Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-2654 Supreme Courtbf Pennsylvania Court of Common Tleas For Prothonotary Use Only Civil Cover Sheet Docket No Lt,tfr °r[MLA' r. County H -J/p54 C"Iviiierm t The information collected on this form is used solely for court administration purposes. This form does not supplement or replace the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law or rules of court. Co mencement of Action: NE S Complaint Q Writ of Summons 0 Petition 0 Transfer from Another Jurisdiction 0 Declaration of Taking E C Lead Plaintiff's Name: Lead Defendant's Name: $' o44 hQlehJp,t.;ran I, • T 0 —60, P':/r-t. Akio) ;11,.01,e. iiL4trjnoVIn/jcole, Do e Dollar Amount Requested: Ng within arbitration limits I Are money damages requested? ( Yes 0 No (check one) Doutside arbitration limits O 1 N Is this a Class Action Suit? 0 Yes 1601 No Is this an MDJAppeal? 0 Yes No A Name of Plaintiff/Appellant's Attorney: TO SkAI:41 904 yne_ El Check here if you have no attorney(are a Self-Represented [Pro Se] Litigant) Nature of the Case: Place an"X"to the left of the ONE case category that most accurately describes your PRIMARY CASE. If you are making more than one type of claim, check the one that you consider most important. TORT(do not include Blass Tort) CONTRACT (do not include Judgments) CIVIL APPEALS nIntentional 0 Buyer Plaintiff Administrative Agencies Malicious Prosecution D Debt Collection: Credit Card 0 Board of Assessment O Motor Vehicle 0 Debt Collection: Other 0 Board of Elections O Nuisance 0 Dept.of Transportation 0 Premises Liability 0 Statutory Appeal: Other S 0 Product Liability (does not include Emass tort) 0 Employment Dispute: I Slander/Libel/Defamation Discrimination C 14�, 0 Employment Dispute: Other 0 Zoning Board T =? . 0 Other: 1 0 Other: 0 MASS TORT O Asbestos N'. ® Tobacco O Toxic Tort-DES ® Toxic Tort-Implant REAL PROPERTY MISCELLANEOUS Q Toxic Waste 0 Other: 0 Ejectment 0 Common Law/Statutory Arbitration B 0 Eminent Domain/Condemnation D Declaratory Judgment O Ground Rent 0 Mandamus O Landlord/Tenant Dispute 0 Non-Domestic Relations O Mortgage Foreclosure:Residential Restraining Order PROFESSIONAL LIABLITY 0 Mortgage Foreclosure: Commercial 0 Quo Warranto 0 Dental 0 Partition 0 Replevin O Legal 0 Quiet Title 0 Other: O Medical 0 Other: O Other Professional: Updated 1/1/2011 \\-\fL C LS'\ eiMc.A\ LI FP / LCJI ? n 44_ , F THE PROT HONG TAP, 20111 HAY - 1 Pill: 26 NA.Alcv CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA \N\N"..1_-C\ -k■\OEci a.\\ ,-)erke_eLsl‘ 7; I -cL96`1 -OLVC d. CLIV '\1 YE•LA \N dectild 6zov61-• Lic to k\Ae_ -LAVAN)&oi, Qc CL fl ( Vki ('- *\ Lc LLAQL,A covi L, &(\neit■ Le_ C2116.\\Y CA\ \t2) Ak\6\NOE\ii ( \\ \ () (-1L;■(‘I'-\r\-\1-1'“, LAI CLL \ Nitjuf "kb (.(diLS4 tu, OL,F tALS,C■Lk A\VA rub. V-E-t,V ac (y)(1)' ■vi'L)cce, A co, \\16(A mcky _tc: ,c)t N&-\ .Ca n_d1 ftletcd Ek«IA t`0, -\\hr C A ciairi O Y rr, 6.f \o`i AVE tA'tcq L tc:OCY (A" VrOiLlAY r‘Aher kc \ 4• IA I 1L' '" 411C.- I l'\1 '&"'41\'\ YCIAI LAW)Itr OnLe_ I\hk- \lave_ C,<C \ot -1c\n'tL .Sek 'COCVN \OW,'".t\At.S Ltkt 74/C,k, \X)CV\ V■ta ((LC AVaAk.- \Alf 1\16 zt_ LAWY • GAM f 16nd. COtkil A ss6 c , PeAcc.cds C 0.6,:cLP kk101 3 / ) 1 \• r; J'A LLCV 'V" V L'At, n) , ,7) Vrif \A\ or() • 4- iL CC\NI c1/4\ ,,• \--\,.„\\)•:••_\'-• /).\.\\ e_ :Tnv\ \ , L. . > . '\\ C (7 (1 ,•„ ;••,„ • , „.„ t \ C ct. , .\; ,A\'■ ■3 r 177 , ,\\ \ \ ; NV1 \\..) kV, \NI 3nk. )- f 4 1. • •- 1'N ,,( ) I (-1( ry \ \ ' n..A\ . \ V LV....),(m t\i :),Li . ' ■ ' —7) t'ALL,\V■ C \ -k \J- (-‘ c)r\ -LP • (I\ , •-S\ t \l '• Ak 5 c i L. ? 1 L \ ts,, •cv,_ \NI -\\ \\-\ (,\rt' C-2(\xv-\,,_I .\\N\v, \(\;■ (ft t e\ c_\ \Dt\I t■,s)\('‘ t / 7_, \ J\ •Nr., , Ati4k)1 -\ACk-\\C\ \1:kA\ -\\i`D C-k r-kc L \ A , ,,, (A. c\r- Lc, , cc \tiV\f,v\ J‘c: \C?.'`. ('). t v)e 11\ At Lct,1 i c ce r\ f r i)irv\ i5L ki/Vc_iv< ■Ac. Lc \:\ \ --frt t \''CI ' I LA(,c (.1 A y tY 6■\ Ma\-c\\ 11-‘,\ LL \ 1L „<:, • (Y\N) f,(- A .0 ,r A (C \V1.\, \\c_ ki• kV \k, c7:4:-_•LICCi V. Li\ 1A)M-'10'S -1-21,A Lill (\t"'CL4/,'1(- (d^ 41-A(Li Li\-1 c c iv\ vi C \ CsDr■4( uk. ffIC:( \AL, cie-A'',72Y /.6',.1 \\N) \-1(A-e i Cu (/ c VYYL' CiCa _ \,\61ev) Akur)tv Avi-d,T0A1(L tifv.A.Ni +11,1; --Nc_ ku jvc A r Lx\c\_. e_ALJAf-r\ kixf\. kv.c___ fir vd / -EC, -P■ )- tlIf 9 r, {) r > - 1k. (-)n riAdtk \ k's-- 4PO: 11\C ■C?( " c loY ‘‘ 'Cs; \\\\ \(\\ \CC At, AC,MeA 1.4e..11LA 11,1 A cC 4? \Lt. iJ , ) '17 \\. c . 11. Li- Ds'AV[{. . IMV6 7\-\-\,(7, \\\( cc *LC_ SlYkAP ;VN e 6 c, 71,41.1y, L ■A_C.:WN ccAmid() c,=f A\\ LL\x/ e_Li\Z•',.1‘..\..‘QTV" \1e_Y f\ 1)(\ k\nAk (:)( \r1 (A (.28: ...V\.\Lot., (Ail, t ty\ kC'q VY\LL \Y\u_knAL-s, L A.,S\ 1 a„\ At LA:A Lor)J. LAri A kAu .V16.\r\ 1E.-t)c_ ci4 A C \YVELCS AV\ (-±tr\ LALL-. ALA, AAA ci5 Le_ b,s,),W\LuA calyi k SL,,.\tv Vt A_ \ S\-. k_k_a AV\ \P\.■ 11 N -t\oLL Cc cladlem fteiLt) CLAAllex\b-A26 EoLAi ki-!_(\6Y Vixt tA 7)1e,Auc,_ • 4■11\-L- PV.\_■ fcc,ca c: LARI\. iicatki'-\\AuL\tch, fi-kk- <,VAtxte CIL - Ci t Ae2(` ---36fii-jebv &C. C6kii.S.k.\\\\, C.n. c)D(Lic Le,d4WV \ Oaeld.c.o\k. N\1\kLN \f&A Koktrk)1 Ine6 c_c-d 6._\"\ (16-1.c■A (AlAhcyfy-•:\11c■i'Y 1 \n,c.J_ rru6 6.-ks . ,Mcfs■ (Atan cP LL),..6\1k..\ ia..ntv cia_Af\vt ,r6u4s,\iw LL QA1N2-_, \N1,tiit-A\ -Hula pc,c_Lx\ Le A -ex;Tic,,\N-\/T6k._. c:c \ -11/ S ALA,V.A\ 4\\42_ c +\-\ -cc.\LI\101 LOPAiti? C_C±S(.\rtd AL-) ec.-Ly),A.\‘\e_c c c_ f\ dA 41-) (it'N 61L :Te qiCa (;■ ((V tkA C I Cjlt r . D4V-. Q \ ' • \ kr\ r-, fa. Lit-1 • I L'IL■\\itl 4 \ - \ \.\ \ Y \ I ..„ [ , "■ t 't 1 • •••.) , t■, r, 4\ ' \ X 1\A \11 f ' 1 ci \ f'• \ • k t k \\t i\\ A c, CluA)-00e...c` LoN\ tY1 T HE PROTHuNdTAR‘I. I P(..01\■L 2014 MAY - I AM 1.1.: 26 CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA \\1 ! iL& i-‘)ACIM Le c -0/6511 TiEV ' (00(...\,E ttr amd V11.Y C_ C v\k. 17911 c l A (DO Am LAVV.11,31 ce..Y -4.r\tEc coI 3 ( ,L cc, 1)C vla I.- ) th c-4 t CrA Lx11(511e_ 'AL ( 'ktel OS■YEI)c..! cALAclin 6 ilAy aY id . ckY -k1AL C_6_S rJc\ k\eSi,e_.-A -k\A0A k\vt cy\icA k(AA 1bA/ CetaA ow id -kc cY c‘.\\X c5,k kr\,\t t-„ 3 LeVisc_-1/2 (1\y/re- < iv//I ICCO 'at‘t.c> rd) QA.16 (' Yenk Al/A PA (<46A- r, (.._L ■Ct.-.n.q A%cn and ,Af(let/leir b2_1\- -,-V--, mc n4.1 IC Y co.nt ectsi 41Y C_VA?e_r'c, /V/14 EfinNflOYei/ S-4-(tk: QtAk-A■C__ c_Ai.:4;toce /1//1A Ci-VArNeS AjP4- kAd(e_S iv/ik we /i , \\) ,\\„\ v,\. k\c‘c, N/A \\ il)CA Ail A6 Aef6, IV/A trfS‘br■ \;:k 1\1v.),LAA 1■// - i-2 ro-r, \7 \ P 2J),079,) (0a-aJtil, 5--kr,si\v-7 .7.1[4 sico? tv-.)1DaN ( 1),5 ,1-Aw9 krM ' \J ) ) V1/j9 dT9VcrY\) SlAvYkfl(2 -) 5i'IT tivA, -.T.u(29 V/AI r fru T)mtiv "\-9 3114/ 4111,\ fIVAI1 31404 TiTT)41 Vf6 V% A5orP v/jv L1J2ti v-0--14517 -y-avim\Q hk,ricl 1/71/4) .-kTIFA WA/ VAQ +Q F7frir— —'"j; 5\An3,77,1 10‘ NM\14\\ICT V././1/ ' 179V`P kAlqkN jWT \). vi/v 74AL wi.\J ,A1 4 /1,0) vdirov (-aVri-3 1P-KAP37 s 3c:' UTT-1\ ‘ 1 1AP15nt FRIA 3-41- TIN (rrricv,-rV rvor ku--7k9ry w)s,F53 Nilotp5,r9 ,PkWq 11 �(. uncle{ c4 AA I hr ,le. a Cord, nLA;PY 6b11'6.LJ 1,`cn IntL\oton Ca_.;.I= - OV 1(N‘&veivicA- l tv IYvi V�ctc o� i C��rYkS r� S LA«Lki Lu LDS - l(\C O & h ►r\ 5,.T \c ,Fy 4-he � J lnefe 2th YeAttt:k lq c)ti unSwdy\ Ccasti,rick,-1-t‘cyl NA\nol`t' \-6° "1° iL1 16a) f1,p� go,‘, ��T Ors Ik X41 I� l��� `-a 3 JOSHUA PAYNE, Plaintiff V. Count)of QCumbtrianb IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SCOTT WHALEN, ET. AL., Defendants ICI-a 1054CIVIL ACTION IN RE: IFP ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this day of May 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Petition, designated "IFP" which is taken as a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, the Petition is GRANTED and Plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis. BY - ou Thoma sl _____________________2 P acey C.P.J. Distribution List: ✓ Joshua Payne /Scott Whalen ee ` Corrections Officer Huber Ma C .441\ C Corrections Officer Ducan AP"'5 5 I i �� Corrections Officer Zeigler 0 sea 9 5h� Prothonotary (_) r.• :•_:: iTiCO `= °1- 1 ..-.rn :1 � .73 --< 2 '1 _<. 1 ul -.-I c c. zz c: N "r(Rt Ronny R Anderson Sheriff Jody S Smith Chief Deputy Richard W Stewart Solicitor SHERIFF'S OFFICE OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY ;LEU—OFFICE OE- THE PROTHONO IAs<. 01tini 14 PM 3.09 CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA OFF ICE OF THE $F!ERIFF Joshua Payne #GQ5980 vs. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Case Number 2014-2654 SHERIFF'S RETURN OF SERVICE 05/07/2014 11:00 AM - Deputy William Cline, being duly sworn according to law, served the requested Complaint & Notice by handing a true copy to a person representing themselves to be Deb Bryant, Paralegal, who accepted as "Adult Person in Charge" for Pennsylvania Department of Corrections at Office of General Counsel, 1920 Technology Parkway, Mechanicsburg, PA 17050. May 08, 2014 (c) Cou ntySui.e Sheriff, Teleosoft, Inc. •'fr -LIAM CLINE, DEPUTY SO ANSWERS, RONNY R ANDERSON, SHERIFF ONZ(NDER IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JOSHUA I. PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. WHALEN, et al., Defendants : CIVIL ACTION LAW : NO. 14-2654 :z DEFENDANTS' MOTION REQUESTING THE COURT TO DECIDE THE DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS ON THE BRIEFS WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT AND NOW come the Defendants,by and through their attorney, Jaime B. Boyd, and move this Honorable Court as follows. 1. Plaintiff Joshua Payne ("Plaintiff') is an inmate incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Dallas ("SCI -Dallas"). At the time of the events pertaining to this matter,, Payne was incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill ("SCI -Camp Hill"). 2. The Defendants are Whalen, Huber, Duncan (incorrectly identified as "Ducan") and Zeigler.' Plaintiff's Complaint seeks relief for alleged violations of his Eighth Amendment rights. ' Plaintiff also names John/Jane Doe as a Defendant, however, the Commonwealth Attorney's Act, 71 P.S. § 732-101, et seq., precludes appearances for unnamed/unidentified alleged employees, who have not consented to legal 3. Contemporaneously with this motion, the Defendants are filing preliminary objections to the Complaint. 4. Cumberland County Local Rule of Civil Procedure No. 1028(c)(9) mandates that preliminary objections shall be argued in argument court, unless a party requests to have the preliminary objections decided on the briefs. 5. Because the Plaintiff in his matter is a pro se prisoner currently being held at SCI -Dallas (located in Luzerne County), and because the issues raised in the preliminary objections are questions of law, the Defendants respectfully request that the preliminary objections be decided on the briefs, without oral argument. 6. In accordance with Local Rule 208.3(a)(2) (requiring disclosure of whether a judge has already ruled on any issue in the same case), the Honorable Thomas A. Placey granted I.F.P. in this matter. representation. 4 Pa. Code § 39.1, et seq.; 42 Pa. C.S. § 8525. Nonetheless, for the reasons set forth herein, any "Doe" Defendant should be dismissed as well. 2 WHEREFORE, the Defendants respectfully that this Honorable Court grant their motion to have the preliminary objections decided on the briefs, without oral argument. By Dated: May 23, 2014 Respectfully submitted, Office of General Counsel Ail! --dir,eir ,='�= lys/ i stant Counsel A torney I.D. No. 90158 Pennsylvania Department of Corrections 1920 Technology Parkway Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 (717) 728-7763 3 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JOSHUA I. PAYNE, Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION LAW v. WHALEN, et al., Defendants : NO. 14-2654 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I am depositing in the U.S. mail a true and correct copy of the foregoing motion upon the person(s) in the manner indicated below: Dated: May 23, 2014 Service by first-class mail addressed as follows: Joshua Payne, GQ5980 SCI -Dallas 1000 Follies Road Dallas, PA 18612 (-47)1 Mary W r ter Legal A s'istant Pennsylvania Department of Corrections 1920 Technology Parkway Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 (717) 728-7763 •IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JOSHUA I. PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. WHALEN, et al., Defendants PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Please enter my appearance as counsel on behalf of the Defendants: Whalen, Huber, Duncan and Zeigler, in the above -captioned matter. Papers may be served at the address set forth below. : CIVIL ACTION LAW : NO. 14-2654 By: Dated: May 23, 2014 Respect submit ed, 40�4I) !' d Assis &tto ant Counsel ey I.D. No. PA90158 Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Office of Chief Counsel 1920 Technology Parkway Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 (717) 728-7763 Fax No.: (717) 728-0307 Email: jaiboyd@pa.gov IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JOSHUA I. PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. WHALEN, et al., Defendants : CIVIL ACTION LAW : NO. 14-2654 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I am this day depositing in the U.S. mail a true and correct copy of the foregoing Praecipe for Entry of Appearance upon the person(s) in the above -captioned matter. Service by first-class mail addressed as follows: Dated: May 23, 2014 Joshua Payne, GQ5980 SCI -Dallas 1000 Follies Road Dallas, PA 18612 1 A37 - Mary "W arVfe Legal Assistant Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Office of Chief Counsel 1920 Technology Parkway Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 (717) 728-7763 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JOSHUA I. PAYNE, Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION LAW v. WHALEN, et al., Defendants : NO. 14-2654 DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO COMPLAINT The Defendants, by and through their attorney, Jaime B. Boyd, Assistant Counsel for the Department of Corrections ("Department"), in accordance with Pa.R.C.P. 1028(a), raise the following Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint. Procedural History 1. Plaintiff Joshua Payne ("Plaintiff'), is an inmate incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Dallas ("SCI -Dallas"). At the time of the events pertaining to this matter, Payne was incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill ("SCI -Camp Hill"). 2. The Defendants are Whalen, Huber, Duncan (incorrectly identified as "Ducan") and Zeigler.l ' Plaintiff also names John/Jane Doe as a Defendant, however, the Commonwealth Attorney's Act, 71 P.S. § 732-101, et seq., precludes appearances for J 4 3. On May 1, 2014, the Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a Complaint and Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (IFP). 4. On May 5, 2014, this Court granted Plaintiff's IPF Motion. 5. On May. 7, 2014, the Defendants were properly served with the Complaint. These Preliminary Objections follow. Factual Allegations 6. Plaintiff alleges that in 2013, the Defendants purposefully took control of several items of his property, refused to return the property, and threw the property away. 7. Plaintiff asserts the alleged property included legal documents, and photographs. Remedies Requested 8. Plaintiff requests monetary damages from the Defendants. FIRST PRELIMINARY OBJECTION Sovereign Immunity 9. Should the Complaint be construed to allege facts that sound in tort. Defendants assert legal insufficiency of pleading under the Prison Litigation Reform Act where Defendants are entitled to the affirmative defense of sovereign unnamed/unidentified alleged employees, who have not consented to legal representation. 4 Pa. Code § 39.1, et seq.; 42 Pa. C.S. § 8525. Nonetheless, for the reasons set forth herein, any "Doe" Defendant should be dismissed as well. 2 3 immunity. Pa.R.C.P., No. 1028(a)(4); 42 Pa. C.S. § 6602; Pa.R.C.P., No. 1030; 1 Pa. C.S. § 2310; 42 Pa.C.S. § 8522. 10. Prison Litigation may be dismissed at any time pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S. § 6602(e)(2) if it: "[i]s frivolous or malicious or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or the defendant is entitled to assert a valid affirmative defense, including immunity, which, if asserted, would prelude relief." (emphasis added.) 11. Plaintiff alleges that the .Defendants intentionally deprived him of his property. However, claims against the Commonwealth, and its officials and employees for intentional misconduct are barred by sovereign immunity. La Frankie v. Miklich, 618 A.2d 1145, 1149 (Pa. Cmwlth 1992). 12. Defendants, employees of the Commonwealth, can only be held liable for negligence which falls within one of the nine categories where sovereign immunity has been waived. 42 Pa.C.S. § 8522. 13. Plaintiff failed to plead facts that fall under an exception to sovereign immunity with respect to the Defendants. WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request this Honorable Court to sustain the Preliminary Objections and dismiss Plaintiff's claims with prejudice. 3 t SECOND PRELIMINARY OBJECTION Lis Pendens 14. In August of 2013, the Plaintiff filed a previous lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Middle District based upon nearly identical operative facts and against the same Defendants. Payne v. Ducan, et. al., Docket No. 3:13- cv-02203 (M.D. Pa.). Complaint and Docketing Statement are attached as Exhibits "A" and `B".2 15. The Defendants request that this Court decline to entertain the claims in the instant Complaint based upon the doctrine of lis pendens. 16. The purpose of a lis pendens is to protect a defendant from the harassment and burden of having to defend several suits involving the same cause of action at the same time. Penox Technologies, Inc. v. Foster Medical Corporation, 546 A.2d 114 (Pa. Super: 1988). 17. Because Plaintiff is asserting several identical claims against identical parties and requesting identical relief from the Department, the Defendants submit that in accordance with Crutchfield v. Eaton Corp., 806 A.2d 1259, 1262 (Pa. Super. 2002), the litigation of the two suits would create a duplication of effort on the part of the parties, waste judicial resources and `create the unseemly spectacle 2 The Court can take judicial notice of public records, including court dockets in related cases. Wyoming Sand & Stone Company v. Department of Revenue, 384 A.2d 1193 (Pa. 1978); Commonwealth v. Greer, 866 A.2d 433 (Pa. Super 2005). 4 of a race to judgment.' Crutchfield 806 A.2d at1262 (citing Norristown Auto Corp. v. Hand, 562 A.2d 902, (Pa. Super. 1989)). WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that the Court grant their Preliminary Objection on the basis of lis pendens. Dated: May 23, 2014 By: 5 Respectfully submitted, Office of General Counsel, _ 1.9- 4 Jai WA#► y i ° s:(ant Counsel Attorney .D. No. 90158 PA Department of Corrections 1920 Technology Parkway Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 (717) 728-7763 FORM TO BE USED BY A PRISONER IN FILING A CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT Case 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Document 1 Filed 08/21/13 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (inmate , ber) (Name of Plalnti y l 6sVofPo lidsff) 2P Addreslainti ihtlas Pia !up -- vs. ACCU) 12_le'ier,Ad». soca, ff e-r,Tolln t, -c eco 44:19r (Names of Defendants) J3zzD3 (Case Number) COMPLAINTCRD SCRANTON AUG 2 1 2013 TO BE FILED UNDER: j( 42 U.S.C. § 1.983 - STATE OFFICIALS / 28 U.S.C. § 1331- FEDERAL OFFICIALS L Previous Lawsuits A. If you have filed any other lawsuits in federal court while a prisoner please list the caption and case number including year, as well as the name of the judicial officer to whom it was ed: Cl" i , M l .P# woc, Ph/c ‘p-sokhiscvht, Doc 61 ait IL Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies A. Is there a grievance procedure available at your institution? 1( Yes No B. Have you filed a grievance concerning the facts relating to this complaint? Yes No If your answer is no, explain why not EXHIBIT Yes I A C. Is the grievance process completed? No IIL Defendantsase 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Document 1 Filed 08/21/13 Page 2 of 14 (In Item A below, place the full name of the defendant in the first blank, his/her official position in the second blank, and his/her place of employment in the third blank. Use Item B for the names, positions and places of employment of any additional defendants.) A. Defendant Z, ` ebf e �.`� �� ' is employed � � poyed as �Gr�T 4nkc�-rrczct Sri 6 c-rq�fl M 1 pow a6o � /L P�. 760 -6ar3 ) B. Additional defendants 1)0,C M , K h 1 bh h C �Ii(f p>� i 7016 G , � c:)06 � IV. Statement of Claim (State here as briefly as possible the facts of your case. Describe how each defendant is involved, including dates and places. Do not give any legal arguments or cite any cases or statutes. Attach extra sheets if necessary.) 1. 2. 3. See affaCh Lb0/f/u Pn 2 Case 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Document 1 Filed 08/21/13 Page 3 of 14 FORMS TO BE COMPLETED BY PRISONERS FILING A CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or 28 U.S.C. § 1331 COVER SFF:F,T THIS COVER SHEET CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT RUNG A COMPLAINT AND YOUR OBUGATIONS IF YOU DO FILE A COMPLAINT. READ AND COMPLETE THE COVER SHEET BEFORE YOU PROCEED FURTHER. ************************************************************************************** The cost for filing a civil rights complaint is $350.00. If you do not have sufficient funds to pay the full filing fee of $350.00 you need permission to proceed in forma pauperis. However, the court will assess and, when funds exist, immediately collect an initial partial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater of: 1) the average monthly deposits to your prison account for the past six months; or 2) the average monthly balance in your prison account for the past six months. Thereafter, the institution in which you are incarcerated will be required to make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's deposits credited to your account until the entire filing fee is paid. CAUTION: YOUR OBLIGATION TO PAY THE FULL FILING FEE WELL CONTINUE REGARDLESS OF THE OUTCOME OF YOUR CASE, EVEN IF YOUR COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED BEFORE THE DEFENDANTS ARE SERVED. ************************************************************************************** 1. You shall file a complaint by completing and signing the attached complaint form and mailing it to the Clerk of Court along with the full filing fee of $350.00. (In the event attachments are needed to complete the allegations in the complaint, no more than three (3) pages of attachments will be allowed.) If you submit the full filing fee along with the complaint, you DO NOT have to complete the rest of the forms in this packet. Check here if you are submitting the filing fee with the complaint form. 2. If you cannot afford to pay the fee, you may file a complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 without paying the full filing fee at this time by completing the following: (1) Complaint Form; (2) Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis; and (3) Authorization Form. You must properly complete, sign and submit all three standard forms or your complaint may be returned to you by the Clerk of Court. Check here if you are filing your complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 without full prepayment of fees. Please Note: If your case is allowed to proceed and you are awarded compensatory damages against a correctional facility or an official or agent of a correctional facility, the damage award will first be used to satisfy any outstanding restitution orders pending. Before payment of any compensatory damages, reasonable attempts will be made to notify the victims of the crime for which you were convicted concerning payment of such damages. The restitution orders must be fully paid before any part of the award goes to you. DO NOT DETACH THE COVER SHEET FROM THp; REST OF THE FORMS Caseg 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Document 1 Filed 08/21/13 Page 4 of 14 1 the lAh Skc 4z_S D, 510 LouA tv Vv\ Nil U\k Ols1Qk1 o i (Pen 5`(1\/(A.;,(1 v oS tax ,? f pne_ iV N a Jvet -k-r,&t Bern ed �b Z'ke C e ' tloA.S,AuIr cficianlbot_ Scab W\VAleg\ l„n;k 64/ arn.G-er Wen Auxli S, 1N4ro cLbn 1:1A;s bete i S a § 1 i1; L,\ ‘ k r1 64 1.I,o '►n4 (' -36,Ar. Qhme & m% S a Soo e Prisener -ted a -k 5 Cl MIAs 1 -oU e S e0 Darks QA tett1'?•. Mitt, MM Violaons cyc 1A, S C.onSt-LttotAA ri'GhtS \Ni SVe__ icAk Llalrns -r-We UA541vw:tivA 51ccit 3 i' Ckims , z, � .y.LL14 -1-o acc IN Oil .•-I-1,`,s tort s amk n -L.1 ©mx- ofaintO'S SAt . -Vora CirsA S urti-moi' u.s. c LSO I Case 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Document 1 Filed 08/21/13 Page 5 of 14 fl Q1n-N LI .-Th , „los-Huck PaYna s a all -i me ('e tvenf ro dufth c. 1-1-vese EVILAs a 2,t son -et o t1\e state, of a+ SLl i.amclih11, Dior ndani S F. D e e,n acini S Our�A Ze__C e{' )11 bef --hon Doe ;s Q� all +ime.s C Dte e..-Honal ofi Le..es a+ S. J - Gomel -1A, 6, Dettedan+ Sco-R \x 1 en at all 4 'w es wa,'. f1. (Af�t iftervA.G-e_f 6-V +h e SPe.� �� l Iha,n ��em� h�- (A ni't L + S F earl *i [ 9, De.'f'ewl &n S Qke bei r r; Lu'e ct r n -Nei e i ncii Viduct( A. 041Q, 4i1 defehdcartc zcJ-d Loidev' Atte eo le)r o4 LaW, Or be £Lbouk Noel -Emil%, 0011, We.. Oa/414Y Cutlo wa S Mous-e, i4 'S S. M.. EA , WaS told. by c efe v f WV+o i Cts cel i-1� the. S. nn.u, ?-e-W b4; i Cep(' . t- Bobts •1 ' l\ie ekcri r4A e re Quethed. -1-hrtAG 1, as 411e tProfell c li u nca-e, are no Lon Gc,r in h; s s fired Pro PcsiYi �Accofclw, Th deiencktwr 14A6e "lky Zats cie.S-froYe.ci or Los+ 6y the ?roil(' VvbferrY of c.et' +1Z{ -16c Pta;nti# 'fumed -Nein i vk 10.rthe Pkin-IN `then Ytle11;6varice.. See cAWtch Gritvice# d3� 43 010 GonlItchvibA sl P aattaZ . WA, i ch .•Jas clew i`ed ova cal 1 tVe1.S of the 6.1 €vcuAce. Peo c.edt.aee.. , *lh►S 1S %t n ohGo:hr. fecti►C,liei in ihe_ ah INA !.+_Jrt -tiel P o 1 o -ccie -111e S'la '}o feta►tekG.Gai v 1' fif t'SoneY'S ei4ier 1 y cleSitoinG 'he.V'e ?rofcgild or Lose oiP r y. t1z when a. Pc,sones co Pla►n+ aaeu,‘ staff -Vela tahcv+ 'felaltate u.A ci.nM CIS Pr;sortJt , Pgr"--A Case 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Document 1 Filed 08/21/13 Page 6 of 14 l III'TSe Cock ire. dear Violcd-ions is the U G. C` S 6\nt \ Qo [ i c► e s, Pr b c ed cse.,S & of Prblext.kl5 to f lne Ql kioni-H re au,e {td -lb be. rci n loufst Ts(YC4Y nor ij even. Lost or dearbie , (oY 411(._ S• IMAA:c P�fer aicaS ttu►,ber Dbe., dk 4I1neSc etti-cbns of s411c aY'ge ate C-e.-faLofc.0 Lohductodue_ by 411,e, e/c h -m PiAih 6 �r�vrxhZe S 61,\ ilnese -1-Wa girtionek6 '%ter `S 13, 4, -Olde_ Pl ai vriiC#' F gng de CreieU4n e'S on (i i Pu, b-er Uo aohn *6C Mc, Pluih t tua s AnroClet IcY C/o Haberan 1)-er. la a o ii 4b tA.I4ler 46-V of ke ei; n -t off r i'611i by Val-V4V1 r ssau,.'islhs -F11e, Plaint SP- bt-s,4-;h 6 -11141-' 1)6 wt. have a, nuc ifm Problem The f ikiY1 sf hl� Cie flubef'' lid he clo not J ft, a. Problem la►ktel him e 'NA dor; \ blow 6- wad- - 4 c�h a�4�s �e s -alk � nG about! '� - � (j, hc�belr f�ten Vehemen;ly \AM +fie. & do d;"1 YoU, Lvrat e Yne ? paw � � Yac�r �ai'asS . Q4 t- n/'o�v t ika 'i1a� u,� . co Y6en &..h o r 6-e t- a,l� loo�ic.s f fern S You. 4u.TYNtrl i h f g. 4\cte Oat Ve`('Son Yo(n. 6cc h Nati) 1 S Yaur.1'P beGuuSt You, 'SSS CY)e f4Ac er k1n.k s{u�et��t4- do -Huber LJ�ke, d av,A Y crawl er A4an t f' S Lel( .t5br E -D# \, ak' VW 6Wcso r t GAY a Pe. Z ov,�,cAlVoii Sli aa(4.43-3t 3 Case 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Document 1 Filed 08/21/13 Page 7 of 14 IL, M no 1 e € s chsL fhe Q[t�tin�i S fxh& or of 1\ c %riCg rct. %bce e Lia.s Fla; '4t f P-e_irnbrsf Qx efti, k7 L s /kr Oesfra«ci li, bin br ca&Ani a_1004- Murch '1111 aoR -1-11c S.MI.u. f)6S6j e S Cell i t s Sewall 6Y S, IYt,tA: 1% DLssn 1 ;s Cell Se&rth +his i nc dent bLt.ure, d.. QendcthkS Zie.tlr Du.0 con aOne +ID rnY as cll d+aor ©rd -ex Mei ?I ai i i F 40 Ca teak, Poi' has Cell '46 be Se&rc.h. 1 .7he. c )G,:in+tf t f oltowed #hc 6rdk; Liven , 6u+ d. ,r + beC re✓ 't-cv C.JL�LS c Ne. Nlain4� F Ilatrc[. Vu til e�h� Lcc h � I� 'Leder fhiif -[he. flainfii4' eAe_. Who c $ h;m UC �Lt. 6u`i e +' e 5,1111.0 Le-CcuLSe ke_ -the fla i nfE'r -1011 ion rn -Pbr 6iv►hG. haven tiV a, i.aZar %err & +llak he ria, [d k,ll kimselP. 1a•rne fkjr1 heard" Ducan 44.1E. Z;e 6Ier 4%,c +h€ ?luthf M L£€, +6 Vie_ 6r i cvu_+nes b Law stAjs 6 h 5i-atc . b gate_ aae_ You. f\mvh aliokY < YI e b +61' trbtexk!,Z ttik e N6 Mae. ?cJeY vv6rk, aI. Igen l- e 'e_Que sfed +b S a.. SLk GOA Se -knot tu,ia Ike. ;cern N64 { l-hraw away h� S 72t$6nd ? hb PexiY, ekcirvtA wo..s°Ducith to Sllt.4 NeVALICu'e i 12e c e.. LE i t e. Yek LQ -t'br Cel' A c h I6 be -Y iu order,. Case 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Document 1 Filed 08/21/13 Page 8 of 14 a3,111 feat' ko be -Lae 6 s # %e.-Va1 tt,t,a;v -4 1 rn -1i)e Form d Ce_zet.1h 6 a nci6c onduc� tePofi. h plain ficf s01311Ai'Ss lY-rolbvvled. LAN canSsii ikkbArAl c7 Ueiv. a i17e ?kV-C IAJCLCLi-then Site .4, e rroze% -1-kavidcuYbels ��� Has back 8i.. 6'60.61,1 oak o ' N;5 c II.wYI I�tc(? n i'tie I eiY 11'1 'fr©Vlt C? 116 e.11. i-> PlaiyAe'f was -Faun esi i. ek.r\-i-ex&otlze by eleievviani DuciAn.whs was SaYini; -Kinn Lske" 1.11 bYou Wool be T;1 nG tb Gri EVun_eS df Lcav uks X11;5 r? , OC '1?fl'/r«, do Ybtti witot wit,Ilse cel. ybkA a. Gr LVanCc ? In fee.' ('ece r G fa-4uA i ctbil Gigs k4,e ai rjf i- ' Sad no-46'114 ° n felly' A.ficAr Z i>ee_ MInu-k. Dcan Vaxlor&l hGxaSmev11- Wa, 1, 0nG C dcteidunk Z %ebler 41-Nrim arAla,Y 11,S Irsorytk Qroe\i. De-enccah+ %can -113 tE? tIefThok e y\ou61,1 -Cot now '" 6eliv2 he 6c* 4\' e. meSSa Ge. Zietlef' s-bf w a1 he tori dan6 c Came. 6u+ © mY cell Vl/ ilh a deur -41r06 1m t f ; Ilea vr;A1n Pla.in-1i ' ClfS6nc, i '�rc, Pe r kY,^4he Plair,444 filen was ' lace bad in h i S Lely & unci P.oY'-e_ >il iouvi 7 6 41re. 4wa daendavAS -b letwc *1re. T-C6uv_<%ecl cceiVe a C6f V C.u{-lovl . 1 i P -to 1 -be Pro fer\i 4rV '/ -4\n5w ti cuway i aatecoac clefichirkit 4nei acvto G�\. me 5h 4 L-U,af Ai1e ntx4 deck • iDstile. WV' Pakflaktt i 5DoulS fernebaer c1C 1 keno tYr,d + Y Lou.ld crC 1- & dCe.d me (xi) atL,. Ake *a de is I at +he gtri 4icf We/4 Inver -1 a Y * fest- o -'C 1n►S Cell PeNithl VcoPec'1Y -b demo ne W +\ rroWii away roluf was Imo, vuh►ch -Re Pla;fifi'4' euk 4-k4 oVer 2 oo eAceS a Le Gal Th etra; I w are VGA fv +wo Alin La 1-6. Glii I'60 S. Paine, V. Klemm L4 at 3i- 1 PO A9 , RIME £f cc l 3: Ia- c v 1�3a M.0 PA luhcfaceae e xh l 13 ;Is , decla -6 s, et- v;dA.v, s v+lhi,h u'1`e. Cf►} i Cal art, . \he b1f orae Cc,SeS (o i h Gln V-cas The PkinI ', " Case 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Document 1 Filed 08/21/13 Page 9 of 14 q,o6 -b +he des -mitt on of +h esti QakeS ; %e f JGe,in- ri 10 hove_ ScAV6-4i +hese Met S i n ©r* 10 Su Ve 1 -he_ Sa7 nytY'Y.3 t;erst-ni ©t +i1C fl % V) i 0 c iSfY\isS -+had U Ji N be -t Meal by de J d(V \S etc .4,l 1;+4erneY ;r1 +he newt' - 'uAu,Y',e,.. 301 AS well cts 5400A +hz Pkinftfrs lSSues. he W;Sh io 6Gn( u\P in Vis �t'ity►;hal co$e i h wh;ch -the Piutn}if' have Lair e Actin's 4k t Vie Cr,,,n C e4 back in coai Lunde. Neuw1Y d;sc. ove d ev.v►dahfe 1n PlafthAM CAA auk (Ase dmrialsci,Vetn, Att i V •tac.v ►k , f , ib g' l s L 1.-ic cede 21.. SAGA d u°ms wl, a.h are re & e umd-ex +1-,c Lau/. • 31. Alc0 31 lattftic.. Vc oks Luce. +lhrbwn awcY .:Tk- +he Pla;niNe had. +o e SA -u M 5a AA he LOW Carne lb weleaitotd i m le men 4 v►Ab hid evcildY Lim , �1S a. nous t 411e_ ; s -lold +o s-kAdy S.. Lec,tn ate% Islam , KS d - e Pcohecr ns ct God (Allah) S. by -Nes ee.,61ialrAY t LRanS DecrAckAvris Zee tle>r L TaAccon �14e. Plain414 was. noi M110t4 4b d.6 46°s. 2:2 Nine_ f)er n l P ked o S &Jas Gc.I JO.Ys -1\,rd/n atA -Coe n$ ©-Sher t Y'eG.,Son be 4 o fm-Valiale k. £ St not -o have anY ehat bi his cii tY rn�m�,bers. 33 , D h March I 13 the Plainfr('#' Semi a Ce©ueS'1 511Q 4o eleictriant WhaleJ1 \i I.AnA ManaGei' +he ou- 6e.inG \A/11a+ \.0.QPen +e, 4,s Merit St. reouedrn d (e;mburs4rnevrf r -kh e nlPAnAcl,brt o ' -lne 5a;a S detY . ©he of AA& da.YY tat -et deeAdani VIlalpev) came_ 40 16. fiwhAV 'SC etl dcr E-A` a a aSr, the Piai i4i "Do he Pec Y tva.ve -fib da 411.67 No -t lArde1'Skevtcl i A t 4 v e C u e S4►`dn -Na t lcu n'i itY ask. cle drkn1 W 4,c,levl ' V16.4 �ci Z n ( 0,106LA- 3� wh<.ti 1.eud `ter +he ddeAclet 4 Jo S-tijc %he .P0VOw,y)c Li ok i d6n 1 I,atve Vane_ foe 4\ 8u1s1, ►i-. `f he ° Y ,S1.,'1 4hut+ my ©-ticef'S Atm 4./AM twos wha+ You fold +heni wash,i►'Gh�? Case 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Document 1 Filed 08/21/13 Page 10 of 14 �'he �:►n1 i ae616 ihtiA k +c7ld deSerAcorAs Du.c vt tie der 4 Atm 6146•Y Stu&N. PdMit01 whaler +hcn s c.(1-hucS no+ whale 1Y O'' S aSe. SoYi n t L - +W S not what I 'M Gain G w An Also N'Ine. arm You. nok4o -6 kiAlkkon : ane o n A 4hoi etsred de-fry/dart VJ 1naken Wo; cbsetet me G,G PdvAck.thel, have io do veA ) x r OttGei S ('e-kol;ak,nb allans-4 roe hecouSt i VAL Gri`EvavicP C Lowsudre 3L In ttill;t6 cidcyritiot V/64en 4usibee &fed `1-11na4 ;- has evew-Ihint 10 do \nt`r11i °+.&, VeciAY Arta 1-o 66 4o PA(G.1(oi +t' 1341-er S-lbf 64Ghin6 C.Drfitia;ximt, algal di. &nV it. au 4-IlloGs MV trF ic.ea do rof (, ! & -Rier► Wo,IICel tocn +he ? n4 'S loot' YL 6n 6valaoksk 66o,sch ITh ai' li% k 13 -Fhe 04:004# fece.ved an echswcr +b the t`et e�-leb SIiQ , See t�,�t�� 1e&e►esl -Yor'l tioAr tYnc c 1N�a �en 40�ein .7h&\ •Ne enl i Items ems 1A' al was A'\IT0Wh iia'/ GJa.S Winat i +old t'ne oV :Ze#'S GJGS 3t. D h i1 ,nh ao+h 3d1 the Pvink4 decAed Gr ibtance. 6L-441►n i nG �>ne Ve61; cLAoi'Y S- r aWY Qci1U1 e1 1 detrrdavil S Z►c Zlet' , lDucah unit enamzer Whaerr . See. et.-1-ru.h t oei oct +he Ga'�EvcknERe. 31.?et' De' r�0 ci tock wkc.h dads wAn +he 'D. b.0 Griar nce. Pf6zes S 1-k def.rl`l S-Ictk6 £ &rd-er S,e c 'oh ane 1 r i EVanCe inAca_l revckw Sv�SC%�ian (22 `"T'1ne. Sica Olegaer &Ala Serves aS 41,e (r�&Vance bWC.esi MM 1 c#" be_ d'ttc lY ittv6Iva ar named at,S 16C Subs-eg the_ CLr iaiarce. .'Thi S in ude ( Se&on A I $ 92 A6w ;hc OrtiA4t bel:ves 41nu'k 4 e_ Grkvunce Coot d; y4140( kno j 4 t)' v,CvY dive. &coda 'h 4>1ts Qt'akLo..A / Proced e_ 4o t©n0,ct' w�h de't.vldunkc. ZteGlet• Ducart WhG►Ier IIV kADWnc defedarri- 4alth is n6, 6oints fo inves-Ic�c��e 1,�s 11ct wilt he. C�,4nG . bi S Qfedelerrnine b aS Since tl�cb! himset c ,tier''S have, oY' CNe �,°m. Case 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Document 1 Filed 08/21/13 Page 11 of 14 `11a-;cs c,Evanc e, wad �n ;'he Satr'le. Gr6L.nds cis 4r. fteiY' reb&AeS1 1116,A to u, S SLAn rn;Ned back on -I\e ! I X11 & PAGAr n a nl3 41-44 1, c Seal io d enJo.n-1 \Aiden by 41,e Pkingfct la, In an 4,-11 Q; Save -MIS rnci:Nrg 4Ye Sulorn 14ei Q Keconci leVd. &PQe.6 +o -the s11Y NicaloLor IAOSTY . \iv\iNk_ (1 cAGS also denied. SoWY ©i the Gradkis 4cck. the I�ii�n�'d'' did nok Acl ctS one co66 �ft,�ms-tha-►s h;S POe t iu 111'Gcl`II cleAtc;k6 "r_cli_,sSe. -41nc 1P1G;vhIr ' Wctacc► -Gt1 ga% c 4b ao13 4o VAQ, Scczoci Jt& fCSR e tom 501 -Haet • 'IS Ve.t% IAC Min C04 a.rl inmate has IS WcXVCi nh claY Tem the Ini vrk 70 Vae ticn 6tZAkAnZe cii l thrl Int;ckJ)4, See, Gri(U.Lncc,cQ ufre.. Dc -ADM i celuce... 'i WlintICi -Nen , &Aiinkick 3 et ral 6 ► . n r:n4.1 ilPI.a 1 A11 t S G.rii1Wnze Vvt% dam &.11 Ce6u,iY'cd Pak' S which aye , A Cce' Ahe lnalcd Gcaevance. ce dk. -6-r e -km bort manct6ei' Ullx[eh . A Cc51°Y 6 ��e SeLbnd 1eve1, c F 061 - tc .c;A:\I matter, i%e Lc6AN S Mowzer S tesibrise , Li,?! 411e. Conccaoti � I�P S PfoU;h G GW eitiSlI t Y of -111.e DeS4YolcIA Pr c4lY k -the AQ t + 40.c ,4 y Ma ber r -es disel tt.114,kh41 Aver i1c VA-Alie .�n days '{-imAtotne ce,llaverl W 4.1 ALV S , Cu`i (Ai b. s sitclinc 4 hal P(& nt c d r t no -4 m 4i e r'�c �(Y Pcar S 4410:4 Gt ittkalce. oCQ. er ,11v i nve ci d Z/, &mS , See i 1�►� 14 Pe.c.�c�en. PIP77 Case 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Document 1 Filed 08/21/13 Page 12 of 14 kr 1 1 Et ebuL'te cL aclims tale eLvrts 40bex 3d1nh Doe_ Corski-kat a 404 Llo,.imc £off' breech off 4\'ei? dca- f ID Pfbi-ec± 'The l?laivrl! Propetskv ,crora bei t Ibs'4 br 1LLeC. 'I d-e.Oroteb wiTbucl due Pta�tss 6r fe&SGil ,l S-tePS 4 Qfv'en4 harm Come - h; S fro&er44 (AvIdev 1i4eir L&r� . LL►s�d�O, in.-, ac46s o-' d-efc,nd anis , 3Q I Do -e Cc n S-frtu e a 'ior-4 C. h i m '�dr brec,cln of -1-1,1` duly 110,x/ tDeParhYf 'rf o Cour i)vis ir C ieS. Procce 64 thrall SRAes 1 v I +lieY Slnaula (lo! ivit Shun tae. lama -es i rorer# Lender Aneir Cam $, Litille actions cAN dei larrk Docan V;a amid ,1- r; /.1yk it 6e Ae.e. -from re6,l1.6,%ton Vac ;1;)111) & .S.brn»+ y, 1'CV nceS b LW,dS l.kx 4 LSSucs \i 'o(A oh S c ' Lti.S ohsi,l, { (ah qci. e cams s£ de{'er,davtt z . clef r V 1'o (C-tes . 1E1 Ct,lYlend.m f,` t -�n 4,62einl P ch Mm 41eY In&dicoctilV des -1n P16.;(141) Pi eciec\ Let rYlai;er►'al VINkievs 41vc Paff 'to 4-11144 to the Lou_r-ts, ci-etefdayris � e filer i DtAC a n , W Vieh vioierief PlaW' "S Vim amedErile44 deca,lin G WtlA due roes b�4 `11aY, f 4tlowin Pia;atiff Q due f foc-,ss mare Jac -601.N f e`cSonal keit 6 Vii‘S.. N 7111e. r `ons o oielcndanIC 2_ ie Clef auc&el /Who levy. (�4uo ConSif PctN f lCh6Wly �L w Y' �h �Ili�flGty LanLP;N„-4-6G,s4hcr -10 Pe`IA.1;6.ae tidainst 4-k 'MICA -Pt ferAAAse 1-11t Pla.d� -r ,' c5, La.WSu��S, e,n� C1'rCVrtYIc SIAA VO -RE1 164' VlikEkagNe Plaln-l-i-N e�ec}#'�11Y ()NIT 4-lti a 4h,s e6c ar4 en -ler Jucice Meryl �ruhl�nG the Main VIt S o (Id1M n el d Case 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Document 1 Filed 08/21/13 Page 13 of 14 ttl � L.Declus6111 3u kemcnk 46, &c -k & otn6 on S \cd idcin lakes +fie Q‘01t-. S f2;0\ -K, M\vJaki L dmPef\SuisY ciLdrwheS i n -Ne a.m6ar4 tneo -1 su .idle_ kinder LAN Ntlyt Am mimed de c..i4i Awaid Quo,, kve &maks. i r1 - e. s.trr,.,n-E rn6s{ S AaLle c trifle( L W Vim \ ull named, dgcndon-ES. 0, Awctr& N6t i o l Dairtae,s f., Aid Akorft'I Pee, S in asc .lk limcx,44 wide ✓' L aft/ Jerry to/ i d triVor £k ni i 131e Ltrr6 YL aW,, ArY itit 16 oR KesPeckalv Sulohlied BY f%o Se oSl,��. PY'o °shut( ?tithe loco-oU1►'eS (� Q DMA& & lehIG a R Filed 08/21/13 a) E 0 0 cNAME 7C611i,if} P nt., NUMBER QS9 CC -State Correctional Institution at Dallas 01000 Follies Road NDallas, Pennsylvania 18612 INMATE MAIL SPA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS co a) cvi U FecovE° sccokolu4i vea aw E.PtstlGLE�K INMATE MAIL i..t.iS D th (_ L( k w� .N ;35 N 1,46‘1116 V oYi 14V2. gbGo)C I Iq( Sr ekn- an PA t 46S " l RS PIrCS :40F ®7.7ig. vairet,0111M0 ISI MI V MAWS 02 1R $ 01.72° 0006553756 AUG 19 2013 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 1 861 2 United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania (Scranton) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Payne v. Ducan et al Assigned to: Honorable Robert D. Mariani Cause: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights PROSE Date Filed: 08/21/2013 Jury Demand: Defendant Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff Joshua Payne represented by Joshua Payne GQ5980 SCI - Dallas SPECIAL MAIL - OPEN ONLY IN THE PRESENCE OF THE INMATE 1000 Follies Road Dallas, PA 18612 PRO SE V. Defendant Ducan represented by Jeffrey M. Paladina Chief Counsel's Office Pennsylvania Department of Corrections 1920 Technology Parkway Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 717-728-7763 Email: jpaladina@pa.gov A 11 'ORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant Adam Shane Huber TERMINATED: 04/23/2014 Defendant John Doe Defendant Scott Whalen TERMINATED: 04/23/2014 represented by Jeffrey M. Paladina (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED represented by Jeffrey M. Paladina (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant Ziegler represented by Jeffrey M. Paladina (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NO IDate Filed I # I Docket Text EXHIBIT B 4/2,1/24.13 1 COMPLAINT against Adam, John Doe, Ducan, Shane Huber, Scott Whalen, Ziegler, filed by Joshua Payne.(lh) (Entered: 08/21/2013) 08/21/2013 2 DECLARATION of Reuben Henry filed by Joshua Payne. (lh) (Entered: 08/21/2013) 08/21/2013 3 DECLARATION of Tarrell Rister filed by Joshua Payne. (lh) (Entered: 08/21/2013) 08/21/2013 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joshua Payne.(lh) (Entered: 08/21/2013) 08/21/2013 5 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION by Joshua Payne allowing prison to submit copy of prisoner's trust fund account to the court, and approving the entire filing fee to be deducted from prisoner inmate account.. (lh) (Entered: 08/21/2013) 08/21/2013 6 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER sent to Prison Superintendent/Warden (lh) (Entered: 08/21/2013) 11/06/2013 7 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Warden or other appropriate official shall, within ten (10) days of this Order, provide to the Court under oath, or declare under penalty of perjury, a statement of the current balance in the Petitioners inmate account and a record of the transactions in his account that have occurred within the preceding six (6) months. If the records are at another institution or if the records are for some reason unavailable, the Court should be so informed. In addition, the Court should be advised as to whether Petitioner has institutional employment and what his average monthly income from his job is.Signed by Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick on 11/6/2013. (cw) (Entered: 11/06/2013) 11/19/2013 8 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Joshua Payne. (cw) (Entered: 11/19/2013) 11/20/2013 9 ORDER granting 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - 1. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 4), is GRANTED.2. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue process to the United States Marshal, who shall serve Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 1) upon Defendants in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in order for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs claims. 3. The Clerk of Court is further directed to provide Plaintiff and Defendants with a form Notice and Consent to the Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. 4. The Defendants are requested to waive service pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Marshal will send the form Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons to Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick on 11/20/2013 (cw) (Entered: 11/20/2013) 11/20/2013 10 Summons Issued as to John Doe, Ducan, Adam Shane Huber, Scott Whalen, Ziegler and provided TO U.S. MARSHAL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: # 1 Summons Packet) (ts) (Entered: 11/20/2013) 12/03/2013 11 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to John Doe. (ao) (Entered: 12/03/2013) 01/13/2014 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey M. Paladina on behalf of Ducan, Adam Shane Huber, Scott Whalen, Ziegler (Paladina, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/13/2014) 01/13/2014 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Ziegler, Adam Shane Huber, Ducan, Scott Whalen. Ziegler waiver sent on 12/2/2013, answer due 1/31/2014; Adam Shane Huber waiver sent on 12/2/2013, answer due 1/31/2014; Ducan waiver sent on 12/2/2013, answer due 1/31/2014; Scott Whalen waiver sent on 12/2/2013, answer due 1/31/2014. (Paladina, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/13/2014) 01/28/2014 14 MOTION to Dismiss by Ducan, Adam Shane Huber, Scott Whalen, Ziegler. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Paladina, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/28/2014) 01:2'2044 15 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ducan, Adam Shane Huber, Scott Whalen, Ziegler. (Attachments: # 1 Unpublished Opinion(s) 04-4713, # 2 Unpublished Opinion(s) 09-3443, # 3 Unpublished Opinion(s) 11-1755, # 4 Unpublished Opinion(s) 12- 3317, # 5 Unpublished Opinion(s) 11-1299, # 6 Unpublished Opinion(s) 12-2085, # 7 Unpublished Opinion(s) 11-1482)(Paladina, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/28/2014) 01/29/2014 16 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Joshua Payne.(lh) (Entered: 01/29/2014) 02/14/2014 17 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Joshua Payne.(ao) (Entered: 02/14/2014) 02/14/2014 18 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Joshua Payne.(bg) (Entered: 02/14/2014) 02/25/2014 19 ORDER denying 16 Motion to Appoint Counsel Signed by Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick on 2/25/2014 (cw) (Entered: 02/25/2014) 04/02/2014 20 REQUEST for copy of docket sheet by Joshua Payne. (lh) (Entered: 04/02/2014) 04/02/2014 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Sent docket sheet to Joshua Payne per his request. (lh) (Entered: 04/02/2014) 04/24/2014 21 MEMORANDUM - Defendants' partial motion to dismiss will be granted. Unit Manager Whalen and Officer Huber will be dismissed from the Complaint. Plaintiff will be permitted to proceed with his claim ofretaliation against Officers Duncan and Ziegler. All other claims in the Complaint will be dismissed. An appropriate Order follows.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/23/14. (jfg) (Entered: 04/24/2014) 04/24/2014 22 ORDER 1. The partial motion to dismiss (Doc. 14) is GRANTED: A. Defendants Whalen and Huber are DISMISSED from the Complaint entirely and the Clerk ofCourt is directed to TERMINATE them as parties to this action; B. Plaintiff is permitted to proceed with his claim of retaliation against Defendants Duncan and Ziegler related to the cell search; and, C. All other claims in the Complaint are DISMISSED. 2. Any appeal will be deemed frivolous, lacking merit, and not taken in good faith. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/23/14. (jfg) (Entered: 04/24/2014) 05/08/2014 23 ANSWER to 1 Complaint by Ducan, Ziegler.(Paladina, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/08/2014) PACER Service Center Transaction Receipt 05/12/2014 13:59:16 PACER Login: cc0489 Client Code: Description: Docket Report Search Criteria: 3:13-cv-02203-RDM Billable Pages: 3 Cost: 0.30 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JOSHUA I. PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. WHALEN, et al., Defendants : CIVIL ACTION LAW : NO. 14-2654 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I am this day depositing in the U.S. Mail a true and correct copy of the foregoing Preliminary Objections to be served upon the person(s) and in the manner indicated below. Service by first-class mail addressed as follows: Joshua Payne, GQ5980 SCI -Dallas 1000 Follies Road Dallas, PA 18612 Mary E. Wasner Legal Assistant Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Office of Chief Counsel 1920 Technology Parkway Mechanicsburg, Pa 17050 Dated: May 23, 2014 1 �) �►,e csx�r� b eyAntron f le. C_ ,m ei\oati PerWAV6,ma, jos a )041)Q. 'J. 2ak(\eC, \kuLktAI1. \e A 70h\/S'o, a DoEl teiemvArxk Coy \r L NA}.) Cocke_ -the QlakkA`O axhi.D.vec's -Policy►,.i►n6 ;ity ( eR-Nu 00 k``Cik►rta VaoQe yf C'vrn06CS an ©i &oQet-W, Nese S r `.0,,A16d aa rAeo\ AAA 64\C ca\ b v'eS‘'c .X411 a*. \AbkatoAS SA4z. icc\ 6ANEL be ept . C,Saa atioct &_?Sh.'"Aceatfielk! i4 -(9c0 q avi[Tent 1. �s is 6ou6\A- In \le. CcLek. OktiCtnc\ & Luetrkitst:dAirk tS G. eco f e4.4 SCt VaL\1rc. iCo 'o\\►es P P€d\cSik. a �.-These. itaend �6cA time tR.�- sal- r`pLAI 'art\t QoiSox and LIAM tzootk barn ts‘t, ciece(lc\(as itve_ krtimAA0\5 6c *Nee.. LOADA we Att & Culfebvt.ilick \Ncitiht. o S C.1- C_ t iNk p. b a Q oX ao6 L,t lka Qa t7col-dam tucks +he. fie_ Owner t 3'1 lSkCrnic ce\ttauc ecc* trAg Q\G X\Y1 P 6i5 X17 4 do B_t4 noir 40. NA -PiveY \Ja.1(AQ .01 -ke. n� g 1, . ciabM 4. Sw.A "P\oak-h WOS 64, �:Cii. 64 1', Celt. k4c \XAI hcZS lndt de_u1—Lc S c\e__ 4,6.kA:vg. 6.014 AVQ, aa& 6.,-Ack-eAbn -I-\Ne. baet:4 (*Ajar sok cle_teiri&k4 Latiac %, nc) flU C' C.4iT \IAA decen 's n % ?\r€c LL,q -thy S kaPJA tAAticiA° ‘4e_ Me_ gine. 4.1.as c_.a..k waic. -lA A- Ctik 1,49 -Pan t cod& c A (\AAA" AA -1.6,i ciuMnaviz, Itothe. r Ae... 6_,A\ Ov4lk- € b 9 tI'1 Ot`5 acv c, at,k Ya.A. Volk ck-kids Ako.°s\,. Lai IL 'e e ttLaVO `,� ��,ue� - ,�5 11A ck-ketvick4 \galte Steefi s r�o� Gj\ ckv 1 t o w A L Lam' 1i t - v r% C 60, 40 PoiuX.G° ki (i ? NAU lx.SL clakcittki. caglk.AN.A.E:-AV do me 66ivIc 40 kioduteLktbA yeus tate cc vd44: te~ ,\ tiyq GacEAZSt ine. Wee& ce c,kc k WlncARSI Uetle.L \ 1k kto evdVALIA L fo 60 (AAA L A .8_ 1k 11.A Mr- tea`f 4ArYin tI L 4,0 t loe.4r S J b1kt..lna14 1 ADA 6_1\y IAA& tai -l-vas va choicer c6". la 0A 6- 134k Pi(M tke tece►ve 1 Veal ReCA 1°E e, S`% s. 4,,LA L ter p Ue_ 1lcc, Q'c*ci s -6 6A 46, rna.`IN. c 013 , - -Ke._ lob +INA \ve. 4iern h V.\Q. G.. G'ci c3.s C_� iJ ic�,�' G i ► G� � C i\0 �� NI -6_ 66'3 uutis ..L\AAN movida ori 104A Vele-a. tyc.11 ca 1y &cleft 1ft-e_ 6611 S-.e.n► a over ;Z.; 60hia. lnu S 1-1‘ e01 4.4 -€Ln •. o.(1,ts b Lp_rta e ke...1 od c,n41 ( -to VeArt&tC L X \&, %flied X615 st.;€\tate o►.\t evelt E Lcon c4k. case. •+\\ o .kkP€4, (C\ti\Aeg.. a.MAcst%4-1past cite_ e_ h0 fit` Oso..A me. viorne. S-kAt- tti 6S . QoVs-k(xtaextks , (Nra'k®S c ' -ire GV Ae. Sem Lem zS ADM v 1US % Vie_ to -k fact 4he {)0. Aok 1'c-re\7e PJ cA -'e Pt`s Itss PaRel`S 6ct t_ P it \t have 'ta C c Cea�tl iA�n&. Sc, ► ear IrxiA V\ L th4— mkt Volut ch dt 4c1.12, ptvikar.o (` \€3('e L&ih1,6o��e 1,Ce.1ESc do .k1ne Svc\ +NA 46/ marc_ nvk- the mae.. Lk 40 Pub eL f64te- of\ tfcau-k& rn�u�n� o ovfy 4 'Ito. ea Wil`\as " . Like_ Sa, � Ce 11'� tl(Ae t� (J AVB_ Varc i bwtteli e Qe ihesQ I s unk a eLkanclostVs Icay, 1 e ts\e.‘e A a\eY' cowl +0Ge4 j 4o Ce_\.6Ae_ MAL. . (AV 1\le. PIckiYA, t 1i�t b CKSt_e.`C. tL.LeivM V yiWk& ‘fLie.r id019 Oefa4Y'kVN?el bA^c6VO 5 ket SonYet. @.. -Ne.y cue ► . pin . Zr e.L t -6 my ce.l. awe 10A s Y�Vu VtaX i1G.`v`( s A. aW \ NLAh CVe 'o Csa.k6V PaklY6 hv,7rnA'icke iAccia0 kif ct 014AeS N's,50(teks, vA\ ter& LL'Yo,,,. \ r1 l` 112 cok 1 \v_.sat! Ve', 4 1 Loo,A 1e hb cote_ Cie& LaLoSitA.S ec.&likv 4� ?' f \. o' 4„,„s the. Sy t Pc1kV&C_ \icau,e_ A,esp._ Qko os Otikelem because. d�k e4 ktholv h ey e tvd- (t&re, Tot Ret::.t EV �, V ► ek-Er -6-Vioac c9e.a k \ ro\i)..kea () Liv\ ` 'PenvVlliutitAA cat s . .ikzA •%bn o LeAcdc/Aquktun c Qsd N Violck-es Site vadiAt v)teAl* AS 1%. kassk.. toode,m0AorY t.,es ► h -rh e iktkowitk. a flub() Aw a,tk cc.s��` kI NR . acx!lv►oc..es i n 4.2.. it uv c i a .000 T fart eac h ciAeyclak ao A 'i •k\tc;.,\ I I1e.4eciel &nY euV t r %l blc d AdeNt ( . Mayn acs{U .ta m6 /Obi La—okkkies Sck Dotkc PiDt tt(9Va. Cit\IWL C_Du M T LCjiikt\Nti\J --1AS t'T (\_. tnaLANI C.tunkY Pet\IVAITA- NUL, \!. CL\r\;\,,:„\e_h - Ge_•Lf-• 5.vc, --(1N(1 Teat- .00 C-i5Ne-C\C7Va C VP_S TS:SLC L. (st.C.A0h Art, ,(5-1-c,AQ..nn-n4S (.7C )usKY ic-CNA DejY1COlt_ CLca-,\-4\c fl, is cc ry,ced,t -\,c_ ecAc)\,v't 6 APle-ficie u (.1 C..),(1�n Li --)3\d \ e_ r_Cf_4-) 6-jc_ 01a3 -SCk.k.)e_c1 « (A\ c__, sd.k 1.0 (AA A.,•61,1 • :A_ LA-Vha 4:t , Wy Is aolg S16 ,feA tVn reo C,L.C-tc6c ib:Jc VDlue__S fc..0 li'cL 11--A(Asin \\\1...\\\-e_ bmc,,r\ (1)• (._.,.x.i\q\e_rLz:Ln Lc.DLL,\Y ,\ nns\), I vanAa. (t)0; \Ni1u.\ NA -6.0(\ -g-a\r\E- #1-Al\r-)-6;Zie9e Dc\NN YA7'6bk e dic54 eiv4Term CALS Niv,AA t,rt C_ovSY C>1 Ci\A P k- \-70e1 tsaoiLi \‘,6, k)efifiSzo„S rr rn cn r— zcj > • k\r\ (Al I 1(1 t ntct 6 M '()(6_ r 4.,gr•df%)(taP-- ,-4.407Sk C) / / • sc-A, CL DICKIE, MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE, P.C. BY: Thomas M. Chairs, Esquire ATTORNEY I.D. NO. 78565 BY: Aaron S. Jayman, Esquire ATTORNEY I.D. NO. 85651 Plaza 21, Suite 302 425 North 21st Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 717-731-4800 (Tele) 888-811-7144 (Fax) ATTORNEY FOR: HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL GLENN B. STONER and BARBARA S. STONER, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D., IND. AND D/B/A MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D., P.C. D/B/A PHYSICIANS OF REHABILITATION, INDUSTRIAL AND SPINE MEDICINE, P.C.; HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG, LLC, D/B/A HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG; RUPEN G. MODI, D.O.; HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL; AND EMCARE MEDICAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA P.C. OR NEW JERSEY/PENNSYLVANIA EM -I MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C., Defendants. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 1'40. '14-28311 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE ACTIiu rn cis I— D Q -a JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ENTRY OF APPEARANCE TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Please enter the appearance of the undersigned as counsel for Defendant, HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A Holy SPIRIT HOSPITAL, in the above -captioned matter. Date: May 23. 2014 By: Respectfully submitted, DICKIE, MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE, P.C. Thomas M. Chairs, Esquire Attorney I.D. No. 78565 Aaron S. Jayman, Esquire Attorney I.D. No. 85651 Plaza 21, Suite 302 425 North 21st Street Camp Hill, PA 17011-2223 717-731-4800 Attorney for Defendants, HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND NOW, May 23, 2014, I, Thomas M. Chairs, Esquire, hereby certify that I did serve a true and correct copy of the foregoing ENTRY OF APPEARANCE upon all counsel of record by depositing, or causing to be deposited, same in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, at Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, addressed as follows: By First -Class Mail: Richard Angino, Esquire ANGINO & LUTZ, P.C. 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (Counsel for Plaintiff) Th@)as M. Chairs, Esquire DICKIE, MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE, P.C. BY: Thomas M. Chairs, Esquire ATTORNEY I.D. NO. 78565 BY: Aaron S. layman, Esquire ATTORNEY I.D. NO. 85651 Plaza 21, Suite 302 425 North 21st Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 717-731-4800 (Tele) 888-811-7144 (Fax) ATTORNEY FOR: HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL GLENN B. STONER and BARBARA S. STONER, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D., IND. AND D/B/A MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D., P.C. D/B/A PHYSICIANS OF REHABILITATION, INDUSTRIAL AND SPINE MEDICINE, P.C.; HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG, LLC, D/B/A HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG; RUPEN G. MODI, D.O.; HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL; AND EMCARE MEDICAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA P.C. OR NEW JERSEY/PENNSYLVANIA EM -I MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C., Defendants. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 14-2831 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE ACTION JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DEFENDANT HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT AND NOW, comes Defendant, HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL, by and through its counsel, Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C. and files the within DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT as follows: 1. Plaintiffs initiated this medical professional negligence action with the filing of a Complaint on May 8, 2014. See Exhibit A. 2. According to Plaintiffs' Complaint, Plaintiffs allege that several physicians and institutional providers were negligent in their care and treatment of Plaintiff, Glenn B. Stoner in May 2012. 3. Generally, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants over -anticoagulated Mr. Stoner causing an intradural hematoma from T6 -T10. Mr. Stoner was subsequently taken to the OR for T6-8 laminectomies and evacuation of intradural hematoma. Plaintiffs allege that despite the surgery, Mr. Stoner now suffers paraplegia, chronic lower extremity neurologic defects, bladder/bowel incontinence, and permanent decline in his functionality. See generally, Exhibit A. ¶¶ 9-56. 4. Defendant, Holy Spirit Hospital, now timely files the following preliminary objections to Plaintiffs' Complaint. I. PRELIMINARY OBJECTION TO STRIKE AGENCY ALLEGATIONS FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE ANY MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF THOSE CLAIMS IN VIOLATION OF PA.R.C.P. 1019(A) 5. Paragraphs 1 through 4 set forth above are incorporated herein by reference. 6. In addition to Defendant Modi and radiologist, Richard P. Moser, III, M.D., Plaintiffs' Complaint also contains unnamed and unidentified individuals whom are alleged to be the employees and agents of Holy Spirit Hospital. See ¶¶ 56, 81, and 83. 7. Plaintiffs, however, do not in any way attempt to identify, name or describe any of these other alleged "employees" or "agents" of Holy Spirit Hospital. 8. Pennsylvania law requires that a Plaintiff must plead, at a minimum, facts that (1) identify the agent by name or appropriate description and (2) set forth the agent's authority and how the tortious acts of agent either fell within the scope of the authority, or if unauthorized, were ratified by the principle. Alumni Association v. Sullivan, 535 A.2d 1095 (Pa. Super. 1977). See also Richtlin v. Edmison, 813 A.2d 862 (Pa. Super. 2002). 9. Plaintiffs' failure to specifically plead their negligence allegations could permit Plaintiffs to later amplify the complaint to allege any act or omission by these unnamed alleged employees and agents of Holy Spirit Hospital. WHEREFORE, Defendant, Holy Spirit Hospital, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court dismiss these unsupported agency allegations, or, direct Plaintiffs to file an Amended Complaint specifically identifying the alleged employees and agents of Holy Spirit Hospital. II. DEMURRER TO ALLEGATIONS OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY AGAINST HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED 10. Paragraphs 1 through 10 set forth above are incorporated herein by reference. 11. In Count IV of the Complaint, Plaintiffs set forth their allegations of vicarious liability against Holy Spirit Hospital. 12. Plaintiffs' Complaint alleges, inter alia, vicarious liability against Holy Spirit Hospital with respect to Defendant Modi and radiologist, Richard P. Moser, III, M.D. 13. Dr. Moser is not a named Defendant in this matter. 14. There are no allegations of negligence or wrongdoing by Dr. Moser in Plaintiffs' Complaint. 15. Pennsylvania is a fact pleading state and as such, a complaint must not only give notice of what the plaintiff's claim is and inform the defendant of the grounds upon which it rests, but it must also formulate the issues by summarizing those facts essential to support the claim. See Pa.R.C.P. 1019(a); Seven v. Kelshaw, 417 Pa.Super. 1, 7, 611 A.2d 1232, 1235 (1992). 16. Pennsylvania law requires a plaintiff to disclose in the complaint the specific acts upon which the cause of action is based, so that the plaintiffs' proof may be confined to such actions, thus providing the defendant a reasonable opportunity to prepare a defense. See Baker v. Rangos, 324 A.2d 498 (Pa.Super. 1974); PennDot v. Shipley Humble Oil Co., 370 A.2d 438 (Pa.Cmwlth. 1977). 17. Here, Plaintiffs' allegations of vicarious liability are supported solely by reference to the actions of Defendant physician, Dr. Modi and yet, Plaintiffs somehow also allege vicarious liability against Holy Spirit Hospital on behalf of the radiologist, Dr. Moser. 18. The facts alleged in Plaintiffs' Complaint do not involve Dr. Modi and do not place Holy Spirit Hospital on notice of any claims. 19. Since Plaintiffs have filed a Certificate of Merit in support of their vicarious liability claims against Holy Spirit Hospital, they have certified that a licensed professional has supplied a written statement that there exists a reasonable probability that the care, skill or knowledge exercised or exhibited in the treatment, practice or work that is the subject of the Complaint, fell outside acceptable professional standards and that such conduct was a cause in bringing about the harm. 20. Thus, Plaintiffs certainly should be in a position to provide Holy Spirit Hospital with all of the factual bases for their vicarious liability claims in this case. 21. Plaintiffs, however, have failed to include any facts in the Complaint to apprise Holy Spirit Hospital of the manner in which they allege the Hospital was vicariously liable for the actions of Dr. Moser. 22. Holy Spirit Hospital is at a loss to understand what basis exists to support a vicarious liability cause of action with respect to Dr. Moser. 23. Defendant, Holy Spirit Hospital respectfully requests that this Honorable Court dismiss the alleged vicarious liability claims as to Dr. Moser with prejudice. WHEREFORE, Defendant, HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter the attached Order dismissing all references to the unnamed and unidentified individuals alleged to be the employers and agents of Holy Spirit Hospital, and all claims of vicarious liability against Holy Spirit Hospital with respect to Richard P. Moser, III, M.D. Respectfully Submitted, DICKIE, MCC •MEY & CHILCOTE, P.C. Date: May 28. 2014 By: _ iS41 �1l�i Thomas M a., squire Attorney I.D. No. 78565 Aaron S. Jayman, Esquire Attorney I.D. No. 85651 Plaza 21, Suite 302 425 North 21st Street Camp Hill, PA 17011-2223 717-731-4800 Attorney for Defendant, HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL EXHIBIT A ANGINO & LUTZ, P.C. Richard C. Angino, Esquire Attorney 1D0: 07140 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 (717) 238-6791 FAX (717).238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) E -Matt : rea( anginolutz.corn GLENN B. STONER and BARBARA S. STONER, Husband and Wife, V. Plaintiffs MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D. INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D., P.C. D/B/A PHYSICIANS OF REHABILITATION, INDUSTRIAL AND SPINE MEDICINE, P.C.; HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG, LLC D/B/A HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG; RUPEN G. MODI, D.O.; HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL; AND EMCARE MEDICAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA, P.C. or NEW JERSEY/PENNSYLVANIA EM -I MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C., Defendants OF TNFILED-OFFICE' O n OTAnY 2014 Y 8 Pi1 3: 42 CUFg8ERLAyyt7 COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. ,11 c r3 I 04 -c-CriK CIVIL ACTION — LAW MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY ACTION JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NOTICE TO DEFEND You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and fling in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and judgment may be entered against you by the Court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you. C 4g317.i /22t. -36S-&) YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW. THIS OFFICE CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH. INFORMATION ABOUT HIRING A LAWYER. IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE A LAWYER, THIS OFFICE MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT AGENCIES THAT MAY OFFER LEGAL SERVICES TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS AT A REDUCED FEE OR NO FEE. Cumberland County Bar Association 32 South Bedford Street Carlisle, PA Telephone number- 717- 249-3166 AVISO USTED HA SIDO DEMANDADO/A EN CORTE. Si usted desea defenderse de las demandas que se persentan mas adelante en las siguientes paginas, debe tomar accion dentro de los proximos veinte (20) dias despues de la notificacion de esta Demanda y Aviso radicando personalmente o por medio de un abogado una comparecencia escrita y radicando en la Corte por escrito sus defensas de, y objecciones a , las demandas presentadas aqui en contra suya. Se le advierte de que si usted falla de tomar accion como se describe anteriormente, el caso puede proceder sin usted y un fallo por cualquier suma de dinero reclamada en la demanda o cualquier otra reclamacion o remedio solicitado. por el demandante puede ser dictado en contra suya por la Corte sin mas aviso adicional. Used puede perder dinero o propiedad u otros derechos importantes para used. USTED DEBE LLEVAR ESTE DOCUMENTO A SU ABOGADO INMEDIATAMENTE. SI USED NO TIENE UN ABOGADO, LLAME 0 VAYA A LA SIGUIENTE OFICINA. ESTA OFICINA PUEDE PROVEERLE INFORMACION A CERCA DE COMO CONSEGUIR UN ABOGADO. SI USED NO PUEDE PAGAR POR LOS SERVICIOS DE UN ABOGADO, ES POSIBLE QUE ESTA OFICINA LE PUEDA PROVEER INFORMACION SOBRE AGENCIAS QUE OFREZCAN SERVICIOS LEGALES SIN CARGO 0 BAJO COSTO A PERSONAS QUE CUALIFICAN. Cumberland County Bar Association 32 South Bedford Street Carlisle, PA Telephone number- 717- 249-3166 551700 2 ANGINO & LUTZ, P.C. Richard C. Angino, Esquire. Attorney Illll: 07140 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 171101708 (717)238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) E-MAIL: rc i an inolutz.corh GLENN B. STONER and BARBARA S. STONER, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs V. MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D. INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D., P.C. D/B/A PHYSICIANS OF REHABILITATION, INDUSTRIAL AND:SPINE MEDICINE, P.C.; HEALTHSOU1'H REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG, LLC D/B/A HEALTHSO1 JTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG; RUPEN G. MODI, D.O.; HOLY SPIRIT; HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL; AND EMCARE MEDICAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA, P.C. or NEW JERSEY/PENNSYLVANIA EM -I MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C., Defendants Attorne s for Plaintiff s IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO, ILI 03,-3) �lw1 CIVIL ACTION — LAW MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY ACTION JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiffs, Glenn and Barbara Stoner are married adult individuals who reside in New Cumberland, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 2. Defendant Michael F. Lupinacci, M.D. individually and d/b/a Michael F. Lupinacci, M.D., P.C. d/b/a Physicians of Rehabilitation Industrial and Spine (hereinafter 1 "Defendant Lupinacci"), is a physician. who specializes in physiatry. Defendant Lupinacci is licensed to practice medicine in Pennsylvania. At the time of the events stated herein, Defendant Lupinacci maintained offices in and regularly practiced medicine in Cumberland County. Plaintiff is asserting a medical professional liability claim against Defendant Lupinacci. A Certificate of Merit for this defendant is attached as Exhibit A. 3. Defendant HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Mech nicsburg, LLC d/b/a HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Mechanicsburg (hereinafter "I-Iea thSouth Rehab''), is a licensed healthcare facility providing inpatient rehabilitation services in Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. Plaintiff is asserting a medical professional liability claim against this Defendant. A Certificate of Merit for this Defendant is attached as Exhibit B. 4. At all relevant times, Defendant HealthSouth Rehab employed Defendant Lupinacci who was acting within the course and scope of his agency and employment for Defendant HealthSouth Rehab. 5. Defendant Rupen G. Modi, D.O. (hereinafter "Defendant Modi") is currently, and was at all times relevant to this Complaint, a physician licensed to practice medicine in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, specializing in emergency medicine. He is an employee, agent, and/or ostensible agent of Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital, Defendant EmCare Medical Services of Pennsylvania, P.C.., and/or Defendant New Jersey/Pennsylvania Em -I Medical Services, P.C., all of whom were doing business in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania at the time of events referenced in this Complaint. Plaintiff is asserting a professional liability claim against Defendant Modi. A Certificate of Merit is attached as Exhibit C. 6. Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital of the Sisters of Christian Charity d/b/a Holy Spirit Hospital (hereinafter "Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital") is a licensed healthcare facility 551700 2 providing a full range of medical services in Camp Hill, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. Plaintiff is asserting: a professional liability claim against Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital. A Certificate of Merit is attached as Exhibit D. 7. At all relevant times, Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital employed Defendant Modi who was acting within the course and scope of his agency and employment for Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital. 8. Defendant EmCare Medical Services of Pennsylvania, P.C. (hereinafter "Defendant EmCare") or New Jersey/Pennsylvania Em -I Medical Services, P.C. (hereinafter "Defendant Em -I Medical Services") are professional corporations created under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and/or New Jersey, which upon information and belief, provides management and physician staffing services for Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital's Emergency Department. At all times relevant hereto, Defendant EmCare and/or Defendant Em -I Medical Services employed Defendant Modi. Plaintiff is asserting a professional liability claim against Defendant EmCare and/or Defendant Em -I Medical Services. A Certificate of Merit is attached as Exhibit E. 9. The facts and occurrences hereinafter related took place on or about May 11, 2012 through May 17, 2012. 10. Plaintiff Glenn Stoner was 77 years old when on May 8, 2012, he was admitted to Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital, with right leg weakness and gait instability due to a Spinal AVM. 11. Prior to and at the time of his admission, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner had a mechanical heart valve and was on Coumadin daily. 551700 3 12. Plaintiff Glenn Stoner underwent a planned Neurosurgical intervention to correct this AVM on May 8, 2012. 13. Given!Plaintiff Glenn Stoner's history of AVR, he was postoperatively resumed on Coumadin with a Target INR of 2.5-3.5 14. In conjunction to Coumadin, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner was also placed on Lovenox until a therapeutic INk was achieved. 15. Plaintiff Glenn Stoner's anticoagulation regimen was to be started post- operatively at the direction of his Neurosurgeon and Cardiologist, and he was given Lovenox on May 10, 2012. 16. On May 11, 2012, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner was transferred to Defendant HealthSouth Rehab and was placed back on Coumadin by Dr. Timothy Walsh of Moffitt Heart and Vascular, along with the Lovenox he was already taking daily. 17. Defendant HealthSouth Rehab's dictated consultation stated, "He is being bridged with Lovenox until his Coumadin becomes therapeutic. The orders came from the hospital. WE will make sure that ?we put the appropriate range in the chart along with discontinuing the Lovenox once his INR is therapeutic." 18. On May 11, 2012 Plaintiff Glenn Stoner's 1NR value was 1.2. 19. On Mhy 11, 2012, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner is noted to have incontinence of bowel, and decreased sensory and strength in the right leg. 20. On th i morning of May 12, 2012, Mr. Stoner was given a dose of Lovenox 80 mg SQ at 6am per the orders. The INR value later the day is noted to be l .6 and Mr. Stoner is given Coumadin 5 mg at 913.m. 551700 4 21. On May 12, 2012, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner "still had some back pain", and began asking for Percocet for back pain through the next three days. 22. On the morning of May 13, 2012, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner was again given Lovenox 80 mg SQ. 23. On May 13, 2012, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner's INR value was 1.7. 24. Later that day, (although dated 5/12 2:30pm but noted at 5/13/12 at 1530pm by the nursing staff), an order was written to increase Lovenox l mg/kg sub Q q]2 hours D/C when INR > 2.5. 25. This new dose is higher than what was written on the preadmission assessment and the transfer records from Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital. The order in the MAR for the Lovenox is noted to lie Lovenox lmg/kg sub Q D/C when INR > 2.5. 26. This order was noted by nursing to start on May 14, 2012. Later that evening, Mr. Stoner was given Coumadin 7.5 mg per the order for an INR value on that of 1.7. 27. On May 14, 2012, Defendant Lupinacci evaluated Mr. Stoner and noted no new complaints. He was participating well in therapy. 28. On May 14, 2012, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner was given Lovenox 80 mg SQ at 6am and 6pm per the order. This is the first day Mr. Stoner was receiving Lovenox SQ twice in one day. 29. The INR value on May 14, 2012, was noted to be 2.0 and Plaintiff Glenn Stoner was given Coumadin 7.5mg in the evening. 30. On the morning of May 15, 2012, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner was given Lovenox 120 mg SQ at 6am. This Was higher than the previous dose. 551700 5 31. Plaintiff Glenn Stoner had an INR value of 2.4 on May 15, 2012, and was given Coumadin 7.5 on that evening. 32. On the night of May 15, 2012, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner received Percocet for back pain. 33. On May 15, 2012, team conference noted to check INR which had been increasing throughout the past three days. 34. Defendant Lupinacci noted Plaintiff Glenn Stoner had no new complaints. He Ii continues on Lovenok and Coumadin. He has buckling on the right with decreased dorsiflexion. Foot not clearing. Labs reviewed. 35. On the morning of May 16, 2012, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner was again given the higher dose of Lovenox at 120 mg SQ at 6ain with orders noted in MAR to discontinue Lovenox when INR above 2.5 kc 48 hours. 3 6. During the day on May 16, 2012, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner continued to require Percocet for his pain and with increased frequency as noted on the MAR. 3 7. Plaintiff Glenn Stoner's INR value later that day was 2.6. 38. Though intended for May 16, 2012, the order for Coumadin that day was written as 5/15 3:05 pm C adin 6 mg tonight. He was in fact given the Coumadin 6mg on the evening of May 16, 2012. 3 9. Plaintiff Glenn Stoner continued to require Percocet for pain relief overnight. 40. On the morning of May 17, 2012, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner was given Lovenox 120 mg SQ at 6am. This was as written in the MAR with orders to discontinue Lovenox when INR is above 2.5 x 48 hours. 41. Plaintiff Glenn Stoner's INR on May 17, 2012, was 3.9. 551100 6 42. Later that morning and only several hours after receiving Lovenox 120 mg SQ and despite having a therapeutic INR of 2.6 the previous day and 3.9 currently, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner was noted to have 10/10 back pain by 9:30 am. 43. By 10:40 am, Defendant Lupinacci noted that Plaintiff Glenn Stoner had increased lower extremity weakness, numbness, and decreased function on the right greater than the left. 44. Plaintiff Glenn Stoner was also noted by Defendant Lupinacci to have bladder incontinence and that these changes were a dramatic change over the past several hours. 45. The decision was made to transfer Plaintiff Glenn Stoner back to Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital for a MRI of this thoracic-lumbar spine and neurosurgical evaluation. 46. Mr. Stoner arrived in the Emergency Room at Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital by 1205pm and was seen by Defendant Modi the Emergency Physician. 47. At 1300, Plaintiff Stoner had lab work completed which resulted in his INR being recognized as 4.2. 4 8. An MRI was ordered at 1315. 49. Plaintiff Stoner was in the MRI at 1415. 5 0, Plaintiff Stoner was returned to the ED at 1515. 51. A subsequent MRI demonstrated intradural hematoma from T6 -T10. 52. At 1955, Dr. Sumas was called by Defendant Modi, and came to evaluate Plaintiff Glenn Stoner at 2100. 53. At 2043, Dr. Timothy Walsh evaluated Plaintiff Glenn Stoner and wrote "recommendations for FFP" to reverse the coagulopathy and that the patient will go "to OR tonight by Dr. Maria Elaina Sumas". 551700 7 54. At 2156, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner was taken to the OR for T6-8 laminectomies and evacuation of intradural hematoma by Dr. Powers. 55. Even with his rescue surgery, Plaintiff Glenn Stoner now suffers paraplegia, chronic lower extremity neurologic deficits and bladder/bowel incontinence and permanent decline in his functionality. 56. Plaintiff Glenn Stoner has substantial significant permanent injuries as the result of Defendants and their agents negligence and failure to conform within the standards of hospitals, rehabilitation hospitals and errors and omissions of nurses, physiatrists, emergency room physicians, radiologists and/or other individual health care providers. COUNT I—NEGLIGENCE GLENN B. STONER V. MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D., P.C. D/B/A PHYSICIANS OF REHABILITATION, INDUSTRIAL AND SPINE MEDICINE, P.C. 57. All prior paragraphs are incorporated herein by reference. 58. Defendant Lupinacci was negligent and careless in his substandard medical treatment of Plaintiff Glenn Stoner as follows: (a) Failure to continuously and properly monitor Plaintiff Glenn Stoner from his first arrival at Defendant HealthSouth Rehab; (b) Failure to properly dose and monitor medications, including but not limited to Lovenox and Coumadin, as administered to Plaintiff Glenn Stoner; (c) Failure to properly dose and monitor the effects of medications such as Lovenox and Coumadin; (d) Failure to more cautiously monitor Plaintiff Glenn Stoner when he developed leg buckling on May 15, 2012; (e) Failure to properly monitor Plaintiff Glenn Stoner's increasing 1NR levels; 551700 8 (f) Failure to follow-up with unclear orders to discontinue Lovenox 2 days after INR was therapeutic in a patient recently having undergone extensive spinal surgery and without such orders from the transferring facility; (g) Failure to recognize Plaintiff Glenn Stoner was being re -anticoagulated post- operatively beyond the safe therapeutic window; and (h) Failure to recognize Plaintiff Glenn Stoner's several days of back pain and progressive lower extremity weakness and numbness along with urinary retention and stool incontinence, which are signs of over -anticoagulation. 59. Defendant Lupinacci's negligence, as stated above, caused Mr. Stoner to suffer a intradural hematoma from T6 -T10. 60. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has been forced to incur and will in the future incur expenses for medical treatment, medications, and similar expenses, and claims are made therefor. 61. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has suffered lost earnings and earning capacity and a permanent diminution of his future earning capacity, and claims are made therefor. 62. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has suffered from and will in the future suffer from pain, suffering, humiliation, embarrassment, and loss of the ability to enjoy life's pleasures, and claims are made therefor. 63. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has suffered from a permanent disfigurement of his body, and claim is made therefor. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Glenn B. Stoner demands judgment against Defendant Michael F. Lupinacci, M.D. individually and d/b/a Michael F. Lupinacci, M.D., P.C. d/b/a Physicians of Rehabilitation, Industrial and Spine Medicine, P.C., in an amount in excess of Fifty Thousand ($50,000) Dollars, exclusive of interest and costs, and in excess of any amount requiring compulsory arbitration. 551700 9 COUNT II—VICARIOUS LIABILITY GLENN B. STONER V. HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG, LLC D/B/A HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG 64. All prior paragraphs are incorporated herein by reference. 65. All of Mr. Stoner's damages are the result of the negligent, careless, and substandard care provided to him by Defendant Lupinacci as stated above and/or other employees of Defendant HealthSouth Rehab that may be developed through discovery. 66. At all times relevant hereto, Defendant Lupinacci was an agent, servant, employee, and/or ostensible agent of Defendant HealthSouth Rehab acting within the course and scope of his employment or agency. 67. Defendant HealthSouth Rehab is vicariously responsible for the negligence of Defendant Lupinacci as stated herein and possibly other employees as may be developed through discovery. 68. As stated above, Dr. Lupinacci's negligence, for which Defendant HealthSouth Rehab is responsible, caused Mr. Stoner to suffer a intradural hematoma from T6 -T10 resulting in paraplegia, chronic lower extremity neurologic deficits and bladder/bowel incontinence and permanent decline in his functionality. 69. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has been forced to incur and will in the future incur expenses for medical treatment, medications, and similar expenses, and claims are made therefor. 70. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has a Medicare lien at this time (amount to be determined). 551700 10 71. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has suffered from and will in the future suffer from pain, suffering, humiliation, embarrassment, and loss of the ability to enjoy life's pleasures, and claims are made therefor. 72. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has suffered from a permanent disfigurement of his body, and claim is made therefor. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Glenn 13. Stoner demands judgment against Defendant HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Mechanicsburg, LLC d/b/a HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Mechanicsburg in an amount in excess of Fifty Thousand ($50,000) Dollars, exclusive of interest and costs, and in excess of any amount requiring compulsory arbitration. COUNT III—NEGLIGENCE GLENN B. STONER V. RUPEN G. MODI, D.O. 73. All prior paragraphs are incorporated herein by reference. 74. Defendant Modi was negligent and careless in his substandard medical treatment of Plaintiff Glenn Stoner as follows: 551700 (a) Failure to administer a rectal exam to check for perianal sensation and rectal tone; and no reflexes, and no actual quantified evaluation of Plaintiff Glenn Stoner's exact strength and sensation; (b) Failure to communicate with the radiologist, who read the May 17, 2012, MR1 report, to confirm the radiologist made someone aware of this neurosurgical emergency and at what time; (c) Failure to immediately bring the Neurosurgeon on call to the bedside for immediate neurosurgical decision on next strategy for care; and (d) Failure to immediately reverse the anticoagulation by using Vitamin K and FFP. 11 75. Defendant Modi's negligence, as stated above, caused Mr. Stoner to suffer delay to evacuation of the culprit spinal hematoma. 76. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has been forced to incur and will in the future incur expenses for medical treatment, medications, and similar expenses, and claims are made therefor. 77. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has suffered lost earnings and earning capacity and a permanent diminution of his future earning capacity, and claims are made therefor. 78. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has suffered from and will in the future suffer from pain, suffering, humiliation, embarrassment, and loss of the ability to enjoy life's pleasures, and claims are made therefor. 79. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has suffered from a permanent disfigurement of his body, and claim is made therefor. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Glenn B. Stoner demands judgment against Defendant Rupen G. Modi, D.O., in an amount in excess of Fifty Thousand ($50,000) Dollars, exclusive of interest and costs, and in excess of any amount requiring compulsory arbitration. COUNT IV—VICARIOUS LIABILITY GLENN B. STONER V. HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY d/b/a HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL 80. All prior paragraphs are incorporated herein by reference. 81. All of Mr. Stoner's damages are the result of the negligent, careless, and substandard care provided to him by Defendant Modi as stated above and other employees 551700 12 including the radiologist, Dr. Richard P. Moser, III, M.D., and other Defendant Ho y pirit Hospital employees and agents as may be developed through discovery. 82. At all times relevant hereto, Defendant Modi was an agent, servant, employee, and/or ostensible agent of Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital acting within the course and scope of his employment or agency. 83. Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital is vicariously responsible for the negligence of Defendant Modi as stated herein and the radiologist, Dr, Richard P. Moser, III, M.D., and other Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital employees and agents as may be developed through discovery. 84, As stated above, Dr. Modi's negligence, for which Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital is responsible, caused Mr. Stoner to suffer delay to evacuation of the culprit spinal hematoma resulting in chronie lower extremity neurologic deficits and bladder/bowel incontinence and permanent decline in his fianctionality. 85. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has been forced to incur and will in the future incur expenses for medical treatment, medications, and similar expenses, and claims are made therefor. 86. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has a Medicare lien at this time (amount to be determined). 87. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has suffered from and will in the future suffer from pain, suffering, humiliation, embarrassment, and loss of the ability to enjoy life's pleasures, and claims are made therefor. 88. As a result of his injuries, Mr. Stoner has suffered from a permanent disfigurement of his body, and claim is made therefor. 551700 13 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Glenn B. Stoner demands judgment against Defendant Holy Spirit Hospital of the Sisters of Christian Charity d/b/a Holy Spirit Hospital in an amount in excess of Fifty Thousand ($50,000) Dollars, exelusive of interest and costs, and in excess of any amount requiring compulsory arbitration. COUNT V—VICARIOUS LIABILITY GLENN B. STONER V. EMCARE MEDICAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA, P.C. or NEW JERSEY/PENNSYLVANIA EM -I MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C. 89. All prior paragraphs are incorporated herein by reference. 90. It is believed and therefore averred that at all times relevant hereto, Defendant Modi was acting within the course and scope of his employment, agency, and/or ostensible agency with Defendant EmCare or Defendant EM -I Medical Services. 91. Defendant EmCare or Defendant EM -I Medical Services is vicariously liable for Defendant Modi's conduct, which is negligent in precisely the same inanner as set forth in Count III, incorporated herein by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Glenn B. Stoner demands judgment against Defendant EmCare Medical Services 4Pennsylvania, P.C. or Defendant New Jersey/Pennsylvania EM -I Medical Services, P.C. in an amount in excess of Fifty Thousand ($50,000) Dollars, exclusive of interest and costs, and in excess of any amount requiring compulsory arbitration. 551700 14 COUNT VI—LOSS OP CONSORTIUM BARBARA,S, STONER.V. MICHAEL F. L- UPINACCI; .M.DINDIVIDUALLY AND.D/E/A MICHAEL P..LUPINACCI, M.D., P.C. D/B/A PHYSICIANS OF REHABILITATION, INDUSTRIAL AND SPINE MEDICINE, P.C.; HEALTHSOUTH.REHABILITATION HOSPITAL<OF MECHANICSBURG, LLC D/I3/A.HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION .I-IOSPITAL.OF MECHANICSBURG;,RUPEN G..MODI; D:O.;.HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS_ OKCHEISTIAN "CHARITY,D/B/A. HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL; AND.EMCAREMEDICAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVJNIA, P.C. or NEW JERSEY/PENNSYLVANIA_EM=I MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C: 92. All prior paragraphs incorporated herein by reference. 93. As a result of the injury to her husband, Glenn Stoner, as stated above, Barbara Stoner has been deprived of the care, custody, society, consortium, services, and companionship of her husband, Glenn Stoner, all of which losses are to her detriment, and claims are made therefor. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Barbara S. Stoner demands judgment against all Defendants in an amount in excess ;of Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars, exclusive of interest and costs and in excess of any amount requiring compulsory arbitration. Date: May ... '�` , 2014 551700 15 AN �:�: LUTZ, P.C. rd C. Angina 'squire I}.. No. 071 503 N. Front : tr- et Harrisburg, .°A 17110 (717) 238 rcautz.com Atto . v "or Plaintiffs VERIFICATION We, Glenn B. Stoner and Barbara S. Stoner, have read the foregoing COMPLAINT and do hereby swear or affirm that the facts set forth in the foregoing are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I understand that this Verification is made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. WITNESS: Dated: sf - Jat ‘Lt Dated: S/7 551700 Glenn B. Stoner Barbara S. Stoner f ANGINO & LUTZ, P.C. Richard C. Angino, Esquire Attorney 1D#: 07140 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 (717) 238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) E -MALL: rcaCi anginolutz.corn GLENN B. STONER and BARBARA S. STONER, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs V. MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D. INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D., P.C. D/B/A PHYSICIANS OF REHABILITATION, INDUSTRIAL AND SPINE MEDICINE, P.C.; HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG, LLC D/B/A HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG; RUPEN G. MOD', D.O.; HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL; AND EMCARE MEDICAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA, P.C. or NEW JERSEY/PENNSYLVANIA EM -I MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C., Defendants Allornevs For Plainrirl(sl IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO, CIVIL ACTION — LAW MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIAB1LITY ACTION JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Certificate of Merit as to Michael F. Lupinacci, M.D. Individually and d/b/a Michael F, Lupinacci, M.D., P.C. d/b/a Physicians of Rehabilitation, Industrial and Spine Medicine, P.C. 1, Richard C. Angino, Esquire, certify that: ( X ) an appropriate licensed professional has supplied a written statement to the undersigned that there is a basis to conclude that the care, skill or knowledge exercised or exhibited by this defendant in the treatment, practice or work that is the subject of the complaint, fell outside acceptable professional standards and that such conduct was a cause in bringing about the harm; AND/OR ( ) the claim that this defendant deviated from an acceptable professional standard is based solely on allegations that other licensed professionals for whom this defendant is responsible deviated from an acceptable professional standard and an appropriate licensed professional has supplied a written statement to the undersigned that there is a basis to conclude that the care, skill or knowledge exercised or exhibited by the other licensed professionals in the treatment, practice or work that is the subject of the complaint, fell outside acceptable professional standards and that such conduct was a cause in bringing about the harm; OR ( ) expert testimony of an appropriate licensed professional unnec . for p, sicution of the claim against this defendant. Date: May I , 2014 551700 Rich d C. Angin f squire Exhibit A e. y ANGINO & LUTZ, P.C. Richard C. Angino, Esquire Attorney 1Dtl: 07140 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 (717) 238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiffs) E -Matt: rcaAanginolutz..com GLENN B. STONER and BARBARA S. STONER, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs V. MICHAEL F. LUPINACC1, M.D. INDIVIDUALLY. AND D/B/A MICHAEL F. LUPI.NACCI, M.D., P.C. D/B/A PHYSICIANS OF REHABILITATION, INDUSTRIAL AND SPINE MEDICINE, P.C.; HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG, LLC D/B/A HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG; RUPEN G. MODI, D.O.; HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL; AND EMCARE.MEDICAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA, P.C. or NEW JERSEY/PENNSYLVANIA EM -I MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C., Defendants Attorneys for Plaintiff(sl IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. CIVIL ACTION —LAW MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY ACTION JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Certificate of Merit as to HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Mechanicsburg, LLC d/b/a HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Mechanicsburg l., Richard C. Angino, Esquire, certify that: ( ) an appropriate licensed professional has supplied a written statement to the undersigned that there is a basis to conclude that the care, skill or knowledge exercised or exhibited by this defendant in the treatment, practice or work that is the subject of the complaint, .fell outside acceptable professional standards and that suchconduct was a cause in bringing about the harm; AND/OR ( X ) the claim that this defendant deviated from an acceptable professional standard is based solely on allegations that other licensed professionals for whom this defendant is responsible deviated from an acceptable professionhl standard and an appropriate licensed professional has supplied a written statement to the undersigned that there is a basis to conclude that the care, skill or knowledge exercised or exhibited by the other licensed :professionals in the treatment, practice or work that is the subject of the complaint, fell outside acceptable professional standards and that such conduct was a cause in bringing abo Y he harm; OR 1 ( ) expert testimony of an appropriate licensed professio claim against this defendant. Date: May ,:2014 551700 unnecessary for pro'ecution of the ,Rd C. Ang Exhibit R squir I ! s ANGINO & LUTZ, P.C. Richard C. Angino, Esquire Attorney ID#: 07140 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708 (717) 238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) E -Matt: rca@anginolutz.com GLENN B. STONER and BARBARA S. STONER, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs V. MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D. INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D., P.C. D/B/A PHYSICIANS OF REHABILITATION, INDUSTRIAL AND SPINE MEDICINE, P.C.; HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG, LLC D/B/A HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG; RUPEN G. MODI, D.O.; HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL; AND EMCARE MEDICAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA, P.C. or NEW JERSEY/PENNSYLVANIA EM: -I MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C., Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. CIVIL ACTION — LAW MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY ACTION JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants Certificate of Merit as to Rupen G. Modi, D.O. I, Richard C. Angino, Esquire, certify that: ( X ) an appropriate licensed professional has supplied a written statement to the undersigned that there is a basis to conclude that the care, skill or knowledge exercised or exhibited by this defendant in the treatment, practice or: work that is the subject of the complaint, fell outside acceptable professional standards and that such conduct was a cause in bringing about the harm; AND/OR ( ) the claim that this defendant deviated from an acceptable professional standard is based solely on allegations that other licensed professionals for whom this defendant is responsible deviated from an acceptable professiona) standard and,an appropriate licensed professional has supplied a written statement to the undersigned that there is a basis to conclude that the care, skill or knowledge exercised or exhibited by the other licensed professionals in the treatment, practice or work that is the subject of the complaint, fell outside acceptable professional standards and that such conduct was a cause in bringing about the harm; OR ) expert testimony of an appropriate licensed profession. .,necessary for prosecution of the claim against this defendant. Date: May (k.- , 2014 551700 Exhibit C ard C. • Ric .gi"ne, Esquire , 4 1 1. ANCINO & LUTZ, P.C. Richard C. Angino, Esquire. Attorney IPti: 07140 4503 North Front Street Harriburg, PA 17110-1708. (717) 238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for PlaintilT(s) E -MAL: rcaAanginolutz.com GLENN B. STONER and!BARBARA S. STONER, Husband and Wife, : Plaintiffs V. MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D. INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MICHAEL E. LUPINACCI, M.D., P.C. D/B/A PHYSICIANS OF;REHABILITATION, INDUSTRIAL AND SPINE MEDICINE, P.C.; HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURGLLC D/B/A HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG RUPEN G. MODI, D.O.; HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL; AND EMCARE MEDICAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA, P.C. or NEW JERSEY/PENNSYLVANIA EMI MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C., Defendants Attorneys for Plainiiff(s) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO, CIVIL ACTION — LAW MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY ACTION JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Certificate of Merit as to Holy Spirit Hospital of the Sisters of Christian Charity d/b/a Holy Spirit Hospital 1, Richard C. Angino, Esquire, certify hat: ) an appropriate licensed professional has supplied a written statement to the undersigned that there is a basis to conclude that the care,.skill or knowledge exercised or exhibited by this defendant in the treatment, practice .or !work that is the subject of the complaint, fell outside acceptable professional standards and that suck conduct was a cause in bringing about the harm; AND/OR ( X ) the claim that this defendant deviated from an acceptable professional standard is based solely on allegations, that othr licensed professionals for whom this defendant is responsible deviated from an acceptable professional standard and an appropriate licensed professional has supplied a written statement to the undersigned thatthere is a basis to conclude that the care, skill or knowledge exercised or exhibited by the other licensed professionals in the treatment, practice or work that iS the subject of the complaint, fell outside acceptablei professional standards and that such conduct was a cause in bringing about the harm; OR : .."---------- ( ) expert testimony of an appropriate licensed profess al is unn- ary for pro ution of the claim against this defendant. ...---- ,---- Date: May 1)- ,2O14 551700 Exhibit D ANGINO & LUTZ, P.C. : Richard C. Angino, Esquire : Attorney ID#: 07140 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-1708. (717)238-6791 FAX (717) 238-5610 Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) E-MAIL: rca(anginolutz.com GLENN B. STONER and BARBARA S. STONER, Husband and Wife, V. MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D. INDIVIDUALLY AND DB/A MICHAEL F. LUPINACCI, M.D., :P.C. D/B/A PHYSICIANS OF:REHABILITATION, INDUSTRIAL AND SPINE MEDICINE, P.C.; HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG; LLC D/B/A HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MECHANICSBURG RUPEN G. MOD1, D.O.; HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF THE SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY D/B/A HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL; AND EMCARE MEDICAL SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA, P.C. or NEW JERSEY/PENNSYLVANIA EM -I MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C., Plaintiffs Defendants Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. CIVIL ACTION — LAW MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY ACTION JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Certificate of Merit as to EmCare Medical Services of Pennsylvania, P.C. or New • Jersey/Pennsylvania EM -I Medical Services, P.C. I, Richard C. Angino, Esquire, certify that: ( ) an appropriate licensed professional has supplied a written statement to the undersigned that there is a basis to conclude that the care, skill or knowledge exercised or exhibited by this defendant in the treatment,. practice or work that is the. subject of the complaint, fell outside acceptable professional standards and that such conduct was a cause in bringing about the harm; AND/OR ( X ) the claim that this defendant deviated from an acceptable professional standard is based solely on allegations that other licensed professionals for whom this defendant is responsible deviated from an acceptable professional standard and an appropriate licensed professional has supplied a written statement to the undersigned that:there is a basis to conclude that the care, skill or knowledge exercised or exhibited by the other licensed professionals in the treatment, practice or work that is the subject of the complaint, fell outside acceptable' professional standards and that such conduct was a cause in bringing about the harm; OR ( ) expert testimony of an appropriate licensed professional is unnecessary for prosecution of the claim against this deferidant. 4' r •. Angino, Date: May T , 2'014 551700 Ric Exhibit E E.l r re CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND NOW, May 28, 2014, I, Thomas M. Chairs, Esquire, hereby certify that I did serve a true and correct copy of the foregoing DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT upon all counsel of record by depositing, or causing to be deposited, same in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, at Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, addressed as follows: By First -Class Mail: Richard Angino, Esquire ANGINO & LUTZ, P.C. 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (Counsel for Plaintiff) Michael F. Lupinacci, M.D. Physicians of Rehabilitation, Industrial and Spine Medicine, P. C. 175 Lancaster Boulevard P.O. Box 2028 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Mechanicsburg, LLC 175 Lancaster Blvd Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 Rupen G. Modi, D.O. c/o Steven D. Costello, Esquire Post & Schell, P.C. 1245 South Cedar Crest Boulevard Suite 300 Allentown, PA 18103 EmCare Medical Services of Pennsylvania, P. C. c/o Steven D. Costello, Esquire Post & Schell, P.C. i 1245 South Cedar Crest Boulevard Suite 300 Allentown, PA 18103 01. Thomas M. Chairs, Esquire IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JOSHUA I. PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. WHALEN, et al., Defendants : CIVIL ACTION LAW : NO. 14-2654 PROPOSED ORDE AND NOW, this day of 2014, upon consideration of the Defendants' motion to have their preliminary objections decided on the briefs without oral argument, the motion is hereby GRANTED. Distribution: gime B. Boyd, Esquire PA Dept. of Corrections, OCC 1920 Technology Parkway Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 oshua Payne, GQ5980 SCI -Dallas 1000 Follies Road Dallas, PA 18612 Thomas A. P!acey Common Pleas , edge L. • \\\I 6\9, L ..a Lb �� `Plc cp4 ..L,mbe Lw k, CxaitAY f-ClaWi11ic.‘ 14 LARt -a6s4 St bks- c ohu\Ven. Meas\ ‘hckifte.. kAv\%e`f, . Of_c-Q.A�c�h�s T eby Less -4Y' 41,k Aid LePD1A0A -kva.)1/4.42_ L r ,t\s`PA EiDitf b "WV_ tleLflOtN(.' A'nel u CdmCO1(ti O V )6\iYYvR, , 3©i1. Lavx.1&A Qt_ a b .e. Of Ca.cz QF Cht e' Ccxa.r S el l qa° i'a rIn'' o('Y PCLV►1/4".11' MQ_t1n .ir\; cC VS , a, I los b -00,\JA "0,&2.1\- tickb\\\ L9rb wf die_ ciou\r't\-aNsL IOb Lux1 �1 b13 Jol AitoiNcklioex Wca-ls-v:11-e le/4 17) a P N'ar. "V`Agj'd 5 krDkudk .'nve3Qi,1,4-194,3k Y;) --a5r113\ki 4c1 AP11.' 7-) !No /c1 1-3VokkgPs'ap `A-k•A‘lvus'i -1) 1Vrn9 ?3,n5p AVG009 A9 AVG) p 11-494,,srp pU-Y7 -avraJA)c-3 \AV Cr7 ral v)79 "a-cA yn 5-QtiJVI o AVI-Wad, 1-9,4U5Jca•a, capic ko,!ND-D5 crrc % 1A1 .0 .)`- hTh1-Yr5 Pc, A-.4\ `,x17 574-3 ao -Tr? -Ds-z1 J5 millwrrYal.ar? 141-ac.axx-At 'Y7-nr4G7-2. 4SN\U4 —PC) 11T2 "V(R14. Si5v3"."4 1 rya: .)•Ava p —a -1<Q vas V704 L4-5! val m.rkikEyvo k.rTr7 %#1 VANICA W "P‘drtkiv (1rrrrl TY)6 ji0 J010) JTAY) k419 \u^9 y -r() o'r? VonN\lki Tki-V ?3,-9 jiaTrilt \A-aVOM 5\WrirPl° kW%CL Xacr —6\1'104 UMW T km u-D.-Iyme-r) k-kc:T7 s kurrv-ay-@ tw5kivr) 5 -1.h),Y) 1-2 11-17 01,-e km -Ann 9UEy1D\stArrg 5k471-- Iry -3-7yrnc.-a.)3 Tov\vm " s sm-a4 korigiloraMi• •36'4 V1191410-2 11-11R0 Oj N7 1 Qv- ›in-rual Vr)10 't01 .1-1Yrbl 'a 3 1'-1-c), N:t r\y") Van) -mrxrlig\Aud Avrns4,06 Avi!'olomig-2 7A-vr)lowcQ TwmAil 0\- vra\r10? `q. 4. 5 vx-Timai--DQ r4;) a-D-Ntr iv-v3a sk-c\r)\-k. ?"‘A`95 \wr3TKI •%•0 JvarroW \'..•V`fl \A-a-m•r-7 \--yr2r • dY\v\rgio -a\411;16-a_ vnk\sqc‘ .1-)1 iry wx)A \ 1\11\1c) LIY)1 AN on -2 Ac) s -\TD -14 \AgkAwkc7- AD Vng"- Thv\-\- ear G`e,uslf s-kkkc.s kthaked Vor iio� c ,54-6A hamnik ln(vra-tP.krrui Q oce.AY r€' A IS -S,e6r'L.ua? i -O lrua.�ld. Pcx,sti,NA roQer \f' LJ A a n !i kL 4'r k Dn c. Pasaid 111u.sk -L1\60 3e:\ PbliLieS Ottle_G E �,� C 6n koortilt'aU 1hmakc. Asti u . QDb'Qev\`� k +0 clb GA�le'' (ill �e l S �IIn SO l {� bike.fi c 3 CL\,en 81.Q n d6,1 S L_©4; cLA r la £.AJ\- S 4\\e. uh t' k r'liuma eN StM.[k Q.11ou, 4 Mlle.'s' le ncic \ MUM &ktoile_ fo ieiSrn`kc IackLea e_ R obks L Pi Ciu eS Vie l0.-keti SeA ('o11c es ddencicrtiv\ \Aeh 4-1-vA,1 dA y► a tkfl' 1-Lbor W e ?:1 i -c) 'P 6.h li hLS it/IA(10es T .€A d Q��t►e��`P +h��s (Om he (.,mss peruoue C rom t11e ,s . u\Aa LA - ►v► the 10 4 -41,,ca' w1,Y 41\e Otrbi\utov eA6 off' ivoiLAT..s' bookcs rnca,ucom..s tom& .\–& c s do -1-u the SYS }e w e inAP Lost c- S lt\n‘lel P sti,s-` PtAPer\-lad-uen in +\ fYgvcata 9, 6b A wL(1k. brt)ty -0A4 +i 1 -IA ► S Pf ut�iCe C�Ici S l hS�t t� iCe_ dU +0 -the PALMY vikjftl.NC;eS Le rsbDia s sulorn,i\lCa. mint ec iYr 11,tc S:u�l,l� L-�' 1��uy'h�► Livvi\S, kveuLiNkt, all be AVA 1tie allowed de'EenLA Mutler^ ha'a1e TMr4U\es 14V'oA.AY Id. CaJhich Leal 4 ThQ M.u\\ev oQ dege.ntkurk 1 beer 1\e_NGa1lY LoSirt1, tI00 10iC\i,,useS off' gict: \- tkot\ he feceUR ,aat�L t- +' e. Mai\ an ane 13, aoi3 Z .eu.hA &(\e., NeG\i &ene.Q, k 1. Det.t 1 .r tS r-1 u ec 6:14€1 i re a t'e t l less , c.0u-61 ta N e G 1 it,. e hG e (\to c kW e.6G,Yd i ►6 S'k 4g.tich Pol c_eS i ve.,G 1u. on . Proeedud, PIGihk4rf.1 {11.A-c\re_S4S w �ai1iV►G, zunA te_ tks►h6 40 Q -)c 6`gt \ADP &LA\ dz LRaw\_dye iv1 PoSSeli0 & S%riv\. PLki,1."to Resuonu. Feder; \\P , Ca, D .Q.eAlc,./A c ukhle_h (k.tic k on a. Tec_VeSS Ne.1► e.nCe_ iN (e, .1 AILAes 4d C_CDA she A -c -' f l.k. ihamAcS Patti, Y ivy OW a.[We_La ct 04' Qbli tie .S , fet jJoA“ & kbt_ed.ure& ct d d/ME nAt vid jkneil u,iht (-mei lh -GtM oC 1n�m sv.-\k-;Ai bcLc a Ccllowi d.vt a1434}avY I�('aeliC��lnrn�- (,�uS t. SA -A\ iS a Vi.o\u�ion 6'i Se* ()Mi(.\eS , If-e.c.u.laAav►i b irocekures Se.#b Cou nk Tvkit `. 13cei \- - ASSum° t3i'ha� dam d6.w1iiu tt &z [,v1.c/..1-e.\n dab 1 no k d i S c 1 rGe 4heiY' du-kY 4.6 ktbkw (311AR a hob P1,‘6.10' cLAIN e Aceme /SEW chi Ceu, ablmgc '33.C1n cl~.ekeAALLA ir`eo;,r_ln-Nne,N) wck4. -111e Plain\i-41P LuheA degelnl Ne_G\;LeAce\Y a.\loo k di v.} -4-6, ek' buck `ttie_ Lege. ZNIV-Ve rS I N1tr ' PerSTila ftde 4CY, 14. ,:,m, AAAA d-desdc,\A\; 4.1uVe\i- w.\` &C.l• fwle.G\\Ge'aceW ih (S-kilitiE 'Pi(�iv1*i Pes 1u1 QemY 1&\ s c9...cY& es , Ce-Galu‘ & �rll� duv eS J1 �4 .���� C_;v & wao..c..Y Is, de x L .)6T\ -1 -ii b1. SQMR,\I LL\kY LO\\SVore k CAA. a he_ Zak o- llelr 40 rvl eG1�Ge nc, Maes ()ex&ciAux Pets of AnsitiA Se& f'iAe.S fecgA, th-t't .5(0* 4+e OeStiNkcne2A v tcticc� 1\\L \c a LXthe l rfns nliel 1>l G ( 6eA ce Loss. / u‘k \Y Ohl C011irc1 4 ;Niv\ 10er5ovvd, 0,PoPein ('Gh dee..40eI\,.0 cLe.h n it.4eel £ inS A C1 iv�l GofSleiraCYWilco l�,eLli Gen�celY !''nsPiv 6 Lo 51' lcoi h Vi-cf o-er onoJ rr4V Cr ,il k cLe_PenlcLr1\S` l�ce��1, 4'+netvl chAlv of .ulke con-IN2A afP \N1.cr1 \\. tJ c G,er'ce\Y L IM fla►nOac PO" S N ,k1 ei'U r�Y. �Acobv^L Z.0 $ki\LA-ovw -k'e APAcuitsk 12.0(x) Arvm dvaendah+ E, Pikk,:r d PahA:ve deu Les A1Ne. ekrnowyl. cr 1.800 Tvowl 2uG11 cleCenci 1,A o *tcA1 ©\ Pfe&YIA.CA L. ji),.,k (\k\otwoN VeejS k/ 0.H& mkt c-Inev re.\iJ l2eelvv &A.t-tcI& uu\ l e s*O 1 CLW , ?VILA. Pf 4i? q6b Ptose 301 Mack, ezol 1`c,ka-vA ppt 1c711--). JOSHUA PAYNE, Plaintiff v. SCOTT WHALEN, ET. AL., Defendants (Count, of Cumberianb IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT /11— a.6SY' —14-1496-7 CIVIL ACTION IN RE: DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this.0.1 day of June 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Preliminary Objections and Brief in Support thereof, and recognizing that this Court's 30 May 2014 ordered that the preliminary objections shall be decided on briefs, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a brief within thirty (30) days of this Order. Distribution List: ✓Jaime B. Boyd, Esq. ✓Joshua Payne / ` iJ sL L/aVIy 1 _ — [ DAVID D. BUELL , PROTHONOTARY ,;:;: : US POSTAGE>>PITNEY BOWES CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE 671.1:.:•: tyce—,7•_ws, ./ ....7,..... ...... 1, : . . ONE COURTHOUSE SQUARE ; .1. re ••. •, ................ i SUITE 100 dsr.,.:C4.:-Pt: ZIP 17013 $ l000.48° 1' •ri. . •. ,r: 02 1YV CARLISLE,PA,17013 RETURN TO S1.- ENDR - •ic . 1.• •" , •••• 0001368848JUN 27 2014 1, I,. P. 1 F. r'U -12E2 11 , 1[ i VINVA-1ASt4i]d JOSHUA PAYNE, CQ5980 r- —,* ; :,.1/ CINV1iU-16411, ... . — , • -fir P e i , '' '-'''' ' ' ..--,-,-,r H ' - ,,,,,,,?,k 1 ,s ,-' 414,,,,,,..-e---,, _'4 ,•4-, SCI-MAHAN '11 '- f- 1_2_,5,t,,,449.41, , -,,-1 "-'''"_.% *,- '' -'s*: - .,- 301 Morea R::,7,7f,,,,--741-,, Frackville, PA,„i'(,-44,10e4'1f,:,,,t_zi.z.,. ,,:t:',:4-*- `: 4,4'147,-, ilk'', -::,.1nrr,ii- -....';':';''''.7. — '-:—If':14ittt*,'.7,' ,::' ' ' ..'"-•i',,ff; , :. - :,' v ) t-srt„ 1.).1 „-:L_ - .-_ ,' .1:5 ---. .,-;:.:57;"4-c.*:idk.-4,er'' '. 4 • JOSHUA PAYNE, i .:.I I i'�' 'r Plaintiff j i j' I 11 C1-�mss. v. Countp et Cuinbertaub IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SCOTT WHALEN, ET. AL., 1N- ?L.Sf Defendants 44-0307 CIVIL ACTION IN RE: DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, th•is�,� day of June 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Preliminary Objections and Brief in Support thereof, and recognizing that this Court's 30 May 2014 ordered that the preliminary objections shall be decided on briefs, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a brief within thirty (30) days of this Order. , Tho as A. Placey C.P.J. Distribution List: Jaime B. Boyd, Esq. Joshua Payne rn co - zm <n N >C) -= _� > PV;drikU N. 5ccp-MmtAa\W DeSeaksstS C_annymweiklk\i\oi' PeilMiVaiq\cL. csaAW o LN a it (JAL In Ow. crosViD omie(\ IIQA' cAlaQ VAM\ 30,0 r__'tc),A_ 0.(s4scrk LJ I4 -s4 kc. -kion rri (-L4" atk1/4 \KA,6\e‘a Lk GA 0(A\ce,5eleT SQnkk-t 7.31: Tickm NID-Rce_ OF ker., -e tfAe_Nt o‘f Odtul I M) &C1\- 8kiCe_ L hi OLVNuW acAu4sL\itaA 1-1A11.A1_D Th\NIMktitA weivas_, ets,,,v(t\N o{ I More'i anri tn wAh +6_ bc_)\ Ybu..\i` Da ,e__& Akte_CV\ONS `it 41/21,e_ diinAs DOA ki..vc\C You, Ut\ll-es 'Thu (JA TN 1Y5 Atm ao'Vkc_Q.,1k 3acke:me.A\Yo vitklitou A -HEM, ciA 1)6tkY LbSe VASittie_XLVI Oner trnte6A (114,11-1-S, lilidsChouil& 11t& MeT 40 YaAr Lthitutr th6nCe_. tie tu, 6,ve t 6..\13Ye_9t cr+64.161\e_. -C-o4 e3W(2._. Qto\f‘AQ._YekL tAfivakon tkka -kVA1 LaVIY.or 16(xl LAA NtA attA -4-V\i`9_A L6N\i\tw accQo may 2)e,6\ok_.4t ()c \lakvdck\f) Inkovyykk.otr\ Auk- ReciNtiLeci-W- b0e._\C Leal \\CQ. Ab elk Llla ()EXI&A Cd aGclukei alv (kib a lid I CA Eff PLQ Dt2a.V‘‘ 2Pas, ,s (MVse. htil& 11M VO-VYt. `11‘).- 41q-3Itt • 9ttot SeN a_ I Oe_d e k ckA Z A . Nine kkee, il4e, (Ica C ieLcstiee Cb�u Vow (\16k- P1'0,,ed42.-k-b enk-er IIAGerieikloY e tell' -© Ate_ Ll -un k��c O Jm oA, Ehk PA 'Mk Con, bCZ_ ciafl Tehnti6 w tot36e Ne nic lxif Qs 1\ I lbs PQk t5 ,nlq aai\ k b, 1k \Rcc r 'i 611e. Lurtlrewe (00 C..edisl e_QiA 11)13 . ,e0.diffrtue 36t kYekf-U0 X19 170 40Ck otk SeIN 1 0 eaue_ 4-6& k Atke_ oft -4AAQ Qe\vt flutIV06 skAkm 1/46€, ck4 ZJA-ke.kLt4-,3011‘ fpW, ttbast -424er IlidtAe/k Deuc #0 ‘kk,W46Mi Ve,t‘m .1Ntuye t&A Lsq D4dk LOVite.,Vea 1 ()cc• ictab'TtrImusi VarUotr KetrioptkOust%irt tloth _ksc kad(i. , *a nat lailie, / , I rixxrar Dc L0'tr mgr Plec,.s of Lurn\oerlct C,oc.VAi t)e.fzuNI:mLI 3cS4,wx2 6,1ne SLOW WtiAen Pdo.m Shad -VVutioeV DeserItAs Tcsm aF nPdk;ce c.et,kk.o enke\r c\ud6Y Pe\\ TU. Sc r cwkkern Mam s .4t0v0 Cid Nth Ce.. I Nr\i y Nth\ce. \libu MIL ra Qac c AlY cue MotAvN an -14e, i r LA4L cis , 4\ C.,a4A Your` l egce&. CD 6.. \ecktoM the C1 offs se k3A) ups-\- Yd 4 leg ' l k vAkA'en lo Das -©nn the. 1D 4e �t1nts Nol&e 4\ tC,,eivl tWle.exikereA Alva ins\ -tau. LLQ; cA\ AefiLA t , (V/ LtSt Yrs Vc `1 oV ('her k(YiorJcmi lots. ,q1dA $1k\.,€.4-11‘kL Wricf -k Yt e .fes tut- Otice_A I3 VA -A L firer, ci'Ce.1e 662. *-V2, 4o4 B\fn; CAPt`(2- n kcc\c‘iaQ Th W& lr cmt;th A U L a CtA1` IVY Lienc) Moth, -to -4-rik MAksev. 4ks 6<a RQti Ice a10k4 WtOle_ ‘iocx, W Wh Inta virk6 _1 - AcAAtiss -Ika IV/ AIN/ U26 -at Sex�S�(_e -1-� �(�Jale. Pecsb+n INCA a_ kesk NO e e, r FILED -OF t Ali., THE PROTHONOTARY ?.114OCT 23 AM 8:t 1 CUMBERLAND COUNTY JOSHUA PAYNE, Plaintiff v. SCOTT WHALEN, ADAM SHANE HUBER, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE Defendants 4Countp of QCumber[anb IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 14-2654 CIVIL ACTION IN RE: DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 22"d day of October 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Preliminary Objections and Brief in Support thereof, as well as Plaintiff's Brief of Preliminary Objections to Defendant's Preliminary Objections, Defendant's Preliminary Objections are SUSTAINED. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiffs brief was not received by the court until 8 October 2014; however, after acceptance and review of Plaintiff's brief, the Court finds that Defendants have sovereign immunity and any actions alleged committed by Defendants were done within the scope their capacity as officers of the state. Distribution List: /Jaime B. Boyd, Esq. /Joshua Payne pia Thomas A. Placey C.P.J. •hfilnd\W eitIM u.Lx. PL \-S'se feaMV6kiso(A.L.o. LunnuniY6frl e , (nth Lcuh- of LcAiinco ial€66 1-11JuiP \t\l\alle)1\ -1-1A-e1 3bIrm 06et icene_ Doe_ 1'1-434 CiVA Ac4 ryico Pekt.ockm\s 5fP < (1) 'JO k C t f' ez,Li — 0 Ci.Ve.v) --(ha ,..46kx& te°ejne_ 1°1(tinft'sf Gdook,/e, cY\ak-\6fAie_fc--,6 eLANC +0 441e. COMMCOWeiti Perd\cy\va,no, et 4e otd.er e..(4cre,4. i Y1 -t\it Glift eV\ 6r) i-V1E. (-), (kV .6.k\ o ckato eP O61(-{ k IS aLier haL been et'H-eYi '\a A6Cle-\- nri Qx\ock.-V\PA L2tLofo1 -1-1to‘inCA1'F n 616,-k-fek SsA kffaulotA- E ‘Pr 0 c..tkicit, eic.-hht fe_tae, k.Th_ittk) In -)PorvhcA__, Pck,ui ,S fick'ky\qc LJLLg%raicve d_91 Moi actq, plo,:onf4p un 011 ()c.ko\Dee 1, /rit)Si-iuix (Mine. (). 6LS(NO ,cct Ma itoko.Rcl dopy mai le id-to omniontoea HA Ozort- P c big 6V ay.La AL t ccOCu tY1er11- ulon FAIN e icer b vi iyy 4- mama' t , r uAA-eA lae,to W k _LSA qC J-:(S- tis -1-ke O1 CA . &Antai . 1nV 'N scn R(I L In L Ypis trr) 4ddras -41tOwS (1- re 160YC� PA- bk-ktme4 Tl Ivo ci (9MM f - 0 oc l c'Da Te,CIMI6E.V w ' lkieci\n(.f(Ls liAArt , 17 as r)ac6- �3 v� a Lel ikokANoir\busy cusAbdrima Lour- `1 Za.,u1A. hocC.CPSVLSI 'G Pte. 7613 nc-t-o1 r 3 l aoi,-( (2.-/ry7e S-e Moei&., ij2 Civil Case Print 2014-02654 PAYNE JOSHUA (vs) WHALEN SCOTT ET AL Reference No. . : Filed • 5/01/2014 Case Type • TORT - INTENTIONAL Time 11 : 26 JudgmentO Execution Date 0/00/0000 Judge Assigned: PLACEY THOMAS AJury Trial Disposed Desc. : DISMISSED Disposed Date10/23/2014 Case Comments Higher Crt 1 . : Higher Crt 2 . : ******************************************************************************** General Index Attorney Info PAYNE JOSHUA PLAINTIFF PRO SE SCI-DALLAS 1000 FOLLIES RD DALLAS PA 18612 0286 SCI-MAHONEY GQ-5980 301 MOREA ROAD FRACKVILLE PA 17932 WHALEN SCOTT DEFENDANT BOYD JAIME B SCI-CAMP HILL HUBER ADAM SHANE DEFENDANT BOYD JAIME B SCI-CAMP HILL DUCAN DEFENDANT BOYD JAIME B SCI-CAMP HILL ZEIGLER DEFENDANT BOYD JAIME B SCI-CAMP HILL JOHN/JANE DOE DEFENDANT SCI-CAMP HILL ******************************************************************************** * Date Entries * ******************************************************************************** FIRST ENTRY 5/01/2014 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - BY PLFF 5/01/2014 COMPLAINT - BY PLFF 5/05/2014 ORDER OF COURT - 5/5/14 - IFP IS *GRANTED* - BY THE COURT THOMAS A PLACEY J - COPY MAILED 5/5/14 **PLFF PROVIDED COPIES OF COMPLAINT AND SHFF' S REQUEST FORM FOR SERVICE - SENT TO SHFF' S OFFICE** 5/14/2014 SHERIFF ' S RETURN - COMPLAINT & NOTICE SERVED ON PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL 1920 TECHNOLOGY PARKWAY MECHANICSBURG PA 17050 SHFF COST - $0 . 00 5/27/2014 DEFENDANT ' S MOTION REQUESTING THE COURT TO DECIDE THE DEFENDANT ' S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS ON THE BRIEFS WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT - BY JAIME B BOYD ATTY FOR DEFTS 5/27/2014 PRAECIPE TO ENTER APPEARANCE - BY JAIME B BOYD ASST COUNSEL FOR DEFTS 5/27/2014 DEFTS ' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO COMPLAINT - BY JAIME B BOYD ASST COUNSEL FOR DEFTS 5/28/2014 AMENDED COMPLAINT - BY PLFF 5/28/2014 PROOF OF SERVICE - AMENDED COMPLAINT/VERIFICATION/PROOF OF SERVICE UPON CLERK OF COURTS - BY PLFF 6/02/2014 PROPOSED ORDER - 5/30/14 - IN RE: DEFTS ' MOTION TO HAVE THEIR PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS DECIDED ON THE BRIEFS WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENTS - MOTION *GRANTED* - BY THE COURT THOMAS A PLACEY J COPIES MAILED 6/2/14 TRUE-COPY-FROM RECORD in Testimony whereof,1 here unto set my hand and the seal of said Co rt at Carlisle,Pa This F� " d- of. $4J ,20 IT L." ,/ Prothonotary rY5511 Cumberland County Prothonotary' s Office Page 2 Civil Case Print g 2014-02654 PAYNE JOSHUA (vs) WHALEN SCOTT ET AL Reference No. . : Filed • 5/01/2014 Case Type • TORT - INTENTIONAL Time 11 :26 Judgment . 00 Execution Date 0/00/0000 Judge Assigned: PLACEY THOMAS A Jury Trial . . . . Disposed Desc . : DISMISSED Disposed Date. 10/23/2014 Case Comments Higqgher Crt 1 . : Hi2 . : 6/10/2014 REQUEST TO AMENDED COMPLAINT/AMENDED COMPLAINT -Crt PLFF 6/10/2014 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - REQUEST TO AMEND COMPLAINT/AMENDED COMPLAINT UPON JAIME B BOYD ASST COUNSEL FOR DEFTS & PROTHONOTARY' S OFFICE - BY PLFF 6/27/2014 ORDER OF COURT - 6/26/14 - IN RE: DEFT' S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS - SHALL BE DECIDED ON BRIEFS - PLFF IS ORDERED TO FILE A BRIEF WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THIS ORDER - BY THE COURT THOMAS A PLACEY J COPIES MAILED 6/27/14 9/17/2014 NOTICE OF PRAECIPE TO ENTER JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT/IMPORTANT NOTICE - BY PLFF 9/17/2014 PROOF OF SERVICE - NOTICE OF PRAECIPE TO ENTER JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT UPON JAIME B BOYD ESQ & DAVID D BUELL/PROTHONOTARY - BY PLFF 10/23/2014 ORDER OF COURT DATED 10-22-14 IN RE DEFENDANTS PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS - *SUSTAINED* - PLFF COMPLAINT IS *DISMISSED* WITH PREJUDICE - BY THE COURT THOMAS A PLACEY J- COPIES MAILED 10-23-14 11/17/2014 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO COMMONWEALTH COURT - BY PLFF 11/17/2014 ORDER OF COURT - 11/17/14 - IN RE: NOTICE OF APPEAL - ORDERED THAT APPELLANT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR COSTS - BY THE COURT THOMAS A PLACEY J COPIES MAILED 11/17/14 LAST ENTRY . 00 . 00 . 00 ******************************************************************************** * End of Case Information ******************************************************************************** TRUE COPY FROM RECORD In Testimony whereof, I here unto set my hand and the seal of said C.uq at Carlisle,Pa 174- d. of l .� ,20 i4 This 1 � `p, Prothonotary FILED-OF F IC;' Vr THE PROTHONOTARY 3' 2014 OCT 23 AM 8: 4 1 CH PENNSYLVAN A OUNTY JOSHUA PAYNE, �.g► Plaintiff • l- j' Gv, 1IJ iif IUL `;i j ! , V. Qt one?of 4Cnmbertanb IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SCOTT WHALEN, ADAM SHANE HUBER, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE 14-2654 CIVIL ACTION Defendants IN RE: DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 22nd day of October 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Preliminary Objections and Brief in Support thereof, as well as Plaintiff's Brief of Preliminary Objections to Defendant's Preliminary Objections, Defendant's Preliminary Objections are SUSTAINED. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's brief was not received by the court until 8 October 2014; however, after acceptance and review of Plaintiff's brief, the Court finds that Defendants have sovereign immunity and any actions alleged committed by Defendants were done within the scope their capacity as officers of the state. BY THE CO Thomas A. Placey C.P.J. Distribution List: frfaded t/Jaime B. Boyd, Esq. s /Joshua Payne U0P7 Xj3/1 TRUE COPY FROM RECORD / In Testimony whereof,I here unto set my hand and the seal of said C•u at Carlisle,Pa,./ This_ , day of U 20 1`7 �, ^ Prothonotary It fl I0 I fl> l R NOV 117 0111: 30 CUMBERLAND CGU " PENNSYLVANIA JOSHUA PAYNE, Plaintiff • 1J ►lllt• a la► v. Count?of QCumberlanb IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SCOTT WHALEN, ADAM SHANE HUBER, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE 14-2654 CIVIL ACTION Defendants IN RE: NOTICE OF APPEAL ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 17t" day of November 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Notice of Appeal, it is hereby ORDERED that the Appellant be allowed to continue to proceed in the Court of Common Pleas without payment of filing fees or costs. The Court notes, however, that a separate IFP petition may have to be filed with the Commonwealth Court by Appellant to file the appeal with that Court without assessment of costs and fees. B - : . _ , Thom s A. Placey C.P.J. Distribution List: �i d Jaime B. Boyd, Esq. Ma��,r ✓ Joshua Payne II .0 i�ll7 DPIII) 0 Kristen W. Brown Prothonotary Michael Krimmel, Esq. Chief Clerk of Commonwealth Court Qtommontoeatti Court of nn pt aria December 10, 2014 NOTICE OF DOCKETING APPEAL RE: Payne, J v. Whalen et al 2100 CD 2014 Filed Date: November 17, 2014 Trial Court Docket No: 14:2654 Civil Action Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 2100 P.O. Box 69185` Harrisburg,(? 1'71063918c+; www.paeourts.us -0 r ~- A Notice of Appeal from an order of your court has been docketed in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. The Commonwealth Court docket number must be on all correspondence and documents filed with the court. Under Chapter 19 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Notice of Appeal has the effect of directing the Court to transmit the certified record in the matter to the Prothonotary of the Commonwealth Court. The complete record, including the opinion of the trial judge, should be forwarded to the Commonwealth Court within sixty (60) days of the date of filing of the Notice of Appeal. Do not transmit a partial record. Pa.R.A.P. 1921 to 1933 provides the standards for preparation, certification and transmission of the record. The address to which the Court is to transmit the record is set forth on the next page of this notice. NOTICE TO COUNSEL A copy of this notice is being sent to all parties or their counsel indicated on the proof of service accompanying the Notice of Appeal. The appearance of all counsel has been entered on the record in the Commonwealth Court. Counsel has thirty (30) days from the date of filing of the Notice of Appeal to file a praecipe to withdraw their appearance pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 907 (b). Appellant or Appellant's attorney should review the record of the trial court, in order to insure that it is complete, prior to certification to this Court. (Note: A copy of the Zoning Ordinance must accompany records in Zoning Appeal cases). The addresses to which you are to transmit documents to this Court are set forth on the next page of this Notice. If you have special needs, please contact this court in writing as soon as possible. - Attorney Name Jaime Beth Boyd, Esq. Jaime Beth Boyd, Esq. Jaime Beth Boyd, Esq. Jaime Beth Boyd, Esq. Participant Name Participant Type Scott Whalen Appellee Adam Shane Huber Appellee John Doe, M.D. Appellee Jane Doe Appellee Address all written communications and direct all filings to: Office of the Chief Clerk Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 2100 P.O. Box 69185 Harrisburg, PA 17106-9185 (717) 255-1650 Filings may be made in person between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (except Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays observed by the Pennsylvania courts), by mail as provided by general rules, or as otherwise permitted by general rules of court. ` 1�1 the, tia* LovAOY►WeuA\ \Pe.nnS4kVok;\\NA, Q160 WLk sael Daz> WoVeS er t7dL rro.,r cal& Oock,' Nck ton Reef, -est .Cor Trusc)orf A w ok-�, . b Mae . k %vx,v A be,e2n .6 Ni a j MAC, 634- Lo(.IN fe fork Ur % S k fi e\oY orkifert ctut..a) Ler:' y y\c ;1-e e kltamc; PPV ih -1-Cis maIktiP Lo \coNttn:AY w ti -W\ t etaa v Ne_ fir. Cita. QeL 03 a6V4 30(Mor/ c2� fractoite VA 1,7W t'JLOL),\A' Oc La VMACAL,delAA1/4\t\, eellINS'AUtt.Ana, LiSkkow,_ aok \d MdNOV, aoN Tutcu Voad- icha6S14 \I\M-ra\ ek J k kLo.\ C) SevuLe., I ‘Ne_tvki CA3\fi 1/44-trA 1 vi tV.)U It Alue,L CcAverk LUV CA- tbk\OU'on1s (A-1/4 Wel -tile_ Pci r '\rQrnake,\i" SeVoW4e1,6(n): •4.[(0 mo,k DfL,i nN NSaffikuNk- Lout\s-e1 Pik DaL iiAOTerloW/ fcortwax NLL LS bat. N. 11M6 0a.. DIbu.1 fcAlA,Moite ORE LL-AAA.-hotAQ LbSkilUe 17M1 /*LA& o 3 cA inok-04.9 T‘t(ka..\]Ufs4 E. PRO ; HONG 2r i Li DEC 13 Pik 52 CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA JOSHUA PAYNE, Plaintiff v. SCOTT WHALEN, ADAM SHANE HUBER, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE Defendants ouutp of QCuatbertanb IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 14-2654 CIVIL ACTION IN RE: NOTICE OF APPEAL ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 15th day of December 2014, upon consideration of the Notice of Appeal filed in the above -captioned matter, Appellant is DIRECTED, pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 1925(b), to file of record in this court and to serve upon the undersigned judge a concise statement of errors complained of an appeal NO LATER THAN 21 days after entry of this Order of Court. Any issues not properly included in the statement, timely filed and served pursuant to this order, shall be deemed WAIVED. BY THE COURT, Distribution List: 1./Ja• a B. Boyd, Esq. oshua Payne Pt ES frz t (S. il,r,,. DEC 30 PM 2: 36 CUMBERLAND COUNiY PENNSYLVANIA JOSHUA PAYNE, Plaintiff v. SCOTT WHALEN, ADAM SHANE HUBER, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE Defendants Count? of €umberbob IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 14-2654 CIVIL ACTION IN RE: REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 30th day of December 2014, upon consideration of the Request for Transcript, the Request is DENIED. This matter was decided on Preliminary Objections raised by the Defendants and with written response by Plaintiff. The Preliminary Objections were sustained without oral argument. Due to the Court ruling on the Objections without a hearing, no transcript exists to produce to Plaintiff/Appellant. H COURT, Distribution List: Jaime B. Boyd, Esq. Joshua PayneVkiI ej oP 31 is JpK� I Thomas . Placey C.P.J.