HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-6379
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT
v.
: CIVIL ACTION NO. 01.. - t.- 3"'1 '? {! i u; L~~
: CITATION NO. 05-1806
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.,
130 W. KING STREET
SHIPPENSBURG, Pa 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
: LID # 3820
: LICENSE NO. CC-511 0
LICENSE FIRST ISSUED: August 10, 1949
PETITION FOR REVIEW
1. Pursuant to Section 464 of the Liquor Code, any applicant who is aggrieved by a decision
of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board to revoke or suspend a liquor license pursuant to S471
of the Code may appeal to the court of common pleas of the county in which the premises or
permit applied for is located.
2. Vets Canteen Association ("Licensee") establishment is located at 130 W. King Street,
Shippensburg, Cumberland County.
3. Licensee appeals the Opinion of the Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement dated
October 4,2006, attached as "Exhibit A", which affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's
opinion dated August 15,2006, attached as "Exhibit B".
4. Licensee alleges that the Bureau erred in affirming the Administrative Law Judge's
decision. Licensee alleges that the Administrative Law Judge committed an error of law, abused
his discretion, or his decision was not based upon substantial evidence in that the violations
charged were not willful and proceeds of the game were used to benefit charity.
5. Licensee contends that a fine is appropriate to punish and prevent recidivism.
6. Licensee contends that automatic supersedeas applies in this case pursuant to Section
471 (b) of the Code in that the nature of the misconduct, which is central to the citation, did not
involve willful acts in violating the Local Options Small Games of Chance Act.
7. Licensee has demonstrated basis for appeal therefore there is sufficient cause upon which
automatic supersedeas may be granted.
8. Petitioner thus requests review and asks that the license suspension be abrogated and
replaced solely with a fine or other appropriate lesser punishment.
WHEREFORE, Licensee asks that the Court review the Pennsylvania Liquor Control
Board's decision and in doing so abrogate the license suspension and replace it solely with a fine
or other appropriate lesser punishment.
Respectfully Submitted,
ROMINGER & WHARE
Date: v." ~l I.'
~
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, Pa 17013
(717) 241-6070
Court Id No. 81924
Attorney for Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT
: CIVIL ACTION NO.
v.
: CITATION NO. 05-1806
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.,
130 W. KING STREET
SHIPPENSBURG. Pa 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
: LID # 3820
: LICENSE NO. CC-5110
LICENSE FIRST ISSUED: August 10, 1949
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Karl E. Rominger, Esquire, attorney for Defendant, do hereby certify that I this day
served a copy of this Petition/or Review upon the following by depositing same in the United
States Mail, first class postage prepaid, at Carlisle, Pennsylvania, addressed as follows:
Thomas M. Ballaron, Esquire
Pennsylvania State Police
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PAl 711 0
Dated:
Respectfully submitted,
ROMINGER & WHARE
~
.
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, P A 17013
(717) 241-6070
Supreme Court ID # 81924
Attorney for Defendant
. IDft.
ailing Date: October 4, 2006
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
HARRISBURG, PA 17124-0001
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT
Citation No. 05-1806
vs.
VETS CANTEEN ASSOCIATION
1 30 West King Street
Shippensburg, PA 17257-1128
License No. CC-511 0
Counsel for Licensee:
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
Rominger & Whare
1 55 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Counsel for Bureau:
Thomas M. Ballaron, Esquire
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PA 17110
OPINION
Vets Canteen Association ("Licensee") appealed from the Opinion and
Order Upon Remand Order From The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
("Board") of Administrative Law Judge Felix Thau ("AL)"), wherein the
AL), upon remand from the Board, re-imposed a penalty consisting of a fine
Exhibit "A"
in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) and added a license
suspension of ten (1 0) days.
The citation contained two counts.
The first count charged Licensee with violations of section 471 of the
Liquor Code [47 P.S. ~ 4-471] and section 315(b) of the Local Option
Small Games of Chance Act [10 P.S. ~ 315(b)], in that during the periods
April 3 through 9, April 10 through 16, April 17 through 23, April 24
through 30, May 1 through 7, May 29 through June 4, June 5 through 11,
June 12 through 18, June 19 through 25, June 26 through July 2, July 3
through 9, July 10 through 16, July 17 through 23 and July 24 through 30,
2005, Licensee, by its servants, agents or employees, offered and/or awarded
more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) in cash or merchandise in any
seven (7)-day period.
The second count charged Licensee with violations of sections 471 and
493( 12) of the Liquor Code [47 P.S. ~~ 4-471, 4-493( 12)], section 311
of the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act [10 P.S. ~ 311] and
section 901 of the Department of Revenue Regulations [61 Pa. Code ~
901], in that on May 13 and August 5, 2005, Licensee, by its servants,
agents or employees, failed to maintain complete and truthful records
2
covering the operation of the licensed business for a period of two (2) years
concerning the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act.
In his original Adjudication and Order dated June 22, 2006, the AL]
sustained both counts of the citation and imposed a penalty of a fine of one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00). He stated that no suspension was being
imposed because Licensee had "... voluntarily agreed to cease operating
pursuant to its Small Games of Chance License for a period of 28 days,
beginning August 1, 2006 and terminating close of business August 28,
2006...." [Page 4]. In Licensee's appeal to the ALl's June 22, 2006
decision, Licensee disputed that it had made such an agreement, and
requested that it be permitted to only pay the fine. Neither the Notes of
Testimony of the hearing before the AL] on May 16, 2006, nor the record
reflects any agreement by Licensee to forego operations pursuant to its small
games of chance license.
By Opinion and Order of the Board mailed on August 2, 2006,
remand of this matter was remanded to the AL] for imposition of penalties
consistent with the record and the Board's Opinion. The ALl's Opinion and
Order Upon Remand From The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, mailed
3
on August 15, 2006, re-imposed the penalty of a fine of one thousand
dollars ($1,000.00) and added a license suspension of ten (10) days.
In its current appeal, filed timely on September 11, 2006, Licensee
alleged that the violations were not willful, and the proceeds of the games
were used for charity. Licensee also opined that a fine is sufficient to punish
licensee and prevent recidivism.
Pursuant to section 471 of the Liquor Code [47 P.S. ~ 4-471], the
appeal in this case must be based solely on the record before the At J. The
Board shall only reverse the decision of the At J if the At J committed an
error of law or abused his discretion, or if his decision was not based upon
substantial evidence. The Commonwealth Court has defined /I substantial
evidence" to be such relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as
adequate to support a conclusion. Joy Global, Inc. v. Workers'
Compensation Appeal Bd. (Hogue), 876 A.2d 1098 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005);
Chapman v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole, 86 Pa. Cmwlth. 49,
484 A.2d 413 (1984).
The record in this matter reflects that counsel for the Pennsylvania State
Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement (/IBureau") recommended a
4
penalty consisting of a fine of one thousand five hundred dollars
($1,500.00), and a five (5)-day suspension of the license. (N.T. 23-24).1
The merits of the Bureau's charges against Licensee will not be
addressed in this appeal as the appeal is only from the new penalty imposed
by the AL] in his August 15, 2006 decision. The imposition of penalties is
the exclusive prerogative of the AL]. The Board may not disturb penalties
imposed by the AL] if they are within the parameters set forth in the Liguor
Code. Section 471 (b) of the Liquor Code [47 P.S. ~ 4-471 (b)] provides
that the AL] shall "immediately suspend or revoke the license, or impose a
fine of not less than fifty dollars ($ 50) nor more than one thousand dollars
($1,000), or both" for offenses of the type set forth in this citation. Because
the penalty set forth by the AL] is clearly permissible and within the scope of
section 471, the Board has no authority to alter it.
Therefore, the decision of the AL] is affirmed.
I Licensee previously had been adjudicated responsible for gambling violations similar to those in the instant
citation. In Citation No. 04-2066, Licensee was assessed a penalty of nine hundred dollars ($900.00) for
(1) failure to maintain complete and truthful records for a period of two (2) years concerning the Local
Option Small Games of Chance Act on November 10, 2004; (2) offering and/or awarding more than five
thousand dollars ($5,000.00) in cash or merchandise in any seven (7)-day period from October 31
through November 6, 2004, and (3) offering and/or giving alcoholic beverages as a prize on October 6,
2004.
5
ORDER
The decision of the ALJ is affirmed.
The appeal of Licensee is dismissed.
Licensee has paid the fine in the amount of one thousand dollars
($1,000.00).
It is hereby ordered that Licensee's Catering Club Liquor License No.
CC-5110 be suspended for a period of ten (10) days beginning at 7:00 a.m.
on Friday, November 1 7, 2006 and ending at 7:00 a.m. on Monday,
November 27, 2006.
Licensee is directed on Friday, November 17, 2006 at 7:00 a.m. to
place a Notice of Suspension placard (Form No. PLCB-1925) in a
conspicuous place on the outside of the licensed premises or in a window
plainly visible from outside the licensed premises and to remove its license
from the wall and place it in a secure location.
Licensee is authorized on Monday, November 27, 2006 at 7:00 a.m.
to remove the suspension placard and return its license to its original wall
location.
Licensee must comply with all other terms and conditions of the ALl's
August 14, 2006 Order.
~)(~
,
Board Secr~tary
2
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
In the event the Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement or the licensee shall feel
aggrieved by the decision of the Board, there shall be a right to appeal to the Court of
Common Pleas in the same manner provided by the Liquor Code for appeals from
refusals to grant licenses. Section 471 of the Liquor Code, which sets forth the
provisions for appeal from refusal to grant licenses, permits an appeal within thirty (30)
days of the Mailing Date of the Board's decision to the Court of Common Pleas of the
county in which the premises is located.
If you file a timely appeal to the Common Pleas Court, you may be entitled
automatically to a supersedeas (or stay) of the Order of suspension, revocation or fine
which has been issued in connection with your case. If the appeal to Common Pleas
Court would not operate as an automatic supersedeas, you may appeal to the Court for a
stay.
Section 471 of the Liquor Code sets forth the circumstances under which an
appeal to the Court of Common Pleas (as reviewing authority) shall not act as a
supersedeas, for example:
. . . . . if the license has been cited and found to have violated section
493(1) insofar as it relates to sales to minors or sales to a visibly
intoxicated person, section 493(10) insofar as it relates to lewd, immoral
or improper entertainment or section 493(14), (16) or (21), or has been
found to be a public nuisance pursuant to section 611, or if the owner or
operator of the licensed premises or any authorized agent of the owner or
operator has been convicted of any violation of "The Controlled
Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act," or of 18 Pa. C.S. ~~ 5902 or
6301, at or relating to the licensed premises, its appeal shall not act as a
supersedeas unless the reviewing authority determines otherwise upon
sufficient cause shown. . . . .
Notice of the Board's Order has been sent to the Bureau of Liquor Control
Enforcement of the Pennsylvania State Police and the licensee.
If a licensee files an appeal, it is the licensee's responsibility to make certain that
the Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement of the Pennsylvania State Police, 3655 Vartan
Way, Harrisburg, PA 17110-9758; the Liquor Control Board, Office of Chief Counsel,
401 Northwest Office Building, Capital and Forster Streets, Harrisburg, PA 17124-0001
and the Office of Administrative Law Judge, Brandywine Plaza, 2221 Paxton Church
Road, Harrisburg, Pa 17110-9661, receive notice of the filing of a timely appeal.
')'-,
II,;:') i I lltC',...
v: '-{ ui ~ I;' ,II! I:)i)
i ()! I "i l,d >-/,; '- Irill'v
,.. U ,1_, :/,/ /./ .("
rORl' ilie--!!! /(~ ,,' (J:-- ,
1/", /II!;r A., I..) [/'1 ^ f", -:) i'" ,R,'~i""-
I UIt;:'Yf(l,. 'Jilt; /..!!''il/;..",/!iJ.
(fIr',''''! ~.. V'ij /J~.'" '., :- C': ',:./11 Ii /
C' (;'" ,,-, , '.:S,(./, JhJ!;'. J/I/\"
"zry/. ljfq()~:t';Y~~!j/i~/
Mailing Date: AUG 1 5 2006
C_:J C~
\-/"Jr, .
v.l .
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYL VANIA
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
FOR
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
PENNSYLVANIA STATE
POLICE, BUREAU OF
LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT
Citation No. 05-1806
Incident No. W03-307363
v.
LID - 3820
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING ST.
SHIPPENSBURG,-PA 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
LICENSE NO. CC-511 0
OPINION AND ORDER UPON
REMAND ORDER FROM THE PENNSYLVANIA
LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
Opinion:
I entered an Order on June 22, 2006, imposing a $1,000.00 fine.
On July 19, 2006, Licensee filed an appeal to the Pennsylvania Liquor Control
Board. On August 2, 2006, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board ordered that
jurisdiction in this matter is remanded to the Office of Administrative Law Judge for
review and administration of the ordered penalties and for any further administration and
to ensure compliance with the Order.
Accordingly, I impose a $1,000.00 fine and a ten days suspension.
Exhibit "B"
VETS CANTEEN ASSOCIA nON
Citation No. 05-1806
PAGE 2
ORDER:
Reimposition of Fine
THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that Licensee pay a fine of $1,000.00 within
20 days of the mailing date of this Order. In the event the aforementioned fine is not paid
within 20 days from the mailing date of this Order, Licensee's license shall be suspended
or revoked.
The fine must be paid by Treasurer's Check, Cashier's Check, Certified Check or
Money Order- Personal checks, which include business-use personal checks, are not
acceptable. Please make your guaranteed check payable to the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania and mail to:
PLCB - Office of Administrative Law Judge
Brandywine Plaza
2221 Paxton Church Road
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110-9661
Imposition of Suspension
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Catering Club liquor license of Vets
Canteen Association, License No. CC-511 0, be suspended for a period of ten days,
BEGINNING at 7:00 a.m., on Friday, October 6,2006, and ENDING at 7:00 a.m.,
on Monday, October 16, 2006.
Licensee is directed, on Friday, October 6,2006, at 7:00 a.m., to place a placard
of notice of suspension (identified as Form No. PLCB-1925 and as printed with red and
black ink) in a conspicuous place on the outside of the licensed premises or in a window
plainly visible from outside the licensed premises and to remove said license from the
wall and place it in a secure location.
Licensee is advised, ifreplacement placards are needed for any reason, they are
available at all Pennsylvania Liquor Stores/Wine & Spirits Shoppes.
The Bureau is directed to visit and monitor the aforementioned licensed premises
for compliance with this Order.
Licensee is authorized, on Monday, October 16,2006, at 7:00 a.m., to remove the
placard of suspension and return its license to its original wall location.
.
VETS CANTEEN ASSOCIATION
Citation No. 05-1806
Retaining Jurisdiction
PAGE 3
Jurisdiction is retained to ensure compliance with this Adjudication.
,,/1-
Dated this ~ day of August, 2006.
pm
~"i'
-~' ,"
---;l I'
I t/.,,-I!3/
~~au~~~~'-/
0
,-
'::.."':";;
~ ~ -:: :-
-r n' ~
i 0 .-
~,,~~~
~ ~
-- ...0
""\:) ~ ~
--t
~
~ ~
...........
.............
~ 0
\,':::~ -n
(,~,'''''' ..-4
-'* :;, -:D
(;:: (, 'r--
;'~;~
:._;!\.\~
-:: -1;--
~.o
(,..) :...::.
:'2 w
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-6379 CIVIL TERM
VS.
CITATION NO. 05-1806
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING STREET
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
LID #3820
LICENSE NO. CC-511 0
LICENSE FIREST ISSUED: August 10,1949
RESPONSE TO LICENSEE'S PETITION FOR REVIEW AND
REQUEST TO VACATE AUTOMATIC SUPERSEDEAS
1. Licensee's appeal which was filed in a timely manner states in pertinent part that the
"Administrative Law Judge committed an error of law, abused his discretion or his decisio was
not based on substantial evidence in that the violations charged were not willful and proce ds to
the game were used to benefit charity" (Licensee's Petition for Review,-r 4).
2. Licensee fails to provide argument, references to the record or case law support for t is
contention. Moreover, Licensee lost its opportunity to challenge the issues of "substantial
evidence" and "error of law" by not pursuing these issues in its first appeal filed with the
Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board on July 19, 2006. Having failed to preserve these issu s for
review, the Licensee is unable to raise these issues before this Honorable Court.
3. The only issue available for the Licensee to raise in the current appeal to this Honora Ie
Court is whether the ALJ abused its discretion imposing a fine and suspension in response . the
Licensee's conduct.
~,
4. As noted by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, it is evident that the 10-day
suspension is well within the authority ofthe ALJ to impose and there is no evidence that he
ALJ abused its discretion in any manner in imposing the sanction.
5. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has set forth a three-part test to determine whethe a
court has abused its discretion: (1) is the judgment of the Court contrary to the governing aw;
illustrated by the evidence of record. Hainsey v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor
(2) is the judgment ofthe Court manifestly unreasonable as demonstrated by the evidence
record; (3) is the judgment of the Court the result of partiality, prejudice, bias or ill-will as
Board, 602 A.2d 1300 (Pa. 1992) citing Kelly v. County of Allegheny, 546 A.2d 608 (Pa. 988).
Also see Pennsylvania State Police, BLCE v. Liberty Society of Erie, 623 A.2d 391
(Pa.Cmwlth. 1993).
WHEREFORE, the Commonwealth respectfully requests that this Honorable Court t
dismiss Licensee's Appeal.
REQUEST TO VACATE AUTOMATIC SUPERSEDEAS:
6. The Licensee is entitled to an automatic supersedeas pursuant to ~ 4-4 71 (b) of the
Pennsylvania Liquor Code, 47 P.S. S 4-471(b).
7. The nature of the misconduct which is central to this Citation involved the actions oft e
statutory limit on the amount of cash or merchandise which may be awarded in any seven (7
Licensee in violating the Local Options Small Games of Chance law by exceeding the $5,00
period. Specifically, during the 14 week period for which the Licensee was charged, the
Licensee paid out the following:
);> April 3 though 9,2005, the licensee paid out $48,280;
);> During the week of April 10-16, 2005, they paid out $39,785;
);> During the week of April 17-23, 2005 they paid out $43,970;
...
~ During the week of April 24-30, 2005, they paid out $47,480;
~ During the week of May 1-7,2005, they paid out $40,500;
~ May 29 -June 4, 2005, the licensee paid out $43,090;
~ During the week of June 5 -11, 2005, they paid out $40,260;
~ During the week of June 12-18,2005, they paid out $32,600;
~ During the week of June 19-25,2005, they paid out $42,110;
~ During the week of June 26-July 2, 2005, they paid out $45,950;
~ During the week of July 3-9,2005, they paid out $48,320;
~ During the week of July 10-16,2005 they paid out $39,450;
~ During the week of July 17-23, 2005 they paid out $45,960; and
~ During the week of July 24-30, 2005, they paid out $38,250.
8. Because the Licensee has demonstrated absolutely no basis for appeal, there is "suffi ient
cause" upon which this Court may vacate the automatic supersedeas. To fail to do so unde these
,
circumstances would be to encourage frivolous appeals by the licensee community.
WHEREFORE, the Commonwealth respectfully requests that this Honorable Court t
vacate Licensee's automatic supersedeas.
Respectfully submitted,
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMEN
By: homas M. Ball on
Assistant Counsel
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 540-7414
Attorney 1.0. #23370
TMB:cd
cc: Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
District Enforcement Office No.3 Commander
Office of Administrative Law Judge
Report Examination Unit Supervisor
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-6379 CIVIL TERM
VS.
CITATION NO. 05-1806
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING STREET
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
LID #3820
LICENSE NO. CC-5110
LICENSE FIREST ISSUED: August 10, 1949
PROOF OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I am this day serving a true and correct copy of the Bureau'
Response To Licensee's Petition For Review and Request To Vacate Automatic Supersedea ,
upon the person and in the manner indicated below:
Service bv first class mail addressed as follows:
Karl E. Rominger, Esq.
Rominger, Bayley & Whare
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 241-6070
(717) 241-6878 FAX
law@romingerlaw.com
www.romingerlaw.com
Dated:
//iyk
, ,
THO'2M(:R~
Assistant Counsel
Pennsylvania State Police
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
"->
=
c::.;.J
c.::r""
-.'''"-
w
c..J
c'
.
.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 06-6379 CIVIL TERM
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.,
Appellant
VS.
PENNSYLVANIA ST ATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT,
Appellee
"CERTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL RECORD"
Appeal from the Order of the Pennsylvania Liquor
Control Board, No. 05-1806 Entered on October 4,
2006
I
,
I
~
~
~
i
I
i
I
~
I
I
~
!
,j
THOMAS M. BALLARON
Assistant Counsel
Pennsylvania State Police
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 540-7411
Attorney tD. #23370
PLCB.1039 11190
.
.
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17124-0001
IN 'IRE PUBliC INTEREST
November 13,2006
Telephone: (717) 783-9454
FAX: (717) 787-8820
Connie L. Davis, LA2
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, P A 17110
RE: Vets Canteen Assn.
130 W. King Street
Shippensburg,PA 17257-1128
Citation No. 05-1806
Dear Ms. Davis:
In accordance with your request, enclosed please find the original and one copy of
the Certification of Official Records in the above-captioned matter.
If additional information is required, please feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
f
~~
Arletha B. Harris
Hearing Clerk
Enclosures
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPWYER
PROCEEDS BENEFIT ALL PENNSYLVANIANS
.
.
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
ATTESTATION/CERTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
TO: Connie L. Davis, Legal Assistant 2
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
ATTESTATION
I HEREBY ATIEST that I am the legal custodian (or deputy custodian) of
the official record designated below of which the attached is a true and correct
copy.
Attestation from the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Office of Administrative
Law Judge issued July 21, 2006 in the name of:
Citation No. 05-1806, issued in the name of:
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. King Street
Shippensburg, P A 17257-1128
and
Citation Hearing Notice mailed to VETS CANTEEN ASSN. on March 29,2006
by Certified mail, return receipt requested.
and
Return Receipt Card signed by April Caratozzola on March 30, 2006.
and
CERTIFICATION O.CORDS
Citation No. 05-1806
Page 2
.
Admission, Waiver, and Authorization Form signed by H. Anthony Adams,
Licensee's Attorney, and received on November 17, 2005.
and
Letter mailed to H. Anthony Adams, Esquire from Office of Administrative Law
Judge refusing Admission and Authorization Waiver on November 22,2005.
and
Testimony taken before the Office of Administrative Law Judge on May 16, 2006
at Citation No. 05-1806, issued to VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
and
Opinion issued by the Office of Administrative Law Judge on June 22, 2006.
and
Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Office of Administrative Law Judge citation
docket.
and
Appeal of Administrative Law Judge Adjudication filed with Pennsylvania Liquor
Control Board by Licensee's Attorney, Karl E. Rominger, dated July 19,2006.
and
Notification Letter dated July 20, 2006 from Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
Chief Counsel to counsel for the Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor
Control Enforcement.
and
CERTIFICATION OF.CORDS
Citation No. 05-1806
Page 3
.
Bureau's Response to Licensee's Appeal filed by Thomas Ballaron, Assistant
Counsel, BLCE received on July 21, 2006.
and
Opinion and Order of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board issued on August 2,
2006 remanding the matter to ALJ.
and
Attestation from the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Office of Administrative
Law Judge issued September 13,2006 in the name of:
Citation No. 05-1806, issued in the name of:
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. King Street
Shippensburg,PA 17257-1128
and
Opinion and Order Upon Remand Order from the Pennsylvania Liquor Control
Board dated August 15,2006.
and
Appeal of Administrative Law Judge Adjudication and Application for
Supersedeas filed with Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board by Licensee's
Attorney, Karl E. Rominger, dated September 11,2006.
and
Notification Letter dated September 12, 2006 from Pennsylvania Liquor Control
Board Chief Counsel to counsel for the Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of
Liquor Control Enforcement.
CERTIFICATION O.CORDS
Citation No. 05-1806
Page 4
.
and
Bureau's Response to Licensee's Appeal filed by Thomas Ballaron, Assistant
Counsel, BLCE received on September 18,2006.
and
Opinion and Order of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board issued on October 4,
2006.
Date: November 13,2006
~~
LEGAL CUSTODIAN or DEPUTY
CUSTODIAN
.
.
CERTIFICATION
I CERTIFY THAT the officer whose name appears above is the official
custodian or deputy custodian of the attached record.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
seal of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board on the day and date specified.
Date: November 13, 2006
~)(~
BOARD SECRETARY
LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
..-\. .'
PENN~ftVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOk..lD
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
ATTESTATION/CERTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
ATTESTATION
o
""'"
""'"
n
('1"1
o
."
~
-
r;; -0
"" ::x:
o
o N
c:: -
~ ()1
n 0
('"
o
~
c....-
c:
.-
N
&"
::0
-om
"('")
r-fTl
C") -
" ..c:::.
COfTl
'0
TO: CHIEF COUNSEL
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ss:
I HEREBY ATTEST that I am the legal custodian or deputy custodian of
the official record designated below of which the attached is a true and correct
copy.
Citation No. 05-1806, issued in the name of:
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING ST.
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128
and
Citation Hearing Notice mailed to VETS CANTEEN ASSN. on March 29, 2006 by
Certified mail, return receipt requested.
and
Return Receipt Card.signed by April Caratozzola on March 30, 2006.
and
Admission, Waiver, and Authorization Form signed by H. Anthony Adams,
Licensee's Attorney, and received on November 17, 2005.
and
Letter mailed to H. Anthony Adams, Esquire from Office of Administrative Law
Judge refusing Admission and Authorization Waiver on November 22, 2005.
and
Testimony taken before the Office of Administrative Law Judge on May 16, 2006
at Citation No.05-1806, issued to VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
and
Opinion issued by the Office of Administrative Law Judge on June 22, 2006.
.-\
J
CERTIFICATION OF RE1..0RDS
Citation No. 05-1806
Page 2
.>
and
Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Office of Administrative Law Judge citation
docket.
Date: July 21, 2006
Gloria M. Spidle
Legal or Deputy Custodian
CERTIFICATION
I CERTIFY THAT the person whose name appears above is the legal
custodian or deputy custodian of the attached record.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the seal of the Office of Administrative Law Judge on the day and date specified.
Date: July 21, 2006
.-c
,
.
COMMO!\TWEAL TH OF PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEl\1ENT
CITATION NO. 05-1806
Incident No. W03-307363
v.
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING ST.
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128
CUl\1BERLAl\TD COUNTY
LID - 3820
License No. CC-5110
License First Issued: August 10, 1949
,.."
<::::I
<::::I
c.n ?J
en fTl
~ ()
o
CITATION UI 0
-0 >
--
-"'" I
,
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board has issued to you the above-~erenced
<::)
license and related permit(s) for the licensed term ending January 31, 2006; and
WHEREAS, the Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement is in possession of facts which leads it
to believe that you have violated the Liquor Code, the Act of April 12, 1951, P. L. 90, as reenacted and
amended, 47 P.S. 91-101, et ~, and the rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, in the
following manner:
1. During the periods April 3 through 9, April 10 through 16, April 17 through 23, April
24 through 30, May 1 through 7, May 29 through June 4, June 5 through 11, June 12 through 18, June
19 through 25, June 26 through July 2, July 3 through 9, July 10 through 16, July 17 through 23 and
July 24 through 30, 2005, you, by your servants, agents or employees, offered and/or awarded more
than $5,000.00 in cash or merchandise in any seven-day period, in violation of Section 471 of the
.
.
Vets Canteen ASSl1.
Citation No. 05-1806
Page 2
Liquor Code, 47 P. S. ~4-4 71 and Section 315 (b) of the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act, 10
P.S. s315(b).
2. On May 13 and August 5, 2005, you, by your servants, agents or employees, failed to
maintain complete and truthful records covering the operation of the licensed business for a period of
two (2) years concerning the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act, in violation of Sections 471
and 493(12) of the Liquor Code, 47 P.S. 994-471 and 4-493(12), Section 311 of the Local Option Small
Games of Chance Act, 10 P.S. S311 and Section 901 of the Department of Revenue Regulations, 61 Pa.
Code 9901.
NOW THEREFORE, you are hereby cited to appear before an Administrative Law Judge,
on a date to be scheduled by the Office of Administrative Law Judge, to show cause why such
license should not be suspended or revoked or a fine imposed.
You have the right to retain legal counsel to represent you. If you do hire an attorney, he or
she must file a Notice of Appearance with the Office of Administrative Law Judge, Brandywine Plaza,
2221 Paxton Church Road, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110-9661, and forward a copy to the Assistant
Counsel at the address listed below in accordance with 1 Pa. Code Subchapter C. Delay in obtaining
counsel is not reason for any continuance.
You have the right to waive your hearing. Such action is an admission to the charges. Should
you choose to waive, the proper form is enclosed for your convenience. Upon receipt, the Office of
Administrative Law Judge will process the forms and issue an adjudication.
.
.
Vets Canteen Assn.
Citation No. 05-1806
Page 3
BY ORDER
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
.~ )/. INvJ~
i,,1
MAJOR LEONARD H. MCDONALD
Director
Date: September 15, 2005
Thomas M. Ballaron, Assistant Counsel
Pennsylvania State Police
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 540-7411
lt~,i?
.
.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
BRANDYWINE PLAZA
2221 PAXTON CHURCH ROAD
HARRISBURG, PA 17110-9661
TEL (717)540-7419/FAX (717)657-4032
March 29, 2006
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W KING ST
SHIPPENSBURG PA 17257-1128
CITATION HEARING NOTICE
RE: Case No(s). 05-1806
LID 3820
Dear Licensee:
The hearing on the above citation case(s) to show cause why the license
issued to you by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board should not be
suspended or revoked, or a fine imposed, or both has been scheduled for
the time and place hereinafter set forth before Judge THAU.
DELAY IN OBTAINING LEGAL COUNSEL IS NOT REASON FOR CONTINUANCE.
DATE & TIME OF HEARING: May 16, 2006 at 11:30 AM
PLACE OF HEARING: Brandywine Plaza
2221 Paxton Church Road
Harrisburg PA 17110-9661
Very truly yours,
R. /n? ~
("'~,4> ,,//~
EILEEN S. MAUNUS
Chief Administrative Law Judge
CERTIFIED MAIL -
Return Receipt Requested
FIRST CLASS MAIL
H ANTHONY ADAMS ESQ
49 W ORANGE ST STE 3
SHIPPENSBURG PA 17257
cc: Administrative Law Judge
PSP Counsel
Reporting Agency
File
.
"
j
r
..
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
. Compl.ete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired.
. Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we ~n return the card to you.
. Attach this card to the.back of the mailplece,
or on the front if space 'permits.
dto:
}
lJ
(30
I
I
I
i
I
I~'
I (
: v v. '\;)1-....
: 2. ArtIcle Number
; (rransfer from servfce label)
I PS Form 3811, February 2004
/J/
C. Date of Delivery
. .~ ~Cfo
D. Is. delivery address different from rn 1? .0 Yes
If rES. enter delivery address below: 0 No
O~-180lp
.1+,.
'7J-57:
I
3. Service Type
Q-<fertffied Mall 0 Express Mall
CI Registered 0 Retum R~lpt for Merchandise
o Insured Mall 0 C.O.D. (.r
4. Restricted Dellvery1 ~ra Fee) 0 Yes
7005 2570 0002 2394 1984
Domestic Return Receipt.
102595-02-M-1 f1'10
COMMOIllWE;AL TM OF PENNSVLVANI~
PENNSYLVANIA
LIOUOR CONTROL BOARD
.I$SION, WAIVER AND AUTHOR.~ON
J ARTICLE IV LICENSEES '
OFFICE OF AOMINrST-~~T1VE
I.AIN JUDG.~
PLEASE REAP INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE BEFORE COMPLETING THIS FORM.
1. NAME OF LJCENSEE AS IT APPEARS ON THE LIC~NSE
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
2, L1Ci:NS~ NUMBER
CC-51l0
$, L10 NUMBER
3820
4, CITATION NlJM6ER
05-1806
5, Has the license been returned to the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board for safekeeping?
If yes, provide date:
DYes
~No
MONTWOA,VIYEA~
6. Has a transfer application been filed with the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board?
If yes, provide date:
DYes
~NO
MONTIo\IO~ "'/VI;~A
7. If a suspension is imposed, do you wish to serve it as soon es possible?
~Yes
DNa
a. Customary and USlJal Days of Operation:
o Sunday
~ Monday
~ Tuesday
~Wednesda.y
!&lThurSdSy
~Friday
~ Saturday
.....,
9. STATEMENT OF ADMISSION, WAIVER AND AUTHORIZATION: g
.. Licensee admits to all violations charged in the ref.erenced citation. ~ fg
.. Licensee admits the Bureau of Liquor Contt'ol Enforcement has compiled with th~ applicable notice requirem!!!1S o~e Liquor
Code. .' ' .....,J 0
.. Llcenaee waives the r.lght to a hearing. -0 ::>
-- r
· LicenaC!e waives the right to appeal the AdjudIcation. N ,.
'-
. Uoensee authorizes the Administrative Law Judge to enter an Adjudication basecl on a summary of facts end pNJ1r AdjUdIcation
History, -
10. THE PENALTIES AUTHORIZED BY LAW ARE:
License suspension and/or revocation: suspens:ion end/or revocation of any ancillary permit, ineluding but not Iimrted to the Amusement
Permit or Sunday Sales Permit; and/or fine of:
$50 to $1,000 as to Count(s) No.1, 2
$1,000 to $5,000 as to Count(s) No. NfA
and/or
If a violation i$ the third or 9ub5equent vIolation of any of the o1'fenaes referred to In subsection 471(b) of the Liquor Code or
CrImes Code within _ four (4) yeBr period, the Admlnlstrattve .Law JUdge must, 815 lesst. Impose a luspenslo".
1. UNDER PENAL TV OF LAW (18 PA. e.s. i4904, RELATING TO UNSWORN FALSIFICATION TO AUTHORITIES), I VERIFY THAT I AM
THE L.ICENSEE,AN OFFICERlPARTNER, CLUB STEWARD OR ATTORNEY AUTHORIZED TO COMPLETE AND SIGN THIS FORM ON
BEHALF OF THE LICENSEE. I HAVE ,READ THE INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM.
~\~~
\~- ~~""'~~"~No~' e~ ~~'-l
( I (1) ~ -3 tm; ~U~Mf:Q? 0
11-/ il JTE~ ~C}
~~~tV .
EMAlL Al)QRESS
.
J
.
.
COMMONVv'EALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONtROL BOARD
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
BRANDYWINE PLAZA
2221 PAXTON CHURCH ROAD
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17110-9661
NOVEMBER 22,2005
FELIX THA U
JUDGE
PHONE (717) 540-5038
FAX (717) 657-4032
H. Anthony Adams, Esquire
49 West Orange Street
Suite 3
Shippensburg, P A 17257
Re: Vets Canteen Assn.
Citation No. 05-1806
LID - 3820
Dear Attorney Adams:
I am returning the Admission, Waiver and Authorization (Waiver) submitted in
the above captioned matter. Because of the repetition of the violations and Licensee's
prior citation history, I believe a hearing is warranted.
You will be notified of the date, time and place of hearing in due course.
Licensee may if it so wishes, resubmit the Waiver at the time of the hearing.
~lY yours,
~~
Administrative Law Judge
FT/pm
Attachment (1)
cc: Thomas M. Ballaron, P .S.P. Counsel
.
!
.,
}
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
* * ** * * * * *
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, *
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL *
ENFORCEMENT *
VS. * Citation No. 05-1806
VETS CANTEEN ASSN., *
130 WEST KING STREET *
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128 * LID No. 3820
*
License No. CC-5110
*
*
* * * * * * * * *
~
<:::::;)
<:::::>
~
Verbatim transcript of a hearing held at ~ ~
Brandywine Plaza, 2221 Paxton Church Road, Harrisb~g p:;
Pennsylvania, on Tuesday, ~ d
P
~ :>
r-
!"-
May 16, 2006
11:30 a.m.
* *
f\J
~ (0, fO) ~
. j \'_. . / I i Ul
* * *
* *
* *
: fi~
BEFORE: FELIX THAU,
Administrative Law Judge
APPEARANCES:
THOMAS M. BALLARON, ESQUIRE
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PA 17110
For the Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
KARL E. ROMINGER, ESQUIRE
Rominger & Whare, Attorneys at Law
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
For the Licensee
REPORTER: LORI A. BEHE
Any reproduction of this transcript is prohibited
without authorization by the certifying agency.
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
.
I
l
.
2
License No. CC-5110
Citation No. 05-1806
INDEX TO WITNESSES
FOR THE
COMMONWEALTH
DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT RECROSS
NONE PRESENT
FOR THE
LICENSEE
NONE PRESENT
'),
f
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
.
.
3
t.
License No. CC-5110
Citation No. 05-1806
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
FOR THE
COMMONWEALTH
IDENTIFIED ADMITTED
C-1
C-2
C-3
Notice of Violation Letter
Citation
Adjudication
5
5
12
5
5
13
FOR THE
LICENSEE
NONE OFFERED
')
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
.
.-
4
PRO C E E DIN G S
-----------------------------------------------------
JUDGE FELIX THAU:
This is the Bureau against Vets Canteen
Association, case number 05-1806.
And I have the
entry with today's form.
I've had two other cases
today dealing with the same kind of problem, where a
club is alleged to have exceeded the limits and just
totally abused the privilege granted by the Local
Option Small Games of Chance Act, which I call the
be kind to lawyers act of --- number one of 19 any
time a legislature sneezes, they make money for
lawyers.
So God bless them.
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
Endless regulation.
JUDGE THAU:
Excuse me?
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
I said endless regulation.
JUDGE THAU:
Every time they pass a law, they make
business for lawyers.
Okay.
So this was another case
where I wanted to
really, to discuss the issues at
a hearing and not handle this matter via paperwork.
Now, the responsible officer is listed as a Ralph Ott?
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
e,
e
5
1
MR. RYAN SMITH:
2
He's no longer there, sir.
3
JUDGE THAU:
4
Okay.
The manager --- the steward is a
5 Patricia Logue?
6 MR. SMITH:
7 Yes.
8 JUDGE THAU:
9 So you're going to admit to the facts,
10 then, today?
11 ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
12 We are, for purposes of today's hearing
13
admitting, as alleged, to the facts as laid out in the
14 pre-hearing memorandum of the Commonwealth.
15 JUDGE THAU:
16 So let's get the documents and talk a
17 little bit.
18 ATTORNEY BALLARON:
19 Judge's Exhibit One and Two.
20 JUDGE THAU:
21
22
23
24
25
,
~
,
Okay.
You agree that these were sent and
received in accordance with the statute?
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
They were, Your Honor.
JUDGE THAU:
,
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
~
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1 13
.
l
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
.
6
The investigation was, as indicated in
Judge's Exhibit Number One, March 9, 2005, completed
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
Correct, Your Honor.
JUDGE THAU:
Okay. All right.
So on the month --- on
August 9, 2005?
the weeks listed, you were exceeding your $5,000
weekly limit. What were the --- what was like the
highest --- what were the amounts?
through 9.
9 was what?
that okay?
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
For the initial week, Your Honor, April 3
JUDGE THAU:
Okay.
Just do --- the week ending April
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
The week ending April 9 was $48,208.
JUDGE THAU:
Ouch.
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
The week ending April 16 was $39,785.
JUDGE THAU:
Okay.
Can you just round them off? Is
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
\
~
}
e
e,
,
,
7
1
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
2
Sure. The week ending April 23 was
3 $44,000.
4 JUDGE THAU:
5 If you have any dispute with the
6 rounding, you can argue.
7
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
8
No, no dispute with the rounding.
That
9 doesn't seem material to the Court's determination.
10 JUDGE THAU:
11 No.
12 ATTORNEY BALLARON:
13
The week ending April 30th was $47,000.
14 The week ending May 7th ---.
15 JUDGE THAU:
16
Wait a minute.
Counsel's not able to
17 hear if he's talking to this client.
I just wanted to
18 give you the courtesy of ---.
19 ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
20 Thank you.
21 ATTORNEY BALLARON:
22 The week ending May 7, Your Honor, was
23 $40,000.
The week ending June 4 was ---
24
JUDGE THAU:
25
Well, there's --- okay.
June 4, right.
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
)
"
.
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
Was $43,000.
JUDGE THAU:
June 11th?
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
June 11 was $40,000.
JUDGE THAU:
June 18th?
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
Was $32,000.
JUDGE THAD:
26th?
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
That was
JUDGE THAU:
25th, I'm sorry.
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
$42,000.
JUDGE THAU:
July 2nd?
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
$45,000.
JUDGE THAU:
July 9?
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
8
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
e
e\
l
9
1
$48,000.
2
JUDGE THAU:
3
July 16?
4
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
5
$39,000.
6
JUDGE THAU:
7
July 23rd?
8
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
9
$45,000. And July 30th was $38,000
10
JUDGE THAU:
11
Okay. And you agree with that?
12
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
"
l
13
My client is saying those numbers are not
14 is that actually the prize or that was the cost of
15 the gross tickets sold?
16 ATTORNEY BALLARON:
17 That's the gross payout amount.
18 JUDGE THAU:
19
Those are the payout amounts. What are
20 you saying, sir?
21
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
22
This is Mr. Ryan Smith, for the Court's
23 information.
24 MR. SMITH:
25
By the regulations, I guess you would
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
&
j
.
.\
f
10
1 call it a payout.
But the actual prize for each one
2
is like, say, for example, a $100 prize once over.
So
3 it's not like we were awarding prizes
4 JUDGE THAU:
5
No, but when you add them all up, it's
6 $40,000.
7 MR. SMITH:
8 Right.
9 JUDGE THAU:
10 What you're telling me is you didn't
11 award one $40,000 prize, you might have awarded 1,000
12
$40 prizes.
That's what you're telling me?
13
MR. SMITH:
14
Right.
15
JUDGE THAU:
16
Something like that.
There's still
17
What's the difference?
excess.
18 ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
19 I'm not sure that they understood that at
20 the time.
21 JUDGE THAU:
22
Well, they understood it after they got
23
the last adjudication.
I mean, you're not telling me
24 your clients are stupid?
25 ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
t 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
.
11
No. But by
JUDGE THAU:
I'm not giving you a hard time; okay?
But I'm really directing that at your clients; you
know? At your clients.
Because you're in a tough
spot; okay? And I respect that and I respect --- and
I want to also commend you for not putting up a big
fight over stuff that was really --- this is the same
speech I gave last time.
I had two hearings, the same
--- this is the third hearing today with the same
problem, with licensees that are repeat offenders;
okay?
First time around the block, I didn't
know.
Okay.
All right.
Second time around the
block, I didn't know, it's like
I start thinking,
are you trying to pee on my leg and tell me it's rain?
Excuse the
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
And I'll
JUDGE THAU:
Let me do the second one, and I will
listen to you.
Complete and truthful records.
What
was the problem with your records?
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
The Licensee has a ticket-dispensing
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8~08
~
i
f
18
.
.
12
1
machine, Your Honor, and the records required by the
2 regulations which govern the operation and small games
3
of chance found at 10 Pa. Code 911.462
those
4 records were not being kept with respect to the ticket
5 --- the small games of chance being dispensed from the
6 ticket machines.
.7 JUDGE THAU:
8
Okay.
Is this one of these converted
9 stamp machines that we used to get ---7
10
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
11
What I call --- are considered break-away
12
cards.
They have the six or five flaps on it where
13 you break it apart and try to get the winning number.
14
JUDGE THAU:
15
Okay.
We agree on that.
So what did
16 get the prior history, then I'll listen to him.
17
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
19 the adjudication.
Prior history, Your Honor, you find in
21
20 JUDGE THAU:
22
23
24
25
I have it herej it's 04-2066?
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
Correct, Your Honor.
JUDGE THAU:
This would be Judge's Exhibit Three. And
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
,
;
.
.,
13
1 you have a copy of that?
2 MR. SMITH:
3
Yes, I do.
4
JUDGE THAU:
5
What did you want to say, sir?
6
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
7
And that's the only reason that we're
8
taking up the Court's time today.
It's by way of
9 explanation, and maybe that's why it's a good thing
10 you bring people in to talk with him.
The problems
11 with small clubs like this, and Mr. Rayburn (phonetic)
12 is relatively new to the position, and has indicated
13 to me, and I think he'll indicate to you, that when he
14
took it over, he actually fired the person who was
15
16
JUDGE THAU:
17
When did you take it over, sir?
18 MR. SMITH:
19 Around January of 2005, officially.
20 ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
21 And it's taken a while for him to clean
22 things --- begin to clean things up and go through and
23
learn what he needs to do and how to do it.
And
24 hopefully he'll be in this position long enough to
25
it's an institutional memory.
A lot of the other bars
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
\
f 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
}
.
.,
I
j
14
I represent or have done work for have the same owner
for 25 years and the owner realizes what they're
doing.
And if they violate, it's very conscious.
These veteran's organizations, not by way of excuse,
but I find that sometimes the management can go bad if
the good people aren't watching what's happening.
JUDGE THAU:
Well, that's exactly what happened in the
last case, where those in charge actually, what looked
to me like they were actually financially raping their
organization.
Is that --- that's apparently what was
--- you know, they did that.
And I commended the two
gentlemen for having the courage to step up to the
plate and try and clean it up.
On the other hand, I
did remind them that they stand in the place of the
organization, that the organization, under the law, is
a separate entity, and that I have to deal with that
issue, too.
Recognizing and trying to strike a
balance is --- it's supposed to be small games of
chance.
It's not --- you're tired of hearing it, too.
This is the third time this has happened.
It's not a
casino.
When you start talking about $50,000 a week,
$40,000 a week, every week, that's a lot of jingle;
you know? And Governor Ed is going to be upset when
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
25
.
.
15
1 he opens up his slot machine parlor, because you guys
2 are going to be in competition, then; okay? And I've
3 been trying to strike a balance here. And when I see
4 an organization --- was the first case also a repeat?
5 ATTORNEY BALLARON:
6
Yes, sir.
7
JUDGE THAU:
8
All three cases today waived. And I
9 suggested that the better course of action would be to
10
have them come in; okay?
So that I can understand who
11
they are.
Because I can tell you that my response,
12 without a hearing, would have been extremely harsh.
13
Extremely harsh.
Because I don't see people, I get
14 paperwork, I see a repeat, I don't understand the
15 circumstances. And I do want to understand the
16 circumstances, and I do want to understand --- put
17 some meat on the bones, to get the facts and
18 something
19 ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
20 And I think
21 JUDGE THAU:
22
The facts or something that works.
Yes?
23
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
24
Not by way of --- again, it's
JUDGE THAU:
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
} 14
!
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
.
16
We're just talking, here.
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
These fellows actually give a large
amount of money.
Now, I know where it all comes from;
right?
I mean, that's how they
if they're selling
this many tickets, that's where the money goes, and
they put it into service, charity.
JUDGE THAU:
I know, and let me give you this speech.
I'm sure the problem with that, sir, is --- and
particularly with a veteran's organization, because
I'm a veteran myself.
I don't belong to a veteran's
organization and I'm veteran; okay?
We have to start thinking about how we're
getting our money.
The ends --- the argument that
Counsel propounded is that the ends justify the means.
And if you're using --- very simple.
That's what it
is. That if you're using the money for good purpose,
then it really
how you get it ought not to be an
issue.
And in our society, we are concerned with the
ends and the means, both; okay?
And as veterans who have struggled,
personally giving up your time, perhaps seen some
things that people ought not to have to see in war.
What did you serve, what war?
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
\
t
j 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
,
.
.
17
MR. SMITH:
I was in Vietnam.
JUDGE THAU:
Okay.
Then you have a better
understanding that the reason we do that is to protect
the things that we value.
And one of the things that
we are supposed to value as a good citizen is to
respect the law and obey the law.
And as a veteran's
group, you have a higher responsibility, I would
maintain.
Not a lower, a higher responsibility to
demonstrate that you are going to stick by the rules,
because that's why we fought; right? Well, I didn't
fight, thank God.
So when I say we, I'm not trying to
suggest that I saw combat.
I did not.
It doesn't
belie the fact that I'm a veteran.
I served.
That's why you guys did what you did,
theoretically; right? And so you have to stand up and
say, we're not going to earn our money this way.
We're going to do it the right way.
And if it means
there's less money, then there's just less money.
Because, guess what?
I could make three times what
I'm making now if I went out and sold some drugs.
What stops me from doing that? In addition to the
possibility of going to jail, wh~t stops me from doing
that is the money is less important to me than the
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
,
~
.
.
18
act.
And that's what you got to start thinking about.
What's important to you? And it should be the values
first and the money second.
I'm going to give you another approach
which I want you to take back to your people.
precisely what is charitable is so subjective that we
even have fights about it.
When Jerry Lewis gets on
TV and rakes in all that monei for, what is it,
muscular dystrophy, other organizations get all bent
out of shape because he's taking their resources. So
what is valuable in terms of how you spend your life
for the charitable purposes?
It's subjective.
I bet
you have organizational struggles inside as to how
you're going to spend your money.
MR. SMITH:
Yes, Your Honor.
JUDGE THAU:
Okay.
So I mean, even in the
organization, you have a certain level of --- how
we're going to spend this.
No, we don't want to spend
it on Little League, we want to do this; it's more
important.
So that's the reason that we don't buy
that argument, because charity is subjective. I
donate money to things that I think are important.
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
.~
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
!
.
19
And I didn't want the Court to believe
that I was propounding that the ends justify the means
purposely.
JUDGE THAU:
You know, if I thought you were, I would
be screaming and yelling; okay?
I'm not doing that.
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
And by way of explanation as t.o how I
think organizations allow themselves to slip into
these positions, and the other problem has been the
recent decline -~-.
JUDGE THAU:
They become addicted.
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
Yes.
JUDGE THAU:
I know exactly how it happens.
They
become addicted to the flow of money.
And it never is
enough.
And it's the same
that's speech number
three, which I used in the last two cases.
We're
going to have the slot machines, and we're going to be
addicted to slot machines for the finances.
And five
or six years down the road, we're not --- that money's
not going to be enough for us.
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
\
J 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
.
20
So they'll add table games to the casinos
next.
JUDGE THAU:
They're going to do --- yes.
Whatever
it's going to be.
Okay? Whatever it's going to be.
So I understand the power.
This money stream is like
an opiate.
It's like a morphine, it's like heroin.
You get addicted to it.
And then you say, well, you
know, God, it's so easy to make money.
Let's go make
a little more; right?
Is that your point?
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
Yes.
And as an organization, the problem
is, again, you have to have strong leadership to
withdraw from this. And I think that's --- I want to
let the Court know, I deal with a lot of people --- I
deal with a lot of really bad people from time to
time, unfortunately.
And I just --- my impression is,
for the Court's information, that this man came to see
me and Mr. Adams had sent him over, and his interest
is in complying and working at what he needs to do at
making this organization
JUDGE THAU:
I'm probably preaching to the choir;
okay? But I need --- you know, I'm trying, in a way,
sir, to help you, to get the message to your people,
Sargent1s Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
\
I 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
.
21
because they're not here.
You're the one that has to
suffer through this.
It's not a fun experience.
I
can't imagine it would be.
It's not the worst thing.
An MRI might be worse, but it's not fun.
It's not
fun.
But you're the one who represents the club and
has to listen to this; all right? And I wish I could
get the club membership here, because that's really
the people that need to hear this.
And the reason I repeat this each hearing
is to help you to frame it in a way so that perhaps
they understand the issues; okay? The ends do not
justify the means.
You know, you're a veteran's
organization, and perhaps you can get the message to
them that we need to think of our civic responsibility
to obey the law.
And we need to think of who's really
destroying our society.
Is it the bad guys or is it
the good guys who are just disregarding the law? And
I would submit to you that it's probably really the
good guys that are just not doing what they're
supposed to do.
They're not stepping up to the plate.
And you guys are role models, too, for
kids.
Let's talk about role models. And it's not
good role-modeling.
It's not good citizenship, if I
could put it that way.
It's not civic responsibility,
and I'd like you to --- you should have written all
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
.
.
j
22
that down.
Because it was brilliant and you didn't
write it down and you're not going to have it to tell
all your club members.
But seriously, I think you do need to
talk to them and get them to think about these things.
I think if they think about it, most people are going
to come to th7 right conclusion.
Okay.
Having said that, you know, I have to
strike a balance here; you know?
I've had two other
cases today.
And I'll tell you what I did with them,
I'll do the same thing here.
I'm not really convinced
that I can do anything with your small games of chance
license, that I have that authority.
I think there's
some argument to be made that --- well, I think it
really is, to be honest with you, legally tenuous; all
right? And so I don't want to do that.
However, I can take into consideration
certain things.
What I did with the last two was they
are going to think about voluntarily stopping small
games of chance operations for 28 days, consecutive
days, in August; all right? And what I did, I gave
them three weeks to let me know by letter.
If they do
that voluntarily, I will take --- certainly take that
into consideration.
It's up to you.
I will take that
into consideration.
So that's my indirect way of
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
'I
if. 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
';
.-
)
.
23
dealing with the small games of chance license,
because there was an abuse of that privilege. And we
also forget what the word license means.
We really do
forget what it means.
The formal definition is, I
give you --- you know, if I'm going to speak in Middle
English, I give you license, I give you permission.
You don't have any right.
It's not an inalienable
God-given right to do this.
It's a privilege.
It's a
license, just like the liquor license.
It's a special
privilege that we, as a society, through the
government, allow you to raise money; okay?
I know I'm preaching to the choir; right?
Okay.
I appreciate that.
Talk to me and I'll help
you to get the message or if he doesn't --- I'm sorry.
Your name again, sir?
MR. SMITH:
Ryan Smith.
JUDGE THAU:
Okay.
Then maybe perhaps Counsel could
express what I said here today.
What is the
recommendation here?
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
$1,000 for count one with a five-day
suspenslon, Your Honor.
And then for count two, a
$500 fine.
~
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
p,
,~ 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
.
.l
24
JUDGE THAU:
Why did you recommend here a suspension
and the other two cases you didn't?
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
Because we learn and we adapt.
JUDGE THAU:
I'll say you're adapted.
ATTORNEY BALLARON:
This recommendation was put together
after the previous recommendation.
We feel bound to
the recommendations when we do them, Your Honor.
JUDGE THAU:
Yes.
You are ethically bound to keep
them; okay? And I appreciate that.
There weren't any
suspensions recommended in the other cases.
I just
really do believe that when it's a repeated problem
that there needs to be some kind of a suspension. And
I gave these --- what I did with the other two
organizations, one was a fire company, one was club.
I don't know what they're doing.
But I tend to be, in
some ways, more difficult on veteran's organizations,
particularly because of what you guys stand for. And
it's really --- when you do stuff like this, it really
offends the purpose for which you exist.
It really
offends what you --- the service that you gave to this
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
\
i
I 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
.
,
.
J
25
country.
It's offensive in that way, in a very, very
fundamental way.
Having said that, again, the two
organizations are going to let me know, and I'll give'
you the same option.
You can send me a letter and
tell me that.
If I don't get a letter in three weeks,
I'll assume that you're not doing it.
That's up to
you.
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
I would send you the letter, telling you
one way or the other.
JUDGE THAU:
Okay.
Whether or not you're going to
cease operation for 28 days during the month of August
pursuant to the Small Games of Chance Act --- and I
want to repeat, again, what I said in the last case.
You can look at that 28 days as an opportunity to
clean it up.
And the reason is, it's difficult to
repair something while it's still working; right? So
what we generally do is we shut things down, and then
we take them apart and we clean them up, and maybe
just to give you a great opportunity to learn and
clean up your act and really take a step back without
the pressure of trying to run things at the same time;
all right? That's up to you.
If you do that, I
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
.
.
26
1 promise you I will take that into consideration; okay?
2 And I will say so in the adjudication, that but for
3
this, I would have done that.
Okay?
So I will take a
4
look at the recommendation.
I can't promise you I'll
5 go along with it; okay?
It's certainly going to be a
6 jumping-off point.
7 ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
8 And my client did want you to know that
9 as --- at least as for the record keeping, that was
10 not intentional
11 JUDGE THAU:
12 I'm less concerned about the record
13
keeping.
I'm only concerned about the repeat nature
14
of this prize limit, because it really is significant.
15
If you don't --- small.
Small games of chance, not
16 big games of chance.
All right.
17
And I appreciate, sir, you corning in
18
here.
I appreciate the position that you're in, that
19 you have a level --- and you, too.
What is your name?
20
MR. BOWERS:
21
My name is Charles Bowers.
I'm the post
22 commander.
23 JUDGE THAU:
24
Okay.
Well, then you definitely heard
25
what I said, and you are going to get back
Do
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
.
.
27
1 you have any thoughts about what I said?
2 MR. BOWERS:
3
Yes, I do.
Those other two people that
4 you've seen prior to seeing our organization, I don't
5 know whether they had restaurant facilities at the
6 fire hall or the other place, private club, men's
7
club, but we do.
We have food facilities, which our
8 food is delicious and it's reasonable, it's cheap.
9 It's a lot cheaper than you would buy at a regular
10 restaurant.
11 JUDGE THAU:
12 Okay.
13 MR. BOWERS:
,
}
14
And the sale of the tickets make up the
15 difference, you know, because of the cheap food, and
16 you know.
17 JUDGE THAU:
18 The sale of the small games make up the
19 difference?
20 MR. BOWERS:
21 Yes.
22 JUDGE THAU:
23
The difference in what? Difference ---
24 because when you say difference ---?
25
MR. BOWERS:
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
\
f
.
.
)
28
1
Well, I mean the difference in price in
2
food.
Like our food is a lot cheaper.
3
JUDGE THAU:
4
Well, the small games of chance is not
5 designed to supplement your food.
It's designed to
6 raise money.
7 MR. BOWERS:
8
And we do --- and we put a lot of money
9 into the community.
10 JUDGE THAU:
11
Okay.
I know
We've been down that road.
12 you did, but you're not putting it in in a way that's
13
illegal.
Why don't you sell cocaine and get three
14
times the amount of money? Why don't you do that?
15 How come?
16 MR. BOWERS:
17 Because I don't do that kind of stuff.
18 JUDGE THAU:
19 You don't do that stuff?
20 MR. BOWERS:
21 I wouldn't do that, no.
22 JUDGE THAU:
23 Well, why would you dbey one law and
24 disobey another? And that's what you have to think
25
about.
That's the philosophical, the ethical issue
Sargent1s Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
t
j 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.,
t
!
.
29
that you need to think about.
What's the difference
between selling cocaine to make money for your
charities and doing what you're doing? Okay.
Legally, sir, there is no difference.
Ethically, if
this were a class in philosophy or ethics, there is no
difference.
Now, I know there is, in ~eality, because
we look at gambling different, particularly when
government pushes gambling.
We tend to look at it in
a different way.
And I understand that, but
ethically, it's still the same problem.
Do you break the law to get money to do
things? Okay? And that's the ethical question. Are
you going to do that?
Is that what this country is
about?
Is that what you fought in Vietnam for?
MR. BOWERS:
No, sir, I didn't.
JUDGE THAU:
Okay.
And that's what you have to think
personally.
And maybe you need to jack the food
prices up a little bit; okay?
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
Judge, I'd just
as long as we're
being philosophical, I think that's the part of ---.
I thought it was interesting to kind of articulate
something that I thought has been a problem for a lot
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
.-
.
30
of these clubs, which is civil society, membership in
clubs has declined over the years.
And veteran's
organizations, Elks, things like that, have found that
a cheap food program keeps people coming in the door.
They get more people for dinner than they do for
membership meetings,
JUDGE THAU:
Yeah, and ---.
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
--- and ---.
JUDGE THAU:
Okay.
I'm sorry.
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
No.
No.
So I mean, it is.
That's what
you were talking about.
Okay.
What we do now if we
don't have this money to supplement our ---?
JUDGE THAU:
Well, if you're running a restaurant,
too, is the IRS after you for --- ! know the IRS is
going to want to know why you're making a profit on
your food, or whatever, how you're keeping afloat.
Hasn't the IRS been hitting the clubs?
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
They do, yes.
JUDGE THAU:
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
!i 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
.
31
Okay.
So you got --- when you start
operating a restaurant for a profit, then you've got
IRS issues and all kinds of things.
I'm not telling
you not to do it.
It's your club.
And I know that
the old guard, with respect to veteran's
organizations, there's less members; right?
I mean,
now than before, because we had a draft.
We had a
draft.
All right.
I'll think about it, but you have three
weeks from today to get that letter in to me and let
me know what you're going to do.
If you do it
there will be some suspension, and I said that to all
three.
Because I think the community needs to
see, and your organization needs to see.
I think in
that way, I will actually be helping you.
How's that
better than throwing the penalty out or something? I
will be helping you get the message out to your
people; okay? Because if you walk in there, they're
going to say, oh, what does he know; right? Because
they weren't here listening to me.
And you can tell
them I was ranting and raving and screaming like a
maniac, too.
Because I have done that.
All right.
I'll think about.
Thank you.
ATTORNEY ROMINGER:
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
,
{I 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
.
.
Thank you.
three weeks, Your Honor.
JUDGE THAU:
All right.
32
I'll get you a letter within
Thank you, sir.
"* * * * * * * *
HEARING CONCLUDED AT 11:55 A.M.
* * * * * * * *
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
~
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
.
.
33
C E R T I F I CAT E
01 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING PROCEEDING WAS
REPORTED STENOGRAPHICALLY BY ME AND THEREAFTER REDUCED
TO TYPEWRITING, AND THAT THIS TRANSCRIPT IS A TRUE AND
ACCURATE RECORD THEREOF.
SARGENT'S COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC.
LORI A. 'BEtlE
COURT REPORTER
Sargent's Court Reporting Service, Inc.
(814) 536-8908
.
.
C E R T I FIe ATE
I hereby certify that the
foregoing proceeding ~ tv -tVl Ct..LA.
, was reported by me, that I have read this
transcript on uU lD~
and I attest
that this transcript is a true and
,
accurate record of the proceeding.
, CLEARFIELD, P A
. ERIE, FA
. OIL CITY. FA
SARGENT'S
COURT REPORTING
SERVICE, INC.
. INDIANA, P A
.GREENSBURG, PA
. PJ:-nJJvJ>ELPHIA, PA
. SOMERSET, F'A
,.PITfSBIJRGH, PA
C''T'' ~"""r.' r'A.T T T:'r-c n A
. \YITT 1{F"l;.RA'RRF" PA
. .\
INNSY! VANI ' :-A-'- POlle"'" I
:- c- - ~ I 11"'~ ~ ! ~ i = : ~
8UREAU OF UQUORGONTROL ENFORCEMENT
HARRISBURG DISTRICT ENFORCEMENT OFFICE
3655 V ART AN WAY
HARRISBURG, PA 17110
PHONE: 71i-541-7961
FAX: 717-541-7861
S;'=lLE 1.3 (5.99)
August 24, 2005
incident #W03-307363
License #CC-511 0
LI 0 #3820
Vets Canteen Assn.
130 West King Street
Cumberland County
Shippensburg, PA 17257-1128
The Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement through its investigation has received
information of the following alleged violations which may result in the issuance of a citation
to show cause why your license should not be suspended or revoked or a fine imposed, or
both:
)I."'~
1. OFFERED AND/OR AWARDED MORE THAN $5,000.00 IN CASH OR
MERCHANDISE IN ANY SEVEN-DAY PERIOD.
04/03/05 THRU 04/09/05, 04/10/05 THRU 04/16/05, 04/17/05 THRU 04/23/05;
04/24/05 THRU 04/30/05, 05/01/05 THRU 05/07/05, OS/29/05 THRU 06/04/05r
06/05/05 THRU 06/11/05, 06/12/05 THRU 06/18/05, 06/19/05 THRU 06/25/05,
, 06/26/05 THRU 07/02105, 07/03/05 THRU 07/09/05, 07/10/05 THRU 07i16/05,
07/17/05 THRU 07/23/05 AND 07/24/05 THRU 07/30/05
2. FAILED TO MAINTAIN COMPLETE AND TRUTHFUL RECORDS COVERING
THE OPERATION OF THE LICENSED BUSINESS FOR A PERIOD OF TWO
YEARS CONCERNING THELOCAL OPTION SMALL GAMES OF CHANCE ACT.
05/13/05,08/05/05 AND DIVERS OTHER OCCASIONS IN THE PAST YEAR
~~:J-
Date Investigation Assigned:
Date Investigation Completed:
03/09/05
08/09/05
No other information will be furnished concerning this matter unless the Bureau
determines that aGitation will be issued.
g~~I:UL
Se~~~t Stephen F. Valencic
District Office Commander, Harrisburg
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
Pennsylvania State Police
CERTIFIED MAIL- Return Receipt Requ~sted
SFV/JTB:gdd
'-:E._ .ff _....,....._.r_.________._.L 4_____~~
'" /
\,/
-.,.-......-
7160 3901 9849 0106 ~400
-'je
e.
...::~' : ~ . -, :-:.j:~' i ~
- ~- "). ~; ;
COM1VIO~TEAL TH OF PENNSYL V Al\iL..\.
PEN"NSYLVA1~lA STATE POLICE
RUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL'
E:N'"FORCElYIEl\iT
CITATION NO. 05-1806
Incident No. W03-307363
v.
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W.KING ST.
SffiPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
LID - 3820
License No. CC-5110
License First Issued: August 10, 1949
crT A TrON
WHEREAS, the Pennsylva.ni,a Liquor Control Board has issued to you the above-referenced
license and related permit(s) for the licensed term ending January 31,2006; and
WHEREAS, the Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement is in possession of facts which leads it
to believe that you have violated the Liquor Code, the Act of April 12, 1951, P.L. 90, as reenacted and
amended, 47 P.S. 91-101, et seq, and the rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, in the
following manner:
1. During the periods April 3 through 9, April 10 through 16, April 17 through 23, April
24through 30, May 1 through 7, May 29 through June 4, June 5 through 11, June 12 through 18, June
19 through 25, June 26 through July 2, July 3 through 9, July 10 through 16, July 17 through 23 and
July 24 through 30, 2005, you, by your servants, agents or employees, offered and/or awarded more
than $5,000.00 in cash or merchandise in any seven-day period, in violation of Section 471 of the
!"-EXHIBIT '.
!. . C<~>.'
I c:-~/t- #~
.
.
Vets Canteen Assn.
Citation No. 05-1806
Page 2
Liquor Code, 47 P.S. ~4-471 and Section 315(b) of the Local Option Smali Games of Chance Act, 10
P.S. ~315(b).
2. On May 13 and August 5, 2005, you, by your servants, agents or employees, failed to
maintain complete and truthful records covering the operation of the licensed business for a period of
two (2) years concerning the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act, in violation of Sections 471
and 493(12) of the Liquor Code, 47 P.S. ~~4-471 and 4-493(12), Section 311 of the Local Option Smail
Games of Chance Act, 10P.S. ~311 and Section 901 of the DeparttnentofRevenue Regulations, 61Pa.
Code ~901.
NOW THEREFORE, you are hereby cited to appear before an Administrative Law Judge,
on a date to be scheduled by the Office of Administrative Law Judge, to show cause why such
license should notbe suspended or revoked or a [me imposed.
You have the right to retain legal counsel to represent you. If you do hire an attorney, he or
she must file a Notice of Appearance with the Office of Administrative Law Judge, Brandywine Plaza,
2221 Paxton Church Road, Harrisburg ,Perinsy lvania 1711 0-9661, and forward a copy to the Assistant
Counsel at the address listed below in accordance with 1 Pa:. Code Subchapter C. Delay in obtaining
counsel is not reason for any continuance.
You have the right to waive your hearing. Such action is an admission to the charges. Should
you choose to waive, the proper form is enc1osedfor your convenience. Upon receipt, the Office of
Administrative Law Judge will process the forms and issue an adjudication.
.
.
Vets Canteen Assn.
Citation No. 05-1806
Page 3
BY ,ORDER
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
.~ )1.,lrlv~~
MAJOR LEONARD H. MCDONALD
Director
Date: September 15, 2005
Thomas M. Ballaron, Assistant Counsel
Pennsylvania State Police
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Telephone: (717) 540-7411
/~~
Mailing Date:
..,
MAR _ ) 2OD5
..
rfJpsIr 0ar
CO:M:MON\VEAL TH OF PENNSYL V_ANIA
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
FOR
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONlROL BOARD
PENNSYLVANIA STATE
POLICE, BUREAU OF
LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT
Citation No. 04-2066
v.
Incident No. W03-300617
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING STREET
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1228
LID-3820
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
LICENSE NO. CC-5110
ADJUDICATION
',.
'BEFORE: JUDGE FLAHERTY
BACKGROUND:
This proceeding arises out of'a citation that was issued on December 9, 2004, by the
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement of the Pennsylvania State Police (herein~er "Bureau")
against VETS CANTEEN ASSN., License Number CC-511 0 (hereinafter "Licensee").
The citation contains three counts.
The first count charges Licensee with violation of Sections 471 and 493(12) of the Liquor
Code [47 P.S. '~~4-471and 4-493(12)], Section 311 of the Local Option Small Games of Chance
Act [10 P.S. 9311] and Section 901 of the Department of Revenue Regulations [61 Pa. Code
9901] in that on November 10, 2004, Licensee, by its servants, agents or employes, failed to
maintain complete and truthful records covering the operation of the licensed business fo! a
period of two years concerning the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act.
The second count charges Licensee with violation of Section 471 of the Liquor Code [47
P.S. g4-471] and Section 315(b) of the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act [10 P.S.
g315(b)] in that during the period October 31 through November 6, 2004, Licensee, by its
servants, agents or employes, offered and/or awarded more than $5,000.00 in cash or
merchandise in any seven day period.
I'. .......EXHIBlt..;.;
!C~3 ~u
I.. ~;;lr;.~~~ ~....,
VETS CMTEEN" -r.
f
CITATION NO. 04-20o{)
.;
I
,
PAGE 2
The third count charges Licensee with violation of Sections 104(c), 401 (a) and 406(a)(1)
of the Liquor Code [47 P.S. SSl-104(c), 4-401(a) and 4-406(a)(1)] in that on October 6, 2004,
. and divers occasions in the past year, Licensee, by its servants, agents or employes, offered
and/or gave liquor and/or malt or brewed beverages as a prize.
Licensee has executed a Statement of Waiver, Admission and Authorization in which
Licensee: admits to the violation(s) charged in the citation and that the Bureau complied with the
applicable investigatory and notice requirements of the Liquor Code~ authorizes the
Administrative Law Judge to enter an Adjudication without a hearing based on a summary of
facts. as provided by the Bureau and prior citation history, and waives the right to appeal this
Adjudication.
Based upon the admission( s) of Licensee and the summary of facts provided by the
Bur~au, I make the following Findings of Fact and reach the following Conclusions of Law:
FINDINGS OF FACT:
COUNTS 1. 2 AND 3
1. On November 10, 2004 an officer of the Bureau visited the licensed premiseS to
conduct a routine inspection.
2. As a result of the aforementioned inspection, it was discovered with respect to the
small games of chance record that no records of winners being awarded in excess of $100.00
were being kept.
3. An audit of Licensee's. small games of chance record by the officer for the dates
October 31 through November 6, 2004 determined that Licensee had paid out $29,280.00 in
winnings. .
4. Further examination of Licensee's records disclosed that Licensee was
maintaining a ''beer board." The aforementioned board was based on a winning tip seal from a
small game of chance for which the club awarded gift certificates. The gift certificates were
stamped for non-alcoholic beverages, but the treasurer/manager and secretary both admitted that
the local distributor was redeeming the certificates for cases of beer. The .records indicated that
the last date beer was given away on the tip board w~ October 6, 2004.
5. The officer interviewed one of the corporate officers of the local beer distributor
who admitted to redeeming some of the aforementioned gift certificates for cases of beer. He
stated that no records were kept of when the certificates were redeemed.
. .
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
Counts 1,2 and 3 of the citation is sustained.
. VETS CAJ.'ITEEN A' ).
CITATION NO. 04-2006
.
PAGE 3
PRlOR RECORD:
. Licensee has been licensed since August 10, 1949, and has had two prior violation(s)
since July 1, 1987, the date of establishment of the Office of Administrative Law Judge:
Citation No. 89-0381. Fine $500.00 and 20 days suspension.
1. Possessed or operated gambling devices or
paraphernalia or permitted gambling or lotteries on
the licensed premises (tickets and punchboards).
Citation No. 94-0938. Fine $400.00.
1. Sales to nonmembers without prior arrangement.
PENALTY:
Section 471 of the Liquor Code [47 P.S. ~4-471J prescribes a penalty of license
suspension or revocation or a fine of not less than $50.00 or more than $1,000.00 or both for
violations of the type found in this case.
Counsel for the Bureau and counsel for Licensee have agreed to recommend a penalty in
this case of a fine of $900.00 (Count 1 - $250.00; Count 2 - '$500.00; Count 3 - $150.00). Under
the circumstances of this case, I find this recommendation to be'acceptable.
Therefore, the penalty imposed shall be as follows:
Count 1 - $250.00 fine
Count 2 - $500.00 fine '.
Count 3 - $150.00 fine
ORDER
THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that Licensee VETS CANTEEN ASSN., pay a fine
of $900.00 within 20 days of the mailing date of this Order. In the event the aforementioned fine
is not paid within 20 days from the mailing date of this Order, Licensee's license shall be
suspended or revoked.
The fine must be paid by Treasurer's Check, Cashier's Check or Certified Check.
Personal checks, which includes business-use personal checks, are not acceptable. Make
check payable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and mail to:
PLCB-Office of Administrative Law Judge
Brandywine Plaza
2221 Paxton Church Road
Harrisburg P A 17110-9661
. VETS CANTEEN -)\T.
CITATION NO. 04-2066
.:
PAGE 4
Jurisdiction is retained pending final resolution of the penalty in this matter.
Dated this ~ay of March, 2005.
an
MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION MUST BE RECEIVED WITHIN 15
DAYS OF THE MAILING DATE OF THIS ORDER IN THE OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE AND REQUIRE A $25.00 FILING FEE. A
WRITTEN REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE
FILING FEE. .
r . \ \'1'..::-:; ..;}: S2
:~Q
."'"
\
Mailing Date: JUN 2 2 l006
.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
FOR
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
PENNSYLVANIA STATE
POLICE, BUREAU OF
LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT
Citation No. 05-1806
Incident No. W03-307363
v.
LID - 3820
VETS CANTEENASSN.
130 W. KING ST.
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
LICENSE NO. CC-5110
BEFORE: JUDGE THAU
APPEARANCES:
For Bureau of Enforcement
Thomas M. Ballaron, Esquire
Pennsylvania State Police
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110
For Licensee
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, P A 17013
ADJUDICATION
BACKGROUND:
This proceeding arises out of a citation that was issued on September 15, 2005, by the
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement of the Pennsylvania State Police (Bureau) against Vets
Canteen Assn. (Licensee), License Number CC-5110.
.--\
,
..,
i
I
VETS CANTEEN ASS:N.
CITATION NO. 05-1806
PAGE 2
This citation 1 contains two counts.
The first count charges Licensee with violations of Section 471 of the Liquor Code [47
P.S. S4-471] and Section 315(b) of the Local Option Small Garnes of Chance Act [10 P.S.
s315(b)]. The charge is that during the periods April 3 through 9, April 10 through 16, April 17
through 23, April 24 through 30, May 1 through 7, May 29 through June 4, June 5 through 11,
June 12 through 18, June 19 through 25, June 26 through July 2, July 3 through 9, July 10
through 16, July 17 through 23 and July 24 through 30, 2005, Licensee, by servants, agents or
employes, offered and/or awarded more than $5,000.00 in cash or merchandise in any seven-day
period.
The second count charges Licensee with violations of Sections 471 and 493(12) [47 P.S.
94-471 and 94-493(12)], Section 311 ofthe Local Option Small Garnes of Chance Act [10 P.S.
9311] and Section 901 of the Department of Revenue Regulations [61 Pa. Code 9901]. The
charge is that on May 13 and August 5, 2005, Licensee, by servants, agents or employes, failed
to maintain complete and truthful records covering the operation of the licensed business for a
period of two (2) years concerning the Local Option Small Garnes of Chance Act.
An evidentiary hearing was conducted on May 16, 2006 at Brandywine Plaza, 2221
Paxton Church Road, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
After review of the transcript of that proceeding, the following Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law are entered.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. The Bureau began its investigation on March 9, 2005 and completed it on August
9,2005. (N.T.6)
2. The Bureau sent a notice of alleged violations to Licensee at the licensed premises
by certified mail-return receipt requested on August 24, 2005. The notice alleged violations as
charged in the citation. (Commonwealth Exhibit No. C-1, N.T. 5)
1. Commonwealth Exhibit No. C-2, N.T. 5.
.-,
j
.\'t
.i
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
CITATION NO. 05-1806
PAGE 3
Count No.1:
3. For the seven-day periods listed in Count No.1, Licensee awarded prizes in
excess of $5,000.00, as follows: Week ending April 9,2005 - $48,208.00; Week ending April
16,2005 - $39,785.00; Week ending April 23, 2005 - $44,000.00; Week ending April 30, 2005 -
$47,000.00; Week ending May 7, 2006 - $40,000.00; Week ending June 4, 2005 - $43,000.00;
Week ending June 11, 2005 - $40,000.00; Week ending June 18, 2006 - $32,000.00; Week
ending June 25,2005 - $42,000.00; Week ending July 2,2005 - $45,000.00; Week ending July 9,
2005 - $48,000.00; Week ending July 16, 2005 - $39,000.00; Week ending July 23, 2005 -
$45,000.00; Week ending July 30, 2005 - $38,000.00. (N.T. 6-8)
Count No.2:
4. On the dates charged, Licensee maintained a ticket dispensing machine. Licensee
was not maintaining required records with respect to that device. (N. T. 11-12)
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
1.
satisijed.
The notice requirements of Liquor Code Section 471 [47 P.S. ~4-471] have been
2.
Count Nos. 1 and 2 are sustained as charged.
PRIOR RECORD:
Licensee has been licensed since August 10, 1949, and has had three prior violation(s)
since July 1, 1987, the date of establishment of the Office of Administrative Law Judge
(Commonwealth Exhibit No. C-3, N.T. 13):
Adjudication No. 89-0381. Fine $500.00 and 20 days suspension.
Possessed or operated gambling devices or paraphernalia or
permitted gambling or lotteries on the licensed premises
(tickets and punchboards).
Adjudication No. 94-0938. Fine $400.00.
Sales to nonmembers without prior arrangement.
March 16, 1994.
.
j
VETS CANTEEN ASS~.
CITATION NO. 05-1806
.
PAGE 4
Adjudication No. 04-2066. Fine $900.00.
1. Failed to maintain complete and truthful records
for a period of 2 years concerning the Local Option
Small Games of Chance Act.
November 10,2004.
2. Offered and/or awarded more than $5,000.00 in
cash or merchandise in any 7 day period.
October 31 through November 6,2004.
3. Offered and/or gave alcoholic beverages
as a pnze.
October 6, 2004.
PENALTY:
Section 471 of the Liquor Code [47 P.S. g4-471] prescribes a penalty of license
suspension or revocation or a fine of not less than $50.00 or more than $1,000.00 or both for
violations of the type found in Count Nos. 1 and 2 in this case.
As Licensee has voluntarily agreed to cease operating pursuant to its Small Games of
Chance License for a period of 28 days, beginning August 1, 2006 and terminating close of
business August 28,2006, I will impose fines without suspension.
Count No.1 - $900.00 fine.
Count No.2 - $100.00 fine.
ORDER:
Imposition of Fine
THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that Licensee pay a fine of$l,OOO.OO within 20 days
ofthe mailing date of this Order. In the event the aforementioned fine is not paid within 20 days
from the mailing date of this Order, Licensee's license shall be suspended or revoked.
The fine must be paid by Treasurer's Check, Cashier's Check, Certified Check or Money
Order. Personal checks, which include business-use personal checks, are not acceptable.
Please make your guaranteed check payable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and mail to:
PLCB - Office of Administrative Law Judge
Brandywine Plaza
2221 Paxton Church Road
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110-9661
.\
\
.
VETS CANTEEN ASS:N.
CITATION NO. 05-1806
PAGES
Retaining Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction is retained to ensure compliance with this Adjudication.
I' Jj..
Dated this ~ aay of June, 2006.
;(f~
pm
MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION MUST BE RECEIVED WITHIN 15
DAYS OF THE MAILING DATE OF THIS ORDER TO THE OFFICE OF
Al)MINISTRA TIVE LAW JUDGE AND REQUIRE A $25.00 FILING FEE. A
WRITTEN REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE
FILING FEE.
.
.
OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
DOCKET ENTRIES
DOCKET NO. 05-1806
DATE 07/21/06
LID - 3820
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
VETS CANTEEN ASSN
130 W KING ST
SHIPPENSBURG PA
09 15 05 DATE OF CITATION
09 15 05 CITATION RECEIVED BY ALJ
09 15 05
AVERMENTS:
1. DURING THE PERIODS APRIL 3 THROUGH 9, APRIL 10 THROUGH
16, APRIL 17 THROUGH 23, APRIL 24 THROUGH 30, MAY 1 THROUGH
7, MAY 29 THROUGH JUNE 4, JUNE 5 THROUGH II, JUNE 12 THROUGH
18, JUNE 19 THROUGH 25, JUNE 26 THROUGH JULY 2, JULY 3
THROUGH 9, JULY 10 THROUGH 16, JULY 17 THROUGH 23 AND JULY
24 THROUGH 30, 2005, OFFERED AND/OR AWARDED MORE THAN
$5,000.00 IN CASH OR MERCHANDISE IN ANY SEVEN-DAY PERIOD, IN
VIOLATION OF SECTION 471 OF THE LIQUOR CODE, 47 P.B. SECTION
4-471 AND SECTION 315(B) OF THE LOCAL OPTION SMAL~ GAMES OF
CHANCE ACT, 10 P.S. SECTION 315(B).
2. ON MAY 13 AND AUGUST 5, 2005, FAILED TO MAINTAIN
COMPLETE AND TRUTHFUL RECORDS COVERING THE OPERATION OF THE
LICENSED BUSINESS FOR A PERIOD OF TWO (2) YEARS CONCERNING
THE LOCAL OPTION SMALL GAMES OF CHANCE ACT, IN VIOLATION OF
SECTIONS 471 AND 493(12) OF THE LIQUOR CODE, 47 P.S.
SECTIONS 4-471 AND 4-493(12), SECTION 311 OF THE LOCAL
OPTION SMALL GAMES OF CHANCE ACT, 10 P.S. SECTION 311 AND
SECTION 901 OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REGULATIONS, 61 PA.
CODE SECTION 901./cD
10 26 05 PRE-HEARING MEMO COMPLETED BY PA STATE POLICE
PRE-HEARING MEMO RECEIVED BY ALJ FROM PA STATE POLICE
10 27 05 PRE-HEARING MEMO SENT TO LICENSEE
11 17 05 RECEIVED ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FROM ATTORNEY:
H ANTHONY ADAMS ESQ
49 W ORANGE ST STE 3
SHIPPENSBURG PA
17257-0000
11 18 05 WAIVER RECEIVED. IDA
.
.
OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
DOCKET ENTRIES
DOCKET NO. 05-1806
DATE 07/21/06
LID - 3820
11 22 05 JUDGE THAU RETURNED THE WAIVER SUBMITTED IN THE
ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER AND DIRECTED THAT A HEARING BE
SCHEDULED./PM
03 31 06 JUDGE THAU ISSUED A PRE-HRG. ORDER DIRECTING
LICENSEE'S COUNSEL TO SUBMIT LICENSEE'S PRE-HRG. MEMORANDUM
TO THIS OFFICE AND TO BUREAU COUNSEL NO LATER THAN THE
CLOSE OF BUSINESS APRIL 12, 2006./PM
04 11 06 PRE-HEARING MEMO RECEIVED FROM LICENSEE
05 09 06 APPEARANCE IN THIS MATTER WAS WITHDRAWN BY:
H ANTHONY ADAMS ESQ
RECEIVED ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FROM ATTORNEY:
KARL E ROMINGER ESQ
155 S HANOVER ST
CARLISLE PA
17013 - 0000
05 12 06 RECEIVED A PRE-HEARING MEMO FROM KARL ROMINGER, ESQ
/DA
05 16 06 HEARING HELD AT 11:30 AM IN HARRISBURG
06 22 06 OPINION AND ADJUDICATION
FINE OF $1000.00 DUE 07/12/06
07 19 06 APPEAL FILED TO BOARD BY LICENSEE
07 19 06 BOARD APPEAL FILING FEE OF
$35.00 PAID
07 21 06 FULL FINE UNPAID AT THIS DATE
07 21 06 RECEIVED THE BUREAU'S RESPONSE TO LICENSEE'S
APPEAL. THE BUREAU REQUESTS THE BOARD AFFIRM THE ORDER OF
THE OALJ. /CH
07 21 06 RECORDS CERTIFIED
\c 4
.) .).
ROMINGER &WHARE
'4
A tt 0 r n e ys a t Law
Karl E, Rominger
Michael J. Whare
Michael O. Palermo, Jr
Leslie A, Tomeo*
* Also admitted in New Jersey
July 19, 2006
Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
Attn: Office of Chi.ef Counsel
Appeal Unit; Room 401
Capital and Boas Streets
Northwest Office Building
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17124-0001 .
RE: Vets'Canteen Assn.
PLCB LicenseNo.: CC-5110
Citation No.: 05-1806
Dear Office of Chief Counsel:
e:.
.." 0
""'1' C".
CS L..
", c::
0- r-
.."
(") l\)
::r 0
m
"Ti >
o :x-
C)
c: '@.
:;7,;
~;n
rr,.
r- \;0
Enclosed please fmd the proper paperwork needed to file for an appeal for the
above referenced matter. I have also enclosed the fee for said appeal.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the office.
. .
Sincerely,
2/'........ ~
. -"
-
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
KER/tlp
Enclosure
cc: Vets Canteen Assn.
155 South Hanover Street, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013 . Tel: (717) 241-6070' Fax: (717) 241-6878
www.romingerlaw.com
ADVOCACY · ADVICE · ANSWERS
:1:1=::0
. f"71
r- C")
nL:2
',,<:
~/"T1
t::"
PLCB-1918 9/02
COMMONWEALTH OFPENNSYL VANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
.~PPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE. J
LAW JUDGE ADJUDICATION '
OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
(SUBMIT IN ORIGINAL ONL Yi
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Remit a $35 fee payable to "PA Liquor Control Board" along with the original of this fully completed Appeal form.
2. Type or print in Blue/Black ink all information except signatures.
3. Attach copy of the Opinion and Adjudication ofthe Administrative Law Judge (AU) that is the subject of the Appeal.
4. Appeal must be filed or postmarked within 30 calendar days of the mailing date of the ALJ's Opinion and Adjudication; untimely filed
Appeals will be dismissed.
5. Send Appeal to: Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, ATTN: Office of Chief Counsel, Appeal Unit, Room 401, Capitol and Boas
Streets, Northwest Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17124-0001.
6. Complete the following (as it appears on the AU's Opinion and Adjudication).
NAME OF LICENSEE PLCB LICENSE NO.
CITATION NO.
TRADE NAME (IF ANY)
o 1 06
ADDRESS OF PREMISES
(STREET. RURAL ROUTE, P.O. BOX NO.)
(POST OFFICE)
(STATE)
(ZIP)
130 w. Kin st.
NAME OF MUNICIPALITY
Shi
PA
17257
7. This Appeal will be considered solely on the record made before the Administrative Law Judge.
In numbered paragraphs, specify how the Administrative Law Judge committed an error of law or abused his/her discretion or how
his/her decision was not based on substantial evidence. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
The licensee did not agree to forego the small games of
chance license and/or the sale of said games for the month of
August. This portion of the Order should be removed, and only
fines paid. Further the violations were not willful and all
of the proceeds of the games were used to support charity, so
a fine is appropriate.
SIGN~
uire Attorne
icensee 7 19 06
LICENSEE OR AUTHORIZED OFFICER OR COUNSEL FOR LICENSEE
DATE
~... \. J
PLCB.j'9197/05
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANiA
.~ . PENNSYLVANIA
LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
.1L1CATION FOR SUPERSEDE.)
OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
(SUBMIT IN ORIGINAL ONLY)
INSTRUCTIONS
1. This Application is to be filed with the Appeal when requesting a supersedeas. In no event shall this Application be filed later
than 30 days after the mailing date of the Administrative Law Judge's Opinion and Adjudication. A "supersedeas" is a stay,
or delay, of a penalty (payment of fine or imposition of a suspension or revocation) while an Appeal is pending.
2. Send to: Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, ATTN: Office of Chief Counsel, Appeal Unit, Room 401, Capital and Boas
Streets, Northwest Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17124-0001.
3. Complete the following (as it appears on the ALJ's Opinion and Adjudication)
NAME OF LICENSEE
PLCB LICENSE NO.
CITATION NO.
Vets
TRADE NAME (IF ANY)
CC-5110
05-1806
ADDRESS OF PREMISES
(STREET. RURAL ROtiTE. P Q. BOX NO)
(PCS T OFFICE)
(STATE)
fZIP)
1
NAME OF MUNICIPALITY
Shi
PA
17257
B
Cum
4. An Appeal to the Board will not operate as a supersedeas if the licensee has been cited and found to have committed one
or more of the following violations: (Unless otherwise indicated, Sections designated are those contained in the Pennsylvania
Liquor Code. The Liquor Code is set forth in Title 47 of Purdon's Statutes).
Section 493(1) (sales to minors or sales to any person visibly intoxicated).
Section 493(10) (lewd entertainment).
Section 493(14) (permitting undesirable persons or minors to frequent).
Section 493(16) (furnishing or delivering liquor or malt or brewed beverages at unlawful hours).
Section 493(21) (right of inspection).
Section 611 (licensed premises found to be a public nuisance).
Section 481 (c) (mandatory revocations for the accrual of twenty or more points in more than one citation
for restaurant and eating place licensees in cities of the first class).
If the owner or operator of the license or any authorized agent of the owner or operator is convicted of any
violation of:
Act of April 14, 1972, (P.L. 233, No. 64), known as "The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic
Act" (See Title 35 of Purdon's Statutes);
Crimes Code, Section 5902 (prostitution or related offenses), or
Crimes Code, Section 6301 (corruption of minors) (See Title 18 of Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes).
An Appeal shall not act as a supersedeas as to any penalty imposed for anyone or more of the violations
set forth above unless the Board determines otherwise upon sufficient cause shown. In cases where
supersedeas is requested due to a revocation under Liquor Code section 481 (c), the licensee must
demonstrate that it is likely to prevail on the merits.
(OVER)
.5. I h~rebY apply for a supersedeas of t.ialtY(ieS) imposed.in the Opinion and A. ltion appealed to the Board. I submit
as sufficient cause the following: (List below each reason which would demonstrate to the Board that sufficient cause exists
for the Board to grant your Application for Supersedeas. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Your signature should be
affixed where indicated below.
A timely Appeal has been filed and disposition of the fine
should be stayed pending the outcome of the case.
./
LICENSEE OR AUTHORIZED OFFICER
,
DATE
K
DATE
REVIEWED BY
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
RECOMMENDATION
HEARING DATE
BOARD ACTION DATE
ICHAIRMAN
I
MEMBER
IMEMBER
I
I
" hnp::~tP.nntS.CQmaCIUSI0nS.htm
.. ~iling Date: JUN 22 ~J~
.....hh ~
.)
C0tvllv10NWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
FOR
PENNSYL VANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
PENNSYLVANIA STATE
POLICE, BUREAU OF
LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT
Citation No. 05-1806
v.
Incident No. W03-
3(}7363
LID - 3820
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING ST.
SHIPPENSBURG, P A 17257-
1128
CU11BERLAND COUNTY
LICENSE NO. CC-5110
BEFORE: JUDGE THAD
APPEARANCES:
F or Bureau of Enforcement
Thomas M. Ballaron, Esquire
Pennsylvania State Police
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110
For Licensee
Karl E. Rominger,
Esquire
155 South Hanover
Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
www.latent-prints.com
I " .
nnp:1 :www.la.[em-pnms.conv.C~USlOns.ntm
J
.)
ADJUDICATION
BACKGROUND:
This proceeding arises out of a citation that was issued on September
15, 2005, by the Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement of the Pennsylvania
State Police (Bureau) against Vets Canteen Assn. (Licensee), License
Number CC-511 O.
This citation 1 contains two counts.
The first count charges Licensee with violations of Section 471 of
the Liquor Code [47 P.S. S4-471] and Section 315(b) of the Local Option
Small Games of Chance Act [10 P.S. S315(b)]. The charge is that during the
periods April 3 through 9, April 10 through 16, April 17 through 23, April 24
through 30, May 1 through 7, May 29 through June 4, June 5 through 11, June
12 through 18, June 19 through 25, June 26 through July 2, July 3 through 9,
July 10 through 16, July 17 through 23 and July 24 through 30, 2005,
Licensee, by servants, agents or employes, offered and/or awarded more than
$5,000.00 in cash or merchandise in any seven-day period.
The second count charges Licensee with violations of Sections 471
and 493(12) [47 P.S. S4-471 and S4-493(12)], Section 311 of the Local
Option Small Games of Chance Act [10 P.S. S311] and Section 901 of the
Department of Revenue Regulations [61 Pa. Code S901]. The charge is that
on May 13 and August 5, 2005, Licensee, by servants, agents or employes,
failed to maintain complete and truthful records covering the operation of the
licensed business for a period of two (2) years concerning the Local Option
Small Games of Chance Act.
An evidentiary hearing was conducted on May 16, 2006
at Brandywine Plaza, 2221 Paxton Church Road, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
After review of the transcript of that proceeding, the following
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are entered.
W\VW . latent -prints .com
. http://,VfWV{.latent-pnnts.COml.l~SlOnS.htm
el
)
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. The Bureau began its investigation on March 9, 2005 and
completed it on August 9,2005. (N.T.6)
2. The Bureau sent a notice of alleged violations to Licensee at
the licensed premises by certified mail-return receipt requested on August 24,
2005. The notice alleged violations as charged in the citation.
(Commonwealth Exhibit No. C-l, N.T. 5)
1. Commonwealth Exhibit No. C-2, N.T. 5.
Count No.1:
3. For the seven-day periods listed in Count No.1, Licensee
awarded prizes in excess of $5,000.00, as follows: Week ending April 9,
2005 - $48,208.00; Week ending April 16, 2005 - $39,785.00; Week ending
April 23, 2005 - $44,000.00; Week ending April 30, 2005 - $47,000.00; Week
ending May 7, 2006 - $40,000.00; Week ending June 4, 2005 - $43,000.00;
Week ending June 11, 2005 - $40,000.00; Week ending June 18, 2006 ;..
$32,000.00; Week ending June 25, 2005 - $42,000.00; Week ending July 2,
2005 - $45,000.00; Week ending July 9, 2005 - $48,000.00; Week ending July
16, 2005 - $39,000.00; Week ending July 23, 2005 - $45,000.00; Week
ending July 30, 2005 - $38,000.00. (N.T. 6-8)
Count No.2:
4. On the dates charged, Licensee maintained a ticket dispensing
machine. Licensee was not maintaining required records with respect to that
device. (N.T. 11-12)
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
www.latent-prints.com
: nnp:/~W\VW.latent-pnnts.COrn/'Cl~SlOns.ntm
. .~
f
1. The notice requirements of Liquor Code Section 471 [47 P.S.
94-471] have been satisfied.
2. Count Nos. 1 and 2 are sustained as charged.
PRlOR RECORD:
Licensee has been licensed since August 10, 1949, and has had three
prior violation(s) since July 1, 1987, the date of establishment of the Office of
Administrative Law Judge (Commonwealth Exhibit No. C-3, N.T. 13):
Adjudication No. 89-0381. Fine $500.00 and 20 days
. -
suspenSlOn,
Possessed or operated gambling devices or
paraphernalia or
permitted gambling or lotteries on the licensed
premIses
(tickets and punchboards).
Adjudication No. 94-0938. Fine $400.00.
Sales to nonmembers without pnor
arrangement.
March 16, 1994.
Adjudication No. 04-2066. Fine $900.00.
1. Failed to maintain complete and truthful
records
for a period of 2 years concerning the
Local Option
Small Games of Chance Act.
November 10, 2004.
2. Offered and/or awarded more than $5,000.00 in
cash or merchandise in any 7 day period.
October 31 through November 6, 2004.
3. Offered and/or gave alcoholic beverages
as a pnze.
October 6, 2004.
www.latent-prints.com
I ' .
. hnP:I!www.latent-pnnts.cOml.cl~slOns.ntm
,
.\
J
PENALTY:
Section 471 of the Liquor Code [47 P.S. 94-471] prescribes a penalty
of license suspension or revocation or a fine of not less than $50.00 or more
than $1,000.00 or both for violations of the type found in Count Nos. 1 and 2
in this case.
As Licensee has voluntarily agreed to cease operating pursuant to its
Small Games of Chance License for a period of 28 days, beginning August 1,
2006 and terminating close of business August 28, 2006, I will impose fines
without suspension.
Count No. 1 - $900.00 fHle.
Count No.2 - $100.00 fine.
ORDER:
Imposition of Fine
THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that Licensee pay a fme of
$1,000.00 within 20 days of the mailing date of this Order. In the event the
aforementioned fine is notpaid within 20 days from the mailing date of this
Order, Licensee's license shall be suspended or revoked.
The fine must be paid by Treasurer's Check, Cashier's Check,
Certified Check or Money Order. Personal checks, which include business-
use personal checks, are not acceptable. Please make your guaranteed
check payable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and mail to:
PLCB - Office of Administrative Law Judge
Brandywine Plaza
2221 Paxton Church Road
. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110-9661
www.latent-prints.com
., ~ttr:/ ~www.latent-pnnts.COm!.Cl~SlOns.htm
. J
.\
I
Retaining Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction is retained to ensure compliance with this Adjudication.
Dated this
th
13- _ day of June, 2006.
Felix Thau, A.L.J.
pm
MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION_MUST BE RECEIVED
WITHIN 15 DAYS OF THE MAILING DATE OF THIS ORDER TO
THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE AND REQUIRE
A $25.00 FILING FEE. A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR
RECONSIDERATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FILING
FEE.
Copyright ~ 2006 Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer .
Close ThisjVindow
www.latent-prints.com
....
~J
....
\\}
+:<
+
o
c:i
"
....
.
RECEIVED
P.L.C.B.
06 JUL 20 AM 9: 19
OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
~'
......
:r:z("))>~~
GlOGl"OS"~
3 ;::I."Q. -g .. ::J
rn' ~ Q;, ' tu ~ rn
0"<-- 'S.
C(1)Q)c-o<
...,rn::J::J Q)
ee - Q; ;::+ CD ::J
-"t! ~ OJ -;0 a or
(1)-00_r-
::J 0 Q) ..." -.
~ CD en ~ 2:.g
~ aJen ~g
-c-,s:..
<a:<aO()()
~ -' (1) ...... 0 0
-' ::J en 5 ~
Glee ent:;
...... ~~
::1 OJ
~ g
I ...,
8 Q;
o
......
-
-
.
",'
.....-.-......-..,.-....--..........-............
0.....::0
II) (J'I 0
:::L(J'I3
-. (J) -'
!!!.o::::l
CD....CO
- ::. CD
-o::r....
CD::cQo
::::l1l)S;
~::::l3'
~~II)
~~Cil
2. (J)
11)_
....
.....CD
o"JCD
0-
.....
t.3
(....
II.' ~
. .
-II _ ' ~
M( :.. . ..
~'g ~ UNlTJ;O
- 0 ~ .9..>-
[;:; N ~ .r-' "1...
0<""'" --eo') ~
0>, '0
:n a:> "111 l' 0
NO""" ~ Q\\ f'^
(J) ~Ii' ~
~o ~" '.-ff
~ '- ~ ! mtt ~
o ;= 0 ::j mlm
o O~~::....
O~0f!113..
m <D <!1l111'<
~, tv m ~ ~II
s: g (;J ~";}j;
,^'Cl o~~ '.ll
.
.
PLCB-J039 11190
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17124,0001
IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
July 20,2006
Telephone: 717-783-9454
FAX: 717-787-8820
Thomas M. Ballaron, Esquire
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POllCE
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PA 17110
RE: Appeal of: Vets Canteen Assn.
130 W. King Street
Shippensburg, PA 17257-1128
Citation No. 05-1806
Dear Mr. Ballaron:
Enclosed please find a copy of an appeal recently filed by Karl E. Rominger, Esquire. The filing date
of the appeal is July 19, 2006. The Board and its staff are reviewing the file in an effort to determine
whether the decision of the Administrative Law Judge was supported by substantial evidence. When
the Board has decided this appeal, you will be sent a copy of its decision.
If you wish to respond to the matters raised by the appeal, please feel free to do so within ten (10) days
from the date of this letter. No response is necessary; however, if you file a timely response, the Board
will consider it prior to making its decision on the appeal at a formal open meeting of the Board.
Very truly yours,
-::r M:IJ 5. i)le~
FAITH S. DIEHL
Chief Counsel
Enclosures
cc: Vets Canteen Assn.
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire,
Pennsylvania State Police Chief Counsel
Chief Administrative Law Judge Eileen S. Maunus
J. Stark, Board Secretary
State Police Commander, District Office #3
Report Examining Unit, State Police
B. Peifer, Bureau of Licensing
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
PROCEEDS BENEFIT ALL PENNSYL V ANlANS
---
.,
.
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT
3655 VARTAN WAY
HARRISBURG, PA 17110
PHONE: 717-540-7414
FAX: 717-540-7461
r,
Governor's Office of
General Counsel
July 21, 2006
C) 0
~ (f'l
c; ~
rn ~
S?t ~
(") ~
::J:
fii -0
"'" :::s
g f')
c:: -
?h s::-
';!i ""
?J
-orn
'n
~rn
n-
. ...:::.
o:;Jf1"\
.0
Faith Diehl, Esq.
PLCB, Office of Chief Counsel
Appeal Unit, Room 403
Capitol and Boas Streets
Northwest Office Building
Harrisburg, PA 17124-0001
RE: Appeal of: Vets Canteen Assn. v. P.S.P.. Bureau
of Liquor Control Enforcement
Citation No. 05-1806
Dear Ms. Diehl:
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Licensee's Appeal in the above-captioned
matter.
Upon review of the Adjudication and the Licensee's submission, the Commonwealth
must note that the Licensee has failed to set forth any basis for appeal. The Licensee has not
alleged that the Administrative Law Judge committed an error of law nor that he failed to base
his findings of fact upon substantial evidence.
For this reason, the Commonwealth respectfully requests this Honorable Board to affirm
the Adjudication and Order of the OALJ.
Sincerely,
~~
Thomas M. Ballaron evL
Assistant Counsel
cc: Karl E. Rominger, Esq.
Office of Administrative Law Judge
District Enforcement Office No.3 Commander
Report Examination Unit Supervisor
An Internationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency
'.
.,.
.
.
Mailing Date: August 2, 2006
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
HARRISBURG, PA 17124-0001
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL:
ENFORCEMENT
Citation No. 05-1 806
vs.
VETS CANTEEN ASSOCIATION
130 West King Street
Shippensburg, PA 17257-1128
License No. CC- 511 0
Counsel for Licensee:
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
Rominger & Whare
1 55 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PAl 701 3
Counsel for Bureau:
Thomas M. Ballaron, Esquire
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PAl 7110
OPINION
Vets Canteen Association ("Licensee") appealed from the Adjudication
and Order of Administrative Law Judge Felix Thau (" ALJ"), wherein the
AL] sustained both counts of the citation and imposed a penalty consisting of
a fine in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00).
V,,
.
.
The citation contained two counts.
The first count charged Licensee with violations of section 471 of the
Liquor Code [47 P.S. 9 4-471] and section 315(b) of the Local Option
Small Games of Chance Act [lOP .S. 9 31 5 (b)], in that during the periods
April 3 through 9, April 10 through 16, April 17 through 23, April 24
through 30, May 1 through 7, May 29 through June 4, June 5 through 11,
June 12 through 18, June 19 through 25, June 26 through July 2, July 3
through 9, July 10 through 16, July 17 through 23 and July 24 through 30,
2005, Licensee, by its servants, agents or employees, offered and/or awarded
more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) in cash or merchandise in any
seven (7)-day period.
The second count charged Licensee with violations of sections 471 and
493(12) of the Liquor Code [47 P.S. 99 4-471, 4-493(12)], section 311
of the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act [lOP .S. 9 311] and
section 901 of the Department of Revenue Regulations [61 Pa. Code ~
901], in that on May 13 and August 5, 2005, Licensee, by its servants,
agents or employees, failed to maintain complete and truthful records
covering the operation of the licensed business for a period of two (2) years
concerning the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act.
2
"
.
.
Pursuant to section 471 of the Liquor Code [47 P .S. ~ 4-471], the
appeal in this case must be based solely on the record before the AL]. The
Board shall only reverse the decision of the AL] if the AL] committed an
error of law or abused his discretion, or if his decision was not based upon
substantial evidence. The Commonwealth Court has defined "substantial
evidence" to be such relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as
adequate to support a conclusion.
Joy Global, Inc. v. Workers'
Compensation Appeal Bd. (Hogue), 876 A.2d 1098 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005);
Chapman v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole, 86 Pa~ Cmwlth. 49,
484 A.2d 413 (1984).
On appeal, Licensee contends that it did not agree to forego the small
games of chance license and/or the sale of said games for the month of
August 2006. Licensee desires for this portion of the Order to be removed
and be made only to pay the fines. Licensee claims that the violations were
not willful and all of the proceeds of the games were used to support charity.
In the record, counsel for the Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of
Liquor Control Enforcement ("Bureau") recommended a penalty consisting
ofa fine of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500.00), and a five (5)-
day suspension of the license. (N.T. 23-24). The AL] stated that, if
3
,.
.
.
Licensee would agree, within three (3) weeks, to voluntarily stop using its
small games of chance license for twenty-eight (28) consecutive days between
August 1, 2006 and August 28, 2006, he would take that into
consideration when fashioning the penalty in this matter. (N.T. 22-23, 31).
Counsel for Licensee stated that he would provide a letter to the ALJ within
three (3) weeks. (N.T.31-32).1
In his Adjudication, mailed June 22, 2006, the AL) stated, "[a]s
Licensee has voluntarily agreed to cease operating pursuant to its Small
Games of Chance License for a period of 28 days, beginning August 1, 2006
and terminating close of business August 28, 2006, I will impose flnes
without suspension." Thereafter, he imposed a flne of one thousand dollars
($1,000.00). (Admin. Notice).
In its appeal, Licensee avers that it "did not agree to forego the small.
games of chance license and/or the sale of said games for the month of
August" and, therefore, that representation in the ALl's Order should be
removed, leaving Licensee subject only to payment of the fine of one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00). (Admin. Notice).
1 The record is devoid of any mention as to whether the ALJ ever received a letter from Licensee's counsel.
4
.
.
.
In light of the fact that the AL] clearly intended to fashion a penalty
without suspension if Licensee agreed to cease using its small games of chance
license for August of 2006, and the fact that Licensee did not agree to cease
using its small games of change license for August of 2006, the Board will
remand this matter to the Office of the Administrative Law Judge for review
and administration of the ordered penalties.
Therefore, the following Order is hereby issued:
5
...
.
.
ORDER
It is hereby ordered that jurisdiction in this matter is remanded to the
Office of Administrative Law Judge of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
for review and administration of the ordered penalties, and for any further
administration and to ensure compliance with this Order.
~)(~,
If
Board Secretary
6
..
.
.
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
ATTESTATION/CERTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
TO: DIRECTOR OF LICENSING
ATTESTATION
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ss:
I HEREBY ATTEST that I am the legal custodian or deputy custodian of
the official record designated below of which the attached is a true and correct
copy.
Docket Entries and Opinion(s) issued by the Office of Administrative Law Juqge
in Citation No(s). 05-1806 issued in the name of: ::::: ~
(") CI)
m tT1
o -0
."
~ ...
i=ii
.,,-0
(") :x:
10 ...'"
c:. ."'"
4It ...
'A
~ en
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING ST.
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128
Date: September 13, 2006
Gloria M. Spidle
Legal or Deputy Custodian
CERTIFICATION
I CERTIFY THAT the person whose name appears above is the legal
custodian or deputy custodian of the attached record,
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the seal of the Office of Administrative Law Judge on the day and date specified.
Date: September 13, 2006
;:0
:-O.fTJ
r- C":)
. .m
("') -
,. -<
!Drn
o
..
.
.
Mailing Date: AUG 1 5 2006
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
FOR
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
PENNSYLVANIA STATE
POLICE, BUREAU OF
LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT
Citation No. 05-1806
Incident No. W03-307363
v.
LID - 3820
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING ST.
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
LICENSE NO. CC-51l0
OPINION AND ORDER UPON
REMAND ORDER FROM THE PENNSYLVANIA
LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
Opinion:
I entered an Order on June 22,2006, imposing a $1,000.00 fine.
On July 19, 2006, Licensee filed an appeal to the Pennsylvania Liquor Control
Board. On August 2, 2006, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board ordered that
jurisdiction in this matter is remanded to the Office of Administrative Law Judge for
review and administration of the ordered penalties and for any further administration and
to ensure compliance with the Order.
Accordingly, I impose a $1,000.00 fine and a ten days suspension.
.
.
VETS CANTEEN ASSOCIATION
Citation No. 05-1806
PAGE 2
ORDER:
Reimposition of Fine
THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that Licensee pay a fine of $1,000.00 within
20 days of the mailing date of this Order. In the event the aforementioned fine is not paid
within 20 days from the mailing date of this Order, Licensee's license shall be suspended
or revoked.
The fine must be paid by Treasurer's Check, Cashier's Check, Certified Check or
Money Order. Personal checks, which include business-use personal checks, are not
acceptable. Please make your guaranteed check payable to the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania and mail to:
PLCB - Office of Administrative Law Judge
Brandywine Plaza
2221 Paxton Church Road
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110-9661
Imposition of Suspension
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Catering Club liquor license of Vets
Canteen Association, License No. CC-511 0, be suspended for a period of ten days, .
BEGINNING at 7:00 a.m., on Friday, October 6, 2006, and ENDING at 7:00 a.m.,
on Monday, October 16, 2006.
Licensee is directed, on Friday, October 6, 2006, at 7:00 a.m., to place a placard
of notice of suspension (identified as Form No. PLCB-1925 and as printed with red and
black ink) in a conspicuous place on the outside of the licensed premises or in a window
plainly visible from outside the licensed premises and to remove said license from the
wall and place it in a secure location.
Licensee is advised, if replacement placards are needed for any reason, they are
available at all Pennsylvania Liquor Stores/Wine & Spirits Shoppes.
The Bureau is directed to visit and monitor the aforementioned licensed premises
for compliance with this Order.
Licensee is authorized, on Monday, October 16,2006, at 7:00 a.m., to remove the
placard of suspension and return its license to its original wall location.
,
.
VETS CANTEEN ASSOCIATION
Citation No. 05-1806
Retaining Jurisdiction
.
PAGE 3
Jurisdiction is retained to ensure compliance with this Adjudication.
Il{..1-
Dated this ~ day of August, 2006.
pm
.~.~.
-r .. ,,/
/.::j . . '-.... "'"
I Felix hau, A.LJ.
.
PLCI3-1918 9/02
, . COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
.~PPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE. I.
LAW JUDGE ADJUDICATION
OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
(SUBMIT IN ORIGINAL ONLY)
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Remit a $35 fee payable to "PA Liquor Control Board" along with the original of this fully completed Appeal form.
2. Type or print in Blue/Black ink all information except signatures.
3. Attach copy of the Opinion and Adjudication of the Administrative Law Judge (AU) that is the subject of the Appeal.
4. Appeal must be filed or postmarked within 30 calendar days of the mailing date of the AU's Opinion and Adjudicatibn; untimely filed
Appeals will be dismissed.
5. Send Appeal to: Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, ATTN: Office of Chief Counsel. Appeal Unit, Room 401, Capitol and Boas
Streets, Northwest Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17124-0001.
6. Complete the following (as it appears on the AU's Opinion and Adjudication).
NAME OF LICENSEE PLCB LICENSE NO. CITATION NO.
Vets Canteen Association
CC-5110
05-1806
TRADE NAME (IF ANY)
ADDRESS OF PREMISES
(STREET, RURAL ROUTE. P.O. BOX NO.)
(POST OFFICE)
(STATE)
(ZIP)
130 WEST KING STREET, SHIPEENSBURG, PA ! &@%&
NAMEOF MUNICIPALITY
Borough of Shippensburg
COUNTY
Cuinber land
7. This Appeal will be considered solely on the record made before the Administrative Law Judge.
In numbered paragraphs, specify how the Administrative Law Judge committed an error of law or abused his/her discretion or how
his/her decision was not based on substantial evidence. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
The violations were not willful and the proceeds of the games vvere used
to benefit charity. A fine is appropriate to punish and prevent recidivism.
Q 0
.."
.$; ~ 0'\
C) en
ITl m
0 -0 ;;0
.." :-0("11
C) N r-n
::t: . rrt
iTi C')-
-., :D- . <
n :E: ?'rn
0 '9 0
c
;;r;
". ,/} &:'"
rr"/
r-
>iGNATURE OF LICENSEE OR AUTHORIZED OFFICERORcOlJNSEL FOR LICENSEE
.~
...
1Je,{ It 2- 0 d6
'.
'. ' PlCB-1919 7/05
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
e-\ . \
At-~LlCA TION FOA SUPERSEDEAS J
OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
(SUBMIT IN ORIGINAL ONLY)
INSTRUCTIONS
1. This Application is to be filed wIth the Appeal when requesting a supersedeas. In no event shall this Application be filed later
than 30 days after the mailing date of the Administrative Law Judge's Opinion and AdjudicatIon. A "supersedeas" is a stay,
or delay, of a penalty (payment of tine or imposition of a suspension or revocation) while an Appeal is pending.
2. Send to: Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, ATTN: Office of Chief Counsel, Appeal Unit, Room 401, Capital and Boas
Streets, Northwest Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17124-0001.
3. Complete the following (as it appears on the ALJ's Opinion and Adjudication)
NAME OF LICENSEE
Vets Canteen Association
PlCB LICENSE NO.
cc-5110
CITATION NO.
05-1806
TRADE NAME (IF ANY)
ADDRESS OF PREMISES
(STREET, RURAL ROIJTE, P.O. BOX NO.)
(POST OFFICE)
(STATE)
(ZIP)
130 West King Street, Shippensburg, PA 17257
NAME OF MUNICIPALITY . .
Borough of Shippensburg
ICDU~
Cumberland
4. An Appeal to the Board will not operate as a supersedeas if the licensee has been cited and found to have committed one
or more of the following violations: (Unless otherwise indicated, Sections designated are those contained In the Pennsylvani,a
Liquor Code. The Liquor Code is set forth in Title 47 of Purdon's Statutes).
Section 493(1) (sales to minors or sales to any person visibly intoxicated).
Section 493(10) (lewd entertainment).
Section 493(14) (permitting undesirable persons or minors to frequent).
Section 493(16) (furnishing or delivering liquor or malt or brewed beverages at unlawful hours).
Section 493(21) (right of Inspection).
Section 611 (licensed premises found to be a public nuisance).
Section 481 (c) (mandatory revocations for the accrual of twenty or more points in more than one citation
for restaurant and eating place licensees in cities of the first class).
If the owner or operator of the license or any authorized agent of the owner or operator is convicted of any
violation of:
Act of April 14, 1972, (P.L. 233, No. 64), known as "The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic
Act" (See Title 35 of Purdon's Statutes);
Crimes Code, Section 5902 (prostitution or related offenses), or
Crimes Code, Section 6301 (corruption of minors) (See Title 18 of Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes).
An Appeal shall not act as a supersedeas as to any penalty imposed for anyone or more of the violations
set forth above unless the Board determines otherwise upon sufficient cause shown. In cases where
supersedeas is requested due to a revocation under Liquor Code section 481 (c), the licensee must
demonstrate that it is likely to prevail on the merits.
,,-...,\ Ir--r-n
',. .. .
5. 'hereby apply for a supersedeas of th~)tY(ie8) imposed in the Opinion and Adjudi"lm appealed to the Board. I submit
as sufficient cause the following: (List below each reason which would demonstrate to the Board fhat sufficient cause exists
for the Board to grant your Application for Supersedeas. Attach additional sheets If necessary.) Your signature should be
affixed where indicated below.
1. The suspension is substantial, and great prejudice will result if
the adjudication is overturned, after the suspension is over.
2. Delaying the suspension will not prejudice the Commonwealth.
3. Appellant has paid the fine.
;IGNATURE OF LI _/THORIZED OFFICER,. DATt:t/1l / O~
/ . OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ATE ~/ REVIEWED BY RECOMMENDATION HEARING DATE
/'
OARD ACTION DATE CHAiRMAN MEMBER MEMBER
.~'ir',
i Iv fl;';: ..
1/1'- " J./F'-
Ui/I'" : iff")
l' .!...l, l Jj ::~~ ~ ./,~. ,1/1'...
'~~iJ;$~~~it~\Cf~7JY
i'
" .
~)
- <;-'l'II "
(J 11, ~ '
I,
--.7"--: ...-.: --
Mailing Date: AUG i 5 2006
C", '"
\' t." ....,
.~- J -<y
.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
FOR
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
PENNSYLVANIA ST A IE
POLICE, BUREAU OF
LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT
Citation No. 05-1806
Incident No. W03-307363
v.
LID - 3820
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. lONG ST.
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
LICENSE NO. CC-5110
OPINION AND ORDER UPON
REMAND ORDER FROM THE PENNSYLVANIA
LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
Opinion:
I entered an Order on June 22, 2006, imposing a $1,000.00 fine.
On J ul y 19, 2006, Licensee filed an appeal to the Pennsylvania Liq uor Control
Board. On August 2, 2006, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board ordered that
jurisdiction in this matter is remanded to the Office of Administrative Law Judge for
review and administration of the ordered penalties and for any further administration and
to ensure compliance with the Order.
Accordingly, I impose a $1,000.00 fine and a ten days suspension.
~
.
)
VETS CANTEEN ASSOCIATION
Citation No. 05-1806
PAGE 2
ORDER:
Reimposition of Fine
THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that Licensee pay a fine of $1 ,000.00 within
20 days ofthe mailing date of this Order. In the event the aforementioned fine is not paid
within 20 days from the mailing date of this Order, Licensee's license shall be suspended
or revoked.
The fine must be paid by Treasurer's Check, Cashier's Check, Certified Check or
Money Order. Personal checks, which include business-use personal checks, are not
acceptable. Please make your guaranteed check payable to the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania and mail to:
PLCB - Office of Administrative Law Judge
Brandywine Plaza
2221 Paxton Church Road
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110-9661
Imposition of Suspension
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Catering Club liquor license of Vets
Canteen Association, License No. CC-511 0, be suspended for a period of ten days,
BEGINNING at 7:00 a.m., on Friday, October 6,2006, and ENDING at 7:00 a.m.,
on Monday, October 16,2006.
Licensee is directed, on Friday, October 6, 2006, at 7:00 a.m., to place a placard
of notice of suspension (identified as Form No. PLCB-1925 and as printed with red and
black ink) in a conspicuous place ort the outside of the licensed premises or in a window
plainly visible from outside the licensed premises and to remove said license from the
wall and place it in a secure location.
Licensee is advised, if replacement placards are needed for any reason, they are
available at all Pennsylvania Liquor Stores/Wine & Spirits Shoppes.
The Bureau is directed to visit and monitor the aforementioned licensed premises
for compliance with this Order.
Licensee is authorized, on Monday, October 16,2006, at 7:00 a.m., to remove the
placard of suspension and return its license to its original wall location.
", ,
e-;
VETS CANTEEN ASSOCIATION
Citation No. 05-1806
Retaining Jurisdiction
.
PAGE 3
Jurisdiction is retained to ensure compliance with this Adjudication.
"/~
Dated this ~ day of August, 2006.
pm
~/
1If..P~ ..',.
'--:,.,' I" .~ "
I' / .,..1-" ,,'
I,V --'"~
I'-~ ~!y;" "--""~-:.' "".'~~"', <0"
1" 'I '.,.tIt' ......... ,r ~ .......~ '_'I_
l Felix 'Thau, A.L.J.
/
PL.CB-I039 11190
.
.
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17124-0001
IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
September 12, 2006
Telephone: 717-783-9454
FAX: 717-787-8820
Thomas M. Ballaron, Esquire
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PA 17110
RE: Appeal of: Vets Canteen Association
130 West King Street
Shippensburg, P A 17257
Citation No. 05-1806
Dear Mr. Ballaron:
Enclosed please find a copy of an appeal rec.ently filed by Karl E. Rominger, Esquire. The filing date
of the appeal is September 11, 2006. The Board and its staff are reviewing the file in an effort to
determine whether the decision of the Administrative Law Judge was supported by substantial
evidence. When the Board has decided this appeal, you will be sent a copy of its decision.
If you wish to respond to the matters raised by the appeal, please feel free to do so within ten (10) days
from the date of this letter. No response is necessary; however, if you file a timely response, the Board
will consider it prior to making its decision on the appeal at a formal open meeting of the Board.
Very trol Y yours,
::r~5.Dle~
FAITHS. DIEHL
Chief Counsel
Enclosures
cc: Vets Canteen Association
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire,
Pennsylvania State Police Chief Counsel
Chief Administrative Law Judge Eileen S. Maunus
J. Stark, Board Secretary
State Police Commander, District Office #3
Report Examining Unit, State Police
B. Peifer, Bureau of Licensing
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
PROCEEDS BENEFIT ALL PENNSYLVANIANS
?EP.1S:2006 14:40 717 540 7~
PSP/LCE LEGAL OFFICE H~A.
H8S7 P.001/004
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
BUREAU OF I.IQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT
3655 VARTAN WAY
HARRISBURG, PA 17110
(717) 540-7414
~
Fax: (717) 540-7461
FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET
Date:
09tL8/0a.
To;
Eaith Diehl. PLCa_Cblef Counsel
#=ax:
717-757..8820
Re:
o Thomas M. Ballaro", J:sq.
o Andrew J. Lovette, Esq.
f Connfe L. Davis, legal Assistant
o Vacancy, Law Clerk
0S-1806. Vets Canteen ~
From:
Memo:
AttachfJd. fs_.JIJ-e Bureau's ResDonse to Licensee's AtJDeal and Automatic
SUDeraed.as. Orlalnal wss "laced in First Class M,II.
-
YOU SHOULD RECEIVE...L PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEIiT.IF YOU 00 NOT
RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PI.EASE CALL. (711) 540-1414.
CO~FIDeNnALITY NOTE: The document(a} accompanyfnq thfl5 facelmll., tranaml..ion contaIn l"fqrm8t1o,", thtlt 18
confidonti:1f and privileged .nd is Intended only for the ldI8 of the add,...... d.'gn.tlrd abovt. If you ai'll not the
intend~d 1'&ctptent. y~u are he,.by notified that dt8CIDIU"" eopylrag, CflatrlJJutJon or taking or any .GlIon In relliilnge on
ttte contents of thIs teleeop'G(llnfOfflllltJOn 'I> strictly prottlblT.ec:t. If you ",c.lve this taG15lmlle in error, pr... rtotlfy ftI.
Permsvlvoa",a State Police Bnd return the original me.sage to ou, office by mill.
An IntemlltlDnlJlly Accredited LlJw Enforcement Agency
SEP.18'2006 14:40 717 540 74.
PSP/LCE LEGAL OFFICE HtllJA.
#4 857 P, 002/004
PENNSYL.VANIA STATE POLICE
OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMl;NT
:saGG VARTAN WAY
HARRrS8URG, PA 17110
PHONE: 7'1"-540.1414
FAX: 7110640-7481
.
GOv$mor'& Offioe of
Ge"~l"$1 Coyn$el
September 1. 8. 2006
Sent by Facsimile and First Class Mall
Faith DiclU, Esq.
Pa. Liquor Control Board.
Offi.ce of alief Counsel
Appeal. Unit, Room 403
Capi.tol an,d Boas Streets
Northwest OfficI: Building
Harrisburg, PAl 7124-0001
RE: P.S.P., BJlteQU of Li.auor Control Enforcement V8. Vets
Canteen. A4i;n.
Ci.tation No. 05-1806; (Response to Appeo/lInd to
Alltbl#ttJ.lic Supersedeas)
Dear Ms. Diehl:
This response to Vets Canteen Assn.'s second Appeal and Request for Supersedeas is
flIed under the authority of40 Pa.Code ~ 17.21 (b)(S) tilnd ~ 17.31(e)~ which provide ten (10) days
to respond to both an Appeal and a Request for Supersedeas,t
fA) RF,SPONSE TO APPEAL!
1. LJ~~"see's First Appeal:
Licensee's initial appea.l was filed. July 19,2006, from an adjudication issued by
]I,fdge Tbau imposing a penalty of $1,000 ($900 for Count I; $100 for Count. 2). TIte only
point raised by the Licell$ee in its first appeal was the propriety of Judge Thau,'s statement
in the Adjudication that the Licensee "has voluntarily agreed to cease operating pursuant
1:0 its Small Games of Chance license for a period of28 days... ." Slip Op. at 5,. In the
f'rrst appeal.. the Licensee failed to raise any question or issue with respect to whether
Judge 1'11111,1 based the Findill.gs of Fact in tbe Adjudication upon substantial evidence of
I In its correspondence of September 12,2006, the Board mistakenly providli:d the Commonwealth with five (5) daY$
to resl'ond, to the Li.~nscc:'s AppliclItion for Supersedeas.
_.....
An Infemst/onafly Accredited Lsw E"forcem~"t Age"cy
~EP.1e~2006 14:40 717 540 74.
PSP/LCE LEGAL OFFICE H'llJA.
#4857 P.003/004
F ait.h Diehl. Esq.
PLeB, Office (If Chief Counsel .
Veb Canteen Assn., Citation No. OS-1806
(Response f.(J Appeal (l.nd to Automatic S,,,ersedeasj
Page 2
Septem.ber 18. 2006
r.ecord, whethet Judge Thau committed an error of law or abused his discretion. Because
these issues were not raised and preserved in the Licensee's first appeal, they have been
waived with respect to the present appeaL The Board subsequently reviewed the record
end found that Judge Thau hlld made a mistake wi.th, r.espect to the Licensee's
commitment to forgo sales ofsmalJ. games of chanco: and subsequently remanded. the
case to tM AU for the imposition of an, appropriate penalty.
.
Foll.owing a conference call, Judae Thau issued th.e present Adjudication, re-
imposing the $1 fOOD fine and adding a ten (10) days suspension. The date of the Opinion
and Order Upon Remand was August 14th (Mailing Date: August 15,2006). It is from
this order that the Licensee filed its second a:p~al.
2. Llcen.see's Second Appeal:
The current Appeal before the Board, filed in a timely manner by the Licensee,
states as follows:
The vioJationE: wm not willfld and the proceeds of the games
were used to benefit charity. A fine i5 appropriate to punish and
prevent recidivi.sm..
As in. the first appeaJj the Licensee failed to provide any detW.l~ references to the
reeor.d. or argum,ent in support of its appeal. The Licensee is essentially complainine tbat
It does not like the sanction imposed. by Jud.ge Thau and therefore the Board should alter
it.
It should be noted that t.he Licensee has Jost i1$ opportunity to challenge the issues
of "substantial evidence" and .~error of law" by Dot pursuing these issues in its first
appeal. The Licensee d.oe$ n,ot get a ~ecoDd chance at these issues simply because it does
not agree with the sanction. imposed by the ALJ.
The only issue available for the Licensee to raise in the current Appeal is whether
the AU ahused its discretion in impoSIDa a tine and suspenslQr;l in r~sponse to the
LIcensee's oonduct.
, It is evident that the ten (10) days suspensi.on i$ well. within. the authority of the
AI,] ~nd rb~e is no evidence that the ALl abused its discretion in any manner in
im.posing this $ancti~n.
~EP.18',2006 14:41 717 5407.
PSP/LCE LEGAL OFFICE HtllJA.
#4857 P.004/004
Faith DIehl. Esq.
PLCB~ Office of Chief Counsel
Vets CIlDteen Assn., Citation No. 05-1806
(Response to Appeal find to Automfltic Supersedeas)
Page 3
September J.8. 2006
As this Honorable Board is a,ware. the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has set forth a
three-part test to dttermine whether a court bas abused its discretion: (1) is the judgment
of the Court contrary to the governing law; (2) is the judgment ofth~ Court ID8Ilifestly
unreasonable as demonstrated by the evidence of record; (3) is the judgment of the Court
the result of partiality, prejudice, bi.as or ilJ.will as illustrated by the evi.dence ofr~Qrd.
Uflimey v. Commfmwe<<lth, Pennqlva"i" Liquor Confrol Board, 602 A.2d 1300 (pa.
1992) citing Kelly Y. County of AI/eg/,e1il~ 546 A.2d 608 (Pa. 1988). Also see
Pen,IIS,IWlnill. Stlltl! Police, BLCE v. Liberty Society of Er/~, 623 A.2d 3'1.
(p.~.CmWlth. 1993).
For the reasons set forth above, the Licellseets AppeQI should be summarily dismissed.
(8) REQUEST TO VACATE A UTOMA TIC SUPERSEDEAS:
The Licensee is entitled to an automatic supersedeas pursuant to 9 4-47'1 (b).
However, the Wllu.re of the miscOndlJct which is central to this Citation involved the
willful acts of the Licensee in viola.ting the Local Options Small Games of Chance Act. More
particularly, because the Licensee has demonstrated absolut.ely nD basis for appeal~ there is
"sufficient cause" upon which this Board may vacate the rmtomatic supersedeas. To fail to do so
under these circumstances would be to etl.courage frivolous 8J?peals by the licensee comm.t1uity.
Therefore, the Comm,onwealth respectfu.lly requests thIs HODorable Board ~o v~ca.te the
Licensee's automatic super~deas.
;;~ ~~
Thomas M, Ball aron,
Assistant C01.IDsel
cc: Karl E. Romingcr~ Esq.
Office of Administrative ~w Judge
Distri.ct Enforcemen.t Office NO.3 Commander
Report Examination Unit SupervisQr
.
.
Mailing Date: October 4, 2006
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
HARRISBURG, PA 17124-0001
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, Citation No. 05-1806
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT
vs.
VETS CANTEEN ASSOCIATION
130 West King Street
Shippensburg, PA 17257-1128
License No. CC-5110
Counsel for Licensee:
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
Rominger & Whare
1 55 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Thomas M. Ballaron, Esquire
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PAl 7110
Counsel for Bureau:
OPINION
Vets Canteen Association ("Licensee") appealed from the Opinion and
Order Upon Remand Order From The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
("Board") of Administrative Law Judge Felix Thau ("ALJ"), wherein the
ALJ, upon remand from the Board, re-imposed a penalty consisting of a fine
. .
.
.
in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) and added a license
suspension of ten (10) days.
The citation contained two counts.
The first count charged Licensee with violations of section 471 of the
Liquor Code [47 P.S. 9 4-471] and section 315(b) of the Local Option
Small Games of Chance Act [lOP. s. 9 31 5 (b)], in that during the periods
April 3 through 9, April 10 through 16, April 17 through 23, April 24
through 30, May 1 through 7, May 29 through June 4, June 5 through 11,
June 12 through 18, June 19 through 25, June 26 through July 2, July 3
through 9, July 10 through 16, July 17 through 23 and July 24 through 30,
2005, Licensee, by its servants, agents or employees, offered and! or awarded
more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) in cash or merchandise in any
seven (7)-day period.
The second count charged Licensee with violations of sections 471 and
493(12) of the Liquor Code [47 P.S. 99 4-471, 4-493(12)], section 311
of the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act [lOP .S. ~ 311] and
section 901 of the Department of Revenue Regulations [61 Pa. Code 9
901], in that on May 13 and August 5, 2005, Licensee, by its servants,
agents or employees, failed to maintain complete and truthful records
2
"
.
.
covering the operation of the licensed business for a period of two (2) years
concerning the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act.
In his original Adjudication and Order dated June 22, 2006, the AL]
sustained both counts of the citation and imposed a penalty of a fine of one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00). He stated that no suspension was being
imposed because Licensee had "... voluntarily agreed to cease operating
pursuant to its Small Games of Chance License for a period of 28 days,
beginning August 1, 2006 and terminating close of business August 28,
2006...." [Page 4]. In Licensee's appeal to the ALl's June 22, 2006
decision, Licensee disputed that it had made such an agreement, and
requested that it be permitted to only pay the fine. Neither the Notes of
Testimony of the hearing before the AL) on May 16, 2006, nor the record
reflects any agreement by Licensee to forego operations pursuant to its small
games of chance license.
By Opinion and Order of the Board mailed on August 2, 2006,
remand of this matter was remanded to the AL) for imposition of penalties
consistent with the record and the Board's Opinion. The ALl's Opinion and
Order Upon Remand From The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, mailed
3
'.
. .
.
.
on August 15, 2006, re-imposed the penalty of a fine of one thousand
dollars ($1,000.00) and added a license suspension of ten (10) days.
In its current appeal, filed timely on September 11, 2006, Licensee
alleged that the violations were not willful, and the proceeds of the games
were used for charity. Licensee also opined that a fine is sufficient to punish
licensee and prevent recidivism.
Pursuant to section 471 of the Liquor Code [47 P.S. 9 4-471], the
appeal in this case must be based solely on the record before the AL]. The
Board shall only reverse the decision of the AL] if the AL] committed an
error of law or abused his discretion, or if his decision was not based upon
substantial evidence. The Commonwealth Court has defined "substantial
evidence" to be such relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as
adequate to support a conclusion. Joy Global, fne. v~ Workers'
Compensation Appeal Bd. (Hogue), 876 A.2d 1098 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005);
Chapman v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole, 86 Pa. Cmwlth. 49,
484 A.2d 413 (1984).
The record in this matter reflects that counsel for the Pennsylvania State
Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement ("Bureau") recommended a
4
.
.
penalty consisting of a fine of one thousand five hundred dollars
($1,500.00), and a five (5)-day suspension of the license. (N.T.23-24).1
The merits of the Bureau's charges against Licensee will not be
addressed in this appeal as the appeal is only from the new penalty imposed
by the AL] in his August 15, 2006 decision. The imposition of penalties is
the exclusive prerogative of the AL]. The Board may not disturb penalties
imposed by the AL] if they are within the parameters set forth in the Liquor
Code. Section 471 (b) of the Liquor Code [47 P.S. 9 4-471 (b)] provides ,
that the AL] shall "immediately suspend or revoke the license, or impose a
fine of not less than fifty dollars ($50) nor more than one thousand dollars
($ 1 ,000), or both" for offenses of the type set forth in this citation. Because
the penalty set forth by the. AL] is clearly permissible and within the scope of
section 471,. the Board has no authority to alter it.
Therefore, the decision of the AL] is affirmed.
1 Licensee previously had been adjudicated responsible for gambling violations similar to those in the instant
citation. In Citation No. 04-2066, Licensee was assessed a penalty of nine hundred dollars ($900.00) for
(1) failure to maintain complete and truthful records for a period of two (2) years concerning the Local
Option Small Games of Chance Act on November 10, 2004; (2) offering and/or awarding more than five
thousand dollars ($5,000.00) in cash or merchandise in any seven (7)-day period from October 31
through November 6, 2004, and (3) offering and/or giving alcoholic beverages as a prize on October 6,
2004.
5
.
.
ORDER
The decision of the AL] is affirmed.
The appeal of Licensee is dismissed. ,
Licensee has paid the fine in the amount of one thousand dollars
($ 1/000.00).
It is hereby ordered that Licensee/s Catering Club Liquor License No.
CC- 5110 be suspended fora period of ten (10) days beginning at 7:00 a.m.
on Friday/ November 17/ 2006 and ending at 7:00 a.m. on Monday/
November 27/ 2006.
Licensee is directed on Friday/ November 17/ 2006 at 7:00 a.m. to
place a Notice of Suspension placard (Form No. PLCB-1925) in a
conspicuous place on the outside of the licensed premises or in a window
plainly visible from outside the licensed premises and to remove its license
from the wall and place it in a secure location.
Licensee is authorized on Monday/ November 27/ 2006 at 7:00 a.m.
to remove the suspension placard and return its license to its original wall
location.
c"'
.
.
Licensee must comply with all other terms and conditions of the ALl's
August 14, 2006 Order.
~)(~
v
Board Secretary
2
o
~~~;.
~
.-1
~?J
',-;--:
" -.I
(J,
~;;l
~ -!
) ;'.~\
.'-~rn
- I
';:-:'\
~(:O
:..::.
-,
.-::~..
~ ""!
0..;-,,"
~)
f-..)
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT
: CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-6379 CIVIL TERM
v.
: CITATION NO. 05-1806
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.,
130 W. KING STREET
SHIPPENSBURG, Pa 17257"'1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
: LID # 3820
: LICENSE NO. CC-511 0
LICENSE FIRST ISSUED: August 10, 1949
LICENSEE'S ANSWER TO COMMONWEATH'S RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR
REVIEW AND REQUEST TO VACATE AUTOMATIC SUPERSEDEAS
1. Admitted.
2. Denied. Licensee contends that no argument, references to the record or case law support
for its contention need be given due to the fact that the courts of common pleas are still required,
under 47 P.S. S 4-471, to conduct de novo review on questions oflaw, fact, administrative
discretion and such other matters as are involved and, in the exercise of its statutory discretion, to
make its own findings and conclusions. Based upon its de novo review, it may sustain, alter,
change, modify or amend the board's action whether or not it makes findings which are
materially different from those found by the board or the administrative law judge.
3. Denied.
4. Denied.
5. Admitted.
WHEREFORE, Licensee respectfully requests that this Honorable Court sustain
Licensee's Appeal.
REQUEST TO VACATE AUTOMATIC SUPERSEDEAS
6. Admitted.
7. Admitted.
8. Denied. Petitioner contends that there is basis for the appeal due to the fact that there are
questions of law and administrative discretion that must be dealt with before the Court can
dispose of the case. In addition, without the requested relief the only harm that will be suffered
will be to the Licensee. Witmer v. Commonwealth, 889 A.2d 638 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2005).
WHEREFORE, Licensee respectfully requests that this Honorable Court stay the
automatic supersedeas until an opportunity has been given to hear argument on the facts of the
case.
Respectfully Submitted,
ROMINGER & WHARE
Date: ~DU I b,. 2 o() ~
~'
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, Pa 17013
(717) 241-6070
Court Id No. 81924
Attorney for Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND. COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA ST ATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT
: CIVIL ACTION NO.
v.
: CITATION NO. 05-1806
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.,
130 W. KING STREET
SHIPPENSBURG, Pa 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
: LID # 3820
: LICENSE NO. CC-5110
LICENSE FIRST ISSUED: August 10, 1949
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Karl E. Rominger, Esquire, attorney for Defendant, do hereby certify that I this day
served a copy of this Petition/or Review upon the following by depositing same in the United
States Mail, first class postage prepaid, at Carlisle, Pennsylvania, addressed as follows:
Thomas M. Ballaron, Esquire
Pennsylvania State Police
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, P A 17110
Respectfully submitted,
ROMINGER & WHARE
Dated: ).JtJl/ !~ 1-006
~
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, P A 17013
(717) 241-6070
Supreme Court ID # 81924
Attorney for Defendant
o
c;~
\-. ~.
::~
-(
f':)
C'":::')
C-::J
0"'
o
-n
-t
:C"
n1r=
-ofl:i
-~J --"t.-'
~J (-.J
- - -: l
.....,,~
r:~
--
(J\
..."
.-~ 'I
-:~::
;.\
",---i"fl
'~
~~
"',0
=-<
-
..
.:;-'
(Jl
PENNSYLVANIA STATE
POLICE, BUREAU OF
LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA
v.
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.,
Defendant
NO. 06-6379 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2006, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Review, and of Plaintiffs Response to Licensee's Petition for Review and
Request To Vacate Automatic Supersedeas, a hearing is scheduled for Monday, January
22, 2007, at 3:00 p.m., in Courtroom No.1, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle,
Pennsylvania.
THE REQUEST to vacate the Licensee's supersedeas is denied.
BY THE COURT,
Thomas M. Ballaron, Esq.
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, P A 17110
Attorney for Plaintiff
Karl E. Rominger, Esq.
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, P A 17013
Attorney for Defendant
.
~~
/ I_~o-D ~
C)-.
:rc
0""1 :! Hd 02 900l
3H,i .jO'
(En!:}
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-6379 CIVIL TERM
v.
CITATION NO. 05-1806
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING STREET
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
LID # 3820
LICENSE NO. CC-5110
LICENSE FIRST ISSUED: August 10, 1949
COMMONWEALTH'S MOTION IN LIMINE
AND NOW comes the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Police-
BLCE (Commonwealth) by and through its attorney and respectfully submits the within Motion
In Limine to restrict the testimony and argument of the Vets Canteen Association
(Club/Licensee) to the single issue of whether the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) abused his
discretion in the imposition of a fine and suspension, and in support thereof avers as follows:
1. The ALJ issued its Order and Adjudication on 6/22/06 imposing a $1,000 fine
with no suspension but with the corresponding acknowledgement that the Licensee would
voluntarily cease selling small games of chance pursuant to its Local Option Small Games of
Chance Permit for 28 days. (Attachment 1).
2. An appeal was filed by the Club/Licensee to the Pennsylvania Liquor Control
Board (PLCB) on 7/19/06 raising a single issue. The Club/Licensee contended that the ALJ had
erred in imposing the sanction, lacking the agreement of the Club/Licensee to withdraw from
sales of small games of chance. (Attachment 2). The Board remanded to the ALJ.
3. Following a conference call with the parties, the OALJ issued its second Order on
8/15/06 imposing a 10 days suspension and re-imposing the $1,000 penalty. (Attachment 3).
4. Club/Licensee filed its second appeal to the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
on 9111/06 contending only that the ALJ had abused its discretion in imposing a 10 day
suspension in tandem with the $1,000 penalty. Club/Licensee narrowed and limited its appeal to
this single issue. It failed to raise any challenge with respect to whether the ALJ had based his
findings of fact upon substantial evidence or committed an error of law in concluding that the
Club/Licensee had acted unlawfully. (See Attachment 4).
5. In its decision dated 10/4/06, the PLCB addressed the single issue raised by the
Club/Licensee and found that the trial court had not abused its discretion in imposing a $1,000
penalty and 10 days suspension. Thereafter, the Club/Licensee filed its timely appeal with this
Honorable Court and for the first time raised the issue of "substantial evidence" and "error of
law."
6. Club/Licensee waived its opportunity to argue the issues of "substantial evidence"
and "error of law" by failing to raise these issues before the appellate tribunal of the PLCB.
7. The Court of Common Pleas sits fundamentally as an appellate court in liquor
enforcement appeals. (See supporting brief).
8. It is axiomatic that only these issues properly preserved for review may be
considered by an appellate court. (See Pa.R.A.P. 302a).
9. Club/Licensee's current appeal to this Honorable Court raising "substantial
evidence, error of law and abuse of discretion" does not cure its failure below to preserve the
first and second issues for review. The Club/Licensee cannot be permitted to broaden their
appeal and request this Court to review the entire prosecution after expressly narrowing and
restricting the PLCB's review to "abuse of discretion."
10. Accordingly, the only issue properly preserved for this Honorable Court's review
is whether the ALl abused its discretion in imposing a $1,000 fine and a 10 days suspension.
2
WHEREFORE, the Commonwealth respectfully requests this Honorable Court to restrict
and limit the testimony and argument during the course of the Club/Licensee's appeal hearing
scheduled for January 22 to the issue of "abuse of discretion."
Respectfully submitted,
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFQRCEMENT
"-
/ ,,/
"(/
By: THOMAS M. B L
Assistant Counsel
Ihk7
,
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 540-7414
Attorney I.D. #23370
Date:
3
ATTACHMENT "1"
Mailing Date: JUN 2 2 2006
j / &~10(JY;
COMMONWEALTH OF PE"N"'NSYL VANIA
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
FOR
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
PENNSYLV ANIA STATE
POLICE, BUREAU OF
LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT
Citation No. 05-1806
Incident No. W03-307363
v.
LID - 3820
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING ST.
SHIPPENSBURG, P A 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
LICENSE NO. CC-5110
BEFORE: JUDGE THAU
APPEARANCES:
For Bureau of Enforcement
Thomas M. Ballaron, Esquire
Pennsylvania State Police
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110
F or Licensee
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PAl 7013
ADJUDICATION
BACKGROUND:
This proceeding arises out of a citation that was issued on September 15, 2005, by the
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement of the Pennsylvania State Police (Bureau) against Vets
Canteen Assn. (Licensee), License Number CC-511 O.
,- _c. 1 l! r ~< :,-:~'~~~j ~ ." '
h t. :(,\ :<-j --
-- ' . . ,
.-..... ~.,. \ ~-_...... .-~
-i:;'.3;r-:C'J ~3\hJ
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
CITATION NO. 05-1806
PAGE 2
This citationl contains two counts.
The first count charges Licensee with violations of Section 471 of the Liquor Code [47
P.S. ~4-471J and Section 31S(b) of the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act [10 P.S.
S31S(b)]. The charge is that during the periods April 3 through 9, April 10 through 16, April 17
through 23, April 24 through 30, May 1 through 7, May 29 through June 4, June 5 through 11,
June 12 through 18, June 19 through 25, June 26 through July 2, July 3 through 9, July 10
through 16, July 17 through 23 and July 24 through 30, 2005, Licensee, by servants, agents or
employes, offered and/or awarded more than $5,000.00 in cash or merchandise in any seven-day
period.
The second count charges Licensee with violations of Sections 471 and 493(12) [47 P.S.
S4-471 and S4-493(l2)], Section 311 of the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act [10 P.S.
S311] and Section 901 of the Department of Revenue Regulations [61 Pa. Code ~901]. The
charge is that on May 13 and August 5, 2005, Licensee, by servants, agents or employes, failed
to maintain complete and truthful records covering the operation of the licensed business for a
period of two (2) years concerning the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act.
An evidentiary hearing was conducted on May 16, 2006 at Brandywine Plaza, 2221
Paxton Church Road, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
After review of the transcript of that proceeding, the following Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law are entered.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. The Bureau began its investigation on March 9, 2005 and completed it on August
9, 2005. (N.T. 6)
2. The Bureau sent a notice of alleged violations to Licensee at the licensed premises
by certified mail-return receipt requested on August 24, 2005. The notice alleged violations as
charged in the citation. (Commonwealth Exhibit No. C-l, N.T. 5)
1. Commonwealth Exhibit No. C-2, N.T. 5.
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
CITATION NO. 05-1806
PAGE 3
Count No.1:
3. For the seven-day periods listed in Count No.1, Licensee awarded prizes in
excess of $5,000.00, as follows: Week ending April 9, 2005 - $48,208.00; Week ending April
16,2005 - $39,785.00; Week ending April 23, 2005 - $44,000.00; Week ending April 30, 2005 -
$47,000.00; Week ending May 7, 2006 - $40,000.00; Week ending June 4, 2005 - $43,000.00;
Week ending June 11, 2005 - $40,000.00; Week ending June 18, 2006 - $32,000.00; Week
ending June 25,2005 - $42,000.00; Week ending July 2,2005 - $45,000.00; Week ending July 9,
2005 - $48,000.00; Week ending July 16, 2005 - $39,000.00; Week ending July 23, 2005 -
$45,000.00; Week ending July 30,2005 - $38,000.00. (N.T. 6-8)
Count No.2:
4. On the dates charged, Licensee maintained a ticket dispensing machine. Licensee
was not mai.ntaining required records with respect to that device. (N.T.11-12)
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
1.
satisfied.
The notice requirements of Liquor Code Section 471 [47 P.S. ~4-471] have been
2.
Count Nos. 1 and 2 are sustained as charged.
PRIOR RECORD:
Licensee has been licensed since August 10, 1949, and has had three prior violation(s)
since July 1, 1987, the date of establishment of the Office of Administrative Law Judge
(Commonwealth Exhibit No. C-3, N.T. 13):
Adjudication No. 89-0381. Fine $500.00 and 20 days suspension.
Possessed or operated gambling devices 'or paraphernalia or
permitted gambling or lotteries on the licensed premises
(tickets and punchboards).
Adjudication No. 94-0938. Fine $400.00.
Sales to nonmembers without prior arrangement.
March 16, 1994.
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
CITATION NO. 05-1806
PAGE 4
Adjudication No. 04-2066. Fine $900.00.
1. Failed to maintain complete and truthful records
for a period of 2 years concerning the Local Option
Small Games of Chance Act.
November 10, 2004.
2. Offered and/or awarded more than $5,000.00 in
cash or merchandise in any 7 day period.
October 31 through November 6, 2004.
3. Offered and/or gave alcoholic beverages
as a pnze.
October 6, 2004.
PENALTY:
Section 471 of the Liquor Code [47 P.S. S4-471] prescribes a penalty of license
suspension or revocation or a fine of not less than $50.00 or more than $1,000.00 or both for
violations of the type found in Count Nos. 1 and 2 in this case.
As Licensee has voluntarily agreed to cease operating pursuant to its Small Games of
Chance License for a period of 28 days, beginning August 1, 2006 and terminating close of
business August 28, 2006, I will impose fines without suspension.
Count No.1 - $900.00 fine.
Count NO.2 - $100.00 fine.
ORDER:
Imposition of Fine
THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that Licensee pay a fine of $1 ,000.00 within 20 days
of the mailing date of this Order. In the event the aforementioned fine is not paid within 20 days
from the mailing date of this Order, Licensee's license shall be suspended or revoked.
The fine must be paid by Treasurer's Check, Cashier's Check, Certified Check or Money
Order. Personal checks, which include business-use personal checks, are not acceptable.
Please make your guaranteed check payable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and mail to:
PLCB - Office of Administrative Law Judge
Brandywine Plaza
2221 Paxton Church Road
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110-9661
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
CITATION NO. 05-1806
PAGE 5
Retaining Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction is retained to ensure compliance with this Adjudication.
/6
Dated this 2 day of June, 2006.
~~
Feli Thau, A.LJ.
pm
MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION MUST BE RECEIVED \VITHIN 15
DAYS OF THE MAILING DATE OF THIS ORDER TO THE OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE AND REQUIRE A $25.00 FILING FEE. A
WRITTEN REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE
FILING FEE.
ATTACHMENT "2"
I'I.cn.i,' l~ 11;'1,'
PE~SYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17124,0001.
IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
July 20, 2006
Telephone: 717-783-9454
FAX: 717-787-8820
Thomas M. Ballaron, Esquire
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, P A 17110
RE: Appeal of: Vets Canteen Assn.
130 W. King Street
Shippensburg, PA 17257-1128
Citation No. 05-1806
Dear Mr. Ballaron:
Enclosed please find a copy of an appeal recently filed by Karl E. Rominger, Esquire. The filing date
of the appeal is July 19, 2006. The Board and its staff are reviewing the file in an effort to determine
whether the decision of the Administrative Law Judge was supported by substantial evidence. When
the Board has decided this appeal, you will be sent a copy of its decision.
If you wish to respond to the matters raised by the appeal, please feel free to do so within ten (10) days
from the date of this letter. No response is necessary; however, if you file a timely response, the Board
will consider it prior to making its decision on the appeal at a formal open meeting of the Board.
Very truly yours,
~t1ff1J5. D}e~
FAITH S. DIEHL
Chief Counsel
Enclosures
cc: Vets Canteen Assn.
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire,
Pennsylvania State Police Chief Counsel
Chief Administrative Law Judge Eileen S. Maunus
J. Stark, Board Secretary
State Police Commander, District Office #3
Report Examining Unit, State Police
B. Peifer, Bureau of Licensing
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNIIT EMPLOYER
PROCEEDS BENEF1T ALL PENNSYLVANIANS
ROMINGER & WHARE
Attorneys at Law
Karl E. Rominger
~ichaelJ. VVhare
Michael O. Palermo, Jr
Leslie A. Tomeo*
* Also admitted in New Jeney
July 19,2006
Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
Attn: Office of Chief Counsel
. Appeal Unit, Room 401
Capital and Boas Streets
Northwest Office Building
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17124-0001
RE: Vets Canteen Assn.
PLCB License No.: CC-5110
Citation No.: 05-1806
0 0
"7J
""rl e.
n L.
M1 c:
0 r- :-o~
..." ~ . f"7j
n
::r 0 r-n
n; ~ o!?]
." .-<:
t") :x ?J",
i:.,' , 0
r.: '!J 0
-;r.
'.h
n; \0
,-
..
Dear Office of Chief Counsel:
Enclosed please find the proper paperwork needed to file for an appeal for the
above referenced matter. I have also enclosed the fee for said appeal.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the office.
Sincerely,
7-"-"~
",r" ·
-
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire
KERJdp
Enclosure
cc: Vets Canteen Assn.
155 South Hanover Street, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013. Tel: (717) 241-6070. Fax: (717) 241-6878
www.romingerlaw.com
ADVOCACY · ADVICE · ANSWERS
PI.C8-1918 9f02
CDMMONWEAL THOFPENNSYLIJANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
LIQUOR CONTROl BOARD
APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW JUDGE ADJUDICATION
OFfiCE OF CHIEi= COUNSEL
(SUBMIT IN ORIGINAl. ONL Y)
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Remit a $35 fee payable to "PA Liquor Control Board" along with the original of this fully completed Appeal form.
2. Type or print in Blue/Black ink all information except signatures.
3. Attach copy of the Opinion and Adjudication of the Administrative Law Judge (AU) that is the subject of the Appeal.
4. Appeal must be fi led or postmarked within 30 calendar days of the mailing date of the ALJ's Opinion and Adjudication; untimely filed
Appeals will be dismissed.
5. Send Appeal to: Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, ATTN: Office of Chief Counsel, Appeal Unit, Room 401, Capitol and Boas
Streets, Northwest Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17124-0001.
6. Complete the following (as it appears on the ALJ's Opinion and Adjudication),
NAME OF LICENSEE PLCB LICENSE NO. CITATION NO.
o 1806
ADDRESS OF PREMISES
(STREET. RURAL ROUTE, P.O. BOX NO.)
(POST OFFICE)
(STI\.TE)
(ZIP)
130 w. Kin St.
NAME OF MUNICIPALITY
Shi
PA
17257
7. This Appeal will be considered solely on the record made before the Administrative Law Judge.
In numbered paragraphs, specify how the Administrative Law Judge committed an error of law or abused his/her discretion or how
his/her decision was not based on substantial evidence. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
The licensee did not agree to forego the small games of
chance license and/or the sale of said games for the month of
August. This portion of the Order should be removed, and only
fines paid. Further the violations were not willful and all
of the proceeds of the games were used to support charity, so
a fine is appropriate.
SIGN
uire Attorne
icensee 7 19 06
ICENSEE OR AUTHORIZED OFFICER OR COUNSEL FOR LICENSEE
DATE
?LCB~f.919 7:1)5
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANiA
PENNSYLVANIA
liQUOR CONTROL BOARD
APPLlCA liON FOR SUPERSEDEAS
OF;:lC~ OF CHIE~ COUNSEL
(SUSMIT IN ORIGINAL ONLY)
INSTRUCTIONS
1. This Application is to be filed with the Appeal when requesting a supersedeas. In no event shall this Application be filed later
than 30 days after the mailing date of the Administrative law Judge's Opinion and Adjudication. A "supersedeas" is a stay.
or delay, of a penalty (payment of fine or imposition of a suspension or revocation) while an Appeal is pending.
2. Send to: Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, ATTN: Office of Chief Counsel. Appeal Unit, Room 401, Capital and Boas
Streets, Northwest Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17124-0001.
3. Complete the following (as it appears on the AU's Opinion and Adjudication)
NAME OF LICENSEE
PLCB LICENSE NO
CITATION NO.
VAts C~nt2en Assn-
rRADE NAME (IF ANY}
CC-5110
05-1806
ADDRESS OF PREMISES
(STREET, AllAM, FlalliE. ? O. !lOX NO 1
l,POS r n~~IGEl
Isr".t;:\
f!IP)
Shi
PA
17257
B
4. An Appeal to the Board will not operate as a supersedeas if the licensee has been cited and found to have committed one
or more of the following violations: (Unless otherwise indicated, Sections designated are those contained in the Pennsylvania
Liquor Code, The Liquor Code is set forth in Title 47 of Purdon's Statutes).
Section 493(1) (sales to minors or sales to any person visibly intoxicated).
Section 493(10) (lewd entertainment).
Section 493(14) (permitting undesirable persons or minors to frequent).
Section 493(16) (fumishing or delivering liquor or malt or brewed beverages at unlawful hours).
Section 493(21) (right of inspection).
Section 611 (licensed premises found to be a public nuisance).
Section 481 (c) (mandatory revocations for the accrual of twenty or more points in more than one citation
for restaurant and eating place licensees in cities of the first class).
If the owner or operator of the license or any authorized agent of the owner or operator is convicted of any
violation of:
Act of April 14, 1972, (P.L. 233, No. 64), known as "The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic
Act" (See Title 35 of Purdon's Statutes);
Crimes Code, Section 5902 (prostitution or related offenses), or
Crimes Code, Section 6301 (corruption of minors) (See Title 18 of Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes).
An Appeal shalf not act as a supersedeas as to any penalty imposed for anyone or more of the violations
set forth above unless the Board determines otherwise upon sufficient cause shown. In cases where
supersedeas is requesled due to a revocation under Liquor Code section 481 (c). the licensee must
demonstrate that it is likely to prevail on the merits.
(OVER)
5. I hereby apply for a supersedeas of the penalty(ies) imposed in the Opinion and Adjudication appealed to the Board. 1 submit
as sufficient cause the following: (List below each reason which would demonstrate to the Board that sufficient cause exists
for the Board to grant your Application for Supersedeas. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Your signature should be
affixed where indicated below.
A timely Appeal has been filed and disposition of the fine
should be stayed pending the outcome of the case.
LICENSEE OR AUTHORIZED OFFICER
,
DATE
DATE REVIEWED BY RECQMMENDA TION HEARING DATE
BOARD ACTION DATE CHAIRMAN MEMBER MEMBER
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ATTACHMENT "3"
~/ &J{Qi1fn
Mailing Date: AUG i 5 2006
~ E F-~ c; i_=~ iJ ;~'~! S;: f
CoO I _. _, . ~
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
FOR
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
'r' 1./ r.t I , C' ....
c;. j' n I'-t',' . ,.J
'-' I' ,..'.:;
PENNSYLVANIA STATE
POLICE, BUREAU OF
LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT
Citation No. 05-1806
Incident No. W03-307363
v.
LID - 3820
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING ST.
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128
CUi\1BERLAND COUNTY
LICENSE NO. CC-5110
OPINION AND ORDER UPON
REMAND ORDER FROM THE PENNSYLVANIA
LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
Opinion:
I entered an Order on June 22, 2006, imposing a $1,000.00 fine.
On July 19, 2006, Licensee filed an appeal to the Pennsylvania Liquor Control
Board. On August 2, 2006, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board ordered that
jurisdiction in this matter is remanded to the Office of Administrative Law Judge for
review and administration of the ordered penalties and for any further administration and
to ensure compliance with the Order.
Accordingly, I impose a S 1 ,000.00 fine and a ten days suspension.
VETS CANTEEN ASSOCIATION
Citation No. 05-1806
PAGE 2
ORDER:
Reimposition of Fine
THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that Licensee pay a fine of $1 ,000.00 within
20 days of the mailing date of this Order. In the event the aforementioned fine is not paid
within 20 days from the mailing date of this Order, Licensee's license shall be suspended
or revoked.
The fine must be paid by Treasurer's Check, Cashier's Check, Certified Check or
Money Order. Personal checks, which include business-use personal checks, are not
acceptable. Please make your guaranteed check payable to the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania and mail to:
PLeB - Office of Administrative Law Judge
Brandywine Plaza
2221 Paxton Church Road
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110-9661
Imposition of Suspension
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Catering Club liquor license of Vets
Canteen Association, License No. CC-511 0, be suspended for a period of ten days,
BEGINNING at 7:00 a.m., on Friday, October 6,2006, and ENDING at 7:00 a.m.,
on i\10nday, October 16, 2006.
Licensee is directed, on Friday, October 6, 2006, at 7:00 a.m., to place a placard
of notice of suspension (identified as Form No. PLCB-1925 and as printed with red and
black ink) in a conspicuous place on the outside of the licensed premises or in a window
plainly visible from outside the licensed premises and to remove said license from the
wall and place it in a secure location.
Licensee is advised, if replacement placards are needed for any reason, they are
available at all Pennsylvania Liquor Stores/Wine & Spirits Shoppes.
The Bureau is directed to visit and monitor the aforementioned licensed premises
for compliance with this Order.
Licensee is authorized, on Monday, October 16, 2006, at 7:00 a.m., to remove the
placard of suspension and return its license to its original wall location.
VETS CANTEEN ASSOCIATION
Citation No. 05-1806
Retaining Jurisdiction
PAGE 3
Jurisdiction is retained to ensure compliance with this Adjudication.
'" /(.,-
Dated this ~ day of August, 2006.
pm
',_ ..p" r .~
-; J L/';
I / <,.-1::/'
._/. . ,.i\;,.,....,..,.....~~,~,,~<A"="'/
.",,/ ........'-,l ~ "
/ Felix tfhau, A.LJ.
ATTACHMENT "4"
I'Ll'H,h'!') 11/'1\1
PENKSYLV ANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17124,0001
IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
September 12, 2006
Telephone: 717-783-9454
FAX: 717-787-8820
Thomas M. Ballaron, Esquire
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, P A 17110
RE: Appeal of: Vets Canteen Association
130 West King Street
Shippensburg, P A 17257
Citation No. 05-1806
Dear Mr. Ballaron:
Enclosed please find a copy of an appeal recently filed by Karl E. Rominger, Esquire. The filing date
of the appeal is September 11, 2006. The Board and its staff are reviewing the file in an effort to
determine whether the decision of the Administrative Law Judge was supported by substantial
evidence. When the Board has decided this appeal, you will be sent a copy of its decision.
If you wish to respond to the matters raised by the appeal, please feel free to do so within ten (10) days
from the date of this letter. No response is necessary; however, if you file a timely response, the Board
will consider it prior to making its decision on the appeal at a formal open meeting of the Board.
Very truly yours,
-;r ~ S.15JehQ.
FAITHS. DIEHL
Chief Counsel
Enclosures
cc: Vets Canteen Association
Karl E. Rominger, Esquire,
Pennsylvania State Police Chief Counsel
Chief Administrative Law Judge Eileen S. Maunus
J. Stark, Board Secretary
State Police Commander, District Office #3
Report Examining Unit, State Police
B. Peifer, Bureau of Licensing
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
PROCEEDS BENEFIT ALL PENNSYL V ANlANS
i"LCS-J918 9f02
COMMON\NEAL TH OF PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
liQUOR CONTROL BOARD
)PPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW JUDGE ADJUDICATION
OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
(SUBMIT IN ORIGINAL ONLY)
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Remit a $35 fee payable to "PA Liquor Control Board" along with the original of this 'fully completed Appeal form.
2. Type or print in BluafBlack ink all information except signatures.
3. Attach copy of the Opinion and Adjudication of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) that is the subject of the Appeal.
4. Appeal must be filed or postmarked within 30 calendar days of the mailing date of the ALJ's Opinion and Adjudication; untimely filed
Appeals will be dismissed.
5. Send Appeal to: Pennsylvania liquor Control Board, ATIN: Office of Chief Counsel, Appeal Unit, Room 401, Capitot and Boas
Streets, Northwest Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17124~0001.
6. Complete the following (as it appears on the AU's Opinion and Adjudication).
NAME OF LICENSEE PLC8 LICENSE NO. CITATION NO.
Vets Canteen Association
CC-5110
05-1806
TRADE NAME (IF ANY)
ADDRESS OF PREMISES
(STREeT. RURAL ROUTE, P.O. BOX NO.~
(POST OfFICE)
(STA TE)
(ZIP)
130 WEST KING STREEI', SHIPEENSBURG, FA ! &@%&
NAME OF MUNICIPALITY
Borough of Shippensburg
COUNTY
Cumberland
7. This Appeal will be considered solely on the record made bafore the Administrative Law Judge.
In numbered paragraphs, specify how the Administrative Law Judge committed an error of law or abused his/her discretion or how
his/her decision was not based on substantial evidence. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
The violations were not willful and the proceeds of the games ~e used
to benefit charity. A fine is appropriate to punish and prevent recidivism.
C) 0
.."
.~ ~ 0'1
C'") U)
f'TI m
0 -0 ;:0
"'Yl .:-orri
n N r-n
::c . M
rT1 C":l.-
"'I"l ~ . <:
C? :z: !=Om
0 'B 0
c::
7: ..
~,f)
t"!"'l
r-
SIGNATURE OF LICENSEE ORAUTHORIZED OFFICER OR CQUNSElFORlICENSEE
~
/-~
...
ID~f.l/ LotJ6
/
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-6379 CIVIL TERM
v.
CITATION NO. 05-1806
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING STREET
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
LID # 3820
LICENSE NO. CC-5110
LICENSE FIRST ISSUED: August 10, 1949
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
----'
AND NOW, this /21 day of January, 2007, I, Thomas M. Ballaron, Esquire,
Office of Chief Counsel, Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement,
hereby certify that I, this day, served the foregoing Motion by depositing a true and correct copy
thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, addressed to the
attorneys of record as follows:
Karl E. Rominger, Esq.
Rominger, Bayley & Whare
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, P A 17013
(717) 241-6070
(717) 241-6878 FAX
law@romingerlaw.com
www.romingerlaw.com
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT
By: ~~~~~e/1J?~
Assistant Counsel '
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 540-7414
Attorney I.D. #23370
f"'-,~ )
<
-
"
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA STATE
POLICE, BUREAU OF LIQUOR:
CONTROL ENFORCEMENT,
Plaintiff
v.
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 06-6379 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2007, upon consideration of
Commonwealth's Motion in Limine, a Rule is hereby issued upon Defendant, to show
cause why the relief requested should not be gr~nted.
RULE RETURNABLE at commencement of a hearing scheduled for January 22,
2007, at 3:00 p.m., in Courtroom No.1, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle,
Pennsylvania.
~mas M. Ballaron, Esq.
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, P ~ 17110
Attorney for Plaintiff
~l E. Rominger, Esq.
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, P A 17013
Attorney for Defendant
:rc
BY THE COURT,
1.
~
:2(
~
D -;~~<
rt :.'f~:
(7 t=2
oc.
LWo...
_l'lJ
CC':c.
l-
'5
('oJ
LO
N
:c
0-
-;-
,.w
~~,
0'\
-I?
~
->
....-
=
=
c-J.
:5
o
,....
PENNSYLVANIA STATE
POLICE, BUREAU OF
LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT,
Plaintiff
v.
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 06-6379 CIVIL TERM
IN RE: DEFENDANT'S PETITION FOR REVIEW and
COMMONWEALTH'S MOTION IN LIMINE
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2007, upon consideration of the attached
letter from Thomas Ballaron, Esq., attorney for Plaintiff, and Karl E. Rominger, Esq.,
attorney for Defendant, the hearing previously scheduled in the above-captioned matter
for January 22, 2007, is cancelled.
~mas M. Ballaron, Esq.
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PAl 711 0
Attorney for Plaintiff
\
/,arl E. Rominger, Esq.
155 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, P A 17013
Attorney for Defendant
:rc
BY THE COURT,
':\;YNnc>
0\ il Hd ZZ ~~r luU1.
IUI;'\ r."f'~" (',' \ \ :J.' 11 )0
{\u J ....u\ ,<^,X \c_ 'j~'}:J ,..>\U. :;
?D\:!dO-Cl31\:\
JAN, 23. 2007 10:35AM
PSP BLCE Hbg, Pa, 17110
NO, 009
P. 2
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
eUR,EAU OF UQUOR CONTROL. ENFORCEMENT
$855 VARIAN WAY
HARRISBURG, PA 17110
PHONE: 717-540.7414
FAX: 717-640-7461
Governor's Office of
General Counsel
January 22, 2007
Sent by F acs.imile
The Honorable J. Wesley Oler
Court of Common Pleas Judge
Cumberland County Courthouse
One Courthouse Square
Carlisle7 PA 17013-33871
RE: f .S.P.2, Bureau of Liauor Control Enforcement V8. Vets
Canteen Assn., No. 06-6379 Civil Term
(Citation No. 05-1806)
Dear Judge Oler:
The above-captioned appeal was scheduled for hearing at 3:00 p.m. today.
Licensee's counsel, Karl Rominger, and I discussed this case yesterday and anived at a
settlement To that end, we will provide an order within a few days for the Court's review
disposing of this matter, and would request that you cancel the hearing scheduled for today.
Respectfully submitte~
'---- /' - '"?
~M.B~
Assistant Counsel
TMB:cd
cc: Karl E. Rominger, Esq,
An Intemationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency
01-22-'07 12:04 FROM-ROMINGER & WHARE
7172416878
T-565 P001/001 F-231
..
ROMINGER & WHARE
Attorneys at Law
Karl E. Rominger
Michael J. Whare
Michael O. Palermo! Jr,
Leslie A. Tomeo*
* Also admitted in New Jersey
January 22, 2007
Honorable Judge Wesley Oler
One Courthouse Square
Carlisle; Pa 17013
Via FaX Only: 240-6462
RE: Vets Canteen Assn.
Citation No. 05-1806
Docket No. 06~6379
Dear Honorable Judge Oler:
This letter is in regards to the hearing scheduled today at 3 :OOp.m. for the above-
captioned matter.
I spoke with Thomas M. Ballaron. assistant counsel for the Permsylvania State Police
liquor control board and we have agreed on a settlement on this matter.
Please cancel the hearing scheduled for today at 3:00p.m. based on the current settlement
agreed upon by both parties.
Thank. you for your time and attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
-) .".".,:.
......~-
~l E. Rominger, Esquire
KER:bab
cc. Thomas Ballaron. via Fax
155 South Hanover Street, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 1701:3 . Tel: (717) 241.6070. Fax; (717) 241-6878
WWw.romingerlaw.com
ADVOCACY 1I ADVICE · ANSWERS
.. .
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL
ENFORCEMENT
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-6379 CIVIL TERM
v.
CITATION NO. 05-1806
VETS CANTEEN ASSN.
130 W. KING STREET
SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257-1128
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
LID # 3820
LICENSE NO. CC-5110
LICENSE FIRST ISSUED: August 10, 1949
ORDER
AND NOW, this r2.X!jay of March 2007, the above-captioned matter having been filed
as an Appeal from the Order of the Office of Administrative Law Judge and the Opinion and
Order of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, upon de novo review of the Record in the said
liquor enforcement appeal,
THE COURT ADOPTS AND INCORPORATES by reference the Findings of Fact of the
Office of Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (Liquor
Board) as found in Citation No. 05-1806, and concludes as a matter of law that Vets Canteen
Assn. has violated Section 471 of the Liquor Code, 47 P.S. ~4-471 and Section 315(b) of the
Local Option Small Games of Chance Act, 10 P.S. ~315(b) as charged in Count 1; and Section
493(12) of the Liquor Code, 47 P.S. ~4-493(l2) and Section 311 of the Local Option Small
Games of Chance Act, 10 P.S. ~311 and Section 901 of the Department of Revenue Regulations,
61 Pa.Code ~901, as charged in Count 2;
Vi(-~'tl\l.\Si\;Njd
U"'i",.-.r.. ." :-"'~:fln"'l
I }\:; :1...,:, : '~'" '.~'-"';1"-jl '....)
2S :2 Hd S I HVH LOOl
AtJV.LOi"Cr;ji,Jcid 3Hl :IO
~
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Appeal of Vets Canteen Assn. is dismissed, the
Opinion and Order of the Liquor Board affirmed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the penalty imposed by the ALJ is modified} in that the
fine of $1000.00 and the suspension of the liquor license for 10 days is vacated; Licensee shall
pay a fine of $1,500; and its liquor license shall be suspended for a period of five (5) days as set
forth below (Count 1: $1,000 and 5 days; Ct,2: $500). Licensee has already paid a fine of
$1,000; Licensee shall pay the additional $500 within 20 days of the mailing date of this Order.
In the event the aforementioned fine is not paid within 20 days from the mailing date of its
Order, Licensee's license shall be suspended for an additional period to that set forth below, or
revoked:
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the liquor license of Vets Canteen Assn., License
No. CC-5110, be suspended for a period of five (5) days beginning at 7:00 a.m. on Sunday,
April 22, 2007, and ending at 7:00 a.m. on Thursday, April 26, 2007. Licensee is directed on
Sunday, April 22, 2007, at 7:00 a.m. to place the notice of suspension (Placard Form #PLCB-
1925) in a conspicuous place on the outside of the licensed premises or in a window plainly
visible from outside the licensed premises and to remove the said license from the wall and place
it in a secure location.
Licensee is advised to obtain the aforementioned placard from a State Liquor Store/Wine
and Spirit Shop.
} Pursuant to the doctrine enunciated in Cantina Gloria's Lounge, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of
Liquor Control Enforcement, 639 A.2d 14 (Pa. 1994), requiring the Court of Common Pleas to conduct a de novo
review of liquor enforcement appeals, the Court is authorized to alter the penalty imposed by the ALJ as it believes
appropriate.
2
I.
The "Bureau of Enforcement" is directed to visit and monitor the aforementioned licensed
premises for compliance with this Order.
Upon completion of the period of suspension, the Licensee is authorized on Sunday,
April 27, 2007, at 7:00 a.m. to remove the placard of suspension and return the license to its
original wall location.
Jurisdiction is retained to ensure compliance with this Order.
The fine must be paid by Treasurer's Check, Cashier's Check, Certified Check or Money
Order. Personal checks, which include business-use personal checks, are not acceptable.
Please make your guaranteed check payable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and mail to:
PLCB - Office of Administrative Law Judge
Brandywine Plaza
2221 Paxton Church Road
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110-9661
BY THE COURT:
J.
J.
3
......
~N. 2~. 2007 12:51PM
PSP BLCE Hbg, Pa.17110
NO. 012
P. 3
\.
The Honorable 1. Wesley OIer
Court of Common Pleas Judge
RE: P.S.P.. BLCE vs.. Vets Canteen Assn.
No. 06-6379 Civil Term (Citation No. 05-1806)
Page 2
March 9, 2007
The enclosed Order reflects this settlement and we would conunend it to this Court for
review and approval.
Both Mr. Rominger and I are available at the Court's convenience to discuss and review
this matter if necessary.
Respectfully submitted.
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PA 17110
(717) 540-7414
FAX (717) 540-7461
Attorney LD. #23370
2MlNGER,ESQ,
AIlDmey for Vets CtI1Jl6M ASS".
Rominger. Bayley & Wbare
155 Soutb Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 241-6070
(117) 241-6878 FAX
Attorney I.D. # 81924
Enclosure