Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-3773IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ROBERTO ESCALET VS. No.: 6s - 3773 COMMONWEALTH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING LICENSE SUSPENSION APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: AND NOW, comes the Petitioner, ROBERTO ESCALET, by and through his attorney, David E. Hershey, Esquire, of Wiley, Lenox, Colgan & Marzzacco, P.C., and files this Appeal and in support thereof, avers as follows: 1. Petitioner, Roberto Escalet is a licensed driver in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with a residence address of 4 Hazelwood Path, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, PA 17050. 2. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing has a mailing address at 1101 South Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17104. 3. Petitioner received an official notice of suspension with a mail date of July 4, 2005, from the Department indicating that his driving privilege is scheduled to be suspended on August 8, 2005, for an exceeding maximum speed violation which incurred 5 points bringing an accumulated total of 11 points. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 4. The proposed suspension is outlined in Exhibit "A" is illegal, improper, or invalid for some or all of the following reasons: a. The underlying summary conviction is currently pending appeal in Cumberland County. b. The proposed suspension is otherwise in violation of the Vehicle Code and/or case law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner prays your Honorable Court enter a supersedeas pursuant to Section 1550 of the Vehicle Code and to schedule a hearing relative to the merits of this appeal. Respectfully submitted, WILEY, LENOX, COLGAN & MARRZZACCO, P.C. / j by: avid ?. Hershey, Esquire 130 West Church Street Suite 100 Dillsburg, PA 17019 (717) 432-9666 Dated: ?`? ID No.: 43092 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bureau of Driver Licensing Harrisburg, PA 17123 JULY 04, 2005 ROBERTO ESCALET WID * 051789283079440 001 4 HAZLEWOOD PATH PROCESSING DATE 06/27/2005 DRIVER LICENSE # 25580268 MECHANICSBURG PA 17050 DATE OF BIRTH 06/29/1972 Dear Motorist: As a result of your conviction of violating section 3362 of the Vehicle Code EXCEEDING MAXIMUM SPEED on 06/22/2005, 5 points have been assigned to your record. Your total point accumulation is 11 points. Since your point record shows an accumulation of 11 Points, a sanction of 365 DAY(S) is hereby imposed as man- dated by Section 1539 of the Vehicle Code. In order to comply with this sanction you are required to return any current driver's license, learner's permit and/or temporary driver's license (camera card) in your possession no later than the effective date listed. If you cannot comply with the requirements stated above, you are required to submit a DL16LC Form or a sworn affidavit stating that you are aware of the sanction against your driving Privi- lege. Failure to comply with this notice shall result in this Bureau referring this matter to the Pennsylvania State Police for prosecution under SECTION 1571(a)(4) of the Ve- hicle Code. Although the law mandates that your driving privilege is under suspension even if you do not surrender your license, Credit will not begin until all current driver's license product(s), the DL16LC Form, or a letter acknowledging your sanction is received in this Bureau. WHEN THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVES YOUR LICENSE OR ACKNOWLEDGE- MENT, WE WILL SEND YOU A RECEIPT. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE THIS RECEIPT WITHIN 15 DAYS CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT IMMEDIATELY. OTHERWISE, YOU WILL NOT BE GIVEN CREDIT TOWARD SERVING THIS SANCTION. The effective date of suspension is 08/08/2005, 12:01 a.m. 051789283079440 Please see the enclosed application for restoration fee in- formation. You will be notified of any outstanding restoration re- quirements approximately 30 days before the eligibility date of the restoration of your driving privilege. You must follow those instructions very carefully in order to have your driving privilege restored. APPEAL You have the right to appeal this action to the Court of Common Pleas (Civil Division) within 30 days of the mail date, JULY 04, 2005, of this letter. If you file an appeal in the County Court, the Court will give you a time-stamped certified copy of the appeal. In order for your appeal to be valid, you must send this time-stamped certified copy of the appeal by certified mail to: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Office of Chief Counsel Third Floor, Riverfront Office Center Harrisburg, PA 17104-2516 Sincerely, Rebecca L. Bickley, Director Bureau of Driver Licensing SEND FEE/LICENSE/DL-16LC/T0: INFORMATION (7:00 AM TO 9:00 PM) Department of Transportation IN STATE 1-800-932-4600 Bureau of Driver Licensing OUT-OF-STATE 717-391-6190 P.D. Box 68693 TDD IN STATE 1-800-228-0676 Harrisburg, PA 17106-8693 TDD OUT-OF-STATE 717-391-6191 VERIFICATION The undersigned, Fp6erto $ ca l e f , verifies that the statements made in this document are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. 1 understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. §4404, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Dated: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On the _? day of July 2005, 1 certify that a copy of the foregoing petition was served upon the following attorney for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania by First- class Mail, as follows: George Kabusk, Esquire Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bureau of Driver Licensing 1101 South Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17104 Respectfully submitted, WILEY, LENOX, COLGAN & MARZZACCO, P.C. by?shey, Esquire 130 West Church Street Suite 100 Dillsburg, PA 17019 (717) 432-9666 ID No.: 43092 N Tf J?. i41 C L C,J C C-1 -n -r i 7 0-1-? RECEIVED JUL 2 620o5 w IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ROBERTO ESCALET Vs. No.: OS- 2'173 COMMONWEALTH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING ORDER t`CULL AND NOW, this 2-79 day of 0 2005, upon consideration of the attached Appeal and the reasons supporting me, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that a hearing on the merits of this case is hereby scheduled for the (Q {yam day of (? Pti , 2005 at p.m. in Courtroom No. _L of the Cumberland County Courthouse, One Courthouse Square, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. Pursuant to Section 1550 of the Motor Vehicle Code, the Department of Transportation is hereby Ordered to stay the proposed thre-rho h sHspensipn yntk such time as is case can be aided n its rit , 0ll1 C cx e? z s 2 S? 1 S D1i1 m cz?Q c? b- Distribution: Cumberland County Prothonotary's Office avid E. Hershey, Esquire, 130 West Church Street, Suite 100, Dillsburg, PA 17019 A. orge Kabusk, Esquire, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bureau of Driver Licensing, 1101 South Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17104 f??ll0?`it? l/ 0 ;11L .. S t1.Y i!- IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ROBERTO ESCALET Vs. COMMONWEALTH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING No.: 05-3773 CIVIL TERM PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE TO THE HONORABLE J. WESLEY OLER, JR., JUDGE OF SAID COURT: AND NOW, comes, Roberto Escalet, Petitioner in the above-captioned matter, by and through his attorneys, Wiley, Lenox, Colgan & Marzzacco, P.C., who respectfully file the within Motion for Continuance, and in support thereof, avers the following: 1. A timely license suspension appeal was filed in the above-captioned matter. 2. Your Honorable Court scheduled a hearing for October 19, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. 3. The basis of the appeal is that Petitioner's underlying summary conviction is pending on appeal in Cumberland County Court. 4. At Defendant's request and with Judge Guido's approval, the underlying summary appeal has been continued until February 2006 at which time it is expected that the appeal will be resolved. 5. Counsel for the Department of Transportation, George Kabusk, Esquire, has been contacted regarding this request for relief and has indicated that the Department has no objection to this request. 6. Continuance of the above-captioned appeal is necessary to avoid an unnecessary interruption in Petitioner's driving privileges as the Department has entered a supersedeas on the proposed one (1) year suspension as a result of this appeal. WHEREFORE, Petitioner prays that your Honorable Court reschedule the above-mentioned license suspension appeal for February 2006 for the above- mentioned reasons. Respectfully submitted, WILEY, LENOX, COLGAN & MARZZACCO, P.C. by. Davies. Hershey, Esquire 130 West Church Street Suite 100 Dillsburg, PA 17019 (717) 432-9666 ID No.: 43092 ??? ?'??' Dated: VERIFICATION The undersigned, on behalf of my client, Roberto Escalet, verify that the statements made in this document are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. §4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Respectfully submitted, WILEY, LENOX, COLGAN & MARZZACCO, P.C. by: Da ' . Hershey, Esquire 130 West Church Street Suite 100 Dillsburg, PA 17019 (717) 432-9666 ID No.: 43092 G'? Dated:,/ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On the / day of October 2005, 1 certify that a copy of the foregoing petition was served upon the following attorney for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania by First-class Mail, as follows: George Kabusk, Esquire Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bureau of Driver Licensing 1101 South Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17104 Respectfully submitted, WILEY, LENOX, COLGAN & MARZZACCO, P.C. x 17019 (717) 432-9666 ID No.: 43092 David . Hershe y, Esquire 130 West Church St reet by: Dillsburg, E. Suite 100 N L? ?;> ?` t c- cn .a ,,_r ...1 `:? t' .. <_ .s. ? RECEIVED OCT 412005 `y IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ROBERTO ESCALET VS. No.: OS`- -3-7-73 COMMONWEALTH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING ORDER AND NOW, this 1!2 1 day of October 2005, upon review of Petitioner's Motion for Continuance and noting further that the Department of Transportation has no objection and noting further the reasons in support herein, said request is hereby This matter is rescheduled for the day of 2006 at ?.m. in a courtroom ?_. BY THE COURT: Distribution: Cu berland County Prothonotary's Office eorge Kabusk, Esquire, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 1101 South Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17104 ,,avid E. Hers y, Esquire, 130 West Church Street, Suite 100, Dillsburg, PA 17019 V .J } j ? '"? i,- ?,?; ?ilT ?- ,?A, rM ROBERTO ESCALET vs Case No. 05-3773 COMM. OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING Statement of Intention to Proceed To the Court: DAVID E. HERSHEY, ESQ. intends to proceed with the above captioned matter. Print Name DAVID. E. HERSHEY, ESQSmgn Name Date:-10108108 Attomey for RpBERTn RCALP.T Explanatory Comment The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has promulgated new Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 governing the termination of inactive cases and amended Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. Two aspects of the recommendation merit comment. 1. Rule of civil Procedure New Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 has been promulgated to govern the termination of inactive cases within the scope of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The termination of these cases for inactivity was previously governed by Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and local rules promulgated pursuant to it. New Rule 230.2 is tailored to the needs of civil actions. It provides a complete procedure and a uniform statewide practice, preempting local rules. This rule was promulgated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shop v. Eagle, 551 Pa. 360,710 A.2d 1104 (1998) in which the court held that "prejudice to the defendant as a result of delay in prosecution is required before a case may be dismissed pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901." Rule of Judicial Administration 1901(b) has been amended to accommodate the new rule of civil procedure. The general policy of the prompt disposition of matters set forth in subdivision (a) of that rule continues to be applicable. II Inactive Cases The purpose of Rule 230.2 is to eliminate inactive cases from the judicial system. The process is initiated by the court. After giving notice of intent to terminate an action for inactivity, the course of the procedure is with the parties. If the parties do not wish to pursue the case, they will take no action and "the Prothonotary shall enter an order as of course temiinating the matter with prejudice for failure to prosecute." If a party wishes to pursue the matter, he or she will file a notice of intention to proceed and the action shall continue. a. Where the action has been terminated If the action is terminated when a party believes that it should not have been terminated, that party may proceed under Rule230(d) for relief from the order of termination. An example of such an occurrence might be the termination of a viable action when the aggrieved party did not receive the notice of intent to terminate and thus did not timely file the notice of intention to proceed. The timing of the filing of the petition to reinstate the action is important. If the petition is filed within thirty days of the entry of the order of termination on the docket, subdivision (d)(2) provides that the court must grant the petition and reinstate the action. If the petition is filed later than the thirty-day period, subdivision (d)(3) requires that the plaintiff must make a show in to the court that the petition was promptly filed and that there is a reasonable explanation or legitimate excuse both for the failure to file the notice of intention to proceed prior to the entry of the order of termination on the docket and for the failure to file the petition within the thirty-day period under subdivision (d)(2). B. Where the action has not been terminated An action which has not been terminated but which continues upon the filing of a notice of intention to proceed may have been the subject of inordinate delay. In such an instance, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedy of a common law non pros which exits independently of termination under Rule 230.2. ,, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On the day of October, 2008, I certify that a copy of the foregoing Statement of Intention to Proceed was served upon the following attorney for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing by regular U.S. mail, first class, as follows: Philip Bricknell, Esquire Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Office of Chief Counsel 1101 S. Front St. Harrisburg, PA 17104 Date: Respectfully submitted, David E. Hershey, Esq ire COLGAN MARZZACCO, LLC ID No.: 43092 130 W. Church St., Ste. 100 Dillsburg, PA 17019 (717) 502-5000 ?"} r.y _ _ C°? ,...? f' ; ' '`_ '` t^ ' ' . ' ? r' ? -w... r <-, ,- ? .. <_., David D. Bued Prothonotary XirkS. Sohonage, ESQ Solicitor F : Z Renee X Simpson I" Deputy Prothonotary Irene E. 9Yorrow 2nd Deputy Prothonotary Office of the Prothonotary Cumberfand County, Tennsykania 01 --3!7m CIVIL TERM ORDER OF TERMINATION OF COURT CASES AND NOW THIS 25T" DAY OF OCTOBER, 2011, AFTER MAILING NOTICE OF INTENTION TO PROCEED AND RECEIVING NO RESPONSE -THE ABOVE CASE IS HEREBY TERMINATED WITH PREJUDICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PA R.C.P 230.2 BY THE COURT, DAVID D. BUELL PROTHONOTARY One Courthouse Square* Suite 100 • Carfisle, PA 17013 • (717)240-6195 0 'Tax, (717) 240-6573