HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-4221
JONATHAN G. RITCHEY, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff . CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
.
:
vs. CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
SHERRI M. RITCHEY : 05 -1~:(1 (7\ Ul L )fIl.WL
Defendant :
COMPLAINT/PETITION FOR CUSTODY
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT:
1. Plaintiff is Jonathan G. Ritchey, an adult individual who
currently resides at 118 Virginia Avenue, Carlisle, Cumberland
County, Pennsylvania, 17013.
2. Defendant is Sherri M. Ritchey, an adult individual who
currently resides at 120 Lebo Road, Carlisle, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania, 17013.
3. The Plaintiff and Defendant are husband and wife having
been married on June 13, 1998.
4. The parties are the natural parents of the minor child,
Hunter J. Ritchey, D.O.B. November 27, 1999 (hereinafter referred
to as "child").
5. Plaintiff seeks an award of primary or equally shared
physical and legal custody of the child.
6. The child who is the subject of the instant custody
petition has resided with Plaintiff and Defendant since birth.
7. During the past three years, the child has resided with
the following people at the following addresses:
Through July 2005
both parents -
120 Lebo Road
Carlisle, PA 17013
August 2005 to Present - Defendant
120 Lebo Road
Carlisle, PA 17013
8. The father of the child is Plaintiff who temporarily
resides at the address set forth above. He is married to
Defendant.
9. The mother of the child is Defendant who resides at the
address set forth above. She is married to the Plaintiff.
10. The Plaintiff is the natural father of the child.
Plaintiff currently resides with a male friend pending location of
an appropriate residence.
11. The Defendant is the natural mother of the child. It is
unknown with whom the Defendant resides.
12. A current temporary custody order exists in association
with a Protection from Abuse Action docketed to No. 05-3757 in the
Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
13. Plaintiff does not know of a person not a party to the
proceedings who has physical custody of the child or claims to
have custody or visitation rights with respect to the child.
14. An Order of Court is necessary to develop a routine
period of custody along with holiday schedules and terms which
address other important dates and transportation schedules for
custodial purposes.
15. The best interests and permanent welfare of the child
will be served by ordering that both parties share legal custody
3
of the child and directing that the parties share physical custody
of the child for the following reasons:
(A) Plaintiff has been extensively involved in the child's
life and the care of the child since the child's birth.
(B) Plaintiff has as much time available to participate in
the care of the child as the does the Defendant.
(C) The best interest of the child will be served by the
child spending substantial periods of time with each parent.
16. Plaintiff is capable of insuring a supportive and loving
environment for the child, and insuring that the child is properly cared
for, including making arrangements for day care, when necessary.
17. Each parent whose parental rights to the child have not been
terminated and the person who has physical custody of the child have
been named as parties to this action.
WHEREFORE, Jonathan G. Ritchey, Plaintiff herein, respectfully
requests that your Honorable Court enter a Custody Order which grants
Plaintiff and Defendant joint legal custody, and which grants Plaintiff
primary physical or shared custody with substantial periods of physical
custody to Defendant.
Andrew C. Sheely, Es
Attorney for Plainti
Pa. I.D. No. 62469
127 S. Market Street,
P.O. Box 95
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
(717) 697-7050
Date: August 17, 2005
4
. ,
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in this Complaint for Custody are
true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made
subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904 relating to unsworn
falsification to authorities.
Date: August /7 , 2005
G. Ritchey
~ -{4.
p --
-
~ll -
r.Il
k) C)
- ~ -,)
\"" r..I( F-
~ -c:..
~ 1::
w
o.v
f.
(")
;.-
\'.':';:
....'
cs~
';er'"
-r::.
'-'
C;'J
Q,
-'
~~~(G
-.J'"\'
:J 7~\q n
" -t
-""i:) (:0-")(')
~ :.;~ r\\
::;:.. -,
J:'- ~A
," 1Q
-- ."'"
c:::>
...,.",
(~,..,
(,-.
C.
'j~
>::~
-
~
JONATHAN G. RITCHEY
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
05-4221
CIVIL ACTION LAW
SHERRI M. RITCHEY
DEFENDANT
IN CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW,
Wednesday, An!!ust 24, 2005
, upon consideration of the attached Complaint,
it is hereby directed that parties and their respective counsel appear before Dawn S. Suuday, Esq. , the conciliator,
at 39 West Main Street, Mechanicsbur!!, PA 17055 on Wednesday, Seplember 21, 2005 at 11:30 AM
for a Pre-Hearing Custody Conference. At such conference, an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or
ifthis cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the court, and to enter into a temporary
order. All children age five or older may also be present at the conference. Failure to appear at the conference may
provide grounds for entry of a temporary or permanent order.
Tbe court hereby directs the parties to furnish any and all existing I'rotection from Abuse orders,
Special Relief orders, and Custody orders to tbe conciliator 48 hours prior to scbeduled bearin\!.
FOR THE COURT.
By: /s/
Dawn S. Sunday, Esq.
Custody Conciliator
~
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law to comply with the Americans
with Disabilites Act of 1990. For information about accessible facilities imd reasonable accommodations
available to disabled individuals having business before the court, please contact our office. All arrangements
must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business before the court. You must attend the scheduled
conference or hearing.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR A TTORNEY AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE AN ATTORNEY OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET
FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Cumberland County Bar Association
32 South Bedford Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
Telephone (717) 249-3 166
~$n> ~ ~,L.
'~ ;:?~. '~ Yr?_~:$
ii":... - ~k; y". -'t>.",
r ~ r -? ~ ~.~ --2>.-"",,,,,
,. '-It('''l\FPM
\/,if\V/\ i/\01_':I\;"~,:M:J1'\
. ,- '-", "-' ':+!"--j \1 IV
)JNfL-,: '.' , , .,
28 :8 lid S2 :Jnv SOOl
"'" ''''lid 3Hl:lO
,. ""':1(\"\ 1"'-, 1 \JI."i.
"" V"'"'~ "ll,J
^-.... ., :"". r{, t l,r\_Q,:1 :!
:1vU::J\-.' ~'"
JONATHAN G. RITCHEY
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNlY, PA
v.
: DOCKET NO.: 05-4221
SHERR! M. RITCHEY
Defendant
: CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
Please enter the appearance of the undersigned as counsel for Defendant, Sherri
Ritchey, in the above-captioned matter.
Respectfully submitted,
ABOM & KUTULAKIS, LLP
DATE
Kara W. Haggerty, E q e
36 S. Hanover Street
Carlisle, P A 17013
(717) 249-0900
IDNo.86914
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this
-+J
/6 day of~et"ref"Ila,>tL 2005, I, Kara W. Haggerty,
Esquire, of Abom & Kutulakis, L.L.P, hereby certify that I did serve a true and correct
copy of the foregoing document by depositing, or causing to be deposited, same in the
United States Mail, First-class mail, postage prepaid addressed to the following:
Andrew C. Sheely, Esquire
127 S. Market Street
P.O. Box 95
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
Respectfully submitted,
MOM & KUTULAKIS, L.L.P.
Kara W. Haggerty (
ID No. 86914
36 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, P A 17013
(717) 249-0900
Attorney for Defendant
(") .......
= 0
c = "
s: en
-00:; en :r:n
f1''1rr J"T1
Z-r -0 m,.....
zt~ :g.~
en ,r: C7\
_.-;e 0
,-'le' =rt-l
'< .
)>C -0 cs,j
~(-~ ::z: -~()
)>c r:-? Om
-;r- 35
~ '"
J:""' -<
JONATHAN G. RITCHEY
Plaintiff
: RECEIVE!')
OCT 2 I: 2005
BY: N\~(..
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
l\
.
vs.
05-4221
CIVIL ACTION LAW
SHERRI M. RITCHEY
Defendant
IN CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this '2. '}- day of Oc:.h.lo<' , 2005, upon
consideration of the attached Custody Conciliation Report, it is ordered and directed as follows:
1. The provisions of this Order shall supercede and take precedence over the custody provisions
set forth in the Protection from Abuse Order entered on August 10,2005.
2. The Father, Jonathan G. Ritchey, and the Mother, Sherri M. Ritchey, shall have shared legal
custody of Hunter J. Ritchey, born November 27, 1999. Each parent shall have an equal right, to be
exercised jointly with the other parent, to make all major non-emergency decisions affecting the
Child's general well-being including, but not limited to, all decisions regarding his health, education
and religion. Pursuant to the tenns of this paragraph each parent shall be entitled to all records and
infonnation pertaining to the Child including, but not limited to, school and medical records and
infonnation.
3. The Mother shall have primary physical custody ofthe Child.
4. The Father shall have partial physical custody of the Child every weekend, beginning
October 22, 2005, alternating between Saturday and Sunday from 10:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. In
addition, the Father shall have custody of the Child every week on Monday, Wednesday and Friday
when the Father shall pick up the Child after school until 7:45 p.m. on Monday and Wednesday and
until 8:30 p.m. on Friday.
5. In 2005, the Father shall have custody ofthe Child on Thanksgiving Day from 9:00 a.m.
until 3:00 p.m. and on the Friday following Thanksgiving for his regular period of custody, for which
the Father shall pick up the Child at the Mother's residence before 4:30 p.m. and have custody of the
Child until 8:30 p.m.
6. In 2005, the Father shall have custody ofthe Child on Christmas Day from 12:00 noon until
7:00 p.m. and the Mother shall have custody ofthe Child for the remainder of Christmas.
7. Unless otherwise specified in this Order, the parties shall exchange custody of the Child at
Sheetz on Route 11 and Route 465 in Plainfield.
;.,J
("-\
8. The Father shall be entitled to have reasonable telephone contact with the Child and shall be
permitted to contact the Mother by telephone for the sole purpose of discussing the custody
arrangements or other related issues concerning the Child. Telephone conversations between the
Father and the Mother shan be restricted to issues concerning the Child.
9. This Order is entered pursuant to an agreement of the parties at a custody conciliation
conference. The parties may modify the provisions of this Order by mutual consent in writing. In the
absence of mutual consent in writing, the terms of this Order shan control.
BY THE COURT,
/1J
J.
J
JONATHAN G. RITCHEY
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs.
05-4221
CIVIL ACTION LAW
SHERRI M. RITCHEY
Defendant
IN CUSTODY
Prior Judge: Kevin A. Hess
CUSTODY CONCILIATION SUMMARY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CUMBERLAND COUNTY RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 1915.3-8, the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following report:
1. The pertinent information concerning the Child who is the subject of this litigation is as
follows:
NAME
DATE OF BIRTH
CURRENTLY IN CUSTODY OF
Hunter J. Ritchey
November 27,1999
Mother
2. A conciliation conference was held on October 20, 2005, with the following individuals in
attendance: The Father, Jonathan G. Ritchie, with his counsel, Andrew C. Sheely, Esquire, and the
Mother, Sherri M. Ritchey, with her counsel, Kara W. Haggerty, Esquire and her assistant, Kathleen
Engle.
3. The parties agreed to entry of an Order in the form as attached.
tJ r..:h:;j;, /' c.:J ~ .;:t::oS
Date
Q...~
Dawn S. Sunday, Esquire
Custody Conciliator