HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-3921
BRENDA J. LANDIS
20 Burning Tree Court
York, Pennsylvania 17404
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
NO. OS- - 39J./ C;L>,-L~82-Y>J
CARROLL A. QUARLES
3861 Twin Lakes Court
Gwynn Oak, MD 21244
THEODORE R. WEDDINGTON,
Frederick Road
Ellicott City, MD 21043
ROADLlNK USA EAST, L.L.C.
1240 Win Drive
Bethlehem, PA 18017
and
EASTERN AMERICAN TRANSPORT
& WAREHOUSING, INC.
8501 Hegerman Street
Philadelphia, PA 19136
Defendants
CIVIL ACTION
PRAECIPE FOR WRIT OF SUMMONS
To: Prothonotary
Issue a writ of summons in Civil Action on behalf of Brenda J. Landis and against
Carroll A. Quarles, Theodore R. Weddington, Roadlink USA East, L.L.C., and Eastern
American Transport & Warehousing, Inc.
M
~
Jonathan H. Rudd
1.0. No. 56880
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
(717)232-8000
Date: August 1 , 2005
"
,..;.
'f~
~... ~~~9
~... \.' (
'v .< --.
f-,' - ",) . V"
:.-. (.~
~ -(,Q.
lJ\.
VI.
ut
" \)
" -.)
.J;l
~ I:'or
\)
~
tjI
"')
"..;"
-),-(~":'-
. -. \'~ '
-\
<:';:'
~-,~;
c:-
~
--
..--
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
County of Cumberland
WRIT OF SUMMONS
BRENDA J. LANDIS
20 BURNING TREE COURT
YORK, PA 17404
Plaintiff
Court of Common Pleas
Vs.
No. 05-3921 CIVIL TERM
In CivilAction-Law
CARROLL A. QUARLES
3861 TWIN LAKES COURT
GWYNN OAK, MD 21244
THEODORE R. WEDDINGTON
FREDERICK ROAD
ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043
ROAD LINK USA EAST, L.L.C.
1240 WIN DRIVE
BETHLEHEM, PA 18017
AND
EASTERN AMERICAN TRANSPORT
& W AREHODSING, INC.
8501 HE GERMAN STREET
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19136
Defendant
To CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE R. WEDDINGTON, ROADLINK
USA EAST, L.L.c., AND EASTERN AMERICAN TRANSPORT &
WAREHOUSING, INC.,
You are hereby notified that BRENDA J. LANDIS, the Plaintiff has I have
commenced an action in Civil Action-Law against you which you are required to defend
or a default judgment may be entered against you.
(SEAL)
Date AUGUST 1, 2005
Deputy
Attorney:
Name: JONATHAN H. RUDD, ESQUIRE
Address: MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
100 PINE STREET
P.O.BOX 1166
HARRISBURG, PA 17108
Attorney for: Plaintiff
Telephone: 717-232-8000
Supreme Court ID No. 56880
BRENDA J. LANDIS,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CARROLL A. QUARLES, et aI.,
Defendants
: NO. 05-3921
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF WRIT OF SUMMONS
UPON EASTERN AMERICAN TRANSPORT & WAREHOUSING, INC.
B&R
235 SOUTH 13TH STREET
PHilADELPHIA, PA 19107
PHONE: (215) 546-7400
FAX: (215) 985-0169
"'F!
Na/ional Association of Philadelphia Association
ProfessiMsl Process SeNars of Professional Process Servers
8enic.e.. for hofuaionab IDe..
Brenda J. Landis
COURT
Court of Common Pleas of Pennsylvania
-vs-
COUNTY Cumberland County
CASE NUMBER 05-3921
Carroll A. Quarles, et al
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA:
B&R Control #
Reference Number
CS017196 -1
Ron Stein, being duly sworn according to law, deposes and says that he/she is the process server/sheriff
herein named, and that the facts set forth below are true and correct to the best of their knowledge, information
and belief.
On August 8, 2005 we received the SUMMONS, and that service was effected upon EASTERN
AMERICAN TRANSPORT & WAREHOUSING, INC. at 8801 Torresdale Avenue Philadelphia PA 19136, on
the 10 DAY OF AUGUST, 2005 at 9:00AM, in the manner described below:
By service upon TOM WEED, FINANCIAL PLANNER as agent or person in charge of office or usual
place of business.
Description
Age
Other
Height
Weight
Race Caucasian Sex M Hair
Served at second address.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
r
MMONWEAL..TH OF PENNSYLVANIA.
NOT,~RIAL SEAL
NADINE 0 HuGHES, Notary Public
City of Philao8lphia, Phlia. County
, . ,~
Ron Stein
Addr# 1
8501 Hegerman S ~~adeIPhia PA 19136'
8/10/2005 8:54 AM Other
The defendant is no longer at this location.
Law Firm For Plaintiff Phone
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees, Wallace & Nurick
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17106
Identification #
(717)232-8000
BR Serve By 813012005
Flied Date 8/1/2005
ORIGINAL
Civil
o
~~
~;2P~'
-'/'" ;
~~2'~"
r:::t
~~~~" I
,';';;;:C"
y(;,~
~
.....'
=
~
E:
c;->
-1
~-
-0
::J::
r:-?
U'1
N
~
;;a'"1J
, "r-
-om
f3~
:~ :+\
(5-0
:;,-m
~~
;,;;
:...;:
BRENDA J. LANDIS,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CARROLL A. QUARLES, et aI.,
Defendants : NO. 05-3921
PRAECIPE TO REISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
To: Prothonotary
Reissue the Writ of Summons in this action.
McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
By
,-)
nathan H. Rudd
00 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
(717)232-8000
Date: September 13, 2005
Attorneys for Plaintiff
(;,
s'f~
--~I
01
(,
SHERIFF'S RETURN - OUT OF COUNTY
CASE NO: 2005-03921 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
LANDI S BRENDA J
VS
QUARLES CARROLL A ET AL
R. Thomas Kline
, Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff who being
duly sworn according to law, says, that he made a diligent search and
and inquiry for the within named DEFENDANT
, to wit:
ROADLINK USA EAST LLC
but was unable to locate Them
in his bailiwick. He therefore
deputized the sheriff of NORTHAMPTON
County, Pennsylvania, to
serve the within WRIT OF SUMMONS
On September 13th , 2005 , this office was in receipt of the
attached return from NORTHAMPTON
Sheriff's Costs:
Docketing
Out of County
Surcharge
Dep Northampton
Postage
18.00
9.00
10.00
52.00
.37
89.37
09/13/2005
BRENDA LANDIS
Co
as kllne
ff of Cumberland County
Sworn and subscribed to before me
this I ~ day of Scp-J.~ l.e/
J,,6': A.'.D' ~
{3~l;iiic;o'r
In The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania
Brenda J. Landis
VS.
Carol A. Quarles, et. al.
Serve: Roadlink USA East LLC
No.
2005-3921 Civil
Now,
8/2/05
. , I, SHERIFF OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, P A, do
hereby deputize the Sheriff of Northampton
County to execute this Writ, this
deputation being made at the request and risk of the Plaintiff.
~~=~~~
Sheriff of Cumberland County, PA
. Affidavit of Service
Now,
,20_, at
o'clock
M. served the
within
upon
at
by handing to
copy of the original
a
and made known to
the contents thereof.
So answers,
Sheriff of
County, P A
Sworn and subscribed before
me this _ day of ,20_
COSTS
SERVICE
MILEAGE
AFFIDAVIT
$
$
..; ..
I All information from the attorney must be filled-in before 4. When a Deputy Sheriff levys or attaches property. he or she
service can be made. will leave the property without a watchman and in custody of
2. Prepare a separate Order for Service form for each defendant to whomever is found in possession, after notifying the person
be served by the Sheriff. the property is under a Sheriff s levy. The Sheriff or
3. When completinl! location for service, be certain to Deputy is not liable in any way for protecting pro;Jerty.
have a valid address or directions. Do not nse P.O. 5. Service will be executed in accordance"with Rule 402 and Title
Boxes or R.D. - ADDRESSES ONLY. Provide the 231, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure.
6. The attorney must certify all copies of process.
township, if applicable. 7. Supply a self-addressed stamped envelope for return of service.
PLAINTIFF,
BRENDA J LANDIS
DEFENDANT,
CAROL A OUARLES eta1
SERVE UPON, LOCATIO",
ROADLINK USA EAST LLC 1240 WIN DRIVE
TYPEOFWRIT: BETHLEHEM PA 18017
WRIT OF SUMMONS
A TIORNEY (NAME, ADDRESS. PHONE) ATIORNEY SIGNATURE,
HON R THOMAS KLINE
ORDER FOR SERVICE REQUEST
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REQUESTING ATIORNEY
DOCKET NUMBER,
FOR PROTHONOTARY USE ONLY
LAST DAY FOR SERVICE,
FEES PAID,
:J 1:1.1
,J, t:. ASAP
RETURN OF SERVICE (To be completed by Sheriff)
DATE,
,4Lc.
/ c/ (J ?c-J ';i)
Served in the following manner:
( ) Defendant personally served
( ) Adult family member with whom said defendant resides
( ) Adult in charge of defendant's residence
( ) Manager/Clerk of place of lodging in which defendant resides
~gent or person in charge of defendant's office or usual place of business
~ ) Officer of said defendant company
( ) Posted property
( ) Levy on property
tt6~~~ Y.s ~
( ) BOROUGH OF)a:l1ITY OF ( ) TOWNSHIP OF,
'4ft-I~
(Comments)
SO ANSWERS, JEFFREY K HA WBECKER
SHERIFF OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
I hereby deputize the Sheriff of County,
To execute and make a return on the above and attached action according to law.
hi $-/7
.
Bad e#
Sheriff of Northam ton Count
Date
ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE
I accept service of the
authorized to do so.
on behalf of
and certify that I am
(Defendant or Authorized Agent)
(Mailing Address)
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
669 WASHINGTON STREET
EASTON, PA 18042-7483
(610) 559-3084
(610) 559-3781 (REAL ESTATE)
v.
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 05-3921
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE
R. WEDDINGTON, ROADLlNK USA
EAST, L.L.C., and EASTERN
AMERICAN TRANSPORT &
WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION
NOTICE
YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth
in the following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint
and Notice are served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and
filing in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against
you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a
judgment may be entered against you by the Court without further notice for any money
claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You
may lose money or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE A LAWYER, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW.
THIS OFFICE CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT HIRING A
LAWYER.
IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE A LAWYER, THIS OFFICE MAY BE ABLE TO
PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT AGENCIES THAT MAY OFFER LEGAL
SERVICES TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS AT A REDUCED FEE OR NO FEE.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
32 South Bedford Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 249-3166
(800) 990-910~
RId
J athan H. Rudd, Esquire
cNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 237-5405
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Date: February 16, 2006
v.
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 05-3921
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE
R. WEDDINGTON, ROADUNK USA
EAST, L.L.C., and EASTERN
AMERICAN TRANSPORT &
WAREHOUSING,INC.
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION
COMPLAINT
1. Plaintiff is Brenda J. Landis, an adult individual who resides at 20 Burning
Tree Court, York County, York, Pennsylvania 17404.
2. Defendant, Carroll A. Quarles (hereinafter "Quarles"), is an adult individual
with a principal place of residence at 2817 Mayfield Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland
21213.
3. Defendant, Theodore R. Weddington (hereinafter "Weddington"), is an adult
individual with a principal place of residence at 8505 Frederick Road, P.O. Box 1336,
Howard County, Ellicott City, Maryland 21043.
4. Defendant, Roadlink USA East, LLC (hereinafter "Roadlink"), is a Delaware
limited liability company with a Pennsylvania place of business at 1240 Win Drive,
Northhampton County, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18017.
5. Defendant, Eastern American Transport & Warehousing, Inc. (hereinafter
"Eastern American Transport") is a corporation which maintains a place of business at
8501 Hegerman Street, Philadelphia County, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19136.
1
6. This action arises out of the collision between a tractor-trailer and passenger
vehicle that occurred on August 11,2003, between 8:30 A.M. and 9:00 A.M., on
Interstate 83, near the border between York County and Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania (hereinafter referred to as the "Accident").
7. At the time of the Accident, Plaintiff was the owner and operator of a 1999
Chrysler Sebring Convertible, Pennsylvania registration number PZT708B (hereinafter
the "Car").
8. At the time and place of the Accident, Plaintiff was operating the Car in a
northerly direction on Interstate 83.
9. At the time and place of the Accident, Defendant Quarles was operating a
2000 International Tractor, Maryland registration number 463F55, pulling an enclosed
trailer (hereinafter the "Tractor-Trailer"), also in a northerly direction on Interstate 83.
10. Immediately prior to the subject Accident, Plaintiff was operating the Car in
the left hand lane and had just passed Exits 39B (Interstate 76/Pennsylvania Turnpike)
and 40A (Limekiln Road).
11. Immediately prior to the subject Accident, Plaintiff was operating the Car at
the lawful rate of speed.
12. As Plaintiff passed Exit 40A, Defendant Quarles was operating the Tractor-
Trailer in the right hand lane of Interstate 83, and began to pass the Car on its right
hand side.
2
13. The Accident started when Defendant Quarles attempted to change from the
right hand to left hand lane when the rear of the Tractor portion of the Tractor-Trailer
was adjacent and next to the Car driven by Plaintiff in the left hand lane.
14. Prior to attempting to change lanes, Defendant Quarles failed to use his turn
signals to indicate that he intended to change lanes.
15. As Defendant Quarles attempted to move the Tractor-Trailer from the right
hand to the left hand lane, the rear portion of the tractor and/or front portion of the trailer
violently struck the right hand side of the Car driven by Plaintiff (hereinafter the "Initial
Impact").
16. At or immediately prior to the Initial Impact, Plaintiff activated the horn of the
Car with such force that she sprained her wrists.
17. After the Initial Impact, Defendant Quarles temporarily moved the Tractor-
Trailer back toward the right, and then immediately moved back toward the left and
violently struck the Car a second time (hereinafter the "Second Impact").
18. At the time of the Second Impact, the Tractor-Trailer had moved farther
ahead of the Car, and the Second Impact took place between closer to the middle of the
Trailer and the right-hand side of the Car.
19. At all times between the Initial Impact and Second Impact, Plaintiff continued
to apply the horn of the Car.
3
20. After the Second Impact, Defendant Quarles once again temporarily pulled
the Tractor-Trailer to the right, and then suddenly pulled back to the left and violently
struck the Car for a third time (the "Third Impact").
21. At the time of the Third Impact, the Tractor-Trailer had continued to move
farther ahead of the Car, and the Third Impact took place between the rear of the Trailer
and the right-hand side of the Car.
22. At all times between the Second Impact and Third Impact, Plaintiff continued
to apply the horn of the Car.
23. After the Third Impact, Defendant Quarles finally passed Plaintiffs Car, and
continued to operate the Tractor-Trailer in a northerly direction on Interstate 83 without
any immediate attempt to stop and pull over to the side of the road.
24. After the Third Impact, Plaintiff was eventually able to bring the Car to a stop.
25. Based upon eye witness statements, Plaintiff believes and therefore avers
that another tractor-trailer driver took some action to intervene in order to prevent
Defendant Quarles from leaving the scene of the Accident.
26. Defendant Quarles eventually brought the Tractor-Trailer to a stop and
parked the Tractor-Trailer on the right hand side of the road almost one mile north on
Interstate 83 from where the Accident began.
27. Plaintiff was assisted at the scene of the Accident by witnesses who claimed
to have observed the Accident and Defendant Quarles' apparent attempt to leave the
scene of the Accident.
4
28. Based upon eye witness statements, Plaintiff believes and therefore avers
that Defendant Quarles refused to exit the cab of the Tractor-Trailer until the police
arrived approximately thirty minutes after the Accident.
29. Prior to the police arriving, Defendant Quarles made no attempt to check on
the condition of Plaintiff.
30. Based upon information received from the Police, Plaintiff believes and
therefore avers that the 2000 International Tractor driven by Defendant Quarles at the
time of the Accident was owned by Defendant Weddington.
31. Based upon further information received by Plaintiff, she believes and
therefore avers that at the time of the Accident, Defendant Quarles was acting as the
servant, agent, employee, or was otherwise operating the Tractor-Trailer under the
control or on the behalf of Defendants Weddington, Roadlink and/or Eastern American
Transport, and was then and there operating the Tractor-Trailer while acting within the
scope and purpose of his agency, servitude, employment, control, behalf and/or
authorization of Defendants Weddington, Roadlink and/or Eastern American Transport.
32. Defendant Quarles was negligent and reckless in attempting to change lanes
when the left hand lane was already occupied by Plaintiff's Car.
33. Defendant Quarles was negligent and reckless in repeatedly striking Plaintiff's
Car when he knew or should have known that his Tractor-Trailer was adjacent to
Plaintiff's vehicle and there was no possible way for him to change lanes without
crushing Plaintiff's Car.
5
34. Defendant Quarles was negligent and reckless in failing to properly operate
the Tractor-Trailer in order to carry out a proper and safe lane change after Plaintiff's
Car had either already passed by the front of his Tractor-Trailer, or in the alternative,
once the rear of Tractor-Trailer was beyond the front of Plaintiff's Car.
35. Defendant Quarles was negligent and reckless in failing to operate the
Tractor-Trailer at a safe rate of speed such that he could make a proper and safe lane
change.
36. Defendant Quarles was negligent and reckless in failing to properly utilize his
mirrors in order to observe Plaintiff's Car before attempting to make a lane change from
the right hand to left hand lane.
37. Defendant Quarles was negligent and reckless in not recognizing after
striking the Plaintiff's Car the first time that the Tractor-Trailer was still not beyond
Plaintiff's Car when he attempted to re-enter the left hand lane the second time, which
resulted in him striking Plaintiff's Car a second time.
38. Defendant Quarles was further negligent and reckless in not recognizing after
striking the Plaintiff's Car the second time that the Tractor-Trailer was still not beyond
Plaintiff's Car when he attempted to re-enter the left hand lane the third time, which
resulted in him striking Plaintiff's Car for the third time.
39. Defendant Quarles was negligent and reckless in his repeated striking of
Plaintiff's Car when he knew or should have known that Plaintiff's Car was adjacent to
his Tractor-Trailer and there was no room for his Tractor-Trailer to move over into the
left hand lane without crushing Plaintiff's Car.
6
40. Defendant Quarles was negligent and reckless in repeatedly failing to heed
the sounding of Plaintiffs horn before and between the Initial Impact and Third Impact.
41. Defendant Quarles was negligent and reckless in failing to immediately take
steps to pull the Tractor-Trailer off onto the right-hand shoulder after the Initial Impact,
which would have eliminated the occurrence of the Second and Third Impacts.
42. Defendant Quarles was negligent and reckless in failing to immediately take
steps to pull the Tractor-Trailer off onto the right-hand shoulder after the Second Impact,
which would have eliminated the occurrence of the Second and Third Impacts.
43. It was unreasonable for Defendant Quarles to have repeatedly attempted to
change lanes when he knew that Plaintiffs Car was in the left hand lane and that there
was no room for the Tractor-Trailer to then and there move into the left hand lane
without crushing Plaintiffs Car.
44. Defendant Quarles disregarded a risk known to him or an obvious risk that he
was aware of in attempting to then and there change from the left hand to the right hand
lane despite that he knew Plaintiffs Car was in the left hand lane and knew, after
repeatedly hitting Plaintiffs Car, that there was no room for him to move over without
crushing Plaintiffs Car.
45. The risk of harm to Plaintiff was very great such as to make it highly probable
that Plaintiff would be injured as a result of Defendant Quarles' repeated attempts to
move the Tractor-Trailer over from the right hand to left hand lane despite that Plaintiffs
Car was in the left hand lane, and consequently striking Plaintiffs Car upon three
attempts until the Tractor-Trailer finally passed by Plaintiffs Car.
7
46. Defendant Quarles' operation of the Tractor-Trailer as described above
evidences a reckless indifference to Plaintiff's interests and well being by repeatedly
striking Plaintiff's Car without any apparent concern that the only way he was then and
there going to be able to move the Tractor-Tractor over to the left hand lane was by
slamming into Plaintiff's Car and eventually crushing Plaintiff's Car such that the
Tractor-Trailer would be able to pass by or over Plaintiff's Car.
47. Defendant Quarles' above described conduct in repeatedly striking Plaintiff's
Car, including after already having hit her Car once and then twice, amounts to
outrageous conduct.
48. Defendants Weddington, Roadlink and Eastern American Transport are liable
and responsible for Defendant Quarles' negligent and reckless conduct, since at the
time of the aforesaid Accident, Defendant Quarles was acting within the scope of his
agency, servitude, employment, control, behalf and/or authorization for Defendants
Weddington, Roadlink and Eastern American Transport.
49. As a result of the negligence and recklessness of Defendants as described
above, Plaintiff's body was repeatedly thrown against the left hand side of her Car, and
repeatedly shaken and jarred inside of her Car.
50. As a result of the negligence and recklessness of Defendants as described
above, Plaintiff suffered, is suffering, and will continue to suffer serious and permanent
injuries, including, but not limited to, injuries to her legs, back, neck, wrist, and left eye.
8
51. As a result of the negligence and recklessness of Defendants as described
above, Plaintiff suffered, is suffering, and will continue to suffer severe physical pain,
numbness, tingling and burning sensations throughout her left leg.
52. As a result of the negligence and recklessness of Defendants as described
above, Plaintiff suffered, is suffering, and will continue to suffer severe physical pain
throughout her lower back and neck regions, and extending down into her shoulders.
53. As a result of the negligence and recklessness of Defendants as described
above, Plaintiff suffered, is suffering, and will continue to suffer loss of mobility and/or
movement throughout her lower back and neck region.
54. As the Accident was occurring, Plaintiff believed that she was going to be
killed by the Tractor-Trailer.
55. Plaintiff continues to have "flash-backs" of the Accident that occurred on
August 11, 2003, and what she considers to be a "near death experience."
56. Plaintiff cannot avoid traveling on roads where she encounters tractor-trailers
passing her as she travels to and from work and makes other trips to and from her
home.
57. As a result of Defendant's negligence and recklessness, Plaintiff suffered, is
suffering, and will continue to suffer great mental anguish, stress, fear, trauma, and at
times a near paralyzing condition, in traveling in the vicinity of and adjacent to tractor-
trailers,
9
58. As a result of Defendants' negligence and recklessness, Plaintiff has suffered,
is suffering, and will continue to suffer a disruption of her daily habits and pursuits, and
a loss of enjoyment and the pleasures of life, including, walking, dancing, performing
household services, performing yard work, aerobics, cross country skiing, sitting for long
periods of time, climbing stairs comfortably, sitting on any hard surface, lying on flat
surfaces for any length of time, and standing for any length of time on a hard surface.
59. As a result of Defendants' negligence and recklessness, and in order to treat
the injuries caused by the Accident, Plaintiff has been compelled to expend various
sums of money for medical attention, medication and supplies, and will be required to
continue to expend sums of money for the same purpose in the future.
60. As a result of Defendants' negligence and recklessness, and as a
consequence of the injuries suffered in the Accident, and the continuing leg, neck and
back pain resulting from the Accident, Plaintiff has missed time at work and will continue
to miss time at work. The economic impact to Plaintiff as a result of the time she has
missed from work is approximately $2,000 as of the filing of this Complaint, and will
continue to increase as she misses more time at work.
61. As a result of Defendants' negligence and recklessness, Plaintiff can no
longer use a push mower to mow her lawn. Accordingly, she had to purchase a riding
lawnmower at a cost of $899.94 in order to continue mowing her lawn.
62. As a result of the continued deterioration of her physical condition caused by
the Defendants' negligence and recklessness, Plaintiff does not anticipate that she will
be able to mow her lawn with a riding lawn mower for very much longer as a result of the
10
constant bouncing and jarring on her lower back and neck. Accordingly, Plaintiff
anticipates having to hire a lawn service to mow her lawn at a significant cost to Plaintiff,
which she would not have incurred but for the Defendants' negligence and
recklessness.
63. As a result of the Defendants' negligence and recklessness, Plaintiff has been
required to pay others to assist her in maintaining the grounds around her house, which
work she would normally have done herself if not for the injuries caused by the
Accident. Plaintiff has attempted to do as much as she can physically endure
considering the physical limitations resulting from the Accident, but has still incurred
approximately $2,345 to date paying for ground's maintenance, which she would
otherwise have performed, and anticipates this amount increasing in the future.
64. As a result of Defendants' negligence and recklessness, Plaintiff is limited in
her ability to perform snow removal tasks. Plaintiff anticipates that she will incur
significant snow removal costs in the future as her condition progresses and/or
deteriorates.
65. As a result of Defendants' negligence and recklessness, Plaintiff has had to
pay others to perform household tasks, such as painting and other house maintenance
and management tasks, which she otherwise would have done but for the injuries
sustained in the Accident. Plaintiff has already incurred $1,800 in additional costs
associated with painting and approximately $750 for miscellaneous charges, and
anticipates additional household maintenance and management expenses will be
incurred in the future as a result of the Accident.
11
66. As a result of Defendants' negligence and recklessness, Plaintiff has been
deprived of sleep and at times has significant difficulty sleeping without being
interrupted by pain and other discomfort caused by the Accident.
67. As a result of Defendants' negligence and recklessness, Plaintiff had to
purchase a new mattress and box spring to try and alleviate some of the pain caused by
the Accident. Plaintiff incurred $350 for a new mattress and box spring. Plaintiff
anticipates as her condition progresses and/or deteriorates, that she will have to
purchase another mattress that provides even greater relief to the pain and discomfort
caused by the Accident.
68. Defendant Quarles' conduct was sufficiently outrageous in that he acted with
a complete reckless indifference to Plaintiff's interests and well-being in striking
Plaintiff's Car when he knew his Tractor-Trailer was adjacent to Plaintiff's Car, or did not
even care if there was a vehicle next to the Tractor-Trailer when he attempted to make
the lane change, and then on two additional occasions after he had already violently
struck Plaintiff's Car, drove into Plaintiff's Car in a continued attempt to smash his way
over into the left hand lane regardless of whether he would have to crush Plaintiff's Car
in order to change lanes, such that Defendants are responsible and liable for punitive
damages.
69. Defendant Quarles' conduct was further outrageous and evidenced a reckless
indifference to Plaintiff's interests and well-being in attempting to leave the scene of the
Accident after initially striking Plaintiff's Car and then repeatedly striking Plaintiff's Car
on two additional occasions as he left the scene of the Initial Impact.
12
70. Defendants Weddington, Roadlink and Eastern American Transport are liable
for punitive damages since Defendant Quarles was acting as the servant, agent,
employee, or was otherwise operating the Tractor-Trailer under the control or on the
behalf of Defendants Weddington, Roadlink and/or Eastern American Transport at the
time of the Accident.
71. As a result of all of the aforesaid negligent, reckless, and outrageous conduct,
Defendants are all liable for Plaintiff's compensatory damages and are further liable for
punitive damages.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against all Defendants for both
compensatory and punitive damages in an amount in excess of the Court's arbitration
limit.
Respectfully Submitted:
McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
,/'/-
v 'J<v).J
J nathan H. Rudd
.0. No. 56880
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
(717)232-8000
Dated: )- \ \ \i1\ 0 \0
13
VERIFICATION
I, Brenda J. Landis, verify that the factual statements made in the foregoing
document are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. In
making this verification, I am relying on my attorney to set forth any legal conclusions
based on the facts. The wording of this document is that of my attorneys and not my
own. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18
Pa.C.S. 94904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
1 r~-
'- !J-'Alv . '" L-./
Brenda J. LaAdis
Dated: c9-/t - d/
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
. v\.-.,
I, Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire, hereby certify that on this ~ day of February,
2006, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by first-class,
United States mail, postage prepaid, upon the following:
Carroll A. Quarles
2817 Mayfield Avenue
Baltimore, MD 21213
Roadlink USA East, L.L.C.
1240 Win Drive
Bethlehem, PA 18017
Theodore R. Weddington
8505 Frederick Road
P.O. Box 1336
Ellicott City, MD 21043
Eastern American Transport
& Warehousing Inc.
8501 Hegerman Street
Philadelphia, PA 19136
l~jJ~
r- Jo athan H. Rudd
14
r""
(".'j
~'-)
_."\)
r,,1
( ~';
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN, SCHAER & TODDY, P.c.
BY: Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Attorney J.D. # 49580
1515 Market Street, Suite] 200 Attorney for Defendants
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102
2] 5-569-2800
BRENDA J. LANDIS
vs.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY.
PENNSYLVANIA
CARROLL A. QUARLES,
THEODORE R. WEDDINGTON,
ROAD LINK USA EAST, LLC., and
EASTERN AMERICAN TRANSPORT
& WAREHOUSING
USA, INC.
No. 05-392]
DEFENDANTS, CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE R. WEDDINGTON,
ROADLINK USA, INC. AND EASTERN AMERICAN TRANSPORT's
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT
Defendants, Carroll A. Quarles ("Quarles"), Theodore R. Weddington
("Weddington") and RoadJink U.S.A., Inc. ("Roadlink"). Eastern American Transport &
Warehousing ("Eastern") by and through their undersigned counsel. hereby preliminarily
object to the allegations of Plaintiff's Complaint in this matter, and in support thereof
aver as follows:
I. This lawsuit arises from a Writ of Summons filed on August 1,2005 by
Plaintiff.
2. On February 20, 2006 Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging a personal
injury and property damage as a result of an alleged auto accident that occurred on
August 11,2003 on Interstate 83, near the border between York County and Cumberland
County, Pennsylvania See Plaintiffs' Complaint, ~6, attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
3. Plaintiff alleges in her Complaint that on the aforesaid date Defendant.
Quarles, was operating a tractor-trailer that made contact with Plaintiffs vehicle, causing
the injuries alleged in Plaintiffs Complaint. See Exhibit "A," ~49-67.
4. As a result of the accident, Plaintiff is seeking compensatory and punitive
damages. See Exhibit "A," ~71.
5. Pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure any party may tile
Preliminary Objections to averments contained in any pleading. Pa. R.C.P. I028(a).
6. Pursuant to Rule 1028(a)(4) a party may preliminarily object by way ofa
demurrer to a pleading. which is legally insufficient.
7. A demurrer is appropriate where an objecting party alleges that a pleading
does not set forth a cause of action upon which relief can be granted. Balsbaugh vs.
Rolland, 290 A.2d 85 (Pa. 1972).
I. PRELIMINARY OBJECTION PURSUANT TO Pa, R.CP. 1028(a)(4)-
DEMURRER TO ALL CLAIMS FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES
8. Plaintiff alleges that shc is entitled to punitive damages in this casc, as set
forth above, however, there are no factual allegations made in Plaintitrs Complaint.
which could support a finding of punitive damages against any of the Dcfendants.
9. Although Plaintiff alleges in her Complaint in this action various
allegations of negligence, however, none of the allegations could. under any fair reading.
support a claim for punitive damages.
] O. In order for the PlaintifT to be able to support a claim ror punitive damages
in this case, Plaintiff must allege that the conduct ofthc Defcndants named hercin was
committed willfully, maliciously, or so intentionally as to show a willful disregard by the
Defendants for the rights of the Plaintiff. Moran VS. G&W.H. Korson. Inc., 586 A.2d.
416 (Pa. 1991); Chambers vs. Montgomery, 192 A.2d 355 (Pa ] 963).
11. Punitive damages are not appropriate where the alleged conduct on the
part of the Defendants, by any fair reading of the allegations. constitutes negligence.
Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Virginia Manor Apartments. Inc., 436 Pa. 350 (Pa.
1970).
12. In fact, punitive damages are only proper pursuant to Pennsylvania Law
when the Defendants' alleged actions are so outrageous as to infer intentional, willful.
wanton or reckless conduct. Bannar vs. Miller, 70] A.2d 232 (Pa. Super 1997).
13. Plaintiff has made no allegation that could. under any fair reading.
remotely suggest the elements of a claim for punitive damages in this case.
14. Accordingly, all allegations that Plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages in
this case must be stricken from the Complaint.
15. Reliance is placed on Defendants' Memorandum of Law attached to their
Motion to Determine these Preliminary Objections. and all arguments contained in that
Memorandum are incorporated herein by reference.
WHEREFORE, Defendants request that this Court sustain Defendants'
Preliminary Objection to Plaintiffs Complaint in the form of demurrer and order that all
claims for punitive damages be stricken from Plaintiffs Complaint.
Respectfully submitted,
BY:
ZARWIN, BAlIM, DeVITO, KAPLAN,
SCHAER & TODDY, P.c.
~~~
~)RE'M. SCHAER, ESQlIIRE
Attorney for Defendants
DATE:
.., ,
'.'
,
"
"'
;:',:.
\
\
f-xhJ bil If
t-eb cl Ul:i lU:5Ua Cind':j Weakle':j
~E;:. 2[1. 7806 i(:')3~Vi t~S:fRf.J ij,:/~R;CA
817-577-4690
'W.;C:13
p.9
f, ~,': 0
Ft8. 2C. 2~OG 0: )jAi..1
t;:.:Jltr,f'i un D.",ll
BRr;:~[\a.J. L~J\!D:S
F~.s.i:....:in
; Ii'? 'HE CCUHT C:'F C0r..MviCd\! ?LE.~S
: eu .!:2-ER~I~!<D cOu~~r'f, FcNNSYLV,t,!'H;~
"'1/.
: [\IO. :;5<~f:2i
C.~.RROU_ /~_.-QU..':.RLSS, THEODO~
(Z. \VEDC;i~GTCN, ~0;\CL;r~;~ U.s/~1.
EP,ST. L_l..C.. 2~id E.~',ST5RH
f'lj'v1ERiC."::,;\! TW~~SrOR7 2;;
'/V/\REf';;OUSiNG, ::'<C.
Defu~d2;:ts
; CIVIL AC7!O~~
I~Q...IJ. C1;
YC,U ;-{,(~V= 8EEt,~ .sUSD iN CCUF(T. If yc>1.! wIsh b ('~':-3;:C:' c.~:,!n$t \:13 dc~m3 S0t bith
in the fC:icr;iTlg Pt:g~~, Yuu ~'j~.t 'tck'? 2c'i.il:.;1 \l:~lh!i; t-',s;:~:l (~:G) CZlYS zftsr ihi2. C8r.1p!Z!r,t
2J"id ~~C'~~-; ~r'2 ~:::f...'2dr by Erlter&r:g a v.uitt-s.n ;: ::,pe~~i2.'lC'~ ~;:lSO~2ny or by f..t~.'Jin2Y a;1o
,:::j' :_ .,:.... ,~. '.;~ c- ~.,,,.,....)~..~~--.,.~ ""- I..... '~_"""'.,"l...~_I._.:'_ /::"-..-1' ___:,..J
",l;1g "l 'tJ[ji.;!"18 ""I.n h,~ <~~ l ./,-,L.n ::=:.;:-'.!.:::'.:..'S ':-'.1 Q-fJ';:C"I~C:-' b ~I_ ". _ ~,,-,,rn~, 5..:~ 1D~\." 2'.:;.~,n:::.-1.
YO'..!. Yet! t~"3 \'.;':::mr.':J th2t .: vc.u fC'ul to CO G~ ~!I'~ e.-;'~.? rn.8.'J ufaC2-~d l.:"l'~t(iGLJt VOU C;rin a.
lL.!clgrl,ent ,;,-.:;:.y bG G:~8re-.j "2~Clnst YC'J by ih,~ Ga:.:rt \'~ith:J0t ':urti";ei notic:3 fo( erry monsj
clz1n'i.3d i;;'J')e Ccm~:12!nt or iei E;[""!Y ob":or c:e.{in or i';::i;:;1 rG'';~ies-~(,~j c.y Lh~ P;:J!;-JUif. ''(ou
i::_~Y iOf'e ::I:.;["';":;'Y ci p!'--?per~y or ofl~:::'r r;s:rlts jrr,'~Dj[2nt b ~tc.:..'.
YOU SHOULO TPJ-::~ ThiS P,t\PER TO YOU~ L~,VV~'SR f.:,T ONG:=, IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE ;',t.j~:/v'YER. GO TO OR Tl=tEFHCi'~E -r;-ir: Oi-fl:r= SET FORTH BELCV\',
THIS OfFiCe CAN PROVIDE YC,U \,ViTH ;r\;::CR:\~.~.~~'jOr~ J'1EOUT HIF.:!r"~G A
. L4\"VY,E~.
iF YOU CiN}-10T I~Fi':"O?D TO :-:]~'= .,~. Li~\~'i.'(c? T;-iIS or :fiC:= rvl1~ Y bS }::.,t3L:: TO
;:P~OV!D= YOU \Vl"n-l i;~~~::-o?:r-i.!-\TlC'N /'B.C'L:'-I- AG;::I.JC122 'TH~T M;;Y Cf=fE~ LEG/:"!..
-::,ERV;CE3 TO cUG!GL:= ?~?:,SC)HS /l.T ~~~ ?:EDU8[;D :=:r:;E OR 1-~1) FEE_
cur~~2S;::t..l;!\:D CDU!\.iT'{ S,~R J~G~,CC!.!\T!ON
22 SDUrl 8::,:;fcrd S~rs,~'\
C~:'Es131 F.'\ 170r~
(71f) 248..2,153
(,-. ....r\ .........~I "'Ii r.,~
{J"..J\,)f ,::;::;.;\;-:-; vC7
:.;,._L.___~"vC~L f1 )/1
/_~"'~"J J::,~';~I;j;::n H~ R~cdl :=:::;~;:-e
'.r '
\ l;"i:.!\!~~; \V.:.HCJC3 & N:.!:1C{ LlC
'-/~.~;n ,':::"G O't:';.--:.t .
.'>'"' I., ... __
~.o. 2::.x 'jiGS
D2t,~: P~~:'r'..:r:ry ~s. 200G
ll.J;T.:;j;~;;-g,:;>A H103u,1t:;:3
(Ti7) 237-5.W5
::\rt:;~(;y;: .\:: Fb:;'lt:~f
ren
cl 06 10:50a
~f~. n. 2:)::5 '0: S9A:v',
Cind" Weakle"
tA~TE~~ ,~\!.E?\CA
817-577-4590
1:10.9013
fE3. 70, iD% 9:53N,j
[P,STER;,: GFS tAll
\,('oJ. 0 IV
5F~El'.lC.'\ J. L/.d\:G~:S
''::'1:::::r;:;\'1
: :H -f!';~ cou?a GF GD~v;{/iO;\l FLE,:\S
: C::YI'.SE-E:j:;L-::.:',jO COUNTYr PEN~,)SYLV/,.f\!!A
\I.
: !~O. cE-3921
CF.RRC'LL r~.. QUA.RLE,S. IHEOC)C~i~
R. Vv2~D~NGTON. RO/\!JUf"':K u.s:,~
EP~.sT. LL.C.~ ~nj S::;':5TE:;-:~hJ
..c;,rJ~ER:CPJ'-.: l~::'l-.:2-?C~.T &
\VAF;EH)UB!NG: INC.
De{,=ndz:nts
: Cl'/;L .:~CTiOt'.:
C:f}~!'.~; r t~::~-n ,~l
1. ?;E..int!~f b 8r-:.7N.~~ J. L~r.c:;s, ell ~Jrjf.:)i k;,6iv-dr..;::! :;\ lie r<~s!j!2S 8120 5tJrl-~:ng
-~~C~'S 2>2":Et; '{c'..:: C0:':;;'~11 '(o::r1:, ?~r;!::::.;:;~'zn;a ";7-10:;.
2. ;:'~cr;~r;::'~E;;,t: Gsn"0lJ ,.c\. C!.!2r:G";; (t~er~;-:t:c:-,:t8; "Ql:~1i ~':;"}> is c:n 2duit i;:dv;d~[:l
\N~lh 0 P~-;C:p2~ p12c?; cf 1-:';.:3;-::.,:;\,;C2 c.,t 281 t rk:~),1h.:~ld N:(2nl:3.'~, 62.\t~rr::JF~!, :\~2rY!2.:I:j
212,3..
3. D.;::::i:::'cn::, Th,;-,oC:c.r:= R_ ~'Vcdd:;1;"bi1 {hH13ill~fi~""f'V.]erj'::;;;;G:O:l").;.:; f:!1 eeL',I!
ir:jjviot:DJ i':'j~h ~ p;ir~cfp~! pl.2Ge c1' rs:s;:jsnL:.3 ct 35eS ;::rtrder-".Q( RC2d, P.O, Sex: 1.:335,
;"ic;"\~.-,~;-d .Cc:..:n~"'i. S:[llz:-::;.:: Cl~YI ~<Ac,j~:12!:d 21 04.:::t
O::;:e:/Cl:;::.t, F~;:;.::.d!:r,{~ U2A E:::t, LLC {h~r2:1:i<:;~2r- I Rotc!~;;:{~\ 13 a DS!~.Ns:-e
E~T;;:8~ !:sb:;;~y' c:~rn~:=:ny ",,','it~ a PE\I!t1~Y;\'er:!8 pls::.'~ of [;~::ii1~ S'J ::t 1240 \1'1;;1 Dri'!.=.
Nc:;thhu7'np~:;il C~:...;-;LYr 8:2~h!-::';i2m, ?3:1nS'/V2n:< '~00r?
" D"t:.....---<-.,...,... :-.,.,....'....-n .;i....,.-:-~..-....~-~_..,.~,...t '" ,,(__~_,.~..,.lf'\ . (' - .~. .'"'-
:. _.0.:..,,,.'::';1,l.-, c:.':.';:'.yl. ('~".<';.IIL~~,\ ('~"'~JJ\,.i' '':':' ~\:;.l'.:::,.'l.-\~ll,g. I;1C. n::"':-Cl:"..2I~c.;..r
":=::J.stern P.r{~:rL:~j<1 T:-.c::r:SPDI-t) b c. CC;;'PCTst;Cl~ VAiich i7;~Jir;tr.1,;$ a picca of cusiness 2t
:~:5Cr j~r:=S~:;.-;-:';n .st,l?(.:\ Ph;:2.::~:ip~:a Cc~r.iY. r:'h:;~d0!phi3. j~~nn:;:;'l\'8:iia'1.9'j3S.
,
p. 10
D
,.
5/19
'. ,
f-eb ;:106 10:51a
Cind~ Weakle~
817-577-4690
,.0. 9013
U' ~I~;. 2:):)6 ~(:::19;:,.',,',
u\q(~:x ;~V[R:Ct\
f~g. 20. 2QO~ 3:53;,;,1
t.I\ ~ I t.l; [( \.:;:' ~ ~ Ji II
6, 7!1;s ~C"~;Oil2;'i5';:S out C:nh5 C':lL!:S:::li"l b2i"\..-/::G:l a ':;:::G!:8r~t?2ij2r 2nd p2SE';i10~r
.. " .. , . '1 MC~ ;, .......".-.....1>"'0 ,., ~,~ ~'''''<1 :::.'......l.....)~ :,,' .....n
\"'-'-"r'-.:.-"""-"nCG"'f--,c.'r~",~',,:t ,-,' .,' '1.::')....<._,.." j":; .-t"..<='I_.......' /'1...1_.......1
-I;'j ..v''''' '.1..:;1. "._ '..:... :;:'., ..11; ''--'.='''__ . . ~'i ~,- ..........' . ..
[fj!,::;rs':::::: 82., ;-;.~3r:J:B bOi"cJer be\'/82:l Y0.11~ '::c,:..;~ty 2;,:1 C :mbL;:~-?,r:d G8l~:it:!.
r-_. '",-.' I;... .~_;__.:j_.....~ ....,..,._.....-..-1 ~ ...._ ..~~o ,,,. -.-:,.J':J'....,-~,.,)
r'G,lriS~I:....:..:nl2. (.ISIt.;;"l"'~(.~\ ,..;..,..;.I'-.......Q '';''v ul..... ;.....V~.',.l'--...~:o
7'. ;.,f ti;e ~iinG Gfine ..:.sc~d~nt. P!2;nti;f'..'w'2S the QV.T:3f end CP'2~~tO:- e:1 ~ 1929
C}:rys:a S-o:,!:'ilii9 Cc'n'.'ertb[(::;. P8j):1sYl'<'3ni~ ~'2g;S1:r:3jQ:1 ;-!:.:mb8: FZT7C2.3 (h3,e.ir-:E;i1s~
t;'12 "CZ().
O. !~:;: \t.~ Cr;':'3 ~:.y:1 P;2C:;;; c,f th~ A~:.k~~:;;i1:. P;::~:nHf .~'!;:$ ':p3~"":3i;ng tha Cc;r iil a
;'icrt!lc,*;, ':Ii~'2.c.Jon C~ 1.,t-::;:;~;;~3" 8(~.
9. .il.! 'lh.~ Utn:;: 2nd p12"-;'S c.fri1e /'.CC.iC'2J1t. D5f:;n::J2.;:~ CU2:-:.Z!S v....c;s ope;-~'~Jng 3
20Q)) j;-:,tST;J8~k:T;=.; Trador. hkry!;;nd re91,;~r~1~on nUinc,er~! :3~5S. D~\!\ir;g ~~i cr.ct::r3~..d
t~ii2r.{h:;:reri,"2ft::::j'~;-;\~ "T~;sfo;-~T.;;:!iicj""). 21so i:"1 ~ n':;i~:J1.~riy c!i:-2ctisn en lirte~~..;.~e E3.
.) D. bmoC:i2C=:Y pnor ,0> tho> sC!b]2-:c' .~.G:fci'~c,t, Pi;;":; Tvl2S op",,":Lc~ ;0..= CSf;;1
~h8 i2ft h2;:C ~e;:9 2:lG h~~ ]:.!.::-.-t ::2:5S~-j E~;':3 ;~.?8 (.lrt':::r5t::~:; 7G/Peiiiisyk3ijla Turt.pi;(2)'
2nd 40,~, {;_iiil~~(ilji J:~02:::;}.
11.
l-:'~-:">...l~;:.""r.-J"r;~.I....I,..,.'~... ....1"'.:6-\" ._....i~,..,~ tJl~: ;..'{'..--=-C....-.-.-.I:-_/~ .....~~-,~
".(...,~'.J,.....,....r ,-'( '~.l l_' l,ll-.;: ,~~':...../_..... Af.I-,\~..:;:-.'t" \.~,\rhT. .~:::", ;.J-;:;Ic.~ll!y ~~Ie '........l. <:;.:..
ihs !::::.~,'.:lui !'2te ::F spe~j.
12.
!L~ ;.::..~;-..'i.:;';" "';:,,~<::~d 1'::":+ L'J ,. O""-rr.-.~..-:-"'. {"I........-/,,_ -'I~' .....~~.....- ...., -.....~...["
,~. !.....,.<.It ~.c..l....__ _r'" ".1 I-I. L..,:..I-..c;""r .-::'-''''',,~.:, 1",.;;$ ~'P'':;"l'-;;.llt,'3 u,e :..c.:.... '-,r-
Tral),;:r in th rfg~1t !18nd !2i12 c,; rr;~2iSU:~';: 83, 0il,j S'C;2rl b pE.~.s ~h:;! Czr 0:1 J~ i.iSht
. ...
11:;'::-1':;: SiC..;:;.
"
p. It
(;/'1)
rcu
C 1
Ub lU::;:,~a
2~. )!:\1:6 ',f~' ;~P,),:.
Cind;j Weakle':j
:;\3lER;,j A'v'ERiCr,
817-577-4G90
\:0. ?O 13
P. i/ifl
Ht 20. 20% 3:S3M,I1
EASTtRh tr~ BA~1
\lV. v,,,
1:':,. Tl1? ,';~c::;lceGt ~t~;, ~=.d \__";-,2n U2";2f':'::"2iTI Qua;-:~~s :; ti,::m~)"~.sd \0 eJ1=:-li!;;2 'irer.; U;~
r;;jht hSJd to \.~<:: hSi:;:1 1:3;:8' w~'E:,'l1he [8;( c,r ;~"2 Ti.;".::t\:T ~c r~~D;1 01 ':r",Cl 7rE:C"~::;..-Ti2i!8\-
':','23 c.::i;::!G':::?~'~ ~"d l::;-;<t to t:~,:3 C::;t ::rfven ~iY ?;:dti~lff in ih.,; Ui1 f:2r:O 1<,;18.
14. F;~ct to ;l.~1-::r;-,p~ir:2 .~~) :;!~2ilf~ Js;~~s. 0S'i2ndf1nt OU2r!2S r2!!.~d to LT::~:: h15 t.~m
s';g:!.ds t:j ind;::;~\:e th;:j h,;~ ii1t:;:ilded to Ci1Zi1'ci:-) :;\~cs.
15. fi.s D2f.2ii:::2.nt C~'..!sdes :::~t<;:J:lpt~.j t:-; !7:;:;":.'G the T;uGtr,r-Tra~'~r frem th'? right
~-,8nd to ~':G jeft 1:2:10 ~2nc. '~~l~ l"22r pcnlon af U~12 t;:;t;:tOi9 8i1lUCi ';l0l':t ;T:>.ticn :>f tii.] !rdisr
\~crslit:y ~:~nld\. ~h<= riQht h::;'Io sl-j:~ cr th::J c.3.f Griv::'~ hy ;'='!c;\~Tnfl' (hcrGitl2~~Sr the hln;cis.l
:;-i1;::2::::C}_
-: B. ;\tOj ir;:mc:j!2t~iy !xier;o the ;(ii~i.zi~mr;8':;t. PI8L...,Hf ~cfjV2'i2d ihz hem ci U18
Csr ~N~?h s'..:d.. fl..;':;;:: thzt she SPi2ij1Sd h::l y,'11Sb.
17. "=:.n::l' th~ iii!GS! 1I>l[:.sd, D={0nd:S;1~ Qt5.~T]:;;S ~~it.i~OI?-ri:~1 r;.:'V2G the Tr2G"!c,r-
Tr"8ik-,r c:::c~: tCVie.rd {::.3 5'j?h~f 2rd ti::~n ir,j;-;-18L:ii~is;y r.;:,v,~j (:::dt tQ'.~,:crct the :s,r end
'/blsn:.:y ,:;Ci"'1::::<' ([1'2 Czr 2: t2:::;:Ci'i ~jil1~ (ns;0fn2:0;.~~ ~r;? "'S.;::.(:.::,:-;:! \inp2d").
"to. F,~;,~"":'0 U;:'1S c~ b1; 8"3-ccr:d l:i"!p?::tlh<:3 Tr:J~~i..-~TG:l sr h:;:d :;-;:)\.'cd 'i8;'trI2:
8hs:r.:d cr i::~ C2[. 2nd the Ssc~ri2 :;-I~.:c:'ct tGch i'1e:c.'J L,~\,_=lC(-.~~ dc:ser t..j ~~-I'3 ~'l:~~re af ~.~\~
'Y'T~~~~r c:;:c t;-;2 rrg;-;t-hcl:c sicz. c-fi!~$ Ca.r.
I:? I~I~;.J iir::-;::::; Q.::t'.N'::::::::I -iii; in:tizi !r:,,;~-act ~'nd :3";':(;'-;1;:5 'r;1'2ct, \~1alf1:;ff col:t':1t!'~d
t.:) E::-lr;ry (;;2 ~~:Gl cf ~;i':; C2t.
3
p. 12
reo 21 Un 1U:52<3 Cind~ LJeakle~
817-577-4590
1-0. ) I) 13
=:3. '20. 2D~6 1U:5i,~\'; t,~S~ER:\J ~,vtR:CA
F~8. 20. 2006 G:~G?~
~_.., 7) I r ~,',~ .1 f J 'J r.L I
20. ~CS'~'2r 't:"1';- S~.:'()i!d :~;'<:"S:~, C0b"-J:iz.:I': C:t::2;~::;s. C\G:;r~ c:g2~"1 :~~~pDi'2i~\)1 p~\~~d
t;-;lJ Tl~.;:c:'C:--T(s.il'2r tG '~~-::s rigiit, 2;;;:; rt:s-n :::1J(:z:.:,:::';~;I)' p'l.l\' sd p::,:d\ la ',-Ti318;"1 z;-;d \'b~8nUy
~>~;-;.:t,;~ '~h~: "::;;'T ):;;'i ~ ~.:-,~;.j tiri"\2l (liJ':~ '....i::~j"d !rf"ipZ-::.r').
;:'.1. /i~ u1,; t:me cf~;'Je Th;rd i~np2ct, t~j2 :rr$ci:.:-:~,:rf2iI~r ;rsd conu!lusci r:) m-oV3'
'f.::r(h2r ~~ie2d C7 'l~1;: 0:;:1, 2nd th,;: TIi!rd !;;:p;::G~ lC';:':~ pbc:; t:~I:;..,,',zci1-:"13 [03:- or the TiC:i!er
;2;;":0 ShG ri~i]t-};2nd 3ide of lh~ C:.r.
22. ~..t 2H ti;;-;25 bsfv,f?,S';1 ;,hs- SSG:)nj j;-:lP:;:;C'! r.;-.cl T;~Jj~d Jrnp;;:;t~ P!~irf~~ w;)tiDued
to 2;::p!~f t:~:3 hern DT th2 C::r.
2'3_ J\;"':,::;; 'J::::; TI::;d ~;np8dl C\~f:;x:d2i1t Qt.:3r;.~.::: rlt:-Sl(Y p;;:lscd Pi~ir-!'Ul"fs C2i, 2nd
G:r';"fi~;.red~:; Cr;';iG":to 01'3 T02l'.':iLC~-Tr2!fsr b a r:c:-::hs:-::y.:Hr..::ctkn <:n in1~r$~2.te 2-3 Vc'ilhout
::li,:l l;;:m~;C::~~'8 att'2~pt 1:0 st~y ~r;d p!.;(f crier ;.C. .J-~e ~~;ci,~ c.i r.!(: rc~j.
'"?"t ,~JtS'I':j-IG Ti):;u ~jY;p2C~, r-'~~':I;Y;:S-;=r '8'(~S. :;'\-'0,,'2...:2:Y "br:: w brj,;g the Czr to z s--i:)p..
25. ::-;,:,s2d ;...\~;,:'n 8Y2: ':\';{i~-:'SS s-:.7:;~2,n'2::~.t;;, '(-!;.:.:k;"~~:'i t2J':.:I,2S 2i1d :(r;:;:p::-~-.;rG 5;:[.rs
'i;12t 3n:)~~('2:f~!'2(:\,or~tr~j~8r driv2r~cs% :;:-;rn.2; ,SG~k';l tc: Jr,:5;V8;r? ~n 08'=[ t,~ p:t;ve;:t
()2:'f,~r'::C.\it O";2d,~~ fl';it! t~;,2V;Tlg ~h'? S':";!f:8 C)f~;~!3 ;',(;,::;i(:,?r~L
2S.
r~'.';.,=,n-'::',''\~' r:l''-I.I~... :::"'~C"'1'''^I~\.' h.-r"'I~'.'I/l. "'~'~ -,. ,..... -:--,," '.r-r--::>:'"==-r '0 - ~''-'J ~"d
_'-"~';~L.-.' _._'0 I-~i..>....,,,.d,,...C.I)' '-'v-~~' ~ u._ ~(_l'_'-'.''--:;''''': ::;l ~,\_i, c."
~'2:-I~Qd t;i-= T~2C~0;.-T[:::iler en ~i18 right f:2{";'.j &:C(;: cf \;)-:; iC'sa ci\il~st crl;} ri;iJ2 r:brth on
[n:S:,3ts:~'3 S;J':rc!il wl~<:r2" t~,,~ /\c~id8:;1 b2gS:L
27. P)2~r;t)fi '.!i:'i3S 8ssjS~0d at t';j~ ::CSj-~:;: of ~I1s; ,':1,,;,;clc,(;;;f ty ,,.:'itll~-S25 \'~';~D ~::?:m:,;d
La j;~\,'B ObS2,,"/~:J the P,Gc!ds-~~ 211:1 Der2n;-J~!,,~ C;'!2.ies;' ,:'{..:pCt'Silt ,2rt0.'T!P~ to leBv\,;; '.ti'=
s~sn9 ofth~ /'.cc!c's-nt.
4
p. J 3
: ~ 9
I-eb 21 OG 10:53a
Cind':j Weakle':1
:~~1W: A:/uICA
817-57'7-4G80
\0. )01)
? ii' j
f:~, 20. 1'0[16 lG:'S9AV
~~8. '20. '200(, 8:~.il\:l.
EASl (R(~ GPS 8A,t 1
t-:'J.t:\\}
/"::'. ~2S2;.j ::P:':1 eye V','!;-r;oss si!?-:,s~.:ts, PiEi-:tl;'! bE :;C;i;':S E;nd -therG:-~,'2 2f~'I[;
i.h?:( D2~~nj3,r!t C:;Ja~r,;;~ ~e-;C2,;"j b c~:it ::;~a Ci~b cf t;il~ Tr2Ci ::;\-T\G[(~r e;r~i[ t(;B ~C-:~C2
~niv6d zpprC-X!/ii2ls:y t.:iIr{y rn!i!utB~',~ ~r:~:;~ th;::: ~,'.:C':d:::rrL
22. Fr:cT ~:. th:: p:.!;,:;e- srr:v;;;2.. c.'cfcl\d::t1t C~u~.~.;(~S ~ 2Qe GO 8:tts;-c,pt 'G') f,h'2:-J~ C..
the o:~;~(j;~on .:)f Fj2\r~jJ.
:30_82.~sd u;J~i1 ;i;~0~[~2Jj':"r: i0CSlvGoJ,cm 'ii'is P'~::Gl~l Piallyjfn:'e:;eves ~~"ld
t~j.s~c:f;:\r'2 2\'.::-:; thz;t the 2000 ln~~.;r~20"b:-lzi lrsd.!;r div,=jj ;) Y Oe~2r.dE:ilt Q:J3fieS at t;ie
Ur:r~ ~f\:!',? A(:.:::~(.i8iit \'/Z:':. O\'I'I\cj by DE;'f=:;j(~i-lt\tyeC;c-,iii:00ii.
31, 2.2;S',26 q;e;n ftJ:!he....lnJ""crmc;"0<Jt'i L?;Cel\t&c :J'j F!:;;;drS. she b<:n<:;",f8S c.nd
'f.h8i'~?C;E: 2V~;''; i.hG1ar t:l~ tim~ c:1 1.he AC"C;:::C:1~, Dsf:;;nc8;!! :::tl!2rl':.l$ t;J23 2ctIng 25 U,e
S':;:""\;"2::t, :':,;S%l ;~j';jpi;::Y:2;8, Dr-was c~hc:(\':r2'3 (:7B!~~:ng kl~ ":-~t:':D)...Tr2i{~r CH"ld:;-j' ",..h3
CCr.~TC: or en I'll.;: Ceh2!f of D'2f:?:1C:2 n;:S \\r~dC:;cgtGD, R::--:Ii!!k 3.r:::Jc.f E2s:':::~'n j\ill8ric2:1
Tf2ns;:;~:-f( 2;~c' \\'2S U;2~ 2;\j +~-:s:c: cp:;r;=:i\;-.Q t16 .h2~t0r-T:-Ei;8r ~.~.'hIJ3 2ct~ng 'dU;s:l U-:~
s:.:::;:~pe- end ~L;:r-::::~2 Cl' h1s :;.;':I,C"j~ 8'2.-i\:i',ude,3"iT:pi':'Y;.J~('ji:r !_~:-nt~c,l, ne[le:f cii'i/or
zt!t~crr?='"2:::i1 c-f Def80D~'E1;.s \:"...r~:::'d~f;Qloj), Rc.;)dHn:\: 2,id/c;..... ;::-<:-:5~2-:tJ /\;naric2n T(2n3~'oi.
32. t;8':::ndzm QL:2;:SS \V23 r,.291i~s:l"t 2,;-::; f5C);lo;~;:; if; z.:H,z':i1Piing fa ch2r-:Ge !2F:2S
\Nt:cfl U~2 12ft ;-,2i:d 12r.e ~'/Z;$ 21r~2dy ccc~pj::.<::' ty Ph::!oi:ffs: ;:::~r.
":":". [:2kl:d~1r1t QL!2..r1~.=:: ~t/2~~ r?=8;;:r~nt E:r,d L::~:l=~'.s L.. r8p.:x.:~e<iti ~t:-ik~i)9. Pi2:nti'lfs
Cur when r::l i(::~w Gi"src.::!d h.:::V3 }:n:),!;/t\ thsr.: h~s Tcc".cbr-T;oz\ier \.\.r29 2dj3c<?nt to
r:-!E,:ii~i1f's \'2;.,:C:3 2nd tl.j~,9 \.~_"2; no pJ:~',f:F:.j.:: ',:,"[;Y f:-);- b:;n to .::;;,2,ng-:: l2;;~'S '/,~~hCi1t
crus;;;ng p:2bm?s Cs.,.
p. 14.
Feb
21 06 10:530
: ::. iv. /:::06 ',' 'D:)'~,\;:
Cind;j Weak1e;j
U;S'[R:( P/,[U,q
817-577--4690
iIO. 90 '13
p.15
~_IQi: 9
f~8. 20. 2006 H:')~P,:J
tG~I~K~ ~rJ O~~(
2.~.. ~~,'2;sr:d;3llt G:~zrles 11\'2,S n291igsr,t ::~:ld ;.:~c!J::;'SS ;;"1 fE,i:ii19 ~o ~'n)~?;iy s~8;cJ.e
ti1.~ Tr2d:j-Tr2E,;i]0 erG?', t.:; ';::8~Ly out a p;o~Br 2:';(1 3;:(2 Ie.: '~2 c:;sng3: <:'f~:;;" ~'lc:l;L1;:rs
G2. h2d c~;-;&l ~;fr';:;2CY p~ss2d b;r 1he f,cni: !yj h:s T~~J,:rtcr;lr;j!el. Oi in ih-3 2~i=.Trii3:tf~~.
:.:nCG the :-2S[ ct trzctc.[- TrcJsr w'~s b'~'y":)i1d [(-.S: ffi);r: O~" PIE \n~lffs C<:::I.
jt;. i)c;t2GCS0t 0.::2r:8;; wcss n'2gHg2:,-;[ and P';-G!':18;;:S iJJ 7'2mlig b cP''::~(-$ n~8
Tmci:o;-..Tr2:;Hsr:=t c; S5f"~ 0~ o"f zF~2d sud") ih:::t h~ s:!1)U rr:;Jb3 2 pruiJer arid s;:.:f::! lc1De
~;j'.~I,~8i
2.6. Csf::;:z52nI QU2GS';:; '.'/=::;5 D2g1ige::1t 21"id rz~ki'S$$ in f2milg t',) preps;;}' !.lijEz~ h~s
jillrrCiS;j) C;.,-:Sf to ct'33n/e r:1~!ryt.;i?$ CGi b3lc,rs ci-sfl~pfng 1) ;Tek:a a L::::(18 Ch2il9t:: r8iTi
f:,8 ii;ht h2,.,d ~.j 1-2lt hSrid Jar'li?
37. Dcf-'S'~d2iilt Q:,j?,)ries ~,;:c:s r:82i~S,:,,;lt 2t'd i'.::.C~(l:'3~ h-; ;'Jt ""2:c:.;]r.tir:g 8;'i.:::r
s[d;(in:"] !h:.:: PI2kt;r?~ Czc the fiGl 'lim,;: t.!;3~ tly:; Trc:\:;~Dr-Tr2g~' -"W::.$ sHl! n:;:-t bO~I;~nd
Ptsicri.rirs CF,;-' \,l:-l,;:,n h'3 2'~'t3iT,p:2ci -'to r:72i::i,~i t'lc :3ft h :;,n:! :3!,j'? 1h'5' s2~:::d iIm2. "".'hien
r2s.u:~sd in Lim s:~riJ;fn9 Fr2in~~'rs G2r;o: [,c,:o::d ~;r.:e.
3.S. !.:".3-f:z,',--d2r.l (::u~j~;SS "".:'-25 fUflher r;s;:lJ.]'.::f1't 2.no r;;;-C;'::;'2,sS iil net rscog0izJI1g ':,:1~1::f
sj-jklllg t"18 Pl:Sfr/:j;rs C2r tll: GS;:;Qild t;rn3 H1E:t:r:e Tr2G~;"- Tnner '~'fGS sti:.l not b:::-YO:id
?1ei~~;fr-s Cz:r.\'r';~'::';1 rlG' Qi'tefii[.if2d to fs-Sn~t:r ~h~ rsi't ~"':;i;-;.d :2;' s ~;':B '(;1;;1 \im'~= \'.:(;!-:7"1
~'SU1!t2d 1,-, h1:TJ st:klng ~~ra;~~nf:; Cs-.r for U":s 1;-;\\\5 Lrne,.
3f.? Cef.sn::r::mt QU8il'.2'S v/25 negiigsilt Zi:!j r2C%~::;,Ss !;) 1 j~ t2pe3ted S~(;!-:!ng of
P;~iil:ifi':::. Ca '../:'hen f.r; kr,8i,'/ or snGujd h~\'.s r~r.':.V/:) t:j:::"~ ?i2ii~n?fs C2'r ,/,'2$ DCJtc;;;;t '(0
j:~:; TR::O.~-r72;j;.r .s:nd tlSj~ ".!:;.~s r,Q rl.J':~;-;J fc;' his Tr8c~:'''Tr2i.'ef to rT:O~:S eV2r iiltD ih2
12ft r;~ti2 :3\\.; '/I,'!t'(';':'0: Ci'J~:"1;n9 P:?:;t;'l:{~S C:2f.
6
, ~u
L.1 uo lU;:;J"ta
, :~. )(1. ))C 6 1: :),),~:..:
LlnO:j Weakle~
~I~S:U:\! ,e,\ER.:CA
817-577-4690
1iO. ?i) 13
j',
p. 1 G
n':)
rEB.20.200~ D:5L,!a;
~ri~. ~~:j'J ~n C.'\.I
;~.0~ [)::~'~Si::j2ri~ QUSrJ€~ 1:/'25 !~<Z9:iJs;;t ~ii.j r.;~.:,,;\ss:; b rep(c2t':::Jclly "f8:1:ng tQ ~-~':,2.:i
'i;'jS soeiY31ns~ of P12i:--d:}1Ts r:C.:l i;sf::;-~ 8i1j f:siv/ssn thB 1,lt\3~ lm~3ct 3;)c) Ti-;ird \/ripc;j:.
..~1. Dcfsn:i3ni: Ou<:::-ies \,..,~s n2gUg:::t1t 2~d Rl::'J2GS :fi f2i~~r;g b:. imm2d:~'L';:\Y leke
S'~.2t:3 :to [)uH t~,::? Tr-'::'c:::;:-- T~';2;H0i 0'~ cr/i.o "iDf; ;'\Jh~-b:::n:j ::;1[.11]2::1 aft;;.'; tile l~jt;.::11j;::::3'::~
t.....1';fc.;, v;~v!d h;3V'~ c'.lrr.;i;'2tsd tj,2; OC;::Vrf2;-rGl=' 01'~h9 S,:cQr:') ENJ llllrd Im!J2c~~.
4.2. Dcf(l?'td~',nt Ot;3;ks V;2S negnQ~:lt 2nd ~'5~:rd(~sa:n lc:ill;":g to j~r:1-2dr3f€fy i2k~
S~0~$ 1;:; ::~~j 'in:: r,c::''::,,:,r-Tfsikr off CfiDJ U-;2 i.~,htpi~8Iid shc~Jder E:i10r the Sec'Jild fmpE/:t,
.;,rh:::;h w-::.t:d h~v~ cE;nr~3h:;-d -U--;.3 oCC:.'m.:;;;.7.2' ofth~::32CDr;,j zr,d T~!rd fmp2Gi"S.
.43_ it 'o'.'~S L:~f22SQi-;ab!e :'Jr C=j~er-;:::'2t:i: Qti~:d~:s tD h:::V2 ;~'p~2,~ediy atbmptGd ~.0
Ch2;1gc ~::;i133: v'!hen he !{GSIc'I E~:rt Ph?,\tiUfr:::. C.~r ':~~S~;i thG :0\\ ha~d 12na ~nd "J1Zt there
V/2.;3 no rC}iJ1 fcr~he Tf'2Gw.-T,c-.\\0-r ~c;. :j-~sn :::';31h'2\:; ma'l~; In~D t~B }~rt tanG !an~
'~\};thout cnl~~:1i>S Fi::~nijJfs Gel.
_~. S2i"sr.i.\::nt Ch2Cl;-l'2S C;5i'2!;2rdsd :9 j"~s;: ~~'18':"'r.: tc ):;171 ':>r Eil c-9V;GL\S ;i~,:i: '~lat ;;-5
lJ/2,S sV'!:;re cf In s?t2r:~p~bg iV 'Jic:n 2;;0 2ier,Z:' c\12;-:g:l rr:::m .,1-';8 lea h2nd to t~.z r:?ht ~~2\:rj
!2:ne, 6esp:t.~ t7-::::t h~: !\,if;W P;c!j;!iifs C:~,r 1!I'3$ in ih::: fc:t1: :~~2;1d IZI!l= 2r:d !r,;ns'N. 8~'::i
;s~:;:;~Y:-cc;h' h~~-?i;.g F;:;;Int;f?:; G:rr, J~2:t .:h'3i2 \--~';~8 n.:! ;-':;':):1\ i"JI h;[~.l ~9 fn::N2 ever \'';iihc'_i1
'::0:::hfr:.':::i Pl:.:;inUj;'s C2i.
.-...... T;,~ .;s.~ of !:28TI 10 f;:::;nt~n 'He'S '.f0i';/ gfc.S:t s~ch L-5 to ,'7;skc it h!bh~.I pn)b3;;L~
'~hct F:I;:;;n(\((v.iG'j(d b3 ~p.lured 25 a 18~\.!~t cr DS'3n~2::t Gl'..s:r.esJ r~pc2tzd c:t~e~pt5 to
\i"\(,~\1e '~.r;'2) 1f:~::;~iy--rr,Js( 0'"..'2/ hG;;: th:::: r:ohi ;':;-::1 tD :~<t n?:i:.j i2fi0 de-3;:;~3 '::hz;t P:2';i:t~ff~.
C::r v;;: 8 i;:.1~12 l~.it ;-1':;-,0 lG;;~, end c:)ij$e;.~u:~;-dy ~Li~~:n2 P;:!:r.t!ffs C2f ~pon 'J~r::;~
2He,npt.;:; L'i1:n ~;l2 Ti2.~a.--Tj::;;l.::.r :'1r,6ily r-~s.:s.:::d ':Jy Pt:':ll\:tff~ C8i.
7
rea
c: 1 UO
r [S, ilL
lu:;:.:::.a
)01)& 1 H).~ril
Ll"a~ weaKle';j
:~,SHrll\ ,!;Y~~ leA
lJ 11-'",U - '\D;JU
:W.90i3
L,Q
I ~ J.
n20eG
~A~I~~~ 0rJ ~"L:
~ . ) ~ (,;',1
t~.6_ C:::fen62r:t Q~~i1sso ct::'ei,:rUcn Gilha TI.~(;tc:r-T;2:l~r 23 ds.s:::nb2d E:b:;~/~
Gl;~c:~nC2S a i.s~!Z!S2.::: :;~.c:,h1~;F~(IC:~ ~'J flc:!r;:m~:: i;-l!'.;'r<;;:?"~s [:i\d !1,,'.~1i b2!;-lg by 0:;:{:22li::.ri;y
~7l~~r;:;n9 P;2;n;g~:s C:r \:j~hD:.:t "2'j;Y ;::,p;;c:;-ent G:::~:1~2:m 'L'~2\ t:i':;:;;-;:Iy wof r.8 \!j~D 'i.hc'j; snd
':;"[';-3 ,9011;9 ~-:l t.,,;: 2cj(~: to !Tlc'c"e G-.(: Tr:;c~:;r-T;c':b. c\-'~:r ~ IT).:.' 12tl h~i:d l2ne ,/,''OS by
212:t1iming into Flcii":~r?~;;: Ci:T 2~d 2V'2n~u2i;y (:;t:~h:ng ~ls;r;:ifrs Car ~;j~h ~~Et t~s
Tr~~'~c,r- Tf2:1~;- '!~(-c!JJd b;z' r:!b!a ~:J y2SS by c-r (:;':8:- Pl~,.[.....'~l'rS Ca r.
~ 7. DG-r':';:iiO::i:t CU2rl0S' 2.~,cve d~~s:ib~d :;-'(":iljUC~ h \'::j l2Stsdiy ~:f;;({n~ F:~:ntff{:;
C"2.r, :r;ci:JciTI9 :=:,:1.~i ::::r~::idy [:.;:)....ting h;t h2r C2.: '::;lSS 0(:':1 t:l$r'l t:,r~;cC, ~r;;cur;ts to
'':;;_1il:::;;~0!...!S ~il::u:L
/~8. D;;'f;;f1d2.;'.~s \.r'Jc~:;i;~ftsD. R-~2d\jr:i< cr,d S2stern P\~i;;;k31 T n:ns;;crt a.a ih.:bI3
::::r-.d r-2SPQ~sit!E .~o; D~,.i2T10Z~r.t Qu::rj,ssl nE::;;l;gsnt ~0cl r::c~dE$:~ CQndu~L, sbc~ :s:t the
j\,;-;,:: O"f ihe ;:::C:2S:=.:;j ;:~~:d=il~l [:.:'[sn.j;::i:! ;~L!3ri ~-S '\./20 2G~liiS1 ;,-.[i[[^((n ti;:=; scc;p'~ of :~!S
2~9;;i<':Y. 3'3rv1h~:;~. ':::.mp1::ym:::nt, c::,rlu-.)\ b2;",2If ;:;r':::i!cr (i"~'i.:A,::,;~; :~':~O;j ~C:I D2fr;;r;::snis
v',: 'S ,:-}jir-.gl-:-n , Ros:T;:;:. C::-.:J ~2d2!,,;1 /',;-;-"z,nC2;') 1'[,3;-;,'~pc.fi.
<:.2. ,~,'2::l J.::-::::.:Jt ~f:':-:S' r.~gH9.::;n:G Z.;,1Is'cJc!I2-ssn::-;~;~ of DI-?";endarots 2,3 d'~.~rib~ci
2!J,Y.";?, P1.::b"lijrs bc.'d; F/E:S n::-::Jt:2:2-:i;y tGn:.'.:/rl 2S!2:n~t th~ [:ft h:~d S!(j~ 0i fY:?~r CS:. 2:'1::1
:'~p~;E:iec:ly Sh2~~,?:;J EIi,j j2;;'2:;: ir-:s:dc cf h,:r C~r.
50. I~ 2 r,:;.$"...:E .;::.-;--:.118 neS};rgetiC;=; zrd r2'~~:;S22r.':;S~; cf D'~ f..:~r:':';;;rlG 23 c1::;SJ::r:b~d
?~:::Vs. ?!8Ii;Wr svi;sr'2::', is S!..:'~rcr~f:g. 2nd w!1l cC'i1lirjl.~,= t: s~j'rfsr s.?;-io'}s 2nd p::;rirr:,;;::nt
rnj:"1l~2S, inc;:ujl~lg. tvt nc,r !:rr;:t.sd to, ;:-:juries b nu 1,~:;J, L~;~d{, reck, \V;-;8, ~1ncl ie11 eye.
2
,
f
F' 17
Ii')
:-: q 2 r}. 2:) C c ".:) i)A\I~
Cind~ Weakle~
:~mR~ A'n.:c.~
817-577-4680
!.~O, ] G 13
p.18
reb l:::'l OS lO:55a
P IV d
Fa. 20, L006 s; ?5t,l~i
[AST[R~ GPS BAll
IN. 0' u
I. It
51, _~,:: 8 ;2~.U!! e,';: 'L[,f.: r~=Q:1S2ii<;'2 2nd rE:;~:C';;:;e:;9 of Ds/.;!nd.::n3 z,s dS2cribs:i
Z:hC)',/2. P;c:i:1U;7 .~~f:~'j2cl. ;2 GUf;2ik..::(. G.fld \'/;1~ ::on~;ljL1e tc s.:,:fer ~SV8r3 f=.:h}'si~2.l ~::2k"1.
" : ro;-, f-".....~,'.: ~ ~.::~ -I~ .... ':' ~', l ;-,' I""".' - __\ ._ .'::',.-''''~' i.....,... :., ,. -.' ."!-,,,,,~ ;-...,. t,- IT { . n'
r.L:I.;L,\'..>_S,Lll~t,n~,",~::J. .,-,..,~l\\,:::. "-'._.,...,,_"'...,,5 t."l..>_::.;""....I.I._t" .~.. 02;3.
t:2. ,~.::;~, ,-:::2ult c5l:)0 rls';:';:S.::;r;;cs: 2rd i::c(~f:';SS;1~3~ Dr ,):,o.''!3i:d2?lls 2:S G33cr?,):;d
2bC'/0, P';tJ;;:~~':T z~~;.er2dT is st:ff2rt10. sr.d '.r;ll cC':ii::;-;US: k- sur:;r s'='~'ere p11y.:;jc.:::1 p2:n
ti1!VUShou1 h'::"f ~'c\'~'sr b2Ck 2r.d neck rc,:;!c~n3, ;::nj e:-:t~nding jD'"V:1 i;tb lier sl;culdslS.
63. A3 2 rZ'5u!i of th21::;91}gc-:nt.~ End r21::~lGS8n~::8 cfJs;rGili',l1ts 35 d2SC;-;bc;d
E:b-:::V2. ft~ilinf{ si.!':!e:-:;;d, is r.cti"2rir:g, 3.l1d .'-1m ,::cr.tl:;t:~: t":J st.:!:'2r !css cf ,.iob!:rty drldlcr
rn::,veii"i3nt ~hrc.~snJu~ }'!2r kii::sr b5-:~' 2nd neck r2~k.Jl.
5-1. A~ the .~,cdd;:;nt '!,.,'&$ Qcc::mng. P:::1nt0f b~H:;'.'.=d thzt sha '"~/2S S.::1r:9 b ba
lzWzd by'C:~~ TraG~")r--r12ii'=:r.
So, F:r::;n'~~jt ':,Cj~'0rl~2s 10 h3V.~ f'f:r;;:;::-ba:::;~s" c-I ;~e P'!;C!~Ej;t '~I-Icl cc;;c:":ITe."d Oil
A'..:g:.:st '11, 2G03, ~\"d \?j\lrt S~3 C0;;.sid&l:;~c Q;?,; ft "i\c;::rcG2Hl G:96riem;e."
~.6. F!2:1~'i~fZ c~.r;;;ct ;;;,\j;:.ij .~:~ve1;:-,g cn r::. =.::i.'3 '.,."h2rB Sr-d en CQi:.!r?,0rs -t.:fc:..:):)r-1.r2~t::.i3
rc-;ss;ng he::::s sb~ tr2V0:s tJ 2:ld frQrn. \'.'0;i~ 2;'\0 i7izk:;:3 ot~crtrips to. 211d i.rO;"i'j he.
1":0:-n:=.
.:::./. '/:,8::; i"Z:$tJIt of Def<9Tld,:::X$ r;~-gHgen-2:; r::r.-:J j:;dd~,s::;!H:':$3. F'!zinFr[ sll'ff3reeJ. ~s
~.1l'ff~r1no, 2.ilrj \:V~(! C:'jT:iilUS: ~o S~5,"2~ gn::;st m:;;~.~t-::::! :;::ngJ::;:h, :;::ress. -;~6e.r. traurr.8. -soi ~t
times 8 nesr p::rEiY2ir.g CC:1c.~i:i8:J. ft"l tr;;v,~[jns- ~:l th~ \':;:ii:~ .,if 2r.d 8'.::'jaC8:fit to tn;:C'~:)r-
~r;~1~18\:.,
9
ceo
"1
Ub lU: :::Jba
Llnd:j Weakle':j
~ASltR'~ ?,:u',EH:CA
817-577-4590
~:Q. 91) 13
P. lC/ 1 ~
p.19
20. 1 :)J6
:);AV
f [3. 20. 28U6 J: ';)r,,',;
tl\;:' J (r., II >,.;,,) '...~ L ,
~.3_ .~\3 a F:3L:lt 8T [::;-)cil22iY:':" r;o,;)1:?sns~ &;:d Jl~::;:j2..;U!2'5S, Pie:ritiff hzs s1.!il~~::d.
;s ;:;!Jl~fGrii19: SJ:d ,,!~.w cont):-:uc;. ~0 :::L!'lfs::r ~ cl;:::HJp;}:';l oi h2r d::.:Ly 1:2Uts znd ;,;'LlrslJi~, 2ii,j
....,. (... (..~;_.._.,t.....l.L'_ ~_ ,,~,,_._ .r.,:f_ :,~'...,!..., ",."~:",, d-"'-'''''' o,..~.-.,...,.-' 9
.~ t,~.:.:::.> C (3. ,.;.J,}'.1:2;\;. (j;;:J ,iiC' p,>22;;:''...:1 t;,::, 81 d.~. II )_H..!;':\ll), '.,J..;:)l'..J ,g, ':;;l ll..lllg. p..., '''-'''' tin
;-;s;j~eho;:l GC.lv):r::.s. [.:,e:-fc..:-,-rHng Y2rd ~":;'c:-r{. c~SrobJ':;31 'ro.:;s c/)~[jty sk~in2. sH-~ing kr b'niJ
p2r~;)ds cfll:'~I':;, ;::i:r;-bil;~ s:1;-s C::;J",f0;-;'l:;bty, sf~Ur,g Gf\ S;.;iy 1::::;0 ~,ur[2:~., lying <;in ~1d
~1.:rfu::2::; fcr 'in} 1..:oi;::Jth CI ili/::::. 3;1.:; S'~C:flcj]ng f:,;- 2rlY ::~r;glh (:f time 0:1 B i":G:lro &L:n~2::;3.
S9. l,88 (.::;su:c;:{ C:s::2nd2:-'.ts' iiG;;:8C:;i1C:~ ::nd G~::;::ie5::- n2SS, ",~~d [n crd'2:~ tD :;:2~t
'i:-:2 hieli2~ ;:-;:us;s i:,y ~i!,? ;.:,::c;k~r;:'nt, Plzlln'iff i1~:~ t2~n ~..-n~~.lH2j t::. t~(p2nd \'2~O:J3
sums cf m.JiI~:Y ;-c;- i7l2c'1::.s! c:~~rr::ol1. ;-T;2ji<2iJl;,1 2nd ~~~~pjL:s. 2nd \NW be ~qu;r2d ~'J
c::-ntini..::'.) \::J z~:p::nd S:.1I,;;:; c:f IT;0G'S)' for AJ~:;~ S2.n'~~ ::>t!ij::!)s'~ in ';he flJ!u;e.
(50.. J':l..$ 6! r.;stJit of [i~.fB;;::r:::l1tst fi-sgl{;&hO:::3 i:.:l1i r;:'.:{~k~:3~T;SSS. alid S3 G
':-:8;'iSGq!...!E'J~C.8:::f ~h'3 i'-;Jutbs B:Jf-io;-..::d In l::e t.r-.-:"i:iSilt. ~i;ld .;;1':: cCritinuhg !eg. nE'-:!~ 2r:d
.b2;::k ps~n ;,~;:~H::g frcm Lh=: P,C-:!j0i1t Fk:t::tf.i h2.S Jn1:~:sd '~~;,".1(~ 2~ '~~./'0r;, 2r:d ItilU c-::nJii:J'~
~:) ,l"U:S3 flT~:: 2t .:,nr-;":. T~,e '3~~.;;0fl1!G im;:2.:t to '?i;:;;r/iiT 2S ;J ,.~SIJ[t cf ~;10 rr.",9 sh~= h;:;:;
fi;;S::;r::O fj'Qfi'.! \,,":'i:-;.IS a;:r:ro;~;m2t,?:}' :.32,OOD 2$~;f th2 ~jni!9 cf I hIs Ccrr,p!;:.ij;c, 2;-;d W!\1
C!';:1Z;:-:!..i8 ta i;";Cr~:.?3C c:,s 8,.:"2 r;;!33SS r(JC;;G 1in'";-2. f,t 'rvcr{.
G~. ":',:;,j iC::....~I~ cf Ds7er,G-:;:nts' n=-9Ege~;:.:3 c:.::d r::~c(:!s-,;;,;'r;ees:: F'!2i:-;"J'~ call n~
1"....4.':\,.. r'~,-'::"'" C'(~:-" '--.-.."-.r1..... ...,.,....,.., :~'-''' ~...,."... 1\ -"r- r;:--"I/ -:;..- l.._.~ to ,-.,1',--:1---:>.... r~,..'r""Q
-'-'.,::;:'....., _-=-'" <:.l ,~........... ,;,.....1,...:. ,.,.t 'L'-',. .1C" '.;.0\',:" r-;'..'---..\ ....dr.::;)~. ;:;-,.t: 11c,:.J, i.'-'....'.....I c.~::: ."".:1....
"~.L,.,.....' -.......'..-.f ~".", ,......_,......1: t'O::"'-j 0"; 'Ir- ---,..,."-- ,-. .........r'-;~' '" ........',,-....... l...--._t_\",
-::;", j~,\'-,~V~.... ::.:.-:-... ',-,\,:~. ,,,..\ ''''1..';)-: .V~ I' L~':",~, ,'", v.J":!"i\.~'." .. ii.r:11: IS .~.~. :..:.: '~lJ_
f'_~?), l..\ -..I " d' 1 . -" . . I ",1 .,
_ ;.88 r?;:.:.'a or ,"~e C~f'l~ln\.!2 c;Gt'2r;:"I.;:t;Sl.'i Ci 11$:r:n/C:~Ge. CG-;O!;iOn CCUSSQ 0,/
the D.;;;er:C:c.i,~3' ;-;eG!ig2~c~ 2nj r.~d:':0s:::n~;!:, P'2ir(~;W' Gn!:S n.:::t '-;r;~:cipg~e ~h2.~ Ghs\,;'!:!
(.)."::t~~-:.::.LD""'.,",\'.~,~..r""--"",,,,"r:\.. ...,~:(~\.- ',.".-- ..-~~o,. . .' I ~-r""'" .- ..'~-.;>\.
l. '- c......,~ l .I.V.{ : ,'.::', '';'\''''! ""ul.;: t ~~1119 :<:.:.-.'J.' (:0',',;;,.', ~ . 'JG:r/ nll:C;) Oil~t'; c::..:;. B rCgu~l..J1 l"e
,0
I-eb cl Ub lU::;)/.a
Llna':j WeaKle~
U l' oJ' ( ""TU"';U
F : 2. 2 (I. 2 ')',:: 6 \ 1 : 't} l,;:~'i
t ~ S -: [r;;'; ,1";"';l R: c.~
m 9013
p, 'i:/\9
F t B. 20. 2005 L j).%~
t/I)ltr,\{ '.:r:> J:"IL;
CCj',S3,?it :C,:::..!~lC:l\g 2.....:j j':::\7k;\] CT"1 h:3r bW2i [:;3:(:.;1.;. <;.',-!d n(;c.~~ P,.~i,..Erlg!y. P~:.inF~i'
:::rJ~k::)pz:L~,;- i.18';;ng t:; h;r~: Zi !:.:t;:,'f', ::?~'~''1'i~:3 ~:,') ;;:O',:! h:;;~ ~~'.y;:~: n si9l!~;k;2m G,:,n b ?;s~~\mf.
F..'h!ch 5;;9 ;-.~;::~!j. r~,:rt h;?~:c i:;C:1~~~d 0';!t rc:r ~hs' DST'Sf].j~nts' ;-e~,n;~;:C3 ;::ii:::\
;15C;~!ZSSSle:?s.
G3. .~,3 ~ i2Si.;;t of Ul~ Ds'::::nd:=::nls' nS;2~i~:::TICC; i~nd r~t:~':~8~2r:8!3~, P~2!DUr; hC8 t>3~?;i)
r~Uj~\~d t~ ~c.y i:t'Jlsrs to ?3C~,:t her In i.f:.3~nt2ij;ii~g n-\:~ gr<:uL~s 2iound hsr ;1c:.s.se. '..::i1\::':1
;,v:::rk, -:::h2: \",'c1jd r.~:1<:'~1?j~! G('::\.!'~ r:ona i~ei"S2~'f ;'1' net 7Ci.th'3 ]i"1j:Jii2S G;?uscd b~l ':h,:=;
J~-,:;.:::'C:;;I1t. F:~I;--:tf,=f ;~I~S G,'[t0in;:.t2d tc: G'~ 2.S m!.:S<l :=:s she c;:,;~: pjl~-'2~c.:Hy encF.SG
CGiiSldenn:: ths p:-Iys:,~l Ei;,ila'ii(;liS r2s~lnng fr,)IT! ;ih~l P)~c;d;;nt, but !i2:5 s.::m in(;~ric:j
c;p:')n:.,):jm;:;~!y 52,3l,:o to date payin; fer grvUfl:-i'5 iil~lnterlJ'ic':;\ v:.'h;ch s~e w()uld
oihciV/;3S ~l;;V? pCriOiT"-iled. Gild c,n1jd;:J~:C3 ih;;:: 2rT,:)l;J;t ir:C~G2,<;.~r:9 in t:,e f~~'Jfe_
54-. A'J S :22!.::t cf Ds,fs'r:;;8;<~S' ..as,~iG;;;:l:;:8 c~iZ; !3(~:~ie~:~:;=.s9. F!E:kj~;;fis limif-sd in
f;?-r ;::bmty ':.1 ~srf::rn Si~O~V re;-:;;)v,:i tE::;::3. F\;,;n;iff Q,;t:Gip~(2~ -U...,:;.! siie ':1::: fr;c~l
<:O-::-~-I'l .....-...- ,-~, -'~''''IJ- -':1'- ...-'~_.., 'I" .'r- ..- sc-..,.--.'; r'
~'J;!.d(--c. I S;,',;':/ P;\".;'')',,<::,l C-..J~\~ [" '.,18 E.~~,~:'.:J c..::r ~t::::1 C,,-,r,(, L-'C:'~ r'J091'~S . W ';";/1...>.0,
C8~~rf':l~~SC_
6:3_ /'.S ;J f2!:U:~t of C'=-f-s,-;c:.;:;n:,s' D2fHQe-nC2 Eli,d r~'G;:lc;::s:,S3$. ~:~!r:tiU :":::5 h~:d to
pc,,: c-U:e;-:3 {{) ;:'2;[Or8 !-:C!!Se!;;-;:ci t251\~. sus-h ;~3 pz.fn'Jilg 2:~,j OG'!.::f h::use fr:c:rnl,::,n2o::e
2r.d r;:.;:;;;-:28C;r-;;:~;1t i=s,f~3f Y;'l\i:~h 81:2 c~hsn..'i:,e '/~'.::.dj i"7:;'/2 C");-;~ DL"i ;':;1 the ~niu[~es
:;~s'~"2~n.:~j in th,~ Accid:::,;'1t. ?r::::::-r:i{f [j~,; i:..!r;z:;-ci:f :r,Co:J,T3d $11 SOD in 2C:C1j:Jc.:;2f c~s~
33:SCG:zh::d ','>'iU1 pair-,Ung s~ci ;;i~~p;"Dxirn:~~8;;' 0730 fer m;3cei'2,nt::::;u6 Cn2n;2G. 2nd
2n1:ic!p.st:;s zjdi'I!8,:e:l hCL's~hold tllS!;:t2i1cllC~~: 2;1d ri1:.T::=:Qer.cnt B:':9SliS03 :"iia b~
j;:cUri-=:d In "(~3 fu~,-Il2: ~'.E; 2i ;2S~;t cr th'2: P.CC\,:;:;"-(.t
11
I".L-~
f-eb
clUb
'OS. )[:.
lU:::llja
2006 11: 01 A:/:
L.l nu~ V.Il:::'d".l t:;::J
:';0. 9;)) 3
:~SH;\ A'nICA
r EB. ~ O. L 005 8: 5Ui\\{
~ ;-tS : t ~:;~ '.:t' ~ bJ-l L I
6::;. F.-';.2 i'?~:...;;t of t'€t8nG:~:::....;~f {:::':8~;:;'~ncs. :~r:d lGc;\.I.z:: 5~-1'3~-.s.. Ft:J;-r.:i:7 hz..s b~~::l
C8priV2C (If ~:2C:P s~d 2.t-U;r:e::.: be,$ ::3?gr:L"!::;2;:t ,jir'~c~jqr S:c'2p:r.g v,'iU-;a~t [.::2:1Gg
!f.;'~';:rru;:t2.d by p21:""i Qi'd ':::~.l;;:r c;i::;o..:r"rc:t CZ;u5-,.:d by ';lle ;\':"..2.:d::;,-:t.
137. ;.$ ~~ [.2;S<..:!t of D'2f;::n02ii1s' jjeg!i~~n!:.:; 2:lC r,"Sd~!s'E~:;r,etS, PIsiG-ti',T he.d to
::'lJi".:fi2S:; ::1 r:.E.W in;:t~r2.~S s:::::i ::0:< ~pr1i~{-.J to ~:jl !3il,j ~:lsv~IC:~8 Jc-rr;e of lr~e P2!:1 C:~/Js2d by
'~h:; Acdd~-:t. F~)2:iltTl1 hlC<,.;;;-c-j $360 fe.r (': n9'.... f;lGt~~"1:~:i':; cjd :..:X :::pr:rtg. Pislnt:iT
;;;;rc;GipG~9~ ~G hst mifd~J:1 prc'Si.;SS2:S 2r,cYcr C.:t:.'i~::rzt~$, ':hst Sh9 \"1~li (;2V3 b
pur":::r~8:;= 2:-,c-t:-h9i ri:;,;:.~trs'~-$ Ci2,~ p;;:;,AC::~5 e\/fm Sf<S:':;:,;i' fe:ief i::> ':he p~;ii1 8;id dis'';v!Th'\:.rt
~us,;d ty th3 ~:\cddc:;;t.
63. C,~:B;;,c'2nt QL:2iIC;;' ccnQ'!..is't ~'lES s:..d:l.:;ienLiy Oti~:-2f:eGL'CI ;n ~IZl he ,;.ct2d \~}til
2 c::iTiplete :GG1--jsss !noijfG:-'~r:C'3' V Pf2:r;!I,Ys t/;cres~s ;:rd 1,;;~~:H-j3:r:g 1// s-h-iJd.ig
PjE.::~1if?s Ca ~',b~n !"';..~ !:n:~\,-". :-::s Ti:s.~~c-:--Tr2~'2'r \~.'.ss ~~'~;~(.;E~~,t tV F18iil~~'N";,,~ GET, oC did p.c:~
D\:;;n :':2.r9 J: t:'132 ;;.232 vc3-.:c:c i:2Xt 7.J ~;;s Trc..:~:c,r-TIC::~:2i \,,.;3)\ he 2;~~2rnpted t'J ;T;cJ:9
i.i-~ '] 12;(8 chs;,~;,S'. 2i'1':1 ~l"';;n ~n ~~';;':;: 2C:ciGc:n~J 0C:::~C:Cll~ ~~:sr 1'.::. :'2Q ~:r22dy \}i,::!,~;;;~i~(
~~;-t':::::::\ r!;::,iili[l's C9r, cr::"~";) i;i~O F)s!nf,;~~s C2f::; ::: .c.:;d";Ynuc::d '::;~~G;npt 10 SfTi2,Si) hIs way
7H31r/,....) "J.-;313f~ ~-;znd lsne r~g;sn:::l::-;::3s Qf i."..)ilSOU-:(;" h:::: WC:1J::i 'r.:,J\!':; to c:n..:sh P;2ht:~i's C~r
in cn:]2r 10 c1i&,f1g.2 ;.2r:2.S, cuc:. U1:~t D~:.:;nd3nis :::re fSS,JCJ,i2ib:e- 2~jd ~i2bj9 fer p~i,r(ivc
(;~:rr:2S~$.
39. D'::;2:id8r:t Q~z::i2.C.' CCf';d~;..:,:t ;1,125 fu(3-1:::;' Cl:i~;,S::;ou::: ~,:d 6';1027'1:;'::-:) 2 re;:.kJ::;s'3
lnG!?rE::iEoc-e ~v P;c:.:kt',riTs ilit~~st;; ~Dd v-'!srl-bej:r-:g h :1:t:'~rr',p:-it;~; fo 1:::5\/8 g13 sc:::-n~ cf ~he
;\sc:ic~)r.t cJ~=:r hili;;;;y ~.!~'i\j::9 ::.'r2;n'31"~ C~; sr~d r1~n :-8~Z;t-:-lJy ::,{ri[d;:g r-!;;;~llt.fy'!s (:':";1
or~ '~~J\~;l 2-:::~:::.:r.'E.j c::-::..:::siC;:3 ~,~ h'.; k;:fI: the ss~~;-,~ 01 th~ !z:fi!:;j ~!-::~2:::1.
~~2
p
I . - ~
H:9
Feb 21 05 10:S8a
::) )0.2[:% 1 U2~:i
Clnd~ WeaKIE'::1
:~,:m\ A'U.ICA
, - --
\1:1 j'1\'-P ".7.!i'--
..\.). ,'J) . i
tE3. 20. 200& o:)&;\:J
WTm GPS 8'.[1
t:O 816
? lJ
7D. Oef~nc.:2nts \rledc;~st::';-;, RC'2d:in~ 2::j ccst:::in ,l:\iT;sr:ca71 l;<Jnsport :o:.r~ li8D!S
f".)[ ~)~::~~j'-n: ~~:n~g8"s; ~,r;)r;2 c>::'::8i.c::.nt QLtd,,;:s ~.V;:$ ;;.::E:-:g ::).3 ths ~S.~',f'2lit, 2~,8:;1,
e:-,-;pk":YE:9. :'X ;'':28. C:),h;:;,,::':S3 o;::;:;isf::g the.: TJ.,:dc~- T:zii'::r C~!_~'':;'2r ~h~ conirQ! 07 C~ "i:\2
Q~hdt OF ~>.:.+;;;:;:ml~ \V2-ddr;gi.GD. R,,;;z-cmn;~ ;;:ntifc.r ;'=asicm P,;'11cr:c2.n Tf&nso;;crt ~t ills
Er.l'8 cr the ":.,':r:J:r.3f:t.
71, P.:' 3 rES"dt cf ;;:11 c1tr:s 8ors'SfJld r;~s!;g.snt, reckif.55, end Gut-2.se~lY5 c'Jnr:.\lc~:
DE',Ts:-;d2;-;:S ~:;0 ;l! ~i::::bl.z f::-r Pi;h1:r;-=s c0it!~~r..s2i'.'~'iy i:;2ms:~;:;s 2liO 210 f-t..:r:j:2r 1i;:;;b~s \-i..:f
PLJ;\~f"e c.\2:::::;~:;.
\~jHE~:;FG::;:~. P;t:i;\N o.E;";Ti8nC;S iUC:Si"i18nt 29:::icst;:;:1 DE~;8ncants 1m- bc~h
C;::;-:ljJ::SI,3'ot:;ry 2ri.::.l )t:nli.iv<3 ds.;7\;;~!es in 2n 2ri~OUf:t in 8;,:'::~:::; or t;1~ CO'..lrt's 8_d::E~-dlcn
Em~t.
R0~.pElct;'t.!i{"l St!bmi:~~~c:
i'.1,::~'.:~ES V\:),.!...LACE :l NURICK LtC
1 ..._ if
p., I'.-r_.<'-/''''''{ J
1~~';'J3;;3~;;C'i H. R!..3dd
, ~..," '.':O~0
'-----./':!.....\;O...)-d..!:...>
100 Pifl2 .)~T2G-t
P.O. B,,"x .ll3S
H;-:1lisb:1:r'. PA -/7-;03
{\'j'1 ()2::::1~3G0a
7<J:I
D:::.;s.::::
I I.
... dtn ~ ',I)
,,'-(' '-I'
-^
\.;:
~eb ~1 Ub lU:~~a
:;: n 2GC6 IU2~:!
L 1 rllJ;:' ...,~~....! t:::::J
:;;SHR1~ ,I;~.(:~ :Ct.,
\~~} ?:) i 3
f[~ }O. 100~ (.:';01::1
~,;~I t~r1 ton DilL I
\.~[::;f;-:r'i-::A.I'~D'?\)
.--"--------..-
I. 13r;;:::3 ~i< !..::t.r,((s., V'2J~~J il-;2t t!;8 fu~LI.!2J Gt~t-~i"2:::r.':~ i':12':"2 In th.s: kfEgS:iig
,:;-:.-c:..n:'..s.J.t 2r3 t;1J..:; er;d c.:;:Tz.::t ~~O \h3 c-=st cf (:.'tY !<r:Q-t~:I.;::[:g0, :C1f~;Tr;:::tbt1 C-'Gd r>2::'~. In
1;-:;::I~~ljg th:3 '.,:er:rrC:,~!:Jn. , ;;tJl rdJ'k~9 0i'l il1.Y 2:t!.urney tc' set f.:t'J; 2lt~ ~ogs.t r;':::Il,::tJ:Sfor:s
b2S?'D c-)l '~il:~ fC:r~(.t. 'fh~ l{l;.:;.:rdin-~ oY this dC~l::~,€:r,( is fhs~: of rr,y .2ttoffiSYS 2;-;j nc.1 my
Q:;'{n. ! unj;r3"~=m,d U::,;j .r2b'2; ~[;t\;~rr:er:t: ;l~r,?j;; ;:.~ il:Z:CS GLbI.::d to ~lc pgr;2!t~2:! cf 16
;:3_0,8. S(;'~SO,:~. re;~;;ng fa u;~:y,'Jom 'j2Isi;1c:.:ib~; '2'0 ~::ihc,ri~-::-:~,
"7J /1
_s!l/:~vf..~~:J.---k.~~J
5i00;(:1 J. L2i<J(:;.:;
uz}ed: 0)-./6- - C-;(~J
P ::.11
-Ill. L L: ~_' b
:G!A'I
ti\~,\t:;~ r,:'tit~:.\"',"
F E3. 20. )(:06 Hoc),1
[ASIEnN GPS 3^lT
<
'\0_ 'ilj 1.;
'\D. 816
Gr:f~T!'Flc:t.:n== O~ S~:R\PC'E
'j v,",
I . :Cil"~i.r::""-I j-1 F~~r~'~ :=:::;"";1):<3" hCI':::1'-.., .....<O.;,',h,. (;~i:::!- on }/il,": J (l G2>V of ;:.-::-bru-qr.'
," "- ._- ". ._-~.-- ....,-.. f ~-<,~.,-,,,._,.J' ~ . .~__ '.1 ..- '-.f
2.003/;:1 trU8 2:1d COilG,~t c:)py C'fthe .?cr:~g:~.ir:9 co:-u:-:tsr:t \Hc,~ ~5Ned ~'f f1~t-::lgss.
Unlted St?t-25 m;2:-,'H, p~1?90 Pf'2p;;d. "jP(:~i tb$ ~~C.:lV\,.I;Pt;:
C::rrca i~. C:..~$.ii-2S
23'i7l\i:,~y?,8Jd AV::H.1Je
E2.i!1:-itGre~ i'.:10 212i3
T~:;.:.~~Cm- K... \:~r~:rc.71;o:;~r.
,,:,:;0::; l-r.~denc.( r-.:02cJ
P.O. 3,['x '12;;0
E~;;cc{i Crtl. ~;E) 21 C43
KCccWill: US-A Er:;s~ LL.C.
-J:~t.O VV~n CG\'G
88~1'I;eh!_~m1 PA 18017
!=:::s:ei.'1' t-.fi1sdC-:;f( Tr2DS7.:'Q;-t
&. iJV~r,~hcuG!i/g Inc. .
85\)'1 rJE.german S~E;et
Phibc'c:;f::-hi.s. PA ,9135
_ -Il~~~=.~ ~ IU{
,.----=j'.,.,-,"-- 1-' "'w'd
\. ~~'_:'~l'I~:1 ,_ .~,_.....
--/
14
r, I ~.' : "}
P.13
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN, SCHAER & TODDY, r.c.
BY: Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Attorney LD. # 49580
1515 Market Street. Suite 1200 Attorney for Defendants
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102
215-569-2800
BRENDA J. LANDIS
vs.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY.
PENNSYLV ANIA
CARROLL A. QUARLES,
THEODORE R. WEDDINGTON.
ROAD LINK USA EAST, LLe., and
EASTERN AMERICAN TRANSPORT
& WAREHOUSING
USA, INC.
No. 05-3921
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire. hereby certify that a true and corrcct copy of thc
foregoing Defendants' Motion to Determine Preliminary Objections with all supporting
exhibits and other documents was served upon Counsel of record this date via first class
mail, postage prepaid at the following address( es):
Jonathan H. Rudd. Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurick. L.L.C.
] 00 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg. P A 17108
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPL-
SCHAER & TODDY~..G;-'-
~-
------.--~
BY: \ ~
THEODORE
/::::::=>
DATE:
/)~2 ;0&
(""
'=.
".,
n
c~"
,---.,
(~
",1
::;:i
f;C7:;]
-;1
r-;
~",:J
f-....)
CD
CD
~!
:::1
-<
o
r'.J
....
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN, SCHAER & TODDY, P.c.
BY: Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Identification No.: 49580 Attorney for Defendants
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102
2 1 5-569-2800
BRENDA J. LANDIS COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY
vs.
CIVIL ACTION
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE
R. WEDDINGTON, ROADLINK USA
EAST, L.L.C., and EASTERN
AMERICAN TRANSPORT &
WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
DOCKET NO.: 05-3921
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
TO THE PROTHONTARY:
Kindly enter my appearance on behalf of the Defendants in the above captioned action.
Defendants by their undersigned attorney, hereby requests a trial by a jury of twelve members.
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVIT LAN,
SCHAER & T , P.C;
~/
BY;------------
THEODORE M.
--,;
I.,,,':':
c.
PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT
(Must be typewritten and submitted in duplicate)
TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY:
Please list the within matter for the next Argument Court.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-------------------------------
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Piaintiff
v.
CARROLLA.QUARLES,THEODORE
R. WEDDINGTON, ROADLlNK USA
EAST, L.L.C., and EASTERN
AMERICAN TRANSPORT &
WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
No. 05-3921, Civil Term
1. State matter to be argued (i.e., plaintiffs motion for new trial, defendant's demurrer to
complaint, etc.):
Defendants' Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's Complaint
2. Identify counsel who will argue cases:
a. for plaintiff:
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
100 Pine Street, P.O. box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108.1166
b. for defendant:
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Zarwin, Saum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, PC
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19102.1981
3. I will notify all parties in writing within two days that this case has been listed for argument.
4. Argument Court Date:
March 29, 2006
d:=t 'r'-~~
I S' nature
:. Jonathan H. Rudd
Dated: March 7, 2006
Attorney for Plaintiff
BRENDA J. LANDIS,
PLAINTIFF
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
CARROLLA. QUARLES, THEODORE
R. WEDDINGTON, ROADLlNK USA
EAST, L.L.C., AND EASTERN
AMERICAN TRANSPORT &
WAREHOUSING, INC.,
DEFENDANTS : 05-3921 CIVIL TERM
IN RE: PRELIMINARY OBJECTION OF DEFENDANTS TO
PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
BEFORE BAYLEY, J. AND GUIDO. J.
ORDER OF COURT
of defendants to plaintiffs complaint, IS DISMISSED.
By the Court,_
AND NOW, this
2'1
day of March, 2006, the preliminary objection
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
For Plaintiff
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
For Defendants
4f-L~1'H.:h<e j . 300~
/~
~.
:sal
(
) :'j'
/. ~~; :21 r!J
Oc
,>
c
;}-iJ.
r~1
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN, SCHAER & TODDY, P.C.
BY: Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Identification No.: 49580 Attorney for Defendants
1515 Market Strcct, Suitc 1200
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 1 91 02
2 15-569-2800
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
vs.
CIVIL ACTION
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE
R. WEDDINGTON, ROADLINK USA
EAST, L.L.C., and EASTERN
AMERICAN TRANSPORT &
WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
DOCKET NO.: 05-392l
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
DEFENDANTS' ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER
1. Denied. After reasonable investigation Answering Defendants are without
knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to truth of averments of this paragraph of
Plaintiffs Complaint. Said averments are, therefore, denied, and strict proof is demanded at the
time of trial.
2.-5. Admitted.
6. Admitted.
7. Denied. After reasonable investigation Answering Defendants are without
knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to truth of averments of this paragraph of
Plaintiffs Complaint. Said averments are, therefore, denied, and strict proof is demanded at the
time of trial.
8. Denied. After reasonable investigation Answering Defendants are without
knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to truth of averments of this paragraph of
Plaintiffs Complaint. Said averments are, therefore, denied, and strict proof is demanded at the
time of trial.
9. Admitted.
10. Denied. After reasonable investigation Answering Defendants are without
knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the averments of this
paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint. Said averments are, therefore, denied, and strict proof is
demanded at the time of trial.
1 I. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth.
l2. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are without
knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the averments of this
paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint. Said averments are, therefore, denied, and strict proof is
demanded at the time of trial.
13.-29.
Denied. After reasonable investigation Answering Defendants are without
knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to truth of the averments of this
paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint. Said averments are, therefore, denied, and strict proof is
demanded at the time of trial.
30.-31.
Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth.
32. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
33. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
34. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
35. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiff's Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
36. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
37. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
38. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
39. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
40. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
41. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
42. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
43. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
44. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
45. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
46. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
47. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
48. Denied. The averments contained in this paragraph of Plaintiffs Complaint are
conclusions of law to which no response is required, and they are, therefore, deemed denied
under the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
49. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
50. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
51. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
52. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
53. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
54. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
55. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
56. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiff's Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
57. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiff's Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
58. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiff's Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiff's Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
59. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiff's Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
60. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
61. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
62. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
63. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
64. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiff's Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
65. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
66. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
67. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth. By way of further
answer, Answering Defendant specifically denies that Defendants were in any way negligent or
that any conduct on the part of Answering Defendants caused or contributed to the occurrence of
the accident described in Plaintiffs Complaint or to an injury, damage and/or lawsuit of Plaintiff,
the existence of which are denied.
68. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth.
69. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth.
70. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiffs Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth.
71. Denied. Answering Defendants deny the averments contained in this paragraph
of Plaintiff's Complaint as conclusions of law to which no response is required under the Rules
of Civil Procedure, and/or because after reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth.
WHEREFORE, Answering Defendants demand judgment in their favor, and
against all other parties, along with such other relief as this Honorable Court deems appropriate.
NEW MATTER
I. Answering Defendants aver that the incident referred to in Plaintiffs Complaint
was caused by the negligence, carelessness and/or recklessness of Plaintiff in that she:
(a) failed to have the motor vehicle which she was operating under proper
control at all relevant times;
(b) failed to maintain a proper look out;
(c) operated her motor vehicle at an exceSSIve rate of speed under the
circumstances;
(d) failed to yield the right of way to the Answering Defendants who were
then and there lawfully upon the highway;
(e) operated her motor vehicle in violation of the Motor Vehicle Laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania;
(f) she was otherwise negligent, careless and/or reckless m the operation
and/or maintenance of her motor vehicle;
(g) she was otherwise negligent, careless and/or reckless in her actions and/or
omissions.
2. Answering Defendants aver that Plaintiff was comparatively and/or contributorily
negligent, and as a result of said negligence, any recovery by Plaintiff should be eliminated or
reduced in accordance with the Pennsylvania Comparative Negligence Act at (42 Pa.C.S.
57102).
3.
Answering Defendants further aver that Plaintiff, by her actions and conduct
assumed the risk of all injuries and/or losses that she may have sustained because of the accident
complained of in her Complaint, and as a result of said assumption of the risk, the Plaintiff is
therefore barred from any recovery.
4. The claims of Plaintiff are subject to the proVISions of the Motor V chicle
Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. 5 170l et. seq., as amended.
5. Claims of Plaintiff are barred by the expiration of the applicable statute of
limitations.
6. Answering Defendants believe and therefore aver that if Plaintiff sustained the
injuries and damages as allege in the Plaintiffs Complaint, said injuries and/or damages were not
the result of any act or failure to act on the part of Answering Defendants, all such allegations
being expressly denied by the Answering Defendant and Plaintiffs action is therefore barred.
7. The accident which is the subject of this Complaint was caused by parties other
than Answering Defendants and for whose action Answering Defendants cannot be held
responsible.
8. The Plaintiffs injuries, if any, were caused by conditions over which Answering
Defendants had no control and for which Answering Defendants cannot be held responsible.
9. Plaintiffs claims are barred by the Doctrines of Collateral Estoppel and Res
Judiciata.
10. Answering Defendants incorporate herein by reference and plead as affirmative
defenses, all of those defenses specified under Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure 1030.
II. Defendants interpleads any and all defenses of all statutes and regulations of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the United States, including and not limited to the Federal
Motor Safety Carrier Regulations.
WHEREFORE, Answering Defendants demand judgment in their favor, and
against all other parties, along with such other relief as this Honorable Court deems appropriate.
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO,J<,APtAN,
SCHAER & TODDy,p..e:~
/,/
,,/'
BY:'
THEODORE M. SCHAER, ESQ.
Attorney for Defendants
Date: < I (lclOC
(/
C\\
,,-'
--
a..r
..
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 237-5405 - phone
(717) 237-5300 - fax
jrudd@mwn.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 05-3921
v.
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE R.
WEDDINGTON, ROADLlNK USA EAST,
L.L.C., and EASTERN AMERICAN
TRANSPORT & WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION
OBJECTION TO SUBPOENA DIRECTED TO
McNEES, WALLACE & NURICK, LLC
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Brenda J. Landis, by and through her attorneys, McNees
Wallace & Nurick LLC, and objects to the subpoena to be served upon McNees Wallace &
Nurick LLC as overbroad, and seeking information that is not relevant, nor likely to lead to
discovery of admissible evidence. Defendants propose to serve a subpoena seeking reviews,
evaluations and medical reports, etc. The requests for reviews, evaluations, and medical
reports is overbroad and seeks information that is not relevant nor is it likely to lead to the
discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff has only put her musculoskeletal condition, primarily
her low back and left leg, at issue in this lawsuit, and Plaintiff maintains her right of privacy
regarding all other medical conditions unrelated to the claims asserted in this lawsuit, as well as
her reviews and evaluations.
Respectfully Submitted:
McN ES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
Dated: June 1,2006
Jo athan H. Rudd
I. . No. 56880
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
..---
..
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
S.r-
I, Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire, hereby certify that on this l day of June, 2006, a true
and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by first-class, United States mail,
postage prepaid, upon the following:
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, PC
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1981
o
S'
~:...
r-.)
=
=
CT'
L_
C.::
-'1....
~
"\.-...
.....-, -.
\
N
~
<-1
:r:.."
rn~1
-On",
::SlC~
.~,(l..)
j~ :~~-\
('.~O
;:SCn
~
-1:7
~
-u
~
;::"
o
0"'
. ..
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 237-5405 - phone
(717) 237-5300 - fax
jrudd@mwn.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
: NO. 05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE R.
WEDDINGTON, ROADLlNK USA EAST,
L.L.C., and EASTERN AMERICAN
TRANSPORT & WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION
OBJECTION TO SUBPOENA DIRECTED TO
KINSLEY CONSTRUCTION
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Brenda J. Landis, by and through her attorneys, McNees
Wallace & Nurick LLC, and objects to the subpoena to be served upon Kinsley Construction as
overbroad, and seeking information that is not relevant, nor likely to lead to discovery of
admissible evidence. Defendants propose to serve a subpoena seeking reviews, evaluations
and medical reports, etc. The requests for reviews, evaluations, and medical reports is
overbroad and seeks information that is not relevant nor is it likely to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence. Plaintiff has only put her musculoskeletal condition, primarily her low back
and left leg, at issue in this lawsuit, and Plaintiff maintains her right of privacy regarding all other
medical conditions unrelated to the claims asserted in this lawsuit, as well as her reviews and
evaluations.
Respectfully Submitted:
McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
~
nathan H. Rudd
.D. No. 56880
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Dated: June 1, 2006
-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ~
I, Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire, hereby certify that on this L day of June, 2006, a true
and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by first-class, United States mail,
postage prepaid, upon the following:
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, PC
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1981
cf~~
. Jo athan H. Rudd
o
C
...:~
,....,
=
=
cr'
(I:.'.
f
<.-
c:
.,...,.,,.
,.,.",.,--
. ,
.~~j
.-'-
..-
,
N
~
~
:r:,,4'}
\I?:
-nfl'1
...."'0
-" \
c~~
~
::<
-0
=.t:
.r:-
.'
o
0'">
..
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 237-5405 - phone
(717) 237-5300 - fax
jrudd@mwn.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
: NO. 05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE R.
WEDDINGTON, ROADLlNK USA EAST,
L.L.C., and EASTERN AMERICAN
TRANSPORT & WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION
OBJECTION TO SUBPOENA DIRECTED TO
INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Brenda J. Landis, by and through her attorneys, McNees
Wallace & Nurick LLC, and objects to the subpoena to be served upon Independence Blue
Cross as overbroad, and seeking information that is not relevant, nor likely to lead to discovery
of admissible evidence. The proposed subpoena to Independence Blue Cross seeks any and
all Blue Cross/Blue Shield records related to Plaintiff. Plaintiff has only put her musculoskeletal
condition, primarily her low back and left leg, at issue in this lawsuit, and Plaintiff maintains her
right of privacy regarding all other medical conditions unrelated to the claims asserted in this
lawsuit. Accordingly, Plaintiff objects to the overbroad nature of this subpoena, and would only
agree to a subpoena limited to records related to her musculoskeletal condition or treatment.
Respectfully Submitted:
McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
~
J
I . No. 56880
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Dated: June 1, 2006
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
( >1----
I, Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire, hereby certify that on this _ day of June, 2006, a true
and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by first-class, United States mail,
postage prepaid, upon the following:
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, PC
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1981
~N
< Jo than H. Rudd
o
(~:;
r-.3
=
=
t.T'
(-
c::;
I
N
o
..,.,
::?
-,-0
flr==
-nrn
.~3~',
-1..... -t-\
a()
0,'1
-I
JE
~
-v
:::t:
.r;-
.,
C)
0"\
4 -
--
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 237-5405 - phone
(717) 237-5300 - fax
jrudd@mwn.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
v.
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE R.
WEDDINGTON, ROADLlNK USA EAST,
L.L.C., and EASTERN AMERICAN
TRANSPORT & WAREHOUSING,INC.
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION
OBJECTION TO SUBPOENA DIRECTED TO
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Brenda J. Landis, by and through her attorneys, McNees
Wallace & Nurick LLC, and objects to the subpoena to be served upon Erie Insurance Group as
overbroad, and seeking information that is not relevant, nor likely to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence. The proposed subpoena to Erie Insurance Group seeks any and all
records related to Plaintiff. Plaintiff has only put her musculoskeletal condition, primarily her low
back and left leg, at issue in this lawsuit, and Plaintiff maintains her right of privacy regarding all
other medical conditions unrelated to the claims asserted in this lawsuit. Accordingly, Plaintiff
objects to the overbroad nature of this subpoena, and would only agree to a subpoena limited to
records related to her musculoskeletal condition or treatment.
Respectfully Submitted:
McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
nathan H. Rudd
.0. No. 56880
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Dated: June 1, 2006
.. .
'.-.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
ISI.--
I, Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire. hereby certify that on this -+-- day of June, 2006, a true
and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by first-class, United States mail,
postage prepaid, upon the following:
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, PC
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1981
~ Y-A.J.4
. Jon han H. Rudd
o
s~
r-.:>
=
C:::')
d'"
(_.
c:
-...",.
...,',;:-
::'~:J\
--<,
,..~
I
N
-0
~."
_..J'.-;...
~
.:::\
:L-n
r \1 p::
:g,el
,':jIC)
- I _~,
L --1'<'
)f')
.::.. 01
::2\
~T;:\"
"JJ
:...:::.
x;:-
o
a-'
...
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 237-5405 - phone
(717) 237-5300 - fax
jrudd@mwn.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
v.
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE R.
WEDDINGTON, ROADLlNK USA EAST,
L.L.C., and EASTERN AMERICAN
TRANSPORT & WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION
OBJECTION TO SUBPOENA DIRECTED TO
WHITE ROSE FAMILY PRACTICE
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Brenda J. Landis, by and through her attorneys, McNees
Wallace & Nurick LLC, and objects to the subpoena to be served upon White Rose Family
Practice as overbroad, and seeking information that is not relevant, nor likely to lead to
discovery of admissible evidence. The proposed subpoena to White Rose Family Practice
seeks any and all records related to Plaintiff. Plaintiff has only put her musculoskeletal
condition, primarily her low back and left leg, at issue in this lawsuit, and Plaintiff maintains her
right of privacy regarding all other medical conditions unrelated to the claims asserted in this
lawsuit. Accordingly, Plaintiff objects to the overbroad nature of this subpoena, and would only
agree to a subpoena limited to records related to her musculoskeletal condition or treatment.
Respectfully Submitted:
McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
J athan H. Rudd
. No. 56880
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Dated: June 1, 2006
..
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
'I~
I, Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire, hereby certify that on this L day of June, 2006, a true
and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by first-class, United States mail,
postage prepaid, upon the following:
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, PC
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1981
d~V-M
J athan H. Rudd
0 1'-.) 0
=
C~ = II
-:-='"' .:;::r.
,- <- :r
c: flt:!J
I
I -om
~~JO
N ::~h
,:1 -f:,
-0 C) -1-1
:.r: "/ C')
.r:- C.)m
);~
0 :rJ
en -<
06-2484L
CERTIFICATE
PREREQUISITE TO SERVICE OF A SUBPOENA
PURSUANT TO RULE 4009.22
In the Matter of:
BRENDA J. LANDIS
. VS.
CARROLL A. QUARLES, ET AL
Court of Common Pleas
Cumberland County
No. 05-3921
As a prerequisite '0 service of a subpoena for documents and things pursuant to Rule 4009.22
CCLR on behalf of REGINA M. VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
Defendant certifies that
(1) A notice of intent to serve the subpoena(s) with a copy of the subpoena(s) attached thereto
was/were mailed or delivered to each party at least twenty days prior to the date on which
the subpoena(s) is/are sought to be served.
(2) A copy of the notice of intent, including the proposed subpoena(s), is attached to the
certificate.
(3) No objection to the subpoena(s) has been received.
(4) The subpoena(s) which will be served is/are identical to the subpoena(s) which is/are
attached to the notice of intent to server the subpoena(s).
DATE: 6/6/2006
~GE~~l)
Counsel for Defendant
......
CCLR
. . . .
Center City Legal Reproductions, Inc.
123 South Broad Street, Suite 1920, Philadelphia, PA 19109
(215)732-11 n fax (215)732-5637
Online Services www.cclrinc.com
BRENDA J. LANDIS
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
VS.
CARROLL A. QUARLES, ET AL
No. 05-3921
NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS
JONATHAN H. RUDD, ESQUIRE
MCNEES, WALLACE & NURICK, LLC
100 PINE STREET
PO BOX 1166
HARRISBURG, PA 17108
Please take notice there has been a request by REGINA M. VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE,
counsel for the flefendant in the above case for production and copying of records in the
possession of (see enclosures).
These records pertain to BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
Enclosed is(are) a copy (copies) of the subpoena(s) to be served on the custodian of
such records and also a Counsel Return Page for you to fill out and return to us stating
whether you would like to order a copy of the records and whether you have any
objections to the production and copying of such records or manner thereof. The fee per
location is in accordance with Act #26.
The subpoena will be sent to the records custodian twenty (20) days from the date of this
notice requesting that the records be produced on or before ten (10) days thereafter
unless we hear from you to the contrary on the Counsel Return Page. If you state an
objection on the Counsel Return Page, we will proceed accordingly.
If you require assistance, please contact our office.
DATE: June 6, 2006
Enclosures: Copy (copies) of Subpoena(s)
Counsel Return Page
...
CCLR
. . . .
Center City Legal Reproductions, Inc.
123 South Broad Street, Suite 1920, Philadelphia, PA 19109
(215)732-1177 fax (215)732-5637
Online Services www.cclrinc.com
BRENDA J. LANDIS
CCLR File NO. 06-2484L
vs.
CARROLL A. QUARLES, ET AL
COUNSEL RETURN PAGE
I have received the Notice of Records Reproduction Request dated 5/16/2006 regarding
records in the custody of (see attached subpoena(s)) and respond as follow:
(1 ) COPIES yes / no
I would like a copy of the records in question sent to me, and agree to
pay the price noted in the Notice of Records Reproduction Request.
(2) I would Iik€ copies of X-Rays sent to me. yes / no
(3) OBJECTIONS yes / no
I understand that I may object to the Notice of Records Reproduction
Request as Follows, and agree that my failure to do so on this Counsel
Return Page shall serve as an agreement that the records reproduction
service should proceed with the records collection process.
(a) I object to the records reproduction service obtaining the yes / no
records without a formal deposition.
(b) I object to the records custodian mailing the original documents yes / no
to the reproduction service.
(c) I object to the records reproduction service taking the records yes / no
out of the custody of the Records Custodian.
(4) I would like to Iqok at the records at a Center City location before yes / no
deciding whether to order a copy.
Date:
Attorney for plaintiff(s) / defendant(s)
JONATHAN H. RUDD, ESQUIRE
MCNEES, WALLACE & NURICK, LLC
100 PINE STREET
PO BOX 1166
HARRISBURG, PA 17108
C(I>MlNWE/\LTH OF prnNSYLVANIA
aJUNl'Y OF aJMIillUAND
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
Fi Ie No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARELS, ET AL
'.
SWPOENA TO PROCll.K:E [)()()..tENTS OR lli I tlGS
FOR D I OC1:NERY ~SUAtlT TO RULE 4009.22
TO: DR. BARBARA CHRISTENSEN
(Nane of Person or Entity)
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
produce the following docunents or things: ANY & ALL MEDICAL RECORDS, FILMS,
REPORTS, OFFICE NOTES, PROGRESS REPORTS, DOCTORS NOTES, CHARTS, SUMMARIES,
TEST RESULTS, EVLAUATIONS, ETC., PERTAINING TO BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
at CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, INC.
(Address)
You may deliver or mail legible copies of the docunents or produce things requested by
this subpoena, together with the certificate of caTPliance, to the party making this
request at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable
cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sougt>t.
If you fail to produce the docunents or things required by this subpoena within twenty
(20) days after its service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court order
caTPe 11 ing you to caTP ly with it.
llilS SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST Of 1HE FOLLONING PERSON:
~: REGINA VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
ADDRESS: eCLR, Inc.
TELEPl-PtlE:
SlJ'REl'E ~T
ATTORNEY FOR:
920
BY 1HE COURT:
Prothonotary/Clerk, civi I Division
DATE:
seal of the OJurt
Deputy
(Eff. 7/91)
~TH OF pmNSYLVANIA
COONl'Y OF QJMBffiU\ND
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
File No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARELS, ET AL
SUBPOENA TO PROO.X:E OOCU'ENTS OR TH I NGS
FOR D I so::NEffi PURSUANT TO RULE 4009.22
TO:
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP
(N<rre of Person or Entity)
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
produce the following docunents or things: ANY & ALL RECORD, REPORTS, MEMOS,
DOCUMENTS, ANY WRITTEN INFORMATION CONTAINED IN FILE REGARDING POLICY #
Q09-3003177 H.
at
CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, INC.
(Address)
You may deliver or mail legible copies of the docunents or produce things requested by
this subpoena, together with the certificate of c::arc>liance, to the party making this
req<.lest at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable
cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sougnt.
1 f you fai 1 to produce the docunents or things req<.lired by this subpoena wi thin twenty
(20) days after its service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court order
carpe l1ing you to <:a'r() ly with it.
920
TELEPHONE:
SUPREt-E ~T
ATTORNEY FOR:
BY THE ~T:
Prothonotary/Clerk. Civil Division
DATE:
Seal of the Court
DepUty
(Eff. 7/97)
~TH OF PalNSYLVANIA
CDUNrY OF alMBffiU\ND
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
File No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARELS, ET AL
SUBPOENA TO PR<lClU'::E [)()ClM3{fS OR 11-11 NGS
FOR 0 I sa:>vERY POOSUANT TO RUlE 4009.22
TO:
HARCOURT CHIROPRACTIC/DR. HARCOURT
(Nane of Person or Entity)
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
produce the following docunents or things: ANY & ALL MEDICAL RECORDS, FILMS,
REPORTS, OFFICE NOTES, PROGRESS REPORTS, DOCTORS NOTES, CHARTS, SUMMARIES,
TEST RESULTS, EVLAUATIONS, ETC., PERTAINING TO BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
at CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, INC.
(Address)
You may deliver or mail legible copies of the docunents or produce things requested by-
this subpoena, together with the certificate of <::aTllliance, to the party making this
req<.lest at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable
cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sougr.t.
If you fail to produce the docunents or things required by this subpoena within twenty
(20) days after its service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court O!"'der
<::aTlle 1 ling you to <::aTllly with it.
11-I1S SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT 1l-lE RE~ST Of WE FOLLONING PERSON:
~: REGINA VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
ADDRESS: CCLR, Inc.
TELEPH:lNE:
~REI'E <XUrr 10 ~
ATTORNEY FOR: D
920
BY 1l-IE ~T:
Prothonotary/Clerk, civi I Division
DATE:
Seal of the Court
Deputy
(Eff. ,/97)
(XM1JNWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
OJUNI'Y OF aJMBrnIAND
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
Fi Ie No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARELS, ET AL
SUBPOENA TO PROCIlK:E DCICltENTS OR TH I NGS _ ___
FOR 0 I s<x>vERY ~SUANT TO RULE 4009.22
TO:
HERD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC
(N<me of Person or Entity)
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
produce the following docunents or things: ANY & ALL MEDICAL RECORDS, FILMS,
REPORTS, OFFICE NOTES, PROGRESS REPORTS, DOCTORS NOTES, CHARTS, SUMMARIES,
TEST RESULTS, EVLAUATIONS, ETC., PERTAINING TO BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
at CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, INC.
(Address)
You may del iver or mai I legible oopies of the docunents or produce things requested by
this subpoena, together with the certificate of <X:Ol>liance, to the party making this
request at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable
cost of preparing the oopies or producing the things sougl-tt.
If you fail to produce the docunents or things required by this subpoena within twenty
(20) days after its service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court O!'der
c:arpelling you to c:arply with it.
THIS SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE REQI..XOST OF THE FOUJJH1NG PERSON:
~: REGINA VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
ADDRESS: CCLR, Inc.
TELEPHONE :
SlJ'REt-E cx:ou
ATTORNEY FOR:
920
BY THE OOJRT:
Prothonotary/Clerk, Civi I Division
DATE:
Seal of the Oourt
Deputy
(Eff. 7/97)
<XJIoM)NWE2\LTH OF pE1IDSYLVANIA
COUNl'Y' OF CUMBJ'1llAND
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
Fi Ie No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARELS, ET AL
'.
SUBPOENA TO PROOlX:E [)()Cl.H:NTS OR Tl-l1 NGS
FOR 0 I srovERY I'rnSUAHT TO RUlE 4009.22
TO:
INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS
(Name of Person or Entity)
within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
prodJce the following docunents or things: ANY & ALL BLUE CROSS BLUE SHEILD RECORDS,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO EXPLANATION OF BENEFITS, REPORTS, M~MU~, DOCUMENTS,
ANY WRITTEN INFORMATION CONTAINED IN FILE REGARDING ID# YWP80051721900.
CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, INC.
at
(AddresS)
You may deliver or mail legible copies of the docunents or produce things requested by
this subpoena, together with the certificate of call>liance, to the party making this
request at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable
cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sougPt.
I f you fai 1 to produce the docunents or things required by this subpoena within twenty
(20) days after its service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court order
call>e l1ing you to call> ly with it.
920
TELEPHONE :
SU'REr-E CXJtm'
ATTORNEY FOR:
BY 1HE ccun:
Prothonotary/Clerk. civi I Division
DATE:
Sea I of the O::xJrt
Deputy
(Eff. 7/97)
<XMDNWFALTH OF palNSYLVANIA
COON1'Y OF CUMBEml\ND
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
Fi Ie No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARELS, ET AL
SUBPOENA TO PR<lOlX:E ()()Cl.t<ENTS OR ni I NGS
FOR 0 I SCOVERY PrnSUANT TO RULE 4009.22
TO: KINSLEY CONSTRUCTION
(N<me of Person or Entity)
within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
produce the fo llowing docunents or things: ANY & ALL EMPLOYMENT I PERSONNEL RECORDS,
INCLUDING WORKERS COMP CLAIMS, DATES OF ATTENDANCE, APPLICATIONS, REVIEWS,
EVALUATIONS, EARNINGS, MEDICAL REPORTS, ETC., PERTAINING TO BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, INC.
at
(Address)
You may deliver or mail legible copies of the docunents or produce things requested by
this subpoena, together with the certificate of ~liance. to the party making this
req<.lest at the address 1 isted above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable
cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sought.
If you fail to produce the docunents or things required by this subpoena within twenty
(20) days after its service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court O!"der
ocxrpelling you to ~ly with it.
nilS SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE REQt.EST OF THE FOLLOHltIG PERSON:
~: REGINA VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
ADDRESS: CCLR. Inc.
TELEPHONE:
SU'REfoE <X:UlT
ATTORNEY FOR:
920
BY THE <X:UlT:
Prothonotary/Clerk, Civi 1 Division
DATE:
Sea 1 of the Court
Deputy
(Eff. 1'/97)
. ,
COMM)NWEI\LTH OF PE2lNSYLVANIA
<XlUNl'Y OF aJMBrnLI\ND
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
File No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARELS, ET AL
SUBPOENA TO PR<:'()CXE IXlCU'ENTS OR ll-ll NGS
FOR 01 flXNERY ~SUANT TO RULE 4009.22
TO:
LORETTA K. SCHMIDGALL, MD
(N<me of Person or Entity)
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the oaurt to
produce the following docunents or things: ANY & ALL MEDICAL RECORDS, FILMS,
REPORTS, OFFICE NOTES, PROGRESS REPORTS, DOCTORS NOTES, CHARTS, SUMMARIES,
TEST RESULTS, EVLAUATIONS, ETC., PERTAINING TO BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, .INC.
at
(Address)
You may deliver or mail legible copies of the docunents or produce things requested by
this subpoena, together with the certificate of carp liance, to the party making this
rElQtJest at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable
cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sougl-lt.
If you fail to produce the docunents or things required by this subpoena within twenty
(20) days after its service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a O)Urt order
carpelling you to carply with it.
ll-lIS SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE FOLLOHtNG PERSON:
~: REGINA VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
ADDRESS: CCLR. Inc.
TELEPH:lNE :
StPREt'E <:n.Rr
ATTORNEY FOR:
920
BY THE a::un:
Prothonotary/Clerk. Civil Division
DATE:
Seal of the Oourt
Deputy
(Eff. 7'/97)
~TH OF PENNSYLVANIA
muNl"i OF aJMBrnIl\ND
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
Fi Ie No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARELS, ET AL
SUBPOENA TO PROI:llX:E DOCl.t1ENTS OR ni I NGS
FOR 0 I SOOVERY PrnSUANT TO RULE 4009.22
TO:
MCNEES, WALLACE, NURICK, LLC
(Name of Person or Entity)
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
"'""""'. th f 11 . docunent th. ANY & ALL EMPLOYMENT/PERSONNEL RECORDS,
,.,. ~ce e 0 OWlng S or lngs.
INCLUING WORKERS COMP CLAIMS, DATES OF ATTENDANCE, APPLICATIONS, REVIEWS,
EVALUATIONS, EARNINGS, MEDICAL REPORTS, ETC., PERTAINING TO BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
at CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, INC.
(Address)
You may deliver or mail legible copies of the docunents or produce things requested by
this subpoena, together with the certificate of carc>liance, to the party making this
request at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable
cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sougPt.
If you fail to produce the docunents or things required by this subpoena within twenty
(20) days after its service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court order
OCITlle 1 ling you to care> ly with it.
nilS SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT 1liE REQUEST OF 1liE FOLLOiIING PERSON:
~: REGINA VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
MlORESS: CCLR. Inc.
TELEPHONE:
SU'RE/'E o.::urr
ATTORNEY FOR:
920
BY 1l-IE OOJRT:
Prothonotary/Clerk, Civi 1 Division
ClATE:
Seal of the Court
Deputy
(Eff. 7/97)
o::MDNWEI\LTEI OF PmNSYLVANIA
<XXJNTY OF CUMBF1UAND
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
File No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARELS, ET AL
'.
SUBPOENA TO PROOUCE ooc::uarrS OR 11-11 NGS
FOR 0 I sa:>vERY PWSUANT TO RULE 4009.22
TO:
THOMAS PHEASANT, MD
.- .-
(Nane of Person or Entity) .
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
produce the following docunents or things: ANY & ALL MEDICAL RECORDS, FILMS,
REPORTS, OFFICE NOTES, PROGRESS REPORTS, DOCTORS NOTES, CHARTS, SUMMARIES,
TEST RESULTS, EVLAUATIONS, ETC., PERTAINING TO BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
at CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, .INC.
(Address)
You may deliver or mail legible copies of the docunents or produce things requested by
this subpoeOa, together with the certificate of ~1iance, to the party making this
request at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable
cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sousnt.
If you fail to produce the docunents or things required by this subpoena within twenty
(20) days after its service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court o,..der
~eI1ing you to ~ly with it.
11-IIS SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT l1-lE REOOEST OF 1l-IE FOLL~ING PERSON:
~: REGINA VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
ADDRESS: CCLR, Inc.
TELEPHONE :
SlJ'REl'E ~T
ATTORNEY FOR:
920
BY 1l-lE ~T:
Prothonotary/Clerk, civil Division
DATE:
Seal of the Oourt
Deputy
(Eff. 7/97)
<XMUNWEI\LTH OF PmNSY!.VANIA
<XlUNI'Y OF aJMBmLAND
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
File No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARELS, ET AL
SUBPOENA TO PRODU:E ooa..tENTS OR TH I NGS
FOR D I S(X)VERY IUlSUANT TO RULE 4009.22
TO:
WHITE ROSE FAMILY PRACTICE
(Hare of Person or Entity)
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
produce the following docunents or things: ANY & ALL MEDICAL RECORDS, FILMS,
REPORTS, OFFICE NOTES, PROGRESS REPORTS, DOCTORS NOTES, CHARTS, SUMMARIES,
TEST RESULTS, EVLAUATIONS, ETC., PERTAINING TO BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
at CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, INC.
(Address)
You may de liver or mail legible copies of the docunents or produce things requested by
this subpoena, together with the certificate of c:arpliance, to the party making this
request at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable
cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sougl>t.
If you fail to produce the docunents or things required by this sWpoena within twenty
(20) days after its service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a <x>urt o,...der
c:arpelling you to cat'(lly with it.
THIS SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE REQl..EST OF THE FOLLCW1NG PERSON:
~: REGINA VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
ADDRESS: COLR, Inc.
TELEPHONE:
SUPREI'E ~
ATTORNEY FOR:
920
BY THE COlJlT:
Prothonotary/Clerk, Civi I Division
DATE:
Seal of the ();)urt
Deputy
(Eft. 7/97)
("J
,
" "
"',
c.::::;
C;,:;'
,:;';:t',
o
-n
'-
C":-
:I!
'"'1-r1
11 F
':'
CJ
I
\.D
t.c/
-0
::r:.
-\z':~
~-=~h I
'-.,..,.
'J)
-<
1'0
1..0
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN, SCHAER & TODDY, P.C.
BY: Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Identification No.: 49580 Attorney for Defendants
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102
215-569-2800
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
vs.
CIVIL ACTION
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE
R. WEDDINGTON, ROADLINK USA
EAST, L.L.C., and EASTERN
AMERICAN TRANSPORT &
WAREHOUSING, INC,
Defendants
DOCKET NO.: 05-3921
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
MOTION OF DEFENDANTS TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO
SUBPOENAS
Defendants, Carroll A. Quarles, Theodore R. Weddington, Roadlink USA East, LLC and
Eastern American Transport Warehousing, Inc., by and through their counsel, Zarwin, Baum,
DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, P.C., herein move this Honorable Court for an Order in the
form attached hereto striking Plaintiffs Objections to Subpoenas, and in support thereof aver as
follows:
1. On or about February 16, 2006, Plaintiff Brenda Landis filed a Civil Action
Complaint as a result of a motor vehicle accident on August 11, 2003. A true and correct copy
ofPlaintif:fs Complaint is attached hereto, made part hereof, and marked as Exhibit "A".
2. Plaintiff alleges serious and permanent personal injuries due to the motor vehicle
accident, specifically injuries to her legs, back, neck, wrist, left eye, low back, numbness,
tingling and burning sensations of the left leg, loss of mobility and/or movement throughout her
lower back and neck region. See Paragraphs 50 and 51 of Plaintiff s Complaint - Exhibit "A".
3. Moreover, Plaintiff alleges that as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident,
she "has missed time at work and will continue to miss time at work". See Exhibit "A" 1 60.
4, Moreover, Plaintiff alleges that as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident,
she has been compelled to expend various sums of money for medical attention, medication and
supplies and will continue to expend sums of money for the same purpose in the future. See
Exhibit "A" 159.
5. Defendants issued certain Interrogatories and Request for Production of
Documents addressed to Plaintiff. In her responses, Plaintiff identifies her present employers as
McNees Wallace & Nurick (from 1996 to the present) and Kinsley Construction (from 2003 to
the present). See Exhibit "B" - Plaintiffs Answers to Interrogatories - #15(d) and 44(b).
6. Plaintiff has identified the name of her automobile insurance carrier as Erie
Insurance. Specifically, "Plaintiffs automobile insurer has been paying the medical
expenses....." and "Plaintiff has made claim for medical benefits. She is not sure how much Erie
has paid for medical benefits." See Exhibit "B", Answers to Interrogatories #17.
7. In addition, Plaintiff identified White Rose Family Practice as a practitioner by
whom she has been treated and/or examined. See Exhibit "B", Answers to Interrogatories 35(c)
and (d).
8.
Plaintiff has identified Blue Cross and Blue Shield (ID# YWP8005l72l900) as
her health and accident insurance company covering any injuries named. Exhibit "B" - Answers
to Interrogatories #50.
9. Pursuant to Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 4009.21, Defendants
issued Notice of Intent to Serve Subpoenas upon the aforementioned providers and/or employers
and/or insurance carriers: McNees, Wallace & Nurick; Kinsley Construction; White Rose
Family Practice; Erie Insurance; and Independence Blue Cross. See Notices of Intent to Serve
Subpoenas attached hereto, made part hereof and collectively marked as Exhibit "C".
10. On or about June 1,2006, Plaintiff filed formal objections to these Subpoenas as
overbroad and seeking information which is not relevant or likely to lead to discovery of
admissible evidence. See Exhibit "D".
11. Defendants believe and therefore aver that all of the above named providers,
insurance carriers and/or employers possess relevant information which is not only admissible
but necessary to determine the validity of the allegations made by Plaintiff as a result of the
subject accident, including but not limited to work performance; time lost; sick pay and/or
vacation pay utilized; medical treatment; exhaustion of benefits; payment of medical bills; and
any medical bills in excess of medical benefits.
12. Defendants will be severely prejudiced without this information as they intend to
utilize at the trial ofthis matter any and all documentation obtained in accordance with the
properly served Subpoenas.
13. Defendants will be severely prejudiced without this information as to the extent of
Plaintiffs alleged injuries, as well as the expected duration of any recovery.
14. Defendants will be severely prejudiced without the documents sought as that they
cannot adequately prepare for trial.
WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request this Honorable Court to enter an Order
in the form attached hereto striking Plaintiffs Objections to Defendants' Subpoenas.
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN,
SCHAER & TODDY, P.C.
By:~d101 )'11 ,~
THEODORE M. SCHAER, ESQUIRE
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN, SCHAER & TODDY, P.e.
BY: Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Identification No.: 49580 Attorney for Defendants
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102
215-569-2800
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
COURT OF CONrnJONPLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
vs.
CIVIL ACTION
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE
R. WEDDINGTON, ROADLINK USA
EAST, L.L.C., and EASTERN
AMERICAN TRANSPORT &
WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
DOCKET NO.: 05-3921
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE
PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SUBPOENAS
Defendants incorporate by reference their Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Objections to
Subpoenas, as though the same were more fully set forth at length herein.
Under the Rules of Civil Procedure, no discovery...shall be permitted which would cause
unreasonable annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, burden or expense to the deponent or any
person or party. The mere existence of some annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression, or the
mere imposition of some expense is not a ground to forbid discovery, In the province of
discovery, case law has recognized an individual's interest in avoiding disclosure of personal
matters that are within a constitutionally protected sphere of privacy. In the instant action arising
out of an automobile accident, however, the defendants served subpoenas on various non-parties
who had provided health care services and/or insurance coverage to the plaintiff or had custody
of the plaintiffs employment records. The records sought possess relevant information which is
not only admissible but necessary to determine the validity ofthe allegations made by Plaintiff as
a result ofthe subject accident, including but not limited to work performance; time lost; sick
pay and/or vacation pay utilized; medical treatment; exhaustion of benefits; payment of medical
bills; and any medical bills in excess of medical benefits.
WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that this Honorable Court enter an Order
in the form attached hereto striking Plaintiffs objections to the Subpoenas issued to Erie
Insurance; Independence Blue Cross; White Rose Family Practice; Kinsley Construction; and
McNees Wallace & Nurick.
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN,
SCHAER & TODDY, P.C.
BY: rt
THEODORE M. SCHAER, ESQUIRE
DATED:~
EXHIBIT" A"
reo
21 06 10:50a Cind~ Weakle~
F E ~. 2 C. 2 D :J 6 ~ 0 : 5 9 .~.~j~ E A S T [ R ;\~I A,V E R 1 C A
fEB. 70,2006 3: 53Nil
E?STE Ri': GPS 8p,l:
8RENDi\ J. UJ,.NDlS
P)~intiff .
817 577 4690
~~ O. 9 0 1 3
I~V. 0 J U
I. 'j
: !N THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUI,/iBERL(}.ND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
: NO. 06-3921
CP,RROLL P-.. QUARLES, THEODORE
R.. iNEDDlNGTON, RO,<\DUNK USA
Etel.STr tAL..C" and ~.STEFU\J
.f.1IMERICAN TRANSPORT &
WAREHOUSING; INC.
Def'"ndsnts : Ci'/IL AC.TJON
CO!\~E1Ar~Ji
~
.,
??,;;1ntiff 11.:: 8r<$lIclG;: J, Landis, Sh :J("]ult indiVduallJ\ 110 resides Sit 20 Buming
Tres C:~U'l"t, Yo.:: Cou!GI'Y, "':"Oi1:. J:'.;ii1i:syiv;;1flla -;7404.
'" '" r:, ....- . ". -- (" ~ nr" l h\' . It' '-'d I
.;' :_'~::::::::'<::~'" '....~ilUlI ,"'\, \..iUanes ner~)>lilz;,Ler '..!UGr,~s ... IS an <:lOU 11101Vi UB
212"13..
w~th 0 orL"C:O&1 nlece of residence at 2817 r,,1r-:;meld AvenuG, B2.lti~re, Mai}llal1d
' ..
3. Daf'311c.fcint, Th.;>odore R. Wc;ddingt(;,o (he'f6inafter"'lNedcHngtofJ"). is an f2cJ1.i!~
HO\'i;;:rd County, EHfCD'tt CIty, MCii"ylzi';C; 2 '1043_
individuah'!'ith a p:i~crpa! place cfresidence at 8505 ,=mde(cic Road', P.O. Box 1336,
!;.. Defend3;;t, RoaclJirj!-{ USA !;;ast, U_C (herc;i:,~,'ter I R02diink"). is .9 Dl"i!~wafe
!\1':)rthh~mptolj COU:Oiy, B.;:fr'deii€m, Pehnsylvania iSOI7.
l!!'i)i~ed EabITiry compeny I.~'ith a P€lnnsyivania plac.e of busiilZ:c:::a at 1240 Vv!n Drive,
.::::
........
...... - . . -, ~ . ~ , 0 l' .. 1 (' ...
LoC'ic::t;!;,<:1nr, t:8S:.';;:m i',i1~enca;l I r2ngporc ~\ ~t,l2.rs.'r;r-'lJ~.ng. Inc, n0re!nanei
"E~.stem AmeriG<:ln TIT'rtspcrt") is 8 ccrpcr::atior. 'Ni}!ch /i';8ri7tr.ins a place of busin.ess at
gs::n Hegermall .strel;'~, Phii'adOlphia Cocsnfy, F'h!r2de-lphis. P&nnsYlvenia19136.
1
p, 10
p
5/19
reo cl U6 10:51a
Cind:;j Weakle:;j
F:8. 10. 20:]6 ~O:59AV
E,~STER~ AVERlcA
817 577 4680
~O. 9013
P. c/H
p. 1 1
r:g,20.20053:53AM
tA~ltun ur~ ~hLI
"..... V I V
6, ThiS action arises out af the. coWsit.>l'I bew.ra6Tl a ~rac!:or-t-airer and passenger
, 1 ~ ...."0'" , . ,. . - 1'-"" f\ ~.' ",,_ri S'O';, (. t.. "u'"'
\..~t...:,....)~'), .t').n-=': nCCn'rj"'1C;'-I' 0/") A\uor ;t..~! $ rt I ~.. D:e::t':.~'et:n \~....jv ;...~. hti. at Ie...! . \J r'\.~V~.. 1 r
'~'i ,.~'- !. .;..;.... _ _t Y', ~ r' ~-........ .,. _~ ..
r"f''''f''''l~,f~. [>,,'q "'I"-~r ;.t..,~, bqrder O' et.:,{een York CCic.mtv and C~mbeda.nd COLHity,
ltJ'...."""',,;,I........"'. '~1.1__ ...J~.... .... . " ..
P ,.;.. -'I. r i',.,,"_,.,j ',-., "'~ '."''>0 ,,~. '-"':da,,,!(")
, tei1nsy~van~a tfler~;na~r.e re~~,~ ~ ~"U <...., tIJ,.o. ~ ~__ .'"'\~..... VI' ~
7, At the 'lime oftne Accident, PJaintiifwas the ovvnar end opel'~tor of a 1999
Chrysler SGibling Convertible. PeMsyr.....ania J'egistr'tiltloil ni.'mber PZT7a8B (hsreinefter
the "Car"),
B, Ai 'the Urns ~nd pt:S!ce of the Ai;cio!?ni:, Piaintiff W;::s operating the Car in a
nOl40fhertj direction on interstate 83.
9. Ai t'1e time and pla:;s of!he Acc.ident, Def:m1arr:: Qu~rles was oper.stlng a
20.00 Jiltemstk:nal Tractor. M~!)'land r'~9istra;tion number 4S3F55. puliing at1 enclosed
tralier.(h$re/nafterthe .T!'Zlctor~T~l!cr"), @Iso in OJ no;1hsrly direction on Intemwre 83.
'10, lmmedl8tely plior i-n the stlbject A:::cfd~f'it, Pi::ltl";tf l' was open<ltin~the Car in
the left nEI:d lene and /'l",q j{Jst passed Exh;s 398 (1rr:erstatG 75/Pel1i1sylvaliia Tumpike}'
2r;c 40J~~ (Lfi7if;;':Jrn Ru:.:d)..
i i - l::1mecHsIely prior tD the GubJect Accident., Plainti'J \"/'as operating the Car 2!
tire re\flFui rate e:f speGd.
12~
,. D" 'N~"" "'!;; "f I"" ~ -. . . f'\ J ,. .
....\S !' !z!m.;'.' ...<:lZ3Cu ,..:~n ""Uk, I..!(:;':encam ...." ~ai1e.s ilt:iS C?pera\lr.g tile TlQcior-
ha.:lcl siOG;.
TraIJe.i In th,'l rIght hsnd la.ne of inte;st81e .33, ~r;d beg~n to p;;;ss the Car on Its rfGht
...
,...
,
...
t-etl
C'l Uti 10:52a
~~: ?0.2006 10: 59ft.\l
E;~.3T[R;'J ,~VERICA
Cind:;j Weakle:;j
817 577 4890
NO, 9013
FEB. 20 2006 8:53AM
EASTERI'; Gr~ :Jt'\~ i
I1V. U IV
13. The Accldefit started when Defen:jarri Quaf:$~s el1emp!ecl to ci1ange from the
right hand to left ner:d lane when the rear or the TGl,:;tc<r pc,rHOil of the Trector-TrafJer
v.res adjacent af'lo ne-xt to tne em" driven by nainftff in The b'ft hand lane.
14. Prlm'to ~tltempting to change Isne~~. DorendElnt Clu~ries fai!~d to LlS$ hIs turn
sIgnals to indicate that he intended to Chailg~~ ~snes.
15. As Oefendant q~srles ::iltempted to move the Trc:lctor- Trager frem the right
hand to t':e ieft he:n d !~nc. -:::l~ rear portion cf thC' tr.:J~:~'Or an lVor front portion of the trellier
Violently $~n1Ck the riGht h~nd side cf froe C~tr driven hy ?tafrrtrf!' {hereinafter tile "Initial
:....:""I,...."':I_.;-~r)
~~: lIi~'C"4"'""1I. .
1 S. f\t {)f Immediately prior to the Initial Impact... Plaintiff ac4'.ivated the horrl of me
Car W;/fi such ferce thm she sprained her \vnsis.
17. p,:"ter me Inif.a! Imp,SC't, Defendant Quarles j~mpof3!lily moved the Tractof-
Tmfier inlck toward the right,. al1d ti1en irnmedlj:te!y m,)ysd i;.::d: !o'J'!ard the left and
violently $tr;,.!~,f( {h.c Car a ~cGOnd ~ime (herein~n'?i the ~SeG'.':::lcllmpact~).
13. p'.t the t;m2 or the S,::t.;or;cJ impact. tr'll;' T ff:lctor~ Tran::r had moved fsrther
chS<:id of ihe Gar. 8M the Sec~md impact toc-k pfC!ca t;et...vcr.:\!~ closer to the r::fdc;e of 1he
1qraiier and the rigl'l!-hand sics cfth~ Car.
19, At ail time.;: bew,reen 1ha Initia: Irn:;?~i: ~rHj -Sf~::;:onQ 'mp2ct, r.':.>lalntiff COnti'fltJed
to appf}.' the ~1cm of ths Ger.
3
p. 12
p,
7 ; ~ (j
It i I
~eb 21 08 10:52a Cind~ Weakle~
:~~. 20. 2:)')6 .iO:59,~:V! EASHRN Ji,VER!CA
817 577 4890
~:O, 9013
r~8, 20, 2006 o'~4,C\~~1
~ g ~ I r I\. i~ \.1f.,) U I~ I.. I
20. Alter the Second liilpe:ct, D",fendant QI.;<:1r!es tlnce again t€lmpor;aiil~1 pulled
th8 Tr-actor-TraiJer to the :ight, 2nd t;ien sucld",inly pul:eri Pl3c:k to 1ne ~eft and vblGr.tly
sr,.....ck ths C;;r fDr a third time (the ''ThIrd Imp,,"ci").
2'1. ,.&,t t~6' time of the Third fmpact, file }"raci:or'-Traifer had contil1ued to move
f.arcner a{1ead of fue Car, and {'he Thlid Impact took pli~re beiween the rear of the Trailer
and the right-hand side of the Car.
22_ .At ail t!rr.es between m& Second lmp~C'1 ami Third impect. PIElirrtiff continued
to apply tbe horn of ihe Car.
.:'~ :.:::;;;-~,~ r;':IU ;:Ji}JdC;i, C'eieooant QU3iies tll1aily pi:lssed Piain-Uff's Car, Clod
ccntirrtJsd to Opsiate tl"h;' TraC'ior- TraUer in a notiheriy dlrecticn on Int~rstc:~e 8.3 wit.'1cut
any Irnmediate attempt to stop and 'pullover to the sid:z, e,f th(: rood.
G "''w,tho Third Impac!, Plaintiif was eventuBly "'10 to bring the Car 10 . stop.
25. Bnsed upon eye vVI.tness sbriements: P!ajn1~'i belie'res end thet~"Ore aVl;liS
th~t another tract.or-trC,liJer driver took scm~ actkm to In~'3;Yer.;~ ;r. crder:o P;"0V6ii~
" ~ , . -, , .. I . -'h -.. II '!
,--,e!e~cant f...,.tUanas rrom ,;aVJng! .9 S~i1e or t"!3 ..-.c~!(;~nt
25. De'i<md::W!t Quarles eventuarly brought fne Tractof-'T,rnifer to a stop and
par!,ed the TractQr- Trailer Of! the right hand sld(~ of the road Hmost OM mile nOrth on
fnier~E;t::te sa ~Tom ~"alner:c: t'ie ,A.cck!enl began.
27. Plaintiff was assisted at the ':C~i19 of ~i'le /-\cddonf ty witnesses who CiSli'fled
to fl;;;;\fe observed the Acciden~ and Defend?!flt Quarles" app~reH1t attempt to lea.ve the
scene Qfthe Accident.
4
p. 13
P. 2./ ~ 9
Feb 21 06 10:53a
Cind~ Weakle~
EASHRil Ai'lH1CA
817 577 4690
~O. 9:) 1 3
,,:~, 20. 2006 1 G: 59AM
FEB. 20. 2006 B:34A~
EASTERN GPS 3AL 1
~!v. ~ 10
,
; ~ .
28. 5ased upon eye wimess S't3tern!;ints, Plabtiff bel~cves end therefore avert.
th,-at D2f€rldant Quartes ;-Er;t:~ed to e:-dt the cab (y~ the;} Tracior-Trailer until the pOrtee
" -./. ~ I ~... . L "" t'-- :\ " ,
alTfiled apprO.f..lrnal8 y t."lH1jl nIH1tjte!~~ a~~3f ne f\.cc:o~~nL
/'':l. Frior to th~ p'~fiC'~ srriving. Defendant CluarlEls rr:ade no atternpt te: checl. Oil
the {'.ond~jon of Piainj'ff.
3D. 8:;:sed upon lm'oli-nation received from the Pollee, Pfaintiffbelieves ~'1c:1
tijerefore avers that me 2000 Int~;matiorlal Ti'Bctor oiven iJ '/ Defendant QU3Jies at tfie
tirn$ of th~ Acc;d8i1t Via:; o\!\!)1ed by DefentJ<;:nt VV0cic\iiigton.
~~
2:;:::;:: :";~'::ll ~"..;tl;-.ii.- i.-Jk;liJ'i:l0DI i rec:eivec ;JY PlaJr:tiff, she believes und
~herefore avers that at tie time 01 'the Accide1!, DefGnc!arl! ~uarles was aGting as tile
SBnlant, :ag8~, employee, on'J'GlS oth~N-iisB opera'(ing the .'rsC'~or~Trai!er under the
control or en the hehalf of C-efenr:!8nts Weddington, i~o3dlin!c anclJor Eastern American
Tl'2nspott. z:nd was then 8nd t"":ere opcrz1:ing ti'6 TractGr-T1'f~iier while acting lvi!hsll (he
scope enD purpcsz en' his 2gcney, eervifude, ,:;mpfoyn-:~'nr. J."~:)ntlol, behalf <!:lila/or
6t!t.f-ror1zai~rm of Defefld2111ts V'%ddingtr:.n. .R(:~~dJ!!!k 2,"!d:'c:- E:'~~.:m r'\maiican TI~tlsport_
32. . L'e;'end,mt QU2ries ONES n.;;gHgeii'f 1:'1"0 fS'G;lIe~,~ ir: 2itempting to change lanes
woel"! the Jeff nand !an~ WZS 2lr88d'y c-ccupiec! by Plaintiffs C;ar.
33. Dsfendant QUE\f'1es ~3 neglig'sn7 End r2c!dE:ss iii repeAredi~ striking Plaintiff's
Cor l',,;16n he l~M"'v o. sholJJd hsve knQ1.~ii thai: his T rc;cbr- T.aUer \t1la9 adjao?nt to
?lair.tiffs ve;"licie 2nd there WE;S no p'~:crbb v,:;}' ~r hh. to cl1c1ilge lanes v,~thcut
crushing Plaintifi's Car.
p. 1~
P. 9/19
r.
Feb 21 08 10:53a Cind~ Weakle~
-:~. 20. 2006 ~ ~ :OOA:/ Ei~S~ER~ hMtR1CA
817 577 4890
h'O 9 ","
1\, G I ~
r~B. 20.2006 B: ')4'.\:11
tH~lt:\i\' IJr,) Of'll I
z..t Defendant Quarles Wi'.lS negligent rima rockl,2'ss in fg;iling to proP2rly operate
th.g Trac;tor.Trnll,s; in croer to carry out a p'ro;:~r 2:'10 sa::e ia:ia c;lange ansr' Pialntl'frs
Car nad e~her already passed by the front of his Ti"aJ~or-T.;~Her. or in .u,~ allemc:tive.
;;,;nce th~ r~r ot Traotor- Trailer Wc;s beyond ll';e 1;"OfI': of PJElntln-s Car.
35. D$f~lid'a:)t Quar!es \'\:GiS negligent and recF:sess En falling to operate the
Trnctor~ Trailer- at a saf~ rate of speed such ih3t he ~llJlcl make a proper and sale lane
change.
36. Cet:':3ndenf Qu<::rleo VieS iif:9/igent i:md reckiess in fulling to properly util1ze his
mirrors in or,.:et to obs.erve Plail1tiffs Car before attempfng t) maKe a lane. change 'from
tits :ight hand t.) leu !1&nd Jan€<.
-7
". .
DCJ.9nd<::nt Q;'J~rli?s was negligeflt and l"6c!dos;~ in 'lot recognizing after
sfrlking the Plaintiff's C~f the first tlm~ that tha Tra;ctoi'- Trailer was sWI not OOjhJnd
Pi3intiffs Cat' whsn he ctlemp~ed to re-enter t'lc left hand lans'the second Hme, which
reSi.llteci in hIm stnhfng Plair'rr.rios Gsr a s-e~oild time.
.5/), Def~nGant Quaries ,~s fl1r~her rlEgngent and rec1::;:ess in not recognizing c:iter
striking the Flarotiffs C81' t11e. second time that:hG Tractor- Ti,~Her was still not beyond
Plaintiffs Cai Vlh~'n h,~ attem::;tsd to ~8nter th~ ;eft .h;mcJ iar,iS tile third lime, ...,.hlch
Rsu!ted in him ,strUang Pfb;ntfff'o Car for the t;'drd time.
39. Defendant QU;;lrles was negiigent ar::j rec.:k:l;iss in )'is repeated striking of
P1Elintifi's C;;;r when he Jmew cr should have lJ1::wn t!i<:i2 pj;.i)fntiff's C",r was adjacent to
hIs iractor.. TIG1:!,ar and thsr(,: was liD iOOi';") foi' his TraGt:lr.TrEis~ to move over into the
1eft hand !snr:;1 vvithout cr...!shing Pjaj'nt!ffs Ccf.
o
V
p. 15
p, i 0/ 19
Feb
21 06 10:54a
~ :~, ~J(L 20G6 ~ ~ OOf~~V;
Cind::l WeClkle~
E,ASTER\j ,^,~!::R;Ci\
817 577
4690
NO. 9013
"
f'.
p.16
11/19
FEB. 20. 2D06
0' 54~\:,1
. .. III
tA~. ~xrJ l1r~ {j,s\~ I
;:;.v. Delendan.t Quarles was li\?:-;lllg~nt End rEriDkleso In ;epeat0dly failing to heed
the sounding of .Pf~lntlt7's hom oafere and betW6sti the frd!a! Impsc1 and Third Impact.
41. Defendant Queries was negilgent and rel~klalSs:n failing to immediately teke
steps to pui1 th.~ Troctz;:f'J Treiler off 0:,,1'0 the right-hand shoulder after t'ne Initisl Impact,.
lithIc.,:, t-vD!.11d have elrmil18ted the OCCurrenCEt ofths Sec'Ond '~H1CI Third Impacts.
42. DefGl1dant Quarl@s was negligent and r&cldess In failing to immediateiy tal(e
steps to puBl the T rnc7:0r- Trailer off Dnto the light-hDI,rj ShC:':llder ofter the Second rmpact,
which w'CU[d heve eliminated trl8 OCCl.me~~' of tr/e :Seco..,J and Th[rd Imp:lctc.
43. it '.'1as unraasol1ab!e for Del'endant QV8dE~S in h;we r€'r:'~pf""rlly;)tt?~;:,ted t:
chsnge tanes when he knsv'j thst Plaintiffs (,':ar wes in the art hand laoe and 'l:hat there
was no room for 'the Tractoj"~Tr2iiei lC then and ~hGm mov;; Into the left hand !ane
without cnlshing Plaintiffs Car.
,,~L Dai'sr;c)ant Q,..) 21;-1 88 <:::sregsrtiec.i a iisl::: know!',: to him or en obviot.:s Tisl, tndt he
W2S taV'!.3re of in attemptlng to U,en and t'1ere chang€~ from {he left hand to the fight !'12i:G!
lane d,!":spit0 1he~ h:, !~f:e'k' P!;;;f:-;tiff's C<:;, It'-as f;-, [;-10 J~~ii. ;'j"md jane 2JX! KnS'iV. EF.cr
mp8:t6diY hittbg Plr;:lnt;ffc Car, ~:~at ~h.;iE: \(Vii:S no ICDnl lor him to move Over v".rlho;Jt
crushing P1a!nLn:OIg Car.
'-
t'..~
't"v.
The risk of harm to Plaintiff VvC1S V6iy great such !::s to make it highly probable
~hat Piaintiff would b9 injured 2S a result of Dt:fen;iat1t QU~r,esl r~peat$d attempts to
. mcve ~.h0 Tractc,r~TraHer eVer from the r1r;;ht ham:! to !~ h::'>f,,:j iane despite th2Jt Plcfnt[ffs
CSlf wee i;:. thr" k;:ft hand 18n~, c.ne cvnseque,;dy striking Plaintiff's Car upon three
attempts until the Tiactor-Trall.;JfftneHy pass{;d by PIG!intiff's Car.
7
Feb
21 06 10:55a
rd, n. 200611 i)jAM
Cind~ WeC!kle~
:P,STE Rr: AV~R I CA
817
577
4690
f~(), 90i3
p. 17
P.
1" I. 9
L/ : ..
FEB. 20, 2006 B:~~M;l
tP,;)lt~,j~ ur) V"L'
40. Defendant Quarles' c{:}er.;;rtloil of the 1i"2etor-Tr~rrE:r as described abovG
strH-;iY1g Pfninuffs Car livitbout any apparent cbrlcem '/ii2t the:mly w<;y hi;! was tr,en end
evidences a ioSc!dess ir:diff€n:m~ 'to Plaintiff':; r:'lter~st:;) €:nd ','Jall beIng by rGpe:::H:oo!y
thE/i-e gDlng to oe able: to move ule Traotof-Tracbr CY~1' to tlH left hand ial1e '.f~dS by
'1 f---
.lammi~g into Pfalnlffl'. Car en.; evenlualiy ,n;shing F'fslnt'ff s Car such thstthe Did! n '
'._~
Tractor-Trailer l.vould b:;' eble to pass by or over Plaintiffs Car.
47. DGf~i1dant Quaties' above described conduct in repeat,ediy striking pealntIfFs
Car, including r.fter aJre9cly hiilv1ng hit her Cal' Clil~S Cii'id thGF'ltllVice, amounl:s to
outrageous cunouct.
48. Defsndaii!S WcCdbg~il, Roadlink ar,d East€:m A!ili!rican Transport ;:;lie liable
::::nd responsible fOf Defendant Qtlsrlo:iS' negligent s~C; r3crdes'~ conduct, sInce: at the
time of the aforGsaid Accidsilt, D,sfsncfarlt Quarl~ w'as acting wtthtn the Scope of his
ag'enC\j, servitude, employment, contra!, behalf andlor auino:t::a'cion faT DefenQanis
V"v'&ddington, RoadEf1!<. 2nd Eaobrn kn.3n~il Transport
49. ,4..'3 a Jcs:..rlt of the negligence ana recklessness of D(~endar.t!< 88 des~i~ea
2bove, P!~inti;fs body was repec:iediY thrown :::~12~'1St the !,=ft h€md side of !'~er C8:', arid
:epeat€.dl}( Si'12kel1 and jarred ins!dc of her Car.,
50. ,:;S a r~$'Jnofthe negligence 2!1CI r2Ck!8SSI1'3Sl; cf Q'E.fenckmts as described
fnjuii:?s, illCiUdlrlg. cui not !irn;t~d to, inJuries !D nE;r I,~gs, "q';X, r:eck, wrist, Bile: iet! eye.
2,bove. Plaintiff Burrer-Sd, Is s;,;i'fet"ln~;, and V',~H ccntllH..l~ -Q suffer ssrJous and permc:nenl
8
Feb 21 06 10: 55a Cind::1 Weakle::1
;: 8. 21), 20C6 ! : OGA;,.1 EASH R~ AVER.:C,~
817-577-4690
:W. ~O'13
F t 8, 20, 2006 S: 5 5 N:~
EASTERlY GPS 8M T
flV. 0 I U
t.:'l
vI.
.~s a resuii of the l1egl1gance and rec}:!e~8ness of Defenccmts CiS desoribed
abo"J:::, P!~i:1W'f suffered, ::,:; GtJ~ferji"fJ, and wi!: corltillUc to sufTer severe physicai palt},
numbness, t~gHng and buming sensations throughout her kJi: leg,
~~r~
,",.c..
As:s result cftl1c negri9'~lIce and rSC~~)SS;1~S3 of Defendants as described
dbove, PisiliZiff su~ered, 1~ suffering, and "'\lm ool1tinuE= to sufFer severe physical pain
throughollt her lower back and nec!c rogions,. $rid e;;iEl!1cHng ::lcwn into hor shoulders,
53. As z result oftha n:;giigencs ano rer:;"reS$n~e:s of Defendants as described
ePOV9. Piaintiff sU"ffered, is suffering, and '..'\Ii!! c::mt(:"lU~! to sufer loss of mobillty and{or
rnovem.snt thml.igh0ut l'Ie. lcr.'1er bacJ< and neck region,
54. As the Ac-cldent was occurring, Plainfjfr believed that ehe was going tt:l be
kllled by th~ Traci:of- -r i1?iI~r.
55. PIZII'I'ilff continues to have "'nBG:h-bae::l~s" elf lhe P.cc!dent that ogcurred on
A:..:gust 11, 2003, sid whst 6be o,jnslciers to be ~ "i10.:ti death l;llqJerience."
56. Plairitiff cannot F.1void 'traveling on m ads where sr.o encountem "tJa~'(Or-1r3;lers
passing her as s!'le trnveis ID and from \york and m2!< ~s Qtt,r.:r trips to and from he.
home.
f/!. /~ ~ r~su!t of Defend<::r:t'~ l1egiigen~n sr.d reckles:;!i6$S, Plaintiff suffered, !s
r:-uffGdng, a.nd \~lfH~ corrtinu~ ~c s!...rffar great m~rlt.al angutstl, s<ress. feef. traurrte, and at
times a near p~rajY'2ing cCf{oi~icn. in traveling ~!1 the \'ffoin:ty of 2nd adjacent to fractor-
'iniiiers.,
9
P. lJ/ 1 ~
p. 18
I. It
I _C"',: /j
~.-V1I.--- J \,,\"-.-'
cf.' I '-./
,r'- ,.
()~ " Vt-
0{UI,
V~Xl C ~
Feb 21 06 10:56a
Cind~ Weakle~
:~3, 20, 2:)06 ~'::)lAV:
~AS'ER~ it,~'iER.:CA
817-577-4690
\U, ~ ,i \ '.)
i'\lV. 'IJ I J
D \ 1/ \ il
I, j"1, II
p.19
FEB. '20.2806 J:j)Mii
tl\~ I ::l\l~ Vt...' \J~,L I
53. ,~ a result or Defendanis' n9gligenc~ 8fJd recfjes::neiSs, Piaintiffhas sllffsred,
~$ ~uffenn9, and vt:Hr CDnUntre to suffer 3 cHsnjpt~on of her d:::.L;~ habr-.s and Qursujt:;~ arid
<; loss of ert\oyme:'li and tni': p!eaStlr8S uf life, inclucJln,9, wall<:r.g, dancing, performing
househo;d 6e..vlcGs. performIng yaid WorK. aeroble;;;, Cro.3S c.')/,mtly skiing, sItting fer long
periods of t!nl,e, climbing sta!rs comf-crtebly, siti.!ns on El.il'Y h:5.rd surface. lying Qn qjat
surfaces for ~ny length or iime, and stcmding for any j:mgth 0f time on 61 hard 6urfaoa.
59. As Ell result of l:)sfendants' negHgence snd mcklesrness, ;;)nd In orner to trea-t
the injuries calt!s&cl by the j::,ccicel1t, Plaintiff hZ\;'lteel'l c:ompol!ed to expend varioLfs
sums of money fer medical atfent:ol1, medicafiD,' and :~uppil:?g, and wU! be rcqllired to
i..'U-l1uHIJ9 ro expend sums OT money "lor ilie same ~H.lrpf)s.e in ';he future.
60. I~.s a result of D~f~ndai1tsr negllgenc:~ and n~cl~res5ness. and as a
~l1sequence of the inJu,;es suffored in the Accident. m'jd th'i!: continuIng leg, nec:~ and
.back pain resultlng frcrn D18 P,ccldent, pjr.:1!ntiff ha;s mi:;:Sed ibe at work and wi/1 c~nijnue
if:; ,miss tirr~6 at VlJot"y", "The economIc rrnpe.~t t:. ~;>12intb~' as s r...~suft of the time she has
missed from w~!r~\ Is appro:::imate!y S2,OC>D as of the fiHng of thIs Complain-c, and will
ccniinu~ to ;ncre.?5(~ as :;the m!~s~s n'lc:re til~-..e Zit ~,,\fOr:::':.
61. /~.s 3 ~.lllt of Defendants' n~gfigenc<3 and r~-~c~!e.s[ness: P'!ai:itl'; can r~o
bn-gei LiSe 8 pU<3i'l iTioWer to mow :,ef i:aw/'). Ac-:ordil"ifI1y. she had to PtJl'chase a nc;jfng
ta...t~nmOllVt;r Et a cost 'Of ~;B99 .94 ~n orrter to ~:>rr';jnL~e rnovling her !.svv'n.
~?
.........
As <J r2Stlh of the coniir~i.Jed ciH~r!cj'e~km of her ph:re;ic8' conditIon caused by
the Dsf.endgn~:s" neg:fgstice: and t.~ck:essneesl?'a{rr~~ff docs not ~niicipetB that she .\iviU
be able to mow her !awn with e riding !ClWi1rnOVr'er fer vsrj mFcl1longer as a restltt of !:he
'10
Fl2b 21 06 10:57a
F E 2. 20, 2O:J 6 1 1 : [) 1 AM
Cind~ Weakle~
EASHRN M\"iER~CA
817 577 4680
p.20
~; f"'\ r\ t! ~ '"
I\V. ~ Ij I)
P. 1 ~,/ j 9
HB,20.2006 c:?)t..\1
ti\JltKI'( \:r~ O,"\L;
COi"is:tS\;;t Gouncing Clna jarring en her to1;';Jcl" b;)ck and ne..'C!t ft,C:;Ordiflgly, Plainirff
~nt1~1p~t'&s ha"!fng tc hfr~- z; !aViri sSi'tt'ica to rntJ\,N h0r ;a\'Vn a:~ a signmc-crr! cos1 to ?~8jt1Hff,
which she wot:ld j'I",:Jt hdl!s if'lcurr~cJ btll far ths. Dsrfell'~aJ'rts' nsgligencz and
;19c!dessness.
.0....
U".
/J.,S a jeSt.l!! of t.he DefendaTlts' negHgsnce imo fet:~{iessl1e~3, Ptalntiff has been
reqUil"ed to pay UD:ers to gseist her in r.naintainire9 tht~ grcur~cls sround her house. '.Vhlc.1
W;Jjl( sM \'IOlJk1 n~:'l.maily hElve done herself ~f not for l:h3 inj:Jlies caused by the
J~.c-jcent. F'l;~!n~fff :ass ~ttemp.tcd to 06 as much as she C.E\., pi1ysi~ll)' endure
considering the physicallimiiatblis resulting from ihtl ,l\cc~d ::nt, but lias snU incurred
=::;::-::;'~;;-::S::!l' .s2.~45 ~v G",[s iio),kjg ';0,- filul.i! -:i'1:; fl 'Qinien~Hce. whicn she WOUld
oth~f'JviS$ have performed. and C'lnticipales this S:mount increa,sing in the future.
64.. As a result of Dsre;,dants' negligsme and rer.kIL%snes13. PIC:lntiif is Iimii6d in
hsr ability to perf:;rrn snow removal taGXB. Ph;;ntiff 8nticip,:ries that she \vili inCur
.,.:~,..,'r:,,_~~ -~_.. .----, .-, ~- ....~ '- H" - r.,." ;r<<> - - ~o-c-''''c'';;o,. pl'O~--ss"'-' "'n.Ji-,.
"';;j::::'>~!;::'~l~; ~:~~""'-r: ;r;:'~~;J.:t'(j,.l..;J~L.;::. f1; ~lf~ t~{Ui,'t..r Co'.i;;r h......1 t./n ilL! .~,~ ~l~ 0;:' ~ u,U'.
d'etcriOrE!CC~
65. ;;3 ~ rasuit of D,af:sndai1ts;' negHgence and rec~kf€f::snes~, P'!~lrrtfff h~s n!:'cl to
pa:( others to penorr.(J housebold task~, such ;~s pz:irdng aild oti"ter hOLlse m€:inren2nc2
and management i;~sksf vfhfch 9he othef'Yt/!se \'VcLdd !13'je d::;;;e btri for the inju;,es
Sl!stafne~j in ~i'li;- Accid;:!1t. Piaintiff h2$ B!rer;:cijl incun-ed $1,SOO in additional costs
:;,5soc.~ated \lvith pSInt:ng and apprOXirnE!1'e;~.' G750 for rrr~sceLaneo!J6 chaPGE:s, and
anticIpates addit~cr:al hou.sehQfd mEJ:ntenan:.:~: arid rr1~nege~nent e;{penses V/in be
ilicurrad In (he fulure as a rasult of the P..ccid2.nt
11
Feb 21 08 10:58a
c:s. 2[:. iD06 11: OlAM
Cind~ Weakle~
: AS TE R"; A:r: R I C A
817 577 4890
p.21
i~O. 9 (; i 3
r. 16/19
FEB. 20. 2006 D:56A~
l;'~; tI(.'J ,;:;~ ol\L I
66_ /;3 ,~ ,-?Slir't of Defenchnts' ?'legJ1geou;; 2.ilG recfdes;;ness, FiElinw1 has been
deprived c.f sleep end c:t-times fie;$' ~1gnlfrcarlt .j[f~cliitl s:€'€p:ng l,vitho!.it being
!ntstTI.lpt8:d by pain and C'U"tS;f dlsC\.imfr,):t caus,s::d by the .t.\c.c;cfent
67. As a resuit or Dafelldan~e neGflgen{;l~ ~nd f1~ck!es:mess, Plaintiff had to
[Durchase a new mattrsss anel bDx sprir;g to tl)/ and t:l:ievia:ts scme ofths psin caused by
the Accida.i1t Pi3:nHff frlCU;re...j $350 for a nEW'" martre;;s and :,ox spring. PlaIntiff
GiJ1t!cipa1ee. M hel" '':'Oildffi;Jn pmgr;sses and/or d~teliOia{~s, 'ihst sha v.-ill have to
rXJr.::has(;: another rr:slttr0S$ that provtcies even grea1ei relief i-;:. 'the p~in and diSf.Xlmbrt
caused Py the Acddent
0.
D,,,fer;dc:i1t Qua;'lc5' ccr;duct ~'laz sumclently O1"ltrageOtlfs in ~'")at ha acted '.?nth
a complete !'ed~Jess lndifi'eieflC9 to Plc:irltiffs irJtcrests and 1,v,~~iI-b:9jng !n smklTlg
Pl~inlif?s Car ""ne.n he !':n,~\iir his Ti:;Jctcr- Traner \;\fSS acj;:ce,.-,t to Plaitlt:ffs Gar, or did not
--- .---
e:veo care It th.:le l1/aS a v~hlci.e next to the 1ra':;7,or-Trz:1)er vir-:en [-Ie attempted to make
th3 kme chEmS'is, 2..d t;;~il or: r.;/;.' 2::;Qition<:il OGGOloic'iS afler le had f:.llresdy vic!e::rnly
sh'VC;':: Plaintf:"s Car, crov:~ 11'1:0 P)9]nf.f:'s Car in ::; c.or.t1nueci ,;:,tiempt to smash h~ way
O\lZ:: 1nm thz iet.: hand lene f0gardiess of ;,\lTV;3mC;r r18 WiJw[d h,:we to civsh P12jiiriff's Cer
in G'''d8'l'' to c1:e::ge lane.s, such ttlc.:t DEfendants ~j02: f2S;jQ:'J!:ib:,:.,' 2nd iiabie f-cr punitivo
oEn12ges..
o
~9)
Defendant O!l2riec.' COlidt:.c.t was f(..irci"ler outr:lg,::ouf. @nd evidencad a reckJ~ss
inclfr0renc~ to Fla~r.tJi'fs intei\~sts aod \,"J.s!!-beinfj in attsmptin;;i to bave t~a scene of the
J~),:;Ghj9!it at\0f hitis!ly ~'1:ri?\jj;g Pfalnt;ffs Cor snd nen r~;:)eatec;ly striking Plaintiffs Car
on tw~ scfcmionzJ ocr-~sjQf1$ ~s ho; ieft the scene of thG lilitlal !:'fij)Sct.
-:2
Feb
21 06 10:58a
~-~
~ :'" :;
20. 20G6 i i : 02AM
Cind~ Weakle~
:;\::TER:'~ A1v\:RICA
817 577 4690 p.22
NO. 9013 P. '! 7/19-------
FES, 20. 2005 S: 56Mii
EJ>,STERi-i GPS B,~l T
m8lo
p. 16
TO. Defendal1t$ Vleddingtcr:, RoadJlnk anj East{:~m l.merican Transport are liable
for Dl!r\ifj've dem2ges since D,~-relld2j't Qu.?r1.::-s \oVC:1:$ HeUng .~:s the ser..ant, agent.
employee, Dr \vas c:men"Jise cpe18fmg the T r<::ctor- Tr2iier uJCilet' the control o!" on '(he
behalf of DufendanIs Weddington. Roac:mnk 8nd/or Eastern American Transport 2lt tile
t!r."1E> of the Acc.\ri~nt.
71, ;1.s 8 resdt cf Ell oftns store-said n-eglig€r.t, reddess, and outrageous conduc~,
De;fendclrl!s an': all H@ble for Pialntm"'s COintsr,s2.rm,f damac:;8 and am fulther ~i~b:e for
~ .~ v
punrtr:re damages.
WHE~EFORE, ~;eintiff demands JUdgi'nent 2geinst G II Defendants for both
com;:X3i':os:atcry and ;;uniHve damages in an amount in e~:c..es~. 01' the Court's arbitrstlon
timH:.
RG~Pf!c1:f'UI{)' Submitted:
r~1c~'.1EES \'"i?/tLU\CE & i\IURiCi( lLC
~ ;r '-"W'
"""I. '/ ..-....--... { ''',
J;~/_ t":=:::::::::::~~~ j !~ i
r i;{~.",fr",,_:""'l L' n~ a-1"";
i ""~.W',HL.:..l(rt .0:4 r ~ d.. ("\" UU\J
, r...... r' '-""~O
\ /' .U, ,\JO. !;l:~OV
......- 100 Pine .3treet
P.c~. Bc;c -1165
HanisbwII, PA ./ i-!DB
(717)232.3000
D'c'te.d;
i \. i fl'"
:Y-l'\P\ li '""-
.'"
i~
Feb 21 06 10:59a
Cind~ Weakle~
817-577-4690
C ::, 20. 2D86 : 1 : 02:\~!
- ^ C T [ P. r,~ .\_ U [" C : r ~
_ n 0".; I L .\., ,,:.~;.. l~ ~ \.. r.
ivO. 9:) 13
F[~. 20. 2006 8:56A~1
tP~.~ltKr~ (Jr~ !):-\~I
Jai~!R(~.E!,7iON
!, Brs,nca J. !..-c:.ncHs, venf;J th2i the fu:ctJ..tr~1 stetl~!n~'nts iTlade in the foregoing
document are. tnie .end correot t~ the best cf ~Yj'';/ k~'o1iw'~edga, !nfcr-rnc::iron and be:fef.. In
mabl"lg this vermcation. i am relying 011 my atttlTiiey te' set fmt.11 ani' legal conclusions
b:::s\~d em tIle facts. Th~ 1/1i'Ording of this docw:nent is ~h5;: of nw attorneys and nat my
own. I undsf"'3iar.d 'til..Uafse statements he,.;}in are r,:lada scbject to the pG'r'laIties of 18
?'z-.C,s. S4S04. reJ",1ing io u!1;;JUl'om fulsi;'iC3'L70~; to D:.;thoritiE::S.,
"() 0, ,"j -
~~ ~.
~l.L.~~J.2f,.~
6n:H~C:a J. Laifclis
".... /' x;,
;]r-\'eo" ~/-/&:- - v(,,"7
wo". .C7
p.23
r.
i ~,/ 1 Q
I v, t I
: :: t, 20, 2G C 6 ": 0 f:'.~t
:/\STER\ MHF:et<
FEB. 20. 1000 B. 56AM
EASiERN GPS BALi
"
! -
'I;\). YO 1 j
).;0.61&
GEfi"ffFiCATE ct= 51=.RV1CE
,
r~"'""
oJ
.. I'
I, -Janath~n H. F:'-id:j, c:sC{!Jlr<?, here!;iy C$rtify \:hat on Hils ~ day of Februarj.
2.006, ;::) true :and COl1'G';ct copy Clf the fON;!gclng documer. t W'aiS served by first-class,
United St:?tes mCln, pC9iage pf'Bpaid, upon ins foilawing:
Carro;' it..... Quarles
28- il !v1ej'neld Avenue
5a!tlrnGre, MD 21213
TlleodDre R VVedding<.-on
B505 r=r'~derick Roed
P.O, !3QX 13~e
E.i;:It.:cr( CH;fr Lier 2~fQ4S
RC'adJilll~ USA ESiSt. LL.C.
'J :~40 W':.. Drive
Settliehem, FA 18017
EZlstem American Transport
&. '\Nareboussng litc.
8!5Q'! l-IE;german street
P;'ii<~def}hi2!, Pf., 18i35
~di,- ~;; ~ j~V(
( Joi.aihan H. ~udd
~
14
r, i ~/ : Y
P, 13
EXHIBIT "B"
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
: NO. 05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE
R. WEDDINGTON, ROADLlNK USA
EAST, L.L.C., and EASTERN
AMERICAN TRANSPORT &
WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION
PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND ANSWERS TO DEFENDANTS'
INTERROGATORIES
GENERAL OBJECTION: In accordance with L or-al Rule of Civil Procedure 4005~ 1,
interrogatories to a party shall not exceed forty in number. Defendants interrogatories
exceed forty in number and are in violation of Local Rule 4005-1. Without waiving this
objection, Plaintiff responds as follows.
INTERROGATORIES
1. (a) Identify each person who (1) was a witness to the incident through
sight or hearing and/or (2) has knowledge of facts concerning the happening of the
incident or conditions or circumstances at the scene of the incident prior to, after or at
the time of the incident.
Brenda Landis - driver of vehicle struck by Defendant Quarles
Carroll A. Quarles - driver of tractor-trailer striking Plaintiff's vehicle
Ed Moorhead, P.O. Box 60606, Harrisburg, PA 17106, work telephone number 1-
800-401-0120.
Tim Longenecker - state trooper who reported to the scene
Many other unidentified drivers on Interstate 83. Plaintiff does not know the
identity of the other witnesses, and only knows the names of Ed Moorhead and
Tim Longenecker because they are identified on the Police Report.
(b) With respect to each person identified in the answer to the
Interrogatory above, state that person's exact location and activity at the time of the
incident.
Brenda Landis was in her car driving north on 1-83 in the left hand lane.
Defendant Quarles was driving north on 1-83 in the right hand lane.
Plaintiff does not know where Ed Moorhead was situated at the time of the
accident.
Tim Longenecker came to the scene after the accident had occurred.
2. If a police or fire department investigation occurred, identify the
department and all personnel involved.
Tim Longenecker, PA state police.
3. If, at the time of the incident(s), or subsequent thereto, any of the persons
listed in the preceding interrogatories wp.rp. or relatives, acquaintances, 3gcnts,
employees or representatives of any party to this action, state the nature of such
association as to each person.
Brenda Landis is the Plaintiff in this action. Plaintiff has no other relationship
with the other listed witnesses.
4. List the names and addresses, both residence and business of all persons
whom you intend to call as witnesses at the trial of this case.
Brenda Landis, Carroll Quarles, Theodore Weddington, Ed Moorhead, and Tim
Longenecker. The addresses of these individuals are listed in the Complaint or
above.
Plaintiff does not know if Ed Moorhead is the driver of an automobile that stopped
to help her, or the truck driver who also stopped and talked with Plaintiff after the
accident. Both individuals claimed to have witnessed the accident, but the Police
Report only identifies one witness. The driver of the automobile who witnessed
the accident did tell Plaintiff that he witnessed the accident and would be her
witness as to what occurred. However, he never gave his name to Plaintiff.
Accordingly, although Plaintiff reasonably believes that the witness identified on
the Police Report as Ed Moorhead is the driver of the automobile, she does not
know that for a certainty.
If Plaintiff locates and is able to identify any other witnesses of the accident, she
will provide this information to Defendants.
2
Plaintiff also intends to call Dr. Barbara Christiansen as a witness as to her
damages. Dr. Christiansen's address is 354 East Penn Drive, Enola, PA 17025
(717) 728-1990.
Plaintiff reserves the right to call any other medical expert that she might consult
regarding the injuries she suffered in the accident, including doctors that have
examined her eyes (Dr. Schmigdall and Dr. Pheasant - records previously
produced).
Plaintiff reserves the right to call any other witness as to the accident or damages
she is claiming, including, but not limited to, her two daughter:
Holly Landis
2236 Slater Hill Lane W.
York, PA 17402
Heidi Landis
922 N. Calvert Street, Apt. 2R
Baltimore, MD 21202
5. At any time after the incident or accident described in the Complaint, were
you aware of any conversation whatsoever relating to the indoAnt or accident. !f so,
identify all parties involved in the conversation, when each conversation took place, the
substance at the time. It the conversation was noted in detail, attach a copy to the
answers and give the name, address and occupation of the custodian of the documents.
Right after the accident occurred, Brenda Landis remembers a young man
standing beside her car. He asked her if she was okay. She said that she was not
sure. He asked if she thought she could drive the car over to the shoulder. She
told him that she was afraid to try, and he said that he would stop the cars if she
could drive her car. She could and moved the car over to the shoulder. The next
thing she remembers is the same young man asking her if she could follow him
up the shoulder. He told her not to worry and just to follow him. She did and
then kept stopping due to fear, and he would then encourage her to come a little
further.
As she drove up the shoulder of the road, she remembers seeing a tractor-trailer
sitting on the shoulder in front of her, and another one sitting stopped in the left
lane of 83N. The young man told her to stay in the car and call the police, which
she did. He also told her he would stay and be her witness. She then remembers
a man walking over to her car. Still very shaken, she thought he must be the
tractor-trailer driver who hit her. She told him that he could have killed her. He
said that he was not the driver of the truck that hit her, but that he was the driver
of the truck (sitting in the left lane) who stopped the truck driver who hit her. She
then thanked him. He asked her if she was okay. He then joined the young man
and they were talking. At some point the young man told Brenda Landis that he
and the truck driver who stopped the man who hit her could not understand why
the truck driver who hit her would not get out of his truck. The young man said
that they thought he might have something to hide. He told Brenda Landis that
3
neither he nor the other trucker were going to approach him because they
thought he might have a gun or possibly was on drugs.
Brenda Landis remembers Officer Longenecker arriving approximately 30
minutes after the accident occurred. He spoke to her asking if she was injured
and she told him that her neck, wrists and back hurt, including pain radiating
from her back down her left leg. Shortly after Officer Longenecker arrived, the
man who hit her finally got out of his truck and started to take pictures of her car.
At one point he walked around to the driver's side, and would not even look at
Ms. Landis. Finally, she spoke to him saying that the least he could do was say
he was sorry, and that he could have killed her. In a very sarcastic tone, he said
that he did not see her, and nothing further.
The officer also spoke to the truck driver parked in the left lane, and the young
man who said he would be her witness. After speaking to Officer Longenecker,
the other truck driver came to Brenda Landis' window and told her that he was
going to leave so he could unblock the left lane, and that the young man who
witnessed the accident was going to stay. She thanked him again for stopping
the truck driver who hit her, and he left.
The officer gave the truck driver who hit Brenda Landis a ticket. The young man
came to say that he was leaving too, and she thanked him for staying to be her
witness. After Officer Longenecker obtained the information he needed, Brenda
Landis was allowed to leave the accident scene.
6. Give the name and address of each person known to you who has been
contacted as a fact witness.
Plaintiff has not contacted anyone to date as a fact witness. She would plan on
contacting Ed Moorhead and Tim Longenecker sometime in the future as the case
proceeds through discovery and approaches trial.
7. Have you, or any person acting for you or your representative, spoken to
any person who had any relevant information concerning the incident described in the
complaint? If so, state the following:
(a) The names of those involved in the conversation;
(b) The dates of each conversation;
(c) A recital of what was started by each party to each conversation;
(d) If the conversation was memorialized in writing, attached a copy of
said writing and give the name and address of the custodian of the original of said
4
writing.
Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference her response to Interrogatory 5.
8. Have you or anyone on your behalf, including insurance agents,
conducted any investigations of the incident which is subject matter of the Complaint?
Plaintiff did not conduct any investigation into the accident.
Defendants' claims adjustor investigated the accident, and this information
should already be in the Defendants' possession, or is easier for Defendants to
obtain than for Plaintiff.
If the answer is in the affirmative, identify:
(a) Each person, and the employer of each person, who conducted
any investigations;
(b) The dates of the investigations:
(c) All notes, reports or other documents prepared during or as a result
of the investigations and the identity of the persons who have possession thereof.
9 (a) State the names and address of each person whom you expect to call as
an expert witness at trial and state the subject matter on which the expert is expected to
testify.
Plaintiff intends to call Dr. Barbara Christiansen as a witness as to her damages.
Dr. Christiansen's address is 354 East Penn Drive, Enola, PA 17025 (717) 728-
1990. Plaintiff has already produced to Defendants a copy of Dr. Christiansen's
report of September 28, 2005.
Plaintiff reserves the right to call Dr. Schmigdall and/or Dr. Pheasant as to the left
eye floater that appeared after the accident, or some other medical expert.
If Plaintiff decides to call any additional expert witnesses, she will produce
reports from such witnesses in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure or
Order of Court.
(b) For each such expert, have the expert state the substance of the
facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify and summarize the grounds
for each such opinion;
(c) Set forth the qualifications of each expert, listed the schools
attended, years of attendance, degrees received, and experience in any particular field
5
of specialization or expertise;
(d) State each expert's age, residence and business address;
(e) State the names and address of the present employer or if self-
employed, the name and address of the business and his occupation;
(f) State the name and address of every person or firm for the last ten
(10) years and detailed description of all duties at each place of employment; if the
expert was self-employed, state specifically and in detailed the description of his duties
and responsibilities.
10. For the expert witness identified in Interrogatory 9, please state the
following:
See response to interrogatory 9.
(a) Whether the facts and opinion<:; to which he is expected to testify
are contained in a written report, memorandum or other transcript and if they are, give
the name and address of the present custodian of same and state whether you will
produce same without the necessity of a Motion;
(b) If the opinion of any expert listed above is based in whole or any
scientific rule or principle, set forth the said rule or principle;
(c) If the opinion of any expert listed above is based in whole or in part
upon any code, regulation or standard, governmental or otherwise, identify the said
code, regulation, standard and specifically set forth the section relied upon;
(d) If the opinion of any expert listed above is based in whole or in part
upon any scientific or engineering textbook or other publication, identify said text or
publication;
(e) If the expert has testified in Court or by way of oral deposition
within the past ten (10) years describe the Court involved, date of testimony and identity
of attorney calling expert as a witness.
11. Identify the name, address and business position each by you in
anticipation of this litigation or in preparation for trial of this litigation and who is not
expected to be called by you as a witness at trial.
Plaintiff does not understand this question. If the intent was to ask about non-
testifying experts, Plaintiff does not know of any non-testifying experts. Plaintiff
did see other medical professionals associated with her injuries who are
6
identified in the documents she has already produced in informal discovery. To
the extent these individuals would qualify as non-testifying experts, their identity
has already been produced.
12. Do you contend or aver that any party or agent of any party herein
violated any law, rule, regulation. standard or ordinance? If so state the following:
Plaintiff is not a legal expert, and would have no way of knowing the specific
laws, rules, regulations, standards or ordinances that were violated by Defendant
Quarles in his operation of the tractor-trailer prior to, during, and after the
accident. Plaintiff would believe that there has to be laws making it illegal to
change lanes in a dangerous manner when some other vehicle is already
occupying the lane in which the operator is trying to move. Plaintiff would also
believe that there must be laws regarding the safe operation of a vehicle, and
driving at a safe speed and in a safe manner. Plaintiff would believe that there
would be laws governing stopping after causing an accident. However, these are
matters that would be better addressed by Plaintiffs lawyer, and it is Plaintiffs
understanding that interrogatories are intended to obtain factual information and
not Plaintiffs lawyer's legal views of the case,
(a) Describe the detail each violation with reference to the source
material containing the law, rule, regulation, standard or ordinance;
(b) Give the date of the violation and identify all persons present at the
time of the violation and manner in which the violation occurred at the that time;
(c) Identify all writings known to you in which the law, rule, regulation,
standard or ordinance id written and/or described.
13. Do you or your expert intend to use any book, magazine or other \Nriting at
the trial of this case? If so, describe the writing in detail as to author, publisher,
copyright date, and give the name and address of any known present custodian of said
writing.
Plaintiff has no present intention to use any book or magazine. Plaintiff cannot
speak for her experts. Plaintiff intends to use writings to the extent they relate to
either the accident or her damages. The writings in her possession have already
been produced in informal discovery. Any writings in the Defendants possession
have yet to be received, but Plaintiff would expect to use some of the writings
produced by Defendant at the trial of this case.
14. Do you or anyone acting on your behalf know of the existence of any
photographs, motion pictures, video recordings, maps, diagrams or models of the site of
the incident, parties or any other subject matter involved in this action?
7
Plaintiff observed Defendant Quarles taking pictures at the accident site, but has
never received these pictures and does not know where they are located.
Plaintiff has no other photographs, etc. of the accident site.
If the answer is affirmative, identify:
(a) The date(s) when they were made and what they are;
(b) The name and address of the person making them;
(c) The subject that each represents or portrays.
15. With reference to you, your decedent or your agent (if vicarious liability is
averred), whichever applicable, state;
(a) Name, date and placB of hirth end socia! security number;
Brenda J. Landis, DOB 11/8/48. Plaintiff objects to providing her social security
number for privacy and security reasons.
(b) Marital status a present and at time of incident with name and
address of spouse(s);
Divorced at present and at the time of the accident.
(c)
each residence;
All residence addresses for the past five (5) years \Nith the dtites of
20 Burning Tree Court, York, PA 17404
(d) Names and addresses of all employers for the past five (5) years
with dates of each employment?
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC, and Kinsley Construction
(e) If you wear prescription glasses, state the condition requiring it.
Brenda Landis wears contact lens daily for farsightedness.
16. If the person executing the affidavit to the Answers to these
Interrogatories is not a party, state the full name, job title, employer and address
(business and residence) of the affiant. If the affiant answers in interrogatory
8
herein from the information not within his personal knowledge and belief, describe the
source of all information given that was not within the personal knowledge of the affiant.
Plaintiff is executing the verification to these interrogatories.
17. State whether you are covered by any types of insurance, including any
excess or umbrella insurance, in connection with this incident.
Plaintiff had her own automobile insurance policy. However, the damage to the
vehicle was handled by Defendants' claims adjustor. Plaintiff's automobile
insurer has been paying the medical expenses up to its limit of $10,000. Plaintiff
is producing a copy of the declaration page of the policy in effect at the time of
the accident.
If the answer is affirmative, state the following with respect to each policy:
insurance;
(a) The name of the insurance carrier which issued each policy of
Erie Insurance
(b) The name insured under each policy and the policy number;
Brenda Landis
(c) The types each policy and the effective dates;
Auto January through December-- Yearly
(d) The amount of coverage provided for injury to each person, for
each occurrence, and the aggregate for each policy;
Plaintiff is not sure what is being requested. However, she is producing the
declarations page of the policy and Defendants can make their own interpretation
of the coverage afforded.
(e) Each exclusion, if any, in the policy which is applicable to any claim
thereunder and the reasons why you or the company claims the exclusion is applicable;
Not applicable
(f) Whether you have made a claim under the policy and if so, set forth
the nature of this claim, the amount recovered and the date of recovery.
Plaintiff has made claim for medical benefits. She is not sure how much Erie has
paid for medical benefits, but it is still paying her chiropractor bills
9
18. Give the name and address of all persons rendering accounting seNices
or legal seNices to you for a period of five (5) years prior to the incident described in the
Complaint.
None, other than a tax preparer who is identified on the tax returns Plaintiff is
producing.
19. Have you given statement as defined by the Rules of Civil Procedure
concerning this action or its subject matter?
Plaintiff provided a written statement to Defendants' claims adjustor at various
times. Any written statement has already been produced to Defendants in
informal discovery.
If so, identify:
(a) Each person to whom a statement was givAn:
(b) When and where each statement was given;
(c) Any person who has custody of any such statements that were
reduced to writing or otherwise recorded.
20. If you were acting by an agent or employee at the time of the accident
described in the Complaint, state the following:
Not applicable.
(a)
on your behalf;
name, last known residential address and job title of person acting
(b) whether you maintained any policy, rule or requirement that if your
employee was involved in an accident while on your business, that a written report of
the accident was to be prepared by the employee;
(c) whether your employee either alone or with other employees
prepared a written report concerning the accident involved herein. If so, give the name
and address of the present custodian of the report.
21. With reference to the motor vehicle operation by your driver or you at the
time of the accident described in the Complaint state:
10
(a) name and address of the owner or owners of the said vehicle;
license number and state of license;
Plaintiff, 13-730-953, PA.
(b) years, make, model and color of said vehicle;
1999 Chrysler Sebring.
(c) if there was any printing or writing, emblem or picture on the
exterior of the vehicle, state the nature of said printing, writing emblem or picture.
Not applicable
(d) what year was your vehicle at the time of the accident;
1999.
(e) which, if any, part of your vehicle did not function rroper!y
immediately prior to this accident.
Vehicle was functioning properly at time of accident.
state:
22. If your vehicle sustained damages as a result of the accident in question,
(a) Names and address of all persons or companies viewing the
damage and preparing a written estimate of damage with the date th~t estimate was
made and the total amount of the estimate of damage;
Cindy Weakley, Defendants' claims adjustor, has already adjusted the property
damage to the Plaintiff's vehicle. She would have all the information regarding
estimates and the nature of the property damage.
(b) List all parts of the vehicle damaged in the accident;
(c) If damages were repaired, state name and address of person or
company making the repairs and the date the repairs were completed;
(d) Location of all damages on vehicle before accident;
23. State:
(a) From what location were you or your vehicle coming at the time of
11
the accident and the time of departure from that location;
Plaintiff had left her home in York, PA at approximately 8:20 a.m.
(b) The destination of you or your vehicle before the accident and your
scheduled time of arrival;
Work. Approximately 9:00 a.m.
(c) List of all stops made between point of origin and accident location;
None
(d) The purpose of the trip and for whose benefit it was being made;
Traveling to work.
state:
24. With reference to the accident or inrident upon which this action is based,
(a) exact place of the accident, giving the name of the locality, the
streets or highways involved, and the nearest intersection or identifying structure;
Interstate 83, just north of exit 40A, near the line between York and Cumberland
County, PA.
(b) exact date and hour of the accident;
8/11/2003. Accident occurred between 8:30 and 9:00 A.M.
(c) the nature of the road with reference to any depressions, curves
obstructions or hills in general area of the accident;
It was in a straight area below a hill and heading toward a higher area.
(d) the condition of the road surface at the place of the accident with
reference to whether it was dirt, tar, concrete or other composition, and further whether
it was wet, dry, icy, snow-covered or slick from some other substance;
There were normal, clear road conditions.
(e) number of all moving and parking traffic lanes on the highway on
which each vehicle and/or pedestrian was traveling;
There are two main travel lanes, a shoulder on the right where a vehicle can fit
12
L_
and be off the roadway, and a small area between the left hand lane and concrete
barrier on the left, where a vehicle cannot fit and be off the roadway. At exit 40A,
there is an additional lane of merging traffic, but Plaintiff was beyond this
merging lane when the accident commenced.
(f) state lane of travel and direction of travel for each vehicle and! or
pedestrian immediately preceding the accident or incident;
Both vehicles were traveling north. Plaintiff was in the left land and Defendant
Quarles in the right lane.
25. With reference to the weather and visibility at the time of the accident or
incident, state:
(a) state in detail, the weather condition at the time of the accident;
It was a clear day.
(b) whether visibility was clear, and if not clear to what extent it was
limited in items of distance;
It was clear and distance was not a factor.
(c) which vehicle, if any, had headlights on the time of the accident;
Plaintiff did not have her headlights on. She could not see the trucks lights.
(d) state whether your vision or that of your driver (whichever
applicable) was obstructed in any manner at the time of the accident by factor
whatsoever. If there was an obstruction, describe it and it's location.
There was no obstruction.
26. If the accident occurred at an intersection, state with regard to you or your
driver (whichever applicable):
Not applicable.
(a) nature of traffic controls facing you or your vehicle at intersection;
(traffic light, stop sign, etc.);
(b) color of traffic light, if any facing you or your vehicle;
(c) if you saw the traffic light at the intersection state the distance you
13
or your vehicle were from the intersection at first and last time you saw the color of
traffic light;
(d) at what speed was you vehicle traveling at the times referred to in
paragraph (c) above;
(e) whether you vehicle was in the process of making a turn, if so,
state whether you vehicle was making a right or left turn and what signals, if any, were
given;
(f) whether the other vehicle involved in the accident was in the
process of making a right or left turn and whether you saw any signal for said turn and
what kind of signal was seen.
27. State exactly where the point of impact occurred, noting the location in
feet from all curbs or other landmarks.
Defendant hit Plaintiff's car three times on the right hand side of Plaintiff's car.
The front, middle and rear of the care were impacted. The impact occurred while
both vehicles were driving north on 1-83 as described above and in the Complaint.
(a) if the impact took place at the intersection, state if the location in
feet from all corners of the intersection;
(b) if the impact did not take place at an intersection, the
corresponding house adjacent to the Place of the impact as well as its distance from
adjacent curbs; if any;
(c) if the impact took place on the highway: state in which lane or lanes
the impact occurred.
28. Did you or your driver (whichever applicable) see the other involved
vehicle or person before the accident? If so, state with reference to your driver or you
(whichever applicable).
Yes.
(a) how far from the point of impact were you or your vehicle when the
other vehicle or person was first observed; if you were driving the vehicle, at what speed
were you traveling at the time;
Plaintiff saw the tractor-trailer coming up from behind her in the right hand lane,
but cannot say the distance between their vehicles when she first observed the
tractor-trailer, or how far it was from when she first observed the Defendants'
tractor-trailer to the initial point of impact. Plaintiff was going approximately 55
14
mph when she first observed the Defendants' tractor-trailer.
(b) how far from the point of impact was the other vehicle or person
when first observed; if another vehicle is involved, at what speed was the vehicle
traveling at that time.
See response (a) above. Defendants' tractor-trailer was going over 55 mph
because it was catching up to Plaintiffs vehicle and eventually began to pass her
vehicle.
29. Did you or your driver (whichever applicable) make any further
observations of the other vehicle or person after the first observation. If so, state:
Yes. Plaintiff observed the Defendants' tractor-trailer as it hit her car three times.
(a) respective speeds of each vehicle at the time of each observation;
Plaintiff was initially doing 55 mph~ and Defendants' tractor-trai!~r 'Nas do!ng
more than 55 mph. The tractor trailer continued at its same rate of speed, and
Plaintiffs vehicle slowed down during and after the accident.
(b) respective distances of each vehicle or person from point of impact
at each observation.
The tractor-trailer was to the immediate right of Plaintiffs vehicle, and the
distance decreased to 0 feet each time the tractor-trailer hit Plaintiffs vehicle.
30. Between the time you or your driver (whichever applicable) last observed
the other vehicle or person and the moment of impact, did the speed of your vehicle
vary. If so, describe fully.
Yes. Plaintiff began to slow down after the Initial Impact and eventually came to a
stop after the Third Impact.
31. Describe in detail what you or your driver (whichever applicable) did to
avoid the accident or incident; how far were you or your vehicle from the ;point of impact
when such action was taken and how far was the other vehicle or person from the point
of impact when such action was taken.
There was no way for Plaintiff to avoid the accident because she was in a
convertible trapped between a tractor-trailer and a concrete median barrier. She
was forced closer to the median barrier each time she was slammed into by the
tractor-trailer.
15
32. State:
(a) whether you or your driver (whichever applicable) was stopped or
moving at the moment of impact;
Moving
(b) whether the other vehicle or person was stopped or moving at the
moment of impact;
Moving
(c) whether any of the vehicles involved in this accident left any skid
marks on the roadway. Identify each such skid mark, state the length, direction and
location of it with regard to the curb line or other identifying structures in the area;
Plaintiff does not know, but does not recall the tractor-trailer braking at it
repeatedly hit her car.
33. State in detail the injuries or diseases that you allege that you have
suffered as a result of the referred to in the Complaint.
Sprained wrists
Neck pain
Left shoulder pain
Back pain
Left leg pain
Left eye floater
34. State whether you were confined to bed or your home as a result of the
injuries alleged to have been sustained in the incident involved in this action. If so, state
the length of the time you were confined to each and the dates thereof.
Plaintiff stayed home the day of and after the accident. She has subsequently
stayed at home because of the back and leg pain, although she does not know
the exact dates.
35. If you received medical treatment or examinations (including x-rays)
because of injuries or diseases you suffered as a result of the incident, identify:
Plaintiff went to her family doctor the day after the accident and to the
chiropractor who took x-rays. She has continued to see a chiropractor. She also
16
had her left eye examined
(a) Each hospital at which you were treated or examined.
N/A
(b) The dates on which each such treatment or examination at a
hospital was rendered and the charges by the hospital for each.
N/A
(c) Each doctor or practitioner by whom you were treated or examined.
White Rose Family Practice
Dr. Loretta Schmidgall
Dr. Thomas Pheasant (Retina Consultants)
Dr. Herd (Herd Chiropractic Clinic)
Dr. Christensen (Christensen Chiropractic)
(d) The dates on which each such treatment or examination by a
doctor or practitioner was rendered and the charges for each.
White Rose-- August 12, 2003
Dr. Herd-- August 21, 2003
Dr. Schmidgall and Dr. Pheasant - August 19, 2003
Dr. Christensen-- Various.
(e) All reports regarding any medical treatment or examinations,
setting forth the author and date of such reportR.
Previously produced in informal discovery.
36. If you have incurred any bills or expenses in connection with the injuries of
diseases which you suffered because of the incident referred to in the Complaint, and
such bills and expenses are not otherwise listed in the answer to these Interrogatories,
set forth the amount for each such bill or expense, the service for which the bill or
expense was incurred, and the identity of the person who rendered the bill or who was
involved in the expense.
All bills for treatment that Plaintiff has been able to locate have been previously
produced in informal discovery.
37. Describe any pain, ailment, complaint, injury or disability that you
presently have as a result of the incident here involved.
17
Continued back, leg and neck pain, and left eye floater.
38. State whether you are still under treatment for the injuries alleged to have
been sustained in the incident involved in this action. If so, state the name and address
of the person who last treated or examined you for the injuries with date and place
where treated or examined.
Yes. Dr. Barbara Christiansen, Pennsboro Commons, 354 E. Penn Drive, Enola,
P A 17025. Various treatment dates.
39. Either prior to or subsequent to the incident referred to in the Complaint,
have you ever suffered any injuries or diseases in those portions of your body claimed
by you to have been affected by the incident referred to in the Complaint?
rf so, identify:
(a) The injuries or diseases you suffered;
No specific injury or disease, but Plaintiff had experienced some back pain prior
to the accident. She had not experienced any severe back pain in the 10 years
prior to the accident. The back pain she experienced after the accident was much
more severe than any pain she had experienced prior to the accident.
(b) The date and place of any incident, if such an injury or disease was
caused by an incident;
N/A
(c) All hospitals, doctors or practitioners who rendered treatment or
examination because of any such injuries or diseases;
Plaintiff had seen various Chiropractors in the past for back pain, but none in the
10 years before the accident.
(d) Anyone against whom a claim was made, and the Court, term or
number of any claim or lawsuit that was filed in connection with any such injuries or
diseases;
None.
(e) If claim and/or lawsuit was brought by you pertaining to said
impairment, describe the person and! or company against whom the claim was made,
the manner in which the claim was made and if a lawsuit was involved, .the Court term
18
and number of said suit.
Not applicable.
40. Aside from the accidents or incidents mentioned above, have you been
involved in any other accidents or incidents in which you sustained damages and/or
injuries. If so, state the nature of the incident, the place and date on which it occurred,
the names and addresses of all persons involved, the injured and impairments
sustained by you and the Court, term and number if any lawsuit commenced as a result
thereof.
None.
41 . If you allege that the incident here involved aggravated a pre-existing
condition, state whether you have recovered from said condition at the time of the
incident and describe in detail all treatment which had been received by you for said
pre-existing condition with the names and addresseR of RII doctors and hospitals
involved with dates of medical care.
Plaintiff's prior back pain, other than normal aches after exertion, etc, had
resolved itself prior to the accident, and she had not been treated for back or leg
pain in the 10 years prior to the accident. She had previously seen Dr. Zigafose in
Abbotstown, and Dr. Harcourt in York for her back pain.
42. State whether you have applied for or received any unemployment
compensation benefits since the incident, and if so: the Rmounts received and the
period covered by the payments.
No.
43. At the time of the incident, what was the nature of your employment
and/or occupation? Describe your usual duties and labors.
Administrative Assistant-secretarial and office manager in nature.
Computer and phone work and various tasks within the office.
44. For the period of three years immediately preceding the date of the
incident referred to in the Complaint, state:
(a) The names and address of each of your employers or, if you were
self-employed during that period, each of your business addresses and names of the
business while self-employed;
19
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC, 100 Pine Street, Harrisburg, PA 17101
Kinsley Construction, 2700 Water Street, York, PA 17405
(b) the date of commencement and termination of each of your periods
of employment or self-employment;
MWN- April of 1996 to present.
Kinsley-- January of 2003 to present
(c) A detailed description of the nature of your occupation in each
employment of self-employment;
Secretarial
(d) The amount of income from employment and self-employment for
each year. (Attach your Federallncorne tax return for each year)
Federal income tax returns are beino oroducp-d for 2003 and 2004. The 2005
.- -.-
return is not yet finalized.
45. If you have engaged in one or more gainful occupations subsequent to the
date of the incident referred to in the Complaint, state:
(a) The name and address of each of your employers or, if you were
self-employed, each of your business addresses and the name of the business while
self-employed;
Same as above.
(b) The dates of commencement and termination of each of your
periods of employment or self-employment;
(c) A detailed description of the nature of your occupation in each
employment or self-employment;
(d) The wage, salary or rate of earnings received by you in each
employment or self-employment. (Attach your Federal Income tax return for each
subsequent accident);
(e) The dates of all absences from your occupation resulting from the
injuries and diseases suffered in this incident. Set forth the amount of any earnings or
other benefits lost by you because of such absences.
20
46. State whether, as a result of the incident, you have been unable to
perform any of your customary occupational duties or social or other activities in the
same manner as prior to the incident, stating with particularity (a) the duties and/or
activities you have been unable to perform, and (b) the periods of times you have been
unable to perform, and (c) the names and last known addresses of all persons having
knowledge thereof.
Plaintiff can still perform her occupational duties when she is at work for the most part.
As stated above, there are times that she cannot work because the back, leg and neck
pain is too great. Most days she tried to push through it. As far as her social activities,
she cannot do the same things as she used to prior to the accident. Specifically, long
walks, taking flights of stairs, extended trips in cars, planes, etc., anything that involves
sitting for long periods of time and surfaces that do not support her back properly, sitting
on hard surfaces, such a picnic benches, and the floor, mowing grass with push mower,
along with using the riding mower, various other types of yard work where you need to
get up and down often, house cleaning, helping to lift her parents when they were sick,
not being able to jay flat for medical tests, getting out of bed on only one side, dance
lessons, cross-country skiing, shopping and much more. She resent always having to
guard her back hoping thrlt wh;:jtever she is doing won't prompt that extreme po:n th~t
can be debilitating.
47. If you claiming loss of earnings or earning power as a result of the
incident, state the total amount of such loss and show in detail how the amount of the
alleged loss was computed.
Plaintiff is not claiming loss of earning power. She has lost earnings as a result
of sick days and/or missed work because of the back pain. The amounts claimed
are set forth in the Complaint; which is incorporated herein by reference.
48. Did you sustain any financial losses as a result of the incident other than
those covered by the preceding Interrogatories? If so state:
Yes. This information has already been provided in informal discovery and is set
forth in the Complaint, which is incorporated herein by reference.
(a) In detail, the nature, date and amount of such additional loss;
(b) If claim is made for household help, state the name and address of
each person employed, the period of employment, the amount actually paid to such
persons, and whether you employed domestic help prior to the date of the incident.
49. State whether you have received or agreed to received from any party any
sum or thing of value for any injuries or damages resulting from the incident referred to
21
in the Complaint and if so, state the amounts received or to be received, dates of
payment, and names and addresses of payers; state the names, business and
employer of the custodian of said writing.
Defendants' claims adjustor made certain payments associated with the damage
to the vehicle.
Erie Insurance Company has made certain payments of medical expenses,
although Plaintiff does not know the exact amount Erie has paid.
50. State your social security number, Blue Cross and Blue Shield numbers,
Veteran's Claim number and the name of any health and accident insurance company
covering any injuries named.
Objection as to social security number for privacy and security reasons.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield-- ID#YWP80051721900
51. State the name of anv hosoit81i7Rtion or workmen's comn,...ensation
. .
insurance company, welfare fund, beneficial association or any other entity covering any
injuries or losses sustained as a result of the incident involved in this case, or any prior
subsequent accident, injury, illness or disability.
As to the current accident related injuries, this information has already been
provided above and before. As to any prior or subsequent illness, this question
is objected on the basis that it is overbroad and is not related to the type of
injuries suffered in the accident, and as such, violates Plaintiff's privacy rights
and HIPPA. Without waiving this objection, there has been no subsequent
treatment for any injury from another cause that is related to the same areas
where Plaintiff was injured from the accident. As to prior treatment, Plaintiff was
not treated for her back or left leg pain at all in the ten years prior to the accident,
and has no record regarding who paid for this prior treatment.
52. Please list all motor vehicle owned by you or your family members
residing in your household on the date of the accident.
Vehicle involved in the accident and described in the Complaint, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
If you listed any vehicles above, please list all automobile insurance carriers and
the corresponding policy numbers, if any automobile insurance was maintained on any
of these vehicles.
53. Of these insurance polic(ies) listed above, please state the 'Tort
22
I
~-
Threshold" applicable to that/those polic(ies).
Not applicable since the Defendants' vehicle is registered in Maryland.
54. Please list the insurance company and policy number for any other
insurance polic(ies) not detailed above, which you claim provides you with a "Tort
Threshold" for subject motor vehicle accident and state the applicable tort threshold
maintained by that policy.
None.
AS TO OBJECTIONS
McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
I VL )lf2.~t(
/ J nathan H. Rudd
.0. No. 56880
/ 100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
H::lrri~hIJrn PA 171nR
-- - - - -- -.. -.=J' . . - .. . - -
(717)232-8000
Dated: Marcn}7, 2006
23
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
~
I, Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire, hereby certify that on thi~ day of March, 2006,
a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by first-class, United
States mail, postage prepaid, upon the following:
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, PC
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1981
/~~ )I- ~t{
/ Jon,athan H. Rudd
VERIFICATION
I, Brenda J. Landis, verify that the factual statements made in the foregoing
Answers to Interrogatories are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information
and belief. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties
of 18 Pa.C.S. S4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
]' r-.I "/
I i "-
'. Ii" 'I
. J I (; -1,' l.r. _" \ ,:'rk1_-,/iJ~)
, -. l' ...... ~
Brenda J. LandIs
Dated: (3 -(~)7-Ci0
EXHIBIT "c"
...
CCLR
. . . .
Center City Legal Reproductions, Inc.
123 South Broad Street, Suite 1920, Philadelphia, PA 19109
(215)732-1177 fax (215)732-5637
Online Servi~es www.cclrinc.com
...
BRENDA J. LANDIS
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
VS.
CARROLL A. QUARLES, ET AL
No. 05.3921
~~OTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS
MCNEES. WALLACE & NURICK. LLC
100 PINE STREET
PO BOX 1166
HARRISBURG, PA 17108
AT1: ''''!!II n. .... ~~._
--. '-~"'N I ',..f--
'"'''' ^ TU ^ "'!-! PI Inn ~~f"\! !!P~
~...,....r't. " "... ". '''___. ____'1 ,_
COpy
Please take notice there has been a request by REGINA M. VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE,
counsel for the Defendant in the above case for production and copying of records in the
possession of (see enclosures).
These records pertain to BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
Enclosed is(are) a copy (copies) of the subpoena(s) to be served on the custodian of
sucr. records and also a Counsel Retum Page for you to fill out and return to us stating
whether you would like to order a copy of the records and whether you have any
objections to the production and copying of such records or manner thereof. The fee per
location is in accordance with Act #26.
The subpoena will be sent to the records custodian twenty (20) days from the date of this
notice requesting that the records be produced on or before ten (10) days thereafter
unless we hear from YOll to the contrary on the Counsel Return Page. If you state an
objection on the Counsel Return Page, we will proceed accordingly.
If you require assistance, please contact our office.
DATE: May 17. 2006
Enclosures: Copy (copies) of Subpoena(s)
Counsel Return Page
(:cM1)NWJ:7\f.TH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNI"i OF ~ND
BRENDA J. LANDIS
vs
Fi Ie No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARELS, ET AL
'SUBP<ENA TO PQOOlX;E DCX:U1ENTS OR ntl NGS
FOR 0 I SCOVERY PURSUANT TO R!JLE 4009.22
ro:
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP
(Nane of Person 0/'" Ent; ty)
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
)t"Oduce the fo 1 lowing docunents or things: ANY & ALL RECORD, REPORTS, MEMOS.
OCUMENTS, ANY WRITTEN INFORMATION CONTAINED IN FILE REGARDING POLICY #
Q09-3003177 H.
it
CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, INC.
(Address)
You may de liver or mail 1 eg i b 1 e 00p ies of the docunents or produce th i ngs requested by
:,his subpoena, together with the certificate of oc::rrpliance, t:A) the party making this
~equest at the address 1 isted above. You have the right to seek in .advance the reasonable
:cst of preparing the copies or producing the things sougt'lt.
f f you fa; 1 to Produce the docunents or things required by this subpoena within twent.y
(20) day~ aft~ H::s s=~ic€:, the party serving this subpoena. may seek a OXJrt O!'der
Xf'11'elHng you to carply with it.
BY 'THE: OOJRT:
Division
)ATE:
h1~ Jf. dla:Y?
Seal of he Court
Oeputy
(Eff _ 7/97)
(~TfI OF J?~V1\NI1\
COUNrY OF a.JMBrnI1.\NO
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
Fi le No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QU~RELS, ET At
.SUBPOENA TO PRCOUCE (')()C.'U-f::NTS OR lH I NGS
F~ 0 r $O)VERY ~SUANT TO RULE 4009.22
TO:
INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS
(N;ne of Person or Ent i ty)
Within twenty (20) days aft.er service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the Court to
produce the following docunent:s or things: ANY & ALL BLUE CROSS BLUE SHEILD RECORDS,
lNCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO EXPLANATION OF BENEFITS, REPORTS, M~MU~, DOCUMENTS,
ANY WRITTEN INFORMATION CONTAINED IN FILE REGARDING 10# YWP80051721900.
at CENTER CITY LEGATJ REPRODUCTIONS, iNC.
(Address)
You may deliver or mai 1 legible copies of the docunents or produce things requested by
this subpoena, together with the certificate of c:x:rrc:>>1iaoce, to the party making this
request at the address listed above. You have the right t..o seek in advance the re~le
cost of prepar i ng the cop i as or produc ing the th ings sou9~t.
'f you fai t to produce the docunents Of' things required by this subpoena within twenty
{20} days ilft~~ iLs serv;ce, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court. or-der
<XITlJe 1 Hng you to CCJ'l1) ly with it.
nus SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE REQJEST OF WE FOLLCWING PERSON:
~: REGINA VOGELSONG, E~QUIRE
AOORESS: CCLR, Inc.
----1~o.ad..St~920
TELEPHONE :'. . 1.9109.-
SlSlR8'-E cx:urr I 0 #~ '7~?-:t.:S-7..2-.
ATTORNEY FOR~ D~~
DATE:
jY}~ /~. ~~
Sea 1 0 the Court -
BY TI-E ~T: . 1
prot~~i1
D;v;sion
~ty
(Eff. 7/91)
~TH Of' PF.mJSYLV1\NJA
COUNrY OF alMBrnU\ND
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
Fi le No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARELS, E'r AL
'SUBPCeNA TO PROOU:E oco..I"ENrS OR TH I NGS
FOR 0 I SOOVERY pURSUANT TO RULE 4009.22
TO: KINSLEY CONSTRUCTION
(Hane of Person or Ent ity)
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
produce the following docunents or things: ANY & ALL EMPLOYMENT/PERSONNEL RECORDS,
INCLUDING WORKERS COMP CLAIMS, DATES OF ATTENDANCE, APPLICATIONS. REVIEWS:
EVALUATIONS, EARNINGS, MlmICAL REPORTS, ETC., PERTAINING TO BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
CENTER CITY LEGAL ~EPRODUCTIONS, .INC.
at
(Address)
You may del iver or mai 1 legible copies of the docunents or prodtJce things requested by
this subpoena, together with the certificate of CXXTl>1iance. to the party making this
request at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable
cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sous"'t.
I f you fai 1 to produce the docunents or things required by this subpoena within twenty
(20) daj'!:; ~ft~ its s~-vice, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court O!"d<U'
OO'l"pe 11 i ng you to COTp 1 y with it.
l1i (S SUBPOENA WAS I SSUED AT THE REQUEST OF 1HE FOLLCW I NO PERSON:
~: REGINA VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
ACCRESS: eClR, Inc.
12tL8~ B'a.BJ1.St~SlU920
TELEPHONE: flli~9-.
SlJ'R~ ~T 10 ~~15~-1177
ATTORNEY FOO:~ D FEN ANT
DATE:
m~ / 1. ~4::?~
Seal o. he Oourt --
BY ~ <nJR~: ~
~
Pro t.ar~ . i 1 Oivision
Deputy
(Eff. 7/97)
~TH OF PJ:NNSYIN1\NJ.l\.
COUNlY OF ~
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
Fi le No.
05-3921
Cl\RROLL A. QUARELS, ET AL
SUBPOENA TO PR~ ooa..tENTS OR TH I NGS
FOR_D I SO::>VERY P~SUANT TO RUlE 4009.22
TO:
MCNEES, WALLACE, NURIC1<, LLC
(Name of Person or Entity)
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena, you are ordered by the court to
_..L. th f 11 . ""'-- -~-t ...L . ANY & ALL EMPLOYMENT I PERSONNEL RECORDS,
p, vuuCe e 0 Chi' ng UU\..OU 'I'::{ I S or l,.{ 11 ngs _
INCLUING WORKERS COMP ~LAI~1S, ~~!ES OF ATTENDANCE, APPLICATIONS, REVIEWS,
EVALUATIONS, EARNINGS, MEDICAL REPORTS, ETC., PERTAINING TO BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
at CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, . INC.
(Address)
You may deliver or mail legible copies of the docunents or produce things r~ested by
this subpoena, together with the certificate of oc::rrpliance, to the party making this
request at the address 1 isted above. You have the dght to seek in advance the reasonab Ie
cost of preparing the copies or producing the things sougnt.
If you fail to produce the docunents or things required by this subpoena within twenty
(2C) days after its service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court or-der
CXJ'Tpe 11i ng you to CO'I'f) 1 y with it.
TH f S SUBPOENA WAS I SSUEO AT ll-lE REQJESi OF 1HE F<X.LON I NG PERSON:
~: REGINA VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
ADDRESS: CCLR,lnc..
-~St----StLt920
TElE~E :
SUPRfJ"E <XUrr ID tt~1+77
ATTORNEY FOR: D~FENdANT
BY 1l-lE COJRT:
1 Division
~ATE:
111~ J1. d~OL_
Seal o~ he Oourt
Pro
Deputy
(Eff. 7/97)
~T.H OF P~YLVANIA
axJNI'Y OF aJMBEIU ANn
BRENDA J. LANDIS
VS
Fi le No.
05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARELS, ET AL
- SUBPOENA TO p~ OOCU1ENTS OR 1li I NGS
FOO 0 I S(X)VERY ~SUANT TO RULE 4009.22
.0: WHITE ROSE FAMILY PRACTICE
(N~ of Person or Ent ;ty)
Wit.hin twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena. you are Ot'dered by the court to
produce the following docunents Of' things: ANY & AJ..L MEDICAL RECORDS, FILMS,
PEPORTS, OF~ICE NCT:S, ~ROGRESS ~E?ORr-S, DOCTORS ~uTES, CHARTS, SUMMARIES,
TEST RESULTS, EVLAUATIONS, ETC., PERTAINING TO BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
at CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, INC.
(Address)
You may deliver or mai 1 legible copies of the docunents or produce things requested by
t.his subpoena, together with the certificate of CXIl1>liance, to the party making this
reqvest at. tho address 1 isted above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable
cost of preparing the copies or producing the t.hings sou9f'\t.
f f you f'~i 1 t..o produce the doct...~nts 0,- things f-e4U ired by this subpoena within twenty
(20) days after its servic~, the party serving this subpoen"l may seek a court or-d<er
~e 11 ing you to CCIllJ ly with it.
1l-f(S SUBPOENA WAS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE FOLL~'NG PERSON:
NAME: REGINA VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
AOORa:;SS: CCLR, Inc.
--1~LabU920
TELEPH::)NE:~.19.1O!L
~R8"E <XX.JRT I D '* '
ATTORNEY FOR: D FEN ANT
BY lHE OOJRT:
vi 1 Oivision
DATE:
m~ /9.~?
Sea 1 of e- Court ~
Deputy
(E:ff. 7/97)
EXHIBIT "D"
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 237-5405 - phone
(717) 237-5300 - fax
jrudd@mwn.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
v.
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE R.
WEDDINGTON, ROADLlNK USA EAST,
L.L.C., and EASTERN AMERICAN
TRANSPORT & WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION
OBJECTION TO SUBPOENA DiRECTED TO
INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Brenda J. Landis, by and through her attorneys, McNees
Wallace & Nurick LLC, and objects to the subpoena to be served upon Independence Blue
Cross as overbroad, and seeking information that is not relevant, nor likely to lead to discovery
of admissible evidence. The proposed subpoena to Independence Blue Cross seeks any and
a!! Blue Cross/Blue Shield records ielated to Plaintiff. Piaintiff has oniy put her musculoskeletal
condition. primarily her low back and left leg, at issue in this Im.vsuit, and Plaintiff maintains her
right of privacy regarding all other medical conditions unrelated to the claims asserted in this
lawsuit. Accordingly, Plaintiff objects to the overbroad nature of this subpoena, and would only
agree to a subpoena limited to records related to her musculoskeletal condition or treatment.
Respectfully Submitted:
McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
~
/Br=
J
I . No. 56880
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Dated: June 1, 2006
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
(\1.---
I, Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire, hereby certify that on this _ day of June, 2006, a true
and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by first-class, United States mail,
postage prepaid, upon the following:
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Zarwin. Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, PC
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1981
/r }LU1
( Jo than H. Rudd
- '--"- -
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 237-5405 - phone
(717) 237-5300 - fax
jrudd@mwn.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
: NO. 05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE R.
WEDDINGTON, ROADLlNK USA EAST,
L.L.C., and EASTERN AMERICAN
TRANSPORT & WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION
OBJECTION TO SUBPOENA DiRECTED TO
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Brenda J. Landis, by and through her attorneys, McNees
Wallace & Nurick LLC, and objects to the subpoena to be served upon Erie Insurance Group as
overbroad, and seeking information that is not relevant, nor likely to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence. The proposed subpoena to Erie Insurance Group seeks any and all
records ielated to Plainiiff. Piainliff has oniy put her muscuioskeietal condition, primarily her low
back and left leg, at issue in this lawsuit, and Plaintiff maintains her right of privacy regarding all
other medical conditions unrelated to the claims asserted in this lawsuit. Accordingly, Plaintiff
objects to the overbroad nature of this subpoena, and would only agree to a subpoena limited to
records related to her musculoskeletal condition or treatment.
Respectfully Submitted:
t'v1cNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
-Y-
(/ J nathan H. Rudd
.D. No. 56880
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Dated: June 1,2006
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
IS 1--
I, Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire, hereby certify that on this +- day of June, 2006, a true
and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by first-class, United States mail,
postage prepaid, upon the following:
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, PC
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1981
rV-~
C Jon han H. Rudd
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
1 00 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, P A 17108-1166
(717) 237-5405 - phone
(717) 237-5300 - fax
jrudd@mwn.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
v.
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE R.
WEDDINGTON, ROADUNK USA EAST,
L.L.C., and EASTERN AMERICAN
TRANSPORT & WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION
OBJECT:O~J TO SUBPOEi..A DiRECTED TO
WHITE ROSE FAMILY PRACTICE
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Brenda J. Landis, by and through her attorneys, McNees
Wallace & Nurick LLC, and objects to the subpoena to be served upon White Rose Family
Practice as overbroad, and seeking information that is not relevant, nor likely to lead to
discovery of admissible evidence. The proposed subpoena to White Rose Family Practice
seeks any and all records related to Plaintiff. Plaintiff has ufliy put her muscuioskeietai
condition, primarily her low back and left leg, at issue in this lawsuit, and Plaintiff maintains her
right of privacy regarding all other medical conditions unrelated to the claims asserted in this
lawsuit. Accordingly, Plaintiff objects to the overbroad nature of this subpoena, and would only
agree to a subpoena limited to records related to her musculoskeletal condition or treatment.
Respectfully Submitted:
McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
B
/" J athan H. Rudd
. No. 56880
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Dated: June 1, 2006
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
,I ~f--
I, Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire, hereby certify that on this L day of June, 2006, a true
and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by first-class, United States mail,
postage prepaid, upon the following:
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, PC
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1981
,~~
(//J . athan H. Rudd
\......./
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
1 00 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 237-5405 - phone
(717) 237-5300 - fax
jrudd@mwn.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
v.
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE R.
WEDDINGTON, ROADLlNK USA EAST,
L.L.C., and EASTERN AMERICAN
TRANSPORT & WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION
OBJECTiON TO SUBPOENA DiRECTED TO
McNEES, WALLACE & NURICK, LLC
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Brenda J. Landis, by and through her attorneys, McNees
Wallace & Nurick LLC, and objects to the subpoena to be served upon McNees Wallace &
Nurick LLC as overbroad, and seeking information that is not relevant, nor likely to lead to
discovery of admissible evidence. Defendants propose to serve a subpoena seeking reviews,
evaluations and rnedi{';Cli reports, etc. The requests for reviews, evaluations, and medical
reports is overbroad and seeks information that is not relevant nor is it likely to lead to the
discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff has only put her musculoskeletal condition, primarily
her low back and left leg, at issue in this lawsuit, and Plaintiff maintains her right of privacy
regarding all other medical conditions unrelated to the claims asserted in this lawsuit, as well as
her reviews and evaluations.
Respectfully Submitted:
Jo athan H. Rudd
I. . No. 56880
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Dated: June 1, 2006
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
\y
I, Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire, hereby certify that on this J..:: day of June, 2006, a true
and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by first-class, United States mail,
postage prepaid, upon the following:
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, PC
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1981
~~~
(/ Jon han H. Rudd
"-..../.
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
(717) 237-5405 - phone
(717) 237-5300 - fax
jrudd@mwn.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
: NO. 05-3921
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE R.
WEDDINGTON, ROADLlNK USA EAST,
L.L.C., and EASTERN AMERICAN
TRANSPORT & WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION
nR 1I=I'TlnM Tn C::IIROnC"-!^ n!DCI'TCn Tn
---...--..-.. .- --..... -.....~..".'......"..... ."""
KINSLEY CONSTRUCTION
AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, Brenda J. Landis, by and through her attorneys, McNees
Wallace & Nurick LLC, and objects to the subpoena to be served upon Kinsley Construction as
overbroad, and seeking information that is not relevant, nor likely to lead to discovery of
admissible evidence. Defendants propose to serve a subpoena seeking reviews, evaluations
~nn "",orfi,...~1 ror'U"Mt' ,..,,+,... Th", "'''''". ".'\1'''+'''' -f"r ...,..."i,...,..,,... _,,_111_4-:__,.., __....I _____,.1:...._1 ....___-"_ :.-
.......u III"'YlvU. ''''tJ\J'I'''''', v,,'-'. "Iv 1\J""1Uv..:H~ IVI I~VIC;;YY';), C:;:YCUUOI.IUII.;:), allU IIICUI\"all'C::;tJUI"~ I;:)
overbroad and seeks information that is not relevant nor is it likely to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence. Plaintiff has only put her musculoskeletal condition, primarily her low back
and left leg, at issue in this lawsuit, and Plaintiff maintains her right of privacy regarding all other
medical conditions unrelated to the claims asserted in this lawsuit, as well as her reviews and
evaluations.
Respectfully Submitted:
McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
Y ~~Vf
}nathan H. Rudd
/f.D. No. 56880
1 00 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Dated: June 1, 2006
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE y-r
I, Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire, hereby certify that on this L day of June. 2006. a true
and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by first-class, United States mail,
postage prepaid, upon the following:
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, PC
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1981
~~iLhJ{
/' Jo athan H. Rudd
,/ /
, I
\~
VERIFICATION
THEODORE M. SCHAER, ESQUIRE, hereby states that he is the attorney for the
Defendants in this action and verifies that the statements made in the foregoing Motion to Strike
Objections to Subpoena(s) are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and
belief. The undersigned understands that the statements made therein are made subject to the
penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
BY:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that service of a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion to Compel
was made on this date by first-class mail, postage pre-paid to the following:
Jonathan Rudd, Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurick
100 Pine Street
Harrisburg, PA 17108
DATED:
!J12-Ob
" )
"
---I
. ,l
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN, SCHAER & TODDY, P.C.
BY: Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Identification No.: 49580 Attorney for Defendants
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102
215-569-2800
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
COURTOFCO~ONPLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
vs.
CNIL ACTION
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE
R. WEDDINGTON, ROADLINK USA
EAST, L.L.C., and EASTERN
AMERICAN TRANSPORT &
WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
DOCKET NO.: 05-3921
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE TO SUBSTITUTE VERIFICATION
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly substitute the attached Verification of Woody Yarwood on behalf of
Defendant, Eastern American Transport & Warehousing, Inc. (improperly identified as
Roadlink USA East, LLC) to Defendants' Answer with New Matter, for the Verification
filed by the attorney of record.
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN,
SCHAER & TODDY, P.C.
BY:
T DaRE M. SCHAER, ESQUIRE
-
r
VERiFICATION
tU()()t! (~u.'oIJD
( p~me
hereby state that I an authorized
representative on behalf of and EASTERN AMERlCAN TRANSPORT &
W ARRHOUSING, INC., d.b.a EASTERN/GPS (IMPROPERLY IDENTIFIED AS
ROADLINK USA EAST, L.L.C.) parties to the within action and that the statements
made in the foregoing Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge, infonnation and belief r lmderstand that the statements made herein are
made su~iectto the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification
to authorities.
Zrt:l<t. /)1 117
LANDIS/TMS
-
VERIFICATION
THEODORE M. SCHAER, ESQUIRE, hereby states that he is the attorney
for the Defendants in this action and verifies that the statements made in the
foregoing are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
The undersigned understands that the statements made therein are made subject to
the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to
authorities.
ZARWlN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN,
SCHAER & TODDY, P.C.
ByillIl&M~ . Scm~
THEODORE M. SCHAER, ESQUIRE
. ."""
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that service of a true and correct copy of the foregoing Praecipe to
Substitute Verification was made on this date by first-class mail, postage pre-paid to the
following:
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees, Wallace & Nurick, LLC
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
ZARWIN, BAUM, DeVITO, KAPLAN,
SCHAER & TODDY, P.C.
DATED: i'\ ~~ \D~
By:1Vufrl8(t rY\ . ~L
THEODORE M. SCHAER, ESQUIRE
. .
r-~.)
C'J
-11
:::-1
fll;r]
..~-"
C..".:!
w.'
\.C.
~J
rv
.
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA
V.
: CIVIL ACTION
CARROLL A. QUARLES,
THEODORE R. WEDDINGTON, : NO. 05'3921 CIVIL
ROADLlNK USA EAST, L.L.C. and
EASTERN AMERICAN TRANSPORT
& WAREHOUSING. INC.
Defendant : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW. this 19th day of July. 2006, upon consideration of the Defendant's
Motion to Strike Objections to Subpoenas. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DIRECTED
that a Rule shall issue upon the Plaintiff to show cause why the Defendant's Motion
should not be granted. The Rule is returnable on or before August 10. 2006.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND DIRECTED that a Discovery Conference in
this case shall be held on August 23, 2006 at 1 :30 p.m. in the jury deliberation room of
Courtroom No.5 of the Cumberland County Courthouse. Carlisle. Pennsylvania to
determine the necessity of holding further hearings in this matter.
By the Court,
""'\
M. L. Ebert. Jr.,
Jonathan Rudd, Esquire
Attorney for Plaintiff
Theodore M. Schaer, ESqUire\~ ~
Regina Vogelsong, Esquire / 1-.;Jo- "t,
Attorneys for Defendants
a..
bas
1..7: 111"1 O?
.. '-, " "' OJ
~
Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire
McNees Wallace & Nurlck LLC
Attorney I.D. No. 56880
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
717-237-5405 (phone)
717-237-5300 (fax)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRENDA J. LANDIS : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v. : NO. 05-3921
CARROLLA. QUARLES, THEODORE
R. WEDDINGTON. ROADLlNK USA
EAST, L.L.C., and EASTERN
AMERICAN TRANSPORT &
WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants : CIVIL ACTION
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS'
MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SUBPOENAS
AND NOW, comes. Plaintiff Brenda J. Landis, by and through her attorneys,
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC, and makes the following answer and show of cause as
to why Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Objections to Subpoenas should not be
granted.
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted with the qualification that the handwritten notation on Exhibit "A"
next to paragraphs 51 and 52 that states: "50ft tissue neck & back" was not on the
Complaint when it was filed, and was apparently added by someone else after the
Complaint was served on the Defendants.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
5. Admitted.
6. Admitted.
7. Admitted.
8. Admitted with the qualification that Defendants requested Plaintiff's Blue
Cross and Blue Shield numbers. Plaintiff provided one number, which is her Capital
Blue Cross number. Plaintiff does not believe that Capital Blue Cross and Blue
Shield/Highmark have any continuing relationship, and does not believe that Blue
Shield/High mark has any records relevant to this matter.
9. Admitted. Additionally, Defendants served Notices of Intent to Serve
Subpoenas upon Dr. Barbara Christensen, Harcourt Chiropractic/Dr. Harcourt, Herd
Chiropractic Clinic, Loretta K. Schmidgall. M.D.. and Thomas Pheasant, M.D. to which
no objection was filed.
10. Admitted. In addition to the formal objections, Plaintiff's counsel sent
Defendants' counsel a letter on June 1, 2006, explaining the basis for the objection. A
copy of this letter is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". In this letter. Plaintiff's counsel
stated:
We have no objection to the service of the subpoenas as
proposed on Dr. Barbara Christensen, Harcourt
Chiropractic/Dr. Harcourt, Herd Chiropractic Clinic, Loretta
K. Schmidgall. MD, and Thomas Pheasant, MD. We do
have objection to the subpoenas directed to Erie Insurance
Group, Independence Blue Cross, McNees Wallace & Nurick
LLC, Kinsley Construction and White Rose Family Practice.
We are serving you with copies of our objections to these
subpoenas. As you will note, we are objecting to these latter
subpoenas as overbroad, and seeking information that is not
relevant nor likely to lead to discovery of admissible
evidence.
11. Admitted in part; denied in part. Plaintiff admits that Plaintiff's health care
providers, insurance carriers and employer have relevant information, and Plaintiff's
counsel made clear in his letter of June 1, 2006 that Plaintiff had no objection to the
disclosure of information relevant to this lawsuit. However, Plaintiff objected to the
overbroad nature of the subpoenas which sought all medical records regarding Plaintiff
regardless of their connection to the claims asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff has a
right to privacy to medical information that is not related to the claims asserted in the
Complaint. For the most part, Plaintiff's claims set forth in the Complaint relate to her
musculoskeletal condition, or left eye. Plaintiff has not objected to the subpoenas
directed to her eye doctors. Further, Plaintiff has not objected to the subpoenas
directed to her chiropractors, since their records would relate directly to her
musculoskeletal condition. However, Plaintiff has objected to the subpoenas directed to
her family physician, insurance companies and employer to the extent that these
records would relate to medical services that have no relationship to the physical
conditions at issue in the lawsuit. Without disclosing the other medical treatment
Plaintiff has received, Plaintiff's commencement of the lawsuit complaining of
musculoskeletal pain as a result of the tractor-trailer accident does not automatically
provide Defendants with the right to invade her privacy as to medical treatment which
has no relationship to the matters complained of in the Complaint.
The federal Heath Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA")
was passed specifically to safeguard patients' privacy with respect to their medical
records. See 42 U.S. ~1320d et sea. (Generally, HIPAA pre-empts state law on the
subjects covered by HIPAA unless state law provides even greater protection for health
information. See 42 U.S.C. 91320d-7(a)(1 )). Subsequent to the passage of HIPAA, the
Secretary of Health and Human Services issued regulations to protect the privacy of
patients' health information. See 45 C.F.R. 9164.500 et sea. One of the overriding
themes of the HIPAA regulations is that disclosure of protected health information must
be limited to the minimum necessary to accomplish its intended purpose. The
regulations provide at Section 164.502(b) as follows:
(b) Standard: Minimum necessary. (1) Minimum necessary
applies. When using or disclosing protected health
information or when requesting protected health information
from another covered entity, a covered entity must make
reasonable efforts to limit protected health information to the
minimum necessarv to accomplish the intended purpose of
the use. disclosure. or reauest.
(Emphasis added). Section 164.512(e) of the regulations specifically deal with
disclosures for judicial and administrative proceedings, and provides in relevant part as
follows:
(e) Standard: Disclosures for judicial and administrative
proceedings.
(1) Permitted disclosures. A covered entity may disclose
protected health information in the course of any judicial or
administrative proceeding:
(i) In response to an order of a court or administrative
tribunal, provided that the covered entity discloses only the
protected health information expressly authorized by such
order; or
(ii) In response to a subpoena, discovery request, or
other lawful process, that is not accompanied by an order of
a court or administrative tribunal, if:
...
(8) The covered entity receives satisfactory
assurance. as described in paragraph (e)(1 )(iv) of this
section. from the party seeking the information that
reasonable efforts have been made by such party to secure
a qualified protective order that meets the requirements of
paragraph (e)(1 )(v) of this section.
See 45 C.F.R. ~164.512(e). (45 C.F.R. ~164.512(e)(1)(ii)(A) does not apply since
Plaintiff has made an objection to the subpoenas. See 45 C.F.R. ~164.512(e)(iii)(C)(1)
& (2).) Defendants have not sought a qualified protective order from this Court and are
attempting to serve subpoenas seeking all of Plaintiff's medical records related to all
medical treatment. and not simply treatment that would be related to her
musculoskeletal condition or left eye. The regulations specifically require such a
protective order under these circumstances. See 45 C.F.R. 164.512(e)(v), which
provides:
(v) For purposes of paragraph (e)(1) of this section. a
qualified protective order means. with respect to protected
health information requested under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of
this section, an order of a court or of an administrative
tribunal or a stipulation by the parties to the litigation or
administrative proceeding that:
(A) Prohibits the parties from using or disclosing the
protected health information for any purpose other than the
litigation or proceeding for which such information was
requested; and
(B) Requires the return to the covered entity or
destruction of the protected health information (including all
copies made) at the end of the litigation or proceeding.
Under the circumstances, this Court should issue a qualified protective order limiting the
disclosure of medical information to the minimum necessary to achieve its intended
purpose. which would be the medical information related to Plaintiff's musculoskeletal
condition and/or left eye. Further, the protective order should have the provisions set
forth in 45 C.F.R. ~164.512(e)(v)(A) & (B) regarding limiting the use of the protected
health information and requiring the return or destruction of the protected health
information at the end of the litigation.
12. Denied. Defendants will not be severely prejudiced, or prejudiced at all, if
they are precluded from obtaining irrelevant medical information. As set forth above,
Plaintiff is not attempting to stop Defendants from obtaining relevant medical
information.
13. Denied. For the reasons stated above, Defendants will suffer no prejudice
as a result of being prohibited from obtaining irrelevant medical information.
14. Denied for the reasons set forth above.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court deny
Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Objections to Subpoenas, and order Defendants
to revise the subpoenas to comply with HIPAA and the regulations promulgated
thereunder. and to limit the scope of the subpoenas to the medical information relevant
to the claims asserted in this matter.
Respectfully Submitted:
McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
Jo athan H. Rudd
I . No. 56880
100 Pine Street
P.O. Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108
(717)232-8000
Dated: 61, loCo
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Jonathan H. Rudd, Esquire, hereby certify that on this ~ay of August. 2006,
a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served by first-class. United
States mail. postage prepaid, upon the following:
Theodore M. Schaer, Esquire
Regina Vogelsong, Esquire
Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy, PC
1515 Market Street, Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1981
r\fM1
---------------
~
t,<h1b.-t A
. .
, AVtY
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC
attorneys at law
JONATHAN H. RUDD
DIRECT DIAl: (717) 237-5405
E-MAIL ADDRESS:JRUDD@MWN.COM
June 1, 2006
Regina M. Vogelsong, Esquire
Zarwin Baum DeVito Kaplan Schaer Toddy PC
1515 Market Street, 12th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1981
FILE COpy
RE: Landis v. Quarles, et al.
Dear Regina:
We are in receipt of a Notice of Intent to Serve a Subpoena to Produce Documents
from Center City Legal Reproductions, Inc. We have no objection to the service of the
subpoenas as proposed on Dr. Barbara Christensen, Harcourt Chiropractic/Dr. Harcourt,
Herd Chiropractic Clinic, Loretta K. Schmidgall, MD, and Thomas Pheasant, MD. We do
have objection to the subpoenas directed to Erie Insurance Group, Independence Blue
Cross, McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC, Kinsley Construction and White Rose Family
Practice. We are serving you with copies of our objections to these subpoenas. As you will
note, we are objecting to these latter subpoenas as overbroad, and seeking information that
is not relevant nor likely to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. If you have the
subpoenas amended to simply limit the medical information to Plaintiff's musculoskeletal
condition and treatment, we would have no objection. However, Plaintiff has a right to
privacy regarding her other medical treatment unrelated to the claims asserted in this
matter. Further, we believe the request for evaluations and reviews from her employers are
not relevant nor likely to lead to discovery of admissible evidence.
As I have indicated in the past to Ted, we want to cooperate in discovery in order to
move this case forward toward a fair settlement or trial. However, we must protect Plaintiff's
privacy rights and cannot simply allow the Defendants to obtain documents relating to
medical conditions that have nothing to do with the claims asserted in this matter, or
otherwise invade Plaintiff's right to privacy.
p.o. Box 1166 '100 PINE STREET' HARRISBURG, PA 17108-1166' TEL: 717.232.8000' FAX: 717.237.5300' WWW.MWN.COM
HAZLETON, PA ' LANCASTER. PA ' STATE COLLEGE, PA' COLUMBUS, OH . WASHINGTON, DC
. )
Regina M. Vogelsong, Esquire
June 1 , 2006
Page 2
Please give me a call if you have any questions regarding the above.
Very truly yours,
McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
--'~
JHRljmb
Enclosure
c: Brenda J. Landis
()
~:;;
~"~
~
<=>
=
""
".
e-
G"}
~
~:Il
~!ii
~_...!~
05::li
~~
~
~
c:::>
-0
::r.
~?
C')
=
06-3325L
"
CERTIFICATE
PREREQUISITE TO SERVICE OF A SUBPOENA
PURSUANT TO RULE 4009.22
In the Matter of:
BRENDA J. LANDIS
- VS-
CARROLL A. QUARLES, ET AL
Court of Common Pleas
Cumberland County
No. 05-3921
As a prerequisite to service of a subpoena for documents and things pursuant to Rule 4009.22
CCLR on behalf of REGINA M. VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
Defendant certifies that
(1) A notice of intent to serve the subpoena(s) with a copy of the subpoena(s) attached thereto
was/were mailed or delivered to each party at least twenty days prior to the date on which
the subpoena(s) is/are sought to be served.
(2) A copy of the notice of intent, including the proposed subpoena(s), is attached to the
certificate.
(3) No objection to the subpoena(s) has been received.
(4) The subpoena(s) which will be served is/are identical to the subpoena(s) which is/are
attached to the notice of intent to server the subpoena(s).
DATE: 8/28/2006
R~OG~~'~~
Counsel for Defendant
f
"
......
CCLR
Center City Legal Reproductions, Inc.
123 South Broad Street, Suite 1920, Philadelphia, PA 19109
(215)732-1177 fax (215)732-5637
Online Services www.cclrinc.com
BRENDA J. LANDIS
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
VS.
CARROLL A. QUARLES, ET AL
No. 05-3921
NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS
JONATHAN H. RUDD, ESQUIRE
MCNEES, WALLACE & NURICK, LLC
100 PINE STREET
PO BOX 1166
HARRISBURG, PA 17108
Please take notice there has been a request by REGINA M. VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE,
counsel for the Defendant in the above case for production and copying of records in the
possession of (see enclosures).
These records pertain to BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
Enclosed is(are) a copy (copies) of the subpoena(s) to be served on the custodian of
such records and also a Counsel Return Page for you to fill out and return to us stating
whether you would like to order a copy of the records and whether you have any
objections to the production and copying of such records or manner thereof. The fee per
location is in accordance with Act #26.
The subpoena will be sent to the records custodian twenty (20) days from the date of this
notice requesting that the records be produced on or before ten (10) days thereafter
unless we hear from you to the contrary on the Counsel Return Page. If you state an
objection on the Counsel Return Page, we will proceed accordingly.
If you require assistance, please contact our office.
DATE: August 7, 2006
Enclosures: Copy (copies) of Subpoena(s)
Counsel Return Page
,
.
...
CCLR
. . . .
Center City Legal Reproductions, Inc.
123 South Broad Street, Suite 1920,'l'fIlladelphla, PA 19109
(215)732-1177 fax (215)732-5637
Online Services www.celrinc.com
BRENDA J. LANDIS
CCLR File NO. 06.3325L
V5.
CARROLL A. QUARLES, ET AL
COUNSEL RETURN PAGE
I have received the Notice of Records Reproduction Request dated 8/4/2006 regarding
records in the custody of (see attached subpoena(s)) and respond as follow:
(1) COPIES yes I no
I would like a copy of the records in question sent to me, and agree to
pay the price noted in the Notice of Records Reproduction Request.
(2) I would like copies of X-Rays sent to me. yes / no
(3) OBJECTIONS yes / no
I understand that I may object to the Notice of Records Reproduction
Request as Follows, and agree that my failure to do so on this Counsel
Return Page shall serve as an agreement that the records reproduction
service should proceed with the records collection process.
(a) I object to the records reproduction service obtaining the yes / no
records without a formal deposition.
(b) I object to the records custodian mailing the original documents yes I no
to the reproduction service.
(c) I object to the records reproduction service taking the records yes I no
out of the custody of the Records Custodian.
(4) I would like to look at the records at a Center City location before yes I no
deciding whether to order a copy.
Date:
Attorney for plaintiff(s) / defendant(s)
JONATHAN H. RUDD, ESQUIRE
MCNEES, WALLACE & NURICK. LLC
100 PINE STREET
PO BOX 1166
HARRISBURG, PA 17108
,
<XMf)NWFALTH OF pamsY!.VANIA
rouNl'Y OF CUMBmIAND
BRENDA LANDIS
File No. 05-3921
VS
CARROLL A. QUARLES, ET AL
.'
SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOO..tENTS OR THI NGS
FOR DI SOOVERY ~SUANT TO RULE 4009.22
.,.......
TO: CATHY CARPENTER, MD
(Name of Person or Entity) ,
Within twenty (20) days after service of this subpoena. you are ordered by the court to
~..... th f 11 0 ...---t tho ANY & ALL MEDICAL RECORDS, REPORTS,
..,........ce e 0 OWlng ""'^"-",..., S or lngs:
OFFICE NOTES, PROGRESS REPORTS, DOCTORS NOTES, ,CHARTS, SUMMARIES, TEST RESULTS,
EVALUATIONS. ETC.. PERTAINING TO BRENDA JANE LANDIS.
at CENTER CITY LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS, INC.
(Address)
You may deliver or mail legible oopies of the docunents or produce things requested by
this subpoena, together with the certificate of ClCJl1)1iance, to the party making this
request at the address listed above. You have the right to seek in advance the reasonable
oost of preparing the oopies or producing the things sousl'>t.
If you fail to produce the docunents or things required by this subpoena within twenty
(20) days after its service, the party serving this subpoena may seek a court order
ClCJl1)e 11 ing you to ClCJl1) 1 y with it.
llilS Sl.ePOENA WAS ISSUEO AT THE RE<U:ST OF TI-E FOLLONING PERSON:
NAtE: REGINA VOGELSONG, ESQUIRE
AOORESS: eCLR, Inc.
t. Ste..1920
SUPR&E 00lm' 10 #
ATTORNEY FOR: D
TEl.EPH)NE :
BY THE ~T:
Prothonotary/Clerk, Civil Oivision
DATE:
Seal of the Oourt
Deputy
(Eff 0 7/97)
o
c:
?::
""OG-.,
D;)[;'
4-c:
Z)__
(j),'
-/ .
r';:'
.....-
;:2
~
"
......
=
=
""
"'"
c::
G)
N
GO
~
:c
m:Il
-or;:;
:,,<:;)
t;ic.)
:1.~ '~1
\2 C)
3m
.-4
~
"'"
:J;:
(-:?
C"
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
BRENDA J. LANDIS
Plaintiff
vs.
CIVIL ACTION
CARROLL A. QUARLES, THEODORE
R. WEDDINGTON, ROAD LINK USA
EAST, L.L.C., and EASTERN AMERICAN
TRANSPORT & WAREHOUSING, INC.
Defendants
DOCKET NO.: 05-3921
ORDER TO SETTLE. DISCONTINUE AND END
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly mark the above-captioned matter settled, discontinued and ended upon
payment of your costs only.
McNEES WALLACE & NURICK
DATED:
B\;}d \ C> ~
~~
Jonathan H, Rudd, Esquire
Attorney for: Plaintiff
Identification No: S"6886
P. 0, Box 1166
100 Pine Street
Harrisburg, PAl 71 08
o
c::.
-q~'\
fl.'.l'
\....:.,.- . -~.
~~;;';.:
~
%
~
-v
N
--'
,~
\.....::::-
~~
~
~~
-o\Q
0'"(
?-2"q,
-'5:;2
-s.,::_~
:3>. (:)
:::-\
~
t;?
<.f\
\.D