HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-1112HEATHER A. SMITH,
Plaintiff
DOUGLAS G. SMITH,
Defendant
· IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
· CIVIL ACTION - LAW
· IN DIVORCE AND CUSTODY
NOTICE TO DEFEND AND CLAIM RIGHTS
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth
in the following pages, you must take prompt action. You are warned that if you fail to do so,
the case may proceed without you and a decree of divorce or annulment may be entered
against you by the court. A judgment may also be entered against you for any other claim or
relief requested in these papers by the plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other
rights important to you, including custody or visitation of your children.
When the ground for the divorce is indignities or irretrievable breakdown of the
marriage, you may request marriage counseling. A list of marriage counselors is available in
the Office of the Prothonotary at the Cumberland County Court House, 1 Courthouse Square,
Carlisle, PA 17013.
IF YOU DO NOT FILE A CLAIM FOR ALIMONY, DIVISION OF PROPERTY,
LAWYER'S FEES OR EXPENSES BEFORE A DIVORCE OR ANNULMENT IS GRANTED,
YOU MAY LOSE THE RIGHT TO CLAIM ANY OF THEM.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU
DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
The Cumberland County Lawyer Referral Service
Cumberland County Bar Association
2 Liberty Avenue, Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 249-3166 or (800) 990-9108
tt0rney for Plaint~
HEATHER A. SMITH,
Plaintiff
DOUGLAS G. SMITH,
Defendant
· IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN DIVORCE AND CUSTODY
ORDER OFCOURT
AND NOW, upon consideration of the attached Complaint, it is hereby directed that
the parties and their respective counsel appear before
Custody Conference Officer, on the day of
at
for a Pre-Hearing Custody
Conference. At such Conference, an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or if
this cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the Court, and to
enter into a Temporary Order. All children age five or older may, at the request of either
attorney or party, be present at the Conference. Failure to appear at the Conference may
provide grounds for the entry of a temporary or permanent Order.
FOR THE COURT,
Date of
Order:
By:
Conference Officer
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE· IF
YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO
OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT
WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
The Cumberland County Lawyer Referral Service
Cumberland County Bar Association
2 Liberty Avenue, Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 249-3166 or (800) 990-9108
HEATHER A. SMITH,
Plaintiff
DOUGLAS G. SMITH,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
·
IN DIVORCE AND CUSTODY
COMPLAINT IN DIVORCE AND CUSTODY
COUNT I - DIVORCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3301(c)
OF THE DIVORCE CODF
1. Plaintiff is Heather Smith, an adult individual who is sui juris and
resides at 22 Crescent Drive, Apartment 1, New Cumberland, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant is Douglas Smith, an adult individual who is sui juris and
resides at 22 Crescent Drive, Apartment 1, New Cumberland, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania. The present whereabouts of the Defendant, to the knowledge of the
Plaintiff, is the same.
3. Both Plaintiff and Defendant have been bona fide residents in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for at least six (6) months immediately previous to the
filing of this Complaint.
4. The Plaintiff and Defendant were married on November 26, 1994 in
New Cumberland, Pennsylvania.
5. There have been no prior actions of divorce or for annulment
between the parties.
6. Plaintiff has been advised of the availability of counseling and the
right to request that the Court require the parties to participate in counseling.
7. The Defendant is not a member of the Armed Services of the United
States or any of its Allies.
8. The Plaintiff avers that the ground on which the action is based is
that the marriage is irretrievably broken.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests the Court to enter a Decree:
A. Dissolving the mardage between Plaintiff and Defendant;
B. For such further relief as the Court may determine equitable and just.
10.
Name
Taylor Smith
Ashton Smith
COUNT II - CUSTODY
Paragraphs 1-8 are incorporated herein by reference.
Plaintiff seeks custody of the following children:
Present Residence
22 Crescent Drive
New Cumberland, PA,
22 Crescent Drive
New Cumberland, pA,
Date of Birth
March 6, 1996
December 23, 1998
The children were born in wedlock.
The children are presently in the custody of Heather Smith, who resides at
22 Crescent Drive, New Cumberland, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
11. During the past five years,
following persons and at the following addresses:
.All Persons
Heather Smith
Douglas Smith
Heather Smith
Douglas Smith
Carla Jumik
Frank Jurcik
Stephanie Jumik
Francis Jurcik
All Addresses
22 Crescent Drive
New Cumberland, PA
22 Crescent Drive
New Cumberland, PA
the children have resided with the
Dates
4/01 - Present
10100.4101
Heather Smith
Douglas Smith
12.
413 Hummel Avenue
Lemoyne, PA
6/98 - 10/00
The mother of the children is Heather Smith, Who resides at 22
Crescent Drive, New Cumberland, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
She is married to Defendant.
13. The father of the children is Douglas Smith, who resides at 22
Crescent Drive, New Cumberland, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
He is married to the Plaintiff.
14. The relationship of Plaintiff to the children is that of natural mother.
The Plaintiff currently resides with the following persons:
Name _Relationship
Douglas Smith Husband
Taylor Smith Daughter
Ashton Smith Daughter
15. The relationship of Defendant to the children is that of natural father.
The Defendant currently resides with the following persons:
Name
Heather Smith
Taylor Smith
Ashton Smith
Wife
Daughter
Daughter
16. Plaintiff has not participated as a party or witness, or in another
capacity, in other litigation concerning the custody of the children in this or another court.
Plaintiff has no information of a custody proceeding concerning the children
pending in a court of this Commonwealth.
Plaintiff does not know of a person not a party to the proceedings who has
physical custody of the children or claims to have custody or visitation rights with respect
to the children.
17. The best interest and permanent welfare of the children will be
served by granting the relief requested because:
a). Plaintiff has been the primary caregiver of the children since their
births;
b). Plaintiff is better able to care for the children physically and mentally;
c). Plaintiff is better able to care for the emotional needs of the children;
d). Plaintiff offers a more stable physical environment for the children;
and
e).
Plaintiff and the children have formed a stronger bond with each
other.
18. Each parent whose parental rights to the children have not been
terminated and the person who has physical custody of the children have been named as
parties to this action.
children.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests the court to grant her custody of the
Respectfully submitted,
TUCKER ARENSBERG & SWARTZ
By: ~2,~Z~/A../ ~
/ iS.-~ .sa~ 0M~2S3ei{;I h m a ~) E squire
111 North Front Street
P.O. Box 889
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0889
(717) 234-4121
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, Heather Smith, acknowledge that the facts stated in the
foregoing document are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and
belief.
I understand that any false statements herein are made subject to the
penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Cumberland
~ RECORD OF ~
I D'VAtO~RCE OR ANNULMENTI
~TATE ~
""'~ ~ . HU-~3AND
~G. Smith
22 Crescent Dr. -- .... ~.-~.~ -'~~_~ ~ m~ II 12 71
~. ~ ....... , ~ ~. 1, New Cu~erlan~
~' 1 J -'-~ _ ~ ~~ emm ~ennsylvania
~ ~ ~ ~ ~C~puter Tech.
~ao ~~ ~ ~ 19 74
22 Crescent Dr , Apt. 1, New Cu
~z ~ -~~, ~ew Cu~erland, Cu~er~ _
~ ~ ~ omer Service
~ ~~~~
,,.:~ ~ ~ ,
HEATHER A. SMITH,
Plaintiff
DOUGLAS G. SMITH,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
· CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 02-1112 Civil Term
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: IN DIVORCE AND CUSTODY
PRAECIPE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Kindly withdraw my appearance for Plaintiff, Heather Smith, in the above-captioned
action.
TUCKER ARENSBERG & SWARTZ
111 North Front Street
P.O. Box 889
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Please enter my appearance on behalf of the Plaintiff, Elizabeth Hoffman, in the
above-captioned matter.
Date: ¢~::~//~<:~_....~
By:
Harrisburg, PA 17'101
HEATHER A. SMITH
Plaintiff
VS
DOUGLAS G. SMITH,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 02-1112 CIVIL TERM
CIVIL ACTION-LAW
IN DIVORCE AND CUSTODY
PRAECIPE
Would you kindly withdraw Count II (Custody) in the above captioned
matter.
Eliz¢:th A. Hoffman ff~'
HEATHER A. SMITH,
Plaintiff
DOUGLAS G. SMITH,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 02-1112 CIVIL TERM
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN DIVORCE
AFFIDAVIT
I, Douglas G. Smith, do hereby acknowledge that I received via the mail the Complaint in
Divorce and Custody in the above-captioned case on or about March 8, 2002.
I verify that the information provided in this Affidavit is true and correct to the best of
my knowledge, information, and belief. I understand that false statements herein are made
subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. §4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date: I ~/Ib~[05
Doug~ G. Smith
Elizabeth A. Hoffman, Esquire
106 Walnut Street
Harrisburg, PA 17011
(717) 236-2956
HEATHER A. SMITH,
Plaintiff
DOUGLAS G. SMITH,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 02-1112 CIVIL TERM
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN DIVORCE
AFFIDAVIT OF CONSENT
1. A complaint in divorce under Section 3301(c) of the Divorce Code was filed on
March 5, 2002
2. The marriage of plaintiff and defendant is irretrievably broken, and ninety days have
elapsed from the date of filing the complaint.
3. I consent to the entry of a final decree of divorce after service of notice of intention to
request entry of the decree.
I verify that the statements made in this affidavit are true and correct. I understand that
false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. §4904 relating to
unswom falsification to authorities.
Date: ooa
Heather A. Smith
Elizabeth A. Hoffman, Esquire
106 Walnut Street
Harrisburg, PA 17011
(717) 236-2956
HEATHER A. SMITH,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v. NO. 02-1112 CIVIL TERM
DOUGLAS G. SMITH,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN DIVORCE
WAIVER OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO
REQUEST ENTRY OF A DIVORCE DECREF
UNDER §3301(c) OF THE DIVORCE CODF
1. I consent to the entry of a final decree of divorce without notice.
2. I understand that I may lose rights concerning alimony, division of property, lawyer's
fees or expenses if I do not claim them before a divorce is granted.
3. I understand that I will not be divorced until a divorce decree is entered by the Court
and that a copy of the decree will be sent to me immediately after it is filed with the
prothonotary.
I verify that the statements made in this affidavit are true and correct. I understand that
false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. §4904 relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
/ H~ather A. Smith
SS# / 70
Elizabeth A. Hoffman, Esquire
106 Walnut Street
Harrisburg, PA 17011
(717) 236-2956
HEATHER A. SMITH,
Plaintiff
V.
DOUGLAS G. SMITH, Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 02-1112 CIVIL TERM
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN DIVORCE
AFFIDAVIT OF CONSENT
1. A complaint in divorce under Section 3301(c) of the Divorce Code was filed on
March 5, 2002
2. The marriage of plaintiff and defendant is irretrievably broken, and ninety days have
elapsed from the date of filing the complaint.
3. I consent to the entry of a final decree of divorce after service of notice of intention to
request entry of the decree.
I verify that the statements made in this affidavit are true, and correct. I understand that
false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. {}4904 relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date:
Dou~/',~s G. Smith
ss#
Elizabeth A. Hoffman, Esquire
106 Walnut Street
Harrisburg, PA 17011
(717) 236-2956
HEATHER A. SMITH,
Plaintiff
V.
DOUGLAS (3. SMITH, Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 02-1112 CIVIL TERM
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN DIVORCE
WAIVER OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO
REQUEST ENTRY OF A DIVORCE DECREF
UNDER §3301(c) OF THE DIVORCE CODF
1. I consent to the entry of a final decree of divome without notice.
2. I understand that I may lose rights concerning alimony, division of property, lawyer's
fees or expenses if I do not claim them before a divome is granted.
3. I understand that I will not be divorced until a divorce decree is entered by the Court
and that a copy of the decree will be sent to me immediately after it is filed with the
prothonotary.
I verify that the statements made in this affidavit are true and correct. I understand that
false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. {}4904 relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date:
/ /~/Douglas G. Smith
H,EATHER A. SMITH
Plaintiff
DOUGLAS G. ,SMITH
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, I:~NNSYLVANIA
:NO, 02-1112 CTVTL TERM
:
: CIVIL ACTION-DiVORCE
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
PRAECIPE TO TRANSMIT RECORr)
Transmit the record, together with the following information, to the Court for entry of a divorce
decree.
Code.
1. Ground for divorce: Irretrievable breakdown under Section 3301 (c) of the Divorce
2. Date and manner of service of the Complaint:
3. Date of Execution of Affidavit of Consent required by Section 3301(c) of the Divorce
Code by Plaintiff- 11/17/03 ; by Defendant-. 11/16/03
4. Related claims pending: NONE
5. (Complete either (a) or (b)
(a) Date and manner of service of the Notice of Intention to File Praecipe to
Transmit record, a copy of which is attached:
(b) Date Plaintiff's Waiver of Notice in Section 3301(c) was filed in the
12/15/03
Prothonotary:
Prothonotary:
blarch 8, 2002-Personal Service
Respectfully submitted:
Date of Defendant's Waiver of Notice in S.ct~on'a ' 3301(c) was filed in the
12/15/03
IN THE COURT OF COMMON
HEATHER A. SMITH
Plaintiff
VERSUS
DOUGLAS G. SMITH
Defendant
Of CUMBERLAND COUNTY
STATE OF ~%, PENNA.
NO.
PLEAS
02-1112 CIVIL TERM
DECREE IN
DIVORCE
AND NOW,
~J~' /~/' , ~., IT iS ORDERED AND
DeCReED THAT HEATHER A. SMITH
DOUGLAS G. SMITH
AND
,PLAINTIFF,
,DEFENDANT,
ARE DIVORCED FROM THE BONDS OF MATRIMONY.
THE COURT RETAINS JurIsDICTION OF THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS WHICH HAVE
BEEN RAISED OF RECORD IN THIS ACTION FOR WHICH A FINAL ORDER HAS NOT
Yet BEEN ENTERED; NONE
PROTHONOTARY
NOTICE TO PLEAD
TO: Plaintiffs
You are hereby notified to plead to the enclosed
New Matter within twenty (20) days from
service hereof or a default judgment
may be entered against you.
DUANE MORRIS LLP
By: Peter Jason
Identification No. 55473
By: Michael Zullo
Identification No. 91827
One Liberty Place
Philadelphia, PA 19103-7396
(215) 979-1174/1178
SHARON WOLF
Plaintiff,
AMERICAN GENERAL ASSURANCE
COMPANY
Respondent.
Attorneys for Defendant
Peter Jason, Esquire
Michael Zullo, Esquire
Attorneys tbr Defendant
American General Assurance Company
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY
NO. 04-1112 CIVIL TERM
:
ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT AND NEW MATTER
American General Assurance Company ("AGAC"), by and through its attorneys, Duane
Morris LLP, hereby answers plaintiff's amended complaint as follows:
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted in part. Denied in part. It is adrnitted only that AGAC is a corporation
with a place of business located at 1000 Woodfield Road, Schaumburg, Illinois 60173-4793, and
that AGAC does business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It is denied that AGAC is a
"Member" of American International Group, Inc.
3. Admitted in part. Denied in part. It is admitted only that on or about July 18,
2002, plaintiff and Richard Wolf signed an application for credit life insurance with AGAC and
that a certificate of insurance no. 0107063992, with an effective date of July 18, 2002, was
issued to them. It is denied that copies of the application or certificate of insurance were attached
to the copy of the amended complaint that was sent to AGAC.
4. Denied as stated. It is admitted only that as of August 14, 2002, the written
certificate of insurance number 0107063992 had been issued lo plaintiff and Richard Wolf, to
which document AGAC refers for a statement of its terms and conditions.
5. At[er reasonable investigation, AGAC is without knowledge or information
sufficient to form a belief as to the troth of the averments of this paragraph; they are, therefore
deemed to be denied.
6. After reasonable investigation, AGAC is without knowledge or information
sufficient to form a belief as to the troth of the averments of this paragraph; they are, therefore
deemed to be denied.
7. Al[er reasonable investigation, AGAC is without knowledge or information
sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the averments of this paragraph; they are, therefore
deemed to be denied, except that AGAC admits that Richard Wolf died on or about July 23,
2003.
PH2\820971.I 2
8. Admitted in part and denied in part. It is admitted that a claim was submitted to
AGAC for death benefits and that AGAC denied the claim, based upon its good faith belief that
there had been a material representation in the application for coverage, concerning Richard
Wolf's health history. It is denied that a copy of AGAC's denial letter was attached to the copy
of the amended complaint that was sent to AGAC.
9. Denied. AGAC's denial of the claim for benefits was based upon its good faith
belief that plaintiff was not entitled to benefits.
10. The averments of this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which no
responsive pleading is required; they are, therefore, deemed to be denied. To the extent that this
paragraph contains factual allegations, such allegations are denied and deemed at issue pursuant
to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1029(e).
11. Denied. AGAC promptly and diligently investigated plaintiff's claim.
12. Denied. At all times relevant hereto, AGAC acted in good faith and administered
plaintiff's claim in good faith.
13. Denied. AGAC explained the basis of its denial of plaintiff's claim, specifically
its understanding based upon letters from treating physicians, that the application contained
material representations concerning Richard Wolf's health history.
14. The averments of this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which no
responsive pleading is required; they are, therefore, deemed to be denied. To the extent that this
paragraph contains factual allegations, such allegations are denied and deemed at issue pursuant
to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1029(e).
15. The averments of this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which no
responsive pleading is required; they are, therefore, deemed to be denied. To the extent that this
paragraph contains factual allegations, such allegations are denied and deemed at issue pursuant
to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1029(e).
16. The averments of this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which no
responsive pleading is required; they are, therefore, deemed to be denied. To the extent that this
paragraph contains factual allegations, such allegations are denied and deemed at issue pursuant
to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1029(e).
17. The averments of this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which no
responsive pleading is required; they are, therefore, deemed to be denied. To the extent that this
paragraph contains factual allegations, such allegations are denied and deemed at issue pursuant
to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1029(e).
18. Denied.
19. The averments of this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which no
responsive pleading is required; they are, therefore, deemed to be denied. To the extent that this
paragraph contains factual allegations, such allegations are denied and deemed at issue pursuant
to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1029(e).
NEW MATTER
1. Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
2. Plaintiff's complaint is or may be barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
3. Plaintiff's amended complaint is or may be bmrred by the doctrine of laches.
PH2\820971.1 4
WHEREFORE, AGAC demands judgment in its favor and against plaintiff, dismissing
the amended complaint with prejudice and awarding to defendant its costs and expenses of this
action, including reasonable attorney's fees as allowed by Imv, and such other and further relief
as the Court may deem just and proper.
Respectfully submitted,
DUANE MORRIS LLP
Peter Jason
I.D. No. 55473
Michael Zullo
I.D. No. 91827
One Liberty Place
Philadelphia, PA 19103-7396
(215) 979-1174
Attorneys for Defendant
PH2~820971.1 5
VERIFICATION
I, Jennifer Macom, do hereby verify that I am the Manager of the Credit Claims
Department for American General Assurance Company and that the facts set forth in the
foregoing Answer and New Matter are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information
and belief. I make this Verification subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. §4904 relating to
unswom falsification to authorities.
J(.~dnnifer Maim
PH2\821404. I
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Michael S. Zullo, Esq., hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above Answer
and New Matter to Plaintiff's Complaint was served this 13~' Day of October, 2004, via first
class mail upon the following:
William P. Douglas, Esquire
27 W. High Street
PO Box 261
Carlisle, PA 17013-02611
Michael S. Zullo, Esq.