Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-24-05 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA (.-:, IN RE: ESTATE OF ROBERT M. MUMMA, ORPHANS' COURT DIVISION, - .-'.'1 Deceased No. 21-86-398 PETITION TO STAY AUDIT PENDING COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY I. Petitioner is Robert M. Mumma II, pro se, a beneficiary of the Estate of Robert M. Mumma. 2. Respondent is the Estate of Robert M. Mumma, by and through its Executrixes and Trustees, Barbara McK. Mumma and Lisa Mumma Morgan. 3. Pursuant to a request by the Estate for an auditor to review the accounting, the Honorable Judge Oler appointed Taylor Andrews, Esquire, to act as auditor. 4. Petitioner has previously filed for the removal of Taylor Andrews as auditor and a hearing was held on that motion on II March 2005 before the Honorable Judge Oler. 5. At that hearing Petitioner argued among other things that any action by the auditor should be stayed until the completion of discovery in the estate. 6. Over the last nineteen years Petitioner has repeatedly requested discovery in this case, but has repeatedly been denied access by the Estate to various discoverable documents. 7. Under the Orphans' Court Rules (local and state), after the audit and report are completed a party shall be permitted to file exceptions to the auditor's report, but new objections to the accounting shall be precluded. 8. If the Estate is permitted to continue to refuse Petitioner discovery, then he could be precluded from raising all objections to the account prior to the audit and would therefore be foreclosed from ever raising those objections. '-.".'1 'I"<J t"..) J 9. Without the benefit of discovery the auditor will be unable to adequately audit the account and will be unable to review all possible objections to the account. 10. As a residuary trust beneficiary of the Estate of Robert M. Mumma the Petitioner is entitled to review and inspect the "subject matter of the trust and the accounts and vouchers and other documents relating to the trust", including opinions of counsel. See Follansbee v. Gerlach. 22 Fiduc.Rep.2 319,56 Pa.D.&CA'h 483 (2002) and Section 173 of the Restatement (Second) of Trusts II. As beneficiary of the estate, Petitioner is entitled to review the work product, billing records and other items regarding this matter being held by the law firms of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Martson Deardorff Williams & Otto, Goldberg Katzman & Shipman, Hadley & Company, Crary Buchanan, Jordan Fields, Esquire, and any other law or accounting firms retained and paid for by the Estate. 12. The account filed by the Estate indicates that over the last nineteen years the Marital Trust has paid Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 1.774 million dollars and has also paid the firms of Martson, Deardorff, Williams and Otto, Goldberg Katzman & Shipman and Hadley & Company, among many others. 13. In the last nineteen years the Estate has paid over 3.8 million (3,800,000) in fees to attorneys and accountants, whose files should all be discoverable by Petitioner. 14. Since the aforementioned firms were paid from Estate funds rather than by the Executrixes/Trustees individually, all work product, records and other items pertaining to such payments are discoverable by the Petitioner or any other beneficiary. Follansbee Id. 15. In contrast to the Estate's position, Petitioner avers that it is premature to compel an audit before the completion of discovery in that " documents sought on discovery, relating to a trust are relevant to the subject matter of an audit of the trustee's account, and may substantially aid in preparation of objections to the account." Matter of Estate of Rosenblum, 459 Pa. 201, 328 A.2d 158 (1974). 16. Since Petitioner's due process rights to fully object to the account will be jeopardized ifhe is denied discovery, he respectfully requests this Court to stay the audit until completion of discovery. 17. Further, inorder to expedite this matter, the Petitioner requests this Court to specifically order that the Estate must make all records available for review by the Petitioner within thirty days or face sanctions in the amount of One Thousand ($1000) Dollars per day. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests this Court to Stay the Audit proceedings pending the completion of discovery by the Petitioner and to set a time period in which the records must be made available for review or otherwise face sanctions. k~~ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Robert M. Mumma II, hereby certifY that I served the foregoing Motion upon all counselors of record and upon Attorney Andrews ~y sending copies of said motion to the following via postage-prepaid, first-class, U.S. Mail: Ivo V. Otto, III, Esquire Martson Deardorff Williams & Otto Ten East High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Joseph A. O'Connor, Jr., Esquire Brady 1. Green, Esquire Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, P A 19103-2921 Taylor P. Andrews, Esquire Court-Appointed Auditor Andrews & Johnson Law Offices 78 West Pomfret Street Carlisle, P A 17013 Ralph A. Jacobs, Esquire Ralph A. Jacobs & Associates LLC 215 S. Broad Street, 10th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19107 ;~ <-1[ 2cO:? Date ' 7lJJJ-~1 Robert M. Mumma II