HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-26-05
IN RE: ESTATE OF MILDRED
ESTATE,anincapacitated
person
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY,PENNSYl VANIA
ORPHANS' COURT DIVISION
NO. 21-2001-92
IN RE:MILDRED J. GERBER TRUST NO. 21-2002-0540
UNDER AGREEMENT DATED
DECEMBER 19,1997
C")
. ~)
MOTION FOR A HEARING BEFORE JUDGE OLER TO
RECONSIDI;R PERIODS AS A RESULT OF TRUSTEE'S
ABSENCE FROM THE UNITED STATES AND TO DELINEATE
PROCEDURAL ISSUES.
.
NOW COMES, Petitioner, Marilyn Gerber who is the eldest child of Mildred J.
Gerber and a full beneficiary of the Estate and Trust stated above and files this
Motion for a Status Conference Before Judge Oler to Establish Deadlines and
. Discovery Periods for the Pending Litigation, as follows:
1. At a conference before Auditor William Duncan on March 17,2005
a schedule was established and agreed to by all counsel for discovery,
in an effort to prepare for the upcoming hearing scheduled for early September on
the Objections to the Accounting by the Trustee.
2. On March 17,2005, Stipulations were signed by all parties, copies of
which are attached hereto. Exhibit A
3. On March 17,2005 upon the signing of all counsel of the agreed
Stipulation, Marilyn Gerber served Richard Rupp,Esquire a Request for Production
-.J
~. J
r~.,)
of Documents which would have been due on April 15,2005. Time was of the essence
to enable Petitioner to prepare for trial.
4. On April 14,2005, Richard Rupp, Esquire faxed the Petitioner requesting
a continuance stating that Frederick E. Gerber,1I was out of the country. Petitioner
disapproved of this Motion and faxed her response back to Rupp on April 14, 2005.
5. Despite the agreement to a time schedule by all counsel, they have an
disregarded them and obtained extensions from the Court based on a simple
assertion that Frederick E. Gerber,1I is "out of the country". Where he is located, when
he left and when he is e)(;pected to return is not set forth nor verified.
6. Last year, Frederick E. Gerber,1I through his counsel, Richard Rupp,
was able to delay this matter and that of the Accounting of PNC Bank for seven
months, claiming the protection of the Sailors and Soldiers Relief Act. Although
he returned from Iraq in December 2003, he never advised the Court to lift the stay
order and thus delayed the proceedings.
7. Further, on or about February 11,2004, at a status conference hearing
before all counsel and Auditor William Duncan, Richard Rupp advised all that
Frederick E. Gerber,1I had returned from Iraq and that his orders had expired. Auditor
Duncan advised Richard Rupp to file this information with the Court to lift the Stay
Order and this was never done.
8. Finally,this Petitioner filed a Motion in June 2004 asking for the Court to
examine the fact that Frederick E. Gerber,1I NEVER filed Motion to lift the Stay but
was indeed in the country, continuing to invoke the Sailors and Soldiers Relief Act in
an effort to delay these proceedings, avoid depositions and the answers to Request
.
for Documents and Interrogatories. Ultimately, Frederick E. Gerber,1I NEVER
answered the numerous requests for Production of Documents or Interrogatories
for the PNC hearing on September 28,29,2004 resulting in prejudice to
the Petitioner for that hearing before the Auditor.
9. The Court referred Petitioner's Motion, to the Auditor for decision.
review Petitioner's Motion. On August 3,2004, before Auditor Duncan, Richard Rupp
finally appeared to produce his client, Frederick E. Gerber,11.
10. All times material herein, Frederick E. Gerber,1I has embarked on a
studied course of delay to prevent the progress of this case by not adhering to time
deadlines, refusing to provide answers to Request for Production of Documents,
supplying incomplete documents, redacting financial information from materials
produced, photocopying incomplete pages of financial data, making himself
unavailable for depositions, harassing the Petitioner during his deposition on
September 27,2005 resulting in the Petitioner requesting that the Auditor come to the
Courthouse for assistance, verbally harassed the Petitioner during his deposition on
October 14,2004, refused to answer Interrogatories and in one instance, completely
refused to answer the Request for Production of Documents.
11. Frederick E. Gerber,1I has legal counsel of Herbert Rupp,Esquire,
Richard Rupp,Esquire, Lindsay Baird,Esquire and Jacqueline Verney,Esquire. These
attorneys have been the architect and authors of all of the Court ordered Accounting
and are in complete possession of all financial documents that were necessary to
author the Accountings. The unavailability of the Trustee is but a continued excuse
and insult to this Court and an attempt to frustrate the efforts of the Petitioner in
obtaining a proper Accounting without a prolonged dissipation of her parents' Estate
and Trusts in paying of these needless counsel fees.
12. All of these delays have further resulted in severe financial pressure on
the Petitioner and a dissipation of her right of inheritance.
13. These continued delays by the Trustee has effectively allowed the
Trustee continued opportunity to access funds and assets from the Estate and Trusts
for his personal enrichment and has only served to prolong his ultimate day in Court
for surcharge.
14. If the Petitioner cannot be available due to his previous military demands
and his now current secret and erratic travel schedule( and despite his
adequate and numerous attorneys), the Trustee should be removed and a
new Trustee should be appointed.
15. Recent requests for continuances and extensions of the Stipulation
deadline periods were filed by attorneys, Lindsay Baird,Esquire and Richard Rupp,
Esquire and were entered exparte without affording me an opportunity to contest it in
Court and be heard on the record.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner your honorable Court is requested to hold a hearing
to set forth a procedural basis for all petitions so that matters will not be
decided exparte: to designate a new discovery schedule as a result of more delay by
the Trustee's absence. To hear evidence concerning the whereabouts of the Trustee,
his likely period of absence from this jurisdiction and dates of his return; enforce the
answer of all Request for Production of Documents, Interrogatories and Depositions
.c__ -'
>
and the supoenas of witnesses and adequate time for expert witnesses to review all of
the documents produced. The Stipulations heretofore entered have been disrupted
and the Petitioner anticipates an onslaught of new Motions before this Court and
and therefore respectfully requests a hearing to resolve the issues raised herein.
Respectfully submitted,
Marilyn Gerber,Pro Se
717 Market Street,#317
Lemoyne,PA 17043
TEL 717 503-5280
FAX 717737-7116
DATE: ~,;J1 ~)
VERIFICATION
I, Marilyn Gerber, deposes and says subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.
C.S. 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities, that she make this
verification by its authority and that the facts set forth in the above stated Motion
before Judge Oler are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information
and belief.
DATE: ~~awr
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on APri~~5' a true and correct copy of the above
stated Motion before Judge Oler was served by US Mail, postage prepaid, upon
the following:
Jacqueline Verney,Esquire
44 South Hanover Street
Carlisle,PA 17013
Lindsay Baird,Esquire
37 South Hanover Street
Carlisle,PA 17013
.
Richard Rupp,Esquire
355 North 21 st Street
Camp HiII,PA 17011
William Duncan,Esquire
One Irvine Row
Carlisle,PA 17013
IN RE: FRED E. GERBER,SR TRUST
UNDER AGREEMENT, dated .
July 29, 1994
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
ORPHANS' COURT DIVISION
NO. 21-199S-0195 0
,-
?;:o
~;J;g
;;;1;P
,:" ?: gj -J
'::CJ) 7'
~;;S3~~ ~
.-)':~;:;
::::,
IN RE: MILDRED J. GERBER,TRUST
UNDER AGREEMENT, dated
December 19,1997
NO. 21-2002-0540
STIPULATIONS. OF PARTIES
(..J1
o
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among counsel for their
respective clients and the parties in the above matters that the following terms and
conditions shall apply to the proceedings before Auditor William A. Duncan,Esquire,
,
regarding the audits of the above captioned matters:
A. With regard to Docket No. 21-199S-0195:
1. Discovery shall begin on March 17,2005 and shall end on June 1,2005.
2. All outstanding discovery issues shall be presented to the Auditor for
disposition on or before June 15,2005.
3. A Pre-Trial Conference shall be held on July 7,2005, at 1 0:00AM at
a location designated by the Auditor. A Pre-Trial Memorandum is due on said date
setting forth the parties respective factual and legal positions,as well as any
proposed witnesses and exhibits.
4. Hearings shall be held on September 7,S,and 9th2005.
The location of the hearings shall be designated by the Auditor. Hearings
shall begin at 09:00AM and end at 4:30PM. The lunch break shall run from 12:00PM
noon to 1 :15PM.
5. Suggested finding of fact, conclusions of law and a brief in support
"'"
=
=
CJ1
:x
~
orJ
-.-,
:::ofTl
C~~~
':-L.::.';:::...,
.1) ;;;:':::-"'.
.t"--"
r"", ,-:" ,~-:
'~'~d c::i
~
o
rn
.:::)
-1'1
~
shall be due 30 days from the date the transcript is filed.
6. The parties consent to an extension of time for the filing of the Auditor's
Report until December 30,2005.
B. With regard to Docket NO.21-2002-0540
1. All of the above paragraphs as stated above shall hereby apply for
Docket No.21-2002-0540.
2. The parties and their counsel do hereby swear before the Auditor,
William A. Duncan, Esquire and the Clerk of the Orphans' Court to these Stipulations.
.
~A~
acq line M. Verney,Esquire
44 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Dated June 27,2003
----
/
Richard C. Rupp, E uire
355 North 21 st Street,Suite 205
Camp HiII,PA 17011
~::;
t:.."::">
c..n
(..,},
1.._'1 -',i
o