HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-4451COKKONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
JENNIFER BECK,
Plaintiff,
v.
CARLISLE SPORTS WORIM,
Defendants.
TERM 2006
YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND
AGAINST THE CLAIMS SET FORTH IN THE FOLLOWING PAGES, YOU MUST
TAKE ACTION WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS AFTER THIS COMPLAINT AND
NOTICE ARE SERVED, BY ENTERING A WRITTEN APPEARANCE
PERSONALLY OR BY AN ATTORNEY AND FILING IN WRITING WITH THE
COURT YOUR DEFENSES OR OBJECTIONS TO THE CLAIMS SET FORTH
AGAINST YOU. YOU ARE WARNED THAT IF YOU FAIL TO DO SO THE CASE
MAY PROCEED WITHOUT YOU AND A JUDGMENT MAY BE ENTERED
AGAINST YOU BY THE COURT WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR ANY
MONEY CLAIMED IN THE COMPLAINT OR FOR ANY OTHER CLAIM OR
RELIEF REQUESTED BY THE PLAINTIFF. YOU MAY LOSE MONEY OR
PROPERTY OR OTHER RIGHTS IMPORTANT TO YOU.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF
YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO THE
TELEPHONE OR THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU
CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
32 SOUTH BEDFORD STREET
CARLISLE, PA 17013
1-800-990-9108
717-249-3166
LAW OFFICE OF GILL AND CHAMAS
655 Florida Grove Road, Box 760
Woodbridge, New Jersey 07095
(732) 324-7600
Attorney for Plaintiff
JENNIFER RECK, 122 Lawrence Parkway,
Laurence Harbor, NJ 08879
COURT OF THE COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
Plaintiff(s),
VS.
CARLISLE SPORTS EMPORIUM, 29 S.
Middlesex Road Carlisle, PA 17013
and
JOHN DOES -10 (fictitious names, real names
unknown) and ABC CORPS, (fictitious names,
real names unknown
Defendant(s)
6 6- y 9's') TERM, 2006
COMPLAINT - CIVIL ACTION
PREMISES LIABILITY
1. Plaintiff, Jennifer Reek, is an adult individual, citizen and resident of the
State of New Jersey, who is currently residing at 122 Laurence Parkway, Laurence
Harbor, New Jersey 08879. As of August 6, 2004, the plaintiff, Jennifer Reek, was
twenty three years old.
2. Defendants, Carlisle Sports Emporium and John Does, businesses,
citizens, and residents of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in Carlisle, Pennsylvania
doing business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
3. At all relevant times hereto, defendant, Carlisle Sports, is a corporation
who owned, operated, maintained and controlled the premises located at 29 S. Middlesex
Road in Carlisle in the State of Pennsylvania.
4. The amount in controversy exceeds the local rules for amounts in
controversy required in arbitration.
5. At all relevant times hereto defendants acted by themselves and by and
through their agents, servants and/or employees, including actual, apparent and/or
ostensible agents.
6. On or about August 6, 2004, the Plaintiff, Jennifer Reck, was legally and
lawfully on defendant's premises.
7. At the time and place aforesaid, the defendants, constructed, controlled,
and supervised the structure on defendant's property.
8. On or about August 6, 2004 while on defendants' premises plaintiff was
injured when she slipped on grease getting offa go kart.
9. The injuries suffered by Jennifer Reck were caused solely and exclusively
by the negligent acts and/or omissions of all defendants, jointly and severally, and were
due in no matter whatsoever to any fault or failure to act on the part of the plaintiff,
Jennifer Reck.
10. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of all
defendants, jointly and severally, their agents, servants and/or employees, Jennifer Reck,
sustained severe and permanent injuries resulting in serious impairment of bodily
functions, all and some of which are permanent, known and unknown, as well as other
2
personal injuries and damages which are not currently apparent, but which will arise in
the future, including, but not limited to the following:
a. Fractured right finger.
b. Seven stitches.
C. Removal of nail.
11. The injuries described above are chronic, permanent, and are a direct
result of the negligence, carelessness and recklessness of all defendants, jointly and
severally, including their agents, servants and/or employees.
COUNTI
JENNIFER RECK v. CARLISLE SPORTS EMPORIUM
NEGLIGENCE
12 The previous paragraphs are incorporated herein by reference.
13. The negligence, carelessness, and recklessness of defendants consists
among other things, of the following;
a. negligently, carelessly, and recklessly failing to provide plaintiff with a
safe place to visit;
b. failure to adequately inspect premises for hazardous conditions;
C. failure to properly secure the security carts;
d. failing to design, maintain, engineer, fabricate, plan, plot, supervise and
establish proper and adequate materials for the premises;
e. failing to warn plaintiff, a social guest, of the dangerous and unsafe
conditions then and there existing upon the premises;
f. failure to adopt, enact, employ and enforce proper and adequate safety
programs, precautions, procedures, measures, and plans:
3
g. violating and failing to comply with federal and state statutes, local
ordinances, and all other rules, enactments, or regulations applicable or in
effect pertaining to the security, construction and maintenance of the
premises, structure and its attachments.;
h. exposing plaintiff, a social guest, to peculiar and unreasonable risks and
dangers by failing to adequately consider, inspect, and secure the
premises, structure and its attachments;
i. inviting the plaintiff onto said premises, structure and its attachments
when defendants knew or should have known of the dangerous conditions
that existed;
j failing to warn the plaintiff of the dangers and defective conditions the
defendants knew or should have known of,
k. failing to repair or remove or eliminate the dangerous and defective
conditions to prevent plaintiff's injuries which such injuries were
reasonably foreseeable to defendants;
1. failing to repair or otherwise eliminate the aforesaid dangers and defective
conditions thereby creating a risk of harm to all person visiting said
premises, and its attachments;
M. failing to warn plaintiff, a social guest, of the lack of proper security;
n. negligence as may be proven from facts now exclusively in the possession
of defendants, which may be ascertained after the filing of this complaint.
4
COUNT II
JENNIFER RECK v. CARLISLE SPORTS EMPORIUM
NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION
14. The previous paragraphs are incorporated herein by reference.
15. The negligence, carelessness and recklessness of defendants, Carlisle
Sports Emporium and John Does, consist of, among other things, the following;
a. failure to supervise and monitor the plaintiffs activities while on their
property/premises;
b. failure to exercise due care under the circumstances;
c. failure to properly supervise and monitor the use of the aforementioned
premises;
d. negligent operational procedure;
e. failure to properly supervise and monitor the security carts;
f. failure to warn the plaintiff on dangers known to the defendants or those that
should have been known to defendants of misuse or incorrect use of
construction materials provided;
WHEREFORE, plaintiff, Jennifer Reck, demand judgment against all defendants
jointly and severally, in an amount in excess of the local arbitration rules an in excess of
Fifty Thousand Dollars, $50,000.00 in compensatory damages, exclusive of prejudgment
interest, costs, and post judgment interest.
LAW O FICES OF GILL AND CHAMAS
By:
I P. MIKITA, JR.
Attorneys for the Plaintiff
P.O. Box 760, 655 Florida Grove Road
Woodbridge, New Jersey 07095
Dated: August 2, 2006 PA Attorney's License #: 73901
5
VERIFICATION
I, William P. Mikita, Jr., Esq., hereby verify the statements made in the foregoing
Civil Action Complaint are true and correct, to the best of my knowledge, information,
and belief. I understand the false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of
18Pa.C.S. §4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
WILLIAM P. MIKITA, JR., ESQ.
Dated: $/46
6
(?
V ...I
W
ro ?
.... ?,?
v ? ?
:t
r
.-1
(+
SHERIFF'S RETURN - REGULAR
CASE NO: 2006-04451 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
RECK JENNIFER
VS
CARLISLE SPORTS EMPORIUM
SHARON LANTZ
, Sheriff or Deputy Sheriff of
Cumberland County,Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law,
says, the within COMPLAINT & NOTICE
CARLISLE SPORTS EMPORIUM
was served upon
DEFENDANT
the
at 2045:00 HOURS, on the 30th day of August , 2006
at 29 S MIDDLESEX ROAD
CARLISLE, PA 17013
by handing to
JAMIE PLASTERER, OWNER, ADULT IN CHARGE
a true and attested copy of COMPLAINT & NOTICE together with
and at the same time directing Her attention to the contents thereof.
Sheriff's Costs: So Answers:
Docketing 18.00
Service 4.40
Affidavit .00
Surcharge 10.00 R. Thomas Kline
.00
32.40-/ 08/31/2006
gL GILL & CHAMAS
7
Sworn and Subscibed to By:?
i
before me this day eputy Sheri
of A.D.
Curtis R. Long
Prothonotary
Office of the Protbonotarp
Cumberfalab Cvuntp
Renee K. Simpson
Deputy Prothonotary
John E. Slike
Solicitor
e )L y /q 5j CVIL TERM
ORDER OF TERMINATION OF COURT CASES
AND NOW THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2009, AFTER MAILING NOTICE OF
INTENTION TO PROCEED AND RECEIVING NO RESPONSE - THE ABOVE
CASE IS HEREBY TERMINATED WITH PREJUDICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PA
R C P 230.2.
BY THE COURT,
CURTIS R. LONG
PROTHONOTARY
One Courthouse Square • Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013 • (717) 240-6195 • Fax (717) 240-6573