HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-5272ANDREW G. FAIDLEY
VS.
KATHLEEN A. MACKAY
Plaintiff
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. O,-
CIVIL ACTION -
NOTICE TO DEFEND AND CLAIM RIGHTS
YOU RAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend
against the claims set forth in the following pages, you
must take prompt action. You are warned that if you fail to
do so, the case may proceed without you and a decree of
divorce or annulment may be entered against you by the
Court. A judgment may also be entered against you for any
other claim or relief requested in these papers by the
Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights
important to you, including custody or visitation of your
children.
When the ground for the divorce is indignities or
irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, you may request
marriage counseling. A list of marriage counselors is
available in the Office of the Prothonotary, Cumberland
County Courhouse, 1 Courthouse Square, Carlisle,
Pennsylvania.
IF YOU DO NOT FILE A CLAIM FOR ALIMONY, DIVISION OF
PROPERTY, LAWYER'S FEES OR EXPENSES BEFORE A DIVORCE OR
ANNULMENT IS GRANTED, YOU RAY LOSE THE RIGHT TO CLAIM ANY OF
THEM.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR'LAWYER AT ONCE. IF
YOU DO NOT RAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR
TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU
CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
COURT ADMINISTRATOR
Cumberland County Courthouse
4th Floor, Cumberland County Courthouse
1 Courthouse Square
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 240-6200
ANDREW G. FAIDLEY,
Plaintiff
V.
KATHLEEN A. MACKAY,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
No. 0,-
CIVIL ACTION-DIVORCE
1. The
at 10 Marshall
Pennsylvania.
2.
resides
29732.
3.
COMPLAINT IN DIVORCE
COUNT NO.
Plaintiff is Andrew G.
Drive,
1
Faidley who currently resides
#I-01, Camp Hill, Cumberland County,
The Defendant is Kathleen A. Mackay who currently
at 1904 Paces Landing Avenue, Rock Hill, South Caroline
Plaintiff has been a bona fide resident of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for at least three (3) months
immediately previous to the filing of this Complaint.
4. The Plaintiff and Defendant are both citizens of the
United States of ~tmerica.
5. The Defendant is not a member of the Armed Services of
the United States or any of its allies.
6. The Plaintiff and Defendant wore married on May , in
Benton County, Arkansas.
7. There have been no prior actions of divorce or annulment
between the parties.
8. The marriage is irretrievably broken.
9. Plaintiff has been advised of the availability of
counseling and that the Plaintiff may have the right to request
that the Court require the parties to participate in counseling.
Decree:
Defendant;
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff requests the Court to enter a
(a) Dissolving the marriage between Plaintiff and
Dated:
PANNEBAKER AND JONES, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Peter R Hen~inger, ~., Esquire
I.D. #44873
4000 Vine Street
Middletown, PA 17057
Telephone: (717) 944-1333
VERIFICATION
I verify that
and correct. I understand that
subject to the penalty of 18 Pa.
falsification to authorities.
the statements made
false
C.S.A.
in this Complaint are true
statements herein are made
~4904, relating to unsworn
:sls FAIDLEY DIVORCE
8 ~
ANDREW G. FAIDLEY,
Plaintiff
KATHLEEN A. MACKAY,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. I Ter
CIVIL ACTION-DIVORCE
PROOF OF SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL
I, Peter R. Henninger, Jr., Esquire, of the law firm of
Pannebaker and Jones, P.C., being duly sworn according to law,
deposes and says that he did serve a copy of the Complaint in
Divorce in the above-captioned matter,
G. Faidley,
September,
filed on behalf of Andrew
to the above term and number on the 11th day of
2001, by mailing a copy of said Complaint in Divorce
by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to the last known
address, that being: 1904 Paces Landing Avenue, Rock Hill, SC
29732. The original Return Receipt, as well as the receipt for
Certified Mail No. 70993400001548929495 are attached evidencing
the delivery of the above referred Complaint in Divorce.
Date:
/~/~ , 2001
SWORN and subscribed to
bef.°,.r~.-;this ~/~-~.L day
:sls FAIE~EY PROOFOFSERVICE
PANNEBAKER & JONES, P.C.
By:~
Pet ~er R. Henhinger, Ur., Esquzre
I.D. #44873
4000 Vine Street
Middletown, PA 17057-3596
Telephone: (717) 944-1333
PRH-FAIDLEY #17108
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
· Print your name and address o~ the reverse
so that we can mtum the cerd to you.
· Attach this card to the back of the mailpisce,
or on the front if space permits.
KAMEN A.
1904 P~es Landing Avenue
Rock Hill, SC 29732
D. is de~ eddress d
if YES, e~er delivery address below:
OYes
3. Service 'Type
I [~Nifled Mall r'l Express Mall
~ Registell~d i~ Re~urn Rec~
J r'l insured Mall r'l C.O.D." : ,
4. Restricted Delivery? tExtta Fee) r-I Yes
7099' 3/~0
PS Form 3811, July 1999 Dome~lo Return Receist 10G~'~ f~ 1789
ANDREW G. FAIDLEY,
Plaintiff
V.
KATHLEEN A. MACKAY,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY,PENNSYLVANIA
:
: NO.
:
: CIVIL ACTION- DIVORCE
;
DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S DIVORCE
COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF A MOTION TO DISMISS
AND NOW, this~.t/ day of November 2001, comes the defendant, Kathleen A.
Mackay, by and through her attorneys, Courtney L. Kishel, Esquire, and The Law Offices
of Richard C. Gaffney, and respectfully requests this Honorable Court to dismiss
plaintiff's divorce complaint, and in support thereof, avers the following:
Plaintiff, Andrew Faidley, filed a divorce complaint in Cumberland County on
September 7, 2001.
Defendant, Kathleen Mackay was served a copy of the divorce complaint via
certified mail, on September 27, 2001.
The divorce complaint avers that Defendant is a resident of South Carolina.
Defendant Mackay admits that she resides at 1904 Paces Landing Avenue, Rock
Hill South Carolina 29732.
Ms. Mackay has in fact never resided in Pennsylvania.
The parties last resided as husband and wife in South Carolina.
The divorce complaint further avers that Plaintiff Faidley has "been a bona fide
resident of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for at least three (3) months
immediately previous to the filing of this Complaint."
10.
11.
Accordingly to Pa.R.Civ. P. 1920.12, a divorce complaint must aver that either
party is a bona fide resident of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for at least six
(6) months immediately prior to the commencement of action.
Plaintiff has not averred that either party has been a bona fide resident of the
Commonwealth for at least six (6) months immediately previous to the
commencement of the action.
The divorce complaint fails to aver the necessary period of residence and is
therefore void for failing to comply with the provisions of Pa.R.Civ. P. 1920.12.
Ms. Mackay subsequently filed a divorce complaint in South Caroline on October
19, 2001. Mr. Faildley was subsequently served a copy via certified mail.
A hearing is temporarily scheduled for November 28, 2001 on that matter.
WHEREFORE, the Defendant respectfully requests this Honorable Court to
dismiss the divorce complaint in Cumberland County since Plaintiff failed to comply
with the provisions of Pa.R.Civ. P. 1920.12, and permit the divorce to proceed in South
Carolina where personal jurisdiction exists.
Respectfully Submitted,
Law Offices of Richard C. Gaffney
C~t~tney L. Ki~e-~squire --
PA Supreme CMart ID# 81509
2120 Market Street, Suite 101
Camp Hill, PA 17011
975-9033
11/26Y':'2'991 16::35 B~332~JllB5 D.$. b$OLLYClqE:(:~(
I ve6f~ that tho sml~nents nmde in ~his ~ompb/nt ore lruc md correct. 1
~ dm false smlemems hc~in ere nmdc subject to the penalties of I~
Pa. CS.A. ~4~04, zela6ng to u~wom falsificntlon Io an~m'i~ies.
ANDREW G. FAIDLEY,
Plaintiff
V.
KATHLEEN A. MACKAY,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 01-5272
CIVIL ACTION- DIVORCE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Courtney L. Kishel, Esquire, hereby certify that I have served a true and correct
copy of the Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's counsel via United States certified mail
this 13t~ day of December, 2001 addressed to:
Mr. Peter R. Henninger, Jr., Esquire
Law Offices of Pannebaker and Jones, P.C.
4000 Vine Street
Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057-3596
c' ney L. k]sl~ Esqulr~
Attorney ID# 8151)9
ANDREW G. FAIDLEY,
Plaintiff
Ve
KATHLEEN A. MACKAY,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY,PENNSYLVANIA
:
: NO. 01-5272
:
: CIVIL ACTION- DIVORCE
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
AND NOW, this 7th day of Januaxy 2002, comes the above-named Defendant, by
and through her attorneys, Courtney L. Kishel, Esquire and The Law Offices of Richard
C. Gaffney, and respectfully requests This Honorable Court to dismiss the above-
captioned action, and in support thereof avers the following:
1. On September 7, 2001, pla'mtiff, Andrew Faidley filed a divome complaint in
Cumberland County.
The divorce complaint averred that plaintiff was a bona fide resident of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for at least three (3) months prior to filing the
complaint.
According to Pa.R.Civ.P. 1920.12, a divome complaint must state "an averment
that the plaintiff, defendant or both have resided in the Commonwealth for at least
six months immediately previous to the commencement of the action."
4. Accordingly, the divorce complaint filed by plaintiffwas deficient on its face for
failing to comply with Pa.R.Civ. P. 1920.12.
On November 27, 2001, defendant, Kathleen Mackay, filed Preliminary
Objections to Plaintiff's Divorce Complaint In the Nature of a Motion to Dismiss,
stating that the plaintiff failed to comply with Pa.R.Civ. P 1920.12.
The preliminary objections were filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ. P 1028 (a)(2), which
states that preliminary objections may be filed for "failure of a pleading to
conform to law or rule of court..." Pa.R.Civ. P.1028(a)(2).
7. Accordingly, under Pa.R.Civ.P. 1028 (a)(2), a responsive pleading is not
necessary as the Court may nde based on information provided in the record.
8. Opposing counsel, Mr. Peter Henninger, Esquire, was served a copy of the
Preliminary Objections on December 14, 2001. (See Exhibit A).
9. Twenty (20) days have expired from the date of service of Defendant's
Preliminary Objections on opposing counsel, and there has been no response filed
on behalf of Plaintiff.
10. Defendant has properly filed a divorce complaint in South Carolina on October
19,2001, whereupon Mr. Faidley was served a copy via certified mail. Said
action is still pending in the Courts of South Carolina.
WHEREFORE, the Defendant, Kathleen A.Mackay, respectfully requests This
Honorable Court to dismiss the divorce complaint pending in Cumberland County, as
it is deficient on its face for failing to comply with Pa.R. Civ. P 1920.12, and permit
the divorce to proceed in South Carolina.
Respectfully Submitted,
The Law Offices of Richard C. Oaffney
Courtney L. Kish~[1, Esquire
EXH'rBZT A
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Courtney L. Kishel, Esquire, hereby certify that I have served a tree and correct
copy of the Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's counsel via United States certified mail
this 7th day of January, 2002 addressed to:
Mr. Peter R. Henninger, Jr., Esquire
Law Offices of Pannebaker and Jones, P.C.
4000 Vine Street
Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057-3596
Courtney-IJ. Ki~el, Esquire
Attorney ID# 81509
ANDREW G. FAIDLEY, :
Plaintiff :
:
vs. : 01-5272 CIVIL
:
KATHLEEN A. MACKAY, : CIVIL ACTION - LAW
Defendant :
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
ORDER
AND NOW, this ~. ~ r day of January, 2002, a nde is issued on the plaintiff to
show cause why the relief requested in the within motion to dismiss ought not to be granted.
This nde returnable ten (10) days after service.
BY THE COURT,
ANDREW G. FAIDLEY,
Plaintiff/Petitioner
KATHLEEN A. MACKAY,
Defendant/Respondent
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
: NO. 01-5272
:
: CIVIL ACTION- DIVORCE
;
PETITION TO MAKE RULE ABSOLUTE
AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2002, comes the Defendant, Kathleen A.
MacKay, by and through her attorneys, the Law Offices of Richard C. Gaffney, who
respectfully requests that this Honorable Court grant this Petition to Make Rule Absolute
and in support thereof avers as follows:
On November 27, 2001, the Defendant filed Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's
Divorce Complaint in the Nature of a Motion to Dismiss for failing to comply
with Pa.R.C.P. 1920.12, which states that a party must be a bona fide resident of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for at least 6 months prior to filing,
On January 7, 2002, the Defendant subsequently filed a Motion to Dismiss
Complaint asking this Honorable Court to dismiss the Complaint in Divorce.
In January 28, 2002, the Honorable Kevin A. Hess, issued a Rule to Show Cause
on the Plaintiff regarding said Motion to Dismiss, returnable within 10 days of
service.
Ten days have passed from the issuance and service of the Rule to Show Cause
and no response to the Rule has been filed by Plaintiff.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Kathleen A. MacKay, respectfully requests that this
Honorable Court grant her Petition to Make Rule Absolute and Dismiss Plaintiff's
Complaint in Divorce.
Respectfully Submitted,
THE LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD C. GAFFNEY
Courtney I~. Ki~l, Esquire --
The Law Offices of Richard C. Gaffney
2120 Market Street
Suite 101
Camp Hill, PA 17011
(717) 975-9033
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Courtney L. Kishel, Esquire, hereby certify that I have served a true and correct
copy of this Petition to Plaintiff's counsel via United States certified mail this 12th day of
February 2002 addressed to:
Mr. Peter R. Henninger, Jr., Esquire
Law Offices of Parmebaker and Jones, P.C.
4000 Vine Street
Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057-3596
~oUr~m~yY I~9Esqmre
ANDREW G. FAIDLEY,
Plaintiff/Petitioner
KATHLEEN A. MACKAY,
Defendant/Respondent
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
: NO. 01-5272
:
: CIVIL ACTION- DIVORCE
:
PETITION TO MAKE RULE ABSOLUTE
AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2002, comes the Defendant, Kathleen A.
MacKay, by and through her attorneys, the Law Offices of Richard C. Gaffney, who
respectfully requests that this Honorable Court grant this Petition to Make Rule Absolute
and in support thereof avers as follows:
On November 27, 2001, the Defendant filed Preliminary Objections to Plaintiff's
Divorce Complaint in the Nature ora Motion to Dismiss for failing to comply
with Pa.R.C.P. 1920.12, which states that a party must be a bona fide resident of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for at least 6 months prior to filing,
On January 7, 2002, the Defendant subsequently filed a Motion to Dismiss
Complaint asking this Honorable Court to dismiss the Complaint in Divorce.
In January 28, 2002, the Honorable Kevin A. Hess, issued a Rule to Show Cause
on the Plaintiff regarding said Motion to Dismiss, returnable within 10 days of
service.
Ten days have passed from the issuance and service of the Rule to Show Cause
and no response to the Rule has been filed by Plaintiff.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Kathleen A. MacKay, respectfully requests that this
Honorable Court grant her Petition to Make Rule Absolute and Dismiss Plaintiff's
Complaint in Divorce.
Respectfully Submitted,
THE LAW OFFICES OF R1CHARD C. GAFFNEY
Courtney I~. Kis~l, Esquir~ --
The Law Offices of Richard C. Gaffney
2120 Market Street
Suite 101
Camp Hill, PA 17011
(717) 975-9033
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Courtney L. Kishel, Esquire, hereby certify that I have served a true and correct
copy of this Petition to Plaintiff's counsel via United States certified mail this 12th day of
February 2002 addressed to:
Mr. Peter R. Henninger, Jr., Esquire
Law Offices of Pannebaker and Jones, P.C.
4000 Vine Street
Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057-3596
CourteSy L. Kill, l, Esquir-~
Attorney ID# 8~09
ANDREW G. FAIDLEY,
Plaintiff/Petitioner
KATHLEEN A. MACKAY,
Defendant/Respondent
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
: NO. 01-5272
:
: CIVIL ACTION- DIVORCE
COURT ORDER
AND NOW, this /~'~ay of February, 2002, after due consideration of
Attorney's foregoing Motion to Dismiss, filed pursuant to Pa.R. Civ. P. 1920.12, and after
a review of the record in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT,
the Plaintiff's Complaint in Divorce is hereby dismissed for failing to comply with the
provisions of Pa.R. Civ. P. 1920.12.
~BqOO ~' '" '~