HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-29-89 (2)
"
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
ORPHANS' COURT DIVISION
RECOROfn.Cf'T'.'
REGIS'f'
'89 AUG 29 A 9 :08
NO. 21-86-398
rL:-;'\ l\'.
ESTATE OF ROBERT M. MUMMA, DECEASEbJII~L!L
ANSWER OF LINDA M. ROTH
TO PETITION OF ROBERT M. MUMMA, II
TO REVOKE DISCLAIMER
Linda M. Roth hereby files the following Answer to the
Petition of Robert M. Mumma, II to Revoke Disclaimer, in
accordance with the numbered paragraphs thereof:
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Denied to the extent that this paragraph states that
"Linda M. Ross" rather than Linda M. Roth survived the testator.
4. The provisions of Robert M. Mumma's Will speak for
themselves.
5. The provisions of Robert M. Mumma's Will speak for
themselves.
6. The provisions of Robert M. Mumma's will speak for
themselves.
7. The provisions of Robert M. Mumma's Will speak for
themselves.
8. Denied as stated. In the weeks prior to the due date
for filing the Federal estate and Pennsylvania inheritance tax
L
:' )
'6
"
returns (January 12, 1987) Arthur L. Klein, Esq., in his
capacity as counsel to Mr. Mumma's estate, discussed with Ms.
Roth, the Executrixes, and other family members, including
Robert M. Mumma, II, that based on preliminary indications from
accountants and outside experts it appeared that the estimated
date-of-death value, net of debts and expenses, of Mr. Mumma's
estate would be at least $9,000,000.
9. It is denied that Arthur L. Klein, Esq., made any
representation to anyone with respect to the value of Mr.
Mumma's estate prior to the execution and filing of a
Disclaimer by Robert M. Mumma, II. It is admitted that Robert
M. Mumma, II, executed a Disclaimer and filed it with the Clerk
of this Court on or about January 6, 1987. Ms. Roth denies
that Exhibit A to the Petition is a copy of the Disclaimer, as
no "Exhibit A" was attached to her copy of the Petition.
10. Denied as stated. Ms. Roth has no knowledge of what
Robert M. Mumma, II, may have "learned" subsequent to his
execution and filing of his Disclaimer. Mr. Mumma's estate,
his widow and his children, inCluding Robert M. Mumma, II,
received an offer from a third party more than a year and a
half after Mr. Mumma's death to purchase certain business
properties owned by all of them for a price of approximately
$43,000,000 (the estate's share would be less than half the
Offering price) subject. however, to various representations,
warranties, escrow arrangements and other conditions and
- 2 -
..~' ~:' ")
.... \..' /
restrictions which at the date hereof have not been finally
agreed to, but which if finally agreed to would be offset to an
undetermined extent the amount to be received by Mr. Mumma's
estate.
11. Denied. Ms. Roth was informed by Robert M. Mumma, II
when he signed and filed his Disclaimer that he was doing so
because (i) he had a large estate of his own and did not need
the inheritance left to him under his father's Will and (ii)
the Disclaimer gave him the opportunity to pass his inheritance
on to his children free of the estate taxes (presently assessed
at the maximum rate of 55\) which would be imposed on that
inheritance were it included in his estate at his death. To
the extent that Robert M. Mumma, II's Petition suggests that
either Ms. Roth or her counsel committed any impropriety by
informing him in good faith of the estimated date-of-death
value of his father's estate for death tax purposes based on
preliminary indications of outside experts, such suggestion is
denied.
12. This paragraph is a request for relief to which no
response is required.
13. Denied as stated. Linda M. Roth takes no position as
to whether Robert M. Mumma, II, should be permitted to revoke
his Disclaimer. However, the facts recited in his Petition as
grounds for permitting such revocation are untrue.
- 3 -
,
~~~
~~o
New Matters
14. Linda M. Roth hereby incorporates by reference the
requests of the Executrixes, Barbara McK. Mumma and Lisa M.
Morgan contained in paragraphs 14 and 15 of their Answer to
Robert M. Mumma, II's Petition. Accordingly, Ms. Roth agrees
that the children and unborn descendants of Robert M. Mumma, II
should have the opportunity to be heard on his Petition, and
that all expenses in connection with the proceeding to Revoke
the Disclaimer should be charged back against the property
distributable to Robert M. Mumma, II or his descendants on the
death of Mr. Mumma's widow.
WHEREFORE, Linda M. Roth requests that provisions be made
in these proceedings for the legal representation of the
children and unborn descendants of Robert M. Mumma, II, as
such, and that the Order finally disposing of Mr. Mumma's
Petition provide that all expenses of this proceeding be
deducted from the shares of the trusts under Mr. Mumma's Will
r
ultimately distributable on the death of Mr. Mumma's widow to
Robert M. Mumma, II, or to his descendants.
Respectfully submitted,
Attorney for Linda M. Roth
- 4 -
~ -,,,
~~J
"
VERIFICATION
I, John Hardin Young, being duly sworn according to law,
depose and say that I am filing this verification pursuant to
Rule 3.2 of the Orphans' Court Rules and Rule l024(c) of the
Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure that the facts set forth
in the foregoing Answer are true and correct to the best of my
information and belief based on privileged conversations and my
conversations with other counsel of record in this matter.
This verification is not made by Linda M. Roth because she is
vacationing outside of the jurisdiction of this Court and her
verification cannot be obtained within the time allowed for
filing this Answer.
/
--
-------
u
~~
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Answer of
Linda M. Roth to Petition of Robert M. Mumma, II to Revoke
Disclaimer has been served upon the fOllowing by first-class
mail, postage prepaid, this 28th day of August, 1989:
Arthur L. Klein, Esq.
2000 One Logan Square
Philadelphia, PA 19103
William C. Kollas, Esq.
Kollas, Costopoulos, Foster & Fields
831 Market Street/P.O. Box 222
Lemoyne, PA 17043
Richard W. Stevenson, Esq.
McNees, Wallace & Durick
100 pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
Robert M. Frey, Esq.
5 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Joseph A. O'Connor, Jr., Esq.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
2000 One Logan Square
Philadelphia, PA 19103
William F. Martson, Esq.
Martson, Deardorff, William & otto
10 East High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Barbara M. McClure
129 Lewisbury Road
Mechanicsburg, PA
.61.( )