Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-00572 i" ",,~ 1 "",""1 . ! COMMONWlJU,TH v. I I I I I IN TH. COURT or COMMON PLIA8 or CUMB.RLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW 94-0~72 CIVIL TBRM JAMBS W. MORAN, II IN RBI LICENSB SUSPBNSION APPIAL BIFORB OLBR. J. OPINION AND OQDBR or COURT Oler, J. The pre..nt ca.. h a pro .e appeal by JUle. W. Moran (Petitioner) from a licen.e .u.pen.ion by the Department of Tran.portation (Reepondent). I A hearing on the appeal wa. held before the undereigned judge on Monday, March 21, 1994, the record wa. eupplemented, in acoordance with an Order entend at the conclu.ion of the hearing, with the tranecript. of a guilty plea and a .entencing proceeding involving Petitioner. I Par the reaeone etatad in thi. Opinion, the appeal will be eu.tained in part and denied in part. Statement of Pacte On October 26, 1993, Petitioner entered guilty pleae to two felonie. in the form of unlawful deliverie. of controlled eub.tancee (marijuana, LSD) ,I arhing out of a eale occurring on Auguet 25, 1992. He reoeived ooncurrent e.ntenoe. of 11~ to 23 I Suoh appeale are provided for by the Act of June 17, 1976, P.L. 162, 51, a. amended, 7~ Pa. C.S. 51550 (1993 Supp.). I See Order of Court dated April 22, 1994. I Se. Act of April 14, 1972, P.L. 233, 13(a) (30), u amended, 3~ P.B. 780-113(a)(30). 94-0~72 CIVIL TRRM monthl on November 30, 1993. By notice. dated December 21, 1993, Re.pondent lu.pended Petitioner' I driving privilege. for .ix IIIOnth. and fur an additional year, al a relult of the conviotionl. It. actionl were purluant to Section 13(m) of the Controlled Bubltanoe, Drug, Devioe and COlmetic Act, providing for IUlpenlion. of luch durationl in the calel of firlt and lecond drug delivery offen.e., intel: alia.. The guilty plea and lentencing tranecriptl indicate that Petitioner wal not advieed by the Court that a licen.e .ulpen.ion would be a con.equence of hi. conviction8. There i. no indioation in either proceeding that a vehicle Wal involved in the unlawful activity. Th. drug offene.. oocurred in the eUle inoidlnt. Petitioner'l appeal from the licen.e IUlpen.ion appear I to be ba..d upon contention. that (1) the .u8peneion. are invalid beaau.e he wa. not adviled by the Court of euch a conlequence when he pled guilty, (2) the IU8penlion. are invalid beoaule a vehicle wa. not involved in the crime., and (3) "both 8ulpeneionl ehould be firat offenle, " lince the underlying crimel ocourred in the IUle incident .' · Act of April 14, 1.972, P.L. 233, '13(m), .. am.nded, 35 P.S. S780-113(m) (1993 Supp.), repealed, Act of June 20,1993, P.L. _, No. 33, 57(a) (Purdon'. Pa. Leg. Serv., No.2, 1993), .ublt.ntially reenaoted, Aot of June 28, 1993, P.L. ___, No. 33, 13, 75 Pa. C.S. 51532(0) (Purdon'8 Pa. Leg. Serv., No.2, 1993), .ee Act of June 28( 19931 P.L. ___, No. 33, 58 (Purdon'. Pa. Leg. Serv., No.2, 1993, (Iav ng. olauee). , Petitioner'l "Petition for Allowanoe of Appeal." 2 94-0572 CIVIL TERM Dhcl1.,ion Notice of pl,a conlequence.. The propolition that a licen.. lu.pen.ion predicated upon 11 guilty plea and .entence for a drug offen.. IIlIlY be invalidated where euch a con.equence wa. not IIlIld. known to the defendant ha. met with judicial, favor. See, e.g., Commcmwealth ot penn.ylvania, Department of 'l'ran.portation v. Ahlborn, 156 Pa. Commw. 196, 626 A.2d 126~ (1993). The propoeition h ba.ed upon the premhe that a licen.e ,ulpen.ion h a direot criminal penalty for the offen.e. rd. at 205-06, 626 A.2d at 1271, .ee Duttey v. Department of 'l'ransportatJon, Bureau ot Driver Licen.ing, 147 Pa. COIN1\W. 280, 607 A.2d 81~ (1992) (cale involving aUlpen.ion re.ulting from plea to underagl drinking).' It now appear., however, that the penn.ylvania Supreme Court doe. not accept thh premhe. See Commonwealth v. Duttey, _ Pit. ___, A.2d ___ (April 8, 1994), rev'g 8ub nom. Duftey v. Department ot 'l'ranaportation, Bureau of Driver Lioensing, 147 Pa. Commw. 280, 607 A.2d 8l!l (1992). Por thh rauon, relief oan not be afforded to Petitioner on thil ground. Su.peneion predicated UDon veh~cle involy.ement ill felony. Under Section 1532 (a) (1) of the Vehicle Code, the D.partment of Tran.portation h to "revoke the operating privilege of any driver for one year upon receiving a certified record of the driver'. · Rev'd aub nom. Commonwealth v. Duffey, ___ Pa. ___, ____, __ A.2d ___ (April 8,1994). 3 94-Q572 CIVIL TBRM oonv1ction of ... [a)ny f.lony in the commiuion of wl)ich . court d.termine. that a vtlhicle w.. ....ntially involved. nl Thie bad. for .u.p.neion of a lic.n.. ie dhcu...d in Southerland v. Commonwealth ot Pennsylvania, Department ot 'l'ran.portation, 127 Pa. Commw. 349, 561 A.2d 1276 (1989), which Petitioner cite. in hi. app.al p.tition. However, .inc. the D.partm.nt'. .u.p.n.ion. in the pre.ent ca.. w.re not ba..d upon thi. .tatutory provieion, thfl fact that ita applicability might b. dubiou. h not helpful to peti tion.r. ~plication of au.p.n.ion .nhanc.m.nt provi.ion in oa.. of .am.-ircid.nt off.n.... In Commonwealth v. perru.o, ___ Pa. Commw. _, 634 A.2d 6n (1993), the Commonw.alth Court con.id.red the qu..tion of wh.th.r the enhancem.nt provi.ion of S.ction 13(m) of the Controll.d Sub.tanc., Drug, D.vice and Co.m.tic Act wa. intend.d to apply in the context of two .am.-incident drug off.n.... In hOlding that it wa. not, the Court .tated that until an offender haa b..n oonvict.d, the d.terr.nt .ff.ct of an .nhancem.nt .tatute i. not activated becau.e only after the tint conviction i. the offend.r aware that furth.r offending b.havior will lead to more ..v.re p.nalti...... [A) p.non mu.t have a prior "conviotion" in order to b. .ubj.ct to the .nhano.m.nt provi.ion.. Id. at _, 634 A.2d at 6915. For thi. r.uon, the con.ecutiv., .nhanc.d p.riod of .u.p.n.ion impo.ed by Re.pondent upon P.tit10n.r 1 Aot of June 17, 1976, P.L. 162, 51, as amended, 75 Pa. C.S. 1532(a)(1) (1993 SUPP')' 4 COMMOHWEALTH 0' PENNIYLVANIA DIPART"EHT 0' TRANSPORTATION lu,..u 0' Driw.r Lic.n'in. H.rri.bur., PA 11a21 DECEHlU 21. un ..-- , , JA"ES W "O~A" III :t YICTO~ LAN!: "ECHAHICS8U~G PA 11055 'JJ~~1~1iOOOII0 00. un"/''t'tJ no'u 710" Ol/iilJo'7J ~ I r Our Hotortlt. A. . r..ul' 0' vour conwic'i-~ on 1111011..1 ., .aea.,. in. lecUon IIAIO Co'hnu. r.le..d '0 . C1on",~ ... '''11- .t'nc.) on 0"25'1"2, vo"r driwine ,ri.il.,. a. II.a", ."...nd.d fo, . ,.,iod 0' 1 YEARCI) .. ..nd.hd llV "cU.n 1IH 0' 'h. Con',olled Sub.hnc., Orue, Dowie. .n. C....Uc Ac'. In o,d., '0 co.plv with thi. ..nction vo" .r. ,..ua,.. to r.turn .nl/ curr.nt drh.r'. lIc.n.., h.,n.r'. ..re" .ndlor t..por.rv dra..,'. aic.n.. Cc...,. c.r.) an ~.ur ,... ....ion no l.'.r th.n 'h. ,".cti.. d.t. la.,.. II.1.w. ,.alur. to co.pll/ wath thi. notic. .h.ll r..ult in '~a. lu' r..u r,'.rrin. thi. ..tt.r to the P.nn'l/aw.ni. I,.t. '.11.. ,or pro..cutlon und.r S.ctlon 151IC.)C4) 0' t~. V.haca. C.... I' I/ou c.nnot co.Plv wlth th. ,.qulr...nt. .t.t.d .11..., V'" .u.' cont.ct tho lu,..u (5" in'or..tlon b.low) 'or 'urth,r dir,ction. on how '0 r,c,iv, cr.di' 'ow.rd' vour ,.ncti.n. Wh.n th. d.p.rt.,nt r.c.iv" I/our lic.n.. .r .c_n.wl- .d....nt, it w111 und vou . r.c.i,.. If YOU do not ,.ulve thh r.cUpt wUhin IS d'I/' contlct the d.,.,t'.n' ..... dil,.ll/. Oth.rwi.., vOU .IV not b. .iy.n cr.dat tow.r. ..rw. in, thi. ..nctlon. Cr.dit wila not bI.ln until III drh.r'. "un.. produotC.) Ir. r.c.iv,d in thi. lur,.u. I".cti.. O.t. 0' Su.p.n.lonl 0111111..4, 12,01 .... Th. Iboy. .,nlllllllll ..11<111111 II III ''''''"ulI I. .nll .". viou.ll/ i..u.. .Inctlonl.,. Your drhln. prh11.tlI w111 not II' rllto,.. until V," prOVide proo' to tho D,p.rt.,nt tho' .11 .ot., w.hlca.. ,.." a.t.r.. in I/our n... Ir. cov,r.d bl/ . lot.r w.hicl. la.II1altv ~ ~ I ~ .. .' ~ , I I , I , " JAMlS W. MORAN, I I V. I I COMMONWB~LTH OF PBNNSYLVANIA, I DBPARTMBN~ OF TRANSPORTATION I IN THB COURT or COMMON PLIA8 O' CUMBBRLANDCOUNTY, PBNNSYLVANIA CIVIl, AC'L'ION - LAW NO. ,Ii '/:.( CIVIL 199.Lf- ORDBR OF CQURT AND NQW, thh q~ day of February 1994, upon consideration of Petitioner'e pro Ie petition for an exteneion of the date for fiUnq the petition of appeal trom lioenee euependon in the above- captioned matter, and it appearing that Petitioner'e initial attempt to file the appeal would have been timely except for the faot that no filinq fee was inclUded, and it further appearing that Petitioner hal promptly refiled the appeal with the neceaeary fee upon being adviaed by the Prothonotary of the fee requirement, the petition for an exteneion of the date for filing the appeal ie GRANTBD and the petition of appeal from licenae 8u8peneion will be entertained by the Court. By eepante Order, a hearing on the appeal will be loheduled. BY ';rHB COURT, Jamee W. Moran, III 1101 Claremont Road Carlisle, PA 17013 Petitioner, Pro Se Matthew x. Haeckler, Seq. Aeeietant Couneel Traffic Safety Section Department of Tranaportation 103 Traneportation and Safety Bldg. Harrieburg, PA 17120 J ~ Ire t~U 1 :~ ~;" ,~~ 11:\1,' 'l' , Ii')', .\~~, ','J I:J ,'f :i Ill, , \,l~ , , " '. . , I' ~I' 'I, 'i' , , ~ iI' ',1 I. " 'I )'11; . i "I " , . I ,,' I;' " " " , , , I , I ,I, I I' I,' I ill !; " .,' .' (January - 21, ~) '1'01 JII1leIl W. M.:>rllll III From I Prottv:lnotax-y's Office CUmberland Cbunty Ws cannot acce~)t tm appeal for driver'lI 8U1nP sum wittv:lut the filing fee of $45. ayable to Prottv:lnutary of CUnt>erl Cbunty. AlIlO, since you waited U)1tH tho last day for fil.i,ng, you wi.ll;flQ\1e to petition the court to file late. You will need to provide copies and also a proposed Ordar of Cburt for each Petition. Thllllk you. ~ J.99'~~ "' ~ \ c\ (' \;~ \< ) JMJ .....~,.-............. It ('Iil" \ ,,) (\ CC'j\'( of ~t)~,\\( llc)~ ~,(v, ~ y~ \ c,~ ') P \ G \I') \ '/ c.:~ (' (' +~l' c" l '.\(\ (;, l , I c-J u VI ,h ~"1. e. . r' cJe.. S ':2. at ()l...J( \ fL-e. +-tx,,-/-' + l,e,? c.: L0(.\",', ('1\ f'c. e. on \~: \ " \'\<:1) f L",s (~ereC( \ . r A vV') () Y1c) ~- Gw\'\Y,~, t: ~\Ov.J 10 -t; 'T... C\ V\ , e y ~ C' ,.,J ,'on 5(, h-e \'( <:. ; + I'S. \ r.\ Jlllt'-l ~ S W \ (Vlo ,2c:\ VI ) Co 1''-'\ e S n CJ eJ) p((,Q ~ I rr -I- {,,'S' t,'-d,-f-It'cfl ~'\/I(I.*-C:::I:?". r 0-)IS\'" (cJ/1. +l"l's H~no)'2tJ)\e CCJl..}.l;:+ +0 eX{ep+ rny P(~(\ {~(2.. +\')I'S e'ftlhtl'O\,)T~ l-"")(,,S (j1?I'(jl'v1CJly r\'\nJ on +\~\.'l-e.., W he \'2 e (;:11':' <!_) r A<Jc. f \" cA th <! PN'\01 C '^ b l-e i (C>CA" ~ 0. cu pt HI> ~ Oere,\ IOLIJ l)l'OI \ t HI' exte\ 1""1 Pc-<'e (~( ,~fLA 11 Y c;J,'l I u~ I . iF, ,. './ ~ /. ~l \ I,,.,,,""'d l lit' I I 1. llll d 0 rHO l' t 1011 I 'l( Ill) A 111111 0 n d l'd Ill' t 0 f A p r I 1 1 11 t h, I 99 2 P. L 1115. Tho rIKST offonHo HIIHponHlon porlod WIlH oxtendod to slx(l1) month.. Mr, Mornn hlld two(2) chnrl\oH thnt J!rOH" Ollt of tho Hilmo trlln.Jll,tlon. MrMoran AVEKS thnt both HUHponHlonH .hollid he flrHt offenHO. IV. MrMoran ulso AVFllS thnt underl COMJIONWI':AL1'l1 OF P~:NNA, DEPT OF TKANSPORTATION BUKEAU OF DRIVERS LICENSING V. Dan II Ahl born 620 A2d. 1.2115 Hl. due process rights were vlolnted. Whore legIslature prOVides for B license suspensIon un a DIRECT crlmlnul ponalty, And sets forth in the Same act thnt proscrIbos the conduct. thon the DUE PROCESS requires that the defendant be gIven notIce of thnt penalty In order to enter an INFORMED f.!"!lA. Mr Mnrnn plead GUIl.TY, loslnl': his lIcense was NOT part of the plea burgaIn.. ,Mr Morun wnA NEV1,R Informed he would lose his lIc- ens., THAT is requiredl I WHEREFORE, Mr. Moran, Pro So, MOVANT in thIs matter, NOW moves this HONORABl.E court to grnnt his petItion for allowance of appenl, HE wishes this court to review all the facts wIthin thIs appenl And rein- state hIs drivIng privlcdl':c OR to ORDER the Dept of Transportetlon to proceed wIth suspension under Section l1a30, 11(m) of the Controlled substance, Drug, DevIce and Cosmetic Act, but havIng both charges under first offense. Mr. Morun WIlS Aentonced to 9J;XLlJ_ 1.1 1/2 to 23 month sen- tnnce, THEREFORE, there could he ,QNEil)_ BuspenAlonl1 A consecutive sec- ond offonse would crente an aDDitional onc(l) yenr suspension. Mr,Morlln DOES have a good work record but wIthout transportation for a year and n half Mr.Moran's professIon would det~rlnte rapidlyl On thia 25th dny of Jnnurary, RERPECTFULl.Y SUBMITTED ~ I,f .J.. ',. '~',) 3~_L' '4!:J~",~ t:.. ~ MER W. MORAN III IIDI Clnremont rd Carlisle P.A 17011 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANJA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATJON lur.lu Qf Oriver Licen.ing H.rri.burg, PA 17125 DECEMIER 21, 1995 ........ JAMES W MORAN III 3 VICTOR LANE MECHANICSBURG PA 17055 '3344641a000660 DOL loa/14/1.":il a30'1.7l.4 o6/aa/1.'73 Our Motorist:. As I result of your cQnviction on 11/50/1993 of viollt- ing SlcUon 15AlIO (offensll rellhd to e controlled .ub- Itlnce) on 08/25/1992, your driving privilege il being IUIPended for I period of 1 YEAR(S) I. mendlted by IIcUon 15M of the Controlhd Subshnce, Drug, Device Ind COlmeUe Act. In order to comply with this .enction you ere required to return Iny current driver's 11cen.e, lalrner'. permit end/or temporlry drivlr'. licln.e (cemere cerd) in your po.- lIuion no lItlr thin the effecUve dlh listed below. Flilure to comply with this notice Ihell relult in this Bu- reeu referring this mltter to the Penn.ylvenie Stlte Police for prolecution under Slction 1571(e)(4) of thl Vehicle Code. Jf you cennot comply with thl requirementl .~eted ebove, you mu.t contect the Burelu (Sel informetion below) for further directions on how to rlceivl credit towerdl your .'nction. When thl dePlrtmlnt rlceive" your 11cenle or Icknowl- Id"lment, it will se"rl yo" a r..e'1n". If you de not rcc~i'",: tnu recelPt withln 1!J alWI eontlct the dePlr lm.nl Ulr." dietely. Othlrwise, you mlY not be given credit towerd eerv- ing thil 'Inction. Credit wi 11 not big in until ell driver's I1cen.e product(l) Ire r.ceivld in thi. Burelu. Effectivl Dete of Suspenlion, 07/11/1"4, 12101 e.m. The Ibovl mlntionld senction il in eddition to eny pre- vioully issuld Ilnction(I). Your driVing privilege will not be re.tored until YOU provide proof to the OIPartmlnt thlt ell motor vehicle. reg- ilterld in your neme Ire covlred by I motor vehicle liebilitv \1 II coxh;A,+ A