The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About87-0042PETER P. ROPER and MARY ROPER, husband and wife, Plaintiffs Ve JOSEPH K. SEIDLE, JR., DAVID R. SLOCUM, and W. WENNER SMITH, as individuals, and trading as SEIDLE, SLOCUM & SMITH, formerly a Pennsylvania general partnership, Defendants : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION--LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED No. ~-~$6 PRAECIPE FOR WRITS OF SUMMONS TO: Lawrence E. Welker, Prothonotary Please issue Writs of Summons to the Defendants identified above to commence an action at law. For service purposes, the business addresses of the Defendants are as follows: Joseph K. Seidle, Jr. 139 E. Baltimore Pike Media, PA 19063 215-748-6670 David R. Slocum Plaza 16 East Lancaster Avenue Ardmore, PA 19003 215-642-2813 W. Wenner Smith Bell of Pennsylvania llth Floor - Real Estate Department One Parkway Philadelphia, PA 19102 215-466-9900 Dated: January 8, 1987 KEEFER, WOOD, ALLEN & RAHAL Charles Wj Rub~al~II Pamela L. Shipman 210 Walnut Street P. O. Box 11963 Harrisburg, PA 17108-1963 717-255-8010 and 255-8033 Attorneys for Plaintiffs -2- Peter P.Roper and Mary Roper husband and wife -vs- Joseph K. Seidle Jr. David R. Solcum W. Wenner Smith In the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania No. 42 Civil 1987 Summons in Civil Action Law William K. Beck, Sheriff, who beingduly sworn according to law, says he m~de diligent search and inquiry for one of the within named defendants to wit: Joseph K. Seidle Jr., but was unable to locate him in his bailiwick. He therefore deputized the sheriff of Delaware County to serve the within Summons in Civil Action Law according to law. Delaware County return: Summoned: Joseph K. Seidle Jr., the within named defendant, 1-28-87 at 10:26 A.M. by handing true and attested copy of the within Complaint for him to Doris L. Schrader, secr., the person in charge personally at 139 E.Balt. Pike, Media, Pa. So answers: Joseph Battle Sheriff Delaware County, Pennsylvania Delaware County return is hereto attached. William K. Beck, Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law,say~ he made diligent search and inquiry for one of the within naned defendants to wit: David R. Solcum, but was unable to locate him in his bailiwick. He therefore deputized the Sheriff of Montgomery County to serve the within Summons accoding to law. MONTGOMERY COUNTY RETURN: See attached .Return from Montgomery County So answers: Francos P. Lilly Sheriff Montgomery County Montgomery County retur is hereto attached. William K. Beck, Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law, says he made diligent search and inquiry for the within named defendant to wit: W.Wenner Smith, but was unable to locate him in his bailiwick. He therefore deputized the Sheriff of Philadelphia County to serve the within Summons according to law. PHILADELPHIA County Return: Served and made known unto Bellof Pa Defendant Company by handing a true attested copy of the within Sumons issued in the above matter on 1-21-87 at 12:39 o'clock P.M.E.S.T. at one Parkway in the County of Philadelphia, State of Pennsylvania to Ms McNulty agent or person for the time being in charge of defendants office or usal place of abode. So answers: Ralph Passio, Sheriffof Philadelphia County,Pennsylvania Philadelphia Return is hereto attached. Sheriff's Costs: Docketing 22.00 Out of County 15.00 Delaware County 24.50 Montgomery County 20.00 Philadelphia County 59.00 Surcharge 6.00 $ 146.50 pd. by' atty 2-11-87 So answers: j~~a~'~. Beck, Sheriff Sworn and Subscribed to Before Me This/~ day of ~J SHERIFF'S RETURN SUMMONED: Joseph K. Seidle Jr., the within named defendant, 1-28-87 at 10:26 a.m. by handinga true and attested copy of the within complaint for him to Doris L. Schrader, sect., the person at the time being in charge personally at 139 E. Bait. Pike, Media, Pa SO ANSWERS Sworn ,~t'~lr.~ubscrib.?d~t~fore me this MY CCL;~,]~SSIO[, EXPiR:S JUNE 19, 1989 dmd SHERIFF DEPUTY SHERIFF LEBO In The C~urt ~ C~mmon P~eas o~~ CumbeHcmd C~unty, Penn~yJvcmic: peter P. Roper and Mary Roper h/w %~. Joseph K. Seidle Jr. 42 ~o. Civil 87 .~w, J anua rv In The Caurt =~ C:mrnon P~ec:s of Cumberk:nd C=untT, Penn=¥{vc:nic: Peter P. Roper and Mary Roper h/w David R. Slocum ~o. 42 Civil ,3 87 January 9 Montgomery ..~,,::Iavit oi: Set-ritz COSTS SHERIFF'S RETURN COST $ DEFENDANT DOCUMENT SERVED INDIVIDUAL SERVED RELATIONSHIP TO DEFENDANT DATE AND PREVAILING TIME LOCATION PROTHONOTARY #: David R. Summons P.S. Slocum 1/13/87 0950 hours Plaza 16, E. Lancaster Ardmore Ave. THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WAS SERVED ON THE DEFENDANT AS PER INFORMATION LISTED ABOVE IN THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. AFFIRMED AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY. January 14, 1987 -"7 NOTARY PUBLIC SO ANSWERS, BY FRANK P. LALLEY SHER~F OF MONTGOM~ERY COUNTY "'~ ~" DEP~ SHERIFF SD Form 036-1 JUNE 86 S. HERII=F'S RETURN - SUMMONS/COMPlAiNT NO. SEIqVED AND MADE KNOWN TO ~~~~ [-]Defendant , ~ ~ ~efendant Comlxmy by handing a true and attested copy of the within Summons/Complaint, ~sued in the above captioned matter on / -- ~*~ / ,19 ~;~ ~ ,at /Z ~o'clock,. /~ M.,(~/D.S.T. , in the County of Philadelphia, ~ (1) the aforesaid defen"dant, personally; [] (2) an adult member of the family of said defendant, with whom said defendant resides, who stated that his/her relationship to said defendant is that of ; (3) an adult person in charge of defendant's residence; the said adult person having refused, upon re- quest, to give his/her name and relationship to said defendant; (4) the manager/clerk of the place of lodging in which said defendant resides; agent or person for the time being in charge of defendant's office or usual place of business. the and officer of said defendant Company; So Answers, RA/I::)H C. I=)A$SIO, III, '$)?eriff By: 12-38 (Rev. *~/84) ~n T~e C,:urt c~ C~mm,:n P]e~.s o~: Cumberland C~untT', PennsyJvc:nic: Peter P. Roper and Mary W. Wenner Smith Rope No. __ )·,, Civil ,a 87 .-~%TID A %T7 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania county of Cumberland PETER P. ROPER and MARY ROPER, husband & wife VS, JOSEPH K. SEIDLE, JR. 139 East Baltimore Pike Media, PA 19063 DAVID R. SLOCUM Plaza 16 East Lancaster Ave Ardmore, PA 19003 W. WENNER SMITH, Bell of PA-11th Floor Real Estate Dept., One Parkway Philadelphia, PA 19102 as individuals, and trading as SEIDLE, SLOCUM & SMITH, formerly a PA general partnership Court of Common Pleas No. 42 CIVIL 198..7..' In CIVIL ACTION - LAW To Joseph K. Seidle, Jr., David R. Slocum, and W. Wenner Smith You are hereby notified that Peter P. Roper and Mary Roper, husband and wife the Plaintiff has commenced an action in Summons - Civil Action - Law against you which you are required to defend or a default judgment may be entered against you. (SEAL) Date January 8, 19 87 Lawrence E. Welker Prothonotary By . ~ ' ~' ~ .... ............ Deputy PETER P. ROPER and MARY ROPER, husband and wife, Plaintiffs Ve JOSEPH K. SEIDLE, JR., DAVID R. SLOCUM, and W. WENNER SMITH, as individuals, and trading as SEIDLE, SLOCUM & SMITH, formerly a Pennsylvania general partnership, Defendants : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION--LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED No. 42 S 1987 PRAECIPE TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Please mark the above action settled and discontinued with prejudice. KEEFER, WOOD, ALLEN & RAHAL Dated: December 2, 1988 By L. Grose, Esquire I.D. #31006 210 Walnut Street P. O. Box 11963 Harrisburg, PA 17108-1963 717-255-8052 Attorneys for Plaintiffs No. 42 ~CIVIL 19 87 PETER P. ROPER and MARY ROPER, Husband & wife VS. ~OSEPH K. SEIDLE, JR., DAVID R. SLOCUM, and W. WENNER SMITH, as individuals, and trading as SEIDLE, SLOCUM & SMITH, formerly a PA general partnership Summons in CIVIL ACTION - LAW KEEFER, WOOD, ALLEN & RAHAL Attorney 210 Walnut Street, PO Box 11963 Harrisburg, PA 17108-1963