HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-1510CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER,
Plaintiff
VS.
AMBER DEMOI-i',
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NC~-/6/~)CIVIL TERM
CUSTODY
COMPLAINT FOR CUSTODY
l. The Plaintiff is Christopher Finkenbinder, residing at 157 Betty Nelson
Court, Carlisle, Cumberland County, PA.
2. The Defendant is Amber Demott, residing at 28 East 100 North,
Brigham City, Utah 84302, who formerly resided at 16 West Main Street, Apt. 2,
Newville, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
3. The Plaintiff seeks custody of the following children:
Name Date of Birth A.qe
Jacob Christopher Finkenbinder 2/1/98 4 years
Justin Edward Finkenbinder 2/1/98 4 years
Jayde Elizabeth Finkenbinder 11/6/93 9 years
The children were born out of wedlock.
The children are presently in the custody of Amber Demott, who resides at
28 East 100 North, Brigham City, Utah, 84302.
4. During the children's lifetime, they have resided with the following
persons and at the following addresses:
Name Address
Amber Demott and College Park Apts.
Christopher Finkenbinder
Date
1997 to July 1999
Amber Demott and Betty Nelson's Court
Christopher Finkenbinder Carlisle, PA
Feb. 2001 to May/June 2001
Amber Demott and
Ann Willie (Grandmother)
320 Mt. View Road,
Shippensburg, PA 17257
Amber Demott and
unknown mate
RR2, Box 137A July 1999 to Feb. 2001
Enon Valley, PA 16120
Amber Demott and
unknown mate
Amber Demott and
and Della Berwell
Newville, PA
May/June 2001 to Feb.21,2002
28 East 100 Nodh Feb. 21,2002---present
Brigham City, Utah 84302
The mother of the children is Amber Demott, who resides at 28 East 100
North, Brigham City, Utah 84302, and who formerly resided at 16 West Main
Street, Apt. 2, Newville, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
The father of the child is Christopher Finkenbinder, currently residing
at 157 Betty Nelson Coud, Carlisle, PA 17081. He is not married; he lives alone.
4. The relationship of Plaintiff to the children is that of Father.
5. The relationship of Defendant to the children is that of Mother.
6. The Plaintiff has not participated as a party or witness, or in another
capacity, in other litigation concerning the custody of the children in this or any
other court.
7. The Plaintiff has no information of a custody proceeding concerning
the children pending in a court of this Commonwealth.
8. The Plaintiff does not know'of a person not a party to' the'
proceedings who has physical custody of the children or claims to have custody
or visitation rights with respect to the children.
9. The best interest and permanent welfare of the children will be
served by granting the relief requested.
10. Each parent whose parental rights to the children have not been
terminated has been named as parties to this action.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff requests that this Court grant custody to him.
Date: '-~//'/~7~ ,2002
Respectfully submitted,
Al~om & Kutulakis, L.L.P.
Carlisle, PA 17013
717-249-0900
Attorney for Plaintiff
Christopher Finkenbinder,
Plaintiff
VS.
Amber Demott,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
: NO. CIVIL TERM
:
:
CUSTODY
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in the foregoing Complaint for Custody are true
and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties 18
Pa.C.S. ~4904, relating to unswom falsifications to authorities.
Date Christopher Finkenbinder
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER,
Plaintiff
VS.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 02-1510 CIVIL TERM
AMBER DEMOTr,
Defendant
CUSTODY
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
I, John J. Aborn, hereby certify that I served a tree and correct copy of the Custody
Complaint upon the Defendant, receipt of which is acknowledged on the attached receipt card on
April 2, 2002.
Date: April 9, 2002
Respectfully submitted,
ABOM & KUTULAKIS
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorney for Plaintiff
· Complete items 1,2, and 3. Als0 complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
· I~lnt.you~. name and address on the reverse
· o that we can return the card to you.
· Attach ~his card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
A. Rec~ved by OWease Print Cleady) B.~o~ll~l/el~
[] Agent
Addre~
D. I$ delivery address different fTom item
if YES, enter delivery address below: [] No
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER
PLAINTIFF
V.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
: 02-1510 CIVIL ACTION LAW
AMBER DEMOTT
DEFENDANT : 1N CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, Tuesday, April 09, 2002 , upon consideration of the attached Complaint,
it is hereby directed that parties and their respective counsel appear before Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq. , the conciliator,
at 4th Floor, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle on Thursday, May 09, 2002 at 9:30 AM
for a Pre-Hearing Custody Conference. At such conference, an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or
if this cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the court, and to enter into a temporary
order. All children age five or older may also be present at the conference. Failure to appear at the conference may
provide grounds for entry of a temporary or permanent order.
The court hereby directs the parties to furnish any and all existing Protection from Abuse orders,
Special Relief orders, and Custody orders to the conciliator 48 hours prior to scheduled hearing.
FOR THE COURT,
By: /si
Hubert X. Gilroy, Esqo~3/t~
Custody Conciliator
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law to comply with the Americans
with Disabilites Act of 1990. For information about accessible facilities and reasonable accommodations
available to disabled individuals having business before the court, please contact our office. All arrangements
must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business before the court. You must attend the
scheduled conference or hearing.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR ATTORNEY AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE AN ATTORNEY OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET
FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Cumberland County Bar Association
2 Liberty Avenue
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
Telephone (717) 249-3166
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER,
Plaintiff
AMBER DEMOTT,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 02- 1510 CIVIL
IN CUSTODY
COURT ORDER
AND NOW, this ~ 7 day of May, 2002, upon consideration of the attached Custody
Conciliation Report, it is ordered and directed as follows:
A hearing is scheduled in the above matter for Thursday, May 30, 2002, at
9:30 a.m. in the Cumberland County Courthouse. At this hearing, the
Mother, Amber Demott, shall be the moving party and shall proceed initially
with testimony. Counsel for the parties shall file with the court and opposing
counsel a memorandum setting forth the history of custody in this case, the
issues currently before the court, a list of witnesses who will be called to testify
on behalf of each party and a summary of the anticipated testimony of each
witness. This memorandum shall be filed with the court on or before
Tuesday, May 28, 2002.
e
Edgar B. Bayley ~-~
John A. Abom, Esquire
Joan Carey, Esquire
The Mother, Amber Demott, may remain in Utah with the minor children
pending the hearing. However, the Mother shall bring the minor children to
Pennsylvania for the hearing and shall deliver custody of the minor children
to the Father at or about 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 28, 2002 so Father may
exercise custody with the minor children for a period of time prior to the
scheduled hearing. _-
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER,
Plaintiff
V
AMBER DEMOTT,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: NO. 02 - 1510 CIVIL
: IN CUSTODY
Prior Judge:
CONCILIATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY CIVIL RULE OF
PROCEDURE 1915.3-8(b), the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following
report:
The pertinent information pertaining to the children who are the subject of this
litigation is as follows:
Jacob Christopher Finkenbinder, born February 1, 1998; Justin Edward
Finkenbinder, born February 1, 1998; and Jayde Elizabeth Finkenbinder, born
November 6, 1993.
A Conciliation Conference was held on May 9, 2002, with the following individuals in
attendance:
The Father, Christopher Finkenbinder, with his counsel, John Abom, Esquire; and
the Mother, Amber Demott, with her counsel, Joan Carey, Esquire.
The parties in this case separated, after a number of prior separations, in June 2001.
Since that time, the Mother has exercised primary physical custody of the minor
children. There is somewhat of a dispute as to how much time the Father has
exercised with the children since separation, with the Father suggesting essentially
time on every alternating weekend, while the Mother suggests Father's time has been
less than a regular alternating weekend schedule. Regardless, in February of this
year the Mother unilaterally moved to Utah without notifying the Father in advance.
The children have been living with the Mother in Utah since February and the older
child at least is in school in Utah.
The conciliator is of the opinion to require the Mother to return immediately to
Pennsylvania with the children pending a hearing. However, in light of the fact that
the court is scheduling a hearing so quickly in this case, the conciliator is not going to
recommend any change in the current custodial situation.
5. The conciliator recommends the entry of an order in the fori~ as attached.
DATE
u b; yX o ni l squ re
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER,
Plaintiff
VS.
AMBER DEMOTT,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: NO. 02-1510 CIVIL TERM
:
: PROTECTION FROM ABUSE AND CUSTODY
PRAECIPE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
To the Prothonotary:
Kindly allow Amber Demott, Defendant, to proceed in forma pauperis:
I, Joan Carey, attorney for the party proceeding in forma pauperis, certify that I believe the party
is unable to pay the costs and that I am providing free legal service to the party.
Attorney for Defendant
MIDPENN LEGAL SERVICES
8 Irvine Row
Carlisle, PA 17013
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER,
PLAINTIFF
V.
AMBER DEMO-I-r,
DEFENDANT
order.
IN THE COURT OF C.
: CUMBERLAND COU~
: 02-1510 CIVIL TERM
IN RE: CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this I '~ ~ day of June, 2002, the followi~
(1) The interim order entered on May 13, 2002, is vacate¢
(2) Amber DeMott and Christopher Finkenbinder shall hal
custody of Jayde Finkenbinder, born November 6, 1993, Justin F
February 1, 1998, and Jacob Finkenbinder, born February 1,199
(3) The mother shall have primary physical custody of Ja
and may have the children live with her in Brigman City, Utah.
(4) The father shall have periods of temporary physical c~
(a) For a continuing period until Saturday, August
summer school vacation periods, from one week al
ends until the first weekend in August.
(b) From noon on Christmas day each year until eit
thereafter depending on the travel arrangements m~
return the children to Utah.
3MMON PLEAS OF
ITY, PENNSYLVANIA
g order is entered:
and replaced with this
e shared legal
nkenbinder, born
B.
de, Justin and Jacob,
stody as follows:
2002. In future
;r the school year
3er December 30t~ or
~de by the mother to
.~l~hn A. Abom, Esquire
For the Father
.~For n Carey, Esquire
the Mother
02-1510 CIVIL TERM
(c) During such periods as he may visit with the ch
Utah, consistent with their school schedules.
(d) For the father's periods of temporary physical c
summer and at Christmas, the parents shall divide
transportation for the children.
Edgar B. Bayley,
:saa
Idren in Brigman City,
Jstody during each
.~qually the costs of
TRUE COPY :ROM RECORD
In Testimony whereof, I here unto set my hand
and the seal of said £oUrt at carlisle, Pa.
'' - Ptothonotary /"~'
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER,
PLAINTIFF
V.
AMBER DEMO-II',
DEFENDANT
IN THE COURT OF C
CUMBERLAND COUI
02-1510 CIVIL TERM
IN RE: CUSTODY
OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT
Bayley, J., June 13, 2002:--
Christopher Finkenbinder, age 29, and Amber DeMott, ag
a daughter, Jayde Finkenbinder, born November 6, 1993, age 8
and Jacob Finkenbinder, ages 4, who were born February 1, 19
this complaint for custody of the three children on March 28, 20£
conciliation conference, an interim order was entered on May 13
first custody order ever entered regarding Jayde, Justin and Jac(
that the mother could remain in Utah with the children until a cus
conducted, and she would bring the minor children to the hearir
conducted on May 30, 2002. The parents agreed that the childl
father for a period of time during this summer pending a further
father, besides seeking primary physical custody, seeks an ord(
from having the children in Utah. The mother seeks primary phy
permission to have the children live with her in Utah. She repres
allowed to have the children live with her in Utah, she will return
OMMON PLEAS OF
~TY, PENNSYLVANIA
27, are the parents of
and twin boys, Justin
18. The father filed
2. Following a
2002. This was the
b. The order provides
:ody hearing was
The hearing was
will stay with the
rder of court. The
prohibiting the mother
sical custody, and
ented that if she is not
o this area of
02-1510 CIVIL TERM
Pennsylvania, where both parties agree that she would have prin
The parents did not live together when Jayde was born, al
been married. The mother and father started to live together in
1994. They broke up in January, 1999. They lived together ag
from September, 1999 to September, 2000. In September,
into a domestic violence shelter for a short time, and then lived f(
mother's home in Shippensburg, Cumberland County. Up to tha'
had always lived with the mother, or with both parents during the
together. At the end of November, 2000, the mother moved to
Pennsylvania to live with a boyfriend. She took Justin and Jaco
Jayde with her mother in Shippensburg so as to not disturb her
an incident in February, 2001, when her boyfriend broke her ja~
back to Cumberland County, and into the mobile home of the fatl
father and the three children then lived together until June, 2001
mother moved into an apartment with the children in Newville, C[
February, 2002, the mother moved with the three children into
Brigman City, Utah, which is near Salt Lake City. She did not tel
moving, but she did call him on the evening she left, and told hirr
She testified that she relied on the advice of an attorney who tole
move the children to Utah without obtaining a court order becaus
custody order in place. The mother and the children lived with h~
-2-
~ary physical custody.
~d they have never
n apartment in April,
in in a mobile home
10, the mother moved
,r three weeks in her
:point, the children
)eriods they lived
ion Valley in western
with her. She left
chool that year. After
the mother moved
er. The mother and
At that time, the
mberland County. In
e home of her aunt in
the father she was
where she was going.
her that she could
e there was no
;r aunt in Brigman City
02-1510 CIVIL TERM
until she obtained her own three-bedroom apartment on April 1
During the periods when the parents have been separate(
seen the children regularly. He would see them when it was con
mother urging him to take them more often. The father has had
few overnights, and has seldom taken all three at the same time
effort to see them during the little over two months that the moth~
Valley at the end of 2000 and the beginning of 2001, although hE
Jayde was with the maternal grandmother in Shippensburg durin
separation in June, 2001, the mother would sometimes take the,
home, and even stay overnight herself, so that he would have tin
Thanksgiving, he spent one hour with the children. Last Christm
father stay at her house overnight so he could spend time with ti"
2002, the maternal grandmother died in Utah. The mother flew t
funeral. During the six days she was gone, the father agreed to~
children, although the mother had to find a care provider while h(
her move to Utah, the father called the children two days later, a~
two weeks later? Lately, he has been calling them more often.
occasions called the father so he could talk to the children. He
children any letters. Both parents agree that the children were
~ The children were still living in Newville with their mother on Fei
the birthday of Justin and Jacob. The father forgot to call them ti
-3-
2002.
the father has never
enient despite the
he children on very
He never made an
;r was living in Enon
, did not know that
that period. After the
~ildren to the father's
te with them. Last
as, the mother had the
e children. In January,
Utah to attend the
ike care of the
was working. After
d then called them
'he mother has on
as not sent the
(cited and happy to
)ruary 1st, which was
tat day.
02-1510 CIVIL TERM
see their father when they arrived from Pennsylvania on May 28~
The mother testified that there has been a history of dome
mental and verbal, during all periods when she lived with the fath
that he never physically abused the mother. The mother presse(
only one occasion in 1999. Those charges were resolved with th
to a count of summary harassment. The mother testified that ow
would often threaten to take the children from her. When she de
she did not tell him that she was going, and in fact told him that
move, because she feared that he would take the children from
The mother has a sporadic work history. Before she mo~
2001, she was a waitress at an restaurant in Shippensburg for a
Newville she worked as a waitress at the Carlisle Truck Plaza for
took a job at a Cracker Barrel restaurant. She later lost that job
too much time because of difficulty in obtaining reliable, afforda[
April 1, 2002, the mother works full-time as a nursing assistant in
facility. She earns $6.50 an hour. She works 2:30 p.m. to 11:00
with two days off each week. Two of those days off are on a wee
week. In addition, the mother attends six hours of class each w(
certified nursing assistant. She will take a test to become a certil
July of this year. If she passes, her salary will increase to $7 per
certification will allow her to seek employment in hospitals. She
-4-
;tic violence, physical,
er. The father testified
criminal charges on
.~ father pleading guilty
;r the years the father
:ided to move to Utah
he was not planning to
er.
~d to Newville in June,
,ear. VVhile living in
six months. She then
,ecause she took off
e childcare. Since
an assisted living
).m. on variable days
kend every other
~ek to become a
ied nursing assistant in
hour and her
~opes to eventually
02-1510 CIVIL TERM
become a licensed practical nurse. When she is working or at cl~
mother's two aunts, Kathy Stone and Della Burwell, provide care
and for Jayde when she is not in school. The mother receives $'
month, food stamps, medical assistance, a welfare payment for
by her aunts, and a welfare payment for her certified nursing as~
receives $90 a week child support from the father.
Until 1998, the father had various jobs. Since 1998, he ha
worker at Carlisle Tire & Wheel. He works a swing shift on a fou~
day schedule. On the first Monday through Friday, he works 6:3(
is then off between Saturday and Wednesday. On the next Thur.
works 2:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m., then on Saturday from 10:30 a.m.
then works on Sunday through Wednesday from 2:30 p.m. to 10:
Thursday. For the next seven days between Friday and Thursda
to 6:30 a.m. and then he is off between Friday and Sunday. He E
In 2001, he earned $23,890.
The mother testified that she was homesick to return to Bri
to Utah for a better life for her and her children. She lived in Brigl
birth until she was twelve years old. Three aunts, two uncles, an~
live there. She has a brother who lives an hour and a half away,
lives nearby in Idaho, both of whom have seen the children. Her
and he too has seen the children. The mother's workplace, and
-5-
iss, one of the
for Justin and Jacob,
35 cash assistance a
le childcare provided
stant classes. She
s been a production
-week, twenty-eight
a.m. to 2:30 p.m. He
day and Friday he
to 10:30 p.m. He
30 p.m., and is off
~,, he works 10:30 p.m.
,arns $13.59 per hour.
gman City and moved
nan City, Utah from
many of her cousins
~nd an uncle who
Father lives in Arizona,
le homes of her
02-1510 CIVIL TERM
aunts, are within walking distance of her apartment. She feels th
established stability for herself and her children in Utah that she
accomplish while living in Pennsylvania. The maternal grandmo'
in Shippensburg and has had a close relationship with the childrE
seldom taken care of all three of them at the same time because
her to handle. She testified that her daughter and the father wen
difficult times, and that she has never seen her daughter so hap[
new life in Brigman City.
An aunt, Kathy Stone, testified that the children have settl~
mother cares very well for them. On days the she works, the mo
Stone's home at 2:00 p.m. VVhen Jayde is in school her aunt pic
Bum/ell, another aunt, helps Stone if there is a conflict. She testi
attend church with her if the mother is working. The mother testi'
of the twins is much better now that her aunts have helped her.
completing second grade in Utah, and better than she did in Ne~
Justin and Jacob do not start Kindergarten until the 2003-2004 s,
mother plans to put them into a headstart program for the 2002-;
is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ and the Latter Day Sa
attended church with the children when she lived in Cumberland
continues to attend church in Utah.
The father testified that he loves his children and he belie~
-6-
at she has already
vas never able to
her, Thora Willie, lives
,n, although she has
the twins are a lot for
t through some very
.y since she started a
.~d in well, and that the
ther takes the boys to
cs her up. Della
~ied that the children
led that the discipline
layde has done well
ville Elementary.
:hool year, but the
003 year. The mother
ints. She regularly
County, and she
'es he can provide for
02-1510 CIVIL TERM
all of their needs. The father lives in a three-bedroom house in
County that he rented in April, 2002. His cousin's wife, Stephan
nearby with her husband and children ages 11 and 15. She has
Saturdays between 8:00 a.m. and noon at the Plainfield post offi~
father that she will care for Jayde, Justin and Jacob when he is v
Saturdays when she works her aunt will watch the children. The'
divorced. His mother lives in Carlisle and his father lives in Plain
grandmother had some contact with the children in the early yea
We must determine what is in the best interest of the chile
factors legitimately affecting their physical, intellectual, moral, spi
Swope v. Swope, 689 A.2d 264 (Pa. Super. 1977). In Gruber v.
Super. 174 (1990), the Superior Court of Pennsylvania set forth
consider in determining whether a custodial parent should be pe
children outside the geographical area of the non-custodial parel
1. the potential advantages of the proposed mc
that the move would substantially improve ti'
custodial parent and the children and is not 1
momentary whim on the part of the custodia
2. the integrity of the motives of both the custo~
parent in either seeking the move or seekinc.
3. the availability of realistic, substitute visitatio
will adequately foster an ongoing relationshi
and the non-custodial parent.
In Beers v, Beers, 710 A.2d 1206 (Pa. Super. 1998), the
-7-
lainfield, Cumberland
Finkenbinder, lives
part-time job on
:e. She has told the
,orking, and on
~ather's parents are
~ield. The maternal
's but that has waned.
ren, considering all
ritual wellbeing.
Gruber, 400 Pa.
hree factors to
'miffed to relocate
it:
~ve and the likelihood
e quality of life for the
he result of a
parent;
rial and non-custodial
to prevent it;
arrangements which
between the child
;uperior Court stated
02-1510 CIVIL TERM
that it has consistently held that Gruber "refines upon, but does
determinative inquiry as to the direction in which the best interes
to the first Gruber factor, the Superior Court stated in Anderson
472 (Pa. Super. 1999):
A court need not consider only economic be~
determining whether relocation substantially impro~
the parent .... Rather, '~vhen the move will signifi¢
general quality of life for the custodial parent, indire
children with whom they reside." This is because "1
child are more closely aligned with the interest and
lot alter the basic and
s of the child lie." As
v. McVay, 743 A.2d
lefits when
es the quality of life of
antly improve the
ct benefits flow to the
he best interests of the
quality of life of the
custodial parent .... "[T]here is no need.., to shcw an independent
benefit, apart from that of [the moving party], flowing to the children
because of the relocation. [See] Zalenko v. White~701 A.2d 227, 229
(Pa. Super. 1997). (Other citations omitted.)
In Ferdinand v. Ferdinand, 763 A.2d 820 (Pa. Super. 2000), the Superior Court
reversed an order of the trial court denying a mother's petition to
economic improvements in the mother's quality of life and happir
benefit of the children. In Burkholder v. Burkholder, 790 A.2d
2002), the Superior Court, affirming a mother's petition to reloca!
court credited the testimony of the mother's son that she was mi
testimony of numerous others that the children were thriving, hal
extended family.
In the case sub judice, this young mother has always stn
three active children under her primary care. The father has see
irregularly, and he has rarely had them for more than one overni
-8-
relocate where non-
~ess would inure to the
1053 (Pa. Super.
~, noted that the trial
ch happier, and the
,py and surrounded by
~ggled to raise the
the children
~t at a time. While the
02-1510 CIVIL TERM
mother was in Pennsylvania, she received some help from her rr
all three children at the same time. In Brigman City, Utah, the m,
home, she now has a network of supportive family members. S~
distance of her aunts, participates in family gatherings, and regul
with the children and her extended family. The childcare provide
helped her maintain her full-time job that she enjoys, and gives
advance in that job by taking classes for a certification. She ha~
obtaining a degree as a licensed practical nurse. We credit the t
maternal grandmother that her daughter, who has gone through
with the new life she has started in Brigman City. This stability a
family has correspondingly improved the quality of life for the thn
developed meaningful relationships with their extended family.
testimony of the mother that the twins are better behaved due t(
and Jayde's grades shows that she has adjusted well to her new
The mother's move to Utah was motivated by a desire to
home and raise her children within the supportive network of he~
has already obtained a degree of stability and security that she
Pennsylvania. She did not move to Utah on a whim, or to frustr
relationship with the children. She realizes that the father's rela~
children is important, and has encouraged him to maintain conta
There is no evidence that the father's resistance to the children
-9-
other, but seldom with
)ther's childhood
e lives within walking
arly attends church
d by the aunts has
er the opportunity to
established a goal of
~stimony of the
so much, is very happy
3d connection with
;e children. They have
~/e also credit the
their aunt's discipline,
school.
eturn to her childhood
extended family. She
ever had in
te the father's
ionship with the
:t with the children.
~oving to Utah is
02-1510 CIVIL TERM
inspired by improper motives. He is concerned about his ability ~) continue a
meaningful relationship with his children despite the fact that his :ontact with them
before they went to Utah was sporadic at best.
Generally, roundtrip airfares between Harrisburg and Salt Lake City range from
$265 to $350. The mother is willing to have the children spend )e better part of each
summer with the father. During the Christmas vacation period e will bring the
children here, and she will stay with her mother. She is willing to split the cost of the
airfare for the children with the father. If the father will visit the ct~ildren in Utah, she will
arrange for a place for him to stay. Such arrangements are prac~ ical, and will actually
provide the father with far more meaningful time with his children then he has ever
exercised.
Considering all of the evidence, we are satisfied that the b sst interest of Jayde,
Justin and Jacob are that the mother has primary physical custo¢ y of them in her home
in Brigman City, Utah. We will enter an order that will provide the father with realistic
temporary periods of physical custody that will adequately foster ~s ongoing
relationship with them.
ORDER OF COURT
order.
AND NOW, this ~ day' of June, 2002, the followin
(1) The interim order entered on May 13, 2002, is vacateC
(2) Amber DeMott and Christopher Finkenbinder shall ha~
-10-
order is entered:
and replaced with this
e shared legal
02-1510 CIVIL TERM
custody of Jayde Finkenbinder, born November 6, 1993, Justin
February 1, 1998, and Jacob Finkenbinder, born February 1, 1
(3) The mother shall have primary physical custody of
and may have the children live with her in Brigman City, Utah.
(4) The father shall have periods of temporary physical c~
(a) For a continuing period until Saturday, August:
summer school vacation periods, from one week at
ends until the first weekend in August.
(b) From noon on Christmas day each year until ei
thereafter depending on the travel arrangements n'
return the children to Utah.
(c) During such periods as he may visit with the ch
Utah, consistent with their school schedules.
(d) For the father's periods of temporary physical
summer and at Christmas, the parents shall divide
transportation for the children.
Edgar B. Bayley,
-11-
'inkenbinder, born
~8.
~de, Justin and Jacob,
~stody as follows:
2002. In future
ter the school year
Iher December 30~ or
ade by the mother to
ildren in Brigman City,
ustody during each
squally the costs of
02-1510 CIVIL TERM
John A. Aborn, Esquire
For the Father
Joan Carey, Esquire
For the Mother
:saa
-12-
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER,
Petitioner
V
AMBER DEMOTT,
Respondent
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION-LAW
NO. 02-1510 CIVIL
IN CUSTODY
PETITION FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT
FOR DISOBEDIENCE OF CUSTODY ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of January, 2003, comes the plaintiff, Christopher
Finkenbinder, by and through his attorney, John A. Aborn, Esquire, of ABOM &
KUTULAKIS, L.L.P., and files this Petition for Civil Contempt pursuant to
Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1915.12 as follows:
1. On June 13, 2002, Judge Edgar B. Bayley entered an order awarding
Christopher Finkenbinder ("Petitioner") partial cuStody of the minor children Jayde
Finkenbinder, Justin Finkenbinder and Jacob Finkenbinder ("subject minors"). A true
and correct copy of the order is attached to this petition.
2. Amber Demott ("Respondent") has willfUlly failed to abide by clause 4(b) of
the Custody Order, which provides:
(4) The father shall have periods of temporary physical custody as
follows:
(b) From noon on Christmas day each year until either December
30th or thereafter depending on the travel arrangements made
by the mother to remm the children to Utah.
3. In telephone conversations the Petitioner had with the Respondent in early
December of 2002, the Respondent:
a) Indicated to the Petitioner that she had no intention of returning to
Pennsylvania with the subject minors so that Petitioner could enjoy his
time of temporary physical custody as provided in clause 4(b) of the
custody order; and
b) Indicated to the Petitioner that she had no intention of making travel
arrangements for the subject minors so that they would delivered to
Petitioners custody during the time of temporary physical custody as
provided in clause 4(b) of the custody order.
4. Undersigned Counsel spoke with the Respondent's Counsel, Joan Carey,
Esquire, who agreed to discuss the matters in averment nurnber three (3) with the
Respondent.
5. Joan Carey, Esquire gave a remm call to undersiigned counsel and indicated
that she no longer had a working telephone number for the Respondent.
6. The subject minors were never delivered to Petitioner's custody for the period
directed by clause 4(b) of the custody order.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that Respondent be held in contempt of court,
that this Court Modify its June 13, 2002, Order of Court to grant primary physical
custody to the Petitioner and to award to the Petitioner his attorney fees related to
prosecuting this contempt matter.
Respectfully submitted,
ABOM & KUTULAKIS, L.L.P.
8 South Hanover Street; Suite 204
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 249-0900
Attorney for .Plaintiff
PETITIONER VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in this complaint are true and correct. I
understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. §
4904 relating to unswom falsification to authorities.
/-% 0_3 ~
Date Pe~il-oher
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER,
Petitioner
V
AMBER DEMOTT,
Respondent
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION-LAW
NO. 02-1510 CIVIL
IN CUSTODY
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this 13th day of January, 2003, I, Jolm A. Abom, Esquire, of Abom
& Kumlakis, L.L.P., hereby certify that I did serve a tree and correct copy of the
foregoing Notice and Order to Appear upon the defemtant, Amber Demott, by hand
delivery to her attorney at the following location:
Joan Carey, Esquire
MidPenn Legal Services
Irvine Row
Carlisle, PA 17013
ABOM & KUTULAKIS, L.L.P.
{John A. Ab, b, ofi.~ --"-------~
~anover Street, Suite 204
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorney for Plaintiff
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER
PLAINTIFF
AMBER DEMOTT
DEFENDANT
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
02-1510 CIVIL .ACTION LAW
IN CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, Friday, January 17, 2003 , upon consideration of the attached Complaint,
it is hereby directed that parties and their respective counsel appear before Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq. , the conciliator,
at 4th Floor, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle on Thursday, February 13, 2003 at 10:30 AM
for a Pre-Hearing Custody Conference. At such conference, an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or
if this cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the court, and to enter into a temporary
order. All children age five or older may also be present at the conference. Failure to appear at the conference may
provide grounds for entry of a temporary or permanent order.
The court hereby directs the parties to furnish any and all existing Protection from Abuse orders,
Special Relief orders, and Custody orders to the conciliator 48 hours prior to scheduled hearing.
FOR THE COURT,
By: /s/ Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq.
Custody Conciliator
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law to comply with the Americans
with Disabilites Act of 1990. For information about accessible facilities and reasonable accommodations
available to disabled individuals having business before the court, please contact our office. All arrangements
must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business before the court. You must attend the
scheduled conference or hearing.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR ATTORNEY AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE AN ATTORNEY OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET
FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Cumberland County Bar Association
2 Liberty Avenue
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 170 ! 3
Telephone (717) 249-3166
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER
PLAINTIFF
AMBER DEMOTT
DEFENDANT
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
02-1510 CIVIL ACTION LAW
IN' CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, Thursday, February 20, 2003 , upon consideration of the attached Complaint,
it is hereby directed that parties and their respective counsel appear before Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq. , the conciliator,
at 4th Floor, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle on Thursday, March 06, 2003 at 10:30 AM
for a Pre-Hearing Custody Conference. At such conference, an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or
if this cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the court, and to enter into a temporary
order. All children age five or older may also be present at the conference. Failure to appear at the conference may
provide grounds for entry of a temporary or permanent order.
The court hereby directs the parties to furnish any and all existing Protection from Abuse orders,
Soecial Relief orders, and Custody orders to the conciliator 48 hours prior to scheduled hearinR.
FOR THE COURT.
By: /s/ Hubert X. Gilroy, Esq.
Custody Conciliator
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law to comply with the
Americans with Disabilites Act of 1990. For information about accessible facilities and reasonable
accommodations available to disabled individuals having business befi>re the court, please contact our office.
All arrangements must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business before the court. You must
attend the scheduled conference or hearing.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR ATTORNEY AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE AN' ATTORNEY OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET
FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Cumberland County Bar Association
32 South Bedford Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
Telephone (717) 249-3 ]t66
APR l l 2003
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER,
Plaintiff
AMBER DEMOTT,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
:
: NO. 02 - 1510 CIVIL
: IN CUSTODY
COURT ORDER
AND NOW, this [ H day of April, 2003, upon consideration of the attached Custody
Conciliation Report, it is ordered and directed as follows:
The Contempt Petitions filed by both parties are dismissed subject to each
party being able to resurrect allegations made in those Contempt Petitions in
the event the parties determine that they desire to file a petition in the future.
This court's Order of June 13, 2002 is modified such that travel arrangements
for exchange of custody between the parties shall be initiated and made by the
Mother with the Mother making the airplane travel reservations and paying
the costs for those reservations up front. Upon Mother's providing Father
with verification of the cost of travel and purchase of the tickets, Father shall
reimburse Mother 50% of the travel cost for the three minor children within
fourteen (14) days of his receipt of verification of those costs. It is understood
that the travel arrangements made by the Mother shall be done in a timely
fashion to take advantage of airfare discounts that could be achieved by
reserving seats prior to twenty-one (21) days before the travel date.
CC:
,//John A. Abom, Esquire
/~Joan Carey, Esquire
Additionally, for the Summer of 2003, Father shall be given an extra week of
custody with the minor children to start at the beginning of Summer on or
about May 31~ or some other time agreed upon by the parties such that
Father achieves an extra week of time in the Summer.
Edgar B. Bayley''' ~ ~
.
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER,
Plaintiff
V
AMBER DEMOTT,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 02 - 1510 CIVIL
IN CUSTODY
Prior Judge: Edgar B. Bayley
CONCILIATION CONFERENCE SUMM/LRY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY CIVIL RULE OF
PROCEDURE 1915.3-8(b), the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following
report:
The pertinent information pertaining to the children who are the subject of this
litigation is as follows:
Jayde Finkenbinder, born November 6, 1993; Justin Finkenbinder, born February 1,
1998; and Jacob Finkenbinder, born February 1, 1998.
A Conciliation Conference was held on March 6, 2003, with the following individuals
in attendance:
The Father, Christopher Finkenbinder, with his counsel, John A. Abom, Esquire;
and Attorney Joan Carey who appeared on behalf of the Mother, Amber Demott.
The parties have a def'mite disagreement with respect to who needs to make
arrangements for reservations for the children to visit the Father. Mother moved out
of the area, and the existing Court Order of June 13, 2002 at Paragraph 4B talks
about "...travel arrangements made by the Mother..." Mother suggests she does not
have enough money to front the entire airplane fair to get the kids from Utah to
Pennsylvania, and Father suggests the same. Basicallly, this is an issue as to who is
going to blink first, and the parties could not agree at the custody conciliation
conference. The conciliator spoke with Judge Bayley and recommended that the
mother be required to somehow generate the funds to purchase the tickets, after
which the Father would be required to promptly reimburse Mother for 50%. It
appears this should be Mother's obligation since Mother moved to Utah and because
the primary custodian is in a better position to arrange their schedule consistent with
a flight schedule for exchange of visitation.
recommends an order in the form as attached.
On that basis, the conciliator
Custody ~ onici~e
CHRISTOPHER F1NKENB1NDER,
Plaintiff/Respondent
VS.
AMBER DEMOTT,
Defendant/Petitioner
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 02-1510 CIVIL TERM
IN CUSTODY
PETITION FOR CONTEMPT AND MODIFICATION
Petitioner, Amber Demott, by and through her counsel, Jessica Diamondstone of
MidPenn Legal Services, states the following:
1. Petitioner is the above-named Defendant, hereinafter referred to as the mother,
who resides at 835 South 400 East, Brigham City, Utah, 84302.
2. Respondent is the above-named Plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as the £ather, who
resides at 11 Pine Road, Plainfield, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 17013.
3. The above-named parties are the natural parents of Jayde, Finkenbinder, born
November 6, 1993; Justin Finkenbinder, born February 1, 1998; and Jacob
Finkenbinder, born February 1, 1998.
4. The current Custody Order, attached as Exhibit "A' and incorporated herein by
reference, is dated April 14, 2003. The Order, in pertinent part, modifies the June
13, 2002 Order "such that travel arrangements for exchange of custody between
the parties shall be initiated and made by the Mother with the Mother making the
airplane travel reservations and paying the costs for those reservations up front."
After the mother makes the travel arrangements and provides the father with
receipts and an itinerary, the father is to reimburse the mother within £ourteen
days.
5. The father has willfully disobeyed the Order by failing to pay his half of the
$919.50 airplane fare for the Christmas 2003 travel arrangements. The mother
purchased tickets for the children to travel during the Christmas 2003 holiday.
The tickets were purchased on October 19, 2003 and the receipts with itinerary
were mailed to the father on October 22, 2003. The children came to
Pennsylvania for the Christmas holiday and spent time with the father, but he
refuses to pay his share of the travel fare in the amount of $459.75.
6. The father is not acting in the children's best interest for reasons including, but
not limited to, the following:
a. According to the June 13, 2002, Order, the children are to be with their
father from noon on Christmas Day until December 30. In 2003, the
father demanded that the children be picked up a day early. When the
mother arrived to retrieve the children, the father became verbally and
physically confrontational with the mother while the children were
watching.
b. Jacob Finkenbinder uses medication to control his ADHD and the father
refuses to give him this medication. Instead, the father feeds the child
candy and soda, increasing the child's hyperactivity and making it more
difficult to regain control of him when he has not been taking his
medication as prescribed.
c. The father promises to send the children presents for birthdays and special
occasions and then never follows through with the promises, causing the
children to be disappointed and confused.
d. Justin Finkenbinder suffers from asthma and consistently has problems
after visits to his father's home because of the cigarette smoke.
7. The mother is the parent who can best provide for the children for reasons
including, but not limited to, the following:
a. The mother has been the primary caregiver fur a majority of the children's
lives and currently has primary physical custody of the children.
b. The mother has attempted to work with the father for the sake of the
children; she is the parent who can best facilitate contact with the other
parent.
c. The mother is presently able to provide for the children by giving the
children a nurturing environment and providing for their emotional,
physical, medical, and educational needs.
8. The father is represented by Attorney John Abom.
9. Counsel for the mother has attempted to contact father's attorney but has been
unable to do so. It is unknown whether opposing counsel concurs with this petition.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the following:
a. That this Court find the father in contempt and order him to pay his
share of the $919.50 airplane travel expenses in the amount of
$459.75
b. That the Court modify the current Order to allow the following
changes:
1. The children shall travel for the Christmas holiday
on alternating years. Mother shall continue to
initiate and pay for the initial cost of the travel fare
and the father shall continue to be responsible to
reimburse her for half of the travel expenses.
2. When the children come to Pennsylvania for the
Christmas holiday, the mother shall be responsible
for getting the children from Baltimore-Washington
International Airport (BWI) to their grandmother's
home in Pennsylvania. Defendant/father shall pick
up the children at the grandmother's home.
3. During summer visits, the father will be responsible
for retrieving the children at BWI airport when their
flight arrives. For all return flights, the father will
be responsible for returning the children to the
grandmother's home by 4:00 p.m. of the evening
before the return flight. The children's grandmother
will provide transportation back to BWI and will
accompany the children for the return flight to Utah.
4. The mother shall send the father receipts and the
itinerary for all flights via certified mail, return
receipt requested, with postal tracking. If the father
has not paid his half of the airplane fare within
fourteen of receipt of the travel information, the
children will not fly for the next planned trip.
Father shall pay Mother half of the travel fare as
well as the cost to change all four tickets (mother
plus three children) to the next travel period within
fourteen days of being notified that the flights have
been changed.
Petitioner also requests any other relief this court deems just and proper.
Respectfully submitted,
Attorney for Defendant/Petitioner
MidPenn Legal Services
8 Irvine Row
Carlisle, PA 17013
VERIFICATION
The above-named Plaintiff, Amber DeMott Landon, verifies that the statements made in
the above Petition for Contempt and Modification, are true and correct. Plaintiff understands that
false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. §4904, relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
AJnber DeMo" Landon, Pla~Pf ~-' !
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER
Plaintiff
VS.
AMBER DEMOTT
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 02-1510 CIVIL TERM
CUSTODY
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Jessica Diamondstone, Esquire, of MidPenn Legal Services, attorney for the
Plaintiff, Amber DeMott, hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing
Petition for Contempt and Modification of a Custody Order on the following date and in
the manner indicated below:
U.S. First Class Mail, Postage Pre-Paid
John A. Abom, Esquire
36 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Date: 5' ff .07
~~~'~squire
MidPenn Legal Services
8 Irvine Row
Carlisle, PA 17013
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER
PLAINTIFF
AMBER DEMOTT :
DEFENDANT :
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
02-1510 CIVIL ACTION LAW
1N CUSTODY
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, __ Thursd__ay, March 18, 2004 _, upon consideration of the attached Complaint,
it is hereby directed that parties and their respective counsel appear befbre Hubert X. Gilro , EsJiLE~sq~, the conciliator,
at 4th Floor, Cumberland Coun_!y Courthouse, Carlisle on Thursda_},, Apr_il 08, 2004
at 10:30_~__~
for a Pre-Hearing Custody Conference. At such conference, an effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute; or
if this cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the court, and to enter into a temporary
order. All children age five or older may also be I~resent at the conference. Failure to apl~ear at the conference may
provide grounds for entry of a temporary or permanent order.
The court hereby directs the parties to furnish any and all existing Protection from Abuse orders,
Special Relief orders, and Custody orders to the conciliator 48 hours prior to scheduled hearinl~.
FOR THE COURT,
By: /s/ Hubert X~tl, ~rnhc
Custody Conciliator
The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law to comply with the
Americans with Disabilites Act of 1990. For information about accessible facilities and reasonable
accommodations available to disabled individuals having business before the court, please contact our office.
All arrangements must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business before the court. You must
attend the scheduled conference or hearing.
HAVE ANYOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR ATTORNEY AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT
ATFORNEY OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET
FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Cumberland County Bar Association
32 South Bedford Street
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
Telephone (717) 249-3166
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER,
Plaintiff
V
AMBER DEMOTT,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: NO. 2002- 1510
: IN CUSTODY
COURT ORDER
AND NOW, this 1~'~ day of July, 2004, upon consideration of the attached
Custody Conciliation report, it is ordered and directed that this Courts prior orders of June
13, 2002 and April 14, 2003 are temporarily modified such that father's rights of visitation
with the minor children are suspended pending father's resoliution of his monetary obligation
to the mother for reimbursement of travel costs mother has paid for the children. Upon the
father making satisfactory payments to mother to reimburse her for the travel costs she has
paid on behalf of father and upon father making adequate assurances in advance that future
costs that mother advances for travel tickets will be reimbursed to her in a timely fashion in
accordance with the April 14, 2003 order, father's periods of temporary custody with the
minor children shall be reinstated.
Should father desire a hearing to address whether the current custody order should
be modified relative to whether father needs to pay any funds for travel expenses, father's
attorney may contact the Custody Conciliator directly for purpases of arranging a hearing
before the Court.
CC:
John A. Abom, Esquire
Jessica Diamondstone, Esquire
Judge E~ar ~.. ]]a~ley~Jr.
iLED-OFri~E
OF THE PROTHONOTARy
21]O~JUL 12 ~l~lll: 28
CHRISTOPHER FINKENBINDER,
Plaintiff
V
AMBER DEMOTT,
Defendant
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERL3~ND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: NO. 2002 - 1510
: IN CUSTODY
CONCILIATION CONFERENCE SUM~_IARY REPORT
The Conciliator met with the parties and counsel back in April on a petition for
contempt f'ded by the mother. The issue is over father's failure to reimburse mother for
travel arrangements she has made for the children.
By way of background, the parties appeared before the Conciliator in March of 2003.
Mother had relocated and a prior order from June of 2002 allowing mother to relocate
specifies that mother would make arrangements for travel. Mother was suggesting at that
time that she did not have enough money to pay in advance for travel tickets. By order of
April 14, 2003, this Court specified that mother would tmtke the arrangements for travel
and pay the costs of the airplane tickets in advance. The o~tder specified that father would
reimburse mother 50% of the travel costs upon receipt of verification of the amount.
Over the past Christmas holiday, mother fronted the money for the travel so the
children could go back to see their father and father has not reimbursed the mother·
Additionally, mother also advanced funds for the plane tickel~s for the children to go back to
see the father in the summer, and father called mother at the last minute indicating that he
could not afford to take the kids in custody during the surmner months. As of this point,
father owes mother about $900.00 and, obviously, mother is reluctant to make any further
commitments relative to sending the children to the father and purchasing tickets in advance
when she cannot rely upon the father to abide by the Court order on this matter.
Based upon the above, the Conciliator recommends an order in the form as attached·
DATE