Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-13-99 . Robert M. Mumma, II BoxE Bowmansdale, P A 17008 (717) 766-6793 August 13, 1999 The Honorable Judges Olyler and Hoffer Cumberland County Courthouse One Courthouse Square Carlisle, PA 17013 To the Honorable Court: I did not receive a copy of the Estate's Memorandum of Law until after the hearing. Most certainly, the estate may serve any materials documents that they wish upon me for Robert M. Mumma, III or my two other children. As the matter goes, I was appointed by York County Court as guardian Ad Litum for all three children. At the outset, the Estate lacks standing to re raise an issue that has already been concluded by this Court. The issue was concluded by Judge Sheely that my motion to revoke the disclaimer was granted. It was a final order, there has been no further appeal, and the Estate lacks standing to raise that issue on their own. If there was such an issue, it would be between me and my children, and my fiduciary duty to them. If this Court would open the issue of my disclaimer and revocation of the disclaimer (which I do not think should be reopened) I had never authorized, in accordance with Pennsylvania law, the filing of the disclaimer, and, in fact, the only disclaimer that I authorized was for the benefit of IRS regulations. There are other issues relative to misrepresentation and fraud in the inducement for signing the waiver in the first place, however, at this date, I believe that it is unnecessary because this Honorable Court came to the right conclusion, that there is no disclaimer, without the necessity of opening all of those issues up relative to the disclaimer itself, and how and why I signed the same. The bottom line is, the Estate is trying to hide behind a fabricated open issue (which there is not) to avoid giving me a final account of my father's Estate. Whether the accounting is for me or on behalf of my children, I am still entitled to an accounting, nevertheless. The issue relating to my disclaimer was adjudicated. If there is any open issue, the Estate doesn't have standing in any event, and if the Estate is interested in preserving assets and "preventing excess fees" they should not be raising fabricated issues and requesting this Court to appoint a guardian Ad Litum to represent my children in excess of five years after an appeal was dismissed, and six years after a final order of the Honorable Judge Sheely. I might add that there are numerous other issues relative to the disclaimer that would be raised if there was ever a hearing on that issue, including distribution already made, under the will, which, in fact, in and of itself would vitiate the disclaimer. Further, a partial accounting was made in 1992, to me, which I had taken exceptions to. I believe that would certainly be a waiver of any issues that the Estate is now raising regarding to whom an accounting should be made. The Executrixes and the attorneys for the Estate are willing to go to any length to avoid being accountable for their actions and management of my father's Estate. Respectfully submitted, ~M..~~J) Robert M. Mumma, II RMMII/rm cc: Joseph O'Conner, Jr., Esquire Ivo Otto, III, Esquire <I .j o <I ~ .t ~ ~ .. - - - - \t n '", )' '::i ~ (j~ ~~~ ~... ~o [~, "d S. l ~~ >6(ji;' --"~Og_ -..1", ~ Ov> 0- ;:;;~~~ ~ (j '" 29 ~l ~l s: W t!t.~ '. ' ~f"'~.OO 00 ;;v.I . VI . .. S OUNll!'o~t " 0 f'.. 1~ , ~lil} "VI. ,~ ." P ,. ,.." ~~~. o~~ l\ -"'-000