Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-0783
V-, l 1)?- ccck - U?. c?'- Cc"f-ncn ?1T Coup yOu kcooL- kin cal r ? d i r) L DL"(A % uk3. 5\r) - c (A-e ,c - c -?Y-4 AA-„ , ola.*?? s??- c-N iY? 4),r--'o\\C) U'D ' ?rt, b U I l LT.tn a o-)r- A n C? zr?.!??.rtc?` ?rSJ ? bC 1' s? c 'w,J in °Ni- Corn "- oc- for C n? of 0601 cm -V 14(vk - `??>c.z ?'??tld faKE 77vs Pap=s io Oro- -Do ?fou Or-? Aw Lak,2cr?r 0-c Cannot (C? onr LCTC, dC T ,? ? c_?- j;i , ?)?P-VxQ To Et??tJ?, ` lk C7105 n t 1N,, Ccl ,:?(+ nc- Cc)"mL)n V)k 4-t-?,Wnn-? nicU vim, ?5 TAX ?A-maf N&e-? GL??c?, Color ??rz?$cx'?c? ? i ? This c?rnvv l CA-to? ak cr ??t> ?,1 kx Gon?t.?rrrc??c?. U unc??r ?/a Pc. C.,S. 931 ewnrl 73 2 C.S_ 0©l-!. 7 D lea bl? ° o Clark Colov I?lcx?rc? or«S ? G? S ). +t?? a C36) i?1?? 1 . 7) Uri e dak 0? T o?a q (i fyi C, 4 ?k?`T h? ?? ??( ? CI?rY? IOK ?'Qt 6z'? ` t lF? IS C? MCI,I ??C3? JCv(i (?X'tn (?_ 'n '1???tt(c E3? V1??lc?nC ?U. Gu4 `f AIM r?EA?ttS CSC CC?n CJJCtS Ppe. cr? nL? < ?n. aox <3L-,qb, 1-?a c ,-, c K, f) c) 9t -g ?B . LJ 1€? ? 3(, ?hy4c in Mc. C?CV? Wl(rEYI ? C?tO Y1 S U ?J , Lt ti R plus ihvs, ??? TCCk C," Puvu??a? c?c?a?t?, n ?? QVwAalav o? 0 4 63 . ?5J D) TO o?- 274 ? tl `. J • --c U--f ti aJa?n? :J C. WA,P)kRCO-ozn0 3 ..7 ? ; C? <a ? c _ .T ',,i?": C? ?. i,. 2j ?1 .._ P NCw ?--j -? EAAJ 1 Yl c Y?t(?. ?2s 1? Gds ) Aj to i? v 4vs ? 4n-te . c)) rar k-V1f, cSix, vMn t?Lr Q c s_?? ??1? ?? +V\ks azc?*on CZVL-r - vyin Al ( ??anc 1?? " 'j .. 3) rYl Cj--tvn-n ?- D-L A4 6L-nO-E 'Ls `{? Cc?Yt c t rL?1C1 (??tth?vl -f ?? +c?ca??? e YIbY oG T- u 10 r ? ?u S CcC ?n c - G.S. vioV, ^r d o:4 `ri , 4a c c«V c r'n ?c?s? C??c onS 40 C u-u loYl A E Q. U ?• f3 20 Caruy??ill, ?FEi700t-?2?? PAGE 1 E-C-1009 INMATE NAME NUMBER LAST CG4129 PRESSLEY BATCH DATE # MO DY YEAR INMATE ACCOUNTS SYSTEM MONTHLY ACCOUNT STATEMENT FIRST MI SHAWN TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION 01-18-2006 880 CAM OLD BALANCE -2.95 TRANSACTION BALANCE AFTER AMOUNT TRANSACTION 6486 12-15-2005 13 PERSONAL GIFT FROM 756579 SEAN PRESLEY 10.00 7.05 6570 12-28-2005 41 MEDICAL MEDICAL SERVICES/ SCRIPTS -4.00 3.05 6570 12-28-2005 41 MEDICAL MEDICAL SERVICES/ SCRIPTS -4.00 -.95 8362 12-28-2005 32 CAM COMMISSARY FOR 12/28/2005 -2.59 -3.54 8364 12-30-2005 13 J-PAY MULLEN REGINA 20.00 16.46 6611 01-06-2006 40 FINES/DAMAGES TOWARDS CELL DAMAGES -6.00 10.46 6640 01-06-2006 39 LEGAL FEES TOWARDS WESTERN 01-2468 -4.00 6.46 NEW BALANCE AS OF THIS STATEMENT -------------------> 6.46 ?_, ?. ? o ?;: -?, `?; -?, G; ?, -, ??,?_ ?., _.: _,::_: ;.<< ,,:, ?? :a SEAN PRESSLEY, PLAINTIFF IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. CLARK COLOR LABORATORIES, DEFENDANT 06-0783 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this. day of February, 2006, the motion of plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis, IS DENIED because the complaint states a frivolous claim.' By the Court; Edgar 6. BayleVJ. / Sean Pressley, CG 4129, Pro se SCI-Camp Hill P.O. Box 200-??L -?? Camp Hill, PA 17001 sal 'Without an averment that Clark Color Laboratories cashed plaintiff's check and did not forward the merchandise ordered, plaintiff has suffered no damage. l~ ?rft5,-4 vs o6 -3(&3 3 D(?-o7 Case NoS Statement of Intention to Proceed To the Court: l intends to proceed with the above captioned matter. Print Name Pest Sign Name ,,Q Date: Attorney for Explanatory Comment The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has promulgated new Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 governing the termination of inactive cases and amended Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. Two aspects of the recommendation merit comment. 1. Rule of civil Procedure New Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 has been promulgated to govern the termination of inactive cases within the scope of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The termination of these cases for inactivity was previously governed by Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and local rules promulgated pursuant to it. New Rule 230.2 is tailored to the needs of civil actions. It provides a complete procedure and a uniform statewide practice, preempting local rules. This rule was promulgated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shop v. Eagle, 551 Pa. 360,710 A.2d 1104 (1998) in which the court held that "prejudice to the defendant as a result of delay in prosecution is required before a case may be dismissed pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901." Rule of Judicial Administration 1901(b) has been amended to accommodate the new rule of civil procedure. The general policy of the prompt disposition of matters set forth in subdivision (a) of that rule continues to be applicable. II Inactive Cases The purpose of Rule 230.2 is to eliminate inactive cases from the judicial system. The process is initiated by the court. After giving notice of intent to terminate an action for inactivity, the course of the procedure is with the parties. If the parties do not wish to pursue the case, they will take no action and "the Prothonotary shall enter an order as of course terminating the matter with prejudice for failure to prosecute.` If a party wishes to pursue the matter, he or she will file a notice of intention to proceed and the action shall continue. a. Where the action has been terminated If the action is terminated when a party believes that it should not have been terminated, that party may proceed under Rule230(d) for relief from the order of termination. An example of such an occurrence might be the termination of a viable action when the aggrieved party did not receive the notice of intent to terminate and thus did not timely file the notice of intention to proceed. The timing of the filing of the petition to reinstate the action is important. If the petition is filed within thirty days of the entry of the order of termination on the docket, subdivision (d)(2) provides that the court must grant the petition and reinstate the action. If the petition is filed later than the thirty-day period, subdivision (d)(3) requires that the plaintiff must make a show in to the court that the petition was promptly filed and that there is a reasonable explanation or legitimate excuse both for the failure to file the notice of intention to proceed prior to the entry of the order of termination on the docket and for the failure to file the petition within the thirty-day period under subdivision (d)(2). B. Where the action has not been terminated An action which has not been terminated but which continues upon the filing of a notice of intention to proceed may have been the subject of inordinate delay. In such an instance, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedy of a common law non pros which exits independently of termination under Rule 230.2. David ID. Bueff Prothonotary Kirks. Sohonage, s(Z Soricitor Knee X Simpson 1st Deputy Prothonotary Irene E. 9Vorrow 2nd Deputy Prothonotary Office of the Prothonotary Cum6erfand County, Pennsykania OL *71;3 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF TERMINATION OF COURT CASES AND NOW THIS 30T' DAY OF OCTOBER, 2012, AFTER MAILING NOTICE OF INTENTION TO PROCEED AND RECEIVING NO RESPONSE -THE ABOVE CASE IS HEREBY TERMINATED WITH PREJUDICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PA R.C.P. 230.2. BY THE COURT, DAVID D. BUELL PROTHONOTARY One Courthouse Square • Suite 100 • Carfis(e, PA 17013 • (717) 240-6195 0 Fa,? (717) 240-6573