Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-1298T mac, ? ? cc?o lC DD T- 47-) C-C'", Env o-VI3 nr c , ac-L. ` ?rvc L z4tn' C{ l?ti N;e> Coc?r? ur dF?? ?s c???%ot 1'? c,ItNls Qcc,??? C l . Y arm 1 )aC i ` C,? ? u??4??5 r o c ( K a rv1cnE icAal o (0 4e,cjrnplaW[? Cc To your r kk YCI 7G ?c, bra ? D, Lax es v C roc c??-c? Cnz-; Go T o Ckv-\ CAS I, kAv CcJQk O\ 1-71 r-)5 0 (7i ?7),?qq -,3rL4; ( Ccl:c. NO. i?c_/1 id_ cal ?, ?C??Y1Cae( a, c-m-Ar D" 10 C?c ion o rYl«,c rnu5 ;? ? for 1Yl DC_:Ill`s: C?1 a> ? c ouA V,<, Lkf"4, -?1of) Cf?-P1oar?k4 CAcsm3 Ptr&uan?-- +o ?. C, -S- 431. 0 0 3? ?IQI>, c??Gx9l hfc?z?? , tS CtiC??2 ? Cok- 4)& and-E8 5f4, ?r a? T) ? ?• QcYlYlb ?I-C.CD4 anlc,- w'!c% r?--cdl r??rvEm 4r-, I his c?c ? on ttjce, can kc,oos- a- PNG c ,d vic t.? cc? ?. 0. ?),f-,goo1 Cep t;111 PA 170-02(X OV, Nc ?x?? is a b4nkir? i??-?rE -60 ??_slj??i A- 5c)0 F? r?? ?V?, l7,?l?lou? ? ? ???19 . 5) On I`S-c??-?)?`?l t I?J???? hvlc?rn Gt Savr C?CC C)'An-? L"? jiv'?t -Pwc, tXl]1`\ (YI?. Yf? ?4£A ?1('FS"F??(1?L1' I? TC? df?+J1? q-3 e/7 and 0, Ccc,? (I Lr? cka,? madam Pte. . pifc L.oua?, (o313,. and wa'L(t (, +0 ? z UAA Ccmpct-nui 7) Can ?'-/L? Pff??jf c4,r??? ?o?'' do x 3C??10, I ?a„ n Pte, DE 6 rY tYMO R? x cwt norn6e-,S' COXVC-0;52i t1vo/ sboces 4? -?ke- JJc" n c -?a m&J,- From EN)r. Pr?wf? ? acLoutl4- anj mail - o Click C C?cc djot-? GIs acc-0 u-r!- 4 /a o ar)j a u-tj ier? ehtck ode. Pa?Ak ?c c4 77.5o Dc, MctEa , , OA a,;? ten. I n 1?? ?? 4t YVIFxY l?? Ylc? flcxr?E??? ?C q?(q Sly S w? i On G-j:5 -QS, anc, mailed -(c- Z44 T? rr)r_Pr? Cc P? qocr1\ to73`f 7 , C=crZC A GhEJL?h , a,?? ? ?? /Ylfrnc? A7c? and X101 ?u? -?C ol? • Ch) ?n a?d? c ?? ? ?NC? ['ink ?rwcc?-? rY1r. Ph, Ccs)c?I ??CA c=? , anJciiF6 - Inen7c cy?- ?? +rav)aa+lbna a-- i,:xSuE- bf47an. 11 _1-, ??c??t?C??c? ?41? ?'?/l4-t,?t?? VVki??. t?(j 't?t2[?S ? v?tic? I??r2?v? ctn.. ry)?-cclLA-C, ? PA, c rAa? (, 40 ctr?z ?t? rr? ?J? ?.? c ECG ? k crL :, a? ?(o ic(f: 3 I rte- NC Qos?1? (_.r V, 1 e-Rro ._ ?lr,?, u 4G "ow rules, ar1L? PQ.R - cw.p AVi,?s ac n tc?Y1? 3)V14L L utci ?4v,+ -OaL z z r r),5(JL, k i-y-?t'i n afr ; in w, y9Drf, rtjc 'ro?-l ?o c 4nScc??rrJ Q3AcA6nG - 4t--, ai-cll-2nrr ll?Z, CG vioz,? l POj 2C0 Gcolr W1, P417& d20C> ??, `:1 ' Y` PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS BUREAU OF DATA PROCESSING REMOTE PRINT TIME 13:50 7r INMATE ACCOUNTS SYSTEM C ? ACCOUNT STATEMENT RUN IAS410 DATE 2/06/2006 PAGE 1 CURB. INST SC1C3 AC'CT. STAT US OPEN IN MATE NAME NU MBER LAST FIRST MI OLD BA LANCE CG 4129 PRES SLEY SHAWN -31. 72 BATCH DATE TRANSAC TION BALANCE AFTER ## MO DY YEAR TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION AMOU NT TRANSAC TION 6039 10- 17-2005 38 INSIDE PURCHASES XEROX OK'S BY R.G. -1. 70 -33. 42 6390 12- 02-2005 13 PERSONAL GIFT FROM 882583 PNC W/D FROM ACCT 42. 47 9. 05 6431 12- 07-2005 44 ORGANIZATIONAL AID-AL-ADHA FEAST -12. 00 -2. 95 6486 12- 15-2005 13 PERSONAL GIFT FROM 756579 SEAN PRESLEY 10. 00 7. 05 6570 12- 28-2005 41 MEDICAL MEDICAL SERVICES/ SCRIPTS -4. 00 3. 05 6570 12- 28-2005 41 MEDICAL MEDICAL SERVICES/ SCRIPTS -4 .00 -. 95 8362 12- 28-2005 32 CAM COMMISSARY FOR 12/28/2005 -2 .59 -3. 54 8364 12- 30-2005 13 J-PAY MULLEN REGINA 20 .00 16. 46 661.1 01- 06-2006 40 FINES/DAMAGES TOWARDS CELL DAMAGES -6 .00 10. 46 6640 01- 06-2006 39 LEGAL FEES TOWARDS WESTERN 01-2468 -4 .00 6. 46 6782 01- 27-2006 37 POSTAGE POSTAGE - .87 5. 59 NEW BALANCE AS OF 02-06-2006 ---- ---- -- 5. 59 Ix ? SEAN PRESSLEY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PLAINTIFF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. PNC BANK, DEFENDANT 06-1298 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this q day of March, 2006, the motion of plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis, IS DENIED.' Xean Pressley, CG 4129, Pro se SCI-Camp Hill P.O. Box 200 J Camp Hill, PA 17001 n( :sal By the ourt, Edgar B. Bayley, J. U? 'The suit is frivolous as there is no cause of action stated. -, ,_;_: - . ,, Rft5A vs O(o- /Lp .i ?h-- 0 7 s Case NoS Statement of Intention to Proceed To the Court: 1 intends to proceed with the above captioned matter. Print Name Sign Name I Lam Date: Attorney for Explanatory Comment The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has promulgated new Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 governing the termination of inactive cases and amended Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. Two aspects of the recommendation merit comment. I. Rule of civil Procedure New Rule of Civil Procedure 230.2 has been promulgated to govern the termination of inactive cases within the scope of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The termination of these cases for inactivity was previously governed by Rule of Judicial Administration 1901 and local rules promulgated pursuant to it. New Rule 230.2 is tailored to the needs of civil actions. It provides a complete procedure and a uniform statewide practice, preempting local rules. This rule was promulgated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shop v. Eagle, 551 Pa. 360,710 A.2d 1104 (1998) in which the court held that "prejudice to the defendant as a result of delay in prosecution is required before a case may be dismissed pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901." Rule of Judicial Administration 1901(b) has been amended to accommodate the new rule of civil procedure. The general policy of the prompt disposition of matters set forth in subdivision (a) of that rule continues to be applicable. II Inactive Cases The purpose of Rule 230.2 is to eliminate inactive cases from the judicial system. The process is initiated by the court. After giving notice of intent to terminate an action for inactivity, the course of the procedure is with the parties. If the parties do not wish to pursue the case, they will take no action and "the Prothonotary shall enter an order as of course terminating the matter with prejudice for failure to prosecute." If a party wishes to pursue the matter, he or she will file a notice of intention to proceed and the action shall continue. a. Where the action has been terminated If the action is terminated when a party believes that it should not have been terminated, that party may proceed under Rule230(d) for relief from the order of termination. An example of such an occurrence might be the termination of a viable action when the aggrieved party did not receive the notice of intent to terminate and thus did not timely file the notice of intention to proceed. The timing of the filing of the petition to reinstate the action is important. If the petition is filed within thirty days of the entry of the order of termination on the docket, subdivision (d)(2) provides that the court must grant the petition and reinstate the action. If the petition is filed later than the thirty-day period, subdivision (d)(3) requires that the plaintiff must make a show in to the court that the petition was promptly filed and that there is a reasonable explanation or legitimate excuse both for the failure to file the notice of intention to proceed prior to the entry of the order of termination on the docket and for the failure to file the petition within the thirty-day period under subdivision (d)(2). B. Where the action has not been terminated An action which has not been terminated but which continues upon the filing of a notice of intention to proceed may have been the subject of inordinate delay. In such an instance, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedy of a common law non pros which exits independently of termination under Rule 230.2.