HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-7027LAW OFFICES STEPHEN C. NUDEL, PC
Stephen C. Nudel, Esquire
Attorney ID #41703
Joseph A. Ricci, Esquire
Attorney ID #49803
219 Pine Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
(717) 236-5000
Kavita V. Thakrar,
Vs.
Sandeep A. Thakrar,
Plaintiff
Defendant
PRD iOdU'',
DEC —5 AM 9: 08
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
: Docket No.:�
l C�. 0 7 0.1
: IN RE: Motion to Quash Subpoenas issued for
matter pending before Howard County
Maryland Circuit Court, Docket
Number: 13-C-12092325
MOTION OF ANIL AND NEEMA THAKRAR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE TO QUASH SUBPOENAS IMPROPERLY ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE
UNIFORM INTERSTATE DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY ACT,
42 Pa.C.S.A. §5331 et. seq.
AND NOW COMES Anil Thakrar and Neema Thakrar by and through their attorneys
Law Offices Stephen C. Nudel, PC by Stephen C. Nudel, Esquire, and Joseph A. Ricci, Esquire,
and request that this Honorable Court issue a Protective Order which relieves the Movants from
participating in a deposition on December 10, 2014 or in the alternative issue an Order quashing
the Subpoenas issued by Prothonotary David Buell on or about November 24, 2014 for the
following reasons:
1. The above captioned matter is an action in divorce which is pending before the
Circuit Court of Howard County Maryland at docket number 13-C-12092325.
2. Issues concerning this matter have not been before this Honorable Court at a
prior time.
C#02//s/
e�3lyii7
3. Neither Anil Thakrar nor Neema Thakrar are parties to the Howard County,
Maryland action.
4. On or about November 24, 2014, Cumberland County Prothonotary David Buell
issued subpoenas duces tecum directed toward Anil Thakrar and Neema Thakrar pursuant to the
Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §5331, et. seq. See, Subpoenas
Duces Tecum collectively attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
5. The subpoenas issued under authority of Cumberland County Prothonotary David
Buell were served upon the Movants on the evening of Saturday November 29, 2014.
6. A review of the subpoenas issued to Anil and Neema Thakrar reveal that they
include extensive requests for the production of documents.
7. Pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, a party seeking
a Pennsylvania subpoena is obligated to comply with the requirements of the Pennsylvania Rules
of Civil Procedure. 42 Pa.C.S.A. §5336.
8. As noted by the Pennsylvania Superior Court:
Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 4009.21 sets forth the proper procedure for
the discovery and production of documents within the control of a nonparty. In
pertinent part, the rule states the following:
Rule 4009.21. Subpoena Upon a Person Not a Party for Production of
Documents and Things. Prior Notice. Objections
(a) A party seeking production from a person not a party to the action
shall give written notice to every other party of the intent to serve a
subpoena at least twenty days before the date of service. A copy of the
subpoena proposed to be served shall be attached to the notice.
Pa.R.C.P. 4009.21(a).
The rule clearly requires that if the production of documents is sought from a
nonparty, it must be accomplished by means of a subpoena served on the
nonparty. We discussed this particular issue in Leonard v. Latrobe Area Hosp.,
379 Pa. Super. 243, 549 A.2d 997 (Pa. Super. 1988), where we stated:
Appellees erred procedurally in attempting to obtain from the hospital
documents which are in the hands of a third person non-party to the
lawsuit. We agree with appellees that relevant documents in the hands of
third persons are discoverable. However, the Civil Rules of Procedure
delineate the proper discovery procedure to be used when discoverable
documents are in the hands of a person not a party to the suit. Rather than
request that the appellants retrieve those records in the hands of the non-
parties, appellees should have attempted to have the non-parties
themselves produce the records. A subpoena duces tecum or an
independent action in equity against the non-parties are the methods
prescribed by the Rules for obtaining such documents from non-parties.
Id. at 999.
Barley v. Conrail, 820 A.2d 740, 743 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2003) citing Leonard v. Latrobe Area
Hosp., 379 Pa. Super. 243, 549 A.2d 997 (Pa. Super. 1988)(emphasis added).'
9. Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P, 4009.21, a party seeking production of documents and
things from a non-party is required to provide notice of their intent to seek production of the
various documents requested at least 20 days prior to the issuance of a subpoena.
10. Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P, 4009.23, prior to the issuance of a subpoena to a non-party
which requires production of documents, the party seeking the subpoena must certify that they
complied with the requirements of Pa.R.C.P. 4009.21.
11. It is believed, and therefore averred that compliance with Pa.R.C.P. 4009.21 and
Pa.R.C.P. 4009.23 was neither sought nor obtained.
12. Failure to comply with the requirements of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil
Procedure violates the requirements of the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, 42
Pa. C.S.A. §5336.
It should be noted that Standard Pa Procedure.2d advocates a similar conclusion. Specifically, it is noted that when
a non-party to be examined by oral deposition is served with a subpoena duces tecum, the party serving the notice
should comply with the requirement of Pa.R.C.P. 4009.21. See, Standard Pa. Practice.2d § 36:21.
13. Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 4007.1, a party desiring to take the deposition of any
person upon oral examination is required to provide reasonable notice of the deposition.
14. The subpoenas duces tecum at issue were served on the Movants on the evening
of Saturday November 29, 2014, a holiday weekend.
15. The subpoenas duces tecum at issue compel the appearance of the Movants at a
deposition scheduled for December 10, 2014; only, 11 days after service of the subpoenas duces
tecum.
16. The subpoenas duces tecum at issue compel the production of an extensive
number of documents comprising a three-page list.
17. Pa.R.C.P. 4009.23 allows a person served with a subpoena duces tecum 20 days
in which to comply with the subpoena.
18. The Subpoenas Duces Tecum served in the instant matter do not allow reasonable
time to gather the requested documents since the Movants were denied the time normally
allowed by the Rules of Civil Procedure for the production of documents from a non-party.
19. Moreover, Maryland Rule of Civil Procedure 2-412, which governs Depositions
in that State and the State in which the underlying action is pending, notes that:
A non-party deponent may be required to produce documents or
thither tangible things at the taking of the deposition by a
subpoena. If a subpoena requiring the production of documents or
other tangible things at the taking the deposition is to be served on
a party or non-party deponent, the designation of the materials to
be produced as set forth in the subpoena shall be attached to or
included in the notice and the subpoena shall be served at least
30days before the date do the deposition.
Maryland Rule of Civil Procedure 2-412(c) [emphasis added].
19. Counsel issuing the Subpoenas duces tecum in the instant matter has failed to
comply with both Pennsylvania and Maryland law.
20. Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. §5903 a witness shall be paid a statutory witness fee and
mileage allowance when subpoenaed.
21. No witness fee or mileage allowance was tendered to either Anil or Neema
Thakrar at the time they were served with the subpoenas at issue.
22. Pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. §5336 the Pennsylvania statutes relating to service of
subpoenas apply in this matter.
23. Failure to tender the required statutory witness fees and mileage allowances is a
violation of Pennsylvania law and renders the subpoenas invalid.
24. Pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, it is proper for
this Honorable Court to enter an order which protects the Movants from having to appear at the
depositions noticed for December 10, 2014 or in the alternative enter an order which quashes the
subpoenas duces tecum at issue. 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 5337.
25. Counsel for Movants contacted Mr. Baum to request that he withdraw the
subpoenas at issue or counsel would file a Motion for Protective Order with this Honorable
Court. Mr. Baum has refused to withdraw his subpoenas; accordingly, his concurrence has been
denied.
[space intentionally left blank]
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that this Honorable Court enter a protective
order which quashes the subpoenas at issue and relieves the Movants from the obligation to
appear at the depositions noticed for December 10, 2014.
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES STEPHEN C. NUDEL, PC
Date: y
Ste. ► n C. Nu.. -1, Esquire
P
Jose. _ icci, Esquire
Pa. ID #49803
Law Offices Stephen C. Nudel, PC
219 Pine Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
(717) 236-5000
Counsel for Anil and Neema Thakrar
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
•
Kavita v. Thakrar •
Plaintiff :
VS File No. 13-C12-092325
Sandeep A, Thakrar
Defendant
SUBPOENA TO ATTEND AND TESTIFY
TO: ANIL THAKRAR
1. You are ordered by the court to come to:
Quality Inn Carlisle, 1255 Harrisburg Pike
at Carlisle,Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, on Wednesday, December 10, 2014 at
1:00'o'clock PM to testify on behalf of Plaintiff in the above case and to remain until
excused.
2. And bring with you the following
SEE ATTACHED
If you fail to attend or to produce the documents or things required by this subpoena, you may be
subject to the sanctions authorized by Rule 234.5 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure,
including but not limited to costs, attorney fees and imprisonment.
REQUESTED BY A PARTY/ATTORNEY IN COMPLIANCE WITH Pa.R.C.P.No.234.2(a):
Name: Robert L. Baum
Address: 401 No. Washington St., Ste 500
Rockville, MD 20850
Telephone: 301-610-0610
Date: )(lay Iy
Seal of the Court Deputy
Official Note: This form of subpoena shall be used whenever a subpoena is issuable, including
hearings in connection with depositions and before arbitrators, masters, commissioners, etc. in
compliance with Pa. R.C.P.No.234.1. If a subpoena for a production of documents, records or
things is desired, complete paragraph 2.
(Eff. 7/97)
BY THE COURT:
Prothonotary/Clerk, ivision
KAVITA V. THAKRAR IN THE
Plaintiff CIRCUIT COURT
vs. FOR
SANDEEP A. THAKRAR HOWARD COUNTY
Defendant Case No. 13-C12-092325
NOTICE OF DEPOSITONS DUCES TECUM
YOU ARE NOTIFIED that Plaintiff, Kavita V. Thakrar, pursuant to the terms and
provisions of the Maryland Rules of Procedure and the Pennsylvania Rules of CMI
Procedure, will take the following depositions before a person duly qualified to
administer an oath, at the time and place indicated below, to be continued from time to
time until completed, which may be used for the purpose of discovery or evidence at
trial or both.
Deponent: Date:
Neema Thakrar Wednesday December 10, 2014 at 10:00 am
Anil Thakrar Wednesday, December 10, 2014 at 1:00 pm
The depositions shall commence as above at the Quality Inn Carlisle, 1255
Harrisburg Pike, Carlisle, PA 17013.
Respectfully submitted,
ROBERT L. BAUM, ESQ.
401 North Washington St, Ste 500
Rockville, Maryland 20850
TEL:(301) 610-0610
Fax: (301)309-9436
E-mail:bob@bobbaumlaw.com
Co -counsel for Plaintiff
Documents to be Produced
Instructions
This Subpoena duces tecum requires you to produce at or before your
scheduled deposition the documents stated below. Unless otherwise instructed,
this subpoena requires production of all responsive materials created after
January 1, 2009. Documents which have previously been produced pursuant to
the "Agreement for Voluntary Production of Documents" dated on or about
November 12, 2014 in this case need not be produced in response to this
subpoena.
Definitions
a) As used herein, the word "documents" and its cognates refer to all
writings or other tangible or electronic records including but not
limited to, all records, charts, correspondence, notes, memoranda,
minutes, letter, e-mails, text messages,inventory records, payroll
records, corporate records, bank records, accounting records, logs,
work reports, ledgers, books of account, tape or other recordings,
contracts, files, photographs, depositions, hearing or trial transcripts,
and all other writings or other data compilations of any nature or sort
from which information can be obtained, whether inscribed by hand
or mechanical, electronic, microfilm, photographic, or other means,
as well as phonic (such as recording), or visual reproduction of any
oral statement, conversation or event.
b) As used herein the word "document" includes all copies, electronic
and printed, unless such copies (including any notations and marks
thereon) are exact duplicates of documents that are produced. The
term "document" includes but in'not limited to "communications" and
"statements" as defined below.
c) As used herein, the word "communication(s)" or "statements" refers
to and includes any contact, oral or written, formal or informal,
including without limitation telephonic, text, emails, letter or
electronic messaging services, at any time or place, under any
circumstances where information was received, recorded,
transmitted or transferred.
d) This Request is directed to all documents within the possession,
custody or control of you, and also includes documents within the
possession, custody or control of agents, persons in privity with you,
including past or present attorneys but does not include any
attorney-client privileged material.
Page 1 of 3
e) As used herein, the term "relate", "relating to" and its cognates
mean containing, recording, discussing, mentioning, noting,
summarizing, referring to, commenting upon, describing, digesting,
reporting, listing, analyzing, or studying the subject matter identified
in a request.
Documents to be Produced
1. All documents which refer or relate to Kavita Verma Thakrar since January
1, 2000.
2. All communications between you and Kavita Verma Thakrar since January
1, 2000.
3. All documents you sent to Sandeep Thakrar which refer or relate to any
actual or potential gifts or loans to him from January 1, 2000.
4. All documents you received from Sandeep Thakrar which refer or relate to
any actual or potential gifts or loans to him from January 1, 2000.
5. All communications between you and Frederick Coover, Esq.
6. All communications between you and any employee of Coover Law Firm,
LLC,
7. All communications between you and Ann Turnbull, Esq.
8. All communications between you and any employee of Turnbull, Nicholson
& Sanders, PA.
9. All documents you have received from Sandeep Thakrar which relate or
refer to Kavita Verma Thakrar.
10.All documents which relate or refer to the divorce of Sandeep Thakrar,
11.AII documents that refer or relate to:
a. Skada Capital
b. Capital Legal Search, LLC
c. Sandeep, Inc.
d. G&T Associated Real Estate Developers
e. Sandeep Thakrar Trust
Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the day of /14�/-- , 20141 served a copy
of the foregoing upon the following undersigned counsel by first class mail, postage
prepaid:
Fred L. Coover, Esq.
Coover & Barr LLC
10500 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 420
Parkside Building
Columbia, MD 21044
Counsel for Defendant
Michael DeHaven, Esq.
Smith, Gildea & Schmidt
LLC, 600 Washington Avenue
Suite 200
Towson; MD 21204
Counsel for Deponents Anil Thakrar and
Neema Thakrar
ROBERT L. BAUM, ESQ.
CIRCUIT COURT FOR HOWARD COUNTY
WAYNE A. ROBEY, CLERK
Circuit Court for Howard County
- 8360 Court Avenue • Ellicott City, Maryland 21043
i-` Q. hraar-
s.
Ekd key ii1'2Lrr
STATE OF MARYLAND, HOWARD COUNTY
1,2z_/SUBPOENA l 4e A j,
To (Name, Address and County): fyj /
Case Number /3- c/2 672,3 Z
Civil PINK COPY MUST BE
FILED WITH THE COURT
UPON ISSUANCE
YOU/�ARE HEREBY COMMANDED6i-414)
,TO: ( ) Personally appear; (k ))}Personally appear and produce documents or objects;
at QAC e /' " I 1y, ,i 6 i- 14 ) ) 2 -A -s Ate? i J I r / ? /Ge C K�'z <-e--
(Place where attendance is required)
on f / � , the /O day of Jj lee , 20 / / at
YOU ARE COMMANDED TO produce the following documents or objects:
Se a e --,6-"f
Subpoena requested by ) Plaintiff; ( ) Defendant; and any questions should be referred to:
i 9u,/kr, XI( 4j /1,, f s .10-6 /4, /A
(Name Of Party or Attorney, Address and Phone Number)
Date Issued /7/ ,, /2,eir
W
CLERK
z.
?ti�S-d /l—‘/v- t' /0
(Signature and Sea!)
NOTICE:
(1) YOU ARE LIABLE TO BODY ATTACHMENT AND FINE FOR FAILURE TO OBEY THIS SUBPOENA.
(2) This subpoena shall remain in effect until you are granted leave to depart by the Court or by an officer acting on behalf of the Court.
(3) If this subpoena is for attendance at a deposition and the party served is an organization, notice is hereby given that the organization
must designate a person to testify pursuant to rule 2-412(d)
( )
( )
Date:
CV -4
SHERIFF'S RETURN
Served and copy delivered on date indicated below.
Unserved, by reason of
Fee: $
SHERIFF
ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY NEEDED FOR EACH WITNESS
Kavita v. Thakrar
VS
Sandeep A, Thakrar
Defendant
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
Plaintiff .
File No. 13-C12-092325.
SUBPOENA TO ATTEND AND TESTIFY
TO: NEEMA THAIC2AR
1. You are ordered by the court to come to:Quality Inn Carlisle, 1255 Harrisburg Pike
at Carlisle,Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, on Wednesday, December 10, 2014 at
10:00 o'clock AM to testify on behalf of Plaintiff in the above case and to remain until
excused.
2. And bring with you the following
SEE ATTACHED
If you fail to attend or to produce the documents or things required by this subpoena, you may be
subject to the sanctions authorized by Rule 234.5 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure,
including but not limited to costs, attorney fees and imprisonment.
REQUESTED BY A PARTY/ATTORNEY IN COMPLIANCE WITH Pa.R.C.P.No.234.2(a):
Name: Robert L. Baum
Address: 401 No. Washington St., Ste 500
Rockville, MD 20850
Telephone: 301-610-0610
Date: II lag t
Seal of the Court Deputy
Official Note: This form of subpoena shall be used whenever a subpoena is issuable, including
hearings in connection with depositions and before arbitrators, masters, commissioners, etc. in
compliance with Pa. R.C.P.No.234.1. If a subpoena for a production of documents, records or
things is desired, complete paragraph 2.
BY THE COURT:
Prothonotary/Clerk, ivil Di sion
(Eff. 7/97)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this 5th day of December, I, Joseph A. Ricci hereby certify that the Motion
of Anil and Neema Thakrar for Protective Order or in the Alternative to Quash Subpoenas
Improperly Issued Pursuant to The Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, 42
Pa.C.S.A. §5331 et. seq. was served upon the following individuals by First Class United States
Mail, postage prepaid at Harrisburg, addressed as follows:
Date: 12..15/
Robert L. Baum, Esquire
401 North Washington Street, Ste. 500
Rockville, MD 20850
Counsel for Kavita Thakrar
Fred L. Coover, Esquire
Coover & Barr, LLC
10500 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 420
Parkside Building
Columbia, MD 21044
Counsel for Sandeep Thakrar
Michael DeHaven, Esquire
Smith, Gildea & Schmidt, LLC
600 Washington Avenue, Suite 200
Towson, MD 21204
Counsel for Anil and Neema Thakrar
icci, Esquire
LAW OFFICES STEPHEN C.NUDEL, PC
Stephen C.Nudel,Esquire
Attorney ID 441703
Joseph A. Ricci,Esquire
Attorney ID#49803
219 Pine Street F E NSYLVA IN{j1%
Harrisburg, PA 17101
(717)236-5000
Kavita V. Thakrar, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff
Docket No.: 14-7027 Civil Term
Vs. :
IN RE: Motion to Quash Subpoena issued for
matter pending before Howard County
Sandeep A. Thakrar, Maryland Circuit Court, Docket
Number: 13-C-12092325
Defendant
MOTION OF JIM BAISH FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO
QUASH SUBPOENA IMPROPERLY ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE UNIFORM
INTERSTATE DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY ACT,
42 Pa.C.S.A. §5331 et. seq.
AND NOW COMES Jim Baish by and through his attorneys Law Offices Stephen C.
Nudel, PC by Stephen C. Nudel, Esquire, and Joseph A. Ricci, Esquire, and requests that this
Honorable Court issue a Protective Order which relieves the Movant from participating in a
deposition on December 10, 2014 or in the alternative issue an Order quashing the Subpoena
issued by Prothonotary David Buell on or about December 5, 2014 for the following reasons:
1. The above captioned matter is an action in divorce which is pending before the
Circuit Court of Howard County Maryland at docket number 13-C-12092325.
2. Jim Baish is not a party to the Howard County, Maryland action.
3. On or about December 5, 2014, Cumberland County Prothonotary David Buell
issued a subpoena ad testificandum directed toward Jim Baish pursuant to the Uniform Interstate
Depositions and Discovery Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §5331, et. seq. See, Subpoena Duces Tecum
attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
4. The subpoena issued under authority of Cumberland County Prothonotary David
Buell was served upon the Movant at the end of the business day on December 5, 2014.
5. Pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, a party seeking
a Pennsylvania subpoena is obligated to comply with the requirements of the Pennsylvania Rules
of Civil Procedure. 42 Pa.C.S.A. §5336.
7. Pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 4007.1, a party desiring to take the deposition of any
person upon oral examination is required to provide reasonable notice of the deposition.
8. The subpoena ad testificandum at issue was served on the Movant at the end of
the business day on December 5, 2014.
9. The subpoena ad testificandum at issue compels the appearance of the Movant at
a deposition scheduled for December 10, 2014; less than 5 days after service of the subpoena ad
testificandum and only two business days after service of the subpoena at issue.
10. Moreover, Maryland Rule of Civil Procedure 2-412 which governs Depositions
notes that:
A party desiring to take a deposition shall serve a notice of
deposition upon oral examination at least ten days before the
date of the deposition or a notice of deposition upon written
questions in accordance with Rule 2-417. The notice shall state the
time and place for taking the deposition and the name and address
of the person to be examined or, if the name is not known, a
general description sufficient to identify the person or the
particular class or group to which the person belongs. If a
subpoena is to be served on the person to be examined, it shall
be served at least ten days before the date of the deposition.
Maryland Rule of Civil Procedure 2-412(a) [emphasis added].
11. The Movant in the instant matter is the Vice President of Operations of a hotel
corporation that owns multiple facilities in several states.
12. The hotel business is particularly busy during the months of November and
December due to the holiday seasons.
13. The business obligations of the Movant preclude him from being available to be
deposed on less than five days notice.
14. The lack of reasonable notice prevents the Movant from being available for a
deposition on December 10, 2014.
15. The lack of timely notice precludes the Movant from having a reasonable
opportunity to consult with his counsel and adequately prepare for a deposition.
16. Counsel issuing the Subpoena duces tecum in the instant matter has failed to
comply with both Pennsylvania and Maryland law.
17. Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. §5903 a witness shall be paid a statutory witness fee and
mileage allowance when subpoenaed.
18. No witness fee or mileage allowance was tendered to either Anil or Neema
Thakrar at the time they were served with the subpoenas at issue.
19. Pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. §5336, the Pennsylvania statutes relating to service of
subpoenas apply in this matter.
20. Failure to tender the required statutory witness fees and mileage allowances is a
violation of Pennsylvania law and renders the subpoenas invalid.
21. Pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, it is proper for
this Honorable Court to enter an order which protects the Movant from having to appear at the
deposition noticed for December 10, 2014 or in the alternative enter an order which quashes the
subpoena ad testificandum at issue.
22. The above captioned matter has not been previously assigned to a judge; however,
it is related to a similar motion of Anil and Neema Thakrar arising from the same matter and also
awaiting assignment.
23. Counsel for the Movant was unable to reach Mr. Baum to request that he
withdraw the subpoena at issue but based upon prior communication in regard to subpoenas
issued to Anil and Neema Thakrar in the above matter, it is presumed that his concurrence will
be denied.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that this Honorable Court enter a protective
order which relieves the Movant from the obligation to appear at the deposition noticed for
December 10, 2014.
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES STEPHEN C.NUDEL, PC
Date: �' I �I ``�
<1D
C. el, Esquire
41703
i, Esquire
Pa. ID #49803
Law Offices Stephen C. Nudel, PC
219 Pine Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
(717) 236-5000
Counsel for Jim Baish
Exhibit A
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
Kavita V.Thakrar
Plaintiff File No.
—
vs.
Sandeep Thakrar
Defendant
SUBPOENA TO ATTEND AND TESTIFY
TO:
Jim Baish,Vice President of Operations,Neema Hospitality 1012 Welsey Dr.,Mechanicsburg,PA 17055
1. You are ordered by the court to come to
Quality Inn,Carlisle, 1255 Harrisburg Pike,Carlisle PA 17013
(Specify Courtroom or other place)
at , Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, on December 10,2014
at 4:00 o'clock, P. K. to testify on behalf of
in the above case, and to remain until excused.
2. And bring with you the following:
If you fail to attend or to produce the documents or things required by this
subpoena, you may be subject to the sanctions authorized by Rule 234.5 of the
Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, including but not limited to costs, attorney fees
and imprisonment.
REQUESTED BY A PARTY/ATTORNEY IN COMPLIANCE WITH Pa.R.C.P.No.234.2(a):
Name: Robert L.Baum
Address: 401 N.Washington St.,Suite 500
Rockville,Maryland 20850
Telephone: (301)610-0610
Supreme Court ID#
BY THE COURT:
Prothonotary/Clerk,Civil Division
Date:
Seal of the Court Deputy
Official Note: This form of subpoena shall be used whenever a subpoena is issuable,including
hearings in connection with depositions and before arbitrators,masters,commissioners,etc. in
compliance with Pa. R.C.P.No.234.1. If a subpoena for a production of documents,records or
things is desired,complete paragraph 2. (Eff. 7/97)
KAVITA V. THAKRAR IN THE
Plaintiff CIRCUIT COURT
VS. FOR
SANDEEP A. THAKRAR HOWARD COUNTY
Defendant Case No. 13-C12-092325
PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DEPOSITION
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Plaintiff Kavita Verma Thakrar, pursuant to
the terms and provisions of the Maryland Rules of Procedure, will take the deposition of
the following named person, before a Notary Public of the State of Pennsylvania or
some other person duly qualified to administer an oath, at the time and place indicated
below, to be continued from time to time until completed.
DEPONENT: Jim Baish
Vice President of Operations, Neema Hospitality
1012 Wesley Drive
Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055
DATE & TIME: December 10, 2014 at 4:00 p.m.
PLACE: Quality Inn, Carlisle
1255 Harrisburg Pike
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
Respectfully submitted,
f �
ROBERT L. BAUM, ESQ.
401 North Washington St, Ste 500
Rockville, Maryland 20850
TEL: (301) 610-0610
Fax: (301) 309-9436
E-mail: bobCab-bobbaumlaw.com
Counsel for Plaintiff
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the day of December 2014 1 served a copy of
the foregoing upon the following undersigned by first class mail, postage prepaid:
Fred L. Coover, Esq.
10500 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 420
Parkside Building
Columbia, MD 21044
Counsel for Defendant
Michael DeHaven, Esq.
Smith, Gildea & Schmidt LLC
600 Washington Avenue
Suite 200
Towson, MD 21204
ROBERT L. BAUM, ESQ.
CIRCUIT COURT FOR HOWARD COUNTY
WAYNE A.ROBEY,CLERK
Circuit Court for Howard County
8360 Court Avenue•Ellicott City,Maryland 21043
KAVITA V THAKRAR Case Number 13-C12-092325
Vs. ?c ) Civil PINK COPY MUST BE
SANDEEP THAKRAR FILED WITH THE COURT
UPONISSUANCE
STATE OF MARYLAND,HOWARD COUNTY
SUBPOENA
To(Name,Address and County): Jim Baish, Vice President of Operations, Neema Hospitality
1012 Wesley Drive
Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055
YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO: ( x) Personally appear; ( ) Personally appear and produce documents or objects;
at Quality Inn, Carlisle, 1255 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17013
(Place where attendance is required)
on Wednesday the 10th day of December ,20 14 at 4:00 a.m. .
YOU ARE COMMANDED TO produce the following documents or objects:
SEE ATTACHED
Subpoena requested by(xx)Plaintiff; ( ) Defendant; and any questions should be referred to: RobertL. Baum
401 North Washingfon gt_ , Suite SOD, Rockville Mid 20850 (x301 )_ 10-0610
(Name of Party or Attorney,Address
/and Phone Number)
Date Issued December 4, 2014 /� P,0
CLERK V, (Signature and Seal)
NOTICE:
(1) YOU ARE LIABLE TO BODY ATTACHMENT AND FINE FOR FAILURE TO OBEY THIS SUBPOENA.
(2) This subpoena shall remain in effect until you are granted leave to depart by the Court or by an officer acting on behalf of the Court.
(3) If this subpoena is for attendance at a deposition and the party served is an organization, notice is hereby given that the organization
must designate a person to testify pursuant to rule 2-412(d)
SHERIFF'S RETURN
( ) Served and copy delivered on date indicated below.
( ) Unserved,by reason of
Date: Fee: $
SHERIFF
ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY NEEDED FOR EACH WITNESS
CV-4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this 81" day of December, 1, Joseph A. Ricci hereby certify that the Motion
of Jim Baish for Protective Order or in the Alternative to Quash Subpoena Improperly Issued
Pursuant to The Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §5331 et. seq.
was served upon the following individuals by First Class United States Mail, postage prepaid at
Harrisburg, addressed as follows:
Robert L. Baum, Esquire
401 North Washington Street, Ste. 500
Rockville, MD 20850
Counsel for Kavita Thakrar
Fred L. Coover, Esquire
Coover& Barr, LLC
10500 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 420
Parkside Building
Columbia, MD 21044
Counsel for Sandeep Thakrar
Michael DeHaven, Esquire
Smith, Gildea& Schmidt, LLC
600 Washington Avenue, Suite 200
Towson, MD 21204
Counsel for Anil and Neema Thakrar
Date: 1A 18 1 q ':X
eph A. icci, Esquire
KAVITA V. THAKRAR, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v. : CIVIL ACTION — LAW
SANDEEP A. THAKRAR,
Defendant : NO. 14-7027 CIVIL TERM
IN RE: MOTION OF ANIL AND NEEMA THAKRAR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO QUASH SUBPOENA
IMPROPERLY ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE UNIFORM
INTERSTATE DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY ACT,
42 Pa. C.S.A. §5331 et. seq.
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 9th day of December , 2014, upon consideration of the above
captioned motion, and Defendant's objection thereto, the motion is granted in part and
denied in part. It is granted that the depositions of Anil and Neema Thakrar for
December 10, 2014 are continued to a date that is mutually agreeable to all parties hereto,
after reasonable notice is provided, with said deposition to occur not later than 30 days
from the date of this order. In all other respects, the motion is denied.
BY THE COURT,
Xobert L. Baum, Esq.
401 N. Washington Street
Suite 500
Rockville, MD 20850
Attorney for Kavita Thakrar
e
Y
Chri sL. Peck, J.
/Michael DeHaven, Esq.
Smith, Gildea & Schmidt, LLC
600 Washington Avenue
Suite 200
Towson, MD 21204
Attorney for Anil and Neema Thakrar
,...--Fred L. Coover, Esq.
Coover & Barr, LLC
10500 Little Patuxent Parkway
Suite 420
Parkside Building
Columbia, MD 21044
Attorney for Sandeep Thakrar
Joseph A. Ricci, Esq.
Stephen C. Nudel, Esq.
219 Pine Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Attorneys for Anil and Neema Thakrar
:rc
KAVITA V. THAKRAR, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v. : CIVIL ACTION — LAW
SANDEEP A. THAKRAR,
Defendant : NO. 14-7027 CIVIL TERM
IN RE: MOTION OF JIM BAISH FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO QUASH SUBPOENA
IMPROPERLY ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE UNIFORM
INTERSTATE DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY ACT,
42 Pa. C.S.A. §5331 et. seq.
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 9th day of December , 2014, upon consideration of the above
captioned motion, and Defendant's objection thereto, the motion is granted in part and
denied in part. It is granted that the deposition of Jim Baish for December. 10, 2014 is
continued to a date that is mutually agreeable to all parties hereto, after reasonable notice
is provided, with said deposition to occur not later than 30 days from the date of this
order. In all other respects, the motion is denied.
BY THE COURT,
Chris lee L. Peck, J.
✓ Robert L. Baum, Esq.
401 N. Washington Street
Suite 500
Rockville, MD 20850
Attorney for Kavita Thakrar
/Michael
DeHaven Esq.
q
Smith, Gildea & Schmidt, LLC
600 Washington Avenue
Suite 200
Towson, MD 21204
Attorney for Anil and Neema Thakrar
��4
red L. Coover, Esq.
Coover & Barr, LLC
10500 Little Patuxent Parkway
Suite 420
Parkside Building
Columbia, MD 21044
Attorney for Sandeep Thakrar
Joseph A. Ricci, Esq.
Stephen C. Nudel, Esq.
219 Pine Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Attorneys for Anil and Neema Thakrar