HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-1298T
mac, ? ? cc?o
lC DD
T- 47-)
C-C'", Env o-VI3 nr c , ac-L. ` ?rvc L z4tn' C{
l?ti N;e> Coc?r? ur dF?? ?s c???%ot 1'? c,ItNls
Qcc,??? C l . Y arm 1 )aC i ` C,?
?
u??4??5 r o c ( K a rv1cnE icAal o (0 4e,cjrnplaW[? Cc
To your r kk
YCI 7G ?c, bra ? D, Lax es v C roc c??-c? Cnz-; Go T o
Ckv-\ CAS I, kAv
CcJQk O\ 1-71 r-)5
0 (7i ?7),?qq -,3rL4;
(
Ccl:c. NO. i?c_/1 id_
cal ?,
?C??Y1Cae(
a, c-m-Ar D" 10 C?c ion o rYl«,c rnu5 ;? ?
for 1Yl DC_:Ill`s: C?1
a> ? c ouA V,<, Lkf"4, -?1of) Cf?-P1oar?k4 CAcsm3 Ptr&uan?--
+o ?. C, -S- 431.
0
0
3? ?IQI>, c??Gx9l hfc?z?? , tS CtiC??2 ? Cok- 4)& and-E8 5f4, ?r a? T) ? ?• QcYlYlb ?I-C.CD4 anlc,- w'!c% r?--cdl
r??rvEm 4r-, I his c?c ? on ttjce, can kc,oos- a- PNG
c ,d vic t.? cc? ?. 0. ?),f-,goo1 Cep t;111 PA 170-02(X
OV, Nc ?x?? is a b4nkir? i??-?rE -60 ??_slj??i
A- 5c)0 F? r?? ?V?, l7,?l?lou? ? ? ???19 .
5) On
I`S-c??-?)?`?l t I?J???? hvlc?rn Gt Savr C?CC C)'An-? L"? jiv'?t -Pwc,
tXl]1`\ (YI?. Yf? ?4£A ?1('FS"F??(1?L1' I? TC? df?+J1?
q-3 e/7 and 0, Ccc,? (I Lr? cka,?
madam
Pte. . pifc L.oua?, (o313,.
and wa'L(t (, +0 ? z UAA Ccmpct-nui
7) Can ?'-/L? Pff??jf c4,r???
?o?'' do x 3C??10, I ?a„ n Pte,
DE 6 rY tYMO R? x cwt norn6e-,S' COXVC-0;52i t1vo/ sboces
4? -?ke- JJc" n c -?a m&J,- From EN)r. Pr?wf? ? acLoutl4-
anj mail - o Click C C?cc
djot-? GIs acc-0 u-r!- 4 /a o ar)j a u-tj ier? ehtck ode.
Pa?Ak ?c c4 77.5o Dc,
MctEa , , OA a,;? ten. I n
1?? ?? 4t YVIFxY l?? Ylc? flcxr?E??? ?C q?(q Sly S w?
i
On G-j:5 -QS, anc, mailed -(c- Z44 T?
rr)r_Pr?
Cc P? qocr1\ to73`f 7 , C=crZC A GhEJL?h , a,?? ? ?? /Ylfrnc?
A7c? and
X101 ?u? -?C
ol?
•
Ch) ?n a?d? c ?? ? ?NC? ['ink ?rwcc?-? rY1r. Ph,
Ccs)c?I ??CA c=? , anJciiF6 - Inen7c
cy?- ?? +rav)aa+lbna a-- i,:xSuE- bf47an.
11
_1-, ??c??t?C??c? ?41? ?'?/l4-t,?t?? VVki??. t?(j 't?t2[?S
? v?tic? I??r2?v? ctn.. ry)?-cclLA-C,
? PA, c rAa? (, 40 ctr?z ?t? rr? ?J? ?.? c ECG ? k
crL :,
a? ?(o ic(f:
3
I
rte- NC Qos?1? (_.r V, 1 e-Rro
._
?lr,?, u 4G
"ow
rules, ar1L? PQ.R - cw.p
AVi,?s ac n
tc?Y1?
3)V14L
L utci ?4v,+ -OaL z z r r),5(JL, k i-y-?t'i n afr ; in w,
y9Drf, rtjc 'ro?-l ?o c 4nScc??rrJ Q3AcA6nG - 4t--, ai-cll-2nrr ll?Z,
CG vioz,? l
POj 2C0
Gcolr W1, P417& d20C>
??, `:1 '
Y`
PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
BUREAU OF DATA PROCESSING
REMOTE PRINT TIME 13:50
7r
INMATE ACCOUNTS SYSTEM C ?
ACCOUNT STATEMENT
RUN IAS410
DATE 2/06/2006
PAGE 1
CURB. INST SC1C3
AC'CT. STAT US OPEN
IN MATE NAME
NU MBER LAST FIRST MI OLD BA LANCE
CG 4129 PRES SLEY SHAWN -31. 72
BATCH DATE TRANSAC TION BALANCE AFTER
## MO DY YEAR TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION AMOU NT TRANSAC TION
6039 10- 17-2005 38 INSIDE PURCHASES
XEROX OK'S BY R.G. -1. 70 -33. 42
6390 12- 02-2005 13 PERSONAL GIFT FROM
882583 PNC W/D FROM ACCT 42. 47 9. 05
6431 12- 07-2005 44 ORGANIZATIONAL
AID-AL-ADHA FEAST -12. 00 -2. 95
6486 12- 15-2005 13 PERSONAL GIFT FROM
756579 SEAN PRESLEY 10. 00 7. 05
6570 12- 28-2005 41 MEDICAL
MEDICAL SERVICES/ SCRIPTS -4. 00 3. 05
6570 12- 28-2005 41 MEDICAL
MEDICAL SERVICES/ SCRIPTS -4 .00 -. 95
8362 12- 28-2005 32 CAM COMMISSARY
FOR 12/28/2005 -2 .59 -3. 54
8364 12- 30-2005 13 J-PAY
MULLEN REGINA 20 .00 16. 46
661.1 01- 06-2006 40 FINES/DAMAGES
TOWARDS CELL DAMAGES -6 .00 10. 46
6640 01- 06-2006 39 LEGAL FEES
TOWARDS WESTERN 01-2468 -4 .00 6. 46
6782 01- 27-2006 37 POSTAGE
POSTAGE - .87 5. 59
NEW BALANCE AS OF 02-06-2006 ---- ---- -- 5. 59
Ix ?
SEAN PRESSLEY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
PLAINTIFF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
PNC BANK,
DEFENDANT 06-1298 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this q day of March, 2006, the motion of plaintiff to proceed
in forma pauperis, IS DENIED.'
Xean Pressley, CG 4129, Pro se
SCI-Camp Hill
P.O. Box 200 J
Camp Hill, PA 17001 n(
:sal
By the ourt,
Edgar B. Bayley, J.
U?
'The suit is frivolous as there is no cause of action stated.
-,
,_;_: - .
,,
Rft5A
vs
O(o- /Lp .i
?h-- 0 7 s
Case NoS
Statement of Intention to Proceed
To the Court:
1
intends to proceed with the above captioned matter.
Print Name Sign Name I Lam
Date: Attorney for
Explanatory Comment
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has promulgated new Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 governing the termination of
inactive cases and amended Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. Two aspects of the recommendation merit
comment.
I. Rule of civil Procedure
New Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 has been promulgated to govern the termination of inactive cases within the
scope of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The termination of these cases for inactivity was previously
governed by Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and local rules promulgated pursuant to it. New Rule 230.2 is
tailored to the needs of civil actions. It provides a complete procedure and a uniform statewide practice, preempting
local rules.
This rule was promulgated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shop v. Eagle, 551 Pa. 360,710 A.2d
1104 (1998) in which the court held that "prejudice to the defendant as a result of delay in prosecution is required
before a case may be dismissed pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901."
Rule of Judicial Administration 1901(b) has been amended to accommodate the new rule of civil procedure. The
general policy of the prompt disposition of matters set forth in subdivision (a) of that rule continues to be applicable.
II Inactive Cases
The purpose of Rule 230.2 is to eliminate inactive cases from the judicial system. The process is initiated by the
court. After giving notice of intent to terminate an action for inactivity, the course of the procedure is with the parties.
If the parties do not wish to pursue the case, they will take no action and "the Prothonotary shall enter an order as of
course terminating the matter with prejudice for failure to prosecute." If a party wishes to pursue the matter, he or she
will file a notice of intention to proceed and the action shall continue.
a. Where the action has been terminated
If the action is terminated when a party believes that it should not have been terminated, that party may proceed
under Rule230(d) for relief from the order of termination. An example of such an occurrence might be the termination
of a viable action when the aggrieved party did not receive the notice of intent to terminate and thus did not timely file
the notice of intention to proceed.
The timing of the filing of the petition to reinstate the action is important. If the petition is filed within thirty days of
the entry of the order of termination on the docket, subdivision (d)(2) provides that the court must grant the petition and
reinstate the action. If the petition is filed later than the thirty-day period, subdivision (d)(3) requires that the plaintiff
must make a show in to the court that the petition was promptly filed and that there is a reasonable explanation or
legitimate excuse both for the failure to file the notice of intention to proceed prior to the entry of the order of
termination on the docket and for the failure to file the petition within the thirty-day period under subdivision (d)(2).
B. Where the action has not been terminated
An action which has not been terminated but which continues upon the filing of a notice of intention to proceed may
have been the subject of inordinate delay. In such an instance, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedy of a
common law non pros which exits independently of termination under Rule 230.2.