HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-0617
~.
SANDRA DEE NEELY,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff
vs.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 06- (,/7
CIVIL TERM
DONALD EDWARD SWARTZ, JR,
Defendant
CUSTODY
COMPLAINT FOR CUSTODY
L Plaintiff is Sandra Dee Neely, hereinafter referred to as Mother. Mother's mailing
address is Post Office Box 1114, Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17013.
2. Defendant is Donald Edward Swartz, Jr., hereinafter referred to Father. Father resides
at 350 West King Street, Chambersburg, Franklin County, Pennsylvania 17201-1520.
3. Mother seeks primary physical custody of the minor children:
Name
Shannon Swartz
Present Residence
250 W. King Street
Chambersburg, P A
Age
5/28/1993 DOB 12 years old
Emily Swartz
P.O. Box 1114
Carlisle, P A
8/20/1995 DOB 10 years old
The children, Shannon and Emily, were born out of wedlock.
The children were in the custody of Mother since the parties separated about 7 years ago.
Since January 22,2006, Father has refused to return Shannon to Mother's custody and he
continues to retain custody of Shannon. Emily is still in Mother's custody.
During her lifetime, Shannon has resided with the following persons and at the following
addresses:
Name
Address
Date
Sandra Neely
Donald Swartz, Jr
59 North East Street
Carlisle, P A
birth - 8/95
Sandra Neely
Donald Swartz, Jr.
Emily Swartz
59 North East Street
Carlisle, P A
8/95-9/95
Sandra Neely
Donald Swartz, Jr.
Emily Swartz
Sandra Neely
Donald Swartz, Jr.
Emily Swartz
Sandra Neely
Emily Swartz
Sandra Neely
Chip Nestor
Emily Swartz
Donald Swartz, Jr.
Christine Swartz
Autum Fife
144 W. Church Street
Carlisle, P A
9/95 ~ 10/98
3090 Spring Road
Carlisle, P A
1 0/98 ~ early 1999
3090 Spring Road
Carlisle, P A
early 1999 - 7/99
3090 Spring Road
Carlisle, P A
7 /99 ~ 1/22/06
350 W. King Street
Chambers burg, P A
1/22/06 ~ present
During her lifetime, Emily, has resided with the following persons and at the following
addresses:
Name
Sandra Neely
Donald Swartz, Jr.
Shannon Swartz
Sandra Neely
Donald Swartz, Jr.
Shannon Swartz
Sandra Neely
Donald Swartz, Jr.
Shannon Swartz
Sandra Neely
Shannon Swartz
Sandra Neely
Chip Nestor
Shannon Swartz
Sandra Neely
Chip Nestor
Address
59 North East Street
Carlisle, P A
Date
birth - 9/95
144 W. Church Street
Carlisle, P A
9/95 ~ 10/98
3090 Spring Road
Carlisle, P A
10/98 ~ early 1999
3090 Spring Road
Carlisle, P A
early 1999 - 7/99
3090 Spring Road
Carlisle, PA
7/99 - 1/22/06
3090 Spring Road
Carlisle, P A
1/22/06 - present
-"
5. Mother currently resides with the following persons:
Name Relationship
Chip Nestor Boyfriend
Emily Swartz Daughter with Father
6. Father lives with the following persons:
Name
Christine Swartz
Autum Fife
Shannon Swartz
Relationship
Wife
Wife's daughter - prior relationship
Daughter with Mother
7. Mother has not participated as a party or witness, or in another capacity, in other
custody litigation concerning the custody of the children in this or another court.
7. Mother has no information of a custody proceeding concerning the children pending
in a court ofthis Commonwealth.
8. Mother does not know of a person not a party to the proceedings who has physical
custody of the children or claims to have custody or visitation rights with respect to the children.
9. The best interest and permanent welfare of the children will be served by granting the
relief requested for reasons including, but not limited to the following:
a. Since the children were born, Mother has provided for the children's emotional,
physical, educational, financial and medical needs.
b. Since the children were born, Mother has been the parent primarily responsible
for their daily care and because Father did not have a driver's license during the
course of their relationship, Mother had to be the parent primarily responsible for
dealing with school activities, medical appointments, WIC appointments and
other such activities.
c. Mother has a stable home environment that is safe and appropriate for the daily
care of the children and has been the primary custodian and caretaker since the
parties separated about seven (7) years ago.
d. Mother is willing to communicate with and work cooperatively with Father to co-
parent the children and will encourage father/daughter relationships with both
children.
10. Father has not acted in the children's best interests in ways including but not limited
to the following:
a. Father took Shannon for a visit the weekend of January 20-January 22, 2006. On
January 22, 2006, Father advised Mother that he was not returning Shannon to
Mother's home.
b. Since January 22, 2006, Father has denied Mother all contact with Shannon.
c. On January 25, 2006, without Mother's consent, Father enrolled Shannon for
school in Chambersburg.
d. Father has demonstrated no concern for the well-being of the children in that he
has separated the girls without consideration of the fact that they have never been
raised apart.
e. Father has not participated m Shannon's medical care and subsequently, has
historically failed to ensure that Shannon takes her prescribed medication for
ADHD. Father's failure to follow recommended treatment is likely to have a
negative impact on the improvements and successes that Shannon has
accomplished in school while working with Mother, the school and medical
professionals.
~.
f. Father's actions m prohibiting contact between Mother and Shannon is
detrimental to the mother/daughter relationship and does not serve Shannon's best
interests.
g. Father has a history of DUI convictions and problems with alcohol abuse. This
causes Mother to fear that Father is unable to provide for the daily needs of a
teenage daughter who needs rules, discipline and limitations.
12. Every person with rights to custody or having actual physical custody of the children
has been named as parties to this action.
WHEREFORE, Mother requests this Court to grant her the following relief:
1. That the parties shall share legal custody of the children.
2. That Mother shall have primary physical custody of the children.
3. That Father shall have periods of partial custody on alternating weekends from
Fridays at 6:00 p.m. until Sundays at 6:00 p.m.
4. That the non-custodial parent shall have reasonable telephone contact with the
children while they are with the other parent
5. That the parties shall have an appropriate holiday schedule so that both parents
can spend time with the children during various holidays.
6. Any other relief this Court finds just and equitable.
Jessica Holst, Esquire
MidPenn Legal Services
401 East Louther Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-9400
.'
VERIFICATION
The above-named PLAINTIFF, Sandra Dee Neely, verifies that
the statements made in the above COMPLAINT FOR CUSTODY are true
and correct. plaintiff understands that false statements herein
are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. 94904, relating
to unsworn falsification to authorities.
'1
Date:
()/- <30 - G&
\.
/ (LiL,-clUlz 1) ,
Sanara Dee Neely
-I ]Uj_(j-
.
SANDRA DEE NEELY,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs.
NO. 06-
CIVIL TERM
DONALD EDWARD SWARTZ, JR,
Defendant
CUSTODY
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL
I, Jessica Holst, do hereby swear that I served Donald Edward Swartz, Jr. with a
I , 2006 by certified mail, return receipt, restricted
delivery, to the person and address below:
Donald Edward Swartz, Jr.
350 W. King Street
Chanbersburg, PA 17201-1520
I, Jessica Holst, verify that the statements made in this Affidavit of Service are true and
correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.
Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date At1;?t-'lv1
Signature'
'):,
\l.l.
~
,~ '
o
l~:~
.....,
~:-:;
0'
o
.,
-1
I-n
rn~-
,~
"l,?\"
;)~?
,:r~ ~T~
:)"'C)
,:jrn
0-;
,<-
-xl
-<
(..,-
J:""
-:,;
(..)
"'"
~-"'"
-,".
(~)
UJ
o
SANDRA DEE NEELY,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA
vs.
NO. 06- V
CIVIL TERM
DONALD EDWARD SWARTZ, JR,
Defendant
CUSTODY
PRAECIPE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
To the Prothonotary:
Kindly allow, Sandra Neely, Plaintiff, to proceed in forma pauperis.
1, Jessica Holst, attorney for the party proceeding in forma pauperis, certify that I believe
the party is unable to pay the costs and that I am providing free legal services to the party.
J essic H Is, squire
Mid enn Legal Services
401 East Louther Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-9400
'"
c;::>
c;;:)
C--'
o
-n
,
::;:l
Gl :21
-0;'-:
:nO
,'~L
~.;~~:
".. -r"
)-~
">0
cS,-n
>
::::L'1
.<
)"
-
w
J::;:<:.
'.0
0::>
SANDRA DEE NEELY,
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs.
NO. 06- ~ /7
CIVIL TERM
DONALD EDW ARD SWARTZ, JR,
Defendant
CUSTODY
o
c-
,..."
c:~
..-~
cr-
<-
~
w
PETITION FOR SPECIAL RELIEF
;;:::
.:Jf...
o
.,
.....
'X"T1
n'F
-om
','7
j;--,~()
_..,,-:-\
--'1
(";
;~C)m
~:-;
:J:;
:<
Petitioner, Sandra Neely, by and through her counsel, MidPenn Legal Services, stateS-tit",
following: ":}
,~,
.c-
o
I, Petitioner is the above-named Plaintiff, hereinafter refen'ed to as Mother, who has a
mailing address of Post Office Box 1114, Carlisle, Cumberland County, pennsylvania
17013.
2. Respondent is the above-named Defendant, and resides at 350 West King Street,
Chambersburg, Franklin County, Pennsylvania 17201.
3. The parties are the natural and biological parents of the minor children, Shannon Swartz,
born May 28, 1993 and Emily Swartz, born August 20, 1995.
4. Defendant is not acting in the children's best interests for reasons including, but not
limited to, the following:
a. On January 20, 2006, Defendant took the older daughter, Shannon, for a weekend
visit On Sunday, January 22, 2006, Defendant refused to return Shannon to
Mother's home.
b. Since Sunday, January 22, 2006, Defendant has refused to allow Mother any
contact with Shannon and he has further registered Shannon for school in
Chambersburg.
,
c. Defendant's actions have had a negative impact on the younger daughter, Emily,
because he has separated siblings who have lived together all their lives. This is
traumatic to Emily and Defendant has completely disregarded the impact of his
actions on her.
d. Defendant has never provided daily care for the children nor was he ever the
primary caretaker for the children.
e. Defendant has a history of problems with alcohol abuse and DUI convictions
which, in fact, interfered with his ability to exercise any custody with the children
because he did not have a valid driver's license and could not transport the
children anywhere.
f. Defendant historically has failed to gIve Shannon her Adderrall medication
required for her ADHD diagnosis and Mother is concerned that Defendant will
not require Shannon to comply with taking the medication as prescribed. This is
medically prescribed and necessary to her ongoing success m schooL
Defendant's decision to determine what is medically best for Shannon is
detrimental to her well-being and does not serve her best interests.
5. Mother is the parent who can best provide for Shannon and Emily for reasons including,
but not limited to, the following:
a. Mother is presently able to provide for both girls by giving them a nurturing and
stable home environment and providing for their emotional, physical, medical and
educational needs.
b. Since the girls were born, Mother is the person who has provided for their daily
needs and did so with little assistance from Defendant. More specifically, since
Defendant did not have a valid driver's license while the parties were together,
Mother not only had to be the primary caretaker in the home, she had to provide
all transportation to the girls' activities, medical appointments, or other matters,
c. Mother can best ensure that Defendant is able to maintain a father/daughter
relationship with the girls.
d. Mother is concerned about the impact of Defendant's actions on the girls because
they have not been separated before and Defendant has refused to allow contact
with Shannon.
e. Mother has worked very hard to help Shannon succeed in school and has been
solely responsible for getting Shannon to a doctor and diagnosed with ADHD.
Mother ensures that Shannon takes her medication as prescribed and since the
diagnosis, Shannon's grades and school performance have improved. Mother
fears that the change in schools and Defendant's history of failing to comply with
medical care will be detrimental to Shannon and will cause her to suffer in schooL
WHEREFORE, Mother respectfully requests that the Court order the following:
a, That Defendant shall immediately return Shannon to Mother's custody.
b, That this matter shall be scheduled for a custody conciliation to determine a
more specific custody schedule regarding the girls.
c. That until the conciliation the parties shall have shared legal custody of the
children.
d. That until the conciliaton, Mother shall have primary physical custody of the
,
children.
<
e. That until the conciliation, Defendant shall have periods of partial physical custody
on alternating weekends from Friday to Sunday.
J essic olst, Esquire
Mid enn Legal Services
401 E. Louther Street
Carlisle, P A 17013
VERIFICATION
The above-named PLAINTIFF, Sandra Dee Neely, verifies that
the statements made in the above PETITION FOR SPECIAL RELIEF are
true and correct. plaintiff understands that false statements
herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. ~4904,
relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
(";'2}_/I)
Date: )/-,~)L L)({J
')
( .,JO l^--d~e?c
-- sandra Dee Neely
n
A'" ;
/L""
~.f2U_f~
,
\
,
. .
SANDRA DEE NEELY,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs.
NO. 06- &11
CIVIL TERL\1
DONALD EDWARD SWARTZ, JR,
Defendant
CUSTODY
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL
I, Jessica Diamondstone, d hereby swear that I served Donald Edward Swartz, Jr. with a
Petition for Special Relief on
~
, 2006 by certified mail, return receipt, restricted
delivery, to the person and ad ress below:
Donald Edward Swartz, Jr.
350 West King Street
Chambersburg, PA 17201-1520
I, Jessica Holst, verify that the statements made in this Affidavit of Service are true and
corrcct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.
Section 4904 rei 'fig to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date:
Signature:
,
. ,....
SANDRA DEE NEELY,
Plaintiff
vs.
DONALD EDWARD SWARTZ, JR,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 06-617
CIVIL TERM
CUSTODY
PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW PETITION
To the Prothonotary:
Please withdraw without prejudice the Petition for Special Relief brought by Plaintiff, Sandra
Dee Neely, in the above captioned case,
Respectfully ~bmitted:
" , )
'//1
/'~'~/
~;~~;Z~Sq. .,'",'.,
MIDPENN LEGAL SERVICES
401 East Louther Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-9400
r--::1
~-J
Co::)
..:.~ -"
-
S2.
"
01
C:J
\
1'''
-;
r..)
c:::->
CP
.
SANDRA DEE NEELY
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF COMtvlON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
06-617
CIVIL ACTION LA W
DONALD EDWARD SWARTZ, JR.
DEFENDANT
IN CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW.
Tbursday, February 02. 2006
. upon consideration of the attached Complaint,
it is hereby directed that parties and their respective counsel appear before Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq.
. the conciliator,
at 4tb Floor, Cumberland County Courtbouse. Carlisle on __.2bursday, Febru,,'1:..2:h.200~_ _ at 8:30 AM
for a Pre-Hearing Custody Conference. At such conference, an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or
if this cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the court, and to enter into a temporary
order. All children age five or older may also be present at the conference. Failure to appear at the conference may
provide grounds for entry of a temporary or permanent order.
The court hereby directs the parties to furnish any and all existing Protection from Abuse orders,
Special Relief orders, and Custody orders to tbe conciliator 48 hours prior to scheduled hearill!!.
FOR THE COURT.
By: Isl
Hubert X Gilrov. Esq.
Custody Conciliator
If'
VJ
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law to comply with the Americans
with Disabilites Act of 1990. For infonnation about accessible facilities and reasonable accommodations
available to disabled individuals having business before the court. please contact our oflice. All arrangements
must be made at least n hours prior to any hearing or business before the court. You must attend the scheduled
conference or hearing.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR ATTORNEY AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HA VE AN ATTORNEY OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET
FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Cumberland County Bar Association
32 South Bedford Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 170 I 3
Telephone (717) 249-3 166
~~'$ ---/~r/~
., ,~z ~ ~6?4<
->;x' j? ~mr~.7 ~
\ "~[,'! v.~:",jr~'jd
\/h"ii\ f/,.""," '-l"inn~
AJr'Jric!'''') ':'~:;':' ,1_,";. ~;11, I
00 :21 ~ld 8- 83.:1 gOal
,. :JLjl :10
l' " IF.-" \ii'-'"..., \ I ..)~
I\~::r<)lt)~ ".',-,J ";;:: (l:tTj
:i~.H_-LL..-'.".,U '
:70. ~- ,.."
"-',
'51:7 .['. t!
"/'0 r e
'Y-
R'::C'::lvED MAR 0 ';:' r.(
SANDRA DEE NEELY,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
DONALD EDWARD SWARTZ, JR.,
Defendant
NO. 06-617
IN CUSTODY
COURT ORDER
AND NOW, this )J {{ day of VV1?~ t- L, 2006, upon consideration of the
attached Custody Conciliation report, it is ordered and directed as follows:
1. The mother, Sandra Dee Neely, and the father, Donald Edward Swartz,
Jr., shall enjoy shared legal custody of Shannon R. Swartz, born May 28,
1993 and Emily A. Swartz, born August 20, 1995.
2. The mother shall have primary physical custody of Emily and the father shall
have primary physical custody of Shannon.
3. The parties shall alternate custody of the minor children on weekends under
the following four week scheduled:
a. For one weekend, both children shall be with father, for the second
weekend both children shall be with mother, for the third weekend
Emily shall be with father and Shannon shall be with mother, and for
the fourth weekend Shannon shall remain with father and Emily shall
remain with mother.
4. The parties shall share custody of the minor children on holidays pursuant to
a schedule arranged between the parties.
"1
5. The parties shall participate in counseling aud include Shannon and Emily as
appropriate to address any issues that are currently in existence and that
require the intervention of a counselor.
6. In the event either party decides to modify this Order, that party may petition
the Court to have the case again scheduled with the Custody Conciliator for a
Conference.
BY THE COURT,
c~sica Holst, Esquire
...>>6nald Edward Swartz, Jr.
.J
"OLP
,dO
oS
SANDRA DEE NEELY,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
DONALD EDW ARD SWARTZ, JR.,
Defendant
NO. 06-617
IN CUSTODY
CONCILIATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY CIVIL RULE OF
PROCEDURE 1915.3-8(b), the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following
report:
1. The pertinent information pertaining to the children who are the subject of this
litigation is as follows:
Shannon R. Swartz, born May 28, 1993 and Emily A. Swartz, born August 20, 1995.
2. A Conciliation Conference was held on Febrnary 23, 2006, with the following
individuals in attendance:
The mother, Shannon Dee Neey, with her counsel, Jessica Holst, Esquire, and the
father, Donald Edward Swartz, Jr., who appeared without counsel.
3. The parties agree to the entry of an Order in the form as attached.
}'~&-Cy
DATE
Hubert X. G' y, Esquire
Custody Con iliator