. '1 Invest, Report (Con'td) Page 8 about an unrelated matter the original and current o,mership of the company was brought up. It was stated at that time that all the names of the people who were the original principals and stockholders, and who are still stockholders to this day, may not be printed in any company publica- tions as some of them belong to the ;1ennoni te Church and would get in trouble if the church Ime,l they owned stock. As this was an area that we were greatly concerned with our Agent prObed into the area as far as possible. "~en our Agent asked point blank if J. Henry Fisher did O\,m or still o,ms any stock in New Holland MaChinE', Inc. or Sperry Rand the interview came to an end as the subject would no longer discuss anything. Before the interview ended however, the gentleman did say that one of the Mennonites that started the company was still heavily involved in the company, and alluded to him being a stockholder. Based on the aforementioned statements of the people interviewed, it seems apparent that Mr, Fisher either had some semblance of control, directly or indirectly, however large or small, in either New Holland, Inc. nOH known as Sper!"J Rand New Holland, Inc. and/or Lancaster Lin- coln and Mercury, We are gathering more inforwation and are still in the process of questioning many other people. It seems apparent, based on our investigation in interviewing '" . .. .., , Invest. Report (Con'td) Page 9 various business leaders in the community, that Mr. Fisher must have had the reputation amongst these people of leading a double life. This is based on some of the following facts, that were given by different people, unknbwn to each other and at different times; 1. The coincidence or fact that Mr. Fisher may have had or has a suite of rooms at the Hotel Pierre on 5th Avenue in New York City. 2. The coincidence or fact that ~~. Fisher may have had or has anF business connections with either Sper~j Rand New Holland, Inc. and/or Lancaster Lincoln Mercury~ 3. The coincidence or fact t]-,at I1r. Fisher IT.ay have in the past frequented two of the leading night clubs in New York City. Based on 0UI' investigation so far, for Probe to express an opinion on this matter, would destroy OUI' objectivity, and there- fore Probe expresses no opinion on the aforementioned information, This completes the first part of our investigation report. More will follow as we still have Agents in the field questioning others. Now that the majori~y of the groundwork has been laid the only remaining thing is to pump a lot of !T~n hours into the invest- gation. And it is entirely possible that more information can be uncovered. I greatly respect your wish not to hurt M~. Fisher or the . c. fI .. . Invest, Report (Con'td) Page 10 your family. church. But can appreciate your strong desire to be reunited with We await your reply. Sincerely, :O#ET~TIVE AGENCY, ~VI f? CHARLES R. LSFEVER PRESIDENT CPL/dme '" , II ' robe DETECTIVE AGENCY, INC. . Lancaster (717) 299-5787 Harrisburg (717) 233-3609 York (717) 843-7563 Additional Information Just Received 4/11/75 Thursday April 10, 1975, approximately 10:)0 a.m. On the above time and date this Agent drove to the Menr,oni te Informa- ion Center 2215 Mill Stream Road, Lancaster, Pep~sylvar.ia 17602. On arrival I was met by ~~. Harold K. Book who is the Business Man- ager and Miss Joyce Hostetter secretarJ. I stated that I was interested in gathering information of .ohe ~len- nonite sects in Lancaster COQ~ty. ~~, Book stated that most Me~~onites, in Lancaster County belong to the Lancaster Conference Mep~onites which is headed by Rev. David Thomas. HI', Book also stated tw.t one of the oldest orders of Mennonites in Lancaster County is the Reformed Her~onites and the Bishop is Rev. Henry Fisher. I then asked both ~~. Book and ~~ss Hostetter if the members of the Hep~onite Church can own businesses or stock in businesses. They both stated that they can, in the Lancaster Conference Mennonites. This agent then asked, what about the Reformed Mennonites? Eoth answered yes, This Agent then asked, does Rev. Henry Fisher own a business or stock in a business? Both answered yes. Rev, Fisher holds a high po- . .. r; , -. Invest. Report (Con' td) Page 2 si tion with New Holland Machine. They both also stated that they do not know what Rev. Fishers position is with New Holland Machine since, they merged with Sperry, but they both feel he is involved in an ex- ecutive position. Mr. Book or Miss Hostetter knew of nO other business- es that Rev, Fisher might be involvE'.d with. Both Mr. Book and Miss Hostetter a:'e Nennoni tes and belong to the Lancaster Conference Mennonites. I thanked both Mr. Book and Miss Hostetter for their co-operation and inforrr~tion before leaving. Mennonite I nformation Center \ 2215 Mill Stream Road Lancaster, Pa. 17602 717.397-7811 Director Lloyd M, Eby .' .:: >~ ~ . April 6, 1975 Reformed Mennonites: Bishop Joe Byers of Chambersburg told me years ago of minister Charles Gipe being suspected of drinking too much. Then a man in the community known to be honest told of Gipe being drunken. The ministers confronted Gipe with the evidence and he confessed. He was excommunicated, shunned by his wife and finally committed suicide. Bishop J. Henry Fisher has also been suspected of wrong doing by some of you in the past but like Gipe he denied it until your ministry felt the evidence was overwhelming against Gipe. The evidence against Bishop J. Henry Fisher is now even much more overwhelming. Minister Charles Gipe was a rather unknown minister compared to Henry Fisher, just so do their offenses fit them. Charles Gipe was a rather unnoticed man with a common weakness which he kept hidden for a time from other Reformed Mennonites. Henry Fisher is big, powerful, brilliant and his sins of lust and hyprocrisy extending over many years and before many witnesses are just as big and spectacularly sinful. Henry is wealthy and has a wealth of sins. Was not Gipe more honorable than Fisher when he finally admitted his weakness rather than to stubbornly persevere until the end of life denying what others knew to be true? () ~;~ c- r-;~ ,~ (J ~" ~-< T" n1f= :To; o It may be that Henry thought his sins were so great thatno:~ simple Reformed Mennonite would ever believe a "pure" bishop n could be so corrupt. Can you imagine how shrewd he thoughtchim-~ self to be and how stupid he must have thought all of you w~re? (Witnesses testify that Henry's wife, Marian, knew of some br =: his misconduct). OJ () ;'-:-1 (0) Henry has not only been false to his God but he has als~ ~ betrayed you. He promised to lead you "across the river" but instead, he became a "Judas goat" and now has sold you down the river. You are going dO~TIl a river just like the Niagara River is, to a mighty fall. It is now only a matter of time before you go over the falls to destruction. You have prayed to your god for years to save you and he very evidently hasn't heard you because what is happening to you, I wouldn't wish to happen to anyone. I have warned you for more than three years that this would be your end. Remember? I will help you if you aren't too proud to accept help from a sinner. Otherwise, God has no joy in the death of sinners and neither dare I have. Another matter is ~illi5 ~eaver telling Richard Wagner about Henry Fisher's past accusers concerning familiarity with women. . (End of letter missing) ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant 05-935 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PRAECIPE TO DISCON~INUE ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2005, upon consideration of Lawrence N. Bard's Petition To Quash a Subpoena filed December 9, 2005, and following a hearing, at which the Plaintiff, Robert L. Bear, initially appeared pro se, and from which he departed prior to completion of the hearing, and at which Defendant's counsel, Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire, and counsel for Lawrence N. Bard, Hubert X. Gilroy, Esquire, appeared, and presented their respective clients' positions on granted. the issue, Lawrence N. Bard's Petition To Quash the Subpoena is Aobert L. Bear 201 Potato Road Carlisle, PA 17013-8991 Plaintiff, pro se ~ley L. Griffie, Esquire 200 N. Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 For Defendant H~ert x. Gilroy, Esquire ~ North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 For Petitioner :mae By the Court, ,c? \r2P C'J U) w:: ~~ IL C1 r- o C'J ..~ cn <"J C.J Ld Q Irr c::-.) ~ ,,-,- "' U ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant 05-935 CIVIL TERM IN RE: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST THAT J. WESLEY OLER, JR., DISQUALIFY HIMSELF TO SIT IN JUDGMENT ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2005, upon consideration of Plaintiff's "Request that Judge J. Wesley 01er, Jr., disqualify himself to sit in judgment at the Subpoena Hearing he has ordered for December 27, 2005 and the Bifurcation Hearing ordered for January 12, 2006," filed December 27, 2005, the request is denied. By the Court, ~f4 '-(", sley 0 er, J " J. J. A~bert L. Bear 201 Potato Road Carlisle, PA 17013-8991 Plaintiff, pro se )3radley L. Griffie, Esquire 200 N. Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 ~For Defendant ~ , bert X. Gilroy, Esquire , 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 For Petitioner :mae ------) / .,", I..':) L."Y:: 0 ...,~ c'J (..2: LU~~ S2~,~'i ...<- 0- \'.;) ('_:_' G"\ 63L~ c'.J ~J1..'j '-, LL:.C LU ,-- CJ Lr::l ~.:) lL = 0 = () <"" . ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v CIVIL ACTION - LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant 05-935 CIVIL TERM IN RE: TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS Proceedings held before the HONORABLE J. Wesley Oler, Jr., J., Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, on December 27, 2005, in Courtroom Number One. APPEARANCES: Robert L. Bear Plaintiff, pro se ORIGINAL Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire For Defendant Hubert X. Gilroy, Esquire For Petitioner ....,... '.''; '"" c:' (" "'~ c::.) (Y) u j':::':: ..-) tL ~ ----~-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: Please be seated. This is the time and place for a hearing on Lawrence N. Bard's Petition To Squash a Subpoena. This was filed on December 9, 2005. In going through the file in this case, which is Bear versus Bear at No. 05-935 Civil Term, a divorce action, last evening I came across a document entitled Praecipe To Discontinue. This appears to have been filed on August 4, 2005, by the Plaintiff, Robert L. Bear. Then this morning on my desk I found a document filed by Mr. Bear which seems to be comprised of 30 pages and begins with the words, requests that Judge J. Wesley Oler, Jr., disqualify himself to sit in judgment at the Subpoena Hearing he has ordered for December 27, 2005, and the Bifurcation Hearing ordered for January 12, 2006. This document appears to have been filed December 27, 2005, by Mr. Bear. The Praecipe To Discontinue appears to be a document of 8 pages, and like the request for recusal, it is all single-spaced and typewritten. Mr. Griffie, were you aware of the Praecipe To Discontinue filed in the case? MR. GRIFFIE: Your Honor, we were aware. That was filed after we had filed an answer, after the Master had been appointed, and after we were proceeding. So on praecipe under the Pennsylvania statutes and Pennsylvania case law, as well as the rules, Mr. Bear would have to file 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 a petition with a rule for us to respond. Once you file the action and once the other side has appeared and entered their request, you can't just withdraw the divorce action so. .. THE COURT: Where do you find that proposition? MR. GRIFFIE: That's in -- it's in -- I wasn't prepared to respond to that today, Your Honor, but it's in the rules. Mr. Bear filed a complaint, and we have answered that and have filed a counterclaim for attorneys fees as part of our answer to his complaint in divorce. So he can't withdraw that now and extinguish our counterclaim that we filed. Plus the admission that we filed to the fact that the parties were separated some 32 years, and he requested a divorce based upon 3301(d) of the two year separation provision, and we concurred in that. So our request is now pending. We don't have to file another divorce complaint to keep it active. I mean I can research that for you and get it for you, but I wasn't prepared to answer that today. THE COURT: The little research I was able to do yesterday evening indicated that a party Plaintiff can withdraw a divorce action without approval of the Court. MR. GRIFFIE: I don't believe he can after an answer has been filed. An answer has been filed where there 3 1 is claims from the Defendant now. He can't extinguish that 2 the other side's claims. Again, I apologize. I did not 3 have any inkling that I would have to answer that today. 4 THE COURT: All right. Mr. Bear, are you 5 still pursuing the Praecipe To Discontinue? 6 MR. BEAR: Judge Oler -- 7 THE COURT: Just answer my question. Are you 8 pursuing that praecipe? 9 MR. BEAR: No. What I intended in the 10 beginning was to prove legally and conclusively that she was 11 guilty of adultery. She's living with the man. 12 THE COURT: Are you withdrawing the Praecipe 13 To Discontinue? You filed a document which is headed 14 Praecipe To Discontinue. 15 MR. BEAR: But it was ignored by the Court. 16 THE COURT: Well, I was unaware of it. It 17 simply says that you're -- it directs the Prothonotary to 18 mark the above-captioned action settled, discontinued, and 19 ended. Are you pursuing -- is that what you want? 20 MR. BEAR: That's what I asked, and I would 21 say this -- 22 THE COURT: No, you didn't ask for it. You 23 ordered it. You directed -- it was a praecipe, which is an 24 order. 25 MR. BEAR: Well, I'm only an 8th grade 4 1 drop-out. 2 THE COURT: Well, you're using 10th grade 3 words. Now, when you filed the Praecipe To Discontinue, at 4 least on the surface that looks as if you're discontinuing 5 the action. Are you, in fact, discontinuing it? 6 MR. BEAR: Since they've been playing with me 7 since -- no, because I think this Court and the lawyers of 8 Cumberland County should thank me. I had Mr. Bard 9 committing in my face almost 19 years of adultery, and all I 10 needed to do was 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 this, please. 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: Be quiet. MR. BEAR: -- hit him in the stomach. THE COURT: Sit down. Mr. Bear, sit down. All I asked you was -- MR. BEAR: You should be thankful that I didn't kill that man then. THE COURT: Mr. Bear, sit down. MR. BEAR: No. You are dealing with -- THE COURT: Mr. Bear, sit down. MR. BEAR: No. I'd like to have a copy of THE COURT: We will let the record indicate that the -- MR. BEAR: I knew when I came here it wasn't any value. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: We will let the record indicate that the Plaintiff is refusing to be seated. Now, Mr. Bear, I'll give you one more chance. This is your action for divorce. All I ask you is whether you're pursuing -- MR. BEAR: And it means nothing in this court. You've mocked me all these years, from the very beginning, just like Judge Weidner. THE COURT: Mr. Bear, be quiet. MR. BEAR: I will. THE COURT: We will let the record indicate that the Plaintiff is leaving the courtroom. MR. BEAR: I need my jacket, sir. THE COURT: We will let the record indicate that the Plaintiff is returning for his jacket. (Whereupon, Mr. Bear left the courtroom at 3:45 p.m.) THE COURT: Mr. Griffie, what are your wishes at this point as far as proceeding with the hearing? MR. GRIFFIE: It's our position that we should be able to proceed with the bifurcation hearing and resolve the issue of the subpoena since today was the time set on the Motion To Quash, that we should be able to proceed with that as well. THE COURT: All right. We will let the record indicate that Hubert Gilroy, who has filed the 6 1 Petition To Quash the Subpoena is also present in court. 2 Mr. Gilroy, what are your wishes with regard to proceeding 3 with the hearing? 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. GILROY: Your Honor, I would like to proceed. Good afternoon. We filed a petition requesting essentially that the subpoena be quashed. We made allegations in the petition indicating that my client, Mr. Bard, would have no information at the hearing on the bifurcation issue that would in any way be relevant, and it was our intention to request that Mr. Bear, Robert Bear, present to this Court at today's hearing an offer of proof as to what issues would be relevant from Mr. Bard's testimony. THE COURT: All right. Initially I have before me a request that Judge J. Wesley Oler, Jr., disqualify himself to sit in judgment at the Subpoena Hearing he has ordered for December 27, 2005, and the Bifurcation Hearing ordered for January 12, 2006. Mr. Gilroy, what is your position on that request? MR. GILROY: It should be denied. THE COURT: All right. And, Mr. Griffie? MR. GRIFFIE: It should be denied, Your Honor. THE COURT: All right. We'll initially enter this order; 7 1 AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2005, 2 upon consideration of Plaintiff's "Request that Judge J. 3 Wesley Oler, Jr., disqualify himself to sit in judgment at 4 the Subpoena Hearing he has ordered for December 27, 2005, 5 and the Bifurcation Hearing ordered for January 12, 2006," 6 filed December 27, 2005, the request is denied. 7 (End of order.) 8 THE COURT: The Praecipe To Discontinue 9 concerns me, Mr. Griffie, because, as I indicated when Mr. 10 Bear was present, I was not able to find anything which 11 indicated that the old rule that a divorce action could not 12 be withdrawn without approval of the Court was still in 13 effect. It seems that the contrary is in effect. I'm 14 willing to proceed at this point because Mr. Bear was, at 15 best, ambivalent as to whether he wishes to continue or 16 discontinue the action, but that does remain a matter of 17 concern to the Court. 18 With respect to Lawrence N. Bard's Petition 19 To Quash the Subpoena which Mr. Gilroy has filed as of 20 December 9, 2005, Mr. Griffie, what is your position on that 21 petition? 22 MR. GRIFFIE: Your Honor, with respect to 23 Mr. Bard being a part of the bifurcation hearing, but for 24 the fact that my client does know Mr. Bard and is now 25 friends with Mr. Bard and has been for about 18 or 19 years, 8 1 his -- anything he could possibly testify to, from our 2 perspective, has nothing to do with our bifurcation request, 3 which essentially revolves around the fact that, by 4 admission in the pleadings by both parties, they have been 5 separated for well over 30 years now. 6 So Mr. Bard came upon the scene some 11 or 12 7 years after the parties separated. I would note that if 8 Mr. Bard were to be at the hearing, because my client and 9 Mr. Bard wish to have a relationship, it actually would be 10 supportive of our position for bifurcation because there's 11 case law on that, that if someone is separated for the 12 appropriate period of time and they would like to move on 13 with their life, that's something in our favor, but 14 everything that I have read, the voluminous information that 15 Mr. Bear has filed, it appears that he misunderstands that 16 the bifurcation hearing has nothing to do with his efforts 17 to try and have two adults somehow testify under oath that 18 they committed adultery. That seems to be the thrust of 19 bringing Mr. Bard in; to embarrass him, to try and have him 20 testify under oath as to whether he has a relationship with 21 Ms. Bear, which simply has nothing to do with the 22 bifurcation. So we would ask that, likewise, the subpoena 23 be quashed. 24 I might add that we are aware that Mr. Bard 25 has medical conditions that are exacerbated by stress, and 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 that and he is well into his 70's, and we understand from what we do know that it would be harmful to Mr. Bard medically to be present in court for that situation. THE COURT: All right. Mr. Gilroy, I have interrupted you. Do you want to proceed with your argument? MR. GILROY: Only that what I anticipate is that Mr. Griffie would most likely object at the hearing to Mr. Bard's testimony as not being relevant, and we believe this Court would rule that it's not relevant, and that the Court would view Mr. Bear as simply trying to put Mr. Bard on to embarrass him, as suggested by Mr. Griffie, and on that basis, that's why we filed the subpoena -- the request to quash the subpoena in advance. So we believe, especially since Mr. Griffie's indicated he would be objecting to the testimony, and there is no possible relevancy that Mr. Bard can offer at a bifurcation hearing, that it was a subpoena issued merely for harassment purposes, and we ask it be quashed. THE COURT: All right. I had intended to ask the Plaintiff, Robert L. Bear, for an offer of proof with respect to the testimony of Mr. Bard, but because of Mr. Bear's departure, that obviously is impossible. We will enter this order, if there's nothing further: AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2005, upon consideration of Lawrence N. Bard's Petition To Quash a 10 1 Subpoena filed December 9, 2005, and following a hearing, at 2 which the Plaintiff, Robert L. Bear, initially appeared pro 3 se, and from which he departed prior to completion of the 4 hearing, and at which Defendant's counsel, Bradley L. 5 Griffie, Esquire, and counsel for Lawrence N. Bard, Hubert 6 X. Gilroy, Esquire, appeared, and presented their respective 7 clients' positions on the issue, Lawrence N. Bard's Petition 8 To Quash the Subpoena is granted. 9 (End of order.) 10 THE COURT: Mr. Griffie or Mr. Gilroy, is 11 there anything further? 12 MR. GILROY: Nothing else, Judge. 13 MR. GRIFFIE: Nothing for us, Your Honor. 14 THE COURT: All right. Court is adjourned. 15 (Whereupon, the proceedings concluded at 3:53 p.m.) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 11 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the proceedings are contained fully and accurately in the notes taken by me on the above cause, and that this is a correct transcript of same. /'7ZcJ~ ~) Michele A. Eline Official Court Reporter The foregoing record of the proceedings on the hearing of the within matter is hereby approved and directed to be filed. :5Z-'7 t S 2-<oot Date 12 ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. NO. 05-935 CIVIL ACTION LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant IN DIVORCE ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2006, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Praecipe To Discontinue filed previously in this matter, and Plaintiff having indicated in open court that he regards his claims in this case as having been discontinued by virtue of the praecipe, the Court deems the Plaintiff's claims discontinued, without prejudice to Defendant's right to file a petition to strike the discontinuance. Pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 232(a), the counterclaim for costs, expenses, and attorney's fees filed by Defendant shall remain viable. By the Court, Robert L. Bear, Plaintiff _ha,Jd Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire For the Defendant - A qN.d pcb :~::i/'-;r\:J ~ I : I Hd Z - 83.:1 900l AtiVl{}K'):-i)J.Yid 3H.L ::10 ,:?8!3)G-Q31!,~ ROBERT L. BEAR v. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 05-935 CIVIL ACTION LAW IN DIVORCE GALE G. BEAR ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2006, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's praecipe to discontinue filed previously in this matter, and Plaintiff having indicated in open court that he regards his claims in this case as having been discontinued by virtue of the praecipe, the Court deems the Plaintiff's claims discontinued without prejudice to Defendant's right to file a petition to strike the discontinuance. Pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 232(a), the counterclaim for costs, expenses and attorney's fees filed by Defendant shall remain viable. By the Court, J. he>" J I-. C/,v cJ Robert L. Bear, Plaintiff Pro Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire For the Defendant pcb \ I ~ ,,'" .' .l~ '.; "~:",,'\n:J ;11 : I Hd Z- 81:lSUOl AtlV.LC;\i::;';"l :U~d 3Hl :10 :l:;1:I~O'03llj ROBERT L. BEAR, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. NO. 05-935 CIVIL ACTION LAW GALE G. BEAR, Defendant IN DIVORCE TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS --" Proceedings held before the HONORABLE J. WESLEY OLER, JR., J., Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, on January 12, 2006, In Courtroom Number 1. APPEARANCES: Robert L. Bear, Plaintiff Pro Se Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire For the Defendant A1I1]r;C"'" i~'" "'."~' ":':'~;/irK) ~ I : I Hd Z - 93:1 goaz ^dV1C,\)0,~tJ.(;(,;d 3H1 :.10 38UJi:}-GJ1!:J , 1 January 12, 2006 Car1isle, Pennsylvania 2 3 (The following proceedings were held at 1:32 a.m.) 4 THE COURT: This is the time and place for a 5 hearing on Defendant's petition to Bifurcate Divorce in the 6 case of Bear versus Bear. The Plaintiff is in court 7 representing himself, the Defendant is in court represented by 8 Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire. 9 At the last proceeding in this court an issue had 10 arisen as to whether the praecipe in this case to discontinue 11 the action was viable, and Mr. Bear left the hearing before he 12 gave a clear answer to the Court on whether he considers his 13 praecipe to discontinue viable. 14 Mr. Bear, I will ask you again, are you pursuing 15 the praecipe to discontinue, in other words, do you regard the 16 action as having been discontinued by your praecipe? 17 MR. BEAR: Judge Oler, I did at the time when I 18 asked that we go to a more honorable court. 19 THE COURT: I am not interested in your diatribes, 20 Mr. Bear, I just want to know whether you consider that 21 praecipe in effect and your answer is yes? 22 MR. BEAR: Not Gale's praecipe, no. 23 THE COURT: No, your praecipe to discontinue. 24 MR. BEAR: Oh, yes. 25 THE COURT: All right. Mr. Griffie. 2 , 1 MR. GRIFFIE: Your Honor, if the Court will bear 2 with me, I just want to make sure that Mr. Bear -- I am not 3 sure that he understood your question because he was kind of 4 answering it in a negative way and I would like to ask him in 5 another way. Do you want the divorce action to keep gOlng on? 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. BEAR: No, when our children know it and I talked to Lawrence N. Bard and he admitted to this adultery, no, that is all we need. MR. GRIFFIE: You don't want the divorce to go on? MR. BEAR: No, it means nothing. MR. GRIFFIE: Your Honor, for the record, I researched this last night and have an associate still trying to find something, because with a praecipe to dismiss once a counterclaim has been filed, if it were able to be completed simply on a praecipe would then extinguish our claim as well. THE COURT: Your claim was simply on equitable distribution grounds I believe? MR. GRIFFIE: Actual1y, attorney fees he raised, and we concurred in the divorce and asked for attorney's fees. THE COURT: It seems, the general rule as I understand that is when you file a praecipe to discontinue a divorce action and you are the Plaintiff, if the other side doesn't want the divorce action discontinued it has to file a praecipe to strike the discontinuance. MR. GRIFFIE: I stopped to talk for a couple 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 minutes with Mr. Elicker on the way up because we actually subpoenaed him to the bifurcation. THE COURT: There is nothing on the record that indicates who Mr. Elicker lS. MR. GRIFFIE: He is the divorce master. Because we did subpoena him for this afternoon, and I wanted him to know we wouldn't need him unless I called. I questioned him on the same thing, unfortunately, his response to me was, we11, yeah, You can't extinguish someone else's claim. I asked if he knew where it was in the law because I can't find it in the rules. He said, I don't know where it is in the law, but I know if you have a claim you have to have the concurrence of counsel to draft it or file a Petition and Rule. THE COURT: Your counterclaim having to do with equitable distribution wouldn't have any effect if the divorce action isn't continuing. So I am going to regard the action as discontinued. If you want to file a praecipe to strike the discontinuance, I will certainly entertain it, which you have to put some grounds in it that is what my research indicates that is to be done if you want to keep this action going. MR. GRIFFIE: Can I have 30 seconds to calI my associate to see what she came up with? THE COURT: Certainly. We will take a brief recess. (Recess.) 4 1 THE COURT: We will let the record indicate that 2 the Court is again in session. Mr. Griffie, have you had an 3 opportunity to research this issue? 4 MR. GRIFFIE: Yes, my associate that I was able to 5 call referenced me to the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure 6 No. 232 which deals with filing precipes to discontinue, and I 7 didn't try to write the whole rule down, but according to what 8 she read to me that when the opposing party has filed a claim, 9 that the praeClpe to discontinue can't extinguish the opposing 10 party's claim. 11 I would point out that not only did we ask for 12 attorney's fees, but in Count 1 of Mr. Bear's complaint for 13 divorce, we concurred in that and we entered our prayer for 14 relief for divorce as well. So our position would be we have 15 asked for divorce, we have asked for attorney's fees, and he 16 can't extinguish our claims that we have made by filing a 17 praecipe. 18 THE COURT: A11 right, we will recess and I will 19 look at Rule 232. 20 (Recess.) 21 THE COURT: The rule cited by Mr. Griffie states as 22 follows: A discontinuance or nonsuit shal1 not affect the 23 right of the Defendant to proceed with a counterclaim 24 theretofore filed. A counterclaim may not be terminated, in 25 whole or in part, by the Defendant, except by discontinuance or 5 1 voluntary nonsuit, and subject to conditions similar to those 2 applicable to the Plaintiff. 3 Mr. Griffie, specifically, what counterclaim did 4 you file? 5 !VIR. GRIFFIE: Your Honor, in the answer to 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 counterclaim we specifically filed a count requesting that Mr. Bear be obligated to pay costs, expenses and attorney's fees associated with these proceedings. That was our prayer for relief. THE COURT: What is the counterclaim denominated? What is it called? MR. GRIFFIE: It has a caption Counterclaim, underneath it says Attorneys's Fees, Costs and Expenses, that is the caption held on it. THE COURT: So you did not file the counterclaim in divorce? MR. GRIFFIE: We did not because we concurred. THE COURT: And you did not file the counterclaim involving equitable distribution, alimony pendente lite, or any of the other economic matters, is that correct? MR. GRIFFIE: That is correct, Your Honor. THE COURT: All right. Are you sure of that? MR. GRIFFIE: I have a copy of the answer right here. THE COURT: All right. We will enter this order, 6 \ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2006, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's praecipe to discontinue filed previously in this matter, and Plaintiff having indicated in open court that he regards his claims in this case as having been discontinued by virtue of the praecipe, the Court deems the Plaintiff's claims discontinued without prejudice to Defendant's right to file a petition to strike the discontinuance. Pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 232(a), the counterclaim for costs, expenses, and attorney's fees filed by Defendant shall remain viable. I think given the research that I have done, I have no choice but to have entered that order. (Court adjourned at 1:48 p.m.) Court is adjourned. 7 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the proceedings are contained fully and accurately in the notes taken by me on the above cause and that this is a correct transcript of same. patricia C. Barrett Official Stenographer The foregoing record of the proceedings on the hearing of the within matter is hereby approved and directed to be filed. ~c1S] . Date -;0 . I 2<:;06 ,~I! 8 ROBERT L. BEAR Plaintiff IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : v. No. OS-93S GALE G. BEAR Defendant : CIVD" ACTION - LAW IN DfVORCE ANSWER TO RULE ISSUED UPON PLAINTIF][<' TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE RELIEF REQUESTED BY DEFENDANT GALE GROSS BEAR SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED In his Petition for Contilfllatrce, Bndley L. GrifrJe, Esquire, staled tbe following on bebalf of bis c1ieut, Gale Gross Bear: 3. Petitioner, Gale G, Bear, will be unavailable to attend the bt::aring on the date and time scheduled and has requested of her legal counsel that a new time and date be secured for the hearing. Gale Gross Bear stated Marcb 10,2005, under the penalties of committiug a crime, wben she stated the following: 7. Admitted in part, Denied in part, a. Denied, It is denied that Defendant committed adultery, b. Denied. It is denied that Defendant offered any indignitil~s whatsoever to Plaintiff, or acted in any way to cause Plaintiff's condition to be intolerable or life burdensome, And I find more bitter tban death the woman, wbose beart is snares and nets, and ber bands as bands: who so pleaseth God shaD escape from her, but the sinner sball be take,n by her. (Ecclesiastes 7:26) For with what judgment ye judge, ye shaD be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shaD be measured to you again. (St. Matthew 7:2) True to Christ's words. it is little wonder Gale Gross Bear bas stage frigbt before her command performance in Cumberland County Courtroom #1 on November 23, 2'.005, at the 1:30 p.m. matinee. Is it any wonder Gale Gross Bear would "find more bitter than death" confessing in court the truth of what her long- time lover, busband and father of rIVe, Lawrence N. Bani, 104 HiDside Drive, Carlisle, PA, freely confessed to me face to face on August 11, 20051 Bad Bani bas been subpoenaed to testify the following: I confronted Lawrence N. Bard, 104 HiDside Drive, Carlisle, PA at about 10 a.m. on the morning of August 11, 2005, in bis gange. Bad Bani readily admitted an almost 1" year long adulterous affair with Gale Gross Bear. I quoted to Bad Bani Cieern's words; "Tbe wise are instructed by reason; ordinary minds by experience; the stupid, by necessity; and brutes by instinct.. .. I tben said face to face to Bani, "You and Gale Gross Bear were instnlcted by your sexual instincts." Lawrence N. Bard confessed, "Yes." He also confessed, "I bave sinned." Bad Bard said he knows his marriage of, 1 believe, 53 yean, is n4)W destroyed and bis wife will divorce bim and clean bim out somewbat financially. Then Bad Bard said he hl)pe5 to marry Gale Gross Bear after sbe and I are divorced. Bad Bard said be believes Gale Gross Bear also bOJIeS to marry him. Bad Bard said he knows our four daughten, but has not yet met our two sons. Our six cblildren knew for years, some as long as 15 years or more. Bad Bani confessed his ongoing adultery with Gale Gross Bear began in 1986 or 1987, a few years before sbe was excommunicated during the faD of 1989 for otber reasons by Reformed Mennonites. Woe unto them that caD evil good, and good evil; tbat put darkD4~ for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! (Isaiab 5:20) Even Lawrence N. Bard agreed on August 11, 2005, had not Reformed Mennonites caUed "good evil," the , preservation ofthis marriage and family against the Gross evils of Mlmnonitism ever since June 11, 1972, Gale Gross Bear would never have committed adultery against me even once with Bad Bard. Then ever since June 23, 1976, the judges of the Cumberland County Court "call evil good" by calling the "evil" of Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness "fully "rarranted - love and concern." Probation Officer David L. Myers once volunteered to me mll1llY years ago. except for what has been done to this marriage and family, he didn't believe I would ever have come before the Cumberland County Court. True to the Holy Bible, this "woe" that has come to Reformed Mennonites and the Cumberland County Court in needing to face their calling "evil good" is almost certainly what tempted Gale Gross Bear to carry out her almost 19 year adulterous affair with Lawrence N. Bard. Women have told me Gale Gross Bear could never have loved me, despite our six children, because if she did she couldn't have done as she has. If Gale Gross Bear testifies in court on November 23, 2005, she never loved me, but Lawrence N. Bard, the husband of another woman who gave birth to their fIVe children, is the love of her life, then I intend to present her with the followiug in court. In May, 1973, the Chambersburg, PA Public Opinion stated th,! following: Mrs, Bear who refused a personal interview, but spoke to Public Opinion via telephone in March, also stated that "The church and its ministry have not been and are not interfering in our marriage." Explaining that her decision to refuse marital relations was not ba&oo on denominational doctrine, she said, "I receive direction and guidance from the spirit, I take the Scriptures in the literal sense," She further stated that "I love my husband, but our faith is the most important phase in our life, ,. When he left the church he knew the situation," Mrs, Bear added that she is doing all in her power to make the life of her husband as well as their children as pleasant as possible under the circumstances, "The principle is love," she :!laid. "Do you know what I suggest? If you would take that (tape recorder) home and bury it on your farm, and if you would repent, you would have your wife back." (Reformed Mennonite Bishop Earl M. Basinger propositioning me on behalf ofMenno Simons (1496-1561) and all Refomled Mennonites, April 15, 1973,) Thus were they defiled with their own works, and went awhoring with their own inventions. (psalm 106:39) True to the Holy Bible, Reformed Mennonites "went awhoring" "in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" (1 Corinthians 5:4) when they demanded their price of "falsely so called" (1 Timothy 6:20) "repent" before they would "Give me my wife - that I may go in unto her." (Genesis 29:21) Reformed Mennonites "went awhoring" by fuUy fulfilling an American Heritage Dictionary definition of whores: "To offer oneself or another for sexual hire," just as surely as had they demanded doUars in the name of God and prostitution before "I may go in unto her." And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: Whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not. (2 P,~er 2:3) Never before in the 450 year history of Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness by die-hard devotees of Menno Simons, has it ever heen as positively proven how tbey "make merchandise" of "the natural use of the woman" (Romans I :27) by selling married sex for the Mennonite demanded price of "repent." They are aU gone aside, they are all together become fikhy: There is none that doeth good, no, not one. (Psalm 14:3) "They are all gone aside" of cult and court. "There is none that doeth good, no, not one," willing to "let God be true" (Romans 3:4) and publicly confess Reformed Mennonites "went awhoring" just as surely by demanding their price of "repent" for married sex as if they "went awboring" by demanding dollars for married sex. Reformed Mennonites and the judges of the Cumberland County <Court would" find it more bitter than death" ifthey would "let God be true" and publicly confess the truth. In an honest court before an honest judge who wants "the truth,. the whole truth, and nothing but the truth," would I not be aUowed to ask Gale Gross Bear the following qUl!stion on November 23, 2005? If "The principle (was) love," to demand that I "repent" Mennol~ite satanic style before "I may go in unto" Gale Gross Bear, as long as she remained a Reformed Mennonite why then is not "The principle is love" to force Bad Bard to likewise "repent" Mennonite satanic style before be "may go in unto her?" "To be forewarned is to be forearmed." Judge Oler reveals ho'" important it is to protect the 'Cumberland County Court's absolute power base. Nothing can seem foul to those that win. (Shakespeare) Patriot-News reporter Matt Miller reported in the June 11, 2003 edition: "Oler asked Bear whether he had also appealed his case to the :ltate Supreme Court." "Bear said he had not. But when he began to elaborate, OIer cut him off and continued ,,,ith the hearing." Knowing Judge Oler will "cut oft" all he can that doesn't portray the Cumberland County Court favorably, as he has in the past, I state truths here Judge Oler wil\"cut oft" in court. And I find more bitter than death the woman, whose heart is sllares and nets, and her hands as bands: who so pleaseth God shall escape from her, but the sinuer shall be taklm by her. (Ecclesiastes 7:26) For what if some did not believe? ShaD their unbelief make the: faith of God without effect? God forbid: Yea, let God be true, but every man aliaI'; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged. (Romans 3:3-4) Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. (St. Matthew 19:6) Ifwe "let God be true," don't we need to "let every man (be) a liar" who doesn't "find more bitter than death the womau" who mocks Christ's sacred marriage and family co:mmuds; but believes and enforees the foUowing God-judged Mennonite "doctrines of devils?" (1 Timothy 4: I) "All human ties, including those of marriage and the family, mlllst give way under the ban of the church, was clearly taught." (page 28) "And if this be heresy aud diabolical sl~uction, as the preachers loudly assert, then must the Son of God, Christ Jesus, and aD the prophets, apostles, and lofty witnesses of God, have been manifest heretics, all! And then the whole Scripture, which teaches nalught but moral improvement, and everywhere points us to Christ, must have been naught but deceit and falsehood!" (Pages 527-28) "For how can there ever be a greater love for God and how can there be a more praiseworthy confession thu that one should be willing and ready not only to give up his temporal goods, ease, honor, and prosperity, but also shun his dearest friend upon earth, while in full health, out of sincere regard for Christ, in obedience to His eternal and holy truth?" (page 973) "Tin they again observe the truth aud cease from their error and return to the right way, (i.e, the Mennonite way) or until they become as ravening, biting dogs or undean, filthy swine." (page 986) "Crush before God, terrify, humble, pulverize," (page 989) "with the I:uh ofthe ban." (page 990) "It is evidenced in that you, a dunghill ofa man -." (page 1019, The Complete Writings of Men no Simons) If we "let God be true," don't we ueed to let "every man (be) a IliaI', " that is, aD Cumberland County Judges who have judged ever since June 23, 1976, God-judged MenDo:Dite "damnable heresies" (2 Peter 2: 1) are not "more bitter than death," but merely Mennonite "fully warranted -love and concern?" For with what judgment ye judge, ye shaD be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. (St, Matthew 7:2) True to Christ's words, wouldn't Cumberland County Judges "find more bitter than death" to "provide things honest in the sight of aD men," (Romans 12:17) "let God be true" and let their June 23, 1976, "fully warranted -love and concern" judgment be a lie? "Judge Oler, you are part of the criminal conspiracy of covering up how I was lied into the mental hospital. - I say that the Cumberland County Court has - is guilty - of the crime of lying me into the mental hospital, attemptiug to have me declared criminally insane. Oue of thl! lies was that I held up a school bus with a loaded gun." This I stated in the witness chair June 6, 2000, The court 1transcript was certified by Judge Oler, In his Petition for Continuance, Bradley L. Griffie, Esquire, also stated on behalf of his client, Gale Gross Bear: 4. With the hearing scheduled three months from the datf: of filing the within Petition, and in that Respondent is opposing the request for bifurcation, any rescheduling of the matter will not create any hardship of any nature whatsoever for Respondent. "Comfort the feebleminded" (1 Thessalonians 5:14) who wouldn't be "opposing the request for bifurcation" before Cumberland County Court Judge J. Wesley OIer, Jr. who is as much a "part of the criminal conspiracy" in covering up how I was lied into the mental hospital, today, as he also was on June 6, 2000. "Comfort the feebleminded" who can't know, Judge J. Wesley IOler, Jr. and other Cumberland County Court judges put me "in prisons more frequent" (2 Corinthians 11 :23) in order to lock up from public view their crimes and lies. Don't all guilty of lying me into Holy Spirit Community Mentall Health Center on December 5, 1977, and 'all who committed their additional cover up crime ever since "find more bitter than death" publicly confessing their crime and all be sentenced to up to one year in prison? On page 3 of his April 1, 2003 Opinion, Judge OIer stated: "The document proceeds to discuss the purported injustice of a mental health commitment proceeding in 1977, a prosecution in which Defendant was apparently accused of holding up a school bus with a loaded gun, and a Mennonite shunning experience to which he was subjected and which appllJ'ently occurred in 1972," Half a fact is a whole falsehood. He who gives the truth a false coloring by his false manner of telling it, is the worst of liars. (E. L. MaGoon) Judge Oler knew he couldn't prove false the documented evidence of how the Cumberland County Court and State Police at Carlisle committed their crime on December 5, 1977, and their additional cover up crime ever since. Nor can Judge OIer read the evidence and deny Reformed Mennonites have given me a life sentence "I find more bitter than death," as every Mennonite damned and shunned husband and father suicide during 450 years has proven God doesn't lie. Then Judge Oler explains on page 4 of his April 1, 2003 Opinion and states essentially the same again on page 8, why Judge Oler states halffaco and ends up with whole lies. On a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal cast:, the evidence is to be viewed "in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth" and "all reasonable inferences in the Commonwealth's favor" are to be entertained. "Comfort the feebleminded" who can't know, Menno Simons lInd Reformed Mennonites cursed me to a "more bitter than death" life sentence. "Comfort the feebleminded" who can't know, all Cumberland County Judges sanctioned my God-judged "more bitter than death" life sentence after their court judges my "m'~re bitter than death" existence is "fully warranted - love and concern" ever since June 23, 1976- "Comfort the feebleminded" who can't know my "more bitter than death" existence would have been immeasurably more, "more bitter than death," had the Cumberland County Court and State Police at Carlisle succeeded in their attempt to lock me away for life with the criminallJr insane. Deprive him of his ambitions and desires. Then he dies a thousand deaths. (B.C, Wise Roman Scaevol) About the only ambition and desire Reformed Mennonites and the Cumberland County Court haven't deprived me of is; to do my best "in prisons more frequent," or out of prison; make it as difficult as possible until I die for Mennonites and a court to gang up and do this to anoth,er marriage and family. Jesus Christ "looked round about on them with anger, being grieved for the hardness of their hearts." (St. Mark 3:5) Doesn't Jesus Christ look down upon all Mennonites, Amish, lInd the Cumberland County Courthouse crowd ''with anger" because they pretend they are too "feebleminded" to answer this simple and apt question? How was it any more "in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" (I Corinthians 5:4) for Menno Simons and his "evil men and seducers" (2 Timothy 3:13) to demand their MennolRite price of "repent" before they would "Give me my wife - that I may go in unto her;" (Genesis 29:21) than it would be "fully warranted -love and concern" had Reformed Mennonites demanded dollars in the name of God and prostitution before "I may go in unto her?" I am certain, had the first Mennonite damned and shunned husband aad father 450 years ago caused the same "uproar" and the "hardness of their hearts" didn't prevent the farst Mennonites from obeying "the gospel of God," (Romans 1: 1) "Provide things honest in the sight of all men;" (Romans 12: 17) the "uproar" of Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness could have been stopped centuries ago. To explain how notorious Chicago crime lord AI Capone could boast when 29 years old in 1928, "I own the police," and proved it, plus other Chicago gangland lawlessness, the minois Crime Survey stated the following: Political pawer in a democracy rests upon friendship. A man is your friend, not merely because he is kind to you, but because you can depend on him, because you know that he will !>tick and that he will keep his word. Politics in the river wards, (of Chicago) and among common people elsewhere as well, is a feudal relationship, The feudal system was one that was based not on law but upon personal loyalties. Politics tends, therefore, to become a feudal sys'em, Gangs, also, are organized on a feudal basis - that is, upon loyalties, upon friendships, and above all, upon dependability. This is one reason why politicians and criminal gangs understand one another so well and so . frequently enter into alliances with each other against the more remote common good. Idealists are notoriously not good friends, No man who is more interested in abstractions like justice, humanity, and righteousness than he is in the more common immediate and personal relations oflife, is not likely to be a good mixer or a good politician, True to the Rli"uis Crime Survey, the Cumberland County Court judgiog it "fully wammted -love aDd conceru" when Reformed Mennonites "went awhoring" and when thc~ Cumberland County Court then committed its crime of lying me into tbe mental hospital wasn't "based on law, but on (court) loyalties." True to the Rli"ois Crime SIIrvey, Cumberland County Court IHlliticians, Gale Gross Bear, her Reformed Mennonite Senior Bishop brother Glenn M. Gross and his gaog of Mt!lln_ite marriage and family murderers, plus the 1,000,000 worldwide Mennonites and Amisb, or however many, "understand one another." Cult and court know they must all hang together and not publicly confess their crimes and lies, or they will assuredly hang up their crimes and lies separately aDd publicly. All Mennonites and Amish would "find more bitter tban death" if they would "let God be true, but (Menno Simons) a liar" because that would mean the death of 450 years of Mennonitism and to many Mennonites, if not most. the end of Mennonitism would be "more bittc~r than death." The judges know, Mennonites "will stick and that (they) wiD ktql (Menno Simons') word." If Mennonites en masse would' let God be true" they would expose how Cumberland County Judges, "the god of this world," (2 Corinthians 4:4) lord over their subordinates to not let them be true and publicly confess the court's crimes and lies. If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him a.eknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments ofthe Lord. But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant. (1 Corinthians 14:33-38) For 450 years, Mennonites and Amish have been too "ignoraot" of"tbe commandments of the Lord" to "let (Menno Simons) be accursed" because be did 'pervert the gospel of Christ" by converting Mennonite wives into "a more bitter than death woman," as Gale Gross Bear is now an lextreme example. I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not another, but there be some that trouble you, and ,,.ould pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you tban tbat wbicb we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again. If any man preach any other gospel unto you than tbat ye have received, let him be accursed. (Galatians 1 :6-9) For I bear them record tbat they bave a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge. (Romans 10:2) Mennonites and Amish bear tbemselves "record." For 450 years tbey too bave had "a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge," or they would have obeyed aU seripture L'I given by inspiration of God," (2 Timothy 3: 16) commanding all Mennonites to "put away from among yourselves: tbat wicked person" (I Corinthians 5: 13) Menno Simons and his God-judged "doctrines of devils." (1 Timothy 4: 1) Above all, taking the shield offaitb, wherewitb ye shall be able to quencb all the fiery darts of the wicked. And take the belmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit. which is the word of God, (Ephesians 6: 16-17) For more tban 33 years I bave called Menno Simons and all Reformed Mennonites a "wicked person" wbo bave so borribly destroyed my marriage and family as it now is. They are all gone aside, tbey are all together become filthy: There is none that doeth good, no, not one. (psalm 14:3) Many Mennonites believe I throw "fiery darts of the wicked" at .them wben I tell Mennonites, Menno Simons was a "wicked penon" and use my Mennonite murdered marrillge and family as dead on proof. But in aU these more tban 33 years. I bave yet to meet the Menn~...ite whose "shield of faitb, helmet of salvation, sword of the Spirit. which is the word of God" can defend to the death Menno Simons wbo did "pervert tbe gospel of Christ" against Cbrist's diametrically opposed "other gospel." Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. (St. Matthew 19:6) I have yet to find one Menn_ite wbo is inspired by "all scriptun~ is given by inspiration of God" to obey the following commands of Saint Peter. But sanctify tbe Lord God in your bearts: And be ready always tl) give an answer to every man tbat asketh you a reason ofthe hope tbat is in you with meekness and fear: Baving a good conscience; that, wbereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoen, they may be asbamed tbat falsely accuse your good conversation in Cbrist. ,For it is better, iftbewiU of God be so, tbat ye suffer for well doing, tllan for evil doing. (] Peter 3:]5-17) Instead, Mennonite historians are too "asbamed" to publicly "ilUffer for well doing" admit or deny, Menno Simons' commands bave murdered an estimated minimum 100,000 marriages and families during the 450 Mennonite years. Menno Simons' marriage and family murdering commands bave driven up to 5,000 Mennonite damned and shunned busbands and fatbers to suicide duriing tbe past 450 years. An estimated 5 more marriages and families worldwide are destroyed by Mennonites aud Amish each week. Generally such Mennonites must breed tbeir own replacements and for any growth UlI their cult they therefore generally have large families. Therefore, an estimated 25 cbildren more per week an~ forced to exist in an evil Mennonite made "bouse divided against itself." (St. Mark 3:25) Mennonites and Amish wbo destroy marriages and families upon commands of Menno Simons drive an estimated one (1) Mennonite damned and sbunned busband and father worldwide to suicide per montb. Mennonites drive tbeir damned and sbunned busband and fatber victims to bave "no bope" and to cause tbem to believe tbey are "witbout God in tbe world" (Ephesians 2: 12) until tbey cboose suicide in order to escape tbeir Mennonite made "more bitter than deatb" existence. Unfortunately, many Mennonites and Amisb would also bave "no bope" and believe tbey would be "witbout God in tbe world" if tbey ended forcing upon tbe victims of Mennonitism a "more bitter than death" existence. True to tbe H1illois Crime SIIrvey, as long as Mennonites and Amisb are more interested "in the more immediate and personal relations of life" tban "in abstractions like justice, bumanity, and rigbteousness" and tbe Judges oftbe Cumberland County Court are interested in tbe same, we can expect no belp from them, only bindrance. I know of no Mennonite bistory of a Mennonite sbunning wife compiling a bistory of almost 19 years in an adulterous affair witb tbe busband and fatber of another family - and continuing. I have never beard before of a Mennonite sbunning "wife" destroying the marriage and family of others in ber greed for sexual gratification denied ber in ber own marriage by ber Mennonite over1otr1ls. I believe Gale Gross Bear and her adulterous lover have inadvertently provided tbe opportunity to end Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness in the Reformed Mennonite cult. If wbat I believe is true, tben it just means applying tbe same principles applied to other marrUlge and family murdering Mennonite and Amish cults can finally end 450 years of Mennonite marriage and familly murdering madness. Therefore, the quicker it ean be established legally that the Reformed Mennonite cult and Cumberland County Court sanctioned destruction of my marriage and family, cult':1 and court's evil power plays have destroyed two marriages and families, the sooner will tbe eud come. Will not those who are more interested "in the more common immediate and personal relations of life," sucb as Gale Gross Bear and ber illicit lover, want to delay tbe day of reekoning forever, if possible? But will not those wbo are "more interested in abstractioDs like .instic:e, bumanity, and righteousness" think of all the Mennonite murdered marriages and families "in jeopardy every bour" (I Corinthians ]5:30) the Cumberland County Court grants a continuance beyond November 23" 2005, at 1:30 p.m.? A friend traveling in Thailand at the time sent me the following World News headline and its accompanying news story. A man who delivered a load of fertilizer to the fium years later said he never thought while serving as a soldier in South Korea he would meet the husband he read about being accused of rape by his Mennonite shunning wife, e - ~ ~ ... I LL BANGKOK POST W~l)'l':slln 1)l':t:l-:~\1IH:R S. 19~ nDn 1nl'l'll I\l\'! fi \1 J: lIU.1!\U ~.". ..<<... I WORLD NEWS BANGKOK. THIAlAND Cumberland County, PA ]979 Criminal Court Testimony, Page.32 Bear: Did you never sexuaUy tease after I was excommunicated? Gale Gross Bear: No Robert, I did not. (Page 34) - Judge Harold E, Sheely: Did he ever rape you? Gale Gross Bear: In my mind, I would say yes, I 'don't know what the definition under the circumstances would be. As I see it, I would say yes. (page 36) - Judge Harold E, Sheely: You are talking now of sexu:" intercoune? Gale Gross Bear: Yes. Page 38) - Bear: Then you mean it occurred sometime between June the IldI of 1972 and 1974 when you left home, is that right? Gale Gross Bear: That's correct. Bear: And you don't know when? Gale Gross Bear: I can't remember. Bear: But it happened? Gale Gross Bear: Yes. Bear: Well, were you clothed or were you naked? Gale Gross Bear: I reaDy can't remember those details. Bear: ])id it happen in the times that I was in your bed or when you were in my bed? District Attorney Michael Eakin objected and Judge Sheely upheld his objection although Judge Sheely earlier had stated: "You will have to tell us what you meant by it." "I find more bitter than death the woman" who on December 3, 1979, made "World News" by falsely accusing me of forcing "rape, sexual intercourse" upon her. "Comfort the feebleminded" (1 Thessalonians 5:14) who can't lmow, had it been humanly possible to penetrate Gale Gross Bear's Reformed Mennonite "plain dress," then penetrate her slip, then her panties, and finally penetrate her body, she could never have honestly testified in court, "I really can't remember those details. .. It could well be that Gale Gross Bear may make "World News" again when she shows up in court with her subpoenaed long time adnlterous lover Lawrence N. Bard. Would not a World News account of what Reformed Mennonites and the Cnmberland County Court did to a on(:e "nice girl," but who would ever believe it now, help sound the death knell to 450 years of Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness? General R. Lee Commanding C,S. Army Headquarters, Armies of the United States April 7, 1865 - 5 p.m. General: The results of the last week must convince you of the hopelessness of further resistance on the part of the Army of North em Virginia in this struggle, I feel that it is so, and regard it as my duty to shift from myself the responsibility of any further effusion of blood, by asking of you the surrender of that portion of the C,S, Army known as the Army of Northern Virginia. Very re:spectfully, your obedient servant, U.S. Grant Commanding Armies of the United States Likewise, Judge J. Wesley Oler, Jr., I too "regard it as my duty to shift from myself the responsibility of any further effusion of blood" of Mennonite murdered marriages and families and snicides due to any "continuance" beyond November 23,2005. I ask you to absolutely sun-ender your absolute power to grant "a continuance." President Abraham Lincoln's second inaugunl address, on Mala 4, 1865, contained the following in the conclusion of his public statement. The Almighty has His own purposes. "Woe unto the world because of offenses! For it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!" Ifwe shall suppose that American Slavery is one of those offences which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North allld South, this terrible war, as the woe due to those by whom the offence came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a Living God always ascrihe to Him? Fondly do we bope - fervently do we pray - that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue, until all the wealth piled by the bond-man's two hundred and fifty years ofumequited toil shall he sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord, are true and righteous altogether." With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the riight, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation's wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan - to do all which may achieve and cheriiih a just, and a lasting peace, among 'Ourselves, and with all nations. Having now before aU concerned the most egregious by far example of Mennonite medieval satanic sexual sadism slavery ever known; how good and how gracious Refornled Mennonites and the Judges of the Cumberland County Court would be if they could emulate Abraham I.inc:oln's attitude toward the end of black slavery in the United States. If only Refonned Mennonites could paralj)hrase Lincoln's reasoning and Cumberland County Court Judges could completely concur to the folll)wing. If we shall suppose that Mennonite satanic shunning SI~xual slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but whiclil, having continued throughout His appointed time of 450 years; He now wills to remove, and th:lt He gives to all concerned Gale Gross Bear's unholy example of her terribly unbridled sexunllust destroying two marriages and families, as the woe to those to whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a Living God always ascribe to him? Fondly do we hope - fervently do we pray - that this mighty Mennolllite satanic sexual sadism scourge of Mennonites who "fight against God" (Acts 5:34) may speedily pass away. Yet if God wills that it continue, until all the wealth of Reformed Mennonites piled while enforcing their satanic sexual sadism shunning slavery, ever since Reformed Mennonites became a cult, June 30, 1812, is sunk, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord, are true and righteous altogether." With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the wounds of all who have suffered Mennonite satanic sexual shunning slavery; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his children effectively orphaned from their Mennonite damned fathers - to do all which may achieve and cherish a just, and a lasting pe:llce forever free of the scourge of Mennonite satanic sexual shunning sadism slavery. Ifin this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all mea most miserable. (I Corinthians 15:19) That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the <tomlBonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise. having no hope, and without God in thl~ world. (Ephesians 2: 12) And with all deceivableae5S of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the trnth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shaD send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the trnth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. (2 Thessalonians 2: 10-12) Until this moment, God has not "sent (me) strong delnsion that {I) shonld believe a lie." the lie that the best way to end my God-judged "more bitter than death" existence is by bloodily murdering a few ofthe many who forced my "more bitter than death" existence upon me. If Refonned Mennonites don't thank God for not sending me "~itrong delusion" I should murder some of them, and I am as evil as "God (has) sent them strong delusion to belien a lie" that I am, as Lincoln reasoned; "shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes wlltieh the believers in a Living God always ascribe to Him?" Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as GlId, neither were they thankful; but became vain in their imaginations and their foolish heart was darkenecll. (Romans 1:21) I pray God will never send me "strong delusion" I shonld murdl~r Reformed Mennonites in order to help end 450 years of Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness. But if Refonned Mennonites become more "vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart (becomes more) darkened;" and "they yet glorified him not as God" by continuing to glorify Menno Simons' "doctrines ofdevUs," (I Timothy 4:1) could any fault God if God sent me "strong delusion" to murder some in order to get them to stop. The fear of the Lord is clean, enduriug forever: the judgmeats of the Lord are troe and righteous altogether. (psalm 19:9) Reformed Mennonites weat astray whea they feared Menno Simons' commandments and each other more than they feared God. For they loved the praise of men more than the praise of Gild. (St. John 12:43) "All scripture is given by inspiration of God" and perfectl), explains how Gale Gross Bear loves the praise of her illicit lover Lawrence N. Bard "more than the praise of God." Reformed Mennonites love "the praise of men more than the praise of God" or they would do as "all scripture is given by inspiration of God" commands them to do with Menno Simons' "doctrines of devils;" "Thou shalt cast them away as a menstruous cloth." (Isaiah 30:22) Cumberland County Judges also "love the praise of men more than the praise of God" or they would vie with each other to be first to "provide things honest in the sight of all men," (Romans 12:17) publicly confess their court's crimes and lies and their own guilt. God informed Abraham that he intended to destroy the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah "because their sin is very grievous." But Abraham pled with God not to dl~troy Sodom and Gomorrah if there could be found fifty righteous. God said he wouldn't destroy the cities if there were "fifty righteous." Then Abraham continued to reduce the number until he said to (rlId, "0 let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Peradventure ten shall be found th4~re. And he said, I will not destroy it for ten's sake." (Genesis 18:32) And it was so, that all that saw it said, There was no such deed done nor seen from the day that the children ofIsrael came up out ofthe land of Egypt unto this day -. (Judges 19:30) Just so, there is no Mennonite history of a Mennonite shunning wife. apparently remaining celibate for about 14 years, then committing adultery for almost 19 years with the husband and father of another family, since the first Mennonites came to Colonial America in 1683. Who hath believed our report? (Romans 10:16) Knowing Ithis first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts. (2 Peter 3:3) But how could there be any who don't believe my "report" and how could there be any "scoffers" if Lawrence N. Bard confesses in court on November 23, 2005, as he confessed to me on August 11, 2005, how Gale Gross Bear and he lusted together for almost 19 )'ears? Who then could deny that when Reformed Mennonites did "defraud" Gale Gross Bear of married sex they drove her into the arms of a married man? Then instead of destroying the usual one marria~~ and family, in this case of Mennonite satanic sexual perversion Reformed Mennonites destroyed two marriages and families. Who could doubt this cruel and inhuman calamity was forced upon this marriage and family by Gale Gross Bear and Reformed Mennonites? The Judges ofthe Cumberland COUlllty Court then fully sanctioned this Gross evil being stripped stark naked before them with their Junl~ 23, 1976, "fully warranted - love and concern" judgment calling Mennonite "evil good?" As Abraham said to God, I say much to "the god of this world," in this case, Judge J. Wesley Oler, Jr., who has absolute power to not grant "a continuance," "0 let not (the god ofthis world) be angry, and I will speak yet but this once." Judge Oler, by not granting "a continuance" and by Mennonites learning months earlier of the evil examples of Reformed Mennonites and Gale Gross Bear, you could surely save at least ten (10) more Mennonite wives from being converted into "more bitter th,ln death" women. "For the Lord Jesus Christ's sake," (Romans 15:30) please don't extend the hearing in this case beyond Wednesday, November 23, 2005, at 1:30 p.m. You will only prolong the miser:y of Mennonite marriage and family murdering madness until other victims are trapped until death. And the Jews' Passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem, and found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: And when he had made a scourge (a whip) of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple. and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out all the changers' money, and overthrew the tables; Amid said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise. And his disciples remembered that it was written: The zeal of thine house hath eau~n me up. (St. John 2: 13-17) For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffe:red for us, leaving us an example. that ye should follow in his steps: Who did no sin, neither was guile fOlmd in his mouth. (I Peter 2:21-22) If Jesus Christ incarnate would do in Reformed Mennonitc~ churches as he did in the temple . because Reformed Mennonites "make merchandise" (2 Peter 2:3) of their women sexually for the Mennonite demanded price of "repent," wouldn't both Reformed Mennonites and the Cumberland County Court Judges call Christ's "good evil?" Wouldn't Cumberland County Court Judges "put darkness for light" and put Jesus Christ in prison as a criminal if Christ continued to do "good?" In whom the god oftbis world hath blinded the minds ofthem which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shil~e unto them. (2 Corinthians 4:4) Wberefore tbey are no more twain, but one ftesb. Wbat tberefore God batb joined togetber, let not man put asunder. (St. Matthew 19:6) That is "the glorious gospel of Christ" for not only Reformed Mennonites and non-Reformed Mennonites, but also for all Reformed Mennonites damn and shun. Menno Simons wrote the following on January 23, 1560, and died a year later, January 31, 1561, without reputing one word of his last will and testament in commanding to "put asunder" husband and wife when one is excommunicated, according to Mennonite histOlians. "My second reply is that none under heaven can practice his faith while living with his apostate consort. To begin with, he would be transgressing all the explicit commandments of the Holy Spirit concerning the ban and shunning. And besides, he would not seek the repentance of his consort in such a manner as the Scripture teaches. And third, he keeps company with one who should, according to the commandment of the Word, be shunned by all pious persons. I ",i11leave to the consideration of all of you if this can be called practicing the faith. Therefore, I pray you, take heed." (Page 1007, The Complete Writings of Men no Simons) True to, "all scripture is given by inspiration of God," (2 Timothy 3:16) "the god ofthis world" Cumberland County Court judges "hath blinded the minds of (Reformed Mennonites to) believe" ever since June 23, 1976, converting Mennonites wives into a "more biitter than death - woman" is "fully warranted - love and concern." Sincerely submitted, (~' ~A--- Robert L. Bear VERIFICATION I verify that the statements made in the foregoin~: docnment are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subjed to the penalties of 18 Ps.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsifications to authorities. DATE:~V St-fJ!<t(Jh\ :<,3, :(0''::'- , *~<.c~ Robert L. Bear C? ~-: ,...> <'"' = c.n <.n "q Lu N W ,.,.. r".-.' -""" ~ :2, Zl n,- -o~ :"y ()(:J ~-l-T. ::r::D ',~O -'::~:m '-~ --.-1 ~.c '< '-!? CP -